Production of biohydrogen by recombinant expression of [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 in Escherichia coli
© Kim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 7 May 2010
Accepted: 7 July 2010
Published: 7 July 2010
Hydrogenases catalyze reversible reaction between hydrogen (H2) and proton. Inactivation of hydrogenase by exposure to oxygen is a critical limitation in biohydrogen production since strict anaerobic conditions are required. While [FeFe]-hydrogenases are irreversibly inactivated by oxygen, it was known that [NiFe]-hydrogenases are generally more tolerant to oxygen. The physiological function of [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 is still ambiguous. We herein investigated the H2 production potential of [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 of Escherichia coli in vivo and in vitro. The hya A and hya B genes corresponding to the small and large subunits of [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 core enzyme, respectively, were expressed in BL21, an E. coli strain without H2 producing ability.
Recombinant BL21 expressing [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 actively produced H2 (12.5 mL H2/(h·L) in 400 mL glucose minimal medium under micro-aerobic condition, whereas the wild type BL21 did not produce H2 even when formate was added as substrate for formate hydrogenlyase (FHL) pathway. The majority of recombinant protein was produced as an insoluble form, with translocation of a small fraction to the membrane. However, the membrane fraction displayed high activity (~65% of total cell fraction), based on unit protein mass. Supplement of nickel and iron to media showed these metals contribute essentially to the function of [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 as components of catalytic site. In addition, purified E. coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 using his6-tag displayed oxygen-tolerant activity of ~12 nmol H2/(min·mg protein) under a normal aeration environment, compared to [FeFe]-hydrogenase, which remains inactive under this condition.
This is the first report on physiological function of E. coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 for H2 production. We found that [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 has H2 production ability even under the existence of oxygen. This oxygen-tolerant property is a significant advantage because it is not necessary to protect the H2 production process from oxygen. Therefore, we propose that [NiFe]-hydrogenase can be successfully applied as an efficient biohydrogen production tool under micro-aerobic conditions.
Hydrogenases have been identified in many archaea and bacteria since the initial discovery of the enzyme in Escherichia coli . These proteins play important roles in energy metabolism by catalyzing the reversible reaction between hydrogen (H2) and proton. Hydrogenases are divided into three classes based on metal content, specifically, [FeFe]-hydrogenases (previously known as [Fe]-hydrogenase), [NiFe]-hydrogenases, and metal-free hydrogenases (now known as [Fe]-hydrogenase) . Among these classes, [FeFe]- and [NiFe]-hydrogenases are the major enzymes; most of hydrogenases found in microorganisms are belong to one of these two enzymes except metal-free hydrogenases that were discovered in some methanogens. The mostly monomeric [FeFe]-hydrogenases are more involved in H2 evolution, and display high sensitivity to oxygen (O2) and carbon monoxide (CO) (irreversibly inactivated after exposure to O2) [3, 4]. [NiFe]-hydrogenases, composed of two subunits, are involved in H2 oxidation, but also catalyze reversible reactions [5, 6]. These enzymes are less active than [FeFe]-hydrogenases by 10~102 fold, but much more tolerant to O2 or CO in a reversible manner . This property is a significant advantage for the biotechnological application of hydrogenase in biohydrogen production, since it is not necessary to protect the production process from O2.
Several types of [NiFe]-hydrogenases have been isolated and characterized using genetic and biochemical methods [2, 7, 8] following the discovery of the enzyme in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum . In E. coli, four types of [NiFe]-hydrogenases have been isolated, and their roles extensively analyzed . Hydrogenase 3 (encoded by hyc operon, group 4 ) participates in H2 production as part of the formate hydrogenlyase (FHL) complex. The FHL complex couples formate oxidation by formate dehydrogenase H (FDH-H) with proton reduction by hydrogenase 3. FDH and hydrogenase 3 are expressed only under strictly anaerobic conditions, and have a highly oxygen-labile nature [2, 11]. Accordingly, their application in biohydrogen production using formate as a substrate in anaerobic E. coli fermentation has been extensively studied . Hydrogenases 1 and 2 (encoded by hya and hyb operons, respectively, group 1 ) in E. coli were isolated by several groups during the mid 1980s [11, 13–16]. Results from genetic and physiological studies indicate that hydrogenase 2 is responsible for uptake of H2 as an electron donor during anaerobic respiration, with fumarate serving as an electron acceptor or glycerol. This allows cells to obtain energy from H2 oxidation [11, 13].
The physiological role of hydrogenase 1 is still a matter of dispute. It was reported that active hydrogenase 1 and 2 are produced in E. coli during late exponential to early stationary phases when H2 concentration would be saturated and hydrogenase 1 could have a role for H2 oxidation . Hydrogenase 1 was suggested to participate in recycling of H2 produced by hydrogenase 3 . It was also concluded that hydrogenase 1 is not a part of H2-evolving FHL system and its role is unclear even though formate is required for expression of hydrogenase 1 . A number of studies have shown that the H2-producing ability of a hydrogenase 3 knockout mutant is weak and negligible, leading to the conclusion that hydrogenase 1 only performs H2 uptake . In contrast to this conclusion, mutation of hydrogenase 1 did not improve or reduce H2 production [17, 18] whereas deletion of hydrogenase 2 wholly contributed to increased H2 production [13, 18]. Hydrogenase 1 and 2 are also immunologically distinct to each other . Thus, it is inaccurate to assume that hydrogenase 1 only exhibits H2 uptake activity, similar to hydrogenase 2. In general, the physiological function of hydrogenase 1 is ambiguous [14, 18–22].
Hydrogenases, including E. coli hydrogenase 1, are uniquely grouped (group 1) based on conserved sequences in their small and large subunits . Using this property, we previously obtained genes for group 1 [NiFe]-hydrogenase core enzyme . Expression of E. coli hydrogenase 1 is pH-dependent [19, 24], and the enzyme displays a high ratio of H2 evolution/H2 oxidation for methyl viologen (MV) as substrate under acidic conditions [5, 14], similar to another hydrogenase belonging to this group . This finding implies that its reversible reaction is dependent on cellular physiology and possible action as a H2-producing enzyme, dependent on the conditions. The enzyme is stable over a wide range of pH values [13, 16] and more tolerant to O2, compared to hydrogenase 2, FHL, and [FeFe]-hydrogenase [4, 14, 25–27].
In the present work, we investigated H2 production ability of homologously expressed E. coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 as a model of group 1 hydrogenase at in vivo and in vitro status. Through the study, we also try to reveal the basic property of recombinant [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 related to metabolism, metal effect, and oxygen-tolerance with focusing on H2 production.
H2 production in E. coli BL21 by homologous expression of E. coli hydrogenase 1
Effect of endogenous or exogenous Formate on H2 production by recombinant E. coli hydrogenase 1
Next, we investigated whether H2 production by hydrogenase 1 is related to endogenous or exogenous formate and FHL in E. coli. H2 production in several Enterobacteriacae, including E. coli, mainly relies on the FHL pathway . Formate is produced via pyruvate formate lyase (PFL) from pyruvate under anaerobic conditions. Endogenous formate is decomposed into carbon dioxide (CO2) and proton by formate dehydrogenase (FDH-H), and H2 generated from the proton by hydrogenase 3 in E. coli. We investigated the effect of exogenous formate by adding 10 mM formate to the medium. H2 production increased more than 2-fold in BL21 cells with recombinant hydrogenase 1, compared to that in cultures not exposed to formate (bars (e) vs (b), Fig. 2). However, wild-type BL21 did not produce H2, regardless of addition of 10 mM formate (bars (b) & (d), Fig. 2). This result implies that FHL system of wild type BL21 was impaired. Moreover, since formate is produced from pyruvate, we analyzed the effects of glucose on H2 production. The glucose concentration did not affect the H2 production to a notable extent. Specifically, we did not observe any noticeable increase in H2 production with an increment in glucose concentration from 0.5% to 1.5% (w/v) (data not shown). In addition, we analyzed the effect of endogenous formate on H2 production by recombinant hydrogenase 1 using sodium hypophosphite, an inhibitor of PFL. Interestingly, BL21 expressing recombinant hydrogenase 1 did not produce detectable H2 following the addition of 10 mM sodium hypophosphite (bar (c), Fig. 2).
Enzymatic activity and localization of recombinant E. coli hydrogenase 1
To assay the biological activity of recombinant enzyme, we separated the sample into total cell lysate, cell debris, crude extract, cytosolic, and membrane fractions. Comparable to in vivo H2 production, samples from each culture showed similar hydrogenase activities of in vitro H2 evolution in both total cell lysate and membrane fractions (Fig. 3B). Total cell lysate and membrane fractions displayed the highest activities (~38 and ~25 nmol H2/(min·mg protein), respectively) when supplemented with both nickel and iron. Upon the addition of iron only to the medium, enzyme activities remained at about 9.4% (total cell lysate fraction) and 20% (membrane fraction) of those observed in the presence of both metals. In the case of nickel only, activities of 4.7% and 7.4% were estimated for the total cell lysate and membrane fractions, respectively. No hydrogenase activity was evident in samples prepared without metals. Importantly, the membrane fraction showed relatively high (about 65% with both Ni & Fe) activity per unit mass of total protein compared to the total cell lysate. However, the activity levels of crude extract (substraction of cell debris from the total cell lysate) and cytosolic (substration of crude membrane from crude extract) fractions were significantly lower than those of total cell lysate and membrane fractions (data not shown). Note that we prepared all protein samples for enzyme assay under normal aerobic conditions during harvesting, disruption, and ultracentrifugation. Since the FHL system is easily inactivated under aerobic conditions , the H2 evolving activity of the cellular extract in the presence of oxygen implies that recombinant E. coli hydrogenase 1 displays O2-tolerant H2-evolving activity.
In addition, recombinant E. coli hydrogenase 1 was purified (data not shown) in the normal aerobic environment using immobilized metal affinity chromatography with the His6-tag fused to each subunit (pTrc-Ech1ABHis; Fig. 1C). Hydrogenase evolution activity data showed that purified His6-tag fused recombinant [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 produced ~12 nmole H2/(min·mg protein). Notably, enzymatic activity of [FeFe]-hydrogenase was not detected under same aerobic conditions .
A previous trial in 1979 demonstrated that purified E. coli hydrogenase from aerobic culture could tolerate an aerobic atmosphere with a half-life of 12 h . This hydrogenase was later identified as isoenzyme 1 by immunoblotting after isolation of three types of E. coli hydrogenase . A study on E. coli hydrogenase 1 expression was performed to determine the roles of proteins comprising the hya operon in a hya mutant strain . However, due to remaining hydrogenase activities in the hya mutant, it was difficult to ascertain the role of hydrogenase 1, and research studies were focused on its H2 uptake property. Subsequently, several studies have been performed on hydrogenase 1 in E. coli [14, 18–22]. Hydrogenase 1 was induced under anaerobic conditions similar to other isoenzymes, but its regulation was distinct from that of hydrogenases 2 and 3 . The enzyme was also induced by formate, similar to FHL, but responded differently to the global regulatory mechanism related to fnr. Moreover, hydrogenase 1 had biochemical properties similar to those of hydrogenase 2, but was not immunogenically cross-reactive with hydrogenase 2 [21, 22]. The enzyme reversibly catalyzed both dihydrogen evolution and uptake [5, 14]. However, a majority of studies concluded that it is not clear to define the physiological role of hydrogenase 1 in E. coli or whether it has similar property to hydrogenase 2 or not. Recent reports have shown that H2 production was enhanced in deletion mutants of hya B and hyb C (encoding the large subunit of hydrogenase 2), leading to the proposal that both E. coli hydrogenases 1 and 2 have H2 uptake activity . However, it remains to be revealed whether H2 production is enhanced due to mutation of both hydrogenases or hydrogenase 2 only because another report on this issue suggested that enhancement of H2 production is entirely dependent on mutation of hydrogenase 2, but not hydrogenase 1 .
In the present work, we investigated the potential of [NiFe]-hydrogenase group 1 as a H2-producing enzyme under micro-aerobic conditions using E. coli hydrogenase 1 as a model. Although we cloned only the two subunits (small and large subunits) comprising core enzyme of hydrogenase 1, recombinant BL21 successfully produced hydrogen. Large subunit has catalytic site for conversion from hydrogen to proton and electron, and vice versa. Small subunit has [Fe-S] clusters for the transfer of electrons to catalytic site in large subunit. It has been known that accessory proteins are also required for the function of mature [NiFe] hydrogenase 1 . We surmise that there was basal expression of native accessory proteins in the host strain that is required for the assembly and function of E. coli hydrogenase 1, and these proteins also functioned on recombinant hydrogenase 1. We initially examined the basic properties of the enzyme in relation to H2 metabolism in E. coli. Similar to other enterobacteria, E. coli utilizes mainly FHL pathway to produce H2 from formate, a product of the PFL pathway. Under the addition of formate, H2 production increased more than 2-fold in BL21 cells with recombinant hydrogenase 1, compared to the culture without formate (bars (e) vs (b), Fig. 2). However, wild-type BL21 did not produce H2, regardless of addition of 10 mM formate (bars (a) & (d), Fig. 2) even if formate is known as substrate for FHL complex to produce hydrogen. We also investigated the effect of endogenous formate on H2 production by recombinant hydrogenase 1 using sodium hypophosphite, an inhibitor of PFL. Interestingly, BL21 expressing recombinant hydrogenase 1 did not produce detectable H2 following the addition of 10 mM sodium hypophosphite (bar (c), Fig. 2). It was also mentioned that lack of H2 production ability in BL21 strain might be due to difference in activities of existing hydrogenases . E. coli is known to use FHL pathway to produce H2 from formate. Nevertheless, we did not notice any meaningful H2 production in wild type BL21 even addition of formate while recombinant BL21 with expression of hydrogenase 1 showed highly improved H2 production by exogenous formate. Therefore, we surmised this phenomenon strongly support possibility of impaired activity in FHL system. However, further investigation will be required on this point. As mentioned above, it was described that hydrogenase 1 content was also enhanced by exogenous formate even though it was not related to FHL activity and showed different global regulation . Thus, these might be the reasons for improvement of H2 production in recombinant BL21 expressing hydrogenase 1. Collectively, these results support that H2 production in recombinant BL21, overexpressing hydrogenase 1, depend on function of recombinant hydrogenase 1. Moreover, there have been no evidences or reports that function of hydrogenase 1 could activate FHL complex to produce hydrogen. In addition, formate is produced from pyruvate (the final product of glycolysis), we also checked the effect of glucose on H2 production by recombinant hydrogenase 1 for analysis of endogenous formate effect. However, we found that glucose had no noticeable effects on H2 production between concentrations of 0.5% and 1.5% (w/v). It seems that there is regulation of internal formate synthesis and its concentration even if more investigation is required. From the results of glucose and sodium hypophosphite, it could be concluded that formate in vivo might has a crucial role for production of H2 by expression of recombinant hydrogenase 1. We surmised that formate affects H2 production by recombinant hydrogenase 1 via triggering complex regulation of cellular mechanism and auxiliary proteins that require for hydrogenase function and expression . Besides formate itself, pH change to acidic condition, caused by formate addition and according to culture time, might also influence on H2 production by recombinant hydrogenase 1. We consider that more investigation is necessary related to cellular metabolism in future studies.
Since hydrogenase 1 contains nickel and iron at the active site , we investigated the effects of these metal ions on expression, in vivo H2 production, and in vitro enzyme activity (Fig. 3). Recombinant cells expressing E. coli hydrogenase 1 produced H2 most actively upon addition of both Ni and Fe. Cells also produced H2 in the sole presence of Fe or Ni in the medium at a lower level than those cultured with both metals, whereas there was no production of H2 without addition of both metals. This result could be interpreted that there is critical limit of Ni and Fe concentration required for function of recombinant hydrogenase 1. This result also indicated that addition of Ni and Fe to the minimal media (with no detectable Ni & Fe) have crucial impacts on the function and formation of recombinant hydrogenase 1 because [NiFe]-hydrogenase contains Ni and Fe at the active site in the large subunit and three [Fe-S] clusters with the role of electron transfer in the small subunit. We observed no significant differences in total protein expression upon alteration of metal content (Fig. 4), which might be due to the fact that anti-His6 antibody cannot differentiate apoenzyme with holoenzyme and unclear fractionation of recombinant hydrogenase due to overexpression. However, in vivo H2 production and in vitro enzyme activities were significantly affected according to metal addition. E. coli hydrogenase 1 exhibits relatively high (~65% compared to total cell lysate) biological activity per unit protein mass in the membrane fraction even if the majority of E. coli hydrogenase 1 enzymes were expressed as insoluble forms and membrane translocation efficiency was very low (Fig. 4). Thus, this also implies that correctly translocated enzyme produces high quantity of H2 even with very small amount compared to total protein. >From this study, membrane localization of [NiFe]-hydrogenase is very important issue for exhibition of its innate ability. The low translocation efficiency problem should be solved to enhance H2 production in the recombinant E. coli system.
Importantly, E. coli [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 maintains its biological activity during preparation of the cell extract or purification under a normal aerobic environment as described in Materials and Methods. Our experiments showed that the cell extract maintains in vitro H2 evolving activity over 10 days at 4°C under aerobic conditions (data not shown). This finding is in agreement with results from previous reports , demonstrating that [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 has oxygen tolerance while [FeFe]-hydrogenase is irreversibly inactivated by oxygen . Accordingly, we propose that [NiFe]-hydrogenase 1 may be successfully used as an efficient biohydrogen production tool under aerobic or micro-aerobic conditions.
Bacterial strains and culture conditions
E. coli Top10 (F- mcrA Δ(mrr-hsdRMS-mcrBC) F80lacZDM15 ΔlacC74 recA1 araD139 Δ(ara-leu)7697 galU galK rpsL (Strr) endA1 nupG) (Invitrogen, USA) was used as the host strain for DNA manipulation and cloning of target genes. E. coli BL21 (DE3) (Novagen, USA) was used for recombinant expression of the hydrogenase gene. For genetic manipulation, LB medium (Difco, USA) containing the appropriate antibiotics (50 μg/mL ampicillin) was employed. For protein expression, 1 mM (final concentration) isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; BioBasic, Canada) was added to each culture medium. For in vivo and in vitro H2 production, cells were grown in M9CA (6 g Na2HPO4, 3 g KH2PO4, 1 g NH4Cl, 0.5 g NaCl, 5 g casamino acids, and 1 mg/L thiamine supplemented with 2 mM MgSO4, 0.1 mM CaCl2) medium including 0.5~1.5% (w/v) glucose. All cultures were performed under normal aerobic or micro-aerobic conditions. Cells were grown in a serum bottle (125 or 500 mL; Wheaton, USA) sealed with a rubber stopper and aluminum capping at 37°C in an air shaking incubator (Jeiotech, Korea) at a gyration rate of 200~230 rpm. For micro-aerobic condition, serum bottle containing medium (with empty head space, ~20% of total bottle volume) was exposed to air for 5 min before seeding of cell stock and addition of IPTG. To determine the effects of metal (nickel or iron) on H2 production, 0.1 M FeSO4 and 1 M NiSO4 solutions were prepared, and the appropriate concentrations added to culture medium at the induction point as indicated. The metal concentrations of prepared M9CA before the addition of each metal solution were measured using an atomic absorption spectrometer (with the aid of the Korean Research Institute of Chemical Technology, Korea).
The E. coli K12 MG1655 genome as a template for gene amplification was extracted using the Wizard genomic DNA purification kit (Promega, USA). Primers were designed (upstream; 5'-AAGAGGTATATATTAATGAATAACGAGGAAACATTTTACCAGG-3', downstream; 5'-TTACGTCGGTGCAGCTTCGGCCAGCCACTG-3') based on the sequence from the NCBI database to clone amplified full-length hya operon (from hya A to hya F) into pGEM-T vector (Promega). PCR reaction was performed using Taq polymerase (Takara, Japan) at following condition; 1 cycle of denaturation at 94°C for 5 min (genome)/1 min 40 sec (plasmid template); 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 2 min (genome)/40 sec (plasmid), annealing at 55°C for 40 sec and extention at 72°C for time based on 1 kb/min; 1 cycle of additional extention at 72°C for 5 min. This vector was designated pGem-T/EcH3 (Fig. 1A). After sequencing, the full operon for hya A-F was digested from pGem-T/EcH3 with EcoR I and cloned into pET 21b (Novagen). A DNA fragment containing hya A & hya B genes was digested from the constructed vector with EcoR I and Nsi I (located after the end of the hya B open reading frame) and cloned between the EcoR I and Pst I sites of pSE420 (Invitrogen). Finally, the fragment digested from the constructed vector using EcoR I and Xho I was cloned into pET-21b, and the construct denoted pET-EcHAB (Fig. 1B). Another expression vector, pTrc-EcH1ABHis, based on pTrcHisC (Invitrogen), was generated for facile purification of recombinant hydrogenase 1 using the His6 affinity tag (Fig. 1C). His6-tag originally located in pTrcHis vector was fused to N-terminal of large subunit (hyaB) and additional His6-tag for small subunit was fused to C-terminal of small subunit (hyaA) using PCR with primer containing 6×His sequence (CACCATCACCATCACCAC). Direction of His6-tag fusion was determined to avoid signal sequence of small subunit at N-terminus and cleavage tail of large subunit at C-terminus.
Recombinant E. coli (400 mL) was harvested by centrifugation at 4°C and 4,000 rpm for 15 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 6.8) and disrupted with a sonic dismembrator (Fisher scientific, USA) for 10 min at 50% power (5 sec pulse on and 2 sec pulse off). The disrupted cell suspension (total cell lysate fraction) was centrifuged at 4°C and 10,000 g for 20 min. The resultant supernatant from previous centrifugation of total cell lysate (crude extract) was centrifuged again at 4°C and 120,000 g for 120 min, and the pellet resuspended in 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 6.8) with weak sonication at 4°C for a few seconds. This fraction was regarded as the crude membrane.
After harvesting recombinant E. coli grown in M9CA, the cell pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) containing 1 mg/mL lysozyme (BioBasic), and incubated for 30 min on ice. After sonic disruption, Ni-NTA agarose slurry (Qiagen, Germany) was added to the cell lysate and mixed by gentle shaking on ice for 60 min. The mixture was loaded on the chromatographic column. After Ni-NTA settled in the column, the resin was washed with buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, pH 8.0) and bound His6-tagged protein to Ni-NTA resin eluted with buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). The eluted sample was desalted by several ultrafiltration cycles using a Vivaspin column (MWCO 3,000; Sartorius, Germany) with 50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 6.8) buffer. This desalted and concentrated sample was used later for in vitro H2 production enzyme activity assay. We performed all of procedures for purification and desalting under normal aerobic condition. In addition, the purified protein sample was analyzed by 15% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and 10% (w/v) native-PAGE. For SDS-PAGE, purified protein sample was resuspended in protein sample buffer (0.5 M Tris-HCl (pH6.8), 10% glycerol; 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 5% β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.25% bromophenol blue) and heated to 100°C for 5 min. After centrifugation for 1 min, the samples were loaded onto a 15% (w/v) SDS-polyacrylamide gel for electrophoresis. For solubilization of the membrane fraction containing hydrogenase 1 in native-PAGE analysis, 15 mM n-octyl-β-D-thioglucoside (OTG; BioBasic) was added to the protein sample and incubated at 50°C for 20 min. Electrophoresis was performed in 0.02 M Tris/0.2 M glycine buffer (pH 8.3). The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (Sigma) for SDS-PAGE and silver nitrate for native-PAGE (Sigma).
Hydrogenase activity assay
Hydrogenase activity was assayed via in vitro H2 evolution from MV (Sigma) reduced with sodium dithionite. In a 7 mL sealed vial, a 2.25 mL reaction mixture comprising 50 mM Tris-Cl buffer (pH 6.8), 3 mM MV and prepared enzyme was purged with N2 gas for 3 min. The enzymatic reaction was initiated with the addition of 0.25 mL of sodium dithionite (230 mM) at 37°C . H2 evolution was measured every 5 min using a gas chromatograph (GC; Younglin Instrument, Korea) equipped with a carboxen-1010 PLOT column (0.53 mm × 30 m; Supelco, USA) and pulsed discharge detector (Valco Instrument, USA). The gas sample (100 μL) was obtained from the reaction vial and injected into GC. Elution was performed using helium as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 10 mL/min, and the temperatures of the injector, detector, and oven set to 130°C, 250°C, and 100°C, respectively. The H2 gas level was quantitatively estimated based on the linear relationship between the area of the H2 peak and amount of 1% standard H2 gas (Supelco).
In vivo hydrogen production
H2 gas produced in cell culture was obtained with a gas-tight syringe (Hamilton, USA) from the headspace of a serum bottle (125 or 500 mL) sealed with a rubber stopper and aluminum cap. Usually, 20~100 μL of the gas sample was analyzed using GC. The H2 concentration in the gas sample was calculated using a standard curve. The H2 amount was determined based on the H2 concentration and gas volume of headspace (which expanded when gas was extracted with a syringe).
Page and Western blot analysis
Samples for each strain with hydrogenase expression were prepared according to cellular fractionation, mixed with protein sample buffer (0.5 M Tris-Cl (pH 6.8), 10% glycerol, 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 5% β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.25% bromophenol blue), and heated to 100°C for 5 min. After centrifugation for 1 min, proteins were separated on a 15% gel. Following SDS-PAGE, gels were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a trans-blot cell (Hoefer, USA) and Bjerrum and Schafer-Nielsen transfer buffer (48 mM Tris, 39 mM glycine, and 20% methanol) for 1 h at 50 V and 50 mA. Following transfer, membranes were immunoblotted with monoclonal anti-His6 antibody (Applied Biological Materials, Canada; 1:1000 dilution). For primary antibody detection, alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) was used as the secondary antibody. After immunoblotting, membranes were washed with TTBS and TBS and developed colorimetrically using nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (NBT/BCIP; Sigma).
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant (NRF-2009-0093214) and the Brain Korea 21 Program funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Korea and the Manpower Development Program for Marine Energy funded by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, Korea.
- Stephen M, Stickland LH: Hydrogenase: a bacterial enzyme activating molecular hydrogen. Biochem J. 1931, 25: 205-214.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Vignais PM, Billoud B, Meyer J: Classification and phylogeny of hydrogenases. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2001, 25: 455-501.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bleijlevens B, Buhrke T, Van Der Linden E, Friedrich B, Albracht SPJ: The auxiliary protein HypX provides oxygen tolerance to the soluble [NiFe]-hydrogenase of Ralstonia eutropha H16 by way of a cyanide ligand to nickel. J Biol Chem. 2004, 279: 46686-46691. 10.1074/jbc.M406942200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frey M: Hydrogenases: hydrogen-activating enzymes. Chembiochem. 2002, 3: 153-160. 10.1002/1439-7633(20020301)3:2/3<153::AID-CBIC153>3.0.CO;2-B.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adams MW, Hall D: Purification of the membrane-bound hydrogenase of Escherichia coli. Biochem J. 1979, 183: 11-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nishihara H, Miyashita Y, Aoyama K, Kodama T, Igarashi Y, Takamura Y: Characterization of an extremely thermophilic and oxygen-stable membrane-bound hydrogenase from a marine hydrogen-oxidizing bacterium Hydrogenovibrio marinus. Biochem Biophy Res Comm. 1997, 232: 766-770. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.6369.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voordouw G: Evolution of hydrogenase genes. Adv Inorg Chem. 1992, 38: 397-422. 10.1016/S0898-8838(08)60069-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wu LF, Mandrand MA: Microbial hydrogenases: primary structure, classification, signatures and phylogeny. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1993, 104: 243-270. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1993.tb05870.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Graf EG, Thauer RK: Hydrogenase from Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum, a nickel-containing enzyme. FEBS Lett. 1981, 136: 165-169. 10.1016/0014-5793(81)81238-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Self WT, Hasona A, Shanmugam KT: Expression and regulation of a silent operon, hyf, coding for hydrogenase 4 isoenzyme in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186: 580-587. 10.1128/JB.186.2.580-587.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Menon NK, Chatelus CY, Dervartanian M, Wendt JC, Shanmugam KT, Peck HD, Przybyla AE: Cloning, sequencing, and mutational analysis of the hyb operon encoding Escherichia coli hydrogenase 2. J Bacteriol. 1994, 176: 4416-4423.Google Scholar
- Yoshida A, Nishimura T, Kawaguchi H, Inui M, Yukawa H: Enhanced hydrogen production from formic acid by formate hydrogen lyase-overexpressing Escherichia coli strains. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71: 6762-6768. 10.1128/AEM.71.11.6762-6768.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ballantine SP, Boxer DH: Isolation and characterisation of a soluble active fragment of hydrogenase isoenzyme 2 from the membranes of anaerobically grown Escherichia coli. Eur J Biochem. 1986, 156: 277-284. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09578.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Francis K, Patel P, Wendt JC, Shanmugam KT: Purification and characterization of two forms of hydrogenase isoenzyme 1 from Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1990, 172: 5750-5757.Google Scholar
- Menon NK, Robbins J, Wendt JC, Shanmugam KT, Przybyla AE: Mutational analysis and characterization of the Escherichia coli hya operon, which encodes [NiFe] hydrogenase 1. J Bacteriol. 1991, 173: 4851-4861.Google Scholar
- Sawers RG, Boxer DH: Purification and properties of membrane-bound hydrogenase isoenzyme 1 from anaerobically grown Escherichia coli K12. Eur J Biochem. 1986, 156: 265-275. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1986.tb09577.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez-Torres V, Maeda T, Wood TK: Metabolic engineering to enhance bacterial hydrogen production. Microbial Biotechnol. 2008, 1: 30-39.Google Scholar
- Redwood MD, Mikheenko IP, Sargent F, Macaskie LE: Dissecting the roles of Escherichia coli hydrogenases in biohydrogen production. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008, 278: 48-55. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00966.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- King PW, Przybyla AE: Response of hya expression to external pH in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 5250-5256.Google Scholar
- Laurinavichene TV, Tsygankov AA: H2 consumption by Escherichia coli coupled via hydrogenase 1 or hydrogenase 2 to different terminal electron acceptors. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001, 202: 121-124. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10790.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Richard DJ, Sawers G, Sargent F, McWalter L, Boxer DH: Transcriptional regulation in response to oxygen and nitrate of the operons encoding the [NiFe] hydrogenases 1 and 2 of Escherichia coli. Microbiology. 1999, 145: 2903-2912.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sawers RG, Balantine SP, Boxer DH: Differential expression of hydrogenase isoenzymes in Escherichia coli K-12: evidence for a third isoenzyme. J Bacteriol. 1985, 164: 1324-1331.Google Scholar
- Kim JYH, Jung HJ, Cha HJ: Universal degenerate oligonucleotide-primed-polymerase chain reaction for detection and amplification of NiFe-hydrogenase genes. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2007, 42: 1-5. 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2007.07.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hayes ET, Wilks JC, Sanfilippo P, Yohannes E, Tate DP, Jones BD, Radmacher MD, BonDurant SS, Slonczewski JL: Oxygen limitation modulates pH regulation of catabolism and hydrogenase, multidrug transporters, and envelope composition in Escherichia coli K-12. BMC Microbiol. 2006, 6: 89- 10.1186/1471-2180-6-89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Akhtar MK, Jones PR: Deletion of iscR stimulates recombinant clostridial Fe-Fe hydrogenase activity and H2-accumulation in Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 78: 853-862. 10.1007/s00253-008-1377-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Laurinavichene TV, Zorin NA, Tsygankov AA: Effect of redox potential on activity of hydrogenase 1 and hydrogenase 2 in Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol. 2002, 178: 437-442. 10.1007/s00203-002-0471-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rossmann R, Sauter M, Lottspeich F, Bock A: Maturation of the large subunit (HYCE) of Escherichia coli hydrogenase 3 requires nickel incorporation followed by C-terminal processing at Arg537. Eur J Biochem. 1994, 220: 377-384. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1994.tb18634.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mishra J, Khurana S, Kumar N, Ghosh AK, Das D: Molecular cloning, characterization, and overexpression of a novel [Fe]-hydrogenase isolated from a high rate of hydrogen producing Enterobacter cloacae IIT-BT 08. Biochem Biophy Res Comm. 2004, 324: 679-685. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.108.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sawers RG: Formate and its role in hydrogen production in Escherichia coli. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005, 33: 42-46. 10.1042/BST0330042.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Volbeda A, Charon MH, Piras C, Hatchikian EC, Frey M, Fontecilla-Camps JC: Crystal structure of the nickel-iron hydrogenase from Desulfovibrio gigas. Nature. 1995, 373: 580-587. 10.1038/373580a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tamiya N, Kondo Y, Kameyama T, Akabori S: Determination of hydrogenase by the hydrogen evolution from reduced methyl viologen. J Biochem. 1955, 42: 613-614.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.