Scale-up bioprocess development for production of the antibiotic valinomycin in Escherichia coli based on consistent fed-batch cultivations
© Li et al. 2015
Received: 5 February 2015
Accepted: 8 May 2015
Published: 12 June 2015
Heterologous production of natural products in Escherichia coli has emerged as an attractive strategy to obtain molecules of interest. Although technically feasible most of them are still constrained to laboratory scale production. Therefore, it is necessary to develop reasonable scale-up strategies for bioprocesses aiming at the overproduction of targeted natural products under industrial scale conditions. To this end, we used the production of the antibiotic valinomycin in E. coli as a model system for scalable bioprocess development based on consistent fed-batch cultivations.
In this work, the glucose limited fed-batch strategy based on pure mineral salt medium was used throughout all scales for valinomycin production. The optimal glucose feed rate was initially detected by the use of a biocatalytically controlled glucose release (EnBase® technology) in parallel cultivations in 24-well plates with continuous monitoring of pH and dissolved oxygen. These results were confirmed in shake flasks, where the accumulation of valinomycin was highest when the specific growth rate decreased below 0.1 h−1. This correlation was also observed for high cell density fed-batch cultivations in a lab-scale bioreactor. The bioreactor fermentation produced valinomycin with titers of more than 2 mg L−1 based on the feeding of a concentrated glucose solution. Valinomycin production was not affected by oscillating conditions (i.e. glucose and oxygen) in a scale-down two-compartment reactor, which could mimic similar situations in industrial bioreactors, suggesting that the process is very robust and a scaling of the process to a larger industrial scale appears a realistic scenario.
Valinomycin production was scaled up from mL volumes to 10 L with consistent use of the fed-batch technology. This work presents a robust and reliable approach for scalable bioprocess development and represents an example for the consistent development of a process for a heterologously expressed natural product towards the industrial scale.
KeywordsValinomycin Synthetic biology Bioprocess development Scale-up Fed-batch Escherichia coli
Natural products are of great significance because they are important sources for pharmaceuticals to treat human and animal diseases . These natural compounds include nonribosomal peptides (NRPs, e.g. vancomycin), polyketides (PKs, e.g. erythromycin) and their hybrids (NRP/PKs, e.g. epothilone). In recent years, a large number of NRPs and PKs have been discovered by genome mining , however, their potential further development and clinical application are often hampered due to the fact that their native producers are not cultivable. Alternatively, with the development of synthetic biology, some NRPs and PKs have been synthesized by heterologous expression of their biosynthetic gene clusters in several well-characterized and genetically tractable host microorganisms [3–12]. While multiple options for a surrogate host exist, Escherichia coli has been chosen as a highly promising and robust cell factory for heterologous production of NRPs and PKs, given its versatile advantages including easy cultivation, genetic manipulation and scalable fermentation .
Although heterologous production of some NRPs and PKs in E. coli has been achieved over the last decade, only a few of them have been produced in large-scale bioreactors, yet the yields were mostly not satisfactory . The polyketide 6-deoxyerythronolide B (6-dEB, precursor of the antibiotic erythromycin) was intensively investigated as a model system. Up to now, the reported highest titer of 6-dEB was 1.1 g L−1, achieving through a 12-day high cell density fed-batch bioreactor fermentation . However, the final compound erythromycin A just reached a titer of 4 mg L−1 in the bioreactor with a batch mode cultivation for 6 days . The antitumor compound echinomycin was the first NRP that was heterologously produced in E. coli with a titer of 0.3 mg L−1 after 8 days of fed-batch fermentation . All studies show that, for increased yields of the target NRPs or PKs, it is challenging not only to recombinantly express the large biosynthetic enzymes, but also to maintain the fitness of the cells over comparably long times of cultivation to guarantee the continuous production of the substrate metabolites. Therefore, more efforts, especially in the context of fed-batch and scale-up bioprocess development, need to be done.
Generally, prior to scale up a bioprocess, the parameters are initially optimized through small scale batch cultivations. However, the optimized parameters might not be transferable directly from small batch to large fed-batch fermentations because of the different cultivation modes. Recently, the enzyme-controlled glucose delivery EnBase® strategy has been developed to cultivate microbial cells under a fed-batch type of cultivation in small-scale vessels such as shake flasks . The EnBase technology enables scalability from microwell plates to larger bioreactors with consistent conditions for the production of different recombinant proteins [24, 25]. While consistent cultivations can be solved by the EnBase system, inhomogeneity is another main concern during the industrial scale fermentations due to the limited mass transfer. An important feature of different product yields in laboratory and industrial scale is especially the existence of a feeding zone which is characterized by a high glucose concentration . As a high glucose concentration is connected to a high metabolic activity, also oxygen limitation appears in such a zone at the typical high cell concentrations . In the case of production of small molecules such a feeding zone directly affects the flux through the central metabolic pathways  and thus may influence the yield of the product. To address this problem, a laboratory scale-down two-compartment reactor (TCR) was applied to simulate the effect of the feed zone and thus to study the robustness of the process . The metabolic and physiological responses of microbial cells in the TCR cultivation environment could thus reflect the situations under a very similar industrial production process, generating useful and valuable information for bioprocess development.
Bacterial strains and culture medium
The host E. coli strain BJJ01 [F− ompT hsdS(r B − m B − ) dcm + TetR gal endA Hte ΔxylA::sfp wt ] is a derivative of E. coli BL21 Gold (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) . It contains sfp gene from Bacillus subtilis for posttranslational phosphopantetheinylation of NRPSs chromosomally integrated into the xylA locus. Two valinomycin producing strains, E. coli BJJ01 pCTUT7-Vlm1 pKS01-Vlm2 that expresses valinomycin synthetase Vlm1 and Vlm2  and E. coli BJJ01 pJL03-Vlm1 pJL07-Vlm2 pJL10-TEII that expresses Vlm1, Vlm2 and a third repairing enzyme type II thioesterase , were used in this study. EnPresso B defined medium without any complex nutrients (BioSilta, Cambridge, UK) was used for valinomycin production in 24-well plates and shake flasks, and as a starter medium in the large bioreactors. The monomer glucose is gradually released from the glucose polymer by a biocatalyst (Reagent A, BioSilta) to feed cells during the cultivation.
Cultivation in 24-well plates
To prepare a preculture, E. coli cells were inoculated into 100 mL EnPresso B defined medium in 500 mL Ultra Yield Flasks™ (Thomson Instrument Company, CA, USA), which was supplemented with 0.3 U L−1 glucose-releasing biocatalyst, 10 μL antifoam 204 (Sigma) and appropriate antibiotics (17 mg L−1 chloramphenicol and 50 mg L−1 ampicillin). The flask was incubated overnight on an orbital shaker (amplitude: 25 mm, Infors HT, Switzerland) at 200 rpm and 30°C. Afterwards, the overnight preculture was distributed without diluting it into the 24-well plates (PreSens Precision Sensing GmbH, Regensburg, Germany) with 1 mL per well. To screen the optimal biocatalyst concentration, additionally to the initial 0.3 U L−1 further amounts of biocatalyst were added to each well (1.5, 3, 9 or 15 U L−1). The 24-well plates were covered with the Duetz System sandwich cover and clamp system (Enzyscreen, Er Haarlem, The Netherlands) for efficient oxygen transfer and low evaporation (appr. 0.1 mL per well over the cultivation time). The subsequent cultivation was continued for 48 h at 30°C and 250 rpm in a shaker (amplitude: 50 mm, Kühner, Birsfelden, Switzerland) with online measurement of DO and pH (SensorDish Reader, PreSens).
Shake flask cultivation
Shake flask cultivations were performed in 500 mL Ultra Yield Flasks with membrane seals (both from Thomson Instrument Company, CA, USA) containing 100 mL EnPresso B defined medium with inoculation of OD600 at 0.1. A biocatalyst concentration of 3 U L−1 to release glucose was added at the start of the experiments. The cultivations were carried out at 200 rpm and 30°C for 12 h in a shaker (amplitude: 25 mm, Infors HT, Switzerland).
Bioreactor fed-batch fermentation
The high cell density fed-batch fermentation for valinomycin production was performed in a 3.7 L bench-top bioreactor (KLF2000, Bioengineering, Switzerland). The cultivation comprised two phases: (1) initial cultivation in EnPresso B defined medium and (2) a fed-batch cultivation with external glucose feeding (a concentrated feed solution contained 400 g L−1 glucose). 2 L EnPresso B as a starter medium were prepared without complex nutrient additives and autoclaved in the bioreactor at 121°C for 20 min. 3 U L−1 biocatalyst (Reagent A, BioSilta) were added to the medium directly before inoculation with an initial OD600 of 0.1. Cells were grown at 30°C and the pH was maintained at 7.0 with 25% NH4OH and 10% H3PO4. The level of DO was maintained above 20% (air saturation) through adjustment of the stirrer rate and air flow rate during the fermentation. Foaming was controlled by adding 2 mL antifoam (PPG2000) per time manually when foam appeared.
Afterwards, the glucose feeding rate was gradually decreased from 0.85 to 0.45 mL min−1 in 6 h to prevent the DO to drop under 20% in the bioreactor, followed by constant feeding at 0.45 mL min−1 until the end of the fermentation. During the whole fed-batch phase, when OD600 increased by ~20, a mixture of 2 mL MgSO4 (1.5 M), 2 mL trace element solution [per L: 0.5 g CaCl2∙2H2O, 0.18 g ZnSO4∙7H2O, 0.10 g MnSO4∙H2O, 20.1 g Na2-EDTA, 16.70 g FeCl3∙6H2O, 0.16 g CuSO4∙5H2O, 0.18 g CoCl2∙6H2O, 0.132 g Na2SeO3∙5H2O, 0.12 g Na2MoO4∙2H2O, and 0.725 g Ni(NO3)2∙6H2O], and 2 mL thiamine (50 g L−1) was added aseptically to the bioreactor containing 2 L culture. Samples were drawn from the bioreactor for OD600 measurement, residual glucose determination and valinomycin quantification.
Two-compartment reactor fermentation
To investigate valinomycin production under oscillating conditions, a scale-down TCR system, which consists of a 15 L standard STR (B. Braun + Diessel Biotech GmbH, Germany) and a 1.2 L PFR equipped with static mixers, was used for the fermentation (see Figure 2d). The strain E. coli BJJ01 pJL03-Vlm1 pJL07-Vlm2 pJL10-TEII was used in this experiment. For comparison, one reference fermentation was performed in the STR without PFR. In the reference STR fed-batch fermentation, 10 L EnPresso B defined medium were used for the initial cultivation followed by a glucose fed-batch cultivation. The exponential feeding was continued for 8 h with a specific growth rate (μ) of 0.2 h−1. In the TCR (STR + PFR) fed-batch fermentation, glucose was fed at the inlet of the PFR with the μ of 0.22 h−1 for 8 h. The culture was circulated between the STR and the PFR by a pump with a residence time of 1 min in the PFR. The inoculation, cultivation temperature, DO, pH and other salt additives were kept the same as described above in “Bioreactor fed-batch fermentation”. All samples were drawn from the STR for OD600 measurement, residual glucose determination and valinomycin quantification.
Cell growth determination
Cell growth in shake flasks and bioreactors was measured by optical density at 600 nm (OD600) with a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 3300, Amersham Biosciences, Germany). For the 24-well plate samples, cell densities were automatically measured using a robotic platform (Hamilton Robotics, Switzerland) by mixing 5 μL culture with 145 μL of 0.9% NaCl in 96-microwell plates, followed by OD600 reading with a Synergy Mx microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, USA). All OD600 values were then recalculated for a light path length of 1 cm according to a calibration curve. All measurements were determined in triplicate.
The specific growth rate (μ) was calculated for the period between two consecutive OD600 measurements and was then fitted with the best spline.
Samples were drawn from bioreactor cultivations and centrifuged at 12,000×g for 5 min. Residual glucose concentration in the supernatant was determined by the Glucose Hexokinase FS kit (DiaSys Diagnostic Systems GmbH, Holzheim, Germany).
Valinomycin preparation and analysis
Valinomycin extraction and quantification were carried out as previously described . Briefly, 1 mL of culture was centrifuged at 16,000×g for 3 min. The resulting supernatant and cell pellet were extracted each with 2 mL ethyl acetate and 2 mL methanol, respectively. Then the two extracts were combined, vacuum dried, and resuspended in 1 mL of methanol. Valinomycin analysis was performed with an Agilent 6460 Triple Quadrupole LC/MS System using an Eclipse Plus C18 column (RRHD 1.8 μm, 2.1 × 50 mm) by injection of 1 μL sample volume. Separations were achieved at a flow rate of 0.3 mL min−1 with elution buffers A (water + 0.1% formic acid) and B (acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid) through a linear gradient from 5 to 100% B over 2.5 min, an isocratic wash at 100% B for 7.5 min and a linear decrease to 5% B within 2 min. Valinomycin concentrations were calculated according to a calibration curve generated with valinomycin standard (Sigma). All measurements were performed in triplicate.
Results and discussion
Cultivations in milliliter scale
Bioprocess development usually starts from small-scale cultivations to evaluate optimal parameters. However, those parameters may not be directly applied to the following large-scale production due to the inconsistent conditions between small and large cultivation modes (e.g. batch vs fed-batch). To circumvent this inconsistency, we used the fed-batch type of cultivation for valinomycin production over the whole process development procedure, which is also necessary to guarantee the long-term production of valinomycin. While in our earlier papers [18, 19], we applied media with complex additives for the production of valinomycin, here we aimed for simple glucose mineral salt based medium, for easier process development. As the building blocks for valinomycin all derive from the central carbon metabolism, a fermentation strategy based on glucose as the sole carbon and energy source should work out for the production of this NRP. An important parameter in the initial screening experiments was the variation of glucose feed rate, which was established by varying the biocatalyst concentrations ranging from 1.5 to 15 U L−1.
Shake flask cultivation
Bioreactor high cell density fed-batch fermentation
In order to scale up the cultures to higher cell densities, a cultivation was performed in a 3.7 L bench-top bioreactor with 2 L culture volume. Instead of the commonly used initial batch mode cultivation in the bioreactor, the fed-batch-like EnPresso B was used as a starter medium for the high cell density cultivation, which would confer cells with consistent intracellular physiological conditions, avoiding overflow metabolism in the initial cultivation phase . Since modest yields of valinomycin could be reached without nutrient boosting (Figure 3d), the bioreactor fed-batch production was performed only based on pure glucose feeding without addition of complex nutrient additives. The cultivation in the bioreactor was started with an initial OD600 of 0.1 and 3 U L−1 of biocatalyst was added for glucose release in the initial phase. During the whole fermentation, E. coli BJJ01 pCTUT7-Vlm1 pKS01-Vlm2, the same strain as in the previous small scale cultivations, was grown at 30°C with a constant pH of 7.0 and the DO was maintained above 20%.
Initially, cells grew exponentially along with the exponential feeding protocol and reached the specific growth rate of 0.2 h−1. When the feeding was adjusted to a constant rate, the specific growth rate dropped to below 0.05 h−1 until the end of the cultivation with a final OD600 of approximately 120 (Figure 5a).
Valinomycin production in a two-compartment reactor
While the previous fed-batch bioreactor process indicated that the scale up of the valinomycin process from shaken cultures to bioreactor scale is not easily predictable, we aimed to test the robustness of valinomycin production under conditions which represent a larger industrial scale.
Therefore, parallel experiments were performed either in a stirred tank reactor (STR) or in a scale-down TCR (see Figure 2d). According to the results we had two hypotheses: (1) the high glucose levels and oxygen limitation in the plug flow reactor (PFR) part of the reactor together with the higher starvation effect in the STR compartment might decrease the valinomycin production; (2) while previous investigations indicated that pyruvate and l-valine can be significantly accumulated in E. coli after a repeated short-time downshift of oxygen at a high glucose concentration in a bioreactor fed-batch fermentation  and also under repeated oscillations of these conditions in a scale down bioreactor , one also might hypothesize that such a two-compartment bioreactor cultivation could even increase valinomycin biosynthesis through increasing the flux of glucose to the synthesis of its precursors pyruvate, α-ketoisovalerate and l-valine. To simulate these conditions, we used a 15 L scale-down TCR (see Figure 2d) for valinomycin production. This TCR system allows continuous circulation of the culture between a STR and a PFR, generating the oscillating fermentation conditions with high glucose and oxygen limitation in the PFR loop with a residence time of approximately 1 min [26, 27].
This first result is promising, as it indicates that valinomycin production is not disturbed by effects which are caused by non-perfect mixing and therefore the process should be robust for scale up. Furthermore, the higher yield of valinomycin on a cell basis (Figure 7b) suggests that there is space for further optimization by variation of the perturbances. Possibilities are variations in the strength and the intervals of the pulses. Such engineering approaches should go hand in hand with a further optimization of the genetic system. The biomass specific production yields for the strain E. coli BJJ01 pJL03-Vlm1 pJL07-Vlm2 pJL10-TEII are only 30–50% of the production yields in E. coli BJJ01 pCTUT7-Vlm1 pKS01-Vlm2, which well agrees with the higher amounts of soluble Vlm1 and Vlm2, respectively, in the latter strain (data not shown). Thus, we conclude that also the amount of Vlm1 and Vlm2 currently limits the accumulation rate of valinomycin.
In this work, valinomycin production was scaled up from mL volumes to 10 L scale with consistent fed-batch cultivations, which illustrates a blueprint of rational bioprocess development for other complex natural product production. Based on the fed-batch-like EnBase cultivation system, the process development procedure for valinomycin production from small to larger scale was efficient by the ability to perform simple-to-perform parallel cultivations. The bioreactor high cell density fed-batch fermentation produced valinomycin with titers of more than 2 mg L−1 based on a pure glucose feeding strategy. Valinomycin production was not negatively affected by the oscillating conditions (i.e. glucose supply and DO) in a scale-down TCR that mimics similar situations in industrial bioreactors, indicating that a scaling of the bioprocess to large industrial scale should be achievable.
JL performed all experiments and analyzed the data. JJ and PL participated in bioreactor fermentation experiments. JL drafted the manuscript and RDS and PN revised the manuscript. RDS and PN supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by a fellowship for JL from the Berlin International Graduate School of Natural Sciences and Engineering (BIG-NSE) of the Cluster of Excellence “Unifying Concepts in Catalysis”, funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and coordinated by the Technische Universität Berlin, as well as by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the Framework Concept “Research for Tomorrow’s Production” (Project No. 02PJ1150, AUTOBIO project) which is managed by the Project Management Agency Karlsruhe (PTKA).
Compliance with ethical guidelines
Competing interests PN declares that he is a cofounder and shareholder of BioSilta Ltd., a company which commercializes the EnBase® technology. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Newman DJ, Cragg GM (2012) Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010. J Nat Prod 75:311–335View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boddy CN (2014) Bioinformatics tools for genome mining of polyketide and non-ribosomal peptides. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 41:443–450View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chiang YM, Oakley CE, Ahuja M, Entwistle R, Schultz A, Chang SL et al (2013) An efficient system for heterologous expression of secondary metabolite genes in Aspergillus nidulans. J Am Chem Soc 135:7720–7731View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eppelmann K, Doekel S, Marahiel MA (2001) Engineered biosynthesis of the peptide antibiotic bacitracin in the surrogate host Bacillus subtilis. J Biol Chem 276:34824–34831View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gruenewald S, Mootz HD, Stehmeier P, Stachelhaus T (2004) In vivo production of artificial nonribosomal peptide products in the heterologous host Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:3282–3291View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matthes D, Richter L, Müller J, Denisiuk A, Feifel SC, Xu Y et al (2012) In vitro chemoenzymatic and in vivo biocatalytic syntheses of new beauvericin analogues. Chem Commun 48:5674–5676View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ongley SE, Bian X, Zhang Y, Chau R, Gerwick WH, Müller R et al (2013) High-titer heterologous production in E. coli of lyngbyatoxin, a protein kinase C activator from an uncultured marine cyanobacterium. ACS Chem Biol 8:1888–1893View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pfeifer BA, Admiraal SJ, Gramajo H, Cane DE, Khosla C (2001) Biosynthesis of complex polyketides in a metabolically engineered strain of E. coli. Science 291:1790–1792View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Siewers V, Chen X, Huang L, Zhang J, Nielsen J (2009) Heterologous production of non-ribosomal peptide LLD-ACV in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 11:391–397View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang H, Boghigian BA, Armando J, Pfeifer BA (2011) Methods and options for the heterologous production of complex natural products. Nat Prod Rep 28:125–151View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang H, Wang Y, Pfeifer BA (2008) Bacterial hosts for natural product production. Mol Pharm 5:212–225View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zobel S, Kumpfmüller J, Süssmuth RD, Schweder T (2015) Bacillus subtilis as heterologous host for the secretory production of the non-ribosomal cyclodepsipeptide enniatin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:681–691View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Neubauer P (2014) Escherichia coli as a cell factory for heterologous production of nonribosomal peptides and polyketides. New Biotechnol 31:579–585View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cheng YQ (2006) Deciphering the biosynthetic codes for the potent anti-SARS-CoV cyclodepsipeptide valinomycin in Streptomyces tsusimaensis ATCC 15141. ChemBioChem 7:471–477View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Magarvey NA, Ehling-Schulz M, Walsh CT (2006) Characterization of the cereulide NRPS α-hydroxy acid specifying modules: activation of α-keto acids and chiral reduction on the assembly line. J Am Chem Soc 128:10698–10699View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Matter AM, Hoot SB, Anderson PD, Neves SS, Cheng YQ (2009) Valinomycin biosynthetic gene cluster in Streptomyces: conservation, ecology and evolution. PLoS One 4:e7194View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jaitzig J, Li J, Süssmuth RD, Neubauer P (2014) Reconstituted biosynthesis of the nonribosomal macrolactone antibiotic valinomycin in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth Biol 3:432–438View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Jaitzig J, Hillig F, Süssmuth R, Neubauer P (2014) Enhanced production of the nonribosomal peptide antibiotic valinomycin in Escherichia coli through small-scale high cell density fed-batch cultivation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:591–601View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li J, Jaitzig J, Theuer L, Legala OE, Süssmuth RD, Neubauer P (2015) Type II thioesterase improves heterologous biosynthesis of valinomycin in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 193:16–22View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lau J, Tran C, Licari P, Galazzo J (2004) Development of a high cell-density fed-batch bioprocess for the heterologous production of 6-deoxyerythronolide B in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 110:95–103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang H, Skalina K, Jiang M, Pfeifer BA (2012) Improved E. coli erythromycin A production through the application of metabolic and bioprocess engineering. Biotechnol Prog 28:292–296View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Watanabe K, Hotta K, Praseuth AP, Koketsu K, Migita A, Boddy CN et al (2006) Total biosynthesis of antitumor nonribosomal peptides in Escherichia coli. Nat Chem Biol 2:423–428View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krause M, Ukkonen K, Haataja T, Ruottinen M, Glumoff T, Neubauer A et al (2010) A novel fed-batch based cultivation method provides high cell-density and improves yield of soluble recombinant proteins in shaken cultures. Microb Cell Fact 9:11View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Glazyrina J, Krause M, Junne S, Glauche F, Storm D, Neubauer P (2012) Glucose-limited high cell density cultivations from small to pilot plant scale using an enzyme-controlled glucose delivery system. New Biotechnol 29:235–242View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Šiurkus J, Panula-Perälä J, Horn U, Kraft M, Rimšeliene R, Neubauer P (2010) Novel approach of high cell density recombinant bioprocess development: optimisation and scale-up from microlitre to pilot scales while maintaining the fed-batch cultivation mode of E. coli cultures. Microb Cell Fact 9:35View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Neubauer P, Junne S (2010) Scale-down simulators for metabolic analysis of large-scale bioprocesses. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21:114–121View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Enfors SO, Jahic M, Rozkov A, Xu B, Hecker M, Jürgen B et al (2001) Physiological responses to mixing in large scale bioreactors. J Biotechnol 85:175–185View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lemoine A, Maya Martίnez-Iturralde N, Spann R, Neubauer P, Junne S (2015) Response of Corynebacterium glutamicum exposed to oscillating cultivation conditions in a two- and a novel three-compartment scale-down bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 112:1220–1231View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Junne S, Klingner A, Kabisch J, Schweder T, Neubauer P (2011) A two-compartment bioreactor system made of commercial parts for bioprocess scale-down studies: impact of oscillations on Bacillus subtilis fed-batch cultivations. Biotechnol J 6:1009–1017View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soini J, Falschlehner C, Liedert C, Bernhardt J, Vuoristo J, Neubauer P (2008) Norvaline is accumulated after a down-shift of oxygen in Escherichia coli W3110. Microb Cell Fact 7:30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Soini J, Ukkonen K, Neubauer P (2011) Accumulation of amino acids deriving from pyruvate in Escherichia coli W3110 during fed-batch cultivation in a two-compartment scale-down bioreactor. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 2:336–339View ArticleGoogle Scholar