Skip to main content

Macular pigment-enriched oil production from genome-edited microalgae

Abstract

Background

The photosynthetic microorganism Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has been approved as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) recently, this can excessively produce carotenoid pigments and fatty acids. Zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP), which converts zeaxanthin to violaxanthin, and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGP). These are key regulating genes for the xanthophyll and starch pathways in C. reinhardtii respectively. In this study, to produce macular pigment-enriched microalgal oil, we attempted to edit the AGP gene as an additional knock-out target in the zep mutant as a parental strain.

Results

Using a sequential CRISPR-Cas9 RNP-mediated knock-out method, we generated double knock-out mutants (dZAs), in which both the ZEP and AGP genes were deleted. In dZA1, lutein (2.93 ± 0.22 mg g−1 DCW: dried cell weight), zeaxanthin (3.12 ± 0.30 mg g−1 DCW), and lipids (450.09 ± 25.48 mg g−1 DCW) were highly accumulated in N-deprivation condition. Optimization of the culture medium and process made it possible to produce pigments and oil via one-step cultivation. This optimization process enabled dZAs to achieve 81% higher oil productivity along with similar macular pigment productivity, than the conventional two-step process. The hexane/isopropanol extraction method was developed for the use of macular pigment-enriched microalgal oil for food. As a result, 196 ± 20.1 mg g−1 DCW of edible microalgal oil containing 8.42 ± 0.92 mg g−1 lutein of oil and 7.69 ± 1.03 mg g−1 zeaxanthin of oil was produced.

Conclusion

Our research showed that lipids and pigments are simultaneously induced in the dZA strain. Since dZAs are generated by introducing pre-assembled sgRNA and Cas9-protein into cells, antibiotic resistance genes or selective markers are not inserted into the genome of dZA, which is advantageous for applying dZA mutant to food. Therefore, the enriched macular pigment oil extracted from improved strains (dZAs) can be further applied to various food products and nutraceuticals.

Background

Microalgae have substantial potential to produce natural compounds such as fatty acids and carotenoid pigments [1, 2]. In recent decades, microalgae research has focused on the utilization of these natural compounds from a commercial perspective. In addition, genetic engineering enables the production of value-added industrial compounds [3,4,5]. Improved extraction methods from microalgal biomass can accelerate the commercialization of microalgae [6, 7]. In the past decade, biofuel production from microalgal biomass has been developed, however, the low productivity of biofuels from microalgae has hampered commercial viability [7]. Thus, in addition to economically unviable biofuel production, microalgal oil has recently been considered an alternative to vegetable oil as a food additive [8, 9]. Research on microalgal oil is currently focused on the discovery of strains with appropriate fatty acid content for edible oil. In addition, oil extraction method suitable for microalgae, and the process of refining oil to meet the quality standards of food additives are also being developed [8].

The model green microalgae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has recently been re-evaluated as an industrial strain, which can be made commercially available [10]. Furthermore, it was recently registered as GRAS (Notice No. GRN 000773), which made C. reinhardtii commercially viable. An attempted strategy for the commercialization of C. reinhardtii is to enable high lipid production or high value-added pigment production. This is because fatty acid and carotenoids biosynthesis are well defined [11].

Previous studies have shown the possibility of producing microalgal oil from C. reinhardtii [12, 13]. The most preferred strain for this is the starchless C. reinhardtii, which accumulated twice as much fatty acid as the wild type [14]. The starchless phenomenon is caused by the knockout of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGP). This strategy has been reported to increase fatty acid synthesis, which is a competitive pathway for starch synthesis [15, 16]. This competitive metabolic regulation between fatty acids and starch is the same as that in Arabidopsis [17]. In addition, overexpression of diacylglycerol acyltransferase Type2 [18] or knockdown of diacylglyceryl-N-trimethyl homoserine synthesis protein [19] in the glycerolipid synthesis pathway was attempted to increase triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation in C. reinhardtii. Recently, it has been reported that fatty acid production is increased with an increase in the precursor pool of fatty acids such as pyruvate or acetyl-CoA [20, 21]. The metabolic pathway involved in the biosynthesis of carotenoid pigments has been elucidated in most processes [22]. The level of zeaxanthin is regulated through the interconversion to violaxanthin by zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) and violaxanthin de-epoxidase (VDE) [23]. In the conversion cycle, it is reported that due to the loss of function of the ZEP gene, zeaxanthin was accumulated in C. reinhardtii. [23, 24]. Zeaxanthin is widely distributed, along with lutein, in the macular region of the retina and the lens of the human eye and is particularly highly concentrated in the central part of the macula [25, 26]. Lutein and zeaxanthin are called macular pigments in clinical practice, as they are essential pigments in maintaining human eye health. Indeed, many studies have reported the relationship between macular pigments and eye-related disorders [27,28,29,30]. Therefore, macular pigments are considered effective agents for lowering the incidence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which is highly associated with impaired vision and blindness, and cataracts in the elderly [26].

However, macular pigments are not synthesized naturally in the body of humans and animals; thus, the content of these pigments seems to decrease continuously from late twenties [30]. For this reason, an additional supply of zeaxanthin is beneficial because the intake of zeaxanthin from vegetables in a normal diet is usually insufficient [31]. C. reinhardtii could be the additional source of zeaxanthin and a strategy for the accumulation of excess zeaxanthin in C. reinhardtii has been reported in a previous study [24]. The strategic regulation of well-known biosynthetic pathways offers us significant opportunities to improve C. reinhardtii. In this study, a strategy to simultaneously regulate both biosynthesis pathways of fatty acids and xanthophylls was established to produce macular pigment-enriched microalgal oil. This algal oil can be used as a functional food oil to help in preventing chronic eye disease without taking an ocular formula. Using the CRISPR-Cas9 mediated knockout method, deletion of the AGP gene was induced in the ZEP knockout strain, which was generated in a previous study [24]. Based on the two distinct phenotypic characteristics of zeaxanthin accumulation and the lack of starch, the creation of the mutants was confirmed. In addition, the medium composition was modified to simplify the process of inducing TAG accumulation to increase the commercial viability of the mutant strain. Through these efforts, we developed a commercially applicable strain that produces macular pigment-enriched microalgal oil under optimized culture conditions.

Results and discussion

Generation of the macular pigment-enriched microalgal oil-accumulating mutant by CRISPR-Cas9

In a previous report, zeaxanthin-accumulating C. reinhardtii (zep) was generated by CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene editing [24]. The wild type of C. reinhardtii can only accumulate zeaxanthin under high light stress. However, zep can accumulate zeaxanthin even under normal conditions without high light stress. Using the properties of the zep strain, we attempted to produce microalgal oil containing a high content of macular pigments. Given that ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGP) is one of the key regulatory enzymes in the production of lipids (oils) in C. reinhardtii, the AGP gene was selected as a gene-editing target of the zep line by CRISPR-Cas9. Because a mutation in the AGP gene was created without the insertion of any antibiotic resistance gene, it was difficult to select the correct mutants from many transformants by PCR. Therefore, mutant screening was conducted based on the limitation of starch synthesis through the reduction of the precursor in the AGP knockout mutant [16]. As a result, the AGP knockout mutants (dZAs) were selected visually based on starchless features (Fig. 1A). The dark green color of the wild type and zep line indicated the presence of starch, whereas starch was absent in dZA mutants (dZAs). Analysis of the genome sequence revealed Ins/Del mutations in the target sequence in the two dZA1 and 2 (Fig. 1B). DNA insertion or deletion at the RuvC site (between  + 17 and  + 18 position on the target site) in dZAs showed that the gene targeted by CRISPR-Cas9 was precisely edited.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Morphological features and genomic sequence analysis of AGP knock-out mutants (dZAs). A Analysis of starch phenotype by iodine staining. After being cultured in the nitrogen-starvation medium, a cell was stained with iodine solution, and the dark green color indicates the presence of starch as in the lower panel. B Genomic DNA sequence alignment of AGP of the wild type, zep line, dZA1, and dZA2. The 20-bp target sequence is underlined, and the red character is the PAM sequence. Blue characters indicate the insertion or deletion sequence on the AGP site in the dZAs. C Cell growth of the dZA1 and dZA2 under normal conditions was compared to that of the wild type and zep line. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments (n  > 9). Error bars indicate standard deviation. D Triacylglycerol (TAG) accumulation in the cells cultured in the nitrogen-starvation medium is visualized by BODIPY staining. The green dot indicates the oil droplet in the cytosol, and the red color indicates the chloroplast. The size bar represents 10 µm. E The fluorescence intensity of the cells cultured under nitrogen-starvation conditions after Nile red-staining. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments (n  > 3)

Since dZAs generated serial mutations, we determined the effect of the AGP mutation on the growth of dZAs using growth analysis and microscopic fluorescence analysis. The growth patterns of dZA1 and dZA2 were almost identical to those of the parental zep line and wild type (Fig. 1C). This indicates that the edited lesions of the AGP gene in dZAs does not have any detrimental effect on the growth of dZAs and increases the oil content. To validate the higher TAG accumulation in the dZAs, oil droplets in the cells were visualized through microscopic fluorescence analysis and compared with the parental strains (Fig. 1D). Further, for the quantification of triacylglycerol (TAG), we measured the Nile red fluorescence of each cell line growing under nitrogen starvation conditions and normalized this to the same cell numbers. The two dZA strains displayed more than two-fold higher Nile red fluorescence than the parental strains (Fig. 1E). These results showed that the dZAs exhibited increased TAG synthesis through metabolite changes when AGP was knocked out.

Accumulation of macular pigments and lipid in the dZAs

We quantitatively analyzed and compared metabolites such as pigments, starch, and lipids in the dZA1 and 2 (dZAs) with those in the parental strains. Because the dZAs were generated using zep as the parental strain, they concurrently accumulated lutein and zeaxanthin (macular pigments). First, the content of pigments in the dZAs was analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The dZAs had both higher lutein (2.93 or 2.55 mg g−1 DCW) and zeaxanthin (3.12 or 3.18 mg g−1 DCW) content than those of the zep line, where lutein and zeaxanthin content is 2.47 and 2.27 mg g−1 DCW, respectively (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, the macular pigments in the dZAs were observed to be higher than that in zep. Approximately 35% higher zeaxanthin was present in both dZAs than that of parental line. In addition, dZA1 showed approximately 20% higher lutein content than the WT or zep line. However, the lutein content of dZA2 was almost the same as that of the WT or zep strain under N-deprivation culture conditions. The reason for the different lutein contents in dZA1 and dZA2 is not known. The metabolite changes such as the remaining D-glucose-1-phosphate and ATP in the dZAs could directly affect the associated carbon metabolic circuits. As one of these effects, carotenogenesis might increase in dZAs [11, 32]. Similar metabolite changes have been reported in citrus plant, indicating that decreased starch synthesis is associated with increased carotenoid levels [33].

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparative and quantitative analysis of pigments, starch, and lipid of cells cultured under nitrogen-starvation medium (TAP-N). A Pigment contents in the wild type and mutants measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Lut lutein; Zea zeaxanthin. B Starch content in the wild type and mutants measured by the enzymatic hydrolysis method. C Total lipid content in the wild type and mutants measured by the chloroform/methanol extraction method. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments (n  > 9). Error bars indicate standard deviation. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences based on Student’s t test (P  < 0.05). a−cIn a row without a common superscript letter, differ (P  < 0.05) as analyzed by two-way ANOVA and the Tukey test. (n  = 6)

To quantify starch synthesis, dried biomass was hydrolysed using an amyloglucosidase/α-amylase combination method, and the starch was quantified by the amount of dissociated glucose as explained in the Materials and Methods section. The starch content based on a DCW was approximately 35% in the wild-type and zep line, and approximately 2% in the dZAs (Fig. 2B), which was consistent with the results of iodine staining (Fig. 1A). Total lipid analysis showed an increase in lipid content in the dZAs with 450.0 mg g−1 DCW in dZA1 and 505.6 mg g−1 DCW in dZA2 (Fig. 2C). Whereas, the total lipid content of the wild type and zep was 221.3 mg g−1 DCW and 254.3 mg g−1 DCW, respectively (Fig. 2C). Such enhancements of lipid content in dZAs indicated that carbon flux to starch production had been changed to fatty acid biosynthesis owing to the defective starch biosynthesis shown in AGP knockout mutants (dZAs) under N-starvation conditions.

Fatty acids were also analyzed by gas chromatography (GC-FID) to compare the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) content and the composition of each strain. After cultivation under TAG-inducing conditions, the content of total FAME measured by GC-FID was approximately half of the amount of total lipids extracted by the Bligh and Dyer method (Fig. 2C), which gave a result of 265 mg g−1 DCW in dZA1 and 296 mg g−1 DCW in dZA2, whereas it was 98 mg g−1 DCW and 128 mg g−1 DCW in the wild type and mutant (zep), respectively (Fig. 3A). According to these results, the fatty acid composition of the dZA strains was highly similar (Fig. 3B). Because the knockout of AGP caused the transfer of precursors from starch synthesis to lipid biosynthesis, the composition of fatty acids should be in accordance with the metabolic pathway of fatty acid synthesis. However, C18:1 increased from 10.9% in the wild type to 19.2–19.9% in the dZAs. Simultaneously, C18:3 decreased as C18:1 increased in the dZAs. This unexpected phenomenon in the desaturation of fatty acids in starchless C. reinhardtii has been reported in a previous study [34]; however, there are no clearly identified mechanisms for this to date. Additionally, the minor fatty acid species, C14 and C20, were not found to be the same as those in a previous report [34, 35].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Analysis of fatty acids of cells cultured in nitrogen-starvation medium (TAP-N). A Amount of total FAMEs. B The profile of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). FAME was analyzed by gas chromatography. Five major species of fatty acids were detected, and C14 and C20 were negligible. All experiments were conducted in triplicate. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences by Student’s t test (P  < 0.05)

Improvement of culture processes for lipid production

The general process for oil production by C. reinhardtii was separated into two steps: cell growth and oil induction. Nitrogen-free medium is normally required for TAG induction after growth, which indicates that the process of harvesting cells and changing the medium is required (Fig. 4A). However, this process is time-consuming and not cost-effective for large-scale cultivation. Therefore, we simplified the oil-induction process by changing the composition of nutrients in the Tris–acetate-phosphate (TAP) medium (Fig. 4B). To determine the optimal design for culture medium, nitrogen, phosphorus, and acetate, which are the main components of TAP medium, were tested by the combination of various concentrations of nitrogen and phosphate ranging 1/8–one-fold, and acetate ranging ½–two-fold in TAP, respectively. As a result, the combination of 1/4 N and 1/4 P with two-fold acetate containing TAP medium revealed the best induction of oil with the desirable amount of macular pigment contents, we called this medium as 1/4NP2A medium. The 1/4NP2A medium included 1.875 mM NH4Cl, 0.155 mM K2HPO4, 0.103 mM KH2PO4, and 2 mL L–1 glacial acetic acid, and others are the same as the TAP medium.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Strategic modification of the cultivation process and optimization of culture medium. A Diagram of existing oil-induction process called the two-step induction process. This process includes a medium change step, and the duration of the entire process is 6 days. B Diagram of simplified oil-induction process called the one-step induction process. The duration of the oil induction process was reduced by the lack of the medium change process by using a modified culture medium (1/4NP2A medium). C Comparison of lipid productivity between the two lipid-induction processes. D Comparison of pigment productivity between the two oil induction processes. The data shown are representative of three independent experiments (n  = 9). a−cIn a row without a common superscript letter, differ (P  < 0.05) as analyzed by two-way ANOVA and the Tukey test (n = 6)

The culture method using this medium was called one-step oil induction process (one-step process), in which cell growth and oil induction occurred in the same medium. Lipid and pigment production from dZA1 were compared between one-step process and the conventional two-step process. Cells growing in the one-step culture condition reached the stationary phase slowly, and the final cell density at 4 days in one-step culture was almost 2/3 than in the normal media (Fig. 1C; Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). In contrast, cells in a two-step process reached the stationary phase fast at normal medium but maintained the cell density during the N-deprivation for 3 more days (Additional file 1: Fig. S1B). Interestingly, at the end of cultivation, the lipid content of dZA1 and dZA2 in the one-step process was enhanced by 1.6-fold and 1.9-fold, respectively, compared to that in the parental strain (zep), based on dry weight (Additional file 1: Table S1). However, when we compared the lipid productivity of dZA strains between one-step and two-step processes, the average value of lipid productivity (144.51 mg/g/day) for dZAs in a one-step process was 1.8-fold that of the two-step process (79.64 mg/g/day) (Fig. 4C).

Pigment production by dZA mutants under oil induction conditions was compared with that of the parental line (zep). The average value of the macular pigment content of dZAs in the one-step process was 38% higher than that of the parental line (zep), but this value in the two-step process was 23% higher than that of zep (Additional file 1: Table S1). Further, the macular pigment productivity of dZAs between the two processes was compared, and the average value of pigment productivity in the one-step process was slightly higher or at least the same as that in the two-step process (Additional file 1: Table S1; Fig. 4D).

A one-step process consisting of reduced nitrogen and phosphate provided by the 1/4NP2A medium resulted in slower cell growth compared to that in normal medium (Fig. 1C and Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). However, for the production of oil and pigment together, this process can shorten the culture time by approximately 33% compared to that with the N-starvation process, and medium replacement is not required; thus, without losing pigments, this one-step process enables the production of pigment-enriched microalgae oil for possible food applications.

Optimization of lipid and pigment extraction for edible use

For efficient oil extraction, a mixture of aqueous and organic solvents is the most feasible system [8]. The cell membrane and lipid binding are disrupted by the aqueous solvent, and the lipids can sufficiently diffuse from the cell to the organic solvent. A mixture of chloroform and methanol is generally used for lipid extraction from microalgae, as in the Bligh and Dyer method. However, this mixture is not suitable for edible oil extraction because of the toxicity of chloroform. Therefore, a method of extracting microalgal oil using a solvent that complies with the food additive regulations (Q3C) [36] had to be developed. In this study, we optimized the extraction method using HI solution (hexane/isopropanol  = 3:2, v/v) following Hara and Radin [37] as a solvent for the edible use of pigment-enriched microalgal oil. A Box–Behnken design was used for a response surface methodology [38] with a total of 15 runs, and three replicates at the central point were performed using Minitab 18. The three variables, temperature (X1, 30–50 °C), time (X2, 30–150 min), and the solvent/biomass ratio (X3, 20 to 100 mL/g) were tested along with pigment extraction yield and lipid extraction yield as responses (Fig. 5). The variability of pigments and lipids could be explained by a second-order polynomial equation with three variables (R2 values ranged from 0.83 to 0.92). The formulae are as follows:

$$\begin{aligned} {\text{Lipid}} & = 0.725 - 0.0029X_{1} - 0.00165X_{2} - 0.00316X_{3} - 0.000067X_{1} \times X_{1} - 0.000004X_{2} \times X_{2} \\ & + 0.000019X_{3} \times X_{3} + 0.000054X_{1} \times X_{2} + 0.000019X_{1} \times X_{3} + 0.000019X_{2} \times X_{3} \\ \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} Lutein =\, & 15.4 + 0.167X_{1} + 0.1237X_{2} + 0.2788X_{3} + 0.00434X_{1} \times X_{1} - 0.000366X_{2} \times X_{2} \\ & - 0.001491X_{3} \times X_{3} - 0.00267X_{1} \times X_{2} - 0.00289X_{1} \times X_{3} + 0.000821X_{2} \times X_{3} \\ \end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned} {\text{Zeaxanthin}} & = 7.02 + 0.19X_{1} + 0.0491X_{2} + 0.1610X_{3} + 0.00118X_{1} \times X_{1} - 0.000130X_{2} \times X_{2} \\ & - 0.000758X_{3} \times X_{3} - 0.001342X_{1} \times X_{2} - 0.00187X_{1} \times X_{3} + 0.000444X_{2} \times X_{3} \\ \end{aligned}$$
Fig. 5
figure 5

Response surface plot of lipids, lutein, and zeaxanthin. Extraction temperature, extraction time, and solvent-to-biomass ratio were comparatively analyzed. All analyzes were performed in triplicate (n  = 3)

The linear term for time and ratio for lipids, the linear and quadratic terms for the ratio, the interaction ratio with time for lutein, and the linear term for the ratio for zeaxanthin were significant. The p value for the lack-of-fit for the three dependent variables was much higher than 0.05, which indicated that the regression model correctly described the experimental data. The extraction of pigments was not significantly affected by the extraction temperature and time, similar to the findings of a previous study [39]. Unlike in previous studies [40, 41], the temperature did not affect the extraction of lipids. This phenomenon could be explained by the presence of isopropanol in this study, which helps to diffuse lipids from the cells. There was an increasing tendency for the dependent variables with increasing extraction time and solvent-to-biomass ratio. From the response surface analysis, we determined that the optimal conditions were 35.7 °C for extraction temperature, 150 min for extraction time, and the ratio of solvent to solid of 100 mL g−1.

Production of macular pigment-enriched microalgal oil

To confirm the actual product, edible microalgal oil from dZA1 was produced using the optimized methods described above. dZA1 was cultivated under one-step cultivation conditions using a 1/4NP2A medium. The biomass yield of dZA1 in 1/4NP2A medium was approximately 70% that in the normal medium (Fig. 1C; Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). According to previous reports, the biomass productivity or cell growth of the starchless strain, such as dZA1, could be affected by the reduction of starch synthesis by AGP knockout under nitrogen-starvation conditions [14, 34, 42]. Under the same conditions, total lipid and pigment production were confirmed, and the productivity was compared to that of the zep. Lipid productivity of dZA1 was 131.53 ± 16.62 mg/g/day, which was 69% higher than that of zep (77.87 ± 8.72 mg/g/day). Pigment productivity of dZA1 (lutein plus zeaxanthin: 0.90 mg/g/day) was also 29% higher than that of zep (0.7 mg/g/day) (Fig. 4C, D; Additional file 1: Table S1). This result indicated that higher amount of pigment-enriched oil can be produced from dZA1 than parental strain in the optimized process.

To evaluate the final yield for edible use, microalgal oil was extracted by the optimized edible oil extraction method using the HI solution (Fig. 6A, B). Pigments in the extracted oils were analyzed by HPLC. The pigment-enriched oil contained large amounts of lutein and zeaxanthin (Fig. 6C). Finally, it was possible to obtain 196 ± 20.1 mg edible oil containing 8.42 ± 0.92 mg g−1 lutein of oil and 7.69 ± 1.03 mg g−1 zeaxanthin of oil from 1 g of dZA1 (Table 1). The extraction yield for edible oil obtained by the food-grade method was calculated as 37.2% and approximately 90% of the pigments was recovered in extracted oil. Thus, edible microalgal oil with highly concentrated pigments was produced, however, the extraction yield of algae oil using food-grade method needs to be improved.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Macular pigment-enriched edible microalgal oil extraction. A Flow chart of the modified hexane extraction method. The method of extracting lipids and pigments simultaneously was optimized based on the Korean Food and Drug Administration Notice. B Pigment-enriched microalgal oil extracted from dZA1 biomass. C Pigments analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography in the extracted oil. The pigment profile of extracted oil (lower) was compared with the pigment profile of cell extract (upper)

Table 1 Edible microalgal oil production from dZA1 using the optimized process (n  = 5)

Conclusion

We generated dZAs through CRISPR-Cas9-mediated AGP knockout targeting zep for greater oil production. For industrial feasibility, we tested the culture process and the macular pigment-enriched oil extraction method. Optimization of the medium for one-step cultivation shortened the production process by approximately 33%. Comparing the two-step and one-step processes, the oil productivity of the dZA strains in the one-step process was 1.75-fold that in the two-step process, but the macular pigment productivity was almost the same for both processes. We also developed an extraction method with hexane/isopropanol to make the oil safe for consumption. Microalgal oil contains a high content of lutein and zeaxanthin was produced from dZA1 mutant under the one-step process, and this is expected to beneficial for human eye health. This new perspective on the development of high value-added and functional microalgal oils could contribute to the commercialization of microalgae-based products.

Method

Microalgal strain and culture conditions

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii CC-4349 cw15 mt (provided by Chlamydomonas Resource Center, University of Minnesota, USA), zep line made by Baek et al. [24] and double knockout mutants were grown in tris acetate phosphate (TAP) medium. Cells were cultured on a shaker (120 rpm) with light intensity of 60 μmol photons m–2 s–1 at 25 °C. To produce pigment-enriched edible oil, cells grown in normal TAP medium were cultured in nitrogen-depleted medium to induce lipid production. To simplify the culture process, the culture medium was adjusted to 1/4NP2A medium. The 1/4NP2A contained 1.875 mM NH4Cl, 0.155 mM K2HPO4, 0.103 mM KH2PO4, and 2 mL L–1 glacial acetic acid; the other components were the same as that of the TAP medium.

CRISPR-Cas9 RNP-mediated knock-out

The C. reinhardtii zep mutant was gene edited as described in a previous study with slight modifications [24]. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGP) gene (Cre03.g188250.t1.2) was selected to editing target to develop a double knockout mutant producing macular pigment enriched microalgal oil. The sgRNA target sequence of AGP gene was 5ʹ-TAGCATGGCCCTGAAGATGCGGG-3ʹ. Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes were generated by premixing 100 μg of Cas9 protein purchased (ToolGen, Seoul, South Korea) and 70 μg of in vitro transcribed sgRNA (GeneArt™ Precision gRNA Synthesis Kit, Invitrogen, CA, USA). Then, RNP complex was incubated 5 × 105 cells for 5 min on ice and transferred into a 0.4-cm electroporation cuvette. Cells and the RNP complex mixture were pulsed using a Gene Pulser Xcell Electroporation System (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) with a set pulse at 600 V (50 µF, and 200 Ω resistance). After electroporation, the cells were plated on TAP agar plates.

Mutant screening by iodine solution assay and genome sequence analysis

To confirm the AGP knockout mutant, liquid-cultured cells were visualized by iodine staining. Candidate mutants from the agar plates were transferred to 96-well culture plates. Transferred cells were cultured in nitrogen-deprived TAP medium for 3 days and were then stained with 1 μg of iodine to visualize starch accumulation (dark green or dark grey). The mutants without color change (green or yellowish green) were selected as AGP knock-out mutants, and the genomic DNA was isolated and subjected to PCR with specific primers which are adjacent to sgRNA target sites in AGP (F: 5ʹ-TGGGCACGACTTGCATTGTGT-3ʹ, R: 5ʹ-AATGGGCCAGCGCGAGCATA-3ʹ). The PCR products were analyzed by gel electrophoresis and by Sanger’s sequencing method (Macrogen, Seoul, South Korea). The AGP gene sequence of the mutants was aligned with the innate gene sequence to confirm mutation.

Quantification of starch

The content of microalgal starch was assayed using a assay kit including amyloglucosidase/α-amylase method (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland). The dried biomass was fragmented with a pestle and resuspended in 80% ethanol. Thermostable α-amylase (3000 U mL−1) in sodium acetate buffer (100 mM sodium acetate buffer, pH 5.0) was added to each sample. The samples were incubated in a boiling water bath for 12 min, followed by heating at 50 °C. Amyloglucosidase (3300 U mL−1) in sodium acetate buffer was then added to each sample before heating. The samples were then kept at 50 °C for 30 min and then centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min. Glucose in the supernatant was assessed using the glucose oxidase reaction based on the colorimetric method (510 nm). Total starch content was calculated according to the following formula provided by the manufacturer:

$${\text{Starch}}, \% = \Delta {\text{A}} \times \frac{{\text{F}}}{{\text{W}}} \times {\text{FV}} \times 0.9$$

ΔA: absorbance; F: glucose amount (100 µg)/absorbance of standard glucose; FV: final sample volume (mL); and W: sample weight (mg).

Lipid analysis

To confirm the presence of lipid bodies in cells, neutral lipids were stained using BODIPY™ 505/515 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). Cells were mixed with 0.04 µg/mL of BODIPY using a vortex mixer, and the mixture was kept at room temperature for 5 min in the dark. BODIPY-stained lipid droplets were examined by fluorescence microscopy (Eclipse Ni, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The fluorescence detection wavelengths is 535 ± 23 nm for the FITC filter for BODIPY and 630 ± 30 nm with the Texas RED filter for chloroplast autofluorescence.

Total lipid contents were measured according to the method described by Bligh and Dyer [43]. The cells were collected after lipid induction and frozen. The cell pellets were resuspended in 4 mL of deionised water, and then 10 mL of methanol and 5 mL of chloroform were added sequentially in a 4:10:5 ratio. After overnight incubation in the dark at room temperature, 5 mL of deionised water and 5 mL of chloroform were added, resulting in a 9:10:10 ratio of water: methanol: chloroform. The extracts were centrifuged for 10 min at 2000×g to separate the two layers. The chloroform layer, which contained lipids, was transferred to a pre-weighed glass bottle and evaporated on a hot plate. The difference in the weight of the bottle before and after evaporation represented the lipid content.

To measure neutral lipids (TAG), the algal cells were stained with the Nile red method described by Chang et al. [44] with some modifications. The fluorescence of Nile red was measured using a Varioskan Flash microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The fluorescence intensity was normalized to that of the cells (100 × 10cells) in the sample. Excitation and emission wavelengths of 530 nm and 595 nm, respectively, were selected. Data are expressed as the mean and standard deviation of three replicates.

Pigment analysis by HPLC

Pigments in cells were extracted with 90% (v/v) acetone. The extracts were analyzed using a Shimadzu Prominence HPLC model LC-20AD (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a Spherisorb 5.0 μm ODS1 4.6 × 250 mm cartridge column (Waters, Milford, USA). The pigment was detected by a photodiode array detector at 445 nm and 670 nm absorbance, as described previously [45].

Fatty acid analysis by gas chromatography

Fatty acids were quantified according to the method described by Garcés and Mancha [46]. Lyophilized cells were treated with 2 mL of methylation mixture (MeOH: benzene: DMP (2,2-dimethoxy-propane): H2SO4, 39: 20: 5: 2) in a 4-mL vial with a Teflon cap. Then, 1 mL of heptane was added. The mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 2 h for the extraction. After cooling at room temperature, the separated organic phase (upper phase) was collected. Pentadecanoic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) was used as the internal standard. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were analyzed using a gas chromatograph (7890A GC, Agilent technology, CA, USA) equipped with a flame ionisation detector and a DB-23 column (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm); (Agilent Technology, CA, USA). Helium was used as carrier gas. For FAME analysis, the injection volume was 1 μL (split ratio, 1:10). The injector temperature was 250 °C, and the detector temperature was 280 °C. Initially, the oven temperature was held at 50 °C for 1 min, gradually increased to 250 °C and then held at 250 °C for 5 min. This study was supported by the National Instrumentation Center for Environmental Management (NICEM).

Lipid extraction for edible use

To extract the edible oil at low temperatures over a short time period, ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) was used. A 0.5 g sample of dried biomass and 50 mL of 3:2 (v/v) hexane/isopropanol mixture (HIP) was used to extract pigment-enriched oil, and the mixture was sonicated in an ultrasonic bath at a frequency of 40 kHz and power of 350 W for 150 min at 35.7 °C (Powersonics 505, Hwashin Technology, Seoul, Korea). The sonicated mixture was centrifuged at 3500×g for 10 min at 4 °C to separate the liquid phase. The supernatant was collected and mixed with 0.88% KCl solution of the same volume. To collect the organic phase, the supernatant with the KCl solution was transferred to a separating funnel, and the upper phase was collected. Finally, the organic solution was evaporated by rotary evaporation at 50 °C for 3 min. The final extract was mixed with acetone, filtered using a 0.2-µm syringe filter for HPLC analysis, and was mixed with chloroform for lipid analysis.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed at least in triplicate. Student’s t test was performed to compare the quantitative values of Nile red fluorescence, starch, and lipid contents between the wild type and the mutants. The p values that are p  < 0.05 are considered to be statistically significant. Data obtained from pigment contents, total lipid productivity, and pigment productivity were analyzed by two-way ANOVA model as described by Assad [47]. Tukey’s multiple comparison was used to test the significance of differences among means. Data are expressed as mean  ±  standard deviation (SD).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Leu S, Boussiba S. Advances in the production of high-value products by microalgae. Ind Biotechnol. 2014;10:169–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhalamurugan GL, Valerie O, Mark L. Valuable bioproducts obtained from microalgal biomass and their commercial applications: a review. Environ Eng Res. 2018;23:229–41.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruiz J, Olivieri G, de Vree J, Bosma R, Willems P, Reith JH, Eppink MH, Kleinegris DM, Wijffels RH, Barbosa MJ. Towards industrial products from microalgae. Energy Environ Sci. 2016;9:3036–43.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fu W, Nelson DR, Mystikou A, Daakour S, Salehi-Ashtiani K. Advances in microalgal research and engineering development. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2019;59:157–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park S, Nguyen THT, Jin E. Improving lipid production by strain development in microalgae: strategies, challenges and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 2019;292:121593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121953.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hannon M, Gimpel J, Tran M, Rasala B, Mayfield S. Biofuels from algae: challenges and potential. Biofuels. 2010;1:763–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Remmers IM, Wijffels RH, Barbosa MJ, Lamers PP. Can we approach theoretical lipid yields in microalgae? Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36:265–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xue Z, Wan F, Yu W, Liu J, Zhang Z, Kou X. Edible oil production from microalgae: a review. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol. 2018;120:1700428.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saad MG, Dosoky NS, Zoromba MS, Shafik HM. Algal biofuels: current status and key challenges. Energies. 1920;2019:12.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scaife MA, Nguyen GT, Rico J, Lambert D, Helliwell KE, Smith AG. Establishing Chlamydomonas reinhardtii as an industrial biotechnology host. Plant J. 2015;82:532–46.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schüler LM, Schulze PS, Pereira H, Barreira L, León R, Varela J. Trends and strategies to enhance triacylglycerols and high-value compounds in microalgae. Algal Res. 2017;25:263–73.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Scranton MA, Ostrand JT, Fields FJ, Mayfield SP. Chlamydomonas as a model for biofuels and bio-products production. Plant J. 2015;82:523–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Salomé PA, Merchant SS. A series of fortunate events: introducing Chlamydomonas as a reference organism. Plant Cell. 2019;31:1682–707. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.18.00952.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Work VH, Radakovits R, Jinkerson RE, Meuser JE, Elliott LG, Vinyard DJ, Laurens LM, Dismukes GC, Posewitz MC. Increased lipid accumulation in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii sta7-10 starchless isoamylase mutant and increased carbohydrate synthesis in complemented strains. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9:1251–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Zabawinski C, Van Den Koornhuyse N, D’Hulst C, Schlichting R, Giersch C, Delrue B, Lacroix J-M, Preiss J, Ball S. Starchless mutants of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii lack the small subunit of a heterotetrameric ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:1069–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Li Y, Han D, Hu G, Dauvillee D, Sommerfeld M, Ball S, Hu Q. Chlamydomonas starchless mutant defective in ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase hyper-accumulates triacylglycerol. Metab Eng. 2010;12:387–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu L, Fan J, Yan C, Xu C. Starch deficiency enhances lipid biosynthesis and turnover in leaves. Plant Physiol. 2018;178:118–29.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Iwai M, Ikeda K, Shimojima M, Ohta H. Enhancement of extraplastidic oil synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using a type-2 diacylglycerol acyltransferase with a phosphorus starvation–inducible promoter. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12:808–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee J-W, Shin S-Y, Kim H-S, Jin E, Lee H-G, Oh H-M. Lipid turnover between membrane lipids and neutral lipids via inhibition of diacylglyceryl N,N,N-trimethylhomoserine synthesis in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Algal Res. 2017;27:162–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim J, Kwak HS, Sim SJ, Jin E. Overexpression of malic enzyme isoform 2 in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii PTS42 increases lipid production. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;7:100239.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rengel R, Smith RT, Haslam RP, Sayanova O, Vila M, Leon R. Overexpression of acetyl-CoA synthetase (ACS) enhances the biosynthesis of neutral lipids and starch in the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Algal Res. 2018;31:183–93.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nisar N, Li L, Lu S, Khin NC, Pogson BJ. Carotenoid metabolism in plants. Mol Plant. 2015;8:68–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Niyogi KK, Bjorkman O, Grossman AR. Chlamydomonas xanthophyll cycle mutants identified by video imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence quenching. Plant Cell. 1997;9:1369–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Baek K, Kim DH, Jeong J, Sim SJ, Melis A, Kim J-S, Jin E, Bae S. DNA-free two-gene knockout in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii via CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30620.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Landrum JT, Bone RA. Lutein, zeaxanthin, and the macular pigment. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2001;385:28–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernstein PS, Li B, Vachali PP, Gorusupudi A, Shyam R, Henriksen BS, Nolan JM. Lutein, zeaxanthin, and meso-zeaxanthin: the basic and clinical science underlying carotenoid-based nutritional interventions against ocular disease. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;50:34–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Abdel-Aal E-SM, Akhtar H, Zaheer K, Ali R. Dietary sources of lutein and zeaxanthin carotenoids and their role in eye health. Nutrients. 2013;5:1169–85.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Beatty S, Koh H-H, Phil M, Henson D, Boulton M. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration. Surv Ophthalmol. 2000;45:115–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Loskutova E, Nolan J, Howard A, Beatty S. Macular pigment and its contribution to vision. Nutrients. 2013;5:1962–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nolan JM, Stack J, O’Donovan O, Loane E, Beatty S. Risk factors for age-related maculopathy are associated with a relative lack of macular pigment. Exp Eye Res. 2007;84:61–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Noviendri D, Hasrini RF, Octavianti F. Carotenoids: sources, medicinal properties and their application in food and nutraceutical industry. J Med Plants Res. 2011;5:7119–31.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ghosh HP, Preiss J. Adenosine diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase a regulatory enzyme in the biosynthesis of starch in spinach leaf chloroplasts. J Biol Chem. 1966;241:4491–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao H, Wang J, Dong X, Han Y, Ma Q, Ding Y, Zhao F, Zhang J, Chen H, Xu Q. Carotenoid accumulation affects redox status, starch metabolism, and flavonoid/anthocyanin accumulation in citrus. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:27.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. James GO, Hocart CH, Hillier W, Chen H, Kordbacheh F, Price GD, Djordjevic MA. Fatty acid profiling of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii under nitrogen deprivation. Biores Technol. 2011;102:3343–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang ZT, Ullrich N, Joo S, Waffenschmidt S, Goodenough U. Algal lipid bodies: stress induction, purification, and biochemical characterization in wild-type and starchless Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8:1856–68.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: Q3C tables and list (revision 3). US Food and Drug Administration: Maryland; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hara A, Radin NS. Lipid extraction of tissues with a low-toxicity solvent. Anal Biochem. 1978;90:420–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferreira SC, Bruns R, Ferreira H, Matos G, David J, Brandao G, da Silva EP, Portugal L, Dos Reis P, Souza A. Box-Behnken design: an alternative for the optimization of analytical methods. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;597:179–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Derrien M, Badr A, Gosselin A, Desjardins Y, Angers P. Optimization of a green process for the extraction of lutein and chlorophyll from spinach by-products using response surface methodology (RSM). LWT Food Sci Technol. 2017;79:170–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Silitonga A, Masjuki H, Ong HC, Mahlia T, Kusumo F. Optimization of extraction of lipid from Isochrysis galbana microalgae species for biodiesel synthesis. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util Environ Eff. 2017;39:1167–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Barizão ÉO, Boeing JS, Martins AC, Visentainer JV, Almeida VC. Application of response surface methodology for the optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) seed oil. Food Anal Methods. 2015;8:2392–400.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Koo KM, Jung S, Lee BS, Kim J-B, Jo YD, Choi H-I, Kang S-Y, Chung G-H, Jeong W-J, Ahn J-W. The mechanism of starch over-accumulation in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii high-starch mutants identified by comparative transcriptome analysis. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:858.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol. 1959;37:911–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Chang KS, Kim J, Park H, Hong S-J, Lee C-G, Jin E. Enhanced lipid productivity in AGP knockout marine microalga Tetraselmis sp. using a DNA-free CRISPR-Cas9 RNP method. Bioresour Technol. 2020;303:122932.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Park S, Lee Y, Jin E. Comparison of the responses of two Dunaliella strains, Dunaliella salina CCAP 19/18 and Dunaliella bardawil to light intensity with special emphasis on carotenogenesis. Algae. 2013;28:203–11.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Garcés R, Mancha M. One-step lipid extraction and fatty acid methyl esters preparation from fresh plant tissues. Anal Biochem. 1993;211:139–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Assaad HI, Hou Y, Zhou L, Carroll RJ, Wu G. Rapid publication-ready MS-Word tables for two-way ANOVA. Springerplus. 2015;4:1–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program and “Carbon to X Project” of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, funded by the Korean government.

Funding

This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program (NRF-2020R1A2C2011998) and “Carbon to X Project” (2020M3H7A1098294) of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, funded by the Korean government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WS, SS and ESJ conceived and designed the experiments; IS and KB generated the mutants; IS, HO, JJ and JK performed the optimization of the culture process and lipid analysis; SK and SJ performed the extraction of edible oil; IS, SK, JK, WS and EJ wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to EonSeon Jin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Biomass, total lipid, pigment production from WT, zep, dZA1, dZA2 from the two-step and one-step process (n = 3). Figure S1. Growth curves of WT, zep, dZA1, dZA2 from A one-step process (n = 6) and B two-step process, TAP-N medium (grey) (n = 3).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Song, I., Kim, S., Kim, J. et al. Macular pigment-enriched oil production from genome-edited microalgae. Microb Cell Fact 21, 27 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-021-01736-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-021-01736-7

Keywords