Skip to main content
Download PDF

Protective effects of a food-grade recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum with surface displayed AMA1 and EtMIC2 proteins of Eimeria tenella in broiler chickens

Microbial Cell Factories volume 19, Article number: 28 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Avian coccidiosis posts a severe threat to poultry production. In addition to commercial attenuated vaccines, other strategies to combat coccidiosis are urgently needed. Lactobacillus plantarum has been frequently used for expression of foreign proteins as an oral vaccine delivery system using traditional erythromycin resistance gene (erm). However, antibiotic selection markers were often used during protein expression and they pose a risk of transferring antibiotic resistance genes to the environment, and significantly restricting the application in field production. Therefore, a food-grade recombinant L. plantarum vaccine candidate would dramatically improve its application potential in the poultry industry.

Results

In this study, we firstly replaced the erythromycin resistance gene (erm) of the pLp_1261Inv-derived expression vector with a non-antibiotic, asd-alr fusion gene, yielding a series of non-antibiotic and reliable, food grade expression vectors. In addition, we designed a dual-expression vector that displayed two foreign proteins on the surface of L. plantarum using the anchoring sequences from either a truncated poly-γ-glutamic acid synthetase A (pgsA′) from Bacillus subtilis or the L. acidophilus surface layer protein (SlpA). EGFP and mCherry were used as marker proteins to evaluate the surface displayed properties of recombinant L. plantarum strains and were inspected by western blot, flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. To further determine its application as oral vaccine candidate, the AMA1 and EtMIC2 genes of E. tenella were anchored on the surface of L. plantarum strain. After oral immunization in chickens, the recombinant L. plantarum strain was able to induce antigen specific humoral, mucosal, and T cell-mediated immune responses, providing efficient protection against coccidiosis challenge.

Conclusions

The novel constructed food grade recombinant L. plantarum strain with double surface displayed antigens provides a potential efficient oral vaccine candidate for coccidiosis.

Background

Chicken coccidiosis is an intestinal protozoan disease caused by the parasite Eimeria, causing serious economic losses to poultry industry worldwide [1]. The most effective means of controlling the disease relies on prophylactic anti-coccidial drugs. However, the increase of parasites resistant to anti-coccidial drugs and the public pressure to limit the use of chemicals in animals [2] have prompted the development of cost-effective vaccines. Although some commercial vaccines are available, such as live virulent, attenuated [3] or live-tolerant vaccines [4], some disadvantages have been noticed including the poor immunological protection, affecting weight gain and virulence reversion [5]. To overcome these problems, several novel vaccine candidates have been studied recently. In particular, bacterial vectors originating from but not limited to Bacillus subtilis [6], Mycobacterium bovis BCG [7], Salmonella enteritidis [8] and Lactococcus lactis [9] have drawn more and more attention to be used as vectors for oral vaccines.

Among these vectors, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have long been used in the fermentation industry as probiotics with the ability to enhance the functionality of the immune system. LAB has also great potential to serve as a vehicle for oral vaccine delivery, by genetically expressing desired foreign proteins [10]. There are three different ways to present foreign proteins (or antigens), which include intracellular, cellular surface and secreted protein production. Usually it is considered that the cell surface anchored antigen and secreted antigen could induce much stronger immune responses compared with the intracellular production of desired antigen due to the higher degree of exposure of the antigen to the host. Our lab has recently used the anchoring sequence from poly-γ-glutamic acid synthetase A (pgsA), a transmembrane protein from Bacillus subtilis [11,12,13] in order to construct recombinant L. plantarum strains capable in expressing foreign antigens. The resulting strains were efficient in the production of protective antibody responses and partial protection against either influenza virus [14], transmissible gastroenteritis virus [15, 16] or porcine epidemic diarrhea virus [17]. Notably, the traditional recombinant L. plantarum vaccines still relies on antibiotic resistance markers such as erythromycin, ampicillin or kanamycin. However, more and more studies have shown that the antibiotic resistance genes may not be safe for food or oral vaccine applications due to its possibility to affect environment [18]. To overcome these disadvantages, several non-antibiotic selection markers such as thyA [19], thr [20], and alr [21] have been developed. Another commonly used non-antibiotic selection marker is the asd gene (EC1.2.1.11), which has been used in E. coli and Salmonella [22].

Apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) is a member of the highly conserved parasite surface proteins among apicomplexan protozoan, such as Toxoplasma gondii [23], Plasmodium and Coccidia [24]. The AMA1 is found on the sporozoite surface of E. tenella. Its expression level at sporozoite stage is higher than that of other stages. The AMA1 protein is a type I transmembrane protein, which plays an important role in sporozoite invasion [25]. A previous report showed that DNA vaccines encoding EbAMA1 of E. brunetti could increase the level of serum specific IgG and cytokines concentration [26]. AMA1 of E. tenella sporozoite is effective at stimulating partial protection against a homologous challenge when expressed as a recombinant protein by Lactococcus lactis [27].

In addition, a number of microfilament proteins such as EtMIC2, which is expressed throughout the life cycle of coccidia and located on the membrane of sporozoites, can be used as potential vaccine candidate antigens against E. tenella infection by either eukaryotic or prokaryotic vectors [28,29,30]. Protective efficacy analysis indicated EtMIC2 conveys only partial protection [31]. To improve the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of EtMIC2 and AMA1, the two antigens were co-expressed on the surface of L. plantarum. As a vaccine delivery vector, L. plantarum has the function of enhancing immunity. We speculate that AMA1 and EtMIC2 co-expressed by L. plantarum could stimulate immune responses and improve immune protection against E. tenella infection.

In this study, we firstly designed a non-antibiotic dependent expression system for use in L. plantarum strains using the asd and alr selective markers. Then a double anchoring vector consisting of pgsA′ and S-layer protein anchoring sequences was constructed and the AMA1 and EtMIC2 proteins of Eimeria tenella (E. tenella) were anchored on the surface of recombinant L. plantarum strain Lp-12 at the same time. The results of in vivo studies suggested that the novel double-antigen anchoring construction delivered via L. plantarum significantly enhanced the immune response in chicken, which protected against E. tenella challenge.

Results

Construction of non-antibiotic selective plasmids

In this study, we sought to create a single expression vector that could be used to co-express two foreign proteins using a dual-anchoring sequence and non-antibiotic selection markers. To achieve this goal, we constructed a series of vectors, including vectors with a food-grade marker (asd-alr) containing various anchoring sequences (see Fig. 1). The Lp1261inv gene in parental plasmid pLp_1261Inv was replaced with either a pgsA′ or S anchor encoding sequence, yielding pLp-pgsA′ or pLp-S, respectively. Then EGFP gene was inserted into the above plasmids, resulting in two EGFP anchoring plasmid pLp-pgsA′-EGFP and pLp-EGFP-S. On the other hand, the erm resistant gene was replaced with an asd-alr expression cassette, which could synthesize Asd and Alr at the same time, yielding the non-antibiotic selective plasmids pLQa-pgsA′, pLQa-S, pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP and pLQa-EGFP-S.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Construction process of erm-marked and asd-alr-marked plasmids for the expression of single-anchored EGFP

Full size image

To determine whether the expression of foreign proteins affects the growth of recombinant strains, the constructed plasmids described above were transformed into either L. plantarum NC8 or its alr deletion mutant strain L. plantarum NC8/Δalr. After induction by the addition of SppIp, significantly decreased growth rates were observed for strains containing pLp-pgsA′-EGFP or pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP, whereas the growth rates of strains harboring pLp-EGFP-S or pLQa-EGFP-S were not obviously affected (Fig. 2). The reason of the decreased growth for strains containing pLp-pgsA′-EGFP or pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP is not clear. We speculate that the pgsA’ anchoring sequence plays an important role that affects growth rate, because the growth rates of the strains containing the pgsA’ sequence were lower than those containing the S_anchoring sequence. PgsA’ is a transmembrane-anchoring sequence. Interestingly, a previous study also showed that the Lp_1568 transmembrane anchoring sequence significantly affected the growth of L. plantarum [32]. Our results suggest that the S layer anchoring approach may be a better choice for surface displayed expression in L. plantarum strains.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Growth characteristics of EGFP-expressing L. plantarum strains. Bacterial cells were pre-cultured to OD600 ≈ 0.3. MRS was divided into two equal parts, one in non-induced culture (gray bars) and another in induced culture with 25 ng/mL SppIp (white bars). OD600 values were measured 4 h post induction. pLP-pgsA′, pLQa-pgsA′ pLp-S and pLQa-S are the empty vectors without the target proteins, and we only used the pLP-pgsA′ or pLQa-pgsA′ as empty vector control

Full size image

Synthesis of EGFP on surface of recombinant strains

The production and display of EGFP on the surface of L. plantarum strains was determined by Western blot, fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometric analysis. As expected, a 46 kDa band (26.3 kDa for EGFP plus the anchoring sequence) was observed in all constructs harboring the EGFP encoding gene (Fig. 3a). A second band with lower molecular weight was observed in some samples (lanes 4–6, but not 3 in Fig. 3a). It is not clear what this band is, but one possibility is that this is a putative protein product, as previously reported [32,33,34,35]. The strength of the respective bands on the Western blot showed no significant difference between the erm-marked and asd-alr-marked plasmids (Fig. 3b). The production of EGFP was further confirmed by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 3c) and flow cytometry (Fig. 3d). All results demonstrated that the synthesis of EGFP was not dramatically affected by the replacement of the erm with an asd-alr cassette, indicating the possibility to use non-antibiotic selective markers for further application.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Western blot analysis of EGFP. Same amount of total protein was loaded for each strain. Two strains containing pLP-pgsA′ (Lane 1) and pLQa-pgsA′ (Lane 2) were used as negative controls. The arrow indicates the bands of the EGFP fusion proteins. b Quantitative analysis of EGFP fusion proteins from Western blots. c Fluorescence microscopy analysis of single-anchoring expression of EGFP in L. plantarum containing asd-alr-marked or erm-marked plasmids (×100 objective). d Representative images of flow cytometry analysis of recombinants containing the following plasmids at 4 h post induction: pLp-pgsA′-EGFP (black), pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP (yellow), pLP-EGFP-S (light blue), pLQa-EGFP-S (green). pLP-pgsA′ (pink) and pLQa-pgsA′ (gray) were used as negative controls

Full size image

Stability of non-antibiotic selective strains

Next, we tested the stability of both erm and asd-alr-selective plasmids. The results showed that the percentage of transformed NC8 strains still harboring the plasmids pLp-pgsA′-EGFP and pLp-EGFP-S were 83% and 86% after 100 generations in selective medium (MRS with erythromycin), respectively. On the other hand, all plasmids were lost in the absence of antibiotics after 100 generations (Table 1). Notably, the percentages of remaining plasmids pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP and pLQa-EGFP-S in NC8/Δalr strains achieved about 66% and 69% at the presence of d-ala after 100 generations, whereas 100% plasmids were found in NC8/Δalr strains when d-ala was absent in culture medium, suggesting that the alr selective marker may benefit the stability of recombinant L. plantarum strains.

Table 1 Stability of erm-marked and asd-alr-marked plasmids
Full size table

Expression of EGFP and mCherry in a single plasmid with co-anchoring sequences

The cloning cassettes of single- or dual-anchored EGFP and mCherry proteins in plasmids pLQa-pgsA′-mCherry, pLQa-p′m-ES and pLQa-ES-p′m are shown in Fig. 4a. A Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence (AGGAAACAGACC), which helps recruit ribosomes to the messenger RNA to initiate protein synthesis, was used for the expression of the secondary protein gene, either EGFP in pLQa-p′m-ES or mCherry in pLQa-ES-p′m.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a The expression cassette for single- or dual-anchored proteins. The promoter PsppA mediated single-anchoring of the mCherryAT in pLQa-pgsA′-mCherry. Each of the co-anchoring expression plasmids (pLQa-p′m-ES and pLQa-ES-p′m) contains the inducible promoter PsppA, followed by two connected single-anchoring cassettes, which were separated by the SD sequence (AGGAAACAGACC). The difference between pLQa-p′m-ES and pLQa-ES-p′m is the splicing order of each anchoring cassette. b Western blot of EGFP using mouse anti-EGFP monoclonal antibody. c Quantitative analysis of western blot shown in b. d Western blot of mCherry using mouse anti-6 × His tag monoclonal antibody. e Quantitative analysis of western blot shown in d. f Representative images of flow cytometric analysis of L. plantarum NC8/Δalr strains containing the plasmids designed for single- or dual-anchoring of EGFP or mCherry. The strains are denoted by different colors in the flow cytometry histograms: pLQa-EGFP-S (green), pLQa-pgsA’-mCherry (red), pLQa-p’m-E (purple), pLQa-ES-p’m (blue). EGFP-A represents the EGFP-expressing strains; mCherry-A represents the mCherry-expressing strains. The L. plantarum NC8/Δalr harboring the empty pLQa-pgsA’ plasmid was used as a negative control (gray). (h) Statistical analysis of the flow cytometry results obtained by one-way ANOVA (NS: no significant difference, P > 0.05, ***P < 0.001)

Full size image

Expression of EGFP and mCherry was confirmed with anti-EGFP and anti-6 × His Tag antibodies. Western blot revealed the presence of a 45.4 kDa band for EGFP (26.3 kDa of EGFP plus the anchoring sequence) (Fig. 4b). The quantitative analysis indicated that the expression level of EGFP was significantly higher in the single-anchor plasmid (pLQa-EGFPS) (P < 0.05) compared with the dual-anchor plasmid (pLQa-p′m-ES) (Fig. 4c). The presence of a 47.6 kDa band corresponds to mCherry (26.6 kDa for mCherry) plus the His-tag and anchoring sequence (Fig. 4d). The identity of this band was further confirmed by western blot, where no significant differences among single or double expression plasmids could be observed (Fig. 4e). These findings were also confirmed by flow cytometry analysis (Fig. 4f, g). All these results indicated that the synthesis of the desired protein in double expression plasmid was mainly dependent on the type and order of anchors rather the target protein.

Co-expression of EGFP and mCherry was further confirmed by fluorescence microscopy (Fig. 5). No green-fluorescence or red-fluorescence was observed in L. plantarum NC8/Δalr strains harboring the pLQa-EGFP-S or pLQa-pgsA′-mCherry for single-anchoring either EGFP or mCherry. On the other hand, both green-fluorescence and red-fluorescence were detected in NC8/Δalr strains harboring plasmids pLQa-p′m-ES and pLQa-ES-p′m for co-anchoring EGFP and mCherry. When the green and red fluorescence were merged together, the recombinants were yellow for L. plantarum NC8/Δalr harboring pLQa-p′m-ES or pLQa-ES-p′m (Fig. 5), indicating that they were colocalized.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Fluorescence microscopy showing co-anchored EGFP and mCherry encoded by a single plasmid. L. plantarum NC8/Δalr harboring plasmids pLQa-EGFP-S or pLQa-pgsA′-mCherry designed for single-anchoring of mCherry or EGFP were used as controls (×100 objective). White arrows indicate co-localization of EGFP and mCherry in strains harboring pLQa-p′m-ES and pLQa-ES-p′m, respectively

Full size image

Co-anchoring of AMA1 and EtMIC2 on surface of L. plantarum strains

According to the results shown in Fig. 5, we selected the construct “protein1-S anchoring-SD-pgsA′-protein2” for further study. Two antigens of E. tenella (AMA1 and EtMIC2) were inserted into the plasmid pLQa-ES-p′m to obtain pLQa-AMA1S-p′EtMIC2, named pLQa12 (Fig. 6a). The L. plantarum NC8/Δalr containing the pLQa12 was referred as Lp-12. Protein expression of AMA1 and EtMIC2 on the surface of Lp-12 surface was determined by western blotting and immunofluorescence using anti-AMA1 or anti-EtMIC2 antibody. As shown in Fig. 6b, a specific AMA1 band appeared at ~ 66 kDa and a specific EtMIC2 band appeared at ~ 56 kDa, with no bands being detected in the vector controls. The presence of synthesized antigens on the surface of Lp-12 strains were confirmed by immunofluence assay, where green fluorescence could be observed (Fig. 6c). These results suggested that the AMA1 and EtMIC2 proteins were co-anchored on the surface of recombinant Lp-12 strains.

Fig. 6
figure 6

a The expression cassette for co-anchoring of AMA1 and EtMIC2 in the plasmid pLQa-AMA1S-p′EtMIC2. b Synthesis of AMA1 and EtMIC2 proteins in Lp-12 was assessed by Western blotting. Lane M: Marker; Lane 1: Lp/pLQa-pgsA′; Lane 2: Lp-12. c Immunofluorescence analysis to detect co-anchored AMA1 and EtMIC2 on the surface of L. plantarum

Full size image

Induced protection for chickens against E. tenella

To determine whether Lp-12-elicited immune response could provide protection against E. tenella, birds in experimental groups were challenged with E. tenella (5 × 104 oocysts/bird) after booster vaccination with Lp-12 strain. Ten days after the challenge, the body weight and oocyst output of chickens were observed and lesion scores in cecum were recorded. As shown in Table 2, the chickens immunized with Lp-12 had significantly increased body weight gains (BWG), decreased cecum lesions and reduced numbers of oocyst output compared with PBS and Lp/pLQa-pgsA′ group (P < 0.001). No chickens died after challenge in any group.

Table 2 Protective effects in each group
Full size table

Lp-12 improved the T cell responses in chickens

To determine whether immunization of Lp-12 affects the cellular immune responses, the T lymphocytes cell responses in peripheral blood of chicken were evaluated by flow cytometry (Fig. 7a) 10 days after the second vaccination. The percentage of CD3+CD4+ T cells in Lp-12 group was significantly higher than that in Lp/pLQa-pgsA′ group and PBS group (Fig. 7b, c) (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, the proportions of CD3+CD8+ T cells in the chickens immunized with Lp-12 increased significantly compared to the Lp/pLQa-pgsA′ group and PBS group (P < 0.05) (Fig. 7c, d), There was no significant difference between PBS group and vector group.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Flow cytometry analysis of Lp-12-triggered T cell responses after vaccination. a The single cells in peripheral-blood were prepared as described and subjected to flow cytometry assay gating was done according to [57]. b Panels representing CD3+ CD4+ T cells for each group. c The percentage of CD3+ CD4+ T cells and CD3+ CD8+ T cells from peripheral-blood were detected using flow cytometry on day 10 post second immunization by Lp-12. Data were shown as mean ± S.E.M (n = 5), were compared by a one-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). d Panels representing CD3+ CD8+ T cells for each group

Full size image

Lp-12 strains increased specific anti-AMA1 and EtMIC2 antibody level

To determine whether vaccination of recombination Lp-12 strains affects the specific antibody levels, 10 days after the second immunization, 5 chickens from each group were chosen to detect the specific serum IgY and intestinal SIgA antibody titers. The results showed that higher specific IgY titer against both AMA1 and EtMIC2 proteins was observed in the Lp-12 group compared with the PBS and Lp/pLQa-pgsA′ groups (Fig. 8a). Similar results were also observed regarding to the mucosal IgA antibody response (Fig. 8b), indicating that the co-expressed antigens could provide us an efficient approach for oral immunization.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Detection of specific IgY in sera (a) and SIgA in intestinal washes (b) from chicks after boosting immunization. The data shown represent mean ± S.E.M (n = 5), which were compared by a one-way ANOVA (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001). The samples were measured with 3 repeats. c Pathological cecum damage 7 dpi. Sample sections were stained using HE (×100 magnification); PBS: PBS control group. The villi and glands of the cecum are clearly visible and appear intact. PBS-challenge: The PBS-challenge group exhibits seriously damaged cecum villi and blurred gland was with blood cells and inflammatory cells present in the submucosa. A large number of coccidial oocysts can be found in the cecum lumen. Lp/pLQa-pgsA′: Lp/pLQa-pgsA′ immunized, followed by a challenge with E. tenella. The cecum villi were severely damaged and the glands appear blurred. Lp-12: Lp-12 immunized, followed by a challenge with E. tenella. The cecum villi were partly exfoliated, but the villus structure and the submucosal tissue remained relatively intact

Full size image

Lp-12 protected chickens from colonic inflammation

HE staining showed that chickens in the PBS-challenge group and the Lp/pLQa-pgsA′ vector group had severe colonic inflammation (Fig. 8c). The cecum villus was seriously damaged, and gland structure was blurred, with inflammatory cells and blood cells in the submucosa. The cecum had a large number of coccidial oocysts in the PBS-challenge group. The Lp-12 group showed the smallest histopathological changes. The villus of cecum was partly exfoliated, but the villus structure was relatively intact.

Discussion

In the genetic engineering of bacteria such as E. coli, Bacillus spp. and LAB, antibiotic resistance genes have traditionally been used as selection markers for the maintenance of recombinant cells [36]. For example, numerous recombinant L. plantarum strains have been constructed to deliver various functional proteins such as antigens [1, 37], enzymes [38], and cytokines [39,40,41]. However, most of these studies used the erm antibiotic resistance gene as selection marker. This resistance gene may however affect human health or the environment negatively [42].

In recent years, auxotrophic selection marker genes such as asd [43] and alr [44] have been used successfully in prokaryotic expression plasmids. In this study, using an asd-alr fusion gene as an auxotrophic selection marker, we designed a series of food-grade plasmids by replacing the erm gene of the pLp_1261Inv-derived expression plasmids. This method can be applied to other pSIP-type vectors, which can then be used as templates for the amplification of DNA fragments when replacing the erm gene with the asd-alr gene. Our results indicated that the asd-alr-marked plasmids were more stable than the erm-marked plasmids in both selective and nonselective media. In the alr gene deleted host strain, the alr plasmid is required for growth. The non-selective medium may not have any disadvantage to the cells. In contrast, an antibiotic gene is not necessary but harmful to cells. The non-selective medium does not have selection pressure towards the host strain, so the plasmid may get lost easily. These findings are consistent with those reported previously [21]. More importantly, the asd-alr-marked plasmid allows for the screening and selection of this plasmid in E. coli (with asd) and in L. plantarum (with alr). This makes it valuable and sustainable for use in the context of LAB engineering [44].

In this study, pgsA′ and S-layer proteins were employed for the co-expression of foreign proteins in L. plantarum. The results showed that both EGFP and mCherry proteins were successfully co-expressed on the surface of L. plantarum NC8/Δalr and the fluorescence signals for EGFP and mCherry could easily be measured in bacterial suspensions. This single plasmid with two anchoring sequences was subsequently employed for the co-expression of AMA1/EtMIC2 resulting in the recombinant L. plantarum strain Lp-12 to exhibit an anti-coccidial effect due to the antigens delivered via the engineered strain.

To evaluate the immune effect of the Lp-12 vaccine strain, we quantified the IgY and SIgA antibody titers and percentages of T cells in peripheral blood. The anti-AMA1 or anti-EtMIC2 specific IgY and SIgA antibodies were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in Lp-12 group comparing with PBS group and vector group. The data revealed that Lp-12 can elicit strong humoral and mucosal immunity. The result is in accordance with our previous report, where a recombinant L. plantarum NC8 strain expressed the SO7-DCpep fusion protein by the erm-marked plasmid pSIP409 [1]. The proportions of CD3+CD4+ T and CD3+CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood were significantly higher in the Lp-12 group, which indicates that Lp-12 efficiently stimulates the cellular immune response, the L. plantarum strain with no antigen can also increase the proportion of CD3+CD4+ T and CD3+CD8+ T cells. The Lp-12 with surface-displayed AMA1/EtMIC2 might be more effective in interacting with intestinal cells to stimulate the mucosal immune response [45] than the strain with no antigen.

To further evaluate the protecting effect of the Lp-12 against coccidia, chickens were challenged with E. tenella. The average BWG of the group vaccinated with Lp-12 was higher compared to the PBS-challenge control group and the empty vector group (P < 0.05). Our results showed that the chickens immunized with Lp-12 exhibited reduced oocyst shedding, less cecum damage, and lower average lesion scores compared to chickens immunized with the empty vector. An explanation for our results could be that the Lp-12 vaccine was able to stimulate the cellular immune response in addition to the humoral and mucosal immune response, resulting in reduced damage of chicken gut tissue, improved feed utilization and an increase in weight gain, the protective effects obtained in this study are similar to those obtained in other studies [27, 45, 46]. One limitation of this animal study is this is a single trial. Further studies, including the protective effect with attenuated vaccines, would be helpful to further confirm these conclusions.

Lactobacillus has been used as a feed supplement to improve weight gain and promote health effects [47]. Previous studies have shown that Lactobacillus itself has an anti-coccidial effect [48]. Our current results showed the L. plantarum strain with no antigen (vector control group: Lp/pLQa-pgsA′) can significantly improve the body weight gain of chickens (P < 0.05) compared with the PBS-challenged group.

Attenuated vaccines against Eimeria parasite are mainly from egg-adapted lines or precocious strains. Because egg-adapted lines are difficult to obtain, the precocious strains are the most widely used. Although the precocious strains provide a satisfactory protective immunity, its uses are limited due to the high cost and reduction of performance [9]. In this study, we developed a safe, economic, and practical oral vaccine against E. tenella, using the recombinant L. plantarum strain as a mucosal vaccine vector. This strain offers several advantages for the development of a coccidiosis vaccine, including ease of use, low cost, higher safety levels, and feasibility of genetic manipulation [49]. To our best knowledge, this is the first report in which an engineered LAB strain delivered double-antigen induced immune responses towards E. tenella. Compared with attenuated vaccines, the recombinant strains may not be as effective as the attenuated vaccines in a humoral immune response, but our present results from T cells proportions suggest the function of recombinant strains might be more effective. In addition, the double-anchoring sequence based co-expression strategy may not be restricted to E. tenella, but provide us a novel platform to co-express antigens from other pathogens. Our technology may further expand its applications in the field of oral vaccine.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we successfully constructed a plasmid that was used to express two foreign proteins on the surface of the L. plantarum NC8/Δalr strain. This plasmid has two anchoring motifs for the two proteins and carries an asd-alr fusion gene as the complementation screening marker. With the non-antibiotic markers, both E. coli and L. plantarum could be screened for successful transformation events and therefore safe for human use. The recombinant Lp-12 strain with co-expressed the AMA1/EtMIC2 improved the chicken immune response and provided partial protection against E. tenella challenge. This may provide a novel option for parasite vaccine research.

Methods

Plasmids, bacterial strains and growth conditions

The plasmids and bacterial strains used are listed in Table 3. E. coli Top10 was grown in lysogeny broth (LB). L. plantarum NC8 was cultured in De Man, Rogosa and Sharpe (MRS) medium at 30 °C without agitation. L. plantarum NC8-competent cells were prepared as previously described [50]. The L. plantarum NC8/Δalr strain was cultured in MRS medium with 200 μg/mL d-ala (Sigma, USA). E. coli χ6212 was cultured in LB medium with 50 μg/mL DAP (Sigma, USA) to compensate for the asd deletion. E. coli χ6212-competent cells were prepared and transformed as described previously [51]. Unless otherwise stated, the erythromycin concentration was 5 μg/mL (for L. plantarum NC8) or 200 μg/mL (for E. coli Top10). The AMA1 and EtMIC2 proteins were purified from E. coli BL21 (DE3) using a His-tagged protein purification kit (Cwbiotech, China). The mouse anti-AMA1 polyclonal antibody was obtained by immunizing mice with the purified AMA1 protein. A highly pathogenic E. tenella strain was isolated from chickens suffering from clinical coccisiosis at the Animal Hospital of Jilin Agricultural University and stored in our lab. In order to ensure its vitality, the E. tenella strain was rejuvenated in chickens every 6 months. The sporulated oocysts were preserved in 2.5% potassium dichromate solution at 4 °C as previously described [52].

Table 3 Strains and plasmids used in this study
Full size table

DNA manipulation

The PurePlasmid Mini Kit (Cwbiotech) was used to extract plasmids, and the Gel Extraction Kit (Cwbiotech) was used to purify DNA fragments. Restriction enzymes and PrimeSTAR Max DNA Polymerase were purchased from TaKaRa (Dalian, China). Polymerase chain reaction fragments were cloned into digested plasmids using the In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR primers used are listed in Table 4. These PCR fragments were sequenced by Genewiz (Suzhou, China). Transformants harboring asd-alr+ plasmids were selected on LB (without DAP) or MRS (without d-ala).

Table 4 List of PCR primers used in the study
Full size table

Construction of alr-deletion mutants

The alr-deletion mutant of L. plantarum NC8 (L. plantarum NC8/Δalr) was constructed using the Cre-lox-based vector mutagenesis system [53] (pNZ5319/pNZ5348) as previously described [21].

Construction of pLp-S, pLp-pgsA′, pLp-pgsA′-EGFP and pLp-EGFP-S cell-surface display vectors

Plasmids were constructed as shown in Fig. 1. First, to obtain the single-anchoring vector, the pLp-S and pLp-pgsA′ plasmids were constructed by replacing the lp_1261 Inv fusion gene of the plasmid pLp_1261Inv (Table 1) either with a part of the SlpA gene (SP-linker and S_anchoring sequence Genbank NO. X71412) or shortened pgsA gene (pgsA′) [35], respectively. Both genes were codon optimized and synthesized by Genewiz (Suzhou, China). A synthesized fragment containing a linker (GGCACGATTGCGGCG) [54] and the multiple cloning site MCS1 (SalI, XhoI, EcoRI, KpnI) between the SP and S-anchoring sequence was digested with NdeI/HindIII and ligated into the NdeI/HindIII digested pLp-1261Inv (5,6 kba fragment) to yield pLp-S. A synthesized fragment containing a linker (GGCACGATTGCGGCG) [54] and the multiple cloning site MCS2 (XbaI, SmaI, AsuII, NarI, and HindIII) downstream of ogsA′ was digested with NdeI/HindIII and ligated into the NdeI/HindIII digested pLp-1261Inv (5,6 kba fragment) to yield pLp-pgsA′.

EGFP (GenBank: MK317917.1) fragments were synthesized by Genewiz and amplified using P-EGFP F/P-EGFP R and S-EGFP F/S-EGFP R primers (Table 4), respectively. The PCR products were then cloned into the XbaI/HindIII-digested pLP-pgsA′ plasmid or the SalI/XhoI-digested pLp-S plasmid, respectively, yielding pLp-pgsA′-EGFP and pLp-EGFP-S plasmids. These plasmids were amplified in E. coli TOP10-competent cells and transformed into L. plantarum NC8 [55] by electroporation.

Construction of food-grade expression vectors pLQa-pgsA′, pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP, pLQa-S, and pLQa-EGFP-S plasmids

To construct food-grade expression vectors, the erm marker was replaced with the non-antibiotic marker asd-alr in the “pLp” vectors. The pYA3342 plasmid (Table 3) was used as template to amplify the asd gene (containing the promoter and terminator sequences) with asd F/asd R primer pairs (Table 4). A plasmid containing the Streptococcus cremoris promoter 23 sequence (P23, GenBank: M24763.1) and the alr gene (NCBI: NC_004567.2) was synthesized by Genewiz. The SalI and HindIII sites in the alr gene were removed during synthesis by mutation (GTCGAC → GTgGAC and AAGCTT → AAaCTT). The synthesized fragment was used as a template to amplify the P23-alr fusion fragment using P23 F/alr R primers (Table 4). Purified asd and P23-alr fragments were fused by overlap extension-PCR using asd F/alr R primers. Four plasmids constructed as described above (pLP-pgsA′, pLP-pgsA′-EGFP, pLp-S, and pLp-EGFP-S) were amplified without the erm gene using pF/pR primers (Table 4). These fragments were subsequently ligated with the asd-p23-alr fusion fragments by seamless cloning, yielding pLQa-pgsA′, pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP, pLQa-S, and pLQa-EGFP-S plasmids (Table 3, Fig. 1). These expression vectors were amplified in E. coli χ6212-competent cells using the asd gene as auxotrophic marker before transformation into the L. plantarum NC8/Δalr strain (using alr gene as screening marker) by electroporation.

Analysis of EGFP expression

To examine whether the non-antibiotic marker affects bacterial growth, six strains (L. plantarum NC8 harboring pLP-pgsA′, pLP-pgsA′-EGFP, and pLp-EGFP-S; L. plantarum NC8/Δalr harboring pLQa-pgsA′, pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP, and pLQa-EGFP-S) were grown at 30 °C without agitation. The overnight liquid cultures were sub-cultured in fresh MRS to a density corresponding to an OD600 ≈ 0.3. Each culture was then divided into an induced culture (addition of SppIp, 25 ng/mL) and a non-induced culture. OD600 values were measured 4 h post induction.

To compare the expression levels of EGFP in antibiotic and non-antibiotic resistance conveying plasmids, after induction for 4 h, the density of cultures were normalized to the same OD600 values. Cells were harvested from the cultures, and then the protein extractions were performed by a method described previously [33, 35]. The protein in the cell-free extracts was quantified using a BCA kit (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) and same amount of protein was subjected to 12% SDS-PAGE and western blotting using mouse anti-EGFP monoclonal antibody (1:5000 dilution) (BBI Life Science) and goat anti-mouse HRP-conjugated monoclonal antibody (1:8000 dilution) (BBI Life Science). The specific band representing EGFP was quantified using ImageJ software. An inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica DMI8) was used to visualize EGFP. The EGFP was quantified using a flow cytometer (BD LSRFortessa). Strains with the empty vector pLp-pgsA′ and pLQa-pgsA′ were used as negative controls.

Measurement of plasmid stability

Replica plating was used to detect the plasmid stability of pLp-pgsA′-EGFP, pLp-EGFP-S, pLQa-pgsA′-EGFP, and pLQa-EGFP-S. The percentage of host cells still containing the plasmid was measured after 50 and 100 generations [21].

Construction of a single plasmid co-expression EGFP and mCherry using dual-anchoring sequences

The mCherry gene (GenBank: KP238582.1) with 6 × His tag was synthesized by Genewiz, and was then ligated with the XbaI/HindIII-digested pLQa-pgsA′ using T4 DNA ligase (NEB). This process yielded the pLQa-pgsA′-mCherry plasmid (Fig. 4a). Then the SP-linker-EGFP-S_anchoring and pgsA′-mCherry fragments were amplified from pLQa-EGFP-S and pLQa-pgsA′-mCherry using SD-EGFPSF/SD-EGFPS R and SD-P′M F/SD-P′ M R primers, respectively. The amplified fragments were cloned into HindIII-digested pLQa-pgsA′-mCherry and pLQa-EGFP-S plasmids (Table 3) with introduction of the SD sequences (AGGAAACAGACC) by seamless cloning. This process yielded the two single co-expression plasmids pLQa-p′m-ES and pLQa-ES-p′m, respectively (Fig. 4a). In order to simplify further plasmid manipulations, the HindIII sites upstream the SD sequence were mutated (AAGCTT → AAaCTT) using the primer SD-P′M F (Table 4) when amplifying the pgsA′-mCherry gene. These plasmids were amplified in E. coli χ6212-competent cells, then transformed into L. plantarum NC8/Δalr by electroporation.

Co-anchoring of EGFP and mCherry on L. plantarum NC8/Δalr surface

Lactobacillus plantarum NC8/Δalr strains harboring pLQa-p′m-ES, or pLQa-ES-p′m were cultured and induced in MRS, fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry were performed to measure EGFP and mCherry expression as described above. For Western blot analysis, 2 mL of bacterial cultures were harvested. Two identical 12% SDS-PAGE gels were run in parallel, then transferred to two nitrocellulose membranes. One was used to detect EGFP as described above. The second membrane was incubated in mouse anti-6 × His tag monoclonal antibody (1:2000 dilution) (Kangwei Co., China) and goat anti-mouse HRP-conjugated monoclonal antibody (1:8000 dilution) (BBI Life Science). Levels of protein expression were analyzed and quantified using ImageJ software. Single-expression vectors (pLQa-EGFP-S and pLQa-pgsA′-mCherry) were used as positive controls.

Co-anchoring of AMA1and EtMIC2 on L. plantarum NC8/Δalr surface

Both the AMA1 (GenBank: AEJ33058.1) and EtMIC2 (GenBank: ACN93990.1) fragments without signal sequence were codon optimized, synthesized by Genewiz (Suzhou, China) and cloned into the pUC57-Kan plasmid. To co-anchor AMA1 and EtMIC2, the synthesized fragments were inserted into pLQa-ES-p′m in two steps. First, AMA1 was cloned into pLQa-ES-p′m using the SalI/XhoI restriction sites, yielding pLQa-AMA1S-p′m. Second, the EtMIC2 fragments were cloned into pLQa-AMA1S-p′m using XbaI/HindIII. This process yielded pLQa-AMA1S-p′ EtMIC2 (pLQa12) (Fig. 6a). The L. plantarum NC8/Δalr containing the pLQa12 is referred to as Lp-12. Western blotting was used to determinate the co-expression of AMA1 and EtMIC2 using a mouse anti-AMA1 polyclonal antibody (1:2000 dilution, provided by Jilin Agricultural University) and a mouse anti-EtMIC2 monoclonal antibody (1:2000 dilution, provided by Professor Xiaomin Zhao of Shandong Agricultural University). Co-anchored AMA1 and EtMIC2 on the surface of Lp-12 was detected by an immunofluorescence assay [56]. Approximately 106 cells were incubated with the mouse anti-EtMIC2 monoclonal or the anti-AMA1 polyclonal antibody, followed by incubation with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. Cells were washed twice with PBST and visualized using a Leica DMI8 fluorescence microscope.

Animal experiments

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committees of Jilin Agriculture University. White feather broiler chickens (1-day-old) were obtained from Hongda Animal Technology Co., Ltd. (Changchun, China). Chickens were weighed and randomly divided into groups A-D with 20 animals per group. All animals in the experimental group A were gavaged with 200 µL buffer containing 2 × 109 CFU of Lp-12 at an age of 4 to 6 days, followed by a booster vaccination at an age of 18 to 20 days with the same amount of Lp-12. Animals in the experimental group B (vector control group) were gavaged with 200 µL buffer containing 2 × 109 CPU of Lp/pLQa-pgsA′ at an age of 4 to 6 days, followed by a booster vaccination at age of 18 to 20 days with the same amount. Animals in the experimental group C (PBS control group) were gavaged with 200 µL PBS at an age of 4 to 6 days and 18 to 20 days. Animals in the experimental group D (PBS-challenge group) were treated with the same amount of PBS as group C. Ten days after the immunization (at age of 30 days), 5 chickens each of group A, B and C were chosen for sample collections to detect immune response. The remaining chickens within groups A, B and D were challenged with 5 × 104 sporulated oocysts of E. tenella as previously described [1].

Detection of antibody response

ELISA was performed to determine the IgY responses against AMA1 and EtMIC2 in sera, as well as secretory immunoglobulin (SIgA) in intestinal washes as described previously [14]. Briefly, to get the intestinal washes [22], the intestines were opened, and the contents were removed. Intestinal scrapings were collected using glass slides and diluted in cold PBS. After shaking for 1 min, the samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 5000×g at 4 °C. Supernatants were collected and stored at − 80 °C for SIgA assays. The 96-well plates were coated with AMA1 or EtMIC2 (100 ng/well) at 4 °C overnight. 1% BSA was added to each sample well and incubated overnight at 4 °C. 100 μL serum samples (1:100) and intestinal washes (1:20) were added to each well and incubated for 1.5 h at 37 °C. Subsequently, HRP-conjugated goat anti-chicken IgY or IgA (SouthernBiotech, USA) antibodies (1:10,000) were added to each well and incubated for additionally 1 h. After washing, 100 μL of 3,3′,5,5′tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) was added to each well. The reaction was stopped by addition of 2 N H2SO4 (50 μL/well). Finally, the absorbance was recorded at 450 nm in a plate reader.

Flow cytometry

Single-cell suspensions from blood were prepared using a peripheral-blood lymphocyte separation kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China), and flow cytometry was performed to detect the percentages of CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ T-cells [57]. The isolated cells (1 × 106) were incubated with FITC-conjugated anti-chicken CD3 and PE-conjugated anti-chicken CD4 or CD8 (SouthernBiotech) monoclonal antibodies, respectively. The samples were quantified by a flow cytometer (BD LSRFortessa™, USA). Experiments were performed in triplicates and the data were analyzed using FlowJo (Version 7.6.2, Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA).

Evaluation of immune protection

At 7 days post-infection (7 dpi), the cecal lesion scores of five chickens per experimental group were assessed as previously described [58]. Ceca were removed and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and stained with standard hematoxylin and eosin (HE) as described previously [59]. Body weights were measured at the day of challenge and 7 dpi to calculate the relative BWG (%) [9]. Fecal samples were collected between 4 dpi and 7 dpi to determine the numbers of oocysts per gram (OPG) in feces [1] and to determine the percentual reduction of oocysts in the feces of the respective treatments relative to the control [60].

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 5.0 software using One-Way ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Abbreviations

EGFP:

Enhanced green fluorescent protein

L. plantarum :

Lactobacillus plantarum

E. coli :

Escherichia coli

E. tenella :

Eimeria tenella

LAB:

Lactic acid bacteria

pgsA:

Poly-γ-glutamic acid synthetase A

SP:

Signal peptide

S:

Anchoring sequence of the surface layer protein

DAP:

5 2, 6-Diaminopimelic acid

erm :

Erythromycin resistance gene

alr :

d-Alanine racemase gene

asd :

β-Semialdehyde dehydrogenase gene

d-ala:

d-Alanine

EtMIC2:

Eimeria tenella microneme-2

AMA1:

Apical membrane antigen 1

SD:

Shine-Dalgarno

LB:

Luria broth

MRS:

De Man Rogosa Sharpe

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

SDS-PAGE:

SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PBS:

Phosphate buffered saline

TMB:

Tetramethylbenzidine

ELISAs:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

SIgA:

Secretory immunoglobulin A

References

  1. Yang G, Yao J, Yang W, Jiang Y, Du J, Huang H, Gu W, Hu J, Ye L, Shi C, et al. Construction and immunological evaluation of recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing SO7 of Eimeria tenella fusion DC-targeting peptide. Vet Parasitol. 2017;236:7–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu L, Zhang W, Song Y, Wang W, Zhang Y, Wang T, Li K, Pan Q, Qi X, Gao Y, et al. Recombinant Lactococcus lactis co-expressing OmpH of an M cell-targeting ligand and IBDV-VP2 protein provide immunological protection in chickens. Vaccine. 2018;36:729–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shirley MW, Bedrnik P. Live attenuated vaccines against avian coccidiosis: success with precocious and egg-adapted lines of Eimeria. Parasitol Today. 1997;13:481–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Li GQ, Kanu S, Xiao SM, Xiang FY. Responses of chickens vaccinated with a live attenuated multi-valent ionophore-tolerant Eimeria vaccine. Vet Parasitol. 2005;129:179–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yin G, Lin Q, Wei W, Qin M, Liu X, Suo X, Huang Z. Protective immunity against Eimeria tenella infection in chickens induced by immunization with a recombinant C-terminal derivative of EtIMP1. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2014;162:117–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin Z, Shi Y, Deng B, Mao X, Yu D, Li W. Protective immunity against Eimeria tenella infection in chickens following oral immunization with Bacillus subtilis expressing Eimeria tenella 3-1E protein. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:3229–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li WC, Zhang XK, Du L, Pan L, Gong PT, Li JH, Yang J, Li H, Zhang XC. Eimeria maxima: efficacy of recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG expressing apical membrane antigen1 against homologous infection. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:3825–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shivaramaiah S, Barta JR, Layton SL, Lester C, Tellez G. Development and evaluation of an Δ aroA/Δ htrA Salmonella enteritidis vector expressing Eimeria maxima TRAP family protein EmTFP250 with CD 154 (CD 40L) as candidate vaccines against coccidiosis in broilers. Int J Poult Sci. 2010. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2010.1031.1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma D, Gao M, Dalloul RA, Ge J, Ma C, Li J. Protective effects of oral immunization with live Lactococcus lactis expressing Eimeria tenella 3-1E protein. Parasitol Res. 2013;112:4161–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu W, Kong J, Kong W. Construction and application of a food-grade expression system for Lactococcus lactis. Mol Biotechnol. 2013;54:170–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoon SW, Lee TY, Kim SJ, Lee IH, Sung MH, Park JS, Poo H. Oral administration of HPV-16 L2 displayed on Lactobacillus casei induces systematic and mucosal cross-neutralizing effects in Balb/c mice. Vaccine. 2012;30:3286–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lei H, Peng X, Zhao D, Ouyang J, Jiao H, Shu H, Ge X. Lactococcus lactis displayed neuraminidase confers cross protective immunity against influenza A viruses in mice. Virology. 2015;476:189–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smit E, Jager D, Martinez B, Tielen FJ, Pouwels PH. Structural and functional analysis of the S-layer protein crystallisation domain of Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 4356: evidence for protein-protein interaction of two subdomains. J Mol Biol. 2002;324:953–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang Y, Yang G, Wang Q, Wang Z, Yang W, Gu W, Shi C, Wang J, Huang H, Wang C. Molecular mechanisms underlying protection against H9N2 influenza virus challenge in mice by recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum with surface displayed HA2-LTB. J Biotechnol. 2017;259:6–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang WT, Li QY, Ata EB, Jiang YL, Huang HB, Shi CW, Wang JZ, Wang G, Kang YH, Liu J, et al. Immune response characterization of mice immunized with Lactobacillus plantarum expressing spike antigen of transmissible gastroenteritis virus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:8307–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin YB, Yang WT, Shi CW, Feng B, Huang KY, Zhao GX, Li QY, Xie J, Huang HB, Jiang YL, et al. Immune responses induced by recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing the spike protein derived from transmissible gastroenteritis virus in piglets. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:8403–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang KY, Yang GL, Jin YB, Liu J, Chen HL, Wang PB, Jiang YL, Shi CW, Huang HB, Wang JZ, et al. Construction and immunogenicity analysis of Lactobacillus plantarum expressing a porcine epidemic diarrhea virus S gene fused to a DC-targeting peptide. Virus Res. 2018;247:84–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trombert A. Recombinant lactic acid bacteria as delivery vectors of heterologous antigens: the future of vaccination? Benef Microbes. 2015;6:313–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu D, Zhao K, Xu H, Zhang X, Bai Y, Saris PEJ, Qiao M. Construction of thyA deficient Lactococcus lactis using the Cre-loxP recombination system. Ann Microbiol. 2014;65:1659–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Glenting J, Madsen SM, Vrang A, Fomsgaard A, Israelsen H. A plasmid selection system in Lactococcus lactis and its use for gene expression in L. lactis and human kidney fibroblasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:5051–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen TT, Mathiesen G, Fredriksen L, Kittl R, Nguyen TH, Eijsink VG, Haltrich D, Peterbauer CK. A food-grade system for inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus plantarum using an alanine racemase-encoding selection marker. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:5617–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang Y, Mo H, Willingham C, Wang S, Park JY, Kong W, Roland KL, Curtiss R 3rd. Protection against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens by regulated delayed lysis Salmonella vaccines. Avian Dis. 2015;59:475–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang TE, Yin LT, Li RH, Wang HL, Meng XL, Yin GR. Protective immunity induced by peptides of AMA1, RON2 and RON4 containing T-and B-cell epitopes via an intranasal route against toxoplasmosis in mice. Parasite Vectors. 2015;8:15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pastor-Fernandez I, Kim S, Billington K, Bumstead J, Marugan-Hernandez V, Kuster T, Ferguson DJP, Vervelde L, Blake DP, Tomley FM. Development of cross-protective Eimeria-vectored vaccines based on apical membrane antigens. Int J Parasitol. 2018;48:505–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang L, Lin J, Han H, Dong H, Zhao Q, Zhu S, Huang B. Identification and characterization of Eimeria tenella apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1). PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e41115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hoan TD, Thao DT, Gadahi JA, Song X, Xu L, Yan R, Li X. Analysis of humoral immune response and cytokines in chickens vaccinated with Eimeria brunetti apical membrane antigen-1 (EbAMA1) DNA vaccine. Exp Parasitol. 2014;144:65–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Li J, Wang F, Ma C, Huang Y, Wang D, Ma D. Recombinant Lactococcus lactis expressing Eimeria tenella AMA1 protein and its immunological effects against homologous challenge. Exp Parasitol. 2018;191:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun H, Wang L, Wang T, Zhang J, Liu Q, Chen P, Chen Z, Wang F, Li H, Xiao Y, Zhao X. Display of Eimeria tenella EtMic2 protein on the surface of Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a potential oral vaccine against chicken coccidiosis. Vaccine. 2014;32:1869–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi W, Liu Q, Zhang J, Sun J, Jiang X, Geng J, Wang F, Xiao Y, Li H, Zhao X. Co-expression of EtMic2 protein and chicken interleukin-18 for DNA vaccine against chicken coccidiosis. Res Vet Sci. 2014;97:64–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ding X, Lillehoj HS, Dalloul RA, Min W, Sato T, Yasuda A, Lillehoj EP. In ovo vaccination with the Eimeria tenella EtMIC2 gene induces protective immunity against coccidiosis. Vaccine. 2005;23:3733–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yan M, Cui X, Zhao Q, Zhu S, Huang B, Wang L, Zhao H, Liu G, Li Z, Han H, Dong H. Molecular characterization and protective efficacy of the microneme 2 protein from Eimeria tenella. Parasite. 2018;25:60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kuczkowska K, Mathiesen G, Eijsink VG, Oynebraten I. Lactobacillus plantarum displaying CCL3 chemokine in fusion with HIV-1 Gag derived antigen causes increased recruitment of T cells. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:169.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dieye Y, Usai S, Clier F, Gruss A, Piard JC. Design of a protein-targeting system for lactic acid bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:4157–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Lin J, Zou Y, Ma C, Liang Y, Ge X, Chen Z, She Q. Construction and characterization of three protein-targeting expression system in Lactobacillus casei. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363:fnw041.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Cai R, Jiang Y, Yang W, Shi S, Shi C, Hu J, Gu W, Ye L, Zhou F, Gong Q, et al. Surface-displayed IL-10 by recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum reduces Th1 responses of RAW264.7 cells stimulated with poly(I:C) or LPS. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26:421–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wen LJ, Hou XL, Wang GH, Yu LY, Wei XM, Liu JK, Liu Q, Wei CH. Immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus casei strains producing K99, K88 fimbrial protein protects mice against enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Vaccine. 2012;30:3339–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shi SH, Yang WT, Yang GL, Zhang XK, Liu YY, Zhang LJ, Ye LP, Hu JT, Xing X, Qi C, et al. Lactobacillus plantarum vaccine vector expressing hemagglutinin provides protection against H9N2 challenge infection. Virus Res. 2016;211:46–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mathiesen G, Sveen A, Brurberg MB, Fredriksen L, Axelsson L, Eijsink VG. Genome-wide analysis of signal peptide functionality in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. BMC Genom. 2009;10:425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang G, Jiang Y, Yang W, Du F, Yao Y, Shi C, Wang C. Effective treatment of hypertension by recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory peptide. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Michon C, Kuczkowska K, Langella P, Eijsink VG, Mathiesen G, Chatel JM. Surface display of an anti-DEC-205 single chain Fv fragment in Lactobacillus plantarum increases internalization and plasmid transfer to dendritic cells in vitro and in vivo. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang WT, Yang GL, Wang Q, Huang HB, Jiang YL, Shi CW, Wang JZ, Huang KY, Jin YB, Wang CF. Protective efficacy of Fc targeting conserved influenza virus M2e antigen expressed by Lactobacillus plantarum. Antiviral Res. 2017;138:9–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Renault P. Genetically modified lactic acid bacteria: applications to food or health and risk assessment. Biochimie. 2002;84:1073–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhao X, Dai Q, Zhu D, Liu M, Chen S, Sun K, Yang Q, Wu Y, Kong Q, Jia R. Recombinant attenuated Salmonella Typhimurium with heterologous expression of the Salmonella choleraesuis O-polysaccharide: high immunogenicity and protection. Sci Rep. 2017;7:7127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Staudigl P, Haltrich D, Peterbauer CK. l-Arabinose isomerase and d-xylose isomerase from Lactobacillus reuteri: characterization, coexpression in the food grade host Lactobacillus plantarum, and application in the conversion of d-galactose and d-glucose. J Agric Food Chem. 2014;62:1617–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Ma C, Zhang L, Gao M, Ma D. Construction of Lactococcus lactis expressing secreted and anchored Eimeria tenella 3-1E protein and comparison of protective immunity against homologous challenge. Exp Parasitol. 2017;178:14–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Wang Q, Chen L, Li J, Zheng J, Cai N, Gong P, Li S, Li H, Zhang X. A novel recombinant BCG vaccine encoding Eimeria tenella rhomboid and chicken IL-2 induces protective immunity against coccidiosis. Korean J Parasitol. 2014;52:251–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Trabelsi I, Ktari N, Ben Slima S, Bouchaala K, Ben Salah R. Effects of supplementation with L. plantarum TN8 encapsulated in alginate-chitosan in broiler chickens. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;89:677–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Giannenas I, Papadopoulos E, Tsalie E, Triantafillou E, Henikl S, Teichmann K, Tontis D. Assessment of dietary supplementation with probiotics on performance, intestinal morphology and microflora of chickens infected with Eimeria tenella. Vet Parasitol. 2012;188:31–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cano-Garrido O, Seras-Franzoso J, Garcia-Fruitos E. Lactic acid bacteria: reviewing the potential of a promising delivery live vector for biomedical purposes. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:137.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Josson K, Scheirlinck T, Michiels F, Platteeuw C, Stanssens P, Joos H, Dhaese P, Zabeau M, Mahillon J. Characterization of a gram-positive broad-host-range plasmid isolated from Lactobacillus hilgardii. Plasmid. 1989;21:9–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Galan JE, Nakayama K, Curtiss R 3rd. Cloning and characterization of the asd gene of Salmonella typhimurium: use in stable maintenance of recombinant plasmids in Salmonella vaccine strains. Gene. 1990;94:29–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Yang S-y. Letting the troops loose: pillage, massacres, and enslavement in early tang warfare. J Chin Mil Hist. 2017;6:1–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Lambert JM, Bongers RS, Kleerebezem M. Cre-lox-based system for multiple gene deletions and selectable-marker removal in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:1126–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Fredriksen L, Kleiveland CR, Hult LT, Lea T, Nygaard CS, Eijsink VG, Mathiesen G. Surface display of N-terminally anchored invasin by Lactobacillus plantarum activates NF-kappaB in monocytes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:5864–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Sorvig E, Mathiesen G, Naterstad K, Eijsink VG, Axelsson L. High-level, inducible gene expression in Lactobacillus sakei and Lactobacillus plantarum using versatile expression vectors. Microbiology. 2005;151:2439–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yang WT, Yang GL, Zhao L, Jin YB, Jiang YL, Huang HB, Shi CW, Wang JZ, Wang G, Kang YH, Wang CF. Lactobacillus plantarum displaying conserved M2e and HA2 fusion antigens induces protection against influenza virus challenge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:5077–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Gao X, Xu K, Yang G, Shi C, Huang H, Wang J, Yang W, Liu J, Liu Q, Kang Y, et al. Construction of a novel DNA vaccine candidate targeting F gene of genotype VII Newcastle disease virus and chicken IL-18 delivered by Salmonella. J Appl Microbiol. 2019;126:1362–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Johnson J, Reid WM. Anticoccidial drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. Exp Parasitol. 1970;28:30–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Jiang Y, Hu J, Guo Y, Yang W, Ye L, Shi C, Liu Y, Yang G, Wang C. Construction and immunological evaluation of recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing HN of Newcastle disease virus and DC-targeting peptide fusion protein. J Biotechnol. 2015;216:82–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Song X, Zhao X, Xu L, Yan R, Li X. Immune protection duration and efficacy stability of DNA vaccine encoding Eimeria tenella TA4 and chicken IL-2 against coccidiosis. Res Vet Sci. 2017;111:31–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Drs. Lars Axelsson and Geir Mathiesen from Norwegian University of Life Sciences for providing the pLp_1261Inv plasmids and thank Dr. Michiel Kleerebezem from NIZO food research for providing the pNZ5319 and pNZ5348 plasmids.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0501200, 2017YFD0501000, 2017YFD0500400), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31672528, 31602092), Science and the Technology Development Program of Jilin Province (20180201040NY and 20190301042NY).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Provincial Engineering Research Center of Animal Probiotics, Key Laboratory of Animal Production and Product Quality Safety of Ministry of Education, Jilin Agricultural University, 2888 Xincheng Street, Changchun, 130118, China

    Qiong Liu, Yanlong Jiang, Wentao Yang, Yongshi Liu, Chunwei Shi, Jing Liu, Xing Gao, Haibin Huang, Tianming Niu, Guilian Yang & Chunfeng Wang

  2. College of Food Engineering, Jilin Engineering Normal University, 3050 KaiXuan Road, Changchun, 130052, Jilin, China

    Qiong Liu

Authors
  1. Qiong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yanlong Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wentao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yongshi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chunwei Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jing Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xing Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Haibin Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tianming Niu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Guilian Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chunfeng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

QL, YLJ, GLY and CFW designed most of the investigation and data analysis; QL and YLJ wrote the manuscript; QL, YSL and XG performed experiments, TMN and HBH provided pathological assistance; SCW and WTY contributed to interpretation of the data and analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guilian Yang or Chunfeng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committees of Jilin Agriculture University.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Q., Jiang, Y., Yang, W. et al. Protective effects of a food-grade recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum with surface displayed AMA1 and EtMIC2 proteins of Eimeria tenella in broiler chickens. Microb Cell Fact 19, 28 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-1297-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-1297-4

Keywords

Microbial Cell Factories

ISSN: 1475-2859

Contact us