Open Access

The small heat-shock proteins IbpA and IbpB reduce the stress load of recombinant Escherichia coli and delay degradation of inclusion bodies

Microbial Cell Factories20054:6

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-4-6

Received: 16 December 2004

Accepted: 11 February 2005

Published: 11 February 2005

Abstract

Background

The permanently impaired protein folding during recombinant protein production resembles the stress encountered at extreme temperatures, under which condition the putative holding chaperones, IbpA/IbpB, play an important role. We evaluated the impact of ibpAB deletion or overexpression on stress responses and the inclusion body metabolism during production of yeast α-glucosidase in Escherichia coli.

Results

Deletion of ibpAB, which is innocuous under physiological conditions, impaired culture growth during α-glucosidase production. At higher temperatures, accumulation of stress proteins including disaggregation chaperones (DnaK and ClpB) and components of the RNA degradosome, enolase and PNP, was intensified. Overexpression of ibpAB, conversely, suppressed the heat-shock response under these conditions. Inclusion bodies of α-glucosidase started to disaggregate after arrest of protein synthesis in a ClpB and DnaK dependent manner, followed by degradation or reactivation. IbpA/IbpB decelerated disaggregation and degradation at higher temperatures, but did hardly influence the disaggregation kinetics at 15°C. Overexpression of ibpAB concomitant to production at 42°C increased the yield of α-glucosidase activity during reactivation.

Conclusions

IbpA/IbpB attenuate the accumulation of stress proteins, and – at high temperatures – save disaggregated proteins from degradation, at the cost, however, of delayed removal of aggregates. Without ibpAB, inclusion body removal is faster, but cells encounter more intense stress and growth impairment. IbpA/IbpB thus exert a major function in cell protection during stressful situations.

Background

Production of recombinant proteins as inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli can induce several stress responses [13] and may interfere with primary metabolism and cellular protein synthesis [46]. The metabolic burden of the synthesis of recombinant and stress proteins [7, 8] may result in stop of the synthesis of components of the protein synthesising machinery, and ribosomes may be actively degraded [4, 9, 10]. Most commonly, the heat-shock response is induced, as the recombinant proteins – unable to fold properly – overload the chaperone network [11, 12]. While appropriate execution of stress responses is of vital importance for the host Escherichia coli [13], the high metabolic load of strong foreign protein production can prevent proper adaptation [14, 15]. The stress situation can become permanent, and only few cellular proteins except heat-shock proteins are synthesised.

Analogously, incubation at extreme temperatures is characterised by near exclusive heat-shock protein synthesis as a consequence of extensive aggregation of cellular proteins [18, 19]. To deal with this challenge, the chaperone DnaK changes its function: Under physiological conditions, DnaK promotes folding of kinetically trapped intermediates by ATP-dependent partial unfolding, but at high temperatures it becomes a holding chaperone and binds its client proteins permanently, unable to release them in a folding-competent conformation [20].

The small heat-shock proteins (sHsps) are intrinsic holding chaperones of multimeric structure. The multimers dissociate at high temperatures into smaller entities for exposure of client binding sites. After binding of misfolded client proteins, the sHsps form large globular assemblies [21]. Thereby, they prevent irreversible aggregation, and under permissive conditions transfer the client proteins to ATP-dependent chaperones for refolding or degradation [22, 23]. Also the E. coli sHsps, IbpA and IbpB, reversibly dissociate upon prolonged incubation at 50°C from multimers of 2 – 3 MDa to monomers in the case of IbpA and to oligomers of 650 – 700 kDa in the case of IbpB, exposing hydrophobic sites [24, 25]. IbpA and IbpB are highly homologous [26], but show distinct features. While IbpB is soluble when overexpressed alone, prevents inactivation or aggregation of proteins upon heat and oxidative stress in vitro and facilitates their subsequent refolding by DnaK [2325], a role for IbpA in mediating the transfer of IbpB and other proteins into the insoluble cell fraction has been proposed [19, 27]. IbpA and IbpB have been found associated with thermally aggregated cellular proteins and with inclusion bodies [26, 28]. The resolubilisation of protein aggregates, which in vitro and in vivo is mediated by ClpB together with DnaK [2831], can be retarded both in strains overexpressing ibpAB as well as in some cases in strains lacking ibpAB [19, 32, 33]. IbpA and IbpB might control the reversible transition between soluble and aggregated forms that account for the plasticity of inclusion bodies [27, 34, 35].

The role of IbpA/IbpB in cell protection is less clear. Overexpression of ibpAB confers resistance to heat and other stresses [37], but deletion of the ibpAB operon does not affect growth even at high temperatures. Only recovery from prolonged exposure to extreme temperatures such as 50°C are impaired in an ibpAB mutant, and growth of ibpAB dnaK double mutants at high temperatures [19, 36]. In this study we exploit the similarities between incubation at extreme temperature and production of aggregation-protein proteins to examine the functions of the small heat-shock proteins IbpA/IbpB in inclusion body metabolism and stress relief during α-glucosidase production. The enzyme α-glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae produced in recombinant E. coli is a suitable model system. It accumulates as inclusion bodies and induces the heat-shock response including prolonged expression of the ibpAB operon [17]. It is, however, also able to fold into its native conformation in E. coli if produced at low temperature [38], enabling the study of in-vivo-reactivation kinetics.

Results

IbpA/IbpB levels during α-glucosidase production with and without IbpAB coexpression

The concentrations of IbpA and IbpB were estimated from the proteomes of cells producing α-glucosidase for two hours. The ibpAB operon was induced already during α-glucosidase production at 30°C, with moderately higher levels at elevated temperatures (Table 1), whereas no IbpA/IbpB was detected in the plasmid-free strain. The ibpAB operon including its own promoter was inserted immediately downstream of the α-glucosidase gene into the plasmid pKK177-3/GLUCP1, expecting overexpression of ibpAB from its heat-shock promoter and as a tricistronic operon together with α-glucosidase. This plasmid gave ten and four times higher concentrations of IbpA and IbpB, respectively, at 30°C, and the sHsp level increased further in proportion to temperature (Table 1). With ibpAB overexpression, the IbpA accumulation was intensified more strongly and the ratio of IbpA to IbpB rose from 2–3 to 6–8. As the two sHsp may exert different functions, this change need to be accounted for. Depending on the temperature, overexpression increased the concentrations of IbpA and IbpB relative to their concentrations without overexpression four to more than 25 times (Table 1). This wide range of concentrations served to investigate the impact of IbpA/IbpB on α-glucosidase production and in-vivo-reactivation.
Table 1

Relative levels of IbpA and IbpB after two hours of α-glucosidase production at various temperatures with and without ibpAB overexpression from plasmid

 

Temperature

wildtype

ibpAB ++

IbpAa

42°C

3.3 ± 1.3

84 ± 9.5

 

37°C

5.0

50

 

30°C

1.6

19

IbpB

42°C

1 ± 0.3

12 ± 1.3

 

37°C

1.4

7

 

30°C

0.7

3

a The level of IbpA and IbpB was estimated by densitometry of Coomassie-stained two-dimensional gels. Spot volumes were normalised using three spots as internal standards (indicated by circles in Fig. 2) and are given relative to the value of chromosomally encoded IbpB at 42°C.

Elevated levels of IbpA/IbpB increase α-glucosidase accumulation

α-Glucosidase was produced in E. coli MC4100 with and without ibpAB overexpression and in an otherwise isogenic ibpAB deletion mutant. α-Glucosidase accumulation was enhanced at elevated IbpA/IbpB level and reduced in the deletion strain in a temperature dependent manner; the effect was strongest at high temperature (Table 2). At temperatures below 30°C, the IbpA/IbpB levels did not influence the amount of α-glucosidase, which accumulated mainly in the soluble cell fraction in active form (Table 2).
Table 2

Effect of temperature and IbpA/IbpB on accumulation and activity of α-glucosidase four hours after induction

 

Genotype

24°C

30°C

37°C

42°C

Total α-glucosidase/ (mg g-1)

ibpAB ++

38 ± 5

52 ± 1

66 ± 11

47 ± 11

 

wt

39 ± 2

47 ± 5

56 ± 16

38 ± 7

 

ibpAB -

36 ± 4

43 ± 2

49 ± 10

28 ± 4

Vol. activity/ (U mL-1)

ibpAB ++

0.56 ± 0.17

0.80 ± 0.29

0.13 ± 0.04

0.15 ± 0.01

 

wt

0.61 ± 0.14

0.76 ± 0.26

0.10 ± 0.02

0.10 ± 0.01

 

ibpAB -

0.55 ± 0.02

0.74 ± 0.20

0.11 ± 0.04

0.10 ± 0.02

Mean values and 95% confidence intervals from at least three independent experiments. The variance between experiments is mainly caused by different times needed to reach the set temperature after induction depending on the volume of the cultures.

Post-induction growth of the ibpAB deletion mutant was retarded at higher temperatures (Fig. 1), although there was no impact of the ibpAB deletion on growth without induction of α-glucosidase synthesis (not shown) or concomitant to production at lower temperature.
Figure 1

Impact of IbpA/IbpB levels on growth during α-glucosidase production at various temperatures. Cultures were grown on complex Luria-Bertani medium at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.5 and after induction of α-glucosidase synthesis by addition of 1 mM IPTG incubated at 24°C, 30°C, 37°C, or 42°C. Growth was linear after induction, and optical density OD600 values after four hours of α-glucosidase production are shown for wildtype strain with (black bars) or without overexpression of ibpAB (grey bars) and the ibpAB deletion strain (white bars). Mean values and 95% confidence intervals from at least three independent experiments are shown.

Thus, the sHsp are effective only under conditions that favour inclusion body formation.

IbpA/IbpB attenuate accumulation of stress proteins during α-glucosidase production

To study the impact of IbpA/IbpB on cellular reactions during α-glucosidase production, the proteomes of cultures producing α-glucosidase for two hours at various temperatures were separated by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (shown for 42°C in Fig. 2). While chaperones assisting de-novo protein folding such as GroEL and GroES were not significantly influenced by IbpA/IbpB level (Fig. 2), the DnaK concentration showed a negative correlation with IbpA/IbpB availability at 42°C (Fig. 3). The disaggregating chaperone ClpB reached higher concentrations in the ibpAB deletion mutant at all temperatures, in addition to the induction at elevated temperatures (Fig. 3). ClpB accumulation was repressed, however, in the wildtype strain at 30°C, and with overexpression of ibpAB both at 30 and 37°C. As the overall level of IbpA/IbpB was low at these temperatures, and other cellular proteins were not affected, this repression is unlikely to be a passive effect of the metabolic burden of ibpAB expression.
Figure 2

Effect of ibpAB availability on the proteome composition after two hours of α-glucosidase production at 42°C. After growth at 37°C to OD600 of 0.5, cultures were induced with 1 mM IPTG, and transferred to 42°C. Two hours later, cells were harvested and the proteome was separated by two-dimensional gel-electrophoresis. Silver-stained two-dimensional gels of (A) wildtype strain with or (B) without ibpAB overexpression, and of (C) the ibp AB deletion strain. Reference spots used for normalisation of spot intensities after densitometry are indicated by circles. Positions of selected proteins (cf. text) are indicated.

Figure 3

Level of stress proteins after production of α-glucosidase at different temperatures. Cultures were grown to an OD600 of 0.5 at 37°C, induced with 1 mM IPTG and transferred to the indicated temperatures for two hours. After two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of the proteomes, spot volumes quantified by densitometry of Coomassie-stained gels were normalised with the summed volumes of three reference spots marked in Fig. 2 by circles. Concentrations c in the wildtype strain with ibpAB overexpression (black bar), without overexpression (grey bar), and in the ibpAB deletion mutant (white bar) are given relative to the maximum concentration cmax determined for the respective protein to facilitate comparison. The 95% confidence interval from four experiments at 42°C are shown. Protein designation are given above the panels: chaperones DnaK and ClpB, the thermo-unstable elongation factor (EF-Tu), enolase (Eno), polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNP), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Production temperatures are given below the bars.

A similar pattern was found for enolase, which showed higher levels at elevated temperatures only in the deletion mutant (Fig. 3). As enolase is a glycolytic enzyme as well as a putative structural component of the RNA degradosome [39], we examined another metabolic enzyme, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), and polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNP), another RNA degradosome member. The positions on the 2D gels of further degradosome components, RNAse E and RhlB, are not listed in the database. While PNP accumulated to higher concentrations at elevated temperatures and reached highest levels in the deletion mutant (Fig. 3), GAPDH concentration was not significantly affected by temperature and had a slightly lower concentration in the ibpAB deletion mutant at 42°C (Fig. 3). Thus, enolase seems to be induced as a part of a stress response rather than as a metabolic enzyme.

A typical house-keeping protein, the translational elongation factor EF-Tu, had a two to three times higher level at 42°C than at lower temperatures, but the concentrations were not effected by IbpA/IbpB level (Fig. 3).

Thus, while housekeeping proteins are not influenced by IbpA/IbpB levels, the accumulation of ClpB and components of the RNA degradosome was intensified in the ibpAB deletion mutant and attenuated with ibpAB overexpression. This indicates that IbpA/IbpB can relieve the cells of the stress encountered during α-glucosidase production.

Impact of chaperones on in-vivo-reactivation and degradation of α-glucosidase from inclusion bodies

The impact of chaperones on the metabolism of α-glucosidase inclusion bodies was examined in wildtype E. coli MC4100 with or without overexpression of ibpAB and in isogenic strains carrying deletions of ibpAB, clpB, or dnaK. After production of α-glucosidase at 37°C for two hours, the cultures were treated with tetracycline to arrest protein synthesis and transferred to 30°C to initiate disaggregation of inclusion bodies as reported for other proteins [34]. In the wildtype and ibpAB strains, disintegration of inclusion bodies, increase of α-glucosidase activity, and higher concentrations of α-glucosidase in the soluble cell fraction could be detected already within 20 min; the disaggregation was accompanied by degradation (cf. below). While the concentration of α-glucosidase was 10–25% higher in dnaK and clpB deletion mutants than in the wildtype strain, the specific activities obtained during the production phase were less than 0.1 Umg-1, compared to about 0.3 Umg-1 in the other strains (data not shown). Importantly, neither disaggregation, nor reactivation nor degradation took place in these mutants within two hours, and the concentration of α-glucosidase inclusion bodies remained unchanged.

The kinetics of disaggregation, reactivation and degradation of inclusion bodies at modified levels of IbpA/IbpB, i.e. with deletion or overexpression of ibpAB, were investigated as a function of temperature. After production of α-glucosidase at 37°C, the cultures were transferred to various temperatures. As protein synthesis was arrested before the transfer, the initial IbpA/IbpB level did not depend on the disaggregation temperature. The α-glucosidase concentration in the insoluble cell fractions of all cultures decreased with time, but with different kinetics. In the ibpAB deletion strain, the disaggregation kinetics were not influenced by the incubation temperature (Fig. 4A–D). With overexpression of ibpAB, the removal of α-glucosidase from the inclusion bodies was fastest at 15°C (Fig. 4A), proceeding with similar rates as in the other strains. The disaggregation was, however, progressively slower at 30 and 37°C (Fig. 4C,D). At 37°C, α-glucosidase was largely preserved in the insoluble cell fraction of the ibpAB overexpressing strain (Fig. 4D). Thus, disaggregation was retarded at higher temperatures in an IbpA/IbpB dependent manner.
Figure 4

Kinetics of disaggregation, degradation and reactivation of α-glucosidase from inclusion bodies at various temperature. Cultures producing α-glucosidase in the wildtype strain with overexpression of ibpAB (black triangles, solid lines) or without (grey circles, dashed lines) and in the ibpAB deletion mutant (white squares, dotted lines) were incubated at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.5 and then induced with 1 mM IPTG. Two hours after induction, tetracycline was added to a final concentration of 25 μg mL-1, and the cultures were transferred to 15°C (A, E, I), 24°C (B, F, J), 30°C (C, G, K) or 37°C (D, H, L), respectively. Mean value and confidence interval of at least 2 (15 and 24°C) or 3–5 (30 and 37°C) independent experiments. Lines are from linear regression. (A-D) The amount of insoluble α-glucosidase was estimated by densitometry of Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gels and was referred to the value at the time of reactivation start (54 mg g-1 in the wildtype, 58 mg g-1 with overexpression of ibpAB and 49 mg g-1 in the deletion mutant). (E-H) α-Glucosidase activity and protein content were determined in cell extracts after disruption. Specific activity of α-glucosidase is given in units per mg of protein. (I-L) Degradational loss of α-glucosidase calculated as difference of the sum of soluble and insoluble α-glucosidase to the value obtained before addition of tetracycline. Time is given in hours after induction.

Disaggregation of α-glucosidase inclusion bodies was accompanied by an increase of the specific α-glucosidase activities in the cell extracts. The reactivation showed a clear temperature optimum in the range of 24 to 30°C, most evident with wildtype levels of IbpA/IbpB (Fig. 4F,G). The specific α-glucosidase activities increased sevenfold up to 2 Umg-1 within 3 h, whereas at both higher and lower temperatures of 37°C and 15°C, only 0.5–0.75 Umg-1 were obtained (Fig. 4E,H). Both, ibpAB overexpression and deletion, did not improve the maximum reactivation yields. The resolubilisation, measured as an increase of the α-glucosidase concentrations in the soluble cell fraction, showed very similar kinetics as the reactivation (data not shown).

A large part of the disaggregated α-glucosidase was subjected to proteolysis: within three hours after arrest of protein synthesis, 30 – 40% of α-glucosidase were lost due to degradation at 15°C in all three strains (Fig. 4I), and in the ibpAB deletion mutant at all temperatures (Fig. 4I–L). Similar to the effect on disaggregation, higher ibpAB expression levels or elevated temperatures synergistically retarded degradation, reducing the loss to 10% with ibpAB overexpression at 37°C (Fig. 4L). IbpA/IbpB thus influenced disaggregation, resolubilisation, reactivation and degradation in a temperature-dependent manner.

IbpA/IbpB favour reactivation of α-glucosidase produced at high temperature

As IbpA/IbpB are designed for action at extreme temperature, α-glucosidase inclusion bodies were produced at 42°C, followed by arrest of protein synthesis and incubation at 30°C. The production temperature did not influence the initial disaggregation kinetics (data not shown). About one third of the α-glucosidase produced concomitant to ibpAB overexpression was resistant to disaggregation after incubation over night, while it was eliminated apart from traces in the other strains (Fig. 5A). Also the removal of other components of the inclusion bodies, which appear as smear in the SDS PAGE of the insoluble cell fractions, were impaired in the overexpressing strain (Fig. 5A), resembling the core inclusion bodies that remain with other proteins [34], whereas the inclusion bodies produced at low IbpA/IbpB levels were completely dissolved after prolonged incubation. Only outer membrane proteins (indicated by arrows) that result from coprecipitation of cell debris during inclusion body preparation [40] remain at constant level in the insoluble cell fraction (Fig. 5A). Thus, the delay of disaggregation by IbpA/IbpB is not specific to α-glucosidase, but effects also cellular proteins in a similar way.
Figure 5

Disaggregation and resolubilisation of inclusion bodies produced at 42°C Inclusion bodies of α-glucosidase were produced for two hours at 42°C, followed by addition of tetracycline and subsequent incubation at 30°C. Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel of (A) the insoluble cell fractions and (B) the soluble cell fractions extracted from identical amounts of biomass; times relative to induction and ibpAB genotype are given above the lanes. Positions of α-glucosidase, IbpA/IbpB and membrane proteins are indicated. First lane contains molecular weight markers of 97.4, 66.2, 45, 31, 21.5 and 14.4 kDa, respectively.

Production at 37°C resulted in degradation of 20% of α-glucosidase during incubation at 30°C for 3 h in the wildtype strain (Fig. 4K). After production at 42°C, however, there was less than 10% of α-glucosidase lost during reactivation at 30°C with or without ibpAB overexpression (Fig. 6). Thus, degradation of α-glucosidase after arrest of protein synthesis was predetermined by the preceding production temperature. The protection was dependent on IbpA/IbpB availability, as in the deletion mutant the loss of α-glucosidase was substantial regardless of the production temperature (Fig. 4K, 6).
Figure 6

Degradation of α-glucosidase after production at 42°C. Cultures of ibpAB deletion mutant (white square), wildtype strain without (grey circle) or with ibpAB overproduction (black triangle) produced α-glucosidase for two hours at 42°C and were transferred to 30°C after addition of tetracycline. Degradational loss of α-glucosidase is shown relative to the amount of α-glucosidase present at the time of tetracycline addition. Time is given in hours after induction.

Consequently, disaggregated α-glucosidase was quantitatively transferred to the soluble cell fraction after production at 42°C concomitant to ibpAB overexpression, and became the most prominent band in the gel. The band intensity increased from 2 to 7% of the total cellular protein (Fig. 5B). In contrast, significantly less α-glucosidase could be detected in the soluble fraction of the deletion mutant even after prolonged incubation, finally corresponding to only 4% of cellular protein (Fig. 5B).

The α-glucosidase activity increased during the initial reactivation phase with similar slopes with and without ibpAB overexpression (Fig. 7B). Stationary level of activity was reached earlier, however, in the ibpAB deletion mutant and in the wildtype strain without overexpression. Hence the final activities in these strains were independent of the production temperature (Fig. 7A,B). In contrast, the activity continued to increase for about 12 h after arrest of protein synthesis subsequent to α-glucosidase production at 42°C with ibpAB overexpression (Fig. 7B), resulting in higher activity yields than obtained in the wild type strain. The final α-glucosidase activities after production with overexpression of ibpAB at 42°C were two times higher than after production at 37°C (Fig. 7A,B). IbpA/IbpB can thus ameliorate reactivation of inclusion bodies produced at high temperature.
Figure 7

Impact of production temperature on reactivation of α-glucosidase from inclusion bodies. Inclusion bodies of α-glucosidase were produced for two hours at 37°C (A) or 42°C (B) in ibpAB deletion mutant (white square), wildtype strain without (grey circle) or with ibpAB overproduction (black triangle). Specific activity of α-glucosidase was measured during incubation at 30°C after addition of tetracycline. Mean values and 95% confidence intervals from six (37°C) or four (42°C) independent experiments. Time is given in hours after induction.

Discussion

Intensified stress response and growth impairment in ibpAB deletion strain

Impairment of cell growth by ibpAB deletion is observed only under conditions characterised by depletion of free DnaK, such as under extremely high temperature or artificially controlled low level [19, 33, 36, 37]. Accumulation of α-glucosidase as inclusion bodies mimics the aspect of permanently impaired protein folding, and growth impairment during α-glucosidase production was more intense in the ibpAB mutant. Moreover, DnaK controls the expression of heat-shock genes. Consequently, chromosomal ibpAB and other heat-shock genes were induced during α-glucosidase production. Especially in the deletion strain, lack of IbpA/IbpB was compensated by enhanced accumulation of the disaggregating chaperone ClpB. Also the levels of two components of the RNA degradosome, enolase and PNP, were elevated in the ibpAB deletion strain at 42°C. Enolase homologues have been reported to be induced by heat shock in a variety of species, including Bacillus subtilis [41], but there was no indication that the E. coli eno gene can be induced by heat-shock or high temperature [42].

Both ClpB and DnaK are essential for disaggregation and de novo protein folding

ClpB and DnaK accumulated to higher levels in the ibpAB deletion strain. These chaperones cooperate with IbpA/IbpB in a "disaggregation triad" [33]. Each chaperone, ClpB and DnaK, was essential for reactivation as well as degradation of α-glucosidase, indicating that both processes operate after disaggregation of the inclusion bodies. With other protein aggregates, varying dependencies on DnaK and ClpB for degradation or reactivation were observed [29, 30, 32, 4345]. To the aggregate-specific factors influencing the chaperone demand for disaggregation in vitro belong their sizes and accessible surface areas [31, 46, 47]. Also the substrate specificity of chaperones may influence the protein-specific requirements.

The impaired disaggregation in clpB and dnaK mutants reduced the accumulation of active α-glucosidase already during production, and a negative impact of the clpB deletion on de novo folding has been observed also with a number of other proteins [48]. Resolubilisation from aggregates might thus be a general route to active protein, in accordance with a quantitative model of inclusion body formation kinetics [16]. This constitutes a major difference to the irreversible aggregation at extreme temperatures, when the client release of DnaK is retarded [20].

IbpA/IbpB disburden DnaK and reduce degradation

Ongoing attempts to fold α-glucosidase will finally result in its degradation. IbpA/IbpB, which are postulated to recognise similar traits of aggregation prone proteins as DnaK [19], will withdraw α-glucosidase from the futile cycle of DnaK binding and release. Thereby, IbpA/IbpB on the one hand disburden the DnaK system to make resources available to repress stress responses, and on the other hand protect α-glucosidase from degradation. These functions might be related, as the heat-shock response includes also proteases that may accumulate to lower levels with ibpAB overexpression. Deletion of ibpAB, conversely, lowers the amount of α-glucosidase and other recombinant proteins [27, 49]. Consequently, unlike to incubation at 50°C, ibpAB deletion did not increase aggregation during α-glucosidase production, rather reduced accumulation of insoluble α-glucosidase. Functional replacement of DnaK by IbpA/IbpB is also reflected by the amount of DnaK associated with inclusion bodies and aggregated cellular proteins, that is increased in the ibpAB deletion mutant and decreased by ibpAB overexpression [[19], unpublished results].

IbpA/IbpB prevent degradation in a temperature-dependent manner

Disaggregation and degradation of inclusion bodies took place after arrest of protein synthesis. The disaggregation at and above 30°C was retarded by high levels of IbpA/IbpB. In wildtype cells, IbpA/IbpB accumulation is therefore restricted to requiring conditions, e.g. by degradation of IbpA/IbpB after dissociation from protein aggregates [33] or repression of ibpAB expression despite an otherwise active heat-shock response [14].

Temperatures during both, formation and disaggregation of inclusion bodies, were important for the rate of disaggregation and yield of reactivation. Irreversible structural changes of IbpA/IbpB at low temperatures [25] may impair the protective function, making the disaggregation kinetics at 15°C independent of the IbpA/IbpB level. Hence with other systems, depending on the conditions, no influence of the ibpAB deletion on disaggregation kinetics or even delayed disaggregation in the mutant were observed [19, 33, 34, 50]. The reactivation rate is determined by the difference of disaggregation and degradation rates, which are influenced in parallel by the availability of the sHsps. Hence reactivation was hardly effected by ibpAB deletion or overexpression, in accordance with observation for other proteins [32, 34].

With high temperature during production, degradation during the subsequent disaggregation phase was nearly completely avoided in ibpAB proficient strains. In the ibpAB deletion strain, on the contrary, production temperature did not ameliorate the recovery of soluble α-glucosidase. Consequently, the reactivation phase was prolonged with higher IbpA/IbpB concentrations, and the final α-glucosidase activities were increased from 4 in the wildtype cells to 5 Umg-1 with ibpAB overexpression. As the yield of reactivated protein is more important for heat-stress survival than the rate of disaggregation [56], the reduction of degradation may also contribute to the cell protective function of the sHsps.

Conclusions

Deletion of ibpAB renders E. coli more susceptible to growth impairment by production of α-glucosidase. Without recombinant protein production, ibpAB deletion affects growth only at extreme temperatures or in combination with mutations of dnaK. Thus, production of an aggregation prone protein constitutes a good model system to study the functions of IbpA/IbpB under non-lethal conditions. Two major functions were found for IbpA/IbpB: First, the sHsps protect cells during α-glucosidase production and disburden the DnaK system. In the ibpAB deletion strain, insufficient free DnaK was available to control ClpB accumulation, which was strongly intensified. Also enolase and PNP showed a similar pattern.

Second, IbpA/IbpB reduce degradation of α-glucosidase during disaggregation from inclusion bodies. The IbpA/IbpB function depends on elevated temperature. Improved reactivation and protection from degradation were found after production at higher temperature, in accordance with the known heat-activation of sHsps. Also during disaggregation, a higher temperature was beneficial, whereas no protection from degradation was found at 15°C. In the ibpAB deletion strain, however, removal of inclusion bodies was accelerated, possibly due to the higher levels of ClpB and DnaK that were found to be essential for reactivation and degradation of α-glucosidase. Thus, the sHsp level is in a delicate balance: IbpA/IbpB are required to protect the cell, but abundant IbpA/IbpB impede the necessary adaptation and retards removal of aggregates.

Methods

Strains and Plasmids

Escherichia coli MC4100 araD139 Δ (argF-lac)U169 rpsL150 relA1 flbB5301 deoC1 ptsF25 rbsR and JGT17 MC4100 Δ ibpAB [36] were used to produce the yeast α-glucosidase encoded on the plasmid pKK177-3/GLUCP1 [38]. Plasmid pUBS520, supplying the minor argU tRNA and carrying the lacI repressor gene [51] was cotransformed for improving the production of α-glucosidase [52]. The sequence from plasmid pIbp [36] between the two Hind III restriction sides, coding for the ibpA and ibpB genes including their native promoter, was cloned into the Hind III site of the plasmid pKK177-3/GLUCP1 [38], located between the α-glucosidase GLUCPI gene and the 5ST1T2 terminator, to give the new plasmid named pKK177-3/GLUCP1_ibpAB, in which the ibpAB operon is under the control of its native promoter and of the tac-promoter upstream of the α-glucosidase gene. Proper orientation of the insert was tested by Ear I digestion.

Culture conditions

The cultures were incubated on Luria-Bertani (LB) medium, supplemented with appropriate antibiotics (ampicilline 100 μg mL-1, chloramphenicol 50 μg mL-1), on a rotary shaker at 37°C to an OD600 of 0.5, induced with 1 mM IPTG and transferred to different temperatures as indicated in the results section. For reactivation experiments, tetracycline was added to a final concentration of 25 μgmL-1 two hours after induction to arrest protein synthesis, and the cultures were transferred to the indicated temperatures.

Product analysis

For SDS-PAGE analysis, cell pellets resuspended in phosphate buffer pH 7 were incubated on ice with 33 mgL-1 lysozyme for 30 min and disrupted by sonication for 20 s. Soluble and insoluble fractions were separated by centrifugation for 20 min at 13,000 rpm. The insoluble fractions were washed with phosphate buffer twice. SDS-PAGE analysis was performed according to the method of Laemmli [53]. Levels of α-glucosidase were estimated by densitometry of Coomassie-stained gels.

α-glucosidase activity was measured as described [54]. For the calculation of specific activities, the protein concentration was determined according to Bradford [55] with bovine serum albumin as standard. Specific activities are expressed as units of α-glucosidase per milligram of total protein (U mg-1).

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Cell pellets from a culture volume of 8/OD600 mL were dissolved in 200 μL lysis buffer containing 8 M urea, 4% CHAPS, 60 mM DDT, 2% Pharmalyte 3–10 and 0.002% bromophenol blue and incubated for one hour at room temperature. The first dimension was carried out on an IPGphor using 24 cm pH gradient 3–10 strips (amersham pharmacia biotech), with the voltage profile recommended by the manufacturer. The second dimension was run in an Ettan Dalt six (amersham pharmacia biotech) on 12.5% polyacrylamide gels. Gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue for quantification or by silver staining for visualisation. Gels for cultures incubated at 42°C were performed in quadruplicate, for other temperatures once. Protein spots were identified by comparison with the E. coli 2D database http://www.expasy.org/cgi-bin/map2/def?ECOLI. Spot identities were verified by N-terminal sequencing for ClpB (RLDRLTN) and enolase (SKIVKII). α-glucosidase was not dissolved from the inclusion bodies and is not visible in the gels.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank F. Baneyx for providing strain MC4100 and JGT17 and plasmid pIbp, B. Bukau for providing a dnaK mutant strain, A. Taylor for providing a clpB mutant strain, Roche for plasmids pUBS520 and pKK177-3/GLUCP1, P. Rücknagel for N-terminal sequencing, U. Rinas for helpful comments and H. Lilie for critically reading an early version of the manuscript. Ha LeThanh is recipient of a grant from Deutscher Akademischer Auslandsdienst (DAAD).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute for Biotechnology, Department of Biochemistry/Biotechnology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
(2)
Bioprocess Engineering Laboratory, Department of Process and Environmental Engineering, Biocenter Oulu,University of Oulu

References

  1. Arís A, Corchero JL, Benito A, Carbonell X, Viaplana E, Villaverde A: The expression of recombinant genes from bacteriophage lambda strong promoters triggers the SOS response in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998, 60: 551-559. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19981205)60:5<551::AID-BIT5>3.0.CO;2-M. addendum Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1999, 64: 127View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Gill RT, Valdes JJ, Bentley WE: A comparative study on global stress gene regulation in response to overexpression of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2000, 2: 178-189. 10.1006/mben.2000.0148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Harcum SW, Bentley WE: Response dynamics of 26-, 34-, 39-, 54-, and 80 kDa proteases in induced cultures of recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1993, 42: 675-685. 10.1002/bit.260420602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Dong H, Nilsson L, Kurland CG: Gratuitous overexpression of genes in Escherichia coli leads to growth inhibition and ribosome destruction. J Bacteriol. 1995, 177: 1497-1504.Google Scholar
  5. Rinas U: Synthesis rates of cellular proteins involved in translation and protein folding are strongly altered in response to overproduction of basic fibroblast growth factor by recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Prog. 1996, 12: 196-200. 10.1021/bp9600039.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Weber J, Hoffmann F, Rinas U: Metabolic adaptation of Escherichiacoli during temperature-induced recombinant protein synthesis: 2. Redirection of metabolic fluxes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002, 80: 320-330. 10.1002/bit.10380.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentley WE, Mirjalili N, Andersen DC, Davis RH, Kompala DS: Plasmid-encoded protein: the principal factor in the "metabolic burden" associated with recombinant bacteria. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1990, 35: 668-681. 10.1002/bit.260350704.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Hoffmann F, Rinas U: On-line estimation of the metabolic burden resulting from synthesis of plasmid-encoded and heat-shock proteins in high-cell density cultures of recombinant Escherichiacoli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001, 76: 333-340. 10.1002/bit.10098.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Teich A, Lin HY, Andersson L, Meyer S, Neubauer P: Amplification of ColE1 related plasmids in recombinant cultures of Escherichia coli after IPTG induction. J Biotechnol. 1998, 64: 197-210. 10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00108-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lin HY, Hanschke R, Nicklisch S, Nietsche T, Jarchow R, Schwahn C, Riemschneider S, Meyer S, Gupta A, Hecker M, Neubauer P: Cellular responses to strong overexpression of recombinant genes in Escherichia coli. DNA relaxation and cell death after induction of α-glucosidase. Recombinant Protein Production with prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. A comparative view on host physiology. Edited by: Merten OW, Mattanovich D, Lang C, Larsson G, Neubauer P, Porro D, Postma PW, Teixeira de Mattos J, Cole J. 2001, Dortrecht, Kluwer Academic Publisher, 55-74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Goff SA, Goldberg AL: Production of abnormal proteins in E. coli stimulates transcription of lon and other heat shock genes. Cell. 1985, 41: 587-595. 10.1016/S0092-8674(85)80031-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Parsell DA, Sauer RT: Induction of a heat shock-like response by unfolded protein in Escherichia coli : dependence on protein level not protein degradation. Genes Dev. 1989, 3: 1226-1232.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoffmann F, Rinas U: Stress Induced by Recombinant Protein Production in Escherichia coli. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2004, 89: 73-92.Google Scholar
  14. Hoffmann F, Rinas U: Kinetics of heat-shock response and inclusion body formation during temperature-induced production of basic fibroblast growth factor in high-cell density cultures of recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Prog. 2000, 16: 1000-1007. 10.1021/bp0000959.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Vind J, Sørensen MA, Rasmussen MD, Pedersen S: Synthesis of proteins in Escherichia coli is limited by the concentration of free ribosomes. Expression from reporter genes does not always reflect functional mRNA levels. J Mol Biol. 1993, 231: 678-688. 10.1006/jmbi.1993.1319.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffmann F, Posten C, Rinas U: Kinetic model of in vivo folding and inclusion body formation in recombinant Escherichiacoli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001, 72: 315-322. 10.1002/1097-0290(20010205)72:3<315::AID-BIT8>3.0.CO;2-G.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Jürgen B, Lin HY, Riemschneider S, Scharf C, Neubauer P, Schmid R, Hecker M, Schweder T: Monitoring of genes that respond to overproduction of an insoluble recombinant protein in Escherichia coli glucose-limited fed-batch fermentations. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000, 70: 217-224. 10.1002/1097-0290(20001020)70:2<217::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-W.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Neidhardt FC, VanBogelen RA: Heat shock response. Escherichiacoli and Salmonella typhimurium – Cellular and Molecular Biology. Edited by: Neidhardt FC. 1987, Washington, DC, ASM Press, 1334-1345.Google Scholar
  19. Kuczyńska-Wiśnik D, Kędzierska S, Matuszewska E, Lund P, Taylor A, Lipinska B, Laskowska E: The Escherichia coli small heat-shock proteins IbpA and IbpB prevent the aggregation of endogenous proteins denatured in vivo during extreme heat shock. Microbiology. 2002, 148: 1757-1765.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Diamant S, Goloubinoff P: Temperature-controlled activity of DnaK-DnaJ-GrpE chaperones: protein-folding arrest and recovery during and after heat shock depends on the substrate protein and the GrpE concentration. Biochemistry. 1998, 37: 9688-9694. 10.1021/bi980338u.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Haslbeck M, Walke S, Stromer T, Ehrnsperger M, White HE, Chen S, Saibil HR, Buchner J: Hsp26: a temperature-regulated chaperone. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 6744-6751. 10.1093/emboj/18.23.6744.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jakob U, Gaestel M, Engel K, Buchner J: Small heat shock proteins are molecular chaperones. J Biol Chem. 1993, 268: 1517-1520.Google Scholar
  23. Veinger L, Diamant S, Buchner J, Goloubinoff P: The small heat-shock protein IbpB from Escherichia coli stabilizes stress-denatured proteins for subsequent refolding by a multichaperone network. J Biol Chem. 1998, 273: 11032-11037. 10.1074/jbc.273.18.11032.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitagawa M, Miyakawa M, Matsumura Y, Tsuchido T: Escherichia coli small heat shock proteins, IbpA and IbpB, protect enzymes from inactivation by heat and oxidants. Eur J Biochem. 2002, 269: 2907-2917. 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.02958.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Shearstone JR, Baneyx F: Biochemical characterization of the small heat shock protein IbpB from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 9937-9945. 10.1074/jbc.274.15.9937.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Allen SP, Polazzi JO, Gierse JK, Easton AM: Two novel heat shock genes encoding proteins produced in response to heterologous protein expression in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1992, 174: 6938-6947.Google Scholar
  27. Carrió MM, Villaverde A: Construction and deconstruction of bacterial inclusion bodies. J Biotechnol. 2002, 96: 3-12. 10.1016/S0168-1656(02)00032-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Laskowska E, Wawrzynów A, Taylor A: IbpA and IbpB, the new heat-shock proteins, bind to endogenous Escherichia coli proteins aggregated intracellularly by heat shock. Biochimie. 1996, 78: 117-122. 10.1016/0300-9084(96)82643-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kędzierska S, Staniszewska M, Węgrzyn A, Taylor A: The role of DnaK/DnaJ and GroEL/GroES systems in the removal of endogenous proteins aggregated by heat-shock from Escherichia coli cells. FEBS Lett. 1999, 446: 331-337. 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00154-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Mogk A, Tomoyasu T, Goloubinoff P, Rüdiger S, Röder D, Langen H, Bukau B: Identification of thermolabile Escherichia coli proteins: Prevention and reversion of aggregation by DnaK and ClpB. EMBO J. 1999, 18: 6934-6949. 10.1093/emboj/18.24.6934.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Weibezahn J, Bukau B, Mogk A: Unscrambling an egg: protein disaggregation by AAA+ proteins. Microbial Cell Factories. 2004, 3: 1-10.1186/1475-2859-3-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kędzierska S, Jezierski G, Taylor A: DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system reactivates endogenous E. coli thermostable FBP aldolase in vivo and in vitro; the effect is enhanced by GroE heat shock proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2001, 6: 29-37. 10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0029:DDCSRE>2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mogk A, Deuerling E, Vorderwülbecke S, Vierling E, Bukau B: Small heat shock proteins, ClpB and the DnaK system form a functional triad in reversing protein aggregation. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50: 585-595. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03710.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Carrió MM, Villaverde A: Protein aggregation as bacterial inclusion bodies is reversible. FEBS Lett. 2001, 489: 29-33. 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)02073-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Carrió MM, Corchero JL, Villaverde A: Proteolytic digestion of bacterial inclusion body proteins during dynamic transition between soluble and insoluble forms. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1999, 1434: 170-176.Google Scholar
  36. Thomas JG, Baneyx F: Roles of the Escherichia coli small heat shock proteins IbpA and IbpB in thermal stress management: comparison with ClpA, ClpB, and HtpG in vivo. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180: 5165-5172.Google Scholar
  37. Kitagawa M, Matsumura Y, Tsuchido T: Small heat shock proteins, IbpA and IbpB, are involved in resistances to heat and superoxide stresses in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000, 184: 165-171. 10.1016/S0378-1097(00)00038-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kopetzki E, Schumacher G, Buckel P: Control of formation of active soluble or inactive insoluble baker's yeast alpha-glucosidase PI in Escherichia coli by induction and growth conditions. Mol Gen Genet. 1989, 216: 149-155. 10.1007/BF00332244.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuhnel K, Luisi BF: Crystal structure of the Escherichia coli RNA degradosome component enolase. J Mol Biol. 2001, 313: 583-592. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5065.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Rinas U, Boone TC, Bailey JE: Characterization of inclusion bodies in recombinant Escherichia coli producing high levels of porcine somatotropin. J Biotechnol. 1993, 28: 313-320. 10.1016/0168-1656(93)90179-Q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller BS, Kennedy TE, Streips UN: Molecular characterization of specific heat shock proteins in Bacillus subtilis. Curr Microbiol. 1991, 22: 231-236.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. VanBogelen RA, Abshire KZ, Pertsemlidis A, Clark RL, Neidhardt FC: Gen-protein database of Escherichia coli K-12. Escherichia coli and Salmonella – Cellular and molecular biology. Edited by: Neidhardt FC. 1996, Washington, DC, ASM Press, 2067-2117.Google Scholar
  43. Carrió MM, Villaverde A: Role of molecular chaperones in inclusion body formation. FEBS Lett. 2003, 537: 215-21. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)00126-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Kędzierska S, Matuszewska E: The effect of co-overproduction of DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE and ClpB proteins on the removal of heat-aggregated proteins from Escherichia coli ΔclpB mutant cells – new insight into the role of Hsp70 in a functional cooperation with Hsp100. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001, 204: 355-60. 10.1016/S0378-1097(01)00427-X.Google Scholar
  45. Laskowska E, Kuczynska-Wisnik D, Skorko-Glonek J, Taylor A: Degradation by protease Lon, Clp and HtrA, of Escherichia coli proteins aggregated in vivo by heat shock; HtrA protease action in vivo and in vitro. Mol Microbiol. 1996, 22: 555-571. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.1231493.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Goloubinoff P, Mogk A, Ben-Zvi AP, Tomoyasu T, Bukau B: Sequential mechanism of solubilization and refolding of stable protein aggregates by a bichaperone network. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999, 96: 13732-13737. 10.1073/pnas.96.24.13732.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Diamant S, Ben-Zvi AP, Bukau B, Goloubinoff P: Size-dependent disaggregation of stable proteins aggregates by the DnaK chaperone machinery. J Biol Chem. 2000, 275: 21107-21113. 10.1074/jbc.M001293200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas JG, Baneyx F: ClpB and HtpG facilitate de novo protein folding in stressed Escherichia coli cells. Mol Microbiol. 2000, 36: 1360-1370. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01951.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Han MJ, Park SJ, Park TJ, Lee SY: Roles and application of small heat shock proteins in the production of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004, 88: 426-436. 10.1002/bit.20227.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Kędzierska S, Jezierski G, Taylor A: DnaK/DnaJ chaperone system reactivates endogenous E. coli thermostable FBP aldolase in vivo and in vitro; the effect is enhanced by GroE heat shock proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2001, 6: 29-37. 10.1379/1466-1268(2001)006<0029:DDCSRE>2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Brinkmann U, Mattes RE, Buckel P: High-level expression of recombinant genes in Escherichia coli is dependent on the availability of the dnaY gene product. Gene. 1989, 85: 109-114. 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90470-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Lin HY: PhD thesis. 2000, Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle-WittenbergGoogle Scholar
  53. Laemmi UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Lin HY, Neubauer P: Influence of controlled glucose oscillations on a fed-batch process of recombinant Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2000, 79: 27-37. 10.1016/S0168-1656(00)00217-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72: 248-254.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Weibezahn J, Tessarz P, Schlieker C, Zahn R, Maglica Z, Lee S, Zentgraf H, Weber-Ban EU, Dougan DA, Tsai FT, Mogk A, Bukau B: Thermotolerance requires refolding of aggregated proteins by substrate translocation through the central pore of ClpB. Cell. 2004, 119: 653-665. 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.027.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© LeThanh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement