Skip to main content

A novel method for transforming Geobacillus kaustophilus with a chromosomal segment of Bacillus subtilis transferred via pLS20-dependent conjugation

Abstract

Background

Geobacillus kaustophilus is a thermophilic Gram-positive bacterium. Methods for its transformation are still under development. Earlier studies have demonstrated that pLS20catΔoriT mobilized the resident mobile plasmids from Bacillus subtilis to G. kaustophilus and transferred long segments of chromosome from one cell to another between B. subtilis.

Results

In this study, we applied mobilization of the B. subtilis chromosome mediated by pLS20catΔoriT to transform G. kaustophilus. We constructed a gene cassette to be integrated into G. kaustophilus and designed it within the B. subtilis chromosome. The pLS20catΔoriT-mediated conjugation successfully transferred the gene cassette from the B. subtilis chromosome into the G. kaustophilus allowing for the desired genetic transformation.

Conclusions

This transformation approach described here will provide a new tool to facilitate the flexible genetic manipulation of G. kaustophilus.

Background

Bacteria proliferate by asexual cell division, and therefore their diversity in genetic traits is likely due to spontaneous mutation. However, bacteria can enhance their genetic diversity through unique mechanisms known as horizontal gene transfer [1]. Horizontal gene transfer takes three distinct mechanistic forms: transformation, transduction, and conjugation. Plasmids are extrachromosomal DNA molecules that play a crucial role in conjugation. Conjugative plasmids encode various elements required for conjugation, including enzymes such as relaxase, recruiting its partner proteins to form a nucleoprotein complex named relaxosome, various proteins composing translocation apparatus, and a DNA stretch with the oriT sequence where the conjugation-specific replication initiates. During conjugation, a donor cell attaches to a suitable recipient cell. The relaxase enzyme attaches to the 5´-end of the single-stranded DNA to form a strand-specific nick at the oriT site. It results in the formation of relaxosome within the donor cell. Then, the membrane-bound translocation apparatus synthesized on the surface of the donor cell recruits the relaxosome. The relaxase enzyme navigates the single-stranded DNA transferred through the translocation apparatus, and the transferred DNA is converted into double-stranded DNA in the recipient cell. On the other hand, non-conjugative plasmids do not encode any of the elements mentioned above and thus cannot transfer themselves [2]. However, when a non-conjugative plasmid has the oriT sequence, it becomes a mobilizable plasmid and can be transferred from one cell to another by the helper function of the conjugative plasmid [3].

pLS20 is a 65-kb conjugative plasmid originally isolated from Bacillus subtilis var. natto, that exhibits conjugative self-transfer characteristics among various Bacillus species, including B. subtilis, Bacillus anthracis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus pumilus, and Bacillus thuringiensis [4]. The conjugative transfer of pLS20 is achieved by mixing the donor and recipient cells in a liquid medium [5]. The genes responsible for conjugation in pLS20 (genes 28–74) are clustered in a large operon that is controlled by a strong promoter, named Pc. Regulation of the pLS20 conjugation genes has been studied in detail [6]. The gene 27 on pLS20 encodes the master regulator of the conjugation operon, RcopLS20, that binds to the operator site within the Pc region to repress the expression of conjugation operon in the ground state. The product of gene 25 is RappLS20 (an anti-repressor that antagonizes RcopLS20), which can relieve the repression caused by RcopLS20 to induce the conjugation operon. On the other hand, the gene 26 synthesizes a small polypeptide that is secreted from the donor cells and processed to release its C-terminal part (five amino acid residues length) as the quorum sensing peptide Phr*pLS20, which then accumulates in the culture medium. Phr*pLS20 is taken back into cells when its accumulation reaches a certain level, inactivating the anti-repressor activity of RappLS20. Therefore, the expression of conjugation genes returns to the ground state as RcopLS20 represses the Pc region to prevent further conjugation [7]. Ectopic overproduction of RappLS20 diminishes the effect of Phr*pLS20, and the expression levels of conjugation genes enhances, resulting in elevated conjugation efficiency [7].

Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426 is a thermophilic Gram-positive bacterium isolated from deep-sea sediments collected from the Mariana Trench [8]. HTA426 grows at higher temperatures from 48 to 74 °C (optimally at 60 °C) and is considered a prospective chassis to construct a high-temperature resistant cell factory. This has the advantage of preventing contamination by mesophilic bacteria and lowering the cost of controlling the fermentation heat. The generation of HTA426 derivatives with improved industrial characteristics requires methods that allow genetic modification of its genome. Because the strain is reluctant to genetic modification by natural competence and electroporation, an approach was developed based on a Gram-negative conjugation system [9]. However, because this strategy relies on counterselection, it has the drawback of being unable to select for mutations that adversely affect the growth. Therefore, a better technique is warranted to manipulate the genome of G. kaustophilus.

In the present study, we developed a strategy that permits the transfer of a chromosomal segment of B. subtilis into G. kaustophilus and provides flexible chromosomal manipulation in G. kaustophilus. In a previous study, we harnessed the helper function of pLS20cat to transfer the a-la-carte-designed mobilizable plasmid pGK1 from an engineered donor strain of B. subtilis to a recipient strain of G. kaustophilus. However, the mobilization efficiency of pGK1 transfer was 50-fold lower than the mobilization of plasmid pGR16B [10] between B. subtilis [11]. Similarly, when the pLS20 oriT sequence was inserted into the chromosome, pLS20catΔoriT, a derivative of pLS20 lacking oriT, enabled the transfer of large chromosomal segments between B. subtilis cells, but the efficiency was also reduced significantly [5]. Here, we have studied several conditions and have applied the results to improve efficiencies to transfer chromosomal DNA segments from B. subtilis into G. kaustophilus.

Results

Additional conditions to enhance the efficiency of pLS20-mediated conjugation.

The pLS20-mediated conjugative transfer of the mobilizable plasmid pGR16B between B. subtilis donor and recipient cells was effective that 0.1% of the total recipient cells acquired pGR16B. Whereas plasmid pGK1 transfer from B. subtilis to G. kaustophilus was significantly less effective [11]. In addition, the pLS20-mediated chromosomal DNA transfer between B. subtilis was also reduced [5]. Therefore, a considerable decrease in efficiency is expected in the heterologous chromosomal DNA transfer from B. subtilis to G. kaustophilus, which is the aim of this study. In order to enhance the efficiency of DNA transfer from B. subtilis to G. kaustophilus, certain measures were employed: overexpressing rappLS20 in donor cells to counteract repression of conjugation by quorum sensing and pre-methylating DNA by expressing the dam methylase gene in donor cells to prevent degradation of the transferred DNA by the restriction modification system present in G. kaustophilus [5, 11].

Besides these measures, we also wondered if the conjugation efficiency can be improved by using ratios of donor and recipient cells in mating mixtures different from the 1:1 ratio that has been standardly used in conjugation experiments. To study this, we determined the conjugative transfer of plasmid pGR16B between B. subtilis, we compared the colony formation unit (CFU) of transconjugants using different ratios of donor (strain KV9) and recipient (strain KV7) (Table 1) [12]. This setup allows to detect subtle differences because pGR16B mobilization is very efficient. In the absence of IPTG, rappLS20 is only expressed from its native locus on the plasmid. As shown in Fig. 1, the highest CFU of transconjugants was observed at a recipient:donor ratio of 1:1. In the presence of IPTG, rappLS20 is induced from the ectopic locus, which results in an increase of the conjugation efficiency. Under these conditions, the highest CFU of transconjugants was obtained at a recipient:donor ratio of 4:1, although the difference was not statistically significant [12]. These results suggest that the recipient:donor ratio of 4:1 might promote the conjugation efficiency for heterologous DNA transfer from B. subtilis to G. kaustophilus.

Table 1 Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
Fig. 1
figure 1

CFU of transconjugants. Donor strain KV9 and recipient strain KV7 were at various ratios for the conjugative transfer of plasmid pGR16B. KV9 was grown with and without IPTG before the conjugation. Colonies of transconjugants were counted to calculate CFU. The values are mean ± SD from three independent experiments

It is likely that chromosomal DNA segments that are transferred via conjugation require time for recombination to integrate into the chromosome of the recipient cell and to express the genes, we investigated the effect of shaking cultivation after the stationary mating to allow the transconjugant to adopt the newly acquired genes. For conjugation recipient strain KV7 and donor strain YNB213 of B. subtilis were combined in a 4:1 ratio to stand for 90 min and then subjected to shaking cultivation for the cells to grow. Figure 2 shows that the CFU of transconjugant incremented at increasing the shaking periods, reaching a maximum of 68-fold using incubation period of 180 min. The incubation period also allows growth of the donor and recipient cells. However, whereas the number of transconjugants increased 68-fold, the numbers of donor and recipient cells only increased 9- and 19-fold, respectively. After the 180 min of shaking cultivation, the total CFU of all the donor, recipient, and transconjugant became very high up to 109, suggesting that the culture might almost have reached saturation.

Fig. 2
figure 2

CFUs of transconjugants (solid), donors (open), and recipients (gray). Donor strain YNB213 and recipient strain KV7 were mixed at a 4:1 ratio of recipient: donor for the conjugative transfer of chromosomal segment containing the ΔiolQGK::kan cassette. YNB213 was grown in the presence of IPTG before the conjugation. After keeping the mixed donor and recipient for conjugation, the mixture was allowed to grow with shaking for the time indicated. Colonies of transconjugants, donors, and recipients were counted to calculate CFU. The values are mean ± SD from three independent experiments

Transferring B. subtilis chromosomal DNA to G. kaustophilus.

The conjugative transfer of chromosomal DNA mediated by pLS20 requires oriTpLS20 integrated into the donor cell chromosome. Moreover, efficiency varies depending on the distance between oriTpLS20 and the region where the selection marker was placed; the maximum efficiency was observed when oriTpLS20 and the marker were 9.5 kb apart [5]. In our study, we placed the oriTpLS20 at yhfK locus and the ΔiolQGK::kan cassette at aprE locus on the chromosome of B. subtilis, 9.5 kb apart from each other. The donor strain YNB213 (Table 1) was constructed by introducing the following three elements: (i) IPTG-inducible rappLS20, which elevates conjugation efficiency [11]; (ii) dam, which methylates DNA to be protected from the restriction/modification system in G. kaustophilus [9]; and (iii) the oriTpLS20-less helper plasmid, pLS20catΔoriT [11]. G. kaustophilus strain MK244 was used as the recipient strain [13]. MK244 and YNB213 were mixed in a 4:1 recipient: donor ratio and stand at 37 °C for 90 min, which was previously reported as the duration required for chromosomal transfer in B. subtilis [5]. The mixture was then cultured at 60 °C for 180 min with shaking, after which the cells were spread on agar plates containing kanamycin followed by incubation at 60 °C. The efficiency of transconjugants in forming colonies was 1.40 ± 1.21 × 10−10 (transconjugant/recipient). One of the transconjugants was isolated and designated G. kaustophilus strain MR01.

Correct transformation of the transconjugant.

Southern blotting was used to analyze the genomic DNA of G. kaustophilus MR01 to ensure that the clone was not the result of a non-specific recombination event (Fig. 3). In this experiment, we used two restriction enzymes, SacII and ClaI, to digest the chromosomes in three combinations: SacII alone, ClaI alone, and both SacII and ClaI. The length of the fragments obtained from each cleavage site is shown in the figure below (Fig. 3). The probe corresponded to part of the coding region of kanamycin (kan). Considering that the chromosomal DNA to be analyzed was completely digested, the number of bands detected is proportional to the number of kan on the chromosome, i.e., the presence of two or more bands indicates non-specific introduction into the chromosome. In contrast, the presence of one band indicates a specific introduction to a particular locus. These results indicate that only the respective target with the predicted length was detected in the lanes of MR01 and YNB213 cleaved with the two restriction enzymes (Fig. 3). According to this novel method, an effective construction of MR01 was confirmed in terms of its genome structure.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Southern blot analysis of strains of B. subtilis and G. kaustophilus. A Schematic organization of the relevant chromosomal loci of B. subtilis YNB213 and G. kaustophilus MK244 and MR01. Chromosomal segments corresponding to B. subtilis and G. kaustophilus are shown as thinner and thicker lines, respectively. The ΔiolQGK::kan cassette set in the chromosome of YNB213 is shown at the top in brackets. ClaI and SacII sites are indicated with a scale underneath representing the relative distance (bp) from the most upstream ClaI site. The kan and iolQGK genes and oriT are shown as arrowheads. The stretch of probe set within kan for the Southern blot analysis is indicated as a solid rectangle. B Results of the Southern blot analysis using the RNA probe to detect kan. Chromosomal DNAs of MK244, YNB213, and MR01 were digested by ClaI and/or SacII as indicated and subjected to the analysis. No signal was detected in MK244, since it does not have kan. In YNB213 and MR01, a single band specific to each was detected. Only for the digestion by ClaI, the length of the DNA fragments containing kan varies due to the difference in the restriction sites. The experiments were repeated at least three times with similar results, and the representative data were shown

The iolQGK gene, which was deleted from the MR01 genome, encodes the repressor for transcriptional regulation of the two iol operons involved in inositol catabolism in G. kaustophilus [14, 15]. Even in the absence of myo-inositol (inducer) in the culture medium, both iol operons in MR01 were found to be transcribed constitutively (Fig. 4). These results corroborated our previous findings with another iolQGK mutant [14], indicating that the conjugation/transformation was successful, as evidenced by this phenotypic change.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of the iol transcripts. Strains MK244 and MR01 were grown with (MI +) and without (MI –) 10 mM myo-inositol to extract the total RNA, which was subjected to quantitative RT-PCR to quantify the transcripts of the two tandem iol operons. The latter and former operons contain gk1894 (A) and gk1899 (B) as the first open reading frames, respectively, transcripts of which were quantified and normalized using the comparative Ct method with the internal control of gk0103 transcript. The values are mean ± SD from three independent experiments

Discussion

The present study demonstrates the use of conjugative plasmid pLS20 to transfer chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis to G. kaustophilus as a genetic manipulation method. This new approach differs from the conventional gene manipulation technique for G. kaustophilus, which involves the two-step processes: the first step is to create the DNA segment to be delivered to G. kaustophilus on the B. subtilis chromosome, and the second step is the conjugative transfer to insert the DNA into the G. kaustophilus chromosome. Furthermore, it can solve the problems and difficulties of conventional techniques using Gram-negative conjugation that require the counterselection marker [16]. However, improvement is required for this approach, particularly the low conjugation/transformation efficiency, which is the most severe problem. Transconjugants are currently obtained by mating donors and recipients in a large-scale liquid culture and then concentrating them by centrifugation followed by spreading on agar plates. It is necessary to reduce the scale of this culture by improving efficiency.

The following is a list of possible future attempts to increase conjugation/transformation efficiency. The first is to promote the survival rate of recipient G. kaustophilus on agar medium. Previous studies have shown that conjugation can compromise the integrity of the cell wall resulting in the death of the recipient cells [17]. A modified lysogeny broth (LB) was shown to be suitable for accelerating the growth rate and reverting G. kaustophilus protoplasts into normal growing cells; the modified LB was supplemented with 10% lactose and 10 mM MgCl2 to serve as a regeneration medium [18]. Since the osmotic pressure of the medium is adjusted by lactose, it is hypothesized that the osmotic stress induced by probable cell wall damage during conjugation might be alleviated, thereby increasing the survival rate could be increased. The second point is to control the induction of rappLS20 more effectively. The enhanced expression of genes required for conjugation is induced by the addition of IPTG to rappLS20. However, we previously observed that inducing rappLS20 in donors resulted in cell death [12]. The overexpression of the conjugation apparatus might cause a significant burden on the donor cell. Considering that the donor cell has only one copy of the mobilizable region of the genome—transmitted by the conjugation—the current conditions for inducing rappLS20 may be too extreme and should be optimized in future studies. The final point is to adjust the temperature and timing for the mating between B. subtilis donor and G. kaustophilus recipient. In our study, mating was accomplished by mixing the liquid cultures containing donor and recipient cells and incubating the mixture at 37 °C for 90 min without shaking, as reported to be required for chromosome transmission between B. subtilis donor and recipient [5]. However, in the present study, G. kaustophilus is the recipient bacterium, which requires a higher growth temperature, and incubation at 37 °C for 90 min might be inadequate. Higher temperature, on the other hand, could be harmful for B. subtilis donor but it may survive up to 48 °C. Therefore, optimizing the temperature and timing for mating B. subtilis donor and G. kaustophilus recipient may help to improve the conjugation efficiency.

The novel finding described here suggests that conjugation/transformation via the chromosomal DNA transfer from B. subtilis can be further developed as a next generation tool for genetic engineering and can be applied to other bacteria, besides G. kaustophilus that have previously been proven difficult to alter genetically. This transformation method based on the conjugative transfer of chromosomal DNA is advanced in that the final target gene configuration can be freely designed and prepared on the B. subtilis chromosome, and then incorporated into the chromosome of the target microorganism. This is due to the remarkable plasticity of the B. subtilis chromosome, which validates the uniqueness of this method. For thermophiles, the disadvantage is that the thermostable antibiotic resistance gene available at present is limited to kan as used in this study, and it is desirable to develop additional thermostable markers to accomplish multiple gene transfer.

Conclusions

Herein, we present a unique approach for transferring chromosomal DNA from B. subtilis to transform G. kaustophilus, which is mediated by conjugative plasmid pLS20. The method outlined here will be beneficial as a tool for flexible genetic manipulation of G. kaustophilus.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and primers

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. The primers used are shown in Additional file 1. The strains were cultured in LB medium (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Antibiotics were added to the culture as needed at the following concentrations: 7.5 mg/L kanamycin, 5 mg/mL chloramphenicol, 1 mg/L erythromycin, 100 mg/L spectinomycin, 12.5 mg/L tetracycline, and 8 mg/L phleomycin.

Preparation of strains

To construct the B. subtilis donor strains, a ΔiolQGK::kan cassette was constructed by ligating five PCR-fragments and inserting it into the aprE locus of B. subtilis chromosome as described below. The fragments 1 and 5 corresponded to the upstream and downstream regions of the aprE locus of B. subtilis, which were amplified by PCR using primer sets aprE-U-f1/aprE-U-r and aprE-D-f2/aprE-D-r (Additional file 1), respectively, using chromosomal DNA strain 168 as a template. The fragments 2 and 4 were the upstream and downstream regions of iolQGK, amplified using the primer sets degA-U-f/degA-U-r2 and degA-D-f2/degA-D-r (Additional file 1), respectively, from G. kaustophilus MK244 chromosome as a template. Finally, fragment 3 corresponds to the thermostable version of kanamycin resistance gene (kan) functioning at high temperatures (60 °C) to grow G. kaustophilus, which was amplified using the primer set kan-f/kan-r2 (Additional file 1) from pUCG18T [9]. All the fragments were linked from 1 to 5 in this order by recombinant PCR using the primer pair aprE-U-f3-nested/ aprE-D-r2-nested (Additional file 1) to form the complete gene cassette.

As described previously, the gene cassette was introduced into B. subtilis strain 168 to generate strain YNB202 that is kanamycin-resistant by natural competence [19] (Table 1). Strain YNB211 [epr::(PrpsO-dam ble)] was made to be phleomycin-resistant transforming strain YNB111 with DNA of YNB104 (Table 1). Finally, strain YNB213 [aprE::(ΔiolQGK::kan)] was obtained as kanamycin-resistant by transforming YNB211 with DNA of YNB202 (Table 1).

Conjugation

Conjugation was performed based on the method described previously [5]. Each of the bacterial strains used as the donor and the recipients was grown until the cells grew to OD600 0.5 in LB liquid medium with shaking at 200 rpm at appropriate temperatures: for B. subtilis and G. kaustophilus, 37 °C and 60 °C, respectively. The donor and recipient cultures were mixed in various ratios as indicated and incubated without shaking at 37 °C for 15 and 90 min to transfer plasmid and chromosomal DNA, respectively. When necessary, the mixture was incubated further at 37 °C and 60 °C for B. subtilis and G. kaustophilus, respectively, up to 180 min with shaking at 200 rpm. CFUs of the donor, recipient, and transconjugant were determined by spreading the conjugation mixture on appropriate selection plates incubated at 37 °C and 60 °C for B. subtilis and G. kaustophilus, respectively. When needed, the conjugation mixture was diluted appropriately to count the colonies or concentrated by centrifugation before spreading on the plates when the conjugation was less efficient.

Southern blotting

The probe used was prepared as follows. The DNA of pUCG18T was used as the template to amplify part of the kanamycin resistance gene by PCR using the primer set kan-probe-f/kan-probe-r (Additional file 1). To obtain the DIG-labeled RNA probe, the PCR fragment was subjected to in- vitro transcription using T7 RNA Polymerase (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Genomic DNAs of bacteria were digested by ClaI and SacII, electrophoresed in an agarose gel, treated with 0.25 M HCl for 30 min and then with 1.5 M NaCl/0.5 M NaOH for 30 min, and transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane Amersham Hybond-N + (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) using Vacuum Transfer BS-31 (Bio Craft, Tokyo, Japan). The transferred DNAs were crosslinked to the membrane with UV crosslinker CL-1000 (UVP, Upland, CA). Hybridization was performed using DIG Easy Hyb (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the standard protocol. The membrane was blocked with Blocking Reagent (Roche). Anti-DIG-AP Fab fragment (Roche) was diluted 10,000 times in Blocking Reagent and incubated with the membrane at room temperature for 30 min. After the incubation, the membrane was washed thoroughly and incubated in detection buffer [0.1 M Tris, 0.1 M NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2 (pH 9.5)] containing the chemiluminescent substrate, disodium 3-(4-methoxyspiro {1,2-dioxetane-3,2'-(5'-chloro) tricyclo [3.3.1.13,7] decan}-4-yl) phenyl phosphate (CSPD, Roche), to detect the signal using ChemiDoc XRS + (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) according to the standard protocol.

Analysis of iol transcripts

Levels of transcription of the two iol operons of G. kaustophilus [14, 15] were quantified using quantitative RT-PCR. Strains MK244 and MR01 were grown aerobically in a minimal liquid medium containing 0.1% casamino acids and 1 µg uracil ml−1 supplemented with and without 10 mM myo-inositol. The bacterial cells were harvested and disrupted to extract and purify the total RNA using RNeasy® Mini kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands). The total RNA was subjected to quantitative RT-PCR using RT-PCR Quick Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and THUNDERBIRD® SYBR® qPCR Mix (Toyobo) as instructed by the provider to quantify the transcripts of the two tandem iol operons. The latter and former operons contain gk1894 and gk1899 as their respective first open reading frames, and the transcripts were amplified with specific primer pairs, gk1894RT-F/gk1894RT-R for gk1894 and gk1899RT-F/gk1899RT-R for gk1899 (Additional file 1). The quantified data was normalized by the comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method using constitutive gk0103 transcript as internal control [see Additional file 2], which encodes translation elongation factor G, amplified with the primer pair gk0103RT-F/gk0103RT-R (Additional file 1).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CFU:

Colony formation unit

LB:

Lysogeny broth

Ct :

Threshold cycle

References

  1. Clark AJ, Adelberg EA. Bacterial conjugation. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1962;16:289–319.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bañuelos-Vazquez LA, Torres Tejerizo G, Brom S. Regulation of conjugative transfer of plasmids and integrative conjugative elements. Plasmid. 2017;91:82–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Francia MV, Varsaki A, Garcillán-Barcia MP, Latorre A, Drainas C, de la Cruz FA. Classification scheme for mobilization regions of bacterial plasmids. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2004;28:79–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Koehlert TM, Thorne CB. Bacillus subtilis (natto) plasmid pLS20 mediates interspecies plasmid transfer. J Bacteriol. 1987;169:5271–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyano M, Tanaka K, Ishikawa S, Takenaka S, Miguel-Arribas A, Meijer WJJ, et al. Rapid conjugative mobilization of a 100 kb segment of Bacillus subtilis chromosomal DNA is mediated by a helper plasmid with no ability for self-transfer. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17:13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meijer WJJ, Boer DR, Ares S, Alfonso C, Rojo F, Luque-Ortega JR, et al. Multiple layered control of the conjugation process of the Bacillus subtilis plasmid pLS20. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:648468.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh PK, Ramachandran G, Ramos-Ruiz R, Peiró-Pastor R, Abia D, Wu LJ, et al. Mobility of the native Bacillus subtilis conjugative plasmid pLS20 is regulated by intercellular signaling. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nazina TN, Tourova TP, Poltaraus AB, Novikova EV, Grigoryan AA, Ivanova AE, et al. Taxonomic study of aerobic thermophilic bacilli: descriptions of Geobacillus subterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Geobacillus uzenensis sp. nov. from petroleum reservoirs and transfer of Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus thermocatenulatus, Bacillus thermoleovorans. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:433–46.

  9. Suzuki H, Yoshida K. Genetic transformation of Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426 by conjugative transfer of host-mimicking plasmids. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;22:1279–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ramachandran G, Miguel-Arribas A, Abia D, Singh PK, Crespo I, Gago-Córdoba C, et al. Discovery of a new family of relaxases in Firmicutes bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2017;13:e1006586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Miyano M, Tanaka K, Ishikawa S, Mori K, Miguel-Arribas A, Meijer WJJ, et al. A novel method for transforming the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus kaustophilus. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17:127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mori K, Verrone V, Amatsu R, Fukui K, Meijer W, Ishikawa S, et al. Assessment of Bacillus subtilis plasmid pLS20 conjugation in the absence of quorum sensing repression. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1931.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki H, Wada K, Furukawa M, Doi K, Ohshima T. A ternary conjugation system for the construction of DNA libraries for Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2013;77:2316–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshida K, Shirae Y, Nishimura R, Fukui K, Ishikawa S. Identification of a repressor for the two iol operons required for inositol catabolism in Geobacillus kaustophilus. Microbiol. 2021.

  15. Yoshida K, Sanbongi A, Murakami A, Suzuki H, Takenaka S, Takami H. Three inositol dehydrogenases involved in utilization and interconversion of inositol stereoisomers in a thermophile, Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426. Microbiology. 2012;158:1942–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suzuki H, Murakami A, Yoshida K. Counterselection system for Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426 through disruption of pyrF and pyrR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:7376–83.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Skurray RA, Reeves P. Characterization of lethal zygosis associated with conjugation in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 1973;113:58–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeigler DR. The Genus Geobacillus. Introduction and strain catalog. Bacillus Genetic Stock Center, Catalog of Strains. 7th ed. Volume 3;2001.

  19. Kunst F, Rapoport G. Salt stress is an environmental signal affecting degradative enzyme synthesis in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1995;177:2403–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Funding

This work was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) with Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research 18H02128, by JSPS and the Royal Society with Bilateral Joint Research Projects/Seminars, and by the ministry of Science and Innovation of the Spanish Government with the Grant [PID2019 108778 GB C21 (AEI/FEDER, EU)].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, KY; methodology, KM, KF, RA, and VV; validation, KY and KM; formal analysis, KY, KM, and KF; data curation, KY, KM, KF and SI; writing–original draft preparation, KY and KM; writing–review and editing, AW and WJJM; visualization, KY, KM and KF; supervision, KY and SI; project administration, KY; funding acquisition, KY and WJJM. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken-ichi Yoshida.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Primers used in this study.

Additional file 2.

Standard curves showing quantity of total RNA vs. threshold cycle (Ct) for gk0103 transcript. The total RNA samples were prepared from strains MK244 and MR01 cells grown in the presence (MI +) and absence (MI –) of myo-inositol, and subjected to quantitative RT-PCR analysis to detect the gk0103 transcript. The four standard curves made for the samples are very similar to each other, indicating that the copy number of gk0103 transcript is constant and reliable as the internal control.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mori, K., Fukui, K., Amatsu, R. et al. A novel method for transforming Geobacillus kaustophilus with a chromosomal segment of Bacillus subtilis transferred via pLS20-dependent conjugation. Microb Cell Fact 21, 34 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-022-01759-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-022-01759-8

Keywords

  • Bacillus subtilis
  • Conjugation
  • Geobacillus kaustophilus
  • Transformation