Skip to main content

Toward more efficient ergothioneine production using the fungal ergothioneine biosynthetic pathway



Ergothioneine (ERG) is a potent histidine-derived antioxidant that confers health-promoting effects. Only certain bacteria and fungi can biosynthesize ERG, but the ERG productivity in natural producers is low. ERG overproduction through genetic engineering represents an efficient and cost-effective manufacturing strategy.


Here, we showed that Trichoderma reesei can synthesize ERG during conidiogenesis and hyphal growth. Co-expression of two ERG biosynthesis genes (tregt1 and tregt2) from T. reesei enabled E. coli to generate 70.59 mg/L ERG at the shaking flask level after 48 h of whole-cell biocatalysis, whereas minor amounts of ERG were synthesized by the recombinant E. coli strain bearing only the tregt1 gene. By fed-batch fermentation, the extracellular ERG production reached 4.34 g/L after 143 h of cultivation in a 2-L jar fermenter, which is the highest level of ERG production reported thus far. Similarly, ERG synthesis also occurred in the E. coli strain engineered with the two well-characterized genes from N. crassa and the ERG productivity was up to 4.22 g/L after 143 h of cultivation under the above-mentioned conditions.


Our results showed that the overproduction of ERG in E. coli could be achieved through two-enzymatic steps, demonstrating high efficiency of the fungal ERG biosynthetic pathway. Meanwhile, this work offers a more promising approach for the industrial production of ERG.


Ergothioneine (ERG) is a thiol-containing histidine betaine derivative, that protects cells against oxidative damage caused by excess reactive oxygen species (ROS). Uniquely, ERG exists predominately in the thione tautomer at physiological pH [1] and possesses relatively high reduction potential (−60 mV), making it more stable and resistant to autooxidation than other thiol-containing antioxidants such as glutathione [2]. As a powerful antioxidant and cytoprotectant, ERG has been suggested to confer effective and beneficial roles on human health, such as anti-inflammation [3], anti-ageing [4], and antidepressant properties and the ability to prevent ultraviolet damage [5,6,7]. Recently, ERG has been assessed as safe to use in the food and cosmetics industries [8,9,10], which will increase the market demand for ERG and exploration of methods to produce ERG [11].

ERG biosynthesis occurs only in certain bacteria and fungi, typically actinobacteria [12], cyanobacteria [13], methylobacteria [14], and various fungi including Neurospora crassa [15], the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe [16] and basidiomycetes mushrooms [17], but not in plants and animals. Cultivation or fermentation of natural ERG producers such as mushrooms, is an important commercial ERG production method. However, this method, which relies heavily on natural producers, has inherent deficiencies, such as low productivity and a long culture period [18], which leads to a limited ERG supply and high production costs. As such, an alternative and cost-effective approach to produce ERG is desired. With the characterization of ERG biosynthetic pathways in bacteria [19, 20] and fungi [15, 16], more interest has shifted to the fermentation production strategy using a microorganism overexpressing ERG biosynthetic genes. For non-ERG producers, bioproduction of ERG has been achieved through introducing the ERG biosynthetic gene cluster from Mycobacterium smegmatis into E. coli [21], engineering S. cerevisiae with the Grifola frondosa egt1/egt2 genes [22] or with the combined use of N. crassa egt1 and Claviceps purpurea egt2 [23]. Of note, high production of ERG (1.31 g/L) was achieved in E. coli after 216 h in a 3-L jar fermenter by expressing five ERG biosynthetic genes (egtABCDE) from M. smegmatis, enhancing l-cysteine (l-Cys) production, knocking out metJ and optimizing the fermentation medium [24]. Likewise, recombinant expression of ERG biosynthetic genes has substantially increased the ERG productivity of natural ERG producers such as S. pombe [16] and Aspergillus oryzae [25]. Therefore, this approach represents an efficient and cost-effective means for the industrial production of ERG [21]. However, the output of ERG is still relatively low, resulting in insufficient supply of ERG and high price. Sequence-based phylogenies of the key genes (egtB, egtD in M. smegmatis and egt1 in N. crassa) revealed that there are far more bacterial species and fungal phyla capable of producing ERG than the number of ERG-producing microorganisms discovered thus far [12]. Exploring the potential of these microorganisms may be the key toward high-level ERG production, particularly for the fungal ERG biosynthetic pathway represented by N. crassa that requires only two genes and may be more effective in ERG biosynthesis. Until now, only a few fungal ERG biosynthesis genes have been characterized, and in terms of the ERG productivity, their potential does not seem to be fully realized in the fungal systems reported previously [22, 25]. Hence, it will be a valuable attempt to investigate the efficiency of various fungal ERG biosynthesis genes of synthesizing ERG in bacterial systems like E. coli that is a model microorganism commonly used for synthetic biology and industrial applications.

The filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei is the workhorse for the industrial production of lignocellulolytic enzymes [26, 27]. Moreover, T. reesei is an attractive host for the production of recombinant proteins due to its extraordinary ability to secrete proteins and its (GRAS) Generally Regarded as Safe status approved by the US Food and Drug Administration [28,29,30]. Although the physiological roles of ERG in T. reesei remain unknown, the presence of putative ERG biosynthetic genes raises the possibility that T. reesei has the potential to produce ERG.

Here, we determined that T. reesei can synthesize ERG. Through heterologous expression in E. coli, we examined the role of the two putative ERG biosynthesis genes from T. reesei and investigated the possibility of synthesizing ERG in E. coli using the fungal ERG biosynthetic genes from T. reesei and N. crassa. Our research showed that high-level of ERG production in E. coli can be achieved by using only two genes from fungi. This work offers a more practical and promising approach for the industrial production of ERG.

Results and discussion

Cloning of ERG biosynthesis genes from T. reesei

Prior to cloning the ERG biosynthesis genes, we extracted ERG from the conidia and mycelia to determine whether T. reesei has evolved the ability to synthesize ERG. HPLC analysis showed that the extracted samples displayed a predominant peak at a retention time of 10–10.5 min, which was the same as that of the ERG standard (Fig. 1). The predominant peak was further confirmed by LC–MS analysis (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). These results clearly demonstrated that T. reesei can synthesize ERG, which provides a basis for cloning of functional ERG biosynthetic genes in T. reesei.

Fig. 1
figure 1

HPLC analysis of ERG content of T. reesei conidia and mycelia. “ERG” indicates the ERG standards (50 mg/L)

BLASTP search with N. crassa Ncegt1 ((NCBI Reference Sequence: XP_956324) and Ncegt2 (NCBI Reference Sequence: XP_001728131) as query sequences revealed that two hypothetical proteins designated Tregt1 (NCBI Reference Sequence: XP_006968620) and Tregt2 (NCBI Reference Sequence: XP_006968735), respectively, were probably involved in ERG biosynthesis in T. reesei. The coding sequences of the cloned tregt1 and tregt2 genes were 2502 bp and 1413 bp (Additional file 1: Data S1, S2), respectively. Tregt1 (Additional file 1: Data S3) shared 61.28% (97% coverage) amino acid sequence identity with Ncegt1 and contained an S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferase domain, a DinB_2 domain, and a sulfoxide synthase domain (Fig. 2A), implying that Tregt1 may catalyze the first two steps of the ERG biosynthetic pathway.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The biosynthetic pathway of ergothioneine (ERG) and the domain prediction of Tregt1 and Tregt2. A Conserved domain predictions of Tregt1 (NCBI Reference Sequence: XP_006968620) and Tregt2 (NCBI Reference Sequence: XP_006968735) from T. reesei. B The biosynthetic pathway of ERG in Neurospora crassa (solid arrow) and Mycobacterium smegmatis (dashed arrow). The ERG biosynthesis in N. crassa requires only two main enzymes (Egt1 and Egt2) while in M. smegmatis, a gene cluster egtABCDE is responsible for ERG biosynthesis. Egt1 is a bifunctional enzyme that catalyzes the first two steps: the addition of three methyl groups in l-histidine to form hercynine, and the formation of C–S bond between l-cysteine (l-Cys) and hercynine to form hercynylcysteine sulfoxide. M. smegmatis sulfoxide synthase utilizes γ-glutamylcysteine (γGC) but not cysteine as sulfur donor. l-Met, l-methionine; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; l-Cys, l-cysteine; l-Glu, l-glutamic acid

Tregt2 (Additional file 1: Data S4), a putative selenocysteine lyase-like protein, displayed 53.77% homology (98% coverage) with NcEgt2 and included the pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-dependent cysteine desulfurase domain present in Ncegt2 that catalyzes the conversion of hercynylcysteine sulfoxide to ergothioneine by cleaving the C–S bond. It is probably that like N. crassa [15], T. reesei synthesizes ERG through two enzymes instead of five-enzymatic catalysis for ERG biosynthesis in M. smegmatis [19] (Fig. 2B).

ERG biosynthesis by a whole-cell biocatalyst

To test whether Tregt1 and Tregt2 have the ability to convert l-histidine into ERG, we constructed recombinant E. coli strains harbouring the expression plasmids pBAD, pBAD-tregt1, pBAD-tregt2, and pBAD-tregt1-tregt2(Fig. 3A). After 48 h of whole-cell biocatalyst reaction, the strain bearing pBAD-tregt1-tregt2 produced 70.59 mg/L extracellular ERG. However, ERG was not detected from the strain with pBAD-tregt2 (Fig. 3B), although tregt2 was successfully expressed in this recombinant E. coli strain (Fig. 3C). Of note, the strain with pBAD-tregt1 was able to synthesize ERG, although its production was lower than that of recombinant strain co-expressing tregt1 and tregt2, suggesting that functions of Tregt2 may be performed by other yet unknown enzymes with weak cleavage activity of hercynylcysteine sulfoxide, which was also observed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [22].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Plasmid profiles, protein expression and ERG biosynthesis. A Schematic drawing of plasmids expressing tregt1 and/or tregt2 used for transforming E. coil BW25113. B The production of ERG by 48-h whole cell catalysis using the recombinant strains BW-tregt1, BW-tregt2 and BW-tregt1-tregt2. Data in the figure are mean values (n = 3 biological replicates). C Detection of Tregt1 and/or Tregt2 expression in recombinant E. coli by SDS-PAGE. M. Protein marker; 1. BW-pBAD (control); 2. BW-tregt1; 3. BW-tregt2; 4. BW-tregt1-tregt2

To test whether ERG biosynthesis in E. coli can also be achieved by using two genes from other fungi, we constructed the recombinant E. coli strain bearing egt1 and egt2 genes from N. crassa. Similarly, we found that the co-expression of egt1 and egt2 from N. crassa also enabled E. coli to produce ERG (Additional file 1: Fig.S2), showing that it is practical to synthesize ERG in E. coli only using two genes originating from fungi.

ERG production by high-cell-density fermentation

To evaluate the potential of the recombinant E. coli strain co-expressing tregt1 and tregt2 for the industrial production of ERG, we performed high-cell-density fermentation in a 2-L jar fermenter with the fed-batch strategy. During the whole fermentation process, the recombinant strain grew well, and the OD600 of the cultures reached 105 at 60 h and 130 at 130 h. Extracellular ERG was detected at 30 h and continued to increase until 143 h, with the concentrations of ERG in the supernatant of 0.89 g/L at 48 h, 1.43 g/L at 72 h, 2.91 g/L at 94 h and 4.34 g/L at 143 h (Fig. 4A), which is the highest ERG production level reported thus far. Similarly, high level of ERG production (4.22 g/L) was achieved in the E. coli strain bearing the two genes responsible for N. crassa ERG biosynthesis (Fig. 4B). In addition to the contribution of the fermentation conditions to ERG production, another important reason for the high yield of ERG is probably due to the utilization of the genes associated with the fungal ERG biosynthesis. Compared to that from M. smegmatis, the fungal ERG biosynthetic pathway represented by N. crassa is more effective since it requires only two genes and l-Cys rather than γ-glutamylcysteine (γGC) as a sulfur donor, which facilitates hercynylcysteine sulfoxide synthesis and avoids competition with the glutathione synthesis pathway [15, 19]. From our results, the effectiveness of the fungal ERG synthesis pathway can be achieved not only in fungi but also in bacteria; therefore, it is practical to overproduce ERG through heterologous expression of ERG biosynthetic genes from fungi in E. coli. To maximize the ERG productivity of the recombinant strain, we will conduct closer inspection of the gene expression level, intermediate product accumulation, ERG precursor supply and proportion, and further optimizations will be made.

Fig. 4
figure 4

ERG production of the recombinant strains in a 2-L jar fermenter. The production of ERG using the recombinant strains BW-tregt1-tregt2 A and BW-ncegt1-ncegt2 B during high-cell-density fermentation. Data in the figure are mean values (n = 3 biological replicates)


Here, we demonstrated that T. reesei can synthesize ERG. By bioinformatics analysis and reconstruction of the T. reesei ERG synthetic pathway in E. coli, we found that ERG biosynthesis in E. coli can be achieved by using only two genes from T. reesei, with Tregt1 being the key enzyme in this process. In addition, the recombinant E. coli strain co-expressing egt1 and egt2 genes from N. crassa also can synthesize ERG. Through fed-batch cultivation, the highest level of ERG production was achieved after 143 h of cultivation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to overproduce ERG in E. coli with fungal biosynthetic genes.

Materials and methods

Strains and media

Trichoderma reesei strain QM9414 (ATCC 26,921) was cultivated on potato dextrose agar (PDA) or in liquid minimal medium (MM) with 5 g/L glucose and 40 g/L lactose as the carbon source. MM without peptone was prepared as described previously [31]. E. coli strain Trans1-T1 (TransGen Biotech, China) was used for standard cloning. E. coli K12/BW25113 (rrnB3 ΔlacZ4787 hsdR514Δ(araBAD)567 Δ(rhaBAD)568 rph-1) [32] was used as the host strain for the heterologous expression of ERG biosynthetic genes from T. reesei and ERG production. Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl) and ZYM auto-induction medium [33] was used to grow E. coli cells and to express enzyme, respectively. A defined medium (DM) was used for whole-cell biocatalysis and fed-batch fermentation, which contained (per L) 10 g of glucose, 8 g of (NH4)2HPO4, 13.3 g of KH2PO4, 1.2 g of MgSO4·7H2O, 1.7 g of citric acid and 10 mL of a trace metal solution. The trace metal solution (per litre of 5 M HCl) consisted of 10 g of FeSO4·7H2O, 2.25 g of ZnSO4·7H2O, 1 g of CuSO4·5H2O, 0.5 g of MnSO4·5H2O, 0.23 g of Na2B4O7·10H2O, 2 g of CaCl2·2H2O and 0.1 g of (NH4)6Mo7O24. When necessary, the antibiotic ampicillin (100 mg/L)or the inducer L-arabinose (2 g/L) was added.

Extraction of ERG from T. reesei

Trichoderma reesei QM9414 was cultivated on PDA at 28 ℃ for 10 days, and then the conidia were suspended in 1.1 M sorbitol solution and centrifuged at 13,300 rpm for 3 min. The lower conidia pellet was frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground into a powder. After that, the conidial powder was added to an 85% methanol solution and vortexed for 1 min, and the suspension was centrifuged at 13,300 rpm for 3 min. The supernatant was collected and diluted tenfold with 70% acetonitrile solution, and then filtered through a 0.22 μm filter for ERG detection.

The conidia of T. reesei QM9414 were inoculated into liquid MM containing 0.5% (w/v) glucose and 4% (w/v) lactose and cultivated on a rotary shaker (200 rpm) at 28 ℃ for 6 days, and the mycelia were collected to extract ERG. The method of extracting ERG from mycelium was the same as that for the conidia.

Construction of the recombinant BW25113 strains

The expression vectors were constructed with the plasmid pBAD/His (Invitrogen, USA) as the backbone, which includes the pBR322 origin, araBAD promoter induced by arabinose and rrnB terminator. Primer pairs FpBAD/RpBAD were designed to amplify plasmid pBAD/His to obtain linearized pBAD/His for subsequent vector construction.

The entire open reading frame of the tregt1 and tregt2 genes were amplified using the primer pairs Ftregt1/Rtregt1 or Ftregt2/Rtregt2 with T. reesei QM9414 cDNA [34] as a template. The amplified tregt1 or tregt2 products were ligated with linearized pBAD/His through a Clone Express® MultiS One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co, China) and then transformed into E. coli Trans1-T1 for cloning and sequencing. The resulting plasmids pBAD-tregt1 and pBAD-tregt2, in which tregt1 or tregt2 was under the control of the araBAD promoter and rrnB terminator, was used to transform BW25113 to obtain the recombinant strains BW-tregt1 and BW-tregt2. To construct the recombined E. coli strain co-expressing tregt1 and tregt2, the T7 RBS sequence (tgtttaactttaagaaggagatatacc) was used to link the two genes. Briefly, primer pairs Ftregt1/RpBAD-tregt1 were designed to amplify the plasmid pBAD-tregt1 to obtain linearized pBAD-tregt1 with the T7 RBS sequence attached to the 3′ end of tregt1. Additionally, tregt2 with the T7 RBS sequence at its 5′ end was amplified by PCR using the plasmid pBAD-tregt2 as template and the primer pairs FpBAD-tregt2/Rtregt2. Subsequently, plasmid pBAD-tregt1-tregt2 was constructed by ligating T7 RBS-containing tregt2 to pBAD-tregt1 harbouring T7 RBS, which was transformed into BW25113 to create the recombinant strain BW-tregt1-tregt2.

We adopted the same strategy to construct the expression plasmid pBAD-ncegt1-ncegt2 harbouring egt1 (XM_951231) and egt2 (XM_001728079.2)responsible for ERG biosynthesis in N. crassa, except that the entire open reading frames of the two genes were synthesized by Tsingke Biotechnology Co., Ltd (China). The resulting plasmid (Additional file 1: Fig.S2A) was transformed into BW25113 to obtain recombinant E. coli strain BW-ncegt1-ncegt2, in which ncegt1 and ncegt2 were also successfully expressed (Additional file 1: Fig.S2C).

All primers used in this study are listed in Table S1 in additional file 1.

Protein expression and identification

BW25113 and the engineered strains derived from it were cultivated in LB medium with ampicillin at 37 ℃ on a rotary shaker (200 rpm) until the optical density of the cultures at 600 nm reached 0.6. Expression was induced by the addition of arabinose at a final concentration of 0.2% (w/v). After 24 h of induction at 30 ℃ and 200 rpm, the cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). The cell suspension was sonicated and centrifuged (12,000×g, 10 min). The supernatant was used for SDS-PAGE analysis.

Whole-cell catalysis conditions

BW25113 and the engineered strains derived from it were grown in LB medium overnight at 37 ℃ on a rotary shaker (200 rpm). Five hundred microliter of the overnight cultures were inoculated into 50 mL of ZYM auto-induction medium containing 2 g/L of arabinose. After 24 h of induction at 30 ℃ and 200 rpm, the cell cultures were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 5 min. The resulting cell pellets were resuspended in the reaction mixture (100 mM PBS, 50 mM glucose, 1 g/L l-histidine, 1 g/L l-methionine, 1 g/L L-cysteine, 20 mg/L FeSO4·7H2O, pH 7.0) to form a cell suspension (OD600 = 10). The whole-cell catalysis reaction was conducted in a 100-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 30 mL of cell suspension on a rotary shaker (200 rpm) at 30 ℃ for 48 h. The extracellular and intracellular ERG content was subjected to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis.

Fed-batch cultivation

Precultures of the recombinant strains co-expressing egt1 and egt2 from T. reesei and N. crassa were prepared with ampicillin-containing LB medium in Erlenmeyer flasks at 37 °C at 200 rpm overnight. One hundred millilitres of the precultures were transferred into 900 mL of DM in 2-L jar fermenter, and cultivation was continued at 37 ℃, agitated with turbine impellers. When the OD600 of the cultures reached 30 (approximately 12 h), the inducer l-arabinose was added at a final concentration of 0.2%(w/v) to induce the expression of egt1 and egt2 at 30 ℃ with mixing for 12 h. After that, the amino acid mixture (40 g/L of each l-histidine, l-methionine and l-cysteine), which are the precursors of ERG biosynthesis, was constantly fed at a flow rate of 4 mL/h/L. During the whole fermentation, feeding solution (50% glucose, w/v) was periodically added after glucose depletion. The dissolved oxygen was kept above 20% air saturation by adjusting the agitation intensity and aeration rate. The pH was maintained at approximately 7.0 by automatic addition of 2.7 M ammonia solution or 1 M H3PO4. At the indicated time points, the cell cultures were sampled and used to detect extracellular ERG and E. coli growth as indicated by the optical density at 600 nm (OD600).

HPLC analysis of ERG

ERG samples were diluted tenfold with a 70% acetonitrile solution. ERG standards (Std) were dissolved in a 70% acetonitrile solution. HPLC (Agilent 1200 infinity series 1260, Agilent Technologies) was performed with an Agilent ZORBAX NH2 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm). A mobile phase of acetonitrile/deionized water (70:30, v/v) was used at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The produced ERG was detected at 254 nm and identified by comparison with the retention time of the analytical ERG standard (Sigma). Quantification was conducted by dividing the slope of the standard curves by the peak area.

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis of ERG

HPLC-purified ERG was identified by LC–MS (Agilent 1260/6460LC/Triple Quadrupole MS, Agilent Technologies) with Agilent ZORBAX NH2 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm). Analysis was performed with a mobile phase of acetonitrile/4 mmol/L ammonium acetate (70:30, v/v).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its additional files.





Potato dextrose agar


Minimal medium


Defined medium


High performance liquid chromatography


Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry


  1. Stanovnik B, Tisler M. Dissociation constants and structure of ergothioneine. Anal Biochem. 1964;9:68–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Franzoni F, Colognato R, Galetta F, Laurenza I, Barsotti M, Di Stefano R, Bocchetti R, Regoli F, Carpi A, Balbarini A, et al. An in vitro study on the free radical scavenging capacity of ergothioneine: comparison with reduced glutathione, uric acid and trolox. Biomed Pharmacother. 2006;60:453–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheah IK, Halliwell B. Could ergothioneine aid in the treatment of coronavirus patients? Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;9:595.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Onofrio N, Servillo L, Giovane A, Casale R, Vitiello M, Marfella R, Paolisso G, Balestrieri ML. Ergothioneine oxidation in the protection against high-glucose induced endothelial senescence: Involvement of SIRT1 and SIRT6. Free Radic Biol Med. 2016;96:211–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakamichi N, Nakayama K, Ishimoto T, Masuo Y, Wakayama T, Sekiguchi H, Sutoh K, Usumi K, Iseki S, Kato Y. Food-derived hydrophilic antioxidant ergothioneine is distributed to the brain and exerts antidepressant effect in mice. Brain Behav. 2016;6: e00477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borodina I, Kenny LC, McCarthy CM, Paramasivan K, Pretorius E, Roberts TJ, van der Hoek SA, Kell DB. The biology of ergothioneine, an antioxidant nutraceutical. Nutr Res Rev. 2020;33:190–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hseu YC, Vudhya Gowrisankar Y, Chen XZ, Yang YC, Yang HL. The antiaging activity of ergothioneine in UVA-irradiated human dermal fibroblasts via the inhibition of the AP-1 pathway and the activation of Nrf2-mediated antioxidant genes. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:2576823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. National Medical Products Administration: Cosmetic raw materials approval in China. 2014. Accessed 30 Jun 2014.

  9. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies(NDA), Turck D, Bresson JL, Burlingame B, Dean T, Fairweather-Tait S, Heinonen M, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Mangelsdorf I, et al. Safety of synthetic l-ergothioneine (Ergoneine®) as a novel food pursuant to regulation (EC) No 258/97. EFSA J. 2016;14:4629.

    Google Scholar 

  10. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies(NDA), Turck D, Bresson JL, Burlingame B, Dean T, Fairweather-Tait S, Heinonen M, Hirsch-Ernst KI, Mangelsdorf I, et al. Statement on the safety of synthetic L-ergothioneine as a novel food - supplementary dietary exposure and safety assessment for infants and young children, pregnant and breastfeeding women. EFSA J. 2017;15:e05060.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Aruoma OI, Coles LS, Landes B, Repine JE. Functional benefits of ergothioneine and fruit- and vegetable-derived nutraceuticals: overview of the supplemental issue contents. Prev Med. 2012;54:S4-8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones GW, Doyle S, Fitzpatrick DA. The evolutionary history of the genes involved in the biosynthesis of the antioxidant ergothioneine. Gene. 2014;549:161–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pfeiffer C, Bauer T, Surek B, Schömig E, Gründemann D. Cyanobacteria produce high levels of ergothioneine. Food Chem. 2011;129:1766–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fujitani Y, Alamgir KM, Tani A. Ergothioneine production using Methylobacterium species, yeast, and fungi. J Biosci Bioeng. 2018;126:715–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bello MH, Barrera-Perez V, Morin D, Epstein L. The Neurospora crassa mutant NcEgt-1 identifies an ergothioneine biosynthetic gene and demonstrates that ergothioneine enhances conidial survival and protects against peroxide toxicity during conidial germination. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49:160–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pluskal T, Ueno M, Yanagida M. Genetic and metabolomic dissection of the ergothioneine and selenoneine biosynthetic pathway in the fission yeast, S. pombe, and construction of an overproduction system. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen SY, Ho KJ, Hsieh YJ, Wang LT, Mau JL. Contents of lovastatin, γ-aminobutyric acid and ergothioneine in mushroom fruiting bodies and mycelia. LWT- Food Sci Technol. 2012;47:274–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang CH, Huang LY, Ho KJ, Lin SY, Mau JL. Submerged cultivation of mycelium with high ergothioneine content from the culinary-medicinal king oyster mushroom Pleurotus eryngii (higher basidiomycetes) and its composition. Int J Med Mushrooms. 2013;15:153–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Seebeck FP. In vitro reconstitution of Mycobacterial ergothioneine biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132:6632–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Burn R, Misson L, Meury M, Seebeck FP. Anaerobic origin of ergothioneine. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:12508–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Osawa R, Kamide T, Satoh Y, Kawano Y, Ohtsu I, Dairi T. Heterologous and high production of ergothioneine in Escherichia coli. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66:1191–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu YH, Pan HY, Guo LQ, Lin JF, Liao HL, Li HY. Successful biosynthesis of natural antioxidant ergothioneine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae required only two genes from Grifola frondosa. Microb Cell Fact. 2020;19:164.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van der Hoek SA, Darbani B, Zugaj KE, Prabhala BK, Biron MB, Randelovic M, Medina JB, Kell DB, Borodina I. Engineering the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of L-(+)-ergothioneine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tanaka N, Kawano Y, Satoh Y, Dairi T, Ohtsu I. Gram-scale fermentative production of ergothioneine driven by overproduction of cysteine in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Takusagawa S, Satoh Y, Ohtsu I, Dairi T. Ergothioneine production with Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2019;83:181–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Seiboth B, Ivanova C, Seidl-Seiboth V. Trichoderma reesei A fungal enzyme producer for cellulosic biofuels. In: Production-Recent Biofuel, editor. Bernardes DMADS Developments and Prospects. Klosterneuburg: in Tech; 2011. p. 309–40.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bischof RH, Ramoni J, Seiboth B. Cellulases and beyond: the first 70 years of the enzyme producer Trichoderma reesei. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nevalainen H, Suominen P, Taimisto K. On the safety of Trichoderna reesei. J Biotechnol. 1994;37:193–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Punt PJ, van Biezen N, Conesa A, Albers A, Mangnus J, van den Hondel C. Filamentous fungi as cell factories for heterologous protein production. Trends Biotechnol. 2002;20:200–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Ramoni J, Seidl-Seiboth V, Bischof RH. Gene expression systems in fungi: advancements and applications. London: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ilmen M, Saloheimo A, Onnela ML, Penttila ME. Regulation of cellulase gene expression in the filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1298–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Baba T, Ara T, Hasegawa M, Takai Y, Okumura Y, Baba M, Datsenko KA, Tomita M, Wanner BL, Mori H. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2006(2):0008.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Studier FW. Protein production by auto-induction in high density shaking cultures. Protein Expr Purif. 2005;41:207–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen XZ, Luo YF, Yu HT, Sun YH, Wu H, Song SH, Hu SN, Dong ZY. Transcriptional profiling of biomass degradation-related genes during Trichoderma reesei growth on different carbon sources. J Biotechnol. 2014;173:59–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Guomin Ai (Public Technology Service Center, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for his technical support in LC-MS analysis. We also thank Yanfeng Zhang and Hanlin Cai for their valuable comments to this research.


This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30970073), the Program of China Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association (DY135-B2-02) and the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0310703).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



XZC and ZHC conceived the project and designed the experiments. ZHC, YZH and XYW performed the experiments. XZC and ZHC analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. LW prepared the Additional file 1: Figure S1. ZYD provided resources and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhiyang Dong or Xiuzhen Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file1: Table S1

Primers used in this study. Fig. S1 LC-MS analysis of ERG. A ERG standards (10 ppm); B the ERG sample extracted from mycelia. Fig. S2 Plasmid profiles, protein expression and ERG production of BW-ncget1-ncegt2. A Schematic drawing of plasmids expressing Ncegt1 and Ncegt2 used in E. coil BW25113 transformation. B The production of ERG by 48-hour whole cell catalysis using the recombinant strains BW-ncegt1-ncegt2. Data in the figure are mean values (n = 3 biological replicates). C Detection of Ncegt1 and Ncegt2 expression in recombinant E. coli by SDS-PAGE. M. Protein marker; 1. BW-pBAD (control); 2. BW-ncegt1-ncegt2. Data S1 Nucleotide sequences of tregt1 from T. reesei (2502 bp). Data S2 Nucleotide sequences of tregt2 from T. reesei (1413 bp). Data S3 Amino acid sequences of Tregt1 from T. reesei (833 aa). Data S4 Amino acid sequences of Tregt2 from T. reesei (470 aa).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., He, Y., Wu, X. et al. Toward more efficient ergothioneine production using the fungal ergothioneine biosynthetic pathway. Microb Cell Fact 21, 76 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Ergothioneine
  • Biosynthesis
  • Heterologous expression
  • Trichoderma reesei
  • Neurospora crassa
  • Escherichia coli