Open Access

Retinoid production using metabolically engineered Escherichia coli with a two-phase culture system

  • Hui-Jeong Jang1,
  • Sang-Hwal Yoon1,
  • Hee-Kyung Ryu2,
  • Jung-Hun Kim1,
  • Chong-Long Wang1,
  • Jae-Yean Kim1,
  • Deok-Kun Oh3 and
  • Seon-Won Kim1Email author
Contributed equally
Microbial Cell Factories201110:59

Received: 26 May 2011

Accepted: 29 July 2011

Published: 29 July 2011



Retinoids are lipophilic isoprenoids composed of a cyclic group and a linear chain with a hydrophilic end group. These compounds include retinol, retinal, retinoic acid, retinyl esters, and various derivatives of these structures. Retinoids are used as cosmetic agents and effective pharmaceuticals for skin diseases. Retinal, an immediate precursor of retinoids, is derived by β-carotene 15,15'-mono(di)oxygenase (BCM(D)O) from β-carotene, which is synthesized from the isoprenoid building blocks isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP). Retinoids are chemically unstable and biologically degraded via retinoic acid. Although extensive studies have been performed on the microbial production of carotenoids, retinoid production using microbial metabolic engineering has not been reported. Here, we report retinoid production using engineered Escherichia coli that express exogenous BCM(D)O and the mevalonate (MVA) pathway for the building blocks synthesis in combination with a two-phase culture system using a dodecane overlay.


Among the BCM(D)O tested in E. coli, the synthetic retinoid synthesis protein (SR), based on bacteriorhodopsin-related protein-like homolog (Blh) of the uncultured marine bacteria 66A03, showed the highest β-carotene cleavage activity with no residual intracellular β-carotene. By introducing the exogenous MVA pathway, 8.7 mg/L of retinal was produced, which is 4-fold higher production than that of augmenting the MEP pathway (dxs overexpression). There was a large gap between retinal production and β-carotene consumption using the exogenous MVA pathway; therefore, the retinal derivatives were analyzed. The derivatives, except for retinoic acid, that formed were identified, and the levels of retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate were measured. Amounts as high as 95 mg/L retinoids were obtained from engineered E. coli DH5α harboring the synthetic SR gene and the exogenous MVA pathway in addition to dxs overexpression, which were cultured at 29°C for 72 hours with 2YT medium containing 2.0% (w/v) glycerol as the main carbon source. However, a significant level of intracellular degradation of the retinoids was also observed in the culture. To prevent degradation of the intracellular retinoids through in situ extraction from the cells, a two-phase culture system with dodecane was used. The highest level of retinoid production (136 mg/L) was obtained after 72 hours with 5 mL of dodecane overlaid on a 5 mL culture.


In this study, we successfully produced 136 mg/L retinoids, which were composed of 67 mg/L retinal, 54 mg/L retinol, and 15 mg/L retinyl acetate, using a two-phase culture system with dodecane, which produced 68-fold more retinoids than the initial level of production (2.2 mg/L). Our results demonstrate the potential use of E. coli as a promising microbial cell factory for retinoid production.


Retinoids are a class of lipophilic isoprenoid molecules that are related chemically to vitamin A [1]. Retinoids are composed of a β-ionone ring and a polyunsaturated side chain, with an alcohol (retinol), an aldehyde (retinal), a carboxylic acid (retinoic acid), or an ester (retinyl esters) functional group (Figure 1A). They play an essential role in vision, bone development, reproduction, and skin health as antioxidants and are also known to reduce the risk of certain cancers. Retinoids have attracted increased attention in recent years as cosmetic active ingredients and effective pharmaceuticals for skin diseases [2]. The retinoid market size has been estimated to be about 1.6 billion dollars worldwide. Chemically synthesized retinoids are the principal commercial source. Retinol has been produced from acidification or hydrolysis of retinal that is synthesized chemically by the reduction of a pentadiene derivative [1, 3]. However, these chemical processes have some disadvantages, such as complex purification steps and the formation of undesirable by-products. Animals produce retinoids from carotenoids (the most effective being β-carotene) obtained from fruits and vegetables, but plants cannot synthesize retinoids. The retinoid synthesis pathway is present only in microorganisms containing bacteriorhodopsin or proteorhodopsin with retinal as a prosthetic group [4, 5]. However, the microorganisms produce the protein-bound form of retinal and are not appropriate for mass production of free retinoids. To date, only a few attempts of the biological production of retinoids have been reported [5, 6]. It would be beneficial to develop a biotechnological process for retinoid production using a metabolically engineered microorganism.
Figure 1

Retinoid biosynthesis. The conversion of β-carotene to retinoids, including retinal, retinol, retinoic acid, and retinyl esters (A). Biosynthesis of retinal in Escherichia coli using the MEP pathway and the exogenous MVA pathway (B). The gene names and the encoded enzymes are as follows: atoB/phaA, acetoacetyl-CoA synthase; mvaS, HMG-CoA synthase; mvaA, HMG-CoA reductase; mvaK1, mevalonate kinase; mvaK2, phosphomevalonate kinase; mvaD, mevalonate-5-diphosphate decarboxylase; idi, IPP isomerase; dxs, DXP synthase; ispA, FPP synthase; crtE, GGPP synthase; crtB, phytoene synthase; crtI, phytoene desaturase; crtY, lycopene cyclase; BCM(D)O, β-carotene 15,15'-mono- or dioxygenase. Pathway intermediates are as follows: G3P, D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xyluose-5-phosphate; MEP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate; IPP, isopentenyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl diphosphate; GGPP, geranylgeranyl diphosphate.

Retinoids are composed of 3 isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) units and 1 dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP), which are the common five-carbon building blocks of all isoprenoids. The IPP and DMAPP building blocks are generally synthesized via the 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate (MEP) and mevalonate (MVA) pathways in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, respectively [79]. Recombinant E. coli harboring an exogenous MVA pathway has been used for the successful production of isoprenoids, such as amorphadiene, carotenoids, and farnesol [1014]. In particular, we reported the high-level production of β-carotene (465 mg/L) from E. coli harboring an engineered MVA pathway [13, 15]. The recombinant E. coli can be engineered to produce retinal by introducing β-carotene 15,15'-mono(di)oxygenase (BCM(D)O) as a β-carotene cleavage enzyme (Figure 1B).

The cleavage of β-carotene by BCM(D)O (E.C. or E.C. is the initial key step of synthesis of various retinoids from β-carotene. The cleavage reactions can be classified as central and eccentric. In the central cleavage, BCM(D)O cleaves the central double bond (15, 15') of the polyene chain of β-carotene to yield two molecules of retinal. In the eccentric cleavage, BCM(D)O randomly cleaves any double bond in the polyene chain to produce β-apo-carotenals with different side chain lengths. In the cleavage reactions, BCMO utilizes an oxygen atom derived from molecular oxygen and water via an epoxide intermediate, whereas BCDO employs a molecular oxygen via an unstable dioxetane intermediate [16, 17]. Retinal is converted to retinol and retinoic acid by retinol dehydrogenase and retinal dehydrogenase/oxidase, respectively (Figure 1A) [18, 19]. Retinol is esterified to retinyl esters by retinol acyltransferase [20].

Retinoids are chemically unstable and readily oxidized and isomerized by heat, oxygen, and light due to their reactive conjugated double bonds [21, 22]. Biologically, retinoids are also easily degraded via retinoic acid. The oxidative degradation begins with the conversion of retinoic acid to more polar metabolites, such as 4-hydroxy- and 4-oxo-retinoic acids [23, 24]. Therefore, successful production of retinoids can be achieved by preventing both chemical and biological degradation. To our knowledge, retinoid production using metabolically engineered microorganisms has never been reported. In this study, we cloned the BCM(D)O genes from several organisms and introduced each gene into recombinant E. coli that produce β-carotene. An exogenous MVA pathway was also utilized to increase retinoid production. A two-phase culture system using a dodecane layer over the culture broth was found to minimize the intracellular degradation of retinoids through in situ extraction from the cells.


Comparison of retinal production from various BCM(D)O genes

Retinal can be produced by introducing the β-carotene mono(di)oxygenase (BCM(D)O) gene into recombinant E. coli that produces β-carotene. We cloned the BCM(D)O genes from two bacteria, Halobacterium sp. NRC-1 (blh and brp) and Natronomonas pharaonis (brp2), and a vertebrate, Mus musculus (Bcmo1) . We also synthesized a codon-optimized BCDO gene (SR) based on the amino acid sequence of the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 blh gene. The BCM(D)O genes were used to construct the retinal synthesis plasmids pT-HBblh, pT-HBbrp, pT-HBbrp2, pT-HBBcmo1 and pT-HBSR, respectively. The recombinant E. coli cells harboring each retinal plasmid were cultured in 2YT medium containing 0.5% (w/v) glycerol and 0.2% (w/v) arabinose as carbon sources for 48 hours at 29°C (Figure 2). The cells were cultured without IPTG induction because leaky expression in the 2YT complex medium was sufficient for retinal production. We have previously observed severe inhibition of both cell growth and carotenoid production due to IPTG induction [12], and similar results were obtained in this retinal production study (data not shown). Recombinant E. coli harboring pT-HBblh, pT-HBbrp, or pT-HBSR produced 2.2, 0.8, or 1.4 mg/L retinal after 24 hours, respectively. However, retinal production from E. coli containing pT-HBblh or pT-HBbrp decreased to 0.7 or 0.4 mg/L after 48 hours, respectively, whereas retinal production of E. coli (pT-HBSR) increased slightly. The decreases in retinal production after 24 hours may be due to intracellular oxidative degradation of retinal. The amounts of retinal obtained from the culture should be dependent on both intracellular synthesis and degradation. Retinal production rates in E. coli harboring pT-HBblh or pT-HBbrp might be lower than their degradation rates after 24 hours of the culture. Trace amounts of retinal were detected in the culture of E. coli harboring pT-HBbrp2 or pT-HBBcmo1. E. coli (pT-HB) with no BCM(D)O gene produced 35 mg/L β-carotene and no retinal. If there is no retinal degradation, β-carotene consumption amounts by BCM(D)Os are exactly proportional to retinal production because β-carotene is the immediate precursor of retinal. The β-carotene cleavage activity of SR was suspected to be the highest among the tested BCM(D)Os because β-carotene remained in the culture of E. coli containing BCM(D)Os other than SR. The SR enzyme was therefore selected for retinal production in further experiments. Cell growth was not affected by overexpression of the BCM(D)O genes, except for the N. pharaonis brp gene, which showed growth retardation.
Figure 2

Comparison of retinal production from various BCM(D)O genes. Retinal and β-carotene production and cell growth of E. coli harboring pT-HB, pT-HBblh, pT-HBbrp, pT-HBbrp2, pT-HBBCMO1, and pT-HBSR. The blh gene of Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, the brp gene of Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, the brp2 gene of N. pharaonis, the BCMO1 gene of M. musculus and the SR codon-optimized blh gene of the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 were introduced into the β-carotene plasmid, pT-HB, resulting in pT-HBblh, pT-HBbrp, pT-HBbrp2, pT-HBBCMO1, and pT-HBSR, respectively. Culture was carried out in 2YT medium containing 0.5% (w/v) glycerol and 0.2% (w/v) arabinose for 48 hours at 29°C. Open bars and solid bars represent 24 hrs and 48 hrs, respectively.

Engineering the MEP and MVA pathways to supply building blocks

The retinal building blocks of IPP and DMAPP can be synthesized in E. coli via the endogenous MEP pathway and the exogenous MVA pathway (Figure 1B). The synthesis of 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate (DXP) has been reported as the critical rate-limiting step in the MEP pathway. Thus, overexpression of DXP synthase (encoded by dxs) increased the levels of lycopene and β-carotene production in our previous study [15, 25]. The dxs gene was introduced to augment the MEP pathway in pT-HBSR, resulting in pT-DHBSR (Figure 3). Retinal production from E. coli (pT-DHBSR) was a slightly higher than that of E. coli (pT-HBSR) after 24 hours, but there was no difference after 48 hours, whereas the β-carotene production from E. coli (pT-DHB) was 1.5-fold higher due to dxs overexpression compared with E. coli (pT-HB). The exogenous MVA pathway in E. coli has been shown to dramatically increase isoprenoid production by providing sufficient amounts of the IPP and DMAPP building blocks [10, 13]. E. coli (pT-DHBSR/pS-NA) harboring the exogenous MVA pathway produced 8.7 mg/L retinal after 48 hours, which was 4-fold higher than that of E. coli (pT-DHBSR). In E. coli strains containing the SR gene, little or no β-carotene remained in the cells probably due to β-carotene cleavage by SR. There was large gap between the amount of β-carotene (substrate) consumed and the amount of retinal (product) produced. We hypothesized that there are other cellular reactions that metabolize retinal in E. coli besides the biological degradation of retinal. The formation of other retinoids derived from retinal by promiscuous enzymes in E. coli was considered. Because retinal could be converted into retinol, retinoic acid, and retinyl ester by cellular enzymatic reactions (Figure 1A), these retinal derivatives were analyzed in the E. coli cultures. Formation of the derivatives, except for retinoic acid, was found, and the levels of retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate produced were measured in further analyses.
Figure 3

Retinal production using the MEP and MVA pathways. Retinal production, β-carotene production, and cell growth of E. coli harboring pT-HB, pT-HBSR, pT-DHB, and pT-DHBSR and E. coli harboring pT-DHB, or pT-DHBSR with the MVA pathway plasmid of pS-NA. Culture was carried out in 2YT medium containing 0.5% (w/v) glycerol and 0.2% (w/v) arabinose for 48 hours at 29°C. Open bars and solid bars represent 24 hrs and 48 hrs, respectively.

Effects of E. coli strains, culture conditions and carbon sources on retinoid production

The effect of the E. coli strain used on the production of retinoids, including retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate, was investigated. Isoprenoid production has been shown to significantly depend on the E. coli strain used [13, 25, 26]. Therefore, retinoid production was analyzed in five E. coli strains, MG1655, DH5α, XL1-Blue, S17-1, and BL21 (DE3), harboring pT-DHBSR and pS-NA (Additional file 1). E. coli DH5α exhibited the highest level of retinoid production (40 mg/L) after 36 hours, followed by E. coli S17-1 and XL1-Blue, which produced approximately 22 mg/L retinoids. However, small amounts of retinoids were obtained from E. coli MG1655 and BL21 (DE3). Thus, E. coli DH5α was selected as the optimal strain for retinoid production. The effect of dissolved oxygen on retinoid production was investigated with different working volumes in a 30 mm diameter test tube (Additional file 2). Retinoid production reached the maximum level earlier with a lower working volume (which corresponds to higher dissolved oxygen) and began to decline earlier, probably due to oxidative degradation. In a 10 mL working volume, both cell growth and retinoid production were retarded, but less product degradation was observed. The optimal working volume for retinoid production was found to be 7 mL. Retinoid production was also affected by culture temperature (Additional file 3), and the highest production was obtained at 29°C. These results agreed with the optimal strains and culture conditions for β-carotene production found in our previous study [15], which was expected because β-carotene was the immediate precursor of retinal. Retinoid production on different carbon sources was compared (Additional file 4). Glycerol was the best carbon source for retinoid production. If glucose or galactose was used as the carbon source, the production of retinoids was lower than that without a carbon source. Therefore, the effects of the glycerol concentration on retinoid production and cell growth were investigated. E. coli DH5α (pT-DHBSR/pS-NA) was grown in 2YT medium containing 0.0% to 2.0% (w/v) glycerol at 29°C (Figure 4). Cell growth increased with increasing glycerol concentrations, and stationary phase was reached at 36, 48, and 72 hours in media containing glycerol concentrations of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0% (w/v), respectively. Retinoid production was maximal at these times and then significantly decreased during stationary phase. Retinoid production appeared to increase mainly after 24 hours. The highest level of retinoid production (95 mg/L) was obtained in 2.0% (w/v) glycerol among the concentrations tested, which was 2.4-fold higher than the maximal retinoid production with 0.5% (w/v) glycerol. A low level of retinoids was produced with no addition of glycerol. The increase in glycerol concentration retarded stationary phase growth and prolonged the period of retinoid production but failed to prevent retinoid degradation. The retinoids obtained in the culture consisted of retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate, and retinol was the major component of the retinoids. Retinol and retinyl acetate are known to be formed by retinol dehydrogenase and retinol acyltransferase, respectively. It was very interesting that retinol and retinyl acetate were produced in E. coli without introduction of the retinol dehydrogenase and retinol acyltransferase genes. In all of the cultures, a severe decrease in retinoid production was observed during stationary phase growth, which might be due to a lack of additional retinoid synthesis and intracellular oxidative degradation during stationary phase.
Figure 4

Effect of glycerol concentration on retinoid production. Retinoid (retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate) production and cell growth of E. coli harboring pT-DHBSR and pS-NA. Culture was carried out in 2YT medium containing 0%, 0.5%, 1%, and 2% (w/v) glycerol and 0.2% (w/v) arabinose at 29°C. For retinoid production, retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate are indicated with light gray, dark gray, and black, respectively. For cell growth, the glycerol concentrations are indicated as symbols; 0%, squares; 0.5%, circles; 1%, triangles; 2%, reversed triangles.

Two-phase culture using dodecane for in situ extraction of retinoids

To prevent intracellular retinoid degradation, a two-phase culture system using the hydrophobic solvent dodecane was performed for in situ extraction of retinoids from the cells. Dodecane was chosen for its low toxicity to E. coli[27], high hydrophobicity (log PO/W, 6.6) for the extraction of hydrophobic retinoids, and low volatility, which prevents loss due to evaporation. A two-phase culture system using decane has been successfully applied to lycopene production [28].

In this study, 1 mL of dodecane was layered over 5 mL of culture broth (Figure 5). Retinoids were extracted into the dodecane phase, and negligible amounts of retinoids were detected in the cell mass and culture broth (data not shown). As a result, retinoid production was measured only from the dodecane phase. The in situ extraction by dodecane could minimize intracellular degradation of the retinoids. The retinoids in the dodecane phase seemed to be relatively stable and were not subject to significant oxidative degradation. Compared with the results in Figure 4 (no dodecane overlay), retinoid production in the two-phase system with 1 mL of dodecane overlay was significantly higher even at 24 hours, and no decrease in retinoid production was observed during stationary phase, while cell growth was not affected by the dodecane overlay. However, retinoid production in the culture containing 2% (w/v) glycerol was not higher than that obtained with 1% (w/v) glycerol, although cell growth was significantly enhanced with the higher glycerol concentration. The dodecane overlay volume of 1 mL might be insufficient for effective in situ extraction of retinoids in cultures containing 2% (w/v) glycerol.
Figure 5

Effect of dodecane overlay on retinoid production. Retinoid production and cell growth of E. coli (pT-DHBSR/pS-NA) in two-phase culture system using a 1 mL of dodecane overlay and 5 mL of culture broth. The culture was carried out in 2YT medium containing 0.5%, 1%, and 2% (w/v) glycerol and 0.2% (w/v) arabinose at 29°C. For retinoid production, retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate are indicated with light gray, dark gray, and black, respectively. For cell growth, the glycerol concentrations are indicated as symbols; 0.5%, squares; 1%, circles; 2%, triangles.

To investigate the effect of the dodecane overlay volume on retinoid production and cell growth, 1 mL to 5 mL of dodecane were initially overlaid on cultures containing 2% (w/v) glycerol (Figure 6A). Total retinoid production was enhanced as the dodecane overlay volume increased. The highest retinoid production of 136 mg/L was obtained after 72 hours of culture with 5 mL dodecane, which was about 2-fold higher than that with 1 mL of dodecane (65 mg/L). Culture times longer than 72 hours with 5 mL of dodecane showed no further increase in retinoid production, which also remained at the maximum level without degradation (data not shown). The dodecane overlay volume was increased to 6 mL in the culture by addition of 2 mL of dodecane at 0, 24, and 48 hours. In the 6 mL dodecane overlaid culture, there was no increase in the total retinoid production compared with the culture with 5 mL of dodecane. Retinoid production also did not increase in a culture with an initial overlay of 6 mL of dodecane (data not shown). Cell growth in all of the cultures with dodecane was slightly higher than that without dodecane (Figure 6A).
Figure 6

Effect of dodecane overlay volume on retinoid production. Effect of the dodecane overlay volume on retinoid production and cell growth of E. coli (pT-DHBSR/pS-NA) in the two-phase culture. The culture was carried out in 2YT medium containing 2% (w/v) glycerol and 0.2% (w/v) arabinose at 29°C, and different dodecane volumes from 1 mL to 5 mL were overlaid on the 5 mL culture broth. For the 6 mL dodecane overlay, the dodecane overlay was divided into three aliquots of 2 mL added at 0, 24 and 48 hours. For retinoid production, retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate are indicated with light gray, dark gray, and black, respectively. For cell growth, the overlaid dodecane volumes are indicated as symbols; 0 mL, closed squares; 1 mL, closed circles; 2 mL, closed triangles; 3 mL, closed reversed triangles; 4 mL, closed diamonds; 5 mL, open squares; 6 mL, open circles (A). Proportions of retinoids produced as a function of culture time and dodecane overlay volume are represented as percentages of the total retinoids. Retinal, retinol, and retinyl acetate are indicated in light gray, dark gray, and black, respectively (B).

The proportions of the retinoids obtained with the various dodecane overlay volumes were determined (Figure 6B). An outstanding difference in the proportions of retinal and retinol obtained with and without the dodecane overlays was found. The proportion of retinal among the retinoids after 48 hours was approximately 51% (w/w) in the dodecane overlaid cultures and 23% in the culture without dodecane overlay, whereas the retinol proportion was 30% to 39% in the dodecane overlaid cultures and 59% in the culture without dodecane overlay. Therefore, the dodecane overlay increased the proportion of retinal but decreased the proportion of retinol. Retinal seemed to be extracted from cells by dodecane before it could be intracellularly converted into retinol, as retinol is formed from retinal in cells. The proportion of retinyl acetate after 48 hours was below 20% in both the dodecane overlaid culture and culture without overlay, which was lower than those of retinal and retinol. In the dodecane-overlaid cultures, the proportion of retinyl acetate decreased with increasing culture time, suggesting that retinyl acetate formation decreased during culture. We concluded that the dodecane overlay prevented the decrease in retinoid production during stationary phase growth and increased retinoid production.


E. coli harboring the synthetic BCDO (SR) gene, which was the codon-optimized blh gene from the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03, successfully produced retinal from β-carotene. Interestingly, the E. coli also produced retinol and retinyl acetate. We hypothesize that promiscuous enzymes in E. coli are able to metabolize retinal to produce retinol and retinyl acetate. Retinal is metabolized to retinol and retinyl acetate in a sequential manner by retinol dehydrogenase and retinol acyltransferase, respectively. Therefore, we investigated a presence of a potential retinol dehydrogenase in E. coli. The ybbO gene in E. coli 83972 (Accession No. ZP_04002297) was identified as a possible retinol dehydrogenase in the NCBI protein database, although we did not expect to find specific enzymes that metabolize foreign compounds, such as retinoids. The ybbO gene is annotated in E. coli strain MG1655 as a predicted oxidoreductase and has the highest identity and similarity (31% and 52%, respectively) in the E. coli genome to H. sapiens retinol dehydrogenase (Accession No. AAC72923) based on the BLASTP analysis of NCBI It has been reported through sequence comparisons and phylogenetic analysis that the ybbO gene may be an example of horizontal gene transfer from a eukaryotic retinol dehydrogenase ancestor [29]. To identify putative homologues of retinol acyltransferase in E. coli, BLASTP analysis was performed with retinol acyltransferases of H. sapiens (Accession No. NP_004735) and two bacteria, Shewanella putrefaciens CN-32 (YP_001185024) and Trichodesmium erythraeum IMS 101 (YP_723688), because the protein sequence of bacterial retinol acyltransferase was available in only these two bacteria. No homologue of retinol acyltransferase was identified from the BLASTP analysis. An alternative approach for the identification of a homologous gene would be to delete the genes of all acyltransferases present in E. coli. Biological degradation of retinoids is initiated from retinoic acid. We observed significant intracellular degradation of retinoids during stationary phase growth. If retinoic acid is quickly degraded in E. coli, it would not be detected in the culture during retinoid production. We hypothesize that retinoic acid is formed in our E. coli strain engineered to produce retinoids. Retinal is converted to retinoic acid by retinal dehydrogenase. Salmonella enterica is known to have a retinal dehydrogenase (Accession No. CBY96723). BLASTP analysis was performed on the E. coli genome with the retinal dehydrogenase of S. enterica, and eutE (predicted aldehyde dehydrogenase/ethanolamine utilization protein) was identified as a homologue (with 94% identity and 97% similarity). The retinal dehydrogenase of H. sapiens (Accession No. NP_733798) was also used for the same BLASTP analysis, and puuC (gamma-Glu-gamma-aminobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase) was found to have the highest homology (42% identity and 63% similarity) to the retinal dehydrogenase. If eutE or puuC are involved in the formation of retinoic acid, deletion of these genes will prevent the biological degradation of retinoids via retinoic acid, resulting in an enhancement in total retinoid production.

In the cultures without a dodecane overlay, there was a significant decrease in retinoid production during stationary phase growth. This might be due to increased oxidative degradation of retinoids by reactive oxygen species, such as hydrogen peroxide and superoxide, which are generated at high levels during stationary phase. Retinoids are easily oxidized as antioxidants by reactive oxygen species. Oxidative retinoid degradation could be decreased by overexpression of catalases (Kat E/G) and superoxide dismutases (Sod A/B/C), which scavenge reactive oxygen species. To prevent biological degradation of retinoids inside of the cells, in situ extraction of retinoids was performed with a two-phase culture system using dodecane. Oxidizable compounds are easily oxidized and degraded by molecular oxygen dissolved in the aqueous phase, whereas compounds in hydrophobic solvents, including dodecane, are sequestered and more stable [30, 31]. Thus, dodecane was found to efficiently extract hydrophobic retinoids from cells and preserve the products during two-phase culture. In a previous report, a two-phase culture system using decane was successfully applied for lycopene production [28]; however, lycopene was inefficiently extracted from recombinant E. coli without partial digestion of the cell wall by lysozyme. In this study, the use of lysozyme for cell wall digestion was not required for the in situ extraction of retinoids. Retinoids are efficiently released from cells without removing the cell walls because retinoids (C20, isoprenoid molecule) are half the size of lycopene (C40). In the two-phase culture for retinoid production, β-carotene should be retained inside of the cells because it is the immediate precursor of retinoids. If it is extracted in the dodecane phase, it would not be available for the cleavage reaction by BCM(D)O located in the cytosol. Even though extraction of β-carotene by dodecane would not be expected because it is a C40 carotenoid like lycopene, two-phase culture for β-carotene production was performed to confirm that β-carotene is retained in the cells (Additional file 5). A negligible amount of β-carotene was detected in the dodecane phase and almost all of the β-carotene was retained in the cells. There was no significant difference in both β-carotene production and cell growth between cultures with and without a dodecane overlay. The two-phase culture system prevents intracellular degradation of retinoids and provides a driving force for further retinoid production. Physical sequestration of the product from a reaction system drives the reaction to high efficiency without the effects of product inhibition or reaction equilibrium [32, 33]. In the two-phase culture system, the retinoids were sequestered from the cells in the dodecane phase, and production was enhanced. A total retinoid production of 122 mg/L was obtained after 48 hours in a culture with a 5 mL dodecane overlay, whereas half of this amount (60 mg/L) was produced after 48 hours without a dodecane overlay. Thus, the dodecane-overlaid two-phase culture system could be employed for other engineered systems that produce lipophilic small molecules.


Our results represent the first report on retinoid biosynthesis using metabolically engineered E. coli. In this study, we successfully produced 136 mg/L retinoids, which were composed of retinal (67 mg/L), retinol (54 mg/L), and retinyl acetate (15 mg/L), using a two-phase culture system with dodecane, which was a 68-fold improvement from the initial level of retinoid production (2.2 mg/L). This improvement was achieved with use of (1) an efficient marine bacterial BCDO gene that was codon-optimized for expression in E. coli, (2) introduction of an exogenous MVA pathway that successfully provided the building blocks IPP and DMAPP for retinoid synthesis, and (3) the use of a two-phase culture system with dodecane that prevented intracellular degradation of the retinoids and provided a driving force for retinoid production. Retinal, retinol and retinyl acetate were contained in the retinoids produced from the recombinant E. coli, which suggests that E. coli has the potential to synthesize multiple retinoids, which can be used for different commercial applications. Based on this potential, the retinoid synthesis pathway of E. coli can be reengineered to produce a specific retinoid through elaborative genetic manipulations, such as gene deletions and overexpression of genes involved in the modification of retinoids. Therefore, E. coli is a genetically tractable host that is a promising microbial cell factory for the engineered production of retinoids.


Bacterial strains and culture conditions

The bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. E. coli DH5α was used for gene cloning and retinoid production. E. coli strains MG1655, BL21 (DE3), XL1-Blue and S17-1 were candidate host strains for retinoid production (Table 1). Culture for retinoid production was carried out in 2YT medium (16 g tryptone, 10 g yeast extract, and 5 g NaCl per liter) using a shaking incubator at 29°C and 250 rpm. Glycerol and arabinose, as the main and auxiliary carbon sources, were added at concentrations of 0.5% to 2% (w/v) and 0.2% (w/v), respectively. The addition of the auxiliary carbon source arabinose has been reported to increase β-carotene production [15]. Glucose, galactose, xylose and maltose were compared to glycerol as carbon sources for retinoid production. Ampicillin (100 μg/mL) and chloramphenicol (50 μg/mL) were added to the culture as required. Cell culture was carried out in a test tube containing 7 mL of medium, and growth was determined by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600). For the two-phase culture for retinoid production, 1 mL of dodecane (Cat. No. 297879, Sigma, USA) was layered over 5 mL of culture medium.
Table 1

Strains, plasmids and primers used in this study

Strains, plasmids and primers


Reference or source

E. coli strains



K12, Wild type



F-, ϕ 80dlac ZΔ M15, Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169, deoR, recA 1 endA 1, hsdR 17(rK- mK+), phoA, supE 44, λ-, thi-1, g yrA96, rel A1



hsdR 17, supE 44, recA 1, endA 1, gyrA 46, thi, relA 1, lac/F ' [proAB + , lacIq, lacZΔ M15::Tn10(tetr)]



recA pro hsdR RP4-2-Tc::Mu-Km::Tn7



F-, ompT, hsdSB(r B - m B - ), gal (λc I 857, ind 1, Sam 7, nin 5, lac UV5-T7gene 1), dcm (DE3)





Plac cloning vector, ColE1 origin, lacZ, Ampr



Plac expression vector, pACYC184 origin, lacZ, Cmr



Ptrc expression vector, pBR322 origin, lacIq, Cmr

Amersham Bioscience


pTrc99A containing crtE, crtB, and crtI from P. agglomerans, crtY from P. ananatis, and ipiHP1 from H. pluvialis



pT-HB containing dxs from E. coli



pT-HB containing blh from Halobacterium sp. NRC-1

This study


pT-HB containing brp from Halobacterium sp. NRC-1

This study


pT-HB containing brp2 from N. pharaonis

This study


pT-HB containing Bcmo1 from M. musculus

This study


pT-HB containing the codon-optimized blh gene (SR) from uncultured marine bacterium 66A03

This study


pT-DHB containing the codon-optimized blh gene (SR) from uncultured marine bacterium 66A03

This study


pSTV28 containing mvaE and mvaS from E. faecalis; mvaK1, mvaK2, and mvaD from S. pneumoniae; and idi from E. coli


































a Template binding regions are indicated with bold letters, start and stop codons are underlined, and restriction sites are double underlined.

Gene cloning and plasmid construction

The plasmids and PCR primers used in this study are listed in Table 1. Common procedures, including genomic DNA preparation, restriction digests, transformations, and other standard molecular biological techniques, were carried out as described in the literature (Sambrook and Russell 2001). PCR was performed using pfu DNA polymerase (Solgent Co., Korea) with a standard protocol. The pBluescript, pTrc99A, and pSTV28 plasmids were used for gene cloning and gene expression (Table 1). The pS-NA plasmid containing the operon for the MVA pathway was used as described previously (Yoon et al., 2009). The BCM(D)O genes blh and brp, brp2, and bcmo1 were amplified using PCR from Halobacterium sp. NRC-1, Natronomonas pharaonis and Mus musculus, respectively. The PCR products were cloned into the EcoR I and Spe I sites of pT-HB, resulting in the retinal plasmids pT-HBblh, pT-HBbrp, pT-HBbrp2 and pT-HBBcmo1 (Table 1) . The blh gene (Genbank accession number AAY68319) of the uncultured marine bacterium 66A03 was synthesized by Genofocus (Daejeon, Korea) according to the codon-optimization function of the company in-house software for expression in E. coli. The synthetic gene named SR (s ynthetic r etinoid gene) was amplified using the PCR primers SR-F and SR-R, and cloned into the Eco RI and Spe I sites of pT-HB, resulting in pT-HBSR. The SR gene cleaved from pT-HBSR with Spe I was cloned into the corresponding site of pT-DHB, which resulted in pT-DHBSR.

Analysis of β-carotene and retinoids

β-Carotene and retinoids were extracted from bacterial cell pellets with acetone [13]. In the two-phase culture system with a dodecane overlay, the upper dodecane phase containing the retinoids was collected and centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm to remove all cellular particles. The acetone extracts and dodecane phases were analyzed with HPLC (LC-20A, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) at detection wavelengths of 370 nm (retinal), 340 nm (retinol and retinyl acetate), and 454 nm (β-carotene) and using the Symmetry C18 (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) with Sentry Guard C18 (15 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) HPLC columns (Waters, Milford, USA). The mobile phases were 95:5 and 70:30 methanol and acetonitrile for the retinoid and β-carotene analyses, respectively. A flow rate of 1.5 ml/min and column temperature of 40°C were applied for the HPLC analysis. Retinal (Cat. No. R2500), retinol (Cat. No. R7632), retinyl acetate (Cat. No. R4632) and β-carotene (Cat. No. C4582) were purchased from Sigma (USA), dissolved in acetone, and used as standard compounds. The results are presented in the means ± SD from three independent experiments.




This work was supported by a grant (2009-0084490) from the Basic Research Program, a grant (NRF-2010-C1AAA001-0029084) from the National Research Foundation, MEST, and a grant from the Next-Generation BioGreen 21 Program (No. 2010-0000), Rural Development Administration, Korea. HJ Jang and JH Kim are supported by scholarships from the BK21 Program, MEST, Korea.

Authors’ Affiliations

Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Program), PMBBRC, Gyeongsang National University
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology
Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Konkuk University


  1. Sorg O, Antille C, Kaya G, Saurat JH: Retinoids in cosmeceuticals. Dermatol Ther. 2006, 19 (5): 289-296. 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2006.00086.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Amer M, Maged M: Cosmeceuticals versus pharmaceuticals. Clin Dermatol. 2009, 27 (5): 428-430. 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.05.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Mercier , Chabardes : Organometallic chemistry in industrial vitamin A and vitamin E synthesis. Pure & Appl Chem. 1994, 66 (7): 1509-1518. 10.1351/pac199466071509.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Peck RF, Echavarri-Erasun C, Johnson EA, Ng WV, Kennedy SP, Hood L, DasSarma S, Krebs MP: brp and blh are required for synthesis of the retinal cofactor of bacteriorhodopsin in Halobacterium salinarum. J Biol Chem. 2001, 276 (8): 5739-5744. 10.1074/jbc.M009492200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sabehi G, Loy A, Jung KH, Partha R, Spudich JL, Isaacson T, Hirschberg J, Wagner M, Beja O: New insights into metabolic properties of marine bacteria encoding proteorhodopsins. PLoS Biol. 2005, 3 (8): e273-10.1371/journal.pbio.0030273.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Martinez A, Bradley AS, Waldbauer JR, Summons RE, DeLong EF: Proteorhodopsin photosystem gene expression enables photophosphorylation in a heterologous host. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007, 104 (13): 5590-5595. 10.1073/pnas.0611470104.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Lee PC, Schmidt-Dannert C: Metabolic engineering towards biotechnological production of carotenoids in microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002, 60: (1-2):1-11. 10.1007/s00253-002-1101-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Rohmer M, Knani M, Simonin P, Sutter B, Sahm H: Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria: a novel pathway for the early steps leading to isopentenyl diphosphate. Biochem J. 1993, 295 (Pt 2): 517-524.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Lange BM, Rujan T, Martin W, Croteau R: Isoprenoid biosynthesis: the evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97 (24): 13172-13177. 10.1073/pnas.240454797.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin VJ, Pitera DJ, Withers ST, Newman JD, Keasling JD: Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids. Nat Biotechnol. 2003, 21 (7): 796-802. 10.1038/nbt833.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Vadali RV, Fu Y, Bennett GN, San KY: Enhanced lycopene productivity by manipulation of carbon flow to isopentenyl diphosphate in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Prog. 2005, 21 (5): 1558-1561. 10.1021/bp050124l.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Yoon SH, Lee YM, Kim JE, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim JY, Jung KH, Shin YC, Keasling JD, Kim SW: Enhanced lycopene production in Escherichia coli engineered to synthesize isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate from mevalonate. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006, 94 (6): 1025-1032. 10.1002/bit.20912.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Yoon SH, Lee SH, Das A, Ryu HK, Jang HJ, Kim JY, Oh DK, Keasling JD, Kim SW: Combinatorial expression of bacterial whole mevalonate pathway for the production of beta-carotene in E. coli. J Biotechnol. 2009, 140: (3-4):218-226. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2009.01.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Wang C, Yoon SH, Shah AA, Chung YR, Kim JY, Choi ES, Keasling JD, Kim SW: Farnesol production from Escherichia coli by harnessing the exogenous mevalonate pathway. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2010, 107 (3): 421-429. 10.1002/bit.22831.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Yoon SH, Park HM, Kim JE, Lee SH, Choi MS, Kim JY, Oh DK, Keasling JD, Kim SW: Increased beta-carotene production in recombinant Escherichia coli harboring an engineered isoprenoid precursor pathway with mevalonate addition. Biotechnol Prog. 2007, 23 (3): 599-605.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Leuenberger MG, Engeloch-Jarret C, Woggon WD: The Reaction Mechanism of the Enzyme-Catalyzed Central Cleavage of beta-Carotene to Retinal This research was supported by F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG and the Swiss National Science Foundation. We are grateful to F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG for a generous gift of carotenoids and Dr. Claus Bornemann for preliminary experiments. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2001, 40 (14): 2613-2617. 10.1002/1521-3773(20010716)40:14<2613::AID-ANIE2613>3.0.CO;2-Z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Borowski T, Blomberg MR, Siegbahn PE: Reaction mechanism of apocarotenoid oxygenase (ACO): a DFT study. Chemistry. 2008, 14 (7): 2264-2276. 10.1002/chem.200701344.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Liden M, Eriksson U: Understanding retinol metabolism: structure and function of retinol dehydrogenases. J Biol Chem. 2006, 281 (19): 13001-13004. 10.1074/jbc.R500027200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin M, Zhang M, Abraham M, Smith SM, Napoli JL: Mouse retinal dehydrogenase 4 (RALDH4), molecular cloning, cellular expression, and activity in 9-cis-retinoic acid biosynthesis in intact cells. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278 (11): 9856-9861. 10.1074/jbc.M211417200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Ross AC: Retinol esterification by rat liver microsomes. Evidence for a fatty acyl coenzyme A: retinol acyltransferase. J Biol Chem. 1982, 257 (5): 2453-2459.Google Scholar
  21. Bempong DK, Honigberg IL, Meltzer NM: Normal phase LC-MS determination of retinoic acid degradation products. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1995, 13 (3): 285-291. 10.1016/0731-7085(95)01270-U.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. McCaffery P, Evans J, Koul O, Volpert A, Reid K, Ullman MD: Retinoid quantification by HPLC/MS(n). J Lipid Res. 2002, 43 (7): 1143-1149. 10.1194/jlr.D200012-JLR200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Swindell EC, Eichele G: Retinoid metabolizing enzymes in development. Biofactors. 1999, 10: (2-3):85-89.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Perlmann T: Retinoid metabolism: a balancing act. Nat Genet. 2002, 31 (1): 7-8.Google Scholar
  25. Kim SW, Keasling JD: Metabolic engineering of the nonmevalonate isopentenyl diphosphate synthesis pathway in Escherichia coli enhances lycopene production. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001, 72 (4): 408-415. 10.1002/1097-0290(20000220)72:4<408::AID-BIT1003>3.0.CO;2-H.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsuruta H, Paddon CJ, Eng D, Lenihan JR, Horning T, Anthony LC, Regentin R, Keasling JD, Renninger NS, Newman JD: High-level production of amorpha-4,11-diene, a precursor of the antimalarial agent artemisinin, in Escherichia coli. PLoS One. 2009, 4: (2):e4489-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ramos JL, Duque E, Gallegos MT, Godoy P, Ramos-Gonzalez MI, Rojas A, Teran W, Segura A: Mechanisms of solvent tolerance in gram-negative bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002, 56: 743-768. 10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.161038.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoon KW, Doo EH, Kim SW, Park JB: In situ recovery of lycopene during biosynthesis with recombinant Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2008, 135 (3): 291-294. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Baker ME: Evolution of mammalian 11beta- and 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases-type 2 and retinol dehydrogenases from ancestors in Caenorhabditis elegans and evidence for horizontal transfer of a eukaryote dehydrogenase to E. coli. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1998, 66 (5-6): 355-363. 10.1016/S0960-0760(98)00064-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuznetsova GM, Kartasheva ZS, Kasaikina OT: Kinetics of limonene autooxidation. Russian Chemical Bulletin. 1996, 45 (7): 1682-1685.Google Scholar
  31. Knight AET, (NJ), Talati, Akshay (East Meadow, NY), Zecchino, Jules (Closter, NJ): Stable compositions containing biologically active components. 1999, United States: E-L Management Corp. (New York, NY)Google Scholar
  32. Shen CR, Lan EI, Dekishima Y, Baez A, Cho KM, Liao JC: High titer anaerobic 1-butanol synthesis in Escherichia coli enabled by driving force. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011Google Scholar
  33. Bond-Watts BB, Bellerose RJ, Chang MCY: Enzyme mechanism as a kinetic control element for designing synthetic biofuel pathways. nature chemical biology. 2011Google Scholar


© Jang et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.