Enhancement of solubility in Escherichia coli and purification of an aminotransferase from Sphingopyxis sp. MTA144 for deamination of hydrolyzed fumonisin B1
© Hartinger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 25 June 2010
Accepted: 18 August 2010
Published: 18 August 2010
Fumonisin B1 is a cancerogenic mycotoxin produced by Fusarium verticillioides and other fungi. Sphingopyxis sp. MTA144 can degrade fumonisin B1, and a key enzyme in the catabolic pathway is an aminotransferase which removes the C2-amino group from hydrolyzed fumonisin B1. In order to study this aminotransferase with respect to a possible future application in enzymatic fumonisin detoxification, we attempted expression of the corresponding fumI gene in E. coli and purification of the enzyme. Since the aminotransferase initially accumulated in inclusion bodies, we compared the effects of induction level, host strain, expression temperature, solubility enhancers and a fusion partner on enzyme solubility and activity.
When expressed from a T7 promoter at 30°C, the aminotransferase accumulated invariably in inclusion bodies in DE3 lysogens of the E. coli strains BL21, HMS174, Rosetta 2, Origami 2, or Rosetta-gami. Omission of the isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) used for induction caused a reduction of expression level, but no enhancement of solubility. Likewise, protein production but not solubility correlated with the IPTG concentration in E. coli Tuner(DE3). Addition of the solubility enhancers betaine and sorbitol or the co-enzyme pyridoxal phosphate showed no effect. Maltose-binding protein, used as an N-terminal fusion partner, promoted solubility at 30°C or less, but not at 37°C. Low enzyme activity and subsequent aggregation in the course of purification and cleavage indicated that the soluble fusion protein contained incorrectly folded aminotransferase. Expression in E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3), which co-expresses two cold-adapted chaperonins, at 11°C finally resulted in production of appreciable amounts of active enzyme. Since His tag-mediated affinity purification from this strain was hindered by co-elution of chaperonin, two steps of chromatography with optimized imidazole concentration in the binding buffer were performed to obtain 1.45 mg of apparently homogeneous aminotransferase per liter of expression culture.
We found that only reduction of temperature, but not reduction of expression level or fusion to maltose-binding protein helped to produce correctly folded, active aminotransferase FumI in E. coli. Our results may provide a starting point for soluble expression of related aminotransferases or other aggregation-prone proteins in E. coli.
Comparison of E. coli(DE3) strains
Recombinant E. coli strains used in this work. AT or AT144 was used for fumI in the vector names.
E. coli BL21(DE3)
E. coli BL21(DE3) pET-3a-AT
N-terminal 6xHis tag
E. coli BL21(DE3) pET-3a-HISAT
E. coli BL21(DE3) pET-30a-AT144
E. coli BL21(DE3) pMAL-AT144
E. coli HMS174(DE3)
N-terminal 6xHis tag
E. coli HMS174(DE3) pET-3a-HISAT
E. coli HMS174(DE3) pMAL-AT144
E. coli Origami 2(DE3)
N-terminal 6xHis tag
E. coli Origami 2(DE3) pET-3a-HISAT
E. coli Origami 2(DE3) pMAL-AT144
E. coli Origami 2(DE3) pMAL
E. coli Rosetta 2(DE3)
N-terminal 6xHis tag
E. coli Rosetta 2(DE3) pET-3a-HISAT
E. coli Rosetta-gami(DE3)
N-terminal 6xHis tag
E. coli Rosetta-gami(DE3) pET-3a-HISAT
E. coli Tuner(DE3)
N-terminal 6xHis tag
E. coli Tuner(DE3) pET-3a-HISAT
E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3)
C-terminal 6xHis tag
E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3) pET-30a-AT144HIS
N-terminal 6xHis tag
E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3) pET-3a-HISAT
E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3) pET-3a-AT
Expression and purification of aminotransferase FumI as fusion protein with maltose-binding protein
Expression in E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3) and His tag-mediated affinity purification
The use of feed enzymes for gastrointestinal detoxification of fumonisins may be a practical solution for ameliorating the negative health effects in animal nutrition caused by fumonisin-contaminated maize, which is frequently encountered in the warmer regions of the world . Detoxification of mycotoxins by biodegradation with specific microorganisms has previously been proposed [52–54]. However, application of one of the known yeast  or bacterial [1, 27, 55] strains capable of fumonisin catabolism as a feed additive would require thorough investigation of possible feed safety issues, and pose the technological challenge of providing viable, yet shippable and storable microbes with sufficient activity for fast fumonisin degradation in the gastrointestinal tract of domestic animals. In comparison, enzymatic detoxification would be a safe and effective alternative, if the specific enzymes can be produced with high yield in microbial cell factories, and if they are active in the gastrointestinal tract. Several enzymes, including phytase , are commercially provided as feed additive. In order to evaluate whether the aminotransferase FumI encoded by the fumI gene of Sphingopyxis sp. MTA144  would be active under the conditions in the gastrointestinal tract, or in steps of feed and possibly also food processing, it was essential to have sufficient amounts of purified enzyme preparations for subsequent studies available. The transition from the unfolded polypeptide to the correctly folded native state may be difficult for FumI, since we consistently failed to produce active enzyme by refolding of inclusion bodies using several protocols and including co-enzyme, substrate and co-substrate. This ineptness in folding could also be a reason why expression of a codon-optimized version of the fumI gene in Pichia pastoris yielded barely detectable amounts of the active aminotransferase. Even though virtually all of the recombinant FumI protein was found in the sedimenting fraction of cell lysate in the initial efforts to produce the aminotransferase in E. coli, low aminotransferase activity was detectable in clarified cell lysate. This indicated that in principle correctly folded aminotransferase could be produced in E. coli, and this was the basis for further exploring E. coli as host for soluble expression of active aminotransferase.
Since expression using the vectors pET-3a-AT or pET-3a-HISAT in the absence of IPTG in E. coli BL21(DE3) or with varying IPTG concentrations in E. coli Tuner(DE3) showed no noticeable effect on the amount or relative proportion of soluble aminotransferase synthesized, we concluded that solubility of aminotransferase FumI does not correlate with expression levels. Promoter strength and expression level are considered important factors for the cytoplasmic solubility of recombinant proteins , and a correlation between induction level and solubility of recombinant proteins in the E. coli cytoplasm has been reported . Our results are more in line with previous findings that the percent solubility was independent of recombinant protein concentration or production rate . Inclusion body formation did not seem to be caused by the presence and possible interference with translation of rare codons in the fumI gene, since expression in E. coli Rosetta 2(DE3), which supplies tRNAs for the rarely used codons AUA, AGG, AGA, CUA, CCC and GGA, did not improve solubility. Efficient folding of recombinant proteins with multiple disulfide bonds in the cytoplasm of E. coli mutants trxB- (thioredoxin reductase) and gor- (glutathion reductase) has been reported . Aminotransferase FumI has eight cysteine residues, but as a cytoplasmic enzyme in Sphingopyxis sp. MTA144 it is not predicted by DISULFIND (disulfind.dsi.unifi.it)  to have disulfide bonds. Furthermore, the protein with the highest sequence identity (glutamate 1-semialdehyde aminotransferase, 26% identity) in the PDB database does not contain S-S bridges. Failure to enhance solubility by expression of fumI in trxB-gor-E. coli Origami 2(DE3) is in agreement with these considerations. The conclusion that fumI is a difficult target for soluble and active expression in E. coli was further confirmed by the finding that addition of sorbitol or betaine to the expression cultures as osmotic modulators had no effect on aminotransferase activity or solubility. In this respect, aminotransferase FumI behaved differently to several recombinant proteins that were reported to show higher solubility in E. coli in the presence of these osmolytes [43, 59, 60].
Together with full-length aminotransferase, shorter fragments of the enzyme seemed to accumulate upon fumI gene expression in E. coli. When FumI was produced with an N-terminal His tag, a peptide of less than 15 kDa, which migrated with the dye front or slightly slower and which was detectable in the soluble fraction of some and in the insoluble fraction of all lysates, reacted specifically with the anti-His6-antibody. Truncated versions of MBP-FumI were also detectable. Since no such peptides interacted with anti-His6-antibody or HisTrap chromatography resin when FumI was produced with a C-terminal His tag, truncated versions may have been formed by premature translation termination.
Fusion of aminotransferase to maltose-binding protein, which was described as more effective in promoting solubility of recombinant proteins than other fusion partners , helped to prevent aggregation only at reduced expression temperature but not at 37°C, adding further evidence for the aggregation-prone nature of aminotransferase FumI. It has been reported that maltose-binding protein can keep a fusion partner in solution, even when this partner has not adopted the correct fold [61, 62]. There is evidence that this might in part also be the case with MBP-FumI. The soluble fusion protein showed 30-fold lower aminotransferase activity than a preparation of 6xHis-tagged aminotransferase purified from cell extract of E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3) when compared at identical concentrations of recombinant protein. Since the enzymatic activity remained unchanged after the fusion partners were separated with recombinant enterokinase, it is possible that the maltose-binding protein fusion does not interfere with aminotransferase activity and that the reduced activity results from incorrectly folded FumI. Further evidence for this is that some of the fusion protein aggregated after affinity purification, when the NaCl concentration was reduced by dialysis and CaCl2 was added for subsequent enterokinase cleavage. Under these conditions, neither MBP nor correctly folded aminotransferase aggregate. However, enterokinase cleavage transferred both fusion partners (MBP and FumI) from the sedimentable fraction to the soluble fraction, which does not fit the assumption that incorrectly folded aminotransferase caused aggregation of the fusion protein. A possible explanation could be that the interaction of enterokinase with the polypeptide chain helped to separate, but not refold, aggregates. In experiments that are not shown we observed that after enterokinase cleavage the amount of soluble aminotransferase did not match the amount of MBP in solution, especially when longer incubation times or higher protein concentrations were used. Taken together, fusion with maltose-binding protein seems to have enhanced solubility of aminotransferase FumI more than it promoted correct folding.
Expression temperature has long been known as a key factor determining solubility of recombinant proteins in the cytoplasm of E. coli[35, 63], and there are numerous examples where growth at low temperature increased solubility. In the case of aminotransferase, a clear effect of temperature reduction on the levels of soluble recombinant protein obtained was only observed when aminotransferase was fused to maltose-binding protein, or produced in E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3). The tenfold increase in enzyme activity that we observed when comparing expression from the same plasmid in E. coli BL21(DE3) at 37°C and E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3) at 11°C was considerably less than e.g. the more than 150-fold increase reported by Ferrer et al. (2004) for the expression of an esterase under similar conditions . Nevertheless, reduction of temperature was the single most effective measure among the approaches we tested to enhance solubility and activity of aminotransferase FumI. Our observation that the co-expressed chaperonin Cpn60 interfered with affinity purification by IMAC and that its elution trailed to the fractions of the recombinant target protein has been described before and was circumvented by changing the binding buffer composition to reduce the interaction between Cpn60 and the recombinant protein . We found that co-elution of Cpn60 could also be avoided by increasing the imidazole concentration in the binding buffer, although at preparative scale a repeat of the affinity chromatography step was necessary to obtain pure target enzyme.
Correct folding of recombinant aminotransferase FumI in E. coli could not be enhanced by reducing the expression level or by fusion to maltose-binding protein. Only lowering the expression temperature to 11°C, enabled by using E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3) as a host, helped the formation of active enzyme. The recombinant aminotransferase FumI thus produced and purified was sufficient to obtain apparently homogeneous protein for subsequent determination of enzyme characteristics, kinetic parameters and evaluation of the application potential as feed enzyme (manuscript in preparation). Further reduction of expression temperature may increase the yield of soluble, active enzyme. However, if aminotransferase FumI were to be produced on a technological scale for application as feed enzyme, an alternative and improved expression system will likely be required.
Strains, vectors, chemicals, media
E. coli host strains for gene expression BL21(DE3), HMS174(DE3), Rosetta 2(DE3), Origami 2(DE3), Rosetta-gami(DE3) and Tuner(DE3) were purchased from Novagen (Madison, WI, USA), and strain E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3) was from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA, USA). The cloning host strain E. coli XL1-Blue was from Stratagene. Genetic transformations were performed according to manufacturer's instructions. Sphingopyxis sp. MTA144 was previously isolated from a soil sample. The sequence of the fum gene cluster was deposited under GenBank accession no. FJ426269.
Vector pMAL-c2E was purchased from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA), and vectors pET-3a and pET-30a(+) were obtained from Novagen. All chemicals were from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Enzymes were purchased from Fermentas (St. Leon-Rot, Germany), except for recombinant enterokinase, which was obtained from Novagen.
Construction of the expression vectors
Molecular cloning was performed according to standard procedures , and all plasmids were confirmed by sequencing of the inserts (VBC-Biotech, Vienna, Austria). The expression vector and host strain combinations used in this work are summarized in Table 1.
pET-3a-AT and pET-3a-HISAT
Cloning of the aminotransferase gene fumI in pET-3a for expression with or without an N-terminal 6xHis tag has previously been described .
pET-30a-AT144HIS and pET-30a-AT144
The fumI gene was amplified by PCR from a preparation of genomic DNA of Sphingopyxis sp. MTA144  using the primers NdeI-fumI-for (5'-CTT ATA CAT ATG GCG AAC GGA ACA AGG CAG AAA G-3') and SacI-fumI-rev (5'-TAT GAG CTC GCA GCA CCG GCG AGT TGC ATT AAA ATG G-3'). Restriction sites are in boldface and start or stop codons are in italics. Vector pET-30a(+) and the PCR product were digested with Nde I and Sac I, and ligated to form pET-30a-AT144HIS. The encoded protein (48.3 kDa) comprises the FumI sequence [GenBank: ACS27061] with a C-terminal extension of ASSVDKLAAALEHHHHHH.
For expression without a 6xHis tag, fumI was amplified by PCR with NdeI-fumI-for and SacI-Stop-fumI-rev (5'-TAT GAG CTC TTA AGC ACC GGC GAG TTG CAT TAA AAT GG-3') and cloned as above to give pET-30a-AT144.
The fumI gene was amplified by PCR using primers BamHI-fumI-for (5'-AGC TAT GGA TCC ATG GCG AAC GGA ACA AGG C-3') and PstI-Stop-fumI-rev (5'-CGC CTT CTG CAG TCA AGC ACC GGC GAG TTG-3'), digested with Bam HI and Pst I, and cloned into the same sites of vector pMAL-c2E. For cleavage of MBP (42.6 kDa) from the fusion protein (89.5 kDa) after affinity purification, the recognition site DDDDK for recombinant enterokinase, which is located upstream of the polylinker site in pMAL-c2E, was used.
Expression of the aminotransferase gene
Expression from pET vectors
Cultures were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (5 g/l yeast extract, 10 g/l tryptone, 10 g/l NaCl) supplemented with 50 μg/ml ampicillin to select for plasmids derived from pET-3a, or 50 μg/ml kanamycin for plasmids derived from pET-30a(+) following the guidelines provided by Novagen. Initially, the fumI gene was expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) from plasmid pET-30a-AT144 by using a 2% inoculum of an overnight culture, incubation at 37°C and 200 rpm until OD600 reached 1.0, addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 1 mM, and continued incubation for 3 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation. For plasmid pET-3a-HISAT, several E. coli strains were compared with protein expression performed as above, except that induction was done with 0 μM, 10 μM, 50 μM, 100 μM, 200 μM, 400 μM or 1000 μM IPTG for E. coli Tuner, and 400 μM IPTG or no IPTG for all other strains, and temperature was shifted to 30°C after induction.
Expression as fusion protein with maltose-binding protein
Strains harboring plasmid pMAL-AT144 were grown overnight at 37°C and 250 rpm in LB-medium with 0.2% glucose and 50 μg/ml ampicillin, diluted 50-fold in the same medium, and incubated under the same conditions until OD600 reached 0.4 - 0.6. IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.3 mM, and incubation was continued for 2 h at 37°C, or for 20 h at 30°C or room temperature (23.5°C).
Expression in E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3)
Cultivation conditions followed the guidelines provided by Stratagene. Strains harboring pET-3a or pET-30a(+) derived plasmids were grown overnight in LB medium with 20 μg/ml gentamycin and the appropriate antibiotic for the pET vector at 37°C and 250 rpm. The cultures were diluted 50-fold in LB medium without antibiotics and incubated for 3 h at 30°C and 250 rpm. The cultures were then transferred to 11°C (Ecotron incubator, Infors HT, Bottmingen, CH), and after 10 min of temperature equilibration, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mM for pET-30a(+) or 0.4 mM for pET-3a derived plasmids. The induced cultures were incubated at 11°C and 250 rpm for 24 h. For subsequent chromatographic purification, fumI was expressed from plasmid pET-30a-AT144HIS as above, except that a modified M9ZB medium  was used, containing the M9 salts, 10 g/l tryptone instead of NZ-amine, 5 g/l yeast extract, 1 mM MgSO4 and 0.4% glucose.
Purification of the recombinant aminotransferase
Purification of the MBP-aminotransferase fusion protein (MBP-FumI)
Pellets of 250-ml cultures were suspended in 10 ml of binding buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) and lysed by passing twice through a French Press (Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) at 20,000 psi cell pressure. The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 9,000 × g for 30 min and 4°C, filtered through a 0.45 μm filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), and diluted 5-fold with binding buffer. Using an ÄKTAprime system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden), 24 ml of that protein solution were loaded at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min onto two serially connected 1-ml MBP Trap HP columns (GE Healthcare) which were pre-equilibrated with 15 ml binding buffer. After washing with 30 ml binding buffer, the fusion protein MBP-FumI was eluted with 10 ml of elution buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 50 mM maltose, pH 7.4). Fractions of 0.5 ml were collected, analyzed by SDS-PAGE using a 10% polyacrylamide gel, and those containing MBP-FumI were pooled and dialyzed against recombinant enterokinase (rEK) cleavage buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM CaCl2, 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) for 20 h at 4°C. To cleave the MBP tag, dialyzed MBP-FumI (120 μg/ml) was incubated with rEK at room temperature (rEK:MBP-FumI ratio (unit:μg) = 1:40). After 6 h of incubation, an equal amount of rEK was added again, and incubation was continued for 18 h at room temperature. Samples for SDS-PAGE analysis were taken before addition of rEK, after 6 h and after 24 h. For separation into soluble and insoluble fractions, samples were centrifuged at 20,817 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and the pellet was resuspended in the same volume of rEK cleavage buffer.
Purification of the 6xHis-tagged aminotransferase by immobilized nickel affinity chromatography
For the development of a purification protocol, the cell pellets from 100-ml expression cultures of E. coli ArcticExpress(DE3), producing aminotransferase from pET-30a-AT144HIS with a C-terminal 6xHis tag, were resuspended in 40 ml of binding buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 7.4) containing 20 mM imidazole, and lysed by passing through a French Press twice at 20,000 psi cell pressure. The lysate was centrifuged at 9,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. The filtered (0.45 μM) supernatant was divided into three aliquots and imidazole was added to the aliquots to a final concentration of 20 mM (I), 60 mM (II) and 100 mM (III), respectively. A 1-ml HisTrap HP column (GE Healthcare), pre-equilibrated with 5 ml binding buffer, was loaded with 6 ml of an aliquot at a flow rate of 1 ml/min using the ÄKTAprime system. The column was washed with 10 ml (I), 12 ml (II) or 14 ml (III) of binding buffer containing 20 (I), 60 (II) or 100 mM (III) imidazole. Proteins were eluted by increasing the imidazole concentration to 500 mM in a linear gradient over 25 ml, and fractions of 1 ml were collected.
Purification at preparative scale was done by resuspending the cells from a 1-l culture (wet weight of cell pellet: 10 g) in 10 ml of binding buffer with 60 mM imidazole, and performing lysis, centrifugation and filtration as above. The clear lysate was doubled in volume with binding buffer containing 60 mM imidazole, and loaded at a flow rate of 1 ml/min onto a 1-ml HisTrap HP column which was pre-equilibrated with 10 ml binding buffer. After washing the column with 15 ml of binding buffer, the recombinant protein was eluted by using a linear gradient of 60 to 500 mM imidazole over 25 ml elution buffer. Fractions of 2 ml were collected, and those containing the protein were pooled, diluted with imidazole-free binding buffer to a final concentration of 60 mM imidazole, and applied again to the re-equilibrated column. Purification was performed as before, except that the gradient elution was done with 50 ml buffer. Fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE, those containing aminotransferase in electrophoretically homogeneous purity were pooled, and the protein concentration was determined by the Bradford assay.
For analysis of aminotransferase production and solubility, 1.5-ml samples of expression culture were centrifuged. The biomass was resuspended in 200 μl of resuspension buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 25 mM EDTA and 0.25% β-mercaptoethanol, pH 8.2), 50 μl of freshly prepared lysozyme (100 mg/ml) were added, and the mixture was incubated for 5 min at 37°C. After addition of 750 μl Triton X-100, the mixture was incubated for another 5 min at 37°C. To distinguish between soluble and aggregated protein, a 100-μl sample of the lysate was centrifuged at 20,817 × g for 20 min at 4°C. The complete lysate, supernatant, and pellet after resuspension in the same volume of 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.2), were analyzed by SDS-PAGE as total, soluble and insoluble protein fractions, respectively. The protein samples were mixed 1:1 with 2× sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-HCl, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.02% bromophenol blue, 2% β-mercaptoethanol, pH 6.8) and heated 5 min at 95°C. SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis  was done according to standard procedures  with a Hoefer SE 260 mini-vertical gel electrophoresis unit (San Francisco, CA, USA). Staining of SDS-PAGE gels was done either with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 or silver nitrate according to standard procedures , or with GelCode Blue Stain Reagent (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Molecular weight marker BenchMark™ Protein Ladder was provided by Invitrogen (Carlsbad, USA).
Western blotting  was carried out using the WesternPro Alkaline Phosphatase Chromogenic Detection Kit (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) with the PerfectBlue "Semi-Dry"-Electro Blotter (Peqlab) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Anti-His6 mouse monoclonal antibody was obtained from Roche (Mannheim, Germany) and was used at a final concentration of 0.4 μg/ml.
Protein concentrations were determined by the method of Bradford  using the reagent provided by Sigma. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as standard.
Enzyme activity assays
Biomass from E. coli expression cultures was harvested by centrifugation at 4,500 × g for 10 min at 4°C, resuspended in the same volume of 20 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM NaCl, 2 mM CaCl2 pH 7.4, and homogenized by passing through a French pressure cell at 20,000 psi. Enzyme activity was determined in the same buffer, after doubling the volume, and using final concentrations of 5 μM HFB1, 20 μM pyridoxal phosphate (PLP) and 3 mM pyruvate.
Enzyme assays with purified MBP-FumI fusion protein and purified His-tagged FumI were carried out in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.0, containing 0.067% BSA, 15 μM HFB1, 20 μM PLP and 5 mM pyruvate. The final concentration of aminotransferase was 20 μg/ml. All reaction mixtures were incubated in a water bath at 25°C, and samples from the reaction were inactivated at 99°C for 10 min.
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)
In order to analyze samples from enzyme activity assays, LC-MS measurements were performed. Samples were centrifuged and 40-μl aliquots were dried at 50°C under a stream of nitrogen, dissolved in 200 μl of solvent containing 13C-FB1 as internal standard, and analyzed by injecting 50 μl onto a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C8 column in an Agilent 1100 LC system coupled to an Agilent 1100 G1946 D mass spectrometer operating in the selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode with positive electrospray ionisation as previously described . For integration of 2-keto-HFB1 into the method, a sample of HFB1, which was reacted to completion with purified His-tagged aminotransferase, was measured by HPLC-MS in scan mode. A novel peak with m/z 427 [M+Na]+ as most intense ion and m/z 387 [M+H-H2O]+ as second most intense ion appeared at 11.5 min. In the next step, fragmentor voltages were optimized by flow injection and m/z 427 and 387 were included into the original SIM method. Ions and fragmentor voltages were as follows: HFB1 quantifier: m/z 406.4, 120 V; HFB1 qualifier: m/z 334.4, 220 V; 13C-FB1 quantifier: 756.5, 150 V; 2-keto-HFB1 quantifier: m/z 427, 130 V; 2-keto-HFB1 qualifier: m/z 387, 90 V. For calibration, standard solutions of FB1, HFB1 and 2-keto-HFB1 in the range of 0.05 to 2 μM containing 200 μg/l 13C-FB1 as internal standard were used.
We would like to thank Markus Kainz and Elisabeth Pichler from Quantas Analytics GmbH (Tulln, Austria) for collaboration on LC-MS analysis. This work was supported in part by the Austrian Research Promotion Agency FFG and the Christian Doppler Research Association.
- Heinl S, Hartinger D, Thamhesl M, Kunz-Vekiru E, Krska R, Schatzmayr G, Moll WD, Grabherr R: Degradation of fumonisin B1 by the consecutive action of two bacterial enzymes. J Biotechnol. 2010, 145: 120-129. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.11.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marasas WF: Fumonisins: history, world-wide occurrence and impact. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1996, 392: 1-17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marasas WF: Discovery and occurrence of the fumonisins: a historical perspective. Environ Health Perspect. 2001, 109: 239-243. 10.2307/3435014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Binder EM, Tan LM, Chin LJ, Handl J, Richard J: Worldwide occurrence of mycotoxins in commodities, feeds and feed ingredients. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007, 137: 265-282. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gelderblom WC, Jaskiewicz K, Marasas WF, Thiel PG, Horak RM, Vleggaar R, Kriek NP: Fumonisins-novel mycotoxins with cancer-promoting activity produced by Fusarium moniliforme. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988, 54: 1806-1811.Google Scholar
- Bezuidenhout SC, Gelderblom WCA, Gorst-Allman CP, Horak RM, Marasas WFO, Spiteller G, Vleggaar R: Structure elucidation of the fumonisins, mycotoxins from Fusarium moniliforme. J Chem Soc Chem Commun. 1988, 743-745. 10.1039/c39880000743.Google Scholar
- Marasas WF, Jaskiewicz K, Venter FS, Van Schalkwyk DJ: Fusarium moniliforme contamination of maize in oesophageal cancer areas in Transkei. S Afr Med J. 1988, 74: 110-114.Google Scholar
- Harrison LR, Colvin BM, Greene JT, Newman LE, Cole JR: Pulmonary edema and hydrothorax in swine produced by fumonisin B1, a toxic metabolite of Fusarium moniliforme. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1990, 2: 217-221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kellerman TS, Marasas WF, Thiel PG, Gelderblom WC, Cawood M, Coetzer JA: Leukoencephalomalacia in two horses induced by oral dosing of fumonisin B1. Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1990, 57: 269-275.Google Scholar
- Gelderblom WC, Kriek NP, Marasas WF, Thiel PG: Toxicity and carcinogenicity of the Fusarium moniliforme metabolite, fumonisin B1, in rats. Carcinogenesis. 1991, 12: 1247-1251. 10.1093/carcin/12.7.1247.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rheeder JP, Marasas WFO, Thiel PG, Sydenham EW, Shephard GS, Van Schalkwyk DJ: Fusarium moniliforme and fumonisins in corn in relation to human esophageal cancer in Transkei. Phytopathology. 1992, 82: 353-357. 10.1094/Phyto-82-353.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ross PF, Ledet AE, Owens DL, Rice LG, Nelson HA, Osweiler GD, Wilson TM: Experimental equine leukoencephalomalacia, toxic hepatosis, and encephalopathy caused by corn naturally contaminated with fumonisins. J Vet Diagn Invest. 1993, 5: 69-74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chu FS, Li GY: Simultaneous occurrence of fumonisin B1 and other mycotoxins in moldy corn collected from the People's Republic of China in regions with high incidences of esophageal cancer. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1994, 60: 847-852.Google Scholar
- Hendricks K: Fumonisins and neural tube defects in South Texas. Epidemiology. 1999, 10: 198-200. 10.1097/00001648-199903000-00022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haschek WM, Gumprecht LA, Smith G, Tumbleson ME, Constable PD: Fumonisin toxicosis in swine: an overview of porcine pulmonary edema and current perspectives. Environ Health Perspect. 2001, 109 (Suppl 2): 251-257. 10.2307/3435016.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voss KA, Riley RT, Norred WP, Bacon CW, Meredith FI, Howard PC, Plattner RD, Collins TF, Hansen DK, Porter JK: An overview of rodent toxicities: liver and kidney effects of fumonisins and Fusarium moniliforme. Environ Health Perspect. 2001, 109 (Suppl 2): 259-266. 10.2307/3435017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Marasas WF, Riley RT, Hendricks KA, Stevens VL, Sadler TW, Gelineau-van WJ, Missmer SA, Cabrera J, Torres O, Gelderblom WC, Allegood J, Martinez C, Maddox J, Miller JD, Starr L, Sullards MC, Roman AV, Voss KA, Wang E, Merrill AH: Fumonisins disrupt sphingolipid metabolism, folate transport, and neural tube development in embryo culture and in vivo: a potential risk factor for human neural tube defects among populations consuming fumonisin-contaminated maize. J Nutr. 2004, 134: 711-716.Google Scholar
- Norred WP, Voss KA, Bacon CW, Riley RT: Effectiveness of ammonia treatment in detoxification of fumonisin-contaminated corn. Food Chem Toxicol. 1991, 29: 815-819. 10.1016/0278-6915(91)90108-J.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sydenham EW, Van der Westhuizen L, Stockenstrom S, Shephard GS, Thiel PG: Fumonisin-contaminated maize: physical treatment for the partial decontamination of bulk shipments. Food Addit Contam. 1994, 11: 25-32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jackson LS, Hlywka JJ, Senthil KR, Bullerman LB: Effect of thermal processing on the stability of fumonisins. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1996, 392: 345-353.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Castelo MM, Sumner SS, Bullerman LB: Stability of fumonisins in thermally processed corn products. J Food Prot. 1998, 61: 1030-1033.Google Scholar
- De Girolamo A, Solfrizzo M, Visconti A: Effect of processing on fumonisin concentration in corn flakes. J Food Prot. 2001, 64: 701-705.Google Scholar
- Solfrizzo M, Carratu MR, Avantaggiato G, Galvano F, Pietri A, Visconti A: Ineffectiveness of activated carbon in reducing the alteration of sphingolipid metabolism in rats exposed to fumonisin-contaminated diets. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001, 39: 507-511. 10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00160-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Avantaggiato G, Solfrizzo M, Visconti A: Recent advances on the use of adsorbent materials for detoxification of Fusarium mycotoxins. Food Addit Contam. 2005, 22: 379-388. 10.1080/02652030500058312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voss KA, Smith GW, Haschek WM: Fumonisins: Toxicokinetics, mechanism of action and toxicity. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2007, 137: 299-325. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.06.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blackwell BA, Gilliam JT, Savard ME, David Miller J, Duvick JP: Oxidative deamination of hydrolyzed fumonisin B1 (AP1) by cultures of Exophiala spinifera. Natural Toxins. 1999, 7: 31-38. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7189(199902)7:1<31::AID-NT36>3.0.CO;2-W.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duvick J, Maddox J, Gilliam J: Compositions and methods for fumonisin detoxification. 2003, US Patent 6538177 Pioneer Hi-Bred. Int. (USA)Google Scholar
- Merrill AH, Wang E, Gilchrist DG, Riley RT: Fumonisins and other inhibitors of de novo sphingolipid biosynthesis. Adv Lipid Res. 1993, 26: 215-234.Google Scholar
- Schmelz EM, Dombrink-Kurtzman MA, Roberts PC, Kozutsumi Y, Kawasaki T, Merrill AH: Induction of apoptosis by fumonisin B1 in HT29 cells is mediated by the accumulation of endogenous free sphingoid bases. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1998, 148: 252-260. 10.1006/taap.1997.8356.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Humpf HU, Schmelz EM, Meredith FI, Vesper H, Vales TR, Wang E, Menaldino DS, Liotta DC, Merrill AH: Acylation of naturally occurring and synthetic 1-deoxysphinganines by ceramide synthase. Formation of N-palmitoyl-aminopentol produces a toxic metabolite of hydrolyzed fumonisin, AP1, and a new category of ceramide synthase inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 19060-19064. 10.1074/jbc.273.30.19060.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Seiferlein M, Humpf HU, Voss KA, Sullards MC, Allegood JC, Wang E, Merrill AH: Hydrolyzed fumonisins HFB1 and HFB2 are acylated in vitro and in vivo by ceramide synthase to form cytotoxic N-acyl-metabolites. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007, 51: 1120-1130. 10.1002/mnfr.200700118.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sorensen HP, Mortensen KK: Soluble expression of recombinant proteins in the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2005, 4: 1- 10.1186/1475-2859-4-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Waugh DS: Making the most of affinity tags. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23: 316-320. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.03.012.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Esposito D, Chatterjee DK: Enhancement of soluble protein expression through the use of fusion tags. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006, 17: 353-358. 10.1016/j.copbio.2006.06.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schein CH, Noteborn MHM: Formation of Soluble Recombinant Proteins in Escherichia coli is Favored by Lower Growth Temperature. Bio/Technology. 1988, 6: 291-294. 10.1038/nbt0388-291.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kolaj O, Spada S, Robin S, Wall JG: Use of folding modulators to improve heterologous protein production in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2009, 8: 9- 10.1186/1475-2859-8-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weickert MJ, Doherty DH, Best EA, Olins PO: Optimization of heterologous protein production in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1996, 7: 494-499. 10.1016/S0958-1669(96)80051-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mergulhao FJ, Summers DK, Monteiro GA: Recombinant protein secretion in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Adv. 2005, 23: 177-202. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.11.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Georgiou G, Segatori L: Preparative expression of secreted proteins in bacteria: status report and future prospects. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005, 16: 538-545. 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.07.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bessette PH, Aslund F, Beckwith J, Georgiou G: Efficient folding of proteins with multiple disulfide bonds in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 13703-13708. 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13703.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rosano GL, Ceccarelli EA: Rare codon content affects the solubility of recombinant proteins in a codon bias-adjusted Escherichia coli strain. Microb Cell Fact. 2009, 8: 41- 10.1186/1475-2859-8-41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schultz T, Martinez L, de Marco A: The evaluation of the factors that cause aggregation during recombinant expression in E. coli is simplified by the employment of an aggregation-sensitive reporter. Microb Cell Fact. 2006, 5: 28- 10.1186/1475-2859-5-28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Blackwell JR, Horgan R: A novel strategy for production of a highly expressed recombinant protein in an active form. FEBS Lett. 1991, 295: 10-12. 10.1016/0014-5793(91)81372-F.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hammarstrom M, Hellgren N, van Den BS, Berglund H, Hard T: Rapid screening for improved solubility of small human proteins produced as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 2002, 11: 313-321. 10.1110/ps.22102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kapust RB, Waugh DS: Escherichia coli maltose-binding protein is uncommonly effective at promoting the solubility of polypeptides to which it is fused. Protein Sci. 1999, 8: 1668-1674. 10.1110/ps.8.8.1668.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shih YP, Kung WM, Chen JC, Yeh CH, Wang AH, Wang TF: High-throughput screening of soluble recombinant proteins. Protein Sci. 2002, 11: 1714-1719. 10.1110/ps.0205202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cho HJ, Lee Y, Chang RS, Hahm MS, Kim MK, Kim YB, Oh YK: Maltose binding protein facilitates high-level expression and functional purification of the chemokines RANTES and SDF-1alpha from Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2008, 60: 37-45. 10.1016/j.pep.2008.03.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ferrer M, Chernikova TN, Yakimov MM, Golyshin PN, Timmis KN: Chaperonins govern growth of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Nat Biotechnol. 2003, 21: 1266-1267. 10.1038/nbt1103-1266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Joseph RE, Andreotti AH: Bacterial expression and purification of interleukin-2 tyrosine kinase: single step separation of the chaperonin impurity. Protein Expr Purif. 2008, 60: 194-197. 10.1016/j.pep.2008.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thain A, Gaston K, Jenkins O, Clarke AR: A method for the separation of GST fusion proteins from co-purifying GroEL. Trends Genet. 1996, 12: 209-210. 10.1016/S0168-9525(96)90022-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rohman M, Harrison-Lavoie KJ: Separation of copurifying GroEL from glutathione-S-transferase fusion proteins. Protein Expr Purif. 2000, 20: 45-47. 10.1006/prep.2000.1271.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Karlovsky P: Biological detoxification of fungal toxins and its use in plant breeding, feed and food production. Nat Toxins. 1999, 7: 1-23. 10.1002/(SICI)1522-7189(199902)7:1<1::AID-NT37>3.0.CO;2-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Fuchs E, Binder EM, Heidler D, Krska R: Structural characterization of metabolites after the microbial degradation of type A trichothecenes by the bacterial strain BBSH 797. Food Additives and Contaminants. 2002, 19: 379-386. 10.1080/02652030110091154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Molnar O, Schatzmayr G, Fuchs E, Prillinger H: Trichosporon mycotoxinivorans sp. nov., a new yeast species useful in biological detoxification of various mycotoxins. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2004, 27: 661-671. 10.1078/0723202042369947.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benedetti R, Nazzi F, Locci R, Firrao G: Degradation of fumonisin B1 by a bacterial strain isolated from soil. Biodegradation. 2006, 17: 31-38. 10.1007/s10532-005-2797-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lei XG, Porres JM: Phytase enzymology, applications, and biotechnology. Biotechnol Lett. 2003, 25: 1787-1794. 10.1023/A:1026224101580.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li RY, Cheng CY: Investigation of inclusion body formation in recombinant Escherichia coli with a bioimaging system. J Biosci Bioeng. 2009, 107: 512-515. 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.01.025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ceroni A, Passerini A, Vullo A, Frasconi P: DISULFIND: a disulfide bonding state and cysteine connectivity prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34: W177-W181. 10.1093/nar/gkl266.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schlicke M, Brakmann S: Expression and purification of histidine-tagged bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase. Protein Expr Purif. 2005, 39: 247-253. 10.1016/j.pep.2004.10.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Picaud S, Olsson ME, Brodelius PE: Improved conditions for production of recombinant plant sesquiterpene synthases in Escherichia coli. Protein Expr Purif. 2007, 51: 71-79. 10.1016/j.pep.2006.06.025.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nomine Y, Ristriani T, Laurent C, Lefevre JF, Weiss E, Trave G: Formation of soluble inclusion bodies by hpv e6 oncoprotein fused to maltose-binding protein. Protein Expr Purif. 2001, 23: 22-32. 10.1006/prep.2001.1451.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zanier K, Nomine Y, Charbonnier S, Ruhlmann C, Schultz P, Schweizer J, Trave G: Formation of well-defined soluble aggregates upon fusion to MBP is a generic property of E6 proteins from various human papillomavirus species. Protein Expr Purif. 2007, 51: 59-70. 10.1016/j.pep.2006.07.029.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schein CH: Production of soluble recombinant proteins in bacteria. Bio/Technology. 1989, 7: 1141-1149.Google Scholar
- Ferrer M, Chernikova TN, Timmis KN, Golyshin PN: Expression of a temperature-sensitive esterase in a novel chaperone-based Escherichia coli strain. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 4499-4504. 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4499-4504.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular cloning: A laboratory manual. 2001, New York, USA: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
- Studier FW, Rosenberg AH, Dunn JJ, Dubendorff JW: Use of T7 RNA polymerase to direct expression of cloned genes. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 185: 60-89. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Burnette WN: "Western blotting": electrophoretic transfer of proteins from sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels to unmodified nitrocellulose and radiographic detection with antibody and radioiodinated protein A. Anal Biochem. 1981, 112: 195-203. 10.1016/0003-2697(81)90281-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72: 248-254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.