Open Access

Actinomycetes as host cells for production of recombinant proteins

Microbial Cell Factories20054:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-4-7

Received: 25 February 2005

Accepted: 23 March 2005

Published: 23 March 2005

Abstract

Actinomycetes (Actinobacteria) are highly attractive as cell factories or bioreactors for applications in industrial, agricultural, environmental, and pharmaceutical fields. Genome sequencing of several species of actinomycetes has paved the way for biochemical and structural analysis of important proteins and the production of such proteins as recombinants on a commercial scale. In this regard, there is a need for improved expression vectors that will be applicable to actinomycetes. Recent advancements in gene expression systems, knowledge regarding the intracellular environment, and identification and characterization of plasmids has made it possible to develop practicable recombinant expression systems in actinomycetes as described in this review.

Review

As a result of the sequencing of entire genomes of more than 100 organisms, the number of open reading frames with unknown functions has increased. To characterize such proteins biochemically and structurally, it is important to obtain substantial amounts of recombinant proteins. Escherichia coli, a Gram-negative γ-proteobacterium, is the most commonly used host bacterium for the large-scale production of recombinant proteins. However, the expression and isolation of all the proteins in E. coli is difficult on account of the problems of insolubility, cytotoxicity, post-translational modifications, or inefficient translation.

In order to overcome these problems, host-vector systems other than E. coli have also been developed in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Bacillus spp. (e.g., B. brevis and B. subtilis) and Lactococcus lactis are Gram-positive bacteria with low G + C content and are often used to secrete expressed proteins into the culture media [15]. Secretion prevents the local accumulation of the recombinant proteins and this occasionally aids in correct protein folding [6]. Bacillus brevis has an extremely high capacity of protein secretion and is being used for the expression of prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins on an industrial scale [2]. Lactococcus lactis can also be used for the secretion of recombinant proteins and these proteins can be used directly in food applications [5]. Eukaryotic cells such as yeast cells, insect cells, or immortalized cell lines are particularly useful for the expression of proteins that undergo post-translational modifications [7].

In actinomycetes (Gram-positive bacteria with a high G + C content), the genera Streptomyces, Rhodococcus, Corynebacterium, and Mycobacterim have received an increasing amount of attention, particularly in the industrial fields. They exhibit potential advantages in the synthesis of secondary metabolites of industrial and medical importance, in the production of amino acids by fermentation, and in bioconversion processes. There have also been several host-vector systems developed for actinomycetes [8, 9], although further improvements were needed to provide highly inducible and tightly regulated promoters, broad-host range vectors, and high producibility of recombinant proteins. Recently, improvements in the host-vector systems in this class of bacteria were reported, thereby making it possible to obtain significant amounts of recombinant proteins under strictly regulated promoters [1012]. Here, we review the host-vector systems, particularly expression vectors, in actinomycetes and also describe the benefits and future possibilities of the system.

Why actinomycetes?

We can highlight two striking characteristics of actinomycetes as host cells. First, they exhibit a unique metabolic diversity and enzymatic capabilities. The compounds they produce as secondary metabolites are valuable for industrial and pharmaceutical purposes [13], and the enzymes themselves are also valuable. For example, Streptomyces spp. produce various types of antibiotics [14] and some Rhodococcus spp. are being used for the industrial production of acrylamide [15]. Historically, the host-vector systems in actinomycetes have been developed to obtain such enzymes in large quantities and/or to manipulate the metabolic pathway involved in the production of antibiotics [8, 9]. Second, actinomycetes are expected to have different intracellular milieu as compared to conventional host cells such as E. coli. Until recently, no host cell from which all the proteins can be universally expressed in large quantities has been found. Therefore, it is important to provide a variety of host-vector systems (expression systems) in order to increase the opportunities to screen for the most suitable expression conditions or host cell.

It is important to select an appropriate promoter for high-level protein expression, and generally, an inducible promoter is more preferable than a constitutive promoter [8, 10]. Several reports used well characterized promoters of the nitrilase gene [10], acetoamidase gene [16], and tipA [11, 12, 17]. In S. coelicolor, the expression vector containing act I/act III promoter was induced during the transition from the growth to the stationary phase to successfully produce polyketido synthases [18]. A derivative of this vector can be used with other actinomycetes [19], thereby expanding the application of the expression system. In M. smegmatis, novel strong constitutive promoters were identified using a genomic library fused to promoterless green fluorescent protein in combination with a fluorescence-associated cell sorting technique [20]. On the other hand, the mutagenesis of the repressor gene is another possible strategy in which the constitutively expressed temperature-sensitive repressor protein is unable to repress the target gene expression at a high temperature [21, 22]. In this review, we have focused on the systems using heterologous promoters to drive strong expression and some examples of such vectors of actinomycetes are summarized in Table 1. In the next sections, several recent topics are discussed in detail.
Table 1

Expression vectors in actinomycetes

Vectors

Inducers

Location

Comments

Ref.

Streptomyces

    

pSH19

ε-caprolactam

cytoplasm

high-level expression

[10]

pULHis2

thiostrepton

cytoplasm

 

[17]

pRM5

-

cytoplasm

growth phase-dependent expression

[18]

pITS-vectors

-(constitutive)

cytoplasm

 

[21]

pLTI-CD4

-(constitutive)

secretion

>300 mg l-1 production of CD4

[27]

pSJ205ΔEcA

-(constitutive)

secretion

 

[28]

pLMS-vectors

-(constitutive)

secretion

 

[29]

Rhodococcus

    

pTip-vectors

thiostrepton

cytoplasm

expression at low temperatures

[11,12]

pNit-vectors

-(constitutive)

cytoplasm

constitutive type of pTip-vectors

[12]

pNT

-(constitutive)

cytoplasm

 

[37]

Mycobacterium

    

pJAM2

acetoamide

cytoplasm

 

[16]

pJEX77

-(constitutive)

cytoplasm

 

[20]

pJEM15-traRts107-Ptra

high temperature

cytoplasm

expression level is not high

[22]

Corynebacterium

    

pECTAC-K99

-(constitutive)

cytoplasm

 

[36]

pCGL-vectors

-(constitutive)

secretion

 

[38]

pWLQ-vectors

IPTG

cytoplasm or secretion

 

[39]

Streptomyces species

Among the Streptomyces spp., S. lividans has been extensively utilized as a potential host for both cytoplasmic and secreted protein production because it lacks restriction systems that are generally present in other Streptomyces and prevent the genetic manipulation of host cells [23]. In addition, S. lividans also exhibits a very low endogenous extracellular proteolytic activity [23].

Recently, Herai et al. reported an expression vector that functions in several Streptomyces spp. [10]. The vector carries the nitrilase gene promoter (PnitA) originating from the nocardioform actinomycete Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1 [15]. The expression is tightly regulated and strongly induced only in the presence of the inducer ε-caprolactam. These researchers expressed several bacterial genes and estimated that up to ~40% of all soluble protein comprised a target protein and that up to 396 mg of the protein per liter of culture media was produced (e.g., the Streptomyces inducible expression system had thus far expressed a maximum of 38 mg of the protein per liter of the culture media [10, 24]). However, the report does not refer to secreted proteins or the production of proteins originating from sources other than bacteria. This hyperinducible expression vector can be further improved to enable protein secretion and can be used to express higher eukaryotic proteins. This vector may also enable rapid progress in genome mining and the production of natural-product gene clusters such as those identified for enediyne antibiotics [25].

An increasing number of studies over the past years have reported Streptomyces as an ideal host for the production of secreted proteins. Signal peptides are an important factor for improving the efficiency of secreted protein production, and are extensively studied via mutagenic approaches [26]. Several Streptomyces secretion systems have successfully produced eukaryotic proteins [2729]. The soluble form of human CD4 was efficiently produced using S. lividans as a host cell. Over 300 mg of protein was produced per liter culture by using pLTI-CD4 containing S. longisporus serine protease inhibitor gene promoter and secretion signals [27].

Rhodococcus species

In Rhodococcus, several cloning vectors have been developed since the first report on E. coli-Rhodococcus shuttle vector [30], and recently, versatile expression vectors have been constructed [11, 12]. The expression levels of proteins from these vectors are not as high as that from the expression system in E. coli (a maximum of 10 mg of protein per liter of culture media). However, in Rhodococcus, proteins can be expressed over a wide range of temperatures – from 4°C to 35°C [11, 12] – because some Rhodococcus cells are psychrotrophic. When the thiostrepton inducible tipA promoter was used, several milligrams of mouse protein per liter of culture media could be expressed even at 4°C [11].

Most of the recombinant protein expression systems established until recently can only be used within the range of 10°C to 37°C. For example, E. coli is a mesophilic bacterium that grows at temperatures ranging from 18°C to 37°C, and recombinant protein expression has been carried out in a similar range of growth temperatures [31]. It is commonly known that a lower temperature is often more preferable for the production of recombinant proteins [32]. Some mouse proteins that could not be expressed in E. coli could be expressed in Rhodococcus at 4°C [11]. The expression at lower temperatures is expected to be effective in producing proteins that damage the host cell, because enzymatic activities of such proteins can be suppressed.

In the case of R. erythropolis, the mycolic acid composition of the host cells makes it difficult to disrupt the cell walls and necessitates an approach for the modification of the host cells to simplify recombinant-protein extraction procedures [33]. The authors reported lysozyme-sensitive mutants that can be lysed by the addition of 12.5 μg ml-1 lysozyme, while the wild type is resistant to over 1 mg ml-1 lysozyme. Rhodococcus spp. are tolerant to various organic solvents and toxic chemicals. A highly efficient bioconversion process can be achieved by the combination of the expression system and this characteristic feature of Rhodococcus spp.

Corynebacterium and Mycobacterium species

Corynebacterium and Mycobacterium spp. are phylogenetically closely related to Rhodococcus spp. [34]. C. glutamicum is used for the industrial production of L-glutamate, while C. diphtheriae is the causative agent of diphtheria [35]. Among the Mycobacterium spp., the fast-growing non-pathogenic M. smegmatis is widely used as a model species [36]. Microorganisms such as M. tuberculosis and M. leprae, which are highly virulent human pathogens, are also well characterized species [8]. Spratt et al. identified strong expression promoters and demonstrated that one of them enabled the production of approximately 125 μg protein per milligram cell lysate [20]. The techniques developed by the authors for identifying the above mentioned novel promoters may be useful, although the technique is only applicable to constitutive promoters. As shown in Table 1, some other expression vectors in these species are used to express homologous and/or heterologous proteins.

Conclusion

When expressing recombinant proteins, it is often recommended to use host cells that are phylogeneticaly closely (ideally, identical) related to the origin of the protein of interest. This is due to the similarity in frequency of codon usage, compatibility with machineries of translation and molecular chaperones, and/or redox states of the cells. Hence, when expressing higher eukaryotic proteins, in principle, using higher eukaryotes as hosts is ideal but it often results in low yields, and furthermore, is expensive and time consuming.

The host-vector systems of actinomycetes are suitable for expressing proteins of actinomycetes and proteins from closely related organisms as well as from higher eukaryotes. However, further development of host-vector system in actinomycetes is required, particularly with respect to the modification of host cells. This includes improvement in stability and easy maintenance of foreign genes (e.g., integration of plasmids), removing host proteins that hamper production (e.g., knock-out of proteases) either at the gene level or during the extraction of proteins.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Liam Good (Center for Genomics and Bioinfomatics of Karolinska Institute, Sweden) for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. We are also grateful to members of our research group for their help and valuable discussions.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Proteolysis and Protein Turnover Research Group, Research Institute of Genome-based Biofactory, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)
(2)
Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics (CGB), Karolinska Institute
(3)
Laboratory of Molecular Environmental Microbiology, Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University

References

  1. Kashima Y, Udaka S: High-level production of hyperthermophilic cellulase in the Bacillus brevis expression and secretion system. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2004, 68: 235-237. 10.1271/bbb.68.235.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Udaka S, Yamagata HY: Protein secretion in Bacillus brevis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1993, 64: 137-143. 10.1007/BF00873023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lam KHE, Chow KC, Wong WKR: Construction of an efficient Bacillus subtilis system for extracellular production of heterologous proteins. J Biotechnol. 1998, 63: 167-177. 10.1016/S0168-1656(98)00041-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Loir YL, Azevedo V, Oliveira SC, Freitas DA, Miyoshi A, Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Nouaille S, Ribeiro LA, Leclercq S, Gabriel JE, Guimaraes VD, Oliveira MN, Charlier C, Gautier M, Langella P: Protein secretion in Lactococcus lactis : an efficient way to increase the overall heterologous protein production. Microb Cell Fact. 2005, 4: 2-10.1186/1475-2859-4-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kuipers OP, de Ruyter PG, Kleerebezem M, de Vos WM: Controlled overproduction of proteins by lactic acid bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 1997, 15: 135-140. 10.1038/nbt0297-135.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Billman-Jacobe H: Expression in bacteria other than Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1996, 7: 500-504. 10.1016/S0958-1669(96)80052-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks SA: Appropriate glycosylation of recombinant proteins for human use: implications of choice of expression system. Mol Biotechnol. 2004, 28: 241-256. 10.1385/MB:28:3:241.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Connell ND: Expression systems for use in actinomycetes and related organisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001, 12: 446-449. 10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00243-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Flores FJ, Rincón J, Martin JF: Characterization of the iron-regulated desA promoter of Streptomyces pilosus as a system for controlled gene expression in actinomycetes. Microb Cell Fact. 2003, 2: 5-10.1186/1475-2859-2-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Herai S, Hashimoto Y, Higashibata H, Maseda H, Ikeda H, Omura S, Kobayashi M: Hyper-inducible expression system for streptomycetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004, 101: 14031-14035. 10.1073/pnas.0406058101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Nakashima N, Tamura T: A novel system for expressing recombinant proteins over a wide temperature range from 4 to 35 degrees C. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004, 86: 136-148. 10.1002/bit.20024.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakashima N, Tamura T: Isolation and characterization of a rolling-circle-type plasmid from Rhodococcus erythropolis and application of the plasmid to multiple-recombinant protein expression. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 5557-5568. 10.1128/AEM.70.9.5557-5568.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Tokiwa Y, Buenaventurada PC: Degradation of microbial polyesters. Biotechnol Lett. 2004, 26: 1181-1189. 10.1023/B:BILE.0000036599.15302.e5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Weber T, Welzel K, Pelzer S, Vente A, Wohlleben W: Exploiting the genetic potential of polyketide producing streptomycetes. J Biotechnol. 2003, 106: 221-232. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2003.08.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Komeda H, Hori Y, Kobayashi M, Shimizu S: Transcriptional regulation of the Rhodococcus rhodochrous J1 nitA gene encoding a nitrilase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 10572-10577. 10.1073/pnas.93.20.10572.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Triccas JA, Parish T, Britton WJ, Gicquel B: An inducible expression system permitting the efficient purification of a recombinant antigen from Mycobacterium smegmatis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998, 167: 151-156. 10.1016/S0378-1097(98)00381-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Enguita FJ, de la Fuente JL, Martín JF, Liras P: An inducible expression system of histidine-tagged proteins in Streptomyces lividans for one-step purification by Ni2+ affinity chromatography. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1996, 137: 135-140. 10.1016/0378-1097(96)00024-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. McDaniel R, Ebert-Khosla S, Hopwood DA, Khosla C: Engineered biosynthesis of novel polyketides. Science. 1993, 262: 1546-1550.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Rowe CJ, Cortés J, Gaisser S, Staunton J, Leadlay PF: Construction of new vectors for high-level expression in actinomycetes. Gene. 1998, 216: 215-223. 10.1016/S0378-1119(98)00327-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Spratt JM, Britton WJ, Triccas JA: Identification of strong promoter elements of Mycobacterium smegmatis and their utility for foreign gene expression in mycobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2003, 224: 139-142. 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00442-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Kataoka M, Tatsuta T, Suzuki I, Kosono S, Seki T, Yoshida T: Development of a temperature-inducible expression system for Streptomyces spp. J Bacteriol. 1996, 178: 5540-5542.Google Scholar
  22. Lim A, Boon C, Dick T: Inducibility of the Streptomyces traRts107-Ptra expression cassette in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biol Chem. 2000, 381: 517-519. 10.1515/BC.2000.066.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Binnie C, Cossar JD, Stewart DIH: Heterologous biopharmaceutical protein expression in Streptomyces. Trends Biotechnol. 1997, 15: 315-320. 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01062-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmitt-John T, Engels JW: Promoter constructions for efficient secretion expression in Streptomyces lividans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1992, 36: 493-498. 10.1007/BF00170190.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Zazopoulos E, Huang K, Staffa A, Liu W, Bachman BO, Nonaka K, Ahlert J, Thorson JS, Shen B, Farnet CM: A genomics-guided approach for discovering and expressing cryptic metabolic pathways. Nat Biotechnol. 2003, 21: 187-190. 10.1038/nbt784.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Lammertyn E, Anné J: Modifications of Streptomyces signal peptides and their effects on prior production and secretion. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1998, 160: 1-10. 10.1016/S0378-1097(97)00583-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Fornwald JA, Donovan MJ, Geber R, Keller J, Taylor DP, Arcuri EJ, Brawner ME: Soluble forms of the human T cell receptor CD4 are efficiently expressed by Streptomyces lividans. Bio/Technology. 1993, 11: 1031-1036. 10.1038/nbt0993-1031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Taguchi S, Kumagai I, Nakayama J, Suzuki A, Miura K: Efficient extracellular expression of a foreign protein in Streptomyces using secretory protease inhibitor (SSI) gene fusions. Bio/Technology. 1989, 7: 1063-1066.Google Scholar
  29. Mellaert LV, Dillen C, Proost P, Sablon E, DeLeys R, Van Broekhoven A, Heremans H, Van Damme J, Eyssen H, Anné J: Efficient secretion of bioactive mouse tumor necrosis factor a by Streptomyces lividans. Gene. 1994, 150: 153-158. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90876-1. 30View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Singer ME, Finnerty WR: Construction of an Eschericha coli-Rhodococcus shuttle vector and plasmid transformation in Rhodococcus spp. J Bacteriol. 1988, 170: 638-645.Google Scholar
  31. Mujacic M, Cooper KW, Baneyx F: Cold-inducible cloning vectors for low-temperature protein expression in Escherichia coli : application to the production of a toxic and proteolytically sensitive fusion protein. Gene. 1999, 238: 325-332. 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00328-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Qing G, Ma LC, Khorchid A, Swapna GVT, Tapas KM, Takayama MM, Xia B, Phadtare S, Ke H, Acton T, Montelione GT, Ikura M, Inouye M: Cold-shock induced high-yield protein production in Escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol. 2004, 22: 877-882. 10.1038/nbt984.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitani Y, Meng XY, Kamagata Y, Tamura T: Characterization of LtsA from Rhodococcus erythropolis– an enzyme with glutamine amidotransferase activity. J Bacteriol. Google Scholar
  34. Rainey FA, Burghardt J, Kroppenstedt RM, Klatte S, Stackebrandt : Phylogenetic analysis of the genera Rhodococcus and Nocardia and evidence for the evolutionary origin if the genus Nocardia from within the radiation of Rhodococcus species. Microbiology. 1995, 141: 523-528.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Tauch A, Kirchner O, Löffler B, Götker S, Pühler A, Kalinowski J: Efficient electrotransformation of Corynebacterium diphtheriae with a mini-replicon derived from Corynebacterium glutamicum plasmid pGA1. Curr Microbiol. 2002, 45: 362-367. 10.1007/s00284-002-3728-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Hermans J, de Bont JA: Techniques for genetic engineering in mycobacteria. Alternative host strains, DNA-transfersystems and vectors. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1996, 69: 243-256. 10.1007/BF00399613.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Matsui T, Noda K, Tanaka Y, Maruhashi K, Kurane R: Recombinant Rhodococcus sp. strain T09 can desulfurize DBT in the presence of inorganic sulfate. Curr Microbiol. 2002, 45: 240-244. 10.1007/s00284-002-3739-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Salim K, Haedens V, Content J, Leblon G, Huygen K: Heterologous expression of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis gene encoding antigen 85A in Corynebacterium glutamicum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997, 63: 4392-4400.Google Scholar
  39. Liebl W, Sinskey A, Schleifer KH: Expression, secretion, and processing of Staphylococcal nuclease by Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 1992, 174: 1854-1861.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Nakashima et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement