Skip to main content

Advertisement

Intranasal administration with recombinant Bacillus subtilis induces strong mucosal immune responses against pseudorabies

Abstract

Background

Pseudorabies caused by pseudorabies virus (PRV) mainly infects the swine and seriously threatens the biosafety of the other animals, including humans. Since 2011, the outbreaks of PRV mutants have caused enormous economic losses in the swine industry, and traditional vaccines cannot offer enough protection. PRV can transmit by direct contact, aerosol transmission and pollutants. PRV mainly transmit through the nasal mucosa. After infecting the nasal epithelial cells, PRV can quickly infect the olfactory nerve and establish a potential infection of sensory neurons. Therefore, nasal immunity can effectively prevent viral colonization infection. Recombinant Bacillus subtilis has been widely used to deliver antigen and achieve adequate protective immune responses.

Results

The present study successfully constructed recombinant Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) expressing the dominant antigen regions of PRV gC and gD proteins (named B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa). Furtherly, we evaluated the immunogenicity of the two recombinant B. subtilis in mice. The mice intranasal administration with B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa effectively stimulated IgA and IgG immune responses, further regulated specific T lymphocytes proliferative response by IFN-γ and IL-10, and ultimately produced high titers of neutralizing antibodies against PRV infection. In particular, B. subtilis-gDa possessed more excellent immune effect than B. subtilis-gCa in mice.

Conclusions

These results suggested that B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa could trigger high levels of mucosal and systemic immune responses and would be potential candidates for developing PRV vaccines.

Introduction

Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis) is a nonpathogenic Gram-positive probiotic and has been extensively used in humans and animals [1]. B. subtilis is a potential and cost-effective substitute of antibiotics and generally regarded as safe (GRAS) by food and drug administration (FDA) in American. Besides, B. subtilis plays a potential role in regulating cellular immunity and humoral immunity. Administration of B. subtilis can resist many diseases in animals, like porcine epidemic diarrhea (PED) [2], foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) and influenza [3, 4]. Furthermore, B. subtilis is also easy to be genetically manipulated and many molecular tools have been developed. Recent researches indicated that recombinant B. subtilis could elicit unique immune responses [5].

Pseudorabies (PR) is a serious veterinary pathogen that can end up with abortions in sows and mortality of piglets. PR is caused by the pseudorabies virus (PRV). PRV belongs to the herpesviridae family. PRV mainly infects the swine and always directly causes lethal infection, regardless of the age of the animal in other species. All kinds of vaccines play important roles to control PRV over the years [6]. However, since 2011, some new emerging PRV variants have swept many pig farms in China and conventional vaccines could not provide enough protection against the new PRV mutants [7]. The new PRV mutants severely hinder the development of the Chinese swine industry and threaten the world’s bio-security [8].

In addition, traditional PRV vaccines exist some problems of security, which furtherly lead to the spread of PRV across different species [9]. Recently, epidemiological data analysis indicated that PRV had the potential to infect humans [10]. The interspecies transmission mechanism and evolutionary dynamics of PRV also proved the potential risk of PRV transmission between humans and animals [11]. Therefore, it is very urgent and meaningful to develop a more efficacious and secure vaccine to eradicate the virulent PRV variants.

The most common pathway of PRV infection is through nasal mucosa. When PRV transmits through the nasal cavity, the virus replicates in the upper respiratory tract before attacking sensory nerve endings, crossing synapses to infect neurons and invading the nervous system [12]. Therefore, intranasal immunization might be an ideal measure against the PRV infection.

Intranasal administration is an effective and attractive route for immunization against diseases caused by upper respiratory tract infections of pathogens [13]. Moreover, it does not require needles and syringes, and can be easily applied to large-scale immunization [14]. Intranasal administration is able to simulate the natural infection of pathogens and induces immunoglobulin A (IgA) production in the nasal mucosa [15]. The unique structure (easily accessible and highly vascularized) of the nasal cavity provides a favorable immunological environment which contains abundant T and B cells, dendritic cells, macrophages and lymphoid tissues such as nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) [16]. Nasal administration can induce both mucosal and systemic immune responses to defend the nasal from the entry of pathogens [17]. Therefore, intranasal vaccination has great potential in clinical use [18].

Although intranasal administration has many promising advantages, some problems still exist to limit its development. Firstly, a variety of enzymes always degrade the antigens carried by the vaccines in the nasal cavity [19]. Secondly, rapidly oscillating cilia greatly shorten the intranasal residence time of vaccines and reduce the antigens uptake, which result in the vaccines failure [20]. At last, the complex and close-knit geometry of the nasal cavity challenges the vaccines to deliver antigens to mucosal surfaces high and deep [21]. Therefore, nasal immunization usually requires the use of vaccine adjuvants or delivery systems to protect the antigen immunogenicity and to increase antigen delivery efficiency.

In the present study, we constructed a recombinant B. subtilis that expressed the major antigenic region of PRV gC or gD proteins and evaluated the immune effect of the recombinant B. subtilis. Our results indicated that the recombinant B. subtilis was beneficial to the mucosal immune system development and could effectively generate specific antibodies against PRV infection, which suggests a potential approach for preventing PRV infection.

Materials and methods

Virus, bacterium, plasmids and cell lines

PRV strain ZJ01 was kindly provided by Professor Ping Jiang (Nanjing Agricultural University) [22]. The viruses were propagated in the porcine kidney cell line (PK-15) and cultured by DMEM (Life Technologies, Shanghai, China) supplemented with 2.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Life Technologies) at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. The viruses were a UV-inactivated at UV dose of 1000 mJ/cm2 to achieve a complete loss of infectivity [23]. The B. subtilis WB800 was kindly provided by Dr. Xuewen Gao (from the department of plant pathology, Nanjing Agricultural University) [24]. The plasmid p43NMK was stored in our lab and constructed by Dr. Xiaozhou Zhang (from the department of Microbiology, Nanjing Agricultural University) [25]. The plasmid pLJM1-EGFP was a gift from David Sabatini (Addgene plasmid # 19319; http://n2t.net/addgene:19319; RRID: Addgene_19319) [26].

Construction of recombinant B. subtilis

PRV strain ZJ01 viral DNA was extracted as described previously by using Viral DNA kit (Omega Bio-Tek Inc., Norcross, GA, USA) [27]. Then, we amplified the gC and gD gene by using the viral genome as the template (Table 1, Additional file 1: Figure S1E). Next, we analyzed the dominant antigen regions of these two proteins by TMHMM 2.0 and DNAstar (Additional file 1: Figure S1A–D). The amplified dominant antigen regions were named gCa and gDa (Additional file 1: Figure S1F). In addition, we amplified the EGFP gene by using the plasmid pLJM1-EGFP as the template (Table 1) (Additional file 2: Figure S2A). Next, we connected the gCa and gDa with the EGFP by overlap extension PCR to obtain gCa-EGFP and gDa-EGFP fragments (Additional file 2: Figure S2B, C). Afterwards, these two fragments were inserted into the plasmid p43NMK which was linearized by PstI and HindIII (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) to construct recombinant plasmid p43NMK-gCa-EGFP and p43NMK-gDa-EGFP. At last, the two recombinant plasmids were transformed into B. subtilis WB800 by electroporation using the Eppendorf Multiporator (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany) as previously described (Additional file 3: Figure S3) [28]. The recombinant B. subtilis WB800 strains were named B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa (Fig. 1a).

Table 1 The genetic information
Fig. 1
figure1

The constitution of recombinant B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa. a The recombinant B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa were constructed by common molecular biology technique. The PRV gCa, gDa, EGFP gene were connected by overlap PCR, then the specific connected fragments were inserted into the linearized plasmid p43NMK by in-fusion clone to get p43NMK-gCa-EGFP and p43NMK-gDa-EGFP. Furthermore, the two recombinant plasmids were transformed into B. subtilis WB800 by electroporation. The fusion proteins of B. subtilis-gDa (b) and B. subtilis-gCa (c) were detected by western blotting in 24 h, 48 h and 60 h. Besides, the green fluorescence were observed the B. subtilis-gCa (e) and B. subtilis-gDa (d) by confocal microscope. f The schematic of the immunization, the intranasal administration was performed at 0 and 14 day. In addition, the black triangle (under the line) indicated the time point of sampling the washings (including BAL and vagina) and serum, the red triangle (under the line) represented the last sampling and sampled the washings, serum and spleen

Analysis of fusion proteins

Bacillus subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa were grown in 5 ml LB medium at 37 °C, 220 rpm for 24 h, 48 h and 60 h. Then, the two strains of bacteria were washed three times by sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After washed, these were centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000×g at 4 °C and re-suspended in 500 μl PBS. And these bacteria were disrupted to release the target proteins by Ultrasonic Cell Crusher (Xianou Tech, China) as previously described [29]. Furthermore, the proteins were detected by western blotting (Fig. 1b, c), in which the mouse anti-EGFP (Sigma) and HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma) were used. Then the blots were developed by ECL enhanced chemiluminescence. The images were captured using a 4600SF Gel Image System (Tanon, China).

Besides, the re-suspended bacteria were observed under Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope (Zeiss, Germany). The images were analyzed using ZEN 2012 (Carl Zeiss) (Fig. 1d, e).

Animals and immunization programs

Sixty healthy BALB/c female mice (5-week-old, purchased from Experimental Animal Center of Yangzhou University) were randomly divided into four groups (n = 15/group) and housed under similar conditions in different cages (in order to avoid probiotic cross-contamination). The animal experiments was permitted by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University and followed the National Institutes of Health’s guidelines for the performance of animal experiments. Mice of groups 1–4 were intranasally administration with 20 μl of PBS (1), 109 CFU WB800 in combination with 105 TCID50 inactivated PRV (B. subtilis-PRV) (2), 109 CFU B. subtilis-gCa (3), and B. subtilis-gDa (4). The immunization protocol was performed on day 0 and day 14 (Fig. 1f). The sera and washings (broncheoalveolar lavage (BAL) and vagina washings) were collected at day 0, 7, 14, 28, 35. At day 35, the last three mice of each group were sacrificed for lymphocyte proliferation assay and the analysis of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes in the spleen.

Detection of PRV specific antibodies by indirect ELISA

The indirect ELISA was performed as previously described protocol [30]. The inactivated PRV virus particles were coated on 96-well microliter plates at a concentration determined by preliminary experiments. The sera were incubated with the plates, and bound antibodies were detected with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or goat anti-porcine antibody (Sigma). The plates were incubated with the color substrate 3,3,5,5-tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) (Sigma) at room temperature for 15 min for color development. The enzyme–substrate reaction was stopped by adding 1% SDS in each well. The optical density (OD) was read at 630 nm.

Analysis of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes in spleen

The spleen was removed from the mice, then cut into pieces and ground gently through a 200 mesh sterile nylon net. The cell suspension was carefully collected and laid on the RPMI Medium 1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The separated spleen mononuclear cells were incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies directed at the following CD markers: PE anti-mouse CD3, FITC anti-mouse CD4, and PE-Cy7 anti-mouse CD8 (BD Biosciences Pharmingen). Gated CD3 positive events were analyzed for CD3+CD8+ and CD3+CD4+ T cells. Flow cytometry was performed using an FC500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA) and analyzed using Beckman Coulter CXP software. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on BD Facscalibur (BD Biosciences) instruments and analyzed by FlowJo software [31].

Lymphocyte proliferation assay

At 35 days, lymphocytes were isolated from the spleens as previously described. The cells were re-suspended at 5 × 106 cells/ml with RPMI Medium 1640 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS, and then transferred into 96-well plates (100 μl per well), followed by PBS, Con A, B. subtilis-PRV, B. subtilis-gCa, and B. subtilis-gDa. The plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C. Then, the proliferative responses were detected using the standard CCK8 (Solarbio, China) method as previously described [32].

Real-time quantitative PCR

After total RNA was extracted from the lung and vagina, 500 ng of total RNA from each sample was reversely transcribed using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (Takara, Japan). Real-time PCR was performed on cDNA using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Japan) on the Line Gene 9600 Plus QPCR system (Bioer, China), using Line Gene 9600 Plus software for comparative quantification. All reactions were carried out in triplicate using a 25 μl volume. PCR amplification was carried out using an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles for 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. The primers for the genes are provided as follows: IFN-γ (F: TGGCATAGATGTGGAAGAA, R: GTGTGATTCAATCAATGACGCTTA), IL-10 (F: GGTTGCCAAGCCTTGTCTGA, R: AGGGAGTTCACATGCGCCT), GAPDH (F: GCCCAAGATGCCCTTCAGT, R: CCTTCCGTGTTCCTACCCC).

Plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT)

PRV neutralizing antibodies were measured in sera by PRNT. The test was performed as previously described with minor modifications [33]. The sera were inactivated at 56 °C for 30 min before used in the assay. 450 μl of sera were twofold serially diluted and mixed with 50 μl viral suspension containing 105 TCID50 PRV virus for 1 h at 37 °C in 12-well flat bottomed tissue culture plates. The mixture was then inoculated for 1 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Then, the mixture was inoculated with PK-15 cells suspension (ca. 1.0 × 106 ml−1) for another 3–4 days. After staining with Crystal Violet, the plates were observed under a microscope for cytopathic effect.

Statistical analysis

Data were represented as the mean ± SD of three replicates per test in a single experiment. GraphPad Prism V6.0 (San Diego, CA, USA) was used to perform statistical analyses. Tukey’s multiple comparison tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyze the significance of the difference between means. P-values less than 0.05 (P < 0.05) were considered significant and P-values less than 0.01 (P < 0.01) were considered as highly significant.

Results

Construction and validation of the recombinant Bacillus subtilis

We cloned PRV gCa, gDa, EGFP gene and constructed two expression plasmids (Fig. 1a) by common molecular biology technique. Then, we transformed the plasmids into the B. subtilis WB800 by electroporation (Additional file 3: Figure S3). Furthermore, we selected positive clones by kanamycin resistant screening. At last, we analyzed the fusion protein expression by western blotting in 24 h, 48 h and 60 h (Fig. 1b, c) and green fluorescence (Fig. 1d, e). The expression of gDa-EGFP fusion proteins increased over time and peaked in 60 h (Fig. 1b). The similar results were detected in gCa-EGFP fusion proteins (Fig. 1c). In addition, the expression of B. subtilis-gDa were higher than B. subtilis-gCa. Moreover, we could clearly observe the B. subtilis-gCa (Fig. 1e) and B. subtilis-gDa (Fig. 1d) with green fluorescence by confocal microscope. These results indicated that recombinant Bacillus subtilis (B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa) were successfully constructed.

The specific antibody in mice induced by recombinant Bacillus subtilis

We detected the anti-PRV-specific secreted IgA (sIgA) and IgG antibodies by ELISA. The anti-PRV-specific IgG antibodies were detected in sera. The anti-PRV-specific secreted IgA antibodies were mainly detected in broncheoalveolar lavage (BAL) and vagina washings. The scheme of intranasal immunization and specimen collection is shown as Fig. 1f.

The results indicated that the titers of specific IgG antibody in the serum of immuned mice increased by immunization times, and presented a gradual increase trend (Fig. 2a). After the boost immunization, the antibody reached the highest level. Besides, the group that undertook intranasal immunization with B. subtilis-gDa kept the highest levels of IgG than the other three groups. The groups that were immunization with B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-PRV almost remained the same level that were clearly higher than the PBS group. These data showed that the recombinant Bacillus subtilis could effectively stimulate systemic immune responses.

Fig. 2
figure2

The specific antibody in mice induced by recombinant B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa. a Detection of anti-PRV IgG antibody in serum from immunized mice by indirect ELISA. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to B. subtilis-PRV. #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 compared to B. subtilis-gCa. b The anti-PRV specific mucosal SIgA antibody in broncheoalveolar lavage (BAL) by indirect ELISA. **P < 0.01. c The anti-PRV specific mucosal SIgA antibody in vagina by indirect ELISA. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. **P < 0.01

Furthermore, the titers of mucosal anti-PRV-specific secreted IgA assessed the mucosal immune responses. As were shown in Fig. 2b, intranasal immunization with B. subtilis-gDa significantly induced a higher level of IgA in BAL on days 7, 28 and 35, compared with the other two groups (P < 0.01). In addition, the B. subtilis-gCa had the same comparative results compared with the B. subtilis-PRV group on four sampling points (P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between the B. subtilis-gDa and B. subtilis-gCa on days 14 (P > 0.05). Figure 2c showed the trend of sIgA levels in the vagina washings and the general trend was the same as BAL. Besides, it is worth noting that the titers of IgA in BAL were higher than vagina washings.

The percentage of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes in spleen

The percentage of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes in spleen was an important indicator of the specific immunity in the body. Flow cytometry was performed to measure the changes in the percentage of CD3+, CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes in spleen (Fig. 3a). After intranasal immunization with B. subtilis-gDa, as shown in Fig. 3b, the percentage of CD3+ T lymphocytes significantly increased than other groups (P < 0.01). Besides, the B. subtilis-gCa group was higher than B. subtilis-PRV group in CD3+ T lymphocytes (P < 0.05). Moreover, intranasal immunization with B. subtilis-gDa induced a higher percentage of CD3+CD4+ T lymphocytes than the other two groups (P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05) between the B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-PRV group (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, the percentage of CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes was similar with Fig. 3b (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05).

Fig. 3
figure3

The percentage of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes in spleen. The spleen was separated from the mice at 35 day. a The representative flow cytometry plots showing CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes in the spleen. The quantification of the frequencies were shown in b CD3+, c CD3+CD4+ and d CD3+CD8+ T cells. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01

The proliferation of lymphocytes in spleen

The proliferation of lymphocytes in spleen was analyzed by CCK8 assay. The data showed that B. subtilis-gDa significantly enhanced the proliferation of lymphocytes in spleen followed the trend shown in Fig. 4 (P < 0.01). And the B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-PRV group remained at the same level as ConA group (P > 0.05).

Fig. 4
figure4

The proliferation of lymphocytes in spleen. Splenocytes were prepared at 35 day and cultured with PBS, Con A, B. subtilis-PRV, B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa for 72 h at 37 °C. Then, the proliferative responses detected by CCK8 method and shown as a proliferation ratio. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. **P < 0.01

Determination of cytokine responses

We tested the ability of recombinant B. subtilis to induce production of cytokines. The cytokines IFN-γ and IL-10 were detected by RT-qPCR in lung and vagina. The data showed that intranasal immunization with B. subtilis-gDa could effectively stimulate upward IFN-γ and IL-10 in lung (P < 0.01) (Fig. 5a, b). However, the IFN-γ had similar expression between the B. subtilis-gDa and B. subtilis-gCa group (P > 0.05) (Fig. 5b). The same cytokine responses were found in vagina (Fig. 5c, d).

Fig. 5
figure5

The determination of cytokine responses by RT-qPCR. The mRNA were extracted in lung and vagina. Then, the expression of IFN-γ and IL-10 were detected by RT-qPCR. a, b Detection of IFN-γ and IL-10 in lung. c, d Detection of IFN-γ and IL-10 in vagina. Data were expressed as the mean ± SD. **P < 0.01

PRV neutralization assay

The neutralizing antibodies from mice intranasal administration with the recombinant B. subtilis was evaluated by PRNT (Fig. 6). We observed that B. subtilis-gDa had better neutralization than other groups in different dilutions of serum (P < 0.01). Besides, B. subtilis-gCa significantly induced higher neutralization titer than B. subtilis-PRV in dilutions of 1:16 and 1:32 (P < 0.01). However, B. subtilis-gCa remarkably declined in dilutions of 1:64 (P < 0.01).

Fig. 6
figure6

The determination of the PRV neutralizing antibodies. PRV neutralizing antibodies were measured in sera by plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Data were shown as the mean ± SD. **P < 0.01

Discussion

Bacillus subtilis is an ideal vehicle to carry foreign proteins, and has a full set of biotechnological application. In the present study, we successfully constructed and verified the recombinant B. subtilis expressing gCa (B. subtilis-gCa) and gDa (B. subtilis-gDa). B. subtilis possess a predominant advantage in inducing specific immunity [34]. It had been shown that recombinant B. subtilis could stimulate humoral and cellular immunity [35]. Therefore, we further explored the immunization efficacy of B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa.

PRV is one of the most infectious swine diseases and makes great economic losses in the world. PRV genome contains 11 different envelope glycoproteins (named gB, gC, gD, gE, gG, gH, gI, gK, gL, gM, and gN) that interact with host cells [36]. Among them, the gC and gD are the major proteins that elicit immune responses. Recombinant baculovirus which expressed gC and gD had been proved to elicit high titers of PRV-specific serum antibodies of IgG and IFN-γ against PRV challenge [37]. Recombinant DNA vaccines expressing gC and gD had been found to effectively induce either humoral or cellular immunity against PRV infection [38,39,40]. Besides, through bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) technology to construct gC and gD substituted pseudorabies virus could produce fantastic relative immune protection [41]. Therefore, using gC and gD proteins to construct recombinant B. subtilis is a great choice against PRV infection.

Intranasal administration is a promising alternative to other traditional administration routes, such as oral or parenteral administration. Intranasal administration depends on the large nasal mucosa and induces strong mucosal immunity. Intranasal immunization with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide could significantly increase the titers of specific IgA and IgG antibodies and induce stronger mucosal immune responses than subcutaneous (SC) route [42]. Although intranasal administration is becoming a preferable way of mucosal immunity, in fact, the complex anatomic structure of the nasal cavity and the special physiological function limit its application range. To solve these problems, a number of different techniques have been used to overcome the limitations posed by the nasal mucosa, liking nasal enzyme inhibition, permeation enhancing, drug chemical structure modification and design of pro-drugs and particulate [43]. However, these techniques currently are in the primary phase, and need further research and general application.

In this case, B. subtilis shows many advantages. Firstly, B. subtilis is able to reach and adhere to the nasal mucosa, more importantly increasing the number of immune cells in the nasal mucosa [44]. Secondly, B. subtilis is an acknowledged safe, cheap and well-tolerated probiotics. At last, B. subtilis has capacity for genetic manipulation, easy handling, short processing times, and convenience for application in large-scale industrial production [45]. This explains why intranasal administration with recombinant B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa stimulated a much stronger immunity in mice.

As mentioned earlier, the nasal cavity is a main pathway of PRV infection. Therefore, mucosal immune plays an important role in against PRV infection. Secretory immunoglobulin A (SIgA) is the major antibody isotype in mucosal immune and provides extended protection. Intranasal administration with monoclonal IgA antibodies could significantly suppress the respiratory syncytial virus and prevent initial infection in nasal mucosa [46]. Besides, SIgA antibodies also provides cross-protection against infection with different strains of influenza B virus [47]. Moreover, oral administration with CpG ODNs induces higher titers of IgA against PRV infection [48]. Our data indicated the B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa could provide sufficiently long-lasting mucosal immunity by increasing the levels of specific IgA in the nasal. In addition, owing to the common mucosal immune system (CMIS), high levels of specific IgA also were detected in vagina, although vagina was so distant from the nasal. The CMIS ensures that lymphocytes induced by an antigen in a mucosal site migrate to other mucosal sites as effector cells to protect all mucosal tissues from the same antigens [49].

Except for mucosal IgA, immunity against PRV depends more on the T lymphocytes. It is demonstrated that the proliferation of CD4+CD8+ T cells might directly contribute to the elimination of PRV infected cells [50]. Cytokines play critical roles in regulating the antigen-specific T cell responses. T-cell responses are classified as either Th1 (IFN-γ, IL-2) or Th2 (IL-4, IL-10) based on their cytokines, with representing either cell-mediated or antibody-mediated responses, respectively [51]. Administration with PRV vaccine with GSLS-TS significantly elicited robust and unbiased Th1 and Th2 immune responses by up-regulated Th1 (IFN-γ and IL-12) and Th2 (IL-5 and IL-10) cytokines [52]. In addition, intranasal administration with PRV DNA vaccine could induce mixed Th1/Th2-type immune responses and provide protective immunity against PRV infection [53]. Similarly, our results also demonstrated that recombinant B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa could regulate the specific T lymphocyte proliferative responses, and produced IFN-γ and IL-10 to raise the percentage of CD3+, CD3+CD4+, and CD3+CD8+ T cells in spleen. The CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells possess the properties of mature antigen-experienced cells and contribute to producing virus-specific antibodies by B cells [54]. Moreover, the CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ T cells could induce a clear PRV-specific CD4-dependent DTH reactivity and a classical CD8-dependent MHC-restricted cytotoxicity [55]. Besides, recombinant B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa could strengthened the systemic immune by upregulating the titers of IgG in serum. The specific virus-neutralizing serum antibodies play a substantial role in controlling PRV infection. Our results showed that recombinant B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa induced strongly neutralizing antibodies to limit virus replication [56]. These all indicated that B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa could induce both cell-mediated immunity (CMI) and antibody-mediated immunity (AMI) in protecting against PRV infection.

In conclusion, the present study successfully constructed recombinant B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa, and demonstrated that intranasal administration with B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa could effectively stimulate IgA and IgG immune responses, regulate specific T lymphocyte proliferative response by IFN-γ and IL-10, ultimately produce high titers of neutralizing antibodies against PRV infection in mice. In particular, B. subtilis-gDa possessed more excellent immune effect. Owing to the outbreaks of PRV in pig farms, B. subtilis-gCa and B. subtilis-gDa might provide new and key perspectives in developing successful PRV nasal vaccines in swine.

References

  1. 1.

    Tavares Batista M, Souza RD, Paccez JD, Luiz WB, Ferreira EL, Cavalcante RC, Ferreira RC, Ferreira LC. Gut adhesive Bacillus subtilis spores as a platform for mucosal delivery of antigens. Infect Immun. 2014;82:1414–23.

  2. 2.

    Wang J, Huang L, Mou C, Zhang E, Wang Y, Cao Y, Yang Q. Mucosal immune responses induced by oral administration recombinant Bacillus subtilis expressing the COE antigen of PEDV in newborn piglets. Biosci Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20182028.

  3. 3.

    Hardy K, Stahl S, Kupper H. Production in B subtilis of hepatitis B core antigen and a major antigen of foot and mouth disease virus. Nature. 1981;293:481–3.

  4. 4.

    Starosila D, Rybalko S, Varbanetz L, Ivanskaya N, Sorokulova I. Anti-influenza activity of a Bacillus subtilis probiotic strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00539.

  5. 5.

    Hosseini S, Curilovs A, Cutting SM. Biological containment of genetically modified Bacillus subtilis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017;84:e02334.

  6. 6.

    Freuling CM, Muller TF, Mettenleiter TC. Vaccines against pseudorabies virus (PrV). Vet Microbiol. 2017;206:3–9.

  7. 7.

    Yu X, Zhou Z, Hu D, Zhang Q, Han T, Li X, Gu X, Yuan L, Zhang S, Wang B, et al. Pathogenic pseudorabies virus, China, 2012. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:102–4.

  8. 8.

    Sun Y, Luo Y, Wang CH, Yuan J, Li N, Song K, Qiu HJ. Control of swine pseudorabies in China: opportunities and limitations. Vet Microbiol. 2016;183:119–24.

  9. 9.

    Li Y, Yan S, Li X, Yang Q, Guo L, Wang Y, Xiao Y, Tan F, Li X, Tian K. From mouse to pig: is PRV vaccine safe across two species? Virus Res. 2017;236:44–9.

  10. 10.

    Wong G, Lu J, Zhang W, Gao GF. Pseudorabies virus: a neglected zoonotic pathogen in humans? Emerg Microb Infect. 2019;8:150–4.

  11. 11.

    He W, Auclert LZ, Zhai X, Wong G, Zhang C, Zhu H, Xing G, Wang S, He W, Li K, et al. Interspecies transmission, genetic diversity, and evolutionary dynamics of pseudorabies virus. J Infect Dis. 2018;218:1705–15.

  12. 12.

    Bosch AA, Biesbroek G, Trzcinski K, Sanders EA, Bogaert D. Viral and bacterial interactions in the upper respiratory tract. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003057.

  13. 13.

    Maroof A, Yorgensen YM, Li Y, Evans JT. Intranasal vaccination promotes detrimental Th17-mediated immunity against influenza infection. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1003875.

  14. 14.

    Kang ML, Cho CS, Yoo HS. Application of chitosan microspheres for nasal delivery of vaccines. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:857–65.

  15. 15.

    Takaki H, Ichimiya S, Matsumoto M, Seya T. Mucosal immune response in nasal-associated lymphoid tissue upon intranasal administration by adjuvants. J Innate Immun. 2018;10:515–21.

  16. 16.

    Bienenstock J, McDermott MR. Bronchus- and nasal-associated lymphoid tissues. Immunol Rev. 2005;206:22–31.

  17. 17.

    Torrieri-Dramard L, Lambrecht B, Ferreira HL, Van den Berg T, Klatzmann D, Bellier B. Intranasal DNA vaccination induces potent mucosal and systemic immune responses and cross-protective immunity against influenza viruses. Mol Ther. 2011;19:602–11.

  18. 18.

    Li Y, Li M, Gong T, Zhang Z, Sun X. Antigen-loaded polymeric hybrid micelles elicit strong mucosal and systemic immune responses after intranasal administration. J Control Release. 2017;262:151–8.

  19. 19.

    Xu Y, Yuen PW, Lam JK. Intranasal DNA vaccine for protection against respiratory infectious diseases: the delivery perspectives. Pharmaceutics. 2014;6:378–415.

  20. 20.

    Sepahi A, Salinas I. The evolution of nasal immune systems in vertebrates. Mol Immunol. 2016;69:131–8.

  21. 21.

    Djupesland PG. Nasal drug delivery devices: characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective-a review. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2013;3:42–62.

  22. 22.

    Gu Z, Dong J, Wang J, Hou C, Sun H, Yang W, Bai J, Jiang P. A novel inactivated gE/gI deleted pseudorabies virus (PRV) vaccine completely protects pigs from an emerged variant PRV challenge. Virus Res. 2015;195:57–63.

  23. 23.

    Van Opdenbosch N, Van den Broeke C, De Regge N, Tabares E, Favoreel HW. The IE180 protein of pseudorabies virus suppresses phosphorylation of translation initiation factor eIF2alpha. J Virol. 2012;86:7235–40.

  24. 24.

    Wu H, Wang S, Qiao J, Liu J, Zhan J, Gao X. Expression of HpaGXooc protein in Bacillus subtilis and its biological functions. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;19:194–203.

  25. 25.

    Zhang XZ, Cui ZL, Hong Q, Li SP. High-level expression and secretion of methyl parathion hydrolase in Bacillus subtilis WB800. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:4101–3.

  26. 26.

    Sancak Y, Peterson TR, Shaul YD, Lindquist RA, Thoreen CC, Bar-Peled L, Sabatini DM. The Rag GTPases bind raptor and mediate amino acid signaling to mTORC1. Science. 2008;320:1496–501.

  27. 27.

    Xiao S, Chen S, Cheng X, Lin F, Wang S, Zhu X, Yu B, Huang M, Wang J, Wu N, et al. The newly emerging duck-origin goose parvovirus in China exhibits a wide range of pathogenicity to main domesticated waterfowl. Vet Microbiol. 2017;203:252–6.

  28. 28.

    Mou C, Zhu L, Xing X, Lin J, Yang Q. Immune responses induced by recombinant Bacillus subtilis expressing the spike protein of transmissible gastroenteritis virus in pigs. Antiviral Res. 2016;131:74–84.

  29. 29.

    Wu J, Liao X, Yu F, Wei Z, Yang L. Cloning of a dibutyl phthalate hydrolase gene from Acinetobacter sp. strain M673 and functional analysis of its expression product in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:2483–91.

  30. 30.

    Nahas AA, Lima MIS, Goulart IMB, Goulart LR. Anti-lipoarabinomannan-specific salivary IgA as prognostic marker for leprosy reactions in patients and cellular immunity in contacts. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1205.

  31. 31.

    Vremec D, Pooley J, Hochrein H, Wu L, Shortman K. CD4 and CD8 expression by dendritic cell subtypes in mouse thymus and spleen. J Immunol. 2000;164:2978–86.

  32. 32.

    Guo J, Sun X, Yin H, Wang T, Li Y, Zhou C, Zhou H, He S, Cong H. Chitosan microsphere used as an effective system to deliver a linked antigenic peptides vaccine protect mice against acute and chronic toxoplasmosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:163.

  33. 33.

    Chang SH, Bae JL, Kang TJ, Kim J, Chung GH, Lim CW, Laude H, Yang MS, Jang YS. Identification of the epitope region capable of inducing neutralizing antibodies against the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Mol Cells. 2002;14:295–9.

  34. 34.

    Amuguni H, Tzipori S. Bacillus subtilis: a temperature resistant and needle free delivery system of immunogens. Hum Vaccine Immunother. 2012;8:979–86.

  35. 35.

    Jiang H, Chen T, Sun H, Tang Z, Yu J, Lin Z, Ren P, Zhou X, Huang Y, Li X, Yu X. Immune response induced by oral delivery of Bacillus subtilis spores expressing enolase of Clonorchis sinensis in grass carps (Ctenopharyngodon idellus). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2017;60:318–25.

  36. 36.

    Pomeranz LE, Reynolds AE, Hengartner CJ. Molecular biology of pseudorabies virus: impact on neurovirology and veterinary medicine. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2005;69:462–500.

  37. 37.

    Grabowska AK, Lipinska AD, Rohde J, Szewczyk B, Bienkowska-Szewczyk K, Rziha HJ. New baculovirus recombinants expressing Pseudorabies virus (PRV) glycoproteins protect mice against lethal challenge infection. Vaccine. 2009;27:3584–91.

  38. 38.

    Monteil M, Le Pottier MF, Ristov AA, Cariolet R, L’Hospitalier R, Klonjkowski B, Eloit M. Single inoculation of replication-defective adenovirus-vectored vaccines at birth in piglets with maternal antibodies induces high level of antibodies and protection against pseudorabies. Vaccine. 2000;18:1738–42.

  39. 39.

    Yoon HA, Aleyas AG, George JA, Park SO, Han YW, Kang SH, Cho JG, Eo SK. Differential segregation of protective immunity by encoded antigen in DNA vaccine against pseudorabies virus. Immunol Cell Biol. 2006;84:502–11.

  40. 40.

    Rajcani J, Banati F, Szenthe K, Szathmary S. The potential of currently unavailable herpes virus vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccine. 2018;17:239–48.

  41. 41.

    Zhang C, Liu Y, Chen S, Qiao Y, Guo M, Zheng Y, Xu M, Wang Z, Hou J, Wang J. A gD&gC-substituted pseudorabies virus vaccine strain provides complete clinical protection and is helpful to prevent virus shedding against challenge by a Chinese pseudorabies variant. BMC Vet Res. 2019;15:2.

  42. 42.

    Cao D, Li H, Jiang Z, Cheng Q, Yang Z, Xu C, Cao G, Zhang L. CpG oligodeoxynucleotide synergizes innate defense regulator peptide for enhancing the systemic and mucosal immune responses to pseudorabies attenuated virus vaccine in piglets in vivo. Int Immunopharmacol. 2011;11:748–54.

  43. 43.

    Jug M, Hafner A, Lovric J, Kregar ML, Pepic I, Vanic Z, Cetina-Cizmek B, Filipovic-Grcic J. An overview of in vitro dissolution/release methods for novel mucosal drug delivery systems. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;147:350–66.

  44. 44.

    Yang Y, Jing Y, Yang J, Yang Q. Effects of intranasal administration with Bacillus subtilis on immune cells in the nasal mucosa and tonsils of piglets. Exp Ther Med. 2018;15:5189–98.

  45. 45.

    Wenzel M, Muller A, Siemann-Herzberg M, Altenbuchner J. Self-inducible Bacillus subtilis expression system for reliable and inexpensive protein production by high-cell-density fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:6419–25.

  46. 46.

    Weltzin R, Traina-Dorge V, Soike K, Zhang JY, Mack P, Soman G, Drabik G, Monath TP. Intranasal monoclonal IgA antibody to respiratory syncytial virus protects rhesus monkeys against upper and lower respiratory tract infection. J Infect Dis. 1996;174:256–61.

  47. 47.

    Asahi-Ozaki Y, Yoshikawa T, Iwakura Y, Suzuki Y, Tamura S, Kurata T, Sata T. Secretory IgA antibodies provide cross-protection against infection with different strains of influenza B virus. J Med Virol. 2004;74:328–35.

  48. 48.

    Linghua Z, Xingshan T, Fengzhen Z. In vivo oral administration effects of various oligodeoxynucleotides containing synthetic immunostimulatory motifs in the immune response to pseudorabies attenuated virus vaccine in newborn piglets. Vaccine. 2008;26:224–33.

  49. 49.

    Bordon Y. Mucosal immunology: air miles for T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13:705.

  50. 50.

    De Pelsmaeker S, Devriendt B, De Regge N, Favoreel HW. Porcine NK cells stimulate proliferation of pseudorabies virus-experienced CD8(+) and CD4(+)CD8(+) T cells. Front Immunol. 2018;9:3188.

  51. 51.

    Rosloniec EF, Latham K, Guedez YB. Paradoxical roles of IFN-gamma in models of Th1-mediated autoimmunity. Arthritis Res. 2002;4:333–6.

  52. 52.

    Ni J, Bi S, Xu W, Zhang C, Lu Y, Zhai L, Hu S. Improved immune response to an attenuated pseudorabies virus vaccine by ginseng stem-leaf saponins (GSLS) in combination with thimerosal (TS). Antiviral Res. 2016;132:92–8.

  53. 53.

    Yoon HA, Han YW, Aleyas AG, George JA, Kim SJ, Kim HK, Song HJ, Cho JG, Eo SK. Protective immunity induced by systemic and mucosal delivery of DNA vaccine expressing glycoprotein B of pseudorabies virus. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;18:591–9.

  54. 54.

    Ober BT, Summerfield A, Mattlinger C, Wiesmuller KH, Jung G, Pfaff E, Saalmuller A, Rziha HJ. Vaccine-induced, pseudorabies virus-specific, extrathymic CD4+CD8+ memory T-helper cells in swine. J Virol. 1998;72:4866–73.

  55. 55.

    Bianchi AT, Moonen-Leusen HW, van Milligen FJ, Savelkoul HF, Zwart RJ, Kimman TG. A mouse model to study immunity against pseudorabies virus infection: significance of CD4+ and CD8+ cells in protective immunity. Vaccine. 1998;16:1550–8.

  56. 56.

    Haagmans BL, van Rooij EM, Dubelaar M, Kimman TG, Horzinek MC, Schijns VE, Bianchi AT. Vaccination of pigs against pseudorabies virus with plasmid DNA encoding glycoprotein D. Vaccine. 1999;17:1264–71.

Download references

Author information

JW performed the experiments and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. YW and JL contributed to constructing the recombinant Bacillus subtilis. EZ and MZ helped the animal experiments. QY designed and coordinated the study, supervised all experimental steps, and revised and finalized the manuscript. At last, we thanked HZ for reviewing the use of English in this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Qian Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal experiments had approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Agricultural University and followed the National Institutes of Health’s guidelines for the performance of animal experiments.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

12934_2019_1151_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Additional file 1: Figure S1. Analysis of the dominant antigen regions. (A) Transmembrane analysis of the whole length of gC protein by TMHMM 2.0 analysis. The results showed that 1–459 amino acids were located outside the membrane, 460–482 amino acids were located on the cell membrane and 483–387 amino acids were located inside the membrane. (B) The whole length of gD protein was analyzed by TMHMM 2.0. The results showed that 1-353 amino acids were located outside the membrane, 354–376 amino acids were located on the cell membrane and 377-402 amino acids were located inside the membrane. (C, D) The secondary structure, hydrophilicity, surface accessibility, flexibility and antigen index of the gC (C) and gD (D) were analyzed by DNAstar Protean software. (E) gC 1417 bp and gD 1139 bp were amplified by PCR. (F) gCa 444 bp and gDa 815 bp were amplified by PCR.

12934_2019_1151_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Additional file 2: Figure S2. Recombinant fragments cloning. EGFP 717 bp (A), gCa-EGFP 1161 bp (B) and gDa-EGFP 1856 bp (C) were obtained by PCR amplification.

12934_2019_1151_MOESM3_ESM.tif

Additional file 3: Figure S3. Transformation Bacillus subtilis by Electroporation. Electroporation under the conditions of 22 KV/cm, 25 μF, 2000 Ω, 5 ms.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Keywords

  • Pseudorabies virus (PRV)
  • Recombinant Bacillus subtilis
  • Mucosal immunity
  • Vaccines