Skip to main content
Download PDF

Gut microbiome as a response marker for pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in a porcine model of exocrine pancreas insufficiency

Microbial Cell Factories volume 19, Article number: 221 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is characterized by the loss of active pancreatic enzymes and a resulting severely reduced food digestion. EPI therapy requires orally applied pancreatic enzyme replacement. The gut microbiome is a known mediator of intestinal diseases and may influence the outcome of EPI and the effects of a pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT). Here, we analyzed the effects of EPI and PERT on the gut microbiome in the model of pancreatic duct ligated minipigs.

Results

The microbial community composition in pig feces was analyzed by next generation sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons. The data were evaluated for α- and β-diversity changes and changes at the different Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) levels by Shannon–Wiener and inverse Simpson index calculation as well as by Principal Coordinates Analysis based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. Microbial α-diversity was reduced after EPI induction and reverted to nearly healthy state after PERT. Analysis of microbial composition and β-diversity showed distinctive clusters of the three study groups and a change towards a composition comparable to healthy animals upon PERT. The relative abundance of possible pathobionts like Escherichia/Shigella, Acinetobacter or Stenotrophomonas was reduced by PERT.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate that EPI-induced dysbiosis could be reverted by PERT to a nearly healthy state. Elevated α-diversity and the reduction of bacterial overgrowth after PERT promises benefits for EPI patients. Non-invasive microbiome studies may be useful for EPI therapy monitoring and as marker for response to PERT.

Background

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) is a severe impairment of food digestion as a result of a loss of active pancreatic enzymes. EPI is defined as a decline of pancreatic enzyme release to less than 5–10%. It can be induced by several disorders like cystic fibrosis (CF), acute (AP) or chronic pancreatitis (CP), pancreatic cancer, diabetes mellitus or as a complication of gastrointestinal surgery [1,2,3,4,5]. EPI patients are affected by weight loss and malnutrition [4, 6]. EPI symptoms significantly impair the quality of life, and malnutrition especially of fat soluble vitamins subsequently may result in other severe diseases like osteoporosis, osteopenia or low-trauma fracture [7, 8]. Disease progression, severity and occurring comorbidities in the course of EPI strongly varies between patients and correlates with the etiology of pre-existing diseases and lifestyle of the affected person (e.g. nutrition, smoking, alcohol consumption etc.) [6].

EPI treatment is mainly based on the orally applied pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) [6, 9]. Due to the heterogeneous course of the disease and the wide range of symptom manifestations, the oral dose of enzymes has to be adjusted to every patient individually. Other effects observed in CF as well as in CP, are small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and changes in the microbial gut composition that in turn leads to worsening of the symptoms [10, 11]. One possible cause for this is a food oversupply in the intestine by the lack of digestion in the host and the lack of pancreatic juice with its antimicrobial function [12]. SIBO and the associated reduction of microbial diversity (i.e. α-diversity) as well as loss of beneficial bacteria are hallmarks of existing dysbiosis [13].

In humans the bacterial diversity increases after birth and has its first climax approx. at the age of 3 years [14]. The total number of bacteria of an adult is estimated to be 3.8*1013 [15] and there is a permanent interaction between microorganisms and the host [13]. Progress in both next-generation sequencing as well as big data handling enables increasing insights into the bacterial colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. As a result, statements about non-culturable bacteria and thus the composition and distribution within the bacterial community could be made [16]. The microbiome gets more and more into the focus of investigations to shed light on the role of the intestinal bacteria on the severity of EPI and a possible impact on therapy.

A model to study the course of EPI and the influence of EPI on cleavage and absorption of food is the ligation of the pancreatic duct in minipigs [2]. Because of the high similarity in digestion compared to humans and the feasibility to ligate the solitary and separated pancreatic duct, pigs and especially minipigs are preferred as EPI models. Using minipigs, the impact of pancreas duct ligation on digestion and absorption of metabolites could be shown [2, 17]. Furthermore, the effect of PERT was investigated in EPI pigs and an improvement of this type of therapy could be achieved [18].

Our aim was to study the influence of PERT on the gut microbiome in pancreatic duct ligated minipigs. Therefore, we performed a longitudinal analysis of the composition of the intestinal bacterial community via 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to analyze the direct effect of an induced EPI and supplemented pancreatic enzymes in EPI. By monitoring the change of the intestinal microbiome caused by the functional loss of the exocrine pancreas and the influence of PERT, new possible therapy targets, such as the manipulation of the microbiome by antibiotics or microbiome transfer, easily accessible endpoints for disease state and therapy monitoring and possibly markers for the efficacy of PERT as a microbiome pattern might be found in the future.

Results

The effects of an experimental EPI and PERT on the intestinal microbiome composition was analyzed in the Göttingen minipig model by next generation sequencing of 16S rRNA amplicons from pig feces. The data were evaluated for α- and β-diversity changes and changes at the different OTU levels. Samples from healthy animals were provided by the breeder and reflect the microbiome status at the delivery of the animals.

Alpha diversity

To investigate the impact of the substitution of pancreatic enzymes in a porcine EPI model on gut microbial composition, we analyzed the species richness of the gut microbiota in Göttingen minipigs. The α-diversity Shannon–Wiener index as well as the inverse Simpson index were estimated from the number of observed Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs). The number of observed OTUs reflects richness, whereas the Shannon–Wiener, as well as inverse Simpson index, evaluate both, richness and evenness. Although the last mentioned indices are both heterogeneity measures, the Shannon–Wiener index places more emphasis on rare species and the inverse Simpson index places more emphasis on dominant species [19]. The calculated values of these indices correlate with diversity. Thus, higher values indicate both more existing species (i.e. richness) and a more even distribution (i.e. evenness) of these species in the microbial composition. The α-diversity regarding the number of observed OTUs (Fig. 1a) and Shannon–Wiener index (Fig. 1b) were highest in the group of healthy animals (1412 ± 84 and 5.0 ± 0.20, respectively) and lowest in animals with EPI (1058 ± 93 and 4.42 ± 0.24, respectively). The α-diversity differs significantly between the healthy animals and the EPI affected animals regarding observed OTUs (p < 0.001) and Shannon–Wiener index (p < 0.001). The treatment of the EPI pigs with enzyme substitution led to a significant increase of α-diversity regarding the number of observed OTUs (1282 ± 106, p = 0.00015) and Shannon–Wiener index (4.81 ± 0.09, p = 0.003), and a tendency towards α-diversity levels of the healthy animals was observed. The dominance-oriented inverse Simpson index (Fig. 1c) showed the highest value for the treated animals with EPI (39.29 ± 7.15), followed by the healthy animals (33.36 ± 7.02), and animals with EPI without treatment (29.51 ± 12.49). However, no significant difference was found.

Fig. 1
figure 1

α-diversity of gut microbiota in healthy Göttingen minipigs (Healthy, n = 10), Göttingen minipigs with induced exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI, n = 9) without and with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (EPI + PERT, n = 9). Richness and evenness were analyzed via the number of observed Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) (a), Shannon–Wiener index (b) and inverse Simpson index (c)

Full size image

Microbial composition

We also analyzed the differences amongst the gut microbial composition in more detail. The bacterial composition differed significantly between healthy animals, animals affected by EPI and affected animals treated with PERT (AMOVA, p < 0.05). Regarding β-diversity visualized in the Principal Coordinates Analysis (PCoA) plot based on the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity coefficient, healthy pigs showed narrower clustering than animals affected by EPI (Fig. 2). It should be noted that the distance between the data points of this figure correlates with the similarity of the microbial composition of the corresponding animals. This means that samples that are close to each other in this figure also show a higher similarity to each other than samples whose data points are further apart. Although pigs suffering from EPI showed a broader distribution, a tendency towards a defined clustering could be seen and the centers of both clusters differed significantly (AMOVA, p = 0.014) indicating that treating the EPI pigs with PERT led to a uniform change in the microbial composition.

Fig. 2
figure 2

β-diversity between gut microbiota of healthy Göttingen minipigs (Healthy, n = 10), pancreas duct-ligated Göttingen minipigs without treatment (EPI, n = 9) or with pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (EPI + PERT, n = 9) visualized as a PCoA plot. Values are calculated via the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity coefficient

Full size image

The differences in β-diversity were also seen at the level of relative abundance of the bacterial genera. The relative abundance of bacterial phyla and order with a value > 0.5% are shown in Fig. 3, where a decrease in the phylum Proteobacteria (Fig. 3a) and the order Enterobacteriales and an increase in the order Spirochaetales (Fig. 3b) could be seen after PERT (for further details on bacterial order and family see Additional file 1: A, B).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Relative abundance of bacterial phyla (a) and bacterial orders (b) in healthy Göttingen minipigs (Healthy, n = 10), in Göttingen minipigs with induced exocrine pancreatic insufficiency without treatment (EPI, n = 9) or after 28 days pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (EPI + PERT, n = 9). Mean values > 0.5% of relative abundance are shown

Full size image

In Fig. 4, the relative abundance of OTUs with changed prevalence is depicted. OTUs with ≥ 0.05% abundance are shown. PERT considerably altered the bacterial composition (Tables 1 and 2) and a tendency towards the abundance pattern of the healthy animals can be assumed (Fig. 4, Additional file 2). Most genera had a remarkably decreased relative abundance (Table 1) and only the presence of 5 genera was increased (Table 2). Besides these alterations in relative abundance, a change in the pattern of microbial community after PERT and a tendency of development towards the detected pattern of the bacterial composition of the healthy animals could be seen (Additional file 2). Measured relative abundance of all detected OTUs are shown in Additional file 2 (for further details see Additional file 2: A–D).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Relative abundance of bacterial genera in healthy Göttingen minipigs (Healthy, n = 10), in Göttingen minipigs with induced exocrine pancreatic insufficiency without treatment (EPI, n = 9) or after 28 days pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (EPI + PERT, n = 9). OTUs with altered relative abundance after treatment are shown. Red color represents highest relative abundance, blue color represents lowest relative abundance

Full size image
Table 1 Decreased abundance in percent of bacterial genera in pancreatic duct-ligated Göttingen minipigs compared to PERT treated animals
Full size table
Table 2 Increased abundance in percent of bacterial genera in pancreatic duct-ligated Göttingen minipigs compared to PERT treated animals
Full size table

The following comparison of microbial composition refers to EPI-affected animals, as the healthy animals had different husbandry conditions and therefore a direct comparison between the healthy and EPI affected pigs would not be appropriate. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) was used to determine the OTUs that most likely accounted for the differences (i.e. separability of both groups) between the bacterial composition of the treated and the untreated EPI animals (Fig. 5). In this algorithm, OTUs are determined with unique sequences, which only occurred in one group of animals [20]. The calculated linear discriminant analysis (LDA) score correlates with the impact of the respective OTU on the differential bacterial composition of EPI pigs before and after treatment.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) based on unique sequences found in pancreatic duct-ligated Göttingen minipigs without treatment (EPI, n = 9) or after pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (EPI + PERT, n = 9). LDA score shows the impact of the OTU on separability between EPI and EPI + PERT. (LDA score = 2.0, α = 0.05)

Full size image

The LDA score reflects an impact on separability by the genera Coprococcus, Parabacteroides, Helicobacter, Callulosilyticum, Alistipes, Acetivibrio and Bacteroides in the group of PERT-treated animals with EPI. On the other hand, the genera Victivallis, Campylobacter, Oscillibacter, Anaeroplasma, Cerasiococcus, Mitsuokella, Paraprevotella, Bifidobacterium, Succiniclasticum, Caryophanon, Clostridium IV, Turicibacter and Clostridium sensu stricto are discriminants of the bacterial community composition of the untreated EPI animals. One has to take into account that although these unique sequences of the respective OTUs concisely distinguish the bacterial colonisation of the animals before and after treatment, no predication about the relative abundance of the respective genera can be made.

Discussion

The direct impact of exocrine pancreas insufficiency on the gut microbiota and the subsequent effects of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy has been poorly studied so far. Because of various factors that affect bacterial composition and variety of EPI–causing diseases, a direct link between the functional loss of the exocrine pancreas activity and of microbiota within the gastrointestinal tract is missing. Here, we established an EPI model in 10 female Göttingen minipigs and analyzed the effect of EPI and PERT on the gut microbiota. So far, our study is the first to describe the intestinal microbiota after PERT in a standardized model and thus the microbiota were unaffected by previous diseases and the associated therapies. The structure of the study was designed in a way, that other influencing factors (e.g. sex, mode of delivery, age, feed, and housing) could be neglected. As expected, the induction of EPI by pancreatic duct ligation reduced α-diversity and affected the composition of the intestinal microbiome. In the EPI minipigs, we observed two major findings: the α-diversity within each animal was elevated after treatment with PERT while the bacterial composition changed remarkable after treatment. We could detect a decreased abundance of Corynebacterium, Brachybacterium, Kocuria, Tessaracoccus, Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, Sphingobacterium, Chryseobacterium, Empedobacter, Wautersiella, Brevundimonas, Ralstonia, Comamonas, Parasutterella, Bilophila, Escherichia/Shigella, Acinetobacter, Enhydrobacter, Stenotrophomonas, Cloacibacillus, Caryophanon, Kurthia, Macrococcus, Pseudoramibacter, Acetanaerobacterium, Dialister and Selenomonas as well as increased abundance of Sphingomonas, Streptococcus, Mogibacterium, Pseudobutyrivibrio and Clostridium_XI. In general, a reduced bacterial diversity (i.e. α-diversity), as well as a changed microbial composition, are hallmarks of dysbiosis.

A correlation between dysbiosis and various diseases such as obesity, autism, Crohn´s disease as well as ulcerative colitis has already been observed several times [21,22,23,24]. Our findings indicate that PERT could restore the intestinal microbiome composition to a nearly healthy state resembling the bacterial colonisation of healthy animals. After PERT, the EPI-affected pigs had a significantly increased α-diversity (p < 0.01) measured by observed OTUs and Shannon–Wiener index. Regarding the inverse Simpson index the treated EPI pigs displayed even a higher bacterial diversity than the healthy pigs. The differences in assessing richness and evenness within the animals (Shannon–Wiener index and inverse Simpson index) could be due to the focus on rare (Shannon–Wiener index) or dominant species (inverse Simpson index) of the respective algorithm used. The Shannon–Wiener index of the EPI pigs was significantly increased after treatment, so that possibly an augmented frequency of rare bacteria instead of dominant bacteria could be assumed. Because of several changes in digestion (i.e. lack of pancreatic enzymes, higher acidity, diminished motility etc.) caused by EPI, there is an oversupply of food for dominant bacterial genera and a lack of host defence. In a recent study in humans, it was shown that mainly the altered function of pancreatic acinar cells, rather than the absence of pancreatic juice, causes an alteration in gut microbiome and a reduction in α–diversity [25]. Therefore, an overgrowth of dominant bacteria can be expected. The importance of antimicrobial peptides secreted by acinar cells has already been demonstrated in a mouse model [26]. In this study, animals showed bacterial overgrowth after deletion of ion channel Orail in pancreatic acinar cells, leading to systemic infection and death within 2 weeks. The survival rate of these animals was significantly improved by the administration of the cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide (CRAMP) [26]. Furthermore, the changed intestinal environment caused by EPI could promote the rise of pathobionts. An increased occurrence of previously reduced bacteria resulting from the decline of dominant bacteria after PERT and PERT -associated reduction in food oversupply could therefore be regarded as a beneficial effect, and it is conceivable that the reported worsening of the symptoms, as it occurs in EPI-associated diseases like CP or CF [10, 11], could be prevented or alleviated by this medication. A directional change in the bacterial composition was also apparent in the representation of the β-diversity calculated by the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity coefficient. Here, the EPI-affected pigs showed a distinct clustering and the centers of the clusters differ significantly with p = 0.014 (AMOVA).

Only a few reports studying the effects of EPI and PERT on the gastrointestinal microbiome composition of animal models are available. An alteration of the composition of intestinal microbiota after supplementation of pancreatic digestive enzymes was observed in healthy mice [27]. In this study, an advantageous effect of PERT was assumed to rely on the increased relative abundance of beneficial bacteria e.g. Akkermansia muciniphila or Lactobacillus reuteri. This is in good agreement with the increase of A. muciniphila after PERT detected in our study in EPI pigs (Additional file 2: C). Remarkably, besides the increased abundance of some beneficial bacteria, most genera showed a diminished relative abundance. This effect supports the hypothesis that bacterial overgrowth was induced by the ligation of the pancreatic duct and the subsequent lack of the antimicrobial function of pancreatic juice [28] in our minipig study.

Our and the aforementioned study had controversial outcomes regarding the specific bacterial composition and this may be due to the different model organism, nutrition and the fact, that the PERT-treated mice were healthy. Healthy adult animals exhibit most probably a different homeostasis of the gut microbiota. An interesting finding is the failure of enzyme supplementation to affect the α-diversity in healthy mice. This indicates that PERT may only be beneficial in the case of a dysbiosis.

Similar results of altered microbial compositions were seen in a study in which healthy dogs and PERT-treated and untreated EPI-affected dogs were compared [29]. Here, a non-significant trend regarding elevated α-diversity in the diseased cohort of dogs after PERT was observed. The elevated α-diversity in EPI pigs upon PERT seen in our study is in accordance to these findings. The comorbidity of bacterial overgrowth, as it can be assumed for the EPI pigs, was also seen in human cystic fibrosis patients and host-mediated inflammation [10, 30]. In the course of intestinal inflammation and the following dysbiosis, an overgrowth with pathobionts, especially members of the γ-proteobacteria, was observed and the importance of a balanced gut microbiome for the maintenance of a healthy gut was emphasized [30]. Furthermore, the change in the proportion of members of the phylum Proteobacteria in the intestinal microbiome has also been discussed as a potential diagnostic marker, because of its correlation to dysbiosis in the sense of pathologic imbalance of the intestinal microbiota and subsequent diseases [31]. Beside bacterial overgrowth, an increase in the genus Prevotella, which is known to be correlated with chronic inflammation, was observed in a mouse-study as well as in humans with reduced exocrine pancreatic function [25, 26].

A decreased relative abundance of pathogens of the genus Prevotella as well as of the phylum Proteobacteria and especially in the class of γ-Proteobacteria (i.e. genera Escherichia/Shigella, Acinetobacter, Stenotrophomonas) could be seen in our study under PERT, and the reduced prevalence of these potential pathobionts may suggest a beneficial effect of PERT in EPI-affected individuals (Fig. 3a, Table 1).

Currently, there has been no direct link between specific bacterial strains or a distinct bacterial composition and the etiology or severity of EPI. Though, a correlation between dysbiosis and the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP), one of many pre-existing diseases of EPI, was already described in patients as well as in mice with induced AP [32]. As mentioned before, one parameter describing dysbiosis is the α-diversity, which was significantly reduced in humans affected by AP. The reduced α-diversity of EPI pigs in our study is consistent with these findings. Furthermore, the increased relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella in mice with induced AP correlated positively with the ability of the bacteria to invade epithelial cells and therefore with the aggravation of the disorder from mild to severe form of AP. The subsequent deteriorated barrier function results in bacterial translocation, which in turn causes the progression of the systemic inflammatory response [32]. In this context, the increased α-diversity as well as the reduced relative abundance of Escherichia/Shigella in our study implies that the frequency of infections caused by these invasive bacteria should also decrease.

As a result of these findings the reduced relative abundance of possible pathobionts like Escherichia/Shigella, Acinetobacter or Stenotrophomonas in combination with an increased α-diversity could function as a marker for the therapeutic success of PERT. Microbiome studies may be useful for EPI therapy monitoring and disease state evaluation with a non-invasive and low burden method.

In most of the EPI-causing pre-existing diseases (i.e. cystic fibrosis, acute and chronic pancreatitis), an impaired intestinal barrier, inflammation and/or imbalanced immune homeostasis are major factors for the progression and the severity of the diseases [33,34,35]. In the aforementioned studies, disease severity and progression were correlated with dysbiosis marked by a lower α-diversity [30, 32]. With regard to this, a higher α-diversity as seen after PERT in our study can be seen as a positive effect and, in the long run, a progression of the EPI-related symptoms and comorbidities could be possibly delayed or stopped.

Conclusion

Our study is the first that describes the effect of supplementation with pancreatic enzymes in an induced exocrine pancreatic insufficiency model in minipigs. Because of the higher similarity to humans compared to other laboratory animals regarding digestion [2], our findings may help to elucidate the ongoing discovery of new potential treatment targets to improve the health status of EPI patients and to reduce present comorbidity. Monitoring of the microbiome particularly with regard to α-diversity during PERT could support therapy dose finding and thus show more quickly whether the correct enzyme dose has been found or whether further action is required. The observed elevated α-diversity and the reduction of bacterial overgrowth after PERT promises benefits for patients. In conclusion, the investigation of the intestinal microbiome could be a potent diagnostic tool and promises, after further experimental validation, to facilitate the monitoring of the disease and to possibly improve the therapeutic success of PERT.

Materials and methods

Animals and sample collection

Study design includes a cohort of ten female Göttingen Minipigs (age 3–4 years). The phenotype of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) in the animals was induced by a surgical ligation of the pancreatic duct 30 months before PERT. The pigs were housed in groups of two within the Central Animal Facility (ZTE) of the University Hospital Münster. Altromin® 9050/51 (Lage, Germany) was fed twice a day without (“EPI”) or with (“EPI + PERT”) 2 g of pancreatic enzymes added (Kreon, activity 50,000 μ/g, Abbott Laboratories GmbH, Hannover, Germany). At the beginning of the study as well as after 28 days with treatment, feces was collected from every animal for 3 days and directly stored at 4 °C after collection. For every animal, samples were pooled and stored at − 20 °C. As reference, feces of 10 adult female Göttingen Minipigs (“Healthy”) was used (kindly provided by the breeder Ellegaard Göttingen Minipigs: Ellegaard Göttingen Minipigs, Dalmose, Denmark).

Isolation of DNA from feces and 16S rRNA sequencing

For DNA extraction, fecal samples were thawed at room temperature. DNA was extracted using the ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) and stored at − 80 °C until further use. Since an insufficient amount of DNA could be isolated from a sample from one EPI pig, the samples from this animal were excluded from further analysis. 16S rRNA amplicon libraries were created according to the Illumina 16S Metagenomic Library Preparation guidelines (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pair 515f (5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGAT GTGTATAAGAGACAGGTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′) and 806Rb (5′-GTC TCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACNVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) with Illumina sequencing adaptors. The amplicon reactions were cleaned using Agencourt AMPure® XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) and an indexing PCR was performed with the Nextera XT Index Primer Set A (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). Libraries were normalized to 4 nM, pooled, and paired-end sequenced (2 × 250 bp) with 5% PhiX samples on a Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA) using v2 sequencing chemistry. We used the ZymoBIOMICS microbial Community DNA Standard (Zymo Research Europe GmbH, Freiburg, Germany) as a reference for validation of our microbiomic workflow.

Data analysis

Obtained sequences were quality trimmed and analyzed by the mothur software package (v1.41.1) [36]. Following the Miseq SOP [37], the paired-end sequences were assembled into contigs. Afterwards, the sequences were screened and reads with ambiguous bases or more than 8 homopolymers were removed. The demultiplexed sequences were aligned to Silva database [38] (Release v.123) and chimeras were removed using the VSEARCH algorithm. Assignment of taxonomic classifications was done using the Wang approach and sequences classified as chloroplast, mitochondria, archaea and eukaryota were removed.

Subsequently, the classified bacterial sequences were assigned to Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) with a cutoff of 97% similarity using the opticlust algorithm. For further analysis of α- and β-diversity, a subsample was set to 47,405 sequences. α-diversity (i.e. richness and evenness) was calculated OUT-based via numbers of observed OTUs, Shannon–Wiener index, inverse Simpson index, and phylogeny based on rarefaction. β-diversity was analyzed using the Bray–Curtis dissimilarity coefficient. To analyze the effect of the conducted treatment of the animals, we used linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) within mothur to determine OTUs that most likely account for the separability of the treated and non-treated EPI animals. LDA score was set to 2.0 and the statistical parameters to α = 0.05, respectively.

Statistical analysis

To analyze whether the α-diversity (i.e. observed OTUs, Shannon–Wiener index, and inverse Simpson index, respectively) differs between the microbial communities of the EPI animals with and without PERT, paired t-test was used with significance defined as p < 0.05. The differences between the healthy and the EPI affected animals was analysed by unpaired t-test. The differences regarding the bacterial composition at the genus level between these two animal groups was investigated using Wilcoxon signed-rank test (α = 0.05) and p-values were corrected with the Benjamini–Hochberg method to control the false discovery rate [39]. We calculated the mentioned statistical test with Microsoft Excel (Excel 2016 MSO) and considered only the animals with induced EPI. Since the healthy pigs were housed in another facility and fed with other fodder than Altromin® 9050/51, a direct comparison between these animals and the animals with EPI was not appropriate and the statistical analysis was carried out only on the samples of animals with induced EPI before and after treatment.

To determine whether the centers of the cluster computed for every animal group differ significantly, we used analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) within the mothur package.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AMOVA:

Analysis of molecular variance

AP:

Acute pancreatitis

CF:

Cystic fibrosis

CP:

Chronic pancreatitis

CRAMP:

Cathelicidin-related antimicrobial peptide

EPI:

Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency

LDA:

Linear discriminant analysis

LEfSe:

Linear discriminant analysis effect size

OTU:

Operational Taxonomic Unit

PCoA:

Principal Coordinates Analysis

PERT:

Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy

SIBO:

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth

ZTE:

Central Animal Facility of the University Hospital Münster

References

  1. Chaudhary A, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Layer P, Lerch MM. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency as a complication of gastrointestinal surgery and the impact of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy. Dig Dis. 2020;38(1):53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gregory PC, Hoffmann K, Kamphues J, Möeler A. The pancreatic duct ligated (Mini)pig as a model for pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in man. Pancreas. 2016;45:1213–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hollemans RA, Hallensleben NDL, Mager DJ, Kelder JC, Besselink MG, Bruno MJ, et al. Pancreatic exocrine insufficiency following acute pancreatitis: systematic review and study level meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2018;18:253–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindkvist B, Phillips ME, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Clinical, anthropometric and laboratory nutritional markers of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency: prevalence and diagnostic use. Pancreatology. 2015;15:589–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Manor O, Levy R, Pope CE, Hayden HS, Brittnacher MJ, Carr R, et al. Metagenomic evidence for taxonomic dysbiosis and functional imbalance in the gastrointestinal tracts of children with cystic fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dominguez-Muñoz JE. Management of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2019;35:455–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stigliano S, Waldthaler A, Martinez-Moneo E, Lionetto L, Robinson S, Malvik M, et al. Vitamins D and K as factors associated with osteopathy in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective multicentre study (P-BONE Study). Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2018;9:e197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tignor AS, Wu BU, Whitlock TL, Lopez R, Repas K, Banks PA, et al. High prevalence of low-trauma fracture in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2680–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Drewes AM. Understanding and treatment of chronic pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:7219–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fridge JL, Conrad C, Gerson L, Castillo RO, Cox K. Risk factors for small bowel bacterial overgrowth in cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007;44:212–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Trespi E, Ferrieri A. Intestinal bacterial overgrowth during chronic pancreatitis. Curr Med Res Opin. 1999;15:47–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pierzynowski SG, Sharma P, Sobczyk J, Garwacki S, Barej W, Weström B. Comparative study of antibacterial activity of pancreatic juice in six mammalian species. Pancreas. 1993;8:546–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Petersen C, Round JL. Defining dysbiosis and its influence on host immunity and disease. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16:1024–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature. 2012;486:222–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sender R, Fuchs S, Milo R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:e1002533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Song S, Jarvie T, Hattori M. Chapter Three—Our Second Genome—Human Metagenome: How Next-Generation Sequencer Changes our Life Through Microbiology. In: Poole RKBT-AiMP, editor.: Academic Press; 2013. p. 119–44.

  17. Mößeler A, Kamphues J. Black-Box gastrointestinal tract—needs and prospects of gaining insights of fate of fat, protein, and starch in case of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency by using fistulated pigs. Nutrients. 2017;9:150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kammlott E, Karthoff J, Stemme K, Gregory P, Kamphues J. Experiments to optimize enzyme substitution therapy in pancreatic duct-ligated pigs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr. 2005;89:105–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Krebs CJ. Ecological methodology. 1999:745.

  20. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dicksved J, Halfvarson J, Rosenquist M, Järnerot G, Tysk C, Apajalahti J, et al. Molecular analysis of the gut microbiota of identical twins with Crohn’s disease. ISME J. 2008;2:716–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kang D-W, Park JG, Ilhan ZE, Wallstrom G, Labaer J, Adams JB, et al. Reduced incidence of Prevotella and other fermenters in intestinal microflora of autistic children. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e68322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lepage P, Häsler R, Spehlmann ME, Rehman A, Zvirbliene A, Begun A, et al. Twin study indicates loss of interaction between microbiota and mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:227–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tschöp MH, Hugenholtz P, Karp CL. Getting to the core of the gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:344–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Frost F, Kacprowski T, Ruhlemann M, Bulow R, Kuhn JP, Franke A, et al. Impaired exocrine pancreatic function associates with changes in intestinal microbiota composition and diversity. Gastroenterology. 2019;156(4):1010–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ahuja M, Schwartz DM, Tandon M, Son A, Zeng M, Swaim W, et al. Orai1-mediated antimicrobial secretion from pancreatic acini shapes the gut microbiome and regulates gut innate immunity. Cell Metab. 2017;25(3):635–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Nishiyama H, Nagai T, Kudo M, Okazaki Y, Azuma Y, Watanabe T, et al. Supplementation of pancreatic digestive enzymes alters the composition of intestinal microbiota in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495:273–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pierzynowska K, Valverde-Piedra J, Szymanczyk S, Prykhod’ko O, Pieszka M, Kardas M, et al. Pancreatic-like enzymes of microbial origin restore growth and normalize lipid absorption in a pig model with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14:407–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Isaiah A, Parambeth JC, Steiner JM, Lidbury JA, Suchodolski JS. The fecal microbiome of dogs with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Anaerobe. 2017;45:50–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lupp C, Robertson ML, Wickham ME, Sekirov I, Champion OL, Gaynor EC, et al. Host-mediated inflammation disrupts the intestinal microbiota and promotes the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae. Cell Host Microbe. 2007;2(2):119–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Shin N-R, Whon TW, Bae J-W. Proteobacteria: microbial signature of dysbiosis in gut microbiota. Trends Biotechnol. 2015;33:496–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhu Y, He C, Li X, Cai Y, Hu J, Liao Y, et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis worsens the severity of acute pancreatitis in patients and mice. J Gastroenterol. 2019;54:347–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Akshintala VS, Talukdar R, Singh VK, Goggins M. The gut microbiome in pancreatic disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(2):290–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Li L, Somerset S. Digestive system dysfunction in cystic fibrosis: challenges for nutrition therapy. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46(10):865–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Soares FS, Amaral FC, Silva NL, Valente MR, Santos LK, Yamashiro LH, et al. Antibiotic-induced pathobiont dissemination accelerates mortality in severe experimental pancreatitis. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:5112–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Schloss P. Information for “MiSeq SOP”-mothur. 2013.

  38. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D590–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol). 1995;57(1):289–300.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Sandra Stoeppeler, Dr. Dorothee Nollmann and Dr. Jens Ehmcke, ZTE University Hospital Muenster, for animal care and the continuous support of this work.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.. Part of this work was funded by a grant of “Bundesministerium fuer Forschung und Bildung” (BMBF) to JS. Haleluya T. Wami was supported by a scholarship by the company Pharma-Zentrale GmbH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Biomedical Technology Center of the Medical Faculty, University of Muenster, Mendelstrasse 17, 48149, Muenster, Germany

    Sabrina Ritz, Daniela Hahn & Juergen Schnekenburger

  2. Institute of Hygiene, University of Muenster, 48149, Muenster, Germany

    Haleluya T. Wami, Karin Tegelkamp & Ulrich Dobrindt

Authors
  1. Sabrina Ritz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniela Hahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Haleluya T. Wami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karin Tegelkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ulrich Dobrindt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Juergen Schnekenburger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Study concept and design: SR, UD, JS. Collection of data, analysis and interpretation: SR, DH, HW, KT, UD, JS. Drafting of the article: SR, DH, HW, UD, JS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juergen Schnekenburger.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments were conducted according to the guidelines of the animal use and care committee of the University of Muenster and the North Rhine Westphalia State Agency for Nature, Environment, and Consumer Protection (LANUV) (no. 84-02.04.2015.A021/01).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1.

 Relative abundance of bacterial order (A) and family (B) in healthy Göttingen minipigs (Healthy, n = 10), in Göttingen minipigs with induced exocrine pancreatic insufficiency without treatment (EPI, n = 9) or after 28 days pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (EPI + PERT, n = 9). Mean values > 0.5% of relative abundance are shown.

Additional file 2.

Heat map of the relative abundance of microbial genera in healthy Göttingen minipigs (Healthy, n = 10), in Göttingen minipigs with induced exocrine pancreatic insufficiency without treatment (EPI, n = 9) or after at least 28 days pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (EPI + PERT, n = 9). Red color represents highest relative abundance, blue color represents lowest relative abundance.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ritz, S., Hahn, D., Wami, H.T. et al. Gut microbiome as a response marker for pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in a porcine model of exocrine pancreas insufficiency. Microb Cell Fact 19, 221 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01482-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01482-2

Keywords

  • Exocrine pancreatic insufficiency
  • Gut microbiota
  • α-diversity
  • β-diversity
  • Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy

Microbial Cell Factories

ISSN: 1475-2859

Contact us