An evolutionary optimization of a rhodopsin-based phototrophic metabolism in Escherichia coli
- Hyun Aaron Kim†1, 7,
- Hyun Ju Kim†2,
- Jihoon Park3,
- Ah Reum Choi4,
- Kyoo Heo6,
- Haeyoung Jeong5,
- Kwang-Hwan Jung4,
- Yeong-Jae Seok6,
- Pil Kim3Email authorView ORCID ID profile and
- Sang Jun Lee2Email author
© The Author(s) 2017
Received: 14 February 2017
Accepted: 12 June 2017
Published: 15 June 2017
The expression of the Gloeobacter rhodopsin (GR) in a chemotrophic Escherichia coli enables the light-driven phototrophic energy generation. Adaptive laboratory evolution has been used for acquiring desired phenotype of microbial cells and for the elucidation of basic mechanism of molecular evolution. To develop an optimized strain for the artificially acquired phototrophic metabolism, an ancestral E. coli expressing GR was adaptively evolved in a chemostat reactor with constant illumination and limited glucose conditions. This study was emphasized at an unexpected genomic mutation contributed to the improvement of microbial performance.
During the chemostat culture, increase of cell size was observed, which were distinguished from that of the typical rod-shaped ancestral cells. A descendant ET5 strain was randomly isolated from the chemostat culture at 88-days. The phototrophic growth and the light-induced proton pumping of the ET5 strain were twofold and eightfold greater, respectively, than those of the ancestral E. coli strain. Single point mutation of C1082A at dgcQ gene (encoding diguanylate cyclase, also known as the yedQ gene) in the chromosome of ET5 strain was identified from whole genome sequencing analysis. An ancestral E. coli complemented with the same dgcQ mutation from the ET5 was repeated the subsequently enhancements of light-driven phototrophic growth and proton pumping. Intracellular c-di-GMP, the product of the diguanylate cyclase (dgcQ), of the descendant ET5 strain was suddenly increased while that of the ancestral strain was negligible.
Newly acquired phototrophic metabolism of E. coli was further improved via adaptive laboratory evolution by the rise of a point mutation on a transmembrane cell signaling protein followed by increase of signal molecule that eventually led an increase proton pumping and phototrophic growth.
Biological energy for life can be harvested from light, and converted into electrochemical proton gradient and/or ATP in phototrophic organisms such as plants and the cyanobacterium, Gloeobacter violaceus , using photosystems and rhodopsin-based mechanism , respectively. Rhodopsin is a proton-pumping transmembrane protein present in many cyanobacteria, and functions as a primitive photosystem . Retinal, a prosthetic molecule present in rhodopsin, absorbs photons, triggers isomerization, and releases protons outside the cytoplasmic membrane . Attention has been paid to the potential of the light-harvesting machinery because of its renewable use of solar energy in biological systems [5–7]. Phototrophic modules such as light-harvesting rhodopsin can be artificially transferred to chemotrophic cells to have additional light-driven energy metabolism. For example, light illumination on a proteorhodopsin-integrated membrane in E. coli resulted in the generation of a proton motive force that can promote flagellar motility . The coupling of the light-driven proton-pumping G. violaceus rhodopsin (GR) and E. coli ATP synthase in the same membrane could generate ATP production .
Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) has been harnessed for the elucidation of basic mechanism of molecular evolution and genome dynamics, and the direction of wanted phenotypes of microbial cells . In application aspects, evolved mutations would allow the optimization of microbial fitness, and they could be transferred to other backgrounds hosts for the acquiring of new cellular functions, which are named evolutionary engineering and reverse metabolic engineering, respectively [11, 12]. Microbial mutations could increase biotechnological productivity and yield [13–15]. Adaptive laboratory evolutions could allow microbial strains to obtain industrially beneficial characteristics such as tolerance to higher concentrations of substrate or product, stress tolerance against toxic chemicals, etc. [16–18]. Chemostat cultures have been preferred to simple serial batch transfer in evolutionary experiments, because environmental factors such as nutrients, pH, oxygenation, and growth rate could be maintained .
In this study, a phototrophic module (i.e., GR: Gloeobacter rhodopsin) was introduced into a chemotrophic E. coli host, and evolution of the phototrophic metabolism was induced under illumination condition by chemostat. The improvement of light-driven proton pumping and phototrophic growth were observed in the descendant strain, in which the corresponding genomic mutation was characterized by genome sequencing analysis and confirmed by genomic complementation. The physiological characteristics of the evolved cells and the evolutionary direction of new phototrophic metabolism were also discussed.
Strain, medium, and adaptive evolution
An E. coli W3110 (laboratory stock at the Catholic University of Korea) harboring pKJ606-GR plasmid  was used as the ancestral strain for adaptive evolution. Chemostat culture of the E. coli ancestral strain was performed using modified M9 minimal medium under illumination condition. The minimal medium composition was as follows: 1 g/L glucose, 0.8 g/L NH4Cl, 0.5 g/L NaCl, 7.5 g/L Na2HPO4·2H2O, 3 g/L KH4PO4, 0.2 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1 g/L CaCl2, 1 mg/L thiamine·HCl supplemented with 5 μM all-trans-retinal (dissolved in ethanol, Cat. number R-2500, Sigma-Aldrich Co. St. Louis, MO, USA), 50 μg/mL ampicillin, and 0.1 mM IPTG.
A single colony of the ancestral E. coli was inoculated in 3 mL of the minimal medium in a 15 mL tube, and incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm for 16 h. Then, 1 mL of the culture broth was transferred to a 250 mL mini-chemostat fermenter jar (Hanil Inc., Gimpo, Korea) containing 100 mL of medium and equipped with LED light bulbs (four 1-W bulbs at 1 cm distances). The mini-fermenter was operated at 37 °C and 200 rpm with aeration (100 mL/min) and constant illumination. A 20 L reservoir was replenished with fresh feeding medium of the same composition as the initial medium whenever depleted. The reservoir jar was wrapped with aluminum foil to reduce inactivation of the light-sensitive retinal component. Inlet and outlet tubings were controlled by peristaltic pumps at 10 mL/h (corresponding to a dilution rate of 0.1 h−1). Samples (1 mL) were collected through the outlet tubing to measure optical density at 600 nm (OD600) .
Samples from the outlet tubing during the chemostat operation were observed daily under a binocular microscope (BX41, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at 1000× magnification. The chemostat culture populations and an evolved descendant E. coli were observed by scanning electron microscopy (S-4800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) in a chemical analytical facility at the Catholic University of Korea.
The chemostat culture broth at 88-days was spread on the agar (1.5%) containing minimal medium. After incubation for 48 h at 37 °C with illumination (13-W bulb at 10 cm distance), a single colony was randomly selected (named ET5) and stored for further analysis.
Phototrophic growth measurement
To estimate the phototrophic growth of the ancestral and the evolved E. coli strains, cells were batch-cultured in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 mL of fresh medium at 37 °C and 200 rpm for 24 h in a shaking incubator equipped with two 13-W light bulbs at a distance of 20 cm. The same medium composition of the chemostat was used, except glucose concentration (2 g/L) for higher biomass. Cell growth was observed by measuring OD600. Chemotrophic growth was measured under light-protected conditions by wrapping the flask with aluminum foil. Phototrophic growth was calculated by subtracting cell growth (OD600) in dark condition from cell growth (OD600) under illumination condition. The growth measurement was repeated at least three times.
Proton pumping measurement
To measure the amount of proton pumping by GR, the cells in log phase were harvested by moderate centrifugation (3600 rpm for 10 min) at room temperature. The cell pellet was gently washed twice with unbuffered saline solution (10 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO4·7H2O, and 0.1 mM CaCl2) . Samples were placed in a spectrophotometric cuvette (path length 1 cm) and illuminated at an intensity of 100 W/m2. Illumination was given using the short-wave cutoff filter (>440 nm, Sigma Koki SCF-50S-44Y, Japan) in combination with a focusing convex lens and heat-protecting CuSO4 filter. Proton pumping was monitored for 1 min by measuring pH values using the F-51 pH meter (Horiba Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) . The measurement was repeated at least three times, and the difference in proton concentrations was determined and fitted with pH = −log10[H+] with calibration by acid addition .
Genomic and plasmid DNAs of the ancestral and the evolved strains were purified using a Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and a Plasmid miniprep kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), respectively. The purified genomic and plasmid DNA samples were mixed in a ratio of 100:1 by mass, and were subjected to sequencing library construction with an average insert size of 600 bp using Illumina TruSeq Nano DNA kit (San Diego, CA, USA). A 300-cycle paired-end sequencing was performed in a sequencing facility at KRIBB (Daejeon, Korea) using an Illumina MiSeq platform (San Diego, CA, USA). Read preprocessing (quality trim limit 0.01, one ambiguous nucleotide allowed per read, and minimum read length of 100 bp), reference mapping, and fixed ploidy variant detection (including indels and structural variants detection) were all conducted using the CLC Genomics Workbench 8.0. The complete genome sequence of E. coli W3110 (RefSeq NC_007779.1) and the sequence of plasmid pKJ606-GR  were used as the references.
Genomic complementation of the single point mutation
Escherichia coli JW1912 strain carrying the kanamycin-resistance gene (KmR) in the place of the open reading frame of amyA encoding α-amylase, which is located 20 kb from the point mutation in the chromosome, was obtained from the Keio collection . The P1 lysate of JW1912 cells was used to transduce ΔamyA::KmR into the ET5 strain to make KmR-tagged dgcQ C1082A strain (HK769), which was verified by DNA sequencing. Subsequently, the P1 lysate of HK769 was used to transduce the point mutation of dgcQ C1082A into the ancestral strain to generate isogenic HK775 strain.
Determination of intracellular c-di-GMP concentration
Intracellular c-di-GMP concentration was determined according to previous publication . Parental type (W3110/GR) and the evolved type (ET5/GR) cells were grown in the M9-glucose minimal medium supplemented with 5 μM all-trans-retinal (dissolved in ethanol), and 50 μg/mL ampicillin under dark or illuminated conditions. When OD reached about 0.5, the culture broths (50 mL) were subjected to centrifugation (at 6000×g and 4 °C, for 10 min). The cells were rapidly frozen by liquid nitrogen after discarding the supernatant and stored at a deep freezer (−80 °C) until extraction. The frozen sample was thawed and mixed with an pre-chilled extraction buffer (methanol:acetonitrile:0.1 N formic acid solution = 40:40:20; 500 μL) and an internal standard (3′,5′-cyclic xanthosine monophosphate; 5 μL). The tube containing the mixture was tightly sealed, then subjected into freezing and thawing to disrupt cells using a liquid nitrogen and a heating block (30 °C) for three times. The tube was incubated in an ice bath for 30 min before the centrifugation (at 10,000×g, 4 °C, for 10 min). The supernatant (400 μL) was transferred into a 1.5 mL-tube and concentrated using a vacuum centrifuge (55 °C), followed by triple distilled water (TDW; 100 μL) addition to resuspend. The suspension sample was centrifuged at 10,000×g, 4 °C, for 30 min to remove debris, and the supernatant was stored at −80 °C. The c-di-GMP concentration in the supernatant was determined by a LC-MS/MS (Accela 1250 UPLC system, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a C18 column (Hypersil Gold column, 2.1 × 100 mm, 1.8 μm, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a mass spectrometer (TSQ Quantum Access MAX Quadrupole MS, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a chemical analysis facility (Seoul National University). Standard chemicals of c-di-GMP and 3′,5′-cyclic xanthosine monophosphate (cXMP) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co.
Adaptive evolution of GR-expressing E. coli
Phototrophic growth of ET5 strain
Cell growths of rhodopsin-expressing E. coli strains with and without illumination
Cell growth (OD600)a
Δ[B − A] (fold)
In dark (A)
In light (B)
1.78 ± 0.05
1.78 ± 0.04
1.52 ± 0.05
1.75 ± 0.08
1.52 ± 0.00
2.03 ± 0.08
Morphology and genomic variation of ET5 strain
Genome sequencing and mapping summary
Avg. length (trimmed)
Read mapping rate (%)
Comparison of light-driven proton pumpings
Effect of evolution-induced dgcQ C1081A mutation on phototrophic growth and proton pumping
Growth in dark (A)
Growth in light (B)
Phototrophic growth Δ[B − A]a
Proton pumping (ΔH+ × 10−7/min OD)
Ancestral E. coli amyA::KmR, dgcQ WT
0.98 ± 0.02
1.08 ± 0.04
0.475 ± 0.020
Ancestral E. coli amyA::KmR, dgcQ C1082A
1.13 ± 0.04
1.64 ± 0.03
0.903 ± 0.107
Comparison of c-di-GMP levels
Effect of evolution-induced dgcQ C1082A mutation on intracellular c-di-GMP concentrations
E. coli W3110 dgcQ WT/pKJ606-GR
E. coli W3110 dgcQ C1082A/pKJ606-GR
6.46 ± 3.43
7.16 ± 2.40
The Gloeobacter rhodopsin-introduced chemotrophic E. coli was adaptively evolved to be more susceptible to phototrophic energy metabolism. A single point mutation on chromosome (Table 2) enhanced light-induced proton pumping (Fig. 4), and the increase of phototrophic-generated energy in the descendant E. coli resulted in the enhancement of growth in the light (Table 1). Therefore, due to evolution, the ancestral E. coli was able to enhance the ability of the newly acquired phototrophic metabolism in its descendants.
As there was no mutation on the plasmid-origin genes, GR protein itself was identical between the ancestral strain and the descendants (Table 2). The ET5 harbored mutated dgcQ gene (also known as the yedQ gene) that encodes a putative diguanylate cyclase which is involved in the regulation of bacterial cell surface-associated traits including biofilm formation  and swimming motility  via c-di-GMP, a second messenger in signal transduction . In addition, a recent study predicted a periplasmic cyclase/histidine kinase-associated sensory domain in DgcQ . The surface variations derived from the c-di-GMP fluctuation in ET5 would have enhanced the phototrophic proton pumping efficiency of rhodopsin by eightfold, as compared to the ancestral strain (Fig. 4). The authors have presumed the mutation on DgcQ might have affected the intracellular level of c-di-GMP, which was indeed confirmed the sudden increase in the evolved strain (Table 4). The increase of c-di-GMP would have signaled on various gene expressions leading modulations of cell surface physiology, or might have interacted directly with GR in the cellular membrane, resulting in enhanced proton pumping in the evolved ET5 strain.
The dgcQ C1082A-induced proton pumping increase in the W3110 host was eightfold (Fig. 4) whereas that in the amyA mutant host (HK774) was only twofold (Table 3). It is not clear why the amyA mutant host only showed marginal proton pumping enhancement. It could not be excluded the possibility that the absence of amyA encoding α-amylase and therefrom metabolic variation in the amyA mutant host background might have contradicted the dgcQ C1082A-induced proton pumping increase in unknown mechanism.
An elongated cell that was observed during the chemostat culture (Fig. 2) must have had evolutionary merit over a non-elongated cell because the widened surface area would have provided more phototrophic energy generation. It was not clear why elongated cells during the chemostat culture were not distinctively observed in the batch culture of ET5 (Fig. 3; Additional file 1: Figure S1). Elongated bacterial shape has been observed in stressed conditions such as oxidative stress, nutrient limitation, DNA damages, antibiotics exposure, or extensive recombinant protein expression [29–31] altering DNA replication and cell division. The plausible reason for this might be that the E. coli might have recognized stress and exhibited elongated cell morphology only within a narrow range of stress conditions, i.e., when the growth rate during the chemostat was D = 0.1 h−1, corresponding to early stationary phase, while the SEM observation and flow cytometry analysis were performed using mid log phase cells in batch cultures. Another explanation for this might be that the elongated cells during the chemostat culture were not selected in the isolation process by chance.
It is noteworthy that the ancestral strain from the home stock, which we assumed it would be similar to the reference wild-type W3110 strain at the beginning of this study, already carried several mutations (Additional file 1: Table S1, Figure S2). These mutations must have accumulated during the laboratory passages and must have been beneficial for its growth in the laboratory conditions, which is representative of bacterial genome plasticity [32, 33].
The artificially introduced phototropic energy metabolism of E. coli has been evolved by the chemostat, indicating the efficiency of synthetic biological parts could be further optimized to some extent via adaptive laboratory evolution. We figured out the single point mutation of a membrane protein involved in cell signal transduction was responsible for the enhanced light-driven cellular performance. Our study is at the beginning stage in the development of artificial phototropism in chemotrophic cells, and further investigation is required to utilize infinite light energy efficiently in synthetic biological systems.
HAK, HJK, JP, and ARC performed experiments. HJ and K-HJ supervised the genome sequencing analysis and proton pumping analysis, respectively. HAK, KH and YJS contributed the intracellular c-di-GMP analysis. SJL and PK supervised the project. HJ, K-HJ, SJL, and PL drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
HAK appreciates internship programs at KRIBB, CUK, and SU.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
Strains in this work are made available upon request to the corresponding authors.
This work was financially supported by the grants from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2016R1E1A1A01943552, 2015R1A2A2A01005402, 2015R1D1A1A01058917, and 2016R1A6A3A11934084) and the KRIBB Research Initiative Program. P. Kim was supported from the research fellowship 2017 of the Catholic University of Korea.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Belkin S, Mehlhorn RJ, Packer L. Proton gradients in intact cyanobacteria. Plant Physiol. 1987;84:25–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Imasheva ES, Balashov SP, Choi AR, Jung KH, Lanyi JK. Reconstitution of Gloeobacter violaceus rhodopsin with a light-harvesting carotenoid antenna. Biochemistry. 2009;48:10948–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura Y, Kaneko T, Sato S, Mimuro M, Miyashita H, Tsuchiya T, Sasamoto S, Watanabe A, Kawashima K, Kishida Y, et al. Complete genome structure of Gloeobacter violaceus PCC 7421, a cyanobacterium that lacks thylakoids. DNA Res. 2003;10:137–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pinhassi J, DeLong EF, Beja O, Gonzalez JM, Pedros-Alio C. Marine bacterial and archaeal ion-pumping rhodopsins: genetic diversity, physiology, and ecology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016;80:929–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Claassens NJ, Volpers M, dos Santos VA, van der Oost J, de Vos WM. Potential of proton-pumping rhodopsins: engineering photosystems into microorganisms. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31:633–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim JY, Jo BH, Jo Y, Cha HJ. Improved production of biohydrogen in light-powered Escherichia coli by co-expression of proteorhodopsin and heterologous hydrogenase. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee HJ, Park J, Lee JY, Kim P. A strategy to increase microbial hydrogen production, facilitating intracellular energy reserves. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;26:1452–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walter JM, Greenfield D, Bustamante C, Liphardt J. Light-powering Escherichia coli with proteorhodopsin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:2408–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choi AR, Shi L, Brown LS, Jung KH. Cyanobacterial light-driven proton pump, Gloeobacter rhodopsin: complementarity between rhodopsin-based energy production and photosynthesis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e110643.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dragosits M, Mattanovich D. Adaptive laboratory evolution—principles and applications for biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang L, Spira B, Zhou Z, Feng L, Maharjan RP, Li X, Li F, McKenzie C, Reeves PR, Ferenci T. Divergence involving global regulatory gene mutations in an Escherichia coli population evolving under phosphate limitation. Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:478–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pal C, Papp B, Posfai G. The dawn of evolutionary genome engineering. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:504–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mormann S, Lomker A, Ruckert C, Gaigalat L, Tauch A, Puhler A, Kalinowski J. Random mutagenesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 using an IS6100-based transposon vector identified the last unknown gene in the histidine biosynthesis pathway. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:205.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zanfardino A, Restaino OF, Notomista E, Cimini D, Schiraldi C, De Rosa M, De Felice M, Varcamonti M. Isolation of an Escherichia coli K4 kfoC mutant over-producing capsular chondroitin. Microb Cell Fact. 2010;9:34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhou X, Zhu H, Liu L, Lin J, Tang K. A review: recent advances and future prospects of taxol-producing endophytic fungi. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:1707–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee JY, Lee HJ, Seo J, Kim ES, Lee HS, Kim P. Artificial oxidative stress-tolerant Corynebacterium glutamicum. Amb Express. 2014;4:15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee JY, Seo J, Kim ES, Lee HS, Kim P. Adaptive evolution of Corynebacterium glutamicum resistant to oxidative stress and its global gene expression profiling. Biotechnol Lett. 2013;35:709–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kwon YD, Kim S, Lee SY, Kim P. Long-term continuous adaptation of Escherichia coli to high succinate stress and transcriptome analysis of the tolerant strain. J Biosci Bioeng. 2011;111:26–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barrick JE, Lenski RE. Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:827–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lee KA, Jung KH. ATP regeneration system using E. coli ATP synthase and Gloeobacter rhodopsin and its stability. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011;11:4261–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeong H, Lee SJ, Kim P. Procedure for adaptive laboratory evolution of microorganisms using a chemostat. J Vis Exp. 2016;115:e54446.Google Scholar
- Wang WW, Sineshchekov OA, Spudich EN, Spudich JL. Spectroscopic and photochemical characterization of a deep ocean proteorhodopsin. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:33985–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2006(2):0008.Google Scholar
- Irie Y, Parsek MR. LC/MS/MS-based quantitative assay for the secondary messenger molecule, c-di-GMP. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1149:271–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-Torres V, Hu H, Wood TK. GGDEF proteins YeaI, YedQ, and YfiN reduce early biofilm formation and swimming motility in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:651–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pesavento C, Becker G, Sommerfeldt N, Possling A, Tschowri N, Mehlis A, Hengge R. Inverse regulatory coordination of motility and curli-mediated adhesion in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 2008;22:2434–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boehm A, Kaiser M, Li H, Spangler C, Kasper CA, Ackermann M, Kaever V, Sourjik V, Roth V, Jenal U. Second messenger-mediated adjustment of bacterial swimming velocity. Cell. 2010;141:107–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hengge R, Galperin MY, Ghigo JM, Gomelsky M, Green J, Hughes KT, Jenal U, Landini P. Systematic nomenclature for GGDEF and EAL domain-containing cyclic di-GMP turnover proteins of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2015;198:7–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Costa SB, Campos AC, Pereira AC, de Mattos-Guaraldi AL, Junior RH, Rosa AC, Asad LM. The role of DNA base excision repair in filamentation in Escherichia coli K-12 adhered to epithelial HEp-2 cells. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;101:423–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Justice SS, Hunstad DA, Cegelski L, Hultgren SJ. Morphological plasticity as a bacterial survival strategy. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008;6:162–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miller C, Thomsen LE, Gaggero C, Mosseri R, Ingmer H, Cohen SN. SOS response induction by beta-lactams and bacterial defense against antibiotic lethality. Science. 2004;305:1629–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Escudero JA, Loot C, Parissi V, Nivina A, Bouchier C, Mazel D. Unmasking the ancestral activity of integron integrases reveals a smooth evolutionary transition during functional innovation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10937.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vijayendran C, Polen T, Wendisch VF, Friehs K, Niehaus K, Flaschel E. The plasticity of global proteome and genome expression analyzed in closely related W3110 and MG1655 strains of a well-studied model organism, Escherichia coli-K12. J Biotechnol. 2007;128:747–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar