Skip to main content

Disruption of vacuolar protein sorting components of the HOPS complex leads to enhanced secretion of recombinant proteins in Pichia pastoris



The yeast Pichia pastoris is a widely used host for the secretion of heterologous proteins. Despite being an efficient producer, we observed previously that certain recombinant proteins were mistargeted to the vacuole on their route to secretion. Simultaneous disruption of one vacuolar sorting pathway together with vacuolar proteases prevented this mis-sorting and resulted in higher levels of secreted heterologous protein. Inspired by the positive results, we now set out to investigate the influence of further parts of the vacuolar pathway, namely the Cvt-pathway and the homotypic fusion and protein sorting (HOPS) complex.


Strains impaired in the Cvt pathway (∆atg11, ∆atg8) had no effect on secretion of the model protein carboxylesterase (CES), but resulted in lower secretion levels of the antibody fragment HyHEL-Fab. Disruption of genes involved in the HOPS complex led to vacuole-like compartments of the B category of vps mutants, which are characteristic for the deleted genes YPT7, VPS41 and VAM6. In particular ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains showed an improvement in secreting the model proteins HyHEL-Fab and CES. Additional disruption of the vacuolar protease Pep4 and the potential protease Vps70 led to even further enhanced secretion in ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains. Nevertheless, intracellular product accumulation was still observed. Therefore, the secretory route was strengthened by overexpression of early or late secretory genes in the vacuolar sorting mutants. Thereby, overexpression of Sbh1, a subunit of the ER translocation pore, significantly increased HyHEL-Fab secretion, leading up to fourfold higher extracellular Fab levels in the ∆ypt7 strain. The beneficial impact on protein secretion and the suitability of these strains for industrial applicability was confirmed in fed-batch cultivations.


Disruption of genes involved in the HOPS complex, especially YPT7, has a great influence on the secretion of the two different model proteins HyHEL-Fab and CES. Therefore, disruption of HOPS genes shows a high potential to increase secretion of other recombinant proteins as well. Secretion of HyHEL-Fab was further enhanced when overexpressing secretion enhancing factors. As the positive effect was also present in fed-batch cultivations, these modifications likely have promising industrial relevance.


The yeast Pichia pastoris (syn. Komagataella spp.) has been extensively and successfully used to express heterologous secreted proteins [1,2,3]. In order for a protein to be secreted, it has to enter the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) through the Sec61 translocon complex. In the ER lumen, the proteins become correctly folded by the help of chaperones such as Kar2 and other folding enzymes [4, 5]. The ER quality control machinery ensures that only correctly folded and modified proteins proceed on the secretory route to the Golgi apparatus. If some of the proteins fail to acquire a proper conformation, they are retained in the ER and destined for degradation by the ER associated degradation (ERAD) system [6, 7]. When the protein passes the quality control in the ER, it is allowed to be transported into the Golgi apparatus where it undergoes further modifications and awaits to be delivered to the cell membrane for secretion or to other cellular destinations.

Even though P. pastoris has been recognized as an efficient secretor with low levels of endogenously secreted proteins, the secretion capacity can be further increased by manipulating pathways within the cell that limit the overall secretion. Examples of successful cell engineering include the overexpression of folding helpers such as protein disulfide isomerase Pdi1, disruption of proteases, and overexpression of transcription factors such as the unfolded protein response (UPR) activator Hac1 or the oxidative stress response activator Yap1 (reviewed e.g. by [8, 9]). Recently, we showed that reducing vacuolar missorting by disruption of CORVET (“class C core vacuole/endosome tethering”) complex subunits led to enhanced secretion, and higher product titers could be achieved by combining CORVET mutants with the knock-out of vacuolar proteases [10]. Furthermore, we revealed that vacuolar degradation seems to be the prevalent degradative route in P. pastoris, and that ERAD mainly plays a role in degrading recombinant proteins failing to translocate and thus stuck at the cytosolic side of the translocon channel [11]. Based on these findings, we were intrigued if also other vacuolar sorting routes affect recombinant protein production.

The CPY and ALP pathways, named after their cargo proteins carboxypeptidase Y and alkaline phosphatase, respectively, are the main two pathways characterized to transport proteins from the late Golgi apparatus to the vacuole. While the CPY pathway represents an indirect pathway to the vacuole via the early endosome/multivesicular body (MVB), the ALP pathway mediates protein transport directly from the Golgi to the vacuole [12]. In order for the cargo to reach the vacuole, proper fusion of the interacting membranes has to take place. The fusion is mediated by Rab GTPase Ypt7 [13] and the two effector proteins Vam6/Vps39 and Vps41 [14] of the multisubunit tethering complex called “homotypic fusion and protein sorting” (HOPS) residing at the vacuolar membrane [15, 16]. Apart from these specific subunits, the HOPS complex is structurally related to the CORVET complex, and they are sharing four class C Vps protein subunits: Vps11, Vps16, Vps18, and Vps33. Through the activation of Rab GTPases by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF), mediating the exchange of GDP for GTP, the tethers are able to capture and trap target vesicles prior to the membrane fusion mediated by N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) [16].

Another way of vacuolar protein transport is autophagy or the closely related Cvt pathway (cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting) where targeted proteins do not enter the ER but instead are transported directly from the cytoplasm to the vacuole [17]. Autophagosomes are created during macroautophagy as a response to stress such as nutrient limitation, whereas Cvt vesicles are formed under vegetative conditions to deliver resident hydrolases such as aminopeptidase I (Ape1) and α-mannosidase (Ams1) to the yeast vacuole. Depending on which pathway is activated, the target protein is recognized by either autophagosomes or Cvt vesicles, which fuse with the vacuole and release their cargo into the vacuolar lumen for degradation and subsequent recycling. In the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae, mutants in autophagy-related genes (atg) led to enhanced secretion of bovine chymosin (Yoon et al. [18]). As Ypt7 has also been shown to be involved in macroautophagy and the Cvt pathway [19], we also included two proteins specifically involved in these pathways (Atg8, Atg11) in our study.

In order to characterize which routes might target recombinant proteins for degradation, we generated several P. pastoris strains impaired in either Cvt or the HOPS complex acting at the final steps of vacuolar protein sorting, and investigated their impact on secretion of two heterologous model proteins, the antibody fragment HyHEL-Fab [11] and the carboxylesterase from Sphingopyxis sp. MTA144, an enzyme that hydrolyzes antinutritive substances that may be naturally contained in animal feed [10, 20]. Both recombinant proteins were shown to be partly missorted to the vacuole in P. pastoris previously [10]. Furthermore, we have observed that translocation into the ER poses an additional bottleneck for the Fab fragment [11].


Disruption of Atg8 and Atg11 involved in the macroautophagy/Cvt pathway does not affect heterologous protein secretion in P. pastoris

In order to prevent the undesired transport of the model proteins to the vacuole for degradation, we first focused on disrupting the autophagy-related Cvt pathway where selected proteins are packaged into Cvt vesicles in the cytoplasm and transported to the vacuole. Two genes (ATG8, ATG11) were chosen to be disrupted due to their important roles in biogenesis of pre-autophagosomal structure and cargo selection into Cvt vesicles, respectively [21,22,23,24]. The single gene disruptions were generated in the strain Fab#34 secreting the HyHEL-Fab antibody and the strain CES#18 secreting carboxylesterase. The secretion performance of the engineered strains was evaluated from the screenings and is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of ∆atg8 oratg11 on model protein secretion in Fab#34 and CES#18. Detection of secreted HyHEL-Fab (a) and CES (b) by ELISA and Western blot. Prior to loading, the protein amounts were normalized to the wet cell weight of each strain. For ELISA, the relative fold changes of extracellular Fab yields were calculated from one screening with 2 ∆atg8, 2 ∆atg11 clones and 2 Fab#34 biological replicates whereas the relative fold changes of extracellular CES yields were calculated from two screenings with 4 ∆atg8, 4 ∆atg11 clones and 2 CES#18 biological replicates in each screening. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM)

As can be seen from the Western blot and ELISA results, the disruption of ATG8 and ATG11 in both Fab#34 and CES#18 did not have a positive impact on secretion. In fact, the extracellular product yields were 40–50% lower (HyHEL-Fab secretors, Fig. 1a) or at similar levels (CES secretors, Fig. 1b) compared to the respective control strain. Biomass was not affected in full medium (CES secretors), while the ∆atg8 and ∆atg11 clones reached only 80% of the biomass concentration of the parent in minimal medium (Fab secretors). The lower secreted Fab levels in the two Cvt-engineered strains (Fig. 1a) are most probably due to the lower biomass accumulated during the screening (Additional file 1: Table S1), as there is no difference in intracellular Fab levels per biomass in these strains (Additional file 2: Figure S1). Our observations therefore reassure that the heterologous proteins found in the vacuole of P. pastoris [10, 25] were indeed missorted from the late secretory route, rather than being misfolded cytosolic forms. The Cvt pathway seems not to be involved in vacuolar targeting of heterologous secretory proteins, at least not in the analysed conditions.

Disruption of HOPS complex subunits leads to enhanced protein secretion

Previously, we showed that recombinant CES was missorted to the vacuole and that disrupting the CORVET complex involved in the early steps of vacuolar sorting had a positive effect on recombinant protein secretion [10]. Encouraged by the positive results, we further investigated the vacuolar pathway, now focusing on the late vacuolar pathway and its impact on protein secretion efficiency. All vacuolar protein sorting pathways share the last steps of vesicle fusion with the vacuole, which is mediated by the Rab GTPase Ypt7 and its two effector proteins Vam6 and Vps41 of the HOPS complex [15].

To restrict vacuolar fusion and therefore potential product degradation of the two model proteins CES and HyHEL-Fab, several strains disrupted in Ypt7, Vam6 and Vps41 were generated in the background of the producing strains Fab#34 and CES#18. In order to check vacuolar morphology of these HOPS-engineered strains as well as to confirm the generation of positive transformants, fluorescence microscopy of FM4-64 stained cells was performed (Fig. 2). Upon disruption of genes involved in the HOPS complex, the cells did no longer contain one large vacuole as observed for the control strains, but instead, contained multiple small vacuole-like compartments. This phenotype of fragmented vacuoles is categorized in the B category of vps mutants as classified by Banta et al. [26] and Raymond et al. [27] and is characteristic, among others, for ∆ypt7, ∆vam6 and ∆vps41 strains in S. cerevisiae [28]. These small vacuole-like compartments are derived from the incapability of the vacuole to fuse with vesicles delivered through endocytosis or vacuolar targeting pathways, therefore allowing the intracellular vesicles to be accumulated in the cytoplasm. In each case, fluorescence microscopy confirmed the positive generation of ∆ypt7, ∆vam6 and ∆vps41 strains.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Vacuolar membrane staining of a Fab#34, ∆vam6, ∆vps41,ypt7 and b CES#18, ∆vam6, ∆vps41, ∆ypt7. The vacuolar membrane was stained with FM4-64 and the cells were viewed in an epifluorescence microscope. The fluorescence and the DIC images are shown. Per strain at least 300–500 cells were analysed in at least 10 microscopic images, of which 100% show the described phenotype. Two representative full size microscopic images per strain are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2. Bar, 3 µm

After positive transformants were confirmed, HOPS mutant strains and their respective controls were cultivated in small scale screenings. After 48 h of incubation, Western blot was performed to evaluate the integrity of the product, and changes in secretion in each of the HOPS engineered strains were quantified by ELISA (Fig. 3). The Western blot confirmed intact product at the expected size (Fig. 3). The supernatants of HyHEL-Fab ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains contained higher HyHEL-Fab concentrations than the control strain, outperforming it in yield by 46% and 41%, respectively (Fig. 3a). Similar observations were recorded also for CES secretors where the average yield of ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains was higher compared to the control CES#18 by 40% and 73%, respectively (Fig. 3b). Even though Vps41 and Vam6 are both interacting with Ypt7 [29], the disruption of VPS41 did not have the same effect on secretion as disruption of VAM6 and YPT7. In fact, the secretion of both model proteins was at a similar level as for the controls supporting the findings of Harsay and Schekman [30] in S. cerevisiae that sorting of exocytic proteins is not affected in ∆vps41 cells. Simultaneous disruption of two HOPS subunits ∆vam6vps41 or ∆vam6ypt7 had similar or even slightly lower improvement than single disruptions, indicating either metabolic burden or this effect is due to the fact that both subunits act in the same pathway (Additional file 1: Table S1). Since the secretion of both model proteins in the ∆vps41 strain was not improved, further strain engineering was continued with the ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Screening of ∆ypt7,vam6 and ∆vps41 strains overexpressing HyHEL-Fab or CES along with their respective control strains Fab#34 and CES#18. Detection of extracellular HyHEL-Fab (a) and CES (b) by ELISA and Western blot. For the ELISA, the relative fold changes of the yield were calculated from 3 to 5 biological and technical replicates each. Error bars represent the SEM. Statistical significance was measured by the Student’s t test and indicated with an asterisk (p < 0.05*, p < 0.01**). Prior to loading the samples on the Western blot, the protein amounts were normalized to the wet cell weight of each strain

Effect of disruption of the vacuolar associated proteins Pep4, Prb1 and Vps70 in Δypt7 and Δvam6 strains

So far the presented results indicate that ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains secrete higher concentrations of both recombinant proteins. As cells with disrupted vacuolar protein sorting pathways have been reported to potentially over-secrete vacuolar proteases, we assessed the presence of vacuolar carboxypeptidase CPY in the supernatant of the engineered strains. In contrast to the high level of extracellular CPY found in the CORVET mutants (7–12 µg/mL tryptic equivalents; [10]), HOPS mutants did not strongly over-secrete vacuolar proteases (Fig. 4a). This is also reflected in the only slightly elevated proteolytic activities in the HOPS mutants compared to the parent strain (Fig. 4b). Nevertheless, we decided to investigate the impact of protease impairment in the HOPS-deficient mutants. Therefore, single gene disruptions of three vacuolar proteases were made in ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains and the newly generated double-disrupted strains were screened for recombinant protein secretion (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Extracellular carboxypeptidase Y and overall proteolytic activity present in the supernatant of HOPS and CORVET mutants. CPY in the supernatant was detected by Western blot (a) and the proteolytic activity was measured by a protease activity assay (b). Proteolytic activity is given as µg/mL tryptic equivalents. The technical variance of the method was approximately 10%. The results of one representative measurement are shown. nd: not detectable

Fig. 5
figure 5

Screening of HOPS engineered strains with disrupted proteases. Detection of secreted HyHEL-Fab (a) or CES (b) by ELISA and Western blot. Prior to loading, the protein amounts were normalized to the wet cell weight of each strain. The relative fold changes of extracellular HyHEL-Fab yields (a) were calculated from 4 independent screenings with 3–6 clones of ∆ypt7pep4, ∆ypt7vps70, ∆vam6pep4, ∆vam6vps70 and Fab#34 in each screening. For CES secretors (b), the relative fold change yields were calculated from one screening with 4–6 clones of ∆ypt7pep4, ∆ypt7vps70, ∆ypt7prb1, ∆vam6prb1 and CES#18 (except ∆vam6pep4 (2 biological replicates) and ∆vam6vps70 (1 clone). Error bars indicate SEM. Statistical significance determined by the Student’s t-test is indicated with an asterisk (p < 0.05*, p < 0.01**, p < 0.001***)

The three proteases chosen to be disrupted included Pep4, Prb1 and the potential protease Vps70 (PP7435_Chr1-1501). Pep4 (proteinase A) is an aspartyl protease involved in the posttranslational regulation of vacuolar hydrolases in S. cerevisiae [31], while Prb1 (proteinase B) is a serine protease of the subtilisin family and its activity depends on the levels and function of Pep4 [32, 33]. Both ∆pep4 and ∆prb1 have previously been associated with enhanced protein secretion in several host organisms including P. pastoris [34,35,36]. The function of the last protein, Vps70, is not fully known but it contains a protease-associated domain. Besides its potential function as a protease, this gene was also down-regulated in microarray analysis of HyHEL-Fab producing strains in chemostat cultivations (unpublished data).

Additional disruption of PEP4 and VPS70 in ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains improved the secretion yield of HyHEL-Fab (Fig. 5a). Compared to the control strain Fab#34, ∆ypt7pep4 and ∆ypt7vps70 mutants outperformed the control in extracellular Fab yield by 51% and 62%, respectively. Even higher differences to the control Fab#34 were reported for ∆vam6pep4 and ∆vam6vps70 where the Fab yield was improved by 87% and 68%, respectively. The double disrupted strains ∆ypt7pep4 and ∆vam6pep4 reached 15–30% higher titers and yields compared to the single disrupted ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains (Additional file 1: Table S1), with only ∆vam6pep4 showing a statistically significant increase of 1.26-fold higher Fab yields in comparison to ∆vam6. However, this occurrence of increased secretion upon protease disruption was not observed for ∆ypt7prb1 and ∆vam6prb1 strains where significantly lower amounts of HyHEL-Fab than in the control Fab#34 were detected. As already seen previously [10], the disruption of Prb1 alone had a negative effect on HyHEL-Fab secretion, which was also observed in combination with ∆ypt7 or ∆vam6 in this study, indicating that Prb1 might be involved in other functions affecting secretion of this model protein rather than proteolysis. Indeed, fluorescence microscopy revealed an altered pattern of FM4-64 staining in ∆ypt7prb1 that was not observed for any other protease knockout (Additional file 2: Figure S3).

Additional disruption of vacuolar proteases did not have the same impact on secretion in ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains secreting CES (Fig. 5b). In fact, only the additional disruption of Pep4 in the ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains resulted in higher yields as compared to single disrupted strains, outperforming the control strain CES#18 in yield by 83% and 75% for ∆ypt7pep4 and ∆vam6pep4, respectively. Disruption of VPS70 and PRB1 did not result in such a high increase to the control but still reaching up to 36% yield improvement in ∆ypt7prb1 followed by ∆vam6vps70 (35%), ∆ypt7vps70 (25%) and ∆vam6prb1 (18%). However, when compared to the yield of single disrupted ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains, the double disrupted strains did not show any improvement in secretion. This indicates that in HOPS mutants Pep4 is the main responsible protease for product degradation. In contrast, disruption of PRB1 in HOPS engineered strains failed to enhance secretion significantly and even lowered the yield of single disrupted strains. These findings were especially surprising in the case of CES production where our previous results identified Prb1 to be the main responsible protease for CES degradation in CORVET engineered strains ∆vps8 and ∆vps21, significantly enhancing secretion by 52% and 80%, respectively [10]. Thus, for further experiments either the single HOPS mutants or the combination with ∆pep4 were used.

Intracellular amounts of heterologous product in ∆ypt7 andvam6 strains

Next, we followed up what happens to the intracellular product in the ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 strains where vacuole formation is impaired (Fig. 6a, b). Compared to the control strain CES#18, the two mutants accumulated higher amounts of CES intracellularly (Fig. 6b). In the Fab strains, higher intracellular product concentrations were only found in strains lacking also vacuolar proteases (not shown), but not in the single HOPS mutants (Fig. 6a), indicating that intracellularly accumulated/missorted Fab was readily degraded when vacuolar proteases were present, while CES is more stable to vacuolar degradation in the HOPS mutants. Fluorescence microscopy revealed that in ∆ypt7 and ∆vam6 the intracellular product (exemplified here as CES-oxGFP) was located to the punctuate structures (Fig. 6c) that are most likely representing the pre-vacuolar compartments characteristic for the HOPS mutant strains (as shown in Fig. 2). Intracellular product retention despite manipulating the vps pathway was also observed previously e.g. in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, where intracellular human growth hormone (hGH) still accumulated in protease deficient Δvps10, Δvps22, and Δvps34 mutants [37].

Fig. 6
figure 6

Intracellular accumulation of the recombinant protein in wt, Δypt7 and Δvps41 strains. Intracellular levels of HyHEL-Fab (a) and CES (b) were detected by Western blot of cell lysates. Equal amounts of total intracellular protein (determined by BCA assay after cell lysis) were loaded on the gel. c Localization of the recombinant protein in P. pastoris overexpressing CES-oxGFP in wt, Δypt7 and Δvps41 strains. After cultivation cells were put directly on a slide and viewed in an epifluorescence microscope. Bar, 5 µm

As there was still intracellular non-secreted product observed in the HOPS mutants strains for CES and Fab (Fig. 6a, b), we next sought to completely block vacuolar transport by combining them with CORVET knockouts. Double disruption of CORVET and HOPS subunits (∆vam6vps8, ∆vam6vps21, ∆ypt7vps8, ∆ypt7vps21) or disruption of the shared subunits (Vps16, Vps33) was attempted. However, except for ∆vam6vps8 in the CES#18 background, we were not able to generate any double mutants of the two pathways. It was not possible to combine disruptions of genes encoding both RabGTPases (Vps21 and Ypt7), or one Rab GTPase and a subunit of the other complex, pointing to the assumption that one of the vacuolar pathways is needed for the survival of the cells. Similarly, disruption of the class C subunits Vps16 or Vps33 that are present in both the HOPS and the CORVET complex resulted in the same lethal phenotype. These results are different to S. cerevisiae, where strains with individual knockouts of class C subunits are viable [38].

Regarding CES secretion, ∆vam6vps8 behaved like ∆vps8 with significantly reduced product titers (Additional file 1: Table S1). Upon simultaneous disruption of Prb1, titers of ∆vam6vps8prb1 were rescued to the level of ∆vps8prb1, showing that the simultaneous disruption of the HOPS and the CORVET complex did not cause a synergetic effect on secretion.

Overexpression of Sbh1 significantly increases secretion of HyHEL-Fab

Based on the finding that there are still considerable amounts of recombinant product found intracellularly (Fig. 6), as a next step we aimed to reinforce the secretory pathway. As it seems that the retained intracellular product is already fully processed, according to the correct size (Fig. 6), and trapped in the fragmented vacuolar vesicles (Fig. 6c), we decided to overexpress secretion enhancing factors in the HOPS mutants. As there was previous evidence that HyHEL-Fab is facing bottlenecks during folding and secretory transport [11, 39], we decided to focus on this model protein.

The genes to be overexpressed were selected based on previous microarray analysis, where tens of genes were identified to be significantly upregulated in HyHEL-Fab producing strains compared to a non-producing control cultivated in chemostat cultures [39]. Out of these, 10 genes were shown to be beneficial for Fab secretion when co-overexpressed in the methanol based AOX1 expression system [39]. So far, no results in the GAP-based expression system were available. To cover a wide range of the secretory pathway functions, 3 of these factors, Kar2, Sbh1 or Rho4, were chosen to be individually overexpressed in Fab#34 under the control of the PGAP promoter.

Kar2 acts as a chaperone to mediate protein folding in the ER and regulates UPR via interaction with Ire1. Overexpression of this helper factor has already been proven to have a positive effect on heterologous protein secretion in some cases, while no impact or even negative effects were reported for other cases (reviewed e.g. by [40]). The second target gene SBH1 encodes the beta subunit of the Sec61 ER translocation complex engaged in nascent peptide translocation into the ER [41]. In S. cerevisiae the beta subunit is encoded by two genes, SBH1 and SBH2, and overexpression of the latter has been implicated with higher protein secretion [42]. The third gene selected for overexpression was PP7435_Chr3-0607, which most likely encodes the non-essential small GTPase Rho4 belonging to the Rho/Rac subfamily of Ras-like proteins. In S. cerevisiae, Rho4 was shown to be dispensable for cell growth, but it plays a role during cell separation where it regulates secretion of the hydrolytic enzymes required for cell septum degradation. Rho4 is also functionally related to Rho3. The interaction of both genes regulates bud formation and is involved in the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity [43, 44]. Interestingly, overexpression of RHO4 in fission yeast results in a defective cell wall, suggesting an additional role for Rho4 in cell wall integrity [45].

Initially, each of the three genes or the empty vector control (EV) was overexpressed in Fab#34 and 12 clones of each construct were screened for Fab secretion. Kar2 did not cause any significant change in HyHEL-Fab secretion (Fig. 7a, b). In fact, titer and yield were decreased below the levels of the EV control strain by 7% in titer and 12% in yield, respectively. Similar results were also reported before [40, 46, 47] and explained by the fact that Kar2 accumulation could prevent activation of the UPR pathway leading to reduced activation of chaperone genes through Hac1 induction. The situation was different for the overexpression of RHO4 where both measured values were higher compared to the control with an increase of 31% in titer and 11% in yield, respectively. Since Rho4 was reported to participate in the secretion of Eng1 and Agn1 glucanases, important for the septum degradation during cytokinesis [48], the higher extracellular concentrations of HyHEL-Fab could be a result of increased speed of cell division. This was also confirmed in our case where the average biomass of the RHO4 overexpressing clones was increased by 10–20% compared to the EV control. The average titer of 12 clones overexpressing SBH1 was more than twofold higher than the average titer of the empty vector control clones. Similarly, the yield amounted to nearly twofold increase compared to the EV control.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Screening of HyHEL-Fab#34 overexpressing KAR2, SBH1 or RHO4, and Δvam6Δpep4 or Δypt7 overexpressing SBH1. The relative fold changes of extracellular HyHEL-Fab titers (a) and HyHEL-Fab yields (b) were determined by ELISA and calculated from one screening containing 12 clones of each strain including the empty vector control strain Fab#34. The relative fold changes of secreted HyHEL-Fab titers (c) and HyHEL-Fab yields (d) in the HOPS mutants were determined by ELISA and calculated from one screening containing the 4 best performing clones of Δvam6Δpep4 + SBH1OE, Δypt7 + SBH1OE, SBH1OE and Fab#34 strains. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance measured by the Student’s t-test is indicated with an asterisk (p < 0.05*, p < 0.01**, p < 0.001***)

Since overexpressing KAR2 did not yield any promising results in terms of higher secretion levels, only SBH1 or RHO4 were overexpressed in the Fab producer strains with disrupted HOPS components (Fig. 7c, d). Unexpectedly, the combination of RHO4 overexpression with ∆vam6 seems to cause a synthetically lethal phenotype, as no viable colonies could be obtained (also when trying a different order of cell engineering steps), which might indicate that they are functioning in closely related pathways. In the background of ∆ypt7, RHO4 overexpression turned out to be successful, leading to 57% higher Fab yield. However, the Δypt7 + RHO4OE strain had approximately 20% lower biomass at the end of the screenings compared to the EV control.

Again, overexpression of SBH1 in the background of high Fab producers deficient in vacuolar transport, namely Δypt7 and Δvam6pep4 strains, significantly outreached the secretion capacity of the control strain Fab#34 transformed only with the empty vector (Fig. 7c, d). SBH1 overexpression—alone or in combination—led to a significant increase in HyHEL-Fab secretion. In the case of the Δypt7 + SBH1OE strain, the clones again significantly outreached the secretion capacity of the control strain Fab#34 + EV with nearly fourfold higher titers and yields, respectively (Fig. 7c, d) while reaching similar biomass. With this high secretion performance, the Δypt7 + SBH1OE strain exceeded the improvements of SBH1 overexpression alone by 1.4-fold and ∆ypt7 alone by more than 2.5-fold. Only a slightly beneficial effect was seen when overexpressing SBH1 in the Δvam6Δpep4 background compared to SBH1 overexpression alone, again confirming that disruption of the RabGTPase had a higher impact than disruption of the other HOPS complex components. We conclude a synergistic effect of Sbh1 and Ypt7 due to an efficient transport of the product into the ER and less targeting to the vacuole.

Fed-batch cultivations of HOPS engineered strains secreting HyHEL-Fab

To verify the performance of the HOPS engineered strains in a production process, fed-batch cultivations of the most promising engineered strains expressing HyHEL-Fab along with their parental strain were conducted. Standard glucose-limited fed batch experiments (constant feed of 3.4 g/h of the glucose fed-batch solution for 75 h fed-batch in 4-parallel DASGIP bioreactors) were performed (4 clones per run). For ∆ypt7, ∆ypt7 + SBH1OE and ∆vam6pep4 + SBH1OE duplicate fed batch runs were performed, while Fab#34 was cultivated in quadruplicates. The deviation between the replicate bioreactor runs of the Fab#34, Δvam6Δpep4 + SBH1OE, Δypt7 and Δypt7 + SBH1OE was less than maximum 15% for QP and qP, and less than 10% for the biomass yield, indicating high consistency between the individual runs (Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S2).

Table 1 Volumetric and specific productivity as well as product yield and specific growth rate of the fed-batch cultivation of HyHEL-Fab#34 overexpressing SBH1, deleted in ypt7 and vam6pep4 and combinations thereof

The batch phase was finished when the glycerol in the batch medium was consumed (after 24 ± 2.5 h). Biomass concentration was 21.9 ± 0.6 g/L DCW at batch end for all strains. During the course of the fed-batch cultivations, all the engineered strains secreted higher amounts of HyHEL-Fab than the control strain Fab#34, while reaching almost similar biomass concentrations (Fig. 8). The increase in extracellular Fab was also reflected in other characteristics such as average volumetric productivity and average specific productivity which turned out to be higher for the engineered strains (Table 1).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Fed-batch cultivation of HyHEL-Fab#34 overexpressing SBH1 and deleted for ypt7 or vam6pep4 and combinations thereof. The product titers (a, c) of all the strains were determined by ELISA and measured at several time points during the fed-batch process. The dry cell weight (b, d) was assessed at similar time points of the cultivation

Interestingly, the ∆vam6pep4 + SBH1OE strain outperformed the ∆vam6pep4 strain only in initial stages of the fed-batch process, whereas towards the end the extracellular product concentration equaled or was even lower compared to the ∆vam6pep4 strain (Fig. 8c). Nevertheless, over the whole process time the average specific productivity ∆vam6pep4 + SBH1OE was increased by 1.9-fold over the control Fab#34, and 30% compared to single SBH1 overexpression.

In the ∆ypt7 background, the positive impact of SBH1 overexpression on Fab secretion could be clearly observed and the secretion behavior of ∆ypt7 + SBH1OE was easily distinguished from the performance of individual single mutations (Fig. 8a, b). Over the whole process time, the ∆ypt7 + SBH1OE strains on average had a 2.8-fold higher specific productivity and a 2.5-fold higher volumetric productivity/space time yield than the control strain Fab#34 (Table 1). The final product titer was 1.9-fold increased (Fig. 8a). The double engineered strain ∆ypt7 + SBH1OE outperformed the respective single engineered strains by 1.6- and 1.9-fold for ∆ypt7 and SBH1, respectively. The results of these experiments correlated well with the trend observed in the screenings (Fig. 7), showing nicely the positive impact of disrupting a gene involved in vacuolar sorting as well as combining this deficiency with a secretion enhancing “helper factor” to enhance secretion even more.


Within the scope of this work, we have generated several P. pastoris mutant strains engineered in different parts of the secretory pathway including the autophagy related Cvt pathway, the HOPS complex involved in the vacuolar sorting pathways, as well as vacuolar proteases and factors involved in protein secretion. Various gene combinations were characterized and evaluated based on their secretion efficiency of two heterologous proteins, the antibody fragment HyHEL-Fab and carboxylesterase CES, in order to generate highly efficient production strains capable of exceeding the capacity of the control strains Fab#34 and CES#18 in terms of recombinant protein secretion.

The first degradative pathway to be disrupted was the autophagy related Cvt pathway involved in transporting targeted proteins such as Ape1 and Ams1 from the cytoplasm to the vacuole. ATG8 and ATG11 were chosen to be disrupted due to their important roles in biogenesis of Cvt vesicles and cargo selection, respectively. However, the ∆atg mutants did not demonstrate any improvement regardless of the secreted product. In fact, the ∆atg mutants secreting HyHEL-Fab performed less efficiently as the control strain whereas similar secretion capabilities were observed for ∆atg mutants secreting CES. While our findings do not correlate with the previous studies in filamentous fungi where atg mutants outperformed the reference strains in extracellular levels of heterologous proteins (Yoon et al. 2013), they clarify that autophagy is not involved in degradation of secretory proteins in P. pastoris.

Since disruption of the Cvt pathway did not lead to secretion increase, we next followed up on targeting the last step of vacuolar protein sorting, which is the fusion of vesicles to the vacuole. For that purpose, three genes (YPT7, VAM6, VPS41) of the HOPS complex were chosen to be disrupted based on their function in vacuolar fusion events. Of these, ∆vam6 and ∆ypt7 had a clearly positive effect on the secretion of the two different recombinant proteins. In all the cases, combination of more than one gene involved in the HOPS complex was counterproductive and did not cause a synergetic effect on secretion. Double disruption of CORVET and HOPS subunits (∆vam6vps8, ∆vam6vps21, ∆ypt7vps8, ∆ypt7vps21) or disruption of the shared subunits (Vps16, Vps33) was attempted, but except for ∆vam6vps8 no viable clones could be obtained in contrast to S. cerevisiae, again indicating that despite having the same players different regulatory mechanisms exist in the vacuolar protein sorting pathways of different yeasts. In particular, disruptions of the genes encoding both Rab GTPases (Vps21, Ypt7) proved to be lethal in both production strains, suggesting that at least one Rab GTPase is required for the survival of the cell. Furthermore, the three HOPS mutant strains (∆vam6, ∆vps41 and ∆ypt7) also differ in some of their phenotypes between the two yeasts. While they all displayed the typical class B-specific “fragmented vacuole” phenotype, the P. pastoris HOPS mutants do not oversecrete vacuolar proteases and CPY secretion is as in the control strain in contrast to S. cerevisiae [28, 38]. The underlying reasons for this are not known, but might be correlated to the fact that the vacuolar cargo accumulates in the pre-vacuolar vesicles in these strains.

Proteins of the HOPS complex indeed proved to play an highly important role in secretion of recombinant proteins, as demonstrated for CES and HyHEL-Fab. Disruption of YPT7 and VAM6 increased secretion, both in small-scale screening format as well as in fed-batch cultivations. Interestingly, in our studies in P. pastoris higher product titers of CES and HyHEL-Fab were obtained in the HOPS mutants than in the CORVET mutants, wherease in the screens for enhanced secretion of cellulases performed in S. cerevisiae the CORVET mutants always had the better performance [49, 50]. This could be related to an enhanced proteolytic susceptibility of our two model proteins compared to the cellulolytic enzymes. Indeed, further impairment of vacuolar proteases [Pep4, Prb1 and Vps70 (PP7435_Chr1-1501)] in the HOPS mutants enhanced the achieved product titers even further, with ∆pep4 having the most distinct impact.

As was shown in previous studies, the intracellular concentration of heterologous proteins is kept at low levels in yeast where functional proteases are present. This was also found to be true for our control strains Fab#34 and CES#18. However, upon disruption of YPT7 and VAM6, the intracellular amounts either stayed at the same level for HyHEL-Fab secretors or were even increased for CES secretors. Our results therefore show that vacuolar product degradation is diminished in ∆vam6 and ∆ypt7 strains where vesicles cannot properly fuse with the vacuole anymore. Nevertheless, the mutations in the HOPS complex are leading to a certain intracellular product retention and accumulation in putative pre-vacuolar compartments. Thus, to rescue the intracellularly trapped recombinant protein, we enforced the flux towards the secretory pathway, by overexpressing one of three P. pastoris genes involved either in the early secretory pathway (ER import protein Sbh1, ER protein folding chaperone Kar2) and the late secretory trafficking steps (RhoGTPase Rho4). Both SBH1 and RHO4 overexpression alone or in combination with ∆ypt7 enhanced recombinant protein secretion. The effect was not as pronounced for the overexpression of SBH1 in ∆vam6, and strikingly enhanced levels of Rho4 proved to be synthetically lethal in ∆vam6. Altough Vam6 has previously been implicated to be the GEF of Ypt7 [51], it has later been clarified that Vam6 is involved in localization and recruitment of Ypt7 to the vacuolar membrane, and serves as interaction partner for the Mon1-Ccz1 GEF complex [52]. Rho4 is a GTPase involved in late vesicular trafficking and cell polarization [43, 53]. We might speculate that upon overexpression in ∆vam6, Rho4 starts to interact with the Mon1-Ccz1 complex, leading to its hyperactivation and thus cell lysis. Regarding the positive effect of SBH1 overexpression, one possible explanation would be that overexpression of this component of the translocation pore might overcome the translocation defect observed for HyHEL-Fab previously [11]. SBH1 (also called SEB1) was initially found as a multicopy suppressor of translocation defective strains in S. cerevisiae [54, 55], indicating that higher levels of this single factor can strengthen the translocation efficiency. However, Sbh1 has also been found to be physically connected with several complexes and processes involved in protein secretion but not directly linked to translocation such as the exocyst complex [56], the OST complex [57], or the reticulons [58]. Indeed, Toikkanen et al. [42] hypothesized that the interaction of Sbh1 with the exocyst is the major factor leading to improved secretion of native and recombinant proteins in S. cerevisiae [42], which might be another reason for the improved secretion of Fab upon SBH1 overexpression observed also in our study.


Our study confirmed that vacuolar mis-sorting of recombinant proteins in P. pastoris happens via the Golgi-to-vacuole sorting pathways and thus most likely affects correctly folded active proteins. Disruption of these pathways alone or in combination with vacuolar proteases leads up to 80% higher extracellular product titers of both tested model proteins, HyHEL-Fab and CES. Upon combining the HOPS mutants with overexpression of secretion enhancing factors, synergistic effects and up to nearly fourfold higher Fab secretion in the strain ∆ypt7 + SBH1OE was achieved in screening cultures. These results could be verified in standard glucose-limited fed batch cultivations, where specific Fab productivity was enhanced 2.8-fold in ∆ypt7 + SBH1 compared to the control strain. Our results thus present a versatile method to enhance recombinant protein secretion by combining mutants in vacuolar protein sorting not only with protease knockouts, but also with enhanced secretion promoting reactions.


Strains and plasmids

The generation of the strain CES#18 expressing carboxylesterase (CES) and the strain Fab#34 expressing HyHEL-Fab were described before [10, 11, 59]. Briefly, the recombinant proteins were expressed under control of the P. pastoris GAP promoter, with the S. cerevisiae α-MF leader sequence for secretion and a Zeocin resistance marker cassette. Prior to transformation, the expression vectors based on plasmid pPM2dZ30-PGAPα, a derivative of pPUZZLE [60], were linearized with the restriction enzyme AvrII for homologous integration into the native GAP promoter locus of the genome of the Komagataella phaffii wild type strain CBS7435 (Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, NL). The three secretion factors KAR2, RHO4 and SBH1 were amplified from genomic DNA and overexpressed under control of the GAP promoter in the plasmid pPM2aK30, which contains the KanMX resistance marker cassette and the 3′-AOX1 region for genomic integration. The vector was linearized with AscI prior to transformation.

Disruption of genes involved in vacuolar transport and vacuolar proteases

The split marker cassette approach as described by Heiss et al. [61] was used to disrupt the genes. Therefore, the flanking regions of the split marker cassette used for homologous recombination (A upstream, D downstream) were first amplified by PCR along with the G418/Hygro resistance cassette fragments B and C. After each of the four fragments was amplified and purified, another round of PCR was performed to fuse A + B and C + D fragments together. After gel purification, equal amounts of both split marker fragments (AB and CD) were pooled and simultaneously transformed into electro-competent P. pastoris. Transformation was done by electroporation as described in [62]. The transformed cells were then plated onto selective YPD plates containing 50 μg/mL Zeocin + 500 μg/mL G418 or 200 μg/mL Hygromycin for single gene disrupted strains and 50 μg/mL Zeocin + 500 μg/mL G418 + 200 μg/mL Hygromycin for multiple gene disrupted strains. Positive transformants were verified by PCR of the genomic DNA using a detection primer pair designed to bind outside of the split-marker cassette in the P. pastoris genome (Additional file 2: Figure S4). Prior to confirming the positive transformants, the genomic DNA was isolated by the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). All the primers used to disrupt the corresponding genes and detect positive transformants are summarized in Additional file 1: Table S3.

Media and cultivation

Chemicals for media preparation were purchased from BD, Carl Roth, and Merck. YPD medium contained per liter 20 g peptone, 10 g yeast extract and 20 g glucose whereas YPD-agar additionally contained 20 g agar–agar. The minimal M2 medium used for the main culture for HyHEL-Fab secreting strains in screenings contained per liter: 3.15 g (NH4)2HPO4, 0.49 g MgSO4*7H2O, 0.80 g KCl, 0.0268 g CaCl2*2H2O, 22.0 g citric acid monohydrate, 1470 µL trace salts and 2 mL biotin (0.2 g/L). The pH of the M2 minimal medium was set to pH = 5.

The PTM0 trace salts stock solution contained (per liter) 6.0 g CuSO4·5H2O, 0.08 g NaI, 3.0 g MnSO4·H2O, 0.2 g Na2MoO4·2H2O, 0.02 g H3BO3, 0.5 g CoCl2, 20.0 g ZnCl2, 65.0 g FeSO4·7H2O and 5.0 ml H2SO4 (95 to 98%). All chemicals for PTM0 trace salts stock solution were from Riedel-de Haën (Seelze, Germany), except for H2SO4 (Merck Eurolab).

The buffered BM-medium, used for screenings of CES secreting strains as a main culture medium, contained per liter: 10 g yeast extract, 20 g soy peptone, 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0), 13.4 g yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and 1 mL biotin stock solution (0.2 g/L).

The strains were cultivated in 24 deep well plates as described before [10, 11]. For the preculture, 2 mL of selective YPD medium was used containing different types of antibiotics according to the type of strain applied. In general, the control strains carrying only HyHEL-Fab or CES were grown in the presence of 50 μg/mL Zeocin, while single and multiple gene disrupted strains were grown in YPD medium supplemented with 50 μg/mL Zeocin + 500 μg/mL G418 and 50 μg/mL Zeocin + 500 μg/mL G418 + 200 μg/mL Hygromycin, respectively. The respective strains were inoculated using a sterile pipette tip and incubated overnight at 25 °C at 280 rpm. The cells were harvested and washed with M2/BM medium. The OD600 of the washed cells was measured and the main culture containing 2 mL M2 minimal medium/BM complex medium supplemented with one glucose feed bead (12 mm, Kuhner, CH) was inoculated with the starting OD600 = 1 (M2 medium) and OD600 = 0.1 (BM medium), respectively. The main culture was incubated for 48 h at 25 °C at 280 rpm. Feed beads are a polymer-based slow release system for controlled glucose release in shake flask and deep well plate cultivations, which allow for a glucose-limited cell growth in fed batch mode [63]. Growth kinetics are shown in Additional file 2: Figure S5. The cells were then harvested by centrifugation for 5 min at full speed and the supernatant was collected.

Fed-batch cultivation

For the preculture, 200 mL of selective YPD medium containing antibiotics according to the type of strain applied were inoculated with one cryo tube of the working cell bank. After 24 h of incubation, the preculture was washed in the batch medium and used to inoculate 450 mL batch medium to reach an initial OD600 = 1.0. Fed-batch cultivations were carried out in 1.0-L working volume DASGIP bioreactors (Eppendorf, Germany) with a computer-based process control. The temperature was maintained at 25 °C, pH was controlled at 5.0 with 25% ammonia and the dissolved-oxygen concentration was kept above 20% saturation by controlling the stirrer speed and the airflow.

The batch medium contained (per liter) 2.0 g citric acid monohydrate, 12.6 g (NH4)2HPO4, 0.022 g CaCl2·2H2O, 0.9 g KCl, 0.5 g MgSO4·7H2O, 46.5 g glycerol, 4.6 mL PTM0 trace salts stock solution and 2 mL Biotin (0.2 g/L). The pH was adjusted to 5.0 with 25% HCl.

The glucose fed-batch solution contained (per liter) 464 g glucose·H2O, 8.4 g KCl, 5.2 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.28 g CaCl2·2H2O, and 10.1 mL PTM0 trace salts stock solution and 1.70 mL Biotin (0.2 g/L).

The batch phase was finished when the glycerol in the batch medium was consumed (after 24 ± 2 h). Biomass concentration was 21.9 ± 0.6 g/L DCW at batch end for all strains. Afterwards, the glucose fed batch with a constant feed rate of 3.4 g /h 50% (w/v) glucose was started. The fed-batch phase was terminated at approximately 75 h. Samples were taken frequently and harvested by washing the pellets and centrifugation for 5 min at full speed. The supernatant was then collected and kept frozen at − 20 °C.

SDS-PAGE and Western blot

The SDS-PAGE was performed using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) NuPAGE® 12% Bis–Tris polyacrylamide gels (Life Technologies™) with NuPAGE® morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer at 180 V for 60 min. Before loading the gel with 15 μL of culture supernatant, each sample supernatant was correlated to the wet cell weight of each sample using RO water.

After SDS-PAGE, the separated proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using the XCell II™ Blot Module for wet (tank) transfer (Life technologies™) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The HyHEL-Fab was immunologically detected with Anti-Human IgG antibody (Abcam, ab7497) produced in mouse, specifically recognizing the Hinge region of Human IgG and Anti-Mouse IgG antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, A3673) coupled with HRP, which was produced in goat. Carboxylesterase was immunologically detected with rabbit anti-CES antiserum (produced in rabbit, provided by Biomin Holding GmbH) and carboxypeptidase Y was detected using anti-CPY antiserum (produced in rabbit, kindly provided by Günther Daum/Karlheinz Grillitsch, Graz University of Technology). As secondary antibodies, anti-rabbit IgG antibodies coupled with horseradish peroxidase (produced in goat, Sigma-Aldrich, A0545) were used.

Quantification of HyHEL-Fab and CES by ELISA

Quantification of HyHEL-Fab by ELISA was done using anti-Human IgG antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich, A8542) coupled with alkaline phosphatase, produced in goat. The supernatant samples were serially diluted on precoated immunosorbent plates (Maxisorp; Nunc, Denmark) along with the purified HyHEL-Fab (Bethyl P80-115) used as standard with an initial concentration of 100 ng/mL. Detection was done with pNPP (Sigma-Aldrich S0942) dissolved in 0.1 M NaHCO3 buffer, pH 9.6–9.8. After each incubation step the plates were washed three times using washing buffer (PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 adjusted to pH 7.4). For plate coating, standard PBS, pH = 7.4 was used whereas dilution steps were done in dilution buffer based on washing buffer additionally supplemented with 1% BSA (w/v).

The same procedure was applied to quantify CES by ELISA using the following antibodies: rabbit-anti-CES antiserum 6287 (produced and provided by Biomin Holding GmbH) as a coating antibody, guinea pig-anti-CES antiserum 12206 (produced and provided by Biomin Holding GmbH) as a primary antibody and goat-anti-guinea pig-IgG-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (Sigma-Aldrich, A-5062) as a detection antibody. The purified standards were produced by Biomin Holding GmbH and diluted to the initial concentration of 100 ng/mL. The yellow color reaction was developed using pNPP dissolved in the detection buffer as previously described. For plate coating, 100 mM carbonate buffer (pH = 9.6) was used.

The yield of recombinant proteins was calculated by relating the product titer to the wet cell weight concentration of the respective culture.

Protease activity assay

Protease activity was measured by Pierce Protease Assay Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions with slight modifications. The culture supernatants containing complex BM medium were washed and buffer exchanged using 2 mL Vivaspin columns (Sartorius) as instructed in the manual. Since we were interested in vacuolar proteases active at cultivation pH, the supernatants were reconstituted in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH = 6. The digestion steps as well as the TNBSA (trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid) development step were incubated for 1 h and overnight, respectively. The buffer exchange was not necessary for samples incubated in M2 medium. However, the incubation times stayed the same.

Fluorescence microscopy

HyHEL-Fab and CES expressing P. pastoris was inoculated in M2/BM medium with an initial OD600 of 0.1 and grown for approximately 18 h. Vacuolar membranes of the cells were stained using FM4-64 [64] as described previously [65]. Briefly, the cells were stained with 15 µM FM4-64 (Invitrogen) diluted in culture medium for 15 min at 30 °C shaking in the dark. The cells were washed and incubated for 1 h in culture medium. After a final washing step, the cells were viewed on a Leica DMI6000B fluorescence microscope using a HCX PL APO CS 100.0 × 1.40 NA oil-immersion objective and appropriate filters for FM4-64 (Leica N2.1). For CES-oxGFP, cells were cultivated in BM medium to an OD of approx. 1.5–2. The cells were then centrifuged (700g, 3 min), resuspended in 1× PBS and viewed in the microscope using a filter for GFP (Leica L5). Images were processed using ImageJ (Rasband W.S. ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA,, 1997–2018).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.


  1. Yang Z, Zhang Z. Engineering strategies for enhanced production of protein and bio-products in Pichia pastoris: A review. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36:182–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Juturu V, Wu JC. Heterologous protein expression in Pichia pastoris: latest research progress and applications. ChemBioChem. 2018;19:7–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Love KR, Dalvie NC, Love JC. The yeast stands alone: the future of protein biologic production. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017;53:50–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Delic M, Valli M, Graf AB, Pfeffer M, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. The secretory pathway: exploring yeast diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2013;37:872–914.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimmermann R, Eyrisch S, Ahmad M, Helms V. Protein translocation across the ER membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1808:912–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hampton RY. ER-associated degradation in protein quality control and cellular regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2002;14:476–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Thibault G, Ng DT. The endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation pathways of budding yeast. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012;4:a013193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Puxbaum V, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Quo vadis? The challenges of recombinant protein folding and secretion in Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:2925–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zahrl R, Gasser B, Mattanovich D, Ferrer P. Detection and elimination of cellular bottlenecks in protein producing yeasts. Methods Mol Biol. 2019;1923:75–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marsalek L, Gruber C, Altmann F, Aleschko M, Mattanovich D, Gasser B, Puxbaum V. Disruption of genes involved in CORVET complex leads to enhanced secretion of heterologous carboxylesterase only in protease deficient Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol J. 2017;12:1600584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zahrl RJ, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. The impact of ERAD on recombinant protein secretion in Pichia pastoris (syn Komagataella spp.). Microbiology. 2018;164:453–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bryant NJ, Stevens TH. Vacuole biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: protein transport pathways to the yeast vacuole. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:230–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Haas A, Scheglmann D, Lazar T, Gallwitz D, Wickner W. The GTPase Ypt7p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is required on both partner vacuoles for the homotypic fusion step of vacuole inheritance. EMBO J. 1995;14:5258–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nakamura N, Hirata A, Ohsumi Y, Wada Y. Vam2/Vps41p and Vam6/Vps39p are components of a protein complex on the vacuolar membranes and involved in the vacuolar assembly in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:11344–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brocker C, Engelbrecht-Vandre S, Ungermann C. Multisubunit tethering complexes and their role in membrane fusion. Curr Biol. 2010;20:R943–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Balderhaar HJ, Ungermann C. CORVET and HOPS tethering complexes—coordinators of endosome and lysosome fusion. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:1307–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li SC, Kane PM. The yeast lysosome-like vacuole: endpoint and crossroads. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1793:650–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Yoon J, Kikuma T, Maruyama J, Kitamoto K. Enhanced production of bovine chymosin by autophagy deficiency in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e62512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Polupanov AS, Nazarko VY, Sibirny AA. CCZ1, MON1 and YPT7 genes are involved in pexophagy, the Cvt pathway and non-specific macroautophagy in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Cell Biol Int. 2011;35:311–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hartinger D, Moll WD. Fumonisin elimination and prospects for detoxification by enzymatic transformation. World Mycotoxin J. 2011;4:271–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kirisako T, Baba M, Ishihara N, Miyazawa K, Ohsumi M, Yoshimori T, Noda T, Ohsumi Y. Formation process of autophagosome is traced with Apg8/Aut7p in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1999;147:435–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie Z, Nair U, Klionsky DJ. Atg8 controls phagophore expansion during autophagosome formation. Mol Biol Cell. 2008;19:3290–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shintani T, Klionsky DJ. Cargo proteins facilitate the formation of transport vesicles in the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:29889–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yorimitsu T, Klionsky DJ. Atg11 links cargo to the vesicle-forming machinery in the cytoplasm to vacuole targeting pathway. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16:1593–605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Heiss S, Puxbaum V, Gruber C, Altmann F, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Multistep processing of the secretion leader of the extracellular protein Epx1 in Pichia pastoris and implications for protein localization. Microbiology. 2015;161:1356–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Banta LM, Robinson JS, Klionsky DJ, Emr SD. Organelle assembly in yeast: characterization of yeast mutants defective in vacuolar biogenesis and protein sorting. J Cell Biol. 1988;107:1369–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Raymond CK, Howald-Stevenson I, Vater CA, Stevens TH. Morphological classification of the yeast vacuolar protein sorting mutants: evidence for a prevacuolar compartment in class E vps mutants. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3:1389–402.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bowers K, Stevens TH. Protein transport from the late Golgi to the vacuole in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1744:438–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brocker C, Kuhlee A, Gatsogiannis C, Balderhaar HJ, Honscher C, Engelbrecht-Vandre S, Ungermann C, Raunser S. Molecular architecture of the multisubunit homotypic fusion and vacuole protein sorting (HOPS) tethering complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:1991–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Harsay E, Schekman R. A subset of yeast vacuolar protein sorting mutants is blocked in one branch of the exocytic pathway. J Cell Biol. 2002;156:271–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Woolford CA, Daniels LB, Park FJ, Jones EW, Van Arsdell JN, Innis MA. The PEP4 gene encodes an aspartyl protease implicated in the posttranslational regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae vacuolar hydrolases. Mol Cell Biol. 1986;6:2500–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Moehle CM, Tizard R, Lemmon SK, Smart J, Jones EW. Protease B of the lysosomelike vacuole of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is homologous to the subtilisin family of serine proteases. Mol Cell Biol. 1987;7:4390–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Moehle CM, Aynardi MW, Kolodny MR, Park FJ, Jones EW. Protease B of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation and regulation of the PRB1 structural gene. Genetics. 1987;115:255–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Kuroda K, Kitagawa Y, Kobayashi K, Tsumura H, Komeda T, Mori E, Motoki K, Kataoka S, Chiba Y, Jigami Y. Antibody expression in protease-deficient strains of the methylotrophic yeast Ogataea minuta. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007;7:1307–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wu M, Shen Q, Yang Y, Zhang S, Qu W, Chen J, Sun H, Chen S. Disruption of YPS1 and PEP4 genes reduces proteolytic degradation of secreted HSA/PTH in Pichia pastoris GS115. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;40:589–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Gleeson MA, White CE, Meininger DP, Komives EA. Generation of protease-deficient strains and their use in heterologous protein expression. Methods Mol Biol. 1998;103:81–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Idiris A, Tohda H, Sasaki M, Okada K, Kumagai H, Giga-Hama Y, Takegawa K. Enhanced protein secretion from multiprotease-deficient fission yeast by modification of its vacuolar protein sorting pathway. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:667–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Bonangelino CJ, Chavez EM, Bonifacino JS. Genomic screen for vacuolar protein sorting genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13:2486–501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gasser B, Mattanovich D, Buchetics M. Recombinant host cell engineered to overexpress helper proteins. European Patent Application EP3132028 (A2).

  40. Delic M, Gongrich R, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Engineering of protein folding and secretion-strategies to overcome bottlenecks for efficient production of recombinant proteins. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21:414–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gogala M, Becker T, Beatrix B, Armache JP, Barrio-Garcia C, Berninghausen O, Beckmann R. Structures of the Sec61 complex engaged in nascent peptide translocation or membrane insertion. Nature. 2014;506:107–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Toikkanen JH, Sundqvist L, Keranen S. Kluyveromyces lactis SSO1 and SEB1 genes are functional in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and enhance production of secreted proteins when overexpressed. Yeast. 2004;21:1045–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Matsui Y, Toh EA. Yeast RHO3 and RHO4 ras superfamily genes are necessary for bud growth, and their defect is suppressed by a high dose of bud formation genes CDC42 and BEM1. Mol Cell Biol. 1992;12:5690–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Park HO, Bi E. Central roles of small GTPases in the development of cell polarity in yeast and beyond. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71:48–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Santos B, Gutierrez J, Calonge TM, Perez P. Novel Rho GTPase involved in cytokinesis and cell wall integrity in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eukaryot Cell. 2003;2:521–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Samuel P, Prasanna Vadhana AK, Kamatchi R, Antony A, Meenakshisundaram S. Effect of molecular chaperones on the expression of Candida antarctica lipase B in Pichia pastoris. Microbiol Res. 2013;168:615–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Borth N, Mattanovich D, Kunert R, Katinger H. Effect of increased expression of protein disulfide isomerase and heavy chain binding protein on antibody secretion in a recombinant CHO cell line. Biotechnol Prog. 2005;21:106–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Santos B, Martin-Cuadrado AB, Vazquez de Aldana CR, Rey F, Perez P. Rho4 GTPase is involved in secretion of glucanases during fission yeast cytokinesis. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4:1639–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kitagawa T, Kohda K, Tokuhiro K, Hoshida H, Akada R, Takahashi H, Imaeda T. Identification of genes that enhance cellulase protein production in yeast. J Biotechnol. 2011;151:194–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Wang TY, Huang CJ, Chen HL, Ho PC, Ke HM, Cho HY, Ruan SK, Hung KY, Wang IL, Cai YW, et al. Systematic screening of glycosylation- and trafficking-associated gene knockouts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies mutants with improved heterologous exocellulase activity and host secretion. BMC Biotechnol. 2013;13:71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wurmser AE, Sato TK, Emr SD. New component of the vacuolar class C-Vps complex couples nucleotide exchange on the Ypt7 GTPase to SNARE-dependent docking and fusion. J Cell Biol. 2000;151:551–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Nordmann M, Cabrera M, Perz A, Brocker C, Ostrowicz C, Engelbrecht-Vandre S, Ungermann C. The Mon1-Ccz1 complex is the GEF of the late endosomal Rab7 homolog Ypt7. Curr Biol. 2010;20:1654–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Madden K, Snyder M. Cell polarity and morphogenesis in budding yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:687–744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Panzner S, Dreier L, Hartmann E, Kostka S, Rapoport TA. Posttranslational protein transport in yeast reconstituted with a purified complex of Sec proteins and Kar2p. Cell. 1995;81:561–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Toikkanen J, Gatti E, Takei K, Saloheimo M, Olkkonen VM, Söderlund H, De Camilli P, Keränen S. Yeast protein translocation complex: isolation of two genes SEB1 and SEB2 encoding proteins homologous to the Sec61 beta subunit. Yeast. 1996;12:425–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Toikkanen JH, Miller KJ, Soderlund H, Jantti J, Keranen S. The beta subunit of the Sec61p endoplasmic reticulum translocon interacts with the exocyst complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:20946–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Chavan M, Yan A, Lennarz WJ. Subunits of the translocon interact with components of the oligosaccharyl transferase complex. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:22917–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Zhao X, Jantti J. Functional characterization of the trans-membrane domain interactions of the Sec61 protein translocation complex beta-subunit. BMC Cell Biol. 2009;10:76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ruth C, Buchetics M, Vidimce V, Kotz D, Naschberger S, Mattanovich D, Pichler H, Gasser B. Pichia pastoris Aft1—a novel transcription factor, enhancing recombinant protein secretion. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Stadlmayr G, Mecklenbrauker A, Rothmuller M, Maurer M, Sauer M, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Identification and characterisation of novel Pichia pastoris promoters for heterologous protein production. J Biotechnol. 2010;150:519–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Heiss S, Maurer M, Hahn R, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Identification and deletion of the major secreted protein of Pichia pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:1241–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Gasser B, Prielhofer R, Marx H, Maurer M, Nocon J, Steiger M, Puxbaum V, Sauer M, Mattanovich D. Pichia pastoris: protein production host and model organism for biomedical research. Future Microbiol. 2013;8:191–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Jeude M, Dittrich B, Niederschulte H, Anderlei T, Knocke C, Klee D, Buchs J. Fed-batch mode in shake flasks by slow-release technique. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;95:433–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Vida TA, Emr SD. A new vital stain for visualizing vacuolar membrane dynamics and endocytosis in yeast. J Cell Biol. 1995;128:779–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Delic M, Rebnegger C, Wanka F, Puxbaum V, Haberhauer-Troyer C, Hann S, Kollensperger G, Mattanovich D, Gasser B. Oxidative protein folding and unfolded protein response elicit differing redox regulation in endoplasmic reticulum and cytosol of yeast. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;52:2000–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank Felix Fuchsberger for his help with cloning and P. pastoris screenings, and Hannes Russmayer for his help with bioreactor cultivations. BOKU-VIBT Imaging Center is acknowledged for providing access to fluorescence microscopy equipment.


This work has been supported by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Digital and Economic Affairs (bmdw), the Federal Ministry of Traffic, Innovation and Technology (bmvit), the Styrian Business Promotion Agency SFG, the Standortagentur Tirol, the Government of Lower Austria and ZIT-Technology Agency of the City of Vienna through the COMET-Funding Program managed by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG. EQ BOKU VIBT GmbH is acknowledged for providing fermentation equipment through the VIBT-Extremophile Center.

Further support by Biomin Holding GmbH, Boehringer-Ingelheim RCV, Lonza AG, Biocrates Life Sciences AG, Validogen (formerly VTU Technology) GmbH, and Sandoz GmbH is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



LM performed most of the experiments and analysed the data, VP performed fluorescence microscopy, and MB identified and tested the secretion enhancing factors. VP and BG supervised data analysis. DM and BG designed the study and contributed to data interpretation. LM, VP and BG wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigitte Gasser.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Intracellular accumulation of the HyHEL-Fab in control, Δatg8 and Δatg11 strains. Intracellular levels of HyHEL-Fab were detected by Western blot of cell lysates. Equal amounts of total intracellular protein (determined by BCA assay after cell lysis) were loaded on the gel. Figure S2. Full size microscopic images of vacuolar membrane staining of Fab#34, ∆vam6, ∆vps41,ypt7 with FM4-64 shown in Fig. 2. Figure S3. Vacuolar membrane staining of HyHEL Fab and CES Δypt7 and additional protease disruptions (Δpep4, Δprb1). Figure S4. Agarose gels of PCRs confirming gene disruptions in genomic DNA of P. pastoris. Figure S5. Growth kinetics of P. pastoris in 2 mL screening cultures based on glucose-release rates of 12 mm glucose Feed Beads.

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Fold changes of titer, wet cell weight and product yield (titer per wet cell weight) of engineered P. pastoris strains in comparison to Fab#34 or CES#18, respectively obtained in small scale screenings. Table S2. Fold changes of volumetric productivity QP, specific productivity qP, biomass yield YX/S and specific growth rate µ of engineered P. pastoris strains in comparison to Fab#34 obtained in fed batch bioreactor cultivations at the end of cultivation. Table S3. Primer sequences used for generation of the split marker cassettes and detection of positive transformants.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marsalek, L., Puxbaum, V., Buchetics, M. et al. Disruption of vacuolar protein sorting components of the HOPS complex leads to enhanced secretion of recombinant proteins in Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact 18, 119 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: