Open Access

Construction of a cellulase hyper-expression system in Trichoderma reesei by promoter and enzyme engineering

  • Gen Zou1,
  • Shaohua Shi1,
  • Yanping Jiang1,
  • Joost van den Brink2,
  • Ronald P de Vries2,
  • Ling Chen1,
  • Jun Zhang1,
  • Liang Ma1,
  • Chengshu Wang1 and
  • Zhihua Zhou1Email author
Microbial Cell Factories201211:21

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-21

Received: 28 November 2011

Accepted: 8 February 2012

Published: 8 February 2012

Abstract

Background

Trichoderma reesei is the preferred organism for producing industrial cellulases. However, a more efficient heterologous expression system for enzymes from different organism is needed to further improve its cellulase mixture. The strong cbh1 promoter of T. reesei is frequently used in heterologous expression, however, the carbon catabolite repressor CREI may reduce its strength by binding to the cbh1 promoter at several binding sites. Another crucial point to enhance the production of heterologous enzymes is the stability of recombinant mRNA and the prevention of protein degradation within the endoplasmic reticulum, especially for the bacteria originated enzymes.

In this study, the CREI binding sites within the cbh1 promoter were replaced with the binding sites of transcription activator ACEII and the HAP2/3/5 complex to improve the promoter efficiency. To further improve heterologous expression efficiency of bacterial genes within T. reesei, a flexible polyglycine linker and a rigid α-helix linker were tested in the construction of fusion genes between cbh1 from T. reesei and e1, encoding an endoglucanase from Acidothermus cellulolyticus.

Results

The modified promoter resulted in an increased expression level of the green fluorescent protein reporter by 5.5-fold in inducing culture medium and 7.4-fold in repressing culture medium. The fusion genes of cbh1 and e1 were successfully expressed in T. reesei under the control of promoter pcbh1m2. The higher enzyme activities and thermostability of the fusion protein with rigid linker indicated that the rigid linker might be more suitable for the heterologous expression system in T. reesei. Compared to the parent strain RC30-8, the FPase and CMCase activities of the secreted enzyme mixture from the corresponding transformant R1 with the rigid linker increased by 39% and 30% at 60°C, respectively, and the reduced sugar concentration in the hydrolysate of pretreated corn stover (PCS) was dramatically increased by 40% at 55°C and 169% at 60°C when its enzyme mixture was used in the hydrolysis.

Conclusions

This study shows that optimizations of the promoter and linker for hybrid genes can dramatically improve the efficiency of heterologous expression of cellulase genes in T. reesei.

Keywords

Fusion protein Site-specific mutagenesis Heterologous expression Transcriptional regulation Cellulase

Background

Limited fossil resources, growing economies and an everlasting burden on our environment have caused an increasing interest for alternative resources to produce fuels and chemicals. Efficient conversion of lignocellulosic biomasses, the largest renewable resource on earth, requires cost-effective enzyme systems to degrade the polysaccharides to monomeric compounds [1]. The current enzyme mixtures for the bioconversion of lignocellulose are not sufficiently efficient for an economic viable biorefinery of plant biomasses. The filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei (teleomorph Hypocrea jecorina) [2] is by far the preferred organism for production of cellulases within industry [3, 4]. To enable efficient degradation of cellulose, the co-operation of at least three types of enzymes is required: cellobiohydrolases, endoglucanases and β-glucosidases. Because cellobiohydrolase I (CBHI, EC 3.2.1.91) and cellobiohydrolase II (CBHII, EC 3.2.1.91) comprise nearly 85% of the total secreted proteins of T. reesei[57], the current commercial cellulase mixture used for biomass hydrolysis requires a cocktail consisting of cellulases produced by T. reesei, and β-glucosidase and new endoglucanases from other fungi or bacteria [8]. Another limitation of the cellulases produced by T. reesei is their relatively low thermostability [5, 9]. Higher reaction temperatures associated with thermostable cellulases during the hydrolytic process may radically reduce substrate viscosity leading to higher reaction velocities and better substrate conversion at lower energy consumption [1012]. To improve the cellulase mixture of T. reesei in its composition and thermostability, homologous or heterologous expression of cellulase genes other than cbh1 and cbh2 is necessary in T. reesei.

The promoter cbh1 of T. reesei is known to be a strong inducible promoter, and is therefore commonly used to construct high-efficient heterologous expression vectors in T. reesei and other fungi [13, 14]. However, three putative carbon catabolite repressor binding sites are present in the region from -685 to -724 nt of the cbh1 promoter. They are considered to reduce transcripts of cbh1 when glucose is present in the fermentation medium [15, 16]. The deletion of these repressor binding sites and introduction of multi-copy activator binding sites in cbh1 promoter not only eliminated the glucose repression effect, but also increased promoter activity and production levels of heterologous proteins in T. reesei Rut-C30 [17]. Except for the main repressor protein CREI, many other transcription factors (TF) of T. reesei have been identified, such as the repressor ACEI, and the positive regulators XYRI, ACEII and the HAP2/3/5 complex [18]. Within this study, we are testing the hypothesis that replacing the negative regulator binding sites of the cbh1 promoter for positive regulator binding sites may further improve the expression level of heterologous genes.

Even though bacteria contain cellulases with interesting properties, heterologous expression in T. reesei of genes originated from bacteria is often causing problems [1921]. One of the most obvious reasons for low expression levels might be the degradation of the heterologous cellulases by the abundant proteases produced in the fungal host [22, 23]. This issue can be solved by stabilizing the recombinant protein, for instance by creating a fusion with a native protein. The fusion protein will serve as a carrier to facilitate the translocation of the foreign protein in the secretory pathway and, thereby, protect the heterologous part from degradation [14, 24].

The endoglucanase E1 (EC 3.2.1.4), secreted by thermophilic bacterium Acidothermus cellulolyticus, will be used as a case-study to test a novel heterologous expression system within T. reesei. The distinctive characteristics of this enzyme were shown to be of high potential for industry [21, 25]. Besides its robustness due to extreme thermostability of endoglucanase E1, it also has a striking synergism with cellulases of T. reesei at high temperature [26]. Furthermore, the heterologous expression of e1 in corn has shown to facilitate conversion of pretreated corn stover (PCS) into glucose [21]. The catalytic domain of e1 was also successfully expressed in T. reesei when fused with the catalytic domain of cbh1, resulting in a 30% increase of PCS hydrolysis efficiency at 55°C [13]. However, whether the fused protein could improve thermostability of the complete cellulase complex from T. reesei is still unknown.

In this study, the three CREI binding sites in cbh1 promoter were replaced by the binding sites of positive regulator ACEII or HAP2/3/5 complex, and the efficiency of the modified promoters were quantified using the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) as reporter. A flexible neutral polyglycine linker and a rigid α-helix linker were used to fuse cbh1 from T. reesei and e1 from A. cellulolyticus. In order to make sure whether the fusion protein would result in an increase of CBHI thermostability, the intact cbh1 gene instead of the core region was used in the fusion gene. This expression system, with the novel cbh1 promoter and the different linkers between the intact CBHI and endoglucanase E1, was characterized for its cellulase activity, thermostability and hydrolytic efficiency against PCS at 50°C-75°C.

Results and discussion

Replacing the CREI binding sites for transcription activator binding sites in the promoter cbh1 increased its ability to express heterologous genes

Expression of cbh1 is dramatically decreased when repressor CREI is bound to its promoter, especially in culture media containing glucose. The deletion of the three CREI binding sites and the repetition of multi-copy regions with activator binding sites resulted in an increase of cbh1 promoter efficiency and thus a higher expression level of heterologous proteins in T. reesei[17]. May the cbh1 repressor binding sites replaced by its activators recognizing-sites also improve its activity? In this study, two newly engineered cbh1 promoters were obtained by site specific mutagenesis: pcbh1m1, in which -724 CREI motif was changed to the binding site of transcription factor ACEII (5'-GGCTAA-3'), and pcbh1m2, in which the two other CREI motifs at -698 and -690 within the pcbh1m1 promoter were changed to the binding site of the HAP2/3/5 protein complex (5'-CCAAT-3') (Figure 1). The specific-site mutageneses were confirmed by sequencing. In order to compare the strength of the wild type cbh1 promoter and its two mutants, the enhanced green fluorescent protein reporter gene (egfp) was placed behind each promoter. This resulted in three expression vectors pDHt/sk-pcbh1, pDHt/sk-pcbh1m1 and pDHt/sk-pcbh1m2.
Figure 1

Schematic structure of cbh1 promoter and its mutants. There are three CREI binding sites located at -690, -698 and -724 in wild type cbh1 promoter. An ACEII binding site was replaced the CREI binding site at -724 in promoter pcbh1m1. Based on pcbh1m1, HAP2/3/5 complex binding sites were substituted for the remaining two CREI binding sites in promoter pcbh1m2.

After transformation and three consecutive subcultures for genetic stability, five mitotically stable transformants with single-copy of the fused genes were selected from each transformation. M0, M1 and M2 represented the transformants with vectors pDHt/sk-pcbh1, pDHt/sk-pcbhm1 and pDHt/sk-pcbhm2, respectively (Figure 2). The promoter strengths of all selected transformants were assessed qualitatively by fluorescence microscopy. The mycelia of all transformants glowed with clear bright green fluorescence after 1 day of growth on inducing culture media, i.e. containing a mix of wheat bran and cellulose just as M0 shown in Figures 2B, D, F. In contrary, transformants with the wild cbh1 promoter radiated weak fluorescence during growth on repressing culture media (containing 2% glucose) (Figure 2A), while transformants with the modified promoter like M1 and M2 still showed bright fluorescence (Figure 2C, E). Although Rut-C30 has a truncated CREI [27], the CREI-mediated carbon catabolite repression appeared to be not completely abolished in its derivative RC30-8.
Figure 2

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of promoter strength via the expression level of egfp reporter gene. Fluorescence microscopy of EGFP in Trichoderma hyphae (A - F). Transformant M0 (A and B) was under control of the wild type cbh1 promoter, and M1 (C and D) and M2 (E and F) corresponded to the mutated promoters pcbh1m1 and pcbh1m2, respectively. The GFP channel is shown in the top part of each figure, while the lower part shows the bright field image. T. reesei hyphae under the repressing condition (2% glucose as repressor) were shown in A, C and E, while those under the inducing condition (3% cellulose and 2% wheat bran as inducer) were in B, D and F. Scale bar = 5 μm. Relative expression levels of egfp (G) were calculated in comparison with the expression of act encoding for actin. Error bars are representing the standard deviation between three independent measurements.

The promoter strengths of M0, M1 and M2 were further quantitatively by real-time (RT) PCR based on the expression level of egfp (Figure 2G). Relative to M0 grown on repressing medium, RT-PCR results showed that the expression level of egfp in transformant M1 was increased by 1.9- and 1.7-fold in inducing and repressing culture media, respectively (Figure 2G). These observations imply that the first mutagenesis, in which -724 motif of cbh1 promoter was replaced with the ACEII binding site, did increase the strength of the promoter. However, the increase was not large and was similar to the deletion of this CREI motif, as shown in the study of Liu et al. [17]. The replacements of the other two motifs at -698 and -690 with the binding site of the HAP2/3/5 protein complex did result in a significant increase of promoter strength. The egfp expression level showed 7.4- and 5.5-fold increase compared to M0 under the inducing and repressing condition, respectively (Figure 2G). The strength of the mutated promoter pcbh1m2 was much stronger compared to the mutated promoter ΔpC in which all of the three CREI binding sites were deleted, and was also stronger than the mutated promoter Δp4C, in which four copies of ACEII and HAP2/3/5 complex binding sites were inserted in promoter ΔpC [17].

The cellulose-induced cumulative effect of positive regulatory factors was clearly observed in our study. Even during growth on the repressing media, the pcbh1m2 promoter resulted in a stronger expression of egfp than the original cbh1 promoter during growth on inducing medium. Although only a few transcripts of genes are independent of CREI in T. reesei, carbon catabolite repression (CCR) involves interaction of many other transcription factors [28, 29]. In addition to CREI, three other proteins, CREII, CREIII and CREIV, participate in CCR. Furthermore, glucokinase (GLKI) and hexokinase (HXKI) are also involved in CREI-mediated CCR [18]. The level of derepression in Δglk1/Δhxk1 strains was higher compared to the Δcre1 mutant Rut-C30 [18]. Consequently, straightforward deletion of CREI binding sites cannot abolish CCR. Our results reveal that replacing repressor binding sites within promoters with a variety of activator binding sites is a powerful tool to enhance expression levels of heterologous proteins.

The linker design showed significant effects on the efficiency of heterologous expression of a bacterial cellulase gene in T. reesei

The modified promoter pcbhm2 together with the signal sequence of cbh1 was used for transforming T. reesei RC30-8 with the intact ORF or the catalytic domain of endocellulase E1 from bacterium A. cellulolyticus. Unfortunately, no corresponding protein products were detected in 23 positive transformants via SDS-PAGE or western blotting (data not shown). Expressing and synthesizing bacterial cellulase genes directly in fungi requires overcoming several severe obstacles, such as compatibility of codon bias for correct transcription, stability of the bacterial mRNA, and misfolding or proteolysis after translation [19, 20, 30]. The e1 mRNAs were detected in those transformants by reverse transcription PCR (data not shown), demonstrating that e1 or its catalytic domain was transcribed by T. reesei. Deductively, E1 was most likely misfolded and then proteolyzed by endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation (ERAD).

Fusion of a heterologous gene with a native gene has been reported to stabilize the recombinant mRNA, facilitate translocation of the foreign protein in the secretory pathway, and avoid protein degradation [20]. To be able to express e1 in T. reesei, two types of linkers, a flexible neutral polyglycine linker (GGGGS)4 and a rigid α-helix linker (EAAAR)4[31] were used to fuse the complete coding region of CBHI and the E1 catalytic domain. The two constructs, i.e. tce1-fle (with flexible neutral polyglycine linker) and tce1-rig (with rigid α-helix linker), were under control of the novel strong promoter pcbhm2 and contained a his-tag at the e1 catalytic domain (Figure 3). When transformed to T. reesei RC30-8, the corresponding fusion proteins and the cleaved E1 catalytic domain were detected in the extracellular enzyme mixture after growth on the inducing media containing wheat bran and cellulose for all positive transformants by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (Figure 4). Two bands of approximately 97 and 40 kDa were detected on Western blots. The large band represented the complete fusion proteins TCE1-FLE or TCE1-RIG, while the smaller band represented the E1 catalytic domains. It means that a portion of the two linkers could be cleaved due to its kexin cleavage site (Lys-Arg) and thus E1 could be separated from the fusion proteins during the process of the protein secretion and purification. This strategy showed to be an effective way to protect the bacterial endoglucanase E1 from protein degradation within the endoplasmic reticulum due to misfolding [3133].
Figure 3

Schematic structure of the fusion gene tce1-fle and tce1-rig. Some expressed fusion proteins would be cleaved at the kexin site (Lys-Arg) by the extracellular proteinases of T. reesei.

Figure 4

SDS-PAGE and western blots of T. reesei RC30-8 and its transformants containing TCE1-FLE or TCE1-RIG. Lane M, protein markers; lanes 1, 2 and 3, the total secreted proteins in the culture filtrate of wild type, transformant with TCE1-FLE and transformant with TCE1-RIG; lane 4 and 5, the purified TCE1-FLE and TCE1-RIG using Novagen Ni-NTA His•Bind® Resin; lane 6 and 7, verification of TCE1-FLE and TCE1-RIG by Western blotting using an anti-His antibody. Unrelated lanes were removed for clarity.

The purified enzymes of the transformants with the fusion gene tce1-fle and tce1-rig, actually including the intact fusion protein and the cleaved E1 from some fusion protein (Figure 4), were tested for their activity against p-nitrophenyl-β-D-cellobioside (p NPCase or cellobiohydrolase activity), carboxymethylcellulose (CMCase or endoglucanase activity) and filter paper (FPase activity). The optimal temperatures were similar for both transformant sets: 70°C for p NPCase activity, 85°C for CMCase activity, and 60°C for FPase activity (Figure 5). However, at the same optimal temperatures, the two fusion proteins possessed different maximum values for the three cellulase activities (Figure 5A, B, C). In fact, compared to TCE1-FLE, TCE1-RIG had significantly higher activities for p NPCase, CMCase and FPase at the tested temperature range (Figure 5A, B, C). For example, FPase activity of TCE1-RIG (0.95 U/mg protein) increased 70% compared to the activity of TCE1-FLE (0.55 U/mg protein) (Figure 5C). Moreover, TCE1-RIG had a better thermostability for its p NPCase (Figure 5H, E) and FPase activity (Figure 5I, F) at 60°C and 70°C after tracing the activities for incubation times up to 24 h at 60°C, 70°C and 85°C.
Figure 5

Cellulase activities of the purified proteins.Endoglucanase (CMCase) activity (A), Cellobiohydrolase (p NPCase) activity (B) and filter paper (FPase) activity (C) measured at 50-95°C. Enzyme activities of TCE1-FLE after 0-1440 min incubation at 60°C, 70°C, or 85°C (D, E and F). Enzyme activities of TCE1-RIG after 0-1440 min incubation at 60°C, 70°C, or 85°C (G, H and I). Error bars are representing the standard deviation between three independent measurements.

These above results demonstrated that the rigid α-helix linker was more suitable for the activity and stability of the fusion proteins. A possible explanation could be that the rigid α-helix linker provides enough space or specific physical adaptation between CBHI and E1, and therefore, maintained the high activities of the fusion protein [31, 3436]. For instance, the fusion protein with the rigid linker had a higher hydrophobicity compared to the flexible linker (TCE1-RIG had 258 AILFWV amino acid residues, while TCE1-FLE had 246 such residues). The potential for ionic interactions was also higher in the fusion protein with the rigid linker (TCE1-RIG had 134 DEKR amino acid residues, while TCE1-FLE had 126 ones). Compared to the native CBHI, the advantage of TCE1-RIG in physical mechanisms was much more significant (increased 20.73% and 11.70% in AILFWV and DEKR amino acid residues, respectively). Another possible explanation could be that the rigid α-helix linker was more stable. The p NPCase activity of the purified native CBHI was drastically decreased after 30 min of incubation at 60°C (data not shown). It means that both the activity and thermostability of p NPCase of the purified proteins depended on the intact fusion proteins (CBHI and E1 interact together). The higher p NPCase activity and thermostability of the purified enzymes with rigid linker (Figure 5H, E) may imply that the rigid one is more stable than the flexible one. The salt bridges of (EAAAR)4 present within the rigid linker were most likely involved in its higher stability [35].

The heterogolous expression of the fusion protein had a large impact on the secreted enzymes and its ability to hydrolyze PCS

FPase activities were measured in culture filtrates from 23 positive transformants with tce1-rig constructs. The FPase activities of all transformants increased significantly (P < 0.05) by 10-30% compared to their parent strain RC30-8 at 60°C (data not shown). R1, R2 and R3 from the tested transformants were selected for further characterization based on their high FPase activities. The activities of FPase and CMCase are normally measured at 50°C, however, the activities of RC30-8 and the transformants had their optimum at 60°C. Besides, the increase in CMCase and FPase activities were much more significant between the transformants and their reference strain at 60°C. The transformants R1, R2 and R3 had an average increase of 26% (P < 0.001) in CMCase activity and 36% (P < 0.01) in FPase activity compared to the parent strain at 60°C (Figure 6). The most efficient transformant, R1, exhibited a 30% increase in CMCase activity and a 39% increase in FPase activity.
Figure 6

CMCase and FPase activities of the secreted enzymes from T. reesei RC30-8 and its transformants. CMCase activity of T. reesei RC30-8, control strain TC, and transformants R1, R2 and R3 (all containing TCE1-RIG) (A). FPase activity of reference RC30-8, control strain TC, and transformants R1, R2 and R3 (all containing TCE1-RIG) (B). Error bars are representing the standard deviation between three independent measurements.

The activities of the enzyme set within the culture filtrate from the transformant with an over-expressed CBHI (transformation control indicated as TC) were completely similar to the parent strain RC30-8 after growth on a mixture of wheat bran and cellulose. Apparently the cellobiohydrolase activity is saturated in the enzyme set of RC30-8 and, therefore, over-expression of CBHI did not result in an increase of the FPase activity. These results demonstrated that the successful expression of the fusion proteins containing the bacterial thermostable endoglucanase E1 had contributed to an increased CMCase activity in the secreted enzyme mixture. As a result of this, the total cellulase activity (measured with filter paper) was also increased in the secreted enzyme mixture of the transformants.

To further analyze the contribution of the highly-expressed fusion proteins, a saccharification experiment was performed by incubating PCS with the secreted enzyme set of T. reesei RC30-8 or its transformants at 50-75°C. The subsequent sugar analysis with HPLC detected only glucose and cellobiose in the hydrolysates from PCS (Figure 7). According to the total reduced sugar concentrations (meaning the sum of glucose and cellobiose), the enzyme sets of T. reesei RC30-8 and the transformant TC showed a similar ability to hydrolyze PCS at the different temperatures. The enzyme sets of all strains showed higher efficiency of PCS hydrolyses at 55°C than that at 50°C. However, compared to T. reesei RC30-8, the enzyme set of transformant R1 showed an increase in reduced sugar concentrations in the PCS hydrolysate at 55°C of 40% (P < 0.001).
Figure 7

Sugar composition (glucose and cellobiose concentrations) in the hydrolysate of PCS. The sugar composition was analyzed by HPLC after incubating PCS with the crude secreted enzymes of T. reesei RC30-8 or its transformants R1, R2 and R3 (all containing TCE1-RIG) at 50-75°C. Error bars are representing the standard deviation between three independent measurements.

The cellobiose concentrations after hydrolyzing PCS at 60°C decreased sharply to near zero for the secreted enzyme set of all strains (Figure 7). This observation was likely explained by a more efficient hydrolysis of cellobiose at 60°C due to the optimal temperature at approximately 60°C of the β-glucosidase enzymes in T. reesei[3739]. In comparison with that at 55°C or 50°C, CMCase and FPase activities of the secreted enzyme mixture from RC30-8 and TC were higher at 60°C (Figure 6A, B), however, the total reduced sugar concentration of PCS hydrolysate at 60°C decreased significantly (Figure 7). The lower reduced sugar concentrations in the PCS hydrolysate of the reference strains at 60°C were probably explained by the different imcubation times used in the measurements of CMCase and FPase activity and the saccharification experiment. The incubation times in the measurement of in vitro enzyme activities were between 30 and 60 min, while the saccharification experiment lasted 24 h. Therefore, the low thermostability of the native enzymes from T. reesei RC30-8 and TC might lower the saccharification of PCS at 60°C. Moreover, other methodological differences such as optimal pH and substrate accessibility most likely influenced the hydrolytic efficiency [40, 41]. In contrast, compared to 50°C, the reduced sugar concentration (mainly the glucose concentration) in the PCS hydrolysate of transformants R1 increased significantly at 60°C. The reduced sugar concentration resulting from transformant R1 was almost three-fold as much as that from the parent strain or TC at 60°C. At 70°C or 75°C, the enzyme set of RC30-8 or transformant TC almost completely lost the ability to hydrolyze PCS. The PCS-hydrolytic efficiency of R1 also decreased greatly at 70°C or 75°C, with the glucose concentration being about one-third of that at 60°C (Figure 7). However, the cellobiose concentration of transformant R1 increased slightly at 70°C or 75°C. This was likely due to a relative high thermostability of the fusion protein TCE1-RIG and E1 mixture at 70°C. These results demonstrated that heterologous expression of a thermostable endoglucanase e1 in T. reesei improved the overall quality of its cellulase mixture due to increased enzyme activities and a far better thermostability.

Conclusions

The direct engineering of the cbh1 promoter of T. reesei by replacing the three binding sites of the carbon catabolite repressor CREI for the binding sites of different transcription activators showed to be a highly efficient strategy to improve the strength of a promoter. This study also demonstrated that gene fusion with a rigid linker should be a successful approach for improvement of heterologous expression efficiency of bacterial cellulases within fungi. The high activity and improved thermostability of the fusion protein in this case-study indicated that supplementing the cellulase complex of T. reesei with thermostable cellulases, especially in form of fusion proteins, greatly improved the ability to release sugars from lignocellulosic biomass such as PCS.

Methods

Microbial strains, plasmids and primers

Escherichia coli DH5α served as the cloning host (Novagen, Gibbstown, NJ, USA). Agrobacterium tumefaciens AGL1 was used as a T-DNA donor to maintain the constructs and for fungal transformation [42]. The T. reesei strain RC30-8, which was screened from mutants of Rut-C30 and maintained in this laboratory, was used as the host for heterologous expression. A T-DNA binary vector, pDHt/sk, containing the hph coding for hygromycin B phosphotransferase (under control of the Aspergillus nidulans trpC promoter and terminator) was used to construct the transformation vectors. The thermostable endocellulase E1 was obtained from A. cellulolyticus 11B (ATCC® Number: 43068) using primers EIGF, EIHF, EISF and EIR. Different forward primers were used to generate corresponding 5'-end to respective linker peptide coding sequences for overlapping (Table 1).
Table 1

Oligonucleotides used in this study

Primer

Experimental purposes

Primer sequences (5'→3')

EIGF

Overlap with cbh1GR

GGCGGCGGCGGCAGCAAGCGGGCGGGCGGCGGCTATTGG

EIHF

Overlap with cbh1HR

GAGGCCGCCGCCCGCAAGCGGGCGGGCGGCGGCTATTGG

EISF

Overlap with signal peptide region of cbh1

GTTGGCCGTCATCACGGCCTTCTTGGCCACAGCTCGTGCTGCGGGCGGCGGCTATTGG

EIR

Cloning of gene e1

GCTCTAGA TCAATGATGATGATGATGATGGCCGACAGGATCGAAAATCG

pcbh1F

Cloning of cbh1 promoter

GGACTAGT TTTCCCTGATTCAGCGTACCCG

pcbh1R

Cloning of cbh1 promoter

GCTCTAGA TTGACTATTGGGTTTCTGTGCC

pcbh1-1R

Site-directed mutagenesis

CGTTGCTTCTGTTTAGCCACAAGCCG

pcbh1-1F

Site-directed mutagenesis

CGGCTTGTGGCTAAACAGAAGCAACG

pcbh1-2R

Site-directed mutagenesis

CAACGGCAAAGCCAATCTTCCAATCGTTTGTTTCTTCACTCA

GFPF

Cloning of egfp

GCTCTAGA GTACCGGTCGCCACCATGGTG

GFPR

Cloning of egfp

GCTCTAGA TTACTTGTACAGCTCGTCCA

cbh1F

Cloning of cbh1

GCTCTAGA ATGTATCGGAAGTTGGCCGTC

cbh1GR

Overlap with EIGF

ACGGCGGCGGCGGCGACGGCGGCGGCGGCGACGGCGGCGGCGGCGACGGCGGCGGCGGGTCCGTGACTCTCATCATTCC

cbh1HR

Overlap with EIHF

GGGCGGCGGCCTCGCGGGCGGCGGCCTCGCGGGCGGCGGCCTCGCGGGCGGCGGCCTCCAGGCACTGAGAGTAGTAAGGG

actF

RT-PCR

TCCTTGCCTTGCGTCATCTAT

actR

RT-PCR

CACCAATCACTCTCCTGCTACAA

GFPrtF

RT-PCR

AGTGCTTCAGCCGCTACCC

GFPrtR

RT-PCR

GATGCCGTTCTTCTGCTTGTC

Note: Restriction sites are underlined

Site-specific mutagenesis of cbh1 promoter

The cbh1 promoter was amplified from T. reesei RC30-8 genomic DNA with the primers pcbh1F and pcbh1R (Table 1), which was designed according to the published sequence (http://genome.jgi-psf.org/Trire2/Trire2.home.html). To mutate the CREI-binding element located at -724 (5'-GTGGGG-3') in the cbh1 promoter, an overlap PCR was carried out with primers pcbh1F, pcbh1-1R, pcbh1-1F, and cbh1R. The generated fragment with the artificial ACEII-binding site named pcbh1m1 (Figure 1) was manipulated with another overlap PCR to mutate the remaining two CREI-binding elements (complementary sequence of 5'-GTGGGG-3' located at -698 and -690) using primers pcbh1F, pcbh1-2R, pcbh1-2F, and cbh1R in a similar way. Finally, the promoter after two rounds of mutagenesis was renamed pcbh1m2 (Figure 1) in which the ACEII-binding site substituted for the CREI-binding element located at -724, and two CCAAT boxes replaced the other two CREI-binding elements.

The construction and transformation of expression vectors for heterologous genes (egfp, e1) and the fusion genes of cbh1 and e1

The cbh1 promoter and its mutated fragments were double digested with SpeI and XbaI, and ligated into the SpeI/XbaI site of plasmid pDHt/sk to obtain vectors pDHt/sk-pcbh1, pDHt/sk-pcbh1m1, pDHt/sk-pcbh1m2. The reporter gene egfp was then introduced into the XbaI site of all four vectors after a PCR carried out with primers GFPF and GFPR and the egfp expression vectors were constructed.

The catalytic domain fragment of e1 (GenBank: U33212.1) was fused with the intact cbh1 coding region via a flexible neutral polyglycine linker (GGGGS)4 and a rigid α-helix linker (EAAAR)4, using overlapping primers cbh1GR and cbh1HR (Table 1). The generated fragments were named tce1-fle and tce1-rig. The catalytic domain of e1 was fused with the signal sequence of cbh1 using the primers cbh1F and E1R and named se1h. All fragments were also introduced into a 6 × His-tag coding region at its 3'-end. The original e1 fused with a his-tag was named e1h. After ligated into the XbaI site of plasmid pDHt/sk-pcbhm2, the heterologous expression vectors harboring tce1-fle, tce1-rig, se1 and e1h were constructed. The cbh1 fragment was also ligated into the same vector for transformation control. The construction of the fusion genes is shown in Figure 3.

All of the expression vectors for the heterologous genes were transformed into the recipient T. reesei RC30-8 using Agrobacterium-mediated fungal transformation [43].

Selection and culture of transformants or T. reesei RC30-8

Transformants were selected using hygromycin B (10 μg/ml) and cefotaxime (300 μM) on potato dextrose agar (PDA). Each positive transformant was used to create monoconidial cultures for genetic stability and confirmed single-copy integration of egfp using real-time PCR. All fungal strains including T. reesei RC30-8 were spread on PDA plates and were grown at 28°C for about 7 days and then stored at 4°C after conidia formed. The conidia of the fungal transformants were collected from PDA plates and inoculated into 50 ml flasks containing 10 ml Sabouraud dextrose broth (SDB) and cultured for 2 days at 28°C and 200 rpm on a rotary shaker for protein expression. Subsequently, 1 ml of the culture was transferred to flasks with 10 ml minimal medium plus different carbon resources [3% cellulose powder (CF-11, Whatman, Maidstone, England) and 2% wheat bran (ground to less than 0.5 mm in diameter by a mill at the lab) as inducer or 2% glucose as repressor] and incubated at 28°C and 200 rpm. The minimal medium contained 0.4% KH2PO4, 0.28% (NH4)2SO4, 0.06% MgSO4·7H2O, 0.05% CaCl2, 0.06% urea, 0.3% tryptone, 0.1% Tween 80, 0.5% CaCO3, 0.001% FeSO4·7H2O, 0.00032% MnSO4·H2O, 0.00028% ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.0004% CoCl2[44] and was adjusted to pH 5.5.

Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of promoter strength

After being cultured for 2 days, mycelia of transformants were collected for fluorescence observation or for total RNA extraction, after rinsing with sterilized water three times. The FastPrep®-24 (MP Biomedicals, Solon, HO, US) instrument in combination with TRIzol® Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was successfully used for total RNA extraction. Reverse transcription was carried out using the PrimeScript® RT reagent Kit (Takara, Dalian, China). Relative expression levels of egfp were calculated in comparison with the expression of act encoding actin by RT-PCR with primers GFPrtF, GFPrtR, actF and actR.

Purification of fused proteins from the T. reesei transformants

After being cultured for 7 days, the culture filtrate of transformants was collected by a centrifugation at 4°C and 8,000 × g for 10 min. The fusion proteins TCE1-FLE or TCE1-RIG in the collected culture filtrate were purified using Novagen Ni-NTA His•Bind® Resin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with step gradient elution. The 40 mM imidazole washouts were collected, and the buffer was exchanged with 20 mM pH 7.4 NaH2PO4 using a Vivaspin™ ultrafilter (10 kDa cut-off, GE Healthcare Piscataway, NJ, USA) to remove the imidazole. Fusion protein production was examined by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting using an anti-His antibody (Yeli, Shanghai, China). Proteins were quantified using the DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Enzyme activity assays

The crude secreted enzymes of fungal strains (the culture filtrate of T. reesei RC30-8 or its transformants was collected by a centrifugation at 4°C and 8,000 × g for 10 min after being cultured for 7 days) or the purified TCE1-FLE and TCE1-RIG were used to examine substrate specificity and to characterize its properties. CMCase activity was assayed by measuring the amount of reducing sugar released from CMC (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) using the DNS method [45]. The assay mixture contained a specific amount of diluted enzyme, 100 μl of 2% CMC and 100 μl 50 mM saline sodium citrate buffer (SSC, pH 5.0). The mixture was incubated at 60°C for 10 min; 200 μl DNS was added to stop the reaction, followed by incubation for 5 min in boiling water. Photometric assays were analysed at OD540 using a Varioskan Flash microplate reader (ThermoScientific, Rockford, IL, USA).

Cellobiohydrolase activity was measured as reported by Deshpande [46] with slight modifications. In brief, 90 μl of 4 mM p NPC solution (50 mM SSC, pH 5.0) containing 1 mg/ml D-glucono-1,5-σ-lactone was incubated with 20 μl of diluted culture supernatant at 50°C for 30 min. Then, 100 μl of each sample was mixed with 100 μl 2% sodium carbonate, and photometric assays were carried out at OD400.

The specific activities of the crude enzymes secreted by T. reesei RC30-8 or its transformants or the purified fusion proteins on FPase activity were measured using a modified IUPAC method [47]. The assay mixture was incubated at an optimal condition of 60°C, pH 5.0 for 60 min, and the reaction was stopped with 120 μl DNS followed by an incubation in boiling water for 10 min. A unit of enzyme activity (U) was defined as the number of micromoles of reducing sugar or p NP released per minute per milligram protein or per milliliter fermented culture. Student's t-test was performed with Excel 2007 (Microsoft, WA, USA), employing a two-tailed test.

The thermostability of the purified proteins or the secreted crude enzymes was assayed by the similar enzyme activity assay methods mentioned above. Samples were exposed to thermal stress in water baths at 60°C, 70°C and 85°C for up to 24 h. Three aliquots were pipetted out for enzyme activity assays at intervals of 15 min-12 h during the exposure.

Hydrolysis assay of PCS

In the hydrolysis of dilute sulfuric acid pretreated corn stover [48], using the culture filtrate of T. reesei RC30-8 or its transformants as crude enzyme preparations, 3% PCS (30 mg) and 30 μl different enzyme preparations were incubated in 50 mM saline sodium citrate (pH 5.0) at 50°C, 55°C, 60°C, 70°C and 75°C for 24 h, and the total volume of the saccharification mixture was 1 ml. The hydrolysates were then centrifuged at 4°C, 12000 × g for 20 min and the concentrations of glucose and cellooligosaccharides in the supernatant were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; LC-20A; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), using a refractive index detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The hydrolysates were filtered using a 0.22 μm pore size membrane (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA) and then separated on a Shodex Asahipak NH2P-50 4E column (Showa Denko K.K., Kanagawa, Japan) with isocratic elution (75% acetonitrile, 25% H2O [vol/vol]) at 1 ml/min.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (973: 2011CB707403; 2012CB721103), the Knowledge Innovation Program (No. KSCX1-YW-11B3, KSCX2-EW-J-12) and International Joint Research Program (GJHZ1128) from the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Dr. Zou Gratefully Acknowledges the Support of CAS K.C. Wong Post-doctoral Fellowships (2008) and SA-SIBS Scholarship Program (2010).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Synthetic Biology, Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(2)
Fungal Physiology, CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre

References

  1. Himmel ME, Bayer EA: Lignocellulose conversion to biofuels: current challenges, global perspectives. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009, 20 (3): 316-317. 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.05.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kuhls K, Lieckfeldt E, Samuels GJ, Kovacs W, Meyer W, Petrini O, Gams W, Borner T, Kubicek CP: Molecular evidence that the asexual industrial fungus Trichoderma reese is a clonal derivative of the ascomycete Hypocrea jecorina. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93 (15): 7755-7760. 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7755.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouws H, Wattenberg A, Zorn H: Fungal secretomes-nature's toolbox for white biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 80 (3): 381-388. 10.1007/s00253-008-1572-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV: Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 35 (5): 377-391. 10.1007/s10295-008-0327-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Gritzali M, Brown RD: The cellulase system of Trichoderma. Hydrolysis of Cellulose: Mechanisms of Enzymatic and Acid Catalysis. Edited by: Brown RD, Jurasek L. 1979, Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 237-260. Comstock MJ (Series Editor): Advances in Chemistry Series, vol 181View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Durand H, Clanet M, Tiraby G: Genetic improvement of Trichoderma reesei for large-scale cellulase production. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1988, 10 (6): 341-346. 10.1016/0141-0229(88)90012-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Jun H, Kieselbach T, Jönsson LJ: Enzyme production by filamentous fungi: analysis of the secretome of Trichoderma reesei grown on unconventional carbon source. Microb Cell Fact. 2011, 10: 68-10.1186/1475-2859-10-68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan SM, Schilling JS: Carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzyme ratios during fungal degradation of woody and non-woody lignocellulose substrates. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2010, 47 (7): 363-371. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2010.07.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Berka RM, Grigoriev IV, Otillar R, Salamov A, Grimwood J, Reid I, Ishmael N, John T, Darmond C, Moisan MC, Henrissat B, Coutinho PM, Lombard V, Natvig DO, Lindquist E, Schmutz J, Lucas S, Harris P, Powlowski J, Bellemare A, Taylor D, Butler G, de Vries RP, Allijn IE, van den Brink J, Ushinsky S, Storms R, Powell AJ, Paulsen IT, Elbourne LD, et al: Comparative genomic analysis of the thermophilic biomass-degrading fungi Myceliophthora thermophila and Thielavia terrestris. Nat Biotechnol. 2011, 29 (10): 922-927. 10.1038/nbt.1976.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Heinzelman P, Snow CD, Wu I, Nguyen C, Villalobos A, Govindarajan S, Minshull J, Arnold FH: A family of thermostable fungal cellulases created by structure-guided recombination. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106 (14): 5610-5615. 10.1073/pnas.0901417106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Szijártó N, Siika-aho M, Tenkanen M, Alapuranen M, Vehmaanperä J, Réczeya K, Viikari L: Hydrolysis of amorphous and crystalline cellulose by heterologously produced cellulases of Melanocarpus albomyces. J Biotechnol. 2008, 136 (3-4): 140-147. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.05.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Viikari L, Alapuranen M, Puranen T, Vehmaanperä J, Siika-Aho M: Thermostable enzymes in lignocellulose hydrolysis. Adv Biochem Eng Biot. 2007, 108: 121-145.Google Scholar
  13. Bower BS, Larenas EA, Mitchinson C: Exo-endo cellulase fusion protein. WO Patent WO2005093073. 2005Google Scholar
  14. Nyyssönen E, Keränen S: Multiple roles of the cellulase CBHI in enhancing production of fusion antibodies by the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Curr Genet. 1995, 28 (1): 71-79. 10.1007/BF00311884.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Ilmén M, Onnela ML, Klemsdal S, Keränen S, Penttilä M: Functional analysis of the cellobiohydrolase I promoter of the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Mol Gen Genet. 1996, 253 (3): 303-314.Google Scholar
  16. Wohlers I, Stachelscheid H, Borstlap J, Zeilinger K, Gerlach JC: The Characterization Tool: A knowledge-based stem cell, differentiated cell, and tissue database with a web-based analysis front-end. Stem Cell Res. 2009, 3 (2-3): 88-95. 10.1016/j.scr.2009.05.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu T, Wang TH, Li X, Liu X: Improved heterologous gene expression in Trichoderma reesei by cellobiohydrolase I gene (cbh1) promoter optimization. Acta Bioch Bioph Sin. 2008, 40 (2): 158-165. 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00388.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Kubicek CP, Mikus M, Schuster A, Schmoll M, Seiboth B: Metabolic engineering strategies for the improvement of cellulase production by Hypocrea jecorina. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2009, 2: 19-10.1186/1754-6834-2-19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Punt PJ, van Biezen N, Conesa A, Albers A, Mangnus J, van den Hondel C: Filamentous fungi as cell factories for heterologous protein production. Trends Biotechnol. 2002, 20 (5): 200-206. 10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01933-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Nevalainen K, Te'o VSJ, Bergquist PL: Heterologous protein expression in filamentous fungi. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23 (9): 468-474. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.06.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ransom C, Balan V, Biswas G, Dale B, Crockett E, Sticklen M: Heterologous Acidothermus cellulolyticus 1, 4-β-endoglucanase E1 produced within the corn biomass converts corn stover into glucose. Applied Biochemistry and Biotecnology. 2007, 137: 207-219. 10.1007/s12010-007-9053-3.Google Scholar
  22. Mattern IE, van Noort JM, van den Berg P, Archer DB, Roberts IN, van den Hondel CA: Isolation and characterization of mutants of Aspergillus niger deficient in extracellular proteases. Mol Gen Genet. 1992, 234 (2): 332-336.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Uusitalo JM, Helena Nevalainen K, Harkki AM, Knowles JKC, Penttilä ME: Enzyme production by recombinant Trichoderma reesei strains. J Biotechnol. 1991, 17 (1): 35-49. 10.1016/0168-1656(91)90025-Q.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Gouka RJ, Punt PJ, van den Hondel CA: Efficient production of secreted proteins by Aspergillus: Progress, limitations and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biot. 1997, 47 (1): 1-11. 10.1007/s002530050880.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sun Y, Cheng JJ, Himmel ME, Skory CD, Adney WS, Thomas SR, Tisserat B, Nishimura Y, Yamamoto YT: Expression and characterization of Acidothermus cellulolyticus E1 endoglucanase in transgenic duckweed Lemna minor 8627. Bioresource Technol. 2007, 98 (15): 2866-2872. 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.055.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Baker JO, Adney WS, Nleves RA, Thomas SR, Wilson DB, Himmel ME: A new thermostable endoglucanase, Acidothermus cellulolyticus E1. Appl Biochem Biotech. 1994, 45 (1): 245-256. 10.1007/BF02941803.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Seidl V, Gamauf C, Druzhinina IS, Seiboth B, Hartl L, Kubicek CP: The Hypocrea jecorina (Trichoderma reesei) hypercellulolytic mutant RUT C30 lacks a 85 kb (29 gene-encoding) region of the wild-type genome. BMC Genomics. 2008, 9: 327-10.1186/1471-2164-9-327.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Portnoy T, Margeot A, Linke R, Atanasova L, Fekete E, Sándor E, Hartl L, Karaffa L, Druzhinina IS, Seiboth B, Le Crom S, Kubicek CP: The CRE1 carbon catabolite repressor of the fungus Trichoderma reesei: a master regulator of carbon assimilation. BMC Genomics. 2011, 12 (1): 269-10.1186/1471-2164-12-269.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Portnoy T, Margeot A, Seidl-Seiboth V, Le Crom S, Ben Chaabane F, Linke R, Seiboth B, Kubicek CP: Differential regulation of the cellulase transcription factors XYR1, ACE2, and ACE1 in Trichoderma reesei strains producing high and low levels of cellulase. Eukaryot Cell. 2011, 10 (2): 262-271. 10.1128/EC.00208-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Gasser B, Saloheimo M, Rinas U, Dragosits M, Rodríguez-Carmona E, Baumann K, Giuliani M, Parrilli E, Branduardi P, Lang C, Porro D, Ferrer P, Tutino ML, Mattanovich D, Villaverde A: Protein folding and conformational stress in microbial cells producing recombinant proteins: a host comparative overview. Microb Cell Fact. 2008, 7: 11-10.1186/1475-2859-7-11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Yan W, Imanishi M, Futaki S, Sugiura Y: α-helical linker of an artificial 6-zinc finger peptide contributes to selective DNA binding to a discontinuous recognition sequence. Biochemistry. 2007, 46 (29): 8517-8524. 10.1021/bi7006417.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Al-Sheikh H, Watson AJ, Lacey GA, Punt PJ, MacKenzie DA, Jeenes DJ, Pakula T, Penttilä M, Alcocer MJ, Archer DB: Endoplasmic reticulum stress leads to the selective transcriptional downregulation of the glucoamylase gene in Aspergillus niger. Mol Microbiol. 2004, 53 (6): 1731-1742. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04236.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Venyaminov SY, Hedstrom JF, Prendergast FG: Analysis of the segmental stability of helical peptides by isotope-edited infrared spectroscopy. Proteins. 2001, 45 (1): 81-89. 10.1002/prot.1126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Dong H, Mukaiyama A, Tadokoro T, Koga Y, Takano K, Kanaya S: Hydrophobic effect on the stability and folding of a hyperthermophilic protein. J Mol Biol. 2008, 378 (1): 264-272. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.02.039.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Elcock AH: The stability of salt bridges at high temperatures: implications for hyperthermophilic proteins. J Mol Biol. 1998, 284 (2): 489-502. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2159.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Berezovsky IN, Shakhnovich EI: Physics and evolution of thermophilic adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005, 102 (36): 12742-12747. 10.1073/pnas.0503890102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Grous W, Converse A, Grethlein H, Lynd L: Kinetics of cellobiose hydrolysis using cellobiase composites from Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus niger. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1985, 27 (4): 463-470. 10.1002/bit.260270411.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Chauve M, Mathis H, Huc D, Casanave D, Monot F, Ferreira NL: Comparative kinetic analysis of two fungal β-glucosidases. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010, 3 (1): 3-10.1186/1754-6834-3-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Chen H, Hayn M, Esterbauer H: Purification and characterization of two extracellular β-glucosidases from Trichoderma reesei. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1992, 1121 (1-2): 54-60. 10.1016/0167-4838(92)90336-C.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Ortega N, Busto MD, Perez-Mateos M: Kinetics of cellulose saccharification by Trichoderma reesei cellulases. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2001, 47 (1): 7-14. 10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00101-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Barabote RD, Parales JV, Guo YY, Labavitch JM, Parales RE, Berry AM: Xyn10A, a thermostable endoxylanase from Acidothermus cellulolyticus 11B. Appl Environ Microb. 2010, 76 (21): 7363-7366. 10.1128/AEM.01326-10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Lazo GR, Stein PA, Ludwig RA: A DNA Transformation-competent Arabidopsis genomic library in Agrobacterium. Nat Biotechnol. 1991, 9 (10): 963-967. 10.1038/nbt1091-963.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Michielse CB, Hooykaas PJ, van den Hondel CA, Ram AF: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus awamori. Nat Protoc. 2008, 3 (10): 1671-1678. 10.1038/nprot.2008.154.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Ma L, Zhang J, Zou G, Wang CS, Zhou ZH: Improvement of cellulase activity in Trichoderma reesei by heterologous expression of a beta-glucosidase gene from Penicillium decumbens. Enzyme Microb Tech. 2011, 49 (4): 366-371. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.06.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Miller GL: Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem. 1959, 31 (3): 426-428. 10.1021/ac60147a030.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Deshpande MV, Eriksson KE, Pettersson LG: An assay for selective determination of exo-1,4,-β-glucanases in a mixture of cellulolytic enzymes. Anal Biochem. 1984, 138 (2): 481-487. 10.1016/0003-2697(84)90843-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Ghose TK: Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem. 1987, 59: 257-268. 10.1351/pac198759020257.Google Scholar
  48. Zhang JA, Zhu ZN, Wang XF, Wang N, Wang W, Bao J: Biodetoxification of toxins generated from lignocellulose pretreatment using a newly isolated fungus, Amorphotheca resinae ZN1, and the consequent ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010, 3: 26-10.1186/1754-6834-3-26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Zou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement