Skip to main content

Microbial cell factories based on filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi

Abstract

Background

Advanced DNA synthesis, biosensor assembly, and genetic circuit development in synthetic biology and metabolic engineering have reinforced the application of filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi as promising chassis cells for chemical production, but their industrial application remains a major challenge that needs to be solved.

Results

As important chassis strains, filamentous microorganisms can synthesize important enzymes, chemicals, and niche pharmaceutical products through microbial fermentation. With the aid of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology, filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi can be developed into efficient microbial cell factories through genome engineering, pathway engineering, tolerance engineering, and microbial engineering. Mutant screening and metabolic engineering can be used in filamentous bacteria, filamentous yeasts (Candida glabrata, Candida utilis), and filamentous fungi (Aspergillus sp., Rhizopus sp.) to greatly increase their capacity for chemical production. This review highlights the potential of using biotechnology to further develop filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi as alternative chassis strains.

Conclusions

In this review, we recapitulate the recent progress in the application of filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi as microbial cell factories. Furthermore, emphasis on metabolic engineering strategies involved in cellular tolerance, metabolic engineering, and screening are discussed. Finally, we offer an outlook on advanced techniques for the engineering of filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi.

Background

Microbial cell factories provide an environmentally friendly strategy to produce industrial chemicals, which include food additives, pharmaceutical intermediates, monomers of bio-based materials, dietary amino acids, and four-carbon organic acids [1,2,3]. The optimal chassis can achieve the maximal efficiency of chemical production, while filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi possesses excellent protein secretion ability, and can be fermented on low-cost materials [4,5,6]. Thus, to improve the production performance of filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi, numerous strategies were developed, such as genome engineering, promoter engineering, biosensor engineering, compartment engineering, and quorum sensing systems [7,8,9,10,11].

Although significant breakthroughs were achieved, it is still necessary to understand the physiological mechanisms for expanding the production potential of filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi [12,13,14]. In this review, we comprehensively summarized the cell tolerance, mutant screening, and metabolic engineering applications in filamentous bacteria (Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Pseudomonas mendocina, Actinomycetes), filamentous yeasts (Candida glabrata, Candida utilis), and filamentous fungi (Aspergillus sp., Rhizopus oryzae), and highlighting that bacteria, yeasts, and fungi are a promising chassis for the engineering of filamentous cells (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Filamentous bacteria, yeast, and fungi application in microbial cell factory. The main filamentous microbiology were the filamentous bacteria (Engineered bacteria, natural Actinomycetes), filamentous yeast (Candida glabrata, Candida utilis), and filamentous fungi (Aspergillus. sp, Rhizopus oryzae), which were the important industrial strains for chemical production. The review hightlight the cellular tolerance, metabolic engineering, and mutant screening application in the filamentous application

Application of filamentous bacteria as microbial cell factories

Filamentous bacteria mainly include the engineered filamentous bacteria and natural Actinomycetes. The cell morphology can be regulated into a filamentous type for increasing the synthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates, enzymes, alginate oligosaccharides and other natural products (Table 1).

Table 1 Metabolic engineering application in filamentous bacteria

Application of engineered bacteria as microbial cell factories

Metabolic engineering in engineered filamentous bacteria (Escherichia coli, Corynebacterium glutamicum, Pseudomonas mendocina) mainly involves in cellular divisome, cell wall, and lifespan. The cellular divisome is a protein complex that promotes the formation of Z ring at the division site, which is recognized as the starting point of cell division, and its core protein FtsZ is an important gene for forming filamentous bacteria. Therefore, the ftsZ gene can be repressed, the sulA gene can be overexpressed, and the minCD genes can be overexpressed to disrupt the divisome assembly, which can produce filamentous bacteria [15, 16]. For example, the CRISPRi technique was utilized to repress the ftsZ gene in the E. coli chromosome, which resulted in filamentous E. coli. Then, the biopolyester polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) pathway was overexpressed to form the E. coli ftsZ (1 + 2 + 3 + 5), in which the PHB content and CDW were increased to 61.17% and 10.44 g/L, respectively [17]. Furthermore, the sulA gene was overexpressed to construct the E. coli BL21 (DE3) (pet28asulA, p15apCAB) which is also a filamentous E. coli. As a consequence, the P(3HB) content and CDW of E. coli BL21 (DE3) (pet28asulA, p15apCAB) reached 26.54% and 8.54 g/L, respectively [18]. In addition, the minCD genes can also be used to increase the cell volume, and Halomonas TD08 (pSEVA341-MinCD)-24 as able to accumulate 82.04% wt PHB [19]. The cell wall as the main outer barrier can be weakened to enhance the cellular permeability and elasticity to accumulate more chemicals. The pbp2b gene encoding a penicillin-binding protein was deleted in C. glutamicum to improve the cellular permeability and length. As a result, the 5-aminolevulinic acid titer of C. glutamicum AP4 was increased to 2.53 g/L, representing a 22% improvement [20]. Another example is to regulate the cellular elasticity to form filamentous bacteria. For example, the ftsW gene in the cell wall synthesis pathway was repressed to weaken the cell rigidity and produce longer cells. For example, the engineered E. coli ftsW1 + ftsW4 (pBHR68) which can produce the 93% wt PHB [21] was built using the CRISPRi system. The replicative lifespan is the number of daughter cells produced before aging, which can be manipulated to form the filamentous type. For example, two fluorescence proteins were utilized to locate the old pole and new pole in E. coli. Furthermore, a recombinase A118-based logic gate was constructed to dynamical regulate the replicative lifespan and poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) pathway. Finally, the daughter (rejuvenated cell) and mother (storage cell) were formed in E. coli PLH4, which can accumulate 52% wt poly(lactate-co-3-hydroxybutyrate) [22].

Application of natural Actinomycetes as microbial cell factories

Actinomycetes are a special group of prokaryotes that can form a branching mycelium with conidia, and grow in a mycelium-like shape, mainly to reproduce by spores [8, 11, 23, 24]. Recently, genome mining approaches and gene expression tools have made it possible to access the unexploited potential of Actinomycetes to produce novel natural products [11, 25, 26]. Thus, the mutant screening and metabolic engineering can be utilized to engineer Actinomycetes for enhancing the synthesis of antibiotics and other drugs (Table 1).

Mutant screening in Actinomycetes

Mutant screening is an efficient strategy to enhance the production of chemicals in Actinomycetes, which mainly includes physical, chemical, and iterative mutagenesis [27]. ARTP, 60Co-γ, and UV irradiation are typical strategies for physical mutagenesis, causing changes in molecular structure and altering production performance [28]. For example, ultraviolet (UV) radiation, ethidium bromide (EB), and ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) were used to screen mutants of Streptomyces avermitilis 41445 with increased production of avermectin B1b. The UV 45 (3) strain could synthesize 254.14 mg/L of avermectin B1b, representing a 14.95-fold increase over the parental strain [29]. Chemical mutagenesis, mainly uses EMS, DES, and NTG, which can cause gene mutation, and chromosome breaks. Notably, EMS mutagenesis resulted in higher thrombinase activity than UV mutagenesis in Streptomyces. The maximum specific growth rate and inhibition constant of the mutant was increased by 45.94% and 17.24%, to 0.5457 /h and 155.1 mg/mL, respectively [30]. Iterative mutagenesis has a synergistic effect, and the rational combination of two or more mutagenesis methods has a better effect than single mutagenesis [31]. For example, the chemical mutagen N-methyl-N-nitroso-N’-nitroguanidine (NTG) and physical mutagenesis with ultraviolet (UV) irradiation were used as iterative agents to screen Streptomyces mutants. The best mutant N3 was then further optimized to improve the yield of amphotericin B. The final yield reached 5260 mg/L, representing a 906.9% improvement over the control strain ZJB 20130827 [31].

Metabolic engineering applications in Actinomycetes

Genome engineering, pathway engineering, and genetic circuits can improve the efficiency of microbial cell factories with the aid of metabolic engineering strategies and synthetic biology tools (Table 1) [11]. Genome engineering is based on multi-omics data and genome-wide metabolic models, which can reprogram the metabolic network at the system level [8]. Multi-omics data are needed to understand the regulatory network and metabolic mechanism of a production strain. For example, the transcriptome and proteome are used to describe the synthesis of model antibiotics in Streptomyces coelicolor. A total of 3570 transcriptions start sites and 230 small RNAs were identified and determined to assist the antibiotic discovery and development [32]. In the application of genome-scale metabolic models, the metabolic network reconstruction was used to improve spinosad production. Amino acid supplementation requirements, transhydrogenase regulation, and target genes were identified based on the in silico metabolic network models. Finally, the spinosad titer was improved to 75.32 mg/L, representing an 86% increase compared to the control [33]. Another example is the use of multiplexed site-specific genome engineering for enhancing the pristinamycin II titer to 2.2 g/L in shake flasks [25].

In addition to pathway engineering, metabolic engineering must also account for the precursor supply [9, 10]. An inducible expression system and auto-inducible expression system can be used to maximize the precursor production in streptomycetes [34]. For example, the oxytetracycline responsive repressor OtrR, and its operator were used to construct a concentration-dependent genetic circuit. When oxytetracycline was added in the range of 0.01–4 μM, it induced significant GFP expression, providing valuable potential regulatory elements for streptomycetes [35]. In pathway optimization, promoter engineering, ribosome binding sites, and terminators can be utilized to enhance the pathway flux and deleted byproduct [24]. For example, the methylmalonyl-CoA formation pathway was overexpressed to regulate the PCC pathway, which increased the FK506 titer to 164.92 mg/L, representing a 75% improvement [23]. A similar approach was used to optimize the pristinamycin II (PII) gene cluster in S. pristinaespiralis, which increased the product titer to 1.16 g/L in the 5-L fermenter, representing a 5.26-fold enhancement [36]. Another example is to eliminate the byproduct pathway of ethylmalonyl-CoA in S. venezuelae, which increased the product titer to 5.5 mg/L, representing a tenfold increase [37]. In addition to high-throughput screening, metabolic engineering can also be applied in Actinomycetes [11]. For example, a low dosage of ketoconazole was utilized to isolate the antifungal activity from more than 20,000 extracts [38].

Moreover, the intelligent switches and genomic information could help the development of specific genetic circuits in Actinomycetes, which mainly include quorum sensing systems, biosensor engineering, promoter libraries, and RNA interference. Quorum sensing systems are the most widely used dynamic regulation tools in industrial microorganisms, which can optimize the cellular metabolism and product synthesis. Therefore, the quorum sensing system was also developed in the S. rapamycinicus, and a CRISPRi system was also integrated with this system to construct the EQCi system for rapamycin production. Finally, the three key nodes were downregulated to channel the carbon flux toward rapamycin synthesis via fine-tuned repression through this ermEp-driving EQCi circuit. The highest product titer reached 1.836 g/L, representing a 660% improvement [7]. For biosensor engineering, the microfluidic platform and biosensor engineering were combined to screen erythromycin-producing strains of Saccharopolyspora erythraea, and a 50% improvement of the erythromycin yield was obtained [39]. In addition, promoter libraries can assist the optimization of genetic circuit. For example, the − 10 and − 35 consensus sequences of the ermEp1 promoter were changed in Actinomycetes, resulting in 2% to 319% relative changes of the expression strength [26]. In addition, the antisense RNA interference strategy was utilized to downregulate the expression of UDGs, resulting in a 2.8- to 65.8-fold improvement of editing efficiency in S. lividans 6 [40].

Application of filamentous yeasts as microbial cell factories

Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis, Candida dubliniensis, Candida glabrata and Candida utilis are typical yeasts that grow in the filamentous form, which can form the blastospore and pseudohyphae. Among them, Candida glabrata and Candida utilis possess potential industrial application value for the production of high-value proteins, enzymes, and organic acids (Table 2).

Table 2 Metabolic engineering application in filamentous yeast

Applications of Candida glabrata as microbial cell factories

Although C. glabrata is potentially pathogenic, it can effectively produce organic acids in industrial application [41,42,43]. In addition, C. glabrata has facilitated the cost-effective biotechnological production of various chemicals and materials based on cellular tolerance and metabolic engineering. Further improvement of cellular tolerance, mutant screening, and metabolic engineering can efficiently reinforce the efficiency of microbial cell factories.

Cellular tolerance in Candida glabrata

Tolerance to acid and osmotic stress are the main cellular tolerance traits in the industrial strains of C. glabrata, which can improve the efficiency of microbial cell factories [44, 45]. The tolerance to HCl and l-malate have been identified as important acid-tolerance traits in C. glabrata [46]. For HCl stress, the CgCrz1p transcription factor was deleted and overexpressed to identify the necessity of growth in a pH 2.0 environment. It was found that membrane composition may be regulated by CgCrz1p transcription factor through global transcriptome analysis. In the Cgcrz1/CgCRZ1 strains, the membrane integrity was decreased by 35.1% according to PI staining and membrane fluidity was increased by 13% according to anisotropy values [47]. Similarly, the CgMed16 was knocked out and overexpressed to confirm the importance of maintaining survival under the high titer l-malate stress. Furthermore, the membrane integrity was maintained by regulating CgMed16 and its corresponding transcription factors CgYAP3 and CgUSV1 based on transcriptome analysis. Finally, a dynamic tolerance system was constructed to improve the l-malate titer to 35.5 g/L, representing a 32.5% improvement [48]. Osmotic stress is mainly caused by high salt concentrations in C. glabrata. In a study on stress resistance to 1.5 M NaCl, the interaction of CgHog1 with CgRds2 was confirmed through transcriptome analysis to regulate glycerophospholipid metabolism. Finally, the membrane integrity and cell growth were increased by 12.1% and 10.2%, respectively [49]. In addition, adaptive laboratory evolution can be used to enhance salt tolerance. For example, the S. cerevisiae mutant XCG001 was obtained through adaptive laboratory evolution to growth in the presence of 1.5 M NaCl for 80 days. Further transcriptomic analysis revealed that the ELO2 gene is related to osmotic stress and it was overexpressed to improve the membrane integrity the S. cerevisiae mutant XCG010. Finally, the membrane integrity, cell growth, and cell survival of S. cerevisiae were improved by 24.4, 21.9, and 22.1%, respectively [50].

Mutant screening in Candida glabrata

Mutation breeding can enhance the pathway efficiency to improve the production performance of C. glabrata. For pathway efficiency, cofactor availability, glycolysis flux, and cell tolerance can be increased through pathway regulation based on mutation breeding [51, 52]. The cofactor availability is mainly related to energy metabolism and cofactor supply. The energy metabolism is mainly focused on ATP utilization, which can increase the production of ATP-dependent chemicals. For example, neomycin was used to screen mutants resistant to inhibition of F0F1-ATPase. Thus, a neomycin-resistant mutant N07 was obtained to decrease the F0F1-ATPase and ATP levels by 65% and 24%. Finally, the 42.9% and 34% enhancements in pyruvate productivity and glucose consumption were achieved, respectively [51]. In addition, an ethanol-utilization and respiratory-deficient screening strategy can also be used to redistribute cofactors. For example, the ethanol-utilizing mutant WSH-13 was obtained to enhance the alcohol dehydrogenase activity by 110%. As a result, the NADH/NAD+ ratio was decreased to 0.22, while the glucose consumption rate and pyruvate production were increased by 26.3% and 22.5%, respectively [52, 53]. In addition, ethidium bromide was used to screen respiratory-deficient mutants. As a result, the specific enzyme activity of complex I, complex I + III, complex II + III, and complex IV in mutant RD-18 were decreased to 2.5, 17.8, 26.2, and 14.4 U/mg protein, respectively, resulting in the production of 43.8 g/L pyruvate and consumption of 97.9 g/L glucose [53]. Similarly, a respiratory-deficient mutant was selected through ethidium bromide mutagenesis, due to which the electron transfer chain activity was reduced. Finally, the mutant strain N07 exhibited increases of the pyruvate titer and glucose consumption by 33.4% and 46.9%, respectively [54].

Metabolic pathway engineering in Candida glabrata

Metabolic engineering applications mainly include optimization of energy metabolism, pathway construction, and compartment engineering to increase the efficiency of microbial cell factories (Table 2) [44]. To optimize energy metabolism, the energy utilization was enhanced and the ATP futile cycle was regulated to enhance pyruvate production in C. glabrata. For example, citrate can be added to resist tolerance by promoting energy metabolism, so that the ∆pH can be maintained with a higher ATP level. Finally, the pyruvate titer was increased by 28% and 32.5% at pH 4.5 and 5.0, respectively [45]. Another example is to reduce the ATP waste. The ATP futile cycle system was constructed for regulating the central metabolism to automatically reduce the intracellular ATP content. Thus, the ATP-FCS was optimized and coordinated with other metabolic pathways to increase pyruvate synthesis. Finally, the maximum pyruvate titer, specific production efficiency, and substrate conversion rate of pyruvate were respectively increased by 33.1%, 55.0%, and 74.2% [55].

Novel pathways can be introduced to produce valuable chemicals in C. glabrata. For example, as a pyruvate-producing strain, C. glabrata can be used as a platform to produce l-malate based on the pyruvate pool. To achieve this, the RoMDH and RoPYC enzymes from Rhizopus oryzae NRRL1526 and RoMAE1 Schizosaccharomyces pombe ATCC 26189 were overexpressed from a plasmid to form the T.G-PMS strain. Finally, 8.5 g/L l-malate was obtained, representing a tenfold improvement over the starting strain [56]. Another example is to engineer the urea cycle and purine nucleotide cycle for fumarate production. The engineered strain T.G-ASL(H)-ADSL(L)-SpMAE1 produces the 8.83 g/L fumarate, representing a 67.9-fold increase over the starting strain T.G-212 [57]. Moreover, to enhance the chemical production, modular pathway engineering, scaffold engineering, and oxygen-inducible promoters can enhance pathway efficiency. Modular pathway engineering was utilized to assemble the enzymes as the whole regulation target to optimize the expression strength. For example, the PMFM module, KSSS module, and RPSF module were separated in fumarate production. By combining the synthesized DNA-guided scaffolds and designed sRNA switch, the fumarate titer was increased to 33.13 g/L with a yield of 0.33 g/g [58]. Scaffold engineering can also enhance fumarate production. When a DNA scaffold was used for modular control over synthetic pathways for fumarate production, the engineered strain T.G-4G-S produced 8.51 g/L fumarate with a yield of 0.09 g/g [59]. An oxygen-inducible expression strategy can be established through hypoxia-inducible factor 1 to increase the relative pathway enzyme activity for pyruvate production at the low DO level. Using this strategy, the pyruvate titer reached 53.1 g/L with a 10% DO level in the 5-L fermenter [60].

Compartment engineering and carrier engineering can concentrate the pathway enzymes for increasing the transport of intermediates. Compartment engineering can be utilized to produce acetoin based on the precursor pyruvate. For example, the mALS and mALDC enzymes of the heterologous acetoin pathway were targeted into the mitochondria of C. glabrata to increase the relative enzyme concentration. Finally, 3.26 g/L acetoin was obtained in the strain CmA5, representing a 59.8% improvement compared to the strain without mitochondrial targeting [61]. In another example, the fumarate pathway as targeted to the mitochondria to obtain a 15.76 g/L fumarate yield [62]. Carrier engineering was also used to enhance the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier to transport pyruvate into the mitochondria. Furthermore, plasma membrane expression of MPCs decreases the intracellular pyruvate content. Finally, 3.38- and 3.47-fold increases of the maximum specific growth rate and specific pyruvate production rate were obtained in the engineered strain CGΔura3Sp-MPC2 [63].

Application of Candida utilis as microbial cell factories

Candida utilis can utilize five- or six-carbon sugars, and does not produce alcohol under aerobic conditions. Moreover, it can not only use the waste liquid of the sulfite process, but also use molasses and wood hydrolysate to produce proteins [64, 65]. Further optimization of cellular tolerance and metabolic engineering can assist the development of Candida utilis cell factories.

Cellular tolerance in Candida utilis

Acid stress and oxidative stress can be applied to enhance the production of chemicals in Candida utilis. Glutathione (GSH) production in C. utilis is increased as defense against acid stress through regulating the intracellular ATP ratio and pH [66,67,68]. In another interesting example, transcriptomic and RNA-Seq data were used to identify the molecular mechanism of the acid stress response in C. utilis. The upregulated genes were mainly involved in intracellular ATP supply and metabolism of sulfur-containing substances, which could improve the glutathione production and intracellular organic selenium [69]. For oxidative stress, the activities of catalase (CAT) and GSH reductase (GR) can be enhanced by H2O2 due to the stress-induced adaptive responses in C. utilis. Therefore, different concentrations and times of H2O2 addition were used to improve the glutathione production, which increased the DCW and glutathione titer to 14.24 g/L and 328.4 mg/L in the 7-L fermenter, respectively [70].

Metabolic engineering applications in Candida utilis

Genetic tools, enzyme expression and pathway construction are the main metabolic engineering strategies in C. utilis. In addition to genetic tools, the gene assembly and gene disruption are generally used for genetic manipulation, while the Cre-loxP system for gene disruption is a vital tool to assist the development of C. utilis cell factories [71]. For example, CuURA3 disruption can be achieved using this system, which is a practical recombinant DNA tool [71]. Engineering strategies for enzyme expression mainly include protein expression and protein secretion [72, 73]. For example, the Candida antarctica lipase B was fused to C. utilis Gas1 cell wall protein, which can be used for surface display. As a result, the lipase activity (A405) was increased by 60% [74]. In a different approach, the BIO2 gene was integrated into the chromosome of C. utilis to produce 1.9 mg/L of biotin [72]. In addition, ethanol and isopropanol synthesis pathways were constructed in C. utilis [75, 76]. For example, when the ctfA, ctfB, adc and sadh genes were overexpressed in C. utilis, it produced 0.21 g/L isopropanol. Furthermore, the ACS2 and ERG10 genes were expressed to enhance the availability of acetyl-CoA, and C. utilis TMS411 produced the 9.52 g/L isopropanol in shake flasks, as well as and 27.2 g/L in the bioreactor [75].

Applications of filamentous fungi as microbial cell factories

Aspergillus, Rhizopus, Penicillium, and Mucor are important industrial microorganisms, among which especially Aspergillus sp. and Rhizopus sp. were engineered to synthesize diverse high-valued chemicals (Table 3).

Table 3 Metabolic engineering application in filamentous fungi

Application of Aspergillus sp. as microbial cell factories

Aspergillus sp. (A. niger, A. oryzae, A. terreus, A. flavus) possess natural advantages in the production of enzymes, organic acids, and other high-value products due to their powerful hydrolytic enzyme system and strong protein secretion pathway that enable it to grow and reproduce quickly and adapt to harsh environments [77,78,79,80]. Furthermore, researchers developed strategies for more efficient production based on high protein secretion efficiency, genomic information, and low culture costs[4]. Therefore, mutation screening and metabolic engineering applications can enhance the production efficiency of Aspergillus sp. (Table 3).

Mutant screening in Aspergillus sp.

Strategies for mutant screening mainly include high-throughput breeding, morphology screening, and adaptive laboratory evolution, which is the direct method to increase the efficiency of microbial cell factories [4, 81]. High-throughput breeding was successfully applied to enhance antifungal activity, glucosidase activity, and gluconate production by improving cellular metabolism [78, 80, 82]. For example, resazurin as used as the indicator for high-throughput screening to improve antifungal activity, which was successfully identified in 2.7% of 12,000 microbial extracts [83]. For glucosidase activity, the correlation between the HC value and FPA was used in conjunction with 24-square deep-well microliter plate fermentation. The best strain A. niger H11201 exhibited 38.74 and 63.23% enhancements in the filter paper assay and glucosidase activity, respectively [84]. Another example is the development of a correlation coefficient between CuSO4 data and HPLC data for detecting gluconate. Furthermore, the mutant IV-7-C6 exhibited a gluconate production rate of 0.077 mol/L/h, representing a 32.8% improvement compared to that of parent strain [82]. When applying morphological screening, the percentage of vegetative mycelia and specific surface area are important parameters to regulate the growth and chemical production of A. oryzae. For example, a high percentage of vegetative (nonconducting and white) mycelia was not conducive for l-malate production. By combining other screening parameters with three rounds of combined mutagenesis based on ARTP, 60Co-γ, and NTG, the mutant FMME-S-38 was selected, which exhibited an l-malate titer of 164.9 g/L, with a productivity of 1.14 g/L/h in a 30-L fermenter [85]. Another example is the improvement of the specific surface area for enhancing nutrient absorption. The mutant FMME-218-37 exhibited a specific surface area of mycelia and pellets of 6.82 μm−1 and 6.98 mm−1, representing respective improvements of 65.91% and 20.97% compared to the control. Finally, the l-malate titer and productivity reached 95.2 g/L and 0.57 g/L/h in the 7.5-L fermenter, respectively [86]. Adaptive laboratory evolution can enhance the production of target chemicals and reduce the generation of byproducts. For example, to improve cellulase production, A. niger was cultured in minimal medium with 1% (w/v) a-cellulose and 1.5% (w/v) agar, followed by transcriptomic analysis. Finally, the evolved strain CBS 140717 exhibited a fivefold increase of cellulase production [87]. In an example of adaptive evolution to reduce byproduct generation, A. oryzae 3.042 was evolved to reduce tyrosine crystals. After further fermentation optimization, the amount of tyrosine crystals was reduced to 5.67 mg/g dry material [88].

Metabolic engineering applications in Aspergillus sp.

Metabolic engineering strategies in Aspergillus sp. mainly include CRISPR techniques and metabolic flux regulation, which can increase the efficiency of microbial cell factories [4, 89, 90] (Table 1). CRISPR techniques alow the accurate and easy editing of chromosomal genes for enhancing pathway efficiency [91] For example, the CRISPR/Cas9 technique was developed in A. niger to achieve the modification of genes through single base editing. The deaminase, Cas9 nickase, and uracil glycosylase inhibitor were used to build the CRISPR/Cas9-rAPOBEC1 base editing system. Finally, the pyrG and fwnA genes were inactivated using this system with an efficiency of 47–100% [92]. Based on this, CRISPR was used to identify the transport protein CexA through loss-of-function mutations, and an engineered strain with inducible pmbfA gene expression showed a higher performance than the control strain with constitutive expression. Finally, 109 g/L of citric acid were obtained in the inducible system, representing a threefold improvement compared to the constitutive expression system [79].

In addition to metabolic flux regulation, studies investigated compartment engineering, pathway engineering, and optimization of substrate utilization. For example, compartment engineering can also be used in A. oryzae for synthesizing l-malate, and the glyoxylate bypass for l-malate was enhanced in the mitochondria to improve carbon metabolism. After the incorporation of other metabolic engineering strategies, the l-malate titer, yield, and productivity were increased to 117.2 g/L, 0.9 g/g, and 1.17 g/L/h, respectively [93]. For pathway engineering, the pyc, mdh3, and the l-malate transporter (C4T318) involved in l-malate synthesis were constitutively expressed to construct the A. oryzae strain 2103a-68, which exhibited a threefold increase of specific l-malate production rate to 1.87 mmol/gDCW/h [94]. To redistribute the flux toward l-malate from citrate, the transporter MstC and the key enzymes in the glycolic pathway were overexpressed to form the A. niger strain S1149, which produced an l-malate titer of 201.13 g/L, with a yield of 1.64 mol/mol productivity of 1.05 g/L/h [95]. Furthermore, the Cre-loxP-based genetic system was utilized to delete the oahA gene, as well as insert pyc, mdh3 and C4dicarboxylate transporter gene c4t318. The resulting engineered strain S575 produced up to 201.24 g/L l-malate in a 2-L fermenter, while also producing 28 g/L citrate and 1.87 g/L fumarate [96]. For substrate utilization, the glaA, amylase (amyB), and glucosidase (agdA) genes were overexpressed in A. oryzae to utilize corn starch, while fumarase was used to promote fumarate transformation for l-malate production [97]. In addition, A. terreus is a potential industrial filamentous fungus for food and pharmaceutical biotechnology, which can produce itaconate and various pharmaceutical [5]. The several cryptic biosynthetic gene clusters can be analyzed by genome mining strategy and improved the synthetic capacity and fermentation capability of chemicals [98].

Applications of Rhizopus sp. as microbial cell factories

Rhizopus stolonifera, Rhizopus delemar, Rhizopus microspores, and Rhizopus arrhizus have all been studied in detail, while Rhizopus oryzae is a typical industrial strain [99, 100]. R. oryzae and R. delemar can produce saccharifying enzymes, glucosidase, lactate, fumarate and malate using starch as a cheap substrate [101]. Mutant screening and metabolic engineering can be applied in R. oryzae and R. delemar to construct more efficient cell factories (Table 3).

Mutant screening in Rhizopus sp.

Respiration-deficient, furfural-resistant, and 2-deoxyglucose-resistant mutant can be obtained through mutant screening. To obtain respiration-deficient mutants of R. oryzae, ultraviolet irradiation was used to generate a mutant library of R. oryzae AS 3.3461, and triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) upper medium was utilized to screen the respiration-deficient mutants. In the resulting strain UV-1, the ATP content was decreased by 27.6% and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity was increased by 22.7%. Finally, the l-lactate titer and productivity of mutant UV-1 reached 91.7 g/L and 1.53 g/L/h, respectively [102]. A furfural-resistant mutant was obtained by using different concentrations of furfural to culture R. oryzae HF120. Then, corncob hydrolytes was used as substrate to culture the mutant WHT5, which produced 49.5 g/L fumarate with a productivityof 0.41 g/L/h [103]. One of the mechanisms of 2-deoxyglucose resistance is the enhancement of glycolysis activity, and corresponding mutants can exhibit higher glucose consumption and improved target product synthesis [86]. The mutant R. oryzae DG-3 could initially produce 39.8 g/L fumarate, which was further increased to 44.1 g/L by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation in a 3-L stirred-tank bioreactor [104]. In addition, the contaminated citric acid fermentation medium was used to isolate R. delemar HF121, which produced an l-malate titer of 120 g/L with a productivity of 2 g/L/h [105].

Metabolic engineering of Rhizopus sp.

Metabolic engineering applications in R. oryzae mainly include pathway construction and evolutionalry engineering, which can channel pathway fluxes toward target chemicals [106,107,108]. Heterologous expression for pathway construction have already been developed in R. oryzae. For example, the endogenous pyruvate carboxylase gene pyc5 and exogenous phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase gene ppc1 can be expressed to improve the titer of oxaloacetate, which is the precursor of fumarate. Thile the pyc5 transformant could only produce small amounts fumarate, the ppc1 transformant achieved a fumarate yield to 0.78 g/g, representing a 26% improvement [107]. Evolutionary engineering, which can utilize natural selection to obtain desired traits, can increase enzyme activity and cellular synthetic ability [109]. For example, various crude glycerol concentrations were used to improve the glycerol utilization and tolerance of R. oryzae wild1.22. The evolved strain G80 was selected in medium with 80 g/L crude glycerol, ad reached a fumarate titer, yield and productivity of 17.1 g/L, 0.314 g/g, and 0.192 g/L/h, respectively. Finally, 25.5 g/L fumarate was obtained in 1-L shake flasks, representing a 20.9-fold increase [110]. In addition, cell immobilization can also improve fumarate production [111].

Discussion

Filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi offer an alternative chassis for synthesizing high-valued chemicals, which mainly include enzymes, organic acids, and pharmaceuticals. Current methods can not only utilize these strains for chemical products, but also can endow them with novel functions to reprogram microbial metabolism [112, 113]. Furthermore, metabolic engineering strategies and synthetic biology tools can improve the production performance, which includes the synthetic capacity, growth performance, and cellular adaptation [114, 115]. Therefore, filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi can translate to the microbial industry through intelligent and artificial strategies [116, 117]. Although filamentous organisms provide many advantages to enhance the efficiency of microbial cell factories, there is still a need to study microbial metabolism based on future perspectives (Fig. 2):

  1. (i)

    Novel synthetic biology developments, new metabolic engineering tools, and intelligent manipulation systems are typical strategies for improving the efficiency of microbial cell factories. The new metabolic engineering tools integrate extracellular environment signals (light, temperature, electricity, and ultrasound) and intracellular signals (biosensors, quorum sensing, genetic circuits) [118, 119]. Furthermore, a modular synthetic biology toolkit can be built for filamentous fungi microorgnaisms, which can be more rapidly assembled in a standardized and modular manner [106, 120]. Intelligent manipulations are mainly based on the new metabolic engineering tools for achieving the autonomous dynamic regulation for the synthesis of chemicals, such as N-acetylglucosamine [121], glucaric acid [122], shikimate [123], and other high-value compounds [124].

  2. (ii)

    Sufficient understanding of microbial physiology, organelles, cell morphology, and artificial consortia can allow us to design artificial novel functions to regulate the pathway optimization and cell–cell communication [125,126,127,128]. For example, the sum is greater than the parts in microbial consortia, which can achieve complex functions and produce challenging chemicals [129, 130]. In addition to microbial organelles, artificial phase separation can enhance the pathway enzyme transformation and regulate cell behavior [131, 132]. Cellular morphology can be regulated in the E. coli, yeasts, and Aspergillus sp. through metabolic engineering and biochemical strategies to produce high-valued chemicals [22, 85].

  3. (iii)

    Intelligent high-throughput screening strategies can be applied because filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi often possess long culture time and limited rational screening tools, which limits their development into efficient cell factories [133, 134]. Therefore, the productive performance of filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi should be assisted by intelligent high-throughput screening strategies, which mainly include random assembly-based strategies, microfluidics technology, high-throughput culture systems, electrochemical sensor-based screening, and biosensor-based screening [135, 136]. Furthermore, the application of big-data and artificial intelligence could revolutionize current screening tools and accelerate the translation from cell to industry [137, 138].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Future perspectives on Filamentous bacteria, yeast, and fungi. The novel synthetic biology development, sufficient microbial physiology mechanisms regulation, and intelligent high-throughput screening strategies could assist the development of filamentous microbiology cell factory

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Li W, Shen X, Wang J, Sun X, Yuan Q. Engineering microorganisms for the biosynthesis of dicarboxylic acids. Biotechnol Adv. 2021;48:107710.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi KR, Jang WD, Yang D, Cho JS, Park D, Lee SY. Systems metabolic engineering strategies: integrating systems and synthetic biology with metabolic engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37:817–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burk MJ, Van Dien S. Biotechnology for chemical production: Challenges and opportunities. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:187–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li C, Zhou J, Du G, Chen J, Takahashi S, Liu S. Developing Aspergillus niger as a cell factory for food enzyme production. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;44:107630.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huang X, Men P, Tang S, Lu X. Aspergillus terreus as an industrial filamentous fungus for pharmaceutical biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;69:273–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumhoff ML, Steiger MG, Mattanovich D, Sauer M. Targeting enzymes to the right compartment: metabolic engineering for itaconic acid production by Aspergillus niger. Metab Eng. 2013;19:26–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tian J, Yang G, Gu Y, Sun X, Lu Y, Jiang W. Developing an endogenous quorum-sensing based CRISPRi circuit for autonomous and tunable dynamic regulation of multiple targets in Streptomyces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:8188–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao Q, Tan GY, Xia X, Zhang L. Learn from microbial intelligence for avermectins overproduction. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017;48:251–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kang HS, Kim ES. Recent advances in heterologous expression of natural product biosynthetic gene clusters in Streptomyces hosts. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;69:118–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li S, Li Z, Pang S, Xiang W, Wang W. Coordinating precursor supply for pharmaceutical polyketide production in Streptomyces. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;69:26–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Palazzotto E, Tong Y, Lee SY, Weber T. Synthetic biology and metabolic engineering of actinomycetes for natural product discovery. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:107366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiss R, Guebitz GM, Pellis A, Nyanhongo GS. Harnessing the power of enzymes for tailoring and valorizing lignin. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:1215–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Y, Liu L, Li J, Du G, Chen J. Synthetic biology toolbox and chassis development in Bacillus subtilis. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37:548–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Faust K. Microbial consortium design benefits from metabolic modeling. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37:123–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mlea Z. Manipulating the bacterial cell cycle and cell size by titrating the expression of ribonucleotide reductase. MBio. 2017;16:38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bisicchia P, Arumugam S, Schwille P, Sherratt D. MinC, MinD, and MinE drive counter-oscillation of early-cell-division proteins prior to Escherichia coli septum formation. MBio. 2013;4:e00856-e913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elhadi D, Lv L, Jiang XR, Wu H, Chen GQ. CRISPRi engineering E. coli for morphology diversification. Metab Eng. 2016;38:358–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y, Wu H, Jiang X, Chen GQ. Engineering Escherichia coli for enhanced production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate) in larger cellular space. Metab Eng. 2014;25:183–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tan D, Wu Q, Chen JC, Chen GQ. Engineering Halomonas TD01 for the low-cost production of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Metab Eng. 2014;26:34–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng L, Zhang Y, Fu J, Mao Y, Chen T, Zhao X, Wang Z. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for efficient production of 5-aminolevulinic acid. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113:1284–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang XC, Guo Y, Liu X, Chen XG, Wu Q, Chen GQ. Engineering cell wall synthesis mechanism for enhanced PHB accumulation in E. coli. Metab Eng. 2018;45:32–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo L, Diao W, Gao C, Hu G, Ding Q, Ye C, Chen X, Liu J, Liu L. Engineering Escherichia coli lifespan for enhancing chemical production. Nat Catal. 2020;3:307–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mo S, Lee SK, Jin YY, Oh CH, Suh JW. Application of a combined approach involving classical random mutagenesis and metabolic engineering to enhance FK506 production in Streptomyces sp. RM7011. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:3053–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang YY, Zhang XS, Luo HD, Ren NN, Jiang XH, Jiang H, Li YQ. Characterization of discrete phosphopantetheinyl transferases in Streptomyces tsukubaensis L19 unveils a complicate phosphopantetheinylation network. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24255.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li L, Zheng G, Chen J, Ge M, Jiang W, Lu Y. Multiplexed site-specific genome engineering for overproducing bioactive secondary metabolites in actinomycetes. Metab Eng. 2017;40:80–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Siegl T, Tokovenko B, Myronovskyi M, Luzhetskyy A. Design, construction and characterisation of a synthetic promoter library for fine-tuned gene expression in Actinomycetes. Metab Eng. 2013;19:98–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu Z, Ji L, Tang W, Guo L, Gao C, Chen X, Liu J, Hu G, Liu L. Metabolic engineering of Streptomyces to enhance the synthesis of valuable natural products. Engineering Microbiology. 2022;2: 100022.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Qin L-L, Zhou B, Ding W, Ma Z. Bioactive metabolites from marine-derived Streptomyces sp. A68 and its Rifampicin resistant mutant strain R-M1. Phytochem L. 2018;23:46–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Siddique S, Syed Q, Adnan A, Qureshi FA. Production and screening of high yield avermectin B1b mutant of Streptomyces avermitilis 41445 through mutagenesis. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7:8626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Naveena B, Gopinath KP, Sakthiselvan P, Partha N. Enhanced production of thrombinase by Streptomyces venezuelae: kinetic studies on growth and enzyme production of mutant strain. Bioresour Technol. 2012;111:417–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang B, Zhang HD, Zhou YT, Huang K, Liu ZQ, Zheng YG. Improvement of amphotericin B production by a newly isolated Streptomyces nodosus mutant. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2018;65:188–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Jeong Y, Kim JN, Kim MW, Bucca G, Cho S, Yoon YJ, Kim BG, Roe JH, Kim SC, Smith CP, Cho BK. The dynamic transcriptional and translational landscape of the model antibiotic producer Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nat Commun. 2016;7:11605.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang X, Zhang C, Wang M, Lu W. Genome-scale metabolic network reconstruction of Saccharopolyspora spinosa for Spinosad Production improvement. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13(1):1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li S, Wang J, Xiang W, Yang K, Li Z, Wang W. An autoregulated fine-tuning strategy for titer improvement of secondary metabolites using native promoters in Streptomyces. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7:522–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang W, Yang T, Li Y, Li S, Yin S, Styles K, Corre C, Yang K. Development of a synthetic oxytetracycline-inducible expression system for Streptomycetes using de novo characterized genetic parts. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5:765–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Li L, Zhao Y, Ruan L, Yang S, Ge M, Jiang W, Lu Y. A stepwise increase in pristinamycin II biosynthesis by Streptomyces pristinaespiralis through combinatorial metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2015;29:12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jung WS, Kim E, Yoo YJ, Ban YH, Kim EJ, Yoon YJ. Characterization and engineering of the ethylmalonyl-CoA pathway towards the improved heterologous production of polyketides in Streptomyces venezuelae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:3701–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lixin Zhang KY, Zhang Yu, Huang R, Bian J, Zheng C, Sun H, Chen Z, Sun N, An R, Min F, Zhao W, Zhuo Y, You J, Song Y, Zhenyan Yu, Liu Z, Yang K, Gao H, Dai H, Zhang X, Wang J, Chengzhang Fu, Pei G, Liu J, Zhang Si, Goodfellow M, Jiang Y, Kuai J, Zhou G, Chen X. High-throughput synergy screening identifies microbial metabolites as combination agents for the treatment of fungal infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;104:4606–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hua E, Zhang Y, Yun K, Pan W, Liu Y, Li S, Wang Y, Tu R, Wang M. Whole-cell biosensor and producer co-cultivation-based microfludic platform for screening Saccharopolyspora erythraea with hyper erythromycin production. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;11:2697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang Y, Yun K, Huang H, Tu R, Hua E, Wang M. Antisense RNA interference-enhanced CRISPR/Cas9 base editing method for improving base editing efficiency in Streptomyces lividans 66. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10:1053–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Li S, Chen X, Liu L, Chen J. Pyruvate production in Candida glabrata: manipulation and optimization of physiological function. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;36:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li S, Xu N, Liu L, Chen J. Engineering of carboligase activity reaction in Candida glabrata for acetoin production. Metab Eng. 2014;22:32–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Iraqui I, Garcia-Sanchez S, Aubert S, Dromer F, Ghigo JM, d’Enfert C, Janbon G. The Yak1p kinase controls expression of adhesins and biofilm formation in Candida glabrata in a Sir4p-dependent pathway. Mol Microbiol. 2005;55:1259–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Chen X, Song W, Gao C, Qin W, Luo Q, Liu J, Liu L. Fumarate production by Torulopsis glabrata: Engineering heterologous fumarase expression and improving acid tolerance. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0164141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhou J, Liu L, Chen J. Improved ATP supply enhances acid tolerance of Candida glabrata during pyruvic acid production. J Appl Microbiol. 2011;110:44–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Qi YL, Liu H, Chen XL, Liu LM. Engineering microbial membranes to increase stress tolerance of industrial strains. Metab Eng. 2019;53:24–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yan D, Lin X, Qi Y, Liu H, Chen X, Liu L, Chen J. Crz1p regulates pH homeostasis in Candida glabrata by altering membrane lipid composition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:6920–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Liang G, Zhou P, Lu J, Liu H, Qi Y, Gao C, Guo L, Hu G, Chen X, Liu L. Dynamic regulation of membrane integrity to enhance L-malate stress tolerance in Candida glabrata. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.27903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu C, Zhang J, Zhu G, Yao R, Liu L. CgHog1-mediated CgRds2 phosphorylation alters glycerophospholipid composition to coordinate osmotic stress in Candida glabrata. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019;85:e02822–12818.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Guoxing Zhu NY. Qiuling Luo, Jia Liu, Xiulai Chen, Liming Liu, Jianrong Wu: Enhancement of sphingolipid synthesis improves osmotic tolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2020;8:e02911-02919.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Liu LM, Li Y, Du GC, Chen J. Increasing glycolytic flux in Torulopsis glabrata by redirecting ATP production from oxidative phosphorylation to substrate-level phosphorylation. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;100:1043–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu L, Li Y, Shi Z, Du G, Chen J. Enhancement of pyruvate productivity in Torulopsis glabrata: Increase of NAD+ availability. J Biotechnol. 2006;126:173–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Liu L, Li Y, Du G, Chen J. Redirection of the NADH oxidation pathway in Torulopsis glabrata leads to an enhanced pyruvate production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;72:377–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Liu L, Li Y, Li H, Chen J. Significant increase of glycolytic flux in Torulopsis glabrata by inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6:1117–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Luo Z, Zeng W, Du G, Chen J, Zhou J. Enhanced pyruvate production in Candida glabrata by engineering ATP futile cycle system. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8:787–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Chen X, Xu G, Xu N, Zou W, Zhu P, Liu L, Chen J. Metabolic engineering of Torulopsis glabrata for malate production. Metab Eng. 2013;19:10–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Chen X, Wu J, Song W, Zhang L, Wang H, Liu L. Fumaric acid production by Torulopsis glabrata: engineering the urea cycle and the purine nucleotide cycle. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:156–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Chen X, Zhu P, Liu L. Modular optimization of multi-gene pathways for fumarate production. Metab Eng. 2016;33:76–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Chen X, Li Y, Tong T, Liu L. Spatial modulation and cofactor engineering of key pathway enzymes for fumarate production in Candida glabrata. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116:622–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Luo Z, Zeng W, Du G, Chen J, Zhou J. Enhancement of pyruvic acid production in Candida glabrata by engineering hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Bioresour Technol. 2020;295:122248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Li SB, Liu LM, Chen J. Compartmentalizing metabolic pathway in Candida glabrata for acetoin production. Metab Eng. 2015;28:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Chen X, Dong X, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Liu L. Mitochondrial engineering of the TCA cycle for fumarate production. Metab Eng. 2015;31:62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Luo Z, Liu S, Du G, Xu S, Zhou J, Chen J. Enhanced pyruvate production in Candida glabrata by carrier engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115:473–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Buerth C, Tielker D, Ernst JF. Candida utilis and Cyberlindnera (Pichia) jadinii: yeast relatives with expanding applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:6981–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Liang G-B, Du G-C, Chen J. A novel strategy of enhanced glutathione production in high cell density cultivation of Candida utilis—Cysteine addition combined with dissolved oxygen controlling. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2008;42:284–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang D-H, Zhang J-L, Dong Y-Y, Wei G-Y, Qi B. Glutathione is involved in physiological response of Candida utilis to acid stress. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:10669–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Liang G, Du G, Chen J. Enhanced glutathione production by using low-pH stress coupled with cysteine addition in the treatment of high cell density culture of Candida utilis. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008;46:507–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Nie W, Wei G, Du G, Li Y, Chen J. Enhanced intracellular glutathione synthesis and excretion capability of Candida utilis by using a low pH-stress strategy. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2005;40:378–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhang GC, Wang DH, Wang DH, Wei GY. The mechanism of improved intracellular organic selenium and glutathione contents in selenium-enriched Candida utilis by acid stress. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101:2131–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Liang G, Liao X, Du G, Chen J. A new strategy to enhance glutathione production by multiple H2O2 induced oxidative stresses in Candida utilis. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100:350–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Ikushima S, Fujii T, Kobayashi O. Efficient gene disruption in the high-ploidy yeast Candida utilis using the Cre-loxP system. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73:879–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Hong Y-R, Chen Y-L, Farh L, Yang W-J, Liao C-H, Shiuan D. Recombinant Candida utilis for the production of biotin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;71:211–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Kunigo M, Buerth C, Ernst JF. Secreted xylanase XynA mediates utilization of xylan as sole carbon source in Candida utilis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:8055–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Kunigo M, Buerth C, Tielker D, Ernst JF. Heterologous protein secretion by Candida utilis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:7357–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Tamakawa H, Mita T, Yokoyama A, Ikushima S, Yoshida S. Metabolic engineering of Candida utilis for isopropanol production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:6231–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Tamakawa H, Ikushima S, Yoshida S. Ethanol production from xylose by a recombinant Candida utilis strain expressing protein-engineered xylose reductase and xylitol dehydrogenase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2011;75:1994–2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Kovilein A, Umpfenbach J, Ochsenreither K. Acetate as substrate for L-malic acid production with Aspergillus oryzae DSM 1863. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Zhao C, Fraczek MG, Dineen L, Lebedinec R, Macheleidt J, Heinekamp T, Delneri D, Bowyer P, Brakhage AA, Bromley M. High-throughput gene replacement in Aspergillus fumigatus. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2019;54:e88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Steiger MG, Rassinger A, Mattanovich D, Sauer M. Engineering of the citrate exporter protein enables high citric acid production in Aspergillus niger. Metab Eng. 2019;52:224–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Chen GG, Li W, Zhang YK, Qin YL, Wu KY, Liang ZQ. A high-throughput method for screening of Aspergillus niger mutants with high transglycosylation activity by detecting non-fermentable reducing sugar. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27:1519–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Narisetty V, Prabhu AA, Al-Jaradah K, Gopaliya D, Hossain AH, Kumar Khare S, Punt PJ, Kumar V. Microbial itaconic acid production from starchy food waste by newly isolated thermotolerant Aspergillus terreus strain. Bioresour Technol. 2021;337: 125426.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Shi F, Tan J, Chu J, Wang Y, Zhuang Y, Zhang S. A qualitative and quantitative high-throughput assay for screening of gluconate high-yield strains by Aspergillus niger. J Microbiol Methods. 2015;109:134–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Monteiro MC, de la Cruz M, Cantizani J, Moreno C, Tormo JR, Mellado E, De Lucas JR, Asensio F, Valiante V, Brakhage AA, et al. A new approach to drug discovery: high-throughput screening of microbial natural extracts against Aspergillus fumigatus using resazurin. J Biomol Screen. 2012;17:542–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Jiang B-L, Wang S-Y, Wang Y-C, Chen J-H, Li W-J, Liu J, Hu W, Xiao G-Q, Dong M-Y, Xu F-Q. A high-throughput screening method for breeding Aspergillus niger with 12C6+ ion beam-improved cellulase. Nucleic Sci Tech. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0157-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ji L, Wang J, Luo Q, Ding Q, Tang W, Chen X, Liu L. Enhancing L-malate production of Aspergillus oryzae by nitrogen regulation strategy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105:3101–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Ding Q, Luo Q, Zhou J, Chen X, Liu L. Enhancing L-malate production of Aspergillus oryzae FMME218-37 by improving inorganic nitrogen utilization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:8739–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Patyshakuliyeva A, Arentshorst M, Allijn IE, Ram AF, de Vries RP, Gelber IB. Improving cellulase production by Aspergillus niger using adaptive evolution. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38:969–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Niu C, Min S, Jia Y, Zhao J, Yang Y, Liu C, Zheng F, Li Q. Adaptive evolution of Aspergillus oryzae3.042 strain and process optimization to reduce the formation of tyrosine crystals in broad bean paste. J Food Biochem. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Brown SH, Bashkirova L, Berka R, Chandler T, Doty T, McCall K, McCulloch M, McFarland S, Thompson S, Yaver D, Berry A. Metabolic engineering of Aspergillus oryzae NRRL 3488 for increased production of L-malic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:8903–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Hevekerl A, Kuenz A, Vorlop KD. Filamentous fungi in microtiter plates-an easy way to optimize itaconic acid production with Aspergillus terreus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:6983–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Nishida K, Kondo A. CRISPR-derived genome editing technologies for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2021;63:141–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Huang L, Dong H, Zheng J, Wang B, Pan L. Highly efficient single base editing in Aspergillus niger with CRISPR/Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion. Microbiol Res. 2019;223–225:44–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Liu J, Li J, Liu Y, Shin HD, Ledesma-Amaro R, Du G, Chen J, Liu L. Synergistic rewiring of carbon metabolism and redox metabolism in cytoplasm and mitochondria of Aspergillus oryzae for increased L-malate production. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7:2139–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Knuf C, Nookaew I, Remmers I, Khoomrung S, Brown S, Berry A, Nielsen J. Physiological characterization of the high malic acid-producing Aspergillus oryzae strain 2103a–68. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:3517–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Xu Y, Zhou Y, Cao W, Liu H. Improved production of malic acid in Aspergillus niger by abolishing citric acid accumulation and enhancing glycolytic flux. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9:1418–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Xu Y, Shan L, Zhou Y, Xie Z, Ball AS, Cao W, Liu H. Development of a Cre-loxP-based genetic system in Aspergillus niger ATCC1015 and its application to construction of efficient organic acid-producing cell factories. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:8105–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Liu J, Li J, Shin HD, Du G, Chen J, Liu L. Metabolic engineering of Aspergillus oryzae for efficient production of L-malate directly from corn starch. J Biotechnol. 2017;262:40–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Huang X, Tang S, Zheng L, Teng Y, Yang Y, Zhu J, Lu X. Construction of an efficient and robust Aspergillus terreus cell dactory for Monacolin J production. ACS Synth Biol. 2019;8:818–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Wang G, Huang D, Li Y, Wen J, Jia X. A metabolic-based approach to improve xylose utilization for fumaric acid production from acid pretreated wheat bran by Rhizopus oryzae. Bioresour Technol. 2015;180:119–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Meussen BJ, de Graaff LH, Sanders JP, Weusthuis RA. Metabolic engineering of Rhizopus oryzae for the production of platform chemicals. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;94:875–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Zhou Z, Du G, Hua Z, Zhou J, Chen J. Optimization of fumaric acid production by Rhizopus delemar based on the morphology formation. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:9345–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Shu C, Guo C, Luo S, Jiang S, Zheng Z. Influence of altered NADH metabolic pathway on the respiratory-deficient mutant of Rhizopus oryzae and its L-lactate production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;176:2053–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Wu X, Liu Q, Deng Y, Chen X, Zheng Z, Jiang S, Li X. Production of fumaric acid by bioconversion of corncob hydrolytes using an improved Rhizopus oryzae strain. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2018;184:553–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Deng Y, Li S, Xu Q, Gao M, Huang H. Production of fumaric acid by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of starchy materials with 2-deoxyglucose-resistant mutant strains of Rhizopus oryzae. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107:363–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Li X, Liu Y, Yang Y, Zhang H, Wang H, Wu Y, Zhang M, Sun T, Cheng J, Wu X, et al. High levels of malic acid production by the bioconversion of corn straw hydrolyte using an isolated Rhizopus delemar strain. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2014;19:478–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  106. Mozsik L, Pohl C, Meyer V, Bovenberg RAL, Nygard Y, Driessen AJM. Modular synthetic biology toolkit for filamentous fungi. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10:2850–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Zhang B, Skory CD, Yang ST. Metabolic engineering of Rhizopus oryzae: effects of overexpressing pyc and pepc genes on fumaric acid biosynthesis from glucose. Metab Eng. 2012;14:512–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Xu S, Zhou Z, Du G, Zhou J, Chen J. Efficient transformation of Rhizopus delemar by electroporation of germinated spores. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;103:58–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Wu Y, Jameel A, Xing X-H, Zhang C. Advanced strategies and tools to facilitate and streamline microbial adaptive laboratory evolution. Trends Biotechnol. 2021;40:38–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Huang D, Wang R, Du W, Wang G, Xia M. Activation of glycerol metabolic pathway by evolutionary engineering of Rhizopus oryzae to strengthen the fumaric acid biosynthesis from crude glycerol. Bioresour Technol. 2015;196:263–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Liu H, Zhao S, Jin Y, Yue X, Deng L, Wang F, Tan T. Production of fumaric acid by immobilized Rhizopus arrhizus RH 7–13-9# on loofah fiber in a stirred-tank reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2017;244:929–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Alam K, Hao J, Zhang Y, Li A. Synthetic biology-inspired strategies and tools for engineering of microbial natural product biosynthetic pathways. Biotechnol Adv. 2021;49:107759.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Wei Z, Xu Y, Xu Q, Cao W, Huang H, Liu H. Microbial biosynthesis of L-malic acid and related metabolic engineering strategies: Advances and prospects. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;29:765685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Ding Q, Diao W, W., Gao C, Chen X, L., Liu L, M. Microbial cell engineering to improve cellular synthetic capacity. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;45:107649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Hammer SK, Avalos JL. Harnessing yeast organelles for metabolic engineering. Nat Chem Biol. 2017;13:823–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Chen XL, Liu LM. Gene circuits for dynamically regulating metabolism. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36:751–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Abbasi MN, Fu J, Bian X, Wang H, Zhang Y, Li A. Recombineering for genetic engineering of natural product biosynthetic pathways. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:715–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Cui S, Lv X, Xu X, Chen T, Zhang H, Liu Y, Li J, Du G, Ledesma-Amaro R, Liu L. Multilayer genetic circuits for dynamic regulation of metabolic pathways. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10:1587–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. Ko YS, Kim JW, Lee JA, Han T, Kim GB, Park JE, Lee SY. Tools and strategies of systems metabolic engineering for the development of microbial cell factories for chemical production. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49:4615–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Deng H, Bai Y, Fan TP, Zheng X, Cai Y. Advanced strategy for metabolite exploration in filamentous fungi. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2020;40:180–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Wu YK, Chen T, Liu YF, Tian R, Lv XQ, Li JH, Du GC, Chen J, Ledesma-Amaro R, Liu L. Design of a programmable biosensor-CRISPRi genetic circuits for dynamic and autonomous dual-control of metabolic flux in Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;48:996–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Xu X, Li X, Liu Y, Zhu Y, Li J, Du G, Chen J, Ledesma-Amaro R, Liu L. Pyruvate-responsive genetic circuits for dynamic control of central metabolism. Nat Chem Biol. 2020;16:1260–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Gao C, Guo L, Hu G, Liu J, Chen X, Xia X, Liu L. Engineering a CRISPRi circuit for autonomous control of metabolic flux in Escherichia coli. ACS Synth Biol. 2021;10:2661–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Wang Z, Cirino PC. New and improved tools and methods for enhanced biosynthesis of natural products in microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;42:159–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. Qian X, Chen L, Sui Y, Chen C, Zhang W, Zhou J, Dong W, Jiang M, Xin F, Ochsenreither K. Biotechnological potential and applications of microbial consortia. Biotechnol Adv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Wang Y, Ling C, Chen Y, Jiang X, Chen GQ. Microbial engineering for easy downstream processing. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:115–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Liu H, Qi YL, Zhou P, Ye C, Gao C, Chen XL, Liu LM. Microbial physiological engineering increases the efficiency of microbial cell factories. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2021;41:339–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Kerfeld CA, Sutter M. Engineered bacterial microcompartments: apps for programming metabolism. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;65:225–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Jones JA, Wang X. Use of bacterial co-cultures for the efficient production of chemicals. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;53:33–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Zaramela LS, Moyne O, Kumar M, Zuniga C, Tibocha-Bonilla JD, Zengler K. The sum is greater than the parts: exploiting microbial communities to achieve complex functions. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;67:149–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Garabedian MV, Wang W, Dabdoub JB, Tong M, Caldwell RM, Benman W, Schuster BS, Deiters A, Good MC. Designer membraneless organelles sequester native factors for control of cell behavior. Nat Chem Biol. 2021;17:998–1007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Zhao EM, Suek N, Wilson MZ, Dine E, Pannucci NL, Gitai Z, Avalos JL, Toettcher JE. Light-based control of metabolic flux through assembly of synthetic organelles. Nat Chem Biol. 2019;15:589–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Veiter L, Rajamanickam V, Herwig C. The filamentous fungal pellet-relationship between morphology and productivity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:2997–3006.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Chroumpi T, Makela MR, de Vries RP. Engineering of primary carbon metabolism in filamentous fungi. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;43:107551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. Zeng W, Guo L, Xu S, Chen J, Zhou J. High-throughput screening technology in industrial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38:888–906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Bowman EK, Alper HS. Microdroplet-assisted screening of biomolecule production for metabolic engineering applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;38:701–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Boyd MA, Kamat NP. Designing artificial cells towards a new generation of biosensors. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;39:927–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Xie MQ, Fussenegger M. Designing cell function: assembly of synthetic gene circuits for cell biology applications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:507–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. Dang L, Liu J, Wang C, Liu H, Wen J. Enhancement of rapamycin production by metabolic engineering in Streptomyces hygroscopicus based on genome-scale metabolic model. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44:259–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  140. Qi Y, Liu H, Yu J, Chen X, Liu L. Med15B regulates acid stress response and tolerance in Candida glabrata by altering membrane lipid composition. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83(18):e01128-e1217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  141. Ikushima S, Fujii T, Kobayashi O, Yoshida S, Yoshida A. Genetic engineering of Candida utilis yeast for efficient production of L-lactic acid. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2009;73(8):1818–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Huang X, Chen M, Lu X, Li Y, Li X, Li JJ. Direct production of itaconic acid from liquefied corn starch by genetically engineered Aspergillus terreus. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Liu J, Xie Z, Shin HD, Li J, Du G, Chen J, Liu L. Rewiring the reductive tricarboxylic acid pathway and L-malate transport pathway of Aspergillus oryzae for overproduction of L-malate. J Biotechnol. 2017;253:1–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Yin X, Shin HD, Li J, Du G, Liu L, Chen J. Pgas, a low-pH-induced promoter, as a tool for dynamic control of gene expression for metabolic engineering of Aspergillus niger. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e03222–e03216.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Chen XL, Zhou J, Ding Q, Luo QL, Liu LM. Morphology engineering of Aspergillus oryzae for L-malate production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2019;116:2662–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Liu Y, Lv C, Xu Q, Li S, Huang H, Ouyang P. Enhanced acid tolerance of Rhizopus oryzae during fumaric acid production. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2015;38:323–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  147. Skory CD. Lactic acid production by Rhizopus oryzae transformants with modified lactate dehydrogenase activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64:237–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funding this work is financially supported by Anhui Province Scientific Research Planning Project (2022AH050110).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Q. D. and C. Y. conceived and designed the manuscript. Q. D. provided and analyzed literature. Q. D. wrote and revised the manuscript. Q. D. and C. Y. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Ye.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

No applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have participated in the review study and manuscript preparation.

Competing interests

The authors hereby declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, Q., Ye, C. Microbial cell factories based on filamentous bacteria, yeasts, and fungi. Microb Cell Fact 22, 20 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02025-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02025-1

Keywords