Skip to main content
Download PDF

High production of ectoine from methane in genetically engineered Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z by preventing ectoine degradation

Microbial Cell Factories volume 23, Article number: 127 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Methane is a greenhouse gas with a significant potential to contribute to global warming. The biological conversion of methane to ectoine using methanotrophs represents an environmentally and economically beneficial technology, combining the reduction of methane that would otherwise be combusted and released into the atmosphere with the production of value-added products.

Results

In this study, high ectoine production was achieved using genetically engineered Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z, a methanotrophic ectoine-producing bacterium, by knocking out doeA, which encodes a putative ectoine hydrolase, resulting in complete inhibition of ectoine degradation. Ectoine was confirmed to be degraded by doeA to N-α-acetyl-L-2,4-diaminobutyrate under nitrogen depletion conditions. Optimal copper and nitrogen concentrations enhanced biomass and ectoine production, respectively. Under optimal fed-batch fermentation conditions, ectoine production proportionate with biomass production was achieved, resulting in 1.0 g/L of ectoine with 16 g/L of biomass. Upon applying a hyperosmotic shock after high–cell–density culture, 1.5 g/L of ectoine was obtained without further cell growth from methane.

Conclusions

This study suggests the optimization of a method for the high production of ectoine from methane by preventing ectoine degradation. To our knowledge, the final titer of ectoine obtained by M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 was the highest in the ectoine production from methane to date. This is the first study to propose ectoine production from methane applying high cell density culture by preventing ectoine degradation.

Background

Methane is a major greenhouse gas with a global warming potential at least 20 times higher than that of carbon dioxide [1]. Atmospheric methane concentrations have been steadily increasing and exceeded 1,900 parts per billion in 2022 [2]. Recently, as the industry’s interest in methane emissions has grown, the “Global Methane Pledge” was declared, marking the beginning of heightened attention towards methane reduction. Although technologies exist for the chemical conversion of methane to liquid fuel, they are inefficient owing to the cost and complexity of the process and the extreme reaction conditions such as high temperature and high pressure [3, 4]. Thus, the biological conversion of methane, which is relatively simple and operates at an ambient temperature and pressure, has been proposed as an alternative [5]. Methane is also highly valued as a next-generation carbon source because it is relatively cheaper than sugar or its derivatives, and does not compete with food resources [6].

Methanotrophs are promising biocatalysts for the production of chemicals such as polyhydroxyalkanoates, single-cell proteins, and methanol from methane [7,8,9]. However, the production of these methane-derived bulk chemicals often cannot compete with petrochemical products in terms of price, due to the low gas-to-liquid mass transfer, low productivity of processes, leading to high investment and operational costs [10,11,12]. In this context, the production of ectoine, an osmotic protector with a retail market value around 1,000 $ kg− 1 and an annual demand of 20,000 tons, has recently attracted increasing attention of industries producing fine chemicals from methane [13]. Ectoine, which protects cells, enzymes, proteins, and other biomolecules, is primarily used in cosmetics and biomedical applications [14, 15]. Recent studies have reported that high profitability of the process from methane to ectoine comparing the production costs of ectoine and the current market price of this chemical [12, 16].

Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z is a methanotrophic ectoine-producing bacterium. Its full genome sequence has been identified and relevant genetic tools have been established [17]. M. alcaliphilum 20Z has a pathway for ectoine synthesis by the sequential action of Ask, EctB, EctA, and EctC as described in Fig. 1 [18]. Ectoine is converted into hydroxyectoine by EctD in M. alcaliphilum 20Z. But, also ectoine degradation pathway exists in M. alcaliphilum 20Z mediated by DoeA, DoeB [19].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Metabolic pathway for ectoine bio-synthesis and degradation in M. alcaliphilum 20Z. Ask: aspartate kinase; AsdB: aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase; EctB: L-2,4-diaminobutyrate transaminase; EctA: L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid acetyltransferase; EctC: L-ectoine synthase; EctD: ectoine hydroxylase; DoeA: ectoine hydrolase; DoeB: N2-acetyl-L-2,4-diaminobutanoate deacetylase; DoeC: aspartate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase; DoeD: L-2,4-diaminobutyrate transaminase

Full size image

The main process used for ectoine production is sugar fermentation by Halomonas species [20, 21]. However, this process is costly because it requires high-quality carbon sources, such as glucose, sodium glutamate, and yeast extract [15]. Although the reported production of ectoine using methanotrophs is much lower than that achieved with traditional sugar-fermenting microbes, the combined process of ectoine production and the treatment of atmospheric methane can reduce the costs associated with ectoine production while also promoting climate change mitigation through active methane reduction. Thus, methanotrophs provide an excellent environmental benefit of producing ectoine from dilute methane.

This study suggests the optimization of a method for enhanced production of ectoine from methane by knocking out doeA, a putative ectoine-degrading hydrolase gene, from M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2, which was constructed by disrupting ectD and ectR genes. Notably, it was confirmed that the nitrogen source is crucial for ectoine synthesis, with production ceasing once the nitrogen source in the medium was depleted. This emphasizes the need for continuous replenishment of nitrogen source in the medium to maintain ectoine production concurrent with cell growth. To the best of our knowledge, the final titer of ectoine obtained from M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 via this process is the highest reported ectoine production from methane to date. This is the first study to propose ectoine production from methane applying high–cell–density culture by preventing ectoine degradation.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture media

Halophilic, methanotrophic Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z was used for ectoine production. Specifically, the ectD and ectR gene–deficient 20ZDP2 strain was constructed in our previous study [22] and 20ZDP3, 20ZDP4, and 20ZDP5 defective in doeA, doeD, ectB genes, respectively, from 20ZDP2 were constructed in this study (Table 1). The bacteria were cultured in a modified Methylomicrobium medium described in the previous study comprising 30% (v/v) methane or 9.93 g/L methanol [22]. The strains were cryopreserved with 10% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide added in the early exponential phase.

Table 1 Strains and vectors used in this study
Full size table

Deletion of ectoine-degradation genes from M. Alcaliphilum 20ZDP2

Deletion of doeA, doeD, or ectB from M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2 was performed with suicide vectors using the conjugation method described previously [22, 23]. The flanking regions of the target gene were cloned into a suicide vector, pK19mobsacB, after restriction digestion using Hind III and EcoRI using an infusion system (In-Fusion™ HD Cloning Kit, Takara Bio Inc., Japan). All subsequent procedures, such as the conjugation of vectors to M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2 and sucrose counterselection for doeA or ectB deletion, were carried out as previously described [22]. The knock–out of target genes was confirmed by PCR. All the oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table 2.

Table 2 Oligonucleotides used in this study
Full size table

Batch culture in a flask

For flask fermentation, seed culture was carried out for 2 days in Methylomicrobium medium containing 3% (w/v) NaCl and 9.93 g/L methanol with the cryo-preserved cell stock at 30 °C and 230 rpm. For the main culture, culture broth was inoculated at an initial OD600 nm of 0.2 to 50 mL medium containing 6% (w/v) NaCl and 0.05 µM tungsten in a 250-mL baffled flask. The headspace of the flask was filled with 30% (v/v) methane gas mixed with air and refreshed every 12 h using a mass flow controller (GMC 1200-MMOO-O-1, ATOVAC, Korea). Flask culture was conducted at 30 °C and 230 rpm and samples taken every 24 h to analyze cell growth and ectoine production. All batch fermentations were performed in triplicate.

Fed-batch culture in a 5-L bioreactor

The pre-culture process was performed in the same manner as that for flask culture. All trials for ectoine production with continuous methane supply and pH control were performed in a 5-L stirred bioreactor (Bio Control & System, Korea) with a working volume of 3 L. All cultivations were conducted at 30 °C, and the pH was maintained at 8.9 to 9.1 using 2.5 M H2SO4 and 5 M NaOH. Air with 30% methane was supplied at 0.1–0.52 vvm with an agitation speed of 300–650 rpm for controlling the dissolved oxygen (DO) levels. To increase biomass, the DO level was maintained at 20% by controlling the agitation speed and flow rate of the gas. The initial OD600 nm value was 0.2; further, 1X trace elements and 20 mM KNO3 were added when the dry cell weight (DCW) increased by 2 g/L.

Accumulation of ectoine after high–cell–density culture

To accumulate ectoine by a hyperosmotic shock, 30 g/L of NaCl was added to the medium (the final salinity reached was 6% (w/v)) when the OD600 nm value reached 110 (22 g/L of DCW) in a bioreactor. Further, 5 g/L of KNO3 was supplied and the agitation speed and gas flow rate were decreased to 300 rpm and 0.1 vvm, respectively, to minimize the shear stress affecting cells.

qRT- PCR

M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2 was cultured for 72 h in a medium containing 1 g/L or 5 g/L KNO3 with methane. Total RNA was prepared using the TRIzol™ Plus RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). Real-time PCR was performed after cDNA synthesis using the Thermal Cycler (Takara Bio Inc., Japan) using the TB GreenR Premix Ex Taq™ II kit (Takara Bio Inc., Japan). The transcriptional level of ectoine-degrading genes (doeA, doeB, doeD) was normalized using 16 S rRNA as a housekeeping gene. Data were analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCT method with the doeA (1 g/L KNO3) sample as the standard.

Analytical procedure

Cell growth was estimated by optical density at 600 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (Biochrom WPA Lightwave II, Biochrom Ltd., UK). The DCW (g/L) was calculated as illustrated in a previous study [24].

For the quantitative analysis of intracellular ectoine, 2 mL of culture broth was harvested over time, and the cells were freeze-dried for 2 days using a freeze dryer (TFD8503, iLShinBioBase, Korea). Intracellular ectoine was then extracted from freeze-dried cells as previously reported [25] and measured using HPLC (RID-20 A, SHIMADZU, Japan) with a UV detector using the ZORBAX-NH2 column (NH2 Analytical HPLC Column 4.6 × 250, Agilent Technologies, United States) under following conditions: mobile phase, 70% (v/v) acetonitrile; temperature of column oven, 35 °C; flow rate, 0.8 mL/min.

For quantitative and qualitative analysis of the produced ectoine in fed-batch fermentation, LC-MS analysis was performed using LC (UltiMate 3000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United states)-MS(EVOQ QUBE, Bruker, United States) with an MS/MS detector using C18 column (C18 50 × 2.1 mm, 1.9 μm, ACME) under the following conditions: mobile phase, 80% (v/v) methanol containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid ; temperature of column oven, 30 °C; flow rate, 0.2 mL/min. This analysis was performed at The Core Facility Center for Chronic and Metabolic Diseases at Sookmyung Women’s University.

For analyzing anionic and cationic ions in the medium at various time intervals, the culture broth was centrifuged (Smart R17 Plus, HANIL SCIENCE CO., LTD, Korea) and the supernatant was analyzed using Ion Chromatography (Dionex™ Aquion™ IC System, Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States) [26].

Results and discussion

Development of M. Alcaliphilum 20Z mutants defective in ectoine degradation

In a previous study, intracellular ectoine was confirmed to be increased until the mid-exponential phase but rapidly decreased in M. alcaliphilum 20Z despite cell growth [18, 22, 27]. To prevent ectoine degradation after the mid-exponential phase, the genes encoding ectoine hydrolase (doeA) were selected for deletion. Thus, we knocked out the doeA gene from M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2 (ΔectDΔectR), which was constructed in our previous study [22]. Deletion of the doeA gene in M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2 was confirmed via PCR (Fig S1a), and the resulting strain was named M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 (ΔectDΔectRΔdoeA).

To investigate the effect of DoeA, flask culture was carried out with M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2 and the newly constructed M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3. Intracellular and extracellular ectoine levels were measured; however, extracellular ectoine was barely detectable under these conditions. The time-course cultivation profile of each strain is shown in Fig. 2. Until 48 h, cell growth and ectoine production was similar in DP2 and DP3; however, after 72 h, their production trends were very different. The biomass (DCW) in DP3 was 1.7-fold lower than that in DP2 at 72 h. In contrast, DP3 produced ectoine up to 102 mg/L for 72 h and maintained it without degradation, whereas DP2 produced ectoine up to 90 mg/L for 48 h, which then rapidly decreased. These results demonstrate that the ectoine can be degraded by DoeA and re-used for synthesizing cell constituents. Therefore, not only was the maximum ectoine production improved by up to 1.2-fold, but ectoine degradation that occurred after the mid-exponential phase was also completely prevented by disrupting the doeA gene.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Flask culture of the mutant defective in doeA (M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3), defective in doeD (M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP4), defective in ectB (M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP5), and M. alcaliphilum 20ZP2 as a control. The biomass (a) and ectoine (b) production

Full size image

In M. alcaliphilum 20Z, ectoine is synthesized by the sequential action of EctB, EctA, and EctC (Fig. 1) [17, 18]. These three genes are organized on the ectABC-ask operon, and the transcriptional regulation of these ectoine synthesis genes by EctR has been identified and described [28]. Notably, two genes encoding L-2,4-diaminobutyrate transaminase are present on the chromosome of M. alcaliphilum 20Z, as indicated in Fig. 1. One is located within the ectABC operon, and the other is located upstream of the doeA gene. Reshetnikov et al. reported that M. alcaliphilum 20Z possesses the putative doeA, doeB, doeC and doeD genes, which code for the enzymes involved in ectoine degradation, and these genes are aligned in the same direction, forming the doeBDAC cluster [19]. And it was demonstrated that DoeA and DoeB are directly involved in the hydrolysis of ectoine in M. alcaliphilum 20Z through the deletion of each gene. As there have been no studies on the effect of ectB or doeD deletion on ectoine synthesis and degradation, M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP4 (DP2ΔdoeD) and M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP5 (DP2ΔectB) were constructed (Table 1).

Successful deletion of doeD and ectB was confirmed by PCR for 20ZDP4 and 20ZDP5 strains, respectively (Fig S1b, Fig S1c). Flask fermentation was carried out using these newly constructed strains. As shown in Fig. 2b, the ectoine titer reached 108 mg/L at 96 h and was maintained in the DP4 strain. Interestingly, the trends in ectoine production and cell growth in DP4 were very similar to that in DP3. The observation of similar effects following the removal of either doeA or doeD may be attributed to these enzymes sequentially catalyzing the conversion of ectoine to aspartate in the metabolic pathway. In contrast, both ectoine production and cell growth were severely inhibited by deletion of the ectB gene from M. alcaliphilum 20DP2, suggesting that inhibition of ectoine production suppressed cell growth under hyperosmotic conditions. These results clearly indicated that doeD exhibits high activity opposite to that of ectB, and might be involved in ectoine degradation. Consequently, ectB is essential for ectoine production, whereas doeD contributes to ectoine degradation. More importantly, disruption of doeA or doeD blocked ectoine degradation, consequently increasing the ectoine titer. Although the ectoine production and cell growth trends were similar between DP3 and DP4, slight degradation of ectoine at 120 h was found in DP4 (Fig. 2b). Therefore, M. alcaliphilum DP3, which completely prevented ectoine degradation, was selected as the final ectoine producer in this study.

Effect of copper on cell growth in batch culture

During batch culture of the newly constructed strain DP3, the ectoine titer was maintained with no degradation, regardless of cell growth, unlike in the DP2 strain, which degraded ectoine after 48 h of culture when approximately 1 g/L of biomass (DCW) was produced. However, after 72 h of culture, the growth rate of the DP3 strain started to slow down compared to that of DP2, resulting in a 1.7-fold lower biomass production. To improve ectoine production by stimulating DP3 cell growth, the optimal concentration of copper, a micromineral that affects cell growth, was determined. Type I methanotrophs, including M. alcaliphilum 20Z, use copper as a cofactor of particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO), which mediates the first step of methane oxidation and converts methane to methanol; many studies have investigated the effects of copper addition on cell growth [29, 30]. Hence, the optimal concentration of copper (0.01–0.5 g/L) was investigated to increase cell growth. Maximum cell growth was achieved with the addition of 0.2, and 0.3 g/L CuCl2; however, the growth rate and biomass production were inhibited when more than 0.4 g/L of CuCl2 was added (Fig. 3a). In contrast, ectoine production was almost identical in all experimental groups regardless of copper concentration and gradually increased as the cells grew up to 48 h, and maintained the ectoine level without degradation (Fig. 3b). These results indicate that addition of copper to the medium might benefit cell growth by promoting methane oxidation but does not affect ectoine production.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of copper (Cu) addition on cell growth and ectoine production in M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3. Time course of the biomass (g/L) (a) and ectoine (mg/L) (b) production from methane by M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 cultured in Methylomicrobium medium containing 6% (w/v) NaCl with 0.01, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 g/L of CuCl2, respectively

Full size image

Effect of nitrogen source on biomass and ectoine synthesis in a batch culture

Considering that ectoine was no longer produced by DP3 strain after 72 h (Figs. 2 and 3), we presumed that the specific nutrients necessary for ectoine biosynthesis were depleted at that point. To investigate the nutrients required for increase of ectoine production in the DP3 culture, flask culture was performed with M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 in an optimized medium with methane for 120 h. The main components of the medium, such as K+, Mg2+, NO3−, and PO43−, were analyzed using ion chromatography (Fig S1). The concentrations of K+, Mg2+, and PO43− were almost constant during culture; however, NO3−, the only nitrogen source, was completely depleted when the biomass (DCW) reached about 1 g/L (Fig. 2 and Fig S1). Given that the point of complete NO3− depletion coincides with the point at which ectoine is no longer produced in the DP3 strain, a sufficient supply of nitrogen sources may be necessary for increased ectoine biosynthesis. In addition, the lower cell growth rate in the DP3 strain compared to that in DP2 at the time of complete depletion of KNO3 after 48 h might be caused by the failure of DP3 in degrading ectoine for reuse as a nitrogen source (Fig. 2 and Fig S1). Nevertheless, as DP3 could grow under nitrogen-starvation conditions, this strain was considered capable of fixing nitrogen in air and supplying it for cell growth, but not at sufficient levels for ectoine synthesis. Methylomicrobium is reported to demonstrate the potential to utilize atmospheric nitrogen gas based on identification of the nif gene cluster and MoFe-containing nitrogenase activity [31,32,33,34,35].

To evaluate the effect of nitrogen sources on the ectoine and biomass production by M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3, flask culture was conducted using an optimized medium containing various concentrations of KNO3 (0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 g/L). As shown in Fig. 4, the final ectoine titer increased as the amount of KNO3 increased, reaching 176.7 mg/L when 5 g/L KNO3 was added, which was 2.3-fold higher than that obtained with 1 g/L of KNO3. This indicates that KNO3 plays a key role in ectoine biosynthesis. Meanwhile, the biomass production in all experimental groups, including that with 5 g/L KNO3, was similar except for that with 0.5 g/L KNO3. Thus, the biomass did not increase with the concentration of KNO3 in the medium, and the cells could grow through nitrogen fixation from air, even if the nitrogen source was exhausted. When 0.5, 1, and 2 g/L of KNO3 was supplied, the ectoine titer did not show any increase although biomass was produced up to 0.5, 1, and 2 g/L, respectively. Thus, the point at which the nitrogen source was exhausted and the point at which ectoine was no longer increased coincided exactly (Fig. 4), consistent with the calculation of the amount of KNO3 required to support cell growth and ectoine production [36]. In other words, 1 g/L of KNO3 per 1 g of dry cells was required for ectoine production proportional to cell growth, maintaining the yield (mg/g DCW) of ectoine as the cells grow. When the nitrogen source was abundant, biomass and ectoine were synthesized together; however, when the nitrogen source was depleted, biomass was produced by the fixation of atmospheric nitrogen gas; however, ectoine, a nitrogen sink, was no longer produced. Further, various nitrogen sources, such as NO2−, NH4+, and urea, have been used to cultivate cells for identifying a nitrogen source useful for cell growth and ectoine production. However, M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 could only use nitrate (NO3−) as a nitrogen source (data not shown).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Comparison of biomass and ectoine production according to the addition of KNO3 in the medium. Biomass (a) and ectoine (b) production by M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 cultivated in a medium with 0.5, 1, 2, 5, and 10 g/L of KNO3, respectively

Full size image

We hypothesized that the expression level of ectoine-degrading proteins in M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2 might be regulated by depletion of the KNO3. To confirm that the increase in ectoine was caused by low expression levels of ectoine-degrading proteins, such as doeA, doeB, and doeD according to the supply of nitrogen source, the transcriptional level of ectoine-degrading genes was estimated by qRT-PCR in the M. alcaliphilum DP2 strain cultivated in medium containing 1–5 g/L of KNO3. To determine the effect of nitrogen starvation on the transcriptional level of related genes, the cells were harvested at 72 h when ectoine would have been degraded. The relative transcriptional levels of doeA, doeB, and doeD with 5 g/L KNO3 were lower than those in samples with 1 g/L KNO3 (0.76-, 0.77-, and 0.64-fold, respectively) (Fig S3). These results indicated that nitrogen starvation induces the transcription of ectoine-degrading genes and that ectoine may act as a nitrogen sink for M. alcaliphilum 20Z under nitrogen-rich conditions. Therefore, high ectoine production in proportion to cell growth can be achieved through a continuous supply of optimized nitrogen source.

In previous studies, it was considered meaningless to grow cells to a high density for the mass production of ectoine because of ectoine degradation and cessation of production at a certain growth point [13, 22, 27]; therefore, the bio-milking process was performed at a certain growth point before ectoine degradation. However, by confirming the key components for ectoine biosynthesis and optimizing the concentration of the medium components, especially nitrogen source, ectoine degradation could be prevented and ectoine synthesis could be achieved in proportion to the increase in cell density, as shown in this study. Therefore, the findings of this study allow cells to be grow to a high density and achieve high ectoine production from methane.

Ectoine production in proportion to cell growth by optimization of culture conditions in a Fed-batch culture

To achieve high production of the ectoine, fed-batch fermentation in optimized Methylomicrobium medium containing 2 g/L of KNO3 and 0.3 g/L CuCl2 was carried out with pH control (pH 8.9–9.1) in a 5-L bioreactor using M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3. To prevent the depletion of nitrogen sources and cofactors, 2 g/L of KNO3 and 1X trace elements were additionally supplied every time the biomass increased by 2 g/L. Biomass was produced up to 16.8 g/L for 73 h with a growth rate of 0.09 µaverage and 0.19 µmax (Fig. 5). As expected, the ectoine titer steadily increased with the concentration of cells, while maintaining a constant ectoine yield (64–78 mg/g DCW) over the entire period; finally, 1.0 g/L of ectoine was produced. To investigate the feasibility of high ectoine production by M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 without growth inhibition using higher levels of KNO3, 5 g/L KNO3 was added every time the biomass increased by 2 g/L. Here, up to 18 g/L of biomass was produced at a rate of 0.1 µaverage and 0.17 µmax; however, only 0.98 g/L ectoine was produced, maintaining the ectoine yield per g DCW (data not shown). Therefore an intermittent supply of 2 g/L KNO3 was confirmed to be sufficient for ectoine synthesis in proportion to the increase in cell mass, which was an efficient and economical condition for fed-batch culture. In summary, ectoine production with a steady yield as well as high–cell–density culture was successfully achieved through fed-batch fermentation by applying the proposed optimal conditions. In this fed-batch culture, we measured the organic acids expelled from the cells, but organic acids such as formate, acetate, and lactate were not detected at significant levels. This indicates that the culture conditions used in this study are highly effective at minimizing the production of by-products.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Fed-batch cultivation by M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 under optimized conditions. Fed-batch was performed with an optimized medium in a 5-L scale fermenter. For high-cell-density cultivation with a constant yield of ectoine to biomass, 2 g/L of KNO3 and 1X trace elements were additionally supplied every time the biomass increased by 2 g/L

Full size image

To estimate the ectoine yield from methane, online gas chromatography was used. The M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 consumed 87.9 g of methane for 73 h with a yield of 0.04 g ectoine/g methane (Fig. 5). Additionally, a yield of 0.6 g biomass/g methane was obtained under the growth conditions, with the remaining methane probably released as carbon dioxide (data not shown). In this study, only 2.3% (g/g) of supplied methane was assimilated in a 5-L bioreactor, which may be due to limited gas-liquid transfer and methanotrophic methane oxidation efficiency. Considering the significant portion of the carbon flux that is converted to non-targeted products, further studies will require bioprocess design, development of novel bioreactor that overcome the limitations of gas-liquid mass transfer, and strain engineering with enhanced carbon flux to ectoine synthesis.

High production of ectoine by hyperosmotic shock

Ectoine is an osmoprotectant that protects cells from osmotic pressure. In previous bio-milking studies, it was possible to accumulate intracellular ectoine in a short time by subjecting cells to hyperosmotic shock [37]. Therefore, a high-density culture was performed in a 5-L bioreactor to verify this effect.

To confirm the accumulation of ectoine by hyperosmotic shock after high–cell density fed-batch culture, 50 mL of culture broth was transferred to a 250-mL flask and an appropriate concentration of NaCl and a nitrogen source were added to the broth to evaluate the optimal conditions for ectoine accumulation (6%, 9% (w/v) NaCl; 5, 10 g/L KNO3). The cells were cultured with shaking at 30 °C for 48 h, and harvested every 24 h to measure the amount of intracellular ectoine. The initial ectoine concentration after fed-batch fermentation was 697 mg/L, which showed a significant (2.3-fold) increase upon adding NaCl and KNO3 (Table 3). In particular, medium containing 6% (w/v) NaCl showed accumulation of up to 1.6 g/L ectoine without biomass increase, and no differences were observed with different concentrations of KNO3. When 9% (w/v) NaCl was added to the medium, ectoine accumulation and production rates were lower than those in medium containing 6% (w/v) NaCl. As sufficient ectoine was accumulated with 5 g/L KNO3 and 6% (w/v) NaCl, these conditions were applied for fed-batch fermentation.

Table 3 Ectoine titer (mg/L) accumulated by hyperosmotic shock after stationary phase by addition of 6% (w/v), 9% (w/v) of salinity and 5 g/L, 10 g/L of KNO3 in 250-mL flask
Full size table

To further improve ectoine production, two stages of fermentation were conducted in a 5-L bioreactor. In the first stage, fed-batch fermentation in optimized Methylomicrobium medium was carried out with pH control (pH 8.9–9.1) using M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3, and 2 g/L of KNO3 and 1X trace elements were additionally added for every 2 g/L increase in biomass to achieve maximum possible cells density with a constant ectoine yield. In the second stage, when cells were determined to have reached stationary phase and no further cell growth was considered possible, 5 g/L of KNO3 was supplied, and NaCl was added to achieve a concentration of 6% (w/v) to induce intracellular ectoine accumulation by hyperosmotic shock. The gas flow rate was lowered from 0.5 vvm to 0.1 vvm, while the ratio of methane to air was kept constant at 3:7 to minimize the shear stress on the cells. The cells grew with a growth rate of 0.09 µaverage and 0.19 µmax until the biomass reached 18.7 g/L (Fig. 6). The specific growth rate (µ) was the highest in the initial 23 h and then decreased until 54 h and remained below 0.03. Ectoine was produced rapidly at 0.9 g/L until 54 h and maintained during first stage of fermentation as the specific growth rate decreased. The point at which ectoine production slowed down owing to decrease of the specific growth rate coincided with the point at which dissolved oxygen in the culture medium rapidly decreased, remained at 0%, and then began to gradually increased (data not shown), which is an oxygen-limitation effect during fermentation. Nevertheless, with additional supplementation with KNO3 and NaCl in the second stage, 1.5 g/L of ectoine was accumulated, which was 1.5-fold higher than that in the first stage. The ectoine yield per biomass (mg/g DCW) was remained approximately 63 mg/ g DCW during initial 54 h but it was slightly decreased afterward (58 mg/ g DCW at 75.5 h). While biomass decreased due to cell lysis caused by hyperosmotic shock, the ectoine yield per biomass was enhanced to 93 mg/g DCW in Stage 2 of fermentation by hyperosmotic shock at 24 h.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Two-stage cultivation of M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 under optimized conditions for high cell density (stage 1) and ectoine accumulation (stage 2). In stage 1, fed-batch culture was conducted using the optimized medium and 2 g/L of KNO3 and 1X trace elements were supplied additionally every time the biomass increased by 2 g/L until the cells reached a stationary phase. In stage 2, 5 g/L of KNO3 was supplied and NaCl was added to adjust the concentration to 6% (w/v) for ectoine accumulation by a hyperosmotic shock. Time course of biomass (g/L) and ectoine (g/L) production by M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3

Full size image

The production of ectoine using methanotrophs is much lower than that achieved through sugar fermentation by using Halomonas species, Escherichia coli, and Corynebacterium glutamicum [20, 38, 39]. However, this process is meaningful as it combines with the atmospheric reduction of methane, a greenhouse gas that contributes to global warming. Table 4 compares the ectoine production from methane from previous reports and this study. Until now, Cantera et al. [37] reported the highest titer of ectoine (0.25 g/L) by M. alcaliphilum 20Z using the bio-milking process. We had previously demonstrated that genetically engineered M. alcaliphilum 20Z could produce ectoine up to 0.14 g/L with the yield of 111 mg/ g DCW from methane under batch fermentation [22]. Additionally, recent studies have suggested that mixed culture of Methylomicrobium species were able to produce ectoine up to 105 mg/ g DCW and 109 mg/ DCW g, respectively [13, 40]. Ngoc Pham et al. [41] reported ectoine production (38 mg/ g DCW) from methane and lignocellulose-derived sugars (glucose and xylose) by genetical modification in M. alcaliphilum 20Z. Previous studies on the conversion of methane to ectoine have focused on the bio-milking process with wild-type stain, which has a limitation of ectoine degradation with cell growth [13, 22, 27]. In this study, we constructed M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 by removing the doeA gene responsible for the first step of ectoine degradation after the cells reached a mid-exponential growth phase. Ectoine production proportional to cell growth was then achieved by supplementation with a sufficient nitrogen source, and enhanced ectoine was synthesized using a hyperosmotic shock and supplying with high salt and nitrogen after the cells reached a stationary phase. Therefore, the highest ectoine titer obtained using methane (1.5 g/L) was achieved. This result was successfully accomplished by preventing ectoine degradation in M. alcaliphilum 20Z. More importantly, this study established the critical role of nitrogen sources in the medium for ectoine production. Additionally, it was found that the expression of genes related to ectoine degradation is regulated by the availability of nitrogen sources in the medium. Considering that the ectoine is a high value-added product, this strain exhibits an excellent industrial and environmental benefit better than other similar methanotrophs.

Table 4 Comparison of ectoine production by methanotrophs
Full size table

Conclusions

In the present study, high ectoine production from methane was achieved using engineered M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3 by preventing ectoine degradation. By combining strategies:1) disruption of doeA gene, which is responsible for the first step of ectoine degradation, in M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP2; 2) supplying nitrogen source for ectoine synthesis in proportion to cell growth; 3) fed-batch fermentation using M. alcaliphilum DP3 supplementing KNO3 and trace element for high cell density culture (HCDC); 4) hyperosmotic shock after HCDC of M. alcaliphilum 20ZDP3, ectoine was accumulated up to 1.5 g/L with a yield of 93 mg/g DCW. The ectoine production achieved in this study is the highest among the methane-based ectoine production using methanotrophs reported to date. Further improvements in the high-cell-density cultivation of M. alcaliphilum 20Z strains based on this study can facilitate eco-friendly and economical processes for ectoine production by methanotrophs, beyond the currently expensive sugar-based fermentation using microorganisms.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Meraz JL, Abel AJ, Clark DS, Criddle CS. Biological conversion of methane to bioplastics: kinetics, stoichiometry, and thermodynamic considerations for process optimization. Chem Eng J. 2023;454:140166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tollefson J. Scientists raise alarm over’dangerously fast’growth in atmospheric methane. Nature. 2022.

  3. Cantera S, Muñoz R, Lebrero R, López JC, Rodríguez Y, García-Encina PA. Technologies for the bioconversion of methane into more valuable products. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;50:128–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hwang IY, Nguyen AD, Nguyen TT, Nguyen LT, Lee OK, Lee EY. Biological conversion of methane to chemicals and fuels: technical challenges and issues. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(7):3071–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cantera S, Bordel S, Lebrero R, Gancedo J, García-Encina PA, Muñoz R. Bio-conversion of methane into high profit margin compounds: an innovative, environmentally friendly and cost-effective platform for methane abatement. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;35(16):1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen DTN, Lee OK, Nguyen TT, Lee EY. Type II methanotrophs: a promising microbial cell-factory platform for bioconversion of methane to chemicals. Biotechnol Adv. 2021;47:107700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Strong PJ, Xie S, Clarke WP. Methane as a resource: can the methanotrophs add value? Environ Sci Technol. 2015;49(7):4001–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pieja AJ, Morse MC, Cal AJ. Methane to bioproducts: the future of the bioeconomy? Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2017;41:123–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantera S, Sánchez-Andrea I, Lebrero R, García-Encina PA, Stams AJM, Muñoz R. Multi-production of high added market value metabolites from diluted methane emissions via methanotrophic extremophiles. Bioresour Technol. 2018;267:401–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strong PJ, Kalyuzhnaya M, Silverman J, Clarke WP. A methanotroph-based biorefinery: potential scenarios for generating multiple products from a single fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2016;215:314–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. López JC, Rodríguez Y, Pérez V, Lebrero R, Muñoz R. CH4-Based polyhydroxyalkanoate production: a step further towards a sustainable bioeconomy. In: Kalia VC, editor. Biotechnological applications of Polyhydroxyalkanoates. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019. pp. 283–321.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Pérez V, Moltó JL, Lebrero R, Muñoz R. Ectoine production from biogas: a sensitivity analysis. Effect of local commodity prices, economy of scale, market trends and biotechnological limitations. J Clean Prod. 2022;369:133440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cantera S, Phandanouvong-Lozano V, Pascual C, García-Encina PA, Lebrero R, Hay A, et al. A systematic comparison of ectoine production from upgraded biogas using Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum and a mixed haloalkaliphilic consortium. Waste Manage. 2020;102:773–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma Z, Wu C, Zhu L, Chang R, Ma W, Deng Y, et al. Bioactivity profiling of the extremolyte ectoine as a promising protectant and its heterologous production. 3 Biotech. 2022;12(12):331.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pastor JM, Salvador M, Argandoña M, Bernal V, Reina-Bueno M, Csonka LN, et al. Ectoines in cell stress protection: uses and biotechnological production. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(6):782–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pérez V, Moltó JL, Lebrero R, Muñoz R. Ectoine production from biogas in waste treatment facilities: a techno-economic and sensitivity analysis. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng. 2021;9(51):17371–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vuilleumier S, Khmelenina VN, Bringel F, Reshetnikov AS, Lajus A, Mangenot S, et al. Genome sequence of the Haloalkaliphilic Methanotrophic Bacterium Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(2):551–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Reshetnikov AS, Khmelenina VN, Trotsenko YA. Characterization of the ectoine biosynthesis genes of haloalkalotolerant obligate methanotroph Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z. Arch Microbiol. 2006;184(5):286–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reshetnikov AS, Rozova ON, Trotsenko YA, But SY, Khmelenina VN, Mustakhimov II. Ectoine degradation pathway in halotolerant methylotrophs. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(4):e0232244.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao Q, Li S, Lv P, Sun S, Ma C, Xu P, et al. High ectoine production by an engineered Halomonas hydrothermalis Y2 in a reduced salinity medium. Microb Cell Fact. 2019;18:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sauer T, Galinski EA. Bacterial milking: a novel bioprocess for production of compatible solutes. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1998;59(1):128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cho S, Lee YS, Chai H, Lim SE, Na JG, Lee J. Enhanced production of ectoine from methane using metabolically engineered Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z. Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022;15(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Puri AW, Owen S, Chu F, Chavkin T, Beck DA, Kalyuzhnaya MG, et al. Genetic tools for the industrially promising methanotroph Methylomicrobium buryatense. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(5):1775–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cho S, Ha S, Kim HS, Han JH, Kim H, Yeon YJ, et al. Stimulation of cell growth by addition of tungsten in batch culture of a methanotrophic bacterium, Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z on methane and methanol. J Biotechnol. 2020;309:81–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jörg Kunte H, Galinski EA, Trüper HG. A modified FMOC-method for the detection of amino acid-type osmolytes and tetrahydropyrimidines (ectoines). J Microbiol Methods. 1993;17(2):129–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Varão Moura A, Aparecido Rosini Silva A, Domingos Santo da Silva J, Aleixo Leal Pedroza L, Bornhorst J, Stiboller M, et al. Determination of ions in Caenorhabditis elegans by ion chromatography. J Chromatogr B. 2022;1204:123312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cantera S, Lebrero R, Rodríguez E, García-Encina PA, Muñoz R. Continuous abatement of methane coupled with ectoine production by Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z in stirred tank reactors: a step further towards greenhouse gas biorefineries. J Clean Prod. 2017;152:134–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mustakhimov II, Reshetnikov AS, Glukhov AS, Khmelenina VN, Kalyuzhnaya MG, Trotsenko YA. Identification and characterization of EctR1, a new transcriptional regulator of the ectoine biosynthesis genes in the halotolerant methanotroph Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(2):410–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cantera S, Lebrero R, García-Encina PA, Muñoz R. Evaluation of the influence of methane and copper concentration and methane mass transport on the community structure and biodegradation kinetics of methanotrophic cultures. J Environ Manage. 2016;171:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chistoserdova L. Modularity of methylotrophy, revisited. Environ Microbiol. 2011;13(10):2603–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hu L, Yang Y, Yan X, Zhang T, Xiang J, Gao Z, et al. Molecular mechanism associated with the impact of methane/oxygen gas supply ratios on cell growth of Methylomicrobium buryatense 5GB1 through RNA-Seq. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:263.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Jung G-Y, Rhee S-K, Han Y-S, Kim S-J. Genomic and physiological properties of a facultative methane-oxidizing bacterial strain of Methylocystis sp. from a wetland. Microorganisms. 2020;8(11):1719.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Dedysh SN, Liesack W, Khmelenina VN, Suzina NE, Trotsenko YA, Semrau JD, et al. Methylocella palustris gen. nov., sp. nov., a new methane-oxidizing acidophilic bacterium from peat bogs, representing a novel subtype of serine-pathway methanotrophs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50(3):955–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Auman AJ, Speake CC, Lidstrom ME. nifH sequences and Nitrogen fixation in type I and type II methanotrophs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(9):4009–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Guo S, Zhang T, Chen Y, Yang S, Fei Q. Transcriptomic profiling of nitrogen fixation and the role of NifA in Methylomicrobium buryatense 5GB1. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106(8):3191–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Akberdin IR, Thompson M, Hamilton R, Desai N, Alexander D, Henard CA, et al. Methane utilization in Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20ZR: a systems approach. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2512.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cantera S, Lebrero R, Rodríguez S, García-Encina PA, Muñoz R. Ectoine bio-milking in methanotrophs: a step further towards methane-based bio-refineries into high added-value products. Chem Eng J. 2017;328:44–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang H, Liang Z, Zhao M, Ma Y, Luo Z, Li S, et al. Metabolic Engineering of Escherichia coli for Ectoine Production with a fermentation strategy of supplementing the amino donor. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gießelmann G, Dietrich D, Jungmann L, Kohlstedt M, Jeon EJ, Yim SS, et al. Metabolic Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for High-Level Ectoine production: design, Combinatorial Assembly, and implementation of a transcriptionally balanced Heterologous Ectoine Pathway. Biotechnol J. 2019;14(9):e1800417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Carmona-Martínez AA, Marcos-Rodrigo E, Bordel S, Marín D, Herrero-Lobo R, García-Encina PA, et al. Elucidating the key environmental parameters during the production of ectoines from biogas by mixed methanotrophic consortia. J Environ Manage. 2021;298:113462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ngoc Pham D, Duc Nguyen A, Hoang Anh Mai D, Yeol Lee E. Development of a novel methanotrophic platform to produce ectoine from methane and lignocellulose-derived sugars. Chem Eng J. 2023;463:142361.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by C1 Gas Refinery Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (2015M3D3A1A01064929).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Sang Eun Lim, Sukhyeong Cho contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Sogang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Sang Eun Lim, Yejin Choi, Jeong-Geol Na & Jinwon Lee

  2. C1 Gas Refinery R&D Center, Sogang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Sukhyeong Cho & Jinwon Lee

Authors
  1. Sang Eun Lim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sukhyeong Cho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yejin Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jeong-Geol Na
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jinwon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SEL, SC, and JL conceived the study. SEL and SC carried out the experimental works and coordinated the manuscript draft. YC participated in the experimental work and analysis. JN and JL reviewed and commented on the manuscript. JL participated in its design and coordination of the manuscript draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinwon Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lim, S.E., Cho, S., Choi, Y. et al. High production of ectoine from methane in genetically engineered Methylomicrobium alcaliphilum 20Z by preventing ectoine degradation. Microb Cell Fact 23, 127 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02404-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-024-02404-2

Keywords

Microbial Cell Factories

ISSN: 1475-2859

Contact us