Open Access

Heterologous expression of an α-amylase inhibitor from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Kluyveromyces lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Microbial Cell Factories201716:110

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0719-4

Received: 11 January 2017

Accepted: 6 June 2017

Published: 15 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Phaseolamin or α-amylase inhibitor 1 (αAI) is a glycoprotein from common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) that inhibits some insect and mammalian α-amylases. Several clinical studies support the beneficial use of bean αAI for control of diabetes and obesity. Commercial extracts of P. vulgaris are available but their efficacy is still under question, mainly because some of these extracts contain antinutritional impurities naturally present in bean seeds and also exhibit a lower specific activity αAI. The production of recombinant αAI allows to overcome these disadvantages and provides a platform for the large-scale production of pure and functional αAI protein for biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications.

Results

A synthetic gene encoding αAI from the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Pinto) was codon-optimised for expression in yeasts (αAI-OPT) and cloned into the protein expression vectors pKLAC2 and pYES2. The yeasts Kluyveromyces lactis GG799 (and protease deficient derivatives such as YCT390) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae YPH499 were transformed with the optimised genes and transformants were screened for expression by antibody dot blot. Recombinant colonies of K. lactis YCT390 that expressed and secreted functional αAI into the culture supernatants were selected for further analyses. Recombinant αAI from K. lactis YCT390 was purified using anion-exchange and affinity resins leading to the recovery of a functional inhibitor. The identity of the purified αAI was confirmed by mass spectrometry. Recombinant clones of S. cerevisiae YPH499 expressed functional αAI intracellularly, but did not secrete the protein.

Conclusions

This is the first report describing the heterologous expression of the α-amylase inhibitor 1 (αAI) from P. vulgaris in yeasts. We demonstrated that recombinant strains of K. lactis and S. cerevisiae expressed and processed the αAI precursor into mature and active protein and also showed that K. lactis secretes functional αAI.

Keywords

Phaseolamin α-Amylase inhibitor αAI Common bean Phaseolus vulgaris Yeast heterologous expression Kluyveromyces lactis Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Background

Phaseolamin or α-amylase inhibitor (αAI) is a seed storage glycoprotein present in most wild and cultivated common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L) [1]. It inhibits some mammalian and insect α-amylases, but not the endogenous plant enzyme [25]. Bean αAI is synthesised as a preproprotein that undergoes glycosylation at Asn residues and proteolytic processing to become the active form, comprising α- and β- subunits [4, 69]. Different cultivars of P. vulgaris contain slightly different forms of αAI exhibiting variation in their primary structure, their N-glycans as well as some heterogeneity in the processing of the C-terminal region of the β- subunit. They all retain their inhibitory activity of α-amylases [9].

The functional protein αAI is composed of non-covalently linked α- and β- subunits [10]. In P. vulgaris, the αAI precursor undergoes post-translational modifications while transiting the secretory pathway. In addition to N-linked glycosylations, three proteolytic cleavages occur during the maturation of αAI. Removal of the signal peptide occurs in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Two carboxy-terminal cleavages occur in the vacuole: the first cleavage at Asn239 removes a short carboxy terminal peptide (propeptide), and the second cleavage is catalysed by a bean vacuolar processing enzyme from the family of legumains (VPE) at Asn77, resulting in the formation of α- and β- subunits [4, 69]. After the proteolytic cleavage at Asn77, the asparagine residue is removed from the C-terminus of the α-subunit by a presumed carboxypeptidase in the bean [9].

The inhibition of mammalian α-amylases by αAI reduces starch metabolism and the production of simple sugars, thus its use may be beneficial in helping control diabetes mellitus and obesity in humans [1113]. The clinical use of bean αAI has been discredited because of the ineffective commercial products released in the early 1980s promoted as starch-blockers [12, 14, 15]. Most of these dietary supplements contained protein concentrates of bean seeds with a low concentration of αAI but with significant levels of antinutritional and potentially toxic compounds, such as phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and trypsin inhibitors, in addition to an active endogenous α-amylase [13].

In contrast to the impure and inefficient commercial formulations, partially purified αAI from beans with increased specific activity reduces starch digestion in human duodenum and remains stable in gastrointestinal secretions [16]. Further studies reported that purified αAI also delayed the digestion and absorption of intestinal glucose, reduced postprandial hyperglycaemia and insulin levels in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects, supporting the notion of the beneficial effect of αAI for the control of diabetes [1720]. More recent studies using commercial extracts of P. vulgaris standardising the content of α-amylase inhibitor determined that many still contain antinutritional impurities, and those with a reduced level of lectins and trypsin inhibitors also exhibit a lower specific activity αAI [2125]. Proteins naturally present in bean seeds such as PHA-L and PHA-E and the lectin-like proteins called arcelins [4, 9, 26] are difficult to remove during purification of αAI from bean seeds [9, 27]. In an attempt to decrease the amount of lectins in bean seeds, a null PHA bean line obtained by backcrossing has been used as raw material for commercial αAI formulations, but seeds from this line still contain trypsin inhibitors [24, 26]. Given that ingestion of trypsin inhibitors increases the secretion of trypsin and α-amylase by the pancreas [28, 29], their presence in commercial bean extracts are likely to affect the activity and efficacy of αAI.

To date there is no efficient method to recover highly pure and fully functional αAI from bean seeds nor an appropriate expression system for the production of purified recombinant αAI. Here we report the heterologous expression of αAI in yeast, using Kluyveromyces lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae as hosts.

Methods

Strains and culture media

Escherichia coli DH5-α was used as host for plasmid propagation and was grown in LB medium. Yeast strains used in this work were K. lactis wild type GG799 (MATα) and protease deficient strains YCT389 (MATα Δyps1p), YCT390 (MATα Δyps7p), YCT569 (MATα Δpfam00026), and YCT598 (MATα ΔBar1p) (purchased from NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) [30] and S. cerevisiae YPH499 (MATa ura3-52 lys2-801_amber ade2-101_ochre trp163 his3200 leu21) [31]. Yeast strains were routinely grown in standard YPD medium. Cultures were induced using YPCGal medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% casaminoacids, 2% galactose and 2 mM ammonium sulphate, supplemented with B complex vitamins [32]) at 28 °C for 72–96 h at 250 rpm. Selection of recombinant strains of K. lactis was based on growth on YCB agar plates containing 5 mM acetamide [33]. S. cerevisiae transformants were selected by their growth in yeast synthetic drop-out medium without uracil agar (SC-ØU).

Construction of expression vectors and yeast transformation

The synthetic gene αAI-OPT was synthesised by GenScript (Piscataway, NJ, USA) using the coding sequence (CDS) of αAI from P. vulgaris cv. Pinto (Fig. 1a, as Accession AY603476) and optimised for yeast codon usage bias, including a Kozak consensus sequence AAAAAG upstream of the start codon and flanking restriction sites HindIII and NotI (Fig. 1b). αAI-OPT gene was cloned into plasmids pKLAC2 (NEB) and pYES2 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) at restriction sites HindIII and NotI, and the resulting vectors were verified by sequence analysis. In construct pKLAC2-αAI-OPT, the αAI-OPT CDS replaced the αMF secretion domain from vector pKLAC2. Restriction endonucleases and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from NEB and standard DNA techniques were performed as described by Sambrook [34]. Chemically competent yeast cells were prepared using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method [35]. K. lactis wild type and protease deficient strains were transformed with 1 µg of the integrative cassette from vector pKLAC2-αAI-OPT (Fig. 1c) previously linearised with SacII [33]; and S. cerevisiae YPH499 was transformed with plasmid pYES2-αAI-OPT (Fig. 1d).
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the gene constructs used for αAI production. Diagrams of a the native αAI gene from cv. Pinto comprising signal peptide (SP), α- and β- subunits and the propeptide sequences; b the synthetic αAI-OPT gene, optimised for expression in two yeasts, including a Kozak consensus sequence and flanked by HindIII and NotI restriction sites. Diagrams of constructs c pKLAC2-αAI-OPT and d pYES2-αAI-OPT. PLac4-PBI and PGal1 correspond to promoters Lac4-PBI and Gal1 in pKLAC2 and pYES2, respectively. TTLac4-PBI and TTCYC correspond to 3′ terminators Lac4-PBI and CYC in pKLAC2 and pYES2, respectively

Isolation and manipulation of nucleic acids

Plasmid DNA was extracted from E. coli and yeasts using QIAPrep® Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and genomic DNA from yeasts was isolated using DNeasy® Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Spheroplasts were obtained by incubating yeast cells with 1 U of lyticase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h at 37 °C. αAI-OPT gene was detected by PCR amplification of a 160 bp amplicon using primers OPT Fwd (TATGACGGTCAAAACGCTGA) and OPT Rev (GCGGAGAAACCAACTCTGAC). Multicopy integration of cassettes was determined by PCR using primers 2, 3 and 5 [33]. Oligonucleotides were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Castle-Hill, NSW, Australia). Samples for nucleotide sequencing were purified using QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). DNA sequencing reactions were amplified using primers KLSQ Fwd (GCGGATAACAAGCTCAAC) and KLSQ Rev (TTATCGCACAAGACAATC) and BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied BioSystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and further analysed in an automatic DNA sequencer ABI 3130xl Genetic Analyser (Applied BioSystems) at the John Curtin Medical Research School, Australian National University (Canberra, ACT, Australia).

Cassette copy-number analysis by q-PCR

Q-PCR analysis was performed using FastStart SYBR Green Master without Rox (Roche Life Science, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) in the CFX96™ real-time PCR detection system (BioRad). The αAI-OPT gene was detected using primers OPT Fwd/OPT Rev, and the single-copy gene, KlACT1, was amplified using primers KlACT1 Fwd/KlACT1 Rev [36]. The conversion of mass concentration of the vector to copy concentration was as described by Whelan et al. [37]. Experiments were performed in triplicate using DNA from three independent biological samples.

Screening of recombinant αAI

Transformed colonies were transferred onto a replica plate and each colony was grown in 600 µL of YPCGal media in a 96-well microplate at 28 °C for 72–96 h at 250 rpm. Cleared supernatants (200 µL) were loaded into a dot blot apparatus connected to a vacuum pump. Pure Pinto-αAI [2] in sterile YPCGal (1 ng/µL) was used as positive control. Cleared YPCGal inoculated with untransformed cells (200 µL) and sterile YPCGal (200 µL) were used as negative controls. The nitrocellulose membrane was probed with a rabbit anti-αAI polyclonal antibody (1:10,000 dilution), and then probed with HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution, Promega Corp. Madison, WI, USA). Protein antibody complexes were made visible using Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate detection reagent (Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) and autoradiography film (Kodak Biomax X-ray film). The relative amount of protein in dots was estimated by densitometry using ImageJ Software [38].

Protein analysis by SDS PAGE and western blot

Proteins from culture supernatants were precipitated using TCA/acetone and resuspended in ammonium bicarbonate buffer (100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.2, 10% DMSO). Proteins from yeast cells were extracted using YeastBuster Protein Extraction Reagent (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany), 50 μL of 100 × THP, protease inhibitors (2 μM PMSF, 30 μg leupeptin, 5 μg pepstatin A) and 1 U of DNAse. Pure Pinto-αAI was used as positive control for SDS-PAGE (3 μg) and western blots (200 ng plus 3 μg of BSA).

Samples were analysed on NuPAGE® Novex® 10% Bis–Tris Pre-Cast Protein Gels (Invitrogen), loaded in MES Running Buffer and stained with Coomassie G-250. For western blotting, separated proteins were electro-transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (0.2 µm Hybond-C, Amersham Biosciences) and probed as described for antibody dot blot. Membranes were stained with Amidoblack prior to probing with the αAI antibody [39]. Protein concentration was determined by Bradford assay [40], using Coomassie Protein Assay (Thermo-Fisher Scientific) and BSA (0–7 µg/µL) as standard.

α-Amylase activity assay

α-Amylase inhibitory activity was determined using Megazyme Ceralpha reagent as substrate (nonreducing-end blocked p-nitrophenyl-α-d-maltoheptaoside, BPNPG7; plus glucoamylase and α-glucosidase; Megazyme International, Ireland) and porcine pancreatic α-amylase (#A6255 Type I-A, Sigma Aldrich), as described by Sarmah et al. [41]. Inhibitory activity was calculated as follows: 1 U of α-amylase activity is the amount of enzyme that generates 1 μmol/min of p-nitrophenol under assay conditions; inhibition units or units of α-amylase inhibition (IU) is the amount of inhibitor that reduces the activity of α-amylase by 50% [2]. Experiments were performed in triplicate and results were expressed as the average ± standard deviation. Prior to inhibitor activity assays of culture supernatants, samples were partially purified by DEAE-Sepharose to remove interfering compounds from culture media.

Statistical analysis

The significance of differences between measurements was analysed using Student’s unpaired t test. Values are reported as the average ± standard deviation. Differences in means were considered significant if P < 0.05.

Purification of recombinant αAI

Induced culture supernatants were dialysed against 0.02% sodium azide solution for 24 h at 4 °C and freeze-dried. The lyophilised powder was resuspended in 5 mL of 10 mM citrate/phosphate buffer (10 mM disodium phosphate; 50 mM citric acid; pH 8.0) and incubated with 5 g of DEAE-Sepharose® CL-6B (Pharmacia Biotech, Sweden) for 1 h at 4 °C. Unbound protein was eluted with 10 mL of 10 mM citrate/phosphate buffer. Fractions containing protein bound to the resin were eluted with 5 mL of 250 mM NaCl solution in 10 mM citrate/phosphate buffer, using a glass sintered-funnel (porosity #2) connected to a vacuum pump by a Büchner flask. Samples were dialysed against 0.02% sodium azide solution for 24 h at 4 °C and freeze-dried. Pre-purified samples were incubated with 5 mL of α-amylase-Sepharose in 20 mL of stabilization buffer (15 mM succinic acid, 20 mM CaCl2, 0.5 M NaCl, pH 5.6) for at least 2 h at 37 °C. Unbound protein was eluted with two washes of 15 mL of stabilization buffer and protein bound to the resin was eluted with two washes of 15 mL of releasing buffer (0.15 M citric acid, pH 3.2) and pH of samples was immediately increased to 5.6 using 0.1 M NaOH. Fractions were dialysed against 0.02% sodium azide solution for 24 h at 4 °C, freeze-dried and stored at 4 °C for further analyses. All eluted fractions were analysed by Bradford assay and Ceralpha assay. Resin α-amylase-Sepharose was prepared as previously described [4].

Identification of recombinant αAI by MS

Protein (25 µg) was loaded on SDS-PAGE and bands corresponding to the non-processed (approximately 35 kDa) and processed forms (a combination of α- and β- subunits of αAI, with a molecular mass between 15 and 20 kDa) were excised from the gel. Samples were submitted to Australian Proteome Analysis Facility (Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia), digested with trypsin and loaded onto a capillary LC system coupled to an MS/MS instrument (1D Nano LC ESI MS/MS) as described by Atack et al. [42]. Tryptic fragments were identified using Mascot Server software (Matrix Science Inc., MA, USA) using the Phaseolus_vulgaris database.

Results

Construction of yeast expression vectors and screening for secretion of recombinant αAI

In preliminary experiments we assessed the expression of αAI in K. lactis and S. cerevisiae using the native gene isolated from beans (shown schematically in Fig. 1a), but no protein expression could be detected (data not shown). We used the amino acid sequence of αAI from cv. Pinto to design and synthesise a gene optimised for yeast codon usage (Fig. 1b). The DNA sequence of the yeast-optimised synthetic gene called αAI-OPT is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1. αAI-OPT was cloned downstream of the galactose-inducible promoters LAC4PBI and Gal1 in plasmids pKLAC2 and pYES2, respectively (Fig. 1c, d). K. lactis wild type and protease deficient strains were transformed with the integrative cassettes derived from construct pKLAC2-αAI-OPT and cells were grown in selective YCB agar plates containing acetamide. In addition, S. cerevisiae YPH499 was transformed with episomal plasmid pYES2-αAI-OPT and cells were grown in yeast SC-ØU agar plates. Since a variable number of plasmid cassettes can be integrated in the K. lactis genome with consequent differences in the αAI-OPT gene dosage, some variability in the expression of recombinant αAI was to be expected. Therefore, we performed a preliminary screening for the expression of recombinant αAI over a large number of colonies instead of first sorting colonies by genetic analysis. Colonies (186) from each transformed strain of K. lactis and S. cerevisiae were grown and induced in micro-scale cultures, and the cleared culture supernatants were screened by protein dot blot using an antibody to αAI. In some cultures of K. lactis YCT390 (circled dots in Fig. 2), the signal intensity was equivalent to 200 ng of pure Pinto-αAI. Cultures from recombinant S. cerevisiae YPH499 and other strains of K. lactis (GG799, YCT389, YCT569 and YCT589) showed a signal intensity equivalent to that of the negative controls (see Additional file 2: Figure S2).
Fig. 2

Antibody dot blot screening of culture supernatants of K. lactis YCT390 with αAI-OPT. Cleared supernatants (200 µL) of transformed colonies of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT. Pure Pinto-αAI (200 ng) used as positive control (+). As negative controls, cleared culture supernatant (200 µL) of untransformed strain YCT390 (−) and culture media YPCGal (200 µL) without cells (− −). Circled dots correspond to dots with a signal intensity equivalent to that of positive control

Saccharomyces cerevisiae YPH499 pYES2-αAI-OPT clones expressed αAI intracellularly

Although dot blot screening of S. cerevisiae YPH499/pYES2-αAI-OPT cultures showed no indications of secreted αAI, plasmid DNA from 10 randomly selected clones was analysed by PCR to screen for the gene. All colonies were positive for the gene (see Additional file 3: Figure S3). To determine whether these clones expressed recombinant αAI, we analysed the proteins in both the culture supernatants and in the lysed cells of three randomly selected clones (8, 27 and 92) by western blot. Immunoreactive polypeptides of the expected size of processed αAI were detected in the intracellular contents of the three recombinant colonies of S. cerevisiae YPH499 but were not detected in the culture supernatants (Fig. 3a). Furthermore, no bands corresponding to αAI precursor were detected in either the lysed cells or in the secreted fraction (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3

Western blot and α-amylase inhibitory activity of proteins from selected colonies of S. cerevisiae YPH499 with αAI-OPT. a Western blot of proteins (25 µg) from culture supernatants and lysed-cells of colonies 8, 27 and 92 transformed with αAI-OPT; the parent strain YPH499 transformed with empty plasmid pYES2 was used as negative control (−C) and pure Pinto-αAI (200 ng) was used as positive control (+C). Molecular markers are shown in kilodaltons at left. b Inhibitory activity against porcine pancreatic α-amylase of lysed-cell extracts (100 µg of protein) of S. cerevisiae YPH499/pYES2-αAI-OPT colonies 8, 27 and 92. Parent strain YPH499 transformed with empty plasmid pYES2 was used as a negative control (−C) and pure Pinto-αAI (200 ng) was used as a positive control (+C). Results are expressed as inhibition units (IU). Data from triplicate experiments were expressed as the average ± standard error. ***P < 0.05 as compared to S. cerevisiae YPH499/pYES2

The intracellular fractions of recombinant clones 8, 27 and 92 of S. cerevisiae YPH499 were analysed by Ceralpha assay, using the parent strain with the empty plasmid (YPH499/pYES2) as negative control (Fig. 3b). The inhibition of α-amylase activity by these extracts was very low, but statistically significant (P < 0.05) when compared to the negative control.

Although attempts were made to purify the recombinant inhibitor from the lysed cellular contents of S. cerevisiae YPH499/pYES2-αAI-OPT, no active inhibitor could be recovered (data not shown).

αAI was synthesised and secreted by K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT

We analysed the proteins from both the lysed-cells and the culture supernatants of K. lactis YCT390 transformants by SDS-PAGE and western blot. We chose 10 colonies from among those showing the highest signal intensities in the antibody dot blot as well as four colonies that showed intensities similar to those of negative controls. Eleven of the 14 colonies secreted polypeptides between 15 and 37 kDa (Fig. 4a, b). The top arrows on the right represent the expected molecular mass of αAI precursor; and bottom arrows on the right represent the expected sizes of processed αAI. Three of the 11 colonies (68A, 17A and 47B) secreted two immune-reactive polypeptides within the range of 15 and 20 kDa (Fig. 4b, bottom arrows on the right represent the expected sizes of processed αAI) which exhibited an electrophoretic mobility similar to the Pinto-αAI α- and β- subunits.
Fig. 4

SDS-PAGE and western blots of proteins from selected lines of K. lactis YCT390 with αAI-OPT. a SDS-PAGE and b Western blot of culture supernatants (TCA-precipitated proteins from 5 mL) of strains 13B, 9B, 8B, 50A, 68A, 39B, 17A, 38B, 35A, 47B, 29B, 76A, 72A and 37B. c SDS-PAGE and d western blot of lysed-cell contents (25 µg of protein) of strains 13B, 9B, 8B, 50A, 68A, 39B, 17A, 38B, 35A, 47B, 29B, 76A, 72A and 37B. Untransformed strain YCT390 was used as a negative control (−C) and pure Pinto-αAI (200 ng) was used as a positive control (+C). Molecular markers are shown in kilodaltons at left

The intracellular extracts contained a polypeptide of approximately 32 kDa which co-migrated with the bean αAI precursor but did not contain detectable processed αAI (Fig. 4c, d, top and bottom arrows, respectively).

The genetic analysis of the 14 colonies of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT confirmed that the 11 colonies expressing the polypeptides of interest carried the αAI-OPT gene and also harboured more than one copy of the cassette inserted into the chromosome, whereas non-expressing colonies showed no amplification of the gene (see Additional file 4: Figure S4).

Precursor or processed αAI were not detected in cell lysates and culture supernatants of colonies from the other transformed strains of K. lactis (GG799, YCT389, YCT569 and YCT589), although they were positive for αAI-OPT gene (data not shown).

We measured copy number of αAI-OPT gene by q-PCR to determine the number of cassettes inserted into the K. lactis chromosome. All strains harboured 5–6 copies of αAI-OPT gene (Table 1).
Table 1

Gene copy number and relative processing of recombinant αAI among strains of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT

K. lactis strain/colony

Gene copy number 

Relative processed αAI

Inhibitory activity (%)

αAI-OPT

KlACT1

Untransformed YCT390 (negative control)

0

1

10.3

YCT390/αAI-OPT 68A

6

1

++++

89.8

YCT390/αAI-OPT 17A

5

1

+++

84.6

YCT390/αAI-OPT 47B

6

1

++

59.2

YCT390/αAI-OPT 29B

6

1

+

49.5

YCT390/αAI-OPT 13B

6

1

16.6

Estimated copy number of genes αAI-OPT and KlACT1 (control) in genomic DNA of selected strains of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT measured by q-PCR. Relative amount of processed recombinant αAI and percentage of inhibitory activity against porcine pancreatic α-amylase among pre-purified extracts of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT strains. Untransformed strain YCT390 was used as negative control

Culture supernatants of K. lactis inhibited α-amylase

To determine whether the polypeptides secreted by selected recombinant strains of K. lactis YCT390 were active as α-amylase inhibitors, we assayed partially purified culture supernatants from five strains for activity by Ceralpha assay (Fig. 5a). The culture supernatants were partially purified with DEAE-Sepharose in order to remove compounds present in the culture media interfering with the activity assay. Strains 17A and 68A strongly inhibited α-amylase activity while extracts from 47B and 29B showed an intermediate level of inhibition of the enzyme, namely 57 and 44%, respectively. Strain 13B culture supernatant was much less active, i.e., only slightly more active than the negative control (untransformed YCT390) (Fig. 5a). Activities from lysed-cell extracts of K. lactis were not significantly different (P < 0.05) to the negative control (Fig. 5b).
Fig. 5

Inhibition of α-amylase by extracts from recombinant strains of K. lactis. Inhibition of porcine pancreatic α-amylase by a partially purified culture supernatants (300 µg of protein) and b lysed-cell extracts (500 µg of protein) from five colonies of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT strains 13B, 68A, 17A, 47B and 29B. Untransformed strain YCT390 was used as negative control (−C) and pure Pinto-αAI (200 ng) was used as positive control (+C). Culture supernatants were partially purified with DEAE-Sepharose prior to inhibitor activity assays. Results are expressed as inhibition units (IU). Data from triplicate experiments were expressed as the average ± standard error

Recombinant αAI was purified from culture supernatants of K. lactis

The methods to purify αAI from seeds [24, 10, 16] were not suitable for the recovery of αAI from culture supernatants possibly because of the composition of YPCGal medium (which has a mixture of hydrolysed peptides, galactose and vitamin B complex). Soluble and functional αAI was recovered from K. lactis culture supernatants using a combination of ion exchange and affinity chromatography. The fractions were analysed by SDS-PAGE, western blot and Ceralpha assay (Fig. 6). Electrophoretic analysis of the purified fractions showed that anionic exchange and affinity purification with α-amylase-Sepharose yielded polypeptides with a size between 15 and 20 kDa (Fig. 6a, lane 2, and Fig. 6b, lane 4, bottom arrow points to α- and β- subunits). Activity assay of the fractions obtained by anion-exchange and α-amylase-Sepharose showed that specific inhibitory activity increased following purification (Fig. 6c).
Fig. 6

Purification of recombinant αAI from culture supernatants of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT. SDS-PAGE and western blot of a fractions purified by anion exchange chromatography from K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT strain 68A: protein unbound to DEAE-Sepharose (lane 1), protein bound to DEAE-Sepharose (lane 2); and b fractions purified by affinity chromatography: unbound proteins to α-amylase-Sepharose (lane 3), and proteins bound to α-amylase-Sepharose (lane 4). Pure Pinto-αAI (200 ng) was used as a positive control (+C). Molecular markers are shown in kilodaltons at left. c Inhibition of porcine pancreatic α-amylase by purified fractions containing unbound proteins to DEAE-Sepharose (lane 1), bound proteins to DEAE-Sepharose (lane 2), unbound proteins to α-amylase-Sepharose (lane 3), and bound proteins to α-amylase-Sepharose (lane 4). Untransformed strain YCT390 was used as a negative control (−C) and pure Pinto-αAI (200 ng) was used as a positive control (+C). Data from triplicate experiments were expressed as the average ± standard error

Prior to purification, 300 mL of culture supernatant from K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT 68A yielded around 0.9 mg protein. After anion-exchange, we recovered about 25% of the protein containing partially purified inhibitor; and after incubation with α-amylase-Sepharose, we recovered approximately 1% of the protein in the culture supernatant as functional αAI (Table 2).
Table 2

Purification of recombinant αAI from culture supernatants of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT strain 68A

Purification step

Total protein (μg)

Specific inhibitory activity (IU/mg)

Dialysed and freeze-dried culture supernatant

899

ND

Anion-exchange batch-adsorption (DEAE-Sepharose CL-6B)

227

8

Affinity batch-adsorption (α-amylase-Sepharose)

8.45

234

The identity of the peptides from K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT 68A was confirmed by 1D Nano LC ESI MS/MS. After electrophoresis, the major bands between 15 and 20 kDa (expected size of α- and β- subunits) were excised from gel together in a single sample (Sample A), and the band of approximately 32 kDa (expected size of αAI precursor) was isolated separately (Sample B). α- and β- subunits of αAI were detected in both of these samples. Processed αAI and the precursor were identified by 5 and 6 distinct tryptic fragments, representing 26 and 31% of coverage, respectively (Fig. 7). No other protein was detected in these major bands.
Fig. 7

Tryptic peptide matches with Pinto-αAI amino acid sequence (Q6J2U4_PHAVU). Mascot search results and sequence similarity of tryptic fragments obtained from recombinant αAI from purified supernatants of K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT 68A, compared to amino acid sequence of α- and β- subunits from Pinto-αAI (Q6J2U4_PHAVU). Expected peptide cleavage sites are denoted by arrows. Identity threshold score for P < 0.05: 13

Discussion

The α-amylase inhibitor αAI from P. vulgaris has been successfully expressed in different plants resulting in functional inhibitor [8, 9]. Nonetheless, the heterologous expression of αAI in a non-plant system has not been reported to date and was not expected to be straight-forward due to the post-translational processing that this protein undergoes during maturation. Nevertheless, using yeasts to express αAI was attractive because of their ability to perform post-translational modifications, as well as their ability to secrete proteins into the culture media, which could facilitate purification.

In preliminary experiments using the plant form of the αAI gene to transform strains of K. lactis GG799 derivatives and S. cerevisiae YPH499, the yeasts expressed the gene transcript but did not express the protein (Brain-Isasi and Higgins, unpublished data). Because recombinant strains of K. lactis YCT390 and S. cerevisiae YPH499 harbouring the reconstructed gene αAI-OPT were able to synthesise functional αAI, we conclude that codon usage bias is a limiting step in the heterologous expression of αAI in yeasts.

Here we demonstrated that the native signal peptide of αAI encoded in the synthetic gene αAI-OPT was recognised by K. lactis YCT390 to target the nascent peptide into the secretory pathway. However, we found an unexpected differential trafficking of αAI between recombinant K. lactis YCT390 and S. cerevisiae YPH499, since recombinant colonies of K. lactis YCT390 secreted αAI (precursor and processed polypeptides) into the culture medium and recombinant S. cerevisiae YPH499 expressed functional αAI intracellularly that was not secreted. This difference in αAI trafficking between two yeast species resembles the results obtained when PHA-L is expressed in Pichia pastoris and S. cerevisiae [43, 44]. PHA-L is also a vacuolar glycoprotein from P. vulgaris and shows considerable amino acid similarity to αAI, but PHA-L is devoid of the proteolytic processing site at Asn77 required for the maturation of αAI [8]. When PHA-L is expressed in P. pastoris using its native signal peptide, the signal peptide is proteolytically cleaved and the protein is secreted into the culture medium [44]. In contrast, when PHA-L is expressed in S. cerevisiae using its native signal peptide, only about 1% is secreted and most of the protein accumulates in the vacuole because of a vacuolar targeting-determinant in the PHA-L sequence which is recognized by this yeast [43, 45]. Therefore, it is possible that αAI shows a similar behaviour to PHA-L when expressed in S. cerevisiae. Like αAI, several other seed proteins require proteolytic cleavage on the carboxyl side of Asn by specific VPEs to make their respective mature forms [46, 47]. To date, no specific Asn-proteases similar to VPEs are known in yeasts. Although yeast Gpi8p shows significant structural similarity to plant VPEs, it is part of the GPI-anchor complex and acts as a transamidase [48].

In other work on yeast overexpression of plant proteins requiring a proteolytic cleavage at an Asn residue, it has been shown that recombinant precursors are not proteolytically processed at the Asn site and if cleaved, this occurs at a different amino acid [49]. For example, when the 2S albumins AL1 and AL3 from soybean (Glycine max) were expressed in P. pastoris, the subunits were post-translationally processed within the same loop region as in the plant but with some differences in the precise sites [50]. Since recombinant αAI expressed in S. cerevisiae YPH499 and K. lactis YCT390 was proteolytically processed into α- and β-like subunits, it appears likely that the proteolytic cleavage was not performed at the Asn77 residue but this did not affect the inhibitory activity of the protein. Aberrant processing of αAI was observed in transgenic tobacco harbouring a mutation at Asn77–Asp77, but the specific activity of the processed protein appears to be similar to that of correctly processed αAI [8]. Also, transgenic chickpea-αAI has a subset of molecules in which the α-subunit devoid of Asn77 and Ala76 retains its inhibitory activity [9].

The integration of cassettes into the chromosome of K. lactis regularly produces strains having multiple copies of the vector [33], and it has been reported that gene dosage can affect the yield of some heterologous proteins expressed in yeasts [33, 51, 52]. Here q-PCR data showed that all the K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT colonies contained an average of six copies of the gene, indicating that there was no correlation between the gene dosage and the differences in processing of αAI. None of the recombinant colonies of K. lactis YCT390 contained mutations in the αAI-OPT gene sequence, and there were no differences in cell growth among the recombinant K. lactis YCT390/αAI-OPT colonies when compared to the control strain (data not shown). As previously described for the expression of recombinant phytase in P. pastoris [52], it seems that the level of processed αAI produced by K. lactis YCT390 was not related to gene dosage, mutations or toxic effects on the host.

When we characterized the heterologous expression of recombinant αAI in K. lactis GG799 and in four protease deletion mutants created in GG799 background [30], we found that only recombinant colonies of K. lactis YCT390 secreted αAI into the culture media, while in the other strains of K. lactis the protein was not detected. The only difference among the K. lactis strains assessed in this work lies in the deletion of a single protease from the secretory pathway, since K. lactis YCT390 is a mutant deficient in KlYps7p, an aspartyl proteinase localised in the plasma membrane and in the yeast cell-wall [30]. Our results are consistent with the notion that in many cases heterologous proteins are degraded in K. lactis due to aspartyl protease, and successful expression is achieved only after using a protease deficient strain [30, 53].

The screening of several hundred transformants is an important bottleneck in yeast expression systems. In our case, the selection of colonies by means of activity or immunodetection was a more efficient method of finding clones that produced a higher level of functional protein than doing an initial genetic screen. Given that the expression profile of αAI was improved in a single K. lactis strain (YCT390), and the other K. lactis strains that did not express the protein were positive for αAI-OPT gene, the selection of colonies by antibody dot blot allowed us to reduce the analysis from several hundreds to <14 colonies per strain.

Here we successfully expressed functional αAI in yeasts. However, it has to be noted that while we optimised the codon usage of native bean αAI for yeast expression we did not further modify the coding sequence nor the cultivation conditions. Therefore, it is possible that the amounts of processed protein may be increased further by modifying the cell culturing and induction conditions, using different strategies to enhance proteolytic cleavage, as well as other bioengineering approaches that have been demonstrated to enhance the levels of other heterologous proteins produced by yeasts [54].

Conclusion

We demonstrated that αAI from P. vulgaris can be expressed in two different yeast heterologous systems. We showed that functional αAI can be secreted and purified from culture supernatants by using a two-step chromatographic method. Therefore, our work allows for the production of recombinant αAI and provides a platform for the large-scale production of pure and functional αAI protein for biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications.

Abbreviations

αAI: 

α-amylase inhibitor 1

Pinto-αAI: 

αAI from bean cv. Pinto

PHA-L: 

phytohemagglutinin-L

αMF: 

α mating factor

CDS: 

coding DNA sequence

YPCGal: 

yeast extract-peptone-casaminoacids-galactose medium

SC-ØU: 

synthetic drop-out medium without uracil

THP: 

tris(hydroxypropyl)phosphine

DEAE: 

diethylaminoethyl/diethylaminoethanol

kDa: 

kilodalton

Mr

relative molecular mass

VPE: 

vacuolar plant enzyme

GPI: 

glycosylphosphatidylinositol

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

SB conducted plasmid construction, protein expression analyses and activity assays. SB and TJH planned experiments. SB, AAL and TJH contributed to the design of the study and data analysis. SB wrote the manuscript. TJH and AAL commented and reviewed the draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank to: Andy Moore (CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australia) for his support in q-PCR and protein purification experiments; Linda Tabe (CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australia) for her support during S.B. stay at CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australia; John W. Moore and Qing Liu (CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, Australia) for their support in yeast transformation; and Christoph Lüthi for his collaboration on affinity chromatography experiments. S.B. acknowledges Grants D-21080439 and AT-24100168 from CONICYT (Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Chile) and financial support from MECESUP Universidad de Chile (Project UCH-0811).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

The authors have read and agreed to the manuscript content and approved the version submitted to this journal.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable. The manuscript does not report data from humans or animals.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Drug Analysis Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacéuticas, Universidad de Chile
(2)
CSIRO Agriculture and Food

References

  1. Ishimoto M, Suzuki K, Iwanaga M, Kikuchi F, Kitamura K. Variation of seed α-amylase inhibitors in the common bean. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;90:425–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Marshall JJ, Lauda CM. Purification and properties of phaseolamin, an inhibitor of α-amylase, from the kidney bean, Phaseolus vulgaris. J Biol Chem. 1975;250:8030–7.Google Scholar
  3. Powers JR, Whitaker JR. Purification and some physical and chemical properties of red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) α-amylase inhibitor. J Food Biochem. 1978;1:217–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Moreno J, Altabella T, Chrispeels MJ. Characterization of α-amylase-inhibitor, a lectin-like protein in the seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiol. 1990;92:703–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kluh I, Horn M, Hýblová J, Hubert J, Dolečková-Marešová L, Voburka Z, et al. Inhibitory specificity and insecticidal selectivity of α-amylase inhibitor from Phaseolus vulgaris. Phytochemistry. 2005;66:31–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yamaguchi H. Isolation and characterization of the subunits of Phaseolus vulgaris α-amylase inhibitor. J Biochem (Tokyo). 1991;110:785–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Santino A, Daminati MG, Vitale A, Bollini R. The α-amylase inhibitor of bean seed: two-step proteolytic maturation in the protein storage vacuoles of the developing cotyledon. Physiol Plant. 1992;85:425–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Pueyo JJ, Hunt DC, Chrispeels MJ. Activation of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) α-amylase inhibitor requires proteolytic processing of the proprotein. Plant Physiol. 1993;101:1341–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell PM, Reiner D, Moore AE, Lee R-Y, Epstein MM, Higgins TJV. Comparison of the α-amylase inhibitor-1 from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties and transgenic expression in other legumes—post-translational modifications and immunogenicity. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:6047–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Le Berre-Anton V, Bompard-Gilles C, Payan F, Rougé P. Characterization and functional properties of the α-amylase inhibitor (α-AI) from kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA-Protein Struct Mol Enzymol. 1997;1343:31–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Powers JR, Whitaker JR. Effect of several experimental parameters on combination of red kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) α-amylase inhibitor with porcine pancreatic α-amylase. J Food Biochem. 1978;1:239–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Hollenbeck CB, Coulston AM, Quan R, Becker TR, Vreman HJ, Stevenson DK, et al. Effects of a commercial starch blocker preparation on carbohydrate digestion and absorption: in vivo and in vitro studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983;38:498–503.Google Scholar
  13. Liener IE, Donatucci DA, Tarcza JC. Starch blockers: a potential source of trypsin inhibitors and lectins. Am J Clin Nutr. 1984;39:196–200.Google Scholar
  14. Bo-Linn GW, Ana CAS, Morawski SG, Fordtran JS. Starch blockers—their effect on calorie absorption from a high-starch meal. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1413–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlson G, Li B, Bass P, Olsen W. A bean α-amylase inhibitor formulation (starch blocker) is ineffective in man. Science. 1983;219:393–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Layer P, Carlson GL, DiMagno EP. Partially purified white bean amylase inhibitor reduces starch digestion in vitro and inactivates intraduodenal amylase in humans. Gastroenterology. 1985;88:1895–902.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Layer P, Rizza RA, Zinsmeister AR, Carlson GL, DiMagno EP. Effect of a purified amylase inhibitor on carbohydrate tolerance in normal subjects and patients with diabetes mellitus. Mayo Clin Proc. 1986;61:442–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Layer P, Zinsmeister AR, DiMagno EP. Effects of decreasing intraluminal amylase activity on starch digestion and postprandial gastrointestinal function in humans. Gastroenterology. 1986;91:41–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Brugge WR, Rosenfeld MS. Impairment of starch absorption by a potent amylase inhibitor. Am J Gastroenterol. 1987;82:718–22.Google Scholar
  20. Boivin M, Flourie B, Rizza RA, Go VL, DiMagno EP. Gastrointestinal and metabolic effects of amylase inhibition in diabetics. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:387–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Obiro WC, Zhang T, Jiang B. The nutraceutical role of the Phaseolus vulgaris α-amylase inhibitor. Br J Nutr. 2008;100:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Ulbricht C, Bryan JK, Conquer J, Costa D, Stock T, Tanguay-Colucci S, et al. An evidence-based systematic review of amylase inhibitors by the Natural Standard Research Collaboration. J Diet Suppl. 2010;7:78–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Onakpoya I, Aldaas S, Terry R, Ernst E. The efficacy of Phaseolus vulgaris as a weight-loss supplement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials. Br J Nutr. 2011;106:196–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Boniglia C, Carratù B, Di Stefano S, Giammarioli S, Mosca M, Sanzini E. Lectins, trypsin and α-amylase inhibitors in dietary supplements containing Phaseolus vulgaris. Eur Food Res Technol. 2008;227:689–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. de Gouveia NM, Alves FV, Furtado FB, Scherer DL, Mundim AV, Espindola FS. An in vitro and in vivo study of the α-amylase activity of phaseolamin. J Med Food. 2014;17:915–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Bollini R, Carnovale E, Campion B. Removal of antinutritional factors from beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seeds. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 1999;3:217–9.Google Scholar
  27. Maczó A, Cucu T, De Meulenaer B, Gelencsér É. Comparison of the α-amylase inhibitor-1 from common beans and transgenic pea expressing the bean α-amylase inhibitor-1 by means of LC–TOF–MS. Food Res Int. 2015;76:86–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Jain NK, Boivin M, Zinsmeister AR, Brown ML, Malagelada JR, DiMagno EP. Effect of ileal perfusion of carbohydrates and amylase inhibitor on gastrointestinal hormones and emptying. Gastroenterology. 1989;96:377–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kotaru M, Iwami K, Yeh H-Y, Ibuki F. In vivo action of α-amylase inhibitor from cranberry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) in rat small intestine. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 1989;35:579–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Ganatra MB, Vainauskas S, Hong JM, Taylor TE, Denson J-PM, Esposito D, et al. A set of aspartyl protease-deficient strains for improved expression of heterologous proteins in Kluyveromyces lactis: Kluyveromyces lactis aspartyl protease mutants. FEMS Yeast Res. 2011;11:168–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Sikorski RS, Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 1989;122:19.Google Scholar
  32. Gamborg OL, Miller RA, Ojima K. Nutrient requirements of suspension cultures of soybean root cells. Exp Cell Res. 1968;50:151–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Read JD, Colussi PA, Ganatra MB, Taron CH. Acetamide selection of Kluyveromyces lactis cells transformed with an integrative vector leads to high-frequency formation of multicopy strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5088–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sambrook J, Fritsch E, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, vol. 2, 2nd ed. S.l. Cold Spring Harbor; 1989.Google Scholar
  35. Gietz RD, Schiestl RH. High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:31–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosa JCC, Colombo LT, Alvim MCT, Avonce N, Van Dijck P, Passos FML. Metabolic engineering of Kluyveromyces lactis for l-ascorbic acid (vitamin C) biosynthesis. Microb Cell Factories. 2013;12:59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Whelan JA, Russell NB, Whelan MA. A method for the absolute quantification of cDNA using real-time PCR. J Immunol Methods. 2003;278:261–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int. 2004;11:36–42.Google Scholar
  39. Aldridge GM, Podrebarac DM, Greenough WT, Weiler IJ. The use of total protein stains as loading controls: an alternative to high-abundance single-protein controls in semi-quantitative immunoblotting. J Neurosci Methods. 2008;172:250–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Sarmah BK, Moore A, Tate W, Molvig L, Morton RL, Rees DP, et al. Transgenic chickpea seeds expressing high levels of a bean α-amylase inhibitor. Mol Breed. 2004;14:73–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Atack JM, Srikhanta YN, Fox KL, Jurcisek JA, Brockman KL, Clark TA, et al. A biphasic epigenetic switch controls immunoevasion, virulence and niche adaptation in non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7828.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Tague BW, Chrispeels MJ. The plant vacuolar protein, phytohemagglutinin, is transported to the vacuole of transgenic yeast. J Cell Biol. 1987;105:1971–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Raemaekers RJ, de Muro L, Gatehouse JA, Fordham-Skelton AP. Functional phytohemagglutinin (PHA) and Galanthus nivalis agglutinin (GNA) expressed in Pichia pastoris correct N-terminal processing and secretion of heterologous proteins expressed using the PHA-E signal peptide. Eur J Biochem FEBS. 1999;265:394–403.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Tague BW, Dickinson CD, Chrispeels MJ. A short domain of the plant vacuolar protein phytohemagglutinin targets invertase to the yeast vacuole. Plant Cell. 1990;2:533–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Hiraiwa N, Nishimura M, Hara-Nishimura I. Expression and activation of the vacuolar processing enzyme in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Plant J Cell Mol Biol. 1997;12:819–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Müntz K, Shutov AD. Legumains and their functions in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2002;7:340–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Fraering P, Imhof I, Meyer U, Strub JM, van Dorsselaer A, Vionnet C, et al. The GPI transamidase complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains Gaa1p, Gpi8p, and Gpi16p. Mol Biol Cell. 2001;12:3295–306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Oliveira C, Teixeira JA, Domingues L. Recombinant lectins: an array of tailor-made glycan-interaction biosynthetic tools. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2012;33:66–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Lin J, Fido R, Shewry P, Archer DB, Alcocer MJC. The expression and processing of two recombinant 2S albumins from soybean (Glycine max) in the yeast Pichia pastoris. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA-Proteins Proteom. 2004;1698:203–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Swennen D, Paul M-F, Vernis L, Beckerich J-M, Fournier A, Gaillardin C. Secretion of active anti-Ras single-chain Fv antibody by the yeasts Yarrowia lipolytica and Kluyveromyces lactis. Microbiol Read Engl. 2002;148:41–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang M, Johnson SC, Murthy PPN. Enhancement of alkaline phytase production in Pichia pastoris: influence of gene dosage, sequence optimization and expression temperature. Protein Expr Purif. 2012;84:247–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Colussi PA, Taron CH. Kluyveromyces lactis LAC4 promoter variants that lack function in bacteria but retain full function in K. lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:7092–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Idiris A, Tohda H, Kumagai H, Takegawa K. Engineering of protein secretion in yeast: strategies and impact on protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:403–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement