Open Access

L-lactic acid production by Aspergillus brasiliensis overexpressing the heterologous ldha gene from Rhizopus oryzae

  • Nadège Liaud1, 2, 3,
  • Marie-Noëlle Rosso1,
  • Nicolas Fabre3,
  • Sylvaine Crapart3,
  • Isabelle Herpoël-Gimbert1, 2,
  • Jean-Claude Sigoillot1, 2,
  • Sana Raouche1, 2 and
  • Anthony Levasseur4Email author
Microbial Cell Factories201514:66

Received: 5 January 2015

Accepted: 23 April 2015

Published: 3 May 2015



Lactic acid is the building block of poly-lactic acid (PLA), a biopolymer that could be set to replace petroleum-based plastics. To make lactic acid production cost-effective, the production process should be carried out at low pH, in low-nutrient media, and with a low-cost carbon source. Yeasts have been engineered to produce high levels of lactic acid at low pH from glucose but not from carbohydrate polymers (e.g. cellulose, hemicellulose, starch). Aspergilli are versatile microbial cell factories able to naturally produce large amounts of organic acids at low pH and to metabolize cheap abundant carbon sources such as plant biomass. However, they have never been used for lactic acid production.


To investigate the feasibility of lactic acid production with Aspergillus, the NAD-dependent lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) responsible for lactic acid production by Rhizopus oryzae was produced in Aspergillus brasiliensis BRFM103. Among transformants, the best lactic acid producer, A. brasiliensis BRFM1877, integrated 6 ldhA gene copies, and intracellular LDH activity was 9.2 × 10−2 U/mg. At a final pH of 1.6, lactic acid titer reached 13.1 g/L (conversion yield: 26%, w/w) at 138 h in glucose-ammonium medium. This extreme pH drop was subsequently prevented by switching nitrogen source from ammonium sulfate to Na-nitrate, leading to a final pH of 3 and a lactic acid titer of 17.7 g/L (conversion yield: 47%, w/w) at 90 h of culture. Final titer was further improved to 32.2 g/L of lactic acid (conversion yield: 44%, w/w) by adding 20 g/L glucose to the culture medium at 96 h. This strain was ultimately able to produce lactic acid from xylose, arabinose, starch and xylan.


We obtained the first Aspergillus strains able to produce large amounts of lactic acid by inserting recombinant ldhA genes from R. oryzae into a wild-type A. brasiliensis strain. pH regulation failed to significantly increase lactic acid production, but switching nitrogen source and changing culture feed enabled a 1.8-fold increase in conversion yields. The strain produced lactic acid from plant biomass. Our findings make A. brasiliensis a strong contender microorganism for low-pH acid production from various complex substrates, especially hemicellulose.


Lactic acid (LA) is a colorless, odorless monocarboxylic acid naturally produced by many organisms. This weak acid has low buffering power and is tasteless, and has thus found broad use as an excipient in the food, cosmetics, pharmaceutical and chemical industries [1,2]. LA is listed in the GRAS inventory, the L-isomer being preferred for food and pharmaceutical applications due to the prevalence of the L-LA found in mammals [3]. Estimates from 2008 claim the food industry absorbs up 85% of LA production [1]. Besides its application as an additive or excipient, LA is the building block for poly-lactic acid (PLA), a biodegradable polymer that could be set to replace petroleum-based plastics. With mounting environmental pressure for sustainable industry, demand for PLA biomaterial is increasing demand for LA, for which the market is expected to hit 1 million tons by 2020 [4]. Nevertheless, the selling price of PLA still has to be cut by at least 50% to compete with fossil fuel-based plastics [2].

Industrial LA production bioprocesses traditionally use lactic acid bacteria (LAB), mainly from Lactobacillus species. LA is a natural end-product of carbohydrate metabolism and is produced from pyruvate with an NAD-dependent lactic acid dehydrogenase (LDH). LAB naturally produce high amounts of LA by fermentation, and yields can approach the theoretical maximum of 100% (w/w) for homolactic fermentation in complex media [1,3,5,6]. However, LA production by LAB is expensive due to their complex nutrient requirements and the restrictive use of pH neutralizers (e.g. CaCO3) during fermentation [5]. To decrease LA production costs and expand the market for LA and its green derivatives, low-cost media containing cheap carbon sources and low-pH production processes are needed [2]. Low-pH production processes that do not require neutralizing chemicals allow undissociated (free) LA to be recovered directly from the broth without any acidification step in the purification process [1].

Members of the fungal kingdom known to have low nutrient requirements and to be acid-tolerant are considered an attractive solution for low-pH LA production. Research into genetically-modified yeasts expressing heterologous ldh genes has intensified, and efficient low-pH production of LA has been obtained in yeasts from Saccharomyces [7-11], Kluyveromyces [12] and Candida genera [13-15]. This engineered yeast-based strategy has reached industrial application, and L-LA is currently produced from fermentable sugars released from pretreated corn starch, sugarcane or sugar beet [2].

Direct conversion of starch or cheaper carbon sources such as raw plant biomass would further reduce the costs of L-LA production. Using lignocellulose as carbon source entails enzymatic depolymerization of cellulose and hemicelluloses followed by assimilation of the released monomers, mainly glucose, xylose and associated arabinose [16]. S. cerevisiae does not naturally assimilate pentose sugars [17]. However, Pichia stipitis and Candida sonorensis are able to naturally utilize xylose, and both strains were successfully engineered for L-LA production from xylose [15,18]. Yeasts do not feature among natural lignocellulose degraders due to their poor (hemi)cellulolytic enzyme arsenal. Therefore, yeast utilization requires complex metabolic engineering before this objective is achievable [19]. In contrast, wood-degrading and saprophytic fungi such as filamentous fungi can grow on various carbon sources and are able to produce the enzymes necessary for biomass breakdown [20].

The sole filamentous fungus known to produce large amounts of L-LA from various carbohydrate materials is Rhizopus oryzae, which belongs to the order Mucorales [21,22]. This fungus is naturally able to produce L-LA from glucose with yields reaching about 80% (w/w) in minimum medium [23-25]. Attempts to produce L-LA from xylose [26,27] and low-cost carbon sources such as raw starch [25], wheat straw [28] and cellulose [29] have already been successfully performed [23], but L-LA production using Rhizopus still requires near-neutral pH conditions, which heavily compromises the global process [21-24]. To our knowledge, no other filamentous fungus has been studied for L-LA production. Aspergillus is a very powerful microbial cell factory that has been used for decades to produce organic acids such as citric acid (A. niger) and itaconic acid (A. itaconicus and A. terreus) at low pH and at industrial scales [24]. This low-pH organic acid production suggests that Aspergilli are able to endure the weak acid stress caused by organic acid accumulation, which makes them promising candidates for low-pH L-LA production. Furthermore, Aspergilli secrete diverse hydrolytic and oxidative enzymes involved in the breakdown of complex carbohydrates [30] and are able to metabolize pentoses from plant biomass degradation. This ability could enable L-LA production from plant biomass, thus cutting down the cost of carbon source.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether Aspergillus brasiliensis could be an efficient alternative to yeast for L-LA production at low pH. A. brasiliensis, a species from the Nigri section of Aspergillus [31], has been suggested to be safer for industrial utilization than A. niger since it is unable to produce fuminosin and ochratoxins, which are carcinogenic mycotoxins [32]. In particular, A. brasiliensis strain BRFM103 is able to accumulate more ethanol than strains from other Aspergillus species in minimum medium without pH regulation [33]. Both lactic acid and ethanol are produced from pyruvate, in the cytosol, with the regeneration of NAD+ cofactors. Lactic acid fermentation will provide an alternative route for the regeneration of NAD+, potentially replacing ethanol production. L-LA-producing strains of A. brasiliensis were obtained by multicopy integration of the heterologous ldhA gene from R. oryzae. Gene copy number and subsequent LDH intracellular activity were determined in order to study their impact on L-LA production yields. The impact of pH on L-LA production was investigated with the strain showing the highest intracellular LDH activity. Finally, L-LA production was tested with various carbohydrate substrates.

Results and Discussion

Selection of transformants in ammonium medium without pH regulation

After co-transformation of A. brasiliensis BRFM103 with the lactate dehydrogenase A gene (ldhA) and the hygromycin resistance gene (hph+), isolated transformants were screened for L-LA production in MM1 liquid medium without pH regulation. pH of the medium dropped from 5 to 2.5 in 40 h then slowly decreased to a final pH of 1.6 at 138 h culture. Eight transformants produced L-LA and were selected for further analysis. The supernatants of these clones were analyzed by chromatography to determine residual glucose, L-LA and by-product concentrations. At 138 h incubation, all the glucose was consumed. L-LA production at 138 h incubation was low (0.03 to 0.6 g/L) for three of the L-LA-producing transformants (BRFM1879, BRFM1873, and BRFM1881). Five recombinant strains (BRFM1872, BRFM1874, BRFM1875, BRFM1877 and BRFM1880) demonstrated high L-LA production (11.7 to 13.9 g/L) from 50 g/L of glucose at 138 h of culture. L-LA conversion yields ranged from 0.1% (w/w) for BRFM1879 to 27% (w/w) for BRFM1880 (Figure 1). Recombinant strains produced low ethanol conversion yields ranging from 1 to 14% (w/w). For the transformants exhibiting L-LA conversion yields higher than 23% (w/w), ethanol production was nearly abolished with final conversion yields below 1% (w/w), suggesting that the heterologous ldhA efficiently compete with native pyruvate decarboxylase (PDC) for pyruvate utilization in high L-LA-producing strains. Similar results were obtained in yeasts with native ethanol production such as Candida sonorensis, where the natural production of around 20 g/L of ethanol was nearly abolished by ldh insertion in neutralized culture conditions [13]. In S. cerevisiae, which naturally produces larger amounts of ethanol, additional modifications of the ethanol pathway are necessary to abolish ethanol production [34,35]. L-LA production had no severe impact on growth of the recombinant strains. However, the biomass conversion yields of high L-LA-producing strains, at 22 to 24% (w/w), were lower than the biomass conversion yields of low L-LA-producing strains, at 28 to 31% (w/w) (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Conversion yields of glucose to biomass, lactic acid, and ethanol by the L-LA-producing transformants of A. brasiliensis. Conversion yields of lactic acid at 138 h of culture (orange square), ethanol at 138 h of culture (blue square), and dry biomass at 144 h of culture (gray square), are expressed in g/100 g of glucose consumed. Transformant strains are sorted on the basis of their L-LA conversion yields.

Gene copy number and intracellular LDH activity in recombinant strains

ldhA gene copy number and intracellular NADH dehydrogenase activities were determined for the recombinant A. brasiliensis-ldhA strains. Fresh cultures of A. brasiliensis-ldhA transformants in MM2 liquid medium without pH regulation were used for these experiments. The wild-type BRFM103 strain was studied as a control.

The genome of LA-producing strains contained between 3 and 16 ldhA gene copies (Figure 2A). Intracellular LDH activities increased with ldhA gene copy number up to 6 copies, corresponding to a maximum LDH activity of 9.1x10−2 U/mg (Figure 2A). Above 6 ldhA gene copies, LDH activity decreased gradually to a minimal value of 1.4x10−2 U/mg. The reduced LDH activity could be a consequence of ldhA mRNA degradation due to gene silencing occurring in Aspergillus [36]. Furthermore, some transformants with equal gene copy numbers showed variable LDH activity levels, probably as a result of ectopic integration of the ldhA gene, which is a feature of the transformation system [37]. Indeed, expression level can be different in different regions of the genome.
Figure 2

Relation between intracellular LDH activity and gene copy number (A) or lactic acid conversion yields (B). The gene copy number was determined with fresh 24 h cultures. Activities are expressed in U per mg of total proteins, where 1 U is the amount of μmole NADH, H+ reduced by intracellular extract per min. For intracellular LDH activity, measurements were carried out in triplicate at 72 h of culture; error bars show the standard deviation. Conversion yields were measured during the screening assays at 138 h incubation.

Increasing LDH activity had a positive impact on LA yields up to 6.7x10−2 U/mg (Figure 2B). Above this threshold, there was no further observable increase in yield. This suggests that the LDH activity is not a limiting step in lactic acid production above 6.7x10−2 U/mg, and so another parameter, such as medium composition or LA toxicity, might be limiting LA production. Since high LDH activity is likely to empower LDH in the competition for pyruvate utilization, A. niger BRFM1877, showing the highest intracellular LDH activity, was chosen for further investigation.

Impact of pH on L-LA production by A. brasiliensis BRFM1877

Over the course of liquid culture of BRFM1877 in MM1, pH of the medium dropped from 5 to 2.4 in 40 h then slowly decreased to a final value of 1.6 at 138 h of culture. This intense acidification illustrates the acid tolerance of Aspergilli. For citric acid production, a pH of 2 increases production yield [38]. However, at low external pH, more energy is needed for the export of lactate, since undissociated L-LA from the broth can freely reenter the cell. This is suggested to be the main reason for weak acid stress in yeasts [11,13]. In order to evaluate the impact of pH acidification during L-LA production by BRFM1877, the strain was cultured in MM2 liquid medium (50 g/L glucose initial) containing Na-nitrate as nitrogen source instead of ammonium sulfate. In this experiment, extra glucose (20 g/L) was added at 96 h growth to increase final titers.

With Na-nitrate as nitrogen source, pH dropped from 5 to 3.2 in 48 hours then remained unchanged during further culture. The L-LA titers and conversion yields reached mean values of 17.7 g/L and 32.2 g/L, 47% (w/w) and 44% (w/w), at 90 h (before extra glucose addition) and 260 h of culture, respectively (Figure 3A). These titers and yields are higher than those obtained at pH below 2 (13.1 g/L, 26%, w/w), highlighting that ammonium sulfate as a nitrogen source restricted L-LA production, most probably via strong pH acidification. Na-nitrate was therefore used as nitrogen source to further investigate the impact of pH on L-LA production by A. brasiliensis BRFM1877.
Figure 3

Impact of pH on organic acid production by A. brasiliensis BRFM1877 in glucose–nitrate-containing medium. Glucose (blue square), gluconic acid (black triangle), ethanol (blue circle), and lactic acid (orange circle) concentrations in cultures carried out in MM2 liquid medium started with 50 g/L of glucose then added with 20 g/L of glucose at 96 h of culture, without (A) and with (B) addition of 80 g/L CaCO3 after 24 h of culture. The evolution of pH in both cultures, with (black triangle) and without (violet square) CaCO3 addition, is also presented (C). Experiments were carried out in triplicate. Error bars show standard deviations.

Cultures at near-neutral pH were performed in MM2 liquid medium with CaCO3 addition and extra glucose addition at 96 h. CaCO3 was added after spore germination (24 h) at a final concentration of 80 g/L. Immediately after CaCO3 addition, pH increased from 4.0 to 6.5 and stabilized around 7.5 within a few hours and throughout subsequent fungal growth. L-LA productivity was strongly improved from 0.13 g/(L.h) to 0.32 g/(L.h) by pH neutralization (Figure 3). Furthermore, the L-LA titers reached mean values of 20.8 g/L and 35.6 g/L at 96 h (before extra glucose addition) and 120 h of culture, respectively (Figure 3B). The conversion yields from 70 g/L of glucose were therefore 51% (w/w) and 46% (w/w) with and without CaCO3 addition, respectively. This result shows that adding CaCO3 has a small effect on L-LA titers and conversion yields of A. brasiliensis BRFM1877 in the conditions tested. Moreover, cultures at pH above the pKa of lactic acid (3.8) led to the production of calcium lactate and complicate the recovery of free lactic acid [2]. Therefore, concentration of free lactic acid will be higher in culture at pH 3 than culture at pH 7.5 (with CaCO3 addition).

The low effect of pH neutralization on L-LA titers and conversion yields could be explained by the significant increase of gluconic acid. The titer of gluconic acid obtained in neutralized conditions was 22.9 g/L whereas only 6.2 g/L was produced at pH 3. Glucose oxidase, the enzyme responsible for gluconic acid production, is known to be less efficient at a pH below 3 [38]. Therefore, the slight positive effect of pH neutralization on lactic acid production might be attenuated by the negative effect of gluconic acid production. One additional advantage of culturing A. brasiliensis BRFM1877 at pH 3 is that it reduces the production of gluconic acid without genetic modification of the gluconic acid metabolic pathway. Studies on recombinant yeast strains expressing heterologous ldh genes have reported various effects of pH on L-LA production [7,13,39,40], the most prevalent being the effect of host genetic background and origin of the heterologous LDHA on low pH L-LA production [13,41]. Looking at the recombinant yeasts expressing the same ldh gene from R. oryzae, A. brasiliensis BRFM1877 compares favorably for low-pH L-LA production. For instance, the production yield of S. cerevisiae cultivated at pH 3.5 was 32% (29.2 g/L of L-LA from 92 g/L of glucose) [40] whereas C. sonorensis cultivated without pH regulation produced 12% of L-LA (6 g/L from 50 g/L of glucose) [13]. Here, L-LA yielded 44% (32.2 g/L of L-LA from 70 g/L of glucose) in nitrate minimum medium at pH 3, demonstrating that A. brasiliensis BRFM1877 shows promising performances for L-LA production at low pH.

Production of lactic acid from various substrates by A. brasiliensis BRFM1877

In agreement with the versatile ability of Aspergilli to break down the lignocellulose building blocks, we evaluated the ability of A. brasiliensis BRFM1877 to assimilate the main pentose monomers from hemicelluloses, i.e. D-xylose and associated L-arabinose, compared to the main hexose, D-glucose, in MM2 liquid medium without pH neutralization. As expected from the literature [15], the best L-LA production yield (34%, w/w) was obtained from D-glucose (Figure 4A). D-xylose was also an efficient carbon source, at 24% (w/w) L-LA production yield (Figure 4B). Using L-arabinose, production yield was 18% w/w (Figure 4C). A similar decrease in product formation when pentoses are used instead of glucose is reported for ethanol production by yeasts. [42]. A redox imbalance due to the need for NADPH in the reduction step of xylose degradation is proposed to be responsible for this decreased production [42]. In Aspergillus, D-xylose and L-arabinose degradation also use NADPH. Moreover, L-arabinose has a greater need for NADPH than D-xylose [43]. Similar redox imbalance could explain the lower L-LA yield observed with L-arabinose compared to D-xylose. The maximum concentration of L-LA (18.5 g/L) was obtained at 120 h culture from D-glucose (Figure 4A). Production time was extended by using pentoses. The strain produced maximal titers of 12.3 g/L L-LA at 216 h from D-xylose (Figure 4B) and 9.0 g/L at 264 h from L-arabinose (Figure 4C). The various production timescales could be explained by the lag phase due to adaptation of the strain transferred from Sabouraud broth (glucose) to media containing pentoses as carbon sources. Alternatively, fungal growth could be slowed down by its xylose and arabinose uptake rates [17].
Figure 4

Lactic acid production and sugar consumption from monosaccharides and plant biomass polysaccharides. Lactic acid (orange square), D-glucose (blue square), D-xylose (black square), L-arabinose (green square) concentrations were determined when A. brasiliensis was grown on monosaccharides (A, B, C) with D-glucose (A), D-xylose (B) or L-arabinose (C). A. brasiliensis was also grown on polysaccharides (D) to produce lactic acid from starch (blue circle) or xylan (black circle). For each, initial substrate concentration was of 50 g/l and 50 g/kg for monosaccharides and polysaccharides, respectively. Experiments were carried out in triplicate. Error bars show standard deviations.

Since A. brasiliensis BRFM1877 was able to produce L-LA from glucose and xylose, we investigated its ability to directly convert glucose and xylose-based polymers, i.e. potato starch and birchwood xylan. L-LA titers reached 11.7 g/L at 120 h and 8.6 g/L at 168 h of cultivation from starch and xylan, respectively (Figure 4D). Production yields were 23% (w/w) from starch and 17% (w/w) from xylan. The loss of yield on these polymers compared to the production yields of their corresponding monomers (glucose 34%, w/w; xylose 24%, w/w) could be attributed to the extra energy needed for the production of starch or xylan-degrading enzymes. Alternatively, L-LA production could be impacted by an incomplete degradation of the polymers. Interestingly, there was no significant lag in L-LA production times on polymers compared with their corresponding monomers. Indeed, the maximum L-LA titers were obtained at 120 h from glucose- and starch-containing media. Surprisingly, our results even suggest that xylan was consumed faster than xylose. Note that we used the same preculture to inoculate all the flasks in this experiment. This result suggests that degradation of the polymer was not a limiting step for L-LA production from starch and xylan.

The major bottleneck for cost-efficient metabolite production from polymers is the cost of enzymatic pretreatment of raw materials [23]. Here, the production of L-LA directly from starch and xylan, without addition of enzyme cocktail, emerges as a novel and promising biotechnological method for L-LA production.


The overexpression of a heterologous ldhA gene from R. oryzae made it possible to produce significant amounts of L-LA by A. brasiliensis recombinant strains. The best L-LA producer strain, A. brasiliensis BRFM1877, integrated 6 ldhA gene copies in its genome and demonstrated an intracellular LDH activity of 9.2 x 10−2 U/mg. Switching the nitrogen source from ammonium sulfate to Na-nitrate prevented a strong drop in pH and increased the L-LA conversion yields. With nitrate, at pH 3, L-LA conversion yield reached 44% (w/w) with low quantities of by-product. L-LA productivity was higher at near-neutral pH than at pH 3, but the lower pH prevents the production of gluconic acid resulting in similar L-LA conversion yields with or without pH neutralization. The recombinant strain was able to produce L-LA from xylose and associated arabinose, the main pentose monomers found in plant biomass. It was also able to produce L-LA directly from starch and birchwood xylan without addition of polysaccharide depolymerizing enzyme cocktails. Further studies including process and metabolic engineering are expected to increase both titer and yield. These findings raise new prospects for using Aspergillus species as new hosts for L-LA production from plant biomass.

Material and methods

Microbial strains

Escherichia coli JM109 (Promega, Charbonnière, France) was used as a host for the cloning and propagation of vectors. A wild-type A. brasiliensis strain (BRFM103, CIRM-CF, Marseille, France) collected in a temperate forest was used as host for fungal transformation [33]. The eight recombinant L-LA-producing strains were registered in the CIRM as BRFM1872, BRFM1873, BRFM1874, BRFM1875, BRFM1877, BRFM1879, BRFM1880, BRFM1881.

Media and culture conditions

A. brasiliensis strains were maintained on agar solidified minimal medium (MM) containing 10 g/L D-glucose, 70 mM NaNO3, 7 mM KCl, 11 mM KH2PO4, 2 mM MgSO4, agar 16 g/L and trace elements (76 μM ZnSO4, 178 μM H3BO3, 25 μM MnCl2, 18 μM FeSO4, 7.1 μM CoCl2, 6.4 μM CuSO4, 6.2 μM Na2MoO4, 174 μM EDTA-Na2). All medium components were from Prolabo except the Na-nitrate which was purchased from by Sigma-Aldrich.

After transformation of the parental strain, the transformants were grown on selective solid MM medium supplemented with 10 or 20 μg/mL hygromycin B (Sigma-Aldrich). All solid cultures were incubated at 30°C.

Liquid cultures were carried out in 250-mL flasks containing 100 mL liquid medium MM1 or MM2. MM1 contained 76 mM (NH4)2SO4 (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM CaCl2, 11 mM KH2PO4, 2 mM MgSO4, 50 g/L D-glucose and trace elements. In MM2, 151.4 mM of NaNO3 was used as nitrogen source instead of (NH4)2SO4 in order to minimize the impact of (NH4)2SO4 consumption on pH acidification. Different carbon sources were used in MM2, at 50 g/L: D-glucose, D-xylose (Sigma-Aldrich), L-arabinose (Sigma-Aldrich), potato starch (Fluka, Sigma-Aldrich) and birchwood xylan (Sigma-Aldrich). When stated, an extra 20 g/L glucose was added to the medium at 96 h of culture. For experiments with added CaCO3, 8 g of sterilized CaCO3 was added to the cultures after 24 h.

Liquid culture media were inoculated with 106 spores/mL. To avoid germination problems in MM2 liquid medium containing pentose monomers and complex substrates, culture media were inoculated using 1 mL of mycelium from a 24 h preculture in Sabouraud broth.

Liquid cultures were incubated at 30°C under shaking at 140 rpm (50 mm orbital).

Expression vector construction and fungal transformation

The ldhA (lactate dehydrogenase A gene) sequence of R. oryzae (Genbank accession number AF226154) was codon-optimized for expression in Aspergillus and synthesized by Life Technologies. The construct contained a NcoI and HindIII at the 5′ and 3′ ends, respectively, for cloning into pAN52.3 (kindly supplied by Pr. P. J. Punt, TNO, The Netherlands). The recombinant gene inserted into the expression vector was sequence-checked before transformation. Fungal co-transformation of A. brasiliensis BRFM103 was carried out as previously described [44] using pAN52.3 ldhA vector and pAN7.1 co-vector (kindly supplied by Pr. P. J. Punt, TNO, The Netherlands). The pAN7.1 co-vector contained the hph selection marker conferring hygromycin B resistance. Hygromycin B inhibition tests were carried out with the wild-type A. brasiliensis BRFM103 strain grown on MM solid medium supplemented with 10, 30, 50, 75, 100, 150, 200, 300, and 400 μg/mL hygromycin B (Sigma Aldrich) inoculated with spore suspensions. Growth inhibition tests showed that low hygromycin B concentration (10 μg/mL) slowed fungal growth and higher (above 10 μg/mL) hygromycin B concentrations prevented growth. Transformant screening was therefore done on MM solid medium supplemented with 20 μg/mL of hygromycin B.

Organic acid production and sugar consumption

Samples were taken from the liquid screening medium during the incubation, and mycelia were removed by centrifugation. The pH values of the supernatants were determined with an Inolab pH l Level 1 electrode (WTW, Weilheim, Germany).

For transformant screening, L-LA was detected spectrometrically by measuring ABTS oxidation at 420 nm as previously described [45]. The reaction mix contained ABTS 0.5 mM, HRP (1.5 mM) and 1.5 mM lactate oxidase in 1 M phosphate buffer pH6.

The culture supernatants of L-LA-producing strains were analyzed by HPLC (Agilent 1100 series HPLC or Dionex Ultimate 3000 series, ThermoScientific) for organic acids and sugars using an Aminex HPX-87H Organic Acid Analysis Column (100 mm × 7.8 mm, Biorad, Marne-la-Coquette, France). The column was equilibrated in 2.5 mM H2SO4 in water at 35 or 30°C, and samples were eluted with 2.5 mM H2SO4 at a 0.6 mL/min flow rate. Sugars and ethanol were detected with a differential refractometer (HP1047A Hewlett Packard or Dionex Ultimate 3000 RI detector, Thermoscientific). Organic acids were detected with a UV detector (Agilent 1100 series wavelength detector or Dionex Ultimate 3000 series RS variable wavelength detector, ThermoScientific). Data were acquired using ChemStation (Agilent, Hewlett Packard) or Chromeleon (Dionex, Thermoscientific) software.

Dry biomass determination

Dry biomass was determined by gravimetric method. At the end of the culture, the biomass was collected onto nylon filters (Miracloth, pore size of 22–25 μm) and washed with 200 mL distilled water to remove residual media. Washed biomass was then oven-dried at 105°C until a constant weight was reached (approximately 48 h).

Determination of ldhA gene copy numbers and intracellular LDH activity

ldhA gene copy numbers in A. brasiliensis-ldhA strains were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Mycelia were harvested at 24 h of culture onto a nylon filter and washed with 100 mL distilled water. For each strain, 100 mg of mycelium was ground down (Fast prep-24®, MP Biomedicals), and genomic DNA was extracted using a Nucleospin Plant II kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). Concentration and purity of genomic DNA were determined by UV detection using a Nanodrop® spectrometer (Nanodrop2000c, Thermoscientific). Genomic DNA was considered pure enough when A260/280 and A260/230 were above 1.8 and 1.6, respectively. Monocopy Translation Elongation Factor 1α (tef1α) and RNA Binding Protein 1 (rbp1) genes were selected as internal calibrator and internal control, respectively. Specific primers for ldhA (forward: 5′-GATAAGACCGCCATCTCCAA-3′; reverse: 5′-CTTCTCGACGTAGACGG-3′), ef1α (forward 5′-AGGTCATCGTCCTCAACCAC-3′; reverse 5′-TGGGGGAAGATTCAACAGAC-3′) and rbp1 (forward: 5′-CCGAAGGCTATGCAGAAGTC-3′; reverse: 5′-AGACAAGTTGGGGTCACCAG-3′) were designed using Primer3 [46]. Amplification efficiencies were determined using 4 serial dilutions of genomic DNA ranging from 1 to 1.10−3 ng/μL, and primers were validated. Each reaction mix comprised 2 μL genomic DNA (1 ng/μL), 0.3 μL forward and reverse primers (10 μM each) and 5 μL Sso AdvancedTM SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, United States). The qPCR reactions were performed in technical duplicates on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad) at 95°C for 30 sec, then 40 cycles at 95°C for 5 sec and 58°C for 5 sec. Melting curve analysis was performed after the PCR to verify the Tm of the amplicons. Gene copy numbers of ldhA and rbp1 were calculated relative to tef1α by the ΔCt method using the amplification efficiency of each analyzed gene. rbp1 gene copy number needs to be 1 in order to validate the qPCR run.

For intracellular LDH activity, mycelia were harvested at 72 h of culture onto a nylon filter and washed with 100 mL of MOPS buffer pH 7.2. The mycelia were stored at −80°C until grinding in liquid nitrogen using a Freezer Mill® 6770 (SPEX Sample Prep; Metuchen, NJ), then 200–300 mg of frozen mycelia powder was aliquoted into 2 mL tubes and suspended in extraction buffer (MOPS 1 M, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, pH 7.2), 20% w/v. Samples were centrifuged at 14,500 g for 5 min at 4°C. NADH reductive activities in the supernatants were determined spectrophotometrically (A340nm) by measuring the kinetics of NADH,H+ reduction (Sigma-Aldrich, 175 μM) with and without pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich, 40 mM) in 1 M MES buffer, pH 6.8. For each supernatant, the difference between NADH, H+ reductive activity with and without pyruvate was associated to combined LDH activity plus alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity. Total protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method. NADH reductive activities were expressed in Units (U) per mg of protein, where one U was defined as the amount of μmole NADH,H+ reduced by the LDH (or ADH) per minute. NADH reductive activities were measured in triplicate. Since the wild-type strain did not produce L-LA but ethanol, in vitro NADH consumption in this strain was attributed to the action of pyruvate decarboxylase and ADH. The LDH dehydrogenase activity of the transformants was therefore obtained by subtracting the NADH dehydrogenase activity of the wild-type strain from the total NADH dehydrogenase activity of each transformant.



Alcohol dehydrogenase


Hygromycin B phosphotransferase gene


L-lactic acid


Lactate dehydrogenase enzyme


Minimum medium


Pyruvate decarboxylase gene


Lactate dehydrogenase gene (from R. oryzae)


Translation elongation factor 1α gene


RNA polymerase II large subunit gene



This work was supported by an Industrial Training and Research Agreement (CIFRE) and co-funded by the National Association of Research and Technology (ANRT). The authors thank David Martina for his help with strain culturing and analysis and Chloé Bennati-Granier for her advice on substrate preparation. We thank Dr. P.J. Punt and Prof. C.A.M.J.J. van den Hondel (TNO, Zeist, The Netherlands) for providing the fungal expression plasmids.

Authors’ Affiliations

INRA, UMR1163 Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Polytech’ Marseille
Aix-Marseille Université, UMR1163 Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Polytech’ Marseille
ARD Agro-Industrie Recherche et Développement
Aix-Marseille Université, Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes (URMITE), UM63, CNRS 7278, IRD 198, INSERM U1095, IHU Méditerranée Infection, Pôle des Maladies Infectieuses, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Faculté de Médecine


  1. Vijayakumar J, Aravindan R, Viruthagiri T. Recent trends in the production, purification and application of lactic acid. Chem Biochem Eng Q. 2008;22:245–64.Google Scholar
  2. Miller C, Fosmer A, Rush B, Mc Mullin T, Beacom D, Suominen P. Industrial production of lactic acid. Compr Biotechnol. 2011;3:179–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Wee Y-J, Kim J-N, Ryu H-W. Biotechnological production of lactic acid and its recent applications. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2006;44:163–72.Google Scholar
  4. Jem KJ, van der Pol JF, de Vos S. Microbial lactic acid, its polymer poly(lactic acid), and their industrial applications. In: Chen GG-Q, editor. Plastic from Bacteria. Volume 14. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2010. p. 323–46. Microbiology Monographs.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Hofvendahl K, Hahn–Hägerdal B. Factors affecting the fermentative lactic acid production from renewable resources. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000;26:87–107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Taskila S, Ojamo H. The current status and future expectations in industrial production of lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria. In: Kongo M, editor. Lactic Acid Bacteria - R & D for Food, Health and Livestock Purposes. Rijeka, Croatia: Tech Open Access Publisher; 2013. p. 615–32.Google Scholar
  7. Colombié S, Dequin S, Sablayrolles J. Control of lactate production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a bacterial LDH gene. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2003;33:38–46.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ishida N, Saitoh S, Tokuhiro K, Nagamori E, Matsuyama T, Kitamoto K, et al. Efficient production of l-lactic acid by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a genome-integrated l-lactate dehydrogenase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:1964–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Saitoh S, Ishida N, Onishi T, Tokuhiro K, Nagamori E, Kitamoto K, et al. Genetically engineered wine yeast produces a high concentration of L-lactic acid of extremely high optical purity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2789–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Skory CD. Lactic acid production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a Rhizopus oryzae lactate dehydrogenase gene. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;30:22–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Valli M, Sauer M, Branduardi P, Borth N, Porro D, Mattanovich D. Improvement of lactic acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cell sorting for high intracellular pH. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5492–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Bianchi MM, Brambilla L, Protani F, Liu CL, Lievense J, Porro D. Efficient homolactic fermentation by Kluyveromyces lactis strains defective in pyruvate utilization and transformed with the heterologous LDH gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67:5621–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Ilmén M, Koivuranta K, Ruohonen L, Rajgarhia V, Suominen P, Penttilä M. Production of L-lactic acid by the yeast Candida sonorensis expressing heterologous bacterial and fungal lactate dehydrogenases. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12:53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Osawa F, Fujii T, Nishida T, Tada N, Ohnishi T, Kobayashi O, et al. Efficient production of L-lactic acid by Crabtree-negative yeast Candida boidinii. Yeast. 2009;26:485–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Koivuranta KT, Ilmén M, Wiebe MG, Ruohonen L, Suominen P, Penttilä M. L-lactic acid production from D-xylose with Candida sonorensis expressing a heterologous lactate dehydrogenase encoding gene. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Gírio FM, Fonseca C, Carvalheiro F, Duarte LC, Marques S, Bogel-Łukasik R. Hemicelluloses for fuel ethanol: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101:4775–800.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Garcia Sanchez R, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Sànchez Nogué V, Almeida JR, Larsson CU, et al. Improved xylose and arabinose utilization by an industrial recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain using evolutionary engineering. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2010;3:13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Ilmén M, Koivuranta K, Ruohonen L, Suominen P, Penttilä M. Efficient production of L-lactic acid from xylose by Pichia stipitis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:117–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Hasunuma T, Okazaki F, Okai N, Hara KY, Ishii J, Kondo A. A review of enzymes and microbes for lignocellulosic biorefinery and the possibility of their application to consolidated bioprocessing technology. Bioresour Technol. 2013;135:513–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Sánchez C. Lignocellulosic residues: biodegradation and bioconversion by fungi. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:185–94.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Soccol CR, Stonoga VI, Raimbault M. Production of L-lactic acid by Rhizopus species. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994;10:433–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Mudaliyar P, Chandrashekar K. Screening of novel substrates for lactic acid production by Rhizopus oryzae. Int J Life Sci Pharma Rev. 2012;2:128–33.Google Scholar
  23. Zhang ZY, Jin B, Kelly JM. Production of lactic acid from renewable materials by Rhizopus fungi. Biochem Eng J. 2007;35:251–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Magnuson JK, Lasure LL. Organic Acid Production by Filamentous Fungi. In: Tkacz JS, Lange L, editors. Advances in Fungal Biotechnology for Industry, Agriculture, and Medicine. Boston: MA: Springer US; 2004. p. 307–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tay A, Yang S-T. Production of L(+)-lactic acid from glucose and starch by immobilized cells of Rhizopus oryzae in a rotating fibrous bed bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2002;80:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Maas RHW, Bakker RR, Eggink G, Weusthuis RA. Lactic acid production from xylose by the fungus Rhizopus oryzae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;72:861–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Saito K, Hasa Y, Abe H. Production of lactic acid from xylose and wheat straw by Rhizopus oryzae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2012;114:166–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Vially G, Marchal R, Guilbert N. L(+) Lactate production from carbohydrates and lignocellulosic materials by Rhizopus oryzae UMIP 4.77. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009;26:607–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Park EY, Anh PN, Okuda N. Bioconversion of waste office paper to L(+)-lactic acid by the filamentous fungus Rhizopus oryzae. Bioresour Technol. 2004;93:77–83.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. De Vries RP. Regulation of Aspergillus genes encoding plant cell wall polysaccharide-degrading enzymes; relevance for industrial production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;61:10–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Varga J, Kocsubé S, Tóth B, Frisvad JC, Perrone G, Susca A, et al. Aspergillus brasiliensis sp. nov., a biseriate black Aspergillus species with world-wide distribution. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57:1925–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Frisvad JC, Larsen TO, Thrane U, Meijer M, Varga J, Samson RA, et al. Fumonisin and ochratoxin production in industrial Aspergillus niger strains. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23496.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Liaud N, Giniés C, Navarro D, Fabre N, Crapart S, Gimbert I, et al. Exploring fungal biodiversity: organic acid production by 66 strains of filamentous fungi. Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2014;1:1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Ishida N, Saitoh S, Onishi T, Tokuhiro K, Nagamori E, Kitamoto K, et al. The effect of pyruvate decarboxylase gene knockout in Saccharomyces cerevisiae on L-lactic acid production. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006;70:1148–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ida Y, Furusawa C, Hirasawa T, Shimizu H. Stable disruption of ethanol production by deletion of the genes encoding alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biosci Bioeng. 2012;113:192–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Cogoni C, Macino G. Homology-dependent gene silencing in plants and fungi: a number of variations on the same theme. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1999;2:657–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Lubertozzi D, Keasling JD. Developing Aspergillus as a host for heterologous expression. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:53–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Kubicek CP, Punt P, Visser J. Production of organic acids by filamentous fungi. In: Hofrichter M, editor. Industrial Applications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. p. 215–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ishida N, Saitoh S, Ohnishi T, Tokuhiro K, Nagamori E, Kitamoto K, et al. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient production of pure L-(+)-lactic acid. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2006;131:795–807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Skory CD. Lactic acid production by Rhizopus oryzae transformants with modified lactate dehydrogenase activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;64:237–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Branduardi P, Sauer M, De Gioia L, Zampella G, Valli M, Mattanovich D, et al. Lactate production yield from engineered yeasts is dependent from the host background, the lactate dehydrogenase source and the lactate export. Microb Cell Fact. 2006;5:4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Verho R, Londesborough J, Penttila M, Richard P. Engineering redox cofactor regeneration for improved pentose fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:5892–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Witteveen CFB, Busink R, Van De Vondervoort P, Dijkema C, Swart K, Visser J. L-Arabinose and D-Xylose catabolism in Aspergillus niger. Microbiology. 1989;135:2163–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Punt P, van den Hondel C. Transformation of filamentous fungi based on hygromycin B and phleomycin resistance markers. Methods Enzymol. 1992;216:447–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Liaud N, Navarro D, Vidal N, Sigoillot J-C, Raouche S. High throughput automated colorimetric method for the screening of L-lactic acid producing microorganisms. MethodsX. 2014;1:254–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Untergrasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth B, Rozen S. Primer 3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e115.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© Liaud et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.