From: Application of different types of CRISPR/Cas-based systems in bacteria
Cas protein | Target species | Strategy and type of modifications | References |
---|---|---|---|
Sp Cas9 | Actinomycetes | Genome editing, deletion and replacement | [58] |
Sp Cas9 | Actinoplanes sp. | Genome editing, deletion | [46] |
Sp Cas9 | B. subtilis | Genome editing, deletions (25.1 kb and 4.1 kb) | [40] |
Sp Cas9 | B. subtilis | Genome editing, gene disruption (33 to 53%) | [47] |
Sp Cas9 | C. acetobutylicum | Genome editing, deletions and insertions (3.6 kb) | [41] |
Sp Cas9 | C. acetobutylicum | Genome editing, deletion and replacement | [44] |
Sp Cas9 | C. autoethanogenum | Genome editing, deletions (over 50% when screening a small library of tetracycline-inducible promoters) | [56] |
Sp Cas9 | C. beijerinckii | Genome editing, deletion and integration in single steps | [51] |
Sp Cas9 | C. difficile | Genome editing, site-specific mutations (20–50%) | [54] |
Sp Cas9 | C. glutamicum | Genome editing, deletion, point mutations and insertion (up to 100%) | [50] |
Sp Cas9 | C. glutamicum | Genome editing, knockout and GABA overproduction | [48] |
Sp Cas9 | C. glutamicum | Genome editing, deletion (60%) and insertion (62.5%) | [49] |
Sp Cas9 | C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum | Genome editing, deletions (75%) | [55] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, knockouts, insertions or substitutions (100%, 5 days) | [28] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, point mutations, deletions, and insertions | [29] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, knock-in | [30] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, knockout (100%, 3 days) | [31] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, (3 genes between 96.5 and 99.7%) | [33] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, deletions, insertions, and replacements (100%) | [35] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, deletion (19.4 kb) and insertion (3 kb) | [37] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, deletion (large chromosomal DNA fragments) | [57] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, insertion (70 to 100%) | [38] |
Sp Cas9 | E. coli | Genome editing, replacement (99%) and insertion (2.4 kb 91%, 3.9 kb 92%, 5.4 kb 71%, and 7.0 kb 61%) | [39] |
Sp Cas9 | S. aureus | Genome editing, knockout, knock-in and single base mutations | [32] |
Sp Cas9 | S. coelicolor | Genome editing, deletion (939 bp) | [53] |
Sp Cas9 | S. coelicolor | Genome editing, single gene deletion, single large-size gene cluster deletion (60% to 100%), simultaneous deletions of actII-orf4 and redD, as well as the ACT and RED biosynthetic gene clusters with high efficiencies of 54 and 45%, respectively. | [34] |
Sp Cas9 | S. elongatus | Genome editing, deletion (100%) | [45] |
Sp Cas9 | Streptomyces | Multiple genome editing, deletions (from 20 bp to 30 kb, 70 to 100%) | [42] |
Sp Cas9 | Streptomyces | Multiple genome editing, knock-in (5 species) | [43] |
Sp Cas9 | S. rimosus | Genome editing, deletions (100%) and point mutations | [52] |
Thermo Cas9 | B. smithii | Genome editing, knockouts and silencing (55 °C) | [36] |
Sp nCas9 | B. licheniformis | Genome editing, deletions (1 gene 100%, 2 genes 11.6%, large-fragment 79%) and insertions (76.5%) | [61] |
Sp nCas9 | C. perfringens | Genome editing, deletion (23 bp) | [62] |
Sp nCas9 (D10A) | E. coli | Genome editing, deletions (from 36 to 96 kb) | [17] |
Sp nCas9 (D10A) | L. casei | Genome editing, deletions and insertions (25 to 62%) | [59] |
Sp dCas9 | B. subtilis | CRISPRi, investigation of gene function (289 known or proposed essential genes, ~ 94% successfully targeting of bona fide essential genes) | [69] |
Sp dCas9 | C. glutamicum | CRISPRi (single gene, two genes) | [63] |
Sp dCas9 | C. acetobutylicum | CRISPRi | [60] |
Sp dCas9 | C. beijerinckii | CRISPRi (97%) | [64] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi | [23] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi (1000-fold repression) | [24] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi (10-fold repression) | [21] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi | [22] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, investigation of gene function | [68] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, harboring a biosynthetic mevalonate (MVA) pathway and enhancing production of (-)-α-bisabolol (C15) and lycopene (C40) | [71] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, pinosylvin biosynthesis by inactivating a malonyl-CoA depleting pathway and a 1.9-fold increase of the pinosylvin content | [73] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, pinosylvin synthesis pathway and the final pinosylvin titer was improved to 281 mg/L, which was the highest pinosylvin titer | [119] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, the methionine biosynthetic pathway and a final titer of 51 mg/L(21-fold improvement overall) | [74] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, malate biosynthetic pathway and 2.3-fold increase in malate titer | [75] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, multiplex repression of competing pathway and n‑butanol yield and productivity increased up to 5.4‑ and 3.2‑fold, respectively. | [76] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, downregulate fatty acid biosynthesis pathway to inactivate the malonyl-CoA consumption pathway | [77] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, 1,4-BDO production and enhanced the 1,4-BDO titer for 100% to 1.8 g/L | [78] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, the butanol synthetic pathway and 0.82 g/L butanol production | [79] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | CRISPRi, the biological synthesis of polyketides, flavonoids and biofuels and 7.4-fold higher production | [80] |
Sp dCas9 | M. tuberculosis | CRISPRi | [67] |
Sp dCas9 | M. tuberculosis | CRISPRi, single or multiple targets | [66] |
Sp dCas9 | Pseudomonas spp. | CRISPRi | [20] |
Sp dCas9 | B. melitensis | Base editor (C-T, 100%) | [26] |
Sp dCas9 | C. glutamicum | Base editor, (single-locus, 100%, double-locus, 87.2%, and triple-locus, 23.3%) | [85] |
Sp dCas9 | E. coli | Base editor (C-T, 99.93%) | [26] |
Sp dCas9 | K. pneumoniae | Base editor (position, PAM distal 4 to 8 bp, efficiency 100%) | [87] |
Sp dCas9 | Staphylococcus | Base editor (position, PAM distal 4 to 8 bp, efficiency 100%) | [88] |