Skip to main content

Identification of a Yarrowia lipolytica acetamidase and its use as a yeast genetic marker

Abstract

Background

Yarrowia lipolytica is an oleaginous yeast that can be genetically engineered to produce lipid and non-lipid biochemicals from a variety of feedstocks. Metabolic engineering of this organism usually requires genetic markers in order to select for modified cells. The potential to combine multiple genetic manipulations depends on the availability of multiple or recyclable selectable markers.

Results

We found that Y. lipolytica has the ability to utilize acetamide as the sole nitrogen source suggesting that the genome contains an acetamidase gene. Two potential Y. lipolytica acetamidase gene candidates were identified by homology to the A. nidulans acetamidase amdS. These genes were deleted in the wild-type Y. lipolytica strain YB-392, and deletion strains were evaluated for acetamide utilization. One deletion strain was unable to grow on acetamide and a putative acetamidase gene YlAMD1 was identified. Transformation of YlAMD1 followed by selection on acetamide media and counterselection on fluoroacetamide media showed that YlAMD1 can be used as a recyclable genetic marker in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Ylamd1Δ Y. lipolytica.

Conclusions

These findings add to our understanding of Y. lipolytica nitrogen utilization and expand the set of genetic tools available for engineering this organism, as well as S. cerevisiae.

Background

Yarrowia lipolytica is a non‐conventional yeast of interest to the biotechnology industry that is rapidly emerging as a valuable host for the production of a variety of lipid and non-lipid biochemicals [1]. It is a dimorphic, oleaginous yeast that has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in manufacturing processes that are generally regarded as safe (GRAS) [2]. It possesses unique phenotypes, including hydrocarbon assimilation [3,4,5,6,7,8], specialty lipid and organic acid production [3, 9,10,11,12,13], and resistance to harsh environments including high salinity [3, 14], broad pH range [3, 15], and ionic liquids [3, 16].

Yarrowia lipolytica’s physiology, metabolism, and genetic regulation diverge significantly from more well‐studied and characterized yeasts such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae creating the need to adapt culture and genetic tools [17]. Metabolic engineering of yeast strains usually requires genetic markers in order to select for those cells that contain the desired genetic modifications. The construction of multiple successive genetic modifications is typically limited by the number of selection markers available in the host or requires marker recycling. There are two types of selection markers used for genetic manipulations in Y. lipolytica [18]: auxotrophic markers [19,20,21] and dominant markers [22,23,24,25]. Currently, only the uracil auxotrophy marker is counterselectable and lends itself to marker recycling through the use of 5′-fluoroorotic acid.

The Aspergillus nidulans acetamidase gene amdS has been successfully used as a dominant selection marker in filamentous fungi, the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis, and S. cerevisiae [26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. Acetamidase hydrolyzes acetamide to acetate and ammonia, making both carbon and nitrogen available to the cell and enabling growth on acetamide as the sole source of either of these elements [33, 34]. As a marker, amdS can be recycled through counterselection with fluoroacetamide, an acetamide homologue that is converted to the toxic compound fluoroacetate in the presence of active acetamidase [35, 36]. Fluoroacetamide counterselection has been applied to cure genetically engineered strains from recombinant constructs carrying the amdS gene [37].

In the present study, we examine acetamide utilization by Y. lipolytica, identify the gene responsible for the major Y. lipolytica acetamidase activity, and demonstrate its use as a counterselectable marker in this organism as well as S. cerevisiae.

Results and discussion

Acetamide utilization in Y. lipolytica

To study acetamide utilization in Y. lipolytica, we tested growth of wild type strain YB-392 on defined media containing either acetamide or a combination of ammonium sulfate and fluoroacetamide as the sole nitrogen source. YB-392 was able to grow on acetamide media suggesting the presence of a functional acetamidase gene (Fig. 1a). When plated on fluoroacetamide media, YB-392 initially doesn’t grow (in agreement with the presence of a functional acetamidase) but gives rise to colonies after 5 days indicating it can bypass the toxicity of fluoroacetamide (Fig. 1b).

Fig. 1
figure1

Y. lipolytica growth on acetamide and fluoroacetamide. Strains YB-392, NS995, and NS996 were streaked on defined media containing a 2.3 g/L acetamide as the sole nitrogen source, or b 5 g/L ammonium sulfate and 4.6 g/L fluoroacetamide. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 5 days

As there are no known acetamidase genes in Y. lipolytica, we searched for the gene(s) responsible for growth on acetamide. We used the A. nidulans amdS amino acid sequence to query the Y. lipolytica genome. A. nidulans is a filamentous fungus and its amdS gene was functional in the yeast S. cerevisiae that shares many selection markers with Y. lipolytica. Our BLAST [38] search identified the two closest amdS homologues: YALI0E34771 (E score 1 × 10−86) and YALI0E11847 (E score 3 × 10−79). To evaluate their role in acetamide utilization, we used targeted integration of the nat1 marker to delete each of these genes, creating strains NS995 (YALI0E34771::nat1) and NS996 (YALI0E11847::nat1) (Table 1). To confirm the gene knock-outs and nat1 insertions, genomic DNA was isolated from strains YB-392, NS995, and NS996 and screened by PCR as well as sequencing of the target loci in the modified strains. PCR results confirmed the replacement of each target gene by the antibiotic resistance marker (Fig. 2). Sequencing results also confirmed the presence of the nat1 sequence in place of YALI0E34771 and YALI0E11847 in NS995 and NS996 respectively (data not shown).

Fig. 2
figure2

Gene deletion confirmation. Genomic DNA from strains YB-392, NS995 and NS996 was probed for the presence of the deletion target genes (“wt”) and the integrated antibiotic resistance cassette (“nat”) by PCR. YB-392 contains both the YlAMD1 gene YALI0E34771 (lane 3) and YALI0E11847 (lane 7) but neither nat1 integration-specific product (lanes 2 and 6). PCR confirms the absence of YALI0E34771 and YALI0E11847 in NS995 and NS996 respectively (lanes 5 and 9) while each of these strains contains the targeted-integration specific nat1 product (lanes 4 and 8)

Table 1 Strains used in this study

Growth comparisons of Y. lipolytica strains YB-392, NS995, and NS996 were carried out in batch fermentations to determine whether the gene deletions made in NS995 and NS996 had a deleterious effect on growth rates. The 3 strains were grown in 1 L fermenters using ammonium sulfate as a nitrogen source. Samples were removed every 2 h and growth continued until nitrogen was exhausted. Doubling times and specific growth rates were calculated from the optical densities (OD600) (Fig. 3). Based on the fermentation data the deletion of YALI0E34771 and YALI0E11847 and their replacement with nat1 did not affect the growth rate of either strain on ammonium when compared to the parental wild-type strain YB-392.

Fig. 3
figure3

Growth comparison. 1 L batch fermentations of strains YB-392, NS995, and NS996 were sampled every 2 h. Specific growth rates and doubling times were determined using optical density readings (OD600)

We tested the deletion strains for growth on acetamide and fluoroacetamide in a side by side comparison (Fig. 1). YB-392 and NS996 behaved similarly on each plate suggesting that YALI0E11847 is likely not involved in acetamide utilization. In contrast, NS995 lost the ability to grow well on acetamide and gained resistance to fluoroacetamide. We conclude that YALI0E34771 is most likely involved in acetamide utilization under the conditions tested in this study and refer to this gene as YlAMD1.

There is a small amount of NS995 growth on acetamide (Fig. 1a) suggesting that minor pathways of acetamide utilization could be present in addition to YlAMD1 or that the strain is able to scavenge nitrogen from unknown impurities in the media. To investigate this growth further, we performed a titration of acetamide in defined media agar plates and followed the growth of YB-392, NS995 and NS996 over 4 days (Fig. 4). None of the strains formed colonies in the absence of an added nitrogen source indicating that other media components did not contain nitrogen accessible and sufficient for growth. All three strains showed robust growth when ammonium sulfate was supplied. For YB-392 and NS996, growth on 2.3 g/L or higher acetamide was similar to growth on ammonium sulfate whereas growth at lower acetamide concentrations required an additional day or two to form larger, defined colonies. N995 had a visible growth defect on acetamide compared to the other strains, in agreement with a role for YlAMD1 in acetamide utilization. This Ylamd1Δ strain was able to form small slow-growing colonies at rates dependent on acetamide concentration. This growth could be due to a secondary acetamidase activity or an impurity in the acetamide supply.

Fig. 4
figure4

Acetamide titration. Strains YB-392, NS995, and NS996 were streaked on defined media containing no added nitrogen source, acetamide as the sole nitrogen source, or ammonium sulfate as the sole nitrogen source in the concentrations shown. Plates were incubated at 30 °C for 2–4 days

Evaluation of YlAMD1 as a selectable and counterselectable marker in Y. lipolytica and S. cerevisiae

We evaluated YlAMD1 as a selectable marker by transforming both Y. lipolytica Ylamd1Δ strain NS995 and haploid S. cerevisiae strain S288C with a plasmid capable of expressing YlAMD1 in either organism (pNC1344, Fig. 5). Control transformations failed to form colonies while YlAMD1-transformed cells gave rise to well-defined colonies on acetamide plates (Fig. 6).

Fig. 5
figure5

YlAMD1 plasmid map. pNC1344 contains sequences for propagation in E. coli, Y. lipolytica and S. cerevisiae and has an expression cassette capable of expressing YlAMD1 in both Y. lipolytica and S. cerevisiae

Fig. 6
figure6

YlAMD1 enables acetamide utilization and serves as a positive selection marker in Y. lipolytica Ylamd1Δ strain NS995 and S. cerevisiae S288C. Control (left) and pNC1344-YlAMD1 (right) transformations were plated on 2.3 g/L acetamide plates and incubated at 30 °C for 5 days (Y. lipolytica NS995, top) or 2 days (S. cerevisiae S288C, bottom)

Acetamide-positive transformants from each strain background were used to investigate whether the YlAMD1 plasmid can be cured using the acetamide homologue fluoroacetamide. These acetamide isolates were streaked on fluoroacetamide media for counterselection and gave rise to a few fluoroacetamide-resistant colonies (see flow diagram in Fig. 7a), suggesting loss of the YlAMD1 plasmid. Fluoroacetamide-resistant S. cerevisiae colonies were restreaked on fluoroacetamide media to ensure loss of the multicopy 2μ plasmid. The parent strain (S288C or NS995), several YlAMD1 transformants and their fluoroacetamide-resistant derivatives were patched onto defined media with either 5 g/L ammonium sulfate or 0.56 g/L acetamide as nitrogen source. Those isolates that arose from fluoroacetamide counterselection no longer grew on acetamide (Fig. 7b). PCR screening confirmed the presence of YlAMD1 in the original pNC1344 transformants and showed YlAMD1 was not present in the parental strains NS995 and S288C, or in the isolates after counterselection on fluoroacetamide plates (Fig. 7c). The lineages leading from parent strains to fluoroacetamide-resistant isolates are described in Additional file 1.

Fig. 7
figure7

Plasmid curing through fluoroacetamide counterselection. a Acetamide-positive pNC1344-YlAMD1 transformants were plated on fluoroacetamide media for counterselection of the acetamidase plasmid. b Parent strains Y. lipolytica NS995 (“Yl”) and S. cerevisiae S288C (“Sc”), acetamide-positive pNC1344-YlAMD1 transformants and fluoroacetamide-resistant isolates derived from these transformants were patched on defined media containing either 5 g/L ammonium sulfate or 0.56 g/L acetamide as the sole nitrogen source and incubated at 30 °C for 2 days. c The strains in B were probed for the presence of the plasmid using primers specific for the YlAMD1 gene

Taken together, these results demonstrate that YlAMD1 can be used as a dominant and counterselectable marker for genetic modifications in Ylamd1Δ Y. lipolytica strains as well as S. cerevisiae, allowing for marker recycling for future bioengineering of the strains with the same marker. Although the Ylamd1Δ Y. lipolytica strain is an acetamide auxotroph, the deletion is not expected to affect central metabolism to the extent of other auxotrophic markers, such as URA3 and LEU2. YlAMD1 may therefore be particularly useful in physiology studies or in industrial applications were auxotrophic supplementation is undesirable [39].

Conclusions

In the present study, we examined acetamide utilization by Y. lipolytica and determined that this oleaginous yeast is able to grow on acetamide as the sole nitrogen source. After deletion of two candidate genes, we showed that YlAMD1 encodes the major Y. lipolytica acetamidase activity and demonstrated its use as a counterselectable marker in this organism and S. cerevisiae. These findings add to our understanding of Y. lipolytica metabolism and expand the set of genetic tools available for engineering this organism.

Methods

Strains, media, and cultivation methods

The wild type yeast strains used for this study were Y. lipolytica YB-392 from the ARS (NRRL) culture collection and S. cerevisiae S288C (ATCC 204508). Yeast strains were cultivated under non-selective conditions in either YPD media (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L bacto peptone, 20 g/L glucose) or defined medium containing 20 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 0.05 mg/L biotin, 25 mg/L myo-inositol, 1 mg/L d-pantothenic acid, 1 mg/L nicotinic acid, 1 mg/L thiamine, 1 mg/L pyridoxine, 0.2 mg/L p-aminobenzoic acid, 1 mg/L H3BO3, 0.3 mg/L CuSO4·5H2O, 0.1 mg/L KI, 0.4 mg/L Na2MoO4·2H2O, 4.5 mg/L ZnSO4·7H2O, 3 mg/L FeSO4·7H2O, 1 mg/L MnCl2·2H2O, 15 mg/L EDTA, 0.3 mg/L CoCl2·6H2O, 4.5 mg/L CaCl2·2H2O. Acetamide selection media was prepared as for the defined media above except that 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4 was replaced with 0.56–9.2 g/L acetamide (Sigma-Aldrich, catalog #A0500–100 g) and with the addition of 6.6 g/L K2SO4 and 5.25 g/L disodium phthalate (buffers at pH 5.6–5.8) [40]. For negative selection on fluoroacetamide, 4.6 g/L fluoroacetamide (MP Biomedicals, LLC, catalog #213878) and 5.25 g/L disodium phthalate were added to defined media. For solid media 15 g/L of agar was added to the media described above. All yeast strains were cultivated at 30 °C. Antibiotic selection was achieved with the addition of nourseothricin at 50 μg/mL for S. cerevisiae and 500 μg/mL for Y. lipolytica.

YlAMD1 plasmid construction

Plasmid construction was based on standard molecular biology practices and protocols. Restriction enzymes and other molecular biology enzymes were acquired from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA). TOP10 electrocompetent (ThermoFisher Scientific, N.Y.) and DH5 alpha chemically competent (N.E. Biolabs) E. coli cells were used to propagate plasmids and the final construct, pNC1344, was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (Wyzer Biosciences). The Y. lipolytica YALI0E34771 gene, YlAMD1, was PCR amplified from YB-392 genomic DNA with primer pair NP3157/NP3158, using Phusion DNA polymerase and cloned into an expression cassette using the PGK1 promoter derived from Arxula adeninivorans and the FBA1 terminator derived from S. cerevisiae. Both these elements drive gene expression in Y. lipolytica and S. cerevisiae (Novogy unpublished data). Additionally, pNC1344 carries ARS and CEN sequences for replication and plasmid maintenance in Y. lipolytica as well as the 2μ sequence for episomal plasmid maintenance in S. cerevisiae. The presence of the plasmid in pNC1344 transformants was confirmed using YlAMD1 internal primers NP3379/NP3334. Primer sequences can be found in Additional file 1.

Gene deletion in Yarrowia lipolytica

The Y. lipolytica YALI0E34771 and YALI0E11847 genes were deleted as follows: A two-fragment deletion cassette was amplified by PCR from a plasmid containing the nourseothricin resistance gene (nat1) such that the nat1 gene was split into two fragments that overlapped and were flanked by ~ 50 bp of homology to the upstream and downstream regions of the coding sequence. The resulting PCR fragments were co-transformed into hydroxyurea-treated YB-392 [41]. Nourseothricin resistant colonies were screened by PCR to confirm the absence of the targeted gene and the presence of the nat1 gene at the targeted locus. The primer pairs used to amplify the deletion cassette and probe for the presence of the target genes and targeted nat1 integration are listed in Additional file 1. The modified loci in NS995 and NS996 were amplified with external primers and the fragments were sequenced to confirm gene replacement. PCR amplification and sequencing primers are listed in Additional file 1.

Yeast transformations

For Y. lipolytica transformations, log phase cells were either treated with 50 mM hydroxyurea for 2 h (gene deletions) [41] or were processed directly for transformation (plasmid transformation) [23]. Y. lipolytica competent cells were prepared following a protocol adapted from Chen et al. [42]. Cells were washed with water and resuspended in a volume of water equal to the volume of the wet cell pellet. 50 µl was aliquoted per transformation reaction, cells were centrifuged, and the supernatant was discarded. 18 μL of DNA and 92 μL of transformation mix (80 μL 60% polyethylene glycol 4000, 5 µl 2 M dithiothreitol, 5 µL 2 M lithium acetate pH 6, 2 µl 10 mg/mL single-stranded salmon sperm DNA) were added to the cell pellet. The cells, DNA, and transformation mix were vortexed and then incubated at 39 °C for 1 h. For S. cerevisiae transformations, log phase cells were washed with water and resuspended in 1 mL water per 100 OD units of cells. The transformation protocol was adapted from Gietz and Woods [43]. 100 µl was aliquoted per transformation reaction. 14 μL of DNA and 286 μL of transformation mix (240 μL 50% polyethylene glycol 3350, 36 µl 1 M lithium acetate, 10 µl 10 mg/mL single-stranded salmon sperm DNA) were added to the cell pellet. The cells, DNA, and transformation mix were vortexed and then incubated at 42 °C for 40 min. For all yeast transformations, the cells were centrifuged after heat shock, the supernatant was discarded, and the cells were resuspended in 1 mL YPD and incubated overnight at 30 °C, 200 rpm. Following the overnight recovery, the transformations were plated to selective media and incubated at 30 °C.

Bioreactor cultures for growth characterization

Frozen working-stocks of strains YB-392 and NS995 were spread onto a YPD plate and grown overnight at 30 °C. For each strain, a 10 µL loopful of cells was removed from the plate and used to inoculate a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask with 50 mL of defined shake flask medium consisting of: glucose (30 g/L), (NH4)2SO4 (5 g/L), KH2PO4 (3 g/L), MgSO4·7H2O (0.5 g/L), d-biotin (0.05 mg/L), Ca-d-pantothenate (1 mg/L), nicotonic acid (1 mg/L), myo-inositol (25 mg/L), thiamine hydrochloride (1 mg/L), pyridoxal hydrochloride (1 mg/L), p-aminobenzoic acid (0.2 mg/L), Na2EDTA (1.5 mg/L), ZnSO4·7H2O (0.45 mg/L), MnCl2·2H2O (0.1 mg/L), CoCl2·6H2O (0.03 mg/L), CuSO4·5H2O (0.03 mg/L), Na2MoO4·2H2O (0.04 mg/L), CaCl2·2H2O (0.45 mg/L), (NH4)2FeSO4·6H2O (0.3 mg/L), H3BO3 (0.1 mg/L), KI (0.01 mg/L), potassium hydrogen phthalate (2 g/L), and disodium phthalate (12 g/L). The pH of the medium was 5.5. Inoculum flasks were cultured overnight at 30 °C with constant agitation of 200 rpm in a New Brunswick I26 incubator shaker, whereupon the OD600 was measured. The volume of each flask culture required to initiate its corresponding 1 L bioreactor at a T0 cell density of 1 OD600 was transferred to separate 50 mL sterile conical tubes. Each conical tube was then brought to 50 mL with sterile diH2O and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 3 min in an Eppendorf 5810 R centrifuge. The supernatant was decanted and the cells were then resuspended in 50 mL sterile diH2O. This washed inoculum was used to inoculate two 1 L bioreactors (Dasgip 1.2 L vessels) with medium consisting of: glucose (40 g/L), (NH4)2SO4 (5 g/L), KH2PO4 (3 g/L), MgSO4·7H2O (0.5 g/L), D-biotin (0.05 mg/L), Ca-d-pantothenate (1 mg/L), nicotonic acid (1 mg/L), myo-inositol (25 mg/L), thiamine hydrochloride (1 mg/L), pyridoxal hydrochloride (1 mg/L), p-aminobenzoic acid (0.2 mg/L), Na2EDTA (1.5 mg/L), ZnSO4·7H2O (0.45 mg/L), MnCl2·2H2O (0.1 mg/L), CoCl2·6H2O (0.03 mg/L), CuSO4·5H2O (0.03 mg/L), Na2MoO4·2H2O (0.04 mg/L), CaCl2·2H2O (0.45 mg/L), (NH4)2FeSO4·6H2O (0.3 mg/L), H3BO3 (0.1 mg/L), and KI (0.01 mg/L). Process parameters included a pH control at 3.5 automatically adjusted with 10 N sodium hydroxide, a temperature of 30 °C, aeration at 1.0 vvm air, and agitation controlled at 1400 rpm. A sample of 5 mL was taken from each culture at 2-h intervals starting at ∆12 h with a Flownamics Seg-flow automated sampler and continuing until nitrogen was depleted. The samples were continuously held at 4 °C after each harvest. The OD600 was measured for each sample and used to calculate the doubling time and cell specific growth rate for each strain. This process was repeated, again with YB-392, and additionally with NS996. The results for both YB-392 cultures were averaged.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article and its additional information files.

References

  1. 1.

    Abdel-Mawgoud AM, Markham KA, Palmer CM, Liu N, Stephanopoulos G, Alper HS. Metabolic engineering in the host Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab Eng. 2018;50:192–208.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Groenewald M, Boekhout T, Neuvéglise C, Gaillardin C, van Dijck PWM, Wyss M. Yarrowia lipolytica: safety assessment of an oleaginous yeast with a great industrial potential. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2014;40(3):187–206.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Walker C, Ryu S, Na H, Zane M, LaButti K, Lipzen A, et al. Draft genome assemblies of five robust Yarrowia lipolytica strains exhibiting high lipid production, pentose sugar utilization, and sugar alcohol secretion from undetoxified lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysates. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2018;7(12):e01040–001118.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Coelho MA, Amaral P, Belo I. Yarrowia lipolytica: an industrial workhorse. Current research, technology and education topics. Appl Microbiol Microb Biotechnol. 2010;2010:930–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fickers P, Benetti P-H, Waché Y, Marty A, Mauersberger S, Smit MS, et al. Hydrophobic substrate utilisation by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica, and its potential applications. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005;5(6–7):527–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ryu S, Hipp J, Trinh CT. Activating and elucidating metabolism of complex sugars in Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(4):1334–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Thevenieau F, Beopoulos A, Desfougeres T, Sabirova J, Albertin K, Zinjarde S, et al. Uptake and assimilation of hydrophobic substrates by the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. In: Timmis KN, editor. Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Berlin: Springer; 2010. p. 1513–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_104.

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ryu S, Trinh CT. Understanding functional roles of native pentose-specific transporters for activating dormant pentose metabolism in Yarrowia lipolytica. Physiology. 2017;84:e02146.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gao C, Yang X, Wang H, Rivero CP, Li C, Cui Z, et al. Robust succinic acid production from crude glycerol using engineered Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9(1):179.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tan M-J, Chen X, Wang Y-K, Liu G-L, Chi Z-M. Enhanced citric acid production by a yeast Yarrowia lipolytica over-expressing a pyruvate carboxylase gene. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2016;39(8):1289–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yovkova V, Otto C, Aurich A, Mauersberger S, Barth G. Engineering the α-ketoglutarate overproduction from raw glycerol by overexpression of the genes encoding NADP+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase and pyruvate carboxylase in Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98(5):2003–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Beopoulos A, Cescut J, Haddouche R, Uribelarrea J-L, Molina-Jouve C, Nicaud J-M. Yarrowia lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production. Prog Lipid Res. 2009;48(6):375–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Blazeck J, Hill A, Liu L, Knight R, Miller J, Pan A, et al. Harnessing Yarrowia lipolytica lipogenesis to create a platform for lipid and biofuel production. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3131.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Andreishcheva EN, Isakova EP, Sidorov NN, Abramova NB, Ushakova NA, Shaposhnikov GL, et al. Adaptation to salt stress in a salt-tolerant strain of the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Biochem Biokhimiia. 1999;64(9):1061–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Epova E, Guseva M, Kovalyov L, Isakova E, Deryabina Y, Belyakova A, et al. Identification of proteins involved in pH adaptation in extremophile yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Proteomic Appl Biol. 2012. https://www.intechopen.com/books/proteomic-applications-in-biology/identification-of-proteins-involved-in-ph-adaptation-in-extremophile-yeast-yarrowia-lipolytica. Accessed 15 May 2019.

  16. 16.

    Ryu S, Labbé N, Trinh CT. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose in ionic liquid for efficient production of α-ketoglutaric acid by Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(10):4237–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wagner JM, Williams EV, Alper HS. Developing a piggyBac transposon system and compatible selection markers for insertional mutagenesis and genome engineering in Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol J. 2018;13(5):e1800022.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Larroude M, Rossignol T, Nicaud J-M, Ledesma-Amaro R. Synthetic biology tools for engineering Yarrowia lipolytica. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36(8):2150–64.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Barth G, Gaillardin C. Yarrowia lipolytica. In: Wolf K, editor. Nonconventional yeasts in biotechnology: a handbook. Berlin: Springer; 1996. p. 313–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79856-6_10.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Le Dall M-T, Nicaud J-M, Gaillardin C. Multiple-copy integration in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Curr Genet. 1994;26(1):38–44.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Vandermies M, Denies O, Nicaud J-M, Fickers P. EYK1 encoding erythrulose kinase as a catabolic selectable marker for genome editing in the non-conventional yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;139:161–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Cordero Otero R, Gaillardin C. Efficient selection of hygromycin-B-resistant Yarrowia lipolytica transformants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;46(2):143–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Friedlander J, Tsakraklides V, Kamineni A, Greenhagen EH, Consiglio AL, MacEwen K, et al. Engineering of a high lipid producing Yarrowia lipolytica strain. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016;9(1):77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nicaud J-M, Fabre E, Gaillardin C. Expression of invertase activity in Yarrowia lipolytica and its use as a selective marker. Curr Genet. 1989;16(4):253–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kretzschmar A, Otto C, Holz M, Werner S, Hübner L, Barth G. Increased homologous integration frequency in Yarrowia lipolytica strains defective in non-homologous end-joining. Curr Genet. 2013;59(1–2):63–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Solis-Escalante D, Kuijpers NG, Bongaerts N, Bolat I, Bosman L, Pronk JT, et al. amdSYM, a new dominant recyclable marker cassette for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013;13(1):126–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kelly J, Hynes M. Transformation of Aspergillus niger by the amdS gene of Aspergillus nidulans. EMBO J. 1985;4:475–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yamashiro CT, Yarden O, Yanofsky C. A dominant selectable marker that is meiotically stable in Neurospora crassa: the amdS gene of Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Gen Genet MGG. 1992;236(1):121–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Swinkels BW, Selten GCM, Bakhuis JG, Bovenberg RAL, Vollebregt AWH. The use of homologous amdS genes as selectable markers. 1997. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO1997006261A2/en. Accessed 9 May 2019.

  30. 30.

    van Ooyen AJJ, Dekker P, Huang M, Olsthoorn MMA, Jacobs DI, Colussi PA, et al. Heterologous protein production in the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. FEMS Yeast Res. 2006;6(3):381–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Read JD, Colussi PA, Ganatra MB, Taron CH. Acetamide selection of Kluyveromyces lactis cells transformed with an integrative vector leads to high-frequency formation of multicopy strains. Appl Env Microbiol. 2007;73(16):5088–96.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ganatra MB, Vainauskas S, Hong JM, Taylor TE, Denson JPM, Esposito D, et al. A set of aspartyl protease-deficient strains for improved expression of heterologous proteins in Kluyveromyces lactis: Kluyveromyces lactis aspartyl protease mutants. FEMS Yeast Res. 2011;11(2):168–78.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Corrick CM, Twomey AP, Hynes MJ. The nucleotide sequence of the amdS gene of Aspergillus nidulans and the molecular characterization of 5′ mutations. Gene. 1987;53(1):63–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hynes MJ. Regulatory circuits of the amdS gene of Aspergillus nidulans. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1994;65(3):179–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Apirion D. The two-way selection of mutants and revertants in respect of acetate utilization and resistance to fluoro-acetate in Aspergillus nidulans. Genet Res. 1965;6(3):317–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hynes MJ, Pateman JAJ. The genetic analysis of regulation of amidase synthesis in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Gen Genet MGG. 1970;108(2):107.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ward M, Wilson LJ, Kodama KH. Use of Aspergillus overproducing mutants, cured for integrated plasmid, to overproduce heterologous proteins. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1993;39(6):738–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Altschul S, Madden TL, Schaffer A, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller WE, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein databases search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;1(25):3389–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pronk JT. Auxotrophic yeast strains in fundamental and applied research. Appl Env Microbiol. 2002;68(5):2095–100.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast Chichester Engl. 1992;8(7):501–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tsakraklides V, Brevnova E, Stephanopoulos G, Shaw AJ. Improved gene targeting through cell cycle synchronization. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):e0133434.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chen D-C, Beckerich J-M, Gaillardin C. One-step transformation of the dimorphic yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1997;48(2):232–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Daniel Gietz R, Woods RA. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. In: Guthrie C, Fink GR, editors. Methods in enzymology. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2002. p. 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Annapurna Kamineni for help with formatting the manuscript, John Sullivan for laboratory support, Hannah Blitzblau for careful reading of the manuscript, and the Novogy team for insightful discussions throughout the course of this work.

Funding

This study was wholly funded by Novogy Inc.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MH carried out all molecular biology and strain engineering experiments. AC and KM performed bioreactor fermentations and analyses. JS contributed to acetamide media development and project planning. VT identified the acetamidase gene candidates studied in this work and developed the experimental plan. MH and VT prepared the manuscript with contributions from AC. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maureen Hamilton.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors are current employees, former employees, or otherwise affiliated with Novogy, Inc., which has a commercial interest in the strains described in this study. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamilton, M., Consiglio, A.L., MacEwen, K. et al. Identification of a Yarrowia lipolytica acetamidase and its use as a yeast genetic marker. Microb Cell Fact 19, 22 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-1292-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Yarrowia lipolytica
  • Acetamidase
  • Acetamide
  • Fluoroacetamide
  • Dominant marker
  • Counterselectable marker
  • Marker removal
  • Marker recycling