Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access

Metabolic network capacity of Escherichia coli for Krebs cycle-dependent proline hydroxylation

  • Eleni Theodosiou1, 2,
  • Oliver Frick2,
  • Bruno Bühler1, 2Email author and
  • Andreas Schmid2
Microbial Cell Factories201514:108

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0298-1

Received: 23 April 2015

Accepted: 15 July 2015

Published: 29 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Understanding the metabolism of the microbial host is essential for the development and optimization of whole-cell based biocatalytic processes, as it dictates production efficiency. This is especially true for redox biocatalysis where metabolically active cells are employed because of the cofactor/cosubstrate regenerative capacity endogenous in the host. Recombinant Escherichia coli was used for overproducing proline-4-hydroxylase (P4H), a dioxygenase catalyzing the hydroxylation of free l-proline into trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline with a-ketoglutarate (a-KG) as cosubstrate. In this whole-cell biocatalyst, central carbon metabolism provides the required cosubstrate a-KG, coupling P4H biocatalytic performance directly to carbon metabolism and metabolic activity. By applying both experimental and computational biology tools, such as metabolic engineering and 13C-metabolic flux analysis (13C-MFA), we investigated and quantitatively described the physiological, metabolic, and bioenergetic response of the whole-cell biocatalyst to the targeted bioconversion and identified possible metabolic bottlenecks for further rational pathway engineering.

Results

A proline degradation-deficient E. coli strain was constructed by deleting the putA gene encoding proline dehydrogenase. Whole-cell biotransformations with this mutant strain led not only to quantitative proline hydroxylation but also to a doubling of the specific trans-4-l-hydroxyproline (hyp) formation rate, compared to the wild type. Analysis of carbon flux through central metabolism of the mutant strain revealed that the increased a-KG demand for P4H activity did not enhance the a-KG generating flux, indicating a tightly regulated TCA cycle operation under the conditions studied. In the wild type strain, P4H synthesis and catalysis caused a reduction in biomass yield. Interestingly, the ΔputA strain additionally compensated the associated ATP and NADH loss by reducing maintenance energy demands at comparably low glucose uptake rates, instead of increasing the TCA activity.

Conclusions

The putA knockout in recombinant E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS) was found to be promising for productive P4H catalysis not only in terms of biotransformation yield, but also regarding the rates for biotransformation and proline uptake and the yield of hyp on the energy source. The results indicate that, upon a putA knockout, the coupling of the TCA-cycle to proline hydroxylation via the cosubstrate a-KG becomes a key factor constraining and a target to further improve the efficiency of a-KG-dependent biotransformations.

Keywords

Whole-cell biocatalysisProline hydroxylationStrain engineeringMetabolic flux analysisBiocatalyst efficiency

Background

Fe(II)⁄α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases are nonheme iron-containing oxygenases coupling dioxygen activation to the oxidative decarboxylation of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). These enzymes catalyze a remarkable range of reactions, such as hydroxylation, desaturation, and epoxidation [1, 2]. In the hydroxylation reaction catalyzed by proline-4-hydroxylase (P4H), one atom of molecular oxygen is introduced into l-proline to give trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline (hyp), a valuable intermediate for the synthesis of chiral pharmaceuticals and antibiotics [3], while the other oxygen atom is introduced into the cosubstrate α-KG to give succinate and CO2 upon oxidative decarboxylation [4].

For an economically viable process that utilizes P4H or other α-KG-dependent dioxygenases, microbial cells are the preferred biocatalysts, since α-KG is a central metabolite and can be supplied continuously by host metabolism, namely the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Thus, the biocatalytic target reaction creates a short-cut in the TCA cycle that intertwines whole-cell catalytic efficiency with microbial metabolism and physiology (Fig. 1). When using whole-cell biocatalysts, numerous physiology-related factors can potentially interfere with catalytic performance, i.e., limited substrate uptake or cosubstrate supply, substrate or product metabolization by host intrinsic enzymes, by-product formation, and toxicity of substrates and products [57]. Therefore, retrofitting of cellular functionalities is often necessary to overcome unwanted constraints and to obtain efficient and robust microbial cell factories specifically tailored to meet commercial biotechnological objectives [8, 9].
Figure 1
Fig. 1

Schematic representation of the interconnection between trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline (hyp) synthesis catalyzed by recombinant Escherichia coli containing proline-4-hydroxylase (P4H) and central carbon metabolism.

For the synthesis of hyp from proline, a commercially used whole-cell process has already been reported [10]. However, the interdependency of process conditions, host metabolism, and catalyst performance has not been unraveled yet. Using P4H containing recombinant Escherichia coli cells, it was recently demonstrated that there is a strong interference of catalytic activity with the regulation of proline uptake and metabolism [11]. In E. coli, proline degradation requires two genes, putP and putA, encoding the Na+/proline symport carrier (PutP) and the multifunctional proline utilization protein A (PutA), respectively [12]. Depending on proline availability, PutA functions either as a DNA-binding transcriptional repressor of putA and putP expression (low proline levels) or as a membrane-bound bi-functional dehydrogenase responsible for the two-step oxidation of proline to glutamate (high proline levels). PutA is thus involved in both, proline catabolism and its transcriptional regulation [13]. For biocatalytically active growing cells, a catalysis-induced reduction of proline uptake was observed, which correlated with reduced transcription of putA and putP, demonstrating that proline uptake and competition of hyp formation from proline by P4H with proline catabolism were the key factors limiting biocatalyst efficiency [11].

In this study, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS), a potent host strain for P4H catalysis ([11], hereafter referred to as wt), overexpressing a codon-optimized p4h gene (p4h1of) was rationally engineered to further comprehend and modulate the interplay between cellular physiology and proline hydroxylation. Toward this goal, a knockout mutant lacking the putA gene (E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS), referred to as ΔputA) was constructed and physiologically characterized. This mutation eliminated both proline oxidation to glutamate and transcriptional repression of the put operon. Using 13C-based metabolic flux analysis (13C-MFA), the metabolic response of the whole-cell catalyst upon genetic (i.e., putA deletion, p4h1of expression) and environmental perturbations (i.e., proline addition, product synthesis) was assessed. Furthermore, energy and redox metabolism were investigated via 13C-MFA to reveal how the cells attune their bioenergetic status upon product synthesis and under various growth conditions.

Results and discussion

Proline degradation deficiency increases both hyp yield and formation rate

To determine how proline metabolism and its regulation affect the physiology of a proline-hydroxylating biocatalyst, the impact of the putA deletion on exponential growth parameters and hyp synthesis was investigated. The engineered strain, bearing either pET-24a (ΔputA_pET) or pET_p4h1of (ΔputA_p4h1of), was incubated aerobically in M9 minimal medium with glucose as carbon and energy source in the presence or absence of proline and compared with the wildtype strain cultivated under the same conditions (Table 1).
Table 1

Physiological comparison of aerobically growing recombinant E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS) strains

 

wt_pET

ΔputA_pET

wt_p4h1of

ΔputA_p4h1of

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

μ (h−1)

0.44 ± 0.01

0.48 ± 0.01

0.42 ± 0.01

0.43 ± 0.01

0.32 ± 0.02

0.33 ± 0.00

0.3 ± 0.01

0.32 ± 0.01

Final biomass (gCDW L−1)

1.9 ± 0.1

2.2 ± 0.1

2.0 ± 0.1

2.0 ± 0.1

1.4 ± 0.1

1.8 ± 0.1

1.5 ± 0.1

1.5 ± 0.1

r Glucose (mmol g−1 h−1)

−5.3 ± 0.3

−5.1 ± 0.1

−5.2 ± 0.2

−5.1 ± 0.2

−4.8 ± 0.3

−4.4 ± 0.3

−4.7 ± 0.2

−3.9 ± 0.1

r Acetate (mmol g h−1)

1.33 ± 0.1

1.59 ± 0.2

0.98 ± 0.1

0.76 ± 0.1

0.92 ± 0.1

1.24 ± 0.1

1.09 ± 0.04

0.93 ± 0.1

r Proline (mmol g h−1)

NA

−1.08 ± 0.01

NA

ND

NA

−0.68 ± 0.01

NA

−0.75 ± 0.01

r Hyp (mmol g h−1)

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.09 ± 0.01

0.37 ± 0.01

0.14 ± 0.01

0.75 ± 0.01

Y x/glc (gCDW g glc −1 )

0.46 ± 0.02

0.52 ± 0.01

0.45 ± 0.02

0.47 ± 0.01

0.39 ± 0.02

0.42 ± 0.03

0.36 ± 0.01

0.45 ± 0.01

Y ace/glc (molace mol glc −1 )

0.25 ± 0.03

0.31 ± 0.04

0.19 ± 0.03

0.15 ± 0.01

0.19 ± 0.01

0.28 ± 0.01

0.23 ± 0.01

0.24 ± 0.03

Y hyp/pro (molhyp mol pro −1 )

NA

ND

NA

ND

NA

0.55 ± 0.01

NA

1 ± 0.01

Y hyp/glc (molhyp mol glc −1 )

ND

ND

ND

ND

0.019 ± 0.001

0.084 ± 0.003

0.030 ± 0.001

0.192 ± 0.002

r Hyp (U gCDW −1)

NA

NA

NA

NA

1.35 ± 0.02

6.1 ± 0.2

2.20 ± 0.02

12.6 ± 0.1

Cultivation was performed at 30°C in M9 medium with 5 g L−1 glucose in the absence (−Pro) or presence (+Pro) of 5 mM proline. wt_pET, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS)(pET-24a); ΔputA_pET, E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS)(pET-24a); wt_p4h1of, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS)(pET_p4h1of); ΔputA_p4h1of, E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS)(pET_p4h1of); μ, specific growth rate; r, specific rates for substrate uptake (negative values) or product formation; CDW, cell dry weight; pro, proline; ace, acetate; hyp, trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline; Yx/glc, Yace/glc, Yhyp/pro, and Yhyp/glc, yield coefficients for biomass and acetate on glucose and for hyp on proline and glucose, respectively; ND, not detected; NA, not applicable; 1 U = 1 μmol of product formed per min. Values represent the average from three different experiments (biological replicates) with standard deviations displayed as error.

In case of pET-24a containing wildtype cells (wt_pET) grown in the presence of proline, PutA associates with the membrane, catalyzing the first steps of proline degradation to glutamate [12]. Glutamate is subsequently deaminated to the TCA cycle intermediate α-KG, supplying additional carbon, nitrogen, and energy to the cells. This ability of the wildtype to catabolize proline together with glucose led to an increase in growth rate, final biomass titer, and biomass yield on glucose, compared to growth on glucose alone. On the contrary, the mutant strain ΔputA was, as expected, unable to degrade proline. The specific growth rate (μ), final biomass titer, and biomass yield on glucose of the ΔputA_pET strain were virtually unchanged upon proline addition and resembled the wt_pET strain grown on glucose (Table 1, see also Additional file 1: Figure S1). Similarly, proline addition had no effect on the growth rate of the ΔputA_p4h1of strain. Interestingly, the presence of proline also did not significantly influence the growth rate of the wildtype strain containing pET_p4h1of (wt_p4h1of). This can be explained by the reduced amount of proline used for biomass formation due to hydroxylation, and the decreased proline uptake rate induced by P4H activity [11]. Nevertheless, proline addition increased the final biomass titer of the wt_p4h1of strain.

In all cases, both growth rate and biomass formed were decreased, when P4H was produced, indicating a metabolic burden imposed by heterologous P4H synthesis [14]. The glucose uptake rate and the biomass yield on glucose were also reduced upon P4H synthesis, independently of proline addition, indicating that less energy and metabolite precursors are used for biomass formation. It should be noted that P4H was successfully produced at constant levels under all conditions studied (see Additional file 1: Figure S2) and that, in the absence of extracellular proline, both wt_p4h1of and ΔputA_p4h1of could synthesize hyp from endogenous proline. Interestingly, upon proline addition, the ΔputA_p4h1of strain displayed the lowest glucose uptake rate (3.9 mmol g−1 h−1), but its biomass yield on glucose (0.45 gCDW g glc −1 ) was comparably high, suggesting energy-efficient biomass formation.

Acetate was secreted by all strains under the conditions studied, implying an excess of available acetyl-CoA as a result of the TCA cycle not keeping pace with glycolysis [15, 16], and was assimilated after glucose depletion. The specific growth rate was not negatively affected by the relatively low acetate concentrations (from 0.1 to 0.26 g L−1, see Additional file 1: Figures S1 and S3), which were below the reported growth-inhibiting acetate concentrations of 0.5–5 g L−1 [17, 18]. While the presence of proline resulted in an increased acetate formation rate in the case of wt_pET and wt_p4h1of, no such effect was observed for the corresponding ΔputA strains. Thus, proline-derived carbon influx into the central metabolism appears to promote overflow metabolism. Interestingly, the ΔputA_pET strain showed less acetate formation as the only difference to the wt_pET strain indicating a higher carbon cost of maintenance. However, in the absence of PutA, P4H synthesis (ΔputA_p4h1of) caused an increase in acetate yield on glucose, probably due to the metabolic stress.

Overall, proline hydroxylation profited from the following beneficial effects of putA deletion: (1) quantitative transformation of proline into hyp, (2) doubling of the specific hyp formation rate, and (3) a 2.3-fold higher molar hyp yield on glucose, characterizing this strain as a favorable biocatalyst for proline hydroxylation (Table 1, see also Additional file 1: Figure S3).

Metabolic network operation: α-KG formation via the TCA cycle does not increase upon P4H catalysis

To investigate how the putA deletion and hyp synthesis affect the operation of the intracellular reaction network, 13C-MFA was performed for the wildtype and the ΔputA strain, bearing either pET-24a or pET_p4h1of, during exponential batch growth in the presence and absence of proline in M9 medium containing labeled glucose (80% [1-13C] and 20% [U-13C]). The relative carbon flux distributions throughout the central metabolic pathways for all strains and conditions studied, normalized to the glucose uptake rate, are mapped in Fig. 2.
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Metabolic fluxes in recombinant E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS) and E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS) strains containing pET-24a or pET_p4h1of during exponential aerobic growth at 30°C in M9 medium containing 5 g L−1 glucose (4:1 mixture of 1-13C-labeled and U-13C-labeled glucose) in the absence or presence of 5 mM proline. All fluxes are given as relative fluxes normalized to the specific glucose uptake rate of 100 for each strain (given for the reaction of glucose to glucose-6-phosphate). For the extracellular metabolite fluxes, the experimental error is given. Arrows indicate the main direction of reversible reactions.

Flux patterns in the upper part of glycolysis (until phosphoenolpyruvate) were similar for all strains and were virtually unaffected by the presence of proline. When using putA-positive strains, unlabeled proline-derived carbon only became evident in amino acids synthesized from TCA cycle intermediates (Table 2). As expected for ΔputA strains, which are unable to channel proline carbon into central metabolism, the unlabeled carbon content in amino acids (except for proline) did not change upon proline addition.
Table 2

Fractional abundance of unlabeled amino acid fragments (m0) during cultivation on labeled glucose with and without unlabeled proline

 

wt_pET

ΔputA_pET

wt_p4h1of

ΔputA_p4h1of

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

Glycolysis

 Ala [M-57]+

0.366

0.377

0.366

0.368

0.365

0.360

0.361

0.359

 Gly [M-57]+

0.622

0.624

0.621

0.622

0.621

0.621

0.619

0.620

 Val [M-57]+

0.175

0.183

0.176

0.175

0.174

0.169

0.169

0.165

 Leu [M-159]+

0.113

0.12

0.114

0.114

0.113

0.105

0.109

0.104

 Ser [M-57]+

0.319

0.322

0.321

0.321

0.313

0.311

0.313

0.310

 Phe [M-57]+

0.111

0.114

0.111

0.110

0.113

0.109

0.109

0.108

TCA

 Asp [M-57]+

0.195

0.336

0.194

0.194

0.191

0.233

0.187

0.179

 Thr [M-57]+

0.193

0.331

0.190

0.190

0.187

0.232

0.184

0.176

 Ile [M-159]+

0.140

0.225

0.140

0.140

0.137

0.157

0.135

0.128

 Glu [M-57]+

0.115

0.333

0.115

0.115

0.113

0.195

0.112

0.105

 Pro [M-159]+

0.184

0.818

0.181

0.819

0.176

0.819

0.175

0.820

Cells were grown aerobically at 30°C in M9 medium with 5 g L−1 labeled glucose (80% 1-13C and 20% U-13C) in the presence (+Pro) and absence (−Pro) of 5 mM unlabeled proline. wt_pET, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS)(pET-24a); ΔputA_pET, E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS)(pET-24a); wt_p4h1of, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS)(pET_p4h1of); ΔputA_p4h1of, E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS)(pET_p4h1of).

The largest differences among strains were observed in the reactions mediated by the malic enzymes and the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase, the TCA cycle, and the fluxes related to proline metabolism and hydroxylation. As the ΔputA_pET strain was not able to catabolize proline, proline addition did not have an impact on the flux distribution, which resembled that of the wt_pET strain grown on glucose only. However, the ΔputA_pET strain virtually substituted endogenous proline biosynthesis with the uptake of extracellular proline. In contrast, proline addition increased the acetate secretion rate by almost 25%, in the wt_pET strain, reversed the flux between α-KG and glutamate towards α-KG synthesis, increased the TCA flux from α-KG to succinate by almost 40%, and activated the conversion of malate to pyruvate. In all other cases, independently of proline addition, this gluconeogenetic reaction was not active. The oxidative decarboxylation of malate catalyzed by the malic enzymes ScfA and/or MaeB [19] has previously been considered absent in E. coli cells growing on glucose [20]. Such a flux through malic enzymes, for which simulations gave evidence only in the case of the wt_pET strain grown on glucose and proline, was not identified in our earlier study, where the pools of malate and oxaloacetate in the TCA cycle and the pools of pyruvate and phosphoenolpyruvate in glycolysis were lumped [11]. Accordingly, proline addition was suggested to reduce the anaplerotic fluxes. In order to assess whether the malate decarboxylation indeed takes place in vivo, a tracer experiment using 100% U-13C labeled glucose was performed and the fraction of unlabeled alanine derived from proline via malate and pyruvate was quantified. When proline was added, the unlabeled alanine m0 fraction of the 260, 232, and 158 [m/z] fragment ions doubled from 1.8, 1.8, and 2.2% to 3.8, 3.4, and 4.0%, respectively (see Additional file 1: Table S4). This experimentally determined increase, reaching on average approximately 1.8%, is in agreement with the 2.1% calculated theoretically from the metabolic fluxes presented in Fig. 2, confirming active flux via malic enzymes. The role of malic enzymes is not clear during growth on glucose, since the combined activities of pyruvate carboxylase, malate dehydrogenase, and malic enzymes result in net ATP consumption and can therefore be regarded as parts of a futile cycle. However, it is generally accepted that the flux from malate to pyruvate produces NADPH and thus functions as NADPH generator for biosynthetic purposes when E. coli grows on substrates that do not make use of glycolysis to enter central metabolism (e.g., acetate, C4-dicarboxylic acids, amino acids) [19, 21, 22]. Moreover, as phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and the malic enzyme(s) may be responsible for the withdrawal of C4- and C5-intermediates from the TCA cycle, they might fulfil a cataplerotic function [23]. Thus, the addition of proline to the wt_pET strain, accompanied by the increased NADH generating flux from a-KG towards succinate and malate, may have led to malic enzyme activation, pyruvate surplus, and finally a higher acetate excretion rate.

In the absence of proline, p4h1 expression and the resulting proline hydroxylation lead to a doubling of the proline synthesis rate in both strains. Additionally, recombinant P4H production was associated with a metabolic burden as reflected by higher relative TCA fluxes in both wt_p4h1of and ΔputA_p4h1of indicating increased biosynthetic and energy demands. When proline was added to the medium, the same effect was observed for wt_p4h1of, but not for ΔputA_p4h1of which retained similar relative TCA cycle fluxes as ΔputA_pET. Another difference between wt_p4h1of and ΔputA_p4h1of is the anaplerotic net flux between phosphoenolpyruvate and oxaloacetate. Upon proline hydroxylation, this flux decreased by 30% in wt_p4h1of, implying an anaplerotic role of proline metabolism, whereas it remained similar in ΔputA_p4h1of, as can be expected from the inability of this strain to metabolize proline. However, in wt_pET such an anaplerotic role of proline metabolism was not observed. Instead, the flux through the malic enzymes was activated as described above. For wt_p4h1of, the missing evidence for an activated malic enzyme flux can be explained by a decreased rate of proline metabolism caused by proline hydroxylation and the lower proline uptake rate.

In the presence of proline, the flux from α-KG to succinate was decreased by 60% in ΔputA_p4h1of compared to only 10% in wt_p4h1of, which can be ascribed to α-KG withdrawal for hyp synthesis. Strikingly, even though putA deletion led to increased proline uptake and hydroxylation rates, it did not induce a “driven-by-demand” increase of the α-KG generating TCA flux, pointing towards a possible limitation of P4H catalysis by the cosubstrate α-KG. Moreover, the intracellular α-KG concentrations determined for both strains (Fig. 3) show that even though the hyp formation rate is almost twice as high when using the ΔputA_p4h1of as compared to wt_p4h1of, P4H has to withdraw α-KG from a pool of similar size competing for α-KG with α-KG dehydrogenase and glutamate dehydrogenase. These results indicate that the main limitation of proline hydroxylation is shifted from intracellular proline to α-KG availability and thus to reactions involved in α-KG formation, such as oxidative isocitrate decarboxylation, rendering them promising targets for future metabolic engineering efforts.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Intracellular a-ketoglutarate (a-KG) and succinate (Succ) concentrations in the mid-exponential growth phase for recombinant E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS) (wt) and E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS) (ΔputA) containing pET-24a (pET) or pET_p4h1of (p4h1of) in M9 medium with 5 g L−1 glucose (Glc) in the absence or presence of 5 mM proline (Pro) at 30°C. Concentrations are given as average values in µmoles per gram cell dry weight from three different samples with standard deviations displayed as error bars.

Decreased maintenance energy demands upon hyp synthesis

Even though stoichiometric modelling provides a precious basis to elucidate how cellular metabolism functions and responds to perturbations, it does not directly offer a deeper insight in the way bacterial cells balance catabolic energy generation with anabolic demands, including redox pools. Thus, based on the metabolic fluxes derived from 13C-MFA, net formation rates of NTPs (ATP and GTP), NAD(P)H, and FADH2 were determined (Table 3, See also Additional file 1: Table S5). The rate of NTP formation via substrate-level phosphorylation was calculated based on glycolysis, TCA cycle, and acetic acid formation rates. The ATP generating pathway from acetyl-CoA to acetate catalyzed by phosphotransacetylase and acetate kinase was considered, assuming that the flux through pyruvate oxidase B (PoxB) plays a minor role [24]. The growth-related demand for energy and redox equivalents was calculated using a stoichiometric equation for biomass formation generated by the FiatFlux software (see Additional file 2) [2527]. The equation contains the specific growth rate (µ) as a variable, thereby considering the differing macromolecular biomass composition at different growth rates [28]. The rate of ATP formation via oxidative phosphorylation was calculated based on the assumptions that (1) the NADH and FADH2 not used for biomass formation are utilized for ATP formation at the maximum P/O ratio (NADH → 3ATP, FADH2 → 2ATP) [29], and (2) only NADH and not NADPH is oxidized by the respiratory chain [30].
Table 3

Effect of putA deletion, p4h1of expression, proline addition, and proline hydroxylation on NTP and cofactor formation and consumption rates

 

wt_pET

ΔputA_pET

wt_p4h1of

ΔputA_p4h1of

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

−Pro

+Pro

Catabolisma

 NADPH

6.4

8.0

6.8

6.8

6.6

6.2

6.4

4.7

 NADH

17.8

19.1

18.5

17.7

19.2

17.6

19.3

12.9

 FADH2

2.1

3.7

2.5

2.5

3.0

2.9

3.1

1.7

 ATP/GTP

14.1

14.5

14.3

13.4

14.1

13.3

14.3

10.1

Biomass formation

 NADPH

−7.3

−7.9

−7.0

−7.3

−5.7

−5.7

−5.2

−5.4

 NADH

1.2

1.3

1.1

1.2

0.9

0.9

0.8

0.8

 FADH2

 ATP

−7.3

−8.1

−7

−7.3

−5.4

−5.4

−4.9

−5.1

Transhydrogenation

 NADPH

0.9

−0.1

0.2

0.5

−0.9

−0.5

−1.2

0.7

 NADH

−0.9

0.1

−0.2

−0.5

0.9

0.5

1.2

−0.7

Oxidative phosphorylation

 NADPH

 NADH

−18.1

−20.5

−19.4

−18.4

−21.0

−19.0

−21.3

−13.0

 FADH2

−2.1

−3.7

−2.5

−2.5

−3.0

−2.9

−3.1

−1.7

 ATP

58.4

67.3

63.3

60.1

68.9

62.3

70.0

42.5

Maintenanceb

 ATP

−65.2

−73.7

−70.6

−66.2

−77.6

−70.2

−79.4

−47.5

E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS) strains were grown in M9 medium containing 5 g L−1 glucose and optionally 5 mM proline (Pro) at 30°C and 250 rpm. Rates are given in mmol g CDW −1 h−1. wt_pET,  E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS)(pET-24a); ΔputA_pET, E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS)(pET-24a); wt_p4h1of, E. coli BL21(DE3)(pLysS)(pET_p4h1of); ΔputA_p4h1of, E. coli BL21ΔputA(DE3)(pLysS)(pET_p4h1of)

aThe calculations were based on the reactions described in Additional file 1: Table S5 and included in the metabolic map presented in Fig. 2.

bThe ATP costs for maintenance were not divided into growth and non-growth associated maintenance.

Substrate-level phosphorylation occurred at similar rates with all strains and under all conditions tested except for ΔputA_p4h1of which displayed a significantly lower rate in the presence of proline (Table 3). This low NTP formation rate can be explained by the decreased flux from α-KG to succinate upon P4H catalysis at high rates. The NTP consumed by the pET containing strains for cell growth was at similar levels, except for wt_pET in the presence of proline which showed a higher NTP demand due to increased biomass formation resulting from proline assimilation.

Upon P4H synthesis, the NTP amounts invested for cell growth on glucose decreased by 26 and 30% for the wt_p4h1of and ΔputA_p4h1of, respectively. The same phenomenon was observed when proline was added to the medium, i.e., 33 and 30% decrease of cell growth-associated NTP consumption, respectively. The metabolic burden of P4H production imposed on the cells when grown on glucose as sole source of carbon was also manifested by an increased respiratory activity that led to 18 and 10% higher NTP formation rates in wt_p4h1of and ΔputA_p4h1of, respectively, and this at a lower growth rate [31, 32]. Accordingly, enhanced maintenance requirements were observed during recombinant protein production as a non-growth associated function that is in agreement with other published results [32, 33]. This situation changed when proline was added to the medium. In ΔputA_p4h1of, the NADH generating flux from α-KG to succinate was partially replaced by the biotransformation and, in wt_p4h1of, less proline was converted to glutamate, both resulting in decreased NADH/FADH2 formation and thus reduced oxidative phosphorylation. This effect was more prominent for ΔputA_p4h1of.

ATP produced and not consumed for growth-related production of cellular material typically is consumed for maintenance processes such as maintenance of electrochemical gradients across the plasma membrane that can reach up to 50% of the ATP produced, degradation and regeneration of cellular macromolecules, futile cycles, energy spilling reactions, proofreading, and cell motility [34, 35]. Based on the calculations performed for ΔputA_p4h1of, the most noteworthy bioenergetic alteration caused by P4H activity consists in the dramatic decrease of NADH available for oxidative phosphorylation. Most interestingly, it seems that, upon hyp synthesis, the engineered strain responded by optimizing its energetic efficiency by reducing its maintenance energy demand instead of increasing the TCA activity. This is especially remarkable as recombinant p4h1of expression itself had the opposite effect increasing the energy demand. Taking into account that the stoichiometry of energy transducing membranes is not fixed and that the maximum P/O ratios assumed in Table 3 will not be reached in reality, the engineered strain may possibly utilize glucose more efficiently by exhibiting a higher in vivo P/O ratio.

Conclusions

In the current study, a putA knockout mutant of E. coli BL21 overproducing a-KG-dependent proline-4-hydroxylase (P4H) was generated and physiologically analyzed to uncover the interference of proline hydroxylation with host cell physiology and metabolism. The deletion of the putA gene has already been reported to be a successful engineering strategy for efficient trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline production [10]. Here, a detailed insight into the metabolic operation of engineered E. coli BL21 upon recombinant P4H catalysis is provided. The results show that the mutant strain unable to catabolize proline displayed not only a higher yield of hyp on proline, but also a higher specific hyp formation rate and a higher hyp yield on glucose as compared to the wildtype. Metabolic flux analysis revealed that, although the hyp formation rate increased when using the mutant strain, the TCA flux supplying a-KG (isocitrate to a-KG) did not increase upon accelerated P4H catalysis, leading to improved glucose utilization efficiency and pointing to a possible limitation in a-KG. Furthermore, a redox and energy balance study based on the 13C-MFA allowed a quantitative assessment of how the cells coordinate catabolism with anabolism during product synthesis. It was shown that P4H catalyzed proline hydroxylation in the mutant strain decreases TCA-mediated energy formation by 25% compared to the wildtype. Obviously, the engineered strain compensated this ATP loss by reducing its maintenance energy demand, e.g., by improving the P/O ratio for more efficient glucose utilization, emphasizing the role of maintenance and respiratory chain operation in dynamic cellular adaptation strategies.

Methods

Chemicals

1-13C (99%) and U-13C labeled glucose (99%) was purchased either from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany) or Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA, USA); l-proline was kindly provided by Evonik Rexim SAS (Ham, France); all other chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany) or Carl-Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany) and were of the highest purity available.

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and cultivation conditions

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Additional file 1: Table S6. For the putA gene deletion, the Quick & Easy E.coli Gene Deletion Kit based on Red®/ET® Recombination (Gene Bridges GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was used. Recombinant E. coli strains were routinely precultured in LB complex medium [36] followed by precultivation and cultivation in M9 mineral medium composed of 8.5 g L−1 Na2HPO4·2H2O, 3.0 g L−1 KH2PO4, 0.5 g L−1 NaCl, 1.0 g L−1 NH4Cl, and 2 mL L−1 1 M MgSO4, which contained 10 mg L−1 thiamine, 5 mg L−1 biotin, 1 mL L−1 USFe trace element solution [37], 5 g L−1 glucose, 5 mM proline (when specified), 34 mg L−1 chloramphenicol, and 50 mg L−1 kanamycin. Such M9 medium was used for main cultures using non-labeled glucose to investigate the physiology and 13C-labeled glucose to perform tracer experiments. For the induction of p4h1of expression, 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to both the M9 preculture and the main culture at inoculation. All strains were incubated in baffled Erlenmeyer flasks in horizontal shakers at 30°C and 250 rpm.

Analytical procedures

Bacterial cell growth was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600), using a Libra S11 spectrophotometer (Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge, UK). The correlation factors between OD600 and cell dry weight (CDW) concentration under the conditions investigated were determined as described elsewhere [38] and are listed in the Additional file 1: Table S7. For the determination of extracellular consumption and secretion rates, samples taken during exponential growth were centrifuged for 10 min at 4°C and 13,000 g. Glucose and acetate were quantified in the resulting supernatants using a LaChrom Elite® HPLC System (VWR International GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) equipped with a Trentec 308R-Gel.H ion exclusion column (300 × 8 mm, Trentec Analysentechnik, Gerlingen, Germany) at 40°C with 5 mM H2SO4 as mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. Analytes were detected either by a UV (λ = 210 nm) (VWR Hitachi L-2420) or refractive index (RI) detector (VWR Hitachi L-2490). Proline and hyp were quantified using a LaChrom Elite® HPLC System (VWR International GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) equipped with a diode array detector (VWR Hitachi L-2450) at 200 nm and an Intersil ODS-3 column (GL Sciences B.V., Eindhoven, Netherlands). The separation was performed at 22°C and 1 mL min−1 flow rate applying a linear gradient profile based on 20 mM KH2PO4 buffer (pH 2.3) containing 1% (v/v) acetonitrile as eluent A and acetonitrile containing 10% (v/v) water as eluent B as follows: 85% eluent A for 2 min, 85% to 70% eluent A within 4 min, 70% eluent A for 8 min, and 70–85% eluent A within 0.5 min. Before analysis, the analytes were derivatized using benzoyl chloride. Briefly, supernatant was vortex-mixed with 100 mM benzoyl chloride in acetonitrile and 0.5 M K2HPO4 (pH 11.7) in a 1:2.5:9 (v/v) ratio followed by incubation for 10 min at room temperature and 20 min at 50°C with stirring. Before analysis, derivatized samples were diluted in a 4:1 ratio using eluent A and 50% phosphoric acid in a 7.5:1 (v/v) ratio. Alternatively, a spectrophotometric method described elsewhere [11] was used for hyp quantification. SDS-PAGE was performed to monitor recombinant protein production [39] using an AlphaImager HP documentation system (Biozym, Hessisch Oldendorf, Germany) for gel imaging.

The quantification of intracellular metabolites was based on a modified fast filtration method described by Bolten et al. [40]. Briefly, cells were separated from the medium via vacuum filtration using a water jet pump and cellulose nitrate filter membranes (Whatman, pore size: 0.2 µm). Two milliliters of cell culture were transferred onto the filter membrane and washed twice with 5 mL of washing solution (NaCl solution with an osmolarity equivalent to the M9 medium). The filter was put upside-down into a 100 mL Schott flask that contained 2 mL of ice-cold extraction solution (45:45:1:9 of acetonitrile, 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol, trifluoroacetic acid, and water [41]) and incubated for 20 min. The quenching was performed in less than 1 min. The extraction solution was then transferred to 2 mL Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged for 5 min at 4°C and 13,300 rpm. The supernatant was then derivatized for GC–MS analysis in two-steps, first oximation using an aqueous methoxylamine solution and then silylation using MBDSTF [42].

13C-labeling experiments

E. coli strains (wildtype and ΔputA) were precultured aerobically in 5 mL M9 minimal medium supplemented with 5 g L−1 of glucose at 30°C and 250 rpm. In the mid-exponential growth phase, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000g and 4°C for 5 min, washed once with M9 medium to remove unlabeled glucose, and used to inoculate M9 medium containing 5 g L−1 of a 4:1 mixture of 1-13C-labeled and U-13C labeled glucose to an OD600 of 0.05 or lower to minimize introduction of non-labeled carbon from precultivation. For labeling analysis of proteinogenic amino acids, cells were harvested in the mid-exponential growth phase (at an OD600 of 2–2.5) by centrifugation for 10 min at 13,000g and 4°C, and washed twice by resuspension in 1 mL 0.9% (w/v) NaCl. The washed pellet was resuspended in 150 μL of 6 M HCl and hydrolyzed for 6 h at 105°C in a well-sealed vial to prevent evaporation. After drying overnight at 85°C, the hydrolyzate was resuspended in 30 µL acetonitrile, and amino acid silylation was initiated by the addition of 30 µl N-methyl-N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-trifluoracetamide (MBDSTFA) followed by incubation at 85°C for 60 min. The quantification of mass isotopomer distributions (MIDs) of 12 amino acids (alanine, glycine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, serine, threonine, phenylalanine, aspartate, glutamate, tyrosine) from biomass hydrolyzates was performed as previously described [43] using a GC 3800 combined with a MS/MS 1,200 unit (Varian Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany).

Metabolic modeling and calculation of metabolic fluxes

The metabolic network of E. coli was adapted from literature [20, 44] and comprised glycolysis (EMP), pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle with the glyoxylate bypass, anaplerotic carboxylation and decarboxylation reactions, acetate formation, proline hydroxylation, and the reactions among proline, glutamate, and α-ketoglutarate (α-KG). The stoichiometric model contained 58 reactions and 38 metabolites in case of growth on glucose only, and 65 reactions and 40 metabolites in case proline was added to the medium. The model was constrained with (1) 4 extracellular fluxes (glucose and proline uptake and acetate and hyp formation), (2) the anabolic precursor requirements for biomass formation, as previously described [44], corrected for the experimentally determined biomass yield on glucose, and (3) the 13C-isotopomer labeling pattern of proteinogenic amino acids. Given that the glyoxylate bypass is considered to be inactive in E. coli grown on glucose and active when grown on acetate [24], the pathway was set to zero. Quantitative analysis of the intracellular metabolic fluxes was performed with OpenFlux [45] and all numerical calculations with Matlab 7.9 (The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). The best-fit values of the intracellular carbon fluxes were estimated by minimizing the deviation between experimentally determined and simulated MIDs. Standard deviations were estimated using the Monte Carlo approach included in OpenFLUX and expressed as upper and lower boundaries for intervals of 95% confidence [46]. Stoichiometries and related files are presented in the Additional file 3.

Rates for in vivo energy production in the form of NTP and redox cofactors NAD(P)H and FADH2 were estimated from the catabolic reactions using the optimal set of fluxes obtained from 13C-MFA. Growth-related NADPH and ATP consumption rates were estimated using a lumped stoichiometric equation for biomass formation derived from the FiatFlux software [26], in which the growth rate is integrated considering that macromolecular biomass composition is growth rate dependent [47] (see Additional file 2). Maximal ATP formation rates via electron transport chain and oxidative phosphorylation were estimated using the maximum theoretical P/O ratios of 3 and 2 for NADH and FADH2, respectively [29]. Maximal NAD(P)H and ATP demands for maintenance were calculated by subtracting the growth-related consumption rate from the production rate.

Abbreviations

α-KG: 

α-ketoglutarate

ATP: 

adenosine triphosphate

CDW: 

cell dry weight (g L−1)

13C-MFA: 

13C-metabolic flux analysis

Cp: 

chloramphenicol

EMP: 

Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas

FAD: 

flavin adenine dinucleotide

HPLC: 

high performance liquid chromatography

Glc: 

glucose

hyp: 

trans-4-l-hydroxy-proline

IPTG: 

isopropyl β-d-thiogalactoside

Km: 

kanamycin

λ: 

wavelength (nm)

LB: 

lysogeny broth

NAD(P): 

nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate)

MBDSTFA: 

N-methyl-N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-trifluoracetamide

MID: 

mass isotopomer distribution

OD600

optical density at 600 nm

P/O: 

phosphate/oxygen

PPP: 

pentose phosphate pathway

pro: 

proline

P4H: 

proline-4-hydroxylase

putA: 

proline utilization protein A

putP: 

Na+/proline symport carrier

RID: 

refractive index detector

SDS-PAGE: 

sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

TCA: 

tricaboxylic acid

UV/VIS: 

ultraviolet/visible

wt: 

wild type

μ: 

exponential growth rate (h−1)

ΔputA

knockout of putA gene encoding proline dehydrogenase (PutA)

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

ET designed, performed the experiments, and drafted the manuscript. BB, OF, and AS participated in the design of the study, supervised it, and participated in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the EU-FP7 Oxygreen project (FP7 EU grant number 212281) and the Mercator Research Center Ruhr (MERCUR, Pr-2013-0010). We thank E. Hart for her experimental assistance regarding intracellular metabolite quantification, F. Falcioni and J. Fu for scientific discussions, and B. Ebert for critical reading of the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical guidelines

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemical and Chemical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biotechnology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
(2)
Department of Solar Materials, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig, Germany

References

  1. Hausinger RP (2004) Fe(II)/alpha-ketoglutarate-dependent hydroxylases and related enzymes. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 39:21View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Purpero V, Moran GR (2007) The diverse and pervasive chemistries of the alpha-keto acid dependent enzymes. J Biol Inorg Chem 12:587View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Remuzon P (1996) Trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline, a useful and versatile chiral starting block. Tetrahedron 52:13803View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. De Carolis E, De Luca V (1994) 2-Oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase and related enzymes: biochemical characterization. Phytochemistry 36(5):1093View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. van Beilen JB, Duetz WA, Schmid A, Witholt B (2003) Practical issues in the application of oxygenases. Trends Biotechnol 21:170View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornelissen S, Liu S, Deshmukh AT, Schmid A, Bühler B (2011) Cell physiology rather than enzyme kinetics can determine the efficiency of cytochrome P450-catalyzed C–H-oxyfunctionalization. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38:1359View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Schrewe M, Julsing MK, Bühler B, Schmid A (2013) Whole-cell biocatalysis for selective and productive C–O functional group introduction and modification. Chem Soc Rev 42(15):6346View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey JE (1991) Toward a science of metabolic engineering. Science 252:1668View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Woolston BM, Edgar S, Stephanopoulos G (2013) Metabolic engineering: past and future. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 4:259View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Shibasaki T, Mori H, Ozaki A (2000) Enzymatic production of trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline by regio- and stereospecific hydroxylation of l-proline. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 64:746View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Falcioni F, Blank LM, Frick O, Karau A, Bühler B, Schmid A (2013) Proline availability regulates proline-4-hydroxylase synthesis and substrate uptake in proline-hydroxylating recombinant Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(9):3091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee YH, Nadaraia S, Gu D, Becker DF, Tanner JJ (2003) Structure of the proline dehydrogenase domain of the multifunctional PutA flavoprotein. Nat Struct Biol 10(2):109View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhou Y, Zhu W, Bellur PS, Rewinkel D, Becker DF (2008) Direct linking of metabolism and gene expression in the proline utilization A protein from Escherichia coli. Amino Acids 35(4):711View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Carneiro S, Ferreira EC, Rocha I (2013) Metabolic responses to recombinant bioprocesses in Escherichia coli. J Biotech 164:396View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Shiloach J, Kaufman J, Guillard AS, Fass R (1996) Effect of glucose supply strategy on acetate accumulation, growth, and recombinant protein production by Escherichia coli BL21 (λDE3) and Escherichia coli JM109. Biotechnol Bioeng 49:421View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Akesson M, Hagander P, Axelsson JP (2001) Avoiding acetate accumulation in Escherichia coli cultures using feedback control of glucose feeding. Biotechnol Bioeng 73:223View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Aristidou AA, San KY, Bennett GN (1994) Modification of central metabolic pathway in Escherichia coli to reduce acetate expression of the Bacillus subtilis acetolactate synthase gene. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:944View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nakano K, Rischke M, Sato S, Märkl H (1997) Influence of acetic acid on the growth of Escherichia coli K12 during high-cell-density cultivation in a dialysis reactor. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 48:597View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang B, Wang P, Zheng E, Chen X, Zhao H, Song P et al (2011) Biochemical properties and physiological roles of NADP-dependent malic enzyme in Escherichia coli. J Microbiol 49(5):797View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sauer U, Lasko RW, Fiaux J, Hochuli M, Glaser R, Szyperski T et al (1999) Metabolic flux ratio analysis of genetic and environmental modulations of Escherichia coli central carbon metabolism. J Bacteriol 181:6679Google Scholar
  21. Bologna FP, Andreo CS, Drincovich MF (2007) Escherichia coli malic enzymes: two isoforms with substantial differences in kinetic properties, metabolic regulation, and structure. J Bacteriol 189(16):5937View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao J, Baba T, Mori H, Shimizu K (2004) Global metabolic response of Escherichia coli to gnd or zwf gene-knockout, based on 13C-labeling experiments and the measurement of enzyme activities. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 64:91View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Sauer U, Eikmanns BJ (2005) The PEP–pyruvate–oxaloacetate node as the switch point for carbon flux distribution in bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29:765View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wolfe AJ (2005) The acetate switch. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 69(1):12View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischer E, Sauer U (2003) Metabolic flux profiling of Escherichia coli mutants in central carbon metabolism using GC-MS. Eur J Biochem 270(5):880View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Zamboni N, Fischer E, Sauer U (2005) FiatFlux—a software for metabolic flux analysis from 13C-glucose experiments. BMC Bioinform 6:209View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Nanchen A, Schicker A, Sauer U (2006) Nonlinear dependency of intracellular fluxes on growth rate in miniaturized continuous cultures of Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(2):1164View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Bremer H, Dennis PP (1996) Modulation of chemical composition and other parameters of the cell by growth rate. In: Neidhardt FC (ed) Escherichia coli and Salmonella. ASM Press, Washington DC, pp 1553–1569Google Scholar
  29. He L, Xiao Y, Gebreselassie N, Zhang F, Antoniewiez MR, Tang YJ et al (2014) Central metabolic responses to the overproduction of fatty acids in Escherichia coli based on 13C-metabolic flux analysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 111(3):575View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kayser A, Weber J, Hecht V, Rina U (2005) Metabolic flux analysis of Escherichia coli in glucose-limited continuous culture. I. Growth-rate-dependent metabolic efficiency at steady state. Microbiology 151:693View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffmann F, Rinas U (2001) On-line estimation of the metabolic burden resulting from the synthesis of plasmid-encoded and heat-shock proteins by monitoring respiratory energy generation. Biotechnol Bioeng 76:333View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber J, Hoffmann F, Rinas U (2002) Metabolic adaptation of Escherichia coli during temperature-induced recombinant protein production: 2. Redirection of metabolic fluxes. Biotechnol Bioeng 80:320View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bhattacharya SK, Dubey AK (1995) Metabolic burden as reflected by maintenance coefficient of recombinant Escherichia coli overexpressing target gene. Biotechnol Lett 17(11):1155View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Stephanopoulos G, Aristidou AA, Nielsen JH (1998) Metabolic engineering: principles and methodologies. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Bodegom P (2007) Microbial maintenance: a critical review on its quantification. Microb Ecol 53:513View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Sambrook J, Russell D (2001) Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring HarborGoogle Scholar
  37. Bühler B, Bollhalder I, Hauer B, Witholt B, Schmid A (2003) Use of the two-liquid phase concept to exploit kinetically controlled multistep biocatalysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 81:683View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Blank LM, Ebert BE, Bühler B, Schmid A (2008) Metabolic capacity estimation of Escherichia coli as a platform for redox biocatalysis: constraint-based modeling and experimental verification. Biotechnol Bioeng 100:1050View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bolten CJ, Kiefer P, Letisse F, Portais JC, Wittmann C (2007) Sampling for metabolome analysis of microorganisms. Anal Chem 79:3843View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Fischer CR, Tseng HC, Tai M, Prather KLJ, Stephanopoulos G (2010) Assessment of heterologous butyrate and butanol pathway activity by measurement of intracellular pathway intermediates in recombinant Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 88:265View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Koek MM, Muilwijk B, van der Werf MJ, Hankemeier T (2006) Microbial metabolomics with gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 78(4):1272View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Heyland J, Blank LM, Schmid A (2011) Quantification of metabolic limitations during recombinant protein production in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 155:178View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Fischer E, Zamboni N, Sauer U (2004) High-throughput metabolic flux analysis based on gas chromatography-mass spectrometry derived 13C constraints. Anal Biochem 325(2):308View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Quek LE, Wittmann C, Nielsen LK, Kromer JO (2009) OpenFLUX: efficient modelling software for 13C-based metabolic flux analysis. Microb Cell Fact 8:25View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Antoniewicz MR, Kelleher JK, Stephanopoulos G (2006) Determination of confidence intervals of metabolic fluxes estimated from stable isotope measurements. Metab Eng 8:324View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Pramanik J, Keasling JD (1997) Stoichiometric model of Escherichia coli metabolism: incorporation of growth-rate dependent biomass composition and mechanistic energy requirements. Biotechnol Bioeng 56:398View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Theodosiou et al. 2015

Advertisement