Open Access

Engineering microbial cell factories for the production of plant natural products: from design principles to industrial-scale production

Contributed equally
Microbial Cell Factories201716:125

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0732-7

Received: 12 January 2017

Accepted: 5 July 2017

Published: 19 July 2017

Abstract

Plant natural products (PNPs) are widely used as pharmaceuticals, nutraceuticals, seasonings, pigments, etc., with a huge commercial value on the global market. However, most of these PNPs are still being extracted from plants. A resource-conserving and environment-friendly synthesis route for PNPs that utilizes microbial cell factories has attracted increasing attention since the 1940s. However, at the present only a handful of PNPs are being produced by microbial cell factories at an industrial scale, and there are still many challenges in their large-scale application. One of the challenges is that most biosynthetic pathways of PNPs are still unknown, which largely limits the number of candidate PNPs for heterologous microbial production. Another challenge is that the metabolic fluxes toward the target products in microbial hosts are often hindered by poor precursor supply, low catalytic activity of enzymes and obstructed product transport. Consequently, despite intensive studies on the metabolic engineering of microbial hosts, the fermentation costs of most heterologously produced PNPs are still too high for industrial-scale production. In this paper, we review several aspects of PNP production in microbial cell factories, including important design principles and recent progress in pathway mining and metabolic engineering. In addition, implemented cases of industrial-scale production of PNPs in microbial cell factories are also highlighted.

Keywords

Plant natural products Synthetic biology Microbial cell factories Metabolic engineering Industrial production

Background

Thousands of plant natural products (PNPs) can be utilized as drugs, cosmetics, dyes, seasonings, nutraceuticals, and industrial chemicals, all of which play important roles in human life [1]. Unfortunately, in recent years over-exploitation has endangered more than 15,000 medicinal plant species in their natural habitats, which resulted in a precarious and unsustainable supply of the invaluable natural products [2, 3]. At the same time, seasonal, climatic or other environmental variations can also threaten the supply of these natural products [4]. The yield of natural products from plants also cannot satisfy the demands of the growing market. Due to the structural complexity of most natural products, total chemical synthesis approaches are often inefficient and accompanied by large amounts of waste and heavy pollution [5]. Therefore, engineering microbial cell factories to produce these high-value PNPs has become a promising solution to protect endangered plants and prevent pollution from chemical synthesis [4, 6]. Current developments in biological “omics” techniques and synthetic biology provide excellent tools to remove obstacles in the construction of microbial cell factories to produce PNPs [5, 7, 8]. Over the past few decades, there has been great progress in multiple aspects of heterologous synthesis of PNPs, including the identification of biosynthetic pathways, the construction of microbial cell factories, and the development of industrial production [9]. Engineered microbial cell factories have been successfully applied to produce PNPs from renewable carbon sources at an industrial scale. Further progress in the field of microbial cell factories will not only potentially save endangered plants, but also profoundly change the traditional ways of PNP production.

In this review, we summarize the recent progress of microbial cell factory engineering, identification of novel biosynthetic pathways, and the production of PNPs on an industrial scale. Firstly, two tentative strategies based on biological “omics” and synthetic biology technologies for gene mining from the biosynthetic pathways of PNPs are introduced, followed by a discussion of three pivotal steps in the optimization of microbial cell factories, including the improvement of precursor supply, enzyme activity and product transport. Finally, several milestone examples of industrial PNP production in microbial cell factories are showcased (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

A schematic summary of microbial cell factories design, optimization and industrial production. The mining of biosynthetic pathways of plant natural products by sequencing-guided pathway exploration and artificial pathway recombination. Optimization of microbial cell factories by improving precursor supply, enzyme modification and transporter engineering. Industrial-scale production of three natural products (artemisinin, resveratrol and carotenoids) is shown as an example

Mining of PNP biosynthetic pathways

The first step in the construction of a PNP-producing microbial cell factory is to identify the original biosynthetic pathway. The rapid development of molecular biology, “omics” technologies and bioinformatics, has enabled great breakthroughs in the identification of PNP-biosynthetic pathways. In this section, recent approaches in gene exploration for the production of natural compounds are reviewed.

Sequencing-guided pathway exploration

Traditionally, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) [1012], RNA interference (RNAi) [13, 14], virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) [15] and isotopic tracer methods [16] had been used to uncover novel genes in the biosynthetic pathways of PNPs. However, these technologies are usually time-consuming, laborious, and consequently expensive. With the rapid development of sequencing technology, “omics” analysis and high-throughput screening technologies, thousands of functional genes related to PNP-biosynthetic pathways have been identified in recent years [17]. For example, the assembly of the Salvia miltiorrhiza transcriptome provided a valuable resource for the investigation of the complete biosynthetic pathway of tanshinone [18]. High-density genetic linkage mapping using recombinant inbred lines (RILs) had been used to decipher the genetic networks underlying flavonoid biosynthesis in Brassica napus [19]. Genes related to cucurbitacins biosynthesis were characterized by genome-wide association analysis based on the genomic variation map of 115 diverse cucumber lines [20, 21]. Whole-genome sequencing of Siraitia grosvenorii, combined with transcriptomic (RNA-Seq) and bioinformatic analyses made a great contribution to illuminate the biosynthetic pathway of mogroside V [22]. Glycosyltransferases of ginsenosides were also successfully cloned based on the ESTs (Expressed Sequence Tags) and cDNA database of Panax ginseng [23, 24]. Six enzymes acquired by RNA-Seq from mayapple were assembled into the complete biosynthetic pathway of the etoposide aglycone [25]. Therefore, “omics” technologies have greatly accelerated the pace of identification of novel genes from the biosynthetic pathways of PNPs.

Recombined artificial biosynthetic pathways

Currently, various online databases providing enormous amounts of genomic data also facilitate the identification of novel genes. For example, the 1000 plants project (1KP) proposed to collect the transcriptomes of 1000 plant species [26]. The Medicinal Plant Genomics Resource provides transcriptome and metabolome resources from medicinal plants [27]. Phytozome is a comparative platform for green plant genomics, providing a view of the evolutionary history of each plant’s genes, as well as access to the sequences and functional annotations [28]. Moreover, based on detailed information about genes, enzymes, reactions and their regulation, comprehensive metabolic networks of PNPs have been composed based on reactions mined from different species using bioinformatics databases such as KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) [29]. From these databases, it is therefore possible to “dig up” genes from different species to construct artificial biosynthetic pathways of PNPs for which the natural pathway is unknown. For instance, the biosynthesis of opioids in yeast is considered to be one of the most remarkable landmarks of synthetic biology, representing a highly sophisticated feat of engineering a very complex metabolic pathway in microbe [3032]. So far, 21 enzymes were successfully reconstructed in yeast for the heterologous biosynthesis of opioids by combining the building blocks derived from multiple species, such as Papaver somniferum, Papaver bracteatum, Coptis japonica, Eschscholzia californica, Rattus norvegicus, Pseudomonas putida, and yeast [31]. Additionally, raspberry ketone [33], salidroside [34], gastrodin [35], and salvianic acid A (SAA) [36] were also successfully synthesized in microorganisms using recombined artificial pathways. Therefore, it has become feasible to construct the biosynthetic pathways of PNPs without genetic information from the original plant. Unprecedented microbial synthesis of PNPs via recombined artificial pathways provides a new perspective in the construction of biosynthetic pathways for even the most complex PNPs. With increasing information on functional genes and enzymes, recombined artificial pathways will shed light on ways to produce new PNPs in cell factories.

Optimization of microbial cell factories

Although many biosynthetic pathways of PNPs have been identified, producing PNPs in microbial cell factories is still a tough challenge for a number of reasons. First, most PNPs are secondary metabolites, which receive relatively low levels of carbon metabolic flux in comparison with primary metabolites. Thus, it is necessary to rewire the metabolic fluxes toward their precursors in order to increase the production of PNPs. Second, due to the complexity of the molecular structures of most high-value PNPs, multiple genes are involved in the biosynthesis of these compounds. Consequently, improving the catalytic activities of so many genes in the synthetic pathway is another bottleneck. Last but not least, when the microbial host is producing PNPs, the accumulation of precursors or products in vivo can cause feedback inhibition or toxicity. In order to rescue cells from metabolite accumulation and improve the production of heterologous PNPs, transporter engineering strategies have been implemented to secrete the target metabolites outside of the cells. In this section, recent progresses in metabolic network rewiring, as well as engineering of enzymes and PNP transporters are summarized.

Improving precursor supply

The limited supply of precursors is one of the main challenges for heterologous PNP synthesis in microbial hosts. One typical case is the heterologous production of terpenoids. The carbon skeletons of all terpene molecules are composed of the five-carbon precursors isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP), which are synthesized through the MEP pathway (2-C-methyl-d-erythritol 4-phosphate pathway) or MVA pathway (mevalonate pathway) [37]. However, the flux toward the MEP or MVA pathway is considered to be limited in terpenoid production in microbial hosts. Overexpression of a truncated HMG1 (tHMG1), which catalyzes the rate-limiting step in the MVA pathway, can be used to avoid accumulating toxic amounts of β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA), and increase the supply of IPP or DMAPP in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [38]. Overexpression of all genes from the MVA pathway in S. cerevisiae using the GAL promoter also increased the metabolic flux [39]. Moreover, decreasing or eliminating the fluxes going toward competitive pathways is also a conventional strategy for pathway optimization. For example, to improve the production of artemisinic acid, an inducible promoter was used to reduce the expression of the ERG9 gene and resulted in a decrease in the metabolic flux from IPP to ergosterol, which in turn pushed the conversion of IPP toward artemisinic acid [40]. Furthermore, a sequential control strategy of the precursor farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP) has been developed in S. cerevisiae, which improved the production of β-carotenoids [41]. This offers a practical and cost-efficient approach to improve the biosynthetic production of natural compounds.

Flavonoids are widespread PNPs with high pharmaceutical value, but the production of flavonoids in recombinant microbes is low. Tyrosine or phenylalanine and malonyl-CoA are the main precursors in flavonoid biosynthesis. Introducing a tyrosine insensitive 3-deoxy-d-arabinose-heptulosonate-7-phosphate synthase mutant (encoded by ARO4 G226S ), knocking-out ARO3, and phenylpyruvate decarboxylase genes (PDC1, PDC5 and PDC6), together with overexpression of chalcone synthase (CHS) and tyrosine ammonia lyase (TAL) resulted in a 40-fold increase of extracellular naringenin titer in glucose-grown shake-flask cultures [42, 43]. In Escherichia coli, the acetyl-CoA carboxylase complex (accABCD), biotin ligase (BirA) from Photorhabdus luminescens, and enzymes in the acetate assimilation pathway [acetate kinase A (ackA), phosphate acetyltransferase (pta) and acetyl-CoA synthase (acs)] were overexpressed, which largely increased flavonoid production [44]. Additionally, overexpression of β-ketoacyl-ACP synthase II (FabF) was able to increase cellular malonyl-CoA levels and pinocembrin production [45]. In recent years, a number of groups have developed strategies for dynamic regulation, which usually depend on appropriate biosensors. These strategies allow the rebalancing of fluxes according to changing conditions in the cell or the fermentation medium [46]. For example, a hybrid cis- and trans- regulatory promoter from Bacillus subtilis, which responds to a broad concentration range of malonyl-CoA during metabolic processes, was introduced into E. coli and led to the dynamic control of malonyl-CoA-associated fluxes [47]. Therefore, various metabolic engineering strategies for the regulation of precursor supply have enabled improvements in yields and titers of a variety of natural products produced in microorganisms.

Enzyme modification

The production of metabolites is often impeded by insufficient catalytic activity of enzymes. Enzyme engineering thus is a key solution for the improvement of metabolic fluxes towards PNPs. Two main strategies have been used in enzyme engineering for higher catalytic activities. One is based on directed evolution, utilizing methods such as error-prone PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction), random mutations and site-specific mutations. The other is based on semi-rational or rational design.

Directed evolution is a widely used strategy for altering the catalytic characteristics of enzymes. For example, the directed evolution of lycopene cyclase (CrtYB) was employed to inactivate the lycopene cyclase function but retain the phytoene synthase function for improving lycopene production in engineered S. cerevisiae. The catalytic activity of geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (CrtE) was also improved by directed evolution in order to enhance the synthesis of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), and reached a production of 1.61 g/L lycopene in the engineered diploid strain by fed-batch fermentation [48]. Bai et al. reported that the catalytic properties of a glycosyltransferase UGT73B6 toward phenolic alcohol were improved through directed evolution, and the resulting strain produced much higher yield of gastrodin, reaching 545 mg/L in 48 h [35]. Through in vivo evolution of stilbene synthase, pinosylvin production was increased up to 23-fold when cerulenin was added [49]. Despite the heavy workload and low efficiency compared to rational design methods, directed evolution is still a simple and accessible method for enzyme modification, especially for those proteins whose structure is unknown.

Rational design methods are usually based on the knowledge of protein structure and catalytic mechanism. Keasling’s team engineered P450BM3 (a substrate-promiscuous P450 enzyme) from Bacillus megaterium via a ROSETTA-based energy minimization method, which enabled the P450BM3 mutants to conduct selective oxidation of amorphadiene, and produced artemisinic-11S,12-epoxide at titers greater than 250 mg/L in E. coli [50]. Ajikumar’s team modified the N-terminus of CYP725A4 and achieved the highest titer of oxygenated taxanes so far (570 ± 45 mg/L) in E. coli [51]. Liu et al. reported that the catalytic activity of isopentenyl phosphate kinase (IPK) was improved for about sevenfold by rationally analyzing the coevolution of IPK protein sequences, so that the recombinant E. coli strain produced 97% more β-carotenoids than the starting strain [52]. Morita et al. demonstrated the synthesis of several unnatural polyketide-alkaloid scaffolds by exploiting a type III Polyketide synthase (PKS) using precursor-directed and structure-based approaches. The catalytic versatility of the type III PKS provides an excellent platform for further development of novel biocatalysts [53]. Computational, rational, or directed evolution engineering strategies can tailor a promiscuous enzyme for greater catalytic activity, thermostability or substrate specificity, and further increase the conversion efficiency from precursor to product.

Transporter engineering

In microbes, excessive accumulation of plant secondary metabolites is usually toxic to the host, which can hamper cell growth and decrease PNP productivity. Thus, engineering transporters from both microorganisms and plants can improve the production of PNPs in microbial hosts [54, 55].

For example, overexpression of an efflux transporter from Alcanivorax borkumensis increased limonene production about 1.5-fold in engineered E. coli [56]. The native ABC transporter (ATP-Binding Cassette transporter) SNQ2 was overexpressed in the engineered S. cerevisiae that produced resveratrol, and the yield of resveratrol was increased from 48 to 61 mg/L after 48 h of fermentation [57]. Tripartite efflux pumps (pleiotropic resistant pumps) were constructed by combining TMDs (transmembrane domains) and NBDs (nucleotide binding domains) from endogenous transporters (AcrAB-TolC and MdtEF-TolC from E. coli) and heterologous transporters (MexAB-OprM from Pseudomonas aeruginosa), to improve isoprenoid production in E. coli [58]. The resulting chimeric transporter TolC-TolC-AcrB improved the specific yield of amorphadiene by 118% and kaurene by 104% [58]. Moreover, the co-overexpression of multiple transporters (tolC combined with macAB, emrAB and emrKY) enhanced the titer of amorphadiene more than threefold [59]. Recently, ginsenoside efflux pumps from Panax ginseng were identified as PDR (pleiotropic drug resistance homolog) transporter subfamily, which is used for the export of ginsenosides from microbial cell factories engineered for ginsenoside production [60, 61]. In addition to pumping out the product, transporters are also involved in substrate uptake in microbial hosts. Leonard et al. introduced Rhizobium trifolii MatB and MatC (encoding malonate synthetase and malonate carrier protein, respectively) into a recombinant E. coli strain, which introduced malonate uptake mechanism to increase synthesis of malonyl-CoA in flavonoid biosynthesis pathway [62].

With the broad and deep development of pathway identification and microbial metabolic engineering strategies, the accumulation and transportation of substrates, intermediates and products at the cellular/subcellular level has become more significant in cell factories, and has attracted growing attention. Accumulated knowledge about the function, structure and mechanism of transporters will facilitate the rearrangement of mass transport for the construction of more sophisticated cell machines in cell factories through transporter engineering.

Engineered microbial cell factories for industrial-scale application

Several microbial cell factories have been improved through decades of efforts, reaching a level of productivity which is acceptable for industrial applications. The production of artemisinic acid, resveratrol and lycopene has increased by tens or hundreds of times, and has reached or is close to an industrial scale. Here, we summarize some successful industrialized cases of PNP production by transgenic microbial hosts to emphasize the viability and prospects of the commercial application of microbial cell factories.

Artemisinin

Artemisinin is acknowledged as an effective pharmaceutical compound for the treatment of malaria [63], a serious disease that in 2015 alone affected 214 million people (African 88%, South-East Asia Region 10%), causing 438,000 deaths [64]. The demand for artemisinin is exponentially increasing every year because of the increased incidence of drug-resistant malaria throughout the world [65]. However, the concentration of artemisinin in the plant Artemisia annua is very low (0.01–1.1%), and improvement of the yield of artemisinin through plant breeding or total organic synthesis remains a challenge. Nevertheless, the synthesis or semi-synthesis of artemisinin using recombinant microorganisms is a promising solution. For more than 10 years, efforts have been made to improve the microbial production of precursors of artemisinin, and remarkable achievements have been made [39, 40, 6669]. By engineering the genotype and carbon flux of S. cerevisiae, the yield of artemisinic acid reached 0.65 g/L in flask fermentation, starting from an initial 0.11 g/L [39]. When the recombinant strain was cultured in a well-controlled fermenter, and when the extractive solvent isopropyl myristate (IPM) was added, 25 g/L artemisinic acid was produced, which was about 35-fold higher than in the flask. Therefore, the production of artemisinic acid has been improved from 0.1 to 25 g/L in engineered S. cerevisiae through in vivo carbon flux rewiring and optimization of fermentation conditions [66], achieving the semi-synthesis of artemisinin (combined with one-step photochemical catalysis) at an industrial scale. Amyris Inc. has been engaged in pushing the semi-synthesis of artemisinin into commercial production.

Resveratrol

Resveratrol is a polyphenolic compound found in several plant species, such as bush berries, peanuts, cranberries, and grapes. Resveratrol has been proved to decrease the risk of heart disease, diabetes and cancer (reviewed in [70]). It is widely used in medicine, as well as the health and cosmetic industries [71]. It is one of the fastest growing nutritional supplements in the flavonoid market [3]. According to a Frost & Sullivan report, in 2012 the global supply market value of resveratrol was about $50 million [72]. Due to the complexity and contamination problems in chemical synthesis of resveratrol, currently it is mostly extracted from plants [73]. Since the concentration of resveratrol in plants is extremely low, its production is limited and unsustainable. Recently, efforts have been focused on engineering microorganisms to synthesize resveratrol through fermentation [73]. Beekwilder et al. first introduced 4CL2 (4-coumaroyl-CoA ligase) from Nicotiana tabacum and STS (stilbene synthase) from Vitis vinifera into E. coli, and produced 16 mg/L resveratrol from 4-coumaric acid [74]. Many studies have also focused on metabolic engineering of E. coli cell factories towards resveratrol production [7577]. Leam et al. reported an engineered E. coli with high resveratrol yield, which was constructed by using a stilbene synthase modification and enhanced intracellular malonyl-CoA supply, resulting in a final resveratrol titer of 2.3 g/L [78]. The budding yeast S. cerevisiae has also been engineered as a host for resveratrol synthesis. Durhuus et al. reported a recombinant S. cerevisiae strain producing about 5 g/L resveratrol [79], which is the highest resveratrol titer from microbial cell factories until now. The Evolva company has successfully accomplished industrial production of resveratrol in a yeast cell factory.

Carotenoids

Carotenoids are a class of tetraterpenoids containing 40 carbons, with many important members such as lycopene, α-carotene, β-carotene, canthaxanthin, zeaxanthin, astaxanthin and lutein, which are used in various industries [80]. Especially, lycopene and astaxanthin are two of the most potent antioxidants among the dietary carotenoids, and may help lower the risk of chronic diseases including cancer and heart diseases [8183]. The global market of carotenoids was $1.5 billion in 2014, and is expected to reach nearly $1.8 billion in 2019, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 3.9% [84]. In recent years, producing carotenoids through microbial fermentation has attracted intense attention [85]. Alper et al. reported that by using systematic (model-based) and combinatorial (transposon-based) methods to identify gene knockout targets, they obtained a maximum lycopene yield of 18 mg/g DCW (Dry Cell Weight), which represents an 8.5-fold increase over the recombinant E. coli K12 without the knockouts [86]. Cho et al. reported that the production of lycopene could reach as high as 1754 mg/L (38.1 mg/g DCW) in E. coli transformed with the mvaK1, mvaD, mvaK2, mvaE, mvaS and idi genes [87]. Although the engineered model microorganisms like E. coli and S. cerevisiae have not yet been successfully applied at the industrial scale, some microorganisms that endogenously produce carotenoids can be made applicable for industrial production through screening or mutation. Marcos et al. reported that a selected Blakeslea trispora strain produced 3.6 g/L lycopene in a dichloromethane-extracted fermentation [88]. Recently, lycopene and astaxanthin have been successfully produced commercially through fermentation of Blakeslea trispora [89] and Phaffia rhodozyma [90], respectively.

Challenges in the fermentation process

Although developments in “omics” technology and synthetic biology have accelerated the pace of construction of microbial cell factories, it is still difficult to drive cell factories on an industrial scale. Only a few PNPs can be produced commercially so far. The essential problem in industrialization of microbial cell factories is how to cut down the production costs. In addition to the summarized strategies for optimizing microbial production in this context, there are still challenges in the field of fermentation process engineering. Two challenges we are facing right now are the engineering of microbial hosts toward the utilization of low-cost feedstocks, and improving microbial host resistance toward robust fermentation conditions.

Glucose is the most widely used material for the production of PNPs, including flavonoids, terpenoids, alkaloids and so on. However, glucose is not favorable in large-scale production because of the high price of raw materials and potential threats to food security. Therefore, engineering microbial hosts to use low-cost, non-food materials is extremely pertinent. Price et al. developed an engineering strategy to manipulate supramolecular enzyme assemblies which dramatically enhanced the carbon flux from methanol to the key intermediate fructose-6-phosphate in the microbial metabolic network, which provides a platform for biological conversion of methanol to higher value-added chemicals [91]. In 2016, Antonovsky et al. reported a non-native carbon fixation cycle that can synthesize sugars and other major biomass components from CO2 in E. coli, where all of the pathway intermediates and products are solely synthesized using CO2 as an inorganic carbon source and pyruvate as an energy source [92]. Although the engineering of microbial hosts to utilize low-cost materials is still not efficient, it will no doubt bring revolutionary progress to the entire cell factory industry, and therefore deserves further attention.

Since the 1930s, microorganisms have been used for industrial fermentation. E. coli and S. cerevisiae are two widely used hosts, as models for prokaryotic and eukaryotic expression systems, respectively. Recently, other microorganisms such as Corynebacterium glutamicum [93], Streptomyces spp. [94], Yarrowia lipolytica [80] and Pichia pastoris [95] have also been used as potential hosts for the production of PNPs. However, to achieve sufficiently high yields, the fermentation process of these microbial hosts requires precise control of factors such as temperature, pH, aeration, stirring, carbon source, nutritional supplements and antibiotics, resulting in high operating costs. Thus, engineering microbial hosts to be more competitive under robust fermentation conditions is another way to achieve cost saving. Shaw et al. engineered E. coli, S. cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica fermentations by supplying essential growth nutrients in the form of xenobiotic or ecologically rare chemicals, omitting the need for sterilization or antibiotics [96]. Yue et al. reported that a recombinant halophilic Halomonas campaniensis LS21 can produce the bioplastic PHB (polyhydroxybutyrate) in an energy-saving (non-sterilization), seawater-based, long-lasting and continuous open process, which largely saved fermentation costs [97]. This method provides microbial competitive advantages with minimal external risks, given that the engineered microbial hosts possess improved fitness within the customized fermentation environments.

Conclusions

This review summarizes recent progress in the identification of novel biosynthetic pathways, engineering of microbial cell factories and industrial fermentation for the production of plant natural products (PNPs). Taking advantage of biological “omics” technologies and synthetic biology, more and more PNPs are being synthesized using microbial cell factories. Nevertheless, a huge number of PNPs remains to be investigated and overcoming current challenges will certainly open the doors for the valorization of a multitude of natural compounds supply through synthetic biology.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ contributions

XL, WD and HJ conceived and designed the manuscript. XL and WD performed the bibliographic research and drafted the manuscript. HJ outlined the structure and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Dan Li and Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic from University of British Columbia, and Prof. Jing Cai from Marco University for revising the manuscript. We are also very grateful to the editor and two reviewers for their valuable comments on the earlier version of this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the review are included within the article.

Funding

This work was supported by the 973 Program (2015CB755704), the Hundred Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31470215) to HJ, as well as by Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (15JCYBJC24200), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31501041) to WD.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Laboratory of Systems Microbial Biotechnology, Tianjin Institute of Industrial Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
(2)
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences

References

  1. Facchini PJ, Bohlmann J, Covello PS, De LV, Mahadevan R, Page JE, Ro DK, Sensen CW, Storms R, Martin VJ. Synthetic biosystems for the production of high-value plant metabolites. Trends Biotechnol. 2012;30:127–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Brower V. Back to nature: extinction of medicinal plants threatens drug discovery. Cancerspectrum Knowl Environ. 2008;100:838–9.Google Scholar
  3. Wang Y, Chen S, Yu O. Metabolic engineering of flavonoids in plants and microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;91:949.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Li JWH, Vederas JC. Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier? Science. 2009;325:161–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Du J, Shao ZY, Zhao HM. Engineering microbial factories for synthesis of value-added products. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;38:873–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang B, Guo J, Yi B, Yu X, Sun L, Chen W. Heterologous production of secondary metabolites as pharmaceuticals in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30:1121–37.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chemler JA, Koffas MA. Metabolic engineering for plant natural product biosynthesis in microbes. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2008;19:597–605.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Keasling JD. Synthetic biology and the development of tools for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2012;14:189–95.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Suzuki S, Koeduka T, Sugiyama A, Yazaki K, Umezawa T. Microbial production of plant specialized metabolites. Plant Biotechnol. 2014;31:465–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Berim A, Gang DR. The roles of a flavone-6-hydroxylase and 7-O-demethylation in the flavone biosynthetic network of sweet basil. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:1795–805.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Miyahara T, Hamada A, Okamoto M, Hirose Y, Sakaguchi K, Hatano S, Ozeki Y. Identification of flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase in the yellow flower of Delphinium zalil. J Plant Physiol. 2016;202:92–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Xiong S, Tian N, Long J, Chen Y, Qin Y, Feng J, Xiao W, Liu S. Molecular cloning and characterization of a flavanone 3-Hydroxylase gene from Artemisia annua L. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;105:29–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Gosch C, Halbwirth H, Stich K. Phloridzin: biosynthesis, distribution and physiological relevance in plants. Phytochemistry. 2010;71:838–43.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Guo J, Ma X, Cai Y, Ma Y, Zhan Z, Zhou YJ, Liu W, Guan M, Yang J, Cui G, et al. Cytochrome P450 promiscuity leads to a bifurcating biosynthetic pathway for tanshinones. New Phytol. 2016;210:525–34.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Hileman LC, Drea S, Martino G, Litt A, Irish VF. Virus-induced gene silencing is an effective tool for assaying gene function in the basal eudicot species Papaver somniferum (opium poppy). Plant J. 2005;44:334–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Di P, Zhang L, Chen J, Tan H, Xiao Y, Dong X, Zhou X, Chen W. 13C tracer reveals phenolic acids biosynthesis in hairy root cultures of Salvia miltiorrhiza. ACS Chem Biol. 2013;8:1537.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Medema MH, Osbourn A. Computational genomic identification and functional reconstitution of plant natural product biosynthetic pathways. Nat Prod Rep. 2016;33:951–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Xu Z, Peters RJ, Weirather J, Luo H, Liao B, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Ji A, Zhang B, Hu S, et al. Full-length transcriptome sequences and splice variants obtained by a combination of sequencing platforms applied to different root tissues of Salvia miltiorrhiza and tanshinone biosynthesis. Plant J. 2015;82:951–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Qu C, Zhao H, Fu F, Zhang K, Yuan J, Liu L, Wang R, Xu X, Lu K, Li JN. Molecular mapping and QTL for expression profiles of flavonoid genes in Brassica napus. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1691.Google Scholar
  20. Shang Y, Ma Y, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Duan L, Chen H, Zeng J, Zhou Q, Wang S, Gu W, et al. Biosynthesis, regulation, and domestication of bitterness in cucumber. Science. 2014;346:1084–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhou Y, Ma Y, Zeng J, Duan L, Xue X, Wang H, Lin T, Liu Z, Zeng K, Zhong Y, et al. Convergence and divergence of bitterness biosynthesis and regulation in Cucurbitaceae. Nat Plants. 2016;2:16183.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Itkin M, Davidovich-Rikanati R, Cohen S, Portnoy V, Doron-Faigenboim A, Oren E, Freilich S, Tzuri G, Baranes N, Shen S, et al. The biosynthetic pathway of the nonsugar, high-intensity sweetener mogroside V from Siraitia grosvenorii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:E7619–28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yan X, Fan Y, Wei W, Wang P, Liu Q, Wei Y, Zhang L, Zhao G, Yue J, Zhou Z. Production of bioactive ginsenoside compound K in metabolically engineered yeast. Cell Res. 2014;24:770–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang P, Wei Y, Fan Y, Liu Q, Wei W, Yang C, Zhang L, Zhao G, Yue J, Yan X, Zhou Z. Production of bioactive ginsenosides Rh2 and Rg3 by metabolically engineered yeasts. Metab Eng. 2015;29:97–105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Lau W, Sattely ES. Six enzymes from mayapple that complete the biosynthetic pathway to the etoposide aglycone. Science. 2015;349:1224–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Matasci N, Hung LH, Yan Z, Carpenter EJ, Wickett NJ, Mirarab S, Nguyen N, Warnow T, Ayyampalayam S, Barker M. Data access for the 1,000 Plants (1KP) project. GigaScience. 2014;3:17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen S, Xiang L, Guo X, Li Q. An introduction to the medicinal plant genome project. Front Med. 2011;5:178–84.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodstein DM, Shu S, Howson R, Neupane R, Hayes RD, Fazo J, Mitros T, Dirks W, Hellsten U, Putnam N. Phytozome: a comparative platform for green plant genomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D1178–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Kanehisa MGS. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:27–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Tan GY, Deng Z, Liu T. Recent advances in the elucidation of enzymatic function in natural product biosynthesis. F1000Res. 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.7187.2.Google Scholar
  31. Galanie S, Thodey K, Trenchard IJ, Interrante MF, Smolke CD. Complete biosynthesis of opioids in yeast. Science. 2015;349:1095–100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakagawa A, Matsumura E, Koyanagi T, Katayama T, Kawano N, Yoshimatsu K, Yamamoto K, Kumagai H, Sato F, Minami H. Total biosynthesis of opiates by stepwise fermentation using engineered Escherichia coli. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10390.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee D, Lloyd ND, Pretorius IS, Borneman AR. Heterologous production of raspberry ketone in the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae via pathway engineering and synthetic enzyme fusion. Microb Cell Fact. 2016;15:49.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Bai Y, Bi H, Zhuang Y, Liu C, Cai T, Liu X, Zhang X, Liu T, Ma Y. Production of salidroside in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6640.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bai Y, Yin H, Bi H, Zhuang Y, Liu T, Ma Y. De novo biosynthesis of Gastrodin in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng. 2016;35:138–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Luo Y, Li BZ, Liu D, Zhang L, Chen Y, Jia B, Zeng BX, Zhao H, Yuan YJ. Engineered biosynthesis of natural products in heterologous hosts. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44:5265–90.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Tholl D. Biotechnology of isoprenoid. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2015;148:63–106.Google Scholar
  38. Dai Z, Liu Y, Zhang X, Shi M, Wang B, Wang D, Huang L, Zhang X. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of ginsenosides. Metab Eng. 2013;20:146–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ro DK, Paradise EM, Ouellet M, Fisher KJ, Newman KL, Ndungu JM, Ho KA, Eachus RA, Ham TS, Kirby J, et al. Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature. 2006;440:940–3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Westfall PJ, Pitera DJ, Lenihan JR, Eng D, Woolard FX, Regentin R, Horning T, Tsuruta H, Melis DJ, Owens A, et al. Production of amorphadiene in yeast, and its conversion to dihydroartemisinic acid, precursor to the antimalarial agent artemisinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:E111–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Xie W, Ye L, Lv X, Xu H, Yu H. Sequential control of biosynthetic pathways for balanced utilization of metabolic intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2015;28:8–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Koopman F, Beekwilder J, Crimi B, Van HA, Hall RD, Bosch D, van Maris AJ, Pronk JT, Daran JM. De novo production of the flavonoid naringenin in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:402–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Jiang H, Wood KV, Morgan JA. Metabolic engineering of the phenylpropanoid pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:2962–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Leonard E, Lim KH, Saw PN, Koffas MA. Engineering central metabolic pathways for high-level flavonoid production in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:3877–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Cao W, Ma W, Zhang B, Wang X, Chen K, Li Y, Ouyang P. Improved pinocembrin production in Escherichia coli by engineering fatty acid synthesis. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;43:557–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Brockman IM, Prather KL. Dynamic metabolic engineering: new strategies for developing responsive cell factories. Biotechnol J. 2015;10:1360–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu P, Li L, Zhang F, Stephanopoulos G, Koffas M. Improving fatty acids production by engineering dynamic pathway regulation and metabolic control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:11299–304.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Xie W, Lv X, Ye L, Zhou P, Yu H. Construction of lycopene-overproducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by combining directed evolution and metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2015;30:69–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. van Summeren-Wesenhagen PV, Marienhagen J. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for the synthesis of the plant polyphenol pinosylvin. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:840–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Dietrich JA, Yoshikuni Y, Fisher KJ, Woolard FX, Ockey D, Mcphee DJ, Renninger NS, Chang MC, Baker D, Keasling JD. A novel semi-biosynthetic route for artemisinin production using engineered substrate-promiscuous P450(BM3). ACS Chem Biol. 2009;4:261–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Biggs BW, Lim CG, Sagliani K, Shankar S, Stephanopoulos G, De Mey M, Ajikumar PK. Overcoming heterologous protein interdependency to optimize P450-mediated Taxol precursor synthesis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:3209–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Liu Y, Yan Z, Lu X, Xiao D, Jiang H. Improving the catalytic activity of isopentenyl phosphate kinase through protein coevolution analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Morita H, Yamashita M, Shi SP, Wakimoto T, Kondo S, Kato R, Sugio S, Kohno T, Abe I. Synthesis of unnatural alkaloid scaffolds by exploiting plant polyketide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:13504–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Nicolaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoutsakis ET. A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: from biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation. Metab Eng. 2010;12:307–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Lv H, Li J, Wu Y, Garyali S, Wang Y. Transporter and its engineering for secondary metabolites. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Dunlop MJ, Dossani ZY, Szmidt HL, Chu HC, Lee TS, Keasling JD, Hadi MZ, Mukhopadhyay A. Engineering microbial biofuel tolerance and export using efflux pumps. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7:361–73.Google Scholar
  57. Katz M, Durhuus T, Smits HP, Förster J. Production of metabolites US 20130209613 A1. US; 2013.Google Scholar
  58. Wang JF, Xiong ZQ, Li SY, Wang Y. Enhancing isoprenoid production through systematically assembling and modulating efflux pumps in Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:8057–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang C, Chen X, Stephanopoulos G, Too HP. Efflux transporter engineering markedly improves amorphadiene production in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2016;113:1755–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang R, Huang J, Zhu J, Xie X, Tang Q, Chen X, Luo J, Luo Z. Isolation and characterization of a novel PDR-type ABC transporter gene PgPDR3 from Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer induced by methyl jasmonate. Mol Biol Rep. 2013;40:6195–204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Cao H, Nuruzzaman M, Xiu H, Huang J, Wu K, Chen X, Li J, Wang L, Jeong JH, Park SJ. Transcriptome analysis of methyl jasmonate-elicited panax ginseng adventitious roots to discover putative ginsenoside biosynthesis and transport genes. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:3035–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  62. Leonard E, Yan Y, Fowler ZL, Li Z, Lim CG, Lim KH, Koffas MA. Strain improvement of recombinant Escherichia coli for efficient production of plant flavonoids. Mol Pharm. 2008;5:257–65.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Barbacka K, Baer-Dubowska W. Searching for artemisinin production improvement in plants and microorganisms. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011;12:1743–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  64. WHO. World Malaria Report. 2015. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world-malaria-report-2015/report/en/.
  65. Abdin MZ, Alam P. Genetic engineering of artemisinin biosynthesis: prospects to improve its production. Acta Physiol Plant. 2015;37:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  66. Paddon CJ, Westfall PJ, Pitera DJ, Benjamin K, Fisher K, McPhee D, Leavell MD, Tai A, Main A, Eng D, et al. High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature. 2013;496:528–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  67. Lenihan JR, Tsuruta H, Diola D, Renninger NS, Regentin R. Developing an industrial artemisinic acid fermentation process to support the cost-effective production of antimalarial artemisinin-based combination therapies. Biotechnol Prog. 2008;24:1026–32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  68. Baadhe RR, Mekala NK, Parcha SR, Prameela Devi Y. Combination of ERG9 repression and enzyme fusion technology for improved production of amorphadiene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Anal Methods Chem. 2013;2013:140469.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  69. Martin VJ, Pitera DJ, Withers ST, Newman JD, Keasling JD. Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21:796–802.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  70. Chun-Fu WU, Yang JY, Wang F, Wang XX. Resveratrol: botanical origin, pharmacological activity and applications. Chin J Nat Med. 2013;11:1–15.Google Scholar
  71. Dgw A, Wyl B, Gtc A. School AM, University NT, Tong N: a simple method for the isolation and purification of resveratrol from Polygonum cuspidatum. J Pharm Anal. 2013;3:241–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  72. Ge S, Yin T, Xu B, Gao S, Hu M. Curcumin affects phase II disposition of resveratrol through inhibiting efflux transporters MRP2 and BCRP. Pharm Res. 2016;33:590–602.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  73. Mei YZ, Liu RX, Wang DP, Wang X, Dai CC. Biocatalysis and biotransformation of resveratrol in microorganisms. Biotech Lett. 2015;37:9–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  74. Beekwilder J, Wolswinkel R, Jonker H, Hall R, de Vos CH, Bovy A. Production of resveratrol in recombinant microorganisms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5670–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  75. Watts KT, Lee PC, Schmidt-Dannert C. Biosynthesis of plant-specific stilbene polyketides in metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. BMC Biotechnol. 2006;6:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  76. Katsuyama Y, Funa N, Miyahisa I, Horinouchi S. Synthesis of unnatural flavonoids and stilbenes by exploiting the plant biosynthetic pathway in Escherichia coli. Chem Biol. 2007;14:613–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  77. Wu J, Liu P, Fan Y, Han B, Du G, Zhou J, Chen J. Multivariate modular metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli to produce resveratrol from l -tyrosine. J Biotechnol. 2013;167:404–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  78. Lim CG, Fowler ZL, Hueller T, Schaffer S, Koffas MA. High-yield resveratrol production in engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:3451–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  79. Durhuus T, Förster J, Katz M, Smits HP. Production of metabolites. WO; 2011.Google Scholar
  80. Ye VM, Bhatia SK. Pathway engineering strategies for production of beneficial carotenoids in microbial hosts. Biotech Lett. 2012;34:1405–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  81. Omoni AO, Aluko RE. The anti-carcinogenic and anti-atherogenic effects of lycopene: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2005;16:344–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  82. Muller L, Caris-Veyrat C, Lowe G, Bohm V. Lycopene and its antioxidant role in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases-a critical review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2016;56:1868–79.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  83. Maritim AC, Sanders RA, Iii JBW. Diabetes, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: a review. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2003;17:24–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  84. Research B. The global market for carotenoids FOD025E. 2015. http://www.bccresearch.com/market-research/food-and-beverage/carotenoids-global-market-report-fod025e.html.
  85. Matagómez LC, Montañez JC, Méndezzavala A, Aguilar CN. Biotechnological production of carotenoids by yeasts: an overview. Microb Cell Fact. 2014;13:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  86. Alper H, Miyaoku K, Stephanopoulos G. Construction of lycopene-overproducing E. coli strains by combining systematic and combinatorial gene knockout targets. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23:612–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  87. Cho NR, Park MS, Lee DH, Chung HS, Kim JK. Method of producing lycopene using recombinant Esherichia coli. US; 2014.Google Scholar
  88. Marcos Rodríguez AT, Estrella De CA, Costa Perez J, Oliver Ruiz MA, Fraile Yecora N, De La FMJL, Rodríguez Saiz M, Diez Garcia B, Peiro Cezon E, Muñoz Ruiz A. Method of producing lycopene through the fermentation of selected strains of Blackeslea trispora, formulations and uses of the lycopene thus obtained. US; 2010.Google Scholar
  89. Mehta BJ, Obraztsova IN, Cerdáolmedo E. Mutants and intersexual heterokaryons of Blakeslea trispora for production of beta-carotene and lycopene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:4043–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  90. Schmidt I, Schewe H, Gassel S, Jin C, Buckingham J, Hümbelin M, Sandmann G, Schrader J. Biotechnological production of astaxanthin with Phaffia rhodozyma/Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;89:555–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  91. Price JV, Chen L, Whitaker WB, Papoutsakis E, Chen W. Scaffoldless engineered enzyme assembly for enhanced methanol utilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:12691–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601797113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  92. Antonovsky N, Gleizer S, Noor E, Zohar Y, Herz E, Barenholz U, Zelcbuch L, Amram S, Wides A, Tepper N, et al. Sugar synthesis from CO2 in Escherichia coli. Cell. 2016;166:115–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  93. Kallscheuer N, Vogt M, Stenzel A, Gatgens J, Bott M, Marienhagen J. Construction of a Corynebacterium glutamicum platform strain for the production of stilbenes and (2S)-flavanones. Metab Eng. 2016;38:47–55.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  94. Park SR. Enhanced flavonoid production in Streptomyces venezuelae via metabolic engineering. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011;21:1143–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  95. Araya-Garay JM, Feijoo-Siota L, Rosa-dos-Santos F, Veiga-Crespo P, Villa TG. Construction of new Pichia pastoris X-33 strains for production of lycopene and beta-carotene. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:2483–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  96. Shaw AJ, Lam FH, Hamilton M, Consiglio A, Macewen K, Brevnova EE, Greenhagen E, Latouf WG, South CR, Van DH. Metabolic engineering of microbial competitive advantage for industrial fermentation processes. Science. 2016;353:583–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  97. Yue H, Ling C, Yang T, Chen X, Chen Y, Deng H, Wu Q, Chen J, Chen GQ. A seawater-based open and continuous process for polyhydroxyalkanoates production by recombinant Halomonas campaniensis LS21 grown in mixed substrates. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7:1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s) 2017