Open Access

CcpA affects expression of the groESL and dnaK operons in Lactobacillus plantarum

  • Cristiana Castaldo1,
  • Rosa A Siciliano2,
  • Lidia Muscariello1,
  • Rosangela Marasco3 and
  • Margherita Sacco1Email author
Microbial Cell Factories20065:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-5-35

Received: 13 October 2006

Accepted: 27 November 2006

Published: 27 November 2006

Abstract

Background

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are widely used in food industry and their growth performance is important for the quality of the fermented product. During industrial processes changes in temperature may represent an environmental stress to be overcome by starters and non-starters LAB. Studies on adaptation to heat shock have shown the involvement of the chaperon system-proteins in various Gram-positive bacteria. The corresponding operons, namely the dnaK and groESL operons, are controlled by a negative mechanism involving the HrcA repressor protein binding to the cis acting element CIRCE.

Results

We studied adaptation to heat shock in the lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus plantarum. The LM3-2 strain, carrying a null mutation in the ccpA gene, encoding the catabolite control protein A (CcpA), showed a lower percent of survival to high temperature with respect to the LM3 wild type strain. Among proteins differentially expressed in the two strains, the GroES chaperon was more abundant in the wild type strain compared to the mutant strain under standard growth conditions. Transcriptional studies showed that class I heat shock operons were differentially expressed upon heat shock in both strains. Indeed, the dnaK and groESL operons were induced about two times more in the LM3 strain compared to the LM3-2 strain. Analysis of the regulatory region of the two operons showed the presence of cre sequences, putative binding sites for the CcpA protein.

Conclusion

The L. plantarum dnaK and groESL operons are characterized by the presence of the cis acting sequence CIRCE in the promoter region, suggesting a negative regulation by the HrcA/CIRCE system, which is a common type of control among the class I heat shock operons of Gram-positive bacteria. We found an additional system of regulation, based on a positive control exerted by the CcpA protein, which would interact with cre sequences present in the regulatory region of the dnaK and groESL operons. The absence of the CcpA protein results in a lower induction of the chaperon coding operons, with a consequent lower percent of survival of the LM3-2 mutant strain population with respect to the wild type when challenged with a heat insult.

Background

Studies on the adaptation to environmental stresses in Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are of great interest due to the large use of these microorganisms in food industry [13]. Indeed the growth performance of the appropriate species of LAB to be used for a fermentation process plays a key role in the development of organoleptic and hygienic quality of the final fermented product. The responses to adverse conditions, which may be encountered during industrial processes, appear therefore to be crucial for fermented food productions. Increasing in temperature during food processing may be one of the stress conditions to be overcome by starters and non-starters LAB. Among the Gram-positive bacteria the response to heat shock has been widely studied in Bacillus subtilis, where the expression of over 200 genes is induced at least three folds upon increasing of temperature [4]. These genes have been classified in six classes depending on the different type of transcriptional regulation they undergo [46]. Some of these genes belonging to the general stress response regulon (Class II), are controlled by the σB factor, while others are under the control of the σA factor and specific regulators. Class I and III are controlled by transcriptional repressors, class IV by transcriptional activators, class V by a two-component signal transduction system, and class VI comprises all the other genes and operons whose regulation system is still unknown [4]. Class I heat shock genes consist of the dnaK and groESL operons, coding proteins belonging to the two chaperon complexes DnaK-GrpE-DnaJ and GroES-GroEL respectively. Both operons are negatively regulated by the HrcA protein, which specifically binds to the inverted repeat CIRCE (c ontrolling i nverted r epeat for c haperon e xpression) under non-stressed conditions. The CIRCE element is composed of a perfect inverted repeat of 9 bp separated by a 9 bp spacer with DNA sequence TTAGCACTC-N9-GAGTGCTAA [4]. A proposed mechanism presumes that the HrcA protein needs the GroE chaperonin system to become active and therefore able to bind the CIRCE element. Upon increasing in temperature, the GroE chaperonin is titrated by non-native proteins arising as a result of the heat shock. Under these conditions GroE is not available for binding with the HrcA protein, which switches from the active (repressor) to the inactive form [4, 7]. Chaperones, in their role of assisting protein folding, are key cell components under physiological as well as stress conditions. They have been found in all the investigated organisms belonging to the bacteria and eucarya domains, while few exceptions were found only among species belonging to the archaea domain [8]. In LAB the expression of the chaperon coding operons, classified as Class I heat shock genes in B. subtilis, are regulated by the HrcA/CIRCE interaction [9, 10]. With the exception of the dnaK operon of Lactococcus lactis, where two CIRCE elements overlap the promoter sequence, all the other chaperon-coding operons of LAB, whose sequences are available, show a single CIRCE element in the regulatory region [10, 11].

In this report we have investigated the expression of class I heat shock genes in Lactobacillus plantarum, a lactic acid bacterium widely distributed in different environmental niches including the mammalian gastrointestinal tract [12]. Indeed, L. plantarum is considered an important component of the intestinal microbiota of healthy individuals and for its properties is considered a probiotic LAB [1, 12]. It is also widely distributed in most fermented products of animal and plant origin either as starter or as NSLAB [13], and more recently it has been used for nutraceutical productions [14]. The availability of its complete genome sequence also allowed the development of metabolic models for improvement of its use as cell factories [15, 16]. Studies on the physiological and molecular mechanisms of adaptation of L. plantarum to various stresses have been recently reviewed, but little is known about the response of this microorganism to heat shock [17, 18]. Gobbetti and co-workers described the increasing expression of the DnaK and GroEL proteins upon adaptation to heat shock in Lactobacillus plantarum [17]. We found the involvement of the CcpA protein in the positive regulation of the dnaK and groESL operons. CcpA has been initially described as the regulatory protein mediating carbon catabolite repression in Gram-positive bacteria; its specific DNA target sequence is named cre (catabolite responsive element) [19, 20]. It is now well documented the role of CcpA as global regulator involved in the control of various metabolic pathways in different gram-positive bacteria, as well as in the control of specific cell function depending on the bacterial species [2127].

Results and discussion

The CcpA-dependent protein expression

In a previous work we have isolated the L. plantarum LM3-2(ccpA1) strain, carrying a null mutation in the ccpA gene [28]. We analyzed the electrophoretic pattern of cytosolic proteins extracted from LM3 and LM3-2 cells, grown under standard conditions up to mid-exponential phase (Fig. 1). The presence of differentially expressed proteins in the two strains, together with results of previous studies [28, 29] demonstrated the role of CcpA as global regulator in L. plantarum. Among the differentially expressed proteins analyzed, one of them, with apparent molecular mass of 60 kDa, was identified by in-gel tryptic digestion and MALDI-TOF (Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight) analysis as the GroEL protein (Fig. 1). Indeed, the GroEL protein appears to be more abundant in the LM3 wild type strain compared to the LM3-2 mutant strain, suggesting the involvement of the CcpA protein in the positive regulation of its expression. In Bacillus subtilis the expression of the GroEL and GroES molecular chaperons have been linked to the CcpA protein, but it is interesting to point out that in this model system expression of the two proteins appeared to be under the CcpA negative regulation [30]. The different CcpA-dependent control of the groESL operon in the two model systems may have been influenced by the diverse growth condition used.
Figure 1

L. plantarum LM3 and LM3-2 protein analysis. SDS-PAGE analysis of the LM3 and LM3-2 cytosolic proteins. The arrow indicates the protein identified as GroEL. Molecular weight markers are indicated.

CcpA affects heat shock survival

CcpA has been found to be involved in various stress responses using different microorganisms as model system. In Listeria monocytogenes CcpA is overexpressed under salt stress conditions together with other general metabolism proteins (alanine dehydrogenase, CysK, EF-Tu, Gap, GuaB, PdhA, PdhD), and general stress proteins (Ctc and DnaK) [31]. In Enterococcus faecalis CcpA negatively regulates the expression of 13 starvation-inducible proteins [32]. In Lactococcus lactis the production of CcpA is induced about three times upon exposure to low temperature [33]. In order to investigate the effect of the ccpA1 mutation on the heat shock response in L. plantarum, cell cultures of the LM3 (wt) and LM3-2 (ccpA1) strains were grown up to exponential phase in MRS with 2% glucose and challenged with high temperature (55°C) for 1 h. The percent of survival for each strain was determined by plating on MRS agar and by comparing the number of live cells after heat shock to the number of live cells before the shock. Under these experimental conditions the percent of survival was extremely low, being 0.07% and 0.004% for LM3 and LM3-2 respectively (Fig. 2A). When the two strains were challenged with the temperature of 50°C for 1 h, the LM3 strain showed 43% survival versus 14% survival of the LM3-2 strain (Fig. 2B). In the first case, the experimental conditions appeared to be very extreme for both strains, still the mutant strain showing a percent of survival 17 fold lower than the wild type strain. When challenged with a less severe heat shock conditions, the LM3-2 strain showed a percent of survival 3 fold lower than the LM3 strain. These results suggest a positive role of CcpA in the heat shock response in L. plantarum. The heat shock temperature of 50°C was chosen for further studies.
Figure 2

Heat shock survival. (A) Heat shock survival of L. plantarum LM3 and LM3-2 strains challenged at 55°C; (B) Heat shock survival of L. plantarum LM3 and LM3-2 strains challenged at 50°C. Mean of 3 independent experiments, with a standard deviation not exceeding 5%.

Transcriptional analysis of the groESL operon

Primer extension experiments were performed using total RNA extracted from the LM3 and LM3-2 cell cultures grown up to exponential phase at 30°C and then left at 30°C (control) or challenged at 50°C for 15 minutes. No differences in the groESL basal transcription were observed in the two strains when incubated at 30°C; after heat shock at 50°C, instead, a transcriptional activation of the groESL operon occurred in both strains, but at a greater extent in the wild type compared to the mutant strain (Fig. 3A). A quantitative analysis by PhosphorImager showed that transcription of the groESL operon was induced 12-fold in the LM3 wild type strain (Fig. 3A, lanes 1 and 2), while only 5-fold in LM3-2 mutant strain (Fig. 3A, lanes 3 and 4). As a control, primer extension analysis of transcripts from the lp_rRNA01 locus, transcribing a 16S rRNA, was performed, and a PhosphorImager analysis showed a 1:1 ratio among the 4 samples (Fig. 3C). The sequence analysis of the groESL promoter region revealed the presence of the CIRCE element of 9 bp separated by 9 bp spacer, with the DNA sequence TTAGCACTT-N9-GAGTGCTAA, starting four nucleotide residues downstream of the start site of transcription. This putative CIRCE element is characterized by one mismatch with respect to the consensus sequence (9th nucleotide residue position) [6]. Furthermore, the sequence analysis revealed the presence of a putative CcpA-binding site (cre), centered at -147.5 with respect to the start point of transcription (Fig. 4A).
Figure 3

Transcriptional analysis of class I heat shock operons. Primer extension analysis of: (A) groESL, (B) dnaK, and (C) lp_rRNA01 transcripts. Primer extension products were obtained by using oligonucleotides groESL2, hrc2, and sed2, respectively. Total RNA was extracted from: LM3 cells grown at 30°C (lane 1), or after a 15 min heat shock at 50°C (lane 2); LM3-2 cells grown at 30°C (lane 3), or after a 15 min heat shock at 50°C (lane 4). As a reference, sequencing reactions were performed with the same primers.

Figure 4

cre sequence alignment. (A) Structure of the groESL and dnaK promoter regions. The positions of the putative cre sequences upstream of the promoters are shown. (B) Comparison of cre box consensus sequence [34] with dnaK and groESL putative cre box sequences. Symbols for nucleotides in the consensus sequence: W (A or T); R (A or G); N (A, G, C or T).

Transcriptional analysis of the dnaK operon

On the basis of the observed effect of CcpA on the induction of the groESL transcription in L. plantarum after exposure to heat shock, we proceeded in the analysis of the expression of the other class I heat shock operon, namely the dnaK operon. The L. plantarum tetra-cistronic dnaK operon consists of the hrcA gene, coding for the transcriptional repressor HrcA, followed by the grpE, dnaK and dnaJ genes, coding for the three proteins constituting the DnaK chaperon complex [15]. Primer extension experiments were performed by using total RNA extracted from the LM3 and LM3-2 cell cultures grown up to exponential phase at 30°C and then left at 30°C (control) or challenged at 50°C for 15 minutes (Fig. 3B). The results were similar to those obtained for the transcriptional analysis of the groESL operon. No detectable differences were found in the basal expression of the operon at 30°C in the two strains. On the contrary, transcription of the dnaK operon was induced 16-fold in the LM3 wild type strain (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 2) and only 8-fold in the LM3-2 mutant strain upon exposure to a heat shock (Fig. 3B, lanes 3 and 4), as measured by a quantitative analysis by PhosphorImager. The sequence analysis of the groESL promoter region revealed the presence of the CIRCE element of 9 bp separated by 9 bp spacer, with the DNA sequence TTAGCACTC-N9-AAGTGCTAA, starting three nucleotide residues downstream of the start site of transcription. As well as for the groESL promoter, this putative CIRCE element is characterized by one mismatch with respect to the consensus sequence (19th nucleotide residue position). A putative CcpA binding site (cre) is centered at -117.5 with respect to the start point of transcription (Fig. 4A).

Class I heat shock operons have been shown so far to be negatively regulated by the HrcA/CIRCE system. We show that a positive regulation mediated by the CcpA protein also occurs for full expression of these operons in L. plantarum.

Analysis of cre sequences

The cre sequence is described as an 18 bp consensus sequence for binding of the CcpA protein in the promoter region of genes and operons subjected to catabolite repression [34]. The two putative cre sequences centered at -147.5 and at -117.5 in the promoter region of the groESL and dnaK operons respectively, contain an additional base with respect to the consensus described by Miwa and coworkers (Fig. 4B) [34]. An additional base also characterizes the cre1 element found in the regulatory region of the ackA gene of Bacillus subtilis, whose expression is controlled by a CcpA-mediated activation mechanism [35]. Nevertheless, the cre1 sequence, centered in position -116.5, does not seem to be functional to the CcpA-mediated activation of the operon under the tested conditions, probably due to the presence of the cre2 promoter proximal sequence [35].

Conclusion

We showed that the GroEL protein is differentially expressed in the LM3 strain of L. plantarum versus its isogenic LM3-2 (ccpA1) mutant strain. Lack of the CcpA protein affects the survival of the LM3-2 cell population after a heat shock insult. Transcription of class I heat shock operons, namely the groESL and dnaK operons, is positively regulated by CcpA upon exposure to high temperature. Putative cre elements were found in the regulatory regions of the L. plantarum groESL and dnaK operons. To our knowledge this is the first indication that a positive regulation of transcription may also occur for full expression of class I heat shock operons.

Methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

L. plantarum LM3 and LM3-2 [28] were used throughout this study. L. plantarum was grown in MRS medium (prepared without carbon source) supplemented with 2% glucose. When needed, chloramphenicol (10 μg/ml) was added to the culture medium.

Heat shock survival

L. plantarum LM3 and LM3-2 cells were grown at 30°C in 100 ml of MRS broth supplemented with 2% glucose, up to exponential phase (OD595= 0,7). One ml of each sample was taken, opportunely diluted, and plated on MRS agar with 2% glucose; the cultures were then divided into two equal volumes, named C and H. "H" samples were incubated at 50°C or 55°C for 1 h, whereas "C" samples were left at 30°C. After 1 h, the cells were diluted and plated. After 16 h of incubation at 30°C, the percent of survival was calculated as [(number of live cells after heat shock/initial number of cells) × 100].

Fractionated cell extracts and SDS-PAGE

LM3 and LM3-2 cells were grown at 30°C in 100 ml of MRS broth supplemented with 2% glucose, up to exponential phase (OD595 = 0,7), washed twice with 10 mM Tris-HCl, (pH 7.5), resuspended in 20 ml of the same buffer and French-pressed (3 cycles, 1,500 psi). After two steps of centrifugation (7,500 rpm, 20 min), the supernatants were ultracentrifugated (120,000 × g, 1 h). The supernatants constituted the cytoplasmic fraction. The protein concentration was determined by the Bradford method, using the Protein Assay Kit (BIO-RAD Inc). Ten micrograms of proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE (10%).

Protein identification by peptide mass fingerprinting

In-gel digestion was carried out according to Shevchenko and co-workers [36]. Briefly, selected Comassie-stained protein bands were manually excised from gels and destained with 50% acetonitrile (ACN) in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate, dehydrated in ACN and vacuum-dried in a Speed-Vac centrifuge (Savant). Proteins contained in the gel pieces were treated with 10 mM dithiothreitol in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate at 56°C for 1 h to reduce disulphide bridges, and alkylation of the cysteine residues was carried out with 50 mM iodoacetamide in 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate at room temperature in the dark for 30 min. Gel bands were dehydrated in ACN and re-swollen in 10 μl of buffer solution (25 mM ammonium bicarbonate pH 8.4) containing 10 ng/μl of trypsin at 4°C for 15 min. The excess of enzymatic solution was removed and 20 μl of buffer solution were added to the gel pieces. Digestion proceeded overnight at 37°C. The obtained peptide mixture (0.5 μl) was mixed with 0.5 μl of a saturated solution of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnaminic acid (10 mg/ml in 50% ACN containing 25 fmol/μl angiotensin and 125 fmol/μl ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone fragment 18-39) as internal standards), spotted directly on a MALDI target plate and dried under ambient condition. All mass spectra were generated on a MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer Voyager DE™ PRO (Applied Biosystems), operating in positive-ion reflectron mode. The laser intensity (N2, 337 nm) was set just above the ion generation threshold and pulsed every 10 ns. Mass spectra were acquired from each sample in the 700–3500 m/z range, by accumulating 100 laser shots and were calibrated using as internal standards the monoisotopic peaks of angiotensin (m/z 931.5154) and ACTH (m/z 2465.1989). All mass values are reported as monoisotopic masses.

Protein identification was achieved by using the MALDI mass spectral data for database search against the NCBInr database using the MASCOT search algorithm [37]. Parameters for all searches were as follows: bacteria as taxonomic category, trypsin as enzyme, carbamidomethyl as fixed modification for cysteine residues and methionine oxidation as variable modification, one missing cleavage and 30 ppm as mass tolerance for the monoisotopic peptide masses.

Primer extension analysis

Total RNA from L. plantarum cells grown to mid-exponential phase on MRS medium supplemented with 2% glucose was isolated as described [28]. Primer extension products of groESL, dnaK, and lp_rRNA01 transcripts were obtained using oligonucleotides groESL2 (5'-CCGCTTTGGGGTTTTCCTTAGCG-3'), hrc2 (5'-GGATCCAACTGGATTACCGCCC-3'), and sed2 (5'-GGTGTTATCCCCCGC-3'), respectively. The experiments were performed as previously described [28].

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by Centro Regionale di Competenza BioTekNet, Naples, Italy.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Scienze Ambientali, Seconda Università di Napoli
(2)
Centro di Spettrometria di Massa Proteomica e Biomolecolare, Istituto di Scienze dell'Alimentazione, CNR
(3)
Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Seconda Università di Napoli

References

  1. Klaenhammer TR, Barrangou R, Buck BL, Azcarate-Peril MA, Altermann E: Genomic features of lactic acid bacteria effecting bioprocessing and health. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005, 29 (3): 393-409. 10.1016/j.femsre.2005.04.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Nga BH: Genome analysis of lactic acid bacteria in food fermentations and biotechnological applications. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005, 8 (3): 307-312. 10.1016/j.mib.2005.04.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Teusink B, Smid EJ: Modeling strategies for the industrial exploitation of lactic acid bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006, 4 (1): 46-56. 10.1038/nrmicro1319.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Schumann W: The Bacillus subtilis heat shock stimulon. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2003, 8 (3): 207-217. 10.1379/1466-1268(2003)008<0207:TBSHSS>2.0.CO;2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Darmon E, Noone D, Masson A, Bron S, Kuipers OP, Devine KM, van Dijl JM: A novel class of heat and secretion stress-responsive genes is controlled by the autoregulated CssRS two-component system of Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2002, 184: 5661-5671. 10.1128/JB.184.20.5661-5671.2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Helmann JD, Winston Wu FW, Kobel PA, Gamo FJ, Wilson M, Morshedi MM, Navre M, Paddon C: Global Transcriptional Response of Bacillus subtilis to Heat Shock. J Bacteriol. 2001, 183: 7318-7328. 10.1128/JB.183.24.7318-7328.2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Reischl S, Weigert T, Schumann W: Isolation and analysis of mutant alleles of the Bacillus subtilis HrcA repressor with reduced dependency on GroE function. J Biol Chem. 2002, 277 (36): 32659-32667. 10.1074/jbc.M201372200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Macario AJ, Malz M, Conway de Macario E: Evolution of assisted protein folding: the distribution of the main chaperoning systems within the phylogenetic domain archaea. Front Biosci. 2004, 9: 1318-1332.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. van de Guchte M, Serror P, Chervaux C, Smokvina T, Ehrlich SD, Maguin E: Stress response in lactic acid bacteria. Antoine Van Leeuwenhoek. 2002, 82: 187-216. 10.1023/A:1020631532202.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. De Angelis M, Gobbetti M: Environmental stress responses in Lactobacillus: A review. Proteomics. 2004, 4: 106-122. 10.1002/pmic.200300497.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Eaton T, Shearman C, Gasson M: Cloning and sequence analysis of the dnaK gene region of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis. J Gen Microbiol. 1993, 139 (12): 3253-3264.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Vaughan EE, Heilig HG, Ben-Amor K, de Vos WM: Diversity, vitality and activities of intestinal lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria assessed by molecular approaches. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005, 29 (3): 477-490. 10.1016/j.femsre.2005.04.009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Molin G: Probiotics in foods not containing milk or milk constituents, with special reference to Lactobacillus plantarum 299v. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001, 73: 380S-385S.Google Scholar
  14. Hugenholtz J, Smid EJ: Nutraceutical production with food-grade microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2002, 13: 497-507. 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00367-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Kleerebezem M, Boekhorst J, van Kranenburg R, Molenaar D, Kuipers OP, Leer R, Targhini R, Peters SA, Sandbrink HM, Fiers MW, Stiekema W, Lankhorst RM, Bron PA, Hoffer SM, Groot MN, Kerkhoven R, de Vries M, Ursing B, de Vos WM, Siezen J: Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum strain WCFS1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003, 100 (4): 1990-1995. 10.1073/pnas.0337704100.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Smid EJ, van Enckevort FJ, Wegkamp A, Boekhorst J, Molenaar D, Hugenholtz J, Siezen RJ, Teusink B: Metabolic models for rational improvement of lactic acid bacteria as cell factories. J Appl Microbiol. 2005, 98 (6): 1326-1331. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02652.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. De Angelis M, Di Cagno R, Huet C, Crecchio C, Fox PF, Gobetti M: Heat shock response in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 1336-1346. 10.1128/AEM.70.3.1336-1346.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Spano G, Beneduce L, Perrotta C, Massa S: Cloning andcharacterization of the hsp 18.55 gene, a new member of the small heat shock gene family isolated from wine Lactobacillus plantarum. Res Microbiol. 2005, 156 (2): 219-224.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Henkin TM, Grundy FJ, Nicholson WL, Chambliss GH: Catabolite repression of alpha-amylase gene expression in Bacillus subtilis involves a trans-acting gene product homologous to the Escherichia coli lacl and galR repressors. Mol Microbiol. 1991, 5 (3): 575-584. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00728.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Warner JB, Lolkema JS: CcpA-dependent carbon catabolite repression in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003, 67 (4): 475-490. 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.475-490.2003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tojo S, Satomura T, Morisaki K, Deutcher J, Hirooka K, Fujita Y: Elaborate transcription regulation of the Bacillus subtilis ilv-leu operon involved in the biosynthesis of branched-chain amino acids through global regulators of CcpA, CodY and TnrA. Mol Microbiol. 2005, 56 (6): 1560-1573.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Puri-Taneja A, Paul S, Chen Y, Hulett FM: CcpA causes repression of the phoPR promoter through a novel transcription start site, P(A6). J bacteriol. 2006, 188 (4): 1266-1278. 10.1128/JB.188.4.1266-1278.2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Varga J, Stirewalt VL, Melville SB: The CcpA protein is necessary for efficient sporulation and enterotoxin gene (cpe) regulation in Clostridium perfringens. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (16): 5221-5229. 10.1128/JB.186.16.5221-5229.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Chagneau C, Saier MH: Biofilm-defective mutants of Bacillus subtilis. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004, 8 (3): 177-188. 10.1159/000085790.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Iver R, Baliga NS, Camilli A: Catabolite control protein A (CcpA) contributes to virulence and regulation of sugar metabolism in Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Bacteriol. 2005, 187 (24): 8340-8349. 10.1128/JB.187.24.8340-8349.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Seidl K, Stucki M, Ruegg M, Goerke C, Harris L, Berger-Bachi B, Bishoff M: Staphylococcus aureus CcpA affects virulence determinant production and antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50 (4): 1183-1194. 10.1128/AAC.50.4.1183-1194.2006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Deutscher J, Herro R, Bourand A, Mijakovic I, Poncet S: P-Ser-Hpr–a link between carbon metabolism and the virulence of some pathogenic bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005, 1754 (1–2): 118-125.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Muscariello L, Marasco R, De Felice M, Sacco M: The functional ccpA gene is required for carbon catabolite repression in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67: 2903-2907. 10.1128/AEM.67.7.2903-2907.2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Lorquet F, Goffin P, Muscariello L, Baudry JB, Ladero V, Sacco M, Kleerebezem M, Hols P: Characterization and functional analysis of the poxB gene, which encodes pyruvate oxidase in Lactobacillus plantarum. J Bacteriol. 2004, 186 (12): 3749-3759. 10.1128/JB.186.12.3749-3759.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Tobisch S, Zuhlke D, Bernhardt J, Stulke J, Hecker M: Role of CcpA in regulation of the central patways of carbon catabolism in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181 (22): 6996-7004.Google Scholar
  31. Duché O, Trémoulet F, Glaser P, Labadie J: Salt stress proteins induced in Listeria monocytogenes. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002, 68: 1491-1498. 10.1128/AEM.68.4.1491-1498.2002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Leboeuf C, Leblanc L, Auffray Y, Hartke A: Characterization of the ccpA gene of Enterococcus faecalis: identification of starvation-inducible proteins regulated by CcpA. J Bacteriol. 2000, 182: 5799-5806. 10.1128/JB.182.20.5799-5806.2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Wouters JA, Kamphuis HH, Hugenholtz J, Kuipers OP, De Vos WM, Abee T: Changes in glycolytic activity of Lactococcus lactis induced by low temperature. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000, 66: 3686-3691. 10.1128/AEM.66.9.3686-3691.2000.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Miwa Y, Nakata A, Ogiwara A, Yamamoto M, Fujita Y: Evaluation and characterization of catabolite-responsive elements (cre) of Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (5): 1206-1210. 10.1093/nar/28.5.1206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Turinsky AJ, Grundy FJ, Kim J, Chambliss GH, Henkin TM: Transcriptional activation of the Bacillus subtilis ackA gene requires sequences upstream of the promoter. J Bacteriol. 1998, 180 (22): 5961-5967.Google Scholar
  36. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M: Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem. 1997, 68: 850-858. 10.1021/ac950914h.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Matrix Science. [http://www.matrixscience.com/]

Copyright

© Castaldo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement