Skip to content


Microbial Cell Factories

Open Access

Mutants of Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3589 grown on waste cooking oil as a biofactory for biodiesel production

  • Gouri Katre1,
  • Namasvi Ajmera1,
  • Smita Zinjarde1 and
  • Ameeta RaviKumar1, 2Email author
Microbial Cell Factories201716:176

Received: 4 May 2017

Accepted: 14 October 2017

Published: 24 October 2017



Oleaginous yeasts are fast emerging as a possible feedstock for biodiesel production. Yarrowia lipolytica, a model oleaginous yeast is known to utilize a variety of hydrophobic substrates for lipid accumulation including waste cooking oil (WCO). Approaches to increase lipid content in this yeast include metabolic engineering which requires manipulation of multiple genes in the lipid biosynthesis pathway. A classical and cost-effective approach, namely, random chemical mutagenesis on the yeast can lead to increased production of biodiesel as is explored here.


In this study, chemical mutagenesis using the alkylating agent, N- methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) as well as an additional treatment with cerulenin, a fatty acid synthase inhibitor generated 800 mutants of Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589 (761 MNNG treated and 39 MNNG + cerulenin treated). A three-stage screening using Sudan Black B plate technique, Nile red fluorimetry and total lipid extraction using solvent was performed, which enabled selection of ten high lipid yielding mutants. Time course studies of all the ten mutants were further undertaken in terms of biomass, lipid yield and lipid content to select three stable mutants (YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1) capable of growing and accumulating lipid on WCO, with lipid contents of 55, 60 and 67% as compared to 45% for the wild type. The mutants demonstrated increased volumetric lipid productivities (0.062, 0.044 and 0.041 g L−1 h−1) as compared to the wild type (0.033 g L−1 h−1). The fatty acid profile of the three mutants consisted of a high content of C16 and C18 saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids and was found to be suitable for biodiesel production. The fuel properties, namely, density, kinematic viscosity, total acid number, iodine value of the three mutants were evaluated and found to lie within the limits specified by internationally accepted standards. Additionally, it was noted that the mutants demonstrated better cetane numbers and higher heating values than the wild type strain.


The chemical mutagenesis strategy adopted in this study resulted in the successful isolation of three stable high SCO yielding mutants. The mutants, namely, YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 exhibited a 1.22, 1.33 and 1.49-fold increase in lipid contents when grown on 100 g L−1 waste cooking oil than the parental yeast strain. The fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) profiles of all the three mutants was determined to be suitable for biodiesel suggesting their potential applicability while simultaneously addressing the management of waste cooking oil.


Yarrowia lipolytica Chemical mutagenesisCeruleninLipid productionBiodieselWaste cooking oil


Biodiesel, an alternative energy source, consists of mono-alkyl esters of long-chain fatty acids (fatty acid methyl esters, FAMEs) produced by transesterification of plant, microbial and algal oils or animal fats. The advantages of biodiesel include its renewable nature, ease of manufacture, favourable carbon footprint, biodegradability, good flash point, low sulfur content and compatibility for blending with petrodiesel [1]. The global biodiesel production has increased by 7.5% in 2015 from 28.7 billion liters to 30.8 billion liters in 2016 [2]. Hence, it is necessary to investigate the potential of non-edible oil sources and waste feedstock for expanding biodiesel production in a sustainable manner.

The main economic challenge for successful production of biodiesel is the high cost of the feedstock. Utilization of industrial and domestic waste as substrates by oleaginous fungi for biodiesel production will not only address management of waste but is also a sustainable and potentially low cost approach to improve process economics. One such waste, waste cooking oil (WCO) is generated at 29 million tons per year [3], which is disposed of by direct discharge on land or into water bodies causing environmental harm [4]. WCO which contains high levels of free fatty acids (FFAs) has been used to produce biodiesel by acid, alkali, or enzyme catalysis and via non-catalyst transesterification. Apart from a high content of FFAs and water, WCO also contains glycerides, dimeric and polymeric acids formed during frying [5]. All these components affect the conventional alkali catalyzed transesterification reaction leading to soap formation resulting in lower yields and non-desirable FAME types, which in turn affect the biodiesel properties [6]. The acid catalyzed process is not sensitive to FFA and water content, but the production process requires long time periods of 18–24 h and has an additional disadvantage of salt interactions leading to corrosion. Enzymes used to catalyze transesterification are slower, expensive for large scale production and result in enzyme inactivation in presence of methanol [7]. Also, these heterogeneous acid and enzyme catalyzed systems suffer from mass transfer limitations and are not favorable for large scale applications. Non-catalyst and supercritical methods require high temperature and pressure and are not economical [8].

Due to the above mentioned limitations, which would require pre-treatments, microbial conversion of WCO to SCOs, with a fatty-acid utilizing yeast like Yarrowia lipolytica would be the preferred option. Our earlier study [9] shows that these SCOs from Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589 can be used as a feedstock for biodiesel. The yeast exhibited a maximal lipid/biomass yield coefficient (0.43 g g−1) when grown on WCO in 72 h. Thus, while conversion of yeast biomass into SCO for biodiesel production is a cost effective and eco-friendly process, the constraint is the mediocre lipid content reported for Y. lipolytica [4, 10].

Various approaches have been used to increase lipid titers for yeast cultures including genetic engineering and media optimization [11, 12]. Microbial strain improvement, which can be achieved through classical mutagenesis is another effective way to increase SCO production [13] and several mutagens such as Ultraviolet light (UV), ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) and N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) have been used [1416]. A co-selection pressure of cerulenin, a fatty acid synthesis inhibitor, along with the chemical mutagen can also be applied to select mutants. Those mutants possessing high fatty acid synthase activity would overcome this inhibition and grow in the presence of cerulenin.

The objective of the present study was to increase the lipid content of Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589 by strain improvement using chemical mutagenesis. Mutants were obtained by non-specific mutagenesis using MNNG alone (MNNG) and with an additional selective pressure of cerulenin (MNNG + cerulenin). To make the process more cost effective, the mutants were checked for their lipid accumulation potential on a waste substrate, WCO. As strain improvement by random mutagenesis requires a good screening methodology for selection of high SCO yielding mutants, preliminarily screening was carried out by using Sudan Black B (a lipid stain) and subsequently quantified using Nile red spectrofluorimetry. The mutants showing higher total lipid yield as compared to the wild type were selected and time course studies were carried out to evaluate their biomass, total lipid yield and lipid content. The fatty acid profile and fuel properties of the mutants showing highest lipid content were also determined to check their applicability as a fuel. Molecular typing of the selected mutants was carried out and stability studies were done to ascertain their long term suitability for biodiesel production.



The chemical mutagen, MNNG was purchased from TCI Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan. Cerulenin and Nile red were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., USA. Sudan Black B was obtained from Hi-media laboratories, Mumbai, India. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade and > 99% pure as per the manufacturer’s specifications. The waste cooking oil was obtained in bulk from a local eatery in Pune, Maharashtra, India. The oil contained 40.5% palmitic acid, 40.39% oleic acid and 10.35% linoleic acid as determined by GC-FID as per the AOCS method [17].

Strain and growth conditions

Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3589 was selected for mutagenesis based on our previous studies [9]. The strain was maintained on MGYP medium (g L−1): 3.0 malt extract; 3.0 yeast extract; 5.0 peptone and 10.0 dextrose, at 4 °C. The liquid broth of similar composition was used for development of the pre-inoculum. To evaluate the mutants for their total lipid yield after MNNG mutagenesis, lipid accumulation medium (LAM) was used (g L−1): 30.0 glucose, 1.5 yeast extract, 0.5 NH4Cl, 5.0 Na2HPO4·12H2O, 7.0 KH2PO4, 1.5 MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1 CaCl2·2H2O, 0.01 ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.08 FeCl3·6H2O and (mg L−1) 0.1 CuSO4·5H2O, 0.1 Co [NO3]2·6H2O, 0.1 MnSO4·5H2O and pH adjusted to 5.5. All shake flask experiments were carried out in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks with 100 mL of medium and incubated on a rotary incubator shaker at 120 rpm at 30 °C.

Effect of cerulenin on colony size

The effect of the fatty acid synthase inhibitor, cerulenin on the colony size of wild type was also determined. A cell count of 2 × 108 cells/mL was taken. The cerulenin stock solution (1 mg/mL) was prepared in absolute ethanol. Different concentrations of cerulenin (0–20 µg/mL) were incorporated into lipid accumulation medium (LAM). The plates were incubated at 30 °C for 192 h and checked for the size of the colonies. The size of the colonies were measured manually and the average of ten colonies used to determine the average size.

MNNG mutagenesis

The overall scheme for mutagenesis and the experimental set up is shown in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

A schematic representation of the strategy followed to obtain the mutants

MNNG stock solution (10 mg/mL) was prepared in 95% (w/v) ethanol. An initial count of 2 × 108 cells/mL was taken. For the cell viability experiments, the concentration of MNNG was varied from 0 to 500 µg/mL, with a fixed exposure time of 15 min. Next, keeping the MNNG concentration fixed, the exposure time of the cells was varied from 0 to 60 min. For both the experiments, the cells were incubated at 30 °C for specified time intervals in a shaking water bath. The action of MNNG was stopped by addition of 1 mL of filter sterilized, sodium thiosulphate (10%, w/v). The cells were centrifuged at 8000 rpm, 10 min and washed twice with distilled water. Different dilutions of the cells were made and plated onto agar plates on LAM media. Additionally another set of LAM media plates supplemented with cerulenin were incubated for 192 h at 30 °C to allow for growth of colonies and estimation of colony diameter.

Preliminary screening of mutants by Sudan Black B staining

The Sudan Black B solution (SBB) was prepared by dissolving 0.08% (w/v) Sudan Black B in 95% (w/v) ethanol. Each individual colony was picked, transferred on a filter paper grid, stained with SBB solution and destained with 95% (w/v) ethanol as per Evans et al. [18].

Secondary screening of mutants and lipid content by Nile red

The selected mutant colonies were inoculated into LAM (10 mL) at a cell count of 2 × 108/mL and incubated on a rotary incubator shaker (120 rpm) at 30 °C for 120 h. Nile red (0.1 mg/mL) dissolved in acetone was used to estimate intracellular lipid content as per Liang et al. [19]. Aliquots (400 μL) were taken from each sample at 96 h for estimating the total lipid yield.

Time course studies of the mutants in shake flasks

An initial pre-inoculum was grown in the liquid MGYP medium. The mutants demonstrating higher total lipid yield as quantitated by Nile red spectrofluorimetry were grown in LAM medium containing WCO (100 g L−1) instead of glucose as mentioned above. Samples were collected at 24 h intervals, for determination of biomass (g L−1), total lipid yield (g L−1) and lipid content (%).

Stability of the mutants

The stability studies on the mutants were carried out by sub-culturing each mutant every month on the MGYP agar medium and checked for their lipid content up to 24 months. The 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th subcultures of the selected mutants were inoculated in MGYP broth and then into LAM medium with 100 g L−1 WCO as described earlier. The lipid content (%) was determined as mentioned under analytical methods.

Molecular typing of mutants

The mutants were identified using molecular typing methods. Yeast genomic DNA was isolated using Qiagen DNeasy Kit following manufacturer’s instructions. Fungal LSU (large ribosomal subunit) and ITS (internal transcribed spacer) regions were amplified using standard PCR reaction [20]. The primers for the ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 regions (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) were used in the PCR amplification. For the LSU region, the primer LR7 (5′-TACTACCACCAAGATCT-3′) and 5.8 SR (5′-TCGATGAAGAACGCAGC-3′) were used to amplify the fragment. After amplification, the products were purified by using a geneO-spin PCR product Purification kit (GeneOmbio Technologies, Pune, India) and were directly sequenced using an ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator V3.1 kit (Applied Biosystems, USA). DNA sequencing was performed using primers used for PCR of LSU and ITS regions. The sequences were analyzed using Sequencing Analysis 5.2 software. BLAST analysis was performed at BlastN site at NCBI server (

Analytical methods

Nile red fluorescence microscopy and spectrofluorimetry

The lipid accumulation was demonstrated by Nile red fluorescence microscopy. Both bright field and fluorescence microscopy were performed to check lipid accumulation of the mutants. Under an oil immersion lens, the yeast cells were observed with the help of a Zeiss microscope (Axio Scope A1) equipped with a digital camera. The images were captured using ProgRes CapturePro 2.7 software (Jenoptik Optical Systems, USA).

For quantitative lipid estimation by Nile red spectrofluorimetry, an aliquot (125 µL) of the cell suspension was added to 2.5 mL of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Cell samples without Nile red and controls (Nile red without cells) were also taken. To the samples, 12.5 µL of Nile red in acetone (0.1 mg/mL) was added and mixed well. From this, 250 µL was taken and loaded onto 96-well black plate and incubated in dark for 10 min. The wavelength used for excitation (λex) was 520 nm. The emission spectra were recorded in the wavelength of 530–750 nm on a spectrofluorimeter (SpectraMax M5, Molecular devices, CA, USA). The peak of the spectrum, which corresponded to the maximum fluorescence (λem) was recorded. The triacylglycerol, triolein dissolved in acetone was used as the standard and a calibration curve was plotted and the total lipid yield estimated.

Biomass determination

The yeast biomass was harvested, made free of the residual substrate by successively washing the cells with hexane and methanol, oven-dried (50 °C, overnight) and the biomass estimated gravimetrically.

Determination of total lipid yield and lipid content

A modified protocol of Yu et al. [21] was used for lipid extraction. The WCO-free, oven-dried yeast cells (0.5 g) was lysed by acid treatment (4 M HCl) and kept on a shaking water bath (Medica instruments, Medica Industries, India) at 80 °C for 2 h. The acid hydrolyzed biomass was mixed with 20 mL of chloroform and methanol (1:1, v/v) and kept on a shaker at 30 °C for 3 h. The lipid extract was washed with 0.88% KCl (v/v) solution, the lower phase filtered and vacuum evaporated. The total lipid yield was estimated gravimetrically and the lipid content was also determined using the dry weight.

Fatty acid profiling of mutants

The total lipid obtained was transesterified as per Leung et al. [22]. Briefly, NaOH (1.5–3%, w/w of the lipid) was added in the presence of excess methanol. The solution was refluxed for 90 min at 60 °C and then the methanol was removed by vacuum evaporation to obtain crude fatty acid methyl ester (FAME). Chloroform: methanol (2:1) was added to reconstitute the crude FAME, which was then made free of water soluble impurities by successive washes with distilled water. The lower organic phase was aspirated, dried using anhydrous sodium sulphate and vacuum evaporated. The purified FAME was again reconstituted in chloroform: methanol (2:1, v/v) and used to determine the fatty acid profile and also for fuel properties.

A gas chromatograph (GC-2014, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) with an FID detector equipped with an Rtx-2560 column (100 m length, 0.25 mm ID, Restek corporation, Bellefonte, USA) was used to determine the profile of the fatty acid methyl esters using the AOCS method [17]. The individual fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were quantified by comparing their retention times with a standard FAME mix (i.e., a 37 component FAME mix, Supelco, USA).

Fuel properties of biodiesel of mutants grown on WCO

The various physico-chemical properties of the FAMEs or biodiesel from the mutants showing maximum lipid content were determined using predictive models and mathematical equations for the transesterified SCOs [9]. Density, saponification number (SN) and iodine value (IV) were determined both experimentally and predicted using mathematical equations. Other properties like cetane number (CN), kinematic viscosity were estimated using predictive equations [23]. The free fatty acid content (FFA), total acid number (TAN) and water content were determined using the Kittiwake DIGI biodiesel test kit (Kittiwake Developments Ltd., UK). The copper strip corrosion test was done as per the test specifications of ASTM D130.

Statistical analysis

All values are means of three independent experiments. The data obtained for biomass, total lipid yield and lipid content were from three independent determinations. The values obtained represent the mean ± standard deviation. The statistical analysis (One way ANOVA, Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test) were done using GraphPad InStat ver 3.10 software and p < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results and discussion

Yarrowia lipolytica, a model organism for lipid accumulation is known to accumulate SCOs as triacylglycerols (TAGs) and its metabolism is well adapted for oil utilization [24]. Its major drawback is its mediocre lipid content (27–57.8%) as reported for Y. lipolytica grown on industrial fats and WCO supplemented with glucose [4, 10]. UV has been used to increase lipid production from 45.4 to 58.9% for oleaginous yeasts like Lipomyces starkeyi DSM 70296 [14]. However, photoreactivation and reversion of mutants is a common feature associated with UV mutants and obtaining stable mutants is a challenge [25]. Chemical mutagens, namely, EMS and MNNG are alkylating agents that cause transition and transversions of chromosomal DNA, which is more genetically stable than the point mutations associated with UV treatments [26]. Chemical mutagenesis using EMS to enhance SCO content for biodiesel production has been previously used for Y. lipolytica [15]. Herein, a different alkylating agent, MNNG was used.

MNNG mutagenesis of Y. lipolytica 3589

The tropical marine yeast, Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589 yielded a maximum lipid/biomass (YL/X) yield coefficient of 0.43–0.45 g g−1 in 72–96 h when grown on 100 g L−1 WCO and was subjected to chemical mutagenesis by MNNG.

Choosing an optimal dose of the mutagen is very important as too high a dose could cause cell death. However an optimal dose (concentration and exposure time of the mutagen) can lead to an increase in the desired product along with stable mutants [27]. The dose response of the yeast cells to the concentration of the mutagen and to the time of exposure was carried out. For this, the survival curve of the yeast cells in response to varying concentrations of MNNG (0–500 μg/mL) at a fixed exposure time of 15 min was plotted in Additional file 1: Figure S1a. An exponential decrease in the number of colonies was seen as the concentration of MNNG was increased. MNNG at 500 μg/mL was found to have an inhibitory effect on the cell growth (99% mortality). Half the number of cells survived on exposure to MNNG (100 µg/mL) for 15 min at room temperature and this was considered as the LD50 value.

In the next experiment, to cross-check the effect of exposure time of the cells to MNNG, the concentration of 100 μg/mL of MNNG was fixed and the cells were exposed to MNNG at varying time intervals of 0–60 min. The survival curve of the yeast cells in response to varying exposure time to MNNG was plotted in Additional file 1: Figure S1b. Half the number of cells survived at an exposure time of 14 min of the mutagen and was considered as the LD50 value [27]. Hence, based on the results obtained as above, a concentration of 100 µg/mL MNNG and an exposure time of 15 min was used wherein a total of 761 mutants were generated. These mutants were screened to identify high SCO producers.

Finogenova et al. [28] have reported mutants of Y. lipolytica VKM Y-2373 with 43.9% increased ability as compared to the wild type strain to synthesize citric acid from glucose by using UV irradiation (4–6 min) and MNNG (40–80 µg/mL). A survival rate of below 25% was obtained for the concentration of 50 µg/mL of MNNG at a UV exposure time of 3–6 min. In contrast, a survival percentage of 10.9 was seen for Y. lipolytica 57 at a concentration of 500 µg/mL EMS for citric acid production [29]. In the yeast Cryptococcus curvatus ATCC 20509, EMS has been used to generate fatty acid auxotrophs (UfaM3) defective in the conversion of stearic acid to oleic acid [30] while MNNG has been used to increase lipase production in Y. lipolytica CBS 6303 [31].

Another strain Y. lipolytica DSM3286 was subjected to mutation using EMS and UV light to obtain mutants producing 10.5 fold higher levels of extracellular lipase than wild type strain using methyl oleate as substrate [32]. In another study, mutant LgX64.81 obtained by chemical mutagenesis of Y. lipolytica CBS6303 using EMS, had the highest potential for extracellular lipase production [31]. In Y. lipolytica NRRL YB-567, > 70, 90 and 99% mortality was observed in 2, 4 and 6 h respectively on UV irradiation [33]. Thus, in this study mutants from Y. lipolytica 3589 were isolated using a chemical mutagen (MNNG) at a low concentration of 100 µg/mL with an exposure time of 15 min.

Effect of cerulenin on colony size

Cerulenin ((2S) (3R) 2, 3-epoxy-4-oxo-7, 10 dodecadienoylamide)), a fatty acid synthase inhibitor, was originally isolated from the culture broth of the fungus Cephalosporium caerulens. It inhibits the crucial condensation step of fatty acid synthesis by binding to the cysteine-SH in the active site of the condensing enzyme component (β-keto-acyl-ACP synthase) of the yeast fatty acid synthase. This prevents the condensation of acetyl-CoA and malonyl-CoA to form β-keto-acyl-ACP, an important step in fatty acid biosynthesis [34].

Incorporation of this inhibitor into the growth medium would inhibit the growth of the wild type cells as demonstrated by a decrease in the colony size. Mutants which possess high fatty acid synthase activity would be capable of overcoming this inhibition and be unaffected in their growth by this inhibitor. Based on this assumption, Wang et al. [35] isolated high lipid producing mutants of the yeast Rhodotorula glutinis with an increase in lipid content from 18.2% in control (wild type) to 28.8–30.7% in mutants. Thus, in this study high SCO yielding mutants were obtained via two approaches—by non-specific mutagenesis by MNNG alone and by using an additional selective pressure with cerulenin (MNNG + cerulenin). Those high lipid yielding colonies capable of overcoming the inhibition exerted by cerulenin on fatty acid synthase would be identifiable based on their colony size, which would be larger than the low lipid producing ones [35].

Studies on the wild type yeast strain showed a visible decrease in colony size upon increasing cerulenin concentrations. The colony size decreased from 2.2 mm in control to 1.1 and < 0.5 mm for the wild type strain treated with 15 and 20 µg/mL cerulenin, respectively. Thus, 15 µg/mL was chosen for further studies as a 50% decrease in the colony size was observed. Mutants were selected with a colony size greater than 1.1 mm. In the MNNG + cerulenin plates, 39 colonies were selected with a colony size > 1.1 mm and further screened using Sudan Black B staining (Fig. 1).

Tapia et al. [14] grew Lipomyces starkeyi DSM 40296 in presence of 10 µg/µL cerulenin after UV mutagenesis and found that the colony size decreased from 0.7 mm for high lipid producers to 0.2 mm for low lipid producers. In Rhodotorula glutinis AY 91015, 33 colonies with diameter > 2 mm were selected as high lipid producers amongst other low lipid producing colonies with lesser diameter after irradiation with carbon ions (80 MeV/u energy) and 8.96 µmol/L cerulenin [35].

Sudan Black B staining of the colonies

Sudan Black B (SBB) is a dye belonging to the phenyl-azo-naphthyl-azo-naphthyl type which stains lipids [36]. A rapid, replica-printing method using SBB was used as a preliminarily screen for high lipid producing colonies [18]. From the MNNG treated cells, a total of 761 mutants were screened and 27 selected based on the SBB staining method. For the MNNG + cerulenin plates, of the 39 colonies screened, 23 colonies were selected (Fig. 1). All these colonies showed an intense dark blue colour when compared to the wild type strain.

Sudan Black B has been used to screen 129 yeasts isolated from different Brazilian regions for their oleaginous potential [37]. In another study, Cryptococcus podzolicus, Trichosporon porosum and Pichia segobiensis were selected as potential lipid producers using the same technique [38]. Similarly, Lindquist et al. [33] showed that the mutant strains of Y. lipolytica NRRL YB-567 when subjected to UV irradiation showed a 48% increase in oil production over the wild type strain based on SBB densitometry.

Thus, in the present study, using both the approaches i.e., MNNG and MNNG + cerulenin, a total of 50 colonies were selected using the preliminary SBB staining method.

Estimation of neutral lipid by Nile red spectrofluorimetry

The fluorescent dye, Nile red has been reported to stain intracellular lipid droplets that can be observed using fluorescent microscopy [39]. It has been previously used to develop a high throughput assay to quantify total lipids or TAG fraction for large-scale screening of yeast samples [40]. Liang et al. [19] have earlier quantified the neutral lipid content in microbes using this fluorescent dye. In this study, a calibration curve using the triacylglycerol triolein as standard was performed and the total lipid yield in the selected mutants determined. Table 1 indicates the amount of lipid accumulated in the mutants grown on LAM containing 30 g L−1 glucose at 96 h. Of the above selected 50 mutants, 10 mutants gave a higher total lipid yield (0.24–0.39 g L−1) as compared to the wild type (0.20 g L−1). The mutants-YlC4, YlB2 and YlB3 (0.18–0.19 g L−1) were also selected which showed comparable lipid content as the wild type. The mutants obtained after MNNG treatment were designated as—YlB6, YlC4, YlC5, YlC6 and YlC7 while those after MNNG + cerulenin treatment were designated as—YlB2, YlB3, YlD5, YlE1 and YlE2. Amongst the mutants, YlE1 and YlC7 exhibited maximum total lipid yield of 0.39 and 0.30 g L−1, respectively.
Table 1

Estimation of total lipid yield of the mutants using Nile red fluorimetry



Total lipid yield (g L−1)



0.24 ± 0.01


0.19 ± 0.01


0.24 ± 0.01


0.27 ± 0.01


0.30 ± 0.02


0.19 ± 0.01

MNNG + cerulenin


0.18 ± 0.01


0.27 ± 0.02


0.39 ± 0.02


0.20 ± 0.01


0.20 ± 0.01

The mutants were grown on LAM containing 30 g L−1 glucose for 96 h. The values represent the mean ± SD of three independent determinations

Time course studies of the mutants producing higher lipid on WCO

The above selected 10 mutants were evaluated in terms of biomass, total lipid yield and lipid content by growing them in LAM containing 100 g L−1 WCO. The results of the time course studies of the highest two SCO yielding mutants (YlB6 and YlC7) obtained after MNNG treatment are presented in Fig. 2a, b. The other three mutants (YlC4, YlC5 and YlC6) obtained after MNNG treatment are presented in Additional file 2: Figure S2. Time course studies of MNNG + cerulenin treated mutants are presented in Fig. 2c. The other four mutants obtained after MNNG + cerulenin treatment (YlB2, YlB3, YlD5and YlE2) are presented in Additional file 3: Figure S3. The results indicate that biomass (X, g L−1) of mutants treated with MNNG varied from 2.24 to 10.86 g L−1. The total lipid yield (L, g L−1) varied from 0.69 to 5.67 g L−1. The lipid content (%) also varied from 24% at 24 h for mutant YlC6 to a maximum of 60% for the mutant YlC7 at 96 h.
Fig. 2

Time course studies to determine biomass, total lipid yield and lipid content of MNNG and MNNG + cerulenin treated mutants. Mutants a YlB6, b YlC7 and c YlE1were grown on 100 g L−1 WCO as mentioned in “Methods”. All values are represented as mean ± SD, determined after three independent experiments. Biomass (g L−1)—black down pointing triangle, Total lipid yield (g L−1)—black circle, Lipid content (%)—white circle. Inset: In each graph light microscopy (left panel) and Nile red fluorescence microscopy (right panel) images of the respective Y. lipolytica mutants under 100 × oil immersion objective. Bar indicates 4 μm

For the MNNG + cerulenin treated mutants (Fig. 2c and Additional file 3: Figure S3a, b, c, d), the biomass varied from 2.3 to 8.98 g L−1. The total lipid yield varied from 0.84 to 5.1 g L−1. The lipid content was lowest at 21% at 24 h in the mutant YlB3 and was maximum at 67% in 96 h for the mutant YlE1. From Fig. 2, Additional file 2: Figure S2 and Additional file 3: Figure S3, it can be seen that the lipid body in the yeast cells (by bright field microscopy) could be visualized as revealed in the Nile red fluorescence images (insets).

Three mutants enriched for lipid contents were obtained from either one of these treatments, viz., YlB6 and YlC7 obtained after MNNG treatment and YlE1 after MNNG + cerulenin treatment. The mutants YlB6 and YlC7 had 55 and 60% lipid contents, respectively, after 96 h compared to 45% for the wild type, which corresponds to a 1.22 and 1.33-fold improvement. The mutant YIE1 had a lipid content of 67% after 96 h, which is a 1.49-fold improvement compared to wild type.

Table 2 describes the X (biomass produced), L (total lipid yield obtained), YL/X (lipid/biomass yield coefficient), QX (volumetric biomass productivity), QL (volumetric lipid productivity) of the mutants grown on WCO for 96 h. The biomass varied from 4.4 to0 10.68 g L−1. The total lipid yield varied from 1.57 to 5.97 g L−1. The lipid/biomass yield coefficient also varied from 0.35 to 0.67 g g−1. When compared to the wild type, maximum biomass and total lipid yield was obtained from the MNNG treated mutant YIB6 (10.86 and 5.97 g L−1, respectively). The volumetric biomass productivity, Qx (g L−1 h−1) for all the mutants varied from 0.045 to 0.113 g L−1 h−1 and was the highest for the mutant YIB6 with a value of 0.113 g L−1 h−1. The volumetric lipid productivity, QL (g L−1 h−1), an important parameter varied from 0.016 to 0.062 g L−1 h−1 for all the mutants. The volumetric lipid productivity reached the maximum in the mutant YIB6 (0.062 g L−1 h−1) followed by YlC7 with 0.044 g L−1 h−1 and the MNNG + cerulenin treated mutant YlE1 with 0.041 g L−1 h−1.
Table 2

Biomass, total lipid yield, yield coefficient, volumetric productivities of biomass and lipid of mutants



X (g L−1)

L (g L−1)

YL/X (g g−1)

QX (g L−1 h−1)

QL(g L−1 h−1)

No treatment


7.1 ± 0.03a

3.2 ± 0.03a

0.45 ± 0.004a,d

0.074 ± 0.0002a

0.033 ± 0.0002a


10.86 ± 0.01b

5.97 ± 0.01b

0.55 ± 0.001b

0.113 ± 0.0001b

0.062 ± 0.0001b



5.76 ± 0.03c

2.73 ± 0.03c

0.47 ± 0.005c,d

0.059 ± 0.0003c

0.028 ± 0.0003c


5.91 ± 0.02d

2.74 ± 0.02c

0.46 ± 0.004d

0.062 ± 0.0002d

0.028 ± 0.0002c


6.25 ± 0.03e

2.23 ± 0.03d

0.35 ± 0.005e

0.065 ± 0.0002e

0.023 ± 0.0003d


7.1 ± 0.03a

4.28 ± 0.01e

0.60 ± 0.004f

0.073 ± 0.0002a

0.044 ± 0.0002e


7.0 ± 0.03a

3.7 ± 0.02f

0.53 ± 0.006g

0.072 ± 0.0006a

0.038 ± 0.0001f


5.40 ± 0.03f

1.92 ± 0.03g

0.35 ± 0.006e

0.056 ± 0.0003f

0.019 ± 0.0003g

MNNG + cerulenin


5.73 ± 0.01c

2.42 ± 0.02h

0.42 ± 0.006h

0.059 ± 0.0001c

0.025 ± 0.0002h


5.84 ± 0.03d

3.91 ± 0.01i

0.67 ± 0.004i

0.061 ± 0.0003d

0.041 ± 0.0001i


4.4 ± 0.03g

1.57 ± 0.02j

0.35 ± 0.004e

0.045 ± 0.0002g

0.016 ± 0.0002j

The values indicate the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Mean values within a column with different superscript letters (a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j) differ significantly and were determined statistically using Graph Pad InStat ver 3.10 software (One-way ANOVA, Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test, p < 0.05). Separate analysis was done for each column. The wild type and mutants were grown on LAM containing 100 g L−1 WCO for 96 h. WT wild type, X biomass, L total lipid yield, Y L/X lipid/biomass yield coefficient, Q X volumetric biomass productivity, Q L volumetric lipid productivity. All yields were determined gravimetrically

The statistical analysis (one way ANOVA and Tukey–Kramer multiple comparison test) further proved that the differences between wild type and mutants were significant (Table 2). For biomass, the wild type, YlB2 and YlC7 belonged to the same group while YlB6 and YlE1 belonged to separate groups. The lipid yields of all mutants and the wild type differed and were separately grouped. For YL/X, notably, YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 showed significantly higher values and were separately grouped. For QX, the wild type, YlC7 and YlB2 belonged to the same group. For QL, the wild type, YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 belonged to different groups and were again significantly higher as compared to the wild type.

On the basis of the results obtained from the MNNG treatment, YlB6 was selected because its cultures showed the maximum biomass, total lipid yield and volumetric biomass and lipid productivities. The mutant YlC7 was also selected because it showed a lipid content of 60% and an increased lipid productivity as compared to the wild type. From the MNNG + cerulenin treatment, the mutant YlE1 was selected which showed the maximum lipid content (67%) along with increased volumetric lipid productivity as compared to the wild type.

The lipid contents in the mutants YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 were comparable to the mutant of Colletotrichum sp. DM06, wherein a ~ 1.7-fold increase in lipid content was observed after its genetic transformation with the CtDGAT2b gene from Candida tropicalis SY005 [41]. The lipid content of the two mutants (YlC7 and YlE1) studied in this study were higher than the six mutants of Lipomyces starkeyi reported with highest lipid content of 58.9% after UV mutagenesis and cerulenin treatment [14]. In another study, after physical mutagenesis of Rhodosporidium toruloides np11 using atmospheric and room temperature plasma method and chemical mutagenesis with MNNG, the mutant strain R. toruloides XR-2, accumulated 41% lipids as compared to 23% of the wild type [16] which was much lower as compared to the results obtained in this study.

A number of studies have been carried out for lipid production by metabolically engineered Y. lipolytica strains grown mainly on glucose as carbon source. Blaczeck et al. [42] rewired the native metabolism through combinatorial multiplexing and phenotypic induction and obtained strains with high lipid content (90%) and lipid titers (25 g L−1). Liu et al. [15] employed an evolutionary engineering approach along with a floating cell enrichment process to obtain a high lipid titers of 39.1 g L−1 with lipid content (87%) and 0.243 g g−1 yield, and 0.56 g L−1 h−1 average specific productivity [15]. Qiao et al. [43] obtained a phenotype capable of accumulating high yield (0.243 g g−1), titer (55 g L−1) and productivity (0.71 g L−1 h−1) by overexpressing delta-9 stearoyl-CoA desaturase, Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC1), and Diacylglyceride acyl-transferase (DGA1). Another study by Tai and Stephanopoulos [11] in which a strain simultaneously overexpressing a tandem gene construct of acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACC1) and diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGA1) grown in a 2 L bioreactor resulted in 61.7% lipid content [11], similar to that reported here. The lipid content of the mutants in the present study were comparable to the mutants accumulating 65–75% lipid content obtained by deleting the genes responsible for β-oxidation and producing mutations in the G3-P shuttle pathway [44]. Though the yeast cannot utilize lignocellulosic biomass or starch, it has been engineered the yeast to grow on different substrates [45]. For example, an obese strain, Y. lipolytica XYL + Obese was generated by overexpression of GPD1 and DGA2 involved in TAG synthesis and XR (xylose reductase), XDH (xylitol dehydrogenase) and XK (xylulose kinase) required for growth on xylose while lipid degradation has been eliminated through deletion of the POX and TGL4 genes. The strain is able to accumulate high levels of lipids (36.5%) when grown on yeast nitrogen base—xylose medium similar to that observed when grown on fructose in shake flask cultures [46].

In this study, classical mutagenesis was tried in order to increase the lipid content of Y. lipolytica 3589 for biodiesel production. The mutants were preliminarily screened on glucose to identify high lipid yielding mutants which were then checked for lipid accumulation on WCO, as it is known that a low cost substrate can reduce production costs.

Our studies to obtain strains with increased SCO content suitable for biodiesel production resulted in isolation of mutants with capacity to accumulate lipid up to 67% using a classical and proven method for strain improvement.

Determination of the fatty acid profile of the selected mutants

The three mutants, YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 were evaluated for their fatty acid profile in order to check if their lipids were suitable for use as a feedstock for biodiesel production. Table 3 lists the fatty acid profiles of the three mutants obtained in comparison with the parental yeast strain. The fatty acid profile showed the presence of C16 and C18 saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs). YlC7 showed a lower content (39.80%) whereas YlB6 and YlE1showed a higher content (54.1 and 58.1%, respectively) of total SFAs in comparison to the wild type (56.2%). Both palmitic and stearic acid were higher in YlB6 (29.1 and 6.3%), YlC7 (28.1 and 6.1%) and YlE1 (30.4 and 8.5%) as compared to the wild type Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589 (21.1 and 3.4%) as shown in the table.
Table 3

Comparison of fatty acid methyl ester profile of the mutants with the wild type

Fatty acid methyl ester

(wt % of total fatty acid methyl esters)





Caprylic acid methyl ester (C8:0)





Lauric acid methyl ester (C12:0)





Myristic acid methyl ester (C14:0)





Palmitic acid methyl ester (C16:0)





Stearic acid methyl ester (C18:0)





Arachidic acid methyl ester (C20:0)





Heneicosanoic acid methyl ester (C21:0)





Total of fatty acids: Saturated





Palmitoleic acid methyl ester (C16:1)





cis-10-Heptadecanoic acid (C17:1)





Oleic acid methyl ester (C18:1n9c)





cis-11Eicosanoic acid (C20:1)





Total of fatty acids: Monounsaturated





Linoleic acid methyl ester (C18:2n6c)





Total of fatty acids: Polyunsaturated





Total of fatty acids





The wild type and mutants were grown on LAM containing 100 g L−1 WCO. The values represent the mean ± SD of three independent determinations

WT Wild type; aas reported earlier [9], ND Not detected

The total MUFAs were higher than the wild type (31.9%) in all the three mutants, at 33.6, 44.2 and 35.4% in YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1, respectively. Palmitoleic acid (C16:1) was present in significantly higher amounts in YlC7and YlE1 (4.1 and 10.0%) as compared to the wild type (0.9%). The content of desirable oleic acid (C18:1n9c) was also higher in all the three mutants-YlB6 (33.6%), YlC7 (40.1%) and YlE1 (25.4%) as compared to the wild type (21.0%). Linoleic acid (C18:2) was higher in YlB6 (12.3%) and YlC7 (16.0%) whereas it was lower in YlE1 (6.6%) when compared to the wild type (11.8%).

The three mutants possessed higher amounts of total C16 and C18 SFAs (35.4, 34.2 and 38.9% for YlB6, YlC7and YlE1, respectively) as compared to 24.5% of the wild type. The total of C16 and C18 MUFAs of the three mutants were also higher (33.6, 44.2 and 35.4% for YlB6, YlC7and YlE1, respectively) in comparison with the wild type (21.9%). The fatty acid profiles of the three mutants were hence found suitable for biodiesel production.

The fatty acid profile of Rhodosporidium toruloides XR-2 mutant contained myristic acid (2.6%), palmitic acid (36.7%), palmitoleic acid (3.1%), stearic acid (11.5%), oleic acid (36.4%) and linoleic acid (2.8%) [16] which was comparable to the fatty acid profile of the three mutants in the present study. The microalga Nannochloropsis sp. was mutated using EMS to yield two mutants, LARB-202-2 and LARB-202-3 with palmitic acid (C16:0, 52.5–53.7%), myristic acid (C14:0, 9.5–8.3%), lesser proportion of oleic acid (C18:1n9c, 15.81-16.43%) and higher proportion of the undesirable eicosapentanoic acid (C20:5, 11.22–12.54%) and was therefore not suitable for biodiesel production [47].

In Y. lipolytica, lipid accumulation occurs via two pathways: the de novo pathway that occurs in presence of non-hydrophobic substrates and the ex novo pathway that occurs in presence of hydrophobic substrates [48]. For screening, the mutants were grown on glucose which would have promoted de novo lipid accumulation. The lipid yield on glucose was found to be low (0.2–0.4 g L−1). In the next step, the mutants were grown on WCO, a hydrophobic substrate, which resulted in lipid accumulation by the ex novo pathway. As the results indicate, the lipid yield (1.57–5.97 g L−1) increased and the mutants could utilize this substrate for increased lipid accumulation. Y. lipolytica is known to either incorporate fatty substrates directly in an unchanged manner or accumulate the substrate in a modified form [48]. In this case, the mutants and wild type both had fatty acid compositions modified from the feed oil. It can be seen from Table 3 that the levels of palmitic acid (40.5%), oleic acid (C18:1, 40.39%) and linoleic acid (C18:2, 10.35%) contents in the WCO were altered in the SCOs of the wild type strain and mutants YlC7 and YlE1. Additionally, SFAs like stearic acid, arachidic acid and heneicosanoic acid and MUFAs like palmitoleic acid (C16:1) could be detected.

Determination of fuel properties of the FAMEs or biodiesel from the selected mutants

The fuel properties of the selected mutants, YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 were determined experimentally and using different mixing rules and prediction equations. Table 4 summarizes the different fuel properties. The experimental and predicted values of density were comparable for the mutants and the wild type. The experimental values of water content, FFA and copper strip corrosion test were also comparable for both mutants and wild type strain. The TAN was lower in the three mutants (2 mg NaOH g−1 for all three) as compared to the wild type (2.8 mg NaOH g−1). An important observation was that for all the three mutants, YlB6, YIC7 and YlE1, the cetane numbers (CN) (66.7, 59.43 and 68.6, respectively) were higher than the CN of the wild type (50.8). The CN of the three mutants was higher than the CN value of 54 reported for Candida freyschussii ATCC 18737 [49]. A higher CN helps ensure good cold-start properties and reduces smoke formation [50]. Biodiesel with high MUFA content has better characteristics with respect to ignition quality, nitrogen oxide emissions, fuel stability, and flow properties. Hence methyl esters of palmitoleic (C16:1) and oleic (C18:1) acids as seen in the FAME profiles of the mutants YlB6,YlC7 and YlE1 are warranted as they are liquid at room temperature. Thus, an ideal biodiesel is made primarily of monounsaturated with balanced levels of saturated and polyunsaturated methyl esters [51] as observed for FAME profiles of the mutants in this study. The HHV of all the three mutants (40.49–40.9 M J kg−1) was higher than that of the wild type (36.77 M J kg−1). HHV or gross calorific value is the amount of energy released upon combustion of 1 g of the fuel at initial temperature [52]. This meant that the FAMEs or biodiesel produced by the three mutants possessed more energy as compared to the wild type strain.
Table 4

Fuel properties of biodiesel produced by the mutants and wild type grown on WCO


Results for Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589

US biodiesel standards ASTM D6751

European biodiesel standards EN14214

Indian biodiesel standards IS15607





Density at 25 °C (g cm−3)a

1.07 (0.87)

1.07 (0.86)

1.08 (0.88)

1.04 (0.87)




Water content (vol%)a





0.05 max

0.25 max

0.03 max

TAN (mg NaOH g-1)a





0.8 max

0.5 max

0.5 max

FFA (%)a








Cu strip corrosiona

Class 1a

Class 1a

Class 1a

Class 1a

Class 3 max

Class 1 max

Class 1 max







51 min

51 min

Kinematic viscosity (40 °C; mm2 s−1)c









190.38 (194.65)


197.4 (192.28)

256.16 (249.4)





50.03 (47.9)

69.4 (65.82)

50.2 (42.58)

37.8 (47.9)




HHV(M J kg−1)b








Concentration of γ-linolenic acid (C18:3) (%)a








FAME having ≥ 4 double bonds (%)a






1 max


The wild type and mutants were grown on LAM containing 100 g L−1 WCO. The experimental values are the mean ± SD of three independent determinations

WT Wild type, as reported earlier [9]; ND Not Detected, NS Not Specified

aExperimentally determined values, followed by predicted ones, if any, in brackets

bCalculated using predicted values of SN and IV

cPredicted values as mentioned in Materials and methods [23]

The other properties like density, kinematic viscosity, SN and IV were all found to lie within the limits specified by national and international specifications. Density is an important physical fuel property of biodiesel which depends on the fatty acid profile of alkyl esters present which in turn is affected by the raw materials used in fuel production. The densities of the mutants YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 were 1.07, 1.07 and 1.08 g cm−3, respectively and are comparable to that of the wild type strain (1.04 g cm−3). The fuel viscosity is known to play a critical role in the fuel spray, mixture formation and combustion process. As the fatty acid chain length increases, viscosity increases while it is observed to decrease with an increase in unsaturation [51]. Kinematic viscosity was lower in the wild type strain (3.6 m m2 s−1) as compared to the three mutants (4.57–5.09 m m2 s−1) as the mutants possessed long chain SFAs like arachidic acid (C20:0) and heneicosanoic acid (C21:0). The density and viscosity of the mutants were also comparable to the density value obtained by transesterifying lipid from Cryptococcus curvatus ATCC 20508 grown on crude glycerol [53]. Iodine value (IV) which indicates the degree of unsaturation was higher in the mutants YlB6 -50.03 (47.9) [values in parentheses indicate the experimentally determined values], YIC7- 69.4 (65.82) and YlE1 50.2 (42.58) as compared to the wild type 37.8 (47.9) as the mutants possessed more proportion of MUFAs and PUFAs. Saponification numbers (SN), which indicate the free triglyceride content of the sample, were lower for all the three mutants as compared to the wild type. The SN, IV and HHV were also found to be similar to the values obtained from two fungi, Alternaria sp. and Colletotrichum sp. grown on glucose [54]. The IV and density of the three mutants were found to be similar to the values obtained from Aspergillus sp. grown on corncob waste liquor [55]. Thus, a good balance of SFAs and MUFAs was present in the mutants isolated by chemical mutagenesis in this study. This was reflected in the biodiesel properties of all the three mutants which were found to lie within the range specified by different biodiesel standards.

Stability of the mutants

The three mutants, YlB6, YIC7 and YlE1 were subcultured every month 24 months and the lipid content was estimated for the 6th, 12th, 18th and the 24th subcultures. Table 5 shows the lipid content of the mutants after repeated sub-culturing. It was found that the lipid content of the mutants YlB6, YIC7 and YlE1 at 54.8, 59.6 and 66.8%, after the 24th subculture remained the same. This indicated that the mutants generated by chemical mutagenesis were stable with respect to lipid production for up to 2 years indicating the selected phenotypes are stable.
Table 5

Lipid content of the three mutants, YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 after the 6th, 12th, 18th and 24th subculture

Number of the subculture





55.1 ± 0.01

60.08 ± 0.02

67.2 ± 0.02


54.9 ± 0.02

60.05 ± 0.02

66.9 ± 0.02


54.8 ± 0.02

59.8 ± 0.02

66.8 ± 0.02


54.8 ± 0.02

59.6 ± 0.02

66.8 ± 0.02

Molecular typing of the three selected mutants

Amplicons of size 1715 and 650 bp were obtained using the LSU and ITS region primers respectively for the strain YIB6. Amplicons of similar sizes were obtained for YlC7 and YIE1 using the LSU and ITS regions. The amplicon size was confirmed using reference ladder. The PCR and DNA sequence results indicate that all the three strains under study showed similarity to Y. lipolytica as indicated in the Additional file 4: Table S1. The LSU and ITS regions of all the three mutants- YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1 showed 100 and 99% sequence identity respectively to Y. lipolytica. This indicates that the three mutant strains that were generated were mutant varieties of the wild type Y. lipolytica strain used in the present study.


The chemical mutagen, MNNG was used for the first time to generate genetically stable high lipid producing mutants from Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589. A total of 800 mutants (761 MNNG treated and 39 MNNG + cerulenin treated) for high SCO yields were screened using a two-stage selection with Sudan Black B and Nile Red. The additional selection pressure using cerulenin was carried out for the first time in Y. lipolytica to isolate high SCO yielding mutants. Three stable, high SCO yielding mutants of Y. lipolytica NCIM 3589, namely, YlB6 and YIC7 using MNNG and YlE1 using MNNG + cerulenin treatment (able to overcome fatty acid synthase inhibition) were selected with increased lipid content of 55, 60 and 67%, respectively. An increase in lipid productivities was demonstrated for YlB6, YlC7 and YlE1which were 1.87- , 1.33- and 1.24-fold, respectively as compared to the wild type. The mutants had a fatty acid profile consisting predominantly of desirable C16 and C18 SFAs and MUFAs, with the absence of undesirable PUFAs suggesting their suitability as good quality biodiesel. The experimentally determined and predicted fuel properties of the FAMEs from the mutants lie within the limits specified by the existing biodiesel standards. Thus, the results in this study suggest the potential of the SCO feedstock from the mutants obtained by chemical mutagenesis as biofactories for biodiesel production when grown on waste cooking oil and in turn may also help in the environmental management of waste cooking oil. Direct conversion of WCO often entails its pretreatment as it leads to soap formation resulting in low yield and poor quality of biodiesel. Many of these processes require high energy inputs, are chemical/enzyme/solvent intensive and require long time periods for conversion [5, 8, 22]. In fact Zhang et al. [56] have estimated the production cost of biodiesel directly from WCO using different processes with prices ranging from $644 to 884/tonne. This study is relevant as an alternative possibly low-cost strategy to increase SCO levels that could eventually pave the way for future large-scale production of biodiesel using oleaginous yeasts.



waste cooking oil




single cell oils




ultraviolet light


ethyl methanesulfonate


N-(trimethylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide




lipid accumulation medium


large ribosomal subunit


internal transcribed spacer


flame ionization detector


saturated fatty acids


monounsaturated fatty acids


polyunsaturated fatty acids


saponification number


iodine value


free fatty acids


total acid number


higher heating value


cetane number


Authors’ contributions

GK completed and performed all the experiments as a part of her doctoral work, analyzed the data and prepared the manuscript. NA helped with the mutagenesis and screening experiments. SZ helped in manuscript preparation. All this work was carried out under the supervision of ARK who coordinated the study, designed the experiments and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


GK acknowledges financial assistance as fellowship from DST-PURSE, SPPU.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and its Additional files.

Consent for publication

All authors have read the manuscript and give their consent for it to be published.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.


This work was supported by the DRDP (Departmental Research and Development Fund) from Savitribai Phule Pune University (SPPU) and DST-PURSE, SPPU.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Bioinformatics and Biotechnology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India
Department of Biotechnology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India


  1. Khot M, Gupta R, Barve K, Zinjarde S, Govindwar S, RaviKumar A. Fungal production of single cell oil using untreated copra cake and evaluation of its fuel properties for biodiesel. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;25(4):459–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. REN 21′s Renewables 2017, Global Status Report. Accessed July 2017.
  3. Lisboa P, Rodrigues AR, Martín JL, Simões P, Barreiros S, Paiva A. Economic analysis of a plant for biodiesel production from waste cooking oil via enzymatic transesterification using supercritical carbon dioxide. J Supercritic Fluids. 2014;85:31–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bialy HE, Gomaa OM, Azab KS. Conversion of oil waste to valuable fatty acids using oleaginous yeast. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;27(12):2791–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Talebian-Kiakalaieh A, Aishah N, Amin S, Mazaheri H. A review on novel processes of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. Appl Energy. 2013;104:683–710.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kulkarni MG, Dalai AK. Waste cooking oil-an economical source for biodiesel: a review. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2006;45(9):2901–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrade TA, Errico M, Christensen KV. Influence of the reaction conditions on the enzyme catalyzed transesterification of castor oil: a possible step in biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol. 2017;243:366–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Lam MK, Lee KT, Mohamed AR. Homogeneous, heterogeneous and enzymatic catalysis for transesterification of high free fatty acid oil (waste cooking oil) to biodiesel: a review. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28:500–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Katre G, Joshi C, Khot M, Zinjarde S, RaviKumar A. Evaluation of single cell oil (SCO) from a tropical marine yeast Yarrowia lipolytica NCIM 3589 as a potential feedstock for biodiesel. AMB Express. 2012;2:36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Papanikolaou S, Muniglia L, Chevalot I, Aggelis G, Marc I. Accumulation of a cocoa-butter-like lipid by Yarrowia lipolytica cultivated on agro-industrial residues. Curr Microbiol. 2003;46(2):124–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Tai M, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering the push and pull of lipid biosynthesis in oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica for biofuel production. Metab Eng. 2013;15:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Zhao X, Kong X, Hua Y, Feng B, Zhao Z. Medium optimization for lipid production through co-fermentation of glucose and xylose by the oleaginous yeast Lipomyces starkeyi. Eur J Lip Sci Technol. 2008;110(5):405–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiedurek J, Trytek M, Szczodrak J. Strain improvement of industrially important microorganisms based on resistance to toxic metabolites and abiotic stress. J Basic Microbiol. 2017;57(6):445–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Tapia EV, Anschau A, Coradini ALV, Franco TT, Deckmann AC. Optimization of lipid production by the oleaginous yeast Lipomyces starkeyi by random mutagenesis coupled to cerulenin screening. AMB express. 2012;2:64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu L, Pan A, Spofford C, Zhou N, Alper HS. An evolutionary metabolic engineering approach for enhancing lipogenesis in Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab Eng. 2015;29:36–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang C, Shen H, Zhang X, Yu X, Wang H, Xiao S, et al. Combined mutagenesis of Rhodosporidium toruloides for improved production of carotenoids and lipids. Biotechnol Lett. 2016;38:1733–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. AOCS Method Ce 1–62. Fatty acid composition by gas chromatography. In: Gaithersburg FD, editor. Official methods of analysis of AOAC. 18th ed. Maryland: AOAC International; 2005.Google Scholar
  18. Evans CT, Ratledge C, Gilbert SC. A rapid screening method for lipid-accumulating yeast using a replica-printing technique. J Microbiol Methods. 1985;4(3–4):203–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang Y, Tang T, Umagiliyage AL, Siddaramu T, McCarroll M, Choudhary R. Utilization of sorghum bagasse hydrolysates for producing microbial lipids. Appl Energy. 2012;91(1):451–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Mitchell TG, Freedman EZ, White TJ, Taylor JW. Unique oligonucleotide primers in PCR for identification of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32(1):253–5.Google Scholar
  21. Yu X, Dong T, Zheng Y, Miao C, Chen S, State W. Investigation of cell disruption methods for lipid extraction from oleaginous microorganisms. Eur J Lip Sci Technol. 2015;117(5):730–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Leung DYC, Wu X, Leung MKH. A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Appl Energy. 2010;87(4):1083–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Khot M, Kamat S, Zinjarde S, Pant A, Chopade B, Ravikumar A. Single cell oil of oleaginous fungi from the tropical mangrove wetlands as a potential feedstock for biodiesel. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Fickers P, Benetti PH, Wache Y, Marty A, Mauersberger S, Smit MS, et al. Hydrophobic substrate utilisation by the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica, and its potential applications. FEMS Yeast Res. 2005;5(6–7):527–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Haynes RH, Kunz BA. DNA repair and mutagenesis in yeast. In: Strathern JN, Jones EW, Broach JR, editors. The molecular biology of the yeast Sachcharomyes: life cycle and inheritance. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor; 1981. p. 371–414.Google Scholar
  26. Kohalmi SE, Kunz BA. Role of neighbouring bases and assessment of strand specificity in Ethylmethanesulphonate and N-methyl-N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine mutagenesis in the SUP4-o gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol. 1988;240(3):561–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawrence CW. Classical mutagenesis techniques. Methods Enzymol. 2002;350:189–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Finogenova TV, Puntus IF, Kamzolova SV, Lunina YN, Monastyrskaya SE, Morgunov IG, et al. Mutant Yarrowia lipolytica strains producing citric acid from glucose. Appl Biochem Microbiol. 2008;44(2):197–202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Yalcin SK. Enhancing citric acid production of Yarrowia lipolytica by mutagenesis and using natural media containing carrot juice and celery byproducts. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2012;21(3):867–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Hassan M, Blanc PJ, Pareilleux A, Goma G. Selection of fatty acid auxotrophs from the oleaginous yeast Cryptococcus curvatus and production of cocoa butter equivalents in batch culture. Biotechnol Lett. 1994;16(8):819–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Fickers P, Nicaud JM, Destain J, Thonart P. Overproduction of lipase by Yarrowia lipolytica mutants. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;63(2):136–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Darvishi F, Destain J, Nahvi I, Thonart P, Zarkesh-Esfahani H. High-level production of extracellular lipase by Yarrowia lipolytica mutants from methyl oleate. N Biotechnol. 2011;28(6):756–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lindquist MR, López-Núñez JC, Jones MA, Cox EJ, Pinkelman RJ, Bang SS, et al. Irradiation of Yarrowia lipolytica NRRL YB-567 creating novel strains with enhanced ammonia and oil production on protein and carbohydrate substrates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99(22):9723–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Heath RJ, White SW, Rock CO. Lipid biosynthesis as a target for antibacterial agents. Prog Lip Res. 2001;40(6):467–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang J, Li R, Lu D. A quick isolation method for mutants with high lipid yield in oleaginous yeast. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;25(5):921–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hartman TL. The use of Sudan Black B as a bacterial fat stain. Stain Technol. 1940;15:23–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Duarte SH, de Andrade CCP, Ghiselli G, Maugeri F. Exploration of Brazilian biodiversity and selection of a new oleaginous yeast strain cultivated in raw glycerol. Bioresour Technol. 2013;138:377–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Schulze I, Hansen S, Großhans S, Rudszuck T, Ochsenreither K, Syldatk C, et al. Characterization of newly isolated oleaginous yeasts—Cryptococcus podzolicus, Trichosporon porosum and Pichia segobiensis. AMB Express. 2014;4:24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenspan P, Mayer EP, Fowler SD. Nile Red: a selective fluorescent stain for intracellular lipid droplets. J Cell Biol. 1985;100(3):965–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Sitepu IR, Ignatia L, Franz AK, Wong DM, Faulina SA, Tsui M, Kanti A, Boundy-Mills K. An improved high-throughput Nile red fluorescence assay for estimating intracellular lipids in a variety of yeast species. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;91(2):321–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Dey P, Mall N, Chattopadhyay A, Chakraborty M, Maiti MK. Enhancement of lipid productivity in oleaginous Colletotrichum fungus through genetic transformation using the yeast ctDGAT2b gene under model-optimized growth condition. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(11):e111253.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Blazeck J, Hill A, Liu L, Knight R, Miller J, Pan A, et al. Harnessing Yarrowia lipolytica lipogenesis to create a platform for lipid and biofuel production. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3131.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Qiao K, Imam Abidi SH, Liu H, Zhang H, Chakraborty S, Watson N, et al. Engineering lipid overproduction in the oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab Eng. 2015;29:56–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Dulermo T, Nicaud JM. Involvement of the G3P shuttle and β-oxidation pathway in the control of TAG synthesis and lipid accumulation in Yarrowia lipolytica. Metab Eng. 2011;13:482–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Ledesma-Amaro R, Nicaud JM. Metabolic engineering for expanding the substrate range of Yarrowia lipolytica. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:798–809.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Ledesma-Amaro R, Lazar Z, Rakicka M, Guo Z, Fouchard F, Le Coq AMC, et al. Metabolic engineering of Yarrowia lipolytica to produce chemicals and fuels from xylose. Metab Eng. 2016;38:115–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Anandarajah K, Mahendraperumal G, Sommerfeld M, Hu Q. Characterization of microalga Nannochloropsis sp. mutants for improved production of biofuels. Appl Energy. 2012;96:371–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Beopoulos A, Cescut J, Haddouche R, Uribelarrea JL, Molina-Jouve C, Nicaud JM. Yarrowia lipolytica as a model for bio-oil production. Prog Lip Res. 2009;48:375–87.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Raimondi S, Rossi M, Leonardi A, Bianchi MM, Rinaldi T. Getting lipids from glycerol: new perspectives on biotechnological exploitation of Candida freyschussii. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Alleman TL, McCormick RL. Biodiesel handling and use guide. 5th ed. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. DOE/GO-102016-4875. US Department of Energy-Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; 2016.Google Scholar
  51. Knothe G. Dependence of biodiesel fuel properties on the structure of fatty acid alkyl esters. Fuel Process Technol. 2005;86(10):1059–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramírez-Verduzco LF, Rodríguez-Rodríguez JE, Jaramillo-Jacob ADR. Predicting cetane number, kinematic viscosity, density and higher heating value of biodiesel from its fatty acid methyl ester composition. Fuel. 2012;91(1):102–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Thiru M, Sankh S, Rangaswamy V. Process for biodiesel production from Cryptococcus curvatus. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(22):10436–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Dey P, Banerjee J, Maiti MK. Comparative lipid profiling of two endophytic fungal isolates—Colletotrichum sp. and Alternaria sp. having potential utilities as biodiesel feedstock. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(10):5815–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Venkata Subhash G, Venkata Mohan S. Biodiesel production from isolated oleaginous fungi Aspergillus sp. using corncob waste liquor as a substrate. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(19):9286–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang Y, Dubé MA, McLean DD, Kates M. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 2. Economic assessment and sensitivity analysis. Bioresour Technol. 2003;90:229–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2017