Table 2 Comparison of our estimated GAM and NGAM for M. maripaludis with those reported for other model organisms
From: Flux measurements and maintenance energy for carbon dioxide utilization by Methanococcus maripaludis
Organism | Substrate | GAM (mmol/gDCW) | NGAM (mmol/gDCW/h) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Escherichia coli | Glucose | 59.81 | 8.39 | [35] |
Lactococcus lactis | Different sugar substrates e.g. mannose, galactose, sucrose, lactose, etc. | 18.15 | 1 | [36] |
Methanosarcina barkeri | Methanol or acetate or H2/CO2 or pyruvate | 70 | 1.75 | [15] |
Methanosarcina acetivorans | CO or methanol | 65 | 2.5 | [37] |
Methanococcus maripaludis | H2/CO2 | 27.14 | 7.836 | This study |