Molecular and process design for rotavirus-like particle production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
© Rodríguez-Limas et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 15 December 2010
Accepted: 14 May 2011
Published: 14 May 2011
Virus-like particles (VLP) have an increasing range of applications including vaccination, drug delivery, diagnostics, gene therapy and nanotechnology. These developments require large quantities of particles that need to be obtained in efficient and economic processes. Production of VLP in yeast is attractive, as it is a low-cost protein producer able to assemble viral structural proteins into VLP. However, to date only single-layered VLP with simple architecture have been produced in this system. In this work, the first steps required for the production of rotavirus-like particles (RLP) in S. cerevisiae were implemented and improved, in order to obtain the recombinant protein concentrations required for VLP assembly.
The genes of the rotavirus structural proteins VP2, VP6 and VP7 were cloned in four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains using different plasmid and promoter combinations to express one or three proteins in the same cell. Performance of the best constructs was evaluated in batch and fed-batch cultures using a complete synthetic media supplemented with leucine, glutamate and succinate. The strain used had an important effect on recombinant protein concentration, while the type of plasmid, centromeric (YCp) or episomal (YEp), did not affect protein yields. Fed-batch culture of the PD.U-267 strain resulted in the highest concentration of rotavirus proteins. Volumetric and specific productivities increased 28.5- and 11-fold, respectively, in comparison with batch cultures. Expression of the three rotavirus proteins was confirmed by immunoblotting and RLP were detected using transmission electron microscopy.
We present for the first time the use of yeast as a platform to express multilayered rotavirus-like particles. The present study shows that the combined use of molecular and bioprocess tools allowed the production of triple-layered rotavirus RLP. Production of VLP with complex architecture in yeasts could lead to the development of new vaccine candidates with reduced restrictions by regulatory agencies, using the successful experience with other yeast-based VLP vaccines commercialized worldwide.
Virus-like particles (VLP) are obtained when viral structural proteins are produced in heterologous expression systems in absence of viral genetic material. VLP assemble without the action of non-structural viral proteins and have the same architectural characteristics as native viral particles. The current market demand of VLP is primarily as products for vaccination , but other applications include diagnostics, biomedicine, material science and nanotechnology [2, 3]. VLP have successfully protected humans and animals from viral diseases , inducing excellent humoral and cellular immune responses [5, 6]. To date, a few VLP-based vaccines are currently used for human vaccination worldwide: hepatitis B and human papillomavirus vaccines are commercialized by several pharmaceutical companies. Other VLP-based vaccine candidates are in clinical trials or undergoing preclinical evaluation, such as influenza virus, parvovirus, Norwalk and various chimeric VLP [7, 8]. VLP have been expressed in different heterologous systems, from bacteria and yeasts to the insect cell/baculovirus system (IC-BVS) and various mammalian cell lines. Ease of expression, ability to scale up and cost of production have made yeast the most popular VLP expression system . However, to date yeasts have only been used to produce simple VLP, formed by a single protein layer.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hansenula polymorpha and Pichia pastoris have been used to produce single-layered VLP of different viruses composed of a single nucleocapsid protein or a chimeric protein assembled in one layer [7, 10]. The production of multilayered VLP in yeast imposes various challenges. First, several recombinant proteins need to be simultaneously produced in each cell in conditions adequate for their self-assembly into VLP. Second, the intracellular concentration of each structural protein should be high enough to promote VLP assembly. Third, the intracellular environment should be adequate for assembly.
In this work, rotavirus-like particles (RLP) were used as a model for multiple layer VLP production in yeast. Rotavirus is the major etiological agent of gastroenteritis in children and young animals [11, 12]. Each year, rotavirus causes the death of approximately 610,000 children and 39% of hospitalizations for diarrhea worldwide . Moreover, rotavirus is an important cause of economic losses in animal production, including death, loss of weight and treatment of affected animals [14, 15]. RLP represent an interesting alternative to traditional vaccines that are now in the market, as they are efficient immunogens, cannot revert to infectious forms, do not need to be inactivated, handling of potentially pathogenic viruses is not needed, and new recombinant vaccines for new serotypes can be rapidly and easily produced [8, 9].
Rotavirus-like particles have been frequently expressed in the insect cell-baculovirus expression system . This system has proven to be productive and versatile. However, insect cell culture requires high cost media and baculovirus manipulation requires highly skilled personnel. In contrast, yeast expression systems are easy to scale-up and highly productive.
RLP production requires the simultaneous expression and assembly of three recombinant proteins, 120 molecules of VP2 (inner layer), 780 molecules of VP6 (middle layer) and 780 molecules of the glycoprotein VP7 (outer layer), into triple-layered particles (tlRLP) . In this work, molecular strategies to simultaneously express the three recombinant proteins in S. cerevisiae and molecular and process strategies to increase their concentration in yeast cells were developed. To our knowledge, this is the first time that double or triple-layered VLP are produced in yeast cells.
Yeast strains and plasmids
Yeasts and plasmids used in this study. Parental strains and their derivatives are shown
MATa ade2-1 can1-100 ura3-1 leu2-3,112 his3-11,15 trp1-1
pRS7, pRS2, pSal4
PPMA1, CEN6/ARSH4, TRP1
PPMA1, 2 μ, LEU2, PCUP1, 2 μ, URA3
PPMA1VP6, CEN6/ARSH4, TRP1
MATa SUC2 MAL2-8c ura3-52
PPGK1, PTEF1, 2 μ, URA3
PPGK1, PTEF1VP6, 2 μ, URA3
PPGK1ΔVP2, PTEF1VP6, PTEF1VP7 2 μ, URA3
MATa LEU ura31 TRP HIS ADE can1100 GAL SUC2
PPGK1, PTEF1, 2 μ, URA3
PPGK1, PTEF1VP6, 2 μ, URA3
PPGK1ΔVP2, PTEF1VP6, PTEF1VP7 2 μ, URA3
MATa trp1-901, leu2-3,112, ura3-52, his 3-200, gal4D gal80D
PPGK1, PTEF1, 2 μ, URA3
PPMA1VP6, CEN6/ARSH4, TRP1
PPGK1, PTEF1VP6, 2 μ, URA3
PPGK1ΔVP2, PTEF1VP6, PTEF1VP7 2 μ, URA3
Batch cultures were performed in a complete synthetic medium (CSM) without uracil. The medium contained glucose 20 g/L, yeast nitrogen base (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO, USA) 6.7 g/L and CSM -ura 0.77 g/L (Foremedium, Hunstanton, UK). Strains PJ.T-6 and W.T-6 were cultured in CSM without tryptophan. Media composition was improved using data from two two-level factorial designs of experiments in shake flask cultures, using VP6 and biomass concentration as response variables (data not shown). Based on the obtained results, culture medium was supplemented with leucine 1.8 mM, glutamate 20 mM and succinate 50 mM. pH was adjusted to 5.0 with KOH 2 N before autoclaving. Feeding medium for fed-batch cultures was 10 X CSM without supplements.
Cultivation of recombinant yeast
All cultures were performed in triplicate in parallel 1L bioreactors (DasGip, Jülich, Germany) with a working volume of 0.7 L. pH was controlled at 5.0 with KOH 2N. The sparged air flow rate was 42 L/h (1 vvm). Carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations in the outlet gas were measured with a DasGip GA4 gas analyzer. Cultures were inoculated to an initial OD600 of 0.01 with a liquid preculture.
and F is the feeding flow rate; b, a feeding constant (0.19 h-1), x0 is the initial biomass concentration at the end of the batch phase; Vo, the initial volume (0.4 L); t, time; Y s/x , the substrate over biomass ratio (assumed to be 6.06 g glucose/g DCW for all strains); C f s , the substrate concentration in the feed (200 g glucose/L); and C s , the substrate concentration at time t.
Dry cell weight was measured by filtration through a 0.45 μm pore-size nitrocellulose filters (Sartorious, Göttingen, Germany) as previously described .
Glucose, glycerol, ethanol, pyruvate, succinate and acetate concentrations were measured in culture supernatants by HPLC (UltiMate® 3000 Standard LC system, Dionex, California, USA) using a HPX-87H Aminex column (Biorad, Richmond, CA, USA) at 50°C with 5 mM H2SO4 as mobile phase at 0.6 mL/min.
Recombinant proteins were extracted from the cell pellet using YeastBuster protein extraction buffer (EMD Biosciences, Inc, Darmstadt, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. VP6 was quantified by ELISA (ProSpecT, Oxoid, Cambridge, UK). VP2, VP6 and VP7 were detected by immunoblotting with monoclonal antibodies at different stages of purification. Briefly, 200 μL of each sample were filtered through a nitrocellulose membrane using a Bio-dot® apparatus (Biorad, Richmond, CA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dried milk in phosphate buffered solution (PBS), incubated for 1 h with monoclonal antibodies in PBS with 0.1% non-fat milk (3A8 for VP2, 255 for VP6 and IC3 for VP7, kindly provided by Drs. Arias and López, IBt- UNAM, Mexico). All monoclonal antibodies used bind conformational epitopes. Therefore, non-denaturing conditions are required for detecting rotavirus proteins with them. Membranes were washed three times with PBS with 0.1% non-fat milk, incubated for 1 h with a goat anti-mouse antibody conjugated with peroxidase (Jackson, Immunoresearch laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA), and washed three times. Peroxidase activity was detected by reaction with carbazole. Inactivated rotavirus strain SA-11 was used as positive control.
RLP were recovered as follows: Yeast intracellular extracts were ultracentrifuged over a 35% sucrose cushion at 112,700 × g for 2 h at 4 C in a SW-28 rotor and an Optima L-90K ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). The pellet obtained was resuspended in TNC buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.15 M NaCl, 10 mM CaCl2). Cesium chloride was added to resuspended pellets to a concentration of 0.42 g/mL. Sample was centrifuged at 148,930 × g for 18 h at 4°C in a SW 55 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). Opalescent bands were isolated and observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Samples were visualized by negative staining: Twenty five microliters of sample were fixed for 1 min in a 200 mesh grid coated with formvar-carbon (Structure probe Inc., West Chester, PA. USA). The grid was washed with ultrapure water and stained with 3% uranyl acetate (Structure probe Inc, West Chester, PA. USA), rinsed and left to dry. Samples were observed in a transmission electron microscope Jeol 1200EXII (Jeol, Peabody, MA. USA) operated at 80 KV.
Cushion sucrose pellets and CsCl gradient bands were also analyzed in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-12% polyacrylamide gels stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue or blotted onto a PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) in a wet chamber. Membranes were blocked with PBS-5% non-fat dry milk and incubated with a rabbit anti-rotavirus serum for 2 h at room temperature. Membranes were washed twice with PBS-0.1% non-fat dry milk and incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG antibody (Jackson, Immunoresearch laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were washed three times with PBS-0.1% non-fat dry milk and peroxidase activity was detected by reaction with the chemiluminescence substrate Western Lightning Plus ECL (Perkin Elmer Inc, Waltman, MA USA). Gels and membranes were scanned and analyzed using a ChemiDoc system and the Image Lab 2.0 software (Biorad, Richmond, CA, USA).
Molecular strategies for the simultaneous expression of three rotavirus genes
Plasmid and strain selection
Kinetic and stoichiometric parameters of strains with one (W.T-6) or three (W.TLU-C) plasmids in the same cell
0.250 ± 0.010
0.159 ± 0.011
2.77 ± 0.12
4.33 ± 0.30
Yx/s (g DCW/g glucose)
0.133 ± 0.001
0.147 ± 0.002
Culture time (h)
Kinetic and stoichiometric parameters of batch cultures for VP6 producers
0.259 ± 0.005
0.276 ± 0.019
0.251 ± 0.035
0.299 ± 0.019
214 ± 21
154 ± 23
80 ± 1
181 ± 37
Yx/s (g DCW/g glucose)
0.107 ± 0.002
0.105 ± 0.002
0.088 ± 0.003
0.160 ± 0.001
Yp/x (μg VP6/g DCW)
99.42 ± 7.95
73.35 ± 9.61
45.47 ± 2.76
56.13 ± 11.46
Yp/s (μg VP6/g glucose)
10.68 ± 1.05
7.74 ± 1.16
4.02 ± 0.40
9.03 ± 1.88
Specific productivity (μg VP6/gDCW· h)
4.52 ± 0.36
2.82 ± 0.37
2.84 ± 0.17
2.14 ± 0.44
Volumetric productivity (μg VP6/L·h)
9.70 ± 0.95
5.96 ± 0.89
5.02 ± 0.50
6.88 ± 1.43
Process strategies for the simultaneous expression of three rotavirus genes
Fed batch cultures
In this work, strategies for the production of triple-layered VLP in yeast were implemented. Our first attempts to express rotavirus VP6 in batch cultures (data not shown) resulted in concentrations four orders of magnitude lower than those routinely obtained in our laboratory in the insect cell-baculovirus system, ca. 200 mg/L (unpublished results). High recombinant protein concentration is especially important for the production of VLP, as higher concentrations are expected to result in higher assembly efficiency both in vivo and in vitro methods . Therefore, molecular and process strategies for increasing the concentration of recombinant rotavirus proteins in yeast were designed in this work to allow their assembly into tlRLP. First, the use of three individual plasmids was compared with the use of a single plasmid. The use of three plasmids resulted in an important metabolic burden, as evidenced by a decrease in growth rate in comparison with the strain with a single plasmid. Using a single plasmid for the expression of the three rotavirus genes has several advantages: (a) the copy number is the same for each rotavirus gene, (b) the nucleic acid demand is reduced, and (c) only one auxotrophy needs to be complemented. Several authors have previously reported that the metabolic burden of recombinant protein production in S. cerevisiae increase due to plasmid copy number amplification [26–28]. Therefore, the use of a single plasmid expressing the three rotavirus genes was pursued (see Figure 1). Interestingly, no difference in growth rate was observed when the same strain with a single plasmid expressed one or three recombinant proteins (Figure 3A), suggesting that the burden imposed by three plasmids was not due to the simultaneous expression of three recombinant genes, but to the load of plasmid amplification or to the need of complementing three auxothropies.
To select the yeast strain and plasmid to be used for the production of tlRLP, four Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory strains with different auxotrophic markers and two types of plasmids, YCp (low copy number) and YEp (high copy number) containing only the rotavirus VP6 gene, were evaluated. The CEN.PK. strains have been used for the industrial production of metabolites and some extracellular proteins in laboratory and commercial applications . CEN.PK.113-5D strain has only one auxotrophy for Ura. The W303-1a is a widely used laboratory haploid strain and has 5 auxotrophies (see Table 1). The PD strain was obtained from the W303-1a strain through the repair of four of its auxotrophies, leaving only an auxotrophy for Ura. e PJ69-4a was developed for the two-hybrid system and has four auxotrophies. VP6 production was growth-associated in all strain and plasmid combinations. The best VP6 producers were the PJ.T-6 and the PD.U-6 strains (Table 3). While the PJ.T-6 strain has 5 auxothrophies, the PD.U-6 has only one. All auxotrophies for the PJ.T-6 strain were supplemented, with the exception of Ura. A decrease in VP6 concentration after the onset of the stationary growth phase was observed only in cultures of the CEN.U-6 strain, most likely a result of protease activity. Although in this work no efforts were pursued to identify the proteases involved, other studies have reported a high aspartyl and serine protease activities (PrA and PrB, mainly) in Saccharomyces strains expressing a recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (rHBsAg) . PrA and PrB are located in the vacuole and are released to the extracellular space when cells rupture. Their concentration increases in response to nutritional stress, and results in important protein degradation [30, 31]. No effect of the type of plasmid used for the individual expression of VP6 was observed. This behavior could be related to a higher stability of centromeric plasmids in comparison with plasmids based on 2 m sequences, even when the later have higher copy numbers .
Selection of the best strain increased recombinant VP6 concentration one order of magnitude. However, VP6 concentration was still three orders of magnitude lower than that obtained in insect cell cultures. Therefore, efforts were aimed at increasing the recombinant protein concentration by using fed-batch cultures, and evaluating two strains that were the best producers in batch cultures. Nutrient feeding increased VP6 concentration 11 times, when VP6 was expressed alone, and 28 times when it was coexpressed with VP2 and VP7. VP6 concentration was three-fold higher when it was co-expressed with VP2 and VP7. This behavior could be associated with a synergistic stabilization of the three structural proteins, protecting them from proteases by their complex structure at the end of the fed batch culture. PJ.U strains grew slower in fed batch cultures and produced less recombinant protein than the PD.U strains. This behavior could be associated to the number of auxotrophies of the PJ.U strain and/or a non-optimized feeding strategy. The maximum VP6 concentration obtained in fed-batch cultures was 144 times higher than the first batch cultures without strain or plasmid selection. The PD.U strains were also the most productive, with a productivity of 196 μg/L h.
The modifications of (a) supplementing limiting metabolites and (b) using a single vector with all three genes increased productivity in batch and fed batch cultures in complete synthetic medium without sacrificing the strong selection pressure that would be lost in complex media. The higher cost associated with defined and supplemented media may be justified on the basis of increased reproducibility, productivity and regulatory requirements for industrial purposes .
VLP formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae was evident in transmission electron microscopy images. However, the VP7/VP6 ratio measured by densitometry in SDS-PAGE gels was 59% lower than that present in the triple-layered rotavirus particle (VP7 mass/VP6 mass = 0.83, calculated from the molecular weight of VP7 and VP6). The observed rotavirus protein ratio in CsCl gradients indicates that only 41% of the obtained rotavirus-like particles were triple layered, as a result of an inefficient assembly or expression of VP7. Thus, a challenge that must be overcome for rotavirus VLP expression in yeast is increasing the heterologous protein concentration to promote a more efficient self-assembly into VLP. In the case of recombinant VLP production in S. cerevisiae, limitations in accumulation of VLP can result from (a) limitation of raw materials for the synthesis of the different components of VLP, (b) protein degradation processes, (c) inhibition of proper particle formation, (d) physical constraints on volume in the cytosol, among others. These factors may work in synergistic ways to limit productivity, i.e. limitations in particle formation may divert recombinant protein to degradation processes. Volumetric productivities of rotavirus proteins in this study are still one order of magnitude lower than the values reached in insect cells . As the culture media, the production process and the equipment required for recombinant protein production in yeast systems are simpler and less expensive than those used in the insect cell system, we believe that yeast are an attractive option for tlRLP production.
In the present study, the simultaneous production of three proteins aimed to the production of triple-layered VLP is shown for the first time in yeast. Although, tlRLP concentration was very low in comparison with other expression platforms, this study constitutes the basis for economic and easy large-scale production of these complex proteins in an efficient system such as yeast. These developments should be useful for the antigen production in a recombinant veterinary vaccine formulation, but can be extrapolated to human use, when the process conditions and the economic costs associated to downstream processes become competitive.
Feeding constant (0.19 h-1)
Substrate concentration in the feed (g glucose/L)
Substrate concentration at time t (g glucose/L)
Complete synthetic medium
Carbon dioxide transfer rate value (mM/h)
Feeding flow rate (mL/h)
Insect cell/baculovirus system
Optical density measured at 600 nm
Phosphate buffered solution
Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 promoter
Plasma membrane ATPase 1 promoter
Ribosome binding site
Recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen
Transcriptional elongation factor 1 promoter
Transmission electron microscopy
Triple layered rotavirus-like particles
Initial volume in batch stage (L)
Gas volume flow per unit of liquid volume per minute (min-1)
Initial biomass concentration at the end of the batch phase (g/L)
Yeast centromeric plasmid
Yeast episomal plasmid
Substrate over biomass ratio (g glucose/g DCW)
Financial support by DGAPA IN-224409, CONACyT-Salud 2007-c01-69911, SEP-CONACyT 2008-c01-101847, NIH F32 Kirschstein NRSA fellowship, The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, EU Framework VII project SYSINBIO (Grant no. 212766), the European Research Council project INSYSBIO (Grant no. 247013), and the Chalmers Foundation. W. Rodríguez-Limas was supported during his graduate studies by CONACyT scholarship No. 210328. Helpful discussions with Prof. Jorge Luis Folch. Technical assistance by V. Hernández. We thank Siavash Partow for providing the pSP-GM2 plasmid and Dr. Alba Lecona (INSP) for support on electron microscopy.
- Pattenden LK, Middelberg AP, Niebert M, Lipin DI: Towards the preparative and large-scale precision manufacture of virus-like particles. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23 (10): 523-529. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2005.07.011.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kwak M, Minten IJ, Anaya DM, Musser AJ, Brasch M, Nolte RJ, Mullen K, Cornelissen JJ, Herrmann A: Virus-like particles templated by DNA micelles: a general method for loading virus nanocarriers. J Am Chem Soc. 2010, 132 (23): 7834-7835. 10.1021/ja101444j.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plascencia-Villa G, Saniger JM, Ascencio JA, Palomares LA, Ramirez OT: Use of recombinant rotavirus VP6 nanotubes as a multifunctional template for the synthesis of nanobiomaterials functionalized with metals. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2009, 104 (5): 871-881. 10.1002/bit.22497.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ludwig C, Wagner R: Virus-like particles-universal molecular toolboxes. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2007, 18 (6): 537-545. 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.10.013.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grgacic EV, Anderson DA: Virus-like particles: passport to immune recognition. Methods. 2006, 40 (1): 60-65. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.018.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chackerian B: Virus-like particles: flexible platforms for vaccine development. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2007, 6 (3): 381-390. 10.1586/14760522.214.171.1241.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Noad R, Roy P: Virus-like particles as immunogens. Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11 (9): 438-444. 10.1016/S0966-842X(03)00208-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Palomares LA, Ramirez OT: Challenges for the production of virus-like particles in insect cells: The case of rotavirus-like particles. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2009, 45 (3): 158-167. 10.1016/j.bej.2009.02.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Federico M: Virus-like particles show promise as candidates for new vaccine strategies. Future virology. 2010, 5 (4): 371-374. 10.2217/fvl.10.29. 10.2217/fvl.10.29.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Stockmann C, Scheidle M, Dittrich B, Merckelbach A, Hehmann G, Melmer G, Klee D, Buchs J, Kang HA, Gellissen G: Process development in Hansenula polymorpha and Arxula adeninivorans, a re-assessment. Microb Cell Fact. 2009, 8: 22- 10.1186/1475-2859-8-22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dhama K, Chauhan RS, Mahendran M, Malik SV: Rotavirus diarrhea in bovines and other domestic animals. Vet Res Commun. 2009, 33 (1): 1-23. 10.1007/s11259-008-9070-x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parashar UD, Hummelman EG, Bresee JS, Miller MA, Glass RI: Global illness and deaths caused by rotavirus disease in children. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9 (5): 565-572.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parashar UD, Gibson CJ, Bresse JS, Glass RI: Rotavirus and severe childhood diarrhea. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12 (2): 304-306.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Holland RE: Some infectious causes of diarrhea in young farm animals. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990, 3 (4): 345-375.Google Scholar
- Saif LJ, Fernandez FM: Group A rotavirus veterinary vaccines. J Infect Dis. 1996, 174 (Suppl 1): S98-106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Pesavento JB, Crawford SE, Estes MK, Prasad BV: Rotavirus proteins: structure and assembly. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2006, 309: 189-219. 10.1007/3-540-30773-7_7.Google Scholar
- Lawton JA, Zeng CQ, Mukherjee SK, Cohen J, Estes MK, Prasad BV: Three-dimensional structural analysis of recombinant rotavirus-like particles with intact and amino-terminal-deleted VP2: implications for the architecture of the VP2 capsid layer. J Virol. 1997, 71 (10): 7353-7360.Google Scholar
- Miyasaka H: The positive relationship between codon usage bias and translation initiation AUG context in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1999, 15 (8): 633-637. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19990615)15:8<633::AID-YEA407>3.0.CO;2-O.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rodriguez-Limas WA, Flores-Samaniego B, de la Mora G, Ramirez OT, Palomares LA: Genotypification of bovine group A rotavirus in Mexico. Vaccine. 2009, 27 (46): 6411-6414. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.06.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Partow S, Siewers V, Bjorn S, Nielsen J, Maury J: Characterization of different promoters for designing a new expression vector in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2010, 27: 955-964. 10.1002/yea.1806.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gietz RD, Schiestl RH: High-efficiency yeast transformation using the LiAc/SS carrier DNA/PEG method. Nat Protoc. 2007, 2 (1): 31-34. 10.1038/nprot.2007.13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dynesen J, Smits HP, Olsson L, Nielsen J: Carbon catabolite repression of invertase during batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the role of glucose, fructose, and mannose. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1998, 50 (5): 579-582. 10.1007/s002530051338.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gimenez JA, Monkovic DD, Dekleva ML: Identification and monitoring of protease activity in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2000, 67 (2): 245-251. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000120)67:2<245::AID-BIT15>3.0.CO;2-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Porro D, Sauer M, Branduardi P, Mattanovich D: Recombinant protein production in yeasts. Mol Biotechnol. 2005, 31 (3): 245-259. 10.1385/MB:31:3:245.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Castro-Acosta RM, Revilla AL, Ramirez OT, Palomares LA: Separation and quantification of double and triple-layered rotavirus-like particles by CZE. Electrophoresis. 2010, 31 (8): 1376-1381. 10.1002/elps.200900558.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gorgens JF, van Zyl WH, Knoetze JH, Hahn-Hagerdal B: The metabolic burden of the PGK1 and ADH2 promoter systems for heterologous xylanase production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in defined medium. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001, 73 (3): 238-245. 10.1002/bit.1056.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Janes M, Meyhack B, Zimmermann W, Hinnen A: The influence of GAP promoter variants on hirudin production, average plasmid copy number and cell growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet. 1990, 18 (2): 97-103. 10.1007/BF00312596.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nacken V, Achstetter T, Degryse E: Probing the limits of expression levels by varying promoter strength and plasmid copy number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 1996, 175 (1-2): 253-260. 10.1016/0378-1119(96)00171-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Entian KD, Kotter P: Yeast genetic strains and plasmid collections. Yeast gene analysis. Edited by: Ian S, Stark MJ. 2007, 36: 629-666. The Netherlands: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- Jones EW: Three proteolytic systems in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1991, 266 (13): 7963-7966.Google Scholar
- Parr CL, Keates RA, Bryksa BC, Ogawa M, Yada RY: The structure and function of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteinase A. Yeast. 2007, 24 (6): 467-480. 10.1002/yea.1485.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Mendoza-Vega O, Sabatie J, Brown SW: Industrial production of heterologous proteins by fed-batch cultures of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1994, 15 (4): 369-410. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.1994.tb00146.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.