- Open Access
CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene deletions in lager yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus
- Arthur R. Gorter de Vries†1,
- Philip A. de Groot†1,
- Marcel van den Broek1 and
- Jean-Marc G. Daran1Email authorView ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s) 2017
- Received: 23 August 2017
- Accepted: 23 November 2017
- Published: 5 December 2017
The ease of use of CRISPR-Cas9 reprogramming, its high efficacy, and its multiplexing capabilities have brought this technology at the forefront of genome editing techniques. Saccharomyces pastorianus is an aneuploid interspecific hybrid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces eubayanus that has been domesticated for centuries and is used for the industrial fermentation of lager beer. For yet uncharacterised reasons, this hybrid yeast is far more resilient to genetic alteration than its ancestor S. cerevisiae.
This study reports a new CRISPR-Cas9 method for accurate gene deletion in S. pastorianus. This method combined the Streptococcus pyogenes cas9 gene expressed from either a chromosomal locus or from a mobile genetic element in combination with a plasmid-borne gRNA expression cassette. While the well-established gRNA expression system using the RNA polymerase III dependent SNR52 promoter failed, expression of a gRNA flanked with Hammerhead and Hepatitis Delta Virus ribozymes using the RNA polymerase II dependent TDH3 promoter successfully led to accurate deletion of all four alleles of the SeILV6 gene in strain CBS1483. Furthermore the expression of two ribozyme-flanked gRNAs separated by a 10-bp linker in a polycistronic array successfully led to the simultaneous deletion of SeATF1 and SeATF2, genes located on two separate chromosomes. The expression of this array resulted in the precise deletion of all five and four alleles mediated by homologous recombination in the strains CBS1483 and Weihenstephan 34/70 respectively, demonstrating the multiplexing abilities of this gRNA expression design.
These results firmly established that CRISPR-Cas9 significantly facilitates and accelerates genome editing in S. pastorianus.
- Saccharomyces pastorianus
- Genome editing
Lager beer is the most produced fermented beverage: in 2015 the worldwide production reached a global volume of 170 × 10+9 L. The fermentation workhorse of lager brewing is Saccharomyces pastorianus, a natural interspecific hybrid of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces eubayanus [1, 2] whose domestication is thought to have occurred in central Europe (Bohemia, nowadays Czech republic) in the late Middle Ages. Its ability to ferment at low temperature, to flocculate and to produce a vast range of flavour compounds make S. pastorianus well suited for the brewing process. In addition to their hybrid nature, S. pastorianus strains share a high degree of aneuploidy. While the first strain of S. pastorianus Weihenstephan 34/70 was sequenced in 2009 , the exact chromosome complement of lager yeast was revealed later with the introduction of next generation sequencing [3–6]. Within S. pastorianus genomes, chromosomes may be completely absent or present in up to five copies and chromosome copy numbers vary widely across different strains . This intricate genome organisation significantly complicates functional gene analysis. Indeed, a simple gene deletion based on double crossover mediated by homologous recombination requires successive removal of all copies of the gene in both sub-genomes by several rounds of transformation. In association with a low propensity to perform homologous recombination, the difficulty to delete high copy number genes may explain the quasi-absence of examples of functional characterisation of S. pastorianus genes in the scientific literature based on impact of gene deletion [7–9]. Instead a S. pastorianus gene or allele is usually cloned in S. cerevisiae and characterised based on the impact of the overexpression. However, such approaches do not take into account the role of the orthologous gene harboured by the other sub-genome, the possible occurrence of paralogs, and the gene expression regulation of the gene in its allo-aneuploid genetic background. Therefore, tools are needed to achieve efficient genome editing in allo-aneuploid S. pastorianus not only to enable targeted genetic modification, but also to enable functional gene analysis.
The exposed DNA strand ends resulting from a DNA double strand break (DSB) are extremely recombinogenic [10, 11]. Even in Saccharomyces cerevisiae that exhibits a natural inclination to perform homologous recombination, introduction of a programmed DSB by combining the insertion an I-SceI restriction site in a chromosomal locus and expression of the endonuclease encoding gene SCEI showed substantial stimulation of homologous recombination at the cut site enabling the correct assembly of multiple DNA fragments . Although efficient, the use of SceI induced DSB is limited since it requires the insertion of the recognition site prior its utilisation. In the past 5 years, the advent of the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat)—Cas9 (CRISPR-associated protein 9) system derived from Streptococcus pyogenes has considerably transformed genome engineering approaches [13, 14]. The system comprises two elements: a short chimeric RNA that derives from the fusion of the tracr and crRNA called guide RNA (gRNA), and the endonuclease Cas9 [13, 14]. By forming a complex with Cas9, the gRNA provides sequence specificity to the system. The hetero-duplex formed by the gRNA and the genomic target places the endonuclease which generates a blunt ended DSB. The systems has been successfully implemented in S. cerevisiae [15–19], which broadened genome editing possibilities by allowing multiplexing [15, 16, 18] and high precision in vivo site-directed mutagenesis . The expression of the gRNA has been a point of attention since the gRNA secondary structures are crucial for the formation of the complex with Cas9. Therefore the 5′ capping and 3′ polyadenylation present in RNA polymerase II transcripts have to be avoided. By analogy with the expression of gRNA in human cell lines , placing the gRNA behind the control of a RNA polymerase III dependent promoter (e.g. SNR52p) resulted in expression of an active gRNA lacking these modifications . In addition, due to the lack of polyadenylation-mediated export to the cytosol, RNA polymerase III transcribed gRNAs reside in the nucleus longer where they can form a complex with Cas9.
However gRNA expression from a RNA polymerase III was shown to result in low and unstable transcript levels . To overcome this issue while avoiding inactivation of the gRNA by 5′ capping and 3′ polyadenylation, the gRNA can be flanked by two ribozymes molecules and expressed by RNA polymerase II. Upon transcription the ribozymes self-cleave, resulting in removal of 5′ and 3- ends and release of a mature gRNA [19, 21]. Such CRISPR-Cas9 systems have been confirmed to mediate efficient genome editing in multiple cell types already, such as human cell lines [13, 14, 22], mice , zebrafish , Caenorhabditis elegans [25, 26], Drosophila , yeasts [15, 16, 28, 29], and plants [30–32].
The goal of the present study was to explore the use of CRISPR-Cas9 in S. pastorianus, a yeast with low genetic accessibility that is characterised by a unique allo-aneuploid genome. To this end, we present the construction of molecular tools to achieve efficient single and double simultaneous gene deletions. The successful application of this methodology offers an opportunity to get a deeper understanding of hybrid yeast biology.
Strains and growth conditions
Strains used throughout this study
SPR3::AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5t
SPR3::AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5t ΔSeilv6
MATa can1Δ::AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5t natNT2
Under nonselective conditions, Saccharomyces pastorianus and cerevisiae strains were grown in complex medium (YPD) containing 10 g L−1 yeast extract, 20 g L−1 peptone, and 20 g L−1 glucose. For nourseothricin selection, YPD medium was supplemented with 100 μg L−1 of the antibiotic. Synthetic media (SM) containing 20 g L−1 glucose, 3 g L−1 KH2PO4, 0.5 g L−1 MgSO47H2O, 5 g L−1 (NH4)2SO4, 1 mL L−1 of a trace element solution and of a vitamin solution was prepared as previously described . For selection of yeast strains harboring an acetamidase marker  (NH4)2SO4 was replaced by 0.6 g L−1 acetamide as nitrogen source and 6.6 g L−1 K2SO4 to compensate for sulfate (SM-Ac). Loss of the acetamide marker was selected for on SM containing 2.3 g L−1 fluoroacetamide (SM-Fac) . The pH in all media was adjusted to 6.0 with KOH. Solid media were prepared by adding 2% agar to the various media. The strains of S. pastorianus and cerevisiae were incubated at 20 and 30 °C respectively.
Shake flask cultures of S. pastorianus were grown at 20 °C in 500 mL flasks containing 100 mL complete medium (YPD) with 20 g L−1 glucose in an Innova 43/43R shaker (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, NY) set at 200 rpm. Frozen stocks were prepared by addition of glycerol (30% v/v) to exponentially growing shake-flask cultures of S. cerevisiae, S. pastorianus and overnight cultures of Escherichia coli and stored aseptically in 1 mL aliquots at − 80 °C.
For growth studies in shake flasks, S. pastorianus strains were grown in shake flasks with complete medium YPD. Growth rates were based on optical density at 660 nm (OD660) measurements using a Libra S11 spectrophotometer (Biochrom, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Specific growth rates were calculated from exponential fits of the OD660 against time.
Plasmids used throughout the study
ori amp r ARS4 CEN6 LEU2 AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5
ori amp r 2 μm natNT2 SNR52p-gRNA CAN1 -SUP4t
ori amp r 2 μm hphNT1 gRNA CAN1 gRNA ADE2
ori amp r LacZ multiple cloning site
ori amp r AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5t
ori amp r NotI HRL AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5t natNT2 HRMNotI
ori kan r SHRA AgTEF1p-amdS-AgTEF1t SHRB
ori kan r SHRB AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -PHO5t
ori kan r SHRB panARSopt SHRC
ori kan r SHRC TDH3p BsaI BsaI CYC1t SHRI
ori kan r SHRI bla ori SHRA
ori amp r BsaI gRNA SeILV6 BsaI
ori amp r BsaI gRNASeATF1 gRNA SeATF2 BsaI
ori amp r panARSopt AgTEF1p-amdS-AgTEF1t TDH3p BsaI BsaI CYC1t
ori amp r panARSopt AgTEF1p-amdS-AgTEF1t TDH3p BsaI BsaI CYC1t AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5t
ori amp r panARSopt AgTEF1p-amdS-AgTEF1t TDH3p-HH-gRNA SeILV6 -HDV-CYC1t
ori amp r panARSopt AgTEF1p-amdS-AgTEF1t TDH3p-HH-gRNA SeILV6 -HDV-CYC1t AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5t
ori amp r panARSopt AgTEF1p-amdS-AgTEF1t TDH3p-HH-gRNA SeATF1 -HDV-HH-gRNA SeATF2-HDV-CYC1t
AaTEF1p-Spcas9 D147Y P411T -ScPHO5t
ori amp r 2 μm hphNT1 gRNA URA3
Primers used in this study
Amplification SHR I
Amplification SHR A
Amplification SHR B
Amplification SHR C
Amplification SHR B
Amplification SHR A
Amplification SHR C
Amplification SHR I
Repair DNA SeURA3
Repair DNA SeURA3
pROS12 + ScURA3 gRNA
Repair DNA ScURA3
Repair DNA ScURA3
Diagnostic primer ILV6
Repair fragment construction
Repair fragment construction
Diagnostic primer ILV6
Diagnostic primer ScURA3
Diagnostic primer ScURA3
Diagnostic primer SeURA3
Diagnostic primer SeURA3
Amplification ScPHO5t + addition SHR F
LCR bridging oligo
LCR bridging oligo
LCR bridging oligo
LCR bridging oligo
Amplification panARSopt + addition of SHR F
40 bp to pUC19 + NotI restriction + Left Homology arm fw
Left Homology arm rv + 40 bp to AaTEF1p
40 bp to natNT2 + right homology arm fw
Right homology arm rv + NotI restriction + 40 bp to pUC19
40 bp to ScPHO5t + natNT2 fw
Repair DNA ILV6
Repair DNA ILV6
Repair DNA SeATF1
Repair DNA SeATF1
Repair DNA SeATF2
Repair DNA SeATF2
pUD423 was assembled from plasmids pCT, pUD528 and pUC19. The Streptococcus pyogenes cas9 open reading frame (cas9 D147Y P411T ) was amplified from the plasmid pCT (Addgene plasmid #60621) (https://www.addgene.org/) using the primers 9390 and 9391. The AaTEF1 promoter flanked upstream by short homology flank (SHF) B was amplified from the plasmid pUD528 using the primers 3841 and 9394. The ScPHO5 terminator fragment was amplified from pUD528 using the primers 9392 and 9393, resulting in the addition of SHR F downstream of the terminator. The three fragments together with the pUC19 backbone  amplified with the primers 7389 and 9395 were assembled in vitro using ligase chain reaction (LCR) with primers 9396–9399 as bridging oligonucleotides as described previously  and the resulting plasmid pUD423 was verified using digestion with NdeI.
The cassette for integration of cas9 into the SPR3 locus was assembled on pUD526. Flanks for homologous recombination of about 500 bp were amplified from genomic DNA of CBS1483 using primers sets 10432/10433 and 10434/10435 adding NotI restriction sites upstream of the left homology arm and downstream of the right homology arm and 40 bp homology flanks on both sides of the homology arms for “Gibson” assembly . The cas9 expression cassette was amplified from plasmid pUD423 using primers 10426 and 10427, the nourseothricin marker was amplified from pMEL15  using primers 3597 and 10436 adding a 40 bp homology flank upstream of the nat gene, and the plasmid backbone was amplified from plasmid pUC19 using primers 7389 and 9395. Next, 0.2 pmol of each fragment were assembled into pUD526 using NEBuilder® HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA), verified by digestion with BamHI and NotI. The integration cassette was obtained by digestion of the plasmid using NotI followed by gel purification.
pUDP004 was assembled from plasmids pUD423, pUD527, pUD530, pUD531 and pUD532 (Fig. 2). The amdS selection cassette  was amplified from pUD527 using primers 3847 and 3276 introducing SHF A and B flanks. The cas9 expression cassette was amplified from pUD423 using primers 3841 and 9393 containing SHF B and F flanks. The synthetic pangenomic yeast replication origin panARSopt  was amplified from pUD530 using primers 9663 and 3856 containing the SHF C flank and introducing the SHF F flank, thereby replacing the SHF B flank. The gRNA introduction site was amplified from pUD531 using primers 3283 and 4068 containing SHF C and I flanks. The E. coli replication origin from pBR322 and the bla gene conferring resistance to β-lactam antibiotics were amplified from pUDP532 using primers 3274 and 3275 containing SHF I and A flanks. The amplified fragments were digested with DpnI, gel purified and quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (ThermoFischer Scientific). 0.2 pmol of each fragment were assembled into pUDP004 using NEBuilder® HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix (New England BioLabs). The assembled plasmid pUDP004 was verified by restriction analysis using PdmI.
The gRNA sequences for pUDP type plasmids were designed such that they could be synthesized and inserted into pUDP003 or pUDP004 by digestion with BsaI and ligation. From 5′ to 3′, the sequences were composed of a BsaI recognition site yielding correct sticky ends “GGTCTCGCAAA”, followed by the hammerhead ribozyme with the first six nucleotides being the reverse complement (c) of the first six nucleotides of the gRNA spacer “cN 6 c N 5 c N 4 c N 3 c N 2 c N1CUGAUGAGUCCGUGAGGACGAAACGAGUAAGC UCGUC”, followed by the 20 nucleotide gRNA spacer designed as previously , followed by the structural gRNA “GUUUUAGAGCUAGAAAUAGCAAGUUAAAAUAAGGCUAGUCCGUUAUCAACUUGAAAAAGUGGCACCGAGUCGGUGCUUUU”, followed by the Hepatitis Delta Virus ribozyme “GGCCGGCAUGGUCCCAGCCUCCUCGCUGGCGCCGGCUGGGCAACAUGCUUCGGCAUGGCGAAUGGGAC”, followed again by a BsaI recognition site yielding correct sticky ends “ACAGCGAGACC”. For multiplexing, linker “ACAGCGCAAA” was added between the HDV ribozyme of the first gRNA and the HH ribozyme of the second gRNA. Plasmids pUD536, containing the gRNA sequence targeting SeILV6, and pUD573, containing a polycistronic array with gRNAs targeting SeATF1 and SeATF2, were de novo synthesised at GeneArt (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The plasmid pUDP010, expressing gRNA SeILV6 , was constructed in a one-pot reaction by digesting pUDP003 and pUD536 using BsaI and ligating with T4 ligase. Similarly pUDP012, expressing gRNA SeILV6 and Spcas9 D147Y P411T, was assembled from pUDP004 and pUD536 and pUDP044, expressing gRNA SeATF1 ::gRNA SeATF2 and Spcas9 D147Y P411T was assembled from pUDP004 and pUD573. Correct assembly of pUDP010 was verified by restriction analysis with SspI and correct assembly of pUDP012 and pUDP044 was verified by restriction analysis using PdmI. Plasmid pUDR107, expressing gRNA URA3 , was constructed using NEBuilder® HiFi DNA Assembly Master Mix by assembling the 2 μm fragment amplified from pROS12 with primer 8314 and the plasmid backbone amplified from pROS12 with primer 6005 as previously described in .
The strain IMX1187 was constructed by transforming CBS1483 with 1 µg of the NotI-digested and gel purified integration cassette from pUD526 by electroporation and plated on YPD with nourseothricin (Fig. 1). After 5 days, 14 colonies had grown and integration of cas9 was confirmed using primers 3750 and 9394. One of the colonies was stocked and sequenced.
IMX1205 (Fig. 1) was constructed by transforming IMX1187 by electroporation with 500 ng of pUDP010 and 1 µg of a 120 bp repair fragment obtained by mixing an equimolar amount of primers 10686 and 10687. Transformants were selected on SM-Ac plates. Transformants were confirmed using primers 9310 and 9313. Prior stocking the isolate was successively streaked out on SM-Ac, YPD and SM-FAc plates. Genotype was systematically verified after each plating round with primers 9310 and 9313. In the end, one of the colonies was stocked.
IMK771 (Fig. 1) was constructed by transforming CBS1483 by electroporation with 200 ng of pUDP012 and 1 µg of 120 bp repair product obtained by mixing an equimolar amount of primers 10686 and 10687. Transformants were selected on SM-Ac plates. Deletion of SeILV6 was confirmed using primers 9310 and 9313. Prior stocking the isolate was successively streaked out on SM-Ac, YPD and SM-FAc plates. Genotype was systematically verified after each plating round with primers 9310 and 9313. In the end, one of the colonies was stocked and sequenced.
IMK786 (Fig. 1) was constructed by transforming CBS1483 by electroporation with 200 ng of pUDP044 and 1 µg of 120 bp repair product obtained by mixing an equimolar quantity of primers 10992 and 10993 for SeATF1 and 1 µg of 120 bp repair product obtained by mixing an equimolar quantity of primers 10994 and 10995 for SeATF2. Transformants were selected on SM-Ac plates, deletion of SeATF1 and SeATF2 was confirmed using primers 11000/11001 and primers 11002/11003, respectively. Prior stocking the isolate was successively streaked out on SM-Ac, YPD and SM-FAc plates. Genotype was systematically verified after each plating round with primers pairs 11000/11001 and 11002/11003 to confirm SeATTF1 and SeATF2 deletions. In the end, one of the colonies was stocked.
IMK813 (Fig. 1) was constructed by transforming Weihenstephan 34/70 by electroporation with 200 ng of pUDP044 and 1 µg of 120 bp repair product obtained by mixing an equimolar quantity of primers 10992 and 10993 for SeATF1 and 1 µg of 120 bp repair product obtained by mixing an equimolar quantity of primers 10994 and 10995 for SeATF2. Transformants were selected on SM-Ac plates, deletion of SeATF1 and SeATF2 was confirmed using primers 11000/11001 and primers 11002/11003, respectively.
Next generation sequencing
IMX1187 and IMK771 were incubated in 500-mL shake-flasks containing 100 mL liquid YPD medium at 20 °C on an orbital shaker set at 200 rpm until the strains reached stationary phase with an OD660 between 12 and 20. Genomic DNA for whole genome sequencing was isolated using the Qiagen 100/G kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using a Qubit® Fluorometer 2.0 (ThermoFisher Scientific). 51.57 µg of genomic DNA from IMX1187 and 14.20 µg from IMK771 was sequenced by Novogene Bioinformatics Technology Co., Ltd (Yuen Long, Hong Kong) on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with 150 bp paired-end reads using True-seq PCR-free library preparation (Illumina). CRISPR-Cas9 assisted deletions were verified by mapping the sequencing reads onto the S. pastorianus CBS1483 genome  using the Burrows–Wheeler Alignment tool (BWA) and further processed using SAMtools [41, 42]. The deletions were confirmed by visualising the generated .bam files in the Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) software . The sequencing data are available at NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) under the Bioproject PRJNA397648.
Construction of a S. pastorianus strain expressing cas9
gRNA delivery systems for efficient editing in S. pastorianus
The ability to obtain successful deletion of ILV6 using the pUDP expression system indicated effective expression of the integrated cas9 in S. pastorianus IMX1187, despite its imperfect integration in the SPR3 locus. The failure to obtain deletion of URA3 using the RNA polymerase III dependent gRNA expression system in S. pastorianus IMX1187 while deletion was possible in S. cerevisiae IMX585 indicated that this gRNA expression system was not effective in S. pastorianus. Based on literature, this ineffectiveness may be caused by low gRNA transcripts levels. Regardless, the new pUDP expression system was functional in S. pastorianus and the deletion of ILV6 constituted the first reported successful use of Cas9 engineering in S. pastorianus.
Plasmid-based co-expression of Cas9 and gRNA in S. pastorianus
Given the notoriously low efficiency of gene insertion by homologous recombination in the genome of S. pastorianus, a plasmid was designed for co-expression of cas9 together with the gRNA, which would render cas9 expression more reproducible and facilitate genome editing in different S. pastorianus strains. The plasmid pUDP004 combined the cas9 expression cassette previously integrated in IMX1187 and the different elements of pUDP003 including the RNA polymerase II dependent gRNA expression cassette (Fig. 2). To assess the efficacy of the pUDP004 system relative to the chromosome borne cas9 together with the pUDP003 system, gRNA SeILV6 was inserted in pUDP004 and the resulting plasmid pUDP012 was used to transform CBS1483. In absence of a 120-bp repair DNA, a total of 14 transformants were obtained, while the number of transformants increased by 63-fold reaching a total of 884 transformants when the repair fragment was co-transformed. Diagnostic PCR using primers 9310 and 9313 confirmed successful deletion of SeILV6 in for all tested colonies and one colony producing a fragment corresponding to effective deletion of SeILV6 was stocked as IMK771. To eliminate any doubt, the IMK771 genome was resequenced using Illumina sequencing technology. The 150-bp pair-end reads were mapped on the CBS1483 reference genome sequence  and as expected no reads mapped to the region targeted for deletion, indicating complete deletion of all four alleles of SeILV6. These results demonstrated that the plasmid-based co-expression of cas9 and a gRNA was functional and could be used for effective genome editing in S. pastorianus.
Multiplexing gene targeting by expression of double ribozyme flanked gRNAs array
Despite the preexisting good genetic accessibility of S. cerevisiae strains, CRISPR-Cas9 mediated editing greatly simplified genome engineering approaches. In particular, the ability to multiplex editing events [15, 18, 50]. Therefore, the possibility of multiplexed gRNA expression was investigated in the pUDP expression system. Conveniently, the self-cleaving properties of the ribozymes might be compatible with the construction of adjacent HH-gRNA-HDV linked in a polycistronic array.
Saccharomyces pastorianus is not genetically amendable
The results reported in this study firmly established that CRISPR-Cas9 improves the performance of homology-directed recombination in S. pastorianus. In contrast to S. cerevisiae, a species amenable to genetic modification, the interspecific hybrid S. pastorianus has shown higher resilience to targeted genetic alterations. This was exemplified by the attempt to integrate the cas9 gene at a specific chromosomal site using traditional double cross over. The size of the cassette complicated the genotype characterisation, but the presence of the endonuclease gene was confirmed and although whole genome resequencing of the strain IMX1187 did not completely resolve the structure of the recombined locus, it strongly suggested that a single crossover integration event occurred, resulting in integration of cas9 next to SPR3 instead of replacing SPR3 as intended. Several literature reports corroborated our unfortunate experience [7, 8]. In different microbial systems, the efficiency of integration by homologous recombination was improved by impairing the non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) function [51–53]. This approach, though successful, was often accompanied by side effects such as an exacerbated sensitivity to environmental stresses. In S. cerevisiae, inactivation of Yku70 and Yku80, two proteins involved in NHEJ, resulted in severe alterations of telomere maintenance and function as well as in deregulation of the cell cycle [54–58], which might explain why this strategy has never been attempted in S. pastorianus. Furthermore, the absence of improvement of the S. pastorianus genetic accessibility is not so surprising after all, since the brewing industry as most industries involved in fermentation of products intended for human consumption, has been reluctant to apply genetically modified organisms by fear of consumers group opinion , and has privileged classical strain improvement programmes.
Eventually, the results reported in this study demonstrated that the introduction of a DSB, which stimulates occurrence of homologous recombination, would represent an efficient solution to circumvent the natural resilience to targeted genetic modification in S. pastorianus.
gRNA expression in S. pastorianus
Fortunately, the proposed alternative involving expression of a ribozyme protected gRNA system turned out to be successful. In this method already used in human cells , plants [21, 32] and fungi [64, 65] the gRNA construct is expressed from a RNA polymerase II promoter. All CRISPR-Cas9 assisted deletions attempted (SeILV6, SeATF1 and SeATF2) were introduced with high fidelity. The challenging nature of genetic modification in S. pastorianus does not come only from the low efficiency of homologous recombination, but also from the requirement to delete multiple alleles simultaneously due to its extensive aneuploidy . In the case of SeILV6, four alleles were simultaneously deleted without introduction of any markers at the loci. The fact that all alleles were deleted at once as intended demonstrates the potency of a CRISPR-Cas9 induced DSB to stimulate targeted homology-mediated integration and circumvent unreliability of recombination in S. pastorianus. Remarkably, this could be achieved simultaneously at two different chromosomal loci (SeATF1 on CHR SeVIII-SeXV and SeATF2 CHR SeVII-ScVII) as well . In total, this resulted in the deletion of five different alleles, one short to the highest number of simultaneously completed deletions in S. cerevisiae . While previously suggested [21, 63], polycistronic ribozymes flanked gRNA expressed from a RNA pol II promoter had never been assayed before. Our results experimentally confirmed that 5′ and 3′ extension as designed at the junction of the two gRNA cassettes did not hinder self-cleavage of HH and HDV ribozymes and allow release of functional mature gRNAs. This result provided a glimpse of the potential of this mode of expression. It would suggest that construction of polycistronic array including more than two gRNA could be contemplated.
Expanding the S. pastorianus genetic tool box
The present study delivered the first really efficient technical solution readily useable to perform targeted genetic modifications in S. pastorianus. The functionality of two modes of Cas9 expression was shown. Chromosomal integration of cas9 (IMX1187) coupled with plasmid-based gRNA expression might be privileged when successive transformations are foreseen . However, plasmid-based cas9 and gRNA co-expression proved to be as effective and presents the advantage to be easily transferable in multiple strain backgrounds. For efficient use of the provided repair fragment to recombine at the locus of the Cas9-induced DSB, Cas9 activity and presence of the repair DNA have to be synchronous. The correct integration of the repair fragment during single and double gene editing showed that the endonuclease was transcribed and translated fast enough for free linear DNA to still be available for repair of the induced DSB. These outcomes were in line with similar approaches attempted in S. cerevisiae or in Aspergillus niger [36, 47, 64]. The presence of the gRNA is not constantly needed, as soon as the chromosomal double cut is inserted and preferably repaired, the plasmid has to be lost to recover a plasmid-free modified strain to either test the strain physiology or to prepare the constructed strain for a next editing round. The selection marker and replication origin used in the pUDP expression system tested in this work were designed to be broadly applicable and to facilitate rapid plasmid recycling. The dominant acetamidase marker confers the ability to use acetamide as sole nitrogen source and can be used in prototrophic strains such as lager yeasts or more generally industrial Saccharomyces strains. Plasmids carrying the amdS marker can be counter selected by growth in presence of fluoro-acetamide . Additionally the panARSopt replication origin ) derived from K. lactis used in the pUDP expression system was shown to be functional in a wide range of yeast species including S. cerevisiae. Contrarily to most replication origins such as the 2 μm replication origin, which necessitates the presence of a wild type native 2 μm plasmid to provide the enzymatic replicative machinery, panARSopt does not require any other genetic element. Furthermore, like ARS-CEN-based plasmids, panARS-based plasmids showed loss frequencies ranging between 5 and 10% per generation when grown in non-selective conditions . These properties should permit efficient use of the pUDP expression system in various strain backgrounds, which might help to standardize a genome editing protocol starting from the design and cloning of the gRNA to the selection of correctly edited strains which have lost the pUDP plasmid.
Finally, while the scope of this work limited the tools application to single and double gene deletions, the availability of CRISPR-Cas9 editing tool makes a broad range of genetic modifications possible. Analogously to modification techniques applied in S. cerevisiae, the pUDP expression system might be applied for in vivo site directed mutagenesis and targeted introduction of multiple genes or entirely new pathways. In S. pastorianus, such modifications would finally allow to systematically investigate the contribution of genes involved in brewing-relevant phenotypes of S. pastorianus. In particular, the use of subgenome specific gRNA targets could enable targeted modification of genes from the S. cerevisiae and S. eubayanus subgenomes and thereby enable research on their interaction. For example, elucidation of the role of individual flocculation genes or implication of individual maltose and maltotriose transporter in S. pastorianus could now be envisaged.
The gRNA and Cas9 expression system developed in this study enabled CRISPR-Cas9 engineering in S. pastorianus. The system was applied successfully for the deletion of all alleles of SeILV6 and could be multiplexed successfully to obtain the simultaneous deletion of all alleles of SeATF1 and SeATF2. While the system was only tested for gene deletion in this study, functional CRISPR-Cas9 engineering in S. pastorianus should also facilitate approaches such as gene insertions and directed mutagenesis. As S. pastorianus is notoriously resilient to genetic modification, these developments significantly improve its genetic accessibility and facilitate future research into the complex allo-aneuploid genome of S. pastorianus.
PAdG performed plasmid and strain construction. ARGdV prepared genomic DNA for whole genome sequencing. ARGdV and MvdB performed bioinformatics analysis. JMGD designed the pUDP-based Cas9 modification system. ARGdV and JMGD supervised the study. ARGdV, PAdG and JMGD wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors would like to thank Hannes Jürgens (Delft University of Technology) and Veronica Gast (Delft University of Technology) for their contributions to the pUDP plasmid modification system. We also would like to thank Xavier Hakkaart for kindly providing pUDR107. We are thankful to Prof. Jack T. Pronk (Delft University of Technology) and Dr. Niels Kuijpers (HEINEKEN Supply Chain B.V.) for their support during this project and their critical reading of the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Availability of data and materials
The raw sequencing data of IMX1187 and IMK771 are available at NCBI under the Bioproject PRJNA397648. Plasmids pUDP003, pUDP004. pUDP010, pUDP012 and pUDP044 were deposited at addgene (http://www.addgene.org/).
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This work was performed within the BE-Basic R&D Program (http://www.be-basic.org/), which was granted an FES subsidy from the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation (EL&I).
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Libkind D, Hittinger CT, Valerio E, Goncalves C, Dover J, Johnston M, Goncalves P, Sampaio JP. Microbe domestication and the identification of the wild genetic stock of lager-brewing yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:14539–44.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakao Y, Kanamori T, Itoh T, Kodama Y, Rainieri S, Nakamura N, Shimonaga T, Hattori M, Ashikari T. Genome sequence of the lager brewing yeast, an interspecies hybrid. DNA Res. 2009;16:115–29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Okuno M, Kajitani R, Ryusui R, Morimoto H, Kodama Y, Itoh T. Next-generation sequencing analysis of lager brewing yeast strains reveals the evolutionary history of interspecies hybridization. DNA Res. 2016;23:67–80.Google Scholar
- van den Broek M, Bolat I, Nijkamp JF, Ramos E, Luttik MAH, Koopman F, Geertman JM, de Ridder D, Pronk JT, Daran JM. Chromosomal copy number variation in Saccharomyces pastorianus is evidence for extensive genome dynamics in industrial lager brewing strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:6253–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Walther A, Hesselbart A, Wendland J. Genome sequence of Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, the world’s first pure culture lager yeast. G3. 2014;4:783–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hewitt SK, Donaldson IJ, Lovell SC, Delneri D. Sequencing and characterisation of rearrangements in three S. pastorianus strains reveals the presence of chimeric genes and gives evidence of breakpoint reuse. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e92203.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Duong CT, Strack L, Futschik M, Katou Y, Nakao Y, Fujimura T, Shirahige K, Kodama Y, Nevoigt E. Identification of Sc-type ILV6 as a target to reduce diacetyl formation in lager brewers’ yeast. Metab Eng. 2011;13:638–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bolat I, Romagnoli G, Zhu F, Pronk JT, Daran JM. Functional analysis and transcriptional regulation of two orthologs of ARO10, encoding broad-substrate-specificity 2-oxo-acid decarboxylases, in the brewing yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus CBS1483. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013;13:505–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murakami N, Miyoshi S, Yokoyama R, Hoshida H, Akada R, Ogata T. Construction of a URA3 deletion strain from the allotetraploid bottom-fermenting yeast Saccharomyces pastorianus. Yeast. 2012;29:155–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bollag RJ, Waldman AS, Liskay RM. Homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Genet. 1989;23:199–225.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Choulika A, Perrin A, Dujon B, Nicolas JF. Induction of homologous recombination in mammalian chromosomes by using the I-SceI system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:1968–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kuijpers NGA, Solis-Escalante D, Bosman L, van den Broek M, Pronk JT, Daran JM, Daran-Lapujade P. A versatile, efficient strategy for assembly of multi-fragment expression vectors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using 60 bp synthetic recombination sequences. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337:816–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cong L, Ran FA, Cox D, Lin S, Barretto R, Habib N, Hsu PD, Wu X, Jiang W, Marraffini LA, Zhang F. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science. 2013;339:819–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mans R, van Rossum HM, Wijsman M, Backx A, Kuijpers NGA, van den Broek M, Daran-Lapujade P, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA, Daran JMG. CRISPR/Cas9: a molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15:fov004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4336–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jakociunas T, Rajkumar AS, Zhang J, Arsovska D, Rodriguez A, Jendresen CB, Skjodt ML, Nielsen AT, Borodina I, Jensen MK, Keasling JD. CasEMBLR: Cas9-facilitated multiloci genomic integration of in vivo assembled DNA parts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:1226–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Horwitz AA, Walter JM, Schubert MG, Kung SH, Hawkins K, Platt DM, Hernday AD, Mahatdejkul-Meadows T, Szeto W, Chandran SS, Newman JD. Efficient multiplexed integration of synergistic alleles and metabolic pathways in yeasts via CRISPR-Cas. Cell Syst. 2015;1:88–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ryan OW, Cate JHD. Multiplex engineering of industrial yeast genomes using CRISPRm. Method Enzymol. 2014;546:473–89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Turowski TW, Tollervey D. Transcription by RNA polymerase III: insights into mechanism and regulation. Biochem Soc Trans. 2016;44:1367–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gao Y, Zhao Y. Self-processing of ribozyme-flanked RNAs into guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR-mediated genome editing. J Int Plant Biol. 2014;56:343–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mali P, Yang L, Esvelt KM, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Church GM. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science. 2013;339:823–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li W, Teng F, Li T, Zhou Q. Simultaneous generation and germline transmission of multiple gene mutations in rat using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:684–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hwang WY, Fu Y, Reyon D, Maeder ML, Tsai SQ, Sander JD, Peterson RT, Yeh JR, Joung JK. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:227–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Friedland AE, Tzur YB, Esvelt KM, Colaiacovo MP, Church GM, Calarco JA. Heritable genome editing in C. elegans via a CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Methods. 2013;10:741–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Waaijers S, Portegijs V, Kerver J, Lemmens BB, Tijsterman M, van den Heuvel S, Boxem M. CRISPR/Cas9-targeted mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2013;195:1187–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gratz SJ, Cummings AM, Nguyen JN, Hamm DC, Donohue LK, Harrison MM, Wildonger J, O’Connor-Giles KM. Genome engineering of Drosophila with the CRISPR RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease. Genetics. 2013;194:1029–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Schwartz CM, Hussain MS, Blenner M, Wheeldon I. Synthetic RNA polymerase III promoters facilitate high-efficiency CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5:356–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weninger A, Hatzl AM, Schmid C, Vogl T, Glieder A. Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. J Biotechnol. 2016;235:139–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Feng Z, Zhang B, Ding W, Liu X, Yang DL, Wei P, Cao F, Zhu S, Zhang F, Mao Y, Zhu JK. Efficient genome editing in plants using a CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res. 2013;23:1229–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Zhang B, Yang X, Yang CP, Li MY, Guo YL. Exploiting the CRISPR/Cas9 system for targeted genome mutagenesis in petunia. Sci Rep. 2016;6:20315.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Miao J, Guo D, Zhang J, Huang Q, Qin G, Zhang X, Wan J, Gu H, Qu LJ. Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system. Cell Res. 2013;23:1233–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Vandijken JP. Effect of benzoic-acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts—a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast. 1992;8:501–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Solis-Escalante D, Kuijpers NG, Bongaerts N, Bolat I, Bosman L, Pronk JT, Daran JM, Daran-Lapujade P. amdSYM, a new dominant recyclable marker cassette for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013;13:126–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson JR, Register E, Curotto J, Kurtz M, Kelly R. An improved protocol for the preparation of yeast cells for transformation by electroporation. Yeast. 1998;14:565–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bao ZH, Xiao H, Lang J, Zhang L, Xiong X, Sun N, Si T, Zhao HM. Homology-integrated CRISPR-Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2015;4:585–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene. 1985;33:103–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- de Kok S, Stanton LH, Slaby T, Durot M, Holmes VF, Patel KG, Platt D, Shapland EB, Serber Z, Dean J, et al. Rapid and reliable DNA assembly via ligase cycling reaction. ACS Synth Biol. 2014;3:97–106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA 3rd, Smith HO. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods. 2009;6:343–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liachko I, Dunham MJ. An autonomously replicating sequence for use in a wide range of budding yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:364–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:589–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing S. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. 2011;29:24–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wartmann T, Boer E, Pico AH, Sieber H, Bartelsen O, Gellissen G, Kunze G. High-level production and secretion of recombinant proteins by Arxula adeninivorans. Yeast. 2003;20:S326.Google Scholar
- Goldstein AL, McCusker JH. Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1999;15:1541–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Generoso WC, Gottardi M, Oreb M, Boles E. Simplified CRISPR-Cas genome editing for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Microbiol Methods. 2016;127:203–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Guffanti E, Ferrari R, Preti M, Forloni M, Harismendy O, Lefebvre O, Dieci G. A minimal promoter for TFIIIC-dependent in vitro transcription of snoRNA and tRNA genes by RNA polymerase III. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:23945–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harismendy O, Gendrel CG, Soularue P, Gidrol X, Sentenac A, Werner M, Lefebvre O. Genome-wide location of yeast RNA polymerase III transcription machinery. EMBO J. 2003;22:4738–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ronda C, Maury J, Jakociunas T, Jacobsen SAB, Germann SM, Harrison SJ, Borodina I, Keasling JD, Jensen MK, Nielsen AT. CrEdit: CRISPR mediated multi-loci gene integration in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Krappmann S, Sasse C, Braus GH. Gene targeting in Aspergillus fumigatus by homologous recombination is facilitated in a nonhomologous end-joining-deficient genetic background. Eukaryot Cell. 2006;5:212–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ninomiya Y, Suzuki K, Ishii C, Inoue H. Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:12248–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kooistra R, Hooykaas PJ, Steensma HY. Efficient gene targeting in Kluyveromyces lactis. Yeast. 2004;21:781–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Boulton SJ, Jackson SP. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ku70 potentiates illegitimate DNA double-strand break repair and serves as a barrier to error-prone DNA repair pathways. EMBO J. 1996;15:5093–103.Google Scholar
- Polotnianka RM, Li J, Lustig AJ. The yeast Ku heterodimer is essential for protection of the telomere against nucleolytic and recombinational activities. Curr Biol. 1998;8:831–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laroche T, Martin SG, Gotta M, Gorham HC, Pryde FE, Louis EJ, Gasser SM. Mutation of yeast Ku genes disrupts the subnuclear organization of telomeres. Curr Biol. 1998;8:653–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gravel S, Larrivee M, Labrecque P, Wellinger RJ. Yeast Ku as a regulator of chromosomal DNA end structure. Science. 1998;280:741–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Barnes G, Rio D. DNA double-strand-break sensitivity, DNA replication, and cell cycle arrest phenotypes of Ku-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:867–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Varzakas TH, Arvanitoyannis IS, Baltas H. The politics and science behind GMO acceptance. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007;47:335–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gibson B, Liti G. Saccharomyces pastorianus: genomic insights inspiring innovation for industry. Yeast. 2015;32:17–27.Google Scholar
- Gorter de Vries AR, Pronk JT, Daran JG. Industrial relevance of chromosomal copy number variation in Saccharomyces yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;83:e03206–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Piatkowska EM, Naseeb S, Knight D, Delneri D. Chimeric protein complexes in hybrid species generate novel phenotypes. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003836.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nissim L, Perli SD, Fridkin A, Perez-Pinera P, Lu TK. Multiplexed and programmable regulation of gene networks with an integrated RNA and CRISPR/Cas toolkit in human cells. Mol Cell. 2014;54:698–710.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nodvig CS, Nielsen JB, Kogle ME, Mortensen UH. A CRISPR-Cas9 system for genetic engineering of filamentous fungi. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133085.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weber J, Valiante V, Nodvig CS, Mattern DJ, Slotkowski RA, Mortensen UH, Brakhage AA. Functional reconstitution of a fungal natural product gene cluster by advanced genome editing. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6:62–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bolat I, Walsh MC, Turtoi M. Isolation and characterization of two new lager yeast strains from the WS34/70 population. Roum Biotechnol Lett. 2008;6:62–73.Google Scholar
- Nijkamp JF, van den Broek M, Datema E, de Kok S, Bosman L, Luttik MA, Daran-Lapujade P, Vongsangnak W, Nielsen J, Heijne WHM, et al. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Norrander J, Kempe T, Messing J. Construction of improved M13 vectors using oligodeoxynucleotide-directed mutagenesis. Gene. 1983;26:101–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar