Open Access

Highly effective, regiospecific reduction of chalcone by cyanobacteria leads to the formation of dihydrochalcone: two steps towards natural sweetness

Microbial Cell Factories201716:136

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0752-3

Received: 3 May 2017

Accepted: 28 July 2017

Published: 4 August 2017

Abstract

Background

Chalcones are the biogenetic precursors of all known flavonoids, which play an essential role in various metabolic processes in photosynthesizing organisms. The use of whole cyanobacteria cells in a two-step, light-catalysed regioselective bio-reduction of chalcone, leading to the formation of the corresponding dihydrochalcone, is reported. The prokaryotic microalgae cyanobacteria are known to produce phenolic compounds, including flavonoids, as natural components of cells. It seems logical that organisms producing such compounds possess a suitable “enzymatic apparatus” to carry out their biotransformation. Therefore, determination of the ability of whole cells of selected cyanobacteria to carry out biocatalytic transformations of chalcone, the biogenetic precursor of all known flavonoids, was the aim of our study.

Results

Chalcone was found to be converted to dihydrochalcone by all examined cyanobacterial strains; however, the effectiveness of this process depends on the strain with biotransformation yields ranging from 3% to >99%. The most effective biocatalysts are Anabaena laxa, Aphanizomenon klebahnii, Nodularia moravica, Synechocystis aquatilis (>99% yield) and Merismopedia glauca (92% yield). The strains Anabaena sp. and Chroococcus minutus transformed chalcone in more than one way, forming a few products; however, dihydrochalcone was the dominant product. The course of biotransformation shed light on the pathway of chalcone conversion, indicating that the process proceeds through the intermediate cis-chalcone. The scaled-up process, conducted on a preparative scale and by using a mini-pilot photobioreactor, fully confirmed the high effectiveness of this bioconversion. Moreover, in the case of the mini-pilot photobioreactor batch cultures, the optimization of culturing conditions allowed the shortening of the process conducted by A. klebahnii by 50% (from 8 to 4 days), maintaining its >99% yield.

Conclusions

This is the first report related to the use of whole cells of halophilic and freshwater cyanobacteria strains in a two-step, light-catalysed regioselective bio-reduction of chalcone, leading to the formation of the corresponding dihydrochalcone. The total bioconversion of chalcone in analytical, preparative, and mini-pilot scales of this process creates the possibility of its use in the food industry for the production of natural sweeteners.

Keywords

ChalconeBiotransformationCyanobacteriaDihydrochalconeRegioselective bio-reduction

Background

Chalcones (1,3-diphenyl-2-propen-1-ones) are the biogenetic precursors of all known flavonoids (derivatives of 2-phenyl-benzo-gamma-pyrone), which play an essential role in various metabolic processes in photosynthesizing organisms [1, 2]. As phytochemicals of a lipophilic nature, chalcones are composed of two aromatic rings linked by a three-carbon α,β-unsaturated carbonyl system, which usually results in their yellow colour. Chalcones considered as obligate intermediated in flavonoid biosynthesis but they do not accumulate to appreciable degree in most plants [3]. They are especially abundant in fruits (e.g., citruses, apples), vegetables (e.g., tomatoes, shallots, bean sprouts, potatoes), spices (e.g., licorice), and are also widely distributed in various parts (roots, rhizomes, heartwood, buds, leaves, flowers, and seeds) of species of genera Angelica, Sophora, Glycyrrhiza, Humulus, Scutellaria, Parartocarpus, Ficus, Dorstenia, Morus, Artocarpus, and so forth—many of which have been used for centuries in traditional herbal medicine [4, 5]. Both natural and synthetic compounds with a chalcone-based structure have received great attention due to their wide variety of pharmacological activities [6, 7]. Because of the health promoting properties, an increasing interest in finding new biologically active derivatives of chalcone has been recently observed [810].

Extraction from plants is classic and still the most popular method of obtaining the majority of flavonoids, including chalcones. However, this method suffers from the low concentration of these compounds in plant tissues, as well as from environmental, seasonal, or regional variations of their abundance in these natural resources [11]. The second extraction method, chemical synthesis, requires extreme reaction conditions and toxic chemicals, which constrains its application on an industrial scale [12]. Biocatalysis seems to offer an interesting alternative to both the aforementioned approaches, especially when it involves whole microbial cell systems that offer scalable, cheaper and more accessible strategies for efficient acquisition of these compounds [13]. Simultaneously, the use of biocatalysis minimizes the problems of isomerization, racemization, epimerization and rearrangement during the transformation [14, 15].

Studies on the interactions of microorganisms with chalcones published thus far show that the transformation of these compounds can only be done by heterotrophic microorganisms, such as bacteria, filamentous fungi and yeast. Biotransformations of chalcones by whole cells of these microorganisms are similar to the metabolic conversion pathways of these compounds in plants and include hydroxylation [1621], cyclization [16, 17, 1922], O-demethylation [16, 17, 19], O-dealkylation [18], epoxidation [22], glycosylation [2325], and hydrogenation [19, 20, 2630]. The reduction of a dihydrochalcone to the respective alcohol has been rarely reported [2730]. Moreover, microorganisms are able to cleave the C-ring of the benzo-γ-pyrone system of flavonoids to form chalcones [31, 32]. It should be noted that there is no information about the natural occurrence of flavonoids in the cells of heterotrophs that can transform these substances. Interestingly, however, these microorganisms contain an assembly of biosynthetic genes and are able to form an artificial phenylpropanoid pathway, which may allow them to form flavonoids and related compounds [33, 34].

The microbial transformation of compounds containing an α,β-unsaturated chain connected to a carbonyl group has gained growing interest, especially with the recent rediscovery of the Old Yellow Enzyme (OYE) [35, 36] and its homologues from yeast, bacteria, and plants [37, 38]. Enoate reductases catalyse a highly stereoselective reduction of a broad variety of α,β-unsaturated compounds, producing excellent yields [35, 39, 40]. A recombinant enoate reductase was also expressed in a prokaryotic microalgae, cyanobacteria, and was used for the light-induced, enantioselective reduction of C=C bonds [41]. Such a transformation leads to the formation of dihydrochalcones. Due to their sweet taste and natural origin, these compounds are desirable in the food industry for the production of multicomponent, low-calorie sweeteners. In turn, their antioxidant, UV-protective and pro-health properties make dihydrochalcones interesting to the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries [42, 43].

Little information is available regarding the connections between flavonoids and cyanobacteria. Known examples are related to the presence of flavonoids in the cells and culture media of cyanobacteria [4446]; cyanobacterial cells growing in different culture media can accumulate flavonoids to near-millimolar levels [47]. Additionally, evidence was found for the influence of flavonoids on gene expression of cyanobacteria [48, 49] and the ability to inhibit the growth of cyanobacteria by plants containing flavonoids [5052]. Nevertheless, the interactions between chalcones, the initial precursors of flavonoid biosynthesis, and cyanobacteria still remain poorly understood, especially due to unknown mechanisms(s) of metabolic adaptations of these microorganisms. Therefore, the study of such interactions seems reasonable.

Due to the potential ability of cyanobacteria to promote biotransformation of flavonoids, we decided to study such processes using chalcone as the model compound. Whole cells of halophilic and freshwater cyanobacteria strains were used to indicate the favoured routes of chalcone biocatalytic transformation in batch cultures performed on analytical, preparative and mini-pilot scales.

Methods

Chemicals

Chalcone (Cat. No. 136123) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poznan, Poland). The chalcone stock solution was prepared in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (15 mg/mL) and was sterilized by filtration, prior to its addition to the medium. The chalcone stock solution was prepared on the same day of its use and was stored in the dark to prevent photodamage. All chemical components of the medium were purchased from POCH S.A. (Avantor Performance Materials Poland S.A., Gliwice, Poland). All chemicals were of analytical grade. Milli-Q water (Merck, Millipore, Germany) was used for culture preparation and maintenance, whereas special Millipore Milli-Q A10 water of high purity was used for any analytical purposes.

Strains and culture conditions

Cyanobacteria used in our experiments occur either naturally in hypersaline ponds, such as Spirulina platensis [strain C1 (PCC9438)], or in freshwater ecosystems, such as Anabaena sp. [strain CCALA 007], Anabaena laxa [strain CCALA 805], Aphanizomenon klebahnii [CCALA 009], Nodularia moravica [strain CCALA 797], Chroococcus minutus [strain CCALA 055], Merismopedia glauca [strain CCALA 099] and Synechocystis aquatilis [strain CCALA 190]. Axenic culture of the S. platensis strain was obtained from the Pasteur Culture Collection (PCC) (Institut Pasteur, Paris), whereas all other cyanobacterial species were purchased from the Culture Collection of Autotrophic Organisms (CCALA) (Institute of Botany AS CR, Trebon, Czech Republic).

To make the inoculates, which were used to initiate the experimental cultures, all tested microorganisms were pre-grown in standard media: MSp (ATCC 1679) medium for the halophilic strain, and BG11 (ATCC 616) or Z8 medium for freshwater strains.

Subcultures of cyanobacteria were revitalized every 3 weeks by transferring 10-mL aliquots to 50 mL of fresh adequate media [53]. The cultures of the tested cyanobacteria were grown at 24 ± 1 °C for 16 h day (1000 lx light intensity) and 8 h night photoperiods, corresponding to the conditions of the long day in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 60 mL of each culture [54, 55].

Experimental cultures

Screening (analytical) scale biotransformations of chalcone were arranged by transferring the appropriate volumes of aliquots from 21-day-old subcultures to adequate, fresh media. The volumes of the inoculates were established experimentally by considering the final concentration of chlorophyll, which was 1 mg/L at the beginning of culturing for all tested species. Chlorophyll content was measured in methanolic extracts, according to a previously described procedure [56]. The inoculum was added to 100 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 30 mL of the appropriate culture medium supplemented with chalcone stock solution (0,13%, v/v), which resulted in a final chalcone concentration of 20 mg/L. This concentration of substrate was chosen based on the results of screening experiments that were performed in a concentration range from 5 up to 100 mg/L, which guaranteed the highest amount of chemical that did not induce the sudden death of cyanobacterial cells.

Cyanobacterial cultures were incubated at 24 ± 1 °C under constant adjusted light conditions with a photoperiod (16 h:8 h, day:night at 2500 lx light intensity) of 14 days. The stability of substrate under these conditions was demonstrated by preparing and incubating control samples consisting of the solution of tested flavonoid in sterile cultivation medium, the substrate control. The culture controls consisted of the microbial colonies (inocula) in fermentation medium cultivated without the chalcone. All experiments, including controls, were performed at least in triplicate.

After fourteen (14) days of incubation, the cells and culture medium were separated by filtration followed by centrifugation at 5.000×g for 1 min. Next, all the transformation medium obtained in each repetition was removed separately and was extracted three times with 10 mL of ethyl acetate. Then, these three extracts (from each separate repetition) were combined and dried over anhydrous magnesium sulphate, and the solvent was evaporated to dryness using a vacuum evaporator. The remaining residue was dissolved in 200 µL of ethyl acetate and subjected to analysis with the use of planar chromatography (TLC) and gas chromatography (GC–MS), using the appropriate standards. The effectiveness of the biotransformations was calculated based on the quantification of the products obtained with respect to the areas of relevant peaks, while the total peak area was treated as 100%. The resulting biotransformation yield is the average of the values obtained.

Additionally, in the case of A. klebahnii, the entire transformation mixture was removed every 24 h, prepared as described above and analysed by GC–MS. The determination of the growth of A. klebahnii in experimental cultures was performed by time-course measurements of total chlorophyll content [53].

Preparative-scale biotransformations of chalcone by cyanobacteria

To scale-up the biotransformation process, eight repetitions of the same experiment were performed in 1000 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 250 mL of the cultivation medium. The cultures were incubated under the same conditions using the same final concentration of substrate. After 14 days of incubation, the mixtures were extracted with ethyl acetate (each repetition, 3 × 80 mL) and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After evaporation of the solvent in a vacuum evaporator, the products of transformation were separated by preparative thin layer chromatography (PTLC), and the structures of the separated substances were confirmed by mass spectrometry (MS), infrared spectroscopy (IR), proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR), and carbon nuclear magnetic resonance (13C NMR), including homonuclear correlation spectroscopy (COSY) and heteronuclear single-quantum correlation (HSQC) experiments.

Biotransformation of chalcone by cyanobacterium Aphanizomenon klebahnii in a mini-pilot scale photobioreactor

The mini-pilot scale photobioreactor was composed of a “Jupiter,” modular, autoclavable fermentation unit and multicolour light emitting diodes (LED) module called “Elara.” Both modules are produced by Solaris (Mantova, Italy). “Jupiter” is designated for microbial and cell culture applications and is suitable for both aerobic and anaerobic bioprocesses. The total volume of the borosilicate glass chamber is 4 L; however, the working volume was set at 2 L. The chamber was equipped with a Teflon® stirrer and cooling system. “Elara” contains sets of warm-white, red, green and blue LED lamps placed in the collar surrounding the glass chamber and padded with a reflective surface to lower the loss of light irradiation and to prevent the penetration of outside light. The entire system is controlled by the dedicated Process Control System based on Leonardo 2.0 software. Such a photobioreactor allows for the control of carbon dioxide supply, water supply, optimal temperature, efficient exposure to light, culture density, pH level, gas supply rate and the stirring regime of the culture.

The 2 L volume mini-pilot scale of A. klebahnii culture was established using pre-cultured inoculum and freshly autoclaved Z8 medium. The volume of inoculum was adjusted experimentally with respect to the concentration of chlorophyll, which at the beginning of culturing was 1 mg/L. The culture was supplemented with chalcone up to a final concentration of 20 mg/L and was irradiated with white/yellow light [(RGB)—R: 225, G: 242, B:87, S:255] of 2,5 ± 0,3 klux intensity with a defined photoperiod (16 h:8 h, day:night). The temperature of the culture was set at 25 °C, and the stirring speed was 100 rpm. Circulating, filtered air was supplied through a syringe filter to the bottom part of the vessel for uniform mixing of the culture and to prevent stagnation. This setup was left undisturbed for 7 days, the entirety of the batch experiment. A photobioreactor was connected to the additional unit, a gas analyser (produced by Solaris), which allowed for the measurement of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in the headspace of the culture in the real-time mode. Those data were recorded, and the respiration coefficient was calculated.

The same parameters were applied to the sterile Z8 medium containing chalcone at a concentration of 20 mg/L but without cyanobacterial cells (without inoculum), which acted as a substrate control. The same parameters were also applied to the sterile Z8 medium inoculated with the biota under examination but without the chalcone that was treated as the culture control.

Determination of biotransformation course and obtained products by chromatographic and spectroscopic methods

The biotransformations were carried out by TLC and GC. In the case of thin layer chromatography, the 10 µL volumes of ethyl acetate extracts from experimental cultures, substrate and culture controls, and the solution of chalcone standard were applied on TLC aluminium plates (silica gel 60, 0.2 mm thickness; Merck, Germany) using a CAMAG Linomat 5 applicator (CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland). Plates were developed in a dedicated glass chamber previously saturated with a hexane:acetone mobile phase mixture (3:1, v/v). Developed plates were visualised under 254 and 366 nm wavelengths of UV-light and under white light in a CAMAG TLC Visualizer 2 (CAMAG, Muttenz, Switzerland). Then, the plates were sprayed with a solution of 10 g of Ce(SO4)2 and 20 g of phosphomolybdic acid (H3[P(Mo3O10)4]) dissolved in 1 L of 10% H2SO4 to verify the presence of flavonoids, which give yellow to brown-orange spots. After spraying, the plates were gently heated until coloured spots appeared, whereupon the plates were inspected again under the UV light at 254 and 366 nm wavelengths and under white light in the reflectance mode. The retention coefficients (Rf) and colours of the spots were recorded using CAMAG VisionCats software.

The changes in chemical composition of biotransformation medium were determined by the GC–MS system Thermo Scientific TriPlus Trace GC Ultra fitted with the ITQ 1100 mass detector (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) equipped with an HP-5 fused silica capillary column (30.0 m × 0.25 mm i.d., film thickness 0.25 µm). To determine the composition of the products the following temperature program was used: 90 °C/0 min, gradient 3 °C/min to 200 °C/5 min, gradient 10 °C/min to 280 °C/5 min. The injector temperature was set at 250 °C. The flow rate of the carrier gas (helium) was set at 1.5 mL/min. The split flow was 30 mL/min. A split ratio of 20:1 was applied. The chromatographic data were recorded and processed using the XCalibur software.

The products of biotransformations performed in preparative and mini-pilot scale experiments were separated by PTLC by the use of a CAMAG system and silica gel glass plates without a fluorescent indicator (Silica gel 60 matrix, 500 µm thickness, Sigma-Aldrich) using a hexane:acetone (3:1, v/v) mixture as the eluent. Separated products were extracted from the silica bed with ethyl acetate, which was then evaporated under a stream of nitrogen. Then, the structures of isolated products were confirmed by MS, FTIR and nuclear magnetic resonance techniques: 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HSQC and COSY. Spectra were recorded using the NMR Bruker UltraShield 400 MHz spectrometer with tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal reference. The NMR spectra were measured in DMSO-d6. To confirm the presence of characteristic absorption bands, the obtained products were incorporated in KBr pellets and were subjected to FT-IR measurements using a Thermo Scientific NICOLET 6700 spectrometer (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). The structures of the known compounds were confirmed by comparing their spectroscopic properties with spectra of appropriate standards and with data published in the literature.

Results and discussion

Bioconversion of chalcone by cyanobacteria in analytical scale

To select the strains capable of bio-converting chalcone, eight species of cyanobacteria, one halophilic strain (S. platensis) and seven freshwater strains (A. laxa, Anabaena sp., A. klebahnii, N. moravica, C. minutus, M. glauca, and S. aquatilis), were screened. These species are known to be capable of transforming monoterpenes and organophosphonic compounds [57]. To the best of our knowledge there are no reports regarding biotransformation of chalcones with the help of cyanobacteria. In fact, known reports describing hydrogenation of chalcones by microorganisms to the corresponding dihydrochalcones concerned the reactions catalyzed by bacteria of the genera Gordonia, Lactobacillus, Rhodococcus, yeasts of the genera Rhodotorula, Saccharomyces, and Yarrowia, and mycellial fungi of the genera Aspergillus, Chaetomium, Fusarium [19, 27, 28, 30].

All cyanobacterial strains examined were capable of transforming chalcone, and a few strains converted this substrate with a >99% yield upon fourteen (14) days of incubation. The mass of the molecular ion of the conversion product, its m/z fragmentation and the specific differences in its mass spectrum compared to chalcone, strongly suggested the propenyl chain was bio-reduced, which thus suggests dihydrochalcone was formed. The use of the GC–MS system with respect to the retention time and the specific fragmentation of dihydrochalcone used as a standard, as well as the comparison of spectroscopic data of this substance with those published in the literature, confirmed this hypothesis. Moreover, the results of the NMR experiments (1H, 13C, HSQC and COSY) confirmed the structure of dihydrochalcone as the product and led us to the same conclusion.

Based on this finding, supported by the GC–MS quantification, chalcone was found to be converted to dihydrochalcone by all examined cyanobacterial strains; however, the effectiveness of this process depends on the strain with biotransformation yields ranging from 3% to >99% (after 14 days of incubation). The most effective biocatalysts, A. laxa, A. klebahnii, N. moravica, S. aquatilis and M. glauca, reduced chalcone, causing alteration only in the C=C bond of the olefin fragment of the molecule without affecting the carbonyl group (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Regioselective bioreduction of chalcone (1) that leads to the formation of dihydrochalcone (2) as the only product, as it is catalysed by Anabaena laxa, Aphanizomenon klebahnii, Nodularia moravica, Synechocystis aquatilis and Merismopedia glauca

The first four freshwater cyanobacterial strains completely transformed the substrate with >99% yield, whereas the latter strain transformed the substrate with 92% yield. It is worth noting that in all five strains, the regioselective reduction of 1,3-diphenyl-2-propen-1-one was the only means identified by which this substrate was transformed.

Alternatively, the Anabaena sp. and C. minutus could transform chalcone using several means and thus provided few products. However, dihydrochalcone remained dominant. Anabaena sp. converted chalcone into dihydrochalcone with a yield of nearly 90%, producing additional corresponding secondary alcohols: 1,3-diphenyl-2-propen-1-ol and 1,3-diphenylpropan-1-ol with 7 and 6% of yields, respectively (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Specific transformation of chalcone catalysed by Anabaena sp.

Biotransformation of chalcone in the culture of C. minutus led to the formation of dihydrochalcone with 70% yield. Moreover, this strain degrades chalcone into two structurally related metabolites, cinnamic and hydrocinnamic acid, with 3 and 10% yields, respectively. The relationship between the amounts of both acids produced suggests that C. minutus also catalysed the reduction of the C=C bond in the propenyl chain of the cinnamic acid molecule, which resulted in the appearance of hydrocinnamic acid in the culture (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Transformation of chalcone catalysed by Chroococcus minutus

The lowest rate of conversion was observed in the case of S. platensis, which after 2 weeks of culturing, transformed only 3% of the substrate, producing dihydrochalcone as the only product.

In summary, all the examined strains produced five different products, which were identified based on their relative retention times (Rf values) as well as on their MS spectral data.

The course of biotransformation (in 24 h intervals), i.e., the dynamics of this process, was examined in an axenic culture of A. klebahnii as the model of a highly effective biocatalyst. Filamentous, N2-fixing A. klebahnii is one of the main cyanobacterial strains that forms cyanobacterial blooms, and it is characterized by a relatively rapid increase in biomass [58]. Fortunately, this strain is not reported as being a producer of dangerous cyanotoxins, such as microcystins and cylindrospermopsin [59].

This experiment shed the light on the pathway of chalcone conversion as the process proceeded through the intermediate. The results of GC–MS determinations indicated that in both experimental medium and substrate control, during the first 24 h of incubation, the substrate (peak of Rt = 32.8 min) was converted into the intermediate (peak of Rt = 27.6 min). Surprisingly, the m/z fragmentation of this intermediate was identical to that of the substrate (Figs. 4, 5).
Fig. 4

GC–MS profiles of the samples collected on day 0 (a), day 1 (b), and day 8 (c) during the transformation of chalcone into dihydrochalcone by Aphanizomenon klebahnii

Fig. 5

Adequate mass spectra of substrate (a), intermediate (b) and product (c)

The same intermediate has been detected in substrate control, where it existed in stable equilibrium with trans-chalcone, with an 80%:20% ratio after 14 days of incubation (Fig. 6b).
Fig. 6

Time-dependent transformations of chalcone in the culture of Aphanizomenon klebahnii (a) and in substrate control (b)

Although chalcone may exist in two isomeric forms, cis or trans, we presume that it exists as cis-chalcone, which might be an intermediate that is then bioreduced by cyanobacteria. It is known that in water solutions irradiated by daylight, trans-chalcone is rapidly converted to the excited (twisted) state P*, which forms cis-chalcone through a simple isomerization process (Fig. 7) [60].
Fig. 7

The formation of two distinct, medium-dependent isomeric forms of chalcone

Such a behaviour of chalcone suggests that, although trans-chalcone is the thermodynamically favourable form in polar protic solvents similar to the microbial media, the cis-isomer is the dominant form of this compound.

The results of 1H NMR measurements of cis-chalcone revealed that its spectrum was similar to that of the substrate. Nevertheless, the coupling constant of the H2 and H3 protons of the double bond of the olefin chain was 8 Hz, instead of 15 Hz, which is characteristic of the chalcone of the trans-configuration. This result confirmed that cis-chalcone is the final intermediate that was transformed by cyanobacteria to dihydrochalcone.

Bearing in mind the dynamics of these transformations, it is worth discussing the sequence of events leading to the complete conversion of trans-chalcone. As shown in Fig. 4, the first step was the photochemical transformation of trans-chalcone into its cis-isomer, which was observed immediately after the addition of the substrate to the medium, even at day 0. The final product of the biocatalytic conversion of cis-chalcone, dihydrochalcone (peak of Rt = 28.5 min), was determined the next day together with cis-chalcone, whose amount was two times larger than the trans-isomer (Fig. 4). From that moment, the biocatalysis proceeded dynamically, alongside a decrease in the concentration of substrate and intermediate up to day 8, when >99% of the substrate and intermediate disappeared. Quantitative data presented in Fig. 6 fully reflect that manner of transformation. Considering the possible enzyme activity, it is worth emphasizing that because of the spatial exposition of the propenyl ketone chain in cis-chalcone, this form seems to be more accessible than the analogous group in the trans-chalcone molecule. Such a thesis seems to be supported by the data revealing the activity of enoate reductase, which catalyse light-induced, highly selective hydrogenation of C=C bonds [41, 61]. In such circumstances, the catalytic cycle comprises two half-reactions: reduction of flavin mononucleotide by NAD(P)H, followed by flavin oxidation through stereospecific reduction of the C=C bond [62]. Moreover, enoate reductase from anaerobic bacterium Eubacterium ramulus can reduce some polyhydroxylated chalcones to adequate dihydrochalcones [63].

The influence of chalcone on the growth of A. klebahnii that was monitored daily revealed that the 20 mg/L concentration of chalcone significantly inhibited the growth of examined cyanobacterium. In fact, after 2 weeks, the amount of chlorophyll was approximately 20% of its initial concentration. Nevertheless, such a strong disturbance of microbial growth did not inhibit its biocatalytic activity, which resulted in a >99% conversion of chalcone after 8 days of culturing.

To verify whether such an efficient activity also exists in scaled-up cultures, the same experiments were conducted on a preparative scale and in A. klebahnii cultures in a mini-pilot photobioreactor.

Bioconversion of chalcone by cyanobacteria on a preparative scale

Biocatalytic conversion of chalcone on a preparative scale was carried out in 250 mL volumes of cyanobacterial cultures in 1 L Erlenmeyer flasks. The scaled-up bioconversions of chalcone fully confirmed the results obtained on the analytical scale, either with respect to the chemical nature of the products (Fig. 8) or with respect to the transformation dynamics and effectiveness.
Fig. 8

The structures of the substrate—chalcone (1) and the products of biotransformation (26) performed by the examined cyanobacteria

Using the preparative scale for the experiments enabled the acquisition of products in amounts that allowed their separation by PTLC and allowed for fully credible confirmation of their structures using a set of spectroscopic methods: MS, IR, and NMR. The effectiveness of biocatalysis in each strain of cyanobacterium was established based on quantitative determination using mass spectrometry coupled with gas chromatography (Table 1). Table 2 presents the GC–MS data for compounds 16.
Table 1

The yields of biocatalytic transformation of chalcone by cyanobacteria examined in experiments carried out on a preparative scale

Strain of cyanobacteria

Product

Yield (%)

Spirulina platensis

2

3.1 ± 0.2

Anabaena laxa

2

>99.0

Anabaena sp.

2

87.6 ± 1.2

3

6.7 ± 1.5

4

5.7 ± 0.2

Aphanizomenon klebahnii

2

>99.0

Nodularia moravica

2

>99.0

Chroococcus minutus

2

69.9 ± 1.9

5

2.9 ± 0.4

6

9.8 ± 2.5

Merismopedia glauca

2

91.8 ± 5.0

Synechocystis aquatilis

2

>99.0

The yields are the average values from at least four repetitions

Table 2

GC–MS data for compounds 16

No.

Compound

RT (min)

Fragment ions

1

Chalcone

32.80

208.1 [M]+, 207.1, 179.2, 165.1, 152.2, 131.1, 103.1, 89.2, 77.1

2

Dihydrochalcone

28.40

210.1 [M]+, 106.0, 105.0, 91.2, 77.1, 51.0

3

1,3-Diphenyl-2-propen-1-ol

30.20

208.1 [M]+, 121.1, 105.1, 91.1, 77.1, 51.1

4

1,3-Diphenylpropan-1-ol

28.20

208.1 [M]+, 107.1, 92.1, 79.0, 65.1, 51.0

5

Cinnamic acid

13.60

148.1, 147.1 [M]+, 131.1, 119.1, 103.1, 91.1, 77.1, 51.2

6

Hydrocinnamic acid

10.60

150.0 [M]+, 131.1, 104.1, 91.2, 78.1, 65.1, 51.1

Although halophilic species of cyanobacteria grow faster and more efficiently than freshwater species, but are less efficient biocatalysts in case of chalcone transformation. The most probable reason is related to the transmembrane transport, resulted from the specific structure of the cell wall of halophilic cyanobacteria as S. platensis is [64]. For this reason, transmembrane transport in the cells of halophiles strains is better controlled, what means that the transportation of uncertain substances (as chalcone and/or dihydrochalcone are in this case) is carried out to the smaller extent. Therefore the differences in a cell wall construction and physiological features of halophilic and freshwater cyanobacteria, may be the reasons for their various biocatalytic abilities. Additionally, consistent physiological differences between freshwater and marine taxa correspond to clear genetic divergence and possible differences in cell division. The main distinction is intolerance of moderate to high salinities in freshwater taxa, while marine taxa have no problem growing in freshwater [65]. Even if mentioned S. platensis is not the most effective biocatalyst in formation of dihydrochalcone, for sure is safe for consumers and its activity provided the added value to its use, simply as it is—without any modifications. We think that this strain is the example that might fulfill together the requirements of pharmaceutical and food industry as commonly accepted nutraceutic.

Bioconversion of chalcone by Aphanizomenon klebahnii carried out in a mini-pilot scale photobioreactor

For 2 L volume batch cultures, the proposed regimen of intensity and the colour of light, pH, temperature, vigour of mixing and aeration of medium, allowed for biocatalysis conducted by A. klebahnii in Z8 medium to be shortened from 14 to 4 days. What should be emphasized is that the yield of this scaled-up transformation was >99%, which is the same as the conversion yields at the analytical and preparative scales. Fourteen-day transformation of chalcone (1) (40 mg) in 2 L volume of the culture of A. klebahnii yielded 30 mg of compound 2, with at least over 75% absolute productivity. It is worth to emphasize that this system has not been optimized yet.

Interestingly, such a high effectiveness of conversion was accompanied by relatively low photosynthetic activity for the cyanobacterium, confirmed by an approximately constant pH (7.0 ± 0.2) throughout the culture period. However, in the case of the control cells, the pH fluctuated since it was influenced by exponentially increasing photosynthetic CO2 fixation during the dark periods and cyanobacterial respiration (responsible for CO2 releasing) when the light was operated (Fig. 9). Moreover, the increase in respiration rate, indicated by higher CO2 concentration over the surface of the medium, was more pronounced in the experimental culture, which suggests the higher activity of ongoing catabolic processes.
Fig. 9

The changes of CO2 content in the headspace of the photobioreactor (b) as a function of time in control and experimental cultures of Aphanizomenon klebahnii

In the closed system of the batch photobioreactor culture, the changes in pH also resulted from a steady decrease in the amount of nutrients, from net fluxes of H+ across the plasma membranes, and from the influx of weak electrolytes such as CO2/HCO3 and NH4 +/NH3 [56]. The inorganic carbon equilibrium is easily unbalanced because uncatalysed hydration–dehydration reactions are very slow compared to biological interactions in carbon assimilation and/or releasing, in which case cyanobacteria may catalyse by carbonic anhydrase. Many strains of blue-green algae can actively transport inorganic carbon from the growth medium into cells when passive CO2 diffusion is not adequate to support photosynthetic demands. Moreover, in a closed system, a dense blue-green algal culture can profoundly influence the pH of the medium since cyanobacteria has only a limited pH range within which growth is possible and usually has a defined pH optimum [66].

Microbial synthesis of flavonoids is well documented in the literature; however, there are no reports on the chemomicrobial synthesis of dihydrochalcones using cyanobacterial strains. It seems logical that organisms producing flavonoids possess a suitable “enzymatic apparatus” to transform such natural compounds, with specific enzyme behaviour advantages, such as chemo-, regio-, and stereoselectivity. It is possible that the cells can adjust such a system to a specific substance that appears in their environment through the formation of enzymes enabling the metabolism of this compound and its inclusion in the chain of internal changes. When phototrophic microorganisms such as cyanobacteria are exposed to the influence of xenobiotic compounds, they may develop the capacity for metabolic adaptations. In this respect, cyanobacteria can perform an incomplete degradation of the substrate, which may reduce the probability of by-product formation or further product degradation [67].

The metabolic capabilities of cyanobacteria create a rational premise to select the conditions of biocatalytic transformations of chalcones that enable targeted biotransformations based on the structural variability of these compounds. One of these processes may be the formation of dihydrochalcone, a valuable natural sweetener. Starting material supplying the chalcones for bioconversion to the desired products may be a by-products from other branches of industry, e.g. hop plant Humulus lupulus. The residue after hop supercritical carbon dioxide extraction is a rich source of technologically useful substances, primarily chalcones, as described by Anioł [68]. Other well-known plants rich in chalcones are cherry tomatoes [69], kava–kava (Piper methysticum) [70], Boesen-bergia rotunda [71], and Lophira alata [72].

Chromatographic and spectroscopic data about biotransformation products

Dihydrochalcone/1,3-diphenylpropan-1-one (2)

Chalcone (1) was used as a substrate. The crude product was purified by preparative thin layer chromatography (hexane:acetone 3/1, v/v) to obtain white crystals, mp. 71–73 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz) (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 7.99 (d, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.60 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.50 (m, 2H, J = 8 Hz), 7.28 (d, 4H, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.17 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.37 (t, 2H, J = 8,0 Hz), 2.94 (t, 2H, J = 7.6 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz) (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 199.1, 141.2, 136.5, 133.1, 128.6, 128.3, 127.9, 125.8, 39.5, 29.4; IR (KBr) νmax/cm−1 3061, 2927, 2341, 1957, 1824, 1681, 1595, 1494, 1448, 1208, 1075, 973, 928, 743, 701; GC–MS (EI) m/z (%) = 210.1 (33) [M]+, 106.0 (12), 105.0 (100), 91.2 (10), 77.1 (39), 51.0 (10); the retention times: 1–32.80, 2 –28.40 min.

2-Propenyl, 1-hydroxy-1,3-diphenyl-/1,3-diphenyl-2-propen-1-ol (3)

Transformation of chalcone (1) in the Anabaena sp. culture yielded compound 3 (white solid); mp. 55–57 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz) (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.26–7.40 (m, 10H), 6.66 (dd, 1H), 6.40 (m, 1H), 5.14 (m, 1H), 1.61 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (100 MHz) (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 142.8, 136.5, 131.5, 130.6, 128.6, 128.5, 127.8, 127.7, 126.6, 126.3, 75.1; IR (KBr) νmax/cm−1 3345, 3027, 1599, 1493, 1450, 1010, 966, 746, 696; GC–MS (EI) m/z (%) = 208.1 (42) [M]+, 121.1 (21), 105.1 (100), 91.1 (57), 77.1 (61), 51.1 (15); the retention time: 3–30.20 min.

1,3-Diphenylpropan-1-ol (4)

Transformation of chalcone (1) in the culture Anabaena sp. yielded compound 4 (pale yellow oil); mp. 52–54 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz) (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.37–7.21 (10H, m), 4.70 (1H, m), 2.83–2.61 (2H, m), 2.22–1.97 (2H, m); 13C NMR (100 MHz) (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 144.6, 141.9, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 127.7, 126.0, 125.9, 73.9, 40.5, 32.1; IR (KBr) νmax/cm−1 3395, 3027, 2940, 1603, 1495, 1454, 1058, 747, 699; GC–MS (EI) m/z (%) = 208.1 (4) [M]+, 107.1 (80), 92.1 (61), 79.0 (100), 65.1 (13), 51.0 (12); the retention time: 4–28.20 min.

2-Propenoic acid, 3-phenyl/cinnamic acid (5)

Transformation of chalcone (1) in the C. minutus culture yielded compound 5 (white crystals); mp. 132–133 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz) (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 12.41 (s, 1H), 7.69–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.60 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz), 7.42–7.40 (m, 3H), 6.54 (d, 1H, J = 8 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz) (DMSO-d6) δ (ppm): 168.4, 144.7, 135.1, 133.1, 129.7, 129.1, 120.1.; IR (KBr) νmax/cm−1 3230–2485, 1692, 1625, 1450, 1288, 982, 769, 712; GC–MS (EI) m/z (%) = 148.1 (58), 147.1 (100) [M]+, 131.1 (15), 119.1 (4), 103.1 (45), 91.1 (18), 77.1 (22), 51.2 (14); the retention times: 5–13.60 min.

Benzenepropanoic acid/hydrocinnamic acid (6)

Transformation of chalcone (1) in the C. minutus culture yielded compound 6 (colourless to faintly yellow); mp. 45–48 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz) (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 7.21–7.33 (m, 5H), 2.97 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz), 2.70 (t, 2H, J = 7.8 Hz); 13C NMR (25 MHz) (CDCl3) δ (ppm): 179.6, 140.2, 128.6, 128.3, 126.4, 35.7, 30.6; IR (KBr) νmax/cm−1 3060–2633, 1699, 1603, 1409, 1304, 1221, 933, 703; GC–MS (EI) m/z (%) = 150.0 (45) [M]+, 131.1 (4), 104.1 (100), 91.2 (81), 78.1 (18), 65.1 (14), 51.1 (10); the retention times: 5–10.60 min.

Conclusions

Cyanobacterial cultures are ready to be used for highly efficient chemoselective conjugate reduction of α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds occurring in aqueous media in mild conditions. This is the first report related to the use of whole cyanobacterial cells for the bio-reduction of 1,3-diaryl-2-propen-1-one, producing the corresponding saturated ketone; 1,3-diaryl-2-propan-1-one. After optimization of this process, the complete conversion of substrate (>99%) was obtained. The use of blue-green algae as biocatalysts in the biotransformation of chalcones seems to be an important biotechnological strategy to obtain dihydrochalcone with high chemoselectivity, using low-cost reagents. Moreover, the scaling-up of this process to preparative and mini-pilot scales fully corroborates the results obtained with the analytical scale. Moreover, >99% effectiveness of bioconversion on analytical, preparative, and mini-pilot scales creates the possibility of rescaling this process to a semi-technical or technical scale. Therefore, we propose a relatively simple way of obtaining dihydrochalcone. Due to its sweet taste and growing interest in its use, this method may find an application in the food industry that is still eager for the production of new, natural sweeteners.

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

BŻ, MA, and JL conceived the research. BŻ performed the experiments. BŻ, MA, and JL contributed reagents and analytical tools. BŻ and JL analyzed and interpreted the data. BŻ and JL wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included within the article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by Polish National Science Centre (NCN) Grant Number 2016/21/N/NZ9/02310.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Analytical and Ecological Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Opole
(2)
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Food Science, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences

References

  1. Ballester AR, Molthoff J, de Vos R, Hekkert B, Orzaez D, Fernandez-Moreno JP, et al. Biochemical and molecular analysis of pink tomatoes: deregulated expression of the gene encoding transcription factor SlMYB12 leads to pink tomato fruit color. Plant Physiol. 2010;152:71–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Attar S, O’Brien Z, Alhaddad H, Golden ML, Calderon-Urrea A. Ferrocenyl chalcones versus organic chalcones: a comparative study of their nematocidal activity. Bioorg Med Chem. 2011;19:2055–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Rozmer Z, Perjési P. Naturally occurring chalcones and their biological activities. Phytochem Rev. 2016;15:87–120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Di Carlo G, Mascolo N, Izzo AA, Capasso F. Flavonoids: old and new aspects of a class of natural therapeutic drugs. Life Sci. 1999;65:337–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Yadav VR, Prasad S, Sung B, Aggarwal BB. The role of chalcones in suppression of NF-κB-mediated inflammation and cancer. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:295–309.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Avila HP, Smania Ede F, Monache FD, Smania A Jr. Structure–activity relationship of antibacterial chalcones. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16:9790–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Karaman I, Gezegen H, Gurdere MB, Dingil A, Ceylan M. Screening of biological activities of a series of chalcone derivatives against human pathogenic microorganisms. Chem Biodivers. 2010;7:400–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ritter M, Martins RM, Dias D, Pereira CMP. Recent advances on the synthesis of chalcones with antimicrobial activities: a brief review. Lett Org Chem. 2014;11:498–508.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Stompor M, Dancewicz K, Gabrys B, Aniol M. Insect antifeedant potential of xanthohumol, isoxanthohumol, and their derivatives. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:6749–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Okoniewska K, Konieczny MT, Lemke K, Grabowski T. Pharmacokinetic studies of oxathio-heterocycle fused chalcones. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2017;42:49–58.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Du H, Huang Y, Tang Y. Genetic and metabolic engineering of isoflavonoid biosynthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86:1293–312.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Park SR, Yoon JA, Paik JH, Park JW, Jung WS, Ban YH, et al. Engineering of plant-specific phenylpropanoids biosynthesis in Streptomyces venezuelae. J Biotechnol. 2009;141:181–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. de Carvalho CC, da Fonseca MM. Biotransformation of terpenes. Biotechnol Adv. 2006;24:134–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberts SM, Turner NJ, Willetts AJ, Turner MK. Introduction to biocatalysis, using enzymes and microorganisms. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1996;43:162.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Demirjian DC, Shah PC, Morís-Varas F. Screening for novel enzymes. In: Fressner WD, editor. Biocatalysis from discovery to application. Berlin: Springer; 2000. p. 1–30.Google Scholar
  16. Sanchez-Gonzalez M, Rosazza JP. Microbial transformations of chalcones: hydroxylation, O-demethylation, and cyclization to flavanones. J Nat Prod. 2004;67:553–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Alarcón J, Alderete J, Escobar C, Araya R, Cespedes CL. Aspergillus niger catalyzes the synthesis of flavonoids from chalcones. Biocatal Biotransf. 2013;31:160–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanchez-Gonzalez M, Rosazza JP. Biocatalytic synthesis of butein and sulfuretin by Aspergillus alliaceus. J Agric Food Chem. 2006;54:4646–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Corrêa MJC, Nunes F, Bitencourt HR, Borges FC, Guilhon GMSP, Arruda MSP, et al. Biotransformation of chalcones by the endophytic fungus Aspergillus flavus isolated from Paspalum maritimum trin. J Braz Chem Soc. 2011;22:1333–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Tronina T, Bartmańska A, Filip-Psurska B, Wietrzyk J, Popłoński J, Huszcza E. Fungal metabolites of xanthohumol with potent antiproliferative activity on human cancer cell lines in vitro. Bioorg Med Chem. 2013;21:2001–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tronina T, Bartmańska A, Popłonski J, Huszcza E. Transformation of xanthohumol by Aspergillus ochraceus. J Basic Microb. 2014;54:66–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Herath WH, Ferreira D, Khan IA. Microbial transformation of xanthohumol. Phytochemistry. 2003;62:673–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Xu J, Yang L, Zhao SJ, Chou GX, Wang ZT. Microbial glycosylation of cardamonin by Mucor spinosus. Yao Xue Xue Bao. 2011;46:733–7.Google Scholar
  24. Huszcza E, Bartmańska A, Tronina T. Glycosylation of xanthohumol by fungi. Z Naturforsch C. 2008;63:557–60.Google Scholar
  25. Tronina T, Bartmańska A, Milczarek M, Wietrzyk J, Popłoński J, Rój E, et al. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activity of glycosides obtained by biotransformation of xanthohumol. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23:1957–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Stompor M, Potaniec B, Szumny A, Zieliński P, Żołnierczyk AK, Anioł M. Microbial synthesis of dihydrochalcones using Rhodococcus and Gordonia species. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2013;97:283–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Janeczko T, Gładkowski W, Kostrzewa-Susłow E. Microbial transformations of chalcones to produce food sweetener derivatives. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2013;98:55–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Silva VD, Stambuk BU, Nascimento MDG. Efficient chemoselective biohydrogenation of 1,3-diaryl-2-propen-1-ones catalyzed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeasts in biphasic system. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2010;63:157–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Stompor M, Potaniec B, Szumny A, Zieliński P, Żołnierczyk A, Anioł M. Microbiological reduction of xanthohumol and 4-methoxychalcone. Przem Chem. 2013;92:574–8.Google Scholar
  30. Stompor M, Kałużny M, Żarowska B. Biotechnological methods for chalcone reduction using whole cells of Lactobacillus, Rhodococcus and Rhodotorula strains as a way to produce new derivatives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:8371–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Kostrzewa-Susłow E, Dmochowska-Gładysz J, Białońska A, Ciniuk Z. Microbial transformations of flavanone by Aspergillus niger and Penicillium chermesinum cultures. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2008;52–53:34–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kostrzewa-Susłow E, Janeczko T. Microbial transformations of 7-methoxyflavanone. Molecules. 2012;17:14810–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Schijlen EGWM, Ric de Vos CH, van Tunen AJ, Bovy AG. Modification of flavonoid biosynthesis in crop plants. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:2631–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Santos CNS, Koffas M, Stephanopoulos G. Optimization of a heterologous pathway for the production of flavonoids from glucose. Metab Eng. 2011;3:392–400.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Hall M, Stueckler C, Hauer B, Stuermer R, Friedrich T, Breuer M, Kroutil W, Faber K. Asymmetric bioreduction of activated C=C bonds using Zymomonas mobilis NCR enoate reductase and old yellow enzymes OYE 1–3 from yeasts. Eur J Org Chem. 2008;9:1511–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Williams RE, Bruce NC. ‘New uses for an Old Enzyme’—the old yellow enzyme family of flavoenzymes. Microbiology. 2002;148:1607–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Swiderska MA, Steward JD. Stereoselective enone reductions by Saccharomyces carlsbergensis old yellow enzyme. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2006;42:52–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Muller A, Sturmer R, Hauer B, Rosche B. Stereospecific alkyne reduction: novel activity of old yellow enzymes. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46:3316–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Iqbal N, Rudroff F, Brigé A, Van Beeumenb J, Mihovilovic MD. Asymmetric bioreduction of activated carbon–carbon double bonds using Shewanella yellow enzyme (SYE-4) as novel enoate reductase. Tetrahedron. 2012;68:7619–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Winkler CK, Tasnadi G, Clay D, Hall M, Faber K. Asymmetric bioreduction of activated alkenes to industrially relevant optically active compounds. J Biotechnol. 2012;162:381–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Koninger K, Gomez Baraibar A, Mugge C, Paul CE, Hollmann F, Nowaczyk MM, Kourist R. Recombinant cyanobacteria for the asymmetric reduction of C=C bonds fueled by the biocatalytic oxidation of water. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;55:5582–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. DuBois GE, Crosby GA, Stephenson RA, Wingard RE Jr. Dihydrochalcone sweeteners. Synthesis and sensory evaluation of sulfonate derivatives. J Agric Food Chem. 1977;25:763–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Winnig M, Bufe B, Kratochwil NA, Slack JP, Meyerhof W. The binding site for neohesperidin dihydrochalcone at the human sweet taste receptor. BMC Struct Biol. 2007;7:66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Scholz B, Liebezeit G. Chemical screening for bioactive substances in culture media of microalgae and cyanobacteria from marine and brackish water habitats: first results. Pharm Biol. 2006;44:544–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Singh DP, Prabha R, Meena KK, Sharma L, Sharma AK. Induced accumulation of polyphenolics and flavonoids in cyanobacteria under salt stress protects organisms through enhanced antioxidant activity. Am J Plant Sci. 2014;5:726–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Goiris K, Muylaert K, Voorspoels S, Noten B, De Paepe D, Baart GJE, De Cooman L. Detection of flavonoids in microalgae from different evolutionary lineages. J Phycol. 2014;50:483–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharathchandra K, Rajashekhar M. Antioxidant activity in the four species of Cyanobacteria isolated from a sulfur spring in the Western Ghats of Karnataka. Int J Pharm Bio Sci. 2013;4:275–85.Google Scholar
  48. Cohen MF, Yamasaki H. Flavonoid-induced expression of a symbiosis-related gene in the cyanobacterium Nostoc punctiforme. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:4644–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Cohen MF, Sakihama Y, Takagi YC, Ichiba T, Yamasaki H. Synergistic effect of deoxyanthocyanins from symbiotic fern Azolla spp. on hrmA gene induction in the cyanobacterium Nostoc punctiforme. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2002;15:875–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Yan R, Wu Y, Yang L, Fang Y, Kerr PG. Scutellaria baicalensis georgi controls cyanobacterial blooms and benefits to aquatic ecosystem. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2011;20:18–25.Google Scholar
  51. Ahmad A, Kim SH, Ali M, Park I, Kim JS, Kim EH, Lim JJ, Kim SK, Chung IM. New chemical constituents from oryza sativa straw and their algicidal activities against blue-green algae. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61:8039–48.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Huang H, Xiao X, Ghadouani A, Wu J, Nie Z, Peng C, Xu X, Shi J. Effects of natural flavonoids on photosynthetic activity and cell integrity in Microcystis aeruginosa. Toxins. 2015;7:66–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Forlani G, Prearo V, Wieczorek D, Kafarski P, Lipok J. Phosphonate degradation by Spirulina strains: cyanobacterial biofilters for the removal of anticorrosive polyphosphonates from wastewater. Enzym Microb Technol. 2011;48:299–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Allen MM. Simple conditions for growth of unicellular blue-green algae on plates(1, 2). J Phycol. 1968;4:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Rippka R, Deruelles J, Waterbury JB, Herdman M, Stainer RY. Generic assignment, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J Gen Microbiol. 1979;111:1–61.Google Scholar
  56. Lipok J, Studnik H, Gruyaert S. The toxicity of RoundupVR 360 SL formulation and its main constituents: glyphosate and isopropylamine toward non-target water photoautotrophs. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010;73:1681–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Kasowska-Żok E, Ostrowska M, Studnik H, Balcerzak L, Żyszka B, Drzyzga D, Bazgier G, Kafarski P, Lipok J. The biotechnological potential of cyanobacteria forming blue-green algal blooms. Chemik. 2014;68:355–62.Google Scholar
  58. Chen H, Burke J, Mosindy T, Fedorak PM, Prepas EE. Cyanobacteria and microcystin-LR in a complex lake system representing a range in trophic status: lake of the woods, Ontario, Canada. J Plankton Res. 2009;31:993–1008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Novakova K, Babica P, Adamovsky O, Blaha L. Modulation of gap-junctional intercellular communication by a series of cyanobacterial samples from nature and laboratory cultures. Toxicon. 2011;58:76–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Leydet Y, Batat P, Jonusauskas G, Denisov S, Lima JC, Parola AJ, McClenaghan ND, Pina F. Impact of water on the cis–trans photoisomerization of hydroxychalcones. J Phys Chem A. 2013;117:4167–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Brenna E, Gatti FG, Manfredi A, Monti D, Parmeggiani F. Enoate reductase-mediated preparation of methyl (S)-2-bromobutanoate, a useful key intermediate for the synthesis of chiral active pharmaceutical ingredients. Org Process Res Dev. 2012;16:262–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Chaparro-Riggers JF, Rogers TA, Vazquez-Figueroa E, Polizzi KM, Bommarius AS. Comparison of three enoate reductases and their potential use for biotransformations. Adv Synth Catal. 2007;349:1521–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Gall M, Thomsen M, Peters C, Pavlidis IV, Jonczyk P, Grunert PP, et al. Enzymatic conversion of flavonoids using bacterial chalcone isomerase and enoate reductase. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53:1439–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. van Eykelenburg C. On the morphology and ultrastructure of the cell wall of Spirulina platensis. Antonie van leeuwenhoek. 1977;43:89–99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Henley WJ, Hironaka J, Guillou L, Buchheim MA, Buchheim JA, Fawley MW, Fawley KP. Phylogenetic analysis of the ‘Nannochloris-like’ algae and diagnoses of Picochlorum oklahomensis gen. et sp. nov. (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta). Phycologia. 2004;43:641–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Blanchemain A, Grizeau D, Guary JC. Effect of different organic buffers on the growth of Skeletonema costatum cultures; further evidence for an autoinhibitory effect. J Plankton Res. 1994;16:1433–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Carr NG. Metabolic control and autotrophic physiology. In: Carr NG, Whitton BA, editors. The biology of blue-green algae. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1973. p. 39–66.Google Scholar
  68. Anioł M. Residue after hop supercritical carbon dioxide extraction as a source of technologically useful substances. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy; 2009.Google Scholar
  69. Slimestad R, Verheul M. Properties of chalconaringenin and rutin isolated from cherry tomatoes. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:3180–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Abu N, Ho WY, Yeap SK, Akhtar MN, Abdullah MP, Omar AR, Alitheen NB. The flavokawains: uprising medicinal chalcones. Cancer Cell Int. 2013;13:102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  71. Isa NM, Abdelwahab SI, Mohan S, Abdul AB, Sukari MA, Taha MM, Syam S, Narrima P, Cheah S, Ahmad S, Mustafa MR. In vitro anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of boesenbergin A, a chalcone isolated from Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) (fingerroot). Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;45:524–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Ajiboye TOYM, Oladiji AT. Cytotoxic, antimutagenic, and antioxidant activities of methanolic extract and chalcone dimers (Lophirone B and C) derived from Lophira alata (Van Tiegh. Ex Keay) stem bar. Evid Based Complement Altern Med. 2014;19:20–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017