Skip to main content

Table 2 Modelled (A, μ, λ) and measured (dry mass) fermentation and growth parameters of the fermentation assays that were performed at different temperatures (10 and 20 °C) and supplemented ethanol levels (0 and 8% (v/v) EtOH)

From: Inheritance of brewing-relevant phenotypes in constructed Saccharomyces cerevisiae × Saccharomyces eubayanus hybrids

Strain and condition

A (°brix)

μ (°brix h−1)

λ (hours)

Dry mass (g L−1)

10 °C, 0% EtOH

P1

6.85 (±0.18)ab

0.132 (±0.0107)ab

160 (±2.3)b

9.2 (±0.65)cd

P2

6.63 (±0.13)b

0.140 (±0.0172)a

122 (±2.3)c

9.8 (±0.05)bcd

P3

7.10 (±0.15)a

0.108 (±0.0064)bc

97 (±2.2)e

11.0 (±0.33)abc

H1 (P1 × P3)

7.02 (±0.18)ab

0.089 (±0.0059)c

111 (±3.1)d

12.2 (±1.62)ab

H2 (P2 × P3)

7.13 (±0.19)a

0.106 (±0.0083)c

118 (±3.2)c

12.6 (±0.14)a

H3 (P1 × P2)

6.87 (±0.16)ab

0.095 (±0.0058)c

120 (±2.6)c

7.5 (±1.75)d

T1 (H1 × P2)

7.01 (±0.14)ab

0.095 (±0.0054)c

106 (±2.5)d

12.7 (±0.39)a

T2 (T1 segregant)

7.05 (±0.13)ab

0.093 (±0.0015)c

182 (±0.7)a

10.9 (±0.16)abc

20 °C, 0% EtOH

P1

6.63 (±0.02)b

0.403 (±0.0069)a

36 (±0.1)b

12.5 (±3.12)a

P2

6.86 (±0.05)a

0.470 (±0.0630)a

31 (±0.6)c

11.6 (±0.16)a

P3

6.83 (±0.07)a

0.501 (±0.1218)a

30 (±0.8)cd

10.6 (±0.58)a

H1 (P1 × P3)

6.83 (±0.04)a

0.435 (±0.0406)a

29 (±0.3)de

13.9 (±1.55)a

H2 (P2 × P3)

6.80 (±0.03)a

0.426 (±0.0470)a

22 (±0.7)f

10.6 (±0.18)a

H3 (P1 × P2)

6.74 (±0.06)ab

0.428 (±0.1647)a

27 (±0.7)e

13.3 (±1.88)a

T1 (H1 × P2)

6.87 (±0.05)a

0.392 (±0.0494)a

23 (±1.0)f

13.1 (±0.80)a

T2 (T1 segregant)

6.77 (±0.08)ab

0.357 (±0.0292)a

42 (±0.4)a

11.5 (±0.22)a

10 °C, 8% EtOH

P1

3.45 (±0.53)d

0.009 (±0.0007)bc

569 (±14.9)ab

4.3 (±0.4)bc

P2

0.32 (±0.03)e

0.001 (±0.0001)d

186 (±28.3)d

0.3 (±0.04)bc

P3

7.50 (±0.20)a

0.027 (±0.0010)a

446 (±5.7)c

15.7 (±1.97)a

H1 (P1 × P3)

6.45 (±0.96)ab

0.017 (±0.0082)b

596 (±58.9)a

8.1 (±5.26)b

H2 (P2 × P3)

4.22 (±0.63)cd

0.004 (±0.0008)cd

559 (±43.5)ab

6.4 (±0.24)b

H3 (P1 × P2)

5.14 (±0.60)bc

0.010 (±0.0008)bc

561 (±16.6)ab

3.3 (±0.09)bc

T1 (H1 × P2)

1.53 (±0.51)e

0.002 (±0.0005)cd

464 (±66.3)bc

3.3 (±0.70)bc

T2 (T1 segregant)

NA

NA

NA

NA

20 °C, 8% EtOH

P1

6.69 (±0.11)b

0.068 (±0.0036)b

171 (±2.8)b

7.5 (±1.53)b

P2

1.00 (±0.01)d

0.020 (±0.0011)c

56 (±1.3)d

1.5 (±0.08)c

P3

0.31 (±0.01)e

0.013 (±0.0031)cd

57 (±2.9)d

0.8 (±0.10)c

H1 (P1 × P3)

7.09 (±0.19)a

0.095 (±0.0068)a

220 (±2.9)a

14.9 (±0.10)a

H2 (P2 × P3)

0.50 (±0.01)e

0.015 (±0.0033)cd

49 (±4.1)d

1.5 (±0.06)c

H3 (P1 × P2)

1.29 (±0.03)c

0.015 (±0.0014)cd

58 (±4.4)d

1.5 (±0.09)c

T1 (H1 × P2)

0.51 (±0.01)e

0.016 (±0.0037)cd

49 (±4.4)d

1.1 (±0.06)c

T2 (T1 segregant)

1.14 (±0.03)cd

0.007 (±0.0005)d

70 (±4.5)c

1.3 (±0.04)c

  1. NA not available
  2. The growth curves were modelled using the logistic model in the ‘grofit’ package for R. Values were determined from three independent cultivations (standard deviation in parentheses). Values in the same group in the same column with different superscript letters (a–f) differ significantly (p < 0.05 as determined with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test)