Skip to main content

Ribosome binding site libraries and pathway modules for shikimic acid synthesis with Corynebacterium glutamicum



The shikimic acid (SA) pathway is a fundamental route to synthesize aromatic building blocks for cell growth and metabolic processes, as well as for fermentative production of various aromatic compounds. Genes encoding enzymes of SA pathway are not continuous on genome and they are differently regulated.


In this study, efforts were made to construct continuous genetic modules of SA pathway that are regulated by a same Ptac promoter. Firstly, aro genes [aroG (NCgl2098), aroB (NCgl1559), aroD (NCgl0408) and aroE (NCgl1567)] from Corynebacterium glutamicum and ribosome binding site (RBS) libraries that were tailored for the above genes were obtained, and the strength of each RBS in the 4 libraries was quantified. Secondly, 9 genetic modules were built up from the RBS libraries, a previously characterized ribozyme insulator (RiboJ) and transcriptional promoter (Ptac) and terminator, and aroG, aroB, aroD and aroE. The functionality and efficiency of the constructed genetic modules were evaluated in C. glutamicum by determination of SA synthesis. Results showed that C. glutamicum RES167ΔaroK carrying a genetic module produced 4.3 g/L of SA, which was 54 folds higher compared to that of strain RES167ΔaroK (80 mg/L, without the genetic module) during fermentation in 250-mL flasks. The same strain produced 7.4, and 11.3 g/L of SA during 5-L batch and fed-batch fermentations, respectively, which corresponding to SA molar yields of 0.39 and 0.24 per mole sucrose consumption.


These results demonstrated that the constructed SA pathway modules are effective in increasing SA synthesis in C. glutamicum, and they might be useful for fermentative production of aromatic compounds derived from SA pathway.


The shikimic acid (SA) pathway exists in prokaryotes and plants, and is the common route for the synthesis of aromatic amino acids (Trp, Phe, Tyr) [13] and vitamins such as phylloquinone [4]. Since its discovery, the SA pathway has attracted extensive interest from science and industries. Recent investigations have demonstrated that more chemicals can be produced by expanding the SA pathway [5]. Seven steps of reactions complete the SA pathway, leading to the conversion of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and erythrose 4-phophate (E4P) to chorismic acid [1]. In Corynebacterium glutamicum, the aro genes encoding DAHP synthase (aroG/ncgl2098), 3-dehydroquinate synthase (aroB/ncgl1559), 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase (aroD/ncgl0408) and shikimate dehydrogenase (aroE/ncgl1567) are involved in conversion of PEP and E4P to shikimic acid, and they are located at different transcriptional regulation units [69] (Fig. 1). Recent study showed that transcription of aroE was correspondent to the levels of shikimate in C. glutamicum [9]. Genes encoding the enzymes of SA pathway are not continuous on genome and are differently regulated; this would results in extra difficulties for genetic manipulation and metabolic engineering of SA pathway.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overview of shikimic acid pathway (a) and location of its encoding genes in C. glutamicum chromosome (b). aroG codes for 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosonate 7-phosphate (DAHP) synthase, aroB for 3-dehydroquinate synthase, aroD for 3-dehydroquinate dehydratase and aroE for shikimate dehydrogenase

The development of synthetic biology brings new concepts to design and construct genetic modules or metabolic engineering for bioprocesses. Genetic elements that regulate transcription, translation or encode various enzymes are used as “parts” to build genetic modules [10, 11]. Ideally, the properties of the parts and modules can be accurately and quantitatively predicted when they are implanted into chassis cells [12, 13]. Recently, scientists have designed and constructed a series of parts libraries of promoters, ribosome binding sites (RBS) and terminators, which enabled the regulation of gene expression over wide dynamic ranges in Escherichia coli cells [14, 15]. For example, RBS of different strengths have been applied to optimize the metabolic flux of mevalonate-based farnesyl pyrophosphate biosynthetic pathway [16]. So far, synthetic parts and modules are very limited for C. glutamicum, an important industry production workhorse that has been used for decades to produce amino acids, vitamins, nucleotides [1720], and recently biofuels and chemicals [2124].

In this study, efforts were made to construct continuous genetic modules for SA pathway with synthetic biology logistics. Four RBS libraries that were tailored for C. glutamicum and 9 genetic modules for SA synthesis were constructed. The functionality and efficiency of the constructed SA pathway modules were evaluated by determination of SA production with C. glutamicum. Results suggested that the newly constructed pathway modules were effective. During batch and fed-batch fermentation, SA production reached titers of 7.4 and 11.3 g/L, respectively. This represented the highest titer of fermentative production of SA with C. glutamicum.


Design, construction, and screening of RBS libraries for aroB, aroD, aroE and aroG

RBS sequences such as AGAAAGGAGG and GAAAGGAGG [2527] had been previously identified in C. glutamicum. In addition, the sequence of AAAGGAGGA had been used for expression of genes involving in biopolyester synthesis with C. glutamicum [28]. All these RBS sequences shared a common feature of AAAGGAGG, which is correspondent to the anti-Shine-Dalgarno sequence at the 3’-end of the 16S rRNA from corneybacteria [26]. In addition, it was reported that the spaces between RBS and translational start codon were found to be dominantly 5–10 nucleotides in C. glutamicum [27]. Based on these observations, we generalized a seeding sequence of AAAGG(N)6–9. According to this design, a pool of RBS sequences was chemically synthesized.

For easy screening of RBS sequences of different strengths and for the purpose to prevent the influence of neighboring elements on gene translation, the enhanced green fluorescence protein (eGFP) [29] and the ribozyme-based insulator RiboJ [30] genes were applied to make constructions for screening tailored RBS libraries for individual aroG, aroB, aroD and aroE. Construction and screening of the tailored RBS libraries are diagramed in Fig. 2. As showed in Fig. 2, 146, 52, 59 and 54 clones were randomly selected for aroB, aroD, aroE and aroG, respectively. Plasmids harboring RBS sequences of different strengths were extracted from E. coli clones, and were further sequenced. These plasmids were then transferred into C. glutamicum. RBS of different strengths were screened by quantification of fluorescence intensities in C. glutamicum, and finally 4 RBS libraries were obtained that had 33, 43, 49 and 42 members for aroB, aroD, aroE and aroG, respectively. The RBS sequences of these libraries and the strength of individual RBS are showed in Fig. 3. As seen from Fig. 3, the strengths of the RBS libraries spanned wide ranges. Specifically, the individual RBS strengths of aroB, aroD, aroE and aroG libraries had 70, 21, 19 and 10-folds differences, respectively.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Procedures of construction and screening of RBS libraries tailored for aroG, aroB, aroD and aroE. Numbers of RBS sequences in each library are represented by the clone numbers of E. coli or C. glutamicum

Fig. 3
figure 3

Quantification of RBS strength in C. glutamicum by measuring fluorescence emitted from eGFP fusion proteins with AroG (a), AroB (b), AroD (c), or AroE (d). Columns appeared in dark were RBS selected for construction of genetic modules

Construction and evaluation of genetic modules for SA pathway

The above RBS libraries were exploited to build up genetic modules for SA pathway. Each genetic module had aroB, aroD, aroE and aroG genes that were independently regulated by RBS of different strengths. The organization of the genetic modules is generalized in Fig. 4a. To simplify the construction and evaluation of genetic modules, RBS with relative high (H), medium (M) or low (L) strength (Fig. 3) from each of the four libraries, were selected for aroG, aroB, aroD or aroE. Starting with these building blocks (3 RBS of different strengths and 4 genes with the order of aroG-aroB-aroD-aroE), there were theoretical 81 combinations (i.e. genetic modules that possible have different levels of gene expression). By using a mathematic model of combinatorial approach, such 81 combinations were scaled down to 9 combinations (Fig. 4c).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The components and structure of the genetic modules (a) and AroE activities from cellular lysates of C. glutamicum harboring various genetic modules (b). In panel b, the RBS were determined by a combinatorial approach (c). For each aroG, aroB, aroD and aroE gene, three levels of RBS strength [high (H), medium (M), low (L), see Fig. 3] were selected, and totally 9 genetic modules were obtained. Three parallel experiments for AroE activity were performed and the standard deviations are showed in panel b

Genetic modules of the above 9 combinations were constructed and were inserted into pXMJ19. Thus, 9 pXMJ19 derivatives, namely plasmid-1 to plasmid-9, were obtained and were transferred into C. glutamicum RES167ΔaroK cells. To determine that if gene translations in the genetic modules were exactly correlated to their RBS strengths as they were previously determined, shikimate dehydrogenase (AroE) activities were determined. As shown in (Fig. 4b), those modules (GHBLDLEL, GMBHDMEL, and GLBMDHEL) harbored low strengths of RBS exhibited low AroE activities and those modules (GHBHDHEH, GMBMDLEH, and GLBLDMEH) harbored higher strengths of RBS exhibited higher AroE activities. These results suggested that levels of gene translations in the 9 genetic modules were highly correlated to RBS strengths determined previously via EGFP fluorescence intensities.

Genetic modules increased SA synthesis with C. glutamicum

In order to obtain a mutant that accumulated SA, the aroK that encodes shikimate kinase was deleted from C. glutamicum RES167, generating the mutant RES167ΔaroK. Plasmids (Table 1) harboring the SA pathway modules (Fig. 4c) were transferred into C. glutamicum RES167ΔaroK cells and the effect of those genetic modules on SA production was observed. Results showed that the SA production varied significantly among different genetic modules (Fig. 5), although the growth of C. glutamicum was not affected by those genetic modules (Data not shown). The SA production with RES167ΔaroK/plasmid-2 that carried genetic module of GHBMDMEM was 6.8 higher than that of RES167ΔaroK, suggesting that the module of GHBMDMEM was the most effective combination for SA synthesis in C. glutamicum.

Table 1 Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
Fig. 5
figure 5

Production of shikimic acid by C. glutamicum RES167ΔaroK harboring various genetic modules. Three cultivations were conducted in 250-mL flasks and the standard deviations of shikimic acid production are indicated

Insertion of transcriptional terminators into genetic modules further increased SA production with C. glutamicum

The genetic module GHBMDMEM was designed that there is a tac promoter for each gene but only one terminator after the last gene (Fig. 4a). Since terminator regulates also gene transcription and subsequently translation, 3 new SA pathway modules with insertion of terminators were constructed (Fig. 6a). The SA productions with those new combinations by C. glutamicum are shown in Fig. 6b. It was found that insertion of a terminator between aroB and aroD (GHBMTDMEM) resulted in improvement of SA production by about 56 % (Fig. 6b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Insertion of transcriptional terminators into genetic modules at various position (a) and their effects on shikimic acid production by C. glutamicum RES167ΔaroK (b). In panel B, three cultivations were conducted in 250-mL flasks and the standard deviations of shikimic acid production are indicated

SA production in 250-mL flasks and 5-L fermenters with C. glutamicum RES167ΔaroK/pXMJ19-GBTDE

To evaluate SA productivity, C. glutamicum RES167ΔaroK/pXMJ19-GBTDE was cultivated in 250-mL flasks and 5-L fermenters. Cell growth, SA production, consumption of sucrose and accumulation of 3-dehydroshikimate were monitored (Fig. 7a, 7b, 7c). SA productions were 4.3, 7.4, and 11.3 g/L during 250-mL flask, 5-L batch and fed-batch fermentations, respectively. SA yields from sucrose were 0.22, 0.39, 0.24 mol SA per mole sucrose consumption.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The growth (solid squares), sucrose consumption (open squares), productions of shikimic acid (circles) and 3-dehydroshikimic acid (open circles) with recombinant C. glutamicum RES167ΔaroK harboring pXMJ19-GBTDE, during shake-flask (a), batch (b), and fed-batch cultivation (c). Data are averages of three parallel fermentations


Several methods, such as overexpression of aro genes [31, 32] and the use of enzymes with improved properties [33], have been reported to enhance the metabolic flux into SA pathway, thus finally increase the production of aromatic amino acids or shikimic acid. This current study revealed a new synthetic biology strategy: Four aro genes were organized as continuous genetic modules and their transcriptions were coordinated by the same tac promoter, RiboJ and terminator. The translation levels of aro genes in the genetic modules were regulated by their RBS, which were quantatively characterized in this study.

RBS is vital to initiate genetic translation, and are useful synthetic biology parts for construction modules [16]. In this study, four tailored-made RBS libraries were constructed and the strength of each RBS sequence was determined in the background of C. glutamicum cells. Although the RBS libraries were tailored for aroG, aroB, aroD and aroE, it is believed that these RBS would be applicable also for other purposes when C. glutamicum was used as host. Similarly, the constructed SA pathway modules were tested for SA production in this study, they should be also useful for productions such as aromatic amino acids that are derived from SA pathway.

SA is a highly valued commercial compound. Efforts were made to improve SA production by de-repressing of feedback inhibition of enzymes involved in SA synthesis [33], increasing glucose availability [34], and optimizing metabolic fluxes [31], with E. coli or B. subtilis. So far as we know, C. glutamicum has not been exploited for SA production. By implementing the constructed genetic modules in the shikimate kinase deficient mutant, C. glutamicum was successfully engineered to produce SA at 11.3 g/L in 5-L fermenter. So far, this represents the highest titer of SA production with C. glutamicum. The SA production with C. glutamicum is comparable to the productivity with B. subtilis (19.7 g/L) [35]. Although this SA titer is lower when compared to SA production by E. coli (84 g/L) [33], C. glutamicum is still a promising SA producer due to its non-pathogenic nature, and its productivity can be further improved by optimization of fermentation process, or by replacement of the tryptophan- and prephenate-sensitive DAHP synthase [36, 37].


Synthetic biology tool boxes for manipulating C. glutamicum were expanded by including 4 RBS libraries, in addition to the previous reported promoters [38, 39] and CoryneBrick [40]. The RBS libraries represent the first set of RBS libraries that were quantatively characterized in C. glutamicum. The selected RBS and aro genes could be organized as continuous genetic modules and their transcriptions could be coordinated. Genetic modules were successful constructed for SA pathway, and were demonstrated to be useful for increase of SA synthesis. In fed-batch fermentation, C. glutamicum harboring newly constructed SA pathway modules achieved 11.3 g/L SA, which represented the highest SA production with C. glutamicum.

Materials and methods

Microorganisms, plasmids, medium, and cultivation

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. C. glutamicum was cultivated at 30 °C in Luria Bertani (LB) [41] broth or Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) medium [42]. E. coli was cultivated at 37 °C in 50 mL of LB broth in 250-ml flasks on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm. When needed, chloramphenicol at a final concentration of 10 or 20 μg/mL in medium was used for cultivation of C. glutamicum or E. coli. Expression of genes with C. glutamicum was induced with 0.5 mM isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG).

Fermentative production of shikimic acid with C. glutamicum was carried out in 250 mL flasks and 5-L fermenter (Bioflo Model 3000 bioreactor, New Brunswick Scientific, N.J., U.S.A.). Seeding cultures were grown with Medium A (g/L): K2HPO4 · 3H2O (0.5); KH2PO4 (0.5); (NH4)2SO4 (10); glucose (40); MgSO4 · 7H2O (0.2); phenylalanine (0.15); tyrosine (0.15); tryptophan (0.15); CaCO3 (30); FeSO4 · 7H2O (0.02); MnSO4 · 4H2O (0.02); biotin (50 μg); thiamine (200 μg), pH 7.4.

Fermentation was conducted with Medium B (g/L): K2HPO4 · 3H2O (0.5); KH2PO4 (0.5); Urea (3); sucrose (38); MgSO4 · 7H2O (0.2); Yeast extract (10); peptone (4); FeSO4 · 7H2O (0.02); MnSO4 · 4H2O (0.02); biotin (50 μg); thiamine (200 μg), pH 7.4. The fermenter was stirred at 300 rpm, aerated at 3.0 vol/vol per minute, and pH was maintained at 7.0. Cell growth was monitored by measuring optical density at 600 nm (OD600) with a spectrophotometer (Biospec-1601 DNA/Protein Enzyme Analyzer, Shimadzu). Cellular dry weights were determined by centrifugation and lyophilization with 3 parallel samples.

C. glutamicum was cultivated in mineral salts (MS) medium when RBS strength were tested. The MS medium contained following components (g/L, pH 8.0): Na2HPO4 · 12H2O (2); KH2PO4 (0.5); MgSO4 · 7H2O (0.03); NH4C1 (0.53); trace element solution 2 mL. Trace element solution (g/L, pH 6.0): EDTA, (0.5); ZnSO4 · 7H2O, (0.22); CaCl2, (0.055); MnCl2 · 4H2O, (0.051); FeSO4 · 7H2O, (0.0499); (NH4)6Mo7O24 · 4H2O, (0.011); CuSO4 · 5H2O, (0.0157); CoCl2 · 6H2O, (0.0161); biotin (0.0125); thiamine (0.05).

DNA extraction, amplification, plasmid construction and genetic transformation

Plasmid and chromosomal DNAs were isolated using the OMEGA Plasmid Mini Kit and the OMEGA Bacterial DNA Kit (Omega genetics, Beijing), respectively. DNA fragments from PCR amplification were purified with the OMEGA Cycle-Pure Kit (Omega genetics, Beijing). Restriction enzymes, ligases and other DNA-manipulating enzymes were used according to their manufacturer’s instructions. Genetic transformation of C. glutamicum and E. coli was carried out by electroporation, and recombinant strains were selected according to Tauch et al. [43].

Construction of pXMJ19-aroG MU, pXMJ19-aroD MU pXMJ19-aroB MU, pXMJ19-aroE MU and pZB

The aro genes, i.e., aroG (GenBank accession number, NP_601382.1), aroB (NP_600835.1), aroD (NP_599670.1), and aroE (NP_600843.1) were PCR amplified from genomic DNA of C. glutamicum RES167 using primers listed in Table 2. Subsequently, these aro genes were cloned into pXMJ19, generating pXMJ19-aroG, pXMJ19-aroB, pXMJ19-aroD, and pXMJ19-aroE. For subsequent cloning, the following silent mutations were made with primers listed in Table 1: the HindIII and PstI of aroG, BamHI and SpeI of aroB, PstI of aroD, and EcoRI and SalI of aroE. The resulting plasmids were named pXMJ19-aroG MU, pXMJ19-aroB MU, pXMJ19-aroD MU, and pXMJ19-aroE MU.

Table 2 Oligonucleotides used in this study

pZB was derived from pXMJ19. Chemically synthesized gene of RiboJ (27) was cloned into pXMJ19 at HindIII and PstI sites, resulting in pXMJ19-RiboJ. This pXMJ19-RiboJ was digested with EcoRI and KpnI, and a genetic fragment encoding the enhanced green fluorescence protein was cloned at the KpnI and EcoRI sites. The resulting plasmid was named pZB, and was used for later construction of RBS libraries.

Design and construction of RBS libraries tailored for aroG, aroB, aroD and aroE, and evaluation of RBS strength according to fluorescence intensity

Based on the currently known RBS sequences from C. glutamicum, we designed a seeding sequence of AAAGG(N)6–9, where “N” represents any nucleotide of A, T, G, or C. From this seeding sequence, oligonucleotides tagged as MU-RBSAG-F, MU-RBSAB-F, MU-RBSAD-F, and MU-RBSAE-F, were chemically synthesized. These oligonucleotides and their partner primers (Table 2) were used to amplify the aro genes from plasmid pXMJ19-aroG MU, pXMJ19-aroB MU, pXMJ19-aroD MU, pXMJ19-aroE MU. The amplified aro genes, each had a specific RBS sequence at its 5’-end, were digested with restriction endonuclease and were cloned into the samely digested pZB. Thus, four RBS libraries were constructed and were named as pZB-aroG, pZB-aroB, pZB-aroD, and pZB-aroE (Fig. 2).

The strength of each RBS for genetic translation was determined according to its fluorescence intensity. C. glutamicum cells harboring single plasmid (thus a single RBS) of libraries of pZB-aroG, pZB-aroB, pZB-aroD, and pZB-aroE were cultivated in the presence of 0.5 mM IPTG at 30 °C in MS medium. After incubation for 48 h at 30 °C and 200 rpm, 200 μl of cell suspension was transferred into a 96-well plate. The fluorescence from the eGFP in C. glutamicum cells and optical density were measured using a BioTek® synergy H4 Hybrid Reader (Keruiente, Beijing, China).

Construction of genetic modules for SA pathway

To construct the nine plasmids with the combination of different strength RBS, aroG gene with high, middle and low strength RBS were amplified from pXMJ19-aroG MU and cloned between SalI and BamHI cloning sites of plasmid pXMJ19-RiboJ. These three plasmids were named as pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroG MU-H, pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroG MU-M and pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroG MU-L, respectively. Taking the same way, we got plasmids pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroB MU-H, pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroB MU-M, pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroB MU-L, pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroD MU-H, pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroD MU-M, pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroD MU-L, pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroE MU-H, pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroE MU-M and pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroE MU-L, which also have the high, middle and low strength RBS, accordingly. Then, Ptac-RiboJ-aroB MU-H fragments with BamHI and XmaI sites were amplified from plasmid pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroB MU-H and cloned into plasmid pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroG MU-H, resulting plasmid named pXMJ19-GHBH. Then fragments Ptac-RiboJ-aroD MU-H with XmaI and KpnI sites were cloned into plasmid pXMJ19-GHBH, resulting plasmid named pXMJ19-GHBHDH. From plasmid pXMJ19-RiboJ-aroE MU-H we got fragments Ptac-RiboJ-aroE MU-H with KpnI and EcoRI sites and cloned the fragments into plasmid pXMJ19-GHBHDH, resulting plasmid named plasmid-1. Plasmid-2 to plasmid-9 and derivate plasmids were also got by the way describe above. Three terminator fragments with XmaI, BamHI and KpnI cloning sites were amplified from plasmid pXMJ19, respectively. After terminator with XmaI site was cloned in plasmid-2, we got plasmid pXMJ19-GBTDE. Then terminator with BamHI site was cloned in plasmid pXMJ19-GBTDE to get plasmid pXMJ19-GBTDTE. Plasmid pXMJ19-GTBTDTE was constructed by cloning terminator with KpnI site.

Measurement of SA dehydrogenase activity

The enzyme activities of the shikimate dehydrogenases were assayed by monitoring the absorbance of NADPH at 340 nm (ε = 6230 M−1 cm−1) using a spectrophotometer (Specord 205 Analytik, Jena, Germany). The assays were conducted at 25 °C in a volume of 1 mL solution, containing 100 mM Tris–HCl buffer at pH 8.0, 1 mM SA, and 2 mM NADP+. Cellular lysates from C. glutamicum were added finally to trigger the reaction. One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme catalyzing the conversion of 1 μmol of NADP+ per minute at 25 °C.

For preparation of cellular lysates of C. glutamicum, cells were harvested by centrifugation (6000 g, 4 °C, 5 min) of culture samples. Supernatants were removed, the cell pellets were washed and re-suspended in 50 mM pH 8.0 Tris–HCl buffer. This cell suspension was subjected to sonication (Ningbo Scientz Biotechnology Co., LTD, China) and centrifugation (12,000 g, 4 °C, 10 min). The supernatants were collected and used for enzyme assays. Protein concentrations were determined using Bradford method [44].

Construction of C. glutamicum RES167∆aroK

Disruption of the shikimate kinase gene, aroK, in C. glutamicum was performed using the suicide vector pK18mobsacB. The intact DNA fragment (2946 bp) of aroK was amplified from chromosomal DNA of C. glutamicum, using the primers aroK-F and aroK-R (Table 1). This intact aroK fragment was cloned into pK18mobsacB EcoRI/HindIII sites. The resulting plasmid was named pK18mobsacB-aroK, and was amplified with primers KTaroK-F and KTaroK-R, thus resulting DNA fragments with disrupted aroK gene. After digested with XmaI restriction endonuclease, DNA fragments were ligated and transformed into E. coli. The recombinant plasmid was named pK18mobsacB-∆aroK and was electroporated into C. glutamicum RES167. Using the method described by Schäfer et al. [45], the aroK mutant RES167∆aroK was screened out on BHI agar plates. The Disruption of aroK was verified by PCR amplification and sequence of the disrupted aroK gene from RES167∆aroK.

Determination of SA and 3-dehydroshikimic acid concentrations

The concentrations of SA and 3-dehydroskimic acid were determined with an HPLC system (Agilent 1200 series, Agilent Technologies, Inc., USA) equipped with a ZORBAX SB C18 column (4.6 mm x 250 mm x 5 μm) and detected at 215 nm wavelength. The HPLC was run with a mixture of solution A (phosphoric acid in water, pH 2.5) and solution B (methanol) as eluant and was operated at a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min. The following gradient was used: at 0–7.5 min, 95 % of solution A and 5 % of solution B; at 7.5-15 min, 100 % of solution B; 15.0-22.5 min, 95 % of solution A and 5 % of solution B. Standard shikimic acid (Cat. No. S5375, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 3-dehydroshikimic acid (Cat. No. 05616, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were eluted at 5.411 and 6.241 min, respectively, under these conditions.

Determination of sucrose concentrations

The sucrose concentrations in fermentation broth were determined with spectrometric method, as previously described [46].


  1. 1.

    Herrmann KM. The shikimate pathway: early steps in the biosynthesis of aromatic compounds. Plant Cell. 1995;7:907–19.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Krämer M, Bongaerts J, Bovenberg R, Kremer S, Müller U, Orf S, et al. Metabolic engineering for microbial production of shikimic acid. Metab Eng. 2003;5:277–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Tzin V, Galili G. New insights into the shikimate and aromatic amino acids biosynthesis pathways in plants. Mol Plant. 2010;3:956–72.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Quiroz DCD, Carmona SB, Bolívar F, Escalante A. Current perspectives on applications of shikimic and aminoshikimic acids in pharmaceutical chemistry. Res Rep Med Chem. 2014;4:35–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Weber C, Bruckner C, Weinreb S, Lehr C, Essl C, Boles E. Biosynthesis of cis, cis-Muconic acid and its aromatic precursors, catechol and protocatechuic acid, from renewable feedstocks by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:8421–30.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Liao HF, Lin LL, Chien HR, Hsu WH. Serine 187 is a crucial residue for allosteric of Corynebacterium glutamicum 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001;194:59–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Han MA, Lee HS, Cheon CI, Min KH MSL. Cloning and analysis of the aroB gene encoding dehydroquinate synthase from Corynebacterium glutamicum. Can J Microbiol. 1999;45:885–90.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Liu C, Liu YM, Sun QL, Jiang C, Liu SJ. Unraveling the kinetic diversity of microbial 3-dehydroquinate dehydratases of shikimate pathway. AMB Express. 2015;5:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kubota T, Tanaka Y, Hiraga K, Inui M, Yukawa H. Characterization of shikimate dehydrogenase homologues of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:8139–49.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ajikumar PK, Xiao WH, Tyo KE, Wang Y, Simeon F, Leonard E, et al. Isoprenoid pathway optimization for Taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science. 2010;330:70–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Brophy JA, Voigt CA. Principles of genetic circuit design. Nat Methods. 2014;11:508–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schendzielorz G, Dippong M, Grunberger A, Kohlheyer D, Yoshida A, Binder S, et al. Taking control over control: Use of product sensing in single cells to remove flux control at Key enzymes in biosynthesis pathways. ACS Synth Biol. 2014;3:21–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Oyarzun DA, Stan GB. Synthetic gene circuits for metabolic control: design trade-offs and constraints. J R Soc Interface. 2012;10:13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mutalik VK, Guimaraes JC, Cambray G, Lam C, Christoffersen MJ, Mai QA, et al. Precise and reliable gene expression via standard transcription and translation initiation elements. Nat Methods. 2013;10:354–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Chen YJ, Liu P, Nielsen AA, Brophy JA, Clancy K, Peterson T, et al. Characterization of 582 natural and synthetic terminators and quantification of their design constraints. Nat Methods. 2013;10:659–64.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Nowroozi FF, Baidoo EE, Ermakov S, Redding-Johanson AM, Batth TS, Petzold CJ, et al. Metabolic pathway optimization using ribosome binding site variants and combinatorial gene assembly. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:1567–81.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Binder S, Siedler S, Marienhagen J, Bott M, Eggeling L. Recombineering in Corynebacterium glutamicum combined with optical nanosensors: a general strategy for fast producer strain generation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:6360–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Krause FS, Blombach B, Eikmanns BJ. Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for 2-ketoisovalerate production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:8053–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Stabler N, Oikawa T, Bott M, Eggeling L. Corynebacterium glutamicum as a host for synthesis and export of D-Amino Acids. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:1702–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rittmann D, Lindner SN, Wendisch VF. Engineering of a glycerol utilization pathway for amino acid production by Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:6216–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ravasi P, Peiru S, Gramajo H, Menzella HG. Design and testing of a synthetic biology framework for genetic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:147.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Litsanov B, Kabus A, Brocker M, Bott M. Efficient aerobic succinate production from glucose in minimal medium with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Biotechnol. 2012;5:116–28.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wieschalka S, Blombach B, Bott M, Eikmanns BJ. Bio-based production of organic acids with Corynebacterium glutamicum. Microb Biotechnol. 2013;6:87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wieschalka S, Blombach B, Eikmanns BJ. Engineering Corynebacterium glutamicum for the production of pyruvate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;94:449–59.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Amador E, Castro JM, Correia A, Martin JF. Structure and organization of the rrnD operon of ‘Brevibacterium lactofermentum’: analysis of the 16 s rRNA gene. Microbiology. 1999;145:915–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Martı́n JF, Barreiro C, González-Lavado E, Barriuso M. Ribosomal RNA and ribosomal proteins in corynebacteria. J Biotechno. 2003;104:41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Pfeifer-Sancar K, Mentz A, Rückert C, Kalinowski J. Comprehensive analysis of the Corynebacterium glutamicum transcriptome using an improved RNAseq technique. BMC Genomics. 2013:14.

  28. 28.

    Liu Q, Ouyang SP, Kim J, Chen GQ. The impact of PHB accumulation on L-glutamate production by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biotechnol. 2007;132:273–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Cinelli RAG, Ferrari A, Beltram F, Pellegrini V, Tyagi M, Giacca M. The enhanced green fluorescent protein as a tool for the analysis of protein dynamics and localization: local fluorescence study at the single-molecule level. Photochem Photobiol. 2000;71:771–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lou C, Stanton B, Chen YJ, Munsky B, Voigt CA. Ribozyme-based insulator parts buffer synthetic circuits from genetic context. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:1137–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Liu DF, Ai GM, Zheng QX, Liu C, Jiang CY, Liu LX, et al. Metabolic flux responses to genetic modification for shikimic acid production by Bacillus subtilis strains. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Cui YY, Ling C, Zhang YY, Huang J, Liu JZ. Production of shikimic acid from Escherichia coli through chemically inducible chromosomal evolution and cofactor metabolic engineering. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chandran SS, Yi J, Draths KM, von Daeniken R, Webe W, Frost JW. Phosphoenolpyruvate availability and the biosynthesis of shikimic acid. Biotechnol Prog. 2003;19:808–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Escalante A, Calderon R, Valdivia A, de Anda R, Hernandez G, Ramirez OT, et al. Metabolic engineering for the production of shikimic acid in an evolved Escherichia coli strain lacking the phosphoenolpyruvate: carbohydrate phosphotransferase system. Microb Cell Fact. 2010;9:21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Iomantas YAV, Abalakina EG, Polanue BM, Yampolskaya TA, Bachina TA, Kozlov YI. Method for producing shikimic acid. U.S. 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Liu YJ, Li PP, Zhao KX, Wang BJ, Jiang CY, Drake HL, et al. Corynebacterium glutamicum contains 3-deoxy-D-arabino-heptulosonate 7-phosphate synthases that display novel biochemical features. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:5497–503.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Li PP, Li DF, Liu D, Liu YM, Liu C, Liu SJ. Interaction between DAHP synthase and chorismate mutase endows new regulation on DAHP synthase activity in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:10373–80.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Pauling J, Rottger R, Tauch A, Azevedo V, Baumbach J. CoryneRegNet 6.0–Updated database content, new analysis methods and novel features focusing on community demands. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D610–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Patek M, Holatko J, Busche T, Kalinowski J, Nesvera J. Corynebacterium glutamicum promoters: a practical approach. Microb Biotechnol. 2013;6:103–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kang MK, Lee J, Um Y, Lee TS, Bott M, Park SJ. Synthetic biology platform of CoryneBrick vectors for gene expression in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its application to xylose utilization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014;98:5991–6002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sezonov G, Joseleau-Petit D, D'Ari R. Escherichia coli physiology in Luria-Bertani broth. J Bacteriol. 2007;189:8746–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Georgi T, Rittmann D, Wendisch VF. Lysine and glutamate production by Corynebacterium glutamicum on glucose, fructose and sucrose: roles of malic enzyme and fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase. Metab Eng. 2005;7:291–301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Tauch A, Kirchner O, Loffler B, Gotker S, Puhler A, Kalinowski J. Efficient electrotransformation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae with a mini-replicon derived from the Corynebacterium glutamicum plasmid pGA1. Curr Microbiol. 2002;45:362–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Chem. 1976;72:248–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schäfer A, Tauch A, Jäger W, Kalinowski J, Thierbachb G, Pühler G. Small mobilizable multi-purpose cloning vectors derived from the Escherichia coli plasmids pK18 and pK19: selection of defined deletions in the chromosome of Corynebacterium glutamicum. Gene. 1994;145:69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Wu H, Li Q, Lu R, Wang Y, Zhuang X, He N. Fed-batch production of a bioflocculant from Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;37:1203–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by 973 Project from Ministry of Science and Technology (No. 2012CB7211-04).

Author information



Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cheng-Ying Jiang or Shuang-Jiang Liu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

BZ and NZ carried out the experimental work, BZ drafted the manuscript. YML and CL and CBL participated in experimental design. CYJ and SJL supervised the research and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, B., Zhou, N., Liu, YM. et al. Ribosome binding site libraries and pathway modules for shikimic acid synthesis with Corynebacterium glutamicum . Microb Cell Fact 14, 71 (2015).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Shikimic acid pathway
  • Corynebacterium glutamicum
  • Shikimate production
  • Synthetic biology
  • Genetic modules
  • Ribosome binding site (RBS)