Open Access

Secretion of biologically active interferon-gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10) by Lactococcus lactis

  • Julio Villatoro-Hernandez1,
  • Maria J Loera-Arias1,
  • Anali Gamez-Escobedo2,
  • Moises Franco-Molina2,
  • Jorge G Gomez-Gutierrez2,
  • Humberto Rodriguez-Rocha1,
  • Yolanda Gutierrez-Puente3,
  • Odila Saucedo-Cardenas1, 5,
  • Jesus Valdes-Flores4 and
  • Roberto Montes-de-Oca-Luna1Email author
Microbial Cell Factories20087:22

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-7-22

Received: 10 June 2008

Accepted: 28 July 2008

Published: 28 July 2008



Chemokines are a large group of chemotactic cytokines that regulate and direct migration of leukocytes, activate inflammatory responses, and are involved in many other functions including regulation of tumor development. Interferon-gamma inducible-protein-10 (IP-10) is a member of the C-X-C subfamily of the chemokine family of cytokines. IP-10 specifically chemoattracts activated T lymphocytes, monocytes, and NK cells. IP-10 has been described also as a modulator of other antitumor cytokines. These properties make IP-10 a novel therapeutic molecule for the treatment of chronic and infectious diseases. Currently there are no suitable live biological systems to produce and secrete IP-10. Lactococcus lactis has been well-characterized over the years as a safe microorganism to produce heterologous proteins and to be used as a safe, live vaccine to deliver antigens and cytokines of interest. Here we report a recombinant strain of L. lactis genetically modified to produce and secrete biologically active IP-10.


The IP-10 coding region was isolated from human cDNA and cloned into an L. lactis expression plasmid under the regulation of the pNis promoter. By fusion to the usp45 secretion signal, IP-10 was addressed out of the cell. Western blot analysis demonstrated that recombinant strains of L. lactis secrete IP-10 into the culture medium. Neither degradation nor incomplete forms of IP-10 were detected in the cell or supernatant fractions of L. lactis. In addition, we demonstrated that the NICE (nisin-controlled gene expression) system was able to express IP-10 "de novo" even two hours after nisin removal. This human IP-10 protein secreted by L. lactis was biological active as demonstrated by Chemotaxis assay over human CD3+T lymphocytes.


Expression and secretion of mature IP-10 was efficiently achieved by L. lactis forming an effective system to produce IP-10. This recombinant IP-10 is biologically active as demonstrated by its ability to chemoattract human CD3+ T lymphocytes. This strain of recombinant L. lactis represents a potentially useful tool to be used as a live vaccine in vivo.


Migration of immune cells at sites of antigenic challenge or lesions is mainly mediated by chemotactic cytokines called chemokines. Interferon-gamma inducible-protein-10 (IP-10) is a C-X-C cytokine that belongs to the subfamily of chemokines and is secreted by T cells, monocytes, endothelial cells, and keratinocytes [1, 2]. IP-10 exerts a chemotactic effect on activated T lymphocytes and, Monocytes and NK cells [3, 4]. It also has antitumor activity mediated by its angiostatic features, inhibiting tumor neovascularization and promoting damage in established tumor vasculature followed by necrosis in vivo [57]. Microbiological studies in radial diffusion assays revealed an antimicrobial activity of IP-10 against Escherichia coli and Lysteria monocytogenes [8]. Another report using a murine experimental model showed that bacterial clearance of the pneumonia-causal agent Klebsiella pneumoniae was associated with the presence of IP-10 [9]. Related reports demonstrated an important function of IP-10 in the infection resolution of the intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis, in which the absence of IP-10 led to the evolution of the infection originated by the causal agent [10]. For parasites, IP-10 exerted a protective response against Leishmania amazonensis in mice, not only reducing the prevalence of infection and the parasitic burden but also delaying and diminishing lesions caused by this intracellular parasite [11]. All these findings formed our interest to make use of this chemokine and investigate its effect on different chronic or infectious diseases. To accomplish this goal, several approaches have been developed for the construction of an adenovirus encoding for the mature moiety of the IP-10. Narvaiza et al. in 2000 reported that the use of an adenovirus encoding for IP-10 (Ad-IP-10) injected intratumorally reduced the tumor diameter, but when injected simultaneously with an adenovirus coding for the interleukin-12 (Ad-IL-12) the tumors disappeared completely in all the mice tested [12]. To date there were no suitable, safe strategies to produce and deliver IP-10 in a reliable, feasible manner in animal models. In recent years the use of L. lactis, a nonpathogenic, noninvasive lactic-acid bacterium has yielded optimistic and promising results as a biological vector to produce heterologous proteins of therapeutic interest [1316]. This innocuous food-grade bacterium has been manipulated to express cytokines and antigens of therapeutic and medical interest with high efficiency and with safe and well-characterized expression systems. The administration of this L. lactis intranasally, resulted in the generation of protective immune responses against chronic and infectious diseases [14, 17, 18].

In our work we genetically manipulated the food-grade bacterium L. lactis to produce and secrete chemokine IP-10. This effort is impelled by the solid precedents that have demonstrated that L. lactis is a safe microorganism that could be used for the production of molecules of medical interest, intended to cause immune responses and be employed as a live vaccine.

Results and Discussion

Construction of an inducible system for IP-10 secretion by Lactococcus lactis

To obtain a template to amplify the coding sequence for the mature IP-10, a cDNA was generated from total RNA isolated from human macrophages (see material and methods for more details). A 231-bp DNA fragment encoding IP-10 was amplified and cloned into the pCR 2.1 vector. This new plasmid was named pCR-hIP-10 and was transformed into E. coli DH5α. The identity of the human ip-10 gene was confirmed by sequencing. This construction was digested with Nsi I-EcoR I releasing the IP-10 coding region without ATG and then subcloned into the pVE:3684-E7 vector digested with the same enzymes. This IP-10 coding region was subcloned in-frame with the secretion-signal peptide-encoding sequence of the usp45 gene of L. lactis and under control of the nisin-inducing promoter Pnis [19]. This final construct, presented in Figure 1, was named plasmid pSEC:huIP-10 and was used to transform L. lactis NZ9000 by electroporation. Transformants of L. lactis were referred as the NZpSEC:huIP-10 strain. Table 1 contains strains and plasmids used and constructed in this work.
Figure 1

Schematic design of IP-10 expression system for production and secretion by Lactococcus lactis. The scheme represents the final construction of the IP-10 inducible expression system carried by Lactococcus lactis (pSEC:huIP-10). The diagram shows the nisin-inducible promoter PnisA, the ribosome binding-site of usp45 (RBS), the usp45 signal peptide of the usp45 gene (SPusp), and the coding region for the mature moiety of IP-10. The open circle represents a rho-independent trpA transcription terminator fused just downstream to the IP-10 gene (not to scale).

Table 1

Bacterial strains and plasmids.





E. coli DH5α

Wild type, plasmid free


L. lactis MG1363

Wild type, plasmid free

Gasson, 1983

L. lactis NZ9000

MG1363 (nisRK genes into chromosome), plasmid free

Kuipers et al., 1998


MG1363 (nisRK genes into chromosome), pSEC:huIP-10

This work



Plasmid characteristics



ori pUC




ori pUC

Apr, DNA fragment encoding the IP-10 mature moiety

This work



Cmr; gene expressed from PnisA encodes SPUsp-E7 precursor

Bermúdez-Humarán et al., 2002



Cmr; gene expressed from PnisA encodes SPUsp-huIP-10 precursor

This work

Secretion analysis of IP-10 by Lactococcus lactis

The ability of strain NZpSEC:huIP-10 to produce and secrete IP-10 was examined by Western Blot using anti-human IP10 antibodies. Protein samples were prepared from cell (C) and supernatant (S) fractions of induced (+) and noninduced (-) NZpSEC:huIP-10 cultures. Supernatant fraction analysis from three recombinant-induced strains (+) showed a clear band corresponding to the size of the human IP-10 protein (Figure 2). No signal was detected either in the cell fraction of induced cultures (data not shown) or in the supernatant of noninduced recombinant strains (Figure 2). Different outcomes have been reported about the integrity of heterologous proteins produced by L. lactis. In most cases an efficient and correct expression was achieved, but sometimes a poor secretion or intracellular retention of incomplete proteins have been reported, even when this is directed by a secretion-signal peptide. We detected by Western blot a band corresponding to the size of the complete IP-10 protein in the supernatant fraction of induced cultures of L. lactis NZ pSEC:huIP-10. We did not find incomplete or immature forms of IP-10 in any fraction.
Figure 2

Expression analysis of IP-10 secretion by recombinant Lactococcus lactis. Protein extracts from induced and noninduced cultures of recombinant Lactococcus lactis NZpSEC:huIP-10 were prepared from cell-free samples and analyzed by Western blotting using anti-IP-10. Mature IP-10 was detected in all the induced (+) cultures in the 10 kDa range as expected. No signal was found for noninduced cultures (-) of recombinant L. lactis NZpSEC:huIP-10. No immature or incomplete forms of IP-10 were detected. M, protein molecular marker.

Because we wanted to generate a lactococcal vehicle able to produce and secrete the human chemokine IP-10, to deliver IP-10 in vivo, we evaluated the ability of this recombinant strain to secrete IP-10 "de novo" over time after induction by nisin. To answer this, an experiment was made to specifically detect new IP-10 secretion after induction by nisin. Usually the time-course protein-expression experiments reported in the literature are done without removing the protein synthesized and accumulated over time, which may lead to misinterpretation. To avoid this we made the experiment shown in Figure 3. Three separate batches of recombinant L. lactis were induced with nisin (A, B, and C). One hour after nisin induction, cells in B and C were washed and suspended in new nisin-free medium (culture A was kept with nisin throughout the experiment). Two hours later cells in culture B were washed to remove the accumulated protein, suspended in new nisin-free medium and allowed to grow three more hours. A sample was taken for IP-10 detection by Western blot from the three cultures at different times, 1, 3, and 6 hours (counting time 0 as the time nisin was added). Results in Figure 3 show an IP-10 band of similar intensity in all cultures at one hour (A, B, and C) as expected because all of them were under the same conditions. This band corresponds to the amount of huIP-10 protein produced and accumulated during the first hour. Similar findings were observed at hour 3 where the intensity of the bands was equivalent in all three cultures. Because extracellular nisin had been removed from cultures B and C at one hour, their secreted IP-10 at hour 3 corresponds to the synthesized protein from the "switched on" operon induced by the intracellular nisin during the one-hour induction period. The secreted IP-10 detected at 6 hours in the supernatant of culture B represents the protein produced and secreted just in the last 3 hours, because washing the cells at hour 3 eliminated all the protein accumulated in the medium during the first three hours. This secreted IP-10 protein, although less than that in A and C at the same time point, corresponds to what we call "de novo" protein because secretion of this protein starts 2 hours after elimination of the nisin. At this point, we did not know if this last three hour IP-10 secretion in culture B is dependent on an intracellular-remaining inductor or translation of IP-10 mRNA still present in the cytoplasm.
Figure 3

De novo secreted IP-10 in the absence of nisin. Three separate cultures (A, B, and C) of NZpSEC:huIP-10 were induced with 10 ng/ml of nisin for 1 hour. Culture A was in the presence of nisin all the time; culture B washed and suspended in fresh medium without inducer at hour 1 and 3, and culture C was washed and suspended in fresh medium without inducer only at hour 1. All cultures were grown a total of 6 hours. Protein extracts were analyzed by Western blot at hour 1, 3, and 6. The band in culture B at hour 6 (asterisk) represents the IP-10 "de novo" specifically secreted from hour 3 to 6 in the total absence of nisin demonstrating the ability of Lactococcus lactis to keep expressing and producing IP-10 for at least three hours.

Our time-correlated evaluation of IP-10 secretion at different times, removing all accumulated protein, avoids misinterpretations and allows pointing out the time that L. lactis is able to secrete recombinant proteins after inducing the activity of the pNis promoter. This experiment demonstrated that cultures of recombinant L. lactis continue expressing and secreting IP-10 for at least two hours after elimination of nisin from the culture media. For this reason, we would expect to find a similar secretion response from L. lactis after its administration into an animal model, where the inductor would no longer be available but where secretion efficiency would be influenced by the host environment.

Recombinant IP-10 secreted by Lactococcus lactis is biologically active

Glycosylation is a common event caused by eukaryotic cells in a variety of proteins. This posttranslational modification has been seen to affect the activity of the protein itself. Because IP-10 has been reported as a glycoprotein [1] and because L. lactis, as other bacteria, does not cause glycosylation, we needed to determine if this L. lactis -secreted IP-10 was biologically active.

Chemoattraction of activated T lymphocytes is an important feature of IP-10. To evaluate the chemoattraction activity of the recombinant IP-10, human-peripheral T lymphocytes were activated with human IL-2 and subjected to an in vitro migration assay in a Boyden chamber (for more details see materials and methods). Cell-free supernatants from cultures of recombinant L. lactis were sterilized by filtration (0.22 μm) and added to the lower compartment of the Boyden chemotaxis chambers, with 100 000 IL-2 activated lymphocytes added to the upper wells. After 1 hour of chemotaxis and the counting of cells migrating to the lower side of the membrane (the one that was not exposed to the cells), we were able to demonstrate by direct observation that supernatants from cell-free cultures of recombinant strain NZ pSEC:huIP-10 significantly attracted more T lymphocytes than the controls L. lactis (Wild Type) and PBS, as demonstrated by the greater amount of cells on this underside (Fig 4A). Our conclusion is that presence of recombinant IP-10 in supernatants from induced NZ pSEC:huIP-10 cultures is able to interact specifically and chemoattract activated human T lymphocytes.
Figure 4

Secreted IP-10 by Lactococcus lactis is biologically active. Chemoattraction of L. lactis-secreted IP-10 was determined by using a Boyden chamber for chemotaxis. T lymphocytes obtained directly from human peripheral blood were stimulated with human IL-2 for 12 days. Chemotaxis assays using Boyden chambers were made with supernatants sterilized by filtration of both recombinant and wild-type Lactococcus lactis. To determine the number of chemoattracted cells, the membranes were stained with hematoxylin and the cells counted by using light microscopy at 1000 × (A). Cells in the lower chamber were incubated with specific anti-CD3+ and counted by FACS analysis (B). Supernatants of wild-type (WT) L. lactis and PBS were used as negative controls and Zymosan-activated serum (S+) as a positive control.

Chemotaxis activity on T lymphocytes was also evaluated by counting the cells that had migrated into the lower chamber by using a fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) flow cytometer using an anti-CD3 antibody (Fig 4B). The amount of cells detected by the flow cytometer in the positive control sample (Zymosan-activated human serum) showed the largest number of cells that did migrate all the way through the membrane, about 30 000 cells on average. Supernatants containing L. lactis-secreted IP-10 showed a significant chemoattraction to CD3+ human lymphocytes, counting > 5000 CD3+ T lymphocytes (Fig 4B). In contrast, few cells were chemoattracted to the lower chamber from the negative controls, PBS and supernatants from the wild-type L. lactis, as expected. These results effectively confirm that supernatants from recombinant L. lactis contain a biologically active human IP-10 secreted by this lactic acid bacterium.


We developed a novel strain of L. lactis to secrete the antitumor chemokine IP-10 (Interferon-gamma inducible-protein-10). Its secretion was highly efficient because no immature or incomplete forms of this chemokine were detected in the cytoplasm or the media. Our results demonstrate that the recombinant strain NZ pSEC:huIP-10 of L. lactis produces and secretes biologically active human interferon-gamma inducible-protein-10 (IP-10) by using the nisin-controlled expression (NICE) system, as demonstrated by chemoattraction of human lymphocytes in a chemotaxis assay (Fig 4). We demonstrated that cultures of recombinant L. lactis once they are induced by nisin for only 1 hour actively secrete IP-10 protein "de novo" for more than two hours even when the inducer was removed. The chemoattraction ability of this recombinant hIP-10 plus its antitumor property makes this recombinant L. lactis strain expressing IP-10 a valuable tool for cancer therapy. Moreover, this strain of L. lactis able to secrete human IP-10 could be used as a mucosal enhancer to modulate or augment immune responses against tumors or infectious diseases.


Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1. Escherichia coli DH5α was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth at 37°C with vigorous agitation. Lactococcus lactis NZ9000 [20] was grown in M17 medium (DIFCO) supplemented with 1% glucose (GM17) at 30°C without agitation. Unless otherwise indicated, plasmid constructions were first established in E. coli and then transferred to L. lactis by electrotransformation as previously described [21]. Clones were selected by addition of 100 μg/ml of ampicillin or 10 μg/ml of chloramphenicol for E. coli and 10 μg/ml of chloramphenicol for L. lactis.

General procedures for DNA isolations and manipulations were made essentially as described [22]. PCR was done using Vent DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs) and RT-PCR (HS RT-PCR, Sigma) as recommended by the manufacturer using the programmable thermal controller PTC-100 (MJ Research, Inc).

Harvest and culture of macrophages

Human macrophages were isolated from donor whole blood by centrifugation on Histopaque-1077 (Sigma) according to the manufacturer. The layer containing mononuclear cells was carefully recovered, washed, and cultured for 3 hours in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution, and 1% HEPES buffer and then incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Macrophages were semipurified by removing nonadherent cells. Macrophages were seeded into 6-well-plates (Costar) at 5 × 106 cells/ml in complete RPMI-1640 medium (10% heat-inactivated FBS, 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution, and 1% HEPES buffer) stimulated with 20 mg/ml of lipopolysaccharides (LPS B from Escherichia coli 026:B6, Sigma) and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 5 hours.

Synthesis of Human cDNA

The total RNA from 5 × 106 cells of LPS-stimulated human macrophages (previously cultured and harvested) was isolated using TRizol reagent (Gibco) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration and integrity of RNA was determined by measuring absorbance at 260 nm and analyzed by formaldehyde-agarose gel electrophoresis. The first strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA by SuperscriptTM II reverse transcriptase (Gibco) and oligo (dT) 12–18 primer and used to synthesize the second strand.

Inducible Expression of recombinant hIP-10 by Lactococcus lactis

To allow the expression of huIP-10, cultures of recombinant strains of L. lactis (OD600 nm = 0.6–0.8) were induced with 10 ng/ml of nisin (Sigma) for one hour.

For long-term expression experiments, three cultures of recombinant L. lactis were simultaneously induced with 10 ng/ml of nisin at OD600 nm = 0.4 and their growth was followed for 6 hours under optimum conditions. Culture A was left intact and no removal of medium was made at any time. Cultures B and C, after 1-hour induction, were centrifuged, the cell pellet washed with sterile PBS, and resuspended in the same volume of fresh GM17 medium. Culture B underwent the same wash step at hour 3. Protein extraction for all the 3 cultures was done identically at hour 1, 3, and 6.

Protein extraction and Western Blotting

Cell and supernatant fractions were prepared separately. Samples were processed from 1.35 ml of culture. Cell pellets were obtained by centrifugation at 21000 × g at 4°C for 5 minutes and resuspended in 100 μl of TES-lysis buffer (25% sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, 50 mM TRIS·HCL, pH 8.0, lyzozyme [10 mg/ml] complemented with 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF) and 10 mM of dithiothreitol (DTT). The mixture was incubated at 37°C for 1 hour and then 50 μl of 20% SDS and one volume of loading buffer were added. The samples were maintained at -20°C before loading onto the gel.

The supernatant samples were treated with 1 mM of PMSF and 10 mM DTT to avoid proteolysis. Proteins were precipitated using 150 μl of 100% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and incubated on ice for 10 minutes followed by centrifugation at 21000 × g at 4°C for 15 minutes. The pellet was resuspended in 50 μl of 50 mM NaOH and 50 μl of SDS-PAGE loading buffer (100 mM TRIS·HCl, pH 6.8, 200 mM dithiothreitol, 4% SDS, 0.1% bromophenol blue, and 10% glycerol). Twenty μl of these preparations were loaded onto 15% acrylamide gels. SDS-PAGE and Western blotting was done essentially as described [22]. Inmunodetection was done by the use of polyclonal anti-IP-10 (RnD Systems) as a primary antibody and protein-G horseradish-peroxidase conjugate (BioRad) and the SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminiscent Substrate (Pierce) as recommended by the suppliers.

Lymphocyte culture

Human-peripheral blood lymphocytes were isolated from donor whole blood by centrifugation on Histopaque-1077 (Sigma) according to manufacturer's instructions. The mononuclear cell layer was carefully recovered and washed three times with RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco). Adherent cells were discarded and cells in suspension were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 5% human serum (Sigma) and 200 U/ml human IL-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 12 days. Cell density was kept all the time between 1 and 3 × 106 cells/ml.

Chemotaxis assay and flow cytometry

Cell migration was measured in 5.0-μm pore-size cellulose-nitrate membranes (Whatman) using a Boyden chemotaxis chamber. Supernatants from recombinant and wild-type L. lactis, sterilized by filtration through a 0.22-μm filter (Millex, Millipore), were loaded into the lower compartment of the chamber. Lymphocytes (1 × 105 cells) in RPMI 1640 medium were loaded into the upper compartment of the chamber. Chemotaxis was allowed to occur for 1 hour at 37°C in 5% CO2. The membrane from the chamber was removed, washed with PBS, fixed, and stained with hematoxylin. Cells that had migrated to the underside of the filter were fixed with methanol and stained with hematoxylin. The number of migrated cells was counted by using light microscopy. For each membrane, five randomly selected fields were counted. Cells migrating into the lower compartment of the chamber were counted by a fluorescence-activated cell-sorting (FACS) flow cytometer (BD San Jose, CA). For this flow cytometry assay, the aqueous phase from the lower chambers was gently recovered and centrifuged. The resulting cell pellet was suspended in PBS and incubated for 10 min with human anti-CD3 FITC (BD Biosciences Pharmingen, San Diego, USA), washed with PBS, and counted with the FACS sorting cytometer. All chemotaxis assays were done in triplicate. Complement-activated serum was prepared from fresh human serum by addition of 25 mg of zymosan (Sigma) per ml of serum and incubated at 37°C for one hour. Statistical analysis was done using the Tukey test.



This work was supported by National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT) of Mexico, Grant No. 47478 to RM-D-O-L. JVH and MJLA are recipients of a scholarship from CONACYT of Mexico. Thanks to Dr. Ellis Glazier for editing this English-language text. The authors thank Dr. Marcel Baggiolini and collaborators for the chemotaxis consultation.

Authors’ Affiliations

Departamento de Histología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León (UANL)
Departamento de Microbiología e Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, UANL
Departamento de Bioquímica, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, UANL
Departamento de Bioquímica, CINVESTAV
División de Genética, Centro de Investigación Biomédica del Noreste, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (IMSS)


  1. Taub DD, Lloyd AR, Conlon K, Wang JM, Ortaldo JR, Harada A, Matsushima K, Kelvin DJ, Oppenheim JJ: Recombinant human interferon-inducible protein 10 is a chemoattractant for human monocytes and T lymphocytes and promotes T cell adhesion to endothelial cells. J Exp Med. 1993, 177 (6): 1809-1814. 10.1084/jem.177.6.1809.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Taub DD, Longo DL, Murphy WJ: Human interferon-inducible protein-10 induces mononuclear cell infiltration in mice and promotes the migration of human T lymphocytes into the peripheral tissues and human peripheral blood lymphocytes-SCID mice. Blood. 1996, 87 (4): 1423-1431.Google Scholar
  3. Farber JM: Mig and IP-10: CXC chemokines that target lymphocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 1997, 61 (3): 246-257.Google Scholar
  4. Frederick MJ, Clayman GL: Chemokines in cancer. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2001, 3 (19): 1-18. 10.1017/S1462399401003301.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Sgadari C, Angiolillo AL, Cherney BW, Pike SE, Farber JM, Koniaris LG, Vanguri P, Burd PR, Sheikh N, Gupta G, Teruya-Feldstein J, Tosato G: Interferon-inducible protein-10 identified as a mediator of tumor necrosis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996, 93 (24): 13791-13796. 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13791.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Yao L, Pike SE, Pittaluga S, Cherney B, Gupta G, Jaffe ES, Tosato G: Anti-tumor activities of the angiogenesis inhibitors interferon-inducible protein-10 and the calreticulin fragment vasostatin. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2002, 51 (7): 358-366. 10.1007/s00262-002-0294-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Angiolillo AL, Sgadari C, Taub DD, Liao F, Farber JM, Maheshwari S, Kleinman HK, Reaman GH, Tosato G: Human interferon-inducible protein 10 is a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis in vivo. J Exp Med. 1995, 182 (1): 155-162. 10.1084/jem.182.1.155.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole AM, Ganz T, Liese AM, Burdick MD, Liu L, Strieter RM: Cutting edge: IFN-inducible ELR- CXC chemokines display defensin-like antimicrobial activity. J Immunol. 2001, 167 (2): 623-627.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Zeng X, Moore TA, Newstead MW, Deng JC, Kunkel SL, Luster AD, Standiford TJ: Interferon-inducible protein 10, but not monokine induced by gamma interferon, promotes protective type 1 immunity in murine Klebsiella pneumoniae pneumonia. Infect Immun. 2005, 73 (12): 8226-8236. 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8226-8236.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nagarajan UM, Ojcius DM, Stahl L, Rank RG, Darville T: Chlamydia trachomatis induces expression of IFN-gamma-inducible protein 10 and IFN-beta independent of TLR2 and TLR4, but largely dependent on MyD88. J Immunol. 2005, 175 (1): 450-460.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Vasquez RE, Soong L: CXCL10/gamma interferon-inducible protein 10-mediated protection against Leishmania amazonensis infection in mice. Infect Immun. 2006, 74 (12): 6769-6777. 10.1128/IAI.01073-06.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Narvaiza I, Mazzolini G, Barajas M, Duarte M, Zaratiegui M, Qian C, Melero I, Prieto J: Intratumoral coinjection of two adenoviruses, one encoding the chemokine IFN-gamma-inducible protein-10 and another encoding IL-12, results in marked antitumoral synergy. J Immunol. 2000, 164 (6): 3112-3122.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Bermudez-Humaran LG, Langella P, Miyoshi A, Gruss A, Guerra RT, Montes de Oca-Luna R, Le Loir Y: Production of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 protein in Lactococcus lactis. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68 (2): 917-922. 10.1128/AEM.68.2.917-922.2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanniffy SB, Carter AT, Hitchin E, Wells JM: Mucosal delivery of a pneumococcal vaccine using Lactococcus lactis affords protection against respiratory infection. J Infect Dis. 2007, 195 (2): 185-193. 10.1086/509807.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Steidler L: Genetically engineered probiotics. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003, 17 (5): 861-876. 10.1016/S1521-6918(03)00072-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Steidler L, Hans W, Schotte L, Neirynck S, Obermeier F, Falk W, Fiers W, Remaut E: Treatment of murine colitis by Lactococcus lactis secreting interleukin-10. Science. 2000, 289 (5483): 1352-1355. 10.1126/science.289.5483.1352.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Braat H, Rottiers P, Hommes DW, Huyghebaert N, Remaut E, Remon JP, van Deventer SJ, Neirynck S, Peppelenbosch MP, Steidler L: A phase I trial with transgenic bacteria expressing interleukin-10 in Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006, 4 (6): 754-759. 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.03.028.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Robinson K, Chamberlain LM, Lopez MC, Rush CM, Marcotte H, Le Page RW, Wells JM: Mucosal and cellular immune responses elicited by recombinant Lactococcus lactis strains expressing tetanus toxin fragment C. Infect Immun. 2004, 72 (5): 2753-2761. 10.1128/IAI.72.5.2753-2761.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. de Ruyter PG, Kuipers OP, de Vos WM: Controlled gene expression systems for Lactococcus lactis with the food-grade inducer nisin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996, 62 (10): 3662-3667.Google Scholar
  20. Kuipers OP, de Ruyter PG, Kleerebezem M, de Vos WM: Controlled overproduction of proteins by lactic acid bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 1997, 15 (4): 135-140. 10.1016/S0167-7799(97)01029-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Langella P, Le Loir Y, Ehrlich SD, Gruss A: Efficient plasmid mobilization by pIP501 in Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. J Bacteriol. 1993, 175 (18): 5806-5813.Google Scholar
  22. Sambrook J. EFFTM: Molecular Cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd Edition. Cold Spring Harbor. Edited by: Laboratory CSH. 1989, NYGoogle Scholar


© Villatoro-Hernandez et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.