Volume 10 Supplement 1

Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Lactic Acid Bacterium

Open Access

The fast milk acidifying phenotype of Streptococcus thermophilus can be acquired by natural transformation of the genomic island encoding the cell-envelope proteinase PrtS

  • Damien Dandoy1,
  • Christophe Fremaux2,
  • Marie Henry de Frahan1,
  • Philippe Horvath2,
  • Patrick Boyaval2,
  • Pascal Hols1Email author and
  • Laetitia Fontaine1
Contributed equally
Microbial Cell Factories201110(Suppl 1):S21

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-10-S1-S21

Published: 30 August 2011

Abstract

Background

In industrial fermentation processes, the rate of milk acidification by Streptococcus thermophilus is of major technological importance. The cell-envelope proteinase PrtS was previously shown to be a key determinant of the milk acidification activity in this species. The PrtS enzyme is tightly anchored to the cell wall via a mechanism involving the typical sortase A (SrtA) and initiates the breakdown of milk casein into small oligopeptides. The presence or absence of PrtS divides the S. thermophilus strains into two phenotypic groups i.e. the slow and the fast acidifying strains. The aim of this study was to improve the milk acidification rate of slow S. thermophilus strains, and hence optimise the fermentation process of dairy products.

Results

In the present work, we developed for the first time a strategy based on natural transformation to confer the rapid acidification phenotype to slow acidifying starter strains of S. thermophilus. First, we established by gene disruption that (i) prtS, encoding the cell-envelope proteinase, is a key factor responsible for rapid milk acidification in fast acidifying strains, and that (ii) srtA, encoding sortase A, is not absolutely required to express the PrtS activity. Second, a 15-kb PCR product encompassing the prtS genomic island was transfered by natural transformation using the competence-inducing peptide in three distinct prtS-defective genetic backgrounds having or not a truncated sortase A gene. We showed that in all cases the milk acidification rate of transformants was significantly increased, reaching a level similar to that of wild-type fast acidifying strains. Furthermore, it appeared that the prtS-encoded activity does not depend on the prtS copy number or on its chromosomal integration locus.

Conclusion

We have successfully used natural competence to transfer the prtS locus encoding the cell-envelope proteinase in three slow acidifying strains of S. thermophilus, allowing their conversion into fast acidifying derivatives. The efficient protocol developed in this article will provide the dairy industry with novel and optimised S. thermophilus starter strains.

Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely used as starter cultures in the manufacture of dairy products due to their efficient utilisation of milk constituents, principally lactose and caseins. Their capacity to produce lactic acid as the main metabolic end-product of lactose fermentation is of major economic importance, since acidification inhibits the growth of spoilage organisms. Previous studies highlighted a link between the presence of an efficient casein proteolytic system and fast growth and acidification rate of LAB in milk [1]. Casein breakdown is initiated by the cell-envelope proteinases (CEPs) and the resulting oligopeptides are then transported into the cell where they are further hydrolysed by a set of various intracellular peptidases [2, 3]. LAB possess generally only one CEP, but some strains of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus present two or more CEP-encoding genes [46]. Similar to many surface proteins such as adhesins, CEPs generally contain a C-terminal LPXTG motif and are anchored to the cell wall via a mechanism involving the typical sortase A (SrtA) in Gram-positive bacteria [3, 7]. Transpeptidation of LPXTG proteins by the membrane-bound SrtA involves two steps: (i) a cleavage reaction inside the LPXTG motif, and (ii) covalent attachment of the processed and exported N-terminal form to the pentapeptide chain of one peptidoglycan repetition unit [8, 9].

Streptococcus thermophilus is a thermophilic LAB which is considered as the second most important industrial dairy starter culture after Lactococcus lactis[10]. The CEP from S. thermophilus, PrtS, is a LPXTG-containing serine proteinase of the subtilisin family, similar to the cell envelope protease from other LAB [7, 11, 12]. In monoculture, PrtS is essential for rapid growth of S. thermophilus in milk and therefore confers a competitive advantage compared to PrtS-deficient strains [1]. However despite its relevant role for growth in milk, only 21 strains among the 135 strains of the INRA historical collection displayed a high level of proteinase activity, indicating that this characteristic is not common in this species [13]. Since S. thermophilus is generally found in mixed cultures, growth of PrtS-deficient strains relies on the use of oligopeptides released by other LAB such as L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus, Lactobacillus helveticus or L. lactis[1]. However, during the last 10 years, this important metabolic trait for milk adaptation was drastically selected by the dairy industry, resulting in a strong increase of PrtS+ strains in industrial dairy products [14, 15]. These probably result from the attractive technological implications associated with PrtS+ strains, such as optimal development in milk containing high protein content, rapid milk acidification, and acceleration of cheese ripening. Recently, Delorme and co-workers showed that in S. thermophilus, prtS is located in a 15-kb genomic island that was probably acquired by horizontal gene transfer [13]. Indeed, this region which consists of three open reading frames (ORF) present upstream of prtS is flanked by tandem repeats of IS elements (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the ciaH-rpsT locus of S. thermophilus. LMD-9 and DGCC7710 are PrtS+ strains. LMG18311, DGCC7666 and DGCC7891 are PrtS- strains. Genes encoding proteins are represented by thick arrows; insertion sequences (striped), genes conserved between strains (grey). The following elements are indicated: name of the insertion sequences (underlined), region amplified by PCR to transfer the prtS locus from DGCC7710 to LMG18311, DGCC7891 and DGCC7666 (thick grey line), primers used to amplify the prtS regions and to validate the identity of PrtS+ and PrtS- strains (thin black arrows).

Besides the fast acidifying phenotype, some S. thermophilus strains harbour other industrially relevant phenotypes such as texturing properties, bacteriocins production, and phage resistance. However, these features are rarely found together in a single starter strain. Our objective was to develop a strategy to transfer the rapid acidification phenotype in different genetic backgrounds. In a first step, we defined the minimum genetic information associated with this phenotype by investigating the contribution of PrtS and Sortase A. In a second step, we took advantage of competence to transfer prtS from the fast-acidifying strain DGCC7710 into three different slow strains. The PrtS-positive transformants were characterised at the genetic level by PCR mapping and at the phenotypic level by performing proteinase plate assays and monitoring milk acidification.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The S. thermophilus strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Strains were grown at 37°C or at 40°C. For natural transformation experiments, M17 broth (Difco Laboratories Inc., Detroit, MI) and reconstituted CDM [16] were used. These media were supplemented with 1% (wt/vol) of lactose (M17L or CDML, respectively). Two different skimmed milks were used to assess the proteinase phenotype of strains: 10% (vol/vol) UHT milk (Candia GrandLait, Candia, France) and reconstituted 9% (wt/vol) milk (Humana Milchunion, Germany). Solid agar plates were typically prepared by adding 2% (w/v) agar to the medium. When necessary, 5 µg ml-1 chloramphenicol was added to the media. Inoculated solid plates, solely, were incubated in anaerobic conditions (BBL GasPak Systems, Becton Dickinson, Franklin lakes, NJ).
Table 1

Characteristics of S. thermophilus strains used in this work

Strain

Phenotype

Genotype

Transformation rate

 

F

T

prtS

strA

(+ 1mM ComS17-24)[20]

LMG18311

F-

T+

-

Trunc.

1.3 x 10-1

CNRZ1066

F-

T+

-

Trunc.

 

LMD-9

F+

T-

+

+

5.4 x 10-3

DGCC7790

F-

T+

-

+

 

DGCC7710

F+

T+

+

+

1.0 x 10-2

DGCC7853

F+

T-

+

+

 

DGCC7879

F+

T-

+

+

 

DGCC715

F+

T-

+

+

 

DGCC7773

F-

T+

-

Trunc.

 

DGCC7785

F-

T+

-

Trunc.

 

DGCC7796

F+

T-

+

+

 

DGCC7854

F+

T-

+

+

 

DGCC7891/ND03

F-

T+

-

+

1.4 x 10-4

DGCC7666

F-

T-

-

Trunc.

4.2 x 10-2

DGCC7694

F-

T-

-

+

 

DGCC7809

F+

T-

+

+

 

DGCC7909

F-

T+

-

Trunc.

 

DGCC7984

F+

T+

+

+

 

DGCC47

F-

T+

-

Trunc.

 

DGCC7766

F-

T-

-

+

 

DGCC855

F+

NT

+

+

 

DGCC2057

F+

T+

+

+

 

DGCC2058

F-

T+

-

+

 

DGCC9791

F-

NT

-

+

 

DGCC7856

F-

T-

-

+

 

DGCC8014

F+

T+

+

+

 

All strains are from Danisco collection, excepted strains LMD-9 (ATCC collection), CNRZ1066 (CNRZ collection), ND03[29] and LMG18311 (LMG collection)

For phenotype, F+ and F- respectively refer to fast and slow acidifying strains when grown in pasteurized milk, T+ and T- respectively refer to the presence and absence of texturing properties when grown in pasteurized milk, and NT for not tested.

For genotype, + indicates that the gene is detected and entire, – indicates that prtS is no detected, Trunc. indicates a truncated version of srtA

Proteinase plate assay

The PrtS proteinase phenotype of S. thermophilus strains was determined on bacterial colonies grown on Fast Slow Difference Agar (FSDA) medium after 48 to 72 h of incubation at 37°C, as previously reported [17]. This medium contains 1.5% (wt/v) agar, 1.9% (wt/v) Sodium glycerophosphate (Prolabo, Merck, West Chester, PA), 10% (vol/vol) UHT half-skimmed milk (Candia GrandLait, Candia, France) and 0.001% (wt/v) of the bromocresol purple (BCP) indicator (Prolabo, Merck, West Chester, PA). On FSDA plates, bacteria possessing a proteinase activity appear as yellow, big, opaque colonies surrounded by a yellow area (fast acidifying phenotype), whereas proteinase-negative colonies appear small, flat, and translucent (slow acidifying phenotype).

Determination of the kinetics parameters of acidification

The acidification activity of S. thermophilus strains was evaluated by calculating the maximum acidification rate and time necessary to reach pH 5.2. Practically, reconstituted 10% (wt/vol) UHT skimmed milk (autoclaved during 10 minutes, 110°C) was inoculated with 2% (vol/vol) of a 5ml-culture of S. thermophilus grown at 37°C during 24h in M17L broth. After 24h of incubation at 37°C, the cultures were inoculated at 1% (vol/vol) in 150ml skimmed milk i.e. either 10% (vol/vol) UHT milk (Candia GrandLait) or 9% reconstituted (wt/vol) milk (Humana Milchunion, Germany). The cultures were then incubated in a water bath at 40°C and the pH (pH electrode Mettler 405 DPAS SC, Toledo, Spain) was monitored during 16 hours using the CINAC system (Alliance Instruments, France) as previously described [18, 19]. The pH was measured every second and values obtained during 5 minutes were averaged. The maximum acidification rate (Vm), defined as the maximum slope of the pH curve (dpH/dt), was calculated using the CINAC v2.07 software and expressed as pH units/minute.

Natural transformation experiments

Transformation experiments were performed as previously described [20, 21]. Briefly, an overnight culture of S. thermophilus grown in M17L at 37°C was washed twice (5,000 × g, 9 min, room temperature) in one volume of CDML and resuspended in one volume of CDML. The washed culture was then 30-fold diluted in CDML and DNA was added to small volumes (300 μl). The amount of DNA used was either 25 ng (purified overlapping PCR products) or 10 μg (PCR product encompassing the prtS genomic island). After 1h30 of incubation at 37°C, 1 μM of peptide ComS17-24 (purity >95%; supplied by Peptide 2.0 (Chantilly, VA)) was added to the culture. After 5 hours, samples (100 μl of serial dilutions in M17 broth) containing DNA, or not (negative control), were spread on selective plates and incubated anaerobically at 37°C. These plates contained M17L broth supplemented with 5 μg/ml chloramphenicol (transformation of lox66- P32-cat-lox71-containing PCR products) or FSDA medium (transformation of the prtS genomic island). In the latter case, 108 cells were plated on FSDA dishes. After 72 hours of incubation, colonies displaying a fast acidifying phenotype (see above) i.e. colonies emerging on the lawn of slow acidifying colonies were recovered and isolated on FSDA plates. The presence of prtS in fast acidifying colonies was then validated by PCR extension.

DNA techniques

For general molecular biology techniques, we followed the instructions given by Sambrook et al. [22]. Preparation of S. thermophilus chromosomal DNA was performed as described previously [23]. The primers used in this study were purchased from Eurogentec (Seraing, Belgium) and are listed in Table S1 of the Additional file 1. PCRs were performed with Fhusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes Espoo, Finland) or LA Taq™ Polymerase (Takara bio, Otsu, Japan) in a GeneAmp PCR system 2400 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Construction of prtS and srtA deletion mutants

Mutant strains (∆srtA::lox66-P32-cat-lox72 and ∆prtS::lox66-P32-cat-lox72) of LMD-9 and DGCC7710 were constructed by replacing the sequence between the start and stop codons of srtA and prtS with the chloramphenicol resistance cassette lox66- P32-cat-lox71 according to the procedure described by Fontaine et al. [20]. The primers used to construct these strains are listed in Table S1 of the Additional file 1.

Results and discussion

Fast acidifying strains contain the prtS genomic island and a full-length srtA gene

The strategy chosen to optimise the acidification rate of S. thermophilus strains consists of transferring the minimal genetic requirements associated with the fast acidifying phenotype. Based on previous knowledge on the functional role of PrtS and Sortase A in the acidification rate [1, 11, 12] and activity of LPXTG-surface proteins [2426], respectively, we focused our attention on the co-occurrence of srtA and prtS in fast strains. For this purpose, we analysed a sample of fast and slow acidifying strains of S. thermophilus. Their phenotype was determined by a FSDA plate assay (Data not shown and [20]). They were selected by industrial manufacturers for their relevant phenotypes related to milk fermentation [20].

The presence of prtS was firstly analysed by PCR using primers specific to the prtS ORF or flanking genes (Additional file 1, Table S1). These primers were designed based on the sequence of the prtS genomic island in strain LMD-9. Amplification products of the expected size were obtained for 11 out of the 26 strains tested (22 strains plus the 4 sequenced strains LMD-9, LMG18311, CNRZ1066 and ND03) (Data not shown). As expected, the presence or absence of prtS was in perfect agreement with the fast or slow acidifying phenotypes of strains on FSDA medium, respectively (Table 1). In addition, the systematic finding of a PCR amplification product with primers targeting the two genes flanking prtS strongly suggests that its genetic context is similar to that described by Delorme and co-workers (Additional file 1, Fig. S1) [13]. Next, the 11 prtS ORFs were sequenced and the corresponding proteins were aligned with known sequences from strains LMD-9, CNRZ385 and JIM8232 (Additional file 1, Fig. S2). PrtS sequences share a high level of conservation at the protein level (between 96% and 100% of identity in pairwise alignments), which suggests a recent acquisition as hypothesised by Delorme et al. [13]. However, the phylogenetic tree deduced from the multiple alignment of PrtS sequences shows that they form three distinct groups (Additional file 1, Fig. S1). Each cluster is similarly represented, which suggests that at least three different sub-populations have emerged since the initial acquisition of the prtS locus.

A conserved LPNTG sorting motif was identified in the C-terminus part of all PrtS proteins (Additional file 1, Fig. S2), supporting our hypothesis of a putative role for Sortase A in PrtS activity of fast isolates. Consequently, the srtA ORFs were PCR-amplified from the 22 strains, sequenced and compared to srtA from strains LMD-9 (ster_1255), LMG18311 (stu1277-stu1278), CNRZ1066 (str1277-str1278) and ND03 (STND1228). The SrtA proteins are more divergent than PrtS proteins since they share between 93% and 100% identity (deduced from pairwise alignments) (Additional file 1, Figs. S3 and S4). We found that srtA from 7 out of 26 strains contains the same nonsense mutation that shortens the ORF size (378 bp instead of 758 bp) (Additional file 1, Fig. S4). The Y123STOP mutation probably abolishes SrtA activity in those strains. Interestingly, all PrtS+ isolates encode a full-length srtA ORF. Their SrtA protein also contains the conserved catalytic residues (H147, C212 and R220), essential for sortase activity [8, 9]. The co-occurrence of a full-length srtA and prtS in fast acidifying isolates strongly suggests that these two components are both required for an optimal fast acidifying phenotype in S. thermophilus.

PrtS is essential for fast milk acidification while SrtA is not required

The individual contribution of SrtA and PrtS proteinase on milk acidification was investigated by replacing the corresponding ORFs in fast strain LMD-9 and DGCC7710 by a chloramphenicol resistance marker. The physiological effects in milk-based medium were investigated by plating the parental and mutant strains on FSDA medium and by measuring their acidification rates in UHT skimmed milk. As expected, both ∆prtS::lox66-P32-cat-lox71 derivative strains displayed the typical phenotype of slow acidifying strains on FSDA medium. Surprisingly, no striking morphological difference was observed between colonies of WT and ∆srtA::lox66-P32-cat-lox71 derivatives (Data not shown). These results were confirmed by monitoring the pH and measuring the acidification kinetics of strains growing in two skimmed milks: UHT and reconstituted milk. Similar acidification rates were obtained for wild-type and SrtA-defective strains, while prtS-negative mutants were severely impaired in their acidification capacities (Data shown for DGCC7710 and its derivatives in Fig. 2). Altogether, our results show that prtS is the predominant genetic determinant required for the fast acidification phenotype of S. thermophilus in milk-based culturing conditions.
Figure 2

Milk acidification kinetics of srtA and prtS mutants. Milk acidification curves of the parental strain DGCC7710 (black diamonds), and its respective SrtA- (∆srtA::lox66-P32-cat-lox71; red crosses) and PrtS- (∆prtS:: lox66-P32-cat-lox71; green triangles) derivatives. All experiments were performed in the reconstitued milk at 40°C.

Isolation of fast acidifying PrtS+ transformants deriving from three slow strains

The transfer of prtS from fast to slow strains was achieved using the natural competence protocol that was recently developed [20]. The model strains selected for the proof of concept were DGCC7710 as donor, and LMG18311, DGCC7666 and DGCC7891 as receivers. These latter strains were chosen for different reasons: (i) they encode, or not, a full-length srtA ORF (Table 1), (ii) they display different transformation rates [20], (iii) they display different industrially-relevant properties [20], and (iv) their genome has been sequenced (draft genome for DGCC7666, unpublished data; and DGCC7891 is closely related to the recently sequenced strain ND03) [29]. A 15,283-kb PCR product encompassing the whole prtS island (between ster_0839 and ster_0850) (Fig.1) from strain DGCC7710 was used as donor DNA. The entire region was sequenced and shares 99 % identity with the prtS region of LMD-9. The IS elements (ISSth1 and IS1167) flanking the prtS locus would mediate double homologous recombination events between the PCR-amplified DNA fragment and the chromosome of receiver strains. Indeed, these elements are widespread among S. thermophilus genomes (Table 2; Additional file 1, Fig. S3). The natural competence experiments were performed in the presence of 10 µg of the purified PCR fragment and transformants displaying a fast acidifying phenotype were recovered on FSDA plates. After three successive rounds of isolation on FSDA plates, the stable acquisitions of the prtS genomic island in fast acidifying clones were confirmed by PCR mapping. The integration site(s) of the prtS island were then determined by PCR on 3 to 5 clones per strain using a primer specific to ISSth1 or IS1167 flanking genes, and the prtS locus (Additional file 1, Table S1). A random insertion of the prtS locus in both ISSth1 and IS1167 loci was detected among strains and isolated clones (Table 2). Multiple insertions were also observed, reaching in some cases up to seven copies of prtS in the same clone (Table 2). The stable maintenance of prtS copies in three clones per strain was then studied in liquid milk-based medium. After ~160 generations, the copy number and the insertion profile determined by PCR mapping remained unchanged in all isolates (Data not show).
Table 2

Distribution of prtS loci among LMG18311, DGCC7666 and DGCC7891 genomes

Strains

Putative insertion sites and their surrounding genes

prtS insertion number

 

IS Sth1 orf1/2

IS 1167

 
 

ciaH

blpT

galU

msrA1

topA

STND0510

stu0861

stu1089

STND0227

STND0823

STND0900

STND1130

STND1212

 
 

rpsT

stu1680

stu1836

brnQ

stu0900

STND0513

stu0868

stu1075

STND0229

STND-0825

STND0902

STND1132

STND1214

 

DGCC7666 PrtS+

              

CL1

-

+

-

+

/

/

-

+

/

/

/

/

/

3

CL2

+

+

-

-

/

/

+

+

/

/

/

/

/

4

CL3

+

-

-

+

/

/

-

-

/

/

/

/

/

2

CL4

-

-

+

-

/

/

-

-

/

/

/

/

/

1

CL6

-

-

-

+

/

/

-

-

/

/

/

/

/

1

LMG18311 PrtS+

              

CL3A

-

+

-

+

-

/

-

-

/

/

/

/

/

2

CL6A, 10A

+

-

-

-

-

/

-

-

/

/

/

/

/

1

CL9A, 17A

-

-

-

+

-

/

-

-

/

/

/

/

/

1

CL21A, 23A

-

-

+

-

-

/

-

-

/

/

/

/

/

1

DGCC7891 PrtS+

              

CL1A, 19A

+

+

+

/

/

-

/

/

+

+

+

-

+

7

CL1B

+

+

+

/

/

-

/

/

+

+

-

-

+

6

Symbols: / , IS element not detected in the chromosome; - , prtS locus not detected; + , prtS locus detected

Stable acquisition of the prtS genomic island improves the acidification activity of S. thermophilus

To further characterise the phenotype of PrtS+ derivative strains, their performance was analysed by determining kinetics parameters of acidification in milk. We tested culture conditions that are mimicking those encountered in industrial fermentation processes i.e. in the 10% UHT skimmed milk (vol/vol), and the 9% (wt/vol) reconstituted skimmed milk. The results are presented in Fig. 3 and in Table 3. Compared to the parental strains, acidification rates of all derivatives were remarkably improved (2.4 fold) in both milks. In addition, we observed a reduction of the latency period i.e. the time before the pH begins to decrease (Fig. 3 and Data not shown). Consequently, a significantly shorter fermentation time is needed to obtain pH 5.2 (2 to 3-fold) (Table 3). Interestingly, the acidification curves obtained in both milks were almost identical among all PrtS+ clones deriving from the same parental strain. They were also similar to natural fast acidifying strains DGCC7710 or LMD-9 (Table 3 and Data not shown).
Figure 3

Milk acidification kinetics of PrtS + transformants. Milk acidification curves of parental strains and their respective PrtS+ derivatives for DGCC7891 (A), DGCC7666 (B), and LMG18311 (C). All experiments were realised in the reconstituted milk at 40°C.

Table 3

Acidifying capacities of S. thermophilus in milk

Strains

UHT milk

Reconstituted milk

 

Vmax

pH 5.2

Vmax

pH 5.2

 

(pH U x 10 -4 /min)

(min)

(pH Ux 10 -4 /min)

(min)

DGCC7666

48

656

52

475

PrtS+ CL1

125

291

143

169

PrtS+ CL2

114

295

142

172

PrtS+ CL3

109

276

141

169

PrtS+ CL4

116

290

150

181

PrtS+ CL6

132

266

143

174

LMG18311

51

713

81

605

PrtS+ CL3A

122

284

159

164

PrtS+ CL6A

106

276

148

164

PrtS+ CL9A

125

277

156

159

PrtS+ CL10A

111

285

143

173

PrtS+ CL17A

102

379

155

167

PrtS+ CL21A

126

261

157

161

PrtS+ CL23A

128

296

158

168

DGCC7666

71

460

107

281

PrtS+ CLB1

166

181

153

178

DGCC7710

99

386

138

231

PrtS-

33

948

29

1110

SrtA-

115

361

143

213

Kinetics parameters: Vmax, maximum acidification rate in pH units x 10-4 per minute and pH 5.2, time to reach pH 5.2 in minutes

Altogether, our results show that the transfer of the prtS island between S. thermophilus strains is sufficient as such to convert slow acidifying strains into transformants displaying fast activities similar to PrtS+ natural isolates. In addition, acquisition of this property was shown to be independent of the prtS copy number or the chromosomal integration locus.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, we performed for the first time a stable and fully functional transfer of the prtS locus in PrtS-deficient backgrounds of S. thermophilus. By comparing the PrtS+ derivative transformants isolated in this study to (i) natural fast and slow acidifying isolates and (ii) prtS and srtA mutants, we have ultimately shown that PrtS is the most relevant trait responsible for rapid milk acidification. In monoculture, acquisition of a proteolytic system capable of producing short oligopeptides from the casein matrix fulfils thus optimally the nutritional requirements of S. thermophilus in milk. The housekeeping sortase A is not required for full PrtS activity and optimal milk acidification. However, we can not exclude that it could be required in other culturing conditions or for the anchorage and activity of others putative sortase substrates. In absence of sortase A, it is probable that most of active PrtS proteins remain anchored in the cell membrane through their C-terminal hydrophobic domain (downstream of the LPXTG motif). Further studies would be required to fully explore the relation between the SrtA protein and its PrtS substrate in S. thermophilus.

The PrtS+ phenotype was previously reported to be only present in a few strains of S. thermophilus. However, since a decade the proportion of strains isolated from industrial dairy products displaying this phenotype has sharply increased, indicating a significant interest of the food industry for this infrequent adaptation [1115]. The transfer protocol developed in this work is applicable to all transformable S. thermophilus strains, provided the insertion sites for prtS island i.e. ISSth1 or IS1167 elements are present in their genome. It will thus provide the dairy industry with novel and improved starter strains of S. thermophilus, which performed better under fermentation processes and may have a non-Genetically Modified Microorganisms (GMM) status according to the European Legislation [20, 30].

Notes

List of abbreviations used

CEP: 

Cell-Envelope Proteinases

FSDA: 

Fast Slow Difference Agar

GMM: 

Genetically Modified Microorganisms

IS: 

Insertion Sequence

LAB: 

Lactic Acid Bacteria

ORF: 

Open Reading Frames

PCR: 

Polymerase Chain Reaction

WT: 

Wild type.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was carried out with financial support from Danisco and FNRS. L. F. is postdoctoral researcher at FNRS. P. Hols. is research associate at FNRS.

This article has been published as part of Microbial Cell Factories Volume 10 Supplement 1, 2011: Proceedings of the 10th Symposium on Lactic Acid Bacterium. The full contents of the supplement are available online at http://www.microbialcellfactories.com/supplements/10/S1.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biochimie et Génétique Moléculaire Bactérienne, Institut des Sciences de la Vie, Université catholique de Louvain
(2)
Danisco France SAS

References

  1. Courtin P, Monnet V, Rul F: Cell-wall proteinases PrtS and PrtB have a different role in Streptococcus thermophilus/Lactobacillus bulgaricus mixed cultures in milk. Microbiology 2002, 148: 3413-3421.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Christensen JE, Dudley EG, Pederson JA, Steele JL: Peptidases and amino acid catabolism in lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1999, 76: 217-246. 10.1023/A:1002001919720View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Savijoki K, Ingmer H, Varmanen P: Proteolytic systems of lactic acid bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2006, 71: 394-406. 10.1007/s00253-006-0427-1View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Genay M, Sadat L, Gagnaire V, Lortal S: prtH2 , not prtH , is the ubiquitous cell wall proteinase gene in Lactobacillus helveticus . Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75: 3238-3249. 10.1128/AEM.02395-08View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Pederson JA, Mileski GJ, Weimer BC, Steele JL: Genetic characterization of a cell envelope-associated proteinase from Lactobacillus helveticus CNRZ32. J Bacteriol 1999, 181: 4592-4597.Google Scholar
  6. Sadat-Mekmene L, Jardin J, Corre C, Molle D, Richoux R, Delage MM, et al.: Simultaneous presence of PrtH and PrtH2 proteinases in Lactobacillus helveticus strains improves breakdown of the pure alphas1-casein. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77: 179-186. 10.1128/AEM.01466-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernandez-Espla MD, Garault P, Monnet V, Rul F: Streptococcus thermophilus cell wall-anchored proteinase: release, purification, and biochemical and genetic characterization. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000, 66: 4772-4778. 10.1128/AEM.66.11.4772-4778.2000View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Clancy KW, Melvin JA, McCafferty DG: Sortase transpeptidases: insights into mechanism, substrate specificity, and inhibition. Biopolymers 2010, 94: 385-396. 10.1002/bip.21472View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Paterson GK, Mitchell TJ: The biology of Gram-positive sortase enzymes. Trends Microbiol 2004, 12: 89-95. 10.1016/j.tim.2003.12.007View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Hols P, Hancy F, Fontaine L, Grossiord B, Prozzi D, Leblond-Bourget N, et al.: New insights in the molecular biology and physiology of Streptococcus thermophilus revealed by comparative genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2005, 29: 435-463.Google Scholar
  11. Shahbal S, Hemme D, Desmazeaud M: High cell wall-associated proteinase activity of sorne Streptococcus thermophilus strains (H-strains) correlated with a high acidification rate in milk. Lait 1991, 71: 351-357. 10.1051/lait:1991327View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Shahbal S, Hemme D, Renault P: Characterization of a Cell Envelope-Associated Proteinase Activity from Streptococcus thermophilus H-Strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 1993, 59: 177-182.Google Scholar
  13. Delorme C, Bartholini C, Bolotine A, Ehrlich SD, Renault P: Emergence of a cell wall protease in the Streptococcus thermophilus population. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76: 451-460. 10.1128/AEM.01018-09View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Galia W., Perrin C, Dary A: Variability and molecular typing of Streptococcus thermophilus strains displaying different proteolytic and acidifying properties. Lait 2009, 19: 89-95.Google Scholar
  15. Rasmussen TB, Danielsen M, Valina O, Garrigues C, Johansen E, Pedersen MB: Streptococcus thermophilus core genome: comparative genome hybridization study of 47 strains. Appl Environ Microbiol 2008, 74: 4703-4710. 10.1128/AEM.00132-08View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Letort C, Juillard V: Development of a minimal chemically-defined medium for the exponential growth of Streptococcus thermophilus . J Appl Microbiol 2001, 91: 1023-1029. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01469.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Huggins AR, Sandine WE: Differentiation of Fast and Slow Milk-Coagulating Isolates in Strains of Lactic Streptococci. Journal of Dairy Science 1984, 67: 1674-1679. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81491-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Fonseca F, Beal C, Corrieu G: Method of quantifying the loss of acidification activity of lactic acid starters during freezing and frozen storage. J Dairy Res 2000, 67: 83-90. 10.1017/S002202999900401XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Pernoud S, Fremaux C, Sepulchre A, Corrieu G, Monnet C: Effect of the metabolism of urea on the acidifying activity of Streptococcus thermophilus . J Dairy Sci 2004, 87: 550-555. 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73196-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Fontaine L, Dandoy D, Boutry C, Delplace B, de Frahan MH, Fremaux C, et al.: Development of a Versatile Procedure Based on Natural Transformation for Marker-Free Targeted Genetic Modification in Streptococcus thermophilus . Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76: 7870-7877. 10.1128/AEM.01671-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Fontaine L, Boutry C, de Frahan MH, Delplace B, Fremaux C, Horvath P, et al.: A novel pheromone quorum-sensing system controls the development of natural competence in Streptococcus thermophilus and Streptococcus salivarius . J Bacteriol 2010, 192: 1444-1454. 10.1128/JB.01251-09View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Sambrook J, FEaMT: Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring harbour Laboratory Press NY; 1989.Google Scholar
  23. Ferain T, Hobbs JN Jr., Richardson J, Bernard N, Garmyn D, Hols P, et al.: Knockout of the two ldh genes has a major impact on peptidoglycan precursor synthesis in Lactobacillus plantarum . J Bacteriol 1996, 178: 5431-5437.Google Scholar
  24. Dieye Y, Oxaran V, Ledue-Clier F, Alkhalaf W, Buist G, Juillard V, et al.: Functionality of sortase A in Lactococcus lactis . Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76: 7332-7337. 10.1128/AEM.00928-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lalioui L, Pellegrini E, Dramsi S, Baptista M, Bourgeois N, Doucet-Populaire F, et al.: The SrtA Sortase of Streptococcus agalactiae is required for cell wall anchoring of proteins containing the LPXTG motif, for adhesion to epithelial cells, and for colonization of the mouse intestine. Infect Immun 2005, 73: 3342-3350. 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3342-3350.2005View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Nobbs AH, Vajna RM, Johnson JR, Zhang Y, Erlandsen SL, Oli MW, et al.: Consequences of a sortase A mutation in Streptococcus gordonii . Microbiology 2007, 153: 4088-4097. 10.1099/mic.0.2007/007252-0View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Blomqvist T, Steinmoen H, Havarstein LS: Natural genetic transformation: A novel tool for efficient genetic engineering of the dairy bacterium Streptococcus thermophilus . Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72: 6751-6756. 10.1128/AEM.01156-06View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Gardan R, Besset C, Guillot A, Gitton C, Monnet V: The oligopeptide transport system is essential for the development of natural competence in Streptococcus thermophilus strain LMD-9. J Bacteriol 2009, 191: 4647-4655. 10.1128/JB.00257-09View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sun Z, Chen X, Wang J, Zhao W, Shao Y, Wu L, et al.: Complete genome sequence of Streptococcus thermophilus strain ND03. J Bacteriol 2011, 193: 793-794. 10.1128/JB.01374-10View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Official Journal of the European Communities: Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing council Directive 90/220/EEC. Off J Eur Communities 2001, L 106: 1-38.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Dandoy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.