Skip to main content
Download PDF

Metabolic engineering of Rhodotorula toruloides for resveratrol production

Microbial Cell Factories volume 21, Article number: 270 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Resveratrol is a plant-derived phenylpropanoid with diverse biological activities and pharmacological applications. Plant-based extraction could not satisfy ever-increasing market demand, while chemical synthesis is impeded by the existence of toxic impurities. Microbial production of resveratrol offers a promising alternative to plant- and chemical-based processes. The non-conventional oleaginous yeast Rhodotorula toruloides is a potential workhorse for the production of resveratrol that endowed with an efficient and intrinsic bifunctional phenylalanine/tyrosine ammonia-lyase (RtPAL) and malonyl-CoA pool, which may facilitate the resveratrol synthesis when properly rewired.

Results

Resveratrol showed substantial stability and would not affect the R. toruloides growth during the yeast cultivation in flasks. The heterologus resveratrol biosynthesis pathway was established by introducing the 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase (At4CL), and the stilbene synthase (VlSTS) from Arabidopsis thaliana and Vitis labrusca, respectively. Next, The resveratrol production was increased by 634% through employing the cinnamate-4-hydroxylase from A. thaliana (AtC4H), the fused protein At4CL::VlSTS, the cytochrome P450 reductase 2 from A. thaliana (AtATR2) and the endogenous cytochrome B5 of R. toruloides (RtCYB5). Then, the related endogenous pathways were optimized to affect a further 60% increase. Finally, the engineered strain produced a maximum titer of 125.2 mg/L resveratrol in YPD medium.

Conclusion

The non-conventional oleaginous yeast R. toruloides was engineered for the first time to produce resveratrol. Protein fusion, co-factor channeling, and ARO4 and ARO7 overexpression were efficient for improving resveratrol production. The results demonstrated the potential of R. toruloides for resveratrol and other phenylpropanoids production.

Introduction

Resveratrol possesses excellent biological activities and pharmacological properties, which has extensive applications in the chemical, pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetic industries [1, 2]. However, the plant-based extraction could not satisfy ever-increasing market demand, while the chemical synthesis is impeded by the existence of toxic impurities, generated during multiple-step complex reactions, for industrial scale applications [3, 4]. Microbial cell factory offers an alternative approach for resveratrol production since it has advantages like eco-compatibility, and high stereo-selectivity [5].

Microbial production of resveratrol could be achieved through the shikimate and aromatic amino acid (AAA) pathway via recruiting cinnamate-4-hydroxylase (C4H), 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase (4CL), and stilbene synthase (STS) with L-phenylalanine (L-Phe) as the direct precursor or introducing 4CL and STS with L-tyrosine (L-Tyr) as the starter. To date, microbes like Escherichia coli, Yarrowia lipolytica and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been intensively explored for resveratrol production [5]. For ex novo production, the best recombinant E. coli produced 2.3 g/L resveratrol from p-coumaric acid [6] while for de novo biosynthesis, 0.8 g/L and 22.5 g/L resveratrol were obtained with S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica in bench-scale production, respectively [7, 8].

The non-conventional oleaginous yeast R. toruloides is attractive for producing various value-added chemicals including oleochemicals, terpenoids and sugar alcohols from low-cost feedstock [9,10,11]. R. toruloides might be also a potential workhorse for aromatic compounds that it is endowed with an efficient and intrinsic bifunctional RtPAL. As an oleaginous yeast, it should also provide substantial malonyl-CoA and erythrose-4-phosphate (E4P) for aromatic compounds biosynthesis since they are highly required for the fatty acid biosynthesis and NADPH generation during lipid accumulation. Importantly, the RtPAL has been demonstrated efficient in catalyzing L-Phe to trans-cinnamic acid (t-CA), and L-Tyr to p-coumaric acid (p-CA) to support the resveratrol production [12]. To date, no attempts have been made to produce phenylpropanoid compounds, such as resveratrol, in R. toruloides.

To tap its potential for aromatic compound production, the oleaginous yeast R. toruloides was engineered to produce resveratrol as an example by introducing At4CL and VlSTS (Fig. 1). Subsequently, the production was significantly increased via critical genes overexpression, protein fusion, and cofactor channeling. Finally, the maximum titer was improved to 125.2 mg/L. The present study demonstrated that R. toruloides could be explored as a platform for phenylpropanoid bioproduction.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Engineering Rhodotorula toruloides to produce resveratrol. The heterogeneous pathway is green, and the engineered native pathway is yellow. The grey dashed line indicated feedback inhibition. G6P, glucose-6-phosphate; F6P, fructose-6-phosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Ru5P, ribulose-5-phosphate; E4P, erythrose-4-phosphate; DAHP, 3-deoxy-arabino-heptulonate-7-phosphate; CHA, chorismic acid; PPA, prephenate; L-Phe, L-phenylalanine; L-Tyr, L-tyrosine; p-CA, p-coumaric acid; FAS, fatty acid synthase; ARO4, 3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthase; ARO7, chorismate mutase; PAL, L-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; AtC4H, cinnamic acid hydroxylase from A. thaliana; At4CL, 4-coumarate-CoA ligase from A. thaliana; VlSTS, stilbene synthase from Vitis labrusca; AtATR2, cytochrome P450 reductase from A. thaliana; RtCYB5, cytochrome B5 from R. toruloides

Full size image

Materials and methods

Strains, media and cultivation

E. coli DH5α was used for plasmid construction and propagation. Agrobacterium tumefaciens AGL1 was used for R. toruloides transformation. The R. toruloides NP11 is the haploid of R. toruloides CGMCC 2.1389 that was isolated in Prof. Zongbao Zhao’s Lab. E. coli and A. tumefaciens cells were cultivated in Luria Bertani (LB) medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl, and supplemented with 50 μg/mL kanamycin), and kept at 200 rpm, 37–30 °C, respectively. R. toruloides was cultivated at 28 °C, 180 rpm in the YPD medium (20 g/L glucose, 20 g/L peptone, and 10 g/L yeast extract). The selection YPD medium used was supplemented with 50 μg/mL of Nourseothricin (Ntc) or Hygromycin B (Hyg) as needed. For the preparation of solid medium, 2% (w/v) agar was added into liquid LB and YPD. Induction medium (IM) containing 200 μL acetosyringone was prepared as described [13]. Briefly, the IM medium contained 10 mmol/L K2HPO4, 10 mmol/L KH2PO4, 2.5 mmol/L NaCl, 2 mmol/L MgSO4, 0.7 mmol/L CaCl2, 9 μmol/L FeSO4, 4 mmol/L (NH4)2SO4, 10 mmol/L Glucose, pH 7.0.

Plasmid construction

The heterologous genes were codon-optimized according to the R. toruloides preference and synthesized by Synbio Technologies (Suzhou, P. R. China). All vectors used in this study were derived from the binary vector pZPK [13]. The DNA ligation kit (Takara) and In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Takara) were employed for plasmid) construction, following its user instruction. The PCR-based mutation was used for obtaining protein mutants. All the vectors and primers used in this study were summarized in Additional file 1: Tables S1 and S2, respectively.

Transformation and verification

Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (ATMT) was modified according to the protocol reported by Lin et al. [13]. Briefly, the correct binary vector was transformed into A. tumefaciens AGL1 cells by electroporation, and selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin. The A. tumefaciens cells carrying the binary vectors and the R. toruloides cells were cultivated at 28 °C until OD600 reached 2. Both cells were washed twice, and diluted to OD600 = 0.4–0.6 with distilled water. The cell suspensions were mixed with a ratio of 1:1 (v/v). Then, 200 μL of the mixture was spread onto the filter paper placed on the IM plate and incubated at 25 °C for 36 h. Subsequently, the filter paper was transferred onto the selection YPD plate for screening transformants harboring the Ntc or Hyg resistance markers (supplemented with cefotaxime and corresponding antibiotics (Nourseothricin or Hygromycin B) and incubated at 30 °C until colonies appeared. The transformants were randomly selected and streaked onto selecting plates for five generations to certify their stability.

Cultivation in shake flask

The R. toruloides was seeded into 50 mL test tubes containing 5 mL YPD liquid medium supplemented with 50 μg/mL antibiotics if needed, and cultivated under 28 °C, 180 rpm for 48 h. Then, the seed cultures were inoculated into 50 mL medium with the initial OD600 = 0.5 in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks and grown at 28 °C, 180 rpm for 96 h. Unless otherwise stated, the fermentation in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks were loaded with 50 mL YPD medium. To test its stability during yeast fermentation, 0.5 mM resveratrol was added to replace the glucose in the YPD medium.

Analytical methods

The cell density was tested with UV–Vis spectrophotometer EVOLUTION 220 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The d-glucose was quantified by the SBA-40C biosensor (Shandong Province Academy of Sciences, Jinan, China). The resveratrol production capacity of the transformants was analyzed in terms of maximum and averaged titers, since the ATMT strategy leads to random integration in the genome [14]. The analysis of resveratrol and p-coumaric acid was performed as described by Wang et al. [16]. 3 mL of fermentation samples were mixed with 3 mL of ethyl acetate, vortexed thoroughly, and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm, for 5 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was dried with RapidVap (Labconco, USA) at room temperature, re-dissolved in 300 μL acetonitrile, and filtrated by a 0.22 μm membrane before high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis. The Shimadzu LC-2030 PLUS HPLC system is equipped with a Waters T-nature C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm) at 306 nm under isocratic elution of 65% (1% acetic acid aqueous) and 35% (acetonitrile) over 4.3 min (p-coumaric acid), 5.9 min (resveratrol). The column working temperature was kept at 35 °C, and the injection volume was 5 μL with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min.

Results and discussion

Establishing the resveratrol biosynthesis baseline in R. toruloides

R. toruloides is endowed with a versatile metabolism capability and a wide feedstock spectrum, especially it can efficiently assimilate the resveratrol precursor p-CA [10, 17]. To investigate the feasibility of recruiting the bifunctional RtPAL for biosynthesizing resveratrol, the stability of resveratrol was tested during fermentation with R. toruloides. Thus, resveratrol was used as the sole carbon source to replace the glucose in YPD (Fig. 2). The resveratrol presented no obvious decrease during the 120 h fermentation, demonstrating that R. toruloides would not degrade resveratrol (Fig. 2a). Then, the influence of resveratrol on the growth of R. toruloides was investigated. The cell growth was not affected when 500 mg/L resveratrol was added (Fig. 2b). The above results indicated it is possible to harness the RtPAL for biosynthesizing resveratrol in R. toruloides.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Establishing and optimizing the heterogenous resveratrol biosynthesis pathway. a Degradation assays for resveratrol in strain R. toruloides NP11. The 0.5 mM (114.13 mg/L) resveratrol was added as a single carbon source. The inoculated group was shown in yellow, and the control group was shown in blue. b Toxicity tolerance test for resveratrol in strain R. toruloides NP11. The 100 and 500 mg/L resveratrol was added to the YPD medium. c is the resveratrol production in engineered strains after 96 h cultivation in YPD medium. The population performance of each engineered strain was quantified using a violin plot. The resveratrol titer of each transformant was shown as circles, and the grey outline represented the density. The black line presents the mean value of each transformant. Statistical significance was analyzed using two-tailed unpaired t-test (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)

Full size image

The At4CL and grape derived STS have been extensively utilized for the heterologous production of resveratrol [12]. Here, the two essential enzymes At4CL and VlSTS were introduced into R. toruloides, which were mediated by a P2A peptide, by putting them under the promoter of pXYL. The resulting strains (MY11) harboring At4CL and VlSTS produced resveratrol with an averaged titer of 8.7 mg/L at 96 h (Fig. 2c). Since resveratrol can also be produced from L-Phe by RtPAL in R. toruloides, a truncated A. thaliana C4H (the N-terminal membrane anchor region, 1–22 amino acid residue, was removed to generate AttC4H) was subsequently introduced, which was proved beneficial in supporting resveratrol biosynthesis with other microbial hosts [18] (Fig. 2c). By simultaneously introducing of AttC4H, At4CL and VlSTS, the resultant average resveratrol titer was increased by 176% in the strain group MY21 (24.1 mg/L) (Fig. 2c). The results implied that a synergy between the L-Tyr and L-Phe dependent routes might exist as reported in S. cerevisiae, where the L-Phe and L-Tyr routes were combined for producing the aromatic chemicals [19]. The results here also indicated that L-Phe based resveratrol biosynthesis route was more efficient than the one on L-Tyr in R. toruloides.

Enhancing resveratrol production via fusing protein and improving P450 activity

The resveratrol biosynthesis pathway involves two requisite but unstable intermediates, p-CA and p-coumaroyl-CoA. Protein fusion is a common strategy to facilitate substrate trafficking, avoid metabolic flux leakage, and improve enzymatic efficiency [20, 21]. It has been reported successful in improving the efficiency of substrate delivery to support the resveratrol production by employing the fusion protein 4CL::STS [22, 23]. Therefore, the AtC4H and the fusion protein At4CL::VlSTS (linked by Gly-Ser-Gly) were introduced into R. toruloides NP11. The resulting strain group MY22 obtained 29.0 mg/L of resveratrol on average, a 20% increase compared with their independent expression in strain group MY21 (Fig. 2c).

The heterologous expression of a plant originated pathway may function sub-optimally due to the unsuitable cofactor as in the case of microbial production of resveratrol [5]. Particularly, the AtC4H employed in resveratrol synthesis pathway is a membrane-associated plant-derived P450 enzyme, whose heterologous expression may suffer from insufficient cofactor NADPH supply [24]. Additionally, as a heme-thiolate protein, the plant-derived cytochrome P450 monooxygenase AtC4H also requires a cytochrome P450 redox partner [24, 25]. It has been reported that the decline in the catalytic activity of P450 is caused by inadequate and inefficient cofactors, and it would lead to a limitation of resveratrol overproduction [7, 19]. Accordingly, AtC4H may need to be remedied in low activity by increasing the electron transfer efficiency. Thus, the P450-mediated redox partner AtATR2 was introduced and the endogenous heme prosthetic group RtCYB5 was overexpressed in strain MY22-No.29 (one of the most efficient producer in group MY22) to generate strain group MY23, the average resveratrol production of 30 transformants in the resulting strain group MY23 was improved to 64.1 mg/L, a 121% increase compared to those of MY22 (Fig. 2c). As anticipated, accelerating the catalytic cycle in P450 can effectively increase resveratrol production. The result here was consistent with the previous report where the production of resveratrol by S. cerevisiae also increased by about 150% via enhancing the P450 activity [7].

Validating the critical steps in the shikimic acid and AAAs pathways

Due to the multibranch and multistep metabolic pathway, it is challenging for microbial overproduction of plant secondary metabolites [26]. In this case, the critical enzymes like shikimate kinase, chorismate synthase ARO2, prephenate dehydratase PHA2, prephenate dehydrogenase TYR1, and aromatic amino acid aminotransferase I ARO8 in the shikimate acid and AAAs pathways have been reported as the potential limiting steps for further boosting resveratrol production (Fig. 3a) [18].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Validating the critical steps within the shikimic acid and AAAs pathways for resveratrol production. a Schematic illustration of metabolites and the shikimic acid and AAAs pathways in R. toruloides. b, c and d demonstrates resveratrol production in engineered strains after 96 h cultivation in YPD medium by enhancing the shikimic acid pathway b and AAAs pathway c and their combinations d in YPD medium. 3-DHQ, 3-dehydroquinic acid; DHS, 3-dehydroshikimic acid; S3P, shikimic acid 3-phosphate; EPSP, 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate; RtARO1, pentafunctional AROM polypeptide from R. toruloides; EcAroL, shikimate kinase from E. coli; RtAro2, chorismate synthase from R. toruloides; RtTYR1, prephenate dehydrogenase from R. toruloides; RtPHA2, prephenate dehydrogenase from R. toruloides; RtARO8, aromatic amino acid aminotransferase I from R. toruloides

Full size image

A sophisticated and strict metabolic network regulates the biosynthesis pathway of aromatics, especially the feedback inhibition of aromatic amino acids on ARO4 (the first enzyme of the shikimic acid pathway) and ARO7 (the route point enzyme of the AAAs pathway) [11, 27, 28]. First, the potential mutation sites of Aro4p and Aro7p in R. toruloides were identified by multiple pairwise sequence alignment to their counterpart in S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica. Then, the single-point mutations were introduced into the wild-type proteins to obtain the feedback-insensitive mutant enzymes RtARO4K227L and RtARO7G153S. Subsequently, plasmids harboring combinations of the wild-type RtARO4 and RtARO7 and the feedback-insensitive mutants RtARO4K227L and RtARO7G153S were constructed (Fig. 3b).

Next, the above four recombinant plasmids were introduced into the strain MY22-No.29, resulting in the engineered strain groups of MY31, MY32, MY33, and MY34 (Fig. 3b), which have shown a sharp increase in the average production of resveratrol by 233% (96.5 mg/L), 137% (68.7 mg/L), 138% (68.9 mg/L) and 78% (51.4 mg/L) in comparison with an average production of the parental strain group MY22 respectively. Interestingly, the production capacity of strain group MY31, which carried the wild-type RtARO4 and RtARO7, was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of strain group MY34, which bearing the feedback-insensitive mutants RtARO4K227L and RtARO7G153S. The wild-type RtARO4 and RtARO7 were also overexpressed in the strain MY23-No.26 (the highest yield transformant in group MY23) to form the resulting strain group MY41, which produced an average of 102.6 mg/L resveratrol. Likewise, the mutants RtARO4K227L and RtARO7G153S were also introduced into strain MY23-No.26 to obtain strain group MY42, whose averaged resveratrol titer reached 76.1 mg/L (Fig. 3b). The results showed that relieving feedback inhibition regulation could increase resveratrol production while raising the expression of RtARO4 and RtARO7 showed a more positive effect on resveratrol overproduction (125.2 mg/L).

Although it may seem counterintuitive, this inconsistency may be due to the reasons listed below. (1) The low accumulation of 3-deoxy-arabino-heptulonate-7-phosphate (DAHP) and aromatic amino acids was insufficient to initiate concentration-dependent negative feedback inhibition. (2) The catalytic activity of RtARO4K227L and RtARO7G153S cannot surpass that of the wild types after introducing the point mutation at the regulatory site. (3) Due to the limitations of the genetic manipulation technique, the interference caused by the background expression of endogenous RtARO4 and RtARO7 could not be avoided.

Furthermore, previous researches indicated that the shikimate kinase AroL and the chorismate synthase ARO2 might be restricted factors in the shikimate pathway [29, 30]. Thus, the heterologous EcAroL from E. coli and the endogenous RtARO2 were overexpressed in MY41-No.41, respectively. However, the resveratrol production in the resulting strain groups MY51 and MY52 were decreased (Fig. 3c). Likewise, the overexpression of the potential critical enzymes, including prephenate dehydratase RtPHA2, prephenate dehydrogenase RtTYR1, and aromatic amino acid aminotransferase I RtARO8, also resulted in decreased production of resveratrol (Fig. 3c). Unexpectedly, overexpression of seven combinations of the above five genes showed a significant adverse effect on resveratrol production (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3d).

Clearly, the results here were quite beyond anticipation, for which the possible explanations are as follows: (1) There might be a remained unclear and harsh regulatory system in R. toruloides which inhibited the positive effect on resveratrol production by single-mindedly increasing expression levels; for example, the regulation mechanism of the enzyme catalytic activity based on substrate concentration [19, 30]. (2) The current metabolic bottlenecks may be elsewhere, for example, low metabolic flux from the central metabolism into the shikimic acid pathway.

The effects of cerulenin on resveratrol production

Generally, malonyl-CoA is considered the rate-limiting step in resveratrol synthesis since each molecule of resveratrol consumes three molecules of malonyl-CoA [31, 32]. As an oleaginous yeast, there might be more competition for malonyl-CoA between the biosynthesis of resveratrol and lipids [33]. Therefore, cerulenin, an efficient FAS inhibitor, was added to determine whether malonyl-CoA is the bottleneck in resveratrol biosynthesis at the current stage [34] (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4
figure 4

The effects of cerulenin on resveratrol production in R. toruloides. a Schematic illustration of the cerulenin effects on resveratrol production. b The OD600 and resveratrol production of strain MY41-No.41 under different concentrations of cerulenin. All data indicated the mean of n = 3 biologically independent samples, and error bars show standard deviation. c Time profile of resveratrol production, pH, glucose and OD600 from strain MY41-No.41 under different conditions. The red lines denote additions of 0.1 mM citrate buffer (pH = 6.0), and the blue lines denote the control group

Full size image

The highest resveratrol producing strain MY41-No.41 was utilized by supplementing different concentrations of cerulenin (0 μM, 10 μM, 30 μM, 50 μM) into the cultivation medium after 24 h incubation (OD600 = 15–20). As shown in Fig. 4b, strain MY41-No.41 produced 125.2 mg/L resveratrol without the addition of cerulenin, which was significantly higher than those obtained with the addition of cerulenin (111.6 mg/L with 10 μM (p = 0.0119), 112.4 mg/L with 30 μM (p = 0.0324) and 105.0 mg/L with 50 μM (p = 0.0175)). This decline in resveratrol production might be due to the disturbed cell state aroused by lipid metabolism [31]. Moreover, there was an observable growth inhibition when 50 μM cerulenin was added, which may be caused by the fact that lipid metabolism is necessary for cell growth [31]. The results indicated that malonyl-CoA might be adequate in engineered strain for supporting resveratrol synthesis.

Conclusions

This is the first report on engineering R. toruloides for resveratrol production, which was achieved by recruiting heterologous AtC4H, At4CL, and VlSTS. The resveratrol production was enhanced via protein fusion, cofactor manipulation, and ARO4 and ARO7 overexpression. The best producer MY41-No.41 produced 125.2 mg/L in the 250 mL flask from the YPD medium. The present work would provide a reference for the further exploration of R. toruloides as a platform for phenylpropanoids production.

Availability of data and materials

E-supplementary data for this work can be found in the e-version of this paper online. The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Jeandet P, Sobarzo-Sánchez E, Silva AS, Clément C, Nabavi SF, Battino M, Rasekhian M, Belwal T, Habtemariam S, Koffas M, Nabavi SM. Whole-cell biocatalytic, enzymatic and green chemistry methods for the production of resveratrol and its derivatives. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;39:107461.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu Q, Liu Y, Chen Y, Nielsen J. Current state of aromatics production using yeast: achievements and challenges. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2020;65:65–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Braga A, Ferreira P, Oliveira J, Rocha I, Faria N. Heterologous production of resveratrol in bacterial hosts: current status and perspectives. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;34:122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Thodey K, Galanie S, Smolke CD. A microbial biomanufacturing platform for natural and semisynthetic opioids. Nat Chem Biol. 2014;10:837–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cravens A, Payne J, Smolke CD. Synthetic biology strategies for microbial biosynthesis of plant natural products. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lim CG, Fowler ZL, Hueller T, Schaffer S, Koffas MAG. High-yield resveratrol production in engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:3451–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li M, Schneider K, Kristensen M, Borodina I, Nielsen J. Engineering yeast for high-level production of stilbenoid antioxidants. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu M, Wang C, Ren XF, Gao S, Yu SQ, Zhou JW. Remodelling metabolism for high-level resveratrol production in Yarrowia lipolytica. Bioresour Technol. 2022;365:128178.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Díaz T, Fillet S, Campoy S, Vázquez R, Viña J, Murillo J, Adrio JL. Combining evolutionary and metabolic engineering in Rhodosporidium toruloides for lipid production with non-detoxified wheat straw hydrolysates. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:3287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park YK, Nicaud JM, Ledesma-Amaro R. The Engineering potential of Rhodosporidium toruloides as a workhorse for biotechnological applications. Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36:304–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yaegashi J, Kirby J, Ito M, Sun J, Dutta T, Mirsiaghi M, Sundstrom ER, Rodriguez A, Baidoo E, Tanjore D, Pray T, Sale K, Singh S, Keasling JD, Simmons BA, Singer SW, Magnuson JK, Arkin AP, Skerker JM, Gladden JM. Rhodosporidium toruloides: a new platform organism for conversion of lignocellulose into terpene biofuels and bioproducts. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shrestha A, Pandey RP, Sohng JK. Biosynthesis of resveratrol and piceatannol in engineered microbial strains: achievements and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:2959–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin XP, Wang YN, Zhang SF, Zhu ZW, Zhou YJ, Yang F, Sun WY, Wang XY, Zhao ZK. Functional integration of multiple genes into the genome of the oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14(6):547–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin X, Wang Y, Zhang S, Zhu Z, Zhou YJ, Yang F, Sun W, Wang X, Zhao ZK. Functional integration of multiple genes into the genome of the oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:547–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu S, Zhang M, Ren Y, Jin G, Tao Y, Lyu L, Zhao ZK, Yang X. Engineering Rhodosporidium toruloides for limonene production. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2021;14:243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang Y, Yi H, Wang M, Yu O, Jez JM. Structural and kinetic analysis of the unnatural fusion protein 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase::stilbene synthase. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133:20684–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhao Y, Song B, Li J, Zhang J. Rhodotorula toruloides: an ideal microbial cell factory to produce oleochemicals, carotenoids, and other products. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;38:13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao M, Gao M, Suástegui M, Mei Y, Shao Z. Building microbial factories for the production of aromatic amino acid pathway derivatives: From commodity chemicals to plant-sourced natural products. Metab Eng. 2020;58:94–132.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu Q, Yu T, Li X, Chen Y, Campbell K, Nielsen J, Chen Y. Rewiring carbon metabolism in yeast for high level production of aromatic chemicals. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4976.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Aalbers FS, Fraaije MW. Enzyme fusions in biocatalysis: coupling reactions by pairing enzymes. ChemBioChem. 2019;20:20–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Park SY, Yang D, Ha SH, Lee SY. Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for the production of natural compounds. Adv Biosyst. 2018;2:1700190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Guo H, Yang Y, Xue F, Zhang H, Huang T, Liu W, Liu H, Zhang F, Yang M, Liu C, Lu H, Zhang Y, Ma L. Effect of flexible linker length on the activity of fusion protein 4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase::stilbene synthase. Mol Biosyst. 2017;13:598–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang Y, Li SZ, Li J, Pan X, Cahoon RE, Jaworski JG, Wang X, Jez JM, Chen F, Yu O. Using unnatural protein fusions to engineer resveratrol biosynthesis in yeast and mammalian cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2006;128:13030–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li H, Lyv Y, Zhou S, Yu S, Zhou J. Microbial cell factories for the production of flavonoids-barriers and opportunities. Bioresour Technol. 2022;360:127538.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shang Y, Huang S. Engineering plant cytochrome P450s for enhanced synthesis of natural products: past achievements and future perspectives. Plant Commun. 2020;1:100012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, Nielsen J. Recent trends in metabolic engineering of microbial chemical factories. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;60:188–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kobayashi Y, Inokuma K, Matsuda M, Kondo A, Hasunuma T. Resveratrol production from several types of saccharide sources by a recombinant Scheffersomyces stipitis strain. Metab Eng Commun. 2021;13:e00188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Palmer CM, Miller KK, Nguyen A, Alper HS. Engineering 4-coumaroyl-CoA derived polyketide production in Yarrowia lipolytica through a β-oxidation mediated strategy. Metab Eng. 2020;57:174–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gu Y, Ma J, Zhu Y, Xu P. Refactoring ehrlich pathway for high-yield 2-phenylethanol production in Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth Biol. 2020;9(3):623–633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.9b00468

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodriguez A, Kildegaard KR, Li M, Borodina I, Nielsen J. Establishment of a yeast platform strain for production of p-coumaric acid through metabolic engineering of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis. Metab Eng. 2015;31:181–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Johnson AO, Gonzalez-Villanueva M, Wong L, Steinbüchel A, Tee KL, Xu P, Wong TS. Design and application of genetically-encoded malonyl-CoA biosensors for metabolic engineering of microbial cell factories. Metab Eng. 2017;44:253–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Stenzel A, Gätgens J, Bott M, Marienhagen J. Construction of a Corynebacterium glutamicum platform strain for the production of stilbenes and (2S)-flavanones. Metab Eng. 2016;38:47–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wen Z, Zhang S, Odoh CK, Jin M, Zhao ZK. Rhodosporidium toruloides—a potential red yeast chassis for lipids and beyond. FEMS Yeast Res. 2020;20:038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yamada R, Kashihara T, Ogino H. Improvement of lipid production by the oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides through UV mutagenesis. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;33:99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would thank Ms. Xue Wang from the instrument shared platform, College of Food Science & Engineering of NWAFU, for her assistance in the HPLC analysis.

Funding

This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province (2020JM-177), and Chinese Universities Scientifc Fund (2452018314).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mengyao Zhang and Qidou Gao have contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Enology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Xianyang, 712100, Shaanxi, China

    Mengyao Zhang, Qidou Gao, Yijuan Liu, Zhumei Fang & Xiaobing Yang

  2. Division of Biotechnology, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 457 Zhongshan Road, Dalian, 116023, China

    Mengyao Zhang & Zongbao K. Zhao

  3. School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 947 Heping Road, Wuhan, 430081, China

    Zhiwei Gong

Authors
  1. Mengyao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qidou Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yijuan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhumei Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhiwei Gong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zongbao K. Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xiaobing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MZ: conceptualization, methodology, performed the experiments, formal analysis, writing—original draft, designed and coordinated the project. QG: conceptualization, performed the experiments, formal analysis, designed and coordinated the project. YL: performed the experiments, and coordinated the project. ZF: performed the experiments, and coordinated the project. ZG: methodology, and Resources. ZKZ: writing—review & editing. XY: project administration, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing—review & editing. All authors discussed the results commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaobing Yang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare the following competing financial interest(s): the authors (XB Yang, and MY Zhang) applied a patent (Number 202111671253.8) for protecting resveratrol in red yeast. There are no personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Strain and plasmids used in this work. Table S2. Main primers used in this work. Table S3. The highest resveratrol yield among the different hosts and their engineering strategies. Figure S1. Validation of resveratrol production in engineered strain by LCMS. The characteristic peaks of the resveratrol standard are at m/z=227.0714 and m/z=228.0751, and that of fermentation extracts from engineered strain is at m/z=227.0716 and m/z=228.0749, which is highly consistent within the standard. Figure S2. Multiple pairwise sequence alignment between S. cerevisiae, Y. lipolytica and R. toruloides Aro4p and Aro7p. Multiple pairwise alignments of Aro4p; In ScAro4p, the 229th amino acid resulted in a feedback insensitivity when lysine mutated into leucine (Hartmann et al., 2003), and the 211th amino acid in YlAro4p has the same mutation (Palmer et al., 2020), which are marked with red arrows. For Aro7p, In ScAro7p, amino acid 141 resulted in a non-allosterically regulated when glycine mutated into serine (Schnappauf et al., 1998), and the 139th amino acid in YlAro7p has the same mutation (Sáez-Sáez et al., 2020) which are marked with red arrows. Figure S3. Fluorescence microscopy analysis of lipids in engineered R. toruloides stained with Nile Red. Scale bars, 20 μM.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, M., Gao, Q., Liu, Y. et al. Metabolic engineering of Rhodotorula toruloides for resveratrol production. Microb Cell Fact 21, 270 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-022-02006-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-022-02006-w

Keywords

Microbial Cell Factories

ISSN: 1475-2859

Contact us