- Open Access
Biosynthesis of caffeic acid in Escherichia coli using its endogenous hydroxylase complex
© Lin and Yan; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
- Received: 18 January 2012
- Accepted: 4 April 2012
- Published: 4 April 2012
The Erratum to this article has been published in Microbial Cell Factories 2015 14:110
Caffeic acid (3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid) is a natural phenolic compound derived from the plant phenylpropanoid pathway. Caffeic acid and its phenethyl ester (CAPE) have attracted increasing attention for their various pharmaceutical properties and health-promoting effects. Nowadays, large-scale production of drugs or drug precursors via microbial approaches provides a promising alternative to chemical synthesis and extraction from plant sources.
We first identified that an Escherichia coli native hydroxylase complex previously characterized as the 4-hydroxyphenylacetate 3-hydroxylase (4HPA3H) was able to convert p-coumaric acid to caffeic acid efficiently. This critical enzymatic step catalyzed in plants by a membrane-associated cytochrome P450 enzyme, p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase (C3H), is difficult to be functionally expressed in prokaryotic systems. Moreover, the performances of two tyrosine ammonia lyases (TALs) from Rhodobacter species were compared after overexpression in E. coli. The results indicated that the TAL from R. capsulatus (Rc) possesses higher activity towards both tyrosine and L-dopa. Based on these findings, we further designed a dual pathway leading from tyrosine to caffeic acid consisting of the enzymes 4HPA3H and Rc TAL. This heterologous pathway extended E. coli native tyrosine biosynthesis machinery and was able to produce caffeic acid (12.1 mg/L) in minimal salt medium. Further improvement in production was accomplished by boosting tyrosine biosynthesis in E. coli, which involved the alleviation of tyrosine-induced feedback inhibition and carbon flux redirection. Finally, the titer of caffeic acid reached 50.2 mg/L in shake flasks after 48-hour cultivation.
We have successfully established a novel pathway and constructed an E. coli strain for the production of caffeic acid. This work forms a basis for further improvement in production, as well as opens the possibility of microbial synthesis of more complex plant secondary metabolites derived from caffeic acid. In addition, we have identified that TAL is the rate-limiting enzyme in this pathway. Thus, exploration for more active TALs via bio-prospecting and protein engineering approaches is necessary for further improvement of caffeic acid production.
- High Performance Liquid Chromatography
- Caffeic Acid
- Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide
- Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester
- Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester
Caffeic acid (3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid) is a natural phenolic compound initially found in plants. Previous studies on its biological activities suggested that caffeic acid possesses anti-oxidant [1, 2], anti-virus , anti-cancer  and anti-inflammatory properties . Moreover, its derivative, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), has drawn great attention because of its demonstrated therapeutic effects including its potential as an anti-diabetic and liver-protective agent as well as an anti-tumor drug for human breast cancer treatment [6, 7].
Caffeic acid is one of the pivotal intermediates of plant phenylpropanoid pathway starting from the deamination of phenylalanine which generates cinnamic acid. Followed by a two-step sequential hydroxylation at the 4- and 3- position of the benzyl ring, cinnamic acid is converted into caffeic acid via p-coumaric acid [8, 9]. The involved enzymes, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) and p-coumarate 3-hydroxylase (C3H) are plant-specific cytochrome P450 dependent monooxygenases. Due to their instability and membrane-bound property, the purification and characterization of these enzymes are quite challenging, particularly for C3H . It was also suggested that the hydroxylation at the 3-position could also occur after p-coumaric acid is esterified, which does not generate caffeic acid as the intermediate [8, 11]. Recently, genes and enzymes involved in caffeic acid biosynthesis were also reported in the actinomycete Saccharothrix espanaensis. A tyrosine ammonia lyase (TAL) encoded by sam8 and a microbial C3H encoded by sam5 are responsible for the conversion of tyrosine to p-coumaric acid and then to caffeic acid, respectively .
Currently, caffeic acid is commonly produced by extraction from plant sources, such as coffee beans. Chemical or enzymatic hydrolysis of caffeoylquinic acid derivatives is also employed to produce caffeic acid [13, 14]. Like many other secondary metabolites, caffeic acid derivatives are usually accumulated at low levels in plants and hence the isolation of these compounds is to some extent difficult and expensive. Microbial conversion provides an alternative approach to caffeic acid production. Sachan et al. reported the co-production of caffeic acid and p-hydroxybenzoic acid in Streptomyces caeruleus by feeding p-coumaric acid . Over decades, advances in metabolic engineering and synthetic biology enable the production of various plant-specific secondary metabolites in recombinant microorganisms [16–19]. Most recently, the conversion of tyrosine to caffeic acid (the titer was not reported) and ferulic acid (7.1 mg/L) in E. coli was achieved by the co-expression of the enzymes encoded by the sam5 and sam8 from S. espanaensis and an O-methyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana. However, the above-mentioned studies relied on feeding the direct precursors such as tyrosine and p-coumaric acid, which would increase the production cost and can not be preferred for large-scale production. Alternatively, the development of processes that can enable the biosynthesis of these high-value metabolites from simple carbon sources is much more desirable. By utilizing tyrosine-overproducing strains as hosts, the production of several natural compounds such as L-dopa, flavonoids, and benzylisoquinoline alkaloids from simple carbon sources has already been achieved [21–23].
Plants and bacteria are very different in cell structure, physiology and genetics. One of the difficulties in reconstructing plant pathways in microbial systems is the availability of functional enzymes that are compatible with the specific microorganism. For the biosynthesis of caffeic acid in plants, two cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases are involved, which are C4H and C3H . Due to the requirement for anchorage on endoplasmic reticulum, functional expression of these plant P450-dependent enzymes were always problematic in bacterial systems [10, 24]. Fortunately, TALs identified from various sources can catalyze the direct formation of p-coumaric acid from tyrosine bypassing the enzymatic step catalyzed by C4H , and thus, the need for a C4H was not obligatory. Nevertheless, the need for C3H still remains. Although an alternative microbial C3H was identified from S. espanaensis, its activity seems to be low, which limits its applications .
p-Coumaric Acid Hydroxylation by 4HPA3H
In vitro activity of 4HPA3H complex
Activity toward Substrate
Ratio (A : B)
(10-3 U/mg protein)
B ( p -coumaric acid)
(10-3 U/mg protein)
2.44 ± 0.11
5.37 ± 0.31
Comparison of Rc TAL and Rs TAL
Comparison of in vitro activity of Rc TAL and Rs TAL
Activity toward Substrate*
Ratio (A : C)
(10-3 U/mg protein)
C ( L -dopa)
(10-3 U/mg protein)
0.93 ± 0.03
1.54 ± 0.05
0.80 ± 0.13
1.14 ± 0.03
Production of caffeic Acid in E. coli
Production of caffeic acid and tyrosine by engineered E.coli strains
p -coumaric acid
p -coumaric acid
11.1 ± 1.1
12.1 ± 0.3
7.4 ± 0.2
20.2 ± 1.8
2.1 ± 0.3
21.5 ± 4.0
14.2 ± 1.7
188.9 ± 5.7
296.6 ± 1.0
218.6 ± 8.2
426.7 ± 4.9
30.5 ± 1.9
17.1 ± 1.8
2.9 ± 0.3
15.4 ± 1.7
50.2 ± 10.1
25.1 ± 2.5
75.3 ± 13.6
Construction of tyrosine overproducers
The addition of 100 mg/L tyrosine into the cultures of YL-2 resulted in a two-fold increase in caffeic acid production (Table 3), suggesting that tyrosine is a limiting precursor for caffeic acid biosynthesis. In wild-type E. coli, tyrosine biosynthesis is strictly controlled by several regulatory mechanisms. Two feedback inhibition-sensitive enzymes chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydrogenase (CM-PDH, encoded by tyrA) and 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase (DAHPS, encoded by aroG) were identified as the major regulatory components in the tyrosine pathway . The feedback inhibition resistant (fbr) variants tyrA fbr and aroG fbr have already been developed and applied in tyrosine production [30, 31]. In addition, the availability of erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P) and phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) is extremely critical to tyrosine biosynthesis (Figure 1A). Over-expression of PEP synthase (PPS, encoded by ppsA) and transketolase (TKT, encoded by tktA) was able to increase the availability of PEP and E4P, and redirect the carbon flux into the tyrosine pathway . In this work, tyrA fbr , ppsA, tktA and aroG fbr were consecutively cloned into a medium-copy-number plasmid pCS27 under the control of PLlacO1 promoter as well, generating the plasmid pCS-TPTA. By introducing pCS-TPTA into wild type E. coli BW25113, we obtained a recombinant strain YL-3. Compared with wild type strain which produced little tyrosine, YL-3 was able to produce 296.6 ± 1.0 mg/L tyrosine in 48 hours, which indicated that over-expression of the four enzymes was effective. Furthermore, the strain YL-1 (ΔtyrR) was also employed as the host to alleviate the tyrR-mediated regulation . The introduction of pCS-TPTA into YL-1 (yielding strain YL-4) resulted in the accumulation of higher amount of tyrosine (426.7 ± 4.9 mg/L in 48 h, Table 3). It should be noted that YL-4 exhibited only slight improvement in tyrosine production compared to YL-3 in the first 24 hours. However, its advantage was demonstrated in the following 24 hours. These results are consistent with what were reported previously [30, 31].
Improvement of caffeic acid production by tyrosine overproducing strains
Although YL-4 was able to produce higher amount of tyrosine, this tyrR-deleted strain seemed to be in conflict with pZE-derived plasmids for unknown reasons and did not express the enzymes 4HPA3H and Rc TAL as well as expected. Only a trace amount of caffeic acid (< 0.2 mg/L) and p-coumaric acid (< 1 mg/L) but a large amount of tyrosine (> 400 mg/L) were detected in the YL-6 (YL-1 harboring pZE-TH and pCS-TPTA) cultures. Thus, we employed wild type E. coli BW25113 as the parent strain. By transforming it with both pZE-TH and pCS-TPTA, we generated the strain YL-5. The titer of caffeic acid in the shake flask fermentation using YL-5 reached 50.2 ± 10.1 mg/L after 48 h fermentation which is a 5-fold increase compared to YL-2. Moreover, we analyzed the intermediates accumulated in the culture. The presence of 25.1 ± 2.5 mg/L tyrosine indicated that tyrosine availability is no longer the limiting factor for caffeic acid production in the strain YL-5. The accumulation of a large amount of L-dopa (75.3 ± 13.6 mg/L) and a small amount of coumaric acid (< 0.2 mg/L) suggested that Rc TAL became into the rate-limiting step in this artificial pathway, especially after 24 h (Table 3).
We have successfully established a novel pathway and constructed an E. coli strain for the de novo production of caffeic acid via metabolic engineering approaches. We first identifed that 4HPA3H can function as a C3H which exhibited decent activity toward p-coumaric acid and tyrosine, thus gains great potential for metabolic engineering and biocatalysis applications. In addition, we compared the TALs from R. capsulatus (Rc) and R. sphaeroids (Rs) that are able to catalyze the deamination of both tyrosine and L-dopa. RcTAL exhibited higher activities toward both substrates. Then a dual pathway leading from tyrosine to caffeic acid was proposed and introduced into E. coli. The artificial pathway extended the native tyrosine pathway of E. coli and produced 12.1 mg/L of caffeic acid from simple carbon sources. Further improvement of production was accomplished via alleviating feedback inhibition and redirecting carbon flux into tyrosine biosynthesis. Finally, the titer of caffeic acid reached 50.2 mg/L in shake flasks after 48-hour cultivation.
The established pathway obviated the use of two cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases (C4H and C3H) and achieved the de novo biosynthesis of caffeic acid, which opened the possibility of microbial synthesis of more complex plant secondary metabolites derived from caffeic acid. However, for the production system to be more economically viable, productivity has to be further improved. We have identified that Rc TAL is the rate-limiting enzyme in the pathway once the tyrosine availability issue was solved. To meet the process metrics and avoid the accumulation of the intermediates (tyrosine and L-dopa), we will explore more TALs for higher catalytic activity via bioprospecting and protein engineering approaches. In addition to the tyrosine overproducers we generated in this study, the strains employed to produce tyrosine in amino acid industry are also ready to be used as hosts for caffeic acid production. With proper process optimization, industrially relevant production should be expectable.
Chemicals and enzymes
The following commercially available chemicals and enzymes were used in this study: L-dopa (ACROS Organics); tyrosine (Sigma-Aldrich), caffeic acid (TCI), p-coumaric acid (MP Biochemicals), IPTG (Zymo Research Co.), restriction enzymes (NEB), Hot Start KOD Plus DNA polymerase (EMD Chemicals Inc.), Rapid DNA ligase Kit (Roche). All the enzymes were used according to the instructions provided by the manufacturers.
Strains, plasmids, media, and growth conditions
Strains and plasmids used in this study
Plasmid or Strain
ColE1 ori; AmpR; PLlacO1; luc
Lutz et al., 1997
p15A ori; KanR; PLlacO1; MCS1
Shen et al., 2008
From pZE12, PLlacO1; tal(Rc)
From pZE12, PLlacO1; tal(Rs)
From pZE12, PLlacO1; hpaB(Ec)-hpaC(Ec)
From pZE12, PLlacO1; tal(Rc)-hpaB(Ec)-hpaC(Ec)
From pCS27, PLlacO1; tyrA fbr -ppsA-tktA-aroGfb r
recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac [F' proAB lacI q Z ΔM15 Tn10 (TetR)]
F-, Δ(araD-araB), ΔlacZ (::rrnB-3), λ-, rph-1, Δ(rhaD-rhaB), hsdR
BW25113, ΔtyrR::FRT (as JW1316-1, but kan R gene deleted)
BW25113 harboring pZE-TH
BW25113 harboring pCS-TPTA
YL-1 harboring pCS-TPTA
BW25113 harboring pZE-TH and pCS-TPTA
YL-1 harboring pZE-TH and pCS-TPTA
Molecular biology techniques
General molecular biology techniques and DNA manipulations were carried out according to the standard protocols . Deletion of kanamycin resistant gene from E. coli JW1316-1 was conducted using the method described by Kirill A. Datsenko and Barry L. Wanner . Host cells were transformed with the plasmids by electroporation (EPPENDORF Electroporator 2510, 1.8 kV when using 0.1 cm cuvettes).
Construction of plasmids
To construct pZE-Rc TAL and pZE-Rs TAL, the genes encoding Rc TAL and Rs TAL were amplified by high-fidelity polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from the genomic DNAs of Rhodobacter capsulatus and Rhodobacter sphaeroides using the primers listed in Additional file 1: Table S1 . Amplified fragments and pZE12-luc were digested with Kpn I and Sph I, and then ligated with Rapid DNA ligase. To construct pZE-Ec HpaBC, the gene cluster hpaBC was amplified from E. coli MG1655 genome directly. The amplified hpaBC fragment was inserted into pZE12-luc vector between Kpn I and Sph I as well. The pZE-TH was constructed by cloning the gene cluster hpaBC into the pZE-Rc TAL using restriction enzymes Sph I and Xba I. A ribosome binding site is located upstream of each gene to facilitate protein expression. The genes tyrA, aroG, ppsA, and tktA were all amplified from E. coli MG1655 genomic DNA. Point mutations were introduced to tyrA (Met-53-Ile and Ala-354-Val) and aroG (Asp-146-Asn) by splicing and overlapping extension PCR (SOE-PCR), generating tyrA fbr and aroG fbr [36, 37]. The genes tyrA fbr and ppsA were first cloned into pCS27 simultaneously via three-piece ligation using restriction enzymes Kpn I, Nde I, and Sal I, generating the plasmid pCS-TP. Similarly, tktA and aroG fbr were then simultaneously inserted into pCS-TP using restriction enzymes Xho I, Sph I, and Hind III resulting in pCS-TPTA.
4HPA3H In vitro assay
The E. coli strain BW25113 carrying the plasmid pZE-Ec HpaBC was pre-inoculated into LB liquid medium containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin and grown at 37°C overnight with shaking at 250 rpm. In the following day, 1 ml of preinoculum was added to 50 ml of fresh LB medium also containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin. The culture was left to grow at 37°C till OD600 reached 0.6 and then induced with 0.5 mM IPTG. Protein expression was conducted at 30°C for another 3 h. The cells were harvested and resuspended in 2 ml of buffer A (20 mM KH2PO4, pH = 7.0), and then lysed by French Press. The soluble fraction was collected by ultra-centrifugation and used as crude enzyme extract for the enzyme assay. Total protein concentration was estimated using the BCA kit (Pierce Chemicals). The total protein concentration of the crude extract is around 6172 μg/ml. The enzyme activity was assayed according to the protocol described by Tai. et al. with a few modifications . The 1 ml reaction system contained 2 mM NADH, 2 mM FAD, 2 mM substrate (tyrosine or p-coumaric acid) and 100 μl of crude enzyme extract in buffer A. The reaction was incubated at 30°C for 1.5 min and terminated by adding 50 μl HCl (20%) to the 1 ml reaction system. The amount of products (L-dopa and caffeic acid, respectively) were measured and quantified by HPLC.
Whole-cell Bioconversion by 4HPA3H
The E. coli strain BW25113 carrying the plasmid pZE-Ec HpaBC was pre-inoculated into LB liquid medium containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin and grown at 37°C overnight with shaking at 250 rpm. Then 0.1 ml of preinoculum was added to 10 ml of fresh LB medium also containing 100 μg/ml of ampicillin. The culture was grown at 37°C till OD600 reached 0.6 and then induced with 0.5 mM IPTG for 3 hours. After that, 100 uL of p-coumaric acid (10 g/L) was added to reach a final concentration of 100 mg/L. Samples were collected at 3 h and analyzed by HPLC
4HPA3H In vivo assay
The pre-inoculum of E. coli strain BW25113 carrying pZE-Ec HpaBC from an overnight culture was added in to 10 ml of LB medium (1:100 V/V) and grown at 37°C. IPTG was added to the cultures to a final concentration of 0.5 mM until OD600 reached 0.6. The cultures were left at 30°C for around another 3 hours with shaking for protein expression till OD600 reached 3.0 (approximately equivalent to 1 g/L cell). Then the cells were collected, washed, resuspended in 10 ml of NaCl (0.9%) solution. 1 mM substrate (tyrosine or p-coumaric acid) was added to the cell resuspensions at 30°C. Samples were collected after 1 and 2 hours, and then analyzed by HPLC.
Enzyme assay of Rc TAL and Rs TAL
The crude enzyme extracts of Rc TAL and Rs TAL were prepared as described before . But the cells were resuspended in buffer B (50 mM, Tris-HCl, pH = 8.5). The 1 ml reaction system contained 2 mM substrate (tyrosine or L-dopa) and 100 μl crude extract in buffer B. The reaction was incubated at 30°C for 1.5 min and the amount of products (p-coumaric acid and caffeic acid, respectively) was measured by HPLC.
HPLC analysis of products
Tyrosine, L-dopa, p-coumaric acid, and caffeic acid generated in enzyme assays and fermentations were quantitatively analyzed by HPLC (Dionex Ultimate 3000) with a reverse-phase ZORBAX SB-C18 column and an Ultimate 3000 Photodiode Array Detector. The compounds were separated by elution with a methanol-water gradient (water containing 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid). The following gradient was used at a flow rate of 1 ml/min: 10 to 50% methanol for 15 min, 50 to 10% methanol for 1 min, and 10% methanol for an additional 4 min. Quantification for the four above-mentioned compounds was based on the peak areas of absorbance at 274, 280, 308 and 323 nm, respectively. The data shown in this study were generated from duplicate or triplicate independent experiments.
This work was supported by the start-up funds from the Faculty of Engineering, University of Georgia, Athens and a research grant provided by the University of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. We would like to thank Rachit Jain for proofreading the manuscript.
- Mori H, Iwahashi H: Antioxidant activity of caffeic acid through a novel mechanism under uva irradiation. J Clin Biochem Nutr 2009, 45: 49-55. 10.3164/jcbn.08-258View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gulcin I: Antioxidant activity of caffeic acid (3,4-dihydroxycinnamic acid). Toxicology 2006, 217: 213-220. 10.1016/j.tox.2005.09.011View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ikeda K, Tsujimoto K, Uozaki M, Nishide M, Suzuki Y, Koyama AH, Yamasaki H: Inhibition of multiplication of herpes simplex virus by caffeic acid. Int J Mol Med 2011, 28: 595-598.Google Scholar
- Rajendra-Prasad N, Karthikeyan A, Karthikeyan S, Reddy BV: Inhibitory effect of caffeic acid on cancer cell proliferation by oxidative mechanism in human HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cell line. Mol Cell Biochem 2011, 349: 11-19. 10.1007/s11010-010-0655-7View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chao PC, Hsu CC, Yin MC: Anti-inflammatory and anti-coagulatory activities of caffeic acid and ellagic acid in cardiac tissue of diabetic mice. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2009, 6: 33. 10.1186/1743-7075-6-33View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Omene C, Karkoszka J, Bosland M, Eckard J, Klein CB, Frenkel K: Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), derived from a honeybee product propolis, exhibits a diversity of anti-tumor effects in pre-clinical models of human breast cancer. Cancer Lett 2011, 308: 43-53. 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.04.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Celik S, Erdogan S, Tuzcu M: Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) exhibits significant potential as an antidiabetic and liver-protective agent in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Pharmacol Res 2009, 60: 270-276. 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.03.017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bourgaud F, Hehn A, Larbat R, Doerper S, Gontier E, Kellner S, Matern U: Biosynthesis of coumarins in plants: a major pathway still to be unravelled for cytochrome P450 enzymes. Phytochem Rev 2006, 5: 293-308. 10.1007/s11101-006-9040-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kojima M, Takeuchi W: Detection and characterization of p-coumaric acid hydroxylase in mung bean, Vigna mungo, seedlings. J Biochem 1989, 105: 265-270.Google Scholar
- Kim YH, Kwon T, Yang HJ, Kim W, Youn H, Lee JY, Youn B: Gene engineering, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction of cytochrome P450 p-coumarate-3-hydroxylase (C3H), the Arabidopsis membrane protein. Protein Expr Purif 2011, 79: 149-155. 10.1016/j.pep.2011.04.013View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kneusel RE, Matern U, Nicolay K: Formation of trans-caffeoyl-CoA from trans-4-coumaroyl-CoA by Zn2 + -dependent enzymes in cultured plant cells and its activation by an elicitor-induced pH shift. Arch Biochem Biophys 1989, 269: 455-462. 10.1016/0003-9861(89)90129-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Berner M, Krug D, Bihlmaier C, Vente A, Muller R, Bechthold A: Genes and enzymes involved in caffeic acid biosynthesis in the actinomycete Saccharothrix espanaensis. J Bacteriol 2006, 188: 2666-2673. 10.1128/JB.188.7.2666-2673.2006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang J, Lu DQ, Zhao H, Ling XQ, Jiang B, Ouyang PK: Application of response surface methodology optimization for the production of caffeic acid from tobacco waste. Af J Biotechnol 2009, 8: 1416-1424.Google Scholar
- Yoshimoto M, Kurata-Azuma R, Fujii M, Hou DX, Ikeda K, Yoshidome T, Osako M: Enzymatic production of caffeic acid by koji from plant resources containing caffeoylquinic acid derivatives. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2005, 69: 1777-1781. 10.1271/bbb.69.1777View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sachan A, Ghosh S, Sen SK, Mitra A: Co-production of caffeic acid and p-hydroxybenzoic acid from p-coumaric acid by Streptomyces caeruleus MTCC 6638. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006, 71: 720-727. 10.1007/s00253-005-0197-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Chemler J, Huang L, Martens S, Koffas MA: Metabolic engineering of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71: 3617-3623. 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3617-3623.2005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Kohli A, Koffas MA: Biosynthesis of natural flavanones in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71: 5610-5613. 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5610-5613.2005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Huang L, Koffas MA: Biosynthesis of 5-deoxyflavanones in microorganisms. Biotechnol J 2007, 2: 1250-1262. 10.1002/biot.200700119View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yan Y, Li Z, Koffas MA: High-yield anthocyanin biosynthesis in engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 100: 126-140. 10.1002/bit.21721View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi O, Wu CZ, Kang SY, Ahn JS, Uhm TB, Hong YS: Biosynthesis of plant-specific phenylpropanoids by construction of an artificial biosynthetic pathway in Escherichia coli. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 38: 1657-1665. 10.1007/s10295-011-0954-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Santos CN, Koffas M, Stephanopoulos G: Optimization of a heterologous pathway for the production of flavonoids from glucose. Metab Eng 2011, 13: 392-400. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.02.002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakagawa A, Minami H, Kim JS, Koyanagi T, Katayama T, Sato F, Kumagai H: A bacterial platform for fermentative production of plant alkaloids. Nat Commun 2011, 2: 326.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Munoz AJ, Hernandez-Chavez G, de Anda R, Martinez A, Bolivar F, Gosset G: Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for improving L -3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L -DOPA) synthesis from glucose. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 38: 1845-1852. 10.1007/s10295-011-0973-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Leonard E, Runguphan W, O'Connor S, Prather KJ: Opportunities in metabolic engineering to facilitate scalable alkaloid production. Nat Chem Biol 2009, 5: 292-300. 10.1038/nchembio.160View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Xue Z, McCluskey M, Cantera K, Sariaslani FS, Huang L: Identification, characterization and functional expression of a tyrosine ammonia-lyase and its mutants from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 34: 599-604. 10.1007/s10295-007-0229-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Louie TM, Xie XS, Xun L: Coordinated production and utilization of FADH2 by NAD(P)H-flavin oxidoreductase and 4-hydroxyphenylacetate 3-monooxygenase. Biochemistry 2003, 42: 7509-7517. 10.1021/bi034092rView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prieto MA, Perez-Aranda A, Garcia JL: Characterization of an Escherichia coli aromatic hydroxylase with a broad substrate range. J Bacteriol 1993, 175: 2162-2167.Google Scholar
- Liebgott PP, Amouric A, Comte A, Tholozan JL, Lorquin J: Hydroxytyrosol from tyrosol using hydroxyphenylacetic acid-induced bacterial cultures and evidence of the role of 4-HPA 3-hydroxylase. Res Microbiol 2009, 160: 757-766. 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.09.015View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noel JP, Louie GV, Bowman ME, Moore BS, Moffitt MC: Substrate switched ammonia lyases and mutases. United States Patent Application 2009. No. 2009/0011400 A1Google Scholar
- Chavez-Bejar MI, Lara AR, Lopez H, Hernandez-Chavez G, Martinez A, Ramirez OT, Bolivar F, Gosset G: Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for L-tyrosine production by expression of genes coding for the chorismate mutase domain of the native chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydratase and a cyclohexadienyl dehydrogenase from Zymomonas mobilis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74: 3284-3290. 10.1128/AEM.02456-07View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lutke-Eversloh T, Stephanopoulos G: L-tyrosine production by deregulated strains of Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 75: 103-110. 10.1007/s00253-006-0792-9View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shen CR, Liao JC: Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for 1-butanol and 1-propanol production via the keto-acid pathways. Metab Eng 2008, 10: 312-320. 10.1016/j.ymben.2008.08.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lutz R, Bujard H: Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. Nucleic Acids Res 1997, 25: 1203-1210. 10.1093/nar/25.6.1203View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd edition. NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1989.Google Scholar
- Datsenko KA, Wanner BL: One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97: 6640-6645. 10.1073/pnas.120163297View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Heckman KL, Pease LR: Gene splicing and mutagenesis by PCR-driven overlap extension. Nat Protoc 2007, 2: 924-932. 10.1038/nprot.2007.132View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lutke-Eversloh T, Stephanopoulos G: Feedback inhibition of chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydrogenase (TyrA) of Escherichia coli: generation and characterization of tyrosine-insensitive mutants. Appl Environ Microbiol 2005, 71: 7224-7228. 10.1128/AEM.71.11.7224-7228.2005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.