Skip to main content
Download PDF

Identification and application of a growth-regulated promoter for improving l-valine production in Corynebacterium glutamicum

Microbial Cell Factories volume 17, Article number: 185 (2018) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Promoters are commonly used to regulate the expression of specific target genes or operons. Although a series of promoters have been developed in Corynebacterium glutamicum, more precise and unique expression patterns are needed that the current selection of promoters cannot produce. RNA-Seq technology is a powerful tool for helping us to screen out promoters with expected transcriptional strengths.

Results

The promoter PCP_2836 of an aldehyde dehydrogenase coding gene from Corynebacterium glutamicum CP was identified via RNA-seq and RT-PCR as a growth-regulated promoter. Comparing with the strong constitutive promoter Ptuf, the transcriptional strength of PCP_2836 showed a significant decrease that from about 75 to 8% in the stationary phase. By replacing the native promoters of the aceE and gltA genes with PCP_2836 in the C. glutamicum ATCC 13032-derived l-valine-producing strain AN02, the relative transcriptional levels of the aceE and gltA genes decreased from 1.2 and 1.1 to 0.35 and 0.3, and the activity of their translation products decreased to 43% and 35%, respectively. After 28 h flask fermentation, the final cell density of the obtained strains, GRaceE and GRgltA, exhibited a 7–10% decrease. However, l-valine production increased by 23.9% and 27.3%, and the yield of substrate to product increased 43.8% and 62.5%, respectively. In addition, in the stationary phase, the intracellular citrate levels in GRaceE and GRgltA decreased to 27.0% and 33.6% of AN02, and their intracellular oxaloacetate levels increased to 2.7 and 3.0 times that of AN02, respectively.

Conclusions

The PCP_2836 promoter displayed a significant difference on its transcriptional strength in different cell growth phases. With using PCP_2836 to replace the native promoters of aceE and gltA genes, both the transcriptional levels of the aceE and gltA genes and the activity of their translation products demonstrated a significant decrease in the stationary phase. Thus, the availability of pyruvate was significantly increased for the synthesis of l-valine without any apparent irreversible negative impacts on cell growth. Use of this promoter can enhance the selectivity and control of gene expression and could serve as a useful research tool for metabolic engineering.

Background

Promoters control the transcription of genes in bacteria and are commonly used to regulate the expression of target genes or operons in research involving metabolic engineering [1]. A series of promoters have been developed for use in protein expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum [2]. Strong constitutive promoters, such as the tuf and sod promoters, are widely used to optimize metabolic flux for the purpose of improving productivity and yield of target metabolites [3, 4]. This type of promoters enable constitutive expression of the target gene and are not affected by transcriptional regulators [5]. Thus, a target gene under the control of such promoters can be steadily expressed at a high level during all growth phases. However, in some cases such as the expression of toxic proteins, a constitutive expression is not suitable, where a tightly regulated and tunable promoter system is needed [6, 7]. An inducible promoter can deliver high levels of gene expression during a specific growth phase, as desired, and typically confers low expression levels prior to being activated [8]. Additionally, transcriptional repression and RNA interference can also be used to regulate the expression of target genes [9, 10]. It is performed by modifying the upstream DNA sequence or mRNA to inhibit the transcription or translation activity, subsequently weakening the expression of the gene. Moreover, CRISPR interference technology can be employed to specifically reduce the expression of target genes in C. glutamicum [11]. Together, these approaches can easily achieve regulated gene transcription by the simple addition of an inducer or a change to the culture conditions. However, during industrial scale fermentation, a small change in conditions can lead to significant fluctuations in production. Moreover, some specific requirements for controlled gene expression need highly precise and unique controls that current gene expression regulation methods cannot meet.

Under aerobic conditions, the TCA cycle is the main source of cellular energy and also provides a large number of organic acids as metabolic precursors [12, 13]. However, during the synthesis of some products, such as l-valine and l-leucine, an active TCA cycle results in unused carbon, which is not conducive to the efficient synthesis of target products. As such, there is a trade-off between product synthesis and the TCA cycle. Inactivation of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDHC) by deletion of the aceE gene can prevent pyruvate from converting to acetyl-CoA and further entering into the TCA cycle, which facilitates the synthesis of l-valine [14, 15]. Similarly, the inactivation of citrate synthase by deletion of the gltA gene can also weaken the TCA cycle while improving the efficiency of l-leucine synthesis [16]. However, although such genetic modifications improved the availability of carbon for the synthesis of target products, they also have an irreversible negative impact on cell growth, leading to a decline in the final overall production. It would therefore be desirable to find a way that could optimize carbon availability without a negative impact on cell growth for the transcription of those genes.

Transcriptomic analysis can give us a clear understanding of gene transcriptional patterns [17]. In our previously study, a strong constitutive promoter PCP_2454, was identified via RNA-seq from an l-leucine-producing mutant of C. glutamicum CP. The transcriptional strength of the PCP_2454 promoter was about 80% that of the tuf and sod promoters. This promoter could be used to strengthen gene expression and increased the production of l-valine in C. glutamicum [18]. In this study, statistical analysis of the RNA-seq data of C. glutamicum CP was used to identify genes with significant differences in transcription levels between the exponential and stationary phases. Genes that met this criterion might be controlled via a growth-regulated promoter, whose transcriptional strength was down-regulated when cells approach stationary phase [19]. The transcriptional strength of one such promoter, PCP_2836, was verified experimentally, and the promoter was applied to the construction of l-valine-producing strains to increase carbon availability and l-valine production. In addition, this growth-regulated promoter could be employed for engineering optimal gene expression in other C. glutamicum strains.

Results and discussion

Identification and functional verification of a growth-regulated promoter

The RNA-seq data of the mutant l-leucine-producing strain C. glutamicum CP were normalized and presented as the FPKM (expected number of Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript sequence per Million base pairs sequenced) [20]. Transcriptional levels of all genes between the cells in the exponential and stationary growth phases were compared using the average value of the FPKM of each sample (three independent repeats per sample). We first filtered out those genes for which the sum of FPKM values in the exponential growth phase and the stationary growth phase was < 100 to ensure that the transcriptional strength of the screened promoters had a considerable value. As a result, a total of 1836 genes remained. After a log10-fold change, the absolute value of FPKM ratios for about 90% of the genes was < 0.36, which was considered an insignificant differential expressions between the exponential and stationary growth phases. The FPKM ratio of the tuf gene was 0.02, which was under the control of the frequently used strong constitutive tuf promoter and is considered as very stable. The highest FPKM ratio (1.62) was demonstrated by CP_2836, an aldehyde dehydrogenase coding gene, which indicated that the transcriptional level of CP_2836 in the exponential growth phase was significantly higher than that in the stationary growth phase.

To verify this observation, the transcriptional level of CP_2836 was measured by fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR in reference to tuf. In the exponential growth phase, the transcriptional level of CP_2836 was about 75% that of tuf. In the stationary growth phase, however, the level of CP_2836 decreased to just about 8% that of tuf. This result indicated that the transcription of CP_2836 was controlled by a growth-regulated promoter, whose transcriptional strength was significantly decreased in the stationary growth phase.

GFP expression under control of the growth-regulated promoter

In order to assess the growth-regulated promoter PCP_2836, the green fluorescent protein (GFP) was used as a reporter to study the transcriptional strength of PCP_2836 throughout the entire culture process. Using the expression vector pXMJ19 as a backbone, the predicted sequences of PCP_2836 (Fig. 1) were cloned and ligated into pXMJ19 to replace the Ptac promoter of this vector. The GFP reporter gene was expressed under the control of PCP_2836 in reference to the tuf promoter in the wild-type C. glutamicum ATCC 13032. The strains were cultured for 28 h, where the cell densities and cell fluorescence intensities were measured every 4 h. The fluorescence intensity was normalized to cell density. As shown in Fig. 2, at 4, 8, and 12 h, the relative fluorescence intensity of ATCC 13032(pXC36-G) was about 75% that of ATCC 13032(pXTuf-G). As expected, however, the relative fluorescence intensity of ATCC 13032(pXC36-G) decreased at 16 h, and at 20–28 h it was only about 28% of ATCC 13032(pXTuf-G).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sequence of the predicted PCP_2836 promoter. The − 35 box, − 10 box, spacer region, transcription start site, and SD-sequence were highlighted

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Expression of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) under control of the growth-regulated promoter or the tuf promoter by using plasmid. Cell fluorescence intensity was normalized to cell density. Measurement of unit fluorescence intensity of cells at 510 nm was performed using an ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer. Mean ± standard deviations were calculated from three biological replicates

Full size image

These results indicated that this promoter could be applied to regulate a target gene that needed to be highly expressed in the exponential growth phase but silent in the stationary growth phase (e.g. genes that are necessary for cell growth but are not related to target product synthesis). For the synthesis of l-valine, pyruvate is an important precursor which is also necessary for the TCA cycle. Under aerobic conditions, pyruvate entering the TCA cycle is mainly catalyzed by PDHC and citrate synthase [21]. The inactivation of PDHC and citrate synthase can cause an increase in l-valine production, however, it also has an irreversible negative impact on cell growth [15, 18]. Since most of the inducible promoters are tightly regulated with low basal expression before induction, it could not control the transcription of the gltA or aceE genes at a high level in the exponential phase and a low level in the stationary phase. In addition, there are rarely reports to inducible promoters which translation could be stopped or weakened after induction. Thus, by placing aceE or gltA under the control of this growth-regulated promoter, the TCA cycle should be active in the exponential growth phase (for cell growth) but be weakened in the stationary growth phase (increasing carbon availability).

Application of the growth-regulated promoter to optimize the carbon metabolism of l-valine synthesis

To verify this hypothesis, the promoter of the aceE or gltA gene of an l-valine producing strain, C. glutamicum AN02, was each replaced by the growth-regulated promoter PCP_2836 to generate the GRaceE and GRgltA strains, respectively. The l-valine producer AN02 was constructed in our previously study in which two copies of the feedback-inhibition-released acetolactate synthase coding gene were integrated into the genome of wild-type ATCC 13032 (unpublished data). Moreover, for reference, the aceE or gltA gene was also deleted from the genome of AN02 to construct a PDHC-deficient strain, AN02ΔaceE, and a citrate synthase-deficient strain, AN02ΔgltA, respectively. Strains were cultivated in flasks for 28 h. The final cell density, l-valine titer, glucose consumption, and the yield of substrate to product (YS/P) are shown in Table 1. The final cell density of GRaceE and GRgltA was 7–10% lower than that of AN02. However, compared with AN02, the l-valine titer of GRaceE and GRgltA increased 23.9% and 27.3% and their YS/P increased 43.8% and 62.5%, respectively. As there was no extra acetate or citrate added into the culture, the cell densities and l-valine titers of AN02ΔaceE and AN02ΔgltA were both obviously lower than the other strains. However, GRaceE and GRgltA grew normally at 0–12 h, but showed a lower growth rate at 12–28 h compared with AN02 (Fig. 3a).

Table 1 The final cell density, l-valine production, glucose consumption and the yield of substrate to product of different strains after 28 h flask fermentation
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

Application of the growth-regulated promoter to replace the native promoters of the aceE and gltA genes. a Cell densities of different strains. b Relative transcriptional levels of the aceE and gltA genes under the control of the growth-regulated promoter in reference to their native promoters. c Relative activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase and citrate synthase between stationary phase and exponential phase. Exp exponential phase, Sta stationary phase. Means ± standard deviations were calculated from three biological replicates

Full size image

The transcriptional level of the aceE and gltA genes was assessed by fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR. At 8 and 12 h, the transcriptional level of the aceE gene of GRaceE was about 1.2-times higher than that of AN02; however, at 16–24 h, this ratio decreased to about 0.35 (Fig. 3b). Similarly, the expression ratio of the gltA gene of GRgltA to AN02 decreased from about 1.1 (8–12 h) to 0.30 (16–24 h). In addition, the activities of pyruvate dehydrogenase and citrate synthase decreased relative to their gene transcription. In GRaceE, the activity of pyruvate dehydrogenase, which was encoded by aceE, decreased in the stationary phase to about 43% of that of the exponential phase. While in GRgltA, the activity of citrate synthase, which was encoded by gltA, decreased to about 35% of that of the exponential phase (Fig. 3c).

The native promoters of the aceE and gltA genes are σA-dependent promoters. The transcriptional pattern of this type of promoter decreases the transition between the exponential and stationary growth phases [2]. However, the change in the transcriptional strength of PCP_2836 was more sensitive to cell density. The transcriptional strength of PCP_2836 promoter was active throughout the exponential growth phase and rapidly decreased in the stationary growth phase. Moreover, the transcriptional difference of PCP_2836 between the exponential phase and the stationary phase was more apparent and its transcriptional strength was much lower in the stationary growth phase. Therefore, replacing the native promoters of the aceE and gltA genes with the PCP_2836 promoter contributed to optimize carbon availability of l-valine producers without any negative effect on cell growth.

Effect of the growth-regulated promoter on carbon metabolism

In central carbon metabolism pathway, PDHC and citrate synthase are two important nodes connecting the EMP pathway and the TCA cycle [22, 23]. To investigate the changes in the central carbon metabolism of GRaceE and GRgltA, we further measured the intracellular levels of pyruvate, citrate, oxaloacetate, and acetate. As shown in Fig. 4, the intracellular levels of these organic acids showed no obvious differences in the exponential phase (8 h). However, in the stationary phase (24 h), the intracellular citrate levels in GRaceE and GRgltA decreased to 27.0% and 33.6% of that of AN02, respectively. Meanwhile, the intracellular oxaloacetate levels in GRaceE and GRgltA increased to 2.7 and 3.0 times of that of AN02, respectively. These results indicated that the metabolism rate of the TCA cycle of GRaceE and GRgltA were lower than that of AN02 [24]. Moreover, the intracellular pyruvate levels in GRaceE and GRgltA were slightly decreased in the stationary phase compared with AN02. This was probably due to the impact of the decreased metabolism rate of the TCA cycle relative to central carbon metabolism. In addition, the intracellular acetate level of GRaceE was significantly lower than that of GRgltA and AN02 in the stationary phase. The synthesis of acetate depends on acetyl-CoA, which is formed from pyruvate and is catalyzed by PDHC [25]. As such, it was apparent that the promoter replacement caused the activity of PDHC of GRaceE to decrease to the point that sufficient acetyl-CoA could not be provided for acetate synthesis. These results indicated that the activities of the PDHC and citrate synthase decreased in the stationary growth phase and corresponded to the change in transcriptional strength of the growth-regulated promoter. Thus, limited pyruvate entered into the TCA cycle. On the other hand, more pyruvate was available to be used for synthesis of the target product. Therefore, both production and yield of l-valine increased.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The intracellular levels (μM/g cell) of citrate, oxaloacetate, pyruvate, and acetate in the different growth phases. Data are presented as means ± standard deviation of three biological replicates

Full size image

Our promoter replacement strategy overcame the serious, irreversible, and negative impact on cell growth that would occur following a knockout of the aceE or gltA genes. In addition, as this promoter would not require an inducer or any change in the fermentation conditions, it served as an authentic auto-regulation system. This strategy also served to reduce the workload and the risk of contamination and helped ensure the stability of the batch fermentation [26, 27]. Furthermore, this growth-regulated promoter could be used in a number of different metabolic engineering projects to control gene expressing by conferring different transcriptional levels to the different growth phases. Importantly, the development of such growth-regulated promoters can enhance the selectivity and timing of gene expression for use in metabolic engineering, and these could serve as important tools for use in many aspects of basic research.

Conclusions

This study identified the C. glutamicum growth-regulated promoter PCP_2836, which demonstrated a significant difference in transcriptional strength between the exponential and stationary growth phases. The transcriptional strength of PCP_2836 was about 75% that of the strong constitutive promoter, Ptuf, in the exponential growth phase, but only about 8% of Ptuf in the stationary growth phase. By replacing the native promoters of the aceE and gltA genes with PCP_2836 in the l-valine-producing strain C. glutamicum AN02, the transcriptional levels of these genes and the activity of their translational products were both significantly decrease in the stationary growth phase. In addition, in the modified strains GRaceE and GRgltA, the l-valine titers increased by 23.9% and 27.3% and the yield of substrate to product increased 43.8% and 62.5%, respectively. Intracellular organic acid analysis indicated that the metabolism rate of the TCA cycle in the engineered strains decreased. Additionally, compared with a direct knockout of the aceE or gltA gene, the engineered strains did not demonstrate any serious or irreversible negative impacts on cell growth. Besides, to place both the aceE and gltA genes under the control of the PCP_2836 promoter is expected to further increase the l-valine production yield, which will be used to maximize the production of l-valine. The identification of this growth-regulated promoter serves to enhance the selectivity and timing of gene expression in C. glutamicum.

Materials and methods

Strains and plasmids

The strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 2. C. glutamicum CP is an industrial l-leucine-producing strain obtained by repeated mutagenesis and selection. This strain is accessible at the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center with the identifier CGMCC 11425. The wild-type C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 and the plasmids pXMJ19, pK18mobsacB, and pCmGFP are stored in our laboratory.

Table 2 Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
Full size table

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The genome of C. glutamicum CP is accessible at GenBank with the accession number CP012194.1. The RNA-seq data of C. glutamicum CP have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRP143929.

Construction of plasmids and strains

The primers used in this study are listed in Additional file 1. The PCR was performed using the PrimeSTAR® HS DNA Polymerase (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The parameter settings for amplification of DNA were 94 °C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 55 °C for 5 s, and 72 °C for 1 min/Kb, and finally 72 °C for 10 min. General DNA manipulations were performed using the Takara QuickCut Enzyme (TaKaRa) for linearization of plasmid DNA and the ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) for DNA ligation. To construct pXTuf-G, the pXMJ19 plasmid was linearized via digestion with the HpaI and KpnI restriction enzymes, where the Ptac promoter was removed. The sequence of the Ptuf promoter was amplified by PCR from the C. glutamicum CP genome using primers 1/2, and the green fluorescent protein (GFP) coding gene gfp was amplified by PCR from the pCmGFP plasmid using primers 3/4. Then, the PCR products were ligated by overlapping PCR using primers 1/4 and further ligated into the linearized pXMJ19 plasmid. The pXC36-G plasmid was constructed with a similar method using primers 3–6. These plasmids were then transformed into C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 to overexpress GFP.

Chromosomal DNA manipulations were achieved via a markerless system using the suicide vector pK18mobsacB, as previously described [28]. To construct pK18-GRaceE, the pK18mobsacB plasmid was linearized via digestion with the HindIII and EcoRI restriction enzymes. The sequence of the PCP_2836 promoter was amplified by PCR from the C. glutamicum CP genome using primers 7/8, and the up- and down-stream sequences of the aceE gene promoter were amplified by PCR from the C. glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome using primers 9/10 and 11/12. Then, the PCR products were ligated by overlapping PCR using primers 9/12 and ligated into the linearized pK18mobsacB plasmid. The pK18-GRaceE plasmid was transformed into C. glutamicum AN02 by electroporation, and the native promoter of aceE was replaced by PCP_2836 via homologous recombination in the form of a double crossover to obtain the GRaceE strain. The same method was used to replace the gltA promoter with PCP_2836 to obtain the GRgltA strain and to knockout the aceE and gltA genes to obtain the AN02ΔaceE and AN02ΔgltA strains. All DNA manipulations, including chromosomal editing and plasmid construction, performed in this work were verified by Sanger sequencing to ensure no extra DNA changes were introduced.

Fermentation and analytical procedures

Bacteria were cultivated in 500-mL flasks at 32 °C in medium containing 8% (w/v) glucose, 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract, 1% (w/v) (NH4)2SO4, 0.2% (w/v) K2HPO4, 0.2% (w/v) KH2PO4, 0.1% (w/v) MgSO4, 0.001% (w/v) FeSO4, 0.001% (w/v) MnSO4, 0.001% (w/v) biotin, and 0.001% (w/v) thiamine for 28 h to produce l-valine. During the fermentation process, the pH was maintained at approximately 7.0 using NH4OH (25%, v/v) and the concentration of glucose in the culture was maintained at not less than 2% (w/v) by feeding with glucose (80%, w/v).

Amino acid contents were measured by high performance liquid chromatography using an Agilent ZORBAX Eclipse AA column (4.6 mm × 150 mm, 5-µm; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) with detection at 360 nm. Acetate buffered acetonitrile was used as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1 mL/min.

RNA extraction and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted (three independent repeats per condition) using the Eastep Super Total RNA Extraction Kit (Promega, Shanghai, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentrations were determined by Qubit fluorometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). Sequencing libraries were generated using NEBNext® Ultra™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB, Ipswich, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations, and index codes were added to attribute sequences to each sample. The library preparations were sequenced by Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) and 100 bp paired-end reads were generated. After data filtering and quality assessment, there were more than 7 million clean reads and more than 1 Gb clean bases for each sample.

Preparation of cDNA and fluorescence quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted from collected cells using the Eastep Super Total RNA Extraction Kit (Promega, Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, total RNA was reversely transcribed to cDNA using the PrimeScript RT Master Mix (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The transcriptional levels of different genes were identified by fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR using the cDNA as the template. The fluorescence quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNaseH Plus; TaKaRa, Dalian, China). The primers for RT-PCR are listed in Additional file 1. The parameter settings for amplification of DNA were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, and 60 °C for 35 s, and for the dissociation stage were 95 °C for 15 s, 65 °C for 35 s, and 95 °C for 15 s. The transcriptional level of 16S ribosomal RNA was used as an internal reference.

Measurement of cell fluorescence intensity

Cell culture was diluted to an OD600 value of 0.2–0.6 to measure cell fluorescence intensity. A FL F-7000 ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometer (Hitachi, Beijing, China) was used to detect cell fluorescence at an excitation wavelength of 510 nm.

Assay of enzyme activities

For enzyme activity assays, cells were collected by centrifugation (10,000×g, 5 min, 4 °C), and each 100 mg wet cell pellet was re-suspended in 1 mL ice-cold Tris/HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 7.5). Then, 100 μL lysozyme (50 mg/mL in distilled water) was added into a 4 mL cell suspension, and the cell suspensions were incubated at 32 °C for 15 min. The protoplasts were collected by centrifugation (10,000×g, 5 min, 4 °C) and washed twice with Tris/HCl buffer. The protoplasts were then re-suspended to 100 mg wet cells/mL in ice-cold Tris/HCl buffer and subjected to ultrasonic homogenization in an ice bath. The homogenates were centrifuged (15,000×g, 15 min, 4 °C), and the supernatants were used for enzyme activity assays.

Pyruvate dehydrogenase was assayed using the Pyruvate Dehydrogenase (PDH) Enzyme Activity Microplate Assay Kit (Abcam, Shanghai, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Citrate synthase was assayed by the method described in Lemos et al. [29]. First, 520 μL of buffer (containing 50 mM Tris/HCl with 100 mM KCl and 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5), 20 μL DTNB (5,5′-dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzoic acid, 5.025 mM in sample buffer), 20 μL acetyl coenzyme A (2.5 mM in distilled water), and 20 μL of the crude enzyme were mixed in a 1.5 mL EP tube. After 5 min of preincubation at 25 °C, the reaction was initiated with the addition of 20 μL oxaloacetate (5.0 mM in distilled water), and the increase in absorbance at 412 nm was registered.

Intracellular organic acid analysis

Samples for metabolic analysis were collected at the exponential growth (at 8 h) and stationary growth (at 24 h) phases. Cells were centrifuged (10,000×g, 5 min, 4 °C) and washed with 50 mL 0.9% NaCl at 4 °C. After centrifugation (10,000×g, 5 min, 4 °C), 50 mg wet cell pellets were re-suspended in 1 mL PBS buffer (pH 8.0, 4 °C), and 20 μL deuterium-labeled succinate (1 mg/mL) was added as an internal standard. Intracellular metabolites were extracted via five freeze–thaw cycles and ultrasonication (10 min, 4 °C). Finally, the solvent mixture was centrifuged (10,000×g, 5 min, 4 °C) and 1 mL of the supernatant was transferred to a new 1.5-mL tube and completely dried in a Vacuum Freeze Dryer (Gold-Sim, Los Angeles, USA). The dried samples were derivatized with 40 mg/L methoxyamine in 20 mL pyridine at 30 °C for 90 min and 45 µL of N-methyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)trifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) at 37 °C for 30 min. An Agilent 7890A-5975C GC–MS system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) and an HP-5 ms column (60 m × 0.32 mm, 0.25-μm film thickness; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, USA) were used for metabolite analysis. The sample was injected into the GC under split mode (helium total flow rate 9 mL/min with a sweeping rate of 3 mL/min). The initial oven temperature was 70 °C for 2 min and then increased to 290 °C for 4 °C/min. Mass spectra were recorded using full scan mode. The temperatures of the injection port, ion source, transfer line, and quadrupoles were set at 250 °C, 230 °C, 280 °C, and 150 °C, respectively.

References

  1. Browning DF, Busby SJ. The regulation of bacterial transcription initiation. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:57–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pátek M, Nešvera J. Sigma factors and promoters in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2011;154:101–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kind S, Jeong WK, Schröder H, Wittmann C. Systems-wide metabolic pathway engineering in Corynebacterium glutamicum for bio-based production of diaminopentane. Metab Eng. 2010;12:341–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker J, Klopprogge C, Zelder O, Heinzle E, Wittmann C. Amplified expression of fructose 1, 6-bisphosphatase in Corynebacterium glutamicum increases in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway and lysine production on different carbon sources. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8587–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawaguchi H, Vertes AA, Okino S, Inui M, Yukawa H. Engineering of a xylose metabolic pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3418–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Terpe K. Overview of bacterial expression systems for heterologous protein production: from molecular and biochemical fundamentals to commercial systems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;72(2):211–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giacalone MJ, Gentile AM, Lovitt BT, Berkley NL, Gunderson CW, Surber MW. Toxic protein expression in Escherichia coli using a rhamnose-based tightly regulated and tunable promoter system. Biotechniques. 2006;40(3):355–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rytter JV, Helmark S, Chen J, Lezyk MJ, Solem C, Jensen PR. Synthetic promoter libraries for Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:2617–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Letek M, Valbuena N, Ramos A, Ordóñez E, Gil JA, Mateos LM. Characterization and use of catabolite-repressed promoters from gluconate genes in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:409–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell TN, Choy FY. RNA interference: past, present and future. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2005;7:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cleto S, Jensen JV, Wendisch VF, Lu TK. Corynebacterium glutamicum metabolic engineering with CRISPR interference (CRISPRi). ACS Synth Biol. 2016;5:375–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Reimonn TM, Park SY, Agarabi CD, Brorson KA, Yoon S. Effect of amino acid supplementation on titer and glycosylation distribution in hybridoma cell cultures-systems biology-based interpretation using genome-scale metabolic flux balance model and multivariate data analysis. Biotechnol Prog. 2016;32:1163–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wendisch VF, Bott M, Eikmanns BJ. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli and Corynebacterium glutamicum for biotechnological production of organic acids and amino acids. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006;9(3):268–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Blombach B, Schreiner ME, Holátko J, Bartek T, Oldiges M, Eikmanns BJ. l-Valine production with pyruvate dehydrogenase complex-deficient Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(7):2079–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen C, Li Y, Hu J, Dong X, Wang X. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC13869 for L-valine production. Metab Eng. 2015;29:66–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vogt M, Haas S, Klaffl S, Polen T, Eggeling L, Ooyen JV, et al. Pushing product formation to its limit: metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for l-leucine overproduction. Metab Eng. 2014;22:40–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Pfeifer-Sancar K, Mentz A, Rückert C, Kalinowski J. Comprehensive analysis of the Corynebacterium glutamicum transcriptome using an improved RNAseq technique. BMC Genomics. 2013;14(1):888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wei H, Ma Y, Chen Q, Cui Y, Du L, Ma Q, Chen N. Identification and application of a novel strong constitutive promoter in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Ann Microbiol. 2018;68(6):375–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rodrigues F, Sarkar-Tyson M, Harding SV, Sim SH, Chua HH, Lin CH, et al. Global map of growth-regulated gene expression in Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(23):8178–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, Van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Radmacher E, Vaitsikova A, Burger U, Krumbach K, Sahm H, Eggeling L. Linking central metabolism with increased pathway flux: l-valine accumulation by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(5):2246–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sauer UWE, Lasko DR, Fiaux J, Hochuli M, Glaser R, Szyperski T, et al. Metabolic flux ratio analysis of genetic and environmental modulations of Escherichia coli central carbon metabolism. J Bacteriol. 1999;181(21):6679–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sümegi B, Alkonyi I. A study on the physical interaction between the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex and citrate synthase. BBA-Protein Struct Mol Enzymol. 1983;749(2):163–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. van Ooyen J, Noack S, Bott M, Reth A, Eggeling L. Improved l-lysine production with Corynebacterium glutamicum and systemic insight into citrate synthase flux and activity. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(8):2070–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Valgepea K, Adamberg K, Nahku R, Lahtvee PJ, Arike L, Vilu R. Systems biology approach reveals that overflow metabolism of acetate in Escherichia coli is triggered by carbon catabolite repression of acetyl-CoA synthetase. BMC Syst Biol. 2010;4(1):166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bischoff KM, Liu S, Leathers TD, Worthington RE, Rich JO. Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;103(1):117–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schwan RF, Wheals AE. The microbiology of cocoa fermentation and its role in chocolate quality. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2004;44(4):205–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schäfer A, Tauch A, Jäger W, Kalinowski J, Thierbach G, Pühler A. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene. 1994;145:69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lemos D, Salomon M, Gomes V, Phan VN, Buchholz F. Citrate synthase and pyruvate kinase activities during early life stages of the shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae): effects of development and temperature. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 2003;135(4):707–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jakoby M, Ngouoto-Nkili CE, Burkovski A. Construction and application of new Corynebacterium glutamicum vectors. Biotechnol Tech. 1999;13:437–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors’ contributions

XX conceived the project. YM conducted the bioinformatics analyses. YM, YC, LD and XL performed the experiments. XX and YM wrote the manuscript. NC reviewed the obtained results, provided suggestions and revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Qixin Chen for helping with transcriptomic analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this manuscript or in Additional files. The genome of C. glutamicum CP is accessible at GenBank with the accession number CP012194.1. The RNA-seq data of C. glutamicum CP have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) under accession number SRP143929.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470211 and 31770053), Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (17JCQNJC09500), and Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (17YFZCSY01050).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National and Local United Engineering Lab of Metabolic Control Fermentation Technology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, Tianjin, 300457, People’s Republic of China

    Yuechao Ma, Yi Cui, Lihong Du, Xiaoqian Liu, Xixian Xie & Ning Chen

  2. College of Biotechnology, Tianjin University of Science & Technology, No. 29, 13 Main Street, Tianjin Economic and Technological Development Area, Tianjin, 300457, People’s Republic of China

    Yuechao Ma, Yi Cui, Lihong Du, Xiaoqian Liu, Xixian Xie & Ning Chen

Authors
  1. Yuechao Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Cui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lihong Du
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoqian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xixian Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ning Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xixian Xie or Ning Chen.

Additional file

Additional file 1.

Primers used in this study.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Cui, Y., Du, L. et al. Identification and application of a growth-regulated promoter for improving l-valine production in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact 17, 185 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-1031-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-1031-7

Keywords

Microbial Cell Factories

ISSN: 1475-2859

Contact us