Open Access

Improved production of fatty acid ethyl esters in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through up-regulation of the ethanol degradation pathway and expression of the heterologous phosphoketolase pathway

  • Bouke Wim de Jong1,
  • Shuobo Shi2,
  • Verena Siewers1 and
  • Jens Nielsen1Email author
Microbial Cell Factories201413:39

Received: 8 January 2014

Accepted: 5 March 2014

Published: 12 March 2014



Due to an increasing demand of transportation fuels, a lower availability of cheap crude oil and a lack of sustainability of fossil fuels, a gradual shift from petroleum based fuels towards alternative and renewable fuel resources will be required in the near future. Fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs) have properties similar to current crude diesel and could therefore form an important contribution to the development of sustainable transportation fuels in future. It is important to develop novel cell factories for efficient production of FAEEs and their precursors.


Here, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell factory expressing a heterologous wax ester synthase (ws2) from Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus was used to produce FAEEs from ethanol and acyl-coenzyme A (acyl-CoA). The production of acyl-CoA requires large amounts of NADPH and acetyl-CoA. Therefore, two metabolic engineering strategies for improved provision of NADPH and acetyl-CoA were evaluated. First, the ethanol degradation pathway was employed to re-channel carbon flow towards the synthesis of acetyl-CoA. Therefore, ADH2 and ALD6 encoding, respectively, alcohol dehydrogenase and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase were overexpressed together with the heterologous gene acs SE L641P encoding acetyl-CoA synthetase. The co-overexpression of ADH2, ALD6 and acs SE L641P with ws2 resulted in 408 ± 270 μg FAEE gCDW−1, a 3-fold improvement. Secondly, for the expression of the PHK pathway two genes, xpkA and ack, both descending from Aspergillus nidulans, were co-expressed together with ws2 to catalyze, respectively, the conversion of xylulose-5-phosphate to acetyl phosphate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and acetyl phosphate to acetate. Alternatively, ack was substituted with pta from Bacillus subtilis, encoding phosphotransacetylase for the conversion of acetyl phosphate to acetyl-CoA. Both PHK pathways were additionally expressed in a strain with multiple chromosomally integrated ws2 gene, which resulted in respectively 5100 ± 509 and 4670 ± 379 μg FAEE gCDW−1, an up to 1.7-fold improvement.


Two different strategies for engineering of the central carbon metabolism for efficient provision of acetyl-CoA and NADPH required for fatty acid biosynthesis and hence FAEE production were evaluated and it was found that both the ethanol degradation pathway as well as the phosphoketolase pathway improve the yield of FAEEs.


Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fatty acid ethyl ester (FAEE) Biodiesel Metabolic engineering


There is much interest in developing novel cell factories for production of advanced biofuels that can be used as diesel and bunker oil [1], and here we describe production of fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEEs) by yeast. The principle of FAEE production has been demonstrated in Escherichia coli as well as in Saccharomyces cerevisiae where FAEEs were formed by a transesterification reaction between ethanol and fatty acyl-CoA, which was catalyzed by a heterologous wax ester synthase/acyl-CoA:diacylglycerol acyltransferase (WS/DGAT) [2, 3]. The enzyme activities of several WS/DGATs have been analyzed [4]. Five different wax ester synthase genes from different origins were expressed in S. cerevisiae and a strain expressing a wax ester synthase (ws2) from Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus DSM 8798 showed the highest production of FAEEs [4, 5].

While oleaginous organisms such as Botryococcus braunii, Gordonia sp., Humicola lanuginose or Lipomyces starkeyi were reported to accumulate lipids up to 65–75% of their cell dry weight, the yeast S. cerevisiae is a natural ethanol producer and not an oleaginous organism. There is therefore a demand for engineering strategies targeting the synthesis of acyl-CoA, one of the precursors for FAEE production [610].

The precursor for fatty acid biosynthesis is acetyl coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA), which plays a central role in several cellular pathways and compartments, and is involved in regulatory mechanisms [11, 12]. In S. cerevisiae, it is produced in the cytosol, the mitochondria and the peroxisomes, but is not able to cross the organelle membranes. Acetyl-CoA also functions as a gateway for metabolic routes to many other biotechnologically valuable compounds, the pathways of which are mostly targeted to the cytosol and therefore there consists an interest to increase the production of acetyl-CoA in the cytosol [12, 13].

During growth of S. cerevisiae on high concentrations of glucose, most glycolytic carbon is directed towards the production of ethanol from acetaldehyde which is known as the Crabtree effect [14, 15]. To reduce the amount of ethanol and increase the amount of cytosolic acetyl-CoA, a metabolic engineering strategy described by Chen et al. [13] was applied. Alcohol dehydrogenase 2 (Adh2) catalyzes the conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde in S. cerevisiae. For the formation of cytosolic acetyl-CoA, acetaldehyde is converted to acetate, which is catalyzed by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase encoded by endogenous ALD1 - ALD7 and subsequently to acetyl-CoA catalyzed by acetyl-CoA synthetase (encoded by ACS1 and ACS2) [12, 16]. In this approach, endogenous ALD6 and a heterologous ACS variant from Salmonella enterica encoded by acs SE L641P were overexpressed. The ACS variant acs SE L641P carries an amino acid substitution that prevents the enzyme from being inactivated by acetylation [17, 18]. The metabolic pathway is shown in Figure 1A.
Figure 1

Overview of metabolic engineering strategies. A. Schematic metabolic pathways describing the (over-)expression of the ethanol degradation pathway and the phosphoketolase pathway. The genes of interest are: xpkA (xylulose-5-phosphate phosphoketolase), ack (acetate kinase), pta (phosphotransacetylase), ADH2 (alcohol dehydrogenase 2), ALD6 (acetaldehyde dehydrogenase), acs SE L641P (acetyl-CoA synthetase) and ws2 (wax ester synthase). B. Stoichiometric equations for the conversion of glucose to the product of interest, FAEE, via either the EMP pathway or the combination of PP and PHK pathway. For convenience it was assumed that the acyl-CoA chain was unsaturated and 16 carbons long. Abbreviations: ADP (adenosine diphosphate), NAD+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide), NADPH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrogenase), ATP (adenosine triphosphate), NADH (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide hydrogenase), NADP+ (nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate).

For the synthesis of acyl-CoA, acetyl-CoA forms the primer which is extended by addition of C2 units derived from malonyl-CoA. For each new addition of a C2 unit derived from malonyl-CoA the chain grows with two carbons until an average length of 16 carbons is reached. However, each reaction cycle includes two reduction steps, each requiring the redox co-factor NADPH [19]. Therefore, another metabolic pathway leading towards the synthesis of acetyl-CoA was investigated.

The phosphoketolase (PHK) pathway was described previously as potential alternative carbon route for different industrially relevant metabolites due to the increase of acetyl-CoA production with NADPH as co-product [2022]. The carbon flow leading towards the PHK pathway starts with the conversion of glucose to glucose-6-phosphate in the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway followed by conversion of glucose-6-phosphate in three reactions into ribulose-5-phosphate in the oxidative part of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP). Byproducts during these reactions are two moles of NADPH and one mole of CO2 per mole of glucose. The next metabolite in the pathway, xylulose-5-phosphate, represents the precursor of the PHK pathway as it can be converted to acetyl-phosphate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate. This reaction is catalyzed by xylulose-5-phosphate phosphoketolase encoded by xpkA in Aspergillus nidulans. During the second step of the PHK pathway, acetyl phosphate can either directly be converted into acetyl-CoA or indirectly with acetate as intermediate. Direct conversion of acetyl phosphate into acetyl-CoA in Bacillus subtilis is catalyzed by phosphotransacetylase encoded by the gene pta[23]. The formation of acetate and ATP from acetyl phosphate is performed by acetate kinase, encoded by the gene ack in A. nidulans[24, 25]. The metabolic pathway is shown in Figure 1A.

The PHK pathway was first reported in heterofermentative and facultative homofermentative lactic acid bacteria, in bifidobacteria and sporadic in other microorganism, like xylose fermenting yeasts [26]. It has been demonstrated that S. cerevisiae has the ability to functionally express phosphotransacetylase from B. subtilis as well as phosphoketolase and acetate kinase from A. nidulans[20, 27]. The fact that more NADPH is formed when glucose is metabolized via the PPP instead of the EMP pathway makes the combination of PPP and PHK pathway an interesting alternative for FAEE production. The demand of NADPH for lipid synthesis might create the driving force for carbon to flow through the PHK pathway. The reaction equations in Figure 1B show that glucose catabolism through the PHK pathway would reduce the net NADPH demand for FAEE production.

Here, the research goal was the improvement of a S. cerevisiae FAEE cell factory. In more detail, ws2 from M. hydrocarbonoclasticus[4] was expressed in combination with the two different pathways mentioned above, i.e. the ‘ethanol degradation’ pathway responsible for supplying precursor acetyl-CoA and the heterologous phosphoketolase pathway supplying both acetyl-CoA and redox co-factor NADPH. The results of expressing the two pathways were compared in terms of physiological properties and FAEE production of the recombinant strains.

Materials and methods


All plasmid constructions were performed with E. coli strain DH5α [28]. Yeast strain S. cerevisiae CEN.PK 113-11C (MAT a MAL2-8 c SUC2 ura3-52 his3- Δ1) was kindly provided by P. Kötter, University of Frankfurt, Germany. S. cerevisiae CB2I20 is a derivative of CEN.PK 113-5D (MAT a MAL2-8 c SUC2 ura3-52) and contains multiple ws2 chromosomal integrations. This strain has been used for stable expression of ws2 and expression of genes encoding endogenous acyl-CoA binding protein (ACB1) and a bacterial NADP+-dependent glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapN) (unpublished).

Media and growth conditions

E. coli cells were cultured at 37°C and 200 rpm in lysogeny broth (LB) [29] containing 80 mg l−1 ampicillin when needed. S. cerevisiae strains were cultured at 30°C and 150 rpm in synthetic dextrose (SD) medium containing 20 g l−1 glucose, 6.7 g l−1 yeast nitrogen base without amino acids (YNB-AA) (Formedium, Hunstanton, UK), and complete supplement mixture (0.750 g l−1; CSM, Formedium) lacking uracil and histidine.

Plasmid construction

Plasmids containing a HIS3 selection marker were derived from episomal 2-micron plasmids pIYC04 and pIYC08. The construction of the plasmids was described by Chen et al. [12, 13]. The codon optimized ws2 gene from M. hydrocarbonoclasticus (Menlo Park, CA, USA) [4] was amplified with forward primer CTTCAAACTAGT AAAACAATGAAGAGATTAGGTACTCTAGACG and reverse primer CTTCTTGAGCTC TTACTTTCTAGTACGGGCACG attaching restriction sites Spe I and Sac I (marked italic) to the gene. This fragment was cloned into a multi-cloning site on pIYC04 resulting in a plasmid containing the ws2 gene under control of the TEF1 promoter and the ADH1 terminator. This plasmid was verified by sequencing (Eurofins MWG Operon, Ebersberg, Germany) and named pBDJ01. pBDJ02 was constructed from plasmids pIYC08 and pBDJ01, which were both restricted with Sac I and Spe I. The insert from pBDJ01 containing the ws2 gene was cloned into the pIYC08 backbone containing ADH2, ALD6 and acs SE L641P . pBDJ02 finally contained four genes: ws2, ALD6, ADH2 and acs SE L641P . The construction of an additional plasmid (pIYC09) containing genes ALD6, ADH2 and acs SE L641P was described by Chen et al. [30]. Plasmid pSP-GM2 [31, 32] was used as a backbone for the construction of plasmids that contained the URA3 selection marker. The ws2 gene was restricted with Not I/Sac I from pBdJ02 and then ligated into the Not I/Sac I sites of vector pSP-GM2 to construct pSP-B2N. The construction of plasmid pMPa containing genes xpkA and ack was described previously [20]. Plasmid pMPp was constructed accordingly with the difference that it contained pta instead of ack. All plasmids were confirmed by sequencing (Eurofins). A list of all plasmids is shown in Table 1.
Table 1

List of plasmids used in this study

Plasmid name


Marker gene









This study


ALD6, ADH2, acs SE L641P




ws2, ALD6, ADH2, acs SE L641P


This study








Shi et al., submitted


xpKA, ack




xpKA, pta


This study

Strain construction and transformation

The different yeast strains constructed are listed in Table 2. Transformations were performed by following the lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method [33].
Table 2

Strains used in this study


Genetic background

HIS3 based plasmid

URA3 based plasmid

Reference strain


CEN.PK 113-11C

pIYC04 (−−-)

pSP-GM2 (−−-)

Phosphoketolase strains


CEN.PK 113-11C

pBdJ01 (ws2)

pSP-GM2 (−−-)


CEN.PK 113-11C

pBdJ01 (ws2)

pMPa (xpkA, acK)


CEN.PK 113-11C

pBdJ01 (ws2)

pMPp (xpkA, pta)




pSP-GM2 (−−-)




pMPa (xpkA, acK)




pMPp (xpkA, pta)

Ethanol degradation strains


CEN.PK 113-11C

pIYC04 (−−-)

pSPB2N (ws2)


CEN.PK 113-11C

pBdJ02 (ws2, ALD6, ADH2, acs SE L641P )

pSP-GM2 (−−-)


CEN.PK 113-11C

pIYC09 (ALD6, ADH2, acs SE L641P )

pSPB2N (ws2)


The different S. cerevisiae strains were stored in 15% glycerol at −80°C before they were pre-cultured in 5 ml selective SD medium at 30°C and 200 rpm. Thereafter, the strains were grown in 500 ml shake flasks containing 50 ml selective SD-medium starting with an optical density (OD600) of 0.01. Cultures were grown for up to 100 hours at 30°C and 150 rpm.

Analysis of physiological parameters

While culturing, samples were taken regularly (every 3–4 h). The cell growth was measured with a Genesys 20 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) by determining the optical density at 600 nm. The concentration of remaining substrate and formation of byproducts (ethanol and glycerol) was analyzed using filtered samples (0.2 μm nylon membrane) by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system Dionex Softron GmbH, Germering, Germany) equipped with an Aminex HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 65°C and fed with a mobile phase of 5 mM H2SO4 at a flow rate of 0.6 ml min−1. Glucose, glycerol and ethanol were measured with a Shodex RI-101 refractive index detector (Showa Denko, Tokyo, Japan).

Sample preparation for quantification of FAEEs

After 100 hours of culturing the remaining biomass was centrifuged and washed with MQ water thrice before being freeze-dried (Christ Alpha 2–4 LSC, Shropshire, UK). Further sample treatment was performed with a known amount of cell dry weight (CDW) and 20 μg of heptadecanoic acid ethyl ester (17:0) as internal standard (IS). This sample was mixed with 7 ml CHCl3 : MeOH (2:1, v/v) in an extraction tube (Pyrex borosilicate glass 16 × 100 mm) and flushed with nitrogen gas until all air was removed before total lipids were extracted from the sample by a microwave-assisted method described previously [34]. Next, 1.7 ml NaCl (0.73%, w/v) was added to the sample and vortexed vigorously. Centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min resulted in a phase separation. The organic (lower) phase was transferred into a clean tube for vacuum evaporation using a miVac concentrator (Genevac, Ipswich, UK). The sample was re-suspended in 50 μl CHCl3 : MeOH (2:1, v/v), loaded onto a thin layer chromatographic (TLC) Silica gel 60 F254plate (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and separated using a mobile phase of heptane, 2-propanol and acetic acid with a ratio of 95:5:1 (v/v/v) [4]. Free fatty acids, triacylglycerols (TAGs), sterol esters and FAEEs were identified using a standard solution containing heptadecanoic acid, glyceryl triheptadecanoate, cholesteryl palmitate and heptadecanoic acid ethyl ester (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Visualization was performed under ultraviolet radiation after spraying with 0.05% 2,7-dichlorofluorescein in ethanol. The spot of the TLC plate corresponding to FAEEs was scraped off with a razor blade and collected in a tube containing a mix of 3 ml hexane, 2 ml methanol and 2 ml MQ water. The tube was vigorously vortexed, and after centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min, the upper layer was transferred to a clean tube. This solution, containing the FAEEs, was dried by vacuum evaporation using a miVac concentrator (Genevac, Ipswich, UK) before the sample was finally dissolved in 1 ml hexane.

GC-MS analysis

The equipment for separating and quantifying FAEEs included a Focus GC ICQ single quadruple GC-MS from Thermo Fisher Scientific with a Zebron (ZB-WAX) GC column with 30 m × 0.25 mm internal diameter and 0.25 μm film thickness (Phenomenex, Macclesfield, UK). The precise GC-MS conditions, compound identification and quantification conditions have previously been described [4].


FAEE production in strains expressing the ethanol degradation pathway

The production of FAEEs requires a large amount of acetyl-CoA and therefore it was a straight forward idea to metabolically engineer the native pathway in S. cerevisiae to increase the flux towards cytosolic acetyl-CoA synthesis. Ethanol, the second metabolite for synthesis of FAEEs, forms the major byproduct during FAEE production in S. cerevisiae. To re-channel the carbon flux towards the synthesis of acetyl-CoA, Adh2 and Ald6, which respectively catalyze the conversion of ethanol to acetaldehyde and acetaldehyde to acetate, were overexpressed together with the heterologous acs SE L641P , which encodes a de-regulated acetyl-CoA synthetase that catalyzes the conversion of acetate to acetyl-CoA. Details about the metabolic pathway and the strain construction are shown in Figure 1 and Table 2, respectively.

In Figure 2, it can be observed that the introduction of a wax ester synthase resulted in a FAEE yield of 133 ± 113 μg gCDW−1 (strain BdJ07). Up-regulation of ALD6, ADH2 and acs SE L641P , expressed from the same plasmid, led to a yield of 408 ± 270 μg gCDW−1 (strain BdJ08), a 3-fold improvement compared to strain BdJ07, which however lacks statistical significance (p-value: 0.08). The strain showed a large variation of the FAEE yield in the different clones measured, which might be caused by variations in copy number of the relatively large plasmid. Therefore, a similar strain was constructed, reducing the plasmid size by expressing the genes on two different plasmids. This strain, BdJ09, in which ws2 and the three genes ALD6, ADH2 and acs SE L641P were expressed from separate plasmids resulted in a FAEE yield of 359 ± 128 μg gCDW−1. This modified strain showed a 2.7 fold improvement compared to strain BdJ07, which only expressed ws2 (p-value: 0.03), and also showed a lower clonal variation than strain BdJ08.
Figure 2

FAEE yield (μg gCDW −1 ) of investigated S. cerevisiae strains expressing the ethanol degradation pathway. Biological triplicates of the strains were investigated. The experiment was performed twice and standard deviations are indicated.

FAEE production in strains expressing the PHK pathway

Introduction of the PHK pathway has the potential to increase the yield of FAEEs in S. cerevisiae due to its ability to generate two moles of NADPH per mole of glucose, which would provide additional NADPH for acyl-CoA synthesis. Therefore, two genes, xpkA and ack, both descending from A. nidulans, were expressed to catalyze, respectively, the conversion of xylulose-5-phosphate to acetyl phosphate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and acetyl phosphate to acetate with the gain of one ATP. A second strain was constructed, in which the gene pta from B. subtilis replaced ack. Pta converts acetyl phosphate directly to acetyl-CoA. Both strains were compared with strain BdJ01 containing solely the ws2 gene and to a reference strain (BdJref) containing the empty reference plasmids. Figure 3 shows the quantification of total FAEEs of the described S. cerevisiae strains. The expression of xpkA, ack and ws2 (strain BdJ02) resulted in a FAEE yield of 28 ± 3.5 μg gCDW−1 which is 1.5 times higher than for the strain only expressing ws2 (BdJ01). However, the difference between the two strains showed insufficient statistical significance (p-value: 0.10). The expression of xpkA, pta and ws2 (BdJ03) led to a FAEE yield of 105 ± 30 μg gCDW−1 which was 5.7 fold higher than the strain with solely ws2 expression (p-value: 0.03) and a 3.7 times higher FAEE yield than the strain expressing xpkA, ack and ws2 (p-value: 0.05).
Figure 3

FAEE yield (μg gCDW −1 ) of investigated S. cerevisiae strains expressing a heterologous PHK pathway. Biological triplicates of the strains were investigated. The standard deviations are indicated.

Due to the relatively low yield of the strains described above and because of presumed fluctuating plasmid stability during repetitive experiments, the PHK pathway was also expressed in strain CB2I20, a strain with multiple chromosomal ws2 integrations (Shi et al., submitted). These strains are listed in Table 2. It was also hypothesized that multiple expression of the ws2 gene might contribute to a stronger carbon-pull through the PHK pathway. Expression of xpkA and pta in strain CB2I20 (BdJ06) resulted in 4670 ± 379 μg gCDW−1 (p-value: 0.02), a 1.6 fold higher yield of FAEEs compared to the reference strain CB2I20 (BdJ04), whereas the expression of xpkA and ack in CB2I20 (BdJ05) improved the final yield of FAEEs to 5100 ± 509 μg gCDW−1 (p-value: 0.01), which is a 1.7 times improvement compared to BdJ04 (Figure 4). It could also be observed that the production levels of FAEEs in strains BdJ04-BdJ06 were stable and reproducible.
Figure 4

FAEE yield (μg gCDW −1 ) of investigated S. cerevisiae strains containing multiple ws2 chromosomal integrations and expressing a heterologous PHK pathway. Triplicate clones of each strain were investigated (described by 1, 2 and 3). The experiment was performed twice (light and dark columns) and standard deviations are indicated.

Physiological data

Wild type S. cerevisiae is a fast growing and robust microorganism. However, the genetic modifications leading to improved FAEE production could have an impact on its physiology. Cell growth, glucose consumption as well as ethanol formation and consumption were therefore monitored during shake flask cultivations (Table 3 and Figure 5). The final biomass of the engineered strains was reduced compared to the reference strain (BdJref) and also the maximum specific growth rate (μmax) for both PHK pathway expressing strains and ethanol degradation pathway engineered strains showed a reduction of up to 40% (BdJ08). The maximal glucose consumption rate (qsmax) was only slightly reduced for the engineered strains if compared to the reference strain. The most noticeable physiological change between the strains expressing the PHK pathway and the strains engineered for increased ethanol degradation was a slower maximal consumption rate of ethanol (qethmax) for the latter (strains BdJ07-BdJ09). Especially the strains overexpressing genes ADH2, ALD6, acs SE L641P and ws2 showed a reduced ethanol consumption rate of, respectively, 45% (BdJ08) and 70% (BdJ09) compared to the reference strain.
Figure 5

Cell growth and substrate consumption of recombinant strains during shake flask cultivation. The strains BdJref and BdJ01-BdJ06 were analyzed in biological triplicates. The glucose concentration (g l−1) is indicated by squares, the ethanol concentration (g l−1) is indicated by triangles and cell growth (OD 600) is shown by diamonds.

Table 3

Physiological characteristics of modified strains


(Over)expressed genes( HIS3 plasmid) & ( URA3 plasmid)

Final FAEE yield (μg gCDW−1)

Maximal specific growth rate (μmax)

Final biomass (OD 600)

Glucose consumption rate (qsmax)

Ethanol consumption rate (qethmax)


--- & ---

16.3 ± 3.5

0.190 ± 0.010

5.84 ± 0.14

−1.534 ± 0.054

−0.204 ± 0.015

Phosphoketolase pathway


ws2 & ---

18 ± 4.8

0.159 ± 0.006

5.51 ± 0.16

−1.448 ± 0.057

−0.200 ± 0.021


ws2 & xpkA, ack

28.0 ± 3.5

0.168 ± 0.009

5.27 ± 0.13

−1.357 ± 0.084

−0.208 ± 0.016


ws2 & xpkA, pta

105 ± 30

0.136 ± 0.025

4.55 ± 0.11

−1.357 ± 0.078

−0.197 ± 0.014

Ethanol degradation pathway


--- & ws2

133 ± 113

0.192 ± 0.003

5.14 ± 0.22

−1.403 ± 0.035

−0.174 ± 0.003


ws2, ALD6, ADH2, acs SE L641P & ---

408 ± 270

0.115 ± 0.026

3.97 ± 0.42

−1.265 ± 0.365

−0.113 ± 0.002


ALD6, ADH2, acs SE L641P & ws2

359 ± 128

0.136 ± 0.035

3.67 ± 1.82

−1.208 ± 0.495

−0.061 ± 0.023


The production of FAEEs in yeast S. cerevisiae could form an important contribution to the development of sustainable diesel transportation fuels in the future. However, to turn S. cerevisiae into an efficient FAEE producer instead of an ethanol producer, its metabolism requires further engineering. FAEEs are synthesized from acyl-CoA and ethanol and the formation of acyl-CoA in turn is dependent on precursors acetyl-CoA and there from derived malonyl-CoA. Acyl-CoA formation also requires a large amount of co-factor NADPH. In this study, two different metabolic engineering strategies were applied to increase the supply of carbon and co-factor NADPH for production of the FAEE precursor acyl-CoA.

The two main metabolic reactions in S. cerevisiae to produce NADPH during growth on glucose are the conversion of acetaldehyde to acetate by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase and the first steps in the pentose phosphate pathway (catalyzed by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase). Grabowska et al. demonstrated this by constructing a S. cerevisiae mutant with deletions in ZWF1 (encoding glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase) and ALD6 (encoding cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenase), which was not viable on glucose [35]. Later, an additional source of NADPH was identified during growth on lactate, namely cytosolic isocitrate dehydrogenase (Idp2) [36].

In this study, it was found that expression of the phosphoketolase pathway in S. cerevisiae could re-channel carbon flux through the oxidative part of the PPP towards the precursors acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA for synthesis of acyl-CoA. As a consequence, two molecules of the NADPH are being produced for each sugar molecule passing through the PPP. As was demonstrated by Papini et al. the expression of genes xpkA and ack showed a functional carbon flux through the PHK pathway and as shown in this study the expression of genes xpkA, ack and ws2 resulted in a yield of FAEEs 50% higher than in a strain not expressing the PHK pathway [20]. It was also shown that the expression of xpkA, ack resulted in an improved polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) producing strain [22]. Papini et al. could not demonstrate the functionality of the PHK pathway using phosphotransacetylase gene pta (instead of ack), which would result in a direct conversion of acetyl phosphate to acetyl-CoA. However, in their study they did not insert a pull of acetyl-CoA for a specific product, whereas our result clearly shows that expression of this enzyme combination results in improved FAEE production (minimal 60% improvement), which strongly indicates that the enzymes are active. We therefore conclude that the expression of ack from A. nidulans or pta from B. subtillis combined with expression of xpkA from A. nidulans and ws2 from M. hydrocarbonoclasticus represents a successful strategy for increasing FAEE production by S. cerevisiae.

The second strategy, the ethanol degradation pathway, was based on the native acetyl-CoA supply in the cytosol of S. cerevisiae. Chen et al. investigated the physiological effect of some major enzymes relevant for acetyl-CoA metabolism on different carbon sources in S. cerevisiae[12]. Besides being regulated at the transcriptional and post-translational level, yeast acetyl-CoA synthetases Acs1 and Acs2 also show differential subcellular localization [12, 37]. It was shown that the posttranslationally regulated acetyl-CoA synthetase in S. enterica is prevented from acetylation by a point mutation substituting leucine for proline at position 641 of the enzyme and maintaining it in its active state [18]. This enzyme variant encoded by acs SE L641P was previously overexpressed together with ALD6, mainly responsible for the metabolic reaction to form acetate from acetaldehyde, in S. cerevisiae for high-level production of amorphadiene [17]. This successful strategy had been improved by additional overexpression of ADH2 and ERG10 for the production of α-santalene which resulted in a 1.75 times higher production than the reference strain (without overexpression of the four genes) and a 25% increase in titer compared to the strategy introduced by Shiba et al. [17]. The pull-push strategy, pushing the carbon flow down to acetyl-CoA by overexpression of ADH2, ALD6 and acs SE L641P and pulling it towards the product by over expression of ERG10 was also applied in the production of polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) in S. cerevisiae[38]. A 16-fold improvement of PHB production was detected compared to the reference strain. In this study, the wax ester synthase was used to pull the carbon flow towards production of FAEEs. Comparable to the previously performed studies described, we here found the improvement of product formation to be 3-fold compared with the reference strain.

It remains important to consider the different platforms for gene expression in S. cerevisiae. In general, the expression can occur from plasmids or genes can be integrated into the chromosomes. Here both engineered pathways were expressed on 2-micron plasmids resulting in a high copy numbers and therefore high expression. However, expression of several genes on 2-micron plasmids results in large plasmids (pBdJ02 > 15 kb). Plasmid size as well as promoter strengths influences the stability of the plasmid and therefore the gene expression when propagated in S. cerevisiae[3941]. We indeed saw a high clonal variation in some of our plasmid based strains. On the other hand, integration of genes into the chromosomes results in stable expression levels as was clearly demonstrated by Jensen et al. [42]. Strain CB2I20, which was used for expression of the PHK pathway, contained multiple (1–6) integrated copies of the ws2 gene which resulted in stable production levels of FAEE with a 10 fold higher yield (Shi S, Valle-Rodríguez J, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Engineering of chromosomal wax ester synthase integrated Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants for improved biosynthesis of fatty acid ethyl esters, submitted). The high yield in combination with stable expression levels reached by multiple integrated copies is especially valuable for industrial yeast strains.

Further, it seems unlikely that FAEE is toxic to S. cerevisiae at the concentrations produced here. There was no negative effect on cell growth when 1 g/l of myristic acid ethyl esters were added to the medium (data not shown). Therefore, the reduced ethanol consumption rates observed (45% in BdJ08 and 70% in BdJ09 during the ethanol degradation pathway might most likely be explained by the rapid conversion of the ethanol to cytosolic acetyl-CoA which hence reduces the amount of ethanol that can be oxidized in the mitochondria. In general, it might be a presumable assumption that the metabolic changes were caused by the overexpression of several genes.

Thus, in conclusion we found that both strategies for improving the supply of cytosolic acetyl-CoA and NADPH, i.e. overexpression of the heterologous PHK pathway or the overexpression of the ethanol degradation pathway, resulted in improvement in the production of FAEEs, and hence form the basis for engineering an efficient cell factory for production of this biodiesel component.



The research leading to these results has been made possible by the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Vetenskapsrådet, FORMAS, and Ångpanneföreningens Forskningsstiftelse.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology
Institute of Chemical and Engineering Sciences


  1. de Jong B, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Systems biology of yeast: enabling technology for development of cell factories for production of advanced biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012, 23: 624-630. 10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.021.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kalscheuer R, Luftmann H, Steinbuchel A: Synthesis of novel lipids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by heterologous expression of an unspecific bacterial acyltransferase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 7119-7125. 10.1128/AEM.70.12.7119-7125.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Kalscheuer R, Stolting T, Steinbuchel A: Microdiesel: Escherichia coli engineered for fuel production. Microbiology. 2006, 152: 2529-2536. 10.1099/mic.0.29028-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Shi S, Valle-Rodriguez JO, Khoomrung S, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Functional expression and characterization of five wax ester synthases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their utility for biodiesel production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012, 5: 7- 10.1186/PREACCEPT-1932279820621895.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney BM, Wahlen BD, Garner E, Wei JS, Seefeldt LC: Differences in substrate specificities of five bacterial wax ester synthases. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012, 78: 5734-5745. 10.1128/AEM.00534-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Angerbauer C, Siebenhofer M, Mittelbach M, Guebitz G: Conversion of sewage sludge into lipids by Lipomyces starkeyi for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol. 2008, 99: 3051-3056. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.06.045.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Shi SB, Valle-Rodriguez JO, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Prospects for microbial biodiesel production. Biotechnol J. 2011, 6: 277-285. 10.1002/biot.201000117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Banerjee A, Sharma R, Chisti Y, Banerjee U: Botryococcus braunii: A renewable source of hydrocarbons and other chemicals. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2002, 22: 245-279. 10.1080/07388550290789513.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Gouda MK, Omar SH, Aouad LM: Single cell oil production by Gordonia sp DG using agro-industrial wastes. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 24: 1703-1711. 10.1007/s11274-008-9664-z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Meng X, Yang J, Xu X, Zhang L, Nie Q, Xian M: Biodiesel production from oleaginous microorganisms. Renew Energy. 2009, 34: 1-5. 10.1016/j.renene.2008.04.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pronk JT, Steensma HY, van Dijken JP: Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1996, 12: 1607-1633. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199612)12:16<1607::AID-YEA70>3.0.CO;2-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen Y, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Profiling of Cytosolic and Peroxisomal Acetyl-CoA Metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One. 2012, 7: e42475- 10.1371/journal.pone.0042475.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen Y, Daviet L, Schalk M, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Establishing a platform cell factory through engineering of yeast acetyl-CoA metabolism. Metab Eng. 2013, 15: 48-54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Hoek P, Van Dijken JP, Pronk JT: Effect of specific growth rate on fermentative capacity of baker’s yeast. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998, 64: 4226-4233.Google Scholar
  15. Vemuri GN, Eiteman MA, McEwen JE, Olsson L, Nielsen J: Increasing NADH oxidation reduces overflow metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007, 104: 2402-2407. 10.1073/pnas.0607469104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. de Jong-Gubbels P, van den Berg MA, Luttick MAH, Steensma HY, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT: Overproduction of acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase isoenzymes in respiring Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells does not reduce acetate production after exposure to glucose excess. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998, 165: 15-20. 10.1016/S0378-1097(98)00249-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Shiba Y, Paradise EM, Kirby J, Ro D-K, Keasling JD: Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for high-level production of isoprenoids. Metab Eng. 2007, 9: 160-168. 10.1016/j.ymben.2006.10.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Starai VJ, Gardner JG, Escalante-Semerena JC: Residue Leu-641 of acetyl-CoA synthetase is critical for the acetylation of residue Lys-609 by the protein acetyltransferase enzyme of Salmonella enterica. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 26200-26205. 10.1074/jbc.M504863200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Tehlivets O, Scheuringer K, Kohlwein SD: Fatty acid synthesis and elongation in yeast. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007, 1771: 255-270. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.07.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Papini M, Nookaew I, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Physiological characterization of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the Aspergillus nidulans phosphoketolase pathway: validation of activity through C-13-based metabolic flux analysis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012, 95: 1001-1010. 10.1007/s00253-012-3936-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Panagiotou G, Andersen MR, Grotkjaer T, Regueira TB, Hofmann G, Nielsen J, Olsson L: Systems analysis unfolds the relationship between the phosphoketolase pathway and growth in Aspergillus nidulans. PLoS One. 2008, 3: e3847- 10.1371/journal.pone.0003847.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kocharin K, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Improved polyhydroxybutyrate production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae through the use of the phosphoketolase pathway. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013, 110: 2216-2224. 10.1002/bit.24888.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Presecan-Siedel E, Galinier A, Longin R, Deutscher J, Danchin A, Glaser P, Martin-Verstraete I: Catabolite regulation of the pta gene as part of carbon flow pathways in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 6889-6897.Google Scholar
  24. Spector LB: Acetate kinase - a triple-displacement enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980, 77: 2626-2630. 10.1073/pnas.77.5.2626.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ingram-Smith C, Martin SR, Smith KS: Acetate kinase: not just a bacterial enzyme. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14: 249-253. 10.1016/j.tim.2006.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Ratledge C, Holdsworth JE: Properties of a pentulose-5-phosphate phosphoketolase from yeast grown on xylose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1985, 22: 217-221.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sonderegger M, Schumperli M, Sauer U: Metabolic engineering of a phosphoketolase pathway for pentose catabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 2892-2897. 10.1128/AEM.70.5.2892-2897.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Sambrook J, Russel D: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2001, managing editor: Jan Argentine; ISBN 0-87969-87579-87965, Cold Spring Harbor, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 3Google Scholar
  29. Bertani G: Studies on lysogenesis.1. The mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1951, 62: 293-300.Google Scholar
  30. Chen Y, Bao J, Kim I-K, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Coupled incremental precursor and co-factor supply improves 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2014, 22: 105-109.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Partow S, Siewers V, Bjorn S, Nielsen J, Maury J: Characterization of different promoters for designing a new expression vector in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2010, 27: 955-964. 10.1002/yea.1806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Chen Y, Partow S, Scalcinati G, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Enhancing the copy number of episomal plasmids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved protein production. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012, 12: 598-607. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00809.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Gietz RD, Woods RA: Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 2002, 350: 87-96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Khoomrung S, Chumnanpuen P, Jansa-Ard S, Stahlman M, Nookaew I, Boren J, Nielsen J: Rapid Quantification of Yeast Lipid using Microwave-Assisted Total Lipid Extraction and HPLC-CAD. Anal Chem. 2013, 85 (10): 4912-4919. 10.1021/ac3032405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Grabowska D, Chelstowska A: The ALD6 gene product is indispensable for providing NADPH in yeast cells lacking glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. World J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 13984-13988. 10.1074/jbc.M210076200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Minard KI, McAlister-Henn L: Sources of NADPH in yeast vary with carbon source. J Biol Chem. 2005, 280: 39890-39896. 10.1074/jbc.M509461200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. van den Berg MA, de Jong-Gubbels P, Kortland CJ, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, Steensma HY: The two acetyl-coenzyme A synthetases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ with respect to kinetic properties and transcriptional regulation. J Biol Chem. 1996, 271: 28953-28959. 10.1074/jbc.271.46.28953.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kocharin K, Chen Y, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Engineering of acetyl-CoA metabolism for the improved production of polyhydroxybutyrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. AMB Express. 2012, 2: 52- 10.1186/2191-0855-2-52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang Z, MooYoung M, Chisti Y: Plasmid stability in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Adv. 1996, 14: 401-435. 10.1016/S0734-9750(96)00033-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Velmurugan S, Mehta S, Uzri D, Jayaram M: Stable propagation of ‘selfish’ genetic elements. J Biosci. 2003, 28: 623-636. 10.1007/BF02703338.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Dasilva NA, Bailey JE: Influence of plasmid origin and promoter strength in fermentations of recombinant yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1991, 37: 318-324. 10.1002/bit.260370405.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Jensen NB, Strucko T, Kildegaard KR, David F, Maury J, Mortensen UH, Forster J, Nielsen J, Borodina I: EasyClone: method for iterative chromosomal integration of multiple genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013,  :  -doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12118 10.1111/1567-1364.12118.Google Scholar


© de Jong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.