Open Access

Engineered microbial biosensors based on bacterial two-component systems as synthetic biotechnology platforms in bioremediation and biorefinery

Contributed equally
Microbial Cell Factories201716:62

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0675-z

Received: 6 November 2016

Accepted: 4 April 2017

Published: 14 April 2017

Abstract

Two-component regulatory systems (TCRSs) mediate cellular response by coupling sensing and regulatory mechanisms. TCRSs are comprised of a histidine kinase (HK), which serves as a sensor, and a response regulator, which regulates expression of the effector gene after being phosphorylated by HK. Using these attributes, bacterial TCRSs can be engineered to design microbial systems for different applications. This review focuses on the current advances in TCRS-based biosensors and on the design of microbial systems for bioremediation and their potential application in biorefinery.

Keywords

Two-component regulatory system Biosensor Bioremediation Genetic circuit Biorefinery

Background

Toxic chemicals have currently been released into the environment by accidental spills and the improper management of chemical industries. These toxic chemicals include inorganic products such as heavy metals and organic products such as benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, biphenyl, and styrene, accidental release of which into environment are a significant threat to the environment. Heavy metals and oil products are difficult to remove from the environment and cannot be easily degraded. Thus, they are ultimately indestructible and constitute a global environmental hazard. As a result, soil and groundwater contamination has become a major problem at these polluted sites and requires urgent remediation technology to protect the environment.

Over the past few decades, several technologies based on novel analytical methods have been developed to remove certain metals and organic pollutants from the environment [1]. Unfortunately, many conventional techniques have been found to be ineffective and/or expensive due to low permeability, different subsurface conditions, and contaminant mixtures. Owing to the limitations of traditional methods, researchers have focused on in situ bioremediation, which uses microorganisms to degrade petroleum products or immobilize heavy metal contaminants. Bioremediation strategies have been proposed as potential alternatives for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants due to their safety, speed, low cost, and high efficiency in removing pollutants from the environment.

The central principle of bioremediation is that microorganisms are able to produce energy they need to grow and reproduce by degrading hazardous contaminants. In some cases, bioremediation occurs spontaneously because the essential materials required for bacterial growth are naturally present at the contaminated sites. More often, bioremediation requires an engineered bacterial system to accelerate the tailor-made biodegradation of organic compounds or bio-adsorption of inorganic elements as we desired [2, 3]. It is also needed to further optimize the environmental conditions, in which the microorganisms carry out the detoxification reactions by employing several engineered microorganism systems such as cell surface display- and secretion-based strategies to remediate the contaminated environment. Cell surface display technologies have widely been used in both pharmaceutical and bioremediation applications such as live vaccine development, antibody production, peptide library screening, biosensors, bio-adsorption of organic and inorganic pollutants, and whole-cell biocatalysis (Fig. 1) [47].
Fig. 1

Application of different cell surface display technologies in A antibody production, B peptide library screening, C biosensors, D biocatalysts, E bio-adsorption, and F vaccine development

Heavy metals are common pollutants that are byproducts of various industrial activities. Microorganisms usually mobilize metals from one location and scavenge metals from another. Recently, recombinant bacterial systems displaying chimeric proteins on the cell surface have been developed for use in the bio-adsorption of specific heavy metals. To address organic products, microorganisms have been engineered to produce extracellular enzymes or display enzymes as outer membrane proteins, and they act as a whole-cell catalyst to break down petroleum hydrocarbons and their derivatives. However, all of these constructs require expensive inducers, or the constitutive expression of a membrane protein on the cell surface may affect the growth of the host system. Additionally, none of these engineered bacteria can sense the particular bio-component to be degraded. Therefore, engineered bacteria should be designed to monitor the environmental pollutants, and the design should also include a well-defined removal system. The engineered bacterial system should behave normally until it senses the target in the environment. Once the target is detected, the system should modulate bacterial genes in response. In this way, the genes needed to remove the target are only transcribed and expressed when required. Therefore, it is essential to construct an inexpensive system that can efficiently examine and remove hazardous materials present in the environment.

Nature has provided an excellent solution to this problem. Interestingly, cells have evolved many intricate sensory apparatuses to control cellular growth and behavior. Thus, some cells not only sense light, temperature, oxygen, and pH, but also detect the toxic status of the external environment. An essential requirement for a biosensor or bioremediation process is promoting contact between the contaminants and microbes. As a result of this contact, the microbes adapt their cellular functions in response to the surrounding environmental conditions and then express the relevant genes when needed. If the aim is to monitor and remove an individual toxic compound from the environment, then a synthetic biological strategy will be more feasible because the necessary genetic circuits can be assembled to sense and reduce the level of the exogenous toxin. These synthetic genetic circuits can be assembled using a two-component regulatory system (TCRS) in bacteria [8].

Two-component regulatory systems are widely found in prokaryotes, but only a few have been identified in eukaryotic organisms that can be coupled to environmental stimuli for an appropriate cellular response. This system senses environmental changes and regulates cellular metabolism in response to these changes thereby allowing bacteria to grow, thrive and adapt in different environments. A prototypical TCRS has two components: a histidine kinase (HK) and a response regulator (RR). The HK sensor is a homodimeric integral membrane protein that contains a sensor domain as an extracellular loop located between two membrane-spanning segments (TM1 and TM2) and a transmitter domain located in the last transmembrane segment confined to the cytoplasm. All HK domains contain two highly conserved domains: dimerization and histidine phosphotransfer domain (DHp) and catalytic ATP-binding domain (CA). The periplasmic or extracellular region serves mostly as the signal recognition domain. The DHp and CA domains are responsible for the molecular recognition of the cognate RR as well as the hydrolysis of ATP. The transmitter domain, which serves as a signal transmitter linking the periplasmic and cytoplasmic regions, contains three domains that are named after the proteins where they were first discovered: PAS (Periodic circadian proteins, Aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator proteins and Single-minded proteins), HAMP (HKs, Adenylate cyclases, Methyltransferases, and Phosphodiesterases), and GAF (cGMP-specific phosphodiesterases, adenylyl cyclases, and formate hydrogenases). These domains can either transmit signals from the periplasmic region or directly recognize the cytoplasmic signals. Therefore, the HK senses stimuli from the external environment and autophosphorylates conserved histidine residues in the kinase itself. The RR is regulated by the HK, which phosphorylates aspartate residues on the RR. The phosphorylated RR generates output by binding to promoters and thus activates or represses gene expression [8].

Aside from the application of TCRSs in the development of engineered microorganisms for coupled detection and degradation of environmental pollutants, recently, the potential application of TCRSs to metabolically engineered microorganisms has also been extensively examined for different biotechnological purposes. Thus, the recent advances in TCRS-based biosensors designed for cell-mediated bioremediation in response to different environmental pollutants are discussed along with the potential application of TCRSs for the development of engineered host microorganisms in biorefinery process to produce bio-based chemicals.

TCRS sensing of heavy metals and organic pollutants

Two-component regulatory systems can detect a broad range of environmental signals, such us light, oxygen, pH, temperature, and even some heavy metals and organic contaminants [9]. Many types of TCRS-based environmental biosensors have been reported, but only a few heavy metal- and organic pollutant-based sensors have been developed to date (Fig. 2). Bacteria use several TCRSs to sense specific heavy metals. Because heavy metals are cations that are both toxic and essential, bacterial cells use TCRSs to regulate the homeostasis of these metal cations. A HydHG TCRS (also known as ZraSR) was identified in Escherichia coli that senses and controls the expression of zraP gene encoding zinc efflux protein under high concentrations of Zn2+ and Pb2+ in aerobic condition [10]. HydH protein is tightly bound to the cell membrane and is assumed to be responsible for sensing high periplasmic Zn2+ and Pb2+ concentration. Then, in the presence of a phosphoryl donor, HydG binds to the intergenic region within zraP-hydHG resulting in the upregulated expression of ZraP [10]. Likewise, the CusRS (ylcA, ybcZ) TCRS found in E. coli K-12 is responsive to Cu2+ ions and is required for the inducible expression of pcoE, belonging to the plasmid-borne pco operon, the induction of the genes in this operon activates the copper efflux system thereby allowing the excess Cu2+ to exit the cell [11]. Some TCRS can regulate the expression of several specific genes in an operon or a whole operon. The SilRS TCRS increases the resistance of Salmonella enterica to silver cations through the coupled sensing and activation expression of the periplasmic silver-specific binding protein, SilE encoded by silE gene and two parallel efflux pumps, SilP and SilCBA [12]. This is also in the case of NrsSR TCRS identified in Synechocystis sp. PCC6803. NrsSR senses Ni2+ and Co2+ ions and regulates the expression of the nrsBACD operon that encodes proteins involved in Ni2+ resistance [13]. In another study, a PfeS/R TCRS senses ferric enterobactin and induces the production of the enterobactin receptor PfeA in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [14].
Fig. 2

a Domain structure of bacterial two-component regulatory systems (TCRS). Typical two-component phosphotransfer systems contain a sensor domain and a cytoplasmic response regulator (RRs). b A multi-component phosphorelay system containing the HAMP, PAS, and phosphotransfer domains. The periplasmic metal-sensing receptors sense heavy metals and phosphorylate the HK domain and activate the corresponding RR. The RR activates the synthetic genetic circuit of the TCRS resulting in the expression of the reporter protein. The genetic circuit shown in gray can be developed as a biosensor

Aromatic compounds are the most abundant organic contaminants. However, utilizing these compounds is disruptive to most bacteria. Due to the genetic and metabolic flexibility of bacteria, some microorganisms can use organic contaminants as their sole carbon source. Several TCRSs have been identified to be involved in catabolizing aromatic compounds by inducing and activating the aromatic metabolism pathways. The TodST TCRS of Pseudomonas putida can be induced by different aromatic substrates such as toluene, xylene, benzene, and ethylbenzene. This TCRS modulates the expression of the tod genes, which encode enzymes for the catabolism of these aromatic compounds [15]. The StySR TCRS identified in Pseudomonas sp. strain Y2 activates the expression of the styABCD genes in response to changes in styrene concentration in the environment [16]. Another TCRS, BpdST, potentially controls biphenyl or polychlorobiphenyl degradation in Rhodococcus sp. [15].

TCRS-based heavy metal bio-adsorption coupled with a biosensor

One of the best approaches to a biosensor-based method is to use a genetically modified microorganism that emits a clear signal when the microbes encounter a target molecule [17, 18]. To date, many metal-specific and a few petroleum product-based bacterial sensors have been developed [1923]. Based on the nature of the cells used, a variety of TCRS-based environmental contaminant sensors has been constructed by several research groups. However, to remediate environmental pollutants, new synthetic genetic circuits are needed so that the bacterial system can have both sensor and remediation activities. Future research on the application of biosensors in bioremediation should focus on the development of such TCRSs. Some of the TCRS-based heavy metal biosensors for use in bioremediation applications have been developed and are reviewed below.

A zinc adsorption system was developed by using the ZraSR TCRS and chimera Zinc binding OmpC. In normal microbial system, ZraSR detects and induces the membrane protein ZraP, which is responsible for the efflux of Zn2+ ions. Engineered zinc adsorption system was based on normal ZraSR TCRS, in which ZraS is used for detecting Zn2+ ions, but the ZraR activates the ompC-Zinc binding peptide chimeric gene under the ZraP promoter instead of native ZraP. The zinc binding peptides displayed in the cell surface can adsorb exogenous Zinc. This system is sensitive to zinc even at low concentrations (0.001 mM) [24].

In the same manner, simultaneous detection and removal of copper ions in the bacterial surface was achieved through the combined application of CuSR TCRS and cell surface displayed copper binding peptides (CBP) fused to the membrane protein OmpC. In this system, CuSR induces the expression of the chimera OmpC-CBP upon sensing Cu2+ ions. Then, the chimera proteins expressed in bacterial cell surface can adsorb the copper ions [25].

An interesting feature of these adsorption systems is that the expression of the chimeric OmpC with the metal binding site is induced by heavy metals (Table 1). Hence, the construction of a heavy metal biosensor in combination with a bio-adsorption system would complement analytical heavy metal detection methodologies and enable the rapid monitoring and removal of toxic levels of bioavailable metal contaminants in industrial settings. The above biosensor combined with bio-adsorption was able to absorb heavy metals efficiently without any induction system. Following this scheme, this synthetic bacterial system is an excellent paradigm for developing multifunctional synthetic systems that can be applied both in the efficient removal and recovery of the target compound.
Table 1

Two-component regulatory systems based on microbial biosensors coupled with bio-adsorption

Field of application

TCRS

Function

Host chassis

Promoter-reporter

Chemical target

Detection range (mM)

References

Bioremediation

ZraSR (also known as HydHG)

Biosensor

E. coli XL1-blue

zraP-gfp-HydG

Zinc

0.01–1

[66]

CuSR

Biosensor

E. coli XL1-blue

cusC-gfp-CusR

Copper

0.004–1

[25]

ZraSR and CusSR

Biosensor coupled with bio-adsorption

E. coli XL1-blue

zraP-gfp, cusC-gfp

Zinc and Copper

0.05–1

[67]

ZraSR

Biosensor coupled with bio-adsorption

E. coli TOP10

zraP-gfp-ompC

Lead

0.3–1

[68]

ZraSR

Biosensor coupled with bio-adsorption

E. coli XL1-blue

zraP-gfp

Zinc

0.1–1

[24]

Biorefinery

DcuSZ (Chimeric)

Biosensor

E. coli BL21

(DE3)

ompC-gfp

Fumarate

0.1–10

[55]

MalKZ (Chimeric)

Biosensor

E. coli BL21

(DE3)

ompC-gfp

Malate

0.1–10

[56]

AauSZ (Chimeric)

Biosensor

E. coli BL21

(DE3)

ompC-gfp

Acidic amino acid

0.05–10

[57]

Tazl (Chimeric)

Biosensor

E. coli RU1012

ompC-lacZ

Aspartate

0.2–1

[28]

Engineering chimeric TCRSs for detecting novel compounds

The successful design and construction of TCRS provide a better understanding of the system to obtain a chimeric TCRS customized for achieving a desired input/output. The HK domain, which has a variety of signal recognition capabilities, may be used to couple or shuffle a broad range of input signals to the appropriate output responses through a conserved phosphotransfer process. This shuffling can be achieved by cross-linking the domains of evolutionarily distinct TCRSs, and a chimeric TCRS with the desired sensing ability can be obtained. Most of the domain shuffling required for rational design of chimeric proteins is between HKs and rarely between RRs. At present, several research groups have successfully constructed a chimeric two-component sensor protein by fusing the HK domain to the sensory domain of another kinase or a completely unrelated protein. These studies improve our understanding of the molecular events that occur during signal transduction across membranes in these organisms.

Engineering receptor kinases mainly involve a domain swapping or shuffling strategy in which a receptor protein or another HK contributes their functional module. The domain swapping in HKs implies that these proteins are flexible, allowing the construction of new kinases using a rational design strategy. The domain swapping strategy has been used to produce chimeric TCRSs that include chemotaxis proteins. There are several periplasmic chemotactic receptors, such as Tsr, Tar, Trg, and Aer, that recognize specific chemicals, and they can be coupled with the cytoplasmic domain of EnvZ to allow signal transduction [26]. EnvZ is the most studied HK protein that regulates the phosphorylation state of OmpR in response to osmolarity changes. OmpR is an RR protein responsible for the controlled expression of ompF and ompC genes encoding for the membrane porin proteins OmpF and OmpC, respectively. Aside from OmpR, EnvZ can also regulate the phosphotransfer of 11 different RRs found in E. coli [27]. Because the EnvZ–ompR complex in E. coli is a well-studied TCRS that is widely-distributed in bacteria, the DHp and CA domains of EnvZ are commonly used for the domain swapping strategy. A good example of this is the hybridization of Tar, a chemoreceptor transmembrane protein that can detect aspartate and EnvZ. By replacing the cytoplasmic signaling domain of Tar protein with the cytoplasmic kinase/phosphatase domain of EnvZ, the hybridized proteins were able to carry out both the sensing capability of Tar for aspartate and the regulation capability of EnvZ towards OmpR thereby consequently activating ompC [28]. This strategy also worked in the hybridization of Trg protein and EnvZ, allowing the recognition of ribose-binding peptides and activation expression of ompC [29]. In addition to functioning as chemotactic receptors, HK domains are also involved in light sensing, and kinases that sense C4-dicarboxylate, sugar, aspartate, and acidic amino acids have been engineered with the EnvZ cytoplasmic domain to provide a better sensing ability for the desired substance (Table 1). This approach to engineering novel two-component sensor proteins not only acts as a high throughput screening system but also provides knowledge of the newly identified two-component signaling pathways.

Chimeric TCRS-based screening and regulation of microbial chemical production

In line with the depletion of fossil fuels, renewable biomass is being exploited as a sustainable substitute for petroleum. Among the renewable biomass resources, lignocellulosic biomass is one of the most promising due to its abundance. Lignocellulosic biomass undergoes different pretreatment methods that result in a hydrolysate containing mixed sugars and inhibitors that can be detrimental to the growth of microbial cells during fermentation [30].

Metabolic engineering strategies have been developed in systems level for the development of metabolically engineered microorganisms as host strains in biorefinery processes to produce bio-based fuels [3135], chemicals [3641] and polymers [4247] from renewable resources. Also, engineered strains that have high levels of growth and tolerance in the presence of high concentrations of sugars and inhibitors are extensively being developed to utilize biomass-derived renewable resources [4853]. Therefore, it is important to develop a high-throughput screening method to identify the high-producing strains. High-producing strains can be screened using a riboselector, which is composed of a riboswitch that can detect the target compound and a selection module such as tetA, which will enable favorable growth of a lysine-accumulating cell in the presence of selection pressure (NiCl2) [54]. Likewise, chimeric TCRS can be potentially used in screening for high-producing strains (Fig. 3). DcuSZ is an EnvZ/OmpR-based chimeric TCRS that was constructed by fusing the DcuS HK sensory domain with the cytoplasmic domain of EnvZ. The chimeric DcuSZ is highly specific to fumarate in such a way that the expression of the gfp gene under the control of the ompR-regulated ompC promoter is proportional to different fumarate concentrations in the medium [55]. Other chimeric TCRSs based on EnvZ/OmpR were constructed by fusing the HK sensory domain of MalK and AauS to the EnvZ catalytic domain to detect high malate- and aspartate-producing strains, respectively [56, 57].
Fig. 3

Application of TCRSs in bioremediation and microbial biorefinery. TCRSs serve as a regulatory system for the expression of genes encoding enzymes for the degradation of the detected target pollutant compound or for genes encoding enzymes for the production of the target chemical product

Two-component regulatory systems may also be used to develop tightly regulated gene expression systems. Tightly regulated gene expression is important in engineering metabolic pathways to avoid leaky expression that may cause a metabolic burden to the microbial cell. Typical induction strategies include the use of isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). However, IPTG is expensive and can be toxic to cells at high concentrations. An example of tightly regulated gene expression induced by an inexpensive substrate is the invertible promoter system. In this system, the promoter is active or ‘ON’ when the target substrate that serves as an inducer is present and ‘OFF’ (inverted orientation) when absent [58]. Based on this invertible promoter system’s mechanism, the coupled sensing and regulating activities of TCRSs can be modified to achieve tightly regulated gene expression.

Summary and perspectives

To date, some TCRSs have been identified that sense organic compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, biphenyl, styrene, fumarate, and malate) and regulate the gene expression of proteins involved in catabolic pathways. These compounds can be metabolized and used as a carbon source for most groups of microorganisms [9]. In TCRSs, the signal recognized by the sensor kinase domain catalyzes the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of a conserved histidine residue in the protein. The phosphoryl group is then transferred from the histidine to an aspartate residue located in the RR. The phosphorylated RR binds to specific promoter sequences to either activate or repress transcription. At present, a wide range of synthetic genetic circuits has been developed that can couple a sensor output to a desired biological activity [59]. In addition, numerous genetic switches are also available to turn on gene expression once a target molecule has reached its activation threshold. A switch can be assembled using transcriptional repressors or activators, which allows the connection between the sensor output and regulation of the biological response [58]. Several switch types have been developed to control the cellular response: inverter switches that produce a reciprocal response [60]; biphasic switches that use both negative and positive regulation and respond to small amounts of input [61]; toggle switches that use two repressors that cross-regulate each other’s promoters [62]; and riboswitches that regulate gene expression by inhibiting protein synthesis [63]. Likewise, many logic gate types have been developed for biological circuits, including ‘NAND’, ‘NOT IF’ and ‘NOR’ [64].

Integrated approaches provide a better perspective for developing a specific biosensor designed to catalyze the production and/or degradation of the desired compound. To achieve this, it is necessary to rewire the genetic circuits of bacteria using the above synthetic devices. Design of the engineered system should be based on strategies for building sensory regulation components that incorporate a target substrate-responsive TCRS in any desired host (Fig. 4). Introducing a sensory regulation device in a host cell enables it to sense the target compound and trigger the genetic circuit, achieving real-time monitoring of the compound present and upregulation of the effector protein’s gene expression. Use of engineered TCRSs in bacteria would prevent the production of redundant proteins at the initial growth phase and avoid the use of toxic and costly chemical inducers.
Fig. 4

Synthetic TCRS with integrated biosensing and bioremediating functions for the detection of the target compound and upregulation of the effector protein that allow real-time detection of controlled gene expression

Although a large number of accessible sensor parts are available for TCRSs, employing these sensors in a domain shuffling strategy can be challenging. To attach the sensor domain to the HK domain of the protein, structural and functional information on both proteins is needed [65]. When designing chimeric TCRS-based biosensors, great care is required in domain swapping to maximize the kinase activity of the chimeric protein. In the majority of the chimeric TCRS-based biosensors, monitoring of the extracellular targets and the response to these targets is achieved by producing a reporter protein [5557]. Moreover, biosensors have also been modified with other synthetic biology tools such as the bio-absorption of heavy metals with a cell surface display system and expression of an extracellular enzyme to degrade aromatic compounds. Therefore, such a synthetic genetic circuit can be switched on when a signal is detected to remove certain pollutants, and after the input signal disappears, the microbes behave like normal bacteria.

Conclusions

In this review, we have discussed numerous TCRSs engineered in different prokaryotic species that can sense inorganic and organic pollutants, and examined the recent developments in cellular biosensors coupled with bioremediation. The TCRS-based biosensor coupled with bioremediation approach has the potential to advance even further using the recent developments in bioengineering in strain development. However, only a few studies on TCRS-based biosensors have been reported, and much effort is needed to obtain a complete picture of the TCRS-based control of downstream catabolic pathways. To achieve these goals, a thorough understanding of TCRS mechanisms is essential to engineer strains for use in efficient biosensor systems coupled with bio-degradation or bio-adsorption functionality. Moreover, more studies are required to extend its use in food, pharmaceutical and industrial biotechnology applications.

Notes

Abbreviations

TCRS: 

two-component regulatory system

HK: 

histidine kinase

RR: 

response regulator

DHp: 

histidine phosphotransfer domain

CA: 

catalytic ATP-binding domain

ATP: 

adenosine triphosphate

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JC and SJP conceived the project. SR, MGB, SJP, and JC wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning (MSIP) (NRF-2015R1A2A2A01004733), a Golden Seed Project Grant (213008-05-1-SB910) funded by Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, and the Mid-career Researcher Program from MSIP through NRF of Korea (NRF-2016R1A2B4008707).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact corresponding author for data requests.

Consent for publication

Our manuscript does not contain any individual person’s data in any form.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Our manuscript does not report data collected from humans or animals.

Funding

Funding sources are declared in the acknowledgement section.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biomolecules Engineering Lab, Department of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Chonnam National University
(2)
Division of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Ewha Womans University

References

  1. Wanekaya AK, Chen W, Mulchandani A. Recent biosensing developments in environmental security. J Environ Monit. 2008;10:703–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Liu X, Germaine KJ, Ryan D, Dowling DN. Development of a GFP-based biosensor for detecting the bioavailability and biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). J Environ Eng Landsc. 2007;15:261–8.Google Scholar
  3. Lovley DR, Coates JD. Bioremediation of metal contamination. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1997;8:285–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Bae W, Wu CH, Kostal J, Mulchandani A, Chen W. Enhanced mercury biosorption by bacterial cells with surface-displayed MerR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:3176–80.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Harvey BR, Georgiou G, Hayhurst A, Jeong KJ, Iverson BL, Rogers GK. Anchored periplasmic expression, a versatile technology for the isolation of high-affinity antibodies from Escherichia coli-expressed libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:9193–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Lee JS, Shin KS, Pan JG, Kim CJ. Surface-displayed viral antigens on Salmonella carrier vaccine. Nat Biotechnol. 2000;18:645–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Taschner S, Meinke A, Gabain AV, Boyd AP. Selection of peptide entry motifs by bacterial surface display. Biochem J. 2002;367:393–402.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Casino P, Rubio V, Marina A. The mechanism of signal transduction by two-component systems. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2010;20:763–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Tropel D, Van Der Meer JR. Bacterial transcriptional regulators for degradation pathways of aromatic compounds. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68:474–500.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Leonhartsberger S, Huber A, Lottspeich F, Böck A. The hydH/G genes from Escherichia coli code for a zinc and lead responsive two-component regulatory system. J Mol Biol. 2001;307:93–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Munson GP, Lam DL, Outten FW, O’Halloran TV. Identification of a copper-responsive two-component system on the chromosome of Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:5864–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Gupta A, Matsui K, Lo JF, Silver S. Molecular basis for resistance to silver cations in Salmonella. Nat Med. 1999;5:183–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. López-Maury L, García-Domínguez M, Florencio FJ, Reyes JC. A two-component signal transduction system involved in nickel sensing in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Mol Microbiol. 2002;43:247–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Dean CR, Poole K. Expression of the ferric enterobactin receptor (PfeA) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: involvement of a two-component regulatory system. Mol Microbiol. 1993;8:1095–103.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Dı́az E, Prieto MA. Bacterial promoters triggering biodegradation of aromatic pollutants. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2000;11:467–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Velasco A, Alonso S, Garcia JL, Perera J, Díaz E. Genetic and functional analysis of the styrene catabolic cluster of Pseudomonas sp. strain Y2. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:1063–71.Google Scholar
  17. Sagi E, Hever N, Rosen R, Bartolome AJ, Premkumar JR, Ulber R, Lev O, Scheper T, Belkin S. Fluorescence and bioluminescence reporter functions in genetically modified bacterial sensor strains. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2003;90:2–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Yong YC, Zhong JJ. A genetically engineered whole-cell pigment-based bacterial biosensing system for quantification of N-butyryl homoserine lactone quorum sensing signal. Biosens Bioelectron. 2009;25:41–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Biran I, Babai R, Levcov K, Rishpon J, Ron EZ. Online and in situ monitoring of environmental pollutants: electrochemical biosensing of cadmium. Environ Microbiol. 2000;2:285–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Corbisier P, Ji G, Nuyts G, Mergeay M, Silver S. luxAB gene fusions with the arsenic and cadmium resistance operons of Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pI258. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1993;110:231–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Ivask A, Hakkila K, Virta M. Detection of organomercurials with sensor bacteria. Anal Chem. 2001;73:5168–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Selifonova O, Burlage R, Barkay T. Bioluminescent sensors for detection of bioavailable Hg(II) in the environment. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:3083–90.Google Scholar
  23. Tauriainen S, Karp M, Chang W, Virta M. Luminescent bacterial sensor for cadmium and lead. Biosens Bioelectron. 1998;13:931–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Ravikumar S, Yoo IK, Lee SY, Hong SH. A study on the dynamics of the zraP gene expression profile and its application to the construction of zinc adsorption bacteria. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2011;34:1119–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Ravikumar S, Yoo IK, Lee SY, Hong SH. Construction of copper removing bacteria through the integration of two-component system and cell surface display. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2011;165:1674–81.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Grebe TW, Stock J. Bacterial chemotaxis: the five sensors of a bacterium. Curr Biol. 1998;8:R154–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Skerker JM, Prasol MS, Perchuk BS, Biondi EG, Laub MT. Two-component signal transduction pathways regulating growth and cell cycle progression in a bacterium: a system-level analysis. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e334.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Utsumi R, Brissette RE, Rampersaud A, Forst SA, Oosawa K, Inouye M. Activation of bacterial porin gene expression by a chimeric signal transducer in response to aspartate. Science. 1989;245:1246–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Baumgartner JW, Kim C, Brissette RE, Inouye M, Park C, Hazelbauer GL. Transmembrane signalling by a hybrid protein: communication from the domain of chemoreceptor Trg that recognizes sugar-binding proteins to the kinase/phosphatase domain of osmosensor EnvZ. J Bacteriol. 1994;176:1157–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Oh YH, Eom IY, Joo JC, Yu JH, Song BK, Lee SH, Hong SH, Park SJ. Recent advances in development of biomass pretreatment technologies used in biorefinery for the production of bio-based fuels, chemicals and polymers. Korean J Chem Eng. 2015;32:1945–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Oh YH, Eom GT, Kang KH, Joo JC, Jang YA, Choi JW, Song BK, Lee SH, Park SJ. Construction of heterologous gene expression cassettes for the development of recombinant Clostridium beijerinckii. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2016;39:555–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim S, Jang YS, Ha SC, Ahn JW, Kim EJ, Lim JH, Cho C, Ryu YS, Lee SK, Lee SY, Kim KJ. Redox-switch regulatory mechanism of thiolase from Clostridium acetobutylicum. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Jang YS, Malaviya A, Cho C, Lee J, Lee SY. Butanol production from renewable biomass by Clostridia. Bioresour Technol. 2012;123:653–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Jojima T, Noburyu R, Sasaki M, Tajima T, Suda M, Yukawa H, Inui M. Metabolic engineering for improved production of ethanol by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;99:1165–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Gaida SM, Liedtke A, Jentges AH, Engels B, Jennewein S. Metabolic engineering of Clostridium cellulolyticum for the production of n-butanol from crystalline cellulose. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Shin JH, Park SH, Oh YH, Choi JW, Lee MH, Cho JS, Jeong KJ, Joo JC, Yu J, Park SJ, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for enhanced production of 5-aminovaleric acid. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:174.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Oh YH, Choi JW, Kim EY, Song BK, Jeong KJ, Park K, Kim IK, Woo HM, Lee SH, Park SJ. Construction of synthetic promoter-based expression cassettes for the production of cadaverine in recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2015;176:2065–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Choi JW, Yim SS, Lee SH, Kang TJ, Park SJ, Jeong KJ. Enhanced production of gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) in recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum by expressing glutamate decarboxylase active in expanded pH range. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Park SJ, Kim EY, Noh W, Park HM, Oh YH, Lee SH, Song BK, Jegal J, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of 5-aminovalerate and glutarate as C5 platform chemicals. Metab Eng. 2013;16:42–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Abdel-Rahman MA, Xiao Y, Tashiro Y, Wang Y, Zendo T, Sakai K, Sonomoto K. Fed-batch fermentation for enhanced lactic acid production from glucose/xylose mixture without carbon catabolite repression. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;119:153–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Li Y, Wang X, Ge X, Tian P. High production of 3-hydroxypropionic acid in Klebsiella pneumoniae by systematic optimization of glycerol metabolism. Sci Rep. 2016;6:26932.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Choi SY, Park SJ, Kim WJ, Yang JE, Lee H, Shin J, Lee SY. One-step fermentative production of poly(lactate-co-glycolate) from carbohydrates in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:435–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Yang JE, Kim JW, Oh YH, Choi SY, Lee H, Park AR, Shin J, Park SJ, Lee SY. Biosynthesis of poly(2-hydroxyisovalerate-co-lactate) by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol J. 2016;11:1572–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Chae CG, Kim YJ, Lee SJ, Oh YH, Yang JE, Joo JC, Kang KH, Jang YA, Lee H, Park AR, Song BK, Lee SY, Park SJ. Biosynthesis of poly(2-hydroxybutyrate-co-lactate) in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioproc Eng. 2016;21:169–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Park SJ, Jang YA, Noh W, Oh YH, Lee H, David Y, Baylon MG, Shin J, Yang JE, Choi SY, Lee SH, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of Ralstonia eutropha for the production of polyhydroxyalkanoates from sucrose. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:638–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Meng DC, Wang Y, Wu LP, Shen R, Chen JC, Wu Q, Chen GQ. Production of poly(3-hydroxypropionate) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxypropionate) from glucose by engineering Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2015;29:189–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang S, Liu Y, Bryant DA. Metabolic engineering of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 to produce poly-3-hydroxybutyrate and poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-co-4-hydroxybutyrate. Metab Eng. 2015;32:174–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim HS, Oh YH, Jang YA, Kang KH, David Y, Yu JH, Song BK, Choi JI, Chang YK, Joo JC, Park SJ. Recombinant Ralstonia eutropha engineered to utilize xylose and its use for the production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from sunflower stalk hydrolysate solution. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Oh YH, Lee SH, Jang YA, Choi JW, Hong KS, Yu JH, Shin J, Song BK, Mastan SG, David Y, Baylon MG, Lee SY, Park SJ. Development of rice bran treatment process and its use for the synthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates from rice bran hydrolysate solution. Bioresour Technol. 2015;181:283–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Park SJ, Park JP, Lee SY. Production of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) from whey by fed-batch culture of recombinant Escherichia coli in a pilot-scale fermenter. Biotechnol Lett. 2002;24:185–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Kim DY, Yim SC, Lee PC, Lee WG, Lee SY, Chang HN. Batch and continuous fermentation of succinic acid from wood hydrolysate by Mannheimia succiniciproducens MBEL55E. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2004;35:648–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Saha BC, Nichols NN, Qureshi N, Kennedy GJ, Iten LB, Cotta MA. Pilot scale conversion of wheat straw to ethanol via simultaneous saccharification and fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2015;175:17–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang Y, Kumar A, Hardwidge PR, Tanaka T, Kondo A, Vadlani PV. d-lactic acid production from renewable lignocellulosic biomass via genetically modified Lactobacillus plantarum. Biotechnol Prog. 2016;32:271–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang J, Seo SW, Jang S, Shin SI, Lim CH, Roh TY, Jung GY. Synthetic RNA devices to expedite the evolution of metabolite-producing microbes. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1413.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Ganesh I, Ravikumar S, Lee SH, Park SJ, Hong SH. Engineered fumarate sensing Escherichia coli based on novel chimeric two-component system. ‎J Biotechnol. 2013;168:560–6.Google Scholar
  56. Ganesh I, Ravikumar S, Yoo IK, Hong SH. Construction of malate-sensing Escherichia coli by introduction of a novel chimeric two-component system. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2015;38:797–804.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. Ravikumar S, Ganesh I, Maruthamuthu MK, Hong SH. Engineering Escherichia coli to sense acidic amino acids by introduction of a chimeric two-component system. Korean J Chem Eng. 2015;32:2073–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  58. Ham TS, Lee SK, Keasling JD, Arkin AP. A tightly regulated inducible expression system utilizing the fim inversion recombination switch. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;94:1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Voigt CA. Genetic parts to program bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2006;17:548–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Yokobayashi Y, Weiss R, Arnold FH. Directed evolution of a genetic circuit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:16587–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Isaacs FJ, Hasty J, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Prediction and measurement of an autoregulatory genetic module. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:7714–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Gardner TS, Cantor CR, Collins JJ. Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature. 2000;403:339–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Mandal M, Breaker RR. Gene regulation by riboswitches. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:451–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. Guet CC, Elowitz MB, Hsing W, Leibler S. Combinatorial synthesis of genetic networks. Science. 2002;296:1466–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang F, Keasling J. Biosensors and their applications in microbial metabolic engineering. Trends Microbiol. 2011;19:323–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Pham VD, Ravikumar S, Lee SH, Hong SH, Yoo IK. Modification of response behavior of zinc sensing HydHG two-component system using a self-activation loop and genomic integration. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2013;36:1185–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Ravikumar S, Ganesh I, Yoo IK, Hong SH. Construction of a bacterial biosensor for zinc and copper and its application to the development of multifunctional heavy metal adsorption bacteria. Process Biochem. 2012;47:758–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Maruthamuthu MK, Ganesh I, Ravikumar S, Hong SH. Evaluation of zraP gene expression characteristics and construction of a lead (Pb) sensing and removal system in a recombinant Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2015;37:659–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017

Advertisement