Open Access

Overexpression of membrane-bound gluconate-2-dehydrogenase to enhance the production of 2-keto-d-gluconic acid by Gluconobacter oxydans

  • Kefei Li1,
  • Xinlei Mao1,
  • Liu Liu1,
  • Jinping Lin1Email author,
  • Ming Sun1,
  • Dongzhi Wei1 and
  • Shengli Yang1
Microbial Cell Factories201615:121

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0521-8

Received: 7 March 2016

Accepted: 1 July 2016

Published: 9 July 2016

Abstract

Background

2-keto-d-gluconic acid (2KGA) is widely used as a chemical intermediate in the cosmetic, pharmaceutical and environmental industries. Several microbial fermentation processes have been developed for production of 2KGA but these suffer from substrate/product inhibition, byproduct formation and low productivity. In previous work, we showed that 2KGA can be specifically produced from glucose (Glu) or gluconic acid (GA) by resting wild-type Gluconobacter oxydans DSM2003 cells, although substrate concentration was relatively low. In this study, we attempted to improve 2KGA productivity by G. oxydans DSM2003 by overexpressing the ga2dh gene, which encodes the membrane-bound gluconate-2-dehydrogenase enzyme (GA2DH).

Results

The ga2dh gene was overexpressed in G. oxydans DSM2003 under the control of three promoters, P tufB , P ga2dh or P ghp0169 , respectively. Among the recombinant strains obtained, G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh showed a similar growth rate to that of the control strain and displayed the highest specific productivity of 2KGA from GA, which was increased nearly twofold compared with that of the control strain during batch biotransformation. When biocatalysis conditions were optimized, with provision of sufficient oxygen during biotransformation, up to 480 g/L GA was completely utilized over 45 h by resting cells of G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh and 453.3 g/L 2KGA was produced. A productivity of 10.07 g/L/h and a yield of 95.3 % were obtained. Overexpression of the ga2dh gene also significantly improved the conversion of Glu to 2KGA. Under optimized conditions, 270 g/L Glu was converted to 321 g/L 2KGA over 18 h, with a yield of 99.1 % and a productivity of 17.83 g/L/h. The glucose concentrations during the batch biotransformation and the 2KGA productivities achieved in this study were relatively high compared with the results of previous studies.

Conclusions

This study developed an efficient bacterial strain (G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh) for the production of 2KGA by overexpressing the ga2dh gene in G. oxydans. Supply of sufficient oxygen enhanced the positive effect of gene overexpression on 2KGA production. Gluconobacter oxydans_tufB_ga2dh is thus a competitive species for use in 2KGA production.

Keywords

2-keto-d-gluconic acid Gluconobacter oxydans Overexpression Resting cell

Background

2-keto-d-gluconic acid (2KGA) is a noncorrosive mild organic acid, widely used in the cosmetic, pharmaceutical and environmental industries. It is of considerable interest that 2KGA is an intermediate for the generally regarded as safe (GRAS) antioxidant erythorbic acid (isoascorbic acid) and sodium erythorbate (EN) production [1].

2KGA can be produced from glucose by chemical process, enzymatic synthesis or microbial fermentation. During enzymatic or chemical synthesis, expensive enzymes or metal catalysts, such as Pt and Pb, are needed, and the production of by-products and low 2KGA yields is also disadvantageous [2]. To date, microbial fermentation appears to be the most efficient method for 2KGA production. Gluconobacter, Pseudogluconobacter, Pseudomonas, Serratia and Klebsiella spp. have been screened for 2KGA production [1, 3, 4]. The selectivity of glucose oxidation and the ratio of the acids produced vary widely among different strains and their culture conditions. The fermentation of various Pseudomonas species has been the most intensively studied for achieving good yields of 2KGA. The strain P. fluorescens AR4 was identified as having a higher efficiency for producing 2KGA than the previously obtained S. marcescens, P. saccharoketogenes or P. aeruginosa [5]. In semi-continuous culture, P. fluorescens AR4 could produce 444.96 g/L of 2KGA from a total of 476.88 g/L of glucose, resulting in a total productivity of 6.74 g/L/h and a yield of 0.93 g/g, which achieved the commercially acceptable levels of 2KGA. Nonetheless, the glucose tolerance of P. fluorescens AR4, as well as those of other reported 2KGA-producing strains, has been less than 200 g/L. Substrate inhibition remains a major concern in 2KGA fermentation when glucose or starch hydrolysates are used as carbon sources. The bioconversion of cassava-derived glucose to 2KGA was investigated using resting cells of immobilized P. aeruginosa [6]. Although the immobilized bacteria were successfully reused over a period of 2 weeks for the continuous production of 2KGA, with a good molar yield of 94 %, the final 2KGA titer was 35 g/L and the production rate was 0.55 g/L/h, which were relatively low.

The genus Gluconobacter are well known for their ability to rapidly but incompletely oxidize various sugars and sugar alcohols, and have therefore been used in several industrial oxidative fermentation processes [79]. Most Gluconobacter species can produce 2KGA from d-glucose via d-gluconic acid (GA) by two membrane-bound enzymes, glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) and gluconate-2-dehydrogenase (GA2DH). These enzymes are linked to the respiratory chain located in the cytoplasmic membrane facing the periplasm [10, 11], and accumulate the corresponding oxidized products almost completely in the culture medium. Gluconobacter species therefore have been exploited to establish the production process for 2KGA. However, byproducts 5KGA and/or 2,5-diketo-d–gluconate are also observed during the oxidation of glucose or GA in most Gluconobacter species [11, 12]. This not only lowers the final 2KGA productivity but also hinders downstream separation and purification of the product, and increases the production cost. The product formation pattern upon glucose oxidation depends upon the individual strains used. Both Weenk et al. [13] and Herrmann et al. [14] found that different G. oxydans strains differ in the ratio of their products from glucose. In addition, the medium and cultivation conditions influence the individual product yields. Weenk et al. also found that the influence of pH on product formation was significant [13]. For industrial production, it is preferable to engineer G. oxydans to enhance their catalytic properties during biotransformation. Although some early attempts were made to increase the production of GA or exclusively 5KGA [15, 16], little progress has been achieved in 2KGA accumulation by Gluconobacter strains. Therefore, recombinant strains suitable for 2KGA production on an industrial scale remain to be investigated.

In our previous study, we obtained one strain (G. oxydans DSM2003) with a high conversion rate and excellent selectivity towards d-glucose oxidation. We noticed that resting and growing cells of G. oxydans DSM2003 differ in their ratios of 2KGA and 5KGA formation. During microbial fermentation, most d-glucose or GA as a carbon source was transformed to 2KGA by growing cells, accompanied by nearly the same amounts of 5KGA (50 % of the total keto-d-gluconate). However, with resting cells of G. oxydans DSM2003, d-glucose or GA were exclusively converted to 2KGA. During batch bioconversion, 1365 mmol/L (300 g/L)GA was converted to 2KGA with a high yield of >97 % and a productivity of 74 mmol/L/h (16.73 g/L) by 80 g/L resting cells (wet weight) [17]. Therefore, the strain G. oxydans DSM2003 was chosen for 2KGA production. Bioconversion of GA to 2KGA using resting cells was used because of its selective, high-yield production and easy product extraction. In this work, the ga2dh gene, which encodes GA2DH, was overexpressed in G. oxydans DSM2003 with different promoters to enhance the production of 2KGA. The optimization of 2KGA production through catalysis by resting cells of the best recombinant strain, G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh, was investigated.

Results

Overexpression of ga2dh in G. oxydans DSM2003

Efficient expression of ga2dh (gox1230-1232) was essential for enhancing the 2KGA production in G. oxydans DSM2003. A well-characterized promoter is a prerequisite for the overexpression of an enzyme. To achieve the optimum recombinant strains, three different promoters (G. oxydans_tufB, G. oxydans_ gHp0169 and the native promoter of the ga2dh gene) were introduced into the broad-host-range vector pBBR1MCS5 for expression of the ga2dh gene. G. oxydans_tufB and G. oxydans_ gHp0169 were confirmed to be strong promoters for cloning and expression of homologous and heterologous genes in G. oxydans [18]. The three recombinant strains (G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh G. oxydans_g2adh_ga2dh, and G. oxydans_gHp0169_ga2dh) and the control strain G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 were cultured in shaking flasks, and the activities of the obtained resting cells toward GA for 2KGA production were compared. Growth behaviors of the recombinant strains were similar to that of G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5, but the biomass at the late-log phase was slightly lower than that of the control strain (Table 1). During the biocatalysis of GA by resting cells, all of the ga2dh-overexpressing strains produced concentrations of 2KGA higher than that of the control strain. Amongst these strains, G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh and G. oxydans_gHp0169_ga2dh exhibited the highest specific productivities of 2KGA (0.83 and 0.85 g/g/h), about 100 % higher than that of G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 (0.42 g/g/h).
Table 1

Cell growth of different G. oxydans strains and their specific2KGA productivities

 

Biomass (g/L)

Specific productivity (g/g(wet wt)/h)

G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5

29 ± 2

0.42

G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh

29 ± 3

0.83

G. oxydans_g2adh_ga2dh

28 ± 2.5

0.61

G. oxydans_gHp0169_ga2dh

25 ± 2.5

0.85

Concerning the biomass and specific productivity of 2KGA production, the optimal strain G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh was selected and batch bioconversion of GA by resting cells was conducted in a 7-L fermenter with a GA concentration increased to 320 g/L. During the bioconversion, the agitation speed and aeration rate were controlled at 600 rpm and 8 L/min, respectively. pH was controlled at 5.8 using 4 mol/L NaOH solution. As shown in Fig. 1, almost all the GA was converted to 2KGA by 30 g(wet wt)/L cells of the engineered strain in about 25 h, generating 319 g/L 2KGA at a productivity of 12.76 g/L/h. In contrast, the control strain G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 required 51 h to complete this reaction,generating 307 g/L 2KGA at a productivity of 6.02 g/L/h. The results show that enhanced expression of the ga2dh gene in G. oxydans under the control of tufB promoter efficiently improved the production yield of 2KGA from GA.
Fig. 1

Comparison of 2KGA production by G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 and G.oxydans_tufB_ga2dh. The biotransformations were carried out in 7-L fermenterat 30 °C, pH 5.8, 600 rpm, aeration rate 8 L/min and cell concentration 30 g(wet wt)/L. Gluconobacter oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 (blank), G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh (filled)

As expected, the transcriptional levels of the ga2dh gene in the engineered strain (G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh) were significantly enhanced (Fig. 2). The ga2dh expression level obtained was normalized in the control strain G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5. The transcriptional abundance of the three subunits (gox1230, 1231 and 1232) of the ga2dh gene in G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh were 180, 35 and 60-fold higher than those of the control strain G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 respectively. But the transcriptional abundance of the gdh gene (gox0265) in G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh was about 85 % of that in G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5.
Fig. 2

Relative transcriptional abundance of the ga2dh and gdh gene G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 (blank) and G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh (shadow)

Optimization of the biocatalysis conditions by resting G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh cells

To explore the potential of G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh in 2KGA production and achieve a high production titer, the biocatalysis conditions for 2KGA production from GA were optimized. In a 7-L fermenter, pre-experiments had proven that the optimum reaction temperature and pH were 30 °C and 5.8, respectively.

A suitable amount of cell content is necessary for high 2KGA production and the economic feasibility of the bioprocess. To determine the effect of the cell content on 2KGA production, various concentrations of resting G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh cells were used to catalyze 320 g/L GA. As shown in Fig. 3, 2KGA production and the reaction rate increased with the cell concentration increasing to 30 g(wet wt)/L, and then were nearly constant as cell concentration continued to increase. In the presence of 30 g/L resting cells, 2KGA accumulation linearly increased and reached a maximum after 25 h, at which time all GA had been converted to 2KGA, resulting in the highest productivity of 12.76 g/L/h.
Fig. 3

Effect of cell concentration on 2KGA production. The biotransformations were conducted by 10, 20, 30, 40 and 60 g/L G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh resting cells, respectively

The effect of initial GA concentration on 2KGA production was also investigated. Reactions with four different GA concentrations (320, 380, 440 and 480 g/L) were conducted with 30 g(wet wt)/L resting cells at pH 5.8 and 30 °C. Almost all the GA at different concentrations were converted to 2KGA with yields close to 100 %, but the productivity decreased with increasing GA concentration, because of the extension of reaction time when the substrate concentration was increased (Fig. 4a). The 2KGA productivities were 12.76, 9.04, 5.93 and 4.93 g/L/h, at initial GA concentrations of 320, 380, 440 and 480 g/L, respectively. At a high initial GA concentration of 480 g/L, an enhanced concentration of resting cells (60 g(wet wt)/L) had no effect on the productivity for 2KGA production (Fig. 4b). Both GA conversion rate and 2KGA production rate with 60 g(wet wt)/L resting cells were identical with those at 30 g(wet wt)/L resting cells.
Fig. 4

Effect of initial GA concentration on 2KGA production. a The initial GA concentration were 320, 380, 420 and 480 g/L, respectively. Cell concentration was 30 g(wet wt)/L. GA (open); 2KGA (filled), b Initial GA concentration 480 g/L; cell concentration 60 g(wet wt)/L. GA (open); 2KGA (filled). c DO profile during the batch bioconversion, cell concentration 30 g(wet wt)/L

Given that the formation of 2KGA from GA requires oxygen as the final acceptor of electrons formed during the oxidation of GA, oxygen conditions were maintained via a high agitation speed (600 rpm) and air flow rate (8 L/min) throughout the batch bioconversion period. However, as shown in Fig. 4c, it was observed that when the reaction started, dissolved oxygen (DO) sharply decreased to 0 % air saturation, and then remained constant (less than 0 %) until the latter stages of the reaction (about 20 % of GA remaining). This may imply that DO is an important factor influencing the conversion of GA to 2KGA.

The main factors controlling DO concentration during biotransformation are the degree of agitation, gas flow rate and oxygen partial pressure in the supplied gas. Because of the limitations of the fermenter design, the agitation speed and gas flow rate could not be increased further. Thus, to increase DO levels, oxygen instead of air was supplied continuously to support the oxidation of 480 g/L GA by 30 g(wet wt)/L resting cells. Under this condition, the agitation speed and oxygen flow rate were controlled at 600 rpm and 1 L/min, respectively. The DO level in the reaction mixture was maintained above 100 % throughout the process. The time course for GA consumption and 2KGA production are shown in Fig. 5a. During the first 24 h of batch bioconversion, approximately 50 % of GA was linearly reduced and produced 199.42 ± 20.34 g/L 2KGA. Both 2KGA production and the conversion rate of GA to 2KGA were higher than those in bioconversion experiments under continuous air supply, in which a 2KGA titer of 129.42 ± 3.43 g/L and conversion rate of 27.4 % were obtained at 24 h (Fig. 4a). After 24 h, a continuous rise in 2KGA titer was accompanied by a gradual decrease in GA levels, as observed by declines in the product formation and substrate consumption rates. By 108 h, all GA was completely transformed into 2KGA at a level of 461.09 g/L with a productivity of 4.27 g/L/h. To determine the reasons for this behavior, samples of resting cells in the reaction mixture were taken at different reaction times and the relative activities toward GA were determined. The catalytic activities of the samples at the beginning of the reactions from air supply experiments or oxygen supply experiments were set at 100 %. As shown in Fig. 5b, the catalytic activities of the resting cells in these two experiments decreased with the extension of reaction time; however, there was a more marked loss of activity in the oxygen supply experiment than in the air supply experiment. Catalytic activities of resting cells in the oxygen supply experiment decreased by 40 % in 24 h, and showed 33 % activity at the end of bioconversion. The results clearly reveal that high oxygen levels suppressed the oxidative activity of resting cells toward GA, and an excess of oxygen during bioconversion may result in decreasing productivity. Therefore, an optimal oxygen level is important for high 2KGA productivity.
Fig. 5

Effect of DO control strategy on bioconversion of GA to 2KGA. a Time course of GA consumption and 2KGA production with oxygen supply b Relative activities of resting cells during bioconversion

In the case of enhanced oxygen levels via continuous supply of oxygen (Fig. 6), cell content in the reaction mixture was also increased to 60 g(wet wt)/L to make up for the loss of activities of cells. As expected, the conversion time was considerably shortened. By 45 h, 480 g/L GA was completely exhausted, and the 2KGA titer reached about 453.3 g/L, generating a productivity of 10.07 g/L/h, which is 135.8 % higher than that achieved using 30 g/L resting cells.
Fig. 6

Bioconversion of GA to 2KGA with oxygen supply and enhanced cell content (60 g(wet wt)/L)

Bioconversion of glucose to 2KGA by G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh

Overexpression of the ga2dh gene in G. oxydans could significantly improve the productivity and 2KGA production from GA, and enhance the product formation rate from glucose. As shown in Fig. 7, the profiles for 2KGA production from glucose by G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh and the control strain G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 were similar, but the glucose conversion rates and 2KGA formation rates were evidently different. As shown in Fig. 7a, 200 g/L glucose was consumed rapidly by 60 g/L resting G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh cells, which was accompanied by an increase in 2KGA and GA accumulation. After all glucose was fully depleted at 12 h, GA accumulation reached a maximum of 102.42 g/L, with a glucose conversion rate of 16.67 g/L/h. However, using the same amount of resting cells of the control strain G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5, the glucose conversion time was extended to 24 h, corresponding to a lower glucose conversion rate of 7.96 g/L/h (Fig. 7b). During the second period of GA conversion to 2KGA, all GA produced was further converted to 2KGA by G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh within 12–21 h (i.e. elapsed 9 h) with a GA conversion rate of 11.38 g/L/h, which was about fivefold higher than that obtained using G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5. 150.0 g/L GA produced was gradually decreased by G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5 cells and was fully consumed over a long period of time (24–102 h, elapsed 78 h), resulting in a low GA conversion rate of 1.92 g/L/h. It was also demonstrated that overexpression of the ga2dh gene improves the conversion of GA to 2KGA. Unexpectedly, overexpression of the ga2dh gene significantly enhanced the conversion of glucose to GA. Overall, the final 2KGA titer reached 234.6 g/L at 21 h during the batch bioconversion of glucose by the engineered strain, corresponding to a productivity of 11.17 g/L/h, which amounted to a 407 % increase compared with that obtained using the control strain G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5.
Fig. 7

Comparison of 2KGA production from glucose. The biotransformations were carried out in 7-L fermenter at 30 °C, pH 5.8, 600 rpm, aeration rate 8 L/min, initial Glu concentration 200 g/L and cell concentration 60 g(wet wt)/L. a G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh b G. oxydans_ pBBR1MCS5

When the glucose concentration was increased to 270 g/L, full conversion of glucose was observed at 15 h by 60 g/L resting cells of G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh, and the 2KGA titer reached a maximum of 318 g/L at 48 h, giving a productivity of 6.63 g/L/h (Fig. 8a). During the overall reaction process, we also found that DO levels in the fermenter remained below 0 %. Because sufficient oxygen supply could enhance 2KGA productivity during GA conversion, oxygen instead of air was supplied continuously to support the oxidation of 270 g/L glucose at the same cell mass (Fig. 8b). As expected, the reaction time under oxygen supply was significantly decreased compared with that when air was used as the electron acceptor. The glucose conversion rate during the first period of GA formation and the GA conversion rate in the second period of GA conversion to 2KGA were increased by 400 and 268.8 %, respectively. All of the supplied glucose was converted to 321 g/L 2KGA over 18 h by the constructed strain G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh, corresponding to a productivity of 17.83 g/L/h. Both the glucose concentration during batch biotransformation and the 2KGA productivity in this study were relatively high compared with those achieved by Pseudomonas fluorescens [5, 19, 20].
Fig. 8

Comparison of 2KGA production from glucose by G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh. Initial Glu concentration 270 g/L; Cell concentration 60 g(wet wt)/L. a Air b O2

Conclusions

Currently, almost all 2KGA is obtained by microbial fermentation; however, there are a number of problems with this process, including by-product (i.e., gluconate and 5KGA) formation, substrate/product inhibition, and modest productivity resulting from the long fermentation times required. A more economical process for 2KGA production has been a long sought after goal. In the present study, bioconversion of GA or glucose using resting cells of G. oxydans DSM2003 was developed to produce the sole product 2KGA. After overexpression of the ga2dh gene in the G. oxydans DSM2003 strain, the 2KGA productivities from GA (Fig. 1), glucose (Fig. 7) were enhanced by 112.5 and 407 %, respectively. DO concentration during the bioconversion of GA was identified as a key factor in 2KGA production by the engineered strain G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh. When sufficient but not excessive oxygen was supplied during batch bioconversion, 453.3 g/L 2KGA was produced from 480 g/L GA with a yield of 95 % and a productivity of 10.07 g/L/h and 321 g/L 2KGA was produced from 270 g/L glucose with a yield of 99 % and a productivity of 17.83 g/L/h. The proposed efficient bioconversion process for 2KGA production by G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh is potentially competitive in terms of 2KGA titer, yield and productivity, compared with reported microbial fermentation or bioconversion processes.

Methods

Materials

All chemicals and reagents were obtained from commercial sources. Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Generay (Shanghai, China). Restriction endonucleases, Taq DNA polymerase, and PCR reagents were purchased from Fermentas (Shanghai, China). DNA ligation kit was purchased from Takara (Dalian, China). GA (sodium salt) was purchased from Xiwang (Binzhou, China). Glucose, KH2PO4, MgSO4·7H2O, H3PO4, was purchased from Sinopharm (Shanghai, China). Sorbitol was purchased from Roquette (Lianyungang, China). Yeast extract was purchased from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK).

Microorganisms and culture conditions

Strains used in this study are listed in Table 2. Escherichia coli DH5α was cultivated in lysogeny broth (LB) medium or on LB agar plates at 37 °C. Gluconobacter oxydans was grown in a medium containing 80 g/L sorbitol, 20 g/L yeast extract, 1 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O, 0.1 g/L glutamine and 25 μg/mL cefoxitin at 30 °C in 1-L Erlenmeyer fl asks (200 mL culture volume) on an incubator shaker (Hualida, Taichang, China) with a stirring rate of 200 rpm or in a 7-L Fermenter (4 L culture volume) with pH and aeration control. The pH was adjusted to pH 5.5 with H3PO4 before sterilization. Addition of 25 μg/mL Gentamicin was used for plasmid maintenance in G. oxydans and E. coli.
Table 2

Plasmid, strain or primer

plasmid, strain or primer

Description or primer sequence

Source or added sitea

Plasmid

 pRK2013

KmR, mob+, tra+, helper plasmid

Laboratory stored

 pBBR1MCS5

Broad-host-range cloning vector; mod, rep, Gm R , lacZ

[21]

 pBBR1MCS5-P tufB -ga2dh

pBBRMCS5 derivative expressing gox1230-gox1232 containing a tufB promoter, Gm R

This study

 pBBR1MCS5-P ga2dh -ga2dh

pBBRMCS5 derivative expressing gox1230-gox1232 containing a ga2dh promoter, Gm R

This study

 pBBR1MCS5-P gHp0169 -ga2dh

pBBRMCS5 derivative expressing gox1230-gox1232 containing a gHp0169 promoter, Gm R

This study

Strain

 E. coli DH5α

F-, ϕ80, lacZ∆M15, ∆(lacZYA-argF), U169, endA1, recA1, hsdR17(rk-mK+), supE44, λ, thi-1, gyrA96, relA1, phoA

Tiangen, Beijing, China

 G. oxydans

Wild type, cefR

DSM2003

 G. oxydans_pBBR1MCS5

G. oxydans contain plasmid pBBR1MCS5

This study

 G. oxydans_tufB_ga2dh

G. oxydans contain plasmid pBBR1MCS5-P tufB -ga2dh, CefR, GmR

This study

 G. oxydans_g2adh_ga2dh

G. oxydans contain plasmid pBBR1MCS5-P ga2dh -ga2dh, CefR, GmR

This study

 G. oxydans_gHp0169_ga2dh

G. oxydans contain plasmid pBBR1MCS5-P gHp0169 -ga2dh, CefR, GmR

This study

Primer

 ga2dhf

CTATCTAGAGGAGAAACCTGTGCCCCCCATG

XbaI

 ga2dhr

GAGGGATCCTTCAGTTCAGTGAGACCGCATCATC

BamHI

 P tufB _f

ACTGAGCTCCGATGGTAAGAAATCCACTGC

SacI

 P tufB _r

ATATCTAGACCAAAACCCCGCTCCACC

XbaI

 P-ga2dh_f

CACTCTAGACAGAACCAGTGGCCGCCCCGACAAC

XbaI

 P-ga2dh_r

GAGCTGCAGTTCAGTTCAGTGAGACCGCATCATC

PstI

 P-gHp0169_f

ATAGAGCTCTGAAAGCGGCTGGCGCGT

SacI

 P-gHp0169_r

GCATCTAGAGCGGAAGGCGTTATACCCTGA

XbaI

rtPCR primers

 16s-RNA_f

GCGGTTGTTACAGTCAGATG

 

 16s-RNA_r

GCCTCAGCGTCAGTATCG

 

 gox1230_f

GCTGGAGCGAGGAAGACATC

 

 gox1230_r

CGGGTGGCAGACTTTTGAG

 

 gox1231_f

CCAGAACCTGTCCCAGTCCAC

 

 gox1231_r

CGACAACATTACGGCAAAGG

 

 gox1232_f

CGACAACATTACGGCAAAGG

 

 gox1232_r

GCCAGGGAAACCCAGCAT

 

 gox0265_f

AATGTTCGAGTGGGGTGGTC

 

 gox0265_r

CCCTTGGCGTCCTTTTCAG

 

aRestriction endonuclease sites underlined

All the sorbitol mediums mentioned above were sterilized by autoclaving at 121 °C for 20 min. Preculture of bacterium was inoculated with a single cell colony from an agar plate medium and cultured in a 500-mL orbital shaker containing 100 mL liquid medium (200 rpm, 30 °C) until the late exponential growth phase (20 h). The seed culture was repeated twice to adapt the culture to the fermentation environment. An inoculum concentration of 10 % (v/v) was added to the fermenter and grown at 30 °C for 20 h.

Construction of recombinant plasmids

The tufB and gHp0169 promoters were designed as described previously [21]. The ga2dh promoter from G. oxydans DSM2003 was sequenced and found to have the same sequence as that from G. oxydans 621H [22].The ga2dh promoter sequence could be found in Genebank (Genbank, CP000009.1, 1343338-1343689).

Restriction enzyme digestion, DNA ligation, and other DNA modifications were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Genomic DNA from G. oxydans DSM2003 was isolated by TIANamp Bacteria DNA Kit (TIANGEN) and used as a template for the amplification of gox1230-gox1232 (Genbank, CP000009.1, gox1230, 1339527-1340840; gox1231, 1340837-1342615; gox1232, 1342617-1343327), tufB promoter and gHp0169 promoter, with primers listed in Table 1. The resulting tufB promoter/gHp0169 promoter and plasmid pBBR1MCS5 were doubly digested with restriction endonucleases SacI and XbaI and ligated to construct the plasmids PBBR1MCS5-P tufB /P gHp0169 . The constructed plasmids and the 3812 bp amplicon of ga2dh were doubly digested with restriction endonucleases XbaI and BamHI and ligated to construct the plasmids pBBR1MCS5-P tufB -ga2dh and pBBR1MCS5-P gHp0169 -ga2dh.

Moreover, a 4164 bp fragment encoding the ga2dh gene with its own promoter were PCR-amplified from genomic DNA of G. oxydans DSM2003 with the primers P-ga2dh_f/P-ga2dh_r. The resulting amplicon and PBBR1MCS5 were then doubly digested with restriction endonucleases XbaI and PstI and ligated to construct the plasmids pBBR1MCS5-P ga2dh -ga2dh.

Constructs were transformed into E. coli DH5α. Positive transformants were sequenced by the Majorbio (Shanghai, China). The correct inserts were transformed into G. oxydans DSM2003 cells with the help of E. coli containing plasmid pRK2013. Transformation of G. oxydans was performed by triparental mating [23]. The positive transformants of G. oxydans were selected on agar media (as mentioned above) containing cefoxitin and gentamicin to final concentrations of 50 and 25 μg/mL, respectively. As a control, empty vector PBBR1MCS5 was also transformed into G. oxydans DSM2003 cells.

Detection of gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR(qRT-PCR)

To measure the gene expression level of ga2dh and gdh (Genbank, CP000009.1, 280284-282710), real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was carried out. An inoculum concentration of 1 % (v/v) of the G. oxydans strains was added to 50 mL sorbitol medium in 250-mL shake flasks until the late exponential phase (16 h) at 30 °C and 200 rpm on a rotary shaker. After that, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000×g and 4 °C for 10 min for total RNA isolation. Total RNA was extracted by RNAiso reagent (Takara) and then treated with DNase I (Takara). The reverse transcription was carried out to obtain the cDNA, using total RNA as the template, with a first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Quantitative gene expression analysis was performed by quantitative real-time PCR, which was carried out with the StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using primers as listed in Table 1. The 16S rRNA gene was used as an internal standard.

Whole-cell biotransformation of GA to 2KGA

Different strains of G. oxydans cells cultivated in sorbitol media in the 7-L fermenter (pH 5.5, 30 °C) were harvested by centrifugation (10,000×g, 20 min, 4 °C), and then washed with phosphate buffer (pH 6.0). Bioconversions were carried out in 100-mL shake flasks (10 mL transformation volume) which contained 10 g/L resting cells and 40 g/L GA, or in the 7-L fermenter (1.5 L transformation volume) containing resting cells and GA/Glu at 30 °C, pH 5.8. Samples were taken at suitable intervals, and the supernatants were obtained by centrifuging at 10,000×g and 4 °C for 10 min.

Determination of substrate and product concentrations

GA (gluconate) and 2KGA (2-keto-d-gluconate) were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The substances were separated with an IC Sep ICE-Coregel 87H3 reversed-phase HPLC column (Transgenomic, New Haven, CT, America) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min and 0.008 N H2SO4 was used as an eluant at 35 °C. GA and 2KGA were detected at 210 nm [24], and the concentrations were determined by comparison with corresponding calibration lines (1–100 mM for gluconate, 1–100 mM for 2-keto-d-gluconate).The peak maxima were: GA 15.9 min, 2KGA, 13.8 min.

Abbreviations

2KGA: 

2-keto-d-gluconic acid

GA: 

gluconic acid

Glu: 

glucose

ga2dh

membrane-bound gluconate-2-dehydrogenase gene

GA2DH: 

membrane-bound gluconate-2-dehydrogenase enzyme

gdh

membrane-bound glucose-dehydrogenase gene

DO: 

dissolved oxygen

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

JL conceived and designed the experiments, and contributed significantly to manuscript preparation. KL performed the experiments and contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation. XM and LL helped perform the bioconversion experiments. MS contributed reagents and materials. DW and SY contributed to the conception of the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Gene sequences can be found in Genbank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and the accession number and region are indicated in the “Methods” section.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Key Basic Research Development Program of China (No. 2012CB721003), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2012AA022201C), the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (No. 15ZR1408600), the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21276084), the National Major Science and Technology Projects of China (No. 2012ZX09304009) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (No.2013ZR1412100).

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, New World Biotechnology Institute, East China University of Science and Technology

References

  1. Misenheimer T, Anderson R, Lagoda A, Tyler D. Production of 2-ketogluconic acid by Serratia marcescens. Appl Microbiol. 1965;13:393–6.Google Scholar
  2. Elseviers M, Coomans SMH, Lemmens HOJ, Roper, HWW. Process for the production of 2-keto-d-glusonic acid. 2000. US Patent 20006018034.Google Scholar
  3. Kulka D, Hall A, Walker T. Formation of 2-keto-d-gluconic acid, 5-keto-d-gluconic acid, and tartronic acid by Acetobacter species. Nature. 1951;167:905–6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Pfeifer V, Vojnovich C, Heger E, Nelson G, Haynes W. Production of calcium 2-ketogluconate by fermentation with species of pseudomones. Ind Eng Chem. 1958;50:1009–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sun W-J, Zhou Y-Z, Zhou Q, Cui F-J, Yu S-L, Sun L. Semi-continuous production of 2-keto-gluconic acid by Pseudomonas fluorescens AR4 from rice starch hydrolysate. Bioresour Technol. 2012;110:546–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Chia M, Van Nguyen TB, Choi WJ. DO-stat fed-batch production of 2-keto-d-gluconic acid from cassava using immobilized Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;78:759–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Gupta A, Singh VK, Qazi G, Kumar A. Gluconobacter oxydans: its biotechnological applications. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;3:445–56.Google Scholar
  8. Macauley S, McNeil B, Harvey LM. The genus Gluconobacter and its applications in biotechnology. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2001;21:1–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Deppenmeier U, Hoffmeister M, Prust C. Biochemistry and biotechnological applications of Gluconobacter strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;60:233–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Matsushita K, Toyama H, Adachi O. Respiratory chains and bioenergetics of acetic acid bacteria. Adv Microb Physiol. 1994;36:247.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Hölscher T, Schleyer U, Merfort M, Bringer-Meyer S, Görisch H, Sahm H. Glucose oxidation and PQQ-dependent dehydrogenases in Gluconobacter oxydans. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;16:6–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ji A, Gao P. Substrate selectivity of Gluconobacter oxydans for production of 2,5-diketo-d-gluconic acid and synthesis of 2-keto-l-gulonic acid in a multienzyme system. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2001;94:213–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Weenk G, Olijve W, Harder W. Ketogluconate formation by Gluconobacter species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1984;20:400–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrmann U, Merfort M, Jeude M, Bringer-Meyer S, Sahm H. Biotransformation of glucose to 5-keto-d-gluconic acid by recombinant Gluconobacter oxydans DSM 2343. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;64:86–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Meyer M, Schweiger P, Deppenmeier U. Effects of membrane-bound glucose dehydrogenase overproduction on the respiratory chain of Gluconobacter oxydans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;97:3457–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Merfort M, Herrmann U, Ha S-W, Elfari M, Bringer-Meyer S, Görisch H, Sahm H. Modification of the membrane-bound glucose oxidation system in Gluconobacter oxydans significantly increases gluconate and 5-keto-d-gluconic acid accumulation. Biotechnol J. 2006;1:556–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen H, Li K, Shu X, Liu L, Lin J, Wei D. High-yield production of 2-keto-d-gluconate by resting cells of Gluconobacter oxydans. Sci Technol Food Ind. 2012;19:177–81 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  18. Shi L, Li K, Zhang H, Liu X, Lin J, Wei D. Identification of a novel promoter gHp0169 for gene expression in Gluconobacter oxydans. J Biotechnol. 2014;175:69–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Sun W-J, Liu C-F, Yu L, Cui F-J, Zhou Q, Yu S-L, Sun L. A novel bacteriophage KSL-1 of 2-keto-gluconic acid producer Pseudomonas fluorescens K1005: isolation, characterization and its remedial action. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun W-J, Yun Q-Q, Zhou Y-Z, Cui F-J, Yu S-L, Zhou Q, Sun L. Continuous 2-keto-gluconic acid (2KGA) production from corn starch hydrolysate by Pseudomonas fluorescens AR4. Biochem Eng J. 2013;77:97–102.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kovach ME, Elzer PH. Steven Hill D, Robertson GT, Farris MA, Roop II RM, Peterson KM. Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene. 1995;166:175–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Prust C, Hoffmeister M, Liesegang H, Wiezer A, Fricke WF, Ehrenreich A, Gottschalk G, Deppenmeier U. Complete genome sequence of the acetic acid bacterium Gluconobacter oxydans. Nat Biotech. 2005;23:195–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Hölscher T, Görisch H. Knockout and Overexpression of Pyrroloquinoline Quinone Biosynthetic Genes in Gluconobacter oxydans 621H. J Bacteriol. 2006;188:7668–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller J, Estell D, Lazarus R. Purification and characterization of 2, 5-diketo-d-gluconate reductase from Corynebacterium sp. J Biol Chem. 1987;262:9016–20.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2016

Advertisement