Skip to main content

Engineering the synthetic β-alanine pathway in Komagataella phaffii for conversion of methanol into 3-hydroxypropionic acid



Methanol is increasingly gaining attraction as renewable carbon source to produce specialty and commodity chemicals, as it can be generated from renewable sources such as carbon dioxide (CO2). In this context, native methylotrophs such as the yeast Komagataella phaffii (syn Pichia pastoris) are potentially attractive cell factories to produce a wide range of products from this highly reduced substrate. However, studies addressing the potential of this yeast to produce bulk chemicals from methanol are still scarce. 3-Hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) is a platform chemical which can be converted into acrylic acid and other commodity chemicals and biopolymers. 3-HP can be naturally produced by several bacteria through different metabolic pathways.


In this study, production of 3-HP via the synthetic β-alanine pathway has been established in K. phaffii for the first time by expressing three heterologous genes, namely panD from Tribolium castaneum, yhxA from Bacillus cereus, and ydfG from Escherichia coli K-12. The expression of these key enzymes allowed a production of 1.0 g l−1 of 3-HP in small-scale cultivations using methanol as substrate. The addition of a second copy of the panD gene and selection of a weak promoter to drive expression of the ydfG gene in the PpCβ21 strain resulted in an additional increase in the final 3-HP titer (1.2 g l−1). The 3-HP-producing strains were further tested in fed-batch cultures. The best strain (PpCβ21) achieved a final 3-HP concentration of 21.4 g l−1 after 39 h of methanol feeding, a product yield of 0.15 g g−1, and a volumetric productivity of 0.48 g l−1 h−1. Further engineering of this strain aiming at increasing NADPH availability led to a 16% increase in the methanol consumption rate and 10% higher specific productivity compared to the reference strain PpCβ21.


Our results show the potential of K. phaffii as platform cell factory to produce organic acids such as 3-HP from renewable one-carbon feedstocks, achieving the highest volumetric productivities reported so far for a 3-HP production process through the β-alanine pathway.


Fossil fuels not only constitute the most important energy sources in our everyday life, but they are also critical to produce plastics, synthetic materials, and other chemical products. However, the accelerated depletion of fossil resources and its undeniable relationship with global warming are forcing us to identify alternative feedstocks. Moreover, the use of plant-derived sugars as carbon sources comes into conflict with food commodities.

Methanol is increasingly gaining competitiveness as a microbial non-food feedstock for the chemical industry and biomanufacturing. This one-carbon compound is broadly available, presently obtained from syn-gas. It can also be prepared through a catalytic conversion that oxidizes a natural gas (methane). Another renewable alternative to produce methanol includes the reduction of atmospheric CO2 with hydrogen, promoting a sustainable circular carbon economy [1]. In addition, this carbon source has a greater degree of reduction per C-mol compared to most sugars, leading to potential higher product yields, and thus is considered a promising building block for synthesizing biofuels, commodity chemicals and biopolymers [2].

Komagataella phaffii (also known as Pichia pastoris) is a methylotrophic yeast strain capable of assimilating methanol as a sole source of carbon and energy. This is possible due to the presence of strongly induced genes encoding for enzymes involved in methanol metabolism, which are mostly located in the peroxisomes. After its discovery in the late 1960s, K. phaffii was first used for biomass and single-cell protein production from methanol [3, 4]. Later, K. phaffii was developed as a system to produce heterologous proteins for both academic and industrial purposes. The availability of the strong and tightly regulated methanol inducible AOX1 promoter paved the ground for the exploitation of this non-conventional yeast for heterologous protein production. Synthetic biology toolboxes such as GoldenPiCS [5] and CRISPi kit [6], together with the growing knowledge base of its metabolism, have led K. phaffii to stand out as a specialized chassis not only to produce recombinant proteins, but also to metabolically engineer this yeast to produce added value metabolites [7]. In this context, the deployment of technologies for renewable methanol generation makes it an attractive feedstock for chemicals production using methylotrophic microorganisms. Methanol possesses more available electrons per carbon atom (reduction degree) than most sugars, which implies that more reducing power is being generated, usually resulting in enhanced product yields of desired metabolites [2]. Over the past 10 years, several chemicals have been synthesized in K. phaffii using methanol as C-source, including carboxylic acids such as malic acid, d-lactic acid and 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) [8,9,10], polyketides [11,12,13], and fatty acids derivatives [14]. Recently, the production of amino acids (β-alanine) from this renewable feedstock has also been reported in K. phaffii for the first time [15]. This β-amino acid is a precursor for the biosynthesis of several nitrogen-containing chemicals, such as pantothenic acid (vitamin B5).

3-HP was identified as one of the top value-added chemicals from biomass by the US Department of Energy (DOE) in 2004, since it was considered a key building block for both commodity and specialty chemicals production. 3-HP can be converted into 1,3-propanediol (PDO), acrylamide, acrylic acid, and methyl acrylate [16]. There is a growing demand for acrylic acid-based polymers used in the personal care industry, coatings, adhesives, and others. The global market size of this 3-HP derivative is expected to reach $19.2 billion by 2030 [17]. The bioconversion of renewable methanol into this three-carbon acid building block will allow us to reduce the unsustainable use of fossil resources, meaning less environmental pollution [18]. Furthermore, since K. phaffii is considered an acid-tolerant host, the fermentation process could be performed at a pH below the pKa value of 3-HP, obtaining the undissociated form of the acid, therefore reducing the costs of the downstream process [19].

Several microorganisms, both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, are 3-HP natural producers, although none of them produces a significant amount of this organic acid [20]. Three predominant heterotrophic routes named according to its precursor have been reconstructed into the industrial workhorses Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli for 3-HP synthesis. The highest 3-HP titer and overall process productivity were obtained with the coenzyme B12-dependent glycerol pathway implemented in E. coli [21]. Nevertheless, E. coli is not able to produce vitamin B12 on its own. Therefore, this expensive cofactor must be added to the culture medium, making the process economically unfeasible at an industrial scale [22].

Alternatively, the gene encoding for a bifunctional malonyl-CoA reductase from Chloroflexus aurantiacus (MCRCa) has been expressed to implement the malonyl-CoA pathway in several model organisms, such as E. coli [23,24,25,26], S. cerevisiae [27,28,29] and Schizosaccharomyces pombe [30, 31], allowing for the production of 3-HP. Recently, we have successfully introduced the malonyl-CoA pathway in K. phaffii to produce 3-HP from glycerol [32]. After further metabolic engineering, the best strain produced up to 37.1 g l−1 of 3-HP at 0.71 g l−1 h−1 with a final product yield of 0.19 g g−1 in fed-batch cultures, resulting in the highest volumetric productivity reported so far in yeast [33]. Notably, a free fatty acids (FFA) overproducing S. cerevisiae strain engineered with the malonyl-CoA pathway has been recently optimized for an enhanced supply of metabolic precursors (malonyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA) and cofactor (NADPH), enabling the highest 3-HP production (56.5 g l−1) and product yield on glucose (0.31 g g−1) in fed-batch cultivations reported so far in yeast [34]. Similarly, the malonyl-CoA pathway has also been implemented in a FFA-overproducing K. phaffii strain to efficiently produce 3-HP from sole methanol, achieving a final titer of 48.2 g l−1, which is the highest reported 3-HP production from one-carbon feedstocks, and a product yield of 0.23 g g−1 [10].

In addition, 3-HP has been produced through the synthetic β-alanine pathway in E. coli [35, 36] and S. cerevisiae [28, 37]. This metabolic pathway consists of two steps, the first one converting β-alanine into malonyl semialdehyde (MSA) by either a β-alanine-pyruvate aminotransferase (BAPAT) or a γ-aminobutyrate transaminase (GABT), and the second one consisting in a reduction of MSA to 3-HP consuming either NADH or NADPH [38,39,40]. Several genes were tested for each one of these two steps to implement the pathway in S. cerevisiae, finally determining the expression of a BAPAT from Bacillus cereus (BAPATBc), along with a 3-hydroxypropionate dehydrogenase from E. coli K-12 (YDFGEc), as the best option. Moreover, the endogenous biosynthesis of β-alanine is only active via spermine and has a very low flux. For this reason, an aspartate-1-decarboxylase from Tribolium castaneum (PANDTc), catalyzing the conversion of L-aspartate into β-alanine, was expressed in S. cerevisiae. After further metabolic engineering of this strain, a final titer of 13.7 g l−1 of 3-HP with a 0.14 g g−1 product yield was obtained in a glucose-limited controlled fed-batch cultivation [37]. Recently, 3-HP production through the β-alanine pathway has been further optimized by applying phosphate-limiting conditions to a glucose-based fed-batch system, achieving a final 3-HP concentration of approximately 27 g l−1 with a product yield of 0.26 g g−1 [41].

In the present study, the enzymes used by Borodina et al. in S. cerevisiae [37] were expressed for the first time in K. phaffii to enable 3-HP production from methanol via the β-alanine pathway in our base strains. These base strains were further modified through cofactor engineering by overexpressing a Pseudomonas sp. 101 NADP+-dependent formate dehydrogenase variant. Fed-batch cultivations using methanol as the only carbon source in the feed were performed to evaluate the potential of this cell factory to generate an economically important product from this C1 feedstock.

Results and discussion

In silico comparison of the malonyl-CoA and the β-alanine pathways in K. phaffii

The K. phaffii’s iMT1026 v3.0 genome-scale metabolic model [42] was used to evaluate the maximum 3-HP theoretical yield (Υ3-HP max) that could be achieved using methanol as sole carbon source through the malonyl-CoA and the β-alanine pathways. Assuming that all the carbon source was used for product synthesis, that is, not used for biomass growth (µ = 0 h−1), the maximum Υ3−HP through the malonyl-CoA pathway was calculated to be 0.718 g3-HP gMetOH−1 (Fig. 1a), whereas a higher value was obtained when using the β-alanine route (0.795) (Fig. 1b), mainly owing to a lower ATP requirement to produce one molecule of 3-HP from 3 molecules of methanol through the β-alanine pathway (see Additional file 1), resulting in slightly lower oxygen requirements compared to the malonyl-CoA pathway (Fig. 1a, b). The higher ATP requirement for 3-HP production through the malonyl-CoA pathway is mainly due to acetyl-CoA synthesis, which not only has an impact on the Υ3-HP max value, but also results in higher oxygen dependence, as previously pointed out by Borodina et al. [37]. Overall, the β-alanine route stands out as a more attractive metabolic pathway towards 3-HP production at industrial scale.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Quantitative prediction of metabolic capabilities of K. phaffii for 3-HP production from methanol. a Through the malonyl-CoA pathway. b Through the β-alanine pathway. A range of values for the specific growth rate was set, while limiting the system to different oxygen availability conditions. The 3-HP production was defined as the objective function to be maximized, obtaining the above phase planes after calculating the corresponding product yield for each predicted 3-HP production value. The color scale code indicates the specific oxygen uptake rate (qO2), from 5 (yellow) to maximal value set at 8 mmol O2 gDCW−1 h−1 (dark blue). Y-axis represents the product yield (Υ3-HP) (g3-HP gMetOH−1), and the X-axis illustrates the growth rate (µ) (h−1)

The expression of panD, yhxA and ydfG genes in K. phaffii generates a 3-HP-producing strain

To reconstruct the synthetic β-alanine pathway for 3-HP production, the three codon-optimized panD, yhxA and ydfG genes encoding for a PAND from T. castaneum, a BAPAT from B. cereus and a YDFG from E. coli, respectively, were introduced into K. phaffii CBS7435, the parental strain. The strong and methanol inducible alcohol oxidase 1 (AOX1) and formate dehydrogenase (FDH1) promoters, were selected to conduct the expression of panD and yhxA genes, respectively. According to previous studies [37], the utilization of strong promoters such as the translation elongation factor EF-1 alpha promoter (PTEF1-α) for the expression of both panD and yhxA genes proved to be beneficial for 3-HP production with an engineered S. cerevisiae strain growing on glucose, since the reaction catalyzed by the PANDTc was determined to be the main flux control step of the β-alanine pathway. In these two first steps, an l-aspartate is transformed into β-alanine by the PANDTc, which is in turn converted into MSA by the BAPATBc enzyme. 3-HP is finally obtained through the reduction of MSA by the action of the YDFGEc (Fig. 2). Due to the NADPH-dependence of the latter enzyme, we expected the potential generation of a redox imbalance by the last step of the pathway. For this reason, instead of using a strong and methanol inducible promoter to control the expression of the ydfG gene, two different constitutive promoters showing a lower expression strength in comparison with the strong GAP promoter under methanol feed conditions (µmax up to 0.1 h−1) were tested, namely the moderate strength mitochondrial porin (POR1) promoter, obtaining the PpCβ10 strain, and the weak pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC1) promoter, obtaining the PpCβ20 strain [5].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Schematic representation of the biological β-alanine route towards 3-HP production using methanol as substrate. The enzyme abbreviations are as follows: PAND – aspartate-1-decarboxylase, BAPAT – β-alanine-pyruvate aminotransferase, YDFG – 3-hydroxypropionate dehydrogenase, FDH(V9) – mutated formate dehydrogenase. The three heterologous enzymes required for the expression of the synthetic β-alanine pathway in K. phaffii CBS7435 parental strain are highlighted in red. The NADPH regeneration by FDH(V9) is shaded in purple

The PpCβ10 and PpCβ20 strains were grown up to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 2.4 (see Additional file 2) on 24 deep-well plates with minimal medium containing 11.9 g l−1 (i.e., 1.5% v/v) of methanol, along with the reference strain (CBS7435). After 48 h of incubation, methanol was completely depleted. Since K. phaffii does not assimilate 3-HP as C-source [32], an endpoint sample was collected at the end of the culture to quantify the final 3-HP titers. The heterologous expression of panD, yhxA and ydfG genes resulted in 0.93 ± 0.03 g l−1 of 3-HP after 48 h of cultivation when the PPOR1 was used to control the expression of the ydfG gene (PpCβ10 strain), whereas a slightly but significantly higher titer (p-value < 0.05), 1.04 ± 0.01 g l−1 3-HP, was obtained with the weak PPDC1 driving expression of this gene (PpCβ20 strain). Notably, the 3-HP titers obtained herein were slightly higher than those achieved with a base S. cerevisiae strain expressing the same key enzymes under the control of strong constitutive promoters (TEF1 and PGK1) and growing on a 20 g l−1 glucose medium (0.83 g l−1 3-HP) [37]. Moreover, the expression of these three heterologous genes in K. phaffii resulted in similar 3-HP titers to those previously reported for a glucose-utilizing S. cerevisiae strain carrying overexpression cassettes for 5 genes, namely pyruvate carboxylase (PYC1 and PYC2), BAPATBc, PANDTc and YDFGEc. Only when xylose was used as substrate, a higher production of 3-HP was achieved (1.84 g l−1) with the latter strain [28]. These initial screening experiments pointed at K. phaffii as a promising chassis cell for the bioproduction of 3-HP from methanol.

Improving 3-HP production by optimizing the flux through the β-alanine synthetic pathway

Once the functionality of the biosynthetic pathway was confirmed by the presence of 3-HP, we decided to improve the flux towards the production of this carboxylic acid by overexpressing the key biosynthetic enzymes. Previous studies with a S. cerevisiae strain expressing the β-alanine pathway, demonstrated that the effect of multiple integrations of PANDTc was larger than that of multiple copies of BAPATBc/YDFGEc, thus suggesting that the major control point of the flux through the biosynthetic pathway were the panD gene transcriptional levels [37]. Accordingly, we hypothesized the overexpression of this gene as the most straightforward strategy for 3-HP improvement.

The integration of a second copy of the PANDTc expression cassette into both PpCβ10 and PpCβ20 strains resulted in the PpCβ11 and PpCβ21 strains, respectively, which were cultivated on buffered minimal methanol medium (BMM) along with their parentals. After 48 h of cultivation, all strains reached a similar OD600 between 2.3 and 2.5 (see Additional file 2). The 3-HP production slightly increased by 3% (p-value = 0.04) in PpCβ11 strain (0.92 ± 0.01 g l−1 3-HP), in comparison with its parental PpCβ10 strain (0.89 ± 0.02 g l−1), while the strain PpCβ21 reached the highest 3-HP concentration (1.18 ± 0.03 g l−1), i.e., a 12% increase respect to PpCβ20 (1.05 ± 0.01 g l−1). Notably, the 3-HP yield on methanol was increased by 11% with the additional copy of the panD gene (strain PpCβ21) while this effect was much lower in the PpCβ11 strain (3%) (Fig. 3). These results indicate that lower expression levels of the ydfG gene (i.e., under the control of PPDC1) seem to be beneficial in terms of 3-HP production. This suggested the presence of a bottleneck at the final step of the pathway, since the YDFGEc requires NADPH to catalyze the reduction of the malonic semialdehyde to 3-HP, which is not being supplied. We hypothesized that this perturbation of the NADPH homeostasis could be further exacerbated when the β-alanine flux into the pathway is increased (i.e., with the insertion of an additional copy of the panD gene under the very strong AOX1 promoter), resulting in a potential limitation of NADPH equivalents for anabolism/cell growth.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Global product yields (YP/S) calculated for the base strains constructed in this study. The key heterologous enzymes expressed in each strain are depicted in the left side of the graph. One colored arrow corresponds to one copy of the related expression cassette (blue for PANDTc, purple for BAPATBc, and orange for YDFGEc). Promoters selected to drive expression of every transcriptional unit are mentioned above the arrows. On the right side, the grey bars show the average product yield (g g−1), and the black dots represent the averaged endpoint OD600. The error bars show the standard deviation, and the asterisk sign indicates a significant difference in global 3-HP yields between the strains indicated in brackets (p-values < 0.05)

Engineering the redox balance by overexpressing the PseFDH(V9) enzyme variant from Pseudomonas sp. 101, a NADP+-dependent formate dehydrogenase

To increase NADPH supply, the gene coding for a mutated formate dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas sp. 101, namely PseFDH(V9), was expressed in both PpCβ20 and PpCβ21 strains, obtaining the PpCβ20-P and PpCβ21-P strains, respectively. The enzyme variant PseFDH(V9) shows the highest catalytic efficiency (kcat/KM) for NADP+ that has ever been reported for any FDH towards this cofactor, mainly attributed to a very low KMNADP = 0.026 mM. This causes PseFDH(V9) to reduce NADP+ with barely any competition from NAD+, even though the high concentration of this competing substrate in the cytosol [43]. The gene encoding for the PseFDH(V9) enzyme was expressed under the control of the strong and methanol inducible FDH1 promoter. The PpCβ20-P and PpCβ21-P strains were cultivated along with their corresponding parental strains on 24-deep well plates containing BMM. A comparable endpoint OD600 between 2.4 and 2.6 was reached after 48 h of cultivation by the strains PpCβ20, PpCβ21 and PpCβ20-P. Conversely, cell growth was slightly lower for the PpCβ21-P strain (DO600 = 2.2) (see Additional file 2). The final 3-HP titer was significantly reduced by about 11% in strain PpCβ20-P (1.12 ± 0.01 g l−1) compared to its parental strain PpCβ20 (1.24 ± 0.03 g l−1) (p-value < 0.05). The introduction of the PseFDH(V9) enzyme in strain PpCβ21 resulted in a minor but also significant decrease (p-value < 0.0003) of about 6% on the final product titer, from 1.29 ± 0.01 g l−1 to 1.22 ± 0.01 g l−1 (PpCβ21-P). However, there were no significant differences (p-value = 0.38) in the 3-HP produced per OD600 unit between these strains. In summary, the expression of this NADP+-dependent formate dehydrogenase did not improve neither 3-HP production nor product yields using methanol as sole carbon and energy source in small-scale experiments.

Evaluating the impact of the β-alanine pathway on cell growth kinetics

To determine the maximum specific growth rate (µmax) of the different strains obtained in this study, series of growth kinetics experiments were performed by cultivating a representative clone from each strain in shake flask cultures using BMM medium. The introduction of the β-alanine route led to a reduction of the µmax from 0.14 h−1 (reference CBS7435 strain) to 0.11 h−1 and 0.09 h−1 for PpCβ20 and PpCβ10 strains, respectively (see Additional file 2). The β-alanine pathway consumes 1 NADPH per 3-HP, thereby reducing NADPH availability for anabolic purposes, which has been previously correlated to decreased biomass yields on methanol [44]. Coherently, lower expression levels of the NADPH-consuming YDFGEc enzyme (i.e., under the control of PPDC1, strain PpCβ20) of the β-alanine pathway proved to be beneficial, both in terms of 3-HP production and cell growth. Moreover, this effect was more pronounced with the overexpression of the PANDTc expression cassette, as inferred from the µmax comparison between strains PpCβ21 and PpCβ11 (see Additional file 2). Introducing a second panD gene copy into the PpCβ10 strain substantially decreased the µmax value from 0.09 h−1 to 0.06 h−1 (PpCβ11), whereas this effect was minimal in the PpCβ20 strain, leading to a slight (not statistically significant, p-value = 0.28) reduction from 0.11 h−1 to 0.10 h−1 (PpCβ21). According to previous studies [15], fine-tuning the panD gene dosage aiming at increasing the flux towards the β-alanine intermediate through aspartate decarboxylation may cause an impaired cell growth of K. phaffii, since aspartate takes part in many biological processes. The µmax value obtained for the PpCβ11 strain was consistent with this phenomenon, albeit we did not observe this effect in the PpCβ21 strain. Further metabolic flux analyses should help elucidating the cause of the differences between the strains PpCβ11 and PpCβ21 growth. In any case, PpCβ11 was discarded for further bioreactor-scale cultivation experiments.

The introduction of the mutated formate dehydrogenase FDH(V9) from Pseudomonas in the PpCβ20 strain did not affect cell growth on methanol, i.e., both PpCβ20 and PpCβ20-P strains showed the same µmax (0.11 h−1). In contrast, the PpCβ21-P strain showed a lower µmax (0.08 h−1) compared to its parental strain PpCβ21. Since both strains showed similar 3-HP production titers, further characterization in bioreactor-scale experiments was required.

Production of 3-HP in fed-batch cultivations

Initial fed-batch cultivations of the 3-HP-producing strains using a growth defined mineral medium typically used for recombinant protein production in K. phaffii [45], which is only supplemented with biotin, revealed that such medium did not support neither growth nor 3-HP production during the feed phase on methanol. We hypothesized this was probably due to the special co-factor requirements described for some of the enzymes of the β-alanine pathway, specifically for the PANDTc (UniProtKB: A7U8C7) and BAPATBc (UniProtKB: C2VE79) enzymes, which use at least one pyridoxal phosphate as cofactor for its synthesis according to the UniProtKB database [46]. This coenzyme is derived from pyridoxine (vitamin B6) and plays an important role in amino acid metabolism. Moreover, β-alanine is an intermediate in pantothenic acid (vitamin B5) biosynthesis, which, in turn, is an integral part of the coenzyme A and acyl carrier protein, co-factors required for several enzymes [37]. The redirection of this β-amino acid flux towards the production of 3-HP instead of vitamin B5, could be an explanation for the observed growth impairment in the bioreactor-scale cultivations. Indeed, the presence of both vitamins B6 and B5 in the yeast nitrogen based (YNB)-containing medium used in the small-scale cultivations is likely to be the reason why the 3-HP-producing strains grow normally in those conditions. Subsequently, bioreactor cultivations were carried out using a growth medium supplemented with a vitamin solution containing, among others: calcium pantothenate (B5), pyridoxine hydrochloride (B6), and niacin (B3), which is an important precursor for the essential redox cofactors NAD+ and NADP+. This vitamin solution is usually added to Delft medium, commonly employed for bioreactor cultivations of S. cerevisiae [47], allowing for sustained growth on methanol and 3-HP production.

The best performing strains PpCβ20 and PpCβ21, along with the strain expressing the mutated FDH(V9) enzyme from Pseudomonas, PpCβ21-P, were further evaluated in aerobic fed-batch reactors. After the initial glycerol batch and methanol adaptation (transition) phases, the fed-batch phase was started, where methanol was fed following a pre-programmed exponential feeding strategy for controlled growth rate at µ = 0.03 h−1. The feeding phase was finalized before reaching a dry cell weight (DCW) of 50 g l−1 of biomass, accounting for 39.3 h of the total process duration, with a total methanol concentration added into the culture of almost 125 g l−1. Neither methanol nor by-products were detected by HPLC analysis over the course of fermentation. Nonetheless, exometabolome profiling analyses by NMR of the supernatant samples from the early, mid, and late methanol-feeding phase revealed the presence of small amounts (mM range, below HPLC detection limit) of ethanol as well as some metabolites potentially derived from leucine (Leu) and isoleucine (Ile) biosynthesis and degradation pathways (or pyruvate fermentation) such as 2-oxoisocaproate and 3-methyl-2-oxopentanoate (see Additional file 3 for NMR spectra of the culture supernatants). Both compounds are involved in transamination reactions with 2-oxoglutarate and l-glutamate, which, in turn, are also present in the oxaloacetate conversion into l-aspartate catalyzed by an aspartate aminotransferase (AAT2), reaction that takes place upstream of the β-alanine pathway (see Fig. 2). 3-Hydroxyisobutyrate, pyruvate and acetate were also detected in much lower amounts as well as traces of methanol. In contrast to 3-HP-producing K. phaffii strains engineered with the malonyl-CoA pathway growing in fed-batch cultures using glycerol as C-source [32], no arabitol was accumulated during the fermentation process.

At the end of the culture, the PpCβ21 strain produced up to 21.4 ± 0.7 g l−1 of 3-HP, whereas 20.3 ± 0.6 g l−1 were achieved by the strain PpCβ20. In both cases the 3-HP generated during the batch phase of the cultures was slightly above 2 g l−1 (Fig. 4). The addition of a second copy of the panD gene in PpCβ21 resulted in a 12% improvement of the final 3-HP titer in the small-scale screenings. This increase was reduced to 6% when both strains were tested in bioreactor fed-batch cultivations. The 3-HP yield on biomass (YP/X) calculated for the fed-batch phase was increased by 18% in PpCβ21 with respect to PpCβ20. Consequently, this resulted in a 10% improvement of the specific productivity (qp) (Table 1), and thus demonstrating that an enhanced supply of β-alanine intermediate in the metabolic pathway had a positive effect on 3-HP production, coherent with previous studies [37]. The expression of the PseFDH(V9) enzyme in PpCβ21-P strain allowed for a final 3-HP titer of 19.0 ± 0.5 g l−1, along with lower biomass concentration levels (38.8 g l−1 DCW) (Fig. 4), in comparison with the above-mentioned strains. This yielded a further 14% and 10% increase in YP/X and qp, respectively, while the product yield on methanol (YP/S) remained unchanged for both PpCβ21-P and PpCβ21 (Table 1). Furthermore, the specific carbon dioxide evolution rate (qCO2) was significantly increased by 29% (p-value = 0.02) when comparing the PpCβ21-P to the PpCβ21 strain, whereas there were no significant differences (p-value = 0.10) in the qCO2 between strains PpCβ20 and PpCβ21 (Table 1 and Additional file 4). Consistently, the PpCβ21-P showed the highest CO2 yield on methanol (YCO2/S) among the three strains (Table 1). Therefore, it is plausible that the introduction of the ectopic NADPH-regenerating reaction from formate causes a carbon flux redistribution through the methanol dissimilation pathway, that is, generating more CO2 while providing a higher supply of NADPH. This hypothesis is consistent with the higher YP/X and qP values observed for the strain PpCβ21-P, as 3-HP synthesis requires a supply of reduction equivalents. In addition, the biomass yield (YX/S) obtained for the PpCβ21-P strain was reduced compared to the other strains. Since the total amount of methanol consumed by all strains was the same, this was also reflected in a significant increase (p-value = 0.036, see Additional file 4) of the specific methanol consumption rate (qs) of the PpCβ21-P strain in comparison to the PpCβ21 strain (Table 1). Overall, it appears that overexpression of the heterologous PseFDH(V9) gene caused a carbon flux redistribution towards CO2 and 3-HP production to the detriment of biomass generation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Fed-batch phase profiles from the bioreactor-scale experiments performed with the 3-HP-producer strains a PpCβ20, b PpCβ21 and, c PpCβ21-P. Concentration of dry cell weight and 3-HP are represented in the left-side y-axis. The total amount of methanol added, normalized by the actual volume of the reactor at every time, is represented using the right-side y-axis. The cultivation profile shown for each strain corresponds to the average result of two independent cultivations. The error bars denote the standard deviation for the duplicate

Table 1 Averaged value of key process parameters obtained for the methanol fed-batch phase using a pre-programmed µ of 0.03 h−1

The iMT1026 v3.0 genome-scale metabolic model of K. phaffii [42] was used to validate the experimental 3-HP yields resulting from fed-batch cultivations. For the simulations, the experimental values obtained for the main macroscopic variables (i.e., qS, qO2, qCO2, and µ) of each methanol-grown strain were set as constraints, and q3-HP was maximized. YP/S and YP/X were calculated for each strain using the predicted q3-HP values (Table 2). Notably, the model showed reasonably accurate predictions, with overall deviations around 6–15% in most cases, even though the mean elemental biomass composition and the estimated non-growth associated maintenance energy (NGAME) parameter that were used as constraints to perform these simulations were taken from chemostat cultivations of a non-producing (wild-type phenotype) K. phaffii strain growing on methanol [42]. The use of condition-specific biomass composition equations and the recalibration of energetic parameters (i.e., NGAME and GAME) through experimental data derived from chemostat cultivations should allow for a greater accuracy in the prediction of physiological macroscopic parameters.

Table 2 Comparison of theoretical performance of iMT1026 v3.0 with experimental data from the methanol fed-batch cultivations at µ = 0.03 h−1

Interestingly, the highest C-yield (C-mol of 3-HP per C-mol of substrate) calculated for the methanol feeding phase of fed-batch cultivations (0.16 ± 0.01 Cmol Cmol−1) is comparable to that achieved by a S. cerevisiae strain overexpressing AAT2, PYC1, PYC2, BAPATBc, YDFGEc, and multiple copies of PANDTc growing on glucose (0.15 ± 0.0 Cmol Cmol−1, calculated from data provided in Borodina et al. [37]). The conversion of 3 molecules of methanol to one molecule of 3-HP through the β-alanine pathway is an ATP-consuming process, whereas it has no net ATP consumption when glucose is used as substrate (see Additional file 1: Table S1). Therefore, the Υ3−HP max that could be achieved by a K. phaffii strain overexpressing the β-alanine pathway is significantly higher for cells growing on glucose (> 0.9 g3-HP gGlucose−1) than for methanol-grown cells (0.795 g3-HP gMetOH−1), based on simulations performed with the K. phaffi’s iMT1026 v3.0 genome-scale metabolic model [42]. Since there are no fundamental differences between K. phaffii’s and S. cerevisiae’s respiratory glucose metabolisms, the maximum theoretical 3-HP yields on glucose are very similar between these yeasts [37]. Overall, we demonstrate the potential of K. phaffii to achieve 3-HP yields on methanol comparable to those obtained from glucose, albeit methanol assimilation being less energy efficient. Furthermore, the volumetric productivities calculated for the fed-batch phase in this study are more than twofold higher than the one obtained for the above-mentioned S. cerevisiae strain (0.21 g l−1 h−1, calculated from data given by Borodina et al. [37]).

Production of 3-HP from methanol has also been reported by an engineered Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 expressing the reductive malonyl-CoA pathway [48], although the yields obtained were an order of magnitude smaller than the ones reported in this study. Furthermore, the volumetric productivities achieved herein are remarkably higher (about 3.2-fold) to the productivities observed in the recently published K. phaffii strain producing 3-HP from sole methanol (0.15 g l−1 h−1, calculated from data reported by Wu et al. [10]). To our knowledge, the values obtained in this study are the highest volumetric productivities reported so far for a 3-HP production process based on the β-alanine pathway.

Future perspectives

Although the 3-HP production yields and productivities we demonstrate herein are promising, further strain and process engineering is clearly needed to reach economically feasible metrics for carboxylic acid production at industrial scale, that is, a productivity and product yield not lower than 2.5 g l−1 h−1 and 0.5 g g−1, respectively [16]. Moreover, downstream operations may account for 20 to 60% of the entire production process costs. To reduce the overall separation and purification expenses, a final product concentration in the range of 50–100 g l−1 would be required for process scale up [49].

Despite the great potential of K. phaffii to produce metabolites such as 3-HP from methanol, a substantial fraction of the methanol consumed by the cells (typically, up to 50% or even higher) is channeled through the dissimilatory pathway to CO2, limiting the carbon flux entering the assimilation pathway to pyruvate [50], an important central metabolite as well as the critical precursor for 3-HP production. Thereby, metabolic engineering strategies aiming to shift the carbon flux split ratio between the assimilatory and dissimilatory pathways may push carbon flux into 3-HP production and reduce the carbon loss caused by the direct oxidation of methanol into CO2 in K. phaffii. In addition, pulling pyruvate flux into the β-alanine pathway, e.g., by enhancing the generation of pathway precursors such as oxaloacetate and aspartate, can also be effective strategy. Full exploitation of the improved supply of NADPH by overexpression of the NADP+-dependent formate dehydrogenase gene described in this study probably requires further fine-tuning of the ydfG gene expression levels for enhanced 3-HP production. Besides, final product concentration demands for industrial scale production will probably require engineering K. phaffii’s tolerance for high 3-HP concentrations, as demonstrated for other yeasts.


In this study, we successfully engineered the synthetic β-alanine to 3-HP pathway in K. phaffii for the first time. Minimal pathway optimization led to a final 3-HP titer of 21.4 g l−1, a 0.15 g g−1 3-HP yield on methanol, and a volumetric productivity of 0.48 g l−1 h−1 in controlled fed-batch cultures. Notably, no major by-products were observed in the fermentation broth. Overexpression of a mutated formate dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas sp. 101 aiming at increasing NADPH availability led to a higher carbon uptake rate in K. phaffii. Exometabolome profiling points at the pyruvate node as a potential target for future metabolic engineering. Although further strain and process optimization is required to make this system industrially attractive, we laid the basis for development of yeast strains for 3-HP production from renewable C1 feedstocks.

Materials and methods

Computational methods

The genome-scale metabolic model of K. phaffii used for all the simulations performed in this study was the iMT1026 v3.0 [42]. To evaluate the Υ3−HP max of the malonyl-CoA and the β-alanine pathways, a set of experimental and calculated growth parameters based on data obtained from chemostat methanol cultivations were defined as constraints. When growing on this substrate, the growth associated and the non-growth associated maintenance energy (GAME and NGAME parameters) were calculated to be 166.77 mmol ATP gDCW−1 and 0.44 mmol ATP gDCW−1 h−1, respectively. The maximum specific substrate uptake rate (qMetOH max) was determined to be 7.82 mmol MetOH gDCW−1 h−1 at µmax = 0.10 h−1 [42]. The reactions for 3-HP production and excretion using either the malonyl-CoA or β-alanine pathways were added to the original model. The 3-HP yields (Υ3-HP) simulating different oxygen availability conditions (qO2) and growth rates (µ) were calculated using the COBRA Toolbox v3.0 [51], and the colored phase planes were generated using the ‘pcolor’ function from Matlab R2021a (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA).

For the experimental data validation, the main physiological macroscopic parameters derived from the methanol fed-batch cultivations were used as constraints, together with the calculated NGAME value for methanol growth, and 3-HP production was maximized by performing a parsimonious enzyme usage Flux Balance Analysis (pFBA) using the COBRA Toolbox v3.0 software [51] in Matlab R2020b (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA).

Plasmid and strain construction

The parental strain K. phaffii CBS7435 (CBS, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, NL) was used to generate a battery of 3-HP-producer strains by means of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed integrations of the heterologous genes. Plasmids and strains used in this study are listed in Table 3 from this section. The heterologous genes encoding for an aspartate-1-decarboxylase from T. castaneum (PANDTc, GenBank: ABU25221), a β-alanine-pyruvate aminotransferase from B. cereus (BAPATBc, GenBank: EEL86940), a 3-hydroxypropionate dehydrogenase from E. coli (YDFGEc, GenBank: 12932746), and a mutated formate dehydrogenase from Pseudomonas sp. (strain 101) (FDH(V9)Pse(A199G/D222Q/S381V/C256A/H380K), UniprotKB: P33160), were codon-optimized and synthesized by GenScript Biotech (Piscataway, NJ, USA) for its expression in K. phaffii (GenBank accession numbers: OR360384, OR360385, OR360386, and OR360387, respectively).

Table 3 List of plasmids and strains used in this study

The modular cloning vectors used in this work are described in Prielhofer et al. [5], and are available at Addgene (Watertown, MA, USA) as GoldenPiCS kit. The CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed genome editing protocol performed in this study is described in Gassler et al. [6], and a ready-to-use plasmid kit named CRISPi can also be found at Addgene. Further description of the molecular cloning protocols followed in this study can be found in the Additional file 5.

Different genomic regions were selected as targets to efficiently design each sgRNA, focusing on intergenic regions such as upstream of the promoters, where the integration of exogenous genes usually leads to stable expression, and cell fitness remains unaffected [52]. Accordingly, the BAPATBc expression cassette was targeted within the 100-bp upstream of TEF1-α promoter (PP7435_Chr1-1535), while the YDFGEc expression unit was located within the first 100-bp of PFLD1 (PP7435_Chr3-0140), hence confirming this target sequence as a non-critical region of the FLD1 promoter. The PANDTc expression cassette was integrated into the RGI2 locus [5], almost 800-bp upstream of a hypothetical protein (PP7435_Chr1-0725). The second copy of the PANDTc donor DNA template was targeted within 50-bp upstream of the GAP promoter (PP7435_Chr2-0858) for homology-directed DNA repair. Finally, the PseFDH(V9) expression cassette was targeted within 50-bp upstream of the AOX1 promoter (PP7435_Chr4-0130). The potential sgRNA candidates binding target regions within the selected loci were assessed with CHOPCHOP, a widely used web tool for CRISPR-based genome editing [53]. CHOPCHOP v2 seeks and scores suitable 20 nucleotide target sites, called protospacers, followed by a 5′-NGG-3′ motif (PAM sequence). The existence of four consecutive thymine bases (TTTT) within the protospacer sequence might cause Pol III termination. Also, GC content without PAM sequence should be 20–80% [54]. Considering that the choice of the sgRNA causes locus-specific variations on targeting efficiency, and even some sgRNAs might not be functional, two high-scored sgRNA targets for each genome locus were selected for the experiments (Table 4), eventually using one to perform each CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene insertion into the K. phaffii genome.

Table 4 Variable sgRNA targets custom-designed in this study

Electrocompetent K. phaffii cells were prepared as described elsewhere [55]. Donor DNA plasmids carrying each expression cassette flanked by the corresponding homology arms were linearized using the FastDigest BpiI (IIs class) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Transformation was performed according to the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed genome editing protocol for K. phaffii [6]. Correct genomic insertions were verified by Sanger sequencing using a set of primers covering the 5′ and the 3′ homology arms (see Additional file 5: Table S2). The sequenced clones were confirmed to be genetically identical. Recombinant yeast strains were grown at 30 °C in YPD agar plates (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% dextrose and 15 g l−1 agar). The medium was supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic when required: Nourseothricin (200 µg ml−1 working concentration for K. phaffii) from Dismed S.A. (Asturias, Spain), and Geneticin (500 µg ml−1) or Hygromycin (200 µg ml−1) from InvivoGen (San Diego, CA, USA).

Screening in deep-well plates

Komagataella phaffii strains were grown overnight in 24 deep-well plates containing YPG medium (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 1% v/v glycerol). Cultures were placed on a platform with a slope of 20° in an incubator shaker Multitron Standard (Infors HT, Bottmingen, Switzerland) with a 2.5 cm orbit, and grown at 30 °C and 220 rpm. Afterwards, a 24 deep-well plate containing 2 ml of buffered minimal methanol medium (BMM; 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 6, 1.34% yeast nitrogen base (YNB), 0.4 mg l−1 biotin and 0.5% v/v pure methanol) was inoculated with the overnight cultures, at a starting OD600 of 0.1. The cultures were grown for 48 h at 25 °C. Moreover, the relative humidity (rh) in the incubation chamber was fixed to 80%. Agitation was set to 220 rpm. After 24 h, 1% v/v pure methanol pulse was added to the cultures. Three independent transformants from each strain were tested to discard any biological variability. The parental strain K. phaffii CBS7435 was used as a negative control. All clones were inoculated in triplicate. At the end of the culture, the final biomass concentration of each deep-well was determined in duplicate with a 96-well microtiter plate using a Multiskan FC Microplate Photometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) to ensure all the cultures were grown up to a similar endpoint OD600.

Shake-flask cultures for small-scale growth kinetics experiments

Komagataella phaffii strains were inoculated from cryo-vials into 5 ml of YPG medium in 50 ml Falcon tubes. Cultures were grown overnight at 30 °C and 180 rpm. The overnight cultures were then diluted to an OD600 of 0.2 in 250 ml shake flasks containing 25 ml of BMM and grown in an incubator shaker Multitron Standard for 12 h at 25 °C, 180 rpm and a relative humidity of 80%, to adapt cells to methanol metabolism and setting the screening conditions. Afterwards, these cultures were used to inoculate 250 ml shake flasks containing 25 ml of fresh BMM at a starting OD600 of 0.2 and grown during 24 h at the same cultivation conditions. Samples were taken every 3 h to measure the OD600 in duplicate with a 96-well microtiter plate using the SPECTROstar Nano absorbance microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Ortenberg, Germany).

Bioreactor cultivations

Fed-batch cultures were performed in duplicate using a DASGIP Parallel Bioreactor System (Eppendorf, Germany). The starting volume of each 1.3 l reactor vessel was 500 ml. The batch medium consisted of 40 g l−1 glycerol, 1.8 g l−1 citric acid, 0.02 g l−1 CaCl2·2H2O, 12.6 g l−1 (NH4)2HPO4, 0.5 g l−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 0.9 g l−1 KCl, 50 µl antifoam Glanapon 2000 kz (Bussetti and Co GmbH, Vienna, Austria), 0.4 mg l−1 biotin, 2 ml l−1 of vitamin stock solution [47], and 5 ml l−1 of PTM1 trace salts [45]. The pH was adjusted to 5 using 5 M HCl. The vitamins, the biotin and the trace salts were filter-sterilized and added to the autoclaved medium after cooling down.

Inocula were prepared as described elsewhere [56]. Reactors were inoculated at a starting OD600 of 1. The pH was controlled at 5 throughout the culture using 15% ammonia (only base addition was used). The temperature was set to 28 °C, and the inlet gas was fed into the reactors at an aeration rate of 1 vvm (0.5 l min−1). The dissolved oxygen (DO) was set to 30%, automatically controlled using the following cascade: (1) Increasing the stirring rate from 400 to 1000 rpm; (2) Raising the percentage of oxygen in the inlet gas, while maintaining an aeration rate of 0.5 l min−1. For the fed-batch phase, the temperature was set to 25 °C. Pure methanol (ρ = 792 g l−1) and feeding salts were added separately to avoid precipitation. The feeding salts medium composition was 0.35 g l−1 CaCl2·2H2O, 10 g l−1 KCl, 6.45 g l−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 200 µl antifoam Glanapon 2000 kz, 1.2 mg l−1 biotin, 6 ml l−1 of vitamin stock solution, and 15 ml l−1 of PTM1 trace salts. This media was prepared at 2× concentration since pure methanol was used. Two separated solutions were prepared and autoclaved, one containing CaCl2·2H2O, and the other containing the rest of the components. After that, both solutions were mixed under sterile conditions at room temperature. The vitamins, the biotin and the trace salts were filter-sterilized and added to this final feeding solution.

After reaching a peak in the % of CO2 from the exhaust gas, indicating the end of the batch phase, two pulses of pure methanol (1 and 2 g l−1, respectively) were sequentially added into the reactors. Once the methanol of the last pulse was completely depleted, the cultures were fed with a constant feeding rate (Fo) for 6 h to complete the transition phase. After that, the feeding medium was added to the bioreactors using a pre-programmed exponential feeding strategy for controlled specific growth rate described in the following equation:

$$F\left(t\right)= \frac{{\upmu }\left[X\left({t}_{o}\right)V\left({t}_{o}\right)\right]}{{Y}_{X/S}{S}_{o}}{e}^{\left[{\upmu }\left(t-{{t}_{o}}\right)\right]}$$

where µ was 0.03 h−1, the X0 was set to 22 g l−1 and the YX/S to 0.273 g g−1.

The reactors were sampled every 5.5 h to measure OD600, biomass dry cell weight and supernatant metabolites. The OD600 measurements were performed in triplicate using a Lange DR 3900 spectrophotometer (Hach, Loveland, CO, USA). The Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) was below 5%. For the biomass DCW determination, 10 ml of distilled water with 9 g l−1 NaCl were used to wet the pre-weighted glass microfiber filters (APFF04700, Merck Millipore) before filtering 2 ml of culture for each triplicate. After that, the filters were washed using the same volume of the NaCl solution and dried for 24 h at 105 °C. Filters containing the dry biomass were weighted to calculate the DCW. This parameter was quantified for three samples throughout the fed-batch, in which the RSD was below 2.5%. For the rest of the samples, the DCW was calculated by interpolation using an equation from a linear regression between DCW and OD600 measures of the initial fed-batch cultivations. To quantify the metabolites, 2 ml of culture samples were centrifuged 5 min at 13,400 rpm using a MiniSpin (Eppendorf, Germany). The supernatant was then filtered with a 0.2 μm pore size single-use syringe filter (SLLGX13NK, Merck Millipore, CA, USA). The filtered supernatant was stored at − 20 °C until HPLC analysis for methanol and 3-HP quantification, and for exometabolome profiling by NMR.

Analytical methods

Methanol and 3-HP were quantified using an HPLC Dionex Ultimate3000 (Dionex – Thermo Fischer Scientific). The compounds were separated with an ionic exchange column ICSep ICE-COREGEL 87H3 (Transgenomic, Omaha, NE, USA) using 6 mM sulphuric acid as mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.6 ml min−1. Both metabolites were quantified from the Refractive Index (RI) spectrum.

For the NMR method, a Bruker Avance 600 MHz NMR spectrometer operating at a proton (1H) frequency of 600.13 MHz equipped with a triple-resonance Bruker TXI 5 mm room-temperature probe and an autosampler (Bruker Biospin, Rheinstetten, Germany) was utilized. The probe temperature was maintained at 298.0 K in all experiments. Once centrifuged and filtered, each supernatant aliquot (400 µl) was mixed with a D2O sodium phosphate buffer (200 µl, 0.2 M, pH 7.4) containing an internal standard (3-(trimethylsilyl)-[2,2,3,3-2H4]-propionic acid sodium salt (TSP), 1 mM) and transferred to the NMR tube. All samples were analysed conducting 1D 1H NMR experiments with presaturation of the residual water signal applying the pulse sequence commonly termed 1D NOESY-presat [57]. Data were collected into 32K data points during an acquisition time of 2.3 s using a recycle delay of 2 s. Spectra were recorded in the time domain as interferograms (FID) across a spectral width of 7211 Hz and as the sum of 1024 transients. Each FID was multiplied by an exponential apodisation function equivalent to a 0.2 Hz line broadening, prior to Fourier transform. The frequency-domain spectra were manually phased, baseline corrected, and referenced to the TSP resonance at δH 0.00 ppm. The identification of metabolites was carried out using the BMRB spectral database [58] and the software Chenomix NMR Suite 8.5 (Chenomix Inc., Edmonton, Canada).

Process parameters determination and data consistency checking

Recorded offline and online state variables during the fed-batch phase of the bioreactor-scale experiments, namely biomass X, substrate S, product P, flow rate F, and initial volume V0 (see Additional files 4 and 6) were used to calculate all derived variables. Details of all equations derived from the mass balances used to calculate yields and rates in the fed-batch experiments can be found elsewhere [59, 60]. In short, intermediate values of the offline variables (X, P), corresponding to the time when online measured variables were taken, were calculated (interpolated) after application of the ‘smoothingspline’ function from Matlab R2021a (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA). Variables measured as concentrations in the liquid phase were referred to the total volume. Recorded state variables were used to calculate the accumulated variables (total amounts, XV, SV, PV, V) during the fed-batch phase. Linear regression was applied on the time evolution of accumulated variables. Regression slopes and its confidence intervals were taken as averaged rates of total state variables. Averaged rates of state variables during the fed-batch phase were used to calculate the derived variables (growth rate µ, q-rates, and yields). The carbon and electron balances were verified using the averaged measures prior to apply common reconciliation techniques [61]. For the elemental mass balance verification, the mean elemental biomass composition CH1.88O0.63N0.20S0.004 with an ash content of 5.9%, previously reported for cells growing on methanol at µ = 0.035 h−1 [42], was assumed in this study. Loss of methanol by stripping was considered almost negligible since C-balances were satisfied with less than 6% of deviation. Statistical χ2 consistency test based on h-index, applied on measured data balances as described elsewhere [62, 63], was passed with a confidence level of 95%. Consequently, there was no evidence for gross measurement errors. The method used for this purpose is also described in detail elsewhere [59].

Availability of data and materials

The data that supports the findings of this study are included in this published article/Additional files. Further datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. Olah GA. Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2005;44:2636–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Whitaker WB, Sandoval NR, Bennett RK, Fast AG, Papoutsakis ET. Synthetic methylotrophy: engineering the production of biofuels and chemicals based on the biology of aerobic methanol utilization. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2015;33:165–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sreekrishna K, Kropp KE. Pichia pastoris. In: Wolf K, editor. Nonconventional yeasts in biotechnology. A handbook. Berlin: Springer; 1996. p. 203–53.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Wegner GH. Biochemical conversions by yeast fermentation at high cell densities. Patent US4414329, USA; 1983.

  5. Prielhofer R, Barrero JJ, Steuer S, Gassler T, Zahrl R, Baumann K, et al. GoldenPiCS: a golden gate-derived modular cloning system for applied synthetic biology in the yeast Pichia pastoris. BMC Syst Biol. 2017;11:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gassler T, Heistinger L, Mattanovich D, Gasser B, Prielhofer R. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed genome editing in Pichia pastoris. In: Gasser B, Mattanovich D, editors. Recombinant protein production in yeast. New York: Springer; 2019. p. 211–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. De S, Mattanovich D, Ferrer P, Gasser B. Established tools and emerging trends for the production of recombinant proteins and metabolites in Pichia pastoris. Essays Biochem. 2021;65:293–307.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamada R, Ogura K, Kimoto Y, Ogino H. Toward the construction of a technology platform for chemicals production from methanol: d-lactic acid production from methanol by an engineered yeast Pichia pastoris. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;35:37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo F, Dai Z, Peng W, Zhang S, Zhou J, Ma J, et al. Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris for malic acid production from methanol. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2021;118:357–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu X, Cai P, Gao L, Li Y, Yao L, Zhou YJ. Efficient bioproduction of 3-hydroxypropionic acid from methanol by a synthetic yeast cell factory. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2023;11:6445–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao L, Cai M, Shen W, Xiao S, Zhou X, Zhang Y. Engineered fungal polyketide biosynthesis in Pichia pastoris: a potential excellent host for polyketide production. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Xue Y, Kong C, Shen W, Bai C, Ren Y, Zhou X, et al. Methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris as a chassis organism for polyketide synthesis via the full citrinin biosynthetic pathway. J Biotechnol. 2017;242:64–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu Y, Tu X, Xu Q, Bai C, Kong C, Liu Q, et al. Engineered monoculture and co-culture of methylotrophic yeast for de novo production of monacolin J and lovastatin from methanol. Metab Eng. 2018;45:189–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cai P, Wu X, Deng J, Gao L, Shen Y, Yao L, et al. Methanol biotransformation toward high-level production of fatty acid derivatives by engineering the industrial yeast Pichia pastoris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119:29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miao L, Li Y, Zhu T. Metabolic engineering of methylotrophic Pichia pastoris for the production of β-alanine. Bioresour Bioprocess. 2021;8:89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Werpy T, Petersen G. Top value added chemicals from biomass: Volume I — Results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas. Springfield (VA): US Department of Energy; 2004. Report No. DOE/GO-102004-1992.

  17. Bhagyashri P, Pratik M, Eswara P. Acrylic acid market by derivative type, and end-user: global opportunity analysis and industry forecast, 2021–2030. Allied Market Research; 2022. Report No. A00133. Accessed 8 Sept 2022.

  18. Jiang X, Meng X, Xian M. Biosynthetic pathways for 3-hydroxypropionic acid production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;82:995–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Maris AJAV, Konings WN, Dijken JPV, Pronk JT. Microbial export of lactic and 3-hydroxypropanoic acid: implications for industrial fermentation processes. Metab Eng. 2004;6:245–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar V, Ashok S, Park S. Recent advances in biological production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:945–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chu HS, Kim YS, Lee CM, Lee JH, Jung WS, Ahn JH, et al. Metabolic engineering of 3-hydroxypropionic acid biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:356–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. de Fouchécour F, Sánchez-Castañeda AK, Saulou-Bérion C, Spinnler HÉ. Process engineering for microbial production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36:1207–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rathnasingh C, Raj SM, Lee Y, Catherine C, Ashok S, Park S. Production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid via malonyl-CoA pathway using recombinant Escherichia coli strains. J Biotechnol. 2012;157:633–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu C, Wang Q, Xian M, Ding Y, Zhao G. Dissection of malonyl-coenzyme a reductase of Chloroflexus aurantiacus results in enzyme activity improvement. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(9):e75554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu C, Ding Y, Zhang R, Liu H, Xian M, Zhao G. Functional balance between enzymes in malonyl-CoA pathway for 3-hydroxypropionate biosynthesis. Metab Eng. 2016;34:104–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu B, Xiang S, Zhao G, Wang B, Ma Y, Liu W, et al. Efficient production of 3-hydroxypropionate from fatty acids feedstock in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2019;51:121–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen Y, Bao J, Kim IK, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Coupled incremental precursor and co-factor supply improves 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2014;22:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kildegaard KR, Wang Z, Chen Y, Nielsen J, Borodina I. Production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid from glucose and xylose by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng Commun. 2015;2:132–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Tong T, Tao Z, Chen X, Gao C, Liu H, Wang X, et al. A biosynthesis pathway for 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in genetically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Green Chem. 2021;23:4502–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Suyama A, Higuchi Y, Urushihara M, Maeda Y, Takegawa K. Production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid via the malonyl-CoA pathway using recombinant fission yeast strains. J Biosci Bioeng. 2017;124:392–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Takayama S, Ozaki A, Konishi R, Otomo C, Kishida M, Hirata Y, et al. Enhancing 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in combination with sugar supply engineering by cell surface-display and metabolic engineering of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17:176.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Fina A, Brêda GC, Pérez-Trujillo M, Freire DMG, Almeida RV, Albiol J, et al. Benchmarking recombinant Pichia pastoris for 3-hydroxypropionic acid production from glycerol. Microb Biotechnol. 2021;14:1671–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Fina A, Heux S, Albiol J, Ferrer P. Combining metabolic engineering and multiplexed screening methods for 3-hydroxyprionic acid production in Pichia pastoris. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:942304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu W, Cao X, Gao J, Zhou YJ. Overproduction of 3-hydroxypropionate in a super yeast chassis. Bioresour Technol. 2022;361:127690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Song CW, Kim JW, Cho IJ, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid and malonic acid through β-alanine route. ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5:1256–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lacmata ST, Kuiate JR, Ding Y, Xian M, Liu H, Boudjeko T, et al. Enhanced poly(3-hydroxypropionate) production via β-alanine pathway in recombinant Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:0173150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Borodina I, Kildegaard KR, Jensen NB, Blicher TH, Maury J, Sherstyk S, et al. Establishing a synthetic pathway for high-level production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via β-alanine. Metab Eng. 2015;27:57–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Liao HH, Gokarn RR, Gort SJ, Jessen HJ, Selifonova OV. Production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid using beta-alanine/pyruvate aminotransferase. Patent WO118719; 2005.

  39. Jessen H, Liao HH, Gort SJ, Selifonova OV. Beta-alanine/alpha-ketoglutarate aminotransferase for 3-hydroxypropionic acid production. Patent WO027742; 2008.

  40. Jessen H, Rush B, Huryta J, Mastel B, Berry A, Yaver D et al. Compositions and methods for 3-hydroxypropionic acid production. Patent WO074818; 2012.

  41. Lis AV, Schneider K, Weber J, Keasling JD, Jensen MK, Klein T. Exploring small-scale chemostats to scale up microbial processes: 3-hydroxypropionic acid production in S. cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18:50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Tomàs-Gamisans M, Ferrer P, Albiol J. Fine-tuning the P. pastoris iMT1026 genome-scale metabolic model for improved prediction of growth on methanol or glycerol as sole carbon sources. Microb Biotechnol. 2018;11:224–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Calzadiaz-Ramirez L, Calvó-Tusell C, Stoffel GMM, Lindner SN, Osuna S, Erb TJ, et al. In vivo selection for formate dehydrogenases with high efficiency and specificity toward NADP+. ACS Catal. 2020;10:7512–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Jordà J, Rojas H, Carnicer M, Wahl A, Ferrer P, Albiol J. Quantitative metabolomics and instationary 13C-metabolic flux analysis reveals impact of recombinant protein production on trehalose and energy metabolism in Pichia pastoris. Metabolites. 2014;4:281–99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Maurer M, Kühleitner M, Gasser B, Mattanovich D. Versatile modeling and optimization of fed batch processes for the production of secreted heterologous proteins with Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact. 2006;5:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Consortium TU. UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:523–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jensen NB, Strucko T, Kildegaard KR, David F, Maury J, Mortensen UH, et al. EasyClone: method for iterative chromosomal integration of multiple genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:238–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Yang YM, Chen WJ, Yang J, Zhou YM, Hu B, Zhang M, et al. Production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid in engineered Methylobacterium extorquens AM1 and its reassimilation through a reductive route. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16:179.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Mazzoli R. Current progress in production of building-block organic acids by consolidated bioprocessing of lignocellulose. Fermentation. 2021;7:248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Guo F, Qiao Y, Xin F, Zhang W, Jiang M. Bioconversion of C1 feedstocks for chemical production using Pichia pastoris. Trends Biotechnol. 2023;41:1066–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Becker SA, Feist AM, Mo ML, Hannum G, Palsson B, Herrgard MJ. Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA toolbox. Nat Protoc. 2007;2:727–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Liu Q, Shi X, Song L, Liu H, Zhou X, Wang Q, et al. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genomic multiloci integration in Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18:144.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Labun K, Montague TG, Gagnon JA, Thyme SB, Valen E. CHOPCHOP v2: a web tool for the next generation of CRISPR genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W272–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Yang Y, Liu G, Chen X, Liu M, Zhan C, Liu X, et al. High efficiency CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing system with an eliminable episomal sgRNA plasmid in Pichia pastoris. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2020;138:109556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sears IB, O’connor J, Rossanese OW, Glick BS. A versatile set of vectors for constitutive and regulated gene expression in Pichia pastoris. Yeast. 1998;14:783–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Garcia-Ortega X, Ferrer P, Montesinos JL, Valero F. Fed-batch operational strategies for recombinant fab production with Pichia pastoris using the constitutive GAP promoter. Biochem Eng J. 2013;79:172–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Nicholson JK, Foxall PJD, Spraul M, Farrant RD, Lindon JC. 750 MHz 1H and 1H-13C NMR spectroscopy of human blood plasma. Anal Chem. 1995;67:793–811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hoch JC, Baskaran K, Burr H, Chin J, Eghbalnia HR, Fujiwara T, et al. Biological magnetic resonance data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D368–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Ponte X, Montesinos-Seguí JL, Valero F. Bioprocess efficiency in Rhizopus oryzae lipase production by Pichia pastoris under the control of PAOX1 is oxygen tension dependent. Process Biochem. 2016;51:1954–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Barrigón JM, Montesinos JL, Valero F. Searching the best operational strategies for Rhizopus oryzae lipase production in Pichia pastoris mut+ phenotype: methanol limited or methanol non-limited fed-batch cultures? Biochem Eng J. 2013;75:47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Verheijen PJT. Data reconciliation and error detection. In: Smolke CD, editor. The metabolic pathway engineering handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2010. p. 81–13.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Noorman HJ, Rornein B, Ch M, Luyben KA, Heijnen JJ. Classification, error detection, and reconciliation of process information in complex biochemical systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996;49:364–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. van der Heijden RT, Heijnen JJ, Hellinga C, Romein B, Luyben KC. Linear constraint relations in biochemical reaction systems: I. Classification of the calculability and the balanceability of conversion rates. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;43:3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Albert Fina and Eric Antón for their assistance to perform MATLAB simulations.


This work was supported by project ‘innoVative bIo-based chains for CO2 VALorisation as aDded-value organic acids’—VIVALDI (ID: 101000441) from the Horizon 2020 Program of the European Commission; 2017-SGR-1462 and 2021-SGR-00143 from the Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (AGAUR) of the Catalan Government. SAC was supported with a FI scholarship (2022FI_B1_00173) from AGAUR.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SAC, JA, and PF conceived and designed the research project. SAC performed all experiments and analyzed the data. MPT performed the NMR analyses and metabolite identification. PF and JA contributed to data interpretation. SAC wrote the first draft of the manuscript and PF contributed to manuscript final version. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pau Ferrer.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Diagrams and stoichiometric balances of the malonyl-CoA and β-alanine pathways. Figure S1. Glucose, glycerol, and methanol metabolization to 3-HP via the two main metabolic pathways reported in yeast. Table S1. Stoichiometric analysis of the main metabolic pathways towards 3-HP using different carbon sources.

Additional file 2.

Raw data from the 24-deep well plate cultivations and cell growth kinetics experiments.

Additional file 3

. NMR spectra for PpCβ20, PpCβ21 and PpCβ21-P strains exometabolome. Figure S2. 1H NMR spectra of PpCβ20 strain supernatant samples at different times of the methanol-feeding phase. Figure S3.1H NMR spectra of PpCβ21 strain supernatant samples at different times of the methanol-feeding phase. Figure S4. 1H NMR spectra of PpCβ21-P strain supernatant samples at different times of the methanol-feeding phase.

Additional file 4.

Raw and processed data obtained from the bioreactor-scale experiments.

Additional file 5.

Molecular cloning materials and methods. Table S2. List of primers used for amplification and cloning of DNA parts, sgRNAs construction, and sequence verification of integrations.

Additional file 6

. Raw data of the online monitored standard process parameters.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Àvila-Cabré, S., Pérez-Trujillo, M., Albiol, J. et al. Engineering the synthetic β-alanine pathway in Komagataella phaffii for conversion of methanol into 3-hydroxypropionic acid. Microb Cell Fact 22, 237 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: