Skip to main content

Steroid biotransformations in biphasic systems with Yarrowia lipolytica expressing human liver cytochrome P450 genes



Yarrowia lipolytica efficiently metabolizes and assimilates hydrophobic compounds such as n-alkanes and fatty acids. Efficient substrate uptake is enabled by naturally secreted emulsifiers and a modified cell surface hydrophobicity and protrusions formed by this yeast. We were examining the potential of recombinant Y. lipolytica as a biocatalyst for the oxidation of hardly soluble hydrophobic steroids. Furthermore, two-liquid biphasic culture systems were evaluated to increase substrate availability. While cells, together with water soluble nutrients, are maintained in the aqueous phase, substrates and most of the products are contained in a second water-immiscible organic solvent phase.


For the first time we have co-expressed the human cytochromes P450 2D6 and 3A4 genes in Y. lipolytica together with human cytochrome P450 reductase (hCPR) or Y. lipolytica cytochrome P450 reductase (YlCPR). These whole-cell biocatalysts were used for the conversion of poorly soluble steroids in biphasic systems.

Employing a biphasic system with the organic solvent and Y. lipolytica carbon source ethyl oleate for the whole-cell bioconversion of progesterone, the initial specific hydroxylation rate in a 1.5 L stirred tank bioreactor was further increased 2-fold. Furthermore, the product formation was significantly prolonged as compared to the aqueous system.

Co-expression of the human CPR gene led to a 4-10-fold higher specific activity, compared to the co-overexpression of the native Y. lipolytica CPR gene. Multicopy transformants showed a 50-70-fold increase of activity as compared to single copy strains.


Alkane-assimilating yeast Y. lipolytica, coupled with the described expression strategies, demonstrated its high potential for biotransformations of hydrophobic substrates in two-liquid biphasic systems. Especially organic solvents which can be efficiently taken up and/or metabolized by the cell might enable more efficient bioconversion as compared to aqueous systems and even enable simple, continuous or at least high yield long time processes.


Cytochrome P450s (CYPs) are a large, ubiquitous family of heme-containing monooxygenases that are responsible for the oxidative metabolism of a wide variety of drugs, environmental chemicals and endogenous compounds, such as steroids, prostaglandins and fatty acids[1].

Most cytochrome P450 systems are composed of a monooxygenase and one or two additional proteins, constituting an electron transfer chain. Genes encoding these components are either expressed individually or linked resulting in self sufficient CYPs. To some extent, the natural electron transport chain from NAD(P)H to the heme containing cytochrome P450 can be replaced by either homologues or different proteins with similar function e.g. flavodoxin and flavodoxin reductase to support catalytic activity[2]. Therefore, the activity of CYPs is not only determined by its abundance, but also by the abundance of the electron transport partners[3] and possibly by their molar ratio.

Eukaryotic CYPs are membrane associated and many of those are located on the cytosolic side of the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. However, several important CYPs such as the vitamin D3 25-hydroxylase CYP27B1 are also associated to mitochondrial membrane[4]. In mammalian cells, expression takes place in different tissues, but the highest levels are found in the liver, where CYPs have the principal function to introduce an oxygen atom into hydrophobic substrates. The increased hydrophilicity of the product facilitates its elimination from the mammalian body.

Several genes of xenobiotic-metabolizing CYPs are expressed in human liver, among which CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 appear to be most commonly responsible for drug metabolism[5]. The relative importance for drug metabolism is reflected in the abundance of these enzymes, e.g., CYP3A4 being most abundant with ~ 30% of total CYP in liver cells, and the preference to bind and/or metabolize chemicals with structures commonly found in drugs, e.g., CYP2D6 preferentially binds widely used drugs with basic amine functions[3].

Many of these drug-metabolizing CYPs are subject to polymorphisms, duplications, and differential expression levels, which gives rise to wide variation in pharmacokinetics profiles. This makes CYPs highly important to the pharmaceutical industry, where human drug metabolites are essential for drug development and analysis.

In order to provide sufficient amounts of human CYPs, several recombinant expression systems have been investigated in the past 20 years, from the more complicated and expensive mammalian[6] and Baculovirus-infected insect cell system[7] to the “simpler” expression host Escherichia coli. Since the first functional expression of mammalian CYPs in bakers’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was demonstrated in the mid 80s[8, 9], in recent years, the focus shifted more and more to yeast systems, which combine the ease of handling of prokaryotic systems with the sub-cellular structure of eukaryotic systems reassembling a more natural environment. Mammalian CYP genes have been expressed, e.g., in the yeasts S. cerevisiae[814], P. pastoris[15, 16], S. pombe[1719], and Y. lipolytica[2022]. Frequently, whole-cells were used for drug metabolite synthesis to deal with inherent stability problems of human CYP enzymes and regeneration of NADPH.

Most of the typical substrates for CYPs are very hydrophobic and most probably enter the enzyme’s active site via biological membranes. This also explains why specific activities of truncated and soluble human CYPs are lower than those of their native membrane bound counterparts[23]. Another obstacle in performing bioconversions with hydrophobic substrates is their very low solubility in the aqueous phase, which limits cellular uptake and thus overall biotransformation performance. Investigations showed that the substrates have to be added in concentrations above the solubility limit to achieve efficient biotransformation. To ensure a homogenous suspension, the substrates have to be dissolved at high concentration in an organic solvent and quickly added to the aqueous solution[24].

However, there are several approaches to increase substrate availability. The addition of water-miscible organic solvents or detergents has been tested[17], which may results in a drastic increase of substrate solubility. Some solvents and most of the detergents, however, have a strong impact on cell membranes, compromising cell integrity and viability, and thus biocatalyst functionality.

In a more sophisticated approach, water-soluble cyclodextrins, toroid-shaped cyclic oligosaccharids, have been used to capture hydrophobic substances in their cavities, thereby increasing their apparent solubility. This approach has been successfully used with Mycobacterium sp.[25], but seems to have toxic effects on yeast cells[17].

Biphasic systems consisting of an organic and an aqueous phase, represent a valuable tool for the biotransformation of hydrophobic substrates[2632]. The organic phase regulates the substrate and product concentration in the aqueous phase, allowing high overall concentrations of otherwise toxic hydrophobic substrates. Furthermore, such a system can be used to avoid inhibition effects by substrate and/or product and can help to guide equilibrium reactions into the desired direction enhancing stereoselectivity. A crucial step is the choice of the organic phase depending on different parameters, including toxic or inhibitory effects of the solvent on the cells as well as substrate and product solubility[31, 32].

Our studies have been focused on Y. lipolytica which is naturally adapted to such two-phase systems. Y. lipolytica is often isolated from biphasic environments like dairy products rich in lipids[33] or oil-polluted soil and water[34, 35]. Applications of Y. lipolytica include bioremediation of diesel-contaminated soils[36] and olive-mill waste water[37], protein production on alkanes[38], and aroma compound formation from fatty acid derivatives[39]. When Y. lipolytica is grown on hydrophobic substrates, the cell surface is in direct contact with substrate droplets and several modifications in cell structure occur, which are probably related to hydrophobic substrate transport. These observations have led to the hypothesis that hydrophobic substrates can migrate through channels via the plasma membrane to the ER[40, 41].

These unique properties of the alkane utilizing yeast Y. lipolytica together with the availability of efficient genetic tools for this species underscore its potential for biotransformations in biphasic systems. The yeast Y. lipolytica has been revealed as one of the most suitable host for heterologous protein production[42] and several CYP genes of mammalian e.g. from Bos taurus and Homo sapiens s.[2022], plant e.g. green bell pepper[43], and fungal origin e.g. Candida maltosa and Rhodotorula minuta[44, 45], have been expressed in this yeast so far.

In this study, we report the first example of functional co-expression of genes encoding the important human liver CYPs CYP2D6 or CYP3A4 together with hCPR and intrinsic YlCPR in Y. lipolytica and their use in biphasic whole-cell bioconversions aiming at steroid oxidation and as a model for the hydroxylation of other poorly soluble substrates.

Results and discussion

Cloning and expression of genes for human liver cytochrome P450s and CPRs

One of the most frequently studied bottlenecks in heterologous gene expression is the variable codon-usage and -bias of different organisms. By exchanging rare codons with more frequently used ones of the host, the expression of heterologous genes can be significantly improved in some cases[46]. In some cases, however native genes provided better results than codon optimized variants. In this study, we compared expression of wild-type and codon optimized genes for CYP2D6, CYP3A4 and human CPR in Y. lipolytica.

Using Y. lipolytica, it is possible to create multicopy integration clones employing the auxotrophic marker ura3 linked to a largely truncated and deficient promoter[47, 48]. This approach previously allowed the human CYP1A1, YlCPR and bovine CYP17 gene expression to be increased several fold[22, 49, 50].

In a similar approach, the genes encoding CYP2D6, CYP3A4, human cytochrome P450 reductase (hCPR) and Y. lipolytica cytochrome P450 reductase (YlCPR) were cloned and ligated into (i) the integrative plasmid vector p64D-linker for selection of multicopy transformants, as well as into (ii) p65D-linker promoting single copy integration. The resulting series of expression vectors contained each of the two expression cassettes under the control of the ICL1 promoter (pICL1D) and terminator (ICL1t), one for CYP and one for CPR. Y. lipolytica H222-S4 was transformed with the resulting Sac II (Figure 1) linearized plasmids.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of construction of the co-expression vector. Construction of multicopy coexpression vectors by inserting overlap extension PCR fragments into the multicopy integrative vector p64D-linker containing the multicopy selective ura3d4 marker.

Copy numbers of selected clones were verified by RT-PCR. Supposed single copy transformants indeed showed one integrated copy, while multicopy transformants showed between 10 and more than 40 integrated copies (Table 1) as determined by quantitative PCR, which is in good accordance with previous results[20, 22, 47, 48, 51].

Table 1 Used Strains and their expression plasmid copy number determined by RT-PCR

It is common knowledge that separating biomass production and the expression phase of microbial cell cultures can be beneficial for heterologous protein production, both in terms of a reduced metabolic burden and limitation of a potentially harmful toxic activity. Therefore, Y. lipolytica was first grown in YNB medium with glucose as a sole carbon source (YNBG). Upon depletion of glucose and a short starvation phase, heterologous protein production in shake flasks was initiated by induction of the ICL1 promoter with addition of ethanol. After a short lag phase, while switching from glucose to ethanol, a further increase in biomass was observed (Figure 2). Bufuralol and progesterone were used to assess CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 activity, respectively. Already after 4 to 8 h of induction, Y. lipolytica cells harboring CYP genes showed activity towards bufuralol or progesterone, the specific activity did not further increase and remained constant for 70 h (Figure 2). For practical reasons all further experiments were carried out with cells harvested after 26 h of induction.

Figure 2

CYP activity and Y. lipolytica biomass production during induction. CYP2D6 (1’-hydroxybufuralol formation, A) and CYP3A4 (6β-hydroxyprogesterone formation, B) activity during ethanol induction of Y. lipolytica strains YL21 and YL22, respectively. The cultures were incubated at 28°C and induced by ethanol after glucose depletion. The Roman numerals indicate the following process phases: I) batch growth with glucose; II) induction phase of about 70 h. Squares highlight biomass concentrations determined as cell dry weight, while bars document CYP expression levels measured as specific whole-cell activity. Experiments were performed in triplicates. Samples were taken after 4,8,21,26,31,45,50,55 and 69 h.

To confirm expression of heterologous cytochrome P450s, microsomal protein of each clone sampled after 26 h of ethanol induction were analyzed by Western blotting. Bands of CYP2D6 (~ 55 kDa) and CYP3A4 (~ 57 kDa) were detected at the correct sizes. No Western blots were performed for CPR, since strong protein bands with the correct sizes for hCPR (~ 75 kDa) and YlCPR (~ 85 kDa) were already detectable by Ponceau-staining of the blots for multicopy transformants, indicating the high expression levels of CPR. (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Western blot analysis. Western blot analysis of microsomes isolated after 26 h of ethanol induction from cultures of Y. lipolytica H222-S4 transformed with p64D- or p65D-based integrative vectors, containing different combinations of CYPs and CPRs. Protein transfer was monitored by Ponceau S (*) staining, where putative CPR-protein bands in multicopy transformants were already visible. CYP-protein bands CYP2D6 (A) and CYP3A4 (B) were immunodetected with anti CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 antibodies, respectively.– CYP2D6 was detected in single copy clones (sc) YL12 and YL15 expressing YlCPR-WT + 2D6syn (1), hCPR-WT + 2D6syn (2) respectively and multicopy clones (mc) YL11, YL10 and YL21 expressing YlCPR-WT + 2D6syn (5), hCPRsyn + 2D6syn (6), hCPR-WT + 2D6syn (7) respectively. CYP3A4 was detected in single copy clones (sc) YL19 and YL20 expressing YlCPR-WT + 3A4syn (1), hCPR-WT + 3A4syn (2) respectively and multicopy clones (mc) YL18 and YL22 expressing YlCPR-WT + 3A4syn (5), hCPR-WT + 3A4syn (6) respectively. YL23 clone harboring empty p65D-linker vector (3 + 4 in both panels) was used as negative control. PageRuler Prestained Protein Ladder (M) was used for monitoring protein separation and transfer efficiency.

Human liver cytochromes P450 2D6 and 3A4 and human cytochrome P450 reductase (hCPR) as well as Y. lipolytica cytochrome P450 reductase (YlCPR) were functionally expressed. The codon optimized versions of either CYPs showed best activities in combination with wild-type human CPR and wild-type Y. lipolytica CPR (data not shown). Therefore, these combinations were used for Western blot analysis and further used throughout this study.

For both CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, the use of the p64D-derived multicopy integration vectors led to a significant increase of expression (Figure 3) and whole-cell CYP activity compared to single copy integrants. CYP2D6 multicopy gene integration gave ~ 70 fold increase of activity towards bufuralol, and multiple copies of the CYP3A4 coding sequence resulted in a ~ 50 fold increased activity towards progesterone (Figure 4). This increase was similar to that observed by overexpressing a CYP1A1 gene in the Y. lipolytica strain PO1d[22]. The highest expression levels assessed by CO-spectra for human liver cytochrome P450 2D6 and 3A4 were 92.3 ± 9.2 and 60.9 ± 5.9 pmol per mg microsomal protein, respectively. No results from CO spectra have been reported for CYP1A1 expression in Y. lipolytica. Expression levels in the range of 90 and 51–250 pmol per mg microsomal protein have been reported for CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 in bakers yeast, respectively[12, 52, 53].

Figure 4

Influence of copy number and type of reductase on CYP activity. CYP2D6 (A) and CYP3A4 (B) activity of and CPR activities of Y. lipolytica single-copy and multicopy transformants. Strains coexpressed under pICL1-control the codon-optimized P450 2D6syn (A) or P450 3A4syn (B) in combination with the wild-type human or Y. lipolytica NADPH-P450 reductases (hCPRwt, YlCPR) from integrated single-copies or multiple vector copies as indicated, except the control strain YL23 on the left in A and B, containing only one endogenous chromosomal YlCPR copy, which is present as background in all strains. Cultivation at 28°C in YNBG on glucose, induction by 1% ethanol, microsomes isolation, whole-cell CYP activity and cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) activity (determined as NADPH-cytochrome c reductase, NCR) measurements were performed as described in Materials and Methods. Filled bars, CPR activity; hatched bars, CYP activities; -, no genes; + genes in single copy; ++ genes in multicopy.

Coexpression of CYPs and CPRs

It has been shown that the coexpression of a functional CPR is important for optimal CYP activity[54, 55]. In some cases the proteins of the native electron transfer chain can be replaced by other proteins. For example, the adrenodoxin homologue of Schizosaccharomyces pombe etp1fd was shown to be able to replace mammalian adrenodoxin and transfer electrons from adrenodoxin reductase to CYP11B1 and CYP11B2[56]. However, in most cases the mammalian CPRs are more effective in supplying electrons to mammalian CYPs than other CPRs[57]. This suggests that the intrinsic yeast CPRs may be a limiting factor in the heterologous expression and application of mammalian CYPs in yeast. Therefore, we coexpressed not only the endogenous Y. lipolytica CPR but also the human CPR.

Cytochrome P450 reductase activity measured as NADPH cytochrome c reductase activity was detected in all clones expressing either human CPR or Y. lipolytica CPR, while a control strain transformed with the empty vector showed only low endogenous CPR activity. The multicopy effect described for the hydroxylation activity was also observed for the CPR activity towards cytochrome c (Figure 4).

Multicopy transformants YL11 and YL18 over-expressing the endogenous Y. lipolytica CPR showed 7-fold or 40-fold higher activity towards cytochrome c compared to multicopy transformants Yl21 and Yl22 over-expressing the human CPR, respectively. This may be due to a higher affinity of the Y. lipolytica CPR to cytochrome c as compared to the human CPR. However, the more likely reason might be the higher YlCPR expression level, as indicated by the more intense band on the Western blot when compared to the human CPR (Figure 3). Despite the higher activity of over-expressed YlCPR towards cytochrome c, YlCPR coexpression did yield much lower CYP activities than achieved with clones coexpressing the human CPR (Figure 4). This indicates that coupling of the human CYPs with Y. lipolytica CPR, although possible, is inferior to coupling with human CPR. This is in accordance with earlier results suggesting that mammalian CPR is more effective in transporting electrons to mammalian CYPs as compared to alternative CPRs[3, 56, 58].

Determination of operation parameters

Resting and growing whole-cells can be employed as catalysts for biotransformations. Growing cells are considered more favorable than resting-cells when expressing a protein with low stability, since they permit sustained protein expression during biotransformation. However, resting-cells have the advantage that the desired reaction can be investigated independently of growth phenomena and at higher cell densities. Furthermore, biotransformation conditions can be chosen independently from growth conditions minimizing side reactions and allowing identification of potential limitations[59].

Differences between growing and resting cells on bufuralol and protesterone hydroxylation rates were investigated for Y. lipolytica harboring hCPR combined with CYP2D6 and CYP3A4, respectively. The hydroxylation rates were determined as product formation rates measuring the concentrations of hydroxybufuralol or hydroxyprogesterone, respectively. Resting-cells showed significantly higher hydroxylation rates than growing cells (data shown in Additional file1). Therefore, resting-cells were used further in this study.

Both CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 have also been tested for their ability to hydroxylate testosterone, 17-alpha-methyltestosterone and progesterone. CYP2D6 usually prefers substrates containing a basic amine function[3]. Nevertheless, some studies have shown that CYP2D6 is also involved in steroid hydroxylation[60, 61]. Both recombinant human liver cytochrome P450 whole-cell Yarrowia catalysts hydroxylated testosterone, 17alpha-methyltestosterone and progesterone (Figure 5). Although expression levels have been lower for CYP3A4 compared to CYP2D6, Y. lipolytica cells harboring CYP3A4 and hCPR in all cases showed the expected several-fold higher activity towards steroids, with a preference towards testosterone. The untransformed control strain YL23 showed no formation of any hydroxylated steroid. However, Y. lipolytica is oxidizing the hydroxy function of testosterone at position 17 to the corresponding keto-function giving androstenedione[62, 63]. Such undesired side reactions may hamper the reliability of activity measurements. Therefore, testosterone was excluded and progesterone, another known standard substrate for CYP3A4, was used for bioconversion studies. Furthermore, progesterone was used to investigate the potential of two-liquid biphasic systems and Y. lipolytica catalysts for more efficient whole-cell bioconversions.

Figure 5

Whole-cell hydroxylation of different steroids. Whole-cell hydroxylation of different steroids in aqueous phase system, employing Y. lipolytica YL21 and YL22 cells harboring CYP2D6 (filled bars) or CYP3A4 (striped bars), respectively. Data is shown as activity relative to the highest measured apparent hydroxylation rate of testosterone (3.9 ± 0.1 mU per g CDW). Compounds were converted by cells equivalent to ~ 10 g/L CDW for 16 hours. Activity was determined in test tubes as product formation rate after adding steroids dissolved in DMSO to a final concentration of 2 mM.

Whole-cell conversion in biphasic systems

Most of the typical human liver CYP substrates are very hydrophobic. Hence, one main function of CYPs is to incorporate a hydroxyl function to render the compound more water soluble and to activate it for further metabolization. Alkane-utilizing yeasts, such as Y. lipolytica, can excrete surfactants and adjust their cell surface and cell wall to directly interact with water immiscible organic substrates, like alkanes, long-chain fatty acids and triglycerides, facilitating their uptake[40, 41, 6467]. These properties as well as metabolic adaptations and the subcellular organization of the alkane-utilizing yeast cell are obviously supporting the high in vivo turnover numbers observed for the host-own P450s of the CYP52 family involved in primary alkane and fatty acid oxidation[40, 41, 6769].

In this study, we investigated whether the unique properties of Y. lipolytica will support also the function of heterologously expressed CYPs in this yeast and will give this organism an advantage in CYP-catalyzed bioconversion of hydrophobic substrates dissolved in organic solvents. A spectrum of 10 water immiscible organic solvents ranging from (i) solvents with known good solvent properties (toluene, 1-octanol), (ii) inert fluids (bis-ethyl hexyl phthalate, dibutyl phthalate) to (iii) potential carbon sources (1-decanol, 1-dodecanol, methyl laureate, ethyl oleate, n-decane, n-dodecane)[70, 71] were chosen. The solvents toluene and 1-octanol, which are known to be toxic for microorganisms, enabled the highest solubility of steroids. Indeed, they showed the expected toxic effect on Y. lipolytica cells, too. Two solvents, known to be utilized as a carbon source by Y. lipolytica, n-decane and n-dodecane, conferred very low solubility of progesterone and were therefore excluded from further analyses. 1-decanol, 1-dodecanol, methyl laureate, ethyl oleate, bisethylhexylphthalate (BEHP) and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) had no obvious toxic effects and enabled reasonable solubility of steroids (Additional file2).

As mentioned before, exposing Y. lipolytica cells to water immiscible organic solvents triggers changes in cell structure resulting in increased hydrophobicity[66]. Even when the organic solvent is not utilized by Y. lipolytica, morphological changes of the cells immediately become obvious. The cell suspensions become less homogenous and cell agglomerates form. It has been reported that significant changes to the cell surface (increased cell wall hydrophobicity, occurrence of protrusions and special channel like structures) are important for the cells to attach to the hydrophobic substrates as well as for the uptake of these substrates[40, 41, 66, 72, 73]. Y. lipolytica was observed to adsorb to the organic solvent droplets of DBP and ethyl oleate, similarly to the previously observed adsorption to hexadecane when cells are grown in media containing that alkane as sole carbon source[40, 41].

Based on the experiences with aqueous whole-cell bioconversions, biotransformations in biphasic systems also were performed with resting-cells. Cells were taken after 26 h of ethanol induction and resuspended in 100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, containing 1% w/v glucose to a biomass concentration of ~ 12 g/L CDW. The cell suspension was then mixed with an equal volume of the organic phase containing 20 mM of progesterone. Conversions were performed at 30°C over night while shaking. All data were calculated with respect to the aqueous phase volume. Based on other reported experiences[24] for conversion in aqueous systems steroids were added above their solubility limit as DMSO stock solution resulting in precipitation of most of the hydrophobic substrate. Surprisingly, most of the tested water immiscible organic solvents led to a decrease in conversion rate of at least 50% compared to the pure aqueous system where just the organic solvent of the pre-solubilized substrate was added. Only ethyl oleate enabled a slightly increased conversion rate (Figure 6).

Figure 6

Whole-cell conversions of Y. lipolytica in biphasic conditions. Comparison of whole-cell conversion with resting Y. lipolytica YL22 cells harboring CYP3A4 and hCPR in aqueous (striped bar) and biphasic systems (filled bars) using different organic solvents as 2nd phase. Activity was determined as product formation rate.

Thus, ethyl oleate was identified as the most promising water immiscible organic solvent for the biphasic conversion of progesterone in shake flask cultures. Comparing one utilizable and one non degradable organic solvent, ethyl oleate and dibutyl phthalate [Mauersberger et al. unpublished results][74], respectively, were chosen to perform bioconversions under more controlled conditions in bioreactors.

Two-liquid phase bioreactor process

Biphasic and aqueous bioconversions of progesterone with recombinant Y. lipolytica catalysts harboring CYP3A4 and hCPR have been performed in a stirred tank bioreactor. For biomass production, a standard batch was run for 16 h (phase I) followed by a fed-batch run for 10 h at a constant growth rate of μ = 0.18/h (phase II). Subsequently CYP3A4 and hCPR production was induced by a low, linearly increasing feed of ethanol over 36 h (phase III). Samples were taken at different time points and specific 6-beta-hydroxyprogesterone formation was determined in test tubes. Interestingly, a low CYP activity was already observed during fed-batch (phase II) on glucose. This reflects a derepression of the pICL1 promoter under conditions of glucose limited growth or glucose depletion. The highest specific 6-beta-hydroxyprogesterone activity of 22 mU/g CDW was reached after roughly 12 h of ethanol-induction and remained constant during the induction time. However, the highest volumetric progesterone hydroxylation rate of 1 U/L (calculated from the specific activity) was reached after roughly 24 h of induction (Figure 7). Cells were harvested after 36 h of induction and resuspended in glucose containing potassium phosphate buffer to a biomass concentration of ~ 25 g/L CDW. Aqueous and biphasic bioconversions in 1.5 L stirred tank reactors used the same cell suspension as starting material. Glucose at a low constant feed of 0.007 g/h/g CDW compared to exponential feed of 1.05 g/h/g CDW during fed batch, was provided as energy source for cell maintenance and regeneration of cofactors.

Figure 7

Biomass and CYP3A4 activity during cultivation of Y. lipolytica YL22 in bioreactor. Time course of biomass concentration and volumetric whole-cell CYP3A4 activity determined during fed-batch cultivation and ethanol induction. Open symbols, biomass concentration determined as cell dry weight; closed symbol, CYP3A4 expression levels measured as volumetric whole-cell activity of 6beta-hydroxyprogesterone formation determined by separate activity assays in test tubes. The Roman numerals show the following process phases: I) batch growth with glucose; II) fed-batch growth over 10 h with exponential addition of glucose at an exponentially increasing feed rate; III) induction phase of about 36 h with a low linear addition of ethanol.

During the first hour in both biphasic systems less hydroxyprogesterone was formed than in the aqueous system. As of 2 hours of conversion the ethyl oleate based biphasic system provided the highest conversion rates (Figure 8). However, after 6 h the product formation rate of all systems started to drop significantly. While the product formation of the aqueous system came even nearly to a halt after 6 h. The product formation of both biphasic systems continued at a reduced rate throughout the whole biotransformation experiment (Figure 8).

Figure 8

Hydroxyprogesterone formation during whole-cell conversion in bioreactor. Time course of hydroxyprogesterone formation during whole-cell conversion of progesterone by Y. lipolytica YL22 cells harboring CYP3A4 and hCPR. Closed triangles: aqueous phase system; open circles: with dibutylphthalate (DBP) as second organic phase; open squares: with ethyl oleate as second organic phase.

In the beginning of the bioconversion of the different systems the substrate is probably taken up directly from the aqueous phase. The discrepancy in the hydroxylation rate of the different bioconversion systems in this early phase of conversion, is likely due to the difference in availability of progesterone in the aqueous phase. Indeed, for ethyl oleate 8 times and for dibutyl phthalate 42 times higher concentration of progesterone were measured in the aqueous system compared to the aqueous phases of the respective biphasic system. The available substrate concentrations in the aqueous phases stayed more or less constant during the whole bioconversion process excluding the influence of partitioning of substrate on observed variations of bioconversion rates during the conversion process. Y. lipolytica cells most probably need some time to adjust to the new hydrophobic environment. This seems to be significantly faster for the naturally occurring utilizable ethyl oleate giving much faster product formation compared to the inert non degradable dibutylphthalate. The generally lower conversion rates in biphasic systems might be explained by lower substrate concentration in the aqueous phase in presence of organic solvents.

Subsequently, the uptake of bioconversion substrate may be achieved in different ways; either Y. lipolytica cells continue to take up the low concentrations of substrate from the aqueous phase, or a direct uptake of substrate from the organic phase takes place. Although, the ethyl oleate might be cleaved by secreted lipases, the most reasonable explanation would be the co-uptake of ethyl oleate and dissolved steroid, similarly to the alkane uptake. In such a case, the conversion rate might be limited by the uptake rate of the organic phase.

Although dibuthylphtalate was shown to be a very well suitable substrate for the conversion of hydrophobic substrates in biphasic system using another alkane utilizing yeast[75], in our study dibutyl phthalate as second phase enabled significantly lower conversion rates compared to ethyl oleate.

After approximately 1.5 and 43 h, the overall product formation of both, the ethyl oleate and DBP biphasic systems, respectively, exceed the aqueous system, with an ongoing catalyst activity within the evaluated period of 100 h of bioconversion. However, it was observed that surprisingly the use of DBP as organic phase also lead to a significant change in the product profile formed from progesterone, while ethyl oleate did not. Already after 2 h there is a discrepancy in the hydroxylation pattern in the dibutyl phthalate biphasic system, compared to the aqueous and the ethyl oleate biphasic system. One might speculate that a different extent of emulsification and transport effects in different solvent systems might contribute to this effect. However no experiments were performed to proof this hypothesis. At the beginning, 6-beta-hydroxylation is dominant. However, the hydroxylase specificity is shifted to the formation of an unknown hydroxy product. After roughly 4 hours, the hydroxylase rate towards the unknown position exceeds the rate towards the 6-beta-position. At the end of the two-liquid phase bioreactor experiment the hydroxylation pattern is considerable shifted. The unknown product makes up 65% of the total product compared to only traces in aqueous system. By comparing the unknown product to in-house available hydroxyprogesterone standards 6-beta, 11-alpha, 16-alpha and 17-alpha hydroxyprogesterone, we were not able to identify the new product. Unfortunately the concentration was not high enough to identify the product by other means e.g. NMR.

Oleate esters naturally occur in the membranes of Y. lipolytica. They are incorporated into lipids or degraded as energy source and might show less influence on cellular membranes or membrane bound proteins than dibutyl phthalate which is not degraded by Y. lipolytica. Furthermore, DBP is more similar to steroids and may enter the binding pocket of CYP3A4 which might explain the distorted hydroxylation patterns.


The Y. lipolytica strain H222-S4 was engineered to express the human liver CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Co-expressing human cytochrome P450 reductase as well as increasing the copy numbers of both genes improved the catalytic performance of these whole-cell biocatalysts. However the human CYP reductase was the more efficient redox partner. Our results support previous findings, stating that not only human CYP3A4 but to some extent also CYP2D6 is able to hydroxylate steroid molecules such as testosterone, 17α-methyltestosterone and progesterone which are non-typical CYP2D6 substrates.

By using bio-degradable ethyl oleate in a two-liquid biphasic setup instead of aqueous systems, we could show that Y. lipolytica cells harboring human CYP3A4 and human CPR can be applied as a whole-cell system with increased biocatalytic stability. This might be caused by different cellular adaptation mechanisms to the organic compounds such as cell wall adaptation or by different transport mechanisms. A systems biology approach might help to clarify these issues, which was out of scope of this study. As expected the alkane-assimilating yeast Y. lipolytica, coupled with above described expression strategies, demonstrated to be promising tools for biotransformations of hydrophobic substrates in two-liquid biphasic systems. Especially organic solvents which can be efficiently taken up and/or metabolized by the cell might enable more efficient bioconversion as compared to aqueous systems and even enable simple, more stable, continuous or at least high yield long time processes.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and reagents

Unless stated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from BD Bioscience (USA), Sigma–Aldrich (Germany), Carl Roth GmbH (Germany), J.T. Baker (Netherlands) and Roche Diagnostics (Germany) at the highest purity available. Oligonucleotides were purchased from IDT (Belgium).

Strains, media and culture conditions

E. coli Top10 or E. coli Top10F’ (Invitrogen Corp.) strains were used as host for recombinant plasmid propagation. Cells were grown on Luria-Bertani Agar (Carl Roth GmbH) supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin at 37°C. DNA isolation and purification was done using Fermentas Miniprep kit or Promega Wizard SV Gel isolation and PCR cleanup kit.

In this study, the Y. lipolytica strain H222-S4 (MATA ura3-302)[76] was used as recipient strain for integration of plasmids described in Table 2. The Y. lipolytica strains were grown at 28°C on solid complete medium YPD or on minimal medium YNB (Difco, BD Biosciences, USA) supplemented with 2% w/v glucose (YNBD) and 15 g/L agar[48]. Transformants were selected on solid YNBD (15 g/l agar). Cultivation in liquid media was performed with 200 or 250 mL of buffered minimal YNB medium supplemented with 0.6% w/v glucose and 200 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 6.5, in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks at 28°C.

Table 2 Plasmids used

All seed and inoculum cultures were prepared using buffered minimal medium YNB (Difco) supplemented with 1% w/v glucose and 200 mM potassium phosphate, pH 6.5. The defined mineral medium used for the main fed-batch cultures contained per liter.

6.0 g (NH4)2SO4, 2.0 g KH2PO4, 0.24 g K2HPO4, 1.4 g MgSO4 x 7 H2O, 0.6 g NaCl, 0.58 g NaNO3, 0.38 g CaCl2, 1 mL PTM trace element solution, i.e. 0.5 g/L H3BO3, 0.04 g/L CuSO4 x 5 H2O, 0.1 g/L KI, 0.303 g/L MnSO4 x 1 H2O, 0.2 g/L Na2MoO4 x 2 H2O, 0.4 g/L ZnSO4 x 7 H2O, 0.2 mL of ethanolic iron chloride solution i.e. 30 g/L FeCl3 x 6 H2O, 1 mL thiamin hydrochloride solution i.e. 4 g/L and 16.5 g glucose monohydrate.

The feed solution contained 550 g glucose monohydrate per liter, 3 mL PTM trace element solution, 0.2 mL ethanolic iron chloride solution and 3 mL thiamin hydrochloride solution.

For induction of the pICL1-controlled CYP expression, pure ethanol was used as feed solution.

Genes and vectors

The integrative multicopy and single copy Y. lipolytica vectors p64ICL1, p65ICL1[51, 77, 78] were adapted by replacing the ICL1 intron and gene with a small linker containing Spe I and Asc I restriction sites and used for cloning and co-expressing CYPs and CPRs. The vector p67RYL was used to isolate the Y. lipolytica CPR gene which is essentially the wild-type gene but alanine at position 2 was chanced to proline[48, 79, 80]. pNMTS-CYP-OR-spe and pBdpTrcRed-3A4(192v)wtA305S were used to isolate codon optimized human CYP3A4 and codon optimized human CPR gene, respectively. Both were optimized for expression in yeast, i.e. hybrid optimized for P. pastoris S. pombe and S. cerevisiae (Weis et al., unpublished).

Wild-type human CYP2D6 (ID30915411), wild-type human CYP3A4 (ID7262313) and wild-type human CPR (ID3882411) genes were isolated from cDNA clones (BioCat GmbH, Germany).

For the codon optimization of the CYP2D6 gene, the free software “Gene Designer V1.1.4.1” (DNA 2.0, USA) was used to design a gene optimized for expression in yeast, i.e. hybrid optimized for P. pastoris and Y. lipolytica, and then synthesized.

Vectors constructions

For vector construction, standard molecular biology procedures were performed[81]. The multicopy vector p64D-linker and single copy vector p65D-linker were obtained by replacing the isocitric lyase 1 (ICL1) gene and intron with a linker containing Spe I and Asc I site, in the parental vectors p64ICL1 and p65ICL1, respectively. Both vectors contain the URA3 selection marker. The p64-vector variants contain a deficient, truncated ura3d4 promoter as multicopy selection marker, which gives only sufficient amounts of gene product when several copies (at least 8–10) of the vector are integrated into the genome. This allows for selection of clones with multicopy integrations or gene multiplications. The p65-vector variants contain the ura3d1 promoter sufficient for single copy selection[47, 48].

Co-expression of single and multicopy vectors with combinations of different CPRs and cytochrome P450s were obtained by cloning overlap extension PCR products into the Spe I and Asc I sites (Figure 1). Each gene was placed under the control of the ICL1 promoter[82]. Shortly; each fragment, i.e. CPR, ICL1 promoter and terminator, CYP was amplified via PCR using primers with overhangs homologous to adjoining parts. Overlap extension PCR was done in two steps. All fragments were added to the first reaction mix PCR was run for 20 cycles using Phusion Polymerase (NEB). Then flanking primers were added to the reaction which was run for another 25 cycles to amplify the overlap construct. The fuel-length PCR construct was then cloned into pJet1.2 using the CloneJET™ PCR Cloning Kit (Fermentas) and verified by sequencing (LGC genomics, Germany). Confirmed inserts were cloned with SpeI/AscI into p64D-linker or p65D-linker, respectively, using T4 DNA ligase (Fermentas) according to standard procedure.

Transformation into Y. lipolytica

Transformation of Y. lipolytica H222-S4 was performed by the lithium acetate method[38] or by electroporation according to a condensed protocol[83]. All vectors contained the rDNA (ribosomal DNA fragment) of Y. lipolytica as integration site and were digested by Sac II before transformation. The transformants were selected for Ura+ phenotype on minimal YNBD medium (2% w/v glucose). Colonies appearing after 2–3 days (single copy) and 2–3 weeks (multicopy) were transferred onto fresh plates and sub-cultured. The resulting prototrophic recombinant Y. lipolytica strains used for CYP and CPR expression and steroid biotransformation studies and their estimated integrated vector copies are given in Table 1.

Real-time PCR (RT-PCR) was used to estimate the copy number of the integrated expression cassettes. Genomic DNA was isolated from Y. lipolytica transformants grown overnight in minimal YNB medium supplemented with 1% w/v glucose (YNBD)[84]. The ICL1 set of primers, ICL1-fw (5′-CCA GCA GCC CGA GAT TGA-3′) and ICL1-rv (5′-ACT CAG CAC CGG ACC ACT TC-3′), anneal to the single copy of the endogenous Y. lipolytica ICL1 gene within the chromosome. The Amp primers, Amp-fw (5′-GCT ATG TGG CGC GGT ATT ATC-3′) and Amp-rv (5′-GTA TGC GGC GAC CGA GTT-3′), target the ampR marker gene present on the integrated vectors. Y. lipolytica YL23 was used as a control organism with a single copy of both the ICL1 and ampR target sequences. Reaction mixes of 18 μl consisted of 100 pg template DNA, Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA), and 250 nM of each primer. Each reaction was run in duplicate in an ABI PRISM 7300 Real Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). The profile used was, 95°C for 10 min, fallowed by 40 cycles of (95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 60 s). Data collection was done after each 60°C step. A melting curve analysis was conducted after the amplification, heating from 45°C to 95°C. Analysis was done using Sequence Detection Software SDS (Applied Biosystems, version 1.2). Average Ct values of the 2 profiles (ICL1 and Amp) were used to estimate the relative copy number for the selected transformant[85].

CPR and CYP induction

Y. lipolytica clones were grown in YNBG (1% w/v glucose) overnight at 28°C and 220 rpm. Exponentially growing cells were taken to inoculate the YNBG (0.6% w/v glucose) main culture to a starting OD600 of ~ 0.5. The main culture was grown at 28°C and 220 rpm for 17 – 20 h until glucose was fully consumed. After additional 2–4 h, the expression of CPR and CYP under the control of the ICL1 promoter was induced by adding ethanol to a final concentration of 1% v/v. Additional 1% v/v ethanol was added after ~ 8 h and ~ 20 h. After 24 h the cells were harvested by centrifugation and further used for either whole-cell biotransformation assays or microsome isolation.

Isolation of microsomes

Yeast cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2 000 g for 10 min and washed twice with water. 4–6 g of cells were resuspended in ~ 20 ml disruption buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.9, containing protease inhibitor 1 mM PMSF, 5% w/w glycerol, 1 mM EDTA and 2 mM DTT). A crude cell lysate was obtained by mechanical cell disruption using “Merkenschlager homogenization”[86]. After cell disruption cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 10 000 g and 4°C for 10 min. To pellet the microsomal fraction, the supernatant was centrifuged at 100 000 g and 4°C for 1 h. The membrane pellet was resuspended in disruption buffer to ~ 1 mg pellet per mL using a Dounce homogenizer and pestle.

SDS-PAGE and Western blot analyses

Total protein content of the microsomal preparation was determined by Bradford using the biorad protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Germany) before separating the proteins by using the NuPAGE® electrophoresis system (Invitrogen Ltd). Samples containing ~ 20 μg total protein in 15–25 μL loading buffer without reducing agent were incubated at RT for at least 10 min. For separation, a NuPAGE Novex 4-12% Bis-Tris-Gel and MOPS buffer were used. The PageRuler Prestained Protein Ladder (Fermentas) was used as molecular mass calibration standard.

Western blotting was done according to the protocol provided with the MAB-2D6 and WB-3A4 kits (BD Gentest™). On completion of PAGE, the proteins were transferred electrophoretically onto nitrocellulose membrane (GE Healthcare Europe GmbH) in a wet blotting system. Then the membranes were blocked at room temperature overnight with whey powder. The blot was developed by incubation with NBT/BCIP at RT for 5 min.

NADPH cytochrome c reductase (NCR) activity

The cytochrome P450 reductase-catalysed reduction of bovine heart cytochrome c was measured at 550 nm essentially as described[70]. A 300 μM cytochrome c solution in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer, pH 7.5, was mixed with 2 to 80 μg of microsomal protein and made up with Tris–HCl to 650 μL. Fifty μL of 50 mM KCN solution, pH 7.7, were added to mask cytochrome c oxidase activity. Reaction was started by adding 50 μL of 1.5 mM NADPH.

Activities were measured on a UV/Vis DU 800 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, USA) and calculated by using ϵ550nm = 21 mM-1 cm-1 as molar extinction coefficient of cytochrome c.

Quantification of cytochrome P450

CYP concentrations in the isolated microsomes were determined by reduced carbon monoxide spectra[87]. Six to 12 mg of microsomal protein were added to 100 mM sodium phospate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 20% w/w glycerol to an end volume of 2 mL. One hundred μL 200 mM KCN, pH 7.7, were added to mask the spectral interference of cytochrome oxidase (negative absorption at 445 nm) with the CYP peak at 450 nm in the CO difference spectrum[49]. A few grains sodium dithionite were added to reduce the CYP. The mixture was transferred into polystyrene cuvettes (Sarstedt, Germany) and a reference spectrum was recorded from 400 to 500 nm (Specord 205 UV/Visible spectrophotometer, Analytik Jena, Germany). The mixture was then bubbled with carbon monoxide for 60 s, and the spectrum was measured repeatedly several times.

The CYP concentration was calculated using a molar extinction coefficient of ϵ450nm = 91 mM-1 cm-1.

CYP activity of microsomes and whole-cells

In vitro substrate conversion with microsomes was performed essentially as described in[88]. Twenty five μM bufuralol or 2 mM steroid (in DMSO) e.g. progesterone, 17alpha-methyltestosterone or testosterone, and 1 mM NADPH were added to 100 mM possium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and pre-incubated for 2–3 min at 37°C. The reaction was started by adding 20 μL microsomal preparation (0.6 to 0.8 mg total protein) to give a total volume of 200 μL. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 20 min (bufuralol) or 1 h (steroid) while shaking and stopped by adding 20 μL 70% perchloric acid. After 20 min of incubation on ice, prednisolone (in DMSO) was added to a final concentration of 50 μM as internal standard and the mixture centrifuged for 10 min at 16 100 g. One hundred μL supernatant were transferred to a fresh microtiter plate and stored at −20°C.

For whole-cell conversions, yeast cultures were spun at 2000 g for 15 min and the cell pellets were resuspended in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1% w/v glucose to a biomass concentration of ~ 10 g/L CDW. Stock solutions of substrate were added to 200 (eppendorf tube) or 1000 μL (PYREX tubes) of cell suspension. Bufuralol was added as 1 mM stock solution to cell suspension yielding a final concentration of 25 μM. Steroid e.g. progesterone, 17alpha-methyltestosterone or testosterone was added as 100 mM stock solution in DMSO to cell suspension yielding a final concentration of 2 mM. Whole-cell conversion of bufuralol and progesterone was performed at 30°C for 20 – 60 min or several hours while shaking, respectively. Then prednisolone (in DMSO) was added to a final concentration of 50 μM as internal and the reaction was stopped by centrifugation at 16 100 g for 10 min. Supernatants were transferred to fresh reaction tubes and stored at −20°C.

CYP activity in whole-cell biphasic systems

Twenty to fifty mL yeast cultures were centrifuged at 2000 g for 15 min and the pellet was resuspended either in induction media supplemented with 1% v/v ethanol or in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 1% w/v glucose to a biomass concentration of ~ 10 g/L CDW. An equal volume of organic solvent containing 20 mM progesterone, was added to 1000 μL of cell suspension. The biphasic whole-cell conversions were performed in 10 mL PYREX tubes at 30°C while shaking at 320 rpm for several hours. Reactions were stopped at desired time points and the two phases were separated by centrifugation at 16 100 g for 10 min. Two to five hundred μL aqueous and organic phase were transferred to fresh reaction tube or GC-vial, respectively. Prednisolone (in DMSO) was added to a final concentration of 50 μM as internal standard. An equal volume of isopropanol was added to the organic phase, and samples stored at −20°C.

Fed-batch cultivation in bioreactors

Cultivation process was performed in a 5 L stirred tank bioreactor (Biostat C, Sartorius, Germany). The initial batch working volume was 3.5 L (minimal mineral salt medium M with initial 1.5% w/v glucose) and was increased to 4 L at the time of harvesting. The set-points of all control variables were maintained during the entire process, thus, the cultivations were accomplished under the conditions of constant temperature of 28°C, 10 L/min air flow (i.e. without any oxygen enrichment), 1500 rpm agitation, pH 5.5. Automated control of the pH was achieved by using 25% ammonia and 25% phosphoric acid solutions. The process consisted of the biomass growth phase on glucose, i.e. batch and exponential fed-batch cultures, and the expression phase on ethanol with linear feed addition. The cultivation started at time 0 h with a batch (1.5% w/v glucose) during which the pO2 value continuously decreased and the base consumption increased, i.e. no control of the pO2 set-point was applied. After 14–16 h, the pO2 increased rapidly and base consumption stopped due to glucose depletion. At this point the exponential addition of glucose feed solution was started and continued over 10 h according to the function f(t) = 1.05*e0.18*t in grams of glucose per hour. During the subsequent production phase, 0.5% v/v ethanol was maintained for 34–36 h in accordance with the function f(t) = 1.05*e0.002*t in grams of ethanol per hour. Biomass concentration was determined by measuring cell dry weight (CDW) e.g. 2 mL cell suspension was centrifuged at 16 000 g for 10 min. Supernatant was discarded and cell pellet dried at 100°C till constant weight. Cells where harvested by centrifugation at RT and 2 000 g for 15 min and cell pellets were resuspended in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, supplemented with 0.5% w/v glucose as energy source to a desired biomass concentration of ~ 25 g/L CDW.

Resting-cell biotransformation in bioreactor

Biotransformations were performed in a 1.5 L stirred tank bioreactor (DASGIP Parallel Bioreactor Systems, DASGIP BioTools, Germany). The batch working volume was 600 mL (phosphate buffer with glucose and ethanol-induced Y. lipolytica cells as indicated above) for aqueous phase system and 450 mL aqueous phase plus 150 mL organic phase for biphasic systems. The set-points of all control variables were maintained during the entire biotransformation at 30°C, 1 NL/min airflow (i.e. without any oxygen enrichment), 500 rpm agitation and pH 7.4.

The transformations began at 0 h by adding 100 mM progesterone stock solution (in DMSO) to a final concentration of 2 mM or 150 mL water immiscible organic solvent containing 20 mM progesterone. Glucose was provided at a low constant rate of 0.17 g h-1 over the entire biotransformation time of 90 hour. Samples were taken at different time points and the reaction was stopped removing the cells by centrifugation at 16 100 g for 10 min. Aqueous and organic phase samples were withdrawn as described above.

Analysis by HPLC-MS

Bufuralol and metabolites were separated by HPLC (1200 series, Agilent technologies, USA) with a XDB-C18, 1.8 μm, 4.6 x 50 mm column (Agilent technologies, USA) using a gradient based on 10 mM ammonium acetate, pH 5.5, and acetonitrile at a flow rate of 0.9 mL/min. Metabolites were detected using MSD SL detector equipped with an electron spray ionization (ESI) unit (Agilent technologies, USA).

Hydroxylated products were quantified by external calibration using reference metabolites or metabolite derivates.

Steroid metabolites were separated by HPLC (1200 series, Agilent technologies, USA) with a Chromolith RP-C18e, 5 μm, 4.6 x 100 mm column (MERCK KGaA, Germany) using a gradient based on water and acetonitrile, both acidified with 0.1% v/v acetic acid, at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.

Author’s contributions

AB, SM, and AG drafted the outline of the expression experiments. BB, AS and AB drafted the outline of the two-phase system and fermentation experiments. SM helped with the selection of expression vectors, strains and cultivation conditions. AB and GM carried out the experiments and analyzed the data. AB wrote the paper which was later revised and corrected by AG and BB. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.



Yarrowia lipolytica




cytochrome P450 reductase


cytochrome P450




ethyl oleate


cell dry weight


NADPH cytochrome c reductase

ICL1 :

isocitric lyase 1


single copy




  1. 1.

    Danielson PB: The cytochrome P450 superfamily: biochemistry, evolution and drug metabolism in humans. Curr Drug Metab. 2002, 3: 561-597. 10.2174/1389200023337054

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hannemann F, Bichet A, Ewen KM, Bernhardt R: Cytochrome P450 systems–biological variations of electron transport chains. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007, 1770: 330-344. 10.1016/j.bbagen.2006.07.017

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Crespi CL, Miller VP: The use of heterologously expressed drug metabolizing enzymes-state of the art and prospects for the future. Pharmacol Ther. 1999, 84: 121-131. 10.1016/S0163-7258(99)00028-5

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wikvall K: Cytochrome P450 enzymes in the bioactivation of vitamin D to its hormonal form (review). Int J Mol Med. 2001, 7: 201-209.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Spatzenegger M, Jaeger W: Clinical importance of hepatic cytochrome P450 in drug metabolism. Drug Metab Rev. 1995, 27: 397-417. 10.3109/03602539508998329

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Langenbach R, Smith PB, Crespi C: Recombinant DNA approaches for the development of metabolic systems used in in vitro toxicology. Mutat Res. 1992, 277: 251-275. 10.1016/0165-1110(92)90047-D

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Asseffa A, Smith SJ, Nagata K, Gillette J, Gelboin HV, Gonzalez FJ: Novel exogenous heme-dependent expression of mammalian cytochrome P450 using baculovirus. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1989, 274: 481-490. 10.1016/0003-9861(89)90461-X

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Oeda K, Sakaki T, Ohkawa H: Expression of rat liver cytochrome P-450MC cDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA. 1985, 4: 203-210. 10.1089/dna.1985.4.203

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Sakaki T, Shibata M, Yabusaki Y, Murakami H, Ohkawa H: Expression of bovine cytochrome P450c17 cDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA. 8: 409-418.

  10. 10.

    Kalsotra A, Turman CM, Kikuta Y, Strobel HW: Expression and characterization of human cytochrome P450 4F11: Putative role in the metabolism of therapeutic drugs and eicosanoids. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004, 199: 295-304. 10.1016/j.taap.2003.12.033

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Rao KNP, Suman SK, Kiran YR, Kuanr AR, Gupta AK, Bhalla K, Kumar V, Kundu P, Arora K, Soni R: Co-expression of Recombinant Human CYP2C9 with Human Cytochrome P450 Reductase in Protease Deficient S. cerevisiae Strain at a Higher Scale Yields an Enzyme of Higher Specific Activity. Drug Metab Lett. 2010,

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Krynetski EY, Drutsa VL, Kovaleva IE, Luzikov VN: High yield expression of functionally active human liver CYP2D6 in yeast cells. Pharmacogenetics. 1995, 5. 10.-9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Urban P, Cullin C, Pompon D: Maximizing the expression of mammalian cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase activities in yeast cells. Biochimie. 1990, 72: 463-72. 10.1016/0300-9084(90)90070-W

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Renaud JP, Cullin C, Pompon D, Beaune P, Mansuy D: Expression of human liver cytochrome P450 IIIA4 in yeast. A functional model for the hepatic enzyme. Eur J Biochem/FEBS. 1990, 194: 889-96. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19483.x.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Dietrich M, Grundmann L, Kurr K, Valinotto L, Saussele T, Schmid RD, Lange S: Recombinant production of human microsomal cytochrome P450 2D6 in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. ChemBioChem. 2005, 6: 2014-22. 10.1002/cbic.200500200

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kolar NW, Swart AC, Mason JI, Swart P: Functional expression and characterisation of human cytochrome P45017alpha in Pichia pastoris. J Biotechnol. 2007, 129: 635-44. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2007.02.003

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Zehentgruber D, Drăgan C-A, Bureik M, Lütz S: Challenges of steroid biotransformation with human cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP21 using resting cells of recombinant Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biotechnol. 2010, 146: 179-85. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.01.019

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Drăgan C-A, Peters FT, Bour P, Schwaninger AE, Schaan SM, Neunzig I, Widjaja M, Zapp J, Kraemer T, Maurer HH, Bureik M: Convenient gram-scale metabolite synthesis by engineered fission yeast strains expressing functional human P450 systems. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011, 163: 965-80.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Bureik M, Schiffler B, Hiraoka Y, Vogel F, Bernhardt R: Functional expression of human mitochondrial CYP11B2 in fission yeast and identification of a new internal electron transfer protein, etp1. Biochemistry. 2002, 41: 2311-21. 10.1021/bi0157870

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Juretzek T, Mauersberger S, Barth G: Recombinant Haploid or diploid Y. lipolytica cells for the expression of CYP P450 systems. EU Patent number WO0003008A2. 2000,

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Novikova LA, Faletrov YV, Kovaleva IE, Mauersberger S, Luzikov VN, Shkumatov VM: From structure and functions of steroidogenic enzymes to new technologies of gene engineering. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2009, 74: 1482-504. 10.1134/S0006297909130057.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nthangeni MB, Urban P, Pompon D, Smit MS, Nicaud J-M: The use of Yarrowia lipolytica for the expression of human cytochrome P450 CYP1A1. Yeast. 2004, 21: 583-92. 10.1002/yea.1127

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kempf AC, Zanger UM, Meyer UA: Truncated human P450 2D6: expression in Escherichia coli, Ni(2+)-chelate affinity purification, and characterization of solubility and aggregation. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1995, 321: 277-88. 10.1006/abbi.1995.1396

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Schmitz G: Regioselective oxidation of terfenadine with Cunninghamella blakesleeana. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2000. 10. 313-324.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Hesselink PGM, Vliet SV, Vries HD, Witholt B: Optimization of steroid side chain deavage by Mycobacterium sp . in the presence of cydodextrins. Enzyme. 1989, 11: 398-404.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    León R: Whole-cell biocatalysis in organic media. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1998, 23: 483-500. 10.1016/S0141-0229(98)00078-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Salter GJ, Kell DB: Solvent selection for whole cell biotransformations in organic media. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 1995, 15: 139-77. 10.3109/07388559509147404

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Bosetti A, Vanbeilen J, Preusting H, Lageveen R, Witholt B: Production of primary aliphatic alcohols with a recombinant Pseudomonas strain, encoding the alkane hydroxylase enzyme system. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1992, 14: 702-708. 10.1016/0141-0229(92)90109-2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Desmet M, Kingma J, Wynberg H, Witholt B: Pseudomonas oleovorans as a tool in bioconversions of hydrocarbons: growth, morphology and conversion characteristics in different two-phase systems. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1983, 5: 352-360. 10.1016/0141-0229(83)90007-8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    WH L, WC H, Tsai MS: Bioconversion of cholesterol to cholest-4-en-3-one in aqueous/organic solvent two-phase reactors. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 1996, 18 (3): 184-189. 10.1016/0141-0229(95)00091-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bühler B, Schmid A: Process implementation aspects for biocatalytic hydrocarbon oxyfunctionalization. J Biotechnol. 2004, 113: 183-210. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schmid A, Kollmer A, Mathys RG, Witholt B: Developments toward large-scale bacterial bioprocesses in the presence of bulk amounts of organic solvents. Extremophiles. 1998, 2: 249-56. 10.1007/s007920050067

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Sinigaglia M, Lanciotti R, Guerzoni ME: Biochemical and physiological characteristics of Yarrowia lipolytica strains in relation to isolation source. Can J Microbiol. 1994, 40: 54-9. 10.1139/m94-008

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Schmitz C, Goebel I, Wagner S, Vomberg A, Klinner U: Competition between n-alkane-assimilating yeasts and bacteria during colonization of sandy soil microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 54: 126-32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kim TH, Lee JH, Oh YS, Bae KS, Kim SJ: Identification and Characterization of an Oil-degrading yeast Yarrowia lipolytica 180. J Microbiol. 1999, 37: 128-135.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Margesin R, Schinner F: Efficiency of indigenous and inoculated cold-adapted soil microorganisms for biodegradation of diesel oil in alpine soils. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 2660-4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Scioli C, Vollaro L: The use of Yarrowia lipolytica to reduce pollution in olive mill wastewaters. Water Res. 1997, 31: 2520-2524. 10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00083-3.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Barth G, Gaillardin C: Nonconventional yeasts in biotechnology. Yarrowia lipolytica. Edited by: Wolf K. 1996, 313-388. Berlin: Springer,

    Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Waché Y, Aguedo M, Nicaud J-M, Belin J-M: Catabolism of hydroxyacids and biotechnological production of lactones by Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003, 61: 393-404.

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fickers P, Benetti P-H, Waché Y, Marty A, Mauersberger S, Smit MS, Nicaud J-M: Hydrophobic substrate utilisation by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica, and its potential applications. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005, 5: 527-43. 10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.09.004

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Thevenieau F, Beopoulos F, Desfougeres T, Sabirova J, Albertin K, Zinjarde S, Nicaud J-M: Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Edited by: Timmis K. 2010, 1514-1527. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, 2,

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Müller S, Sandal T, Kamp-Hansen P, Dalbøge H: Comparison of expression systems in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hansenula polymorpha, Klyveromyces lactis. Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Yarrowia lipolytica. Cloning of two novel promoters from Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast. 1998, 14: 1267-83. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(1998100)14:14<1267::AID-YEA327>3.0.CO;2-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bourel G, Nicaud J-M, Nthangeni B, Santiago-Gomez P, Belin J-M, Husson F: Fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase of green bell pepper: cloning in Yarrowia lipolytica and biogenesis of volatile aldehydes. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2004, 35: 293-299. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2003.12.014.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Prinz A: Testung des ICL1-Promotors zur funktionellen heterologen Expression von Cytochrom P450 in der Hefe Yarrowia lipolytica. 1995,

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Shiningavamwe A, Obiero G, Albertyn J, Nicaud J-M, Smit M: Heterologous expression of the benzoate para-hydroxylase encoding gene (CYP53B1) from Rhodotorula minuta by Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006, 72: 323-9. 10.1007/s00253-005-0264-7

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gustafsson C, Govindarajan S, Minshull J: Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 346-53. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Le Dall MT, Nicaud JM, Gaillardin C: Multiple-copy integration in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Curr Genet. 1994, 26: 38-44. 10.1007/BF00326302

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Juretzek T, Le Dall M-T, Mauersberger S, Gaillardin C, Barth G, Nicaud J-M: Vectors for gene expression and amplification in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast (Chichester, England). 2001, 18: 97-113. 10.1002/1097-0061(20010130)18:2<97::AID-YEA652>3.0.CO;2-U.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Förster A: Untersuchungen zur heterologen Expression von steroidwandelnden Cytochrom P450 Systemen in der Hefe Y. lipolytica. 2001, Dresden University of Technology, Institute of Microbiology: Master thesis,

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Juretzek T: Entwicklung von Wirts-Vektor-Systemen zur heterologen Expression von Proteinen in der nichtkonventionellen Hefe Yarrowia lipolytica und ihre Anwendung für die Cytochrom P450-katalysierte Stoffumwandlung. 1999, Dresden University of Technology, Institute of Microbiology: PhD thesis,

    Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Förster A, Jacobs K, Juretzek T, Mauersberger S, Barth G: Overexpression of the ICL1 gene changes the product ratio of citric acid production by Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 77: 861-9.

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Renaud JP, Cullin C, Pompon D, Beaune P, Mansuy D: Expression of human liver cytochrome P450 IIIA4 in yeast. A functional model for the hepatic enzyme. Eur J Biochem. 1990, 194: 889-96. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb19483.x

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Tsuzuki D, Takemi C, Yamamoto S, Tamagake K, Imaoka S, Funae Y, Kataoka H, Shinoda S, Narimatsu S: Functional evaluation of cytochrome P450 2D6 with Gly42Arg substitution expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Pharmacogenetics. 2001, 11: 709-18. 10.1097/00008571-200111000-00010

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Truan G, Cullin C, Reisdorf P, Urban P, Pompon D: Enhanced in vivo monooxygenase activities of mammalian P450s in engineered yeast cells producing high levels of NADPH-P450 reductase and human cytochrome b5. Gene. 1993, 125: 49-55. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90744-N

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Guengerich FP, Krauser JA, Johnson WW: Rate-limiting steps in oxidations catalyzed by rabbit cytochrome P450 1A2. Biochemistry. 2004, 43. 10.75-88.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Schiffler B, Bureik M, Reinle W, Müller E-C, Hannemann F, Bernhardt R: The adrenodoxin-like ferredoxin of Schizosaccharomyces pombe mitochondria. J Inorg Biochem. 2004, 98: 1229-37. 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.02.006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Murakami H, Yabusaki Y, Ohkawa H: Expression of rat NADPH-cytochrome P-450 reductase cDNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA. 1986, 5: 1-10. 10.1089/dna.1986.5.1

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Eugster HP, Bärtsch S, Würgler FE, Sengstag C: Functional co-expression of human oxidoreductase and cytochrome P450 1A1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae results in increased EROD activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1992, 185: 641-7. 10.1016/0006-291X(92)91673-E

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Becker T, Breithaupt D, Doelle HW, Fiechter A, Griensven M, Kasper C: Ullmann’s Enzyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Biotechnology. 2007, Germany: Wiley VCH Verlag GmbH & Co KGaA, Weinheim, 7,

    Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kishimoto W, Hiroi T, Shiraishi M, Osada M, Imaoka S, Kominami S, Igarashi T, Funae Y: Cytochrome P450 2D catalyze steroid 21-hydroxylation in the brain. Endocrinology. 2004, 145: 699-705.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Paine MJI, McLaughlin LA, Flanagan JU, Kemp CA, Sutcliffe MJ, Roberts GCK, Wolf CR: Residues glutamate 216 and aspartate 301 are key determinants of substrate specificity and product regioselectivity in cytochrome P450 2D6. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 4021-7. 10.1074/jbc.M209519200

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Shkumatov VM, Frolova NS, Rudaia EV, Faletrov IV, Mauersberger S, Barth G: Range of substrates and steroid bioconversion reactions performed by recombinant microorganisms Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Yarrowia lipolytica expressing cytochrome P450c17. Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol. 2006, 42: 539-46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Shkumatov VM, Usova EV, Frolova NS, Barth G, Mauersberger S: Effect of steroid biosynthesis modificators on the progesterone biotransformation by a recombinant yeasts expressing cytochrome P450c17. Biomedi Khim. 2006, 52: 298-308.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Aguedo M, Waché Y, Mazoyer V, Sequeira-Le Grand A, Belin J-M: Increased electron donor and electron acceptor characters enhance the adhesion between oil droplets and cells of Yarrowia lipolytica as evaluated by a new cytometric assay. J Agric Food Chem. 2003, 51: 3007-11. 10.1021/jf020901m

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Cirigliano MC, Carman GM: Isolation of a bioemulsifier from Candida lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984, 48: 747-50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Mlícková K, Roux E, Athenstaedt K, D’Andrea S, Daum G, Chardot T, Nicaud J-M: Lipid accumulation, lipid body formation, and acyl coenzyme A oxidases of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 3918-24. 10.1128/AEM.70.7.3918-3924.2004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Mauersberger S, Ohkuma M, Schunck W-H, Takagi M: Nonconventional yeasts in biotechnology. Candida maltosa. Edited by: Wolf K. 1996, 411-580. Springer, Berlin,

    Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Schunck W-H, Mauersberger S, Kärgel E, Huth J, Müller H-G: Function and regulation of cytochrome P-450 in alkane-assimilating yeast II. Arch Microbiol. 1987, 147: 245-248. 10.1007/BF00463483.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Schunck W-H, Mauersberger S, Huth J, Riege P, Müller H-G: Function and regulation of cytochrome P-450 in alkane-assimilating yeast I. Arch Microbiol. 1987, 147: 240-244. 10.1007/BF00463482.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Phillips AH, Langdon RG: Hepatic triphosphopyridine nucleotide-cytochrome c reductase: isolation, characterization, and kinetic studies. J Biol Chem. 1962, 237: 2652-60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Coelho MAZ, Amaral PFF, Belo I: Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology. Yarrowia lipolytica - an industrial workhorse. Edited by: Méndes-Vilas A. 2010, 930-944. Badajoz: Formatex Research Center, 2010,

    Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Thevenieau F, Nicaud J-M, Gaillardin C: Yeast Biotechnology: Diversity and Applications. Applications of the Non-Conventional Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Edited by: Satyanarayana T, Kunze G. 2009, 589-613. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 3,

    Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Beopoulos A, Nicaud J-M, Gaillardin C: An overview of lipid metabolism in yeasts and its impact on biotechnological processes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011, 90: 1193-206. 10.1007/s00253-011-3212-8

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Munk V, Volfová O, Dostálek M, Mostecký J, Pecka K: Cultivation of the yeast Candida lipolytica on hydrocarbon. 3. Oxidation and utilization of individual pure hydrocarbons. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 1969, 14: 334-44. 10.1007/BF02872701.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Zhang W, Ni Y, Sun Z, Zheng P, Lin W, Zhu P, Ju N: Biocatalytic synthesis of ethyl (R)-2-hydroxy-4-phenylbutyrate with Candida krusei SW2026: A practical process for high enantiopurity and product titer. Process Biochem. 2009, 44: 1270-1275. 10.1016/j.procbio.2009.07.011.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Mauersberger S, Wang HJ, Gaillardin C, Barth G, Nicaud JM: Insertional mutagenesis in the n-alkane-assimilating yeast Yarrowia lipolytica: generation of tagged mutations in genes involved in hydrophobic substrate utilization. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 5102-9. 10.1128/JB.183.17.5102-5109.2001

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Förster A, Aurich A, Mauersberger S, Barth G: Citric acid production from sucrose using a recombinant strain of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007, 75: 1409-17. 10.1007/s00253-007-0958-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Kruse K, Förster A, Juretzek T: Mauersberger S. 2004, DE100333144, Barth G: Method for the biotechnological production of citric acid by means of a genetically-modified yeast Yarrowia lipolytica,

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Juretzek T, Mauersberger S, Barth G: Rekombinante haploide oder diploide Yarrowia lipolytica Zellen zur funktionellen heterologen Expression von Cytochrom P450 Systemen. 2000, DE19932811,

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Juretzek T, Prinz A, Schunck W-H, Barth G, Mauersberger S: Expressionskassetten zur heterologen Expression von Proteinen in der Hefe Yarrowia lipolytica unter der Kontrolle des regulierbaren Promotors der Isocitratlyase. 1997, DE000019525282A1,

    Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York. 2007, 5300-New York: John Wiley and Sons,

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2001, 999-Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 3,

    Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Lin-Cereghino J, Wong WW, Xiong S, Giang W, Luong LT, Vu J, Johnson SD, Lin-Cereghino GP: Condensed protocol for competent cell preparation and transformation of the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Biotechniques. 2005, 38 (44): 46-48.

    Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Hoffman CS, Winston F: A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene. 1987, 57: 267-72. 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD: Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001, 25: 402-8. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Merkenschlager M, Schlossmann K, Kurz W: A mechanical cell homogenizer and its applicability to biological problems. Biochem Z. 1957, 329: 332-40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Omura T, Sato R: The carbon monoxide-binding pigment of liver microsomes. I. Evidence for its hemoprotein nature. J Biol Chem. 1964, 239: 2370-8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Phillips IR, Shephard EA: Cytochrome P450 Protocols. 2006, 384-New Jersey: Humana Press Inc, 2,

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We are indebted to Mr. Harald Pichler and Mr. Andrea Camattari for carefully reviewing the article and giving many useful suggestions and to Mrs. Anna-Maria Hatzl for excellent technical support. This work was supported by the EU-FP7 project OXYGREEN (EC Grant 212281) and by the Austrian Ministry of Science and Research.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Glieder.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Braun, A., Geier, M., Bühler, B. et al. Steroid biotransformations in biphasic systems with Yarrowia lipolytica expressing human liver cytochrome P450 genes. Microb Cell Fact 11, 106 (2012).

Download citation


  • Yarrowia lipolytica
  • Biphasic sytem
  • Cytochrome P450
  • Steroid
  • Whole-cell bioconversion