Open Access

Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of cinnamaldehyde

  • Hyun Bae Bang1,
  • Yoon Hyeok Lee1,
  • Sun Chang Kim2,
  • Chang Keun Sung3 and
  • Ki Jun Jeong1, 4Email author
Contributed equally
Microbial Cell Factories201615:16

Received: 16 October 2015

Accepted: 7 January 2016

Published: 19 January 2016



Plant parasitic nematodes are harmful to agricultural crops and plants, and may cause severe yield losses. Cinnamaldehyde, a volatile, yellow liquid commonly used as a flavoring or food additive, is increasingly becoming a popular natural nematicide because of its high nematicidal activity and, there is a high demand for the development of a biological platform to produce cinnamaldehyde.


We engineered Escherichia coli as an eco-friendly biological platform for the production of cinnamaldehyde. In E. coli, cinnamaldehyde can be synthesized from intracellular l-phenylalanine, which requires the activities of three enzymes: phenylalanine-ammonia lyase (PAL), 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL), and cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR). For the efficient production of cinnamaldehyde in E. coli, we first examined the activities of enzymes from different sources and a gene expression system for the selected enzymes was constructed. Next, the metabolic pathway for l-phenylalanine biosynthesis was engineered to increase the intracellular pool of l-phenylalanine, which is a main precursor of cinnamaldehyde. Finally, we tried to produce cinnamaldehyde with the engineered E. coli. According to this result, cinnamaldehyde production as high as 75 mg/L could be achieved, which was about 35-fold higher compared with that in the parental E. coli W3110 harboring a plasmid for cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis. We also confirmed that cinnamaldehyde produced by our engineered E. coli had a nematicidal activity similar to the activity of commercial cinnamaldehyde by nematicidal assays against Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.


As a potential natural pesticide, cinnamaldehyde was successfully produced in E. coli by construction of the biosynthesis pathway and, its production titer was also significantly increased by engineering the metabolic pathway of l-phenylalanine.


Escherichia coli Cinnamaldehyde l-Phenylalanine Metabolic engineering Nematodes


Nematodes are small organisms that belong to the phylum Nematoda and can be subdivided into five categories: fungivorous (phagocytize fungi), bacterivorous (phagocytize bacteria), corrosive (disassemble organics), predatory (prey on small nematodes), and plant-parasitic nematodes (damage plants). Among them, plant-parasitic nematodes occur naturally in many agricultural soils of the world, causing severe economic damage [1, 2]. Root-knot nematodes, which are classified as plant-parasitic nematodes, are the most deleterious to agricultural products, leading to annual crop yield losses of 10–27 % [3]. In particular, crops like cucumber, watermelon, tomato, carrot, ginseng, and lettuce can be seriously damaged by this nematode. Because root-knot nematodes only gradually harm the underground roots of plants, it is difficult to assess the damage until the entire plant is pulled out or the crop dies [4, 5].

To prevent agricultural crop and plant damage, various pest control systems such as the use of resistant cultivars, and physical or chemical controls, have been employed, but the effectiveness of these methods is limited because of restrictions by climate conditions [6, 7]. Therefore, chemical pesticides are used worldwide to control nematodes effectively. Nematicides are chemical pesticides that eliminate parasitic nematodes on plants. They can be employed with success, although currently there are several disadvantages: (i) it is necessary to pay particular attention to the chemical pesticide used in many susceptible plants and crops, (ii) non-selectivity of the pesticide may occasionally cause elimination of other organisms in addition to nematodes, and (iii) if the pathogen remains after treatment, the damage may be severely exacerbated [8, 9]. To substitute for current agricultural chemicals, natural pesticides, which are derived from plants and microbes, have been researched and developed intensively. Biological pesticides are often less toxic and safer to plants than chemicals, and they do not require extensive reclamation. To date, various molecules derived from nature have been demonstrated which have nematicidal activity [10, 11]. Among them, the specific molecule cinnamaldehyde, which is present in cinnamon bark oil, is attractive as a pesticide because of its potent nematicidal activity [12, 13]. Besides being the main flavoring agent of cinnamon, cinnamaldehyde can be used in a number of different applications in addition to its use as a nematicide; it can be used for treating hepatitis B, diabetes, dementia, and also it has anti-cancer and anti-fungal activities [14, 15]. Cinnamaldehyde is currently obtained by chemical synthesis from benzaldehyde and acetaldehyde or by direct extraction from cinnamon bark oil. However, there are disadvantages with these methods: (i) it is difficult to separate other cinnamaldehyde derivatives and stereoisomers during its chemical production, and (ii) extraction requires the logging and consumption of plants [16]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of an eco-friendly and efficient biological system to produce cinnamaldehyde.

In this study, we sought to engineer Escherichia coli as a microbial cell factory for the production of cinnamaldehyde by construction of the biosynthesis pathway for the production of cinnamaldehyde. Based on in vitro assays of enzyme activities, three biosynthetic enzymes, phenylalanine-ammonia lyase (PAL), 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL), and cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR) were cloned into gene expression constructs. We also manipulated metabolic pathways in E. coli to increase the intracellular pool of l-phenylalanine, which is the main precursor of cinnamaldehyde. Using our engineered E. coli strain with cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis system, we examined cinnamaldehyde production and compared it to that of the parental E. coli strain harboring same cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis system. The nematicidal activity of cinnamaldehyde produced by our engineered E. coli strain was also determined against the nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, which causes pine wilt.

Results and discussion

Selection of enzymes for cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis

Cinnamaldehyde can be synthesized from l-phenylalanine and its biosynthesis requires three enzymatic reactions: (i) deamination of l-phenylalanine into cinnamic acid by phenylalanine-ammonia lyase (PAL, EC, (ii) acid-thiol ligation of cinnamic acid to cinnamoyl-CoA by 4-coumarate:CoA ligase (4CL, EC, and (iii) reduction of cinnamoyl-CoA to cinnamaldehyde by cinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR, EC (Fig. 1a) [1720]. PAL is a ubiquitous enzyme that can be found in many plants, fungi, and some bacteria, and it harbors diverse activities and specificities according to the origin of the enzyme [18, 21]. We examined two PAL enzymes, one from the plant Arabidopsis thaliana (AtPAL) and another from the bacterium Streptomyces maritimus (SmPAL), for their suitability to produce cinnamic acid in E. coli. In case of AtPAL, there are four isomers including AtPAL1 to AtPAL4, and it was previously reported that most of them (AtPAL1, 2, and 4) have similarly higher activities than that of AtPAL3 to l-phenylalanine as a substrate [22], so we selected AtPAL1 as a representative from plant source. Their kinetic constants (Km) were reported to be 68 and 23 μM, respectively [22, 23]. Each His-tagged PAL enzyme was produced in E. coli BL21(DE3) and purified following procedures as described in “Methods”. Both enzymes, AtPAL1 (78 kDa) and SmPAL (56 kDa), were successfully purified (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Although the expression level of AtPAL1 was not so high which band could not be seen in the lanes 1 and 2 of SDS–PAGE, the band of AtPAL1 could be clearly seen after affinity column chromatography in the lane 3 in which the concentrated elute was loaded. The equivalent molarity of each purified PAL enzyme was incubated with the same amount of l-phenylalanine (as a substrate), and the production titer of cinnamic acid was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Additional file 2: Figure S2). As shown in Fig. 1b, SmPAL exhibited significantly higher activity (21-fold at 30 °C reaction and 27-fold at 37 °C reaction) than those of AtPAL1.
Fig. 1

Biosynthesis of cinnamaldehyde and in vitro assay of synthesis enzymes. a Three enzymatic reactions (PAL, 4CL, and CCL) for the biosynthesis of cinnamaldehyde from l-phenylalanine. b In vitro assay of PAL from A. thaliana (AtPAL1, black) and S. maritimus (SmPAL, white) at 30 and 37 °C. c In vitro assay of 4CL and CCL at 30 and 37 °C. Two combinations including (i) 4CL from A. thaliana (At4CL1) and CCR from A. thaliana (AtCCR), and (ii) CCL from S. coelicolor (ScCCL) and CCR from A. thaliana (AtCCR) were mixed with cinnamic acid and cinnamaldehyde production was analyzed. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 2)

We also examined two different 4CL enzymes, one from Streptomyces coelicolor (ScCCL) and another from A. thaliana (At4CL), for their suitability to convert cinnamic acid to cinnamaldehyde in E. coli. In case of At4CL, it is known that there are 14 putative isoforms (At4CL1–At4CL14) [24, 25]. Among 14 isoforms, At4CL1–3 have similar activities to cinnamate while rest of isoforms do not [19]. Therefore, we selected At4CL1 as a representative. Also, we used CCR enzyme from A. thaliana (AtCCR1) for conversion of cinnamoyl-CoA into cinnamaldehyde [26]. Each 4CL enzyme (At4CL1 and ScCCL [27]) was tested in combination with CCR enzyme from A. thaliana (AtCCR). All enzymes were successfully purified with high purity (Additional file 1: Figure S1). To compare the enzymatic activities of At4CL1 and ScCCL, two reactions, (i) At4CL1 with AtCCR and (ii) ScCCL with AtCCR, were prepared and mixed with cinnamic acid as a substrate. After incubating at 30 and 37 °C, cinnamaldehyde titer was analyzed by HPLC. As shown in Fig. 1c, the combination of ScCCL and AtCCR resulted in a higher production titer of cinnamaldehyde (4.4-fold at 30 °C reaction and 10.4-fold at 37 °C reaction) than the combination of At4CL1 and AtCCR. Based on these results, we constructed cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis system in E. coli as described below using the following enzymes: SmPAL, ScCCL, and AtCCR.

Construction of cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis pathway in E. coli

To produce cinnamaldehyde in E. coli, SmPAL, ScCCL, and AtCCR genes were cloned into pTrc99A in the following order: SmPAL, ScCCL, and AtCCR (yielding pHB-CAD) (Fig. 2a). E. coli W3110 harboring pHB-CAD was cultivated at two different temperatures (30 and 37 °C) to find the optimal temperature for cinnamaldehyde production. The expression of enzymes was analyzed by SDS–PAGE, followed by western blot analysis as described in “Methods”. At both temperatures, all enzymes were expressed well and highly soluble (Fig. 2b). Although each enzyme was expressed at a different level, the expression of each enzyme was marginally better at 37 °C than at 30 °C. Also, analysis of cinnamaldehyde titer produced in the culture medium using HPLC revealed that cinnamaldehyde production titer was 4.5-fold higher at 37 °C than at 30 °C (Fig. 2c). We supposed that the higher production titer of cinnamaldehyde at 37 °C was caused by increased expression level of all biosynthetic enzymes at 37 °C actively, even though these enzymes are active at 30 °C [23, 27]. Hereafter, all cultivations for the production of cinnamaldehyde were performed at 37 °C.
Fig. 2

The construction of expression system, production of each enzymes and cinnamaldehyde in E. coli. a The schematic diagram of plasmid pHB-CAD for the expression of three synthesis genes (SmPAL, ScCCL, and AtCCR genes) under the IPTG-inducible trc promoter (Ptrc). RBS means the ribosome binding site for translation and restriction enzyme sites were designated. b Western blot analysis of gene expression under two different temperature (30 and 37 °C). For the detection of SmPAL (lanes 14), anti-FLAG-HRP antibody was used and for the detection of ScCCL and AtCCR (lanes 58), anti-His-HRP antibody was used. Lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7 indicate total protein fraction, and lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8 indicates the soluble protein fractions. Lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6 indicate samples at 30 °C, and lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8 indicate samples at 37 °C. Symbols: Closed arrowhead, SmPAL; open arrowhead, ScCCL; solid arrow, AtCCR. c HPLC analysis of cinnamaldehyde produced under two different temperatures. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 3)

Strain engineering to increase the intracellular pool of l-phenylalanine

For the biosynthesis of cinnamaldehyde, l-phenylalanine is required as an essential precursor [17]. Therefore, to enhance cinnamaldehyde production, it is desirable to increase the intracellular pool of l-phenylalanine. For this purpose, we rationally re-designed E. coli to produce l-phenylalanine more. Using available metabolic and regulatory information as a guide, we engineered E. coli W3110 as follows: (i) deletion of the crr gene that encodes EIIAGlc protein related to glucose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate phosphotransferase system (PTS) for moderating the substrate uptake rate, decreasing metabolite overflow, and precursor enrichment, (ii) deletion of the tyrR gene to alleviate the tight regulation of the TyrR regulon which contains aromatic amino acid (AAA) synthesis genes, (iii) deletion of the trpE (anthranilate synthase component) and tyrA [chorismate (CHA) mutase/prephenate dehydrogenase] genes to prevent the loss of carbon flow into competing pathways (biosynthesis of l-tryptophan and l-tyrosine), and (iv) deletion of the pykA (pyruvate kinase A) gene to enrich the precursor and balance the flux between growth and l-phenylalanine production (Fig. 3). Based on the above scheme, five sequential knockout mutants of E. coli W3110 were developed (YHP01–YHP05) (Table 1).
Fig. 3

The schematic diagram for strain engineering to increase the pool of l-phenylalanine in E. coli W3110. The symbol “X” indicates the corresponding gene deletion. The red-color arrows indicate overexpression of the relevant genes (galP, glk, aroG, ydiB, aroK, pheA) via plasmid (pYHP)-based expression system

Table 1

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study



Reference or source



recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1 hsdR17 supE44 relA1 lac [FproAB lacI q Z ΔM15 Tn10 (Tet r )]



E. coli B F dcm ompT hsdS(r B m B ) gal λ(DE3)



F λ rph-1 INV(rrnD, rrnE)

CGSC no. 44743


W3110 Δcrr

This study


W3110 Δcrr ΔtyrR

This study


W3110 Δcrr ΔtyrR ΔtrpE

This study


W3110 Δcrr ΔtyrR ΔtrpE ΔtyrA

This study


W3110 Δcrr ΔtyrR ΔtrpE ΔtyrA ΔpykA

This study



KmR, p15A origin, tac promoter, 4.0 kb



AmpR, pBR322 origin, trc promoter, 4.2 kb



AmpR, pMB1 origin, lac promoter, 2.6 kb

New England biolabs5


AmpR, pBR322 origin, T7 promoter, 5.5 kb

EMD chemicals6


pET-22b derivatives, PT7AtPAL1 (N-term 8× His-tag)

This study


pET-22b derivatives, PT7At4CL1 (N-term 8× His-tag)

This study


pET-22b derivatives, PT7AtCCR (N-term 8× His-tag)

This study


pET-22b derivatives, PT7SmPAL (N-term 8× His-tag)

This study


pET-22b derivatives, PT7ScCCL (N-term 8× His-tag)

This study


pTrc99A derivatives, PtrcSmPAL (C-term FLAG-tag)

This study


pTrc99A derivatives, PtrcSmPAL (C-term FLAG-tag)–ScCCL (N-term 8× His-tag)–AtCCR (N-term 8× His-tag)

This study


pUC19, aroG8/15

This study


pUC19, ydiB

This study


pUC19, aroK

This study


pUC19, pheA fbr, dm

This study


pTac15k, PtacaroG8/15

This study


pTac15k, PtacaroG8/15ydiB

This study


pTac15k, PtacaroG8/15ydiBaroK

This study


pTac15k, PtacaroG8/15ydiBaroKpheA fbr, dm

This study


pTac15k, PtacaroG8/15ydiBaroKpheA fbr, dm , SacII region modification

This study


pUC19, synthetic BBa_J23113 Anderson promoter (Ppc113)

This study


pTrc99A, MCS modification (SpeI, NotI)

Lab stock


pTrc99A-mod derivatives, Ppc113–glk–Tlpp

This study


pTrc99A-mod derivatives, Ppc113–galP–Tlpp

This study


pYH derivatives, Ppc113–glk–Tlpp

This study


pYH-glk derivatives, Ppc113–galP–Tlpp

This study


AmpR, λ-red recombinase expression plasmid under ara-inducible BAD promoter, cre-loxP recombinase system under lacUV5 promoter, temp sensitive origin



AmpR, CmR, pUG6 derivatives, lox66-cat-lox71


1Stratagene cloning systems, La Jolla, CA, USA

2Novagen, inc., Madison, WI, USA

3The coli genetic stock center, Yale University, USA

4Pharmacia biotech, Uppsala, Sweden

5New England biolabs, inc., Beverly, MA, USA

6EMD chemicals, Gibbstown, NJ, USA

First, a glucose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate PTS was inactivated by deletion of the crr gene in E. coli W3110 strain, yielding E. coli YHP01. Although this disrupts the main system for glucose internalization, YHP01 can still grow in defined media containing glucose as a sole carbon source because the mannose-specific PTS and galactose permease can continue to internalize glucose into the cytoplasm [28, 29]. Bypassing the PTS results in an increased pool of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), which ultimately facilitates l-phenylalanine synthesis [29]. Next, we deleted the tyrR gene in YHP01 to yield YHP02 strain. TyrR protein is a regulator of the TyrR regulon, which contains eight genes involved in the biosynthesis of AAA [30]. Its deletion can also increase the l-phenylalanine pool by alleviating the tight regulation of genes related with AAA synthesis. We next sequentially deleted trpE and tyrA genes starting with YHP02 strain, yielding YHP03 and YHP04 strains, respectively. In the biosynthesis pathway of AAAs, a final branch point occurs wherein chorismate can be converted to l-phenylalanine, l-tryptophan or l-tyrosine by PheA, TrpE or TyrA enzymes, respectively [31, 32]. The deletions of trpE and tyrA genes can prevent the loss of carbon into competing pathways for l-tryptophan and l-tyrosine biosynthesis. Finally, we deleted the pykA gene in YHP04 to yield YHP05 strain. The pykA gene encodes pyruvate kinase A (PykA), which constitutes the second PEP-consuming step. By deleting the pykA gene, more PEP can be used in the shikimate pathway and consequently, more amount of l-phenylalanine can be produced [33]. In each strain (YHP01–YHP05), deletion of genes was verified by PCR and agarose gel electrophoresis (Additional file 3: Figure S3).

All engineered E. coli strains, including YHP01–YHP05 and the parental E. coli W3110, were cultivated in shaking flasks containing semi-defined media, and cell growth and l-phenylalanine production were compared. After cultivation for 48 h, all engineered strains grew slightly better than W3110 strain; in particular, E. coli YHP05 strain exhibited the highest cell density (Fig. 4a). A previous study also observed that inactivation of the PTS and Pyk isozymes increased carbon flux to biomass formation because of the effect of conserving reduced amounts of intermediate metabolites resulting from decreased glucose uptake and catabolism [33]. We also analyzed the production titer of l-phenylalanine in the culture supernatant by HPLC. In the parental W3110 strain, the production titer of l-phenylalanine was 0.24 g/L, but the titer of l-phenylalanine was gradually increased in the engineered E. coli strains (Fig. 4a). E. coli YHP05, in which crr, tyrR, trpE, tyrA, and pykA genes were deleted, exhibited the highest l-phenylalanine production titer (0.52 g/L), which was 2.2-fold higher than that of parental E. coli W3110. Therefore, we decided to use E. coli YHP05 strain for further engineering.
Fig. 4

Comparison of final optical density (black) and l-phenylalanine production (gray) in 48 h flask cultivation. a All five engineered E. coli strains (YHP01 to YHP05) and the parental E. coli W3110 were cultivated and cell growth (OD600) and l-phenylalanine production titers were compared. b E. coli YHP05 strain harboring different plasmids (pTac15kG series or pYHP) were cultivated and cell growth (OD600) and l-phenylalanine production titers were compared. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 3)

Plasmid-based overexpression system to increase the intracellular pool of l-phenylalanine

Starting with E. coli YHP05 strain, production of l-phenylalanine was further improved by plasmid-based gene overexpression. The feedback inhibition in the l-phenylalanine synthesis pathway by shikimate and l-phenylalanine was reduced by overexpressing isozymes or introducing mutations in enzymes involved in the shikimate pathway as follows: (i) overexpression of the 3-deoxy-d-arabinoheptulosonate 7-phosphate (DAHP) synthase gene which is encoded in aroG with engineering (AroG8/15), (ii) overexpression of the ydiB and aroK genes which encode shikimate dehydrogenase and shikimate kinase for enhancing the carbon flow into the shikimate pathway, (iii) overexpression of the pheA gene encoding CHA mutase/prephenate dehydratase with engineering for improvement of substrate binding affinity (PheAfbr, dm), and (iv) overexpression of the galP (galactose permease) and glk (glucokinase) genes to facilitate glucose uptake (Additional file 4: Figure S4).

First, to alleviate feedback inhibition, the plasmid pTac15kG was constructed, which contained the engineered aroG8/15 gene. AroG is the major enzyme involved in the synthesis of DAHP, but AroG is completely inhibited by l-phenylalanine (as low as 0.1 mM) [32, 34]. It is known that the introduction of two mutations (D146N and A202T) resulted in resistance to feedback inhibition without affecting its high specific activity (AroG8/15) [35], so we overexpressed this mutant AroG8/15 enzyme. Next, two plasmids (pTac15kGB and pTac15kGBK) were constructed to overexpress ydiB and aroK genes along with aroG8/15 gene, respectively. Metabolic flux to the shikimate pathway can be enhanced when shikimate dehydrogenase (YdiB) and shikimate kinase (AroK) are overexpressed [36, 37]. Also, pTac15kGBKA plasmid was subsequently constructed to overexpress pheA gene which encodes chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydratase with mutations. In this construct, we amplified only the first 300 amino acids of wild-type PheA (PheAfbr), which excludes the regulatory domain; therefore, PheAfbr is weakly influenced by feedback inhibition. In addition, because PheAfbr has a higher Km value than wild-type PheA, reflecting its decreased binding affinity to the substrate [38], we introduced two mutations (E159A and E232A) in PheAfbr to enhance its substrate-binding affinity, yielding PheAfbr, dm [39]. Lastly, pYHP plasmid was constructed to overexpress galP and glk genes additionally, which encode galactose permease and glucokinase, respectively. Both enzymes facilitate glucose uptake [40].

After the construction of five plasmids, including pTac15kG, pTac15kGB, pTac15kGBK, pTac15kGBKA, and pYHP (Table 1), each plasmid was transformed into E. coli YHP05. After cultivation for 48 h in shaking flasks containing semi-defined media, cell growth and the production titer of l-phenylalanine were analyzed. All cells grew well, and particularly E. coli YHP05 harboring pYHP grew to a marginally higher cell density (OD600 = 9.76) than the others (Fig. 4b). We also analyzed the production titer of l-phenylalanine in the culture supernatant by HPLC. Overexpression of the aroG8/15 gene (pTac15kG) resulted in a significant increase in l-phenylalanine production (2.25 g/L) compared with YHP05 harboring no plasmid (0.52 g/L) (Fig. 4b). Subsequent overexpression of other genes resulted in a serial increase in the production titer of l-phenylalanine and, E. coli YHP05 harboring pYHP exhibited the highest l-phenylalanine production titer (3.91 g/L) (Fig. 4b). The effect of pYHP plasmid resulted in a significant increase in l-phenylalanine production as high as 16.4-fold [comparison between W3110 (no plasmid) and YHP05 (pYHP)] and 7.5-fold [comparison between YHP05 (no plasmid) and YHP05 (pYHP)], respectively. In the cultivation of E. coli YHP05 harboring pYHP, l-phenylalanine yield on glucose and productivity were 0.270 g/g and 0.082 g/L/h, respectively (Additional file 5: Figure S5). Thus, in the engineered E. coli YHP05 harboring pYHP, the pool of l-phenylalanine was significantly improved. Liu et al. previously reported the production of l-phenylalanine in E. coli as high as 47 g/L [41]. However, that record could be achieved in the fed-batch cultivation (15 L scale) and they employed the co-expression of l-phenylalanine transporter (YddG) for the efficient production of l-phenylalanine into culture medium. In our work, we did not introduce the YddG because the ultimate goal of our work was not a production of l-phenylalanine but production of cinnamaldehyde. Although the titer of l-phenylalanine achieved in our work was not the high record, we thought it was enough high for the production of cinnamaldehyde. Therefore, we decided to use this engineered strain for the production of cinnamaldehyde.

Cinnamaldehyde production in the engineered E. coli

Using the engineered E. coli YHP05 harboring pYHP, we first examined the production of cinnamic acid. For this experiment, the plasmid pHB-CA, which contains SmPAL gene under IPTG-inducible trc promoter was constructed (Table 1). E. coli YHP05 harboring both pHB-CA and pYHP was cultivated in flasks for 48 h and the production titer of cinnamic acid was analyzed. E. coli YHP05 and E. coli W3110 harboring pHB-CA (without pYHP) were also examined as controls. Growth patterns of all cells were similar (Fig. 5a) and, E. coli W3110 and YHP05 harboring pHB-CA produced 79 and 108 mg/L of cinnamic acid, respectively (Fig. 5b). E. coli YHP05 harboring both pHB-CA and pYHP exhibited significantly improved production titer (287 mg/L), which was 3.6-fold and 2.7-fold higher than those of E. coli W3110 and YHP05 harboring pHB-CA, respectively (Fig. 5b). To the best of our knowledge, this production titer was also 1.5-fold higher than the highest level (186 mg/L) reported in E. coli [42, 43]. This result clearly indicates that the elevating the amount of l-phenylalanine in the engineered E. coli strain positively contributes to increase cinnamic acid production.
Fig. 5

Cell growth and cinnamic acid production in flask cultivation. a Time profiles of cell growths (OD600). Symbols: Closed circle, E. coli W3110 (pHB-CA); open circle, E. coli YHP05 (pHB-CA); closed square, E. coli YHP05 (pHB-CA and pYHP). b Production titer of cinnamic acid in each strain. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 3)

As a main goal, we examined cinnamaldehyde production in the engineered E. coli YHP05 strain, which was transformed with pHB-CAD and pYHP. Also, E. coli YHP05 and E. coli W3110 harboring pHB-CAD (without pYHP) were examined as controls. The growth of cell was similar (Fig. 6a), and three cinnamaldehyde biosynthetic enzymes were well expressed in all examined cells (Additional file 6: Figure S6). After flask cultivation for 48 h, culture supernatants were collected and the production titers of cinnamaldehyde were determined by HPLC. E. coli W3110 (pHB-CAD) and E. coli YHP05 (pHB-CAD) exhibited cinnamaldehyde production titer as high as 2.18 and 6.3 mg/L, respectively (Fig. 6b). On the contrary, E. coli YHP05 (pHB-CAD and pYHP) exhibited significantly higher production titer (75 mg/L), which was 35-fold higher than that of E. coli W3110 (pHB-CAD).
Fig. 6

Cell growth and cinnamaldehyde production in flask cultivation. a Time profiles of cell growths (OD600). Symbols: Closed circle, E. coli W3110 (pHB-CAD); open circle, E. coli YHP05 (pHB-CAD); closed square, E. coli YHP05 (pHB-CAD and pYHP). b Production titer of cinnamaldehyde in each strain. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 3)

Nematicidal activity of cinnamaldehyde produced by engineered E. coli

To evaluate the nematicidal activity of cinnamaldehyde produced in culture medium, nematodes, B. xylophilus, were treated with cinnamaldehyde following procedures as described in “Methods” [12]. The culture supernatant of E. coli YHP05 harboring pYHP and pHB-CAD was diluted until the final concentration of cinnamaldehyde was 60 mg/L, and nematodes were treated with the diluted culture supernatant. After 1 and 4 h, only 26 % and below 18 % of nematodes survived, respectively (Fig. 7). As a positive control, nematodes were treated with commercially available and purified cinnamaldehyde at an equivalent concentration (60 mg/L). After 4 h, nearly all nematodes (95 %) were killed. These results indicated that the nematicidal activities were similar between commercially purchased cinnamaldehyde and produced one in this study. As a negative control, the culture supernatant of E. coli W3110 was also tested and as expected, nearly all nematodes survived (>92 %) after 4 h.
Fig. 7

Graph of nematode percentage alive (%) after treatment of cinnamaldehyde. Symbols: Closed diamond, culture supernatant of E. coli W3110 as a negative control; closed circle, 60 mg/L commercial and purified cinnamaldehyde as positive control; open circle, 60 mg/L culture supernatant with cinnamaldehyde produced in E. coli YHP05 harboring pYHP and pHB-CAD. Error bars represent standard deviation of the mean (n = 2)


As a potential natural pesticide, the demand for cinnamaldehyde is increasing, and thus the development of an eco-friendly biological system for the industrial production of cinnamaldehyde to replace traditional chemical synthesis processes has become increasingly important [16]. In this study, we constructed the cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis pathway in E. coli strain, which can potentially be used as an eco-friendly production platform. Although each enzyme (PAL, 4CL, and CCR) in the cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis pathway has been well-studied in the aspects of their enzymatic properties [19, 2227], there is still no report about the combination of all three enzymes for biological production of cinnamaldehyde from glucose. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that cinnamaldehyde was biologically synthesized in E. coli. By introducing enzymes for cinnamaldehyde biosynthesis and metabolically engineering of E. coli for the increased production of the main precursor l-phenylalanine, engineered strain E. coli YHP05 harboring pHB-CAD and pYHP produced cinnamaldehyde at titer as high as 75 mg/L, which represented a 35-fold improvement in titer compared to that of the wild-type strain. Through extensive engineering of metabolic pathways to increase the intracellular l-phenylalanine pool, we achieved the production of l-phenylalanine at titer as high as 3.91 g/L with a high glucose yield of 0.270 g/g [41, 44]. In addition, through further optimization of culture conditions on an industrial scale, we suggest that our engineered strain may be useful for the industrial-scale production of l-phenylalanine. Our general strategy for engineering E. coli can be adopted to engineer strains for the production of other amino acids (particularly AAAs). Although we succeeded to produce cinnamaldehyde using E. coli strains in flask cultivations, the production titer (75 mg/L) was not sufficient to warrant their commercialization, which require improvements to achieve gram-scale titer. Therefore, fed-batch cultivation conditions in a lab-scale have to be selected and the study of culture optimization including media compositions and feeding strategies, etc. will be our next work [45, 46]. In addition, the low conversion rate of cinnamaldehyde from l-phenylalanine may be attributed to the relatively poor activities of the biosynthetic enzymes: SmPAL, ScCCL, or AtCCR. Further engineering of the activities of each enzyme or the development of protein scaffolds for the modular control of pathway flux [47, 48] may aid in improving enzymatic reactions and achieving much higher production titer.


Bacterial strains and plasmids

Detailed information about E. coli strains and plasmids used in this study are described in Table 1. E. coli XL1-Blue was used for gene cloning and plasmid maintenance. E. coli BL21(DE3) was used for protein expression and purification. E. coli W3110 strain was used as the primary host for the production of cinnamaldehyde. The pTrc99A vector was used for the expression of cinnamaldehyde biosynthetic genes, and the pTac15k vector was used for the expression of l-phenylalanine biosynthetic genes. All DNA plasmid manipulations, including restriction enzyme digestions, ligations, and transformations, were performed following standard protocols [49]. All restriction enzymes were purchased from Enzynomics™ (Daejeon, Republic of Korea). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed using a C1000™ Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA) with PrimeStar HS polymerase (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). Detailed procedures for the construction of plasmids are described in Additional file 7, Additional file 8: Table S1, and Additional file 9: Table S2.

Strain construction

In E. coli W3110 strain, crr, tyrR, trpE, tyrA, and pykA genes were deleted using a rapid one-step inactivation method [50]. The integrated knockout system vector (pCW611) was used to disrupt the desired genes in the chromosomal DNA of E. coli W3110, and the chloramphenicol-resistance gene (CmR) was used for selection. Chromosomal gene deletions were performed sequentially, and the genotypes of deletion mutants (YHP01 to YHP05) are described in Table 1. Detailed procedures for gene knockout are provided in Additional file 10 and Additional file 8: Table S1 .

Cultivation condition

E. coli cells were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) liquid medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, and 10 g/L NaCl) or on LB agar plates (LB containing 1.5 % (w/v) agar). When necessary, the following concentrations of antibiotics were added to the medium to maintain plasmids: 100 μg/mL ampicillin (Amp) and 40 μg/mL kanamycin (Kan). Flask cultivation for the production of l-phenylalanine was performed using modified fermentation medium previously [5153]. The composition of the fermentation medium is: 20 g/L glucose, 3 g/L KH2PO4, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 1 g/L NaCl, 1.5 g/L sodium citrate, 0.015 g/L CaCl2∙2H2O, 3 g/L MgSO4∙7H2O, 0.01125 g/L FeSO4∙7H2O, 0.075 g/L Thiamine-HCl, 0.3 g/L l-tyrosine (L-Tyr), 0.03 g/L l-tryptophan (L-Trp), 3 g/L yeast extract, and 1.5 mL/L trace element solution (TES) at pH 6.8. TES is composed of 2.0 g/L Al2(SO4)3∙18H2O, 0.75 g/L CoSO4∙7H2O, 2.5 g/L CuSO4∙5H2O, 0.5 g/L H3BO3, 14.64 g/L MnSO4∙H2O, 3 g/L Na2MoO4∙2H2O, 2.5 g/L NiSO4∙6H2O, 15 g/L ZnSO4∙7H2O and 10 mL/L HCl. 12 g/L CaCO3 was added as a neutralizing agent to adjust the pH of the medium. For the production of cinnamic acid and cinnamaldehyde, LB medium was used.

Inoculation was performed in LB medium containing 2 % (w/v) glucose at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. After overnight cultivation, 2.5 mL of cells were transferred to 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL of medium (5 % (v/v) inoculation). When cell density reached an OD600 of mid-exponential phase, isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Sigma–Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to a final concentration of 0.1 mM to induce gene expression. Whenever sampling was required, cells were harvested by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and the pellet and supernatant were separately stored at −20 °C until further analysis.

Enzyme purification and analysis

After cultivation of E. coli BL21(DE3) harboring the pHB-I series (pHB-I01–pHB-I05), cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. Harvested cells were re-suspended in Talon® equilibration buffer (50 mM Na3PO4, 300 mM NaCl, pH 7.0), and disrupted by sonication (VCX 750, Sonics & Materials. Inc., Newtown, CT, USA) while chilled on ice at 50 % pulse and 20 % amplitude for 30 min. Cell lysates were centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C, and the soluble fractions were collected from the supernatant and filtered using 0.45 μm filters. Soluble fractions were mixed with Talon metal-affinity resin (Clontech, Mountain View, CA, USA) in poly-prep chromatography columns (Bio-Rad). After the binding of each enzyme, which was tagged with polyhistidine, the resin was washed with 10 mL of wash buffer (equilibration buffer containing 15 mM imidazole), and enzymes were eluted using 3 mL of elution buffer (equilibration buffer containing 150 mM imidazole).

Protein samples were analyzed using 12 % (w/v) SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE). After gel electrophoresis, gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (50 % (v/v) methanol, 10 % (v/v) acetic acid, and 1 g/L Coomassie brilliant blue R-250) for 30 min and destained using destaining solution (10 % (v/v) methanol and 10 % (v/v) acetic acid). For western blot analysis, electrophoresed protein samples were transferred to polyvinyl difluoride (PVDF; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) membranes using Bio-Rad Trans-blot SD (Bio-Rad) at 70 mA per gel for 90 min. After blocking with 5 % (w/v) skim milk solution in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20 (TBS-T; 10 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl and 0.05 % (v/v) Tween-20, pH 8.0), membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-histidine antibody or an anti-FLAG antibody (Sigma–Aldrich) dissolved in TBS-T with 5 % (w/v) skim milk. Each step was performed for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with TBS-T four times, ECL western blotting detection reagent (Bionote, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea) was added and signals were detected on X-ray films.

Quantification of enzyme activity

To test the enzymatic activity of PAL enzymes, enzymes were mixed with 0.2 mM l-phenylalanine and 250 pmol of PAL from A. thaliana or S. maritimus in 1 mL of 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) and incubated at 30 and 37 °C for 1 h [23]. To test the enzymatic activity of 4CL and CCR, 500 pmol of AtCCR and 500 pmol of At4CL1 (or ScCCL) were mixed with 2.5 mM ATP, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM CoA, 0.1 mM NADPH, and 0.2 mM trans-cinnamic acid in 1 mL of 100 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.5) and incubated at 30 and 37 °C for 1 h [27]. In the reaction by At4CL1 (or ScCCL), CoA consumed by At4CL1 (or ScCCL) can be regenerated by AtCCR in the next step (Fig. 1a), so a smaller amount of CoA (0.2 μM) was used than the substrate (cinnamic acid). Both cinnamic acid and cinnamaldehyde in the reaction were quantified using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Additional file 2: Figure S2).

Analytical procedures

Cell growth was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) with a spectrophotometer (Optizen POP; Mecasys, Daejeon, Republic of Korea). The concentration of glucose was determined by a glucose analyzer (YSI 2700 SELECT™ Biochemistry Analyzer; YSI Life Sciences, Yellow Springs, OH, USA). Cinnamic acid and cinnamaldehyde were quantified using a HPLC (LC-20AD, CTO-20A, SPD-20A; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Zorbax Eclipse AAA column (4.6 × 150 mm 3.5-Micron; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Samples were sterile filtered using 0.22 μm PVDF syringe filters (Futecs Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Republic of Korea). Samples were separated using a binary nonlinear gradient with mobile phase A [0.1 % (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)] and mobile phase B (acetonitrile). The column temperature was maintained at 40 °C and the flow rate was 1 mL/min. Elution conditions were as follows: (i) equilibrate with 10 % B for 1 min, (ii) run gradient from 10 to 70 % B for 19 min, (iii) run gradient from 70 to 10 % B for 5 min, and (iv) clean with 10 % B for 3 min. Samples were detected using a UV detector (280 nm). The analysis of l-phenylalanine was performed under nearly identical conditions used for cinnamic acid and cinnamaldehyde analysis except that elution conditions were different. Elutions were performed as follows: (i) equilibrate with 10 % B for 6 min, (ii) run gradient from 10 to 70 % B for 4 min, (iii) maintain flow at 70 % B for 7 min, (iv) run gradient from 70 to 10 % B for 3 min, and (v) wash with 10 % B for 5 min. Samples were detected using a UV detector (220 nm). The standard curves for phenylalanine (0.1–1 g/L), trans-cinnamic acid (5–200 mg/L), and cinnamaldehyde (1–150 mg/L) were determined using similar procedures. l-phenylalanine, trans-cinnamic acid, and cinnamaldehyde were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich.

Bioassays of nematicidal activity

To evaluate the nematicidal activity of cinnamaldehyde produced by E. coli, direct contact bioassays were performed [12]. Briefly, nematodes were suspended in distilled water at a density of 5000 nematodes/mL, and 15 μL of the suspension (about 75 nematodes) was mixed with 60 μL of the following solutions: culture medium (negative control), commercial cinnamaldehyde dissolved in 10 % (v/v) acetonitrile (positive control), and cinnamaldehyde produced by E. coli prepared in this study. After 4 h of treating nematodes with the solutions, the number of nematodes that remained alive was counted using a microscope. If nematodes were stretched and non-motile, they were scored as dead.




phenylalanine-ammonia lyase


4-coumarate:CoA ligase


cinnamoyl-CoA reductase


cinnamate:CoA ligase


aromatic amino acid


phosphotransferase system




3-deoxy-d-arabinoheptulosonate 7-phosphate


feedback-resistant chorismate mutase/prephenate dehydratase with double mutations


Authors’ contributions

HBB and YHL designed and performed most experiments. HBB, YHL, and KJJ analyzed data. SCK, CKS and KJJ initiated and coordinated the study and contributed to the experimental design and data interpretation. CKS also contributed to the nematicidal activity assay. HBB, YHL, and KJJ mainly wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.


This work was supported by the Intelligent Synthetic Biology Center of Global Frontier Project (Grant no. 2014M3A6A8066443) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Plus Program), KAIST
Department of Biological Science, KAIST
Department of Food Science and Technology, Chungnam National University
Institute for the BioCentury, KAIST


  1. Jones JT, Haegeman A, Danchin EGJ, Gaur HS, Helder J, Jones MGK, Kikuchi T, Manzanilla-Lopez R, Palomares-Rius JE, Wesemael WML, Perry RN. Top 10 plant-parasitic nematodes in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol. 2013;14:946–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Wesemael WML, Viaene N, Moens M. Root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) in Europe. Nematology. 2011;13:3–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Jabbar A, Ali MA, Khan SA, Javed N. Root-knot nematodes an emerging threat to cereal crops. J Green Physiol Genet Genom. 2015;1:33–4.Google Scholar
  4. Haegeman A, Mantelin S, Jones JT, Gheysen G. Functional roles of effectors of plant-parasitic nematodes. Gene. 2012;492:19–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. McCarter JP, Mitreva MD, Martin J, Dante M, Wylie T, Rao U, Pape D, Bowers Y, Theising B, Murphy CV, Kloek AP, Chiapelli BJ, Clifton SW, Bird DM, Waterston RH. Analysis and functional classification of transcripts from the nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R26. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Li W, Wang K, Chen L, Johnson JA, Wang S. Tolerance of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to heated controlled atmosphere treatments. J Stored Prod Res. 2015;62:52–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Thomson LJ, Hoffmann AA. Natural enemy responses and pest control: importance of local vegetation. Biol Control. 2010;52:160–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Giannakou IO, Karpouzas DG. Evaluation of chemical and integrated strategies as alternatives to methyl bromide for the control of root-knot nematodes in Greece. Pest Manag Sci. 2003;59:883–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Wang G, Chen X, Deng Y, Li Z, Xu X. Synthesis and nematicidal activities of 1,2,3-benzotriazin-4-one derivatives against Meloidogyne incognita. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;63:6883–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Bock CH, Shapiro-Ilan DI, Wedge DE, Cantrell CL. Identification of the antifungal compound, trans-cinnamic acid, produced by Photorhabdus luminescens, a potential biopesticide against pecan scab. J Pest Sci. 2014;87:155–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Ntalli NG, Caboni P. Botanical nematicides: a review. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:9929–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Kong JO, Lee SM, Moon YS, Lee SG, Ahn YJ. Nematicidal activity of cassia and cinnamon oil compounds and related compounds toward Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Nematoda: Parasitaphelenchidae). J Nematol. 2007;39:31–6.Google Scholar
  13. Ooi LSM, Li Y, Kam SL, Wang H, Wong EYL, Ooi VEC. Antimicrobial activities of cinnamon oil and cinnamaldehyde from the Chinese medicinal herb Cinnamomum cassia Blume. Am J Chin Med. 2006;34:511–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Bevilacqua A, Corbo MR, Sinigaglia M. Combined effects of low pH and cinnamaldehyde on the inhibition of Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris spores in a laboratory medium. J Food Process Pres. 2008;32:839–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Muhammad JS, Zaidi SF, Shaharyar S, Refaat A, Usmanghani K, Saiki I, Sugiyama T. Anti-inflammatory effect of cinnamaldehyde in Helicobacter pylori induced gastric inflammation. Biol Pharm Bull. 2015;38:109–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Lungarini S, Aureli F, Coni E. Coumarin and cinnamaldehyde in cinnamon marketed in Italy: a natural chemical hazard? Food addit Contam Part A. 2008;25:1297–305.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsu KH, Huang WK, Lin YL, Chang ST, Chu FH. A genetic marker of 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligase gene in the cinnamaldehyde-chemotype Cinnamomum osmophloeum. Holzforschung. 2012;66:897–904.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. da Cunha A. Purification, characterization and induction of l-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in Phaseolus vulgaris. Eur J Biochem. 1988;178:243–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehlting J, Buttner D, Wang Q, Douglas CJ, Somssich IE, Kombrink E. Three 4-coumarate:coenzyme A ligases in Arabidopsis thaliana represent two evolutionarily divergent classes in angiosperms. Plant J. 1999;19:9–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Wengenmayer H, Ebel J, Grisebach H. Enzymic synthesis of lignin precursors. Purification and properties of a cinnamoyl-CoA: NADPH reductase from cell suspension cultures of soybean (Glycine max). Eur J Biochem. 1976;65:529–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Cui JD, Qiu JQ, Fan XW, Jia SR, Tan ZL. Biotechnological production and applications of microbial phenylalanine ammonia lyase: a recent review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2014;34:258–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Cochrane FC, Davin LB, Lewis NG. The Arabidopsis phenylalanine ammonia lyase gene family: kinetic characterization of the four PAL isoforms. Phytochemistry. 2004;65:1557–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Xiang L, Moore BS. Biochemical characterization of a prokaryotic phenylalanine ammonia lyase. J Bacteriol. 2005;187:4286–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamberger B, Hahlbrock K. The 4-coumarate:CoA ligase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana comprises one rare, sinapate-activating and three commonly occurring isoenzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101:2209–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Costa MA, Bedgar DL, Moinuddin SGA, Kim KW, Cardenas CL, Cochrane FC, Shockey JM, Helms GL, Amakura Y, Takahashi H, Milhollan JK, Davin LB, Browse J, Lewis NG. Characterization in vitro and in vivo of the putative multigene 4-coumarate:CoA ligase network in Arabidopsis: syringyl lignin and sinapate/sinapyl alcohol derivative formation. Phytochemistry. 2005;66:2072–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Baltas M, Lapeyre C, Bedos-Belval F, Maturano M, Saint-Aguet P, Roussel L, Duran H, Grima-Pettenati J. Kinetic and inhibition studies of cinnamoyl-CoA reductase 1 from Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2005;43:746–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaneko M, Ohnishi Y, Horinouchi S. Cinnamate: coenzyme A ligase from the filamentous bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Bacteriol. 2003;185:20–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma PW. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2006;70:939–1031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Gosset G. Improvement of Escherichia coli production strains by modification of the phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system. Microb Cell Fact. 2005;4:14. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Pittard J, Camakaris H, Yang J. The TyrR regulon. Mol Microbiol. 2005;55:16–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Gosset G. Production of aromatic compounds in bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2009;20:651–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Rodriguez A, Martinez JA, Flores N, Escalante A, Gosset G, Bolivar F. Engineering Escherichia coli to overproduce aromatic amino acids and derived compounds. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:126. doi: Scholar
  33. Meza E, Becker J, Bolivar F, Gosset G, Wittmann C. Consequences of phosphoenolpyruvate: sugar phosphotransferase system and pyruvate kinase isozymes inactivation in central carbon metabolism flux distribution in Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:127. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sprenger GA. From scratch to value: engineering Escherichia coli wild type cells to the production of l-phenylalanine and other fine chemicals derived from chorismate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;75:739–49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ding R, Liu L, Chen X, Cui Z, Zhang A, Ren D, Zhang L. Introduction of two mutations into AroG increases phenylalanine production in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Lett. 2014;36:2103–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Dell KA, Frost JW. Identification and removal of impediments to biocatalytic synthesis of aromatics from d-glucose: rate-limiting enzymes in the common pathway of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:11581–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Lutke-Eversloh T, Stephanopoulos G. Combinatorial pathway analysis for improved l-tyrosine production in Escherichia coli: identification of enzymatic bottlenecks by systematic gene overexpression. Metab Eng. 2008;10:69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang S, Pohnert G, Kongsaeree P, Wilson DB, Clardy J, Ganem B. Chorismate mutase-prephenate dehydratase from Escherichia coli. Study of catalytic and regulatory domains using genetically engineered proteins. J Biol Chem. 1998;273:6248–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang S, Wilson DB, Ganem B. Probing the catalytic mechanism of prephenate dehydratase by site-directed mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli P-protein dehydratase domain. Biochemistry. 2000;39:4722–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Yi J, Draths KM, Li K, Frost JW. Altered glucose transport and shikimate pathway product yields in E. coli. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19:1450–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu SP, Liu RX, Xiao MR, Zhang L, Ding ZY, Gu ZH, Shi GY. A systems level engineered E. coli capable of efficiently producing l-phenylalanine. Process Biochem. 2014;49:751–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Vannelli T, Wei Qi W, Sweigard J, Gatenby AA, Sariaslani FS. Production of p-hydroxycinnamic acid from glucose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli by expression of heterologous genes from plants and fungi. Metab Eng. 2007;9:142–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Vargas-Tah A, Martinez LM, Hernandez-Chavez G, Rocha M, Martinez A, Bolivar F, Gosset G. Production of cinnamic acid and p-hydroxycinnamic acid from sugar mixtures with engineered Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:6. doi: ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou H, Liao X, Liu L, Wang T, Du G, Chen J. Enhanced l-phenylalanine production by recombinant Escherichia coli BR-42 (pAP-B03) resistant to bacteriophage BP-1 via a two-stage feeding approach. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;38:1219–27.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Yim SC, Jeong KJ, Chang HN, Lee SY. High-level secretory production of human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor by fed-batch culture of recombinant Escherichia coli. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2001;24:249–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Jeong KJ, Lee SY. Enhanced production of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli by filamentation suppression. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:1295–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Dueber JE, Wu GC, Malmirchegini GR, Moon TS, Petzold CJ, Ullal AV, Prather KLJ, Keasling JD. Synthetic protein scaffolds provide modular control over metabolic flux. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:753–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Lee JH, Jung SC, Bui LM, Kang KH, Song JJ, Kim SC. Improved production of l-threonine in Escherichia coli by use of a DNA scaffold system. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:774–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Q Rev Biol. 2001;76:348–9.Google Scholar
  50. Song CW, Lee SY. Rapid one-step inactivation of single or multiple genes in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol J. 2013;8:776–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Gerigk MR, Maass D, Kreutzer A, Sprenger G, Bongaerts J, Wubbolts M, Takors R. Enhanced pilot-scale fed-batch l-phenylalanine production with recombinant Escherichia coli by fully integrated reactive extraction. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2002;25:43–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Yakandawala N, Romeo T, Friesen AD, Madhyastha S. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli to enhance phenylalanine production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;78:283–91.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Yim SS, An SJ, Kang M, Lee J, Jeong KJ. Isolation of fully synthetic promoters for high-level gene expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2013;110:2959–69.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Qian ZG, Xia XX, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the production of putrescine: a four carbon diamine. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009;104:651–62.Google Scholar
  55. Kim JM, Lee KH, Lee SY. Development of a markerless gene knock-out system for Mannheimia succiniciproducens using a temperature-sensitive plasmid. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;278:78–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Bang et al. 2016