Open Access

Enhancement of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) accumulation in Arxula adeninivorans by stabilization of production

  • Mateusz Biernacki1,
  • Marek Marzec1, 6,
  • Thomas Roick2,
  • Reinhard Pätz3,
  • Kim Baronian4,
  • Rüdiger Bode5 and
  • Gotthard Kunze1Email author
Microbial Cell Factories201716:144

Received: 20 June 2017

Accepted: 26 July 2017

Published: 17 August 2017



In recent years the production of biobased biodegradable plastics has been of interest of researchers partly due to the accumulation of non-biodegradable plastics in the environment and to the opportunity for new applications. Commonly investigated are the polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) poly(hydroxybutyrate) and poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB-V). The latter has the advantage of being tougher and less brittle. The production of these polymers in bacteria is well established but production in yeast may have some advantages, e.g. the ability to use a broad spectrum of industrial by-products as a carbon sources.


In this study we increased the synthesis of PHB-V in the non-conventional yeast Arxula adeninivorans by stabilization of polymer accumulation via genetic modification and optimization of culture conditions. An A. adeninivorans strain with overexpressed PHA pathway genes for β-ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase, PHAs synthase and the phasin gene was able to accumulate an unexpectedly high level of polymer. It was found that an optimized strain cultivated in a shaking incubator is able to produce up to 52.1% of the DCW of PHB-V (10.8 g L−1) with 12.3%mol of PHV fraction. Although further optimization of cultivation conditions in a fed-batch bioreactor led to lower polymer content (15.3% of the DCW of PHB-V), the PHV fraction and total polymer level increased to 23.1%mol and 11.6 g L−1 respectively. Additionally, analysis of the product revealed that the polymer has a very low average molecular mass and unexpected melting and glass transition temperatures.


This study indicates a potential of use for the non-conventional yeast, A. adeninivorans, as an efficient producer of polyhydroxyalkanoates.


Polyhydroxyalkanoates PHB-V Arxula adeninivorans Phasin


Currently plastic products cause many problems with disposal and recycling is not sufficient to prevent accumulation. One of the solutions is the production of biodegradable polymers made from renewable substrates. The polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) polymers, which are naturally produced by bacteria as a storage material [1] are a well-known examples. These polymers may be modified for a variety of applications from packaging and agriculture through to medical implants and drug delivery devices [2]. PHA may be composed of more than 150 different monomers which give them a variety of physical and chemical properties [3]. The most well-known PHA, poly(hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), has some disadvantages, e.g. it is brittle, stiff and highly crystalline [4]. In contrast, poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB-V) has better flexibility, toughness and has lower melting and glass transition temperatures, depending on PHV content [5].

Synthesis of PHB-V is carried out by at least three enzymes: β-ketothiolase, (R)-specific NADPH-dependent acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHA synthase [6]. This pathway has been primarily investigated in bacteria, e.g. Cupriavidus necator for PHB-V production with range of accumulation level between 50 and 90% of DCW containing up to 24% PHV [1, 7]. Additionally yeast and plants have been employed for polymer production [8, 9]. Nevertheless, the entire industrial production of PHB-V is currently based on bacteria, which may be associated with certain problems such as phage contamination of Escherichia coli process [10] or possible presence of lipopolysaccharides in the product, which excludes its use in medical applications [11]. On the other hand yeast have a higher contamination resistance, broad substrate spectrum including industrial by-products and cultivation may be carried out in harsh environments, e.g. acidic or high sugar concentration [10]. The majority of yeast studies have been conducted using baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), however, the obtained results were insufficient to compete with bacterial systems. Kocharin et al. [12] showed that a S. cerevisiae strain harbouring PHA pathway genes and additional genes for engineering acetyl-CoA metabolism is able to accumulate 0.25 g L−1 of PHB. In another study, overexpression of targeted PHA synthase to peroxisomes in S. cerevisiae, lead to the synthesis of up to 7% of DCW polymer composed of C4–C8 monomers [13]. Some non-conventional yeast also exhibit PHA synthesis, for example, Kloeckera spp. accumulated 7.03% DCW PHB-V [14] and Pichia pastoris grown on oleic acid was able to produce 1% of medium-chain-length PHA [15]. Recently Li et al. [16] presented a genetically engineered Yarrowia lipolytica, which accumulated PHB up to 10.2% DCW (7.35 g L−1) when grown on glucose and acetate, which is the highest level of PHA accumulation in yeast reported to date. However, production strategies in yeast have concentrated only on direct PHA synthesis and optimization of metabolism, and not on stabilization of accumulation. Phasins are a group of low-molecular-weight proteins with amphiphilic properties. In bacteria, where these proteins were originally found, they play a regulatory and stability role during PHA synthesis and cell division [17]. Moreover, C. necator phasin PhaP1 gene, unexpectedly decreased cells stress when overexpressed in a non-phasin strain of E. coli [18].

Another non-conventional yeast, Arxula adeninivorans, was previously used for PHB-V production by Terentiev et al. who described an Arxula strain harbouring PHA pathway genes from C. necator which accumulated 0.019% PHB and 2.2% PHV using controllable ethanol fed-batch fermentation [19]. Since then the A. adeninivorans expression platform has been optimized and successfully used for production of a number of recombinant proteins [2023]. Based on the improved platform, novel genetic modification techniques and codon optimization gene synthesis, it was proposed that it would be possible to improve PHB-V production in Arxula. Moreover Arxula does not have endogenous genes responsible for intracellular PHA degradation and because of its oleaginous character, has a high concentration of CoA and NADPH reduction power, which are necessary for PHA synthesis. Finally, the groundwork for this study was our previous research in which demonstrated that A. adeninivorans, with overexpressed thl thiolase from Clostridium acetobutylicum and phaB reductase from C. necator, is able to secret enantiomerically pure (R)-3-HB [24].

In present study we describe the optimized production and stable accumulation of PHB-V copolymer by overexpression of PHA pathways and phasin genes in the yeast, A. adeninivorans.


Strains and cultivation condition

Escherichia coli XL1 Blue [recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac [F´ proAB lacI q Z∆M15 Tn10 (Tetr)]], obtained from Invitrogen, was used for cloning experiments and plasmid isolation. Luria–Bertani (LB—Sigma, USA) supplemented with 100 mg L−1 ampicillin, 50 mg L−1 chloramphenicol or 50 mg L−1 kanamycin was used as a growth medium.

The wild-type strain, A. adeninivorans LS3, originally isolated from wood hydrolysate in Siberia and deposited as A. adeninivorans SBUG 724 in the strain collection of the Department of Biology of the University of Greifswald [25] was used as a control strain. The auxotrophic mutant, A. adeninivorans G1216 [aleu2 ALEU2::aade2] [26] and double auxotrophic mutant, MS1006 [aleu2 atrp1::ALEU2 aade2::ALEU2] [27] were used as recipient strains. All strains were cultivated at 30 °C, 180 rpm in 50 mL of broth in a 100 mL flask. The medium was either a selective yeast minimal medium supplemented with 20 g L−1 glucose and 43 mM NaNO3 (YMM-glc-NO3) [28, 29] or a non-selective yeast complex medium containing 20 g L−1 glucose (YPD).

Co-substrate feeding

To check an influence of different co-substrates on polymer and copolymer synthesis, several of C-sources were trialled. Different concentrations of ethanol/1-propanol/propionic acid/valeric acid/sodium propionate were added to cultures after 48 and 96 h of cultivation.

Fed-batch cultivation

Fed-batch cultures were performed in a 5-L bioreactor (Sartorius, Germany) with conditions set to optimize growth and PHB/PHB-V production. The temperature was maintained at 30 °C and a pH of 6.0 was maintained by the addition of 2.5 M NaOH or 1 M H2SO4. The level of oxygen was varied and maintained by the stirring rate. The culture was started in modified YPD followed by the addition of glucose or ethanol/1-propanol (1:1 v/v) and nitrogen to prevent C-source depletion and maintain the metabolism of the organism. Controlled addition of a silicone-based anti-foam agent (Strunktol SB 304, Schill+Seilacher GmbH, Germany) was employed to prevent foaming.

Plasmid construction


The open reading frames (ORFs) of the bacterial genes were synthesized by GeneArt (Life Technologies) using optimized codon usage. All of the ORFs were inserted into pBS-TEF1-PHO5-SA vector with a pair of restriction sites to obtain expression modules containing the A. adeninivorans derived TEF1 strong constitutive promoter and the S. cerevisiae PHO5 terminator [30]. A set of primers (Table 1) and the above plasmids were used to amplify using PCR, the DNA fragments with an ORF, promoter, terminator and additional restriction sites. A multiple-step cloning procedure was used for the construction of the final expression plasmids based on Xplor2.4 system [26]. The TEF1-phaB-PHO5 fragment flanked by 5′-BsiWI/SpeI and 3′-MluI/SacII sites was introduced into the basic vector to create Xplor2.4-TEF1-phaB-PHO5. Subsequently, the expression module containing the TEF1 promoter, PHO5 terminator, one of the two ß-ketothiolase genes (thl, bktB) and 5′-SpeI and 3′-BsiWI restriction sites was cloned into the vector to generate Xplor2.4-TEF1-thl/bktB-PHO5-TEF1-phaB-PHO5 plasmids. Next, the expression module TEF1-phaC-PHO5 with PHAs synthase gene and 5′-MluI and 3′-SacII restriction sites was cloned into the above vector to obtain the final expression plasmid Xplor2.4-TEF1-thl/bktB-PHO5-TEF1-phaB-PHO5-TEF1-phaC-PHO5. Additionally, the expression module TEF1-phaP1-PHO5 with the phasin gene was inserted using 5′-SalI and 3′-ApaI sites (originating from the basic pBS-TEF1-PHO5-SA vector) to generate the Xplor2.4-TEF1-thl/bktB-PHO5-TEF1-phaB-PHO5-TEF1-phaC-PHO5-TEF1-phaP1-PHO5 plasmids.
Table 1

Oligonucleotide primers and A. adeninivorans strains used in this work


Oligonucleotide sequence




Eurofins genomics











Complete strain name



This study









Italic letters indicate restriction sites

All variants of the final plasmids were linearized with AscI or SbfI restriction enzymes and separately transformed into the auxotrophic and double auxotrophic strains, A. adeninivorans G1216 and MS1006 (Fig. 1). The latter strain’s growth medium was supplemented with 20 mg L−1 tryptophan to maintain growth after transformation (ATRP1 marker not yet complemented).
Fig. 1

Influence of the yeast stabilization procedure and the overexpression of phasin gene on PHA production. The five transformants with the highest polymer content are shown for each strain and are marked as follows: a AAG_thl; b AAG_thlp; c AAG_bktBp. Only PHB was detected


A similar multiple-step cloning procedure was used to prepare Xplor2.2-TEF1-thl/bktB-PHO5-TEF1-phaB-PHO5-TEF1-phaC-PHO5-TEF1-PhaP1-PHO5 plasmids. The Xplor2.2 expression platform is similar to Xplor2.4 with the only difference being that the auxotrophic marker is tryptophan instead of adenine [31].

Both variants of the plasmid, were linearized with AscI or SbfI restriction enzymes and separately transformed as previously described [31] into the auxotrophic strains containing the same expression module previously described to form A. adeninivorans MS1006/YIC104-thl-phaB-phaC-phaP1 and MS1006/YIC104-bktB-phaB-phaC-phaP1.

Stabilization of the yeast transformants was performed by passaging on selective and non-selective media as described by Klabunde et al. [32]. Plasmid DNA isolation and DNA restrictions were performed as described by Wartmann et al. [33].

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) analysis

Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analysis was used to determine the concentration of PHA in dried cells. 3–4 mg of lyophilized cells was subjected to propanolysis as described by Riis and Mai [34] but with modification. 1 mL 1,2-DCE and 1 mL n-propanol-HCl solution (4:1 v/v) was added to cells and incubated at 90 °C for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature the reaction mixture was extracted with 2 mL of triple distilled H2O and the lower organic phase was taken for analysis in a Clarus® 680 GC combined with Clarus® SQ 8 S MS (PerkinElmer, USA) equipped with Elite-624 column (PerkinElmer, 30 m × 0.5 mm, 1.4 µm). The GC program was set up as follows: initial temperature 80 °C for 5 min, ramping at 10 °C min−1 to 235 °C and held for 10 min.

Commercial PHB-V (Sigma-Aldrich, 12%mol of PHV) was used to construct a standard curve. The analysis was conducted in triplicate and results were analyzed by TurboMass 6.1 software.

Polymer extraction and analysis

Poly(3-hydroxy)butyrate co-polymer produced by Arxula was isolated by solvent extraction method [35] with further modification. Yeast were harvested, washed twice with water and processed in a French Press. 30 mg L−1 of trypsin was added to the disrupted cell suspension and incubated in 37 °C for 1 h. The resulting cell debris was freeze-dried overnight and 5 g of lyophilized material was boiled for 6 h in 100 mL of chloroform. The excess of solvent was evaporated making the solution viscous which was then mixed dropwise with 10-times volume cold ethanol to precipitate final product. Finally the polymer was collected on a paper filter (2.7 µm, Whatman, USA) and dried in 55 °C.

Purity assessment was carried out by GC/MS. Gas permeation chromatography (GPC), thermoanalysis (DSC) and thermogravimetry (TGA) was performed by KIMW Prüf- und Analyse GmbH (Lüdenscheid, Germany) and mass spectrometry (TOF–SIMS analysis) by OFG—Analytik (Münster, Germany).

Cell imaging

Imaging of PHA granules inside Arxula cells was performed using BODIPY 493/503 (Thermo Fisher, USA), a green fluorescent agent, which binds to neutral lipids and similar compounds. It was shown to be more suitable for PHA staining than Nile Red [36]. The cell material for microscopic analysis was collected after 240 h and twice washed with distilled water. 200 µL of cells suspension was mixed with 20 µL of 0.01% solution of BODIPY 493/503 in DMSO and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. The suspension was then centrifuged and resuspended in an equal volume of distilled water. Freshly prepared material was then analyzed using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 780; Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The BODIPY signal was detected using an argon 488-laser equipped with a 560–615 nm band pass filter.

To enable ultrastructural examination using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), high pressure freezing followed by freeze substitution and resin infiltration were performed according to the method described by Daghma et al. [37]. Ultrathin sections of ~70 nm thickness were prepared as described previously [38] and visualised with a Tecnai Sphera G2 transmission electron microscope (FEI Company, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) set at 120 kV.


Two cultures were grown as independent experiments and GC/MS analysis was performed in triplicate. The final results are average values of the data.


PHA shaking flask screening

Overexpression of ß-ketothiolase gene (origins from C. acetobutylicum or C. necator H16) and acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHA synthase genes from C. necator H16 in A. adeninivorans led to synthesis of PHA by this yeast. Additionally, the phasin gene from C. necator H16, which has been reported to be a stabilizer of PHA production [41], was overexpressed. The plasmids Xplor2.4-thl-phaB-phaC and Xplor2.2/Xplor2.4-thl/bktB-phaB-phaC-phaP1 were created with each containing all three production-genes and an additional gene to stabilize synthesis and flanked with the strong constitutive TEF1 promoter and PHO5 terminator. The endogenous auxotrophic AADE2 and/or ATRP1 markers, which restore adenine or tryptophan synthesis pathways in A. adeninivorans respectively, were used to select positive transformants. After linearization with AscI (YRC—homologous recombination) or SbfI (YIC—non-homologous recombination) plasmids were transformed into the corresponding auxotrophic mutants, A. adeninivorans G1216 or MS1006 and selected on media that does not contain adenine and/or tryptophan (Table 2).
Table 2

Overexpressed genes for PHA production


Accession No.





C. acetobutylicum ATCC 824



C. necator H16

Acetoacetyl-CoA reductase



C. necator H16

PHA synthase



C. necator H16




C. necator H16

The constructed strains used in this article are the result of overexpression of one of the thiolase genes, phaB reductase gene, phaC synthase gene and/or the phaP1 phasin gene. All the ORFs were synthesized by codon optimization method

Cells without phasin gene

As the first screening procedure, strain AAG_thl was tested for PHA production. Before stabilization, measurements of PHA revealed that most of transformants were able to produce PHB after 96 h, with the highest polymer content 7.47% of DCW. On the other hand after stabilization only one of the transformants retained PHB production ability with 1.72% of DCW after 96 h which is only 23.1% of the initial production. The aim of the stabilization procedure is to exclude false positive transformants and also to check the sensitivity of the cells to the polymer. The results showed that the production of PHA by A. adeninivorans has a strong negative influence and only the cells with low or zero polymer production can survive. This effect eliminates these yeast for industrial polymer production.

Cells with phasin gene

To try and counter loss of production ability during the stabilization of the strains, an additional gene—phasin—was expressed. The resulting strains, AAG_thlp and AAG_bktBp, were analysed and the results showed that overexpression of phasin gene had a strong positive influence on PHA synthesis. Most of transformants retained the ability to synthesise PHA and the average loss of production was only 12.0 and 17.3% for AAG_thlp and AAG_bktBp respectively (Fig. 1). The highest content of PHB for AAG_thlp #7 was 9.58% of DCW and 6.71% in AAG_bktBp #14 after 96 h cultivation. Based on these results, these transformants were used in further experiments.

Time-course experiments

Changes of PHA content of the cells are dependent on cultivation time and carbon source. Both factors were explored in simple shake flask experiments without additional feeding. In the first experiment strain AAG_thlp #7 was cultivated in YMM-glc-NO3 and YPD medium. After 120 h, the polymer content was 13.3% and 18.7% of DCW and 1.02 and 2.61 g L−1 of PHB for YMM and YPD medium respectively. Additionally there was no decrease in polymer level over the cultivation period. Based mainly on the final polymer yield per volume of culture medium, the rich medium was chosen for further experiments.

Strains AAG_thlp #7 and AAG_bktBp #14 were compared in rich media without additional C-sources. The two strains differ only in the type of thiolase they have, either thl or bktB. After 240 h, the strain with thl thiolase reached 26.7% of DCW of PHB compared to 19.8% of DCW for strain with bktB thiolase (Table 3). This difference in PHB production was predicted based the findings of Wang et al. [4] and our previous results [24].
Table 3

PHA production using different co-substrates



PHB-V (% of DCW)

PHB-V (g L−1)

PHV (%mol)

AAG_thlp #7














Valeric acid




Propionic acid




Sodium Propionate




AAG_bktBp #14














Valeric acid




Propionic acid




Sodium propionate




Negative control




Cultures were incubated for 240 h in rich media (YPD) with the addition of different co-substrates. Negative control—strain transformed with empty plasmid and incubated in the corresponding conditions


Poly(hydroxyvalerate) was not detected in any of the above experiments and in an attempt to increase PHV synthesis additional substrates were trialled. Four substrates: ethanol, 1-propanol, propionic acid and valeric acid were added at a final concentration of 1% (EtOH, 1-PrOH after 48 h) and 0.1% (PrCOOH, VrCOOH after 48, 72 and 96 h). The results showed that EtOH increases PHB production substantially while a small amount of PHV synthesis occurred when 1-PrOH, PrCOOH and VrCOOH (Table 3; Fig. 2) were added. The maximum level of PHB was obtained for AAG_thlp #7 when ethanol was used (42.9% of DCW of PHB after 240 h of cultivation). On the other hand in the sample with 1-propanol, PHB decreased to 26.0% of DCW but with an additional 2.35% of DCW of PHV. For strain AAG_bktBp #14 the highest content of PHB was also obtained for ethanol (30.5% of DCW), however, because of increased growth on glucose, the highest production was for glucose (4.21 g L−1). Use of 1-propanol resulted in cells producing the copolymer (20.3% of DCW) with 22.5%mol of PHV (compared to 7.30%mol for thl strain). Use of propionic and valeric acid for both strains gave lower yields and created problems because of their toxicity and difficult handling.
Fig. 2

PHB-V co-polymer content of cells cultivated on rich media supplemented with different C-sources. a AAG_thlp #7; b AAG_bktBp #14. The cultures were fed with a C-source after 48/96 h; grey and shaded fields represent PHB and PHV fractions respectively

Sodium propionate was also used as a substrate. For this cultivation the concentration of the substrates were calculated so as to be the same molar carbon level which were 0.45, 0.38 and 0.50% for glucose, 1-propanol and sodium propionate respectively. These substrates were added at 48 and 96 h. The results shown in Table 3 revealed a similar co-polymer content and PHV contribution for both 1-propanol and sodium propionate. However, when the growth behaviour was compared, cells fed with sodium propionate grew more slowly (sodium propionate is commonly used as a food preservative). Thus, while use of ethanol as a substrate is the best way to increase PHB, 1-propanol increases PHV production.

Double mutant strains

Production of polymers by yeast cells can be dependent on several factors, e.g. C-sources, precursor and cofactor availability and growth conditions. Additionally, gene expression levels also may have an influence on PHB-V synthesis. To increase enzyme levels, a double auxotrophic strain A. adeninivorans MS1006 [aleu2 atrp1::ALEU2 aade2::ALEU2] was transformed twice with the same expression plasmid. The resulting strains, AAMS_thlp and AAMS_bktBp, were tested for PHB-V synthesis using rich media supplemented after 48 and 96 h with ethanol/1-propanol mixture (Fig. 3). After 240 h strain AAMS_bktBp #1 accumulated 52.1% of its DCW as PHB-V (10.8 g L−1) of which 12.3%mol was PHV. This was the maximal level of polymer obtained by A. adeninivorans in shaking flasks cultures. In the second strain (with thl thiolase) 43.6% of its DCW (7.80 g L−1) was PHB-V of which 4.08% was PHV. For comparison, strains transformed once with the expression plasmid, had lower levels of productivity; 38.0% DCW was PHB-V (7.67 g L−1; 3.04%mol PHV) and 26.8% DCW was PHB-V (4.12 g L−1; 10.9%mol PHV) for AAG_thlp #7 and AAG_bktBp #14 respectively (Table 3).
Fig. 3

PHB-V co-polymer accumulation for single and double transformed strains. a PHB-V content; b PHV content

Figure 3b shows the trend of PHV accumulation over the period of the experiment. The %mol of PHV for strain with thl thiolase is nearly constant through whole cultivation (except at the first measurement point before EtOH/1-PrOH feeding) while the bktB thiolase strain PHV contribution increased after both supplementation points. This demonstrates that using bktB thiolase and 1-propanol feeding can increase PHV content in the polymer produced by A. adeninivorans.

Bioreactor results

Optimization of culture conditions for improving polymer synthesis was conducted by a controlled fed-batch fermentation. At first, optimized conditions for growth and protein synthesis (aerobic, glucose and nitrogen feeding) was used with strain AAG_thlp #7. After 52 h cells produced only 0.961% of DCW of PHB (0.981 g L−1). In similar conditions that were hypoxic instead of aerobic, production was slightly higher with 4.03% DCW PHB (1.58 g L−1) after 111 h (longer period of cultivation is due to the slower consumption of glucose). The next step was to use ethanol as an additional carbon source without nitrogen feeding (the same basic medium). Catabolism of ethanol in yeast is an aerobic process and maximal aerobic conditions in the bioreactor were maintained. After 144 h, strain AAG_thlp #7 was able to accumulate up to 10.7% of DCW of PHB (10.7 g L−1). To induce synthesis of the PHV fraction, a mixture of equal volumes of ethanol and 1-propanol was added. The three strains selected for PHB-V production were finally grown on the basic modified rich medium with ethanol/1-propanol, without nitrogen feeding and with pO2 at 40%. As expected, PHV was found in all cultivation conditions (Fig. 3). Strain AAG_thlp #7 accumulated 6.95% of DCW of PHB-V (7.36 g L−1) after 113 h but with very low PHV contribution (maximum 1.18%mol after 46 h). For both strains with bktB thiolase, the results were improved with the highest level obtained by strain AAMS_bktBp #1 with 15.3% of DCW of PHB-V (11.6 g L−1) after 113 h growth, compared to 11.0% (10.4 g L−1) for strain AAG_bktBp #14 at 113 h. Also PHV concentrations were significantly higher for both strains. At the end of the cultivation, 23.1%mol of PHV was found for AAMS_bktBp #1 in contrast to 21.3%mol of PHV for AAG_bktBp #14.

Figure 4c shows that, while the maximum accumulation for AAMS_bktBp #1 was 38.3%mol of PHV after 30 h, the concentration decreased until end of the cultivation. However PHV production in AAG_bktBp #14 rose continuously until the end of the cultivation. Polymer synthesis can have a negative influence on growth and the strain with the lowest polymer production had the highest rate of growth (106 g L−1 after 113 h), while in the best PHB-V producer growth rate was the lowest (75.7 g L−1 after 113 h).
Fig. 4

Bioreactor aerobic cultivation results. Cells were cultivated on modified rich medium followed by ethanol/1-propanol (1:1 v/v) feeding: a PHB-V content; b cell dry mass; c PHV fraction contribution

Polymer analysis and microscopy imaging

Poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) co-polymer produced by strain AAMS_bktBp #1 was extracted using an optimized extraction procedure, which resulted in 71.9% polymer recovery with 99.2% purity.

The extracted material consisted of 73.1%wt of PHB and 26.1%wt of PHV. GPC analysis revealed that MN (number average molar mass) and MW (weight average molar mass) values were 8630 and 17,300 respectively which is considered to be very low. The calculated polydispersity index is 2.00 (MW/MN). The melting point (T m ) and glass transition temperature (T g ) were analysed using the DCS method. The first and second T m was 163.3 and 138.1 °C respectively, which are unexpectedly higher than other PHB-V co-polymers with similar PHV fractions [39]. T g is also higher with a value 55.3 °C compared to −5 °C for a co-polymer with 20%mol PHV. Thermogravimetric analysis allows the thermal degradation temperature to be calculated. Degradation of the co-polymer started at 260 °C with a sharp decrease of MW at 300 °C with a final loss of 99.2% of the MW. These values are similar to other PHB-V co-polymers [40]. The TOF-SIMS study confirmed the results obtained by GC/MS, especially the proportion of PHB and PHV. Furthermore, a trace of polydimethylsiloxane was found which probably come from anti-foam agent using to stop foaming during growth in the bioreactor.

Microscopic analysis of cells using BODIPY 493/503 staining agent was performed. Due to cytoplasmic targeting of PHAs pathway proteins, polymer granules were supposed to be located in cytoplasm. Microscopic images suggested that may be the case (Fig. 5a) and TEM analysis confirmed it (Fig. 5b). PHAs in Arxula exist as many granules, in contrast to the few granules seen in bacteria, however, the granule size is similar in yeast and bacteria [17].
Fig. 5

Microscopic analysis of PHB-V inclusions in A. adeninivorans: a cells have been stained using BODIPY 493/503. First row—MS1006 negative control double transformed with empty plasmid; second row—AAMS_bktBp #1. The bars on the right-bottom corner represent 5 µm. Left column—without fluorescence, middle—fluorescence imaging, right—merged images; b TEM images. The bars in the lower right corner represent 1 µm. Left—negative control, right—AAMS_bktBp #1. Light spots represent polymer inclusions


The overexpression of the genes, ß-ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase and PHAs synthase in A. adeninivorans, made it able to synthesize the PHB polymer and PHB-V co-polymer. The types of thiolase and reductase genes that were chosen were based on our previous results [24] but another thiolasebktB gene was investigated for an increased proportion of the PHV fraction [4]. A lack of an endogenous PHA degradation system allows accumulation of polymer during prolonged incubation experiments and resulted in high levels of polymer in the cell.

Arxula adeninivorans was previously used for PHA production but the results were poor [19]. Our initial research showed that lack of stability in the transformants resulted in A. adeninivorans losing most of its capacity to synthesise the polymer. This phenomenon may be, in theory, explained by increased cell stress and the inability of cells to multiply. To counter this effect, the phasin gene, which is one of the factors for PHA granule stabilization in bacteria [41] and is known to decrease of cell stress in E. coli [18], was introduced. Overexpression of the phasin gene resulted in the stabilization of the production of the polymer, even during extended cultivation.

Results show that rich media (YPD) is preferable for PHA synthesis, possibly due to higher protein content and the availability of precursors and cofactors. Without co-substrates, Arxula is able to produce only PHB and to investigate the development of co-polymerization of PHB-V, different C-sources were investigated as co-substrates. Ethanol proved to be the best co-substrate for PHB accumulation and has been shown to be the preferred substrate for synthesis of secondary metabolites in yeast due to its direct conversion to acetyl-CoA in the cytoplasm [42]. Furthermore other co-substrates also allowed Arxula to produce the PHB-V co-polymer. Although sodium propionate resulted in the highest proportion of PHB-V as a % of cell weight, the toxicity of the molecule reduced the DCW. The use of 1-propanol as the co-substrate gave the highest yield in g L−1 which led to its use in all subsequent experiments. Moreover, Arxula is able to use C2–C6 alcohols and convert them to relevant CoA compounds which may theoretically led to synthesis of medium-chain-length PHAs [43]. Thus an equal mixture of ethanol and 1-propanol was chosen to maximise co-polymer production.

The strains used in our research differed only in the type of thiolase they contained. The strain with thl thiolase was the superior polymer producer, however because the product of this thiolase is acetoacetyl-CoA, which is precursor of the 3HB monomer, the resulting co-polymer contained low levels of PHV (up to 8.38%mol). The strain with the bktB thiolase, produced β-ketovaleryl-CoA, which although it accumulated at a lower level, had almost 3-times as much PHV. In the strains transformed twice with the same expression plasmid, the strain with bktB thiolase accumulated the most PHB-V co-polymer. While the PHV fraction was half that in the single transformation strains, it was consistently 3-times higher than in the thl thiolase strain. The production of PHB-V to over 50% of DCW for the double transformed strain may be explained by an increase in the enzymes present (which was the aim of double transformation).

In theory, controllable fed-batch fermentation should increase production by for example, better aeration or pH control. However our study on Arxula cells gave disparate results. While cells were able to accumulate more than 50% PHB-V of DCW in the shake flasks experiment, growth in the bioreactor resulted in around 15% PHB-V of DCW, however the final polymer level calculated in g L−1 was 7.41% higher in the bioreactor experiments. This effect revealed a correlation between growth behaviour and polymer accumulation. Using the same cultivation conditions, strain AAG_thlp #7 accumulated 6.95% DCW of PHB-V with 106 g L−1 of total DCW in contrast to 15.3% DCW of PHB-V with 75.7 g L−1 of total DCW for AAMS_bktBp #1. Thus the highest production of PHB-V by Arxula seems to be a compromise between the level of growth and the accumulation process.

The study of the extracted polymer provided interesting information. Material accumulated by Arxula has a low to very low average molecular mass compared to other microbially produced PHAs which are up to 150-times heavier [44]. The low-molecular-weight of the polymer cannot be explained by the size of the granules due to their similarity in yeast and bacteria (Fig. 5).

The low molecular weight has an influence on the other properties. Most unusual is the glass transition temperature, which is around 60 °C higher than that reported for other polymers with similar PHV fractions. This means that products made of the Arxula polymer will remain brittle at higher temperature, which is a property that undesirable in some applications, however the melting temperature is higher than usual, making this material more robust at higher temperatures. An additional advantage of a low molecular weight polymer may be faster biodegradation [45]. These differences may come from polydimethylsiloxane, a compound that is present in the polymer, or from other unknown impurities. It is also possible that the extraction method may have an influence on the polymer properties and this needs to be investigated.


In this paper we have demonstrated that the non-conventional yeast, A. adeninivorans, is able to produce 52.1% of DCW of PHB-V (10.8 g L−1) with 13.2%mol of PHV in shaking flask and 15.3% of DCW of PHB-V (11.6 g L−1) with 23.1%mol of PHV in fed-batch bioreactor cultivation, which are the highest amounts ever seen in yeast. These results show that A. adeninivorans could be a useful host organism for the production of PHAs. Future work to increase the production of the polymer will include shifting the flux of acetyl-CoA in direction of PHA synthesis by genetic engineering and further optimization of fed-batch growth conditions and scaling up of production process.











gas chromatography/mass spectrometry




yeast rDNA integrative expression cassette


yeast integrative expression cassette


dry cell weight


gas permeation chromatography






time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry


transmission electron microscopy




propionic acid


valeric acid


melting temperature


glass transition temperature


number average molar mass


weight average molar mass


Authors’ contributions

MB carried out the molecular genetic studies, cultivation of microorganisms, polymer extraction and GC/MS analysis and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. MM performed the confocal and electron microscopy and participated in discussion. TR participated in the design of the study and in developing the procedure for purification of the polymers. RP participated in the design of the study and provide excellent input into the discussion. KB provided writing assistance and assisted in the analysis of the results. RB participated in the design of the study and provided excellent background biochemical knowledge. GK conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


The researchers thank Felix Bischoff for his support.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Sequences of genes thl, bktB, phaB, phaC and phaP1 have been submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and may be found under the accession numbers presented in Table 2. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article. Further data (named data not shown in the manuscript) are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.


The research work was supported by Grant from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi—Grant No. KF2131625SB3).

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK)
Jäckering Mühlen-und Nährmittelwerke GmbH
Division Bioprocess Technology, University of Applied Sciences
School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury
Institute of Microbiology, University of Greifswald
Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Silesia


  1. Tan G-YA, Chen C-L, Ling L, Ge L, Wang L, Razad IMN, Li Y, Zhao L, Mo Y, Wang J-Y. Start a research on biopolymer polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA): a review. Polymers. 2014;6:706–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen GQ. A microbial polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) based bio- and materials industry. Chem Soc Rev. 2009;38:2434–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Zinn H, Hany R. Tailored material properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates through biosynthesis and chemical modification. Adv Eng Mater. 2005;7:408–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Wang Q, Liu X, Qi Q. Biosynthesis of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) from glucose with elevated 3-hydroxyvalerate fraction via combined citramalate and threonine pathway in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:3923–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Marchessault RH, Yu G-E. Crystallization and material properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates. Biopol Online. 2005;157–66.Google Scholar
  6. Senior PJ, Dawes EA. The regulation of poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate metabolism in Azotobacter beijerinckii. Biochem J. 1973;134:225–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Liu C-C, Zhang L-L, An J, Chen B, Yang H. Recent strategies for efficient production of polyhydroxyalkanoates by micro-organisms. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2015;62:9–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sandstrom AG, Munoz de las H A, Portugal-Nunes D, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of poly-3-d-hydroxybutyrate from xylose. AMB Express. 2015;5:14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tilbrook K, Poirer Y, Gebbie L, Schenk PM, McQualter RB, Brumbley SM. Reduced peroxisomal citrate synthase activity increases substrate availability for polyhydroxyalkanoate biosynthesis in plant peroxisomes. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12:1–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Lian J, Si T, Nair NU, Zhao H. Design and construction of acetyl-CoA overproducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Metab Eng. 2014;24:139–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen G-Q, Wu Q. The application of polyhydroxyalkanoates as tissue engineering materials. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6565–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kocharin K, Chen Y, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Engineering of acetyl-CoA metabolism for the improved production of polyhydroxybutyrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. AMB Express. 2012;2:52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Zhang B, Carlson R, Srienc F. Engineering the monomer composition of polyhydroxyalkanoates synthesized in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:536–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Abd-El-halaem D, Amara A, Zaki S, Abulhamd A, Abulreesh G. Biosynthesis of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanotes biopolymers in genetically modified yeasts. Intern J Environ Sci Technol. 2007;4:513–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Piorer Y, Erard N, MacDonald-Comber Petetot J. Synthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoate in the peroxisome of Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;207:97–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Z-J, Qiao K, Liu N, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering Yarrowia lipolytica for poly-3-hydroxybutyrate production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;44:605–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. York GM, Junker BH, Stubbe J, Sinskey AJ. Accumulation of the PhaP phasin of Ralstonia eutropha is dependent on production of polyhydroxybutyrate in cells. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:4217–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Almeida A, Catone MV, Rhodius VA, Gross CA, Pettinari MJ. Unexpected stress-reducing effect of PhaP, a poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) granule-associated protein in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:6622–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Terentiev Y, Breuer U, Babel W, Kunze G. Non-conventional yeasts as producers of polyhydroxyalkanoates—genetic engineering of Arxula adeninivorans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64:376–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Rauter M, Kasprzak J, Becker K, Baronian K, Bode R, Kunze G, Vorbrodt H-M. ADH from Rhodococcus ruber expressed in Arxula adeninivorans for the synthesis of 1-(S)-phenylethanol. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2014;104:8–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Chamas A, Giersberg M, Friedrich K, Sonntag F, Kunze D, Uhlig S, Simon K, Baronian K, Kunze G. Purification and immunodetection of the complete recombinant HER-2[neu] receptor produced in yeast. Prot Express Purific. 2015;105:61–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Jankowska DA, Faulwasser K, Schult-Trautwein A, Cordes A, Hoferichter P, Klein C, Bode R, Baronian K, Kunze G. Arxula adeninivorans recombinant adenine deaminase and its application in the production of food with low purine content. J Appl Microbiol. 2013;115:1134–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Böer E, Steinborn G, Florschütz K, Körner M, Gellissen G, Kunze G. Arxula adeninivorans (Blastobotrys adeninivorans)—a dimorphic yeast of great biotechnological potential. In: Satyanarayana T, Kunze G, editors. Yeast biotechnology: diversity and applications. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. p. 615–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Biernacki M, Riechen J, Hähnel U, Roick T, Baronian K, Bode R, Kunze G. Production of (R)-3-hydroxybutyric acid by Arxula adeninivorans. AMB Express. 2017;7:4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kunze G, Kunze I. Characterization of Arxula adeninivorans strains from different habitats. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1994;65:29–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Alvaro-Benito M, Fernández-Lobato M, Baronian K, Kunze G. Assessment of Schwanniomyces occidentalis as a host for protein production using the wide-range Xplor2 expression platform. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;97:4443–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rauter M, Schwarz M, Becker K, Baronian K, Bode R, Kunze G, Vorbrodt HM. Synthesis of benzyl β-d-galactopyranoside by transgalactosylationusing a β-galactosidase produced by the over expression of the Kluyveromyceslactis LAC4 gene in Arxula adeninivorans. J Mol Catal B Enzym. 2013;108:72–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Tanaka A, Ohnishi N, Fukui S. Studies on the formation of vitamins and their function in hydrocarbon fermentation. Production of vitamin B6 by Candida albicans in hydrocarbon medium. J. Ferment. Technol. 1967;45:617–23.Google Scholar
  29. Rose MD, Winston F, Hieter P. Methods in yeast genetics. A laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 1990.Google Scholar
  30. Böer E, Bode R, Mock HP, Piontek M, Kunze G. Atan1p-an extracellular tannase from the dimorphic yeast Arxula adeninivorans: molecular cloning of the ATAN1 gene and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Yeast. 2009;26:323–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Böer E, Piontek M, Kunze G. Xplor®2-an optimized transformation/expression system for recombinant protein production in the yeast Arxula adeninivorans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;84:583–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Klabunde J, Kunze G, Gellissen G, Hollenberg CP. Integration of heterologous genes in several yeast species using vectors containing a Hansenula polymorpha-derived rDNA-targeting element. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003;4:185–93.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wartmann T, Böer E, Pico AH, Sieber H, Bartelsen O, Gellissen G, Kunze G. High-level production and secretion of recombinant proteins by the dimorphic yeast Arxula adeninivorans. FEMS Yeast Res. 2003;2:363–9.Google Scholar
  34. Riis V, Mai W. Gas chromatographic determination of poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid in microbial biomass after hydrochloric acid propanolysis. J. Chrom. 1988;445:285–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Li SY, Dong CL, Wang SY, Ye HM, Chen G-Q. Microbial production of polyhydroxyalkanoate block copolymer by recombinant Pseudomonas putida. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;90:659–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Kacpmar J, Carlson R, Balogh SJ, Srienc F. Staining and quantification of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Cupriavidus necator cell populations using automated flow cytometry. Cytometry. 2006;69:27–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Daghma DS, Kumlehn J, Melzer M. The use of cyanobacteria as filler in nitrocellulose capillaries improves ultrastructural preservation of immature barley pollen upon high pressure freezing. J Microsc. 2011;244:79–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Marzec M, Melzer M, Szarejko I. Asymmetric growth of root epidermal cells is related to the differentiation of root hair cells in Hordeum vulgare (L.). J Exp Bot. 2013;64:5145–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Avella M, Martuscelli E, Raimo M. Review properties of blends and composites based on poly(3-hydroxy)butyrate (PHB) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) copolymers. J Mat Sci. 2000;35:523–45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Xiang H, Wen X, Miu X, Li Y, Zhou Z, Zhu M. Thermal depolymerization mechanisms of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate). Prog Nat Sci Mat Intern. 2016;26:58–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. York GM, Stubbe J, Sinskey AJ. New insight into the role of the PhaP phasin of Ralstonia eutropha in promoting synthesis of polyhydroxybutyrate. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:2394–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. De Jong-Gubbels P, Vanrolleghem P, Heijnen S, van Dijken JP, Pronk J. Regulation of carbon metabolism in chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown on mixtures of glucose and ethanol. Yeast. 1995;11:407–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Kasprzak J, Rauter M, Riechen J, Worch S, Baronian K, Bode R, Schauer F, Kunze G. Characterization of an Arxula adeninivorans alcohol dehydrogenase involved in the metabolism of ethanol and 1-butanol. FEMS Yeast Res. 2016;16:fow018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Aditi S, Shalet D′S, Manish N, Pranesh R, Katyayini T. Microbial production of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) from novel sources: a review. IJRBS. 2015;4:16–28.Google Scholar
  45. Jendrossek D, Schirmer A, Schlegel HG. Biodegradation of polyhydroxyalcanoic acids. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996;46:451–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2017