Skip to main content

Enhancement of Monascus yellow pigments production by activating the cAMP signalling pathway in Monascus purpureus HJ11

Abstract

Background

Monascus azaphilone pigments (MonAzPs), which were produced by Monascus species, have been used as important food colorant and food supplements for more than one billion people during their daily life. Moreover, MonAzPs recently have received more attention because of their diverse physiological activities. However, the high microbial production of MonAzPs is still not always guaranteed. Herein, the aim of this study was to develop an efficient biotechnological process for MonAzPs production.

Results

In this study, exogenous cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) treatment not only induced MonAzPs production, but also stimulated the expression of a cAMP phosphodiesterase gene, named as mrPDE, in M. purpureus HJ11. Subsequently, MrPDE was identified as a cAMP phosphodiesterase by in vitro enzymatic reaction with purified enzyme. Further, a gene knockout mutant of mrPDE was constructed to verify the activation of cAMP signalling pathway. Deletion of mrPDE in M. purpureus HJ11 improved cAMP concentration by 378% and enhanced PKA kinase activity 1.5-fold, indicating that activation of cAMP signalling pathway was achieved. The ΔmrPDE strain produced MonAzPs at 8563 U/g, with a 2.3-fold increase compared with the WT strain. Moreover, the NAPDH/NADP+ ratio of the ΔmrPDE strain was obviously higher than that of the wild type strain, which led to a higher proportion of yellow MonAzPs. With fed-batch fermentation of the ΔmrPDE strain, the production and yield of MonAzPs achieved 332.1 U/mL and 8739 U/g.

Conclusions

A engineered M. purpureus strain for high MonAzPs production was successfully developed by activating the cAMP signalling pathway. This study not only describes a novel strategy for development of MonAzPs-producing strain, but also provides a roadmap for engineering efforts towards the production of secondary metabolism in other filamentous fungi.

Background

Monascus azaphilone pigments (MonAzPs) are large group of secondary metabolites produced via polyketide biosynthesis mainly by Monascus spp. strains [1, 2]. MonAzPs have been generally classified into yellow, orange, and red pigment subclasses on the basis of color [3, 4]. MonAzPs have been extensively used as natural food coloring agents and food supplements for more than one billion people [5, 6]. These pigments have also been found to exhibit a wide range of biological activities, such as anti-cancer, anti-inflammation, and anti-obesity [7,8,9].

The annual MonAzPs production has been estimated to exceed 20,000 metric tons in China alone [6]. Many approaches have been applied for improvement of MonAzPs production, such as mutation breeding, process control, genetic engineering and extraction fermentation [10,11,12,13,14]. Among them, the Monascus kaoliang mutation strain produced azaphilone derivatives, such as monascusones A and B, with potential application in sunscreen cosmetics [10]. The highest MonAzPs production was achieved with 211 U/mL using a mutant M. purpureus strain M183 in liquid-state (submerged) fermentation [15]. However, these microbial productions of MonAzPs still do not fully meet the demand for cost-effective production.

The cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is a second messenger in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells [16]. cAMP was produced by adenylyl cyclase (AC) with ATP as substrate [17]. The concentrations of cAMP in microbial cells directly governed the activity of protein kinase A (PKA) and indirectly modulated metabolic and transcriptional processes (Fig. 1) [18,19,20]. The cAMP-PKA pathway is important for various growth and developmental processes in different fungi [21]. Furthermore, cAMP signalling has been implicated in regulating secondary metabolisms in several fungi, including Fusarium graminearum and Aspergillus species [22, 23]. It has been reported that MonAzPs production in M. ruber M7 was improved by addition of exogenous cAMP to the culture medium [24].

Fig. 1
figure1

Regulation of cAMP signalling pathway on the MonAzPs biosynthesis in engineered M. purpureus HJ11. The concentration of cAMP was negatively regulated by MrPDE. PKA, which was activated by cAMP, modulated the expression of MonAzPs biosynthetic gene cluster indirectly. The enzymes from cluster produced MonAzPs. cAMP, cyclic adenosine monophosphate; PKA, protein kinase A; CA, adenylate cyclase

In cAMP metabolism, it is rapidly and continuously converted into adenosine 5′ monophosphate (5′-AMP) by cAMP phosphodiesterases (PDEs) [25]. Reduction or elimination of PDE activity could improve cAMP concentration, which led to regulation of secondary metabolites (SMs) biosynthesis [26, 27]. PDE-knockout mutant of Aspergillus flavus CA14PTs exhibited twofold higher cAMP level and SM aflatoxin production [28]. In F. graminearum, Pde2 was found to be the major PDE responsible for negative regulation of deoxynivalenol production [23]. On the basis of these literatures, it was speculated that knockout of PDE gene in Monascus spp. might improve MonAzPs production by increasing cAMP concentration (Fig. 1). However, the PDE gene and its regulation on cAMP in Monascus spp. is still unknown.

In this study, a novel PDE gene, mrPDE, from M. purpureus strain HJ11 was identified by in vitro reaction. Then, the mrPDE gene knockout strain was constructed by genetic engineering. The cAMP concentration of ΔmrPDE strain significantly increased, which resulted in a significant improvement of MonAzPs production. Further, a high MonAzPs production was achieved by fed-batch fermentation. This study could provide a new insight for development of efficient MonAzPs-producing strain.

Methods

Strains and plasmids

Monascus purpureus strain HJ11 was isolated from rice wine starter and preserved in our laboratory. Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) was used as gene expression host. M. purpureus HJ11 strain was co-incubated with Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105, containing recombinant pCAMBIA3300, to obtain deletion mutants. pCAMBIA3300 vector was used as deletion vector and pET30a(+) was used as heterologous gene expression in E. coli BL21 (DE3).

Flask cultivation

Monascus purpureus strains were pre-cultured in 10 mL of glucose mineral salt (GM) medium at 30 °C, 120 rpm for 5 days to obtain the seed culture (GM medium in g/L: glucose 30, (NH4)2SO4 5, KH2PO4 5, Na2HPO4 3, MgSO4 0.1, CaCl2 0.1, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.1, FeSO4·7H2O 0.1, CoSO4·7H2O 0.05, CuSO4·5H2O 0.02, and MnSO4·H2O 0.01). The seed culture was inoculated in 50 mL of GM medium in 250-mL flasks and incubated under same condition for 10 days. When needed, sterile cAMP powder was added to culture medium. The sterile AMP was prepared as following: the cAMP powder (Sigma, Shanghai, China) was dissolved in dd H2O to 25 mM, and filtered with sterile 0.22 μm membrane filter for removing microorganism, and then the resulting solution was lyophilized to obtain sterile cAMP powder. The collected mycelia were dried to a constant weight at 80 °C to determine DCW.

The fermentation in rice medium was performed as following: 20 g rice (pre-immersed for 2 h in water at 30 °C), and 50 mL water were put into a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask, and mixed well. After sterilization at 121 °C for 20 min, 3 mL spore solution (2 × 105/mL) was inoculated, and then incubated at 30 °C for 5–7 days. The spore solution was prepared by washing the mycelium, pre-cultivated on agar for 7 days, with Tween-80 solution (0.5%). The fermented rice was dried to a constant weight at 80 °C and analyzed for pigments.

Heterologous expression and purification of MrPDE

RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were performed according to our previous study [29]. The mrPDE gene fragment, Monpu1|448456|e_gw1.142.20.1 (ID number of the JGI database), was cloned from cDNA with specificd esigned primers using PCR reaction. The mrPDE DNA fragment and vector pET30a(+) were digested by endonucleases EcoRI and HindIII, respectively. The recombinant vector pET30a(+)-mrPDE was constructed with T4 DNA ligase and used for expression of mrPDE. All sequences were confirmed by DNA sequencing. The recombinant vector pET30a(+)-mrPDE was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) for expression. The resultant E. coli strain was inoculated in 100 mL LB medium, containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin, in 500-mL flask and incubated at 37 °C and 200 rpm. Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to the medium at a final concentration of 0.5 mM, when the optical density of culture reached 0.6–1.0 at 600 nm. Then, the culture was incubated at 18 °C and 200 rpm for 16 h. The His-tagged mrPDE protein was purified using Nickel-NTA Agarose (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), as described in our previous study and was examined on 12% (w/v) SDS-PAGE gel [30]. Protein concentration was estimated by the Bradford method using bovine serum albumin as standard.

PDE activity detection

Phosphodiesterase activity was determined using a PDE activity assay kit (Colorimetric) following the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) with slight modification [31]. The PDE activities were determined in purified mrPDE and recombinant E. coli lysates. The lysates were obtained by disrupting the cells using sonication (W140D, Heat System-Ultrasonics, Inc., NY), followed by centrifugation at 12,000×g for 10 min to remove cell debris. One unit of PDE activity for 3′5′-cAMP was defined as the amount of enzyme required to release 1.0 μmol 5′-AMP from 3′5′-cAMP per minute at 30 °C.

PKA activity determination

Suspended cells were lysed by a high-pressure homogenizer. Cell lysates were incubated at 30 °C as specified by the protocol of PKA (Protein Kinase A) Colorimetric Activity Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The PKA kinase activity was measured by the colorimetric method at 450 nm on a spectrophotometer. The PKA kinase activity was calculated using a calibration curve, which was constructed using five PKA standard solutions.

qRT-PCR

RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, and qRT-PCR were performed as previous work described [29]. Briefly, total RNA was extracted from mycelial samples, and then checked for purity and integrity. cDNA synthesis was performed using the PrimeScript RT master mix (TaKaRa) according to the manufacturer instruction. qRT-PCR was conducted with a two-step thermal procedure (step 1, 95 °C for 10 s, and step 2, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 3 s and 60 °C for 25 s) on a 7500 Fast real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). The cycle number was used for the quantitation of the expression level. Relative expression level of target cDNA was obtained by the 2−ΔΔCT method via normalization to β-actin (GenBank accession no. AJ417880).

cAMP concentration measurement

The cAMP concentration was determined according to the previous work with modification [32]. M. purpureus HJ11 strains were cultivated in GM medium at 30 °C. Fresh mycelia were harvested, frozen and lyophilized and ground into powder using liquid nitrogen. The powder sample was kept in chilled 6% (w/v) trichloro acetic acid (TCA) solution and incubated for for 20 min. After centrifugation of the mixture at 3500×g at 4 °C for 20 min, the supernatant was extracted 3 times with 10 volumes of diethyl ether to remove TCA residues. The resulting extract was dried before further analysis. The cAMP levels were quantified using cAMP Enzyme Immunoassay Kit, Direct (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) following the manufacturer's instructions. In total, assay was repeated three times independently with three biological replicates for each strain.

NADPH/NADP+ ratio determination

Monascus purpureus HJ11 strains were cultivated in GM medium at 30 °C. Mycelia were collected after centrifugation and washed in PBS (50 mM, pH 7.0). Mycelia cells were lysed in base solution containing 1% (w/v) dodecyl (trimethyl)azanium bromide. Then, NADP+ and NADPH were individually detected according to NADP/NADPH-Glo™ Assay (Promega, Southampton, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Batch and fed-batch fermentation

The batch fermentation medium was as follows (g/L): glucose 100, (NH4)2SO4 30, KH2PO4 10, Na2HPO4 5, MgSO4 0.5, CaCl2 0.5, ZnSO4·7H2O 0.3, FeSO4·7H2O 0.3, CoSO47H2O 0.2, CuSO4·5H2O 0.2, and MnSO4·H2O 0.1; pH 4.0. The seed culture was prepared by inoculating 10 mL of 5-days pre-culture into 100 mL of GM medium in a 500-mL flask and incubated at 30 °C and 120 rpm for 7 days. The seed culture (300 mL) was transferred to a 10-L stirred tank bioreactor (Baoxing Bioengineering Equipment Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China) containing 6 L of fermentation medium. Fermentation was performed at 30 °C with an agitation speed of 50 to 200 rpm and airflow rate of 1 to 2 vvm. The pH was maintained at 4.0 by automatic addition of 1.0 M NaOH solution.

Similarly, fed-batch fermentation medium was as follows (g/L): glucose 100, (NH4)2SO4 50, KH2PO4 30, Na2HPO4 10, MgSO4 1.0, CaCl2 1.0, ZnSO4·7H2O 1.0, FeSO4·7H2O 0.5, CoSO4·7H2O 0.5, CuSO4·5H2O 0.3, and MnSO4·H2O 0.1. The seed culture and inoculation were performed similar to the batch fermentation, in a 10-L stirredtank bioreactor (Baoxing Bioengineering Equipment Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China) containing 6 L fermentation media. Fermentation was conducted at 30 °C with an agitation speed of 300 to 800 rpm and an airflow rate of 1.5 to 2.5 vvm. pH was controlled at 4.0 by automatic addition of NaOH solution. After 4 days of fermentation, the residual glucose in medium was determined. When the residual glucose was below 5 g/L, a certain amount (about 300 mL) of feed medium, containing 500 g/L glucose, was added to the 10-L stirred tank bioreactor to maintain glucose concentration at 30 g/L in the fermentation medium, and same amount of culture was withdrawn to analyze residual glucose concentration, biomass and MonAzPs concentration.

MonAzPs analysis

Intercellular MonAzPs concentration was estimated following our previous method [29]. In this study, the concentration of MonAzPs was measured using UV-1700 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) at specific wavelength of 410, 470, and 510 nm that corresponded to the characteristic absorbance of yellow, orange and red pigments, respectively. Total MonAzPs was calculated as the sum of yellow, orange, and red pigments. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test [29].

Gene knockout in M. purpureus HJ11

Targeted gene knockout and complementation of mrPDE in M. purpureus HJ11 was performed as described in our previous study [29].

Data availability

Sequences of the genes mentioned in this article are available in GenBank [29].

Results and discussion

Improvement in MonAzPs production and mrPDE expression by exogenous cAMP addition

The effect of exogenous cAMP on M. purpureus HJ11 was evaluated. The MonAzPs production was determined under different concentrations (0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 and 4.0 mM) of cAMP in GM medium. In the presence of exogenous cAMP, the strain showed higher MonAzPs yield (Fig. 2). At 2.0 mM of cAMP concentration, maximum MonAzPs yield of 6065 U/g DCW was achieved, compared to the yield of 2606 U/g DCW without cAMP (Fig. 2a). This was consistent with a previous study, in which addition of 1.0 mM exogenous cAMP promoted MonAzPs yield in M. ruber strain M7 [24]. In Fusarium graminearum, mycotoxin deoxynivalenol production was approximately increased by 40-folds in cultures treated with 4 mM cAMP [23]. The yields of red, orange, and yellow MonAzPs were 1812 U/g DCW, 1787 U/g DCW and 2466 U/g DCW, respectively (Fig. 2b–d). Among them, maximum rate of increase (179%) was observed in the yield of yellow MonAzPs (Fig. 2d). These results indicated that the cAMP concentration played an important role in the growth and development of fungi and biosynthesis of secondary metabolites. Moreover, it was ascertained that the MonAzPs yield could be improved by increasing the concentration of cAMP.

Fig. 2
figure2

Improvement in MonAzPs production by exogenous cAMP addition. Total MonAzPs (a), red MonAzPs (b), orange MonAzPs (b), and yellow MonAzPs (d) yields of M. purpureus HJ11 strain at different concentrations of exogenous cAMP in GM medium. e DCW of M. purpureus HJ11 strain in the presence of exogenous cAMP. Statistical analysis using Student’s t-test revealed that there was a significant difference (P < 0.05) between groups (0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 mM). f Relative transcription levels of protein kinase A (PKA), adenylate cyclase (AC), mrPDE, LaeA and polyketide synthase (PKS) genes on different exogenous cAMP concentrations. Three replicates were performed for this analysis. Student’s t-test revealed a significant difference in relative expression levels of mrPDE and PKS genes between groups. Groups were not significantly different on PKA, AC and LaeA genes. Error bars represent standard deviations of three flasks

When the concentration of cAMP was 2.0 mM, maximum dry cell weight (DCW) of 4.6 g/L was achieved, while maximum DCW without cAMP was only 4.2 g/L (Fig. 2e). Similar results were found in M. ruber strain M7 [24]. We evaluated the effects of exogenous cAMP on the transcription of genes relative in the cAMP-PKA pathway by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. There were no marked changes in the expression levels of mrpigA and AC genes. The expression of global regulator gene laeA, which can regulate the MonAzPs biosynthetic gene cluster [14], was a little increased. The MonAzPs polyketide synthase gene mrpigA, which was responsible for MonAzPs precursor synthesis [29], showed an obvious increase in expression, explaining the improved production of MonAzPs. Unexpectedly, incubation with cAMP led to a strong induction of expression of a hypothetical PDE gene, named as mrPDE (Fig. 2f and Additional file 1: Fig. S1). So, we speculated that this gene was responsible for negative regulation of cAMP in M. purpureus HJ11.

Identification of MrPDE as a cAMP phosphodiesterase

To the best of our knowledge, there was no report about PDE gene in Monascus spp. It was imperative to identify the PDE gene in M. purpureus HJ11. Comparison of the amino acid sequence of MrPDE with known sequences in the NCBI protein databases showed that a hypothetical PDE gene, XP_001264269.1 from Aspergillus fischeri, displayed the highest similarity of 64% with MrPDE. To further analyze MrPDE, several known PDEs (4OJV_A from S. cerevisiae, Q5AGE4 from Candida albicans, P12019 from Dictyostelium discoideum, and P36599 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe) were selected. A multiple alignment of 6 sequences mentioned above was also performed. The alignment analysis revealed two highly conserved amino acid motifs, which contained catalytic residues (Fig. 3a). This result indicated that MrPDE may be a fungal PDE.

Fig. 3
figure3

3′,5′-Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase function of MrPDE. a Blocks of sequences conserved in MrPDE and several fungal PDEs. Pentagram indicates the possible catalytic amino acid residues. Identical amino acids are on a black background. b SDS-PAGE analysis and purification of MrPDE. M lane, protein marker; C lane, supernatant of E. coli BL21 (DE3) harboring control pET30a(+); S lane, supernatant of E. coli BL21 (DE3) containing pET30a(+)-mrPDE induced by IPTG; P lane, purified MrPDE protein. c Specific activity of MrPDE. The PDE activity of MrPDE was determined at 30 °C in 50 mM Tris–HCl buffer (pH 8.0) using 3′,5′-cAMP as the substrate. Results were reported as mean value of three replicates ± standard deviation

To verify the function of MrPDE, the enzymatic activity was evaluated through in vitro reaction. MrPDE was heterologously expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) strain. After induction with 0.5 mM IPTG at 18 °C for 12 h, SDS-PAGE analysis showed that MrPDE was successfully expressed in E. coli under the control of the T7 promoter (Fig. 3b, S lane). The enzyme was purified using Ni affinity chromatography column (Fig. 3b, P lane). The catalytic activity of MrPDE was determined with 3′,5′-cAMP as substrate. MrPDE was found to efficiently catalyze the hydrolysis of 3′,5′-cAMP (Fig. 3c). The specific activity of purified MrPDE was 15.4 U/mg, which was close to that of PDE1 (20.5 U/mg) from S. cerevisiae S288C [33]. These results indicated that MrPDE was indeed a fungal PDE.

Activation of cAMP signalling pathway by mrPDE knockout

To construct a MonAzPs high-producing strain, a mrPDE gene knockout strain ΔmrPDE and a mrPDE complemented knockout strain CΔmrPDE were successfully engineered through homologous recombination technology. The colony diameter of ΔmrPDE was a little bigger than those of WT and CΔmrPDE, which indicated that the growth of ΔmrPDE strain was not inhibited by mrPDE gene knockout (Fig. 4a). Meanwhile, the morphology of ΔmrPDE colonies grown on GM plate showed more intense color than those of WT and CΔmrPDE, implying that the ΔmrPDE strain might have a high production on MonAzPs (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4
figure4

Activation of cAMP signalling pathway by mrPDE knockout. a Colony morphology of WT and ΔmrPDE strains. The strains were cultivated on GM plates at 30 °C for 10 days. The cAMP concentration (b), relative PKA kinase activity (c), and DCW (d) of WT, ΔmrPDE and CΔmrPDE strains. Experiments were carried out in three replicates

The cAMP concentration was determined in each strain at different times. Notably, the cAMP concentration in ΔmrPDE strain was significantly higher than those of WT and CΔmrPDE strains, attaining a maximum of 11,145 pmol/g on sixth day (Fig. 4b). The cAMP concentration in WT strain increased to 3219 pmol/g at the fourth day before gradually decreasing (Fig. 4b). Similar cAMP trend was observed in CΔmrPDE strain. This result suggested that knockout of mrPDE could inhibit the cAMP degradation, which led to a higher intracellular cAMP concentration. It has been reported that deletion of PDE gene in Ustilaginoidea virens and Magnaporthe oryzae both resulted in double-fold increase in cAMP concentration [21, 34]. Thus, it was ascertained that deletion of PDE gene could efficiently increase cAMP concentration in M. purpureus HJ11.

In cAMP signalling pathway, PKA activity is essential for regulation of primary and secondary metabolism [35, 36]. Our data showed that knockout of mrPDE could induce PKA kinase activity (Fig. 4c), suggesting the increase of cAMP concentration triggered PKA activation [37]. The DCW of ΔmrPDE strain reached 5.1 g/L, which was higher than those of WT (4.2 g/L) and CΔmrPDE strains (4.2 g/L) (Fig. 4d). These results indicated that the cAMP signalling pathway was activated by knockout of mrPDE.

Improvement of MonAzPs yield in ΔmrPDE strain

For further confirmation of the MonAzPs production in ΔmrPDE strain, shake-flask fermentation was performed. After fermentation for 10 days, the MonAzPs yield of ΔmrPDE strain reached 8563 U/g DCW, which was 2.3-fold higher than that of WT strain (Fig. 5). The yields of red, orange, and yellow pigments of ΔmrPDE strain were 2377, 2245 and 3941 U/g DCW, respectively (Fig. 5b–d). These yields were 1.58-times, 1.80-times, and 3.46-times higher than those of WT strain, respectively. The Monascus purpureus WT and ΔmrPDE strains were also cultivated in rice medium. The yields of red, orange, and yellow pigments in ΔmrPDE strain were 3721, 2655 and 4864 U/g DCW, respectively, which were higher than those of WT strain (2924, 2387 and 4059 U/g DCW). Similar study has been reported in F. graminearum, the knockout of PDE gene pde1 resulted in increased production of secondary metabolite deoxynivalenol [23]. The deletion of PDE gene pdeH from A. flavus led to an increased production of aflatoxin to 110 mg/mL from 48 mg/mL [38].

Fig. 5
figure5

Comparison of MonAzPs production between the WT, ΔmrPDE, and CΔmrPDE strains. Time courses of total MonAzPs (a), red MonAzPs (b), orange MonAzPs (c), yellow MonAzPs (d) production of WT, ΔmrPDE and CΔmrPDE strains, respectively. The strains were cultivated in GM medium at 30 °C for 10 days. The means and standard deviations calculated from measurements from three biological replicates for each strain were shown

To explain the reason of increasing MonAzPs yield, the expression of each genes from Monascus azaphilone pigments biosynthetic gene cluster (MPBGC) was determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis. All MPBGC genes were expressed in the WT and ΔmrPDE strains. Unexpectedly, as shown by the ΔmrPDE strain, transcriptional activation of large parts of the genes in the MABGC was achieved, apart from mrpigH, mrpigI, mrpigL and mrpigP, which didn’t participate in MonAzP biosynthesis (Additional file 1: Fig. S2) [29, 39]. The downstream targets of PKA include transcriptional regulators and other effectors to control gene transcriptional expression [40]. These suggested that PKA, activated by cAMP, improved the transcriptional expression of MPBGC genes through indirect activation [41].

It is worth noting that the increased proportion of yellow MonAzPs yield was significantly higher than that of total MonAzPs yield in ΔmrPDE strain (Figs. 2 and 5). In our previous study, orange MonAzPs were found to be converted into yellow MonAzPs in the presence of adequate NADPH [42]. So, it was speculated that the increased cAMP concentration led to higher rate of NADPH/NADP+. There is little knowledge about the influence of cAMP on NADPH/NADP+ rate in microorganism. Herein, it was found that the ratio in ΔmrPDE strain was 0.91, which are much higher than those of WT and CΔmrPDE strains (0.55 and 0.54, respectively) (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). This might be the main reason for the significantly higher yield of yellow MonAzPs than those of red and orange MonAzPs.

High-density fermentation for high MonAzPs production

In order to enhance the production of MonAzPs, batch fermentation of ΔmrPDE strain was performed in a medium, containing initial glucose concentration of 100 g/L. During the fermentation process, M. purpureus WT and ΔmrPDE strains formed pellet with an average diameter of 3.7 ± 0.2 mm. The formation of pellet contributed to pigments production. After 10 days of cultivation, total MonAzPs production reached a maximum of 158.9 U/mL (Fig. 6a), and corresponding total MonAzPs yield was 6782 U/g (Fig. 6b). However, this yield was lower than that in shake flask (8563 U/g). This might be attributed to the insufficient glucose supply (< 5 g/L) in the middle and later stages of fermentation, where mycelia accumulated the main part of MonAzPs (Fig. 6a).

Fig. 6
figure6

MonAzPs production in batch and fed-batch fermentation using ΔmrPDE strain. Time course of cell growth, residual glucose and MonAzPs production during batch fermentation (a) and fed-batch fermentation (c). Patterns of MonAzPs yield in batch fermentation (b) and fed-batch fermentation (d). Data are presented as mean ± SD from three independent experiments of three replicates each (n = 9)

For improvement of glucose supply, a fed-batch fermentation was also performed in a 10-L stirred fermenter [43]. The glucose solution was added in fermentation medium to maintain the glucose at 30 g/L when residual glucose was below 5 g/L. The ΔmrPDE strain displayed rapid growth, and DCW reached 38.1 g/L, which was significantly higher than that of batch fermentation (Fig. 6c). In another study, fed-batch fermentation of Monascus anka strain GIM 3.592 achieved a DCW of 39.77 g/L [44]. Subsequently, a significant increase in MonAzPs production was observed, reaching a maximum of 332.1 U/mL. The total MonAzPs yield reached 8739 U/g DCW, slightly higher than that in shake flask fermentation (Fig. 6d). It has been reported that a mutant M. purpureus strain M183 produced MonAzPs at 211.6 U/mL [15]. To the best of our knowledge, this study achieved highest MonAzPs yield and production.

Conclusion

In summary, mrPDE was identified as a PDE from M. purpureus HJ11. Subsequently, knockout of the mrPDE gene was performed to enhance cAMP concentration. The MonAzPs yield in ΔmrPDE strain was achieved at 8563 U/g, which was 2.3-folds higher than that of WT strain. In order to improve the MonAzPs production, the fed-batch fermentation was performed in a 10-L stirred fermenter. The MonAzPs production was significantly enhanced to 332.1 U/mL, with the MonAzPs yield of 8739 U/g DCW. This study describes a promising method for high production of MonAzPs and provides a strategy for metabolic engineering of secondary metabolism in other filamentous fungi.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Liu L, Zhao J, Huang Y, Xin Q, Wang Z. Diversifying of chemical structure of native Monascus pigments. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3143.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wakai S, Arazoe T, Ogino C, Kondo A. Future insights in fungal metabolic engineering. Bioresour Technol. 2017;254:1314–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chen W, Feng Y, Molnar I, Chen F. Nature and nurture: confluence of pathway determinism and metabolic serendipity diversifies Monascus azaphilone pigments. Nat Prod Rep. 2019;36:561–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Babitha S, Soccol CR, Pandey A. Solid-state fermentation for the production of Monascus pigments from jackfruit seed. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:1554–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Liu J, Chai X, Guo T, Wu J, Yang P, Luo Y, Zhao H, Zhao W, Nkechi O, Dong J, Bai J, Lin Q. Disruption of the ergosterol biosynthetic pathway results in increased membrane permeability, causing overproduction and secretion of extracellular Monascus pigments in submerged fermentation. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67:13673–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Yang Y, Liu B, Du XJ, Li P, Liang B, Cheng XZ, Du LC, Huang D, Wang L, Wang S. Complete genome sequence and transcriptomics analyses reveal pigment biosynthesis and regulatory mechanisms in an industrial strain, Monascus purpureus YY-1. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8331–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Patakova P. Monascus secondary metabolites: production and biological activity. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;40:169–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zheng Y, Zhang Y, Chen D, Chen H, Lin L, Zheng C, Guo Y. Monascus pigment rubropunctatin: a potential dual agent for cancer chemotherapy and phototherapy. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(12):2541–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Shi YC, Pan TM, Liao VHC. Monascin from Monascus-fermented products reduces oxidative stress and amyloid-β toxicity via DAF-16/FOXO in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64(38):7114–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Jongrungruangchok S, Kittakoop P, Yongsmith B, Bavovada R, Tanasupawat S, Lartpornmatulee N, Thebtaranonth Y. Azaphilone pigments from a yellow mutant of the fungus Monascus kaoliang. Phytochemistry. 2004;65(18):2569–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Huang T, Tan HL, Lu FJ, Chen G, Wu ZQ. Changing oxidoreduction potential to improve water-soluble yellow pigment production with Monascus ruber CGMCC 10910. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16:208.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lv J, Zhang BB, Liu XD, Zhang C, Chen L, Xu GR, Cheung PCK. Enhanced production of natural yellow pigments from Monascus purpureus by liquid culture: the relationship between fermentation conditions and mycelial morphology. J Biosci Bioeng. 2017;124:452–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Long C, Zeng X, Xie J, Liang Y, Tao J, Tao Q, Liu M, Cui J, Huang Z, Zeng B. High-level production of Monascus pigments in Monascus ruber CICC41233 through ATP-citrate lyase overexpression. Biochem Eng J. 2019;146:160–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Liu Q, Cai L, Shao Y, Zhou Y, Li M, Wang X, Chen F. Inactivation of the global regulator LaeA in Monascus ruber results in a species-dependent response in sporulation and secondary metabolism. Fungal Biol. 2016;120:297–305.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu J, Guo T, Luo Y, Chai X, Wu J, Zhao W, Jiao P, Luo F, Lin Q. Enhancement of Monascus pigment productivity via a simultaneous fermentation process and separation system using immobilized-cell fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2019;272:552–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hu Y, Liu Y, Hao X, Wang D, Akhberdi O, Xiang B, Zhu X. Regulation of the Gα-cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in cellulose utilization of Chaetomium globosum. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17:160–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hall RA, Mühlschlegel FA. A multi-protein complex controls cAMP signalling and filamentation in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol. 2010;75(3):534–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Guo L, Breakspear A, Zhao G, Gao L, Kistler HC, Xu J, Ma L. Conservation and divergence of the cyclic adenosine monophosphate–protein kinase A (cAMP–PKA) pathway in two plant-pathogenic fungi: Fusarium graminearum and F. verticillioides. Mol Plant Pathol. 2016;17(2):196–209.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mirzadi GA, Mehrabi R, Robert O, Ince IA, Boeren S, Schuster M, Steinberg G, de Wit PJGM, Kema GHJ. Molecular characterization and functional analyses of ZtWor1, a transcriptional regulator of the fungal wheat pathogen Zymoseptoria tritici. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014;15(4):394–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kumar V, Hart AJ, Wimalasena TT, Tucker GA, Greetham D. Expression of RCK2 MAPKAP (MAPK-activated protein kinase) rescues yeast cells sensitivity to osmotic stress. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:85–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ramanujam R, Naqvi NI. PdeH, a high-affinity cAMP phosphodiesterase, is a key regulator of asexual and pathogenic differentiation in Magnaporthe oryzae. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6:e1000897.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Brakhage AA, Liebmann B. Aspergillus fumigatus conidial pigment and cAMP signal transduction: significance for virulence. Med Mycol. 2005;43(Suppl. 1):S75–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jiang C, Zhang C, Wu C, Sun P, Hou R, Liu H, Wang C, Xu J. TRI6 and TRI10 play different roles in the regulation of deoxynivalenol (DON) production by cAMP signaling in Fusarium graminearum. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:3689–701.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lai Y, Wang L, Qing L, Chen FS. Effects of cyclic AMP on development and secondary metabolites of Monascus ruber M-7. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011;52:420–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Cardarelli S, Giorgi M, Naro F, Malatesta F, Biagioni S, Saliola M. Use of the KlADH3 promoter for the quantitative production of the murine PDE5A isoforms in the yeast Kluyveromyces lactis. Microb Cell Fact. 2017;16:159–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Studt L, Humpf HU, Tudzynski B. Signaling governed by G proteins and cAMP is crucial for growth, secondary metabolism and sexual development in Fusarium fujikuroi. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(2):e58185.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Macheleidt J, Mattern DJ, Fischer J, Netzker T, Weber J, Schroeckh V, Valiante V, Brakhage AA. Regulation and role of fungal secondary metabolites. Annu Rev Genet. 2016;50:371–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Li X, Liu Y, Tan X, Li D, Yang X, Zhang X, Zhang D. The high-affinity phosphodiesterase PcPdeH is involved in the polarized growth and pathogenicity of Phytophthora capsici. Fungal Biol. 2020;124:164–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Li M, Kang L, Ding X, Liu J, Liu Q, Shao Y, Molnár I, Chen FS. Monasone naphthoquinone biosynthesis and resistance in Monascus fungi. mBio. 2020;1:e02676-19.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Guo HL, Zhang Y, Shao YC, Chen WP, Chen FS, Li M. Cloning, expression and characterization of a novel cold active and organic solvent tolerant esterase from Monascus ruber M7. Extremophiles. 2016;26:451–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Röhrig T, Liesenfeld D, Richling E. Identification of a phosphodiesterase-inhibiting fraction from roasted coffee (Coffea arabica) through activity-guided fractionation. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65:3792–800.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Carrasco-Navarro U, Vera-Estrella R, Barkla BJ, Zúñiga-León E, Reyes-Vivas H, Fernández FJ, Fierro F. Proteomic analysis of the signaling pathway mediated by the heterotrimeric Gα protein Pga1 of Penicillium chrysogenum. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:173–89.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Tian Y, Cui W, Huang M, Robinson H, Wan Y, Wang Y, Ke H. Dual specificity and novel structural folding of yeast phosphodiesterase-1 for hydrolysis of second messenger’s cyclic adenosine and guanosine 3′,5′-monophosphate. Biochemistry. 2014;53:4938–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Guo WW, Gao YY, Yu ZM, Xiao YH, Zhang ZG, Zhang HF. The adenylate cyclase UvAc1 and phosphodiesterase UvPdeH control the intracellular cAMP level, development, and pathogenicity of the rice false smut fungus Ustilaginoidea virens. Fungal Genet Biol. 2019;129:65–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Musheshe N, Schmidt M, Zaccolo M. cAMP: From long-range second messenger to nanodomain signalling. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2018;39(2):209–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Hu Y, Liu Y, Hao X, Wang D, Akhberdi O, Xiang B, Zhu X. Regulation of the Gα-cAMP/PKA signaling pathway in cellulose utilization of Chaetomium globosum. Microb Cell Fact. 2018;17(1):160.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Koschinski A, Zaccolo M. Activation of PKA in cell requires higher concentration of cAMP than in vitro: implications for compartmentalization of cAMP signalling. Sci Rep. 2017;7:14090.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yang K, Liu Y, Liang L, Li Z, Qin Q, Nie X, Wang S. The high-affinity phosphodiesterase PdeH regulates development and aflatoxin biosynthesis in Aspergillus flavus. Fungal Genet Biol. 2017;101:7–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bijinu B, Suh JW, Park SH, Kwon HJ. Delineating Monascus azaphilone pigment biosynthesis: oxidoreductive modifications determine the ring cyclization pattern in azaphilone biosynthesis. RSC Adv. 2014;4:59405–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Huang G, Huang Q, Wei Y, Wang Y, Du H. Multiple roles and diverse regulation of the Ras/cAMP/protein kinase A pathway in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol. 2019;111(1):6–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cao C, Wu M, Bing J, Tao L, Ding X, Liu X, Huang G. Global regulatory roles of the cAMP/PKA pathway revealed by phenotypic, transcriptomic and phosphoproteomic analyses in a null mutant of the PKA catalytic subunit in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol. 2017;105(1):46–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chen W, Chen R, Liu Q, He Y, Kang L, Guo X, Xie N, Zhou Y, Lu Y, Cox RJ, Molnár I, Li M, Shao Y, Chen F. Orange, red, yellow: biosynthesis of azaphilone pigments in Monascus fungi. Chem Sci. 2017;8:4917–25.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Swart RM, Le Roux F, Naude A, de Jongh NW, Nicol W. Fumarate production with Rhizopus oryzae: utilising the Crabtree effect to minimise ethanol by-product formation. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2020;13(1):22–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chen G, Shi K, Song D, Quan L, Wu Z. The pigment characteristics and productivity shifting in high cell density culture of Monascus anka mycelia. BMC Biotechnol. 2015;15:72–80.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871780 to M.L), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2662018PY059 to M.L. and No. 2019BC014 to J.L).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JL, Y and XP designed the experiments. JL and YD carried out the majority of experimental work and analyzed the results. HM and ML drafted the manuscript. XP revised the manuscript. JL and YD contributed equally to this study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mu Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved publication of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

Relative expression levels of mrPDE gene with or without 2.0 mM cAMP during the cultivation. Error bars represent standard deviations of three flasks. Three replicates were performed for this analysis. Fig. S2. qRT-PCR analysis of the MPBGC genes of the M. purpureus HJ11 wild-type (WT) and ΔmrPDE knockout strains. Gene expression levels from WT strain are taken as the basis of comparison, with the means and standard deviations calculated from measurements from three biological replicates. Fig. S3. NADPH/NADP+ ratio analysis of M. purpureus HJ11 WT and ΔmrPDE knockout strains. NADP+ and NADPH were individually detected. The NADPH/NADP+ ratio was calculated with NADP+ and NADPH levels.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Du, Y., Ma, H. et al. Enhancement of Monascus yellow pigments production by activating the cAMP signalling pathway in Monascus purpureus HJ11. Microb Cell Fact 19, 224 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-020-01486-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Monascus purpureus
  • Monascus azaphilone pigments
  • cAMP signaling pathway
  • cAMP phosphodiesterase
  • Gene knockout
  • Fed-batch fermentation