Open Access

Dynamic regulation of fatty acid pools for improved production of fatty alcohols in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

  • Paulo Gonçalves Teixeira1, 2,
  • Raphael Ferreira1, 2,
  • Yongjin J. Zhou1, 2,
  • Verena Siewers1, 2 and
  • Jens Nielsen1, 2, 3Email author
Microbial Cell Factories201716:45

DOI: 10.1186/s12934-017-0663-3

Received: 11 December 2016

Accepted: 10 March 2017

Published: 15 March 2017



In vivo production of fatty acid-derived chemicals in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires strategies to increase the intracellular supply of either acyl-CoA or free fatty acids (FFAs), since their cytosolic concentrations are quite low in a natural state for this organism. Deletion of the fatty acyl-CoA synthetase genes FAA1 and FAA4 is an effective and straightforward way to disable re-activation of fatty acids and drastically increase FFA levels. However, this strategy causes FFA over-accumulation and consequential release to the extracellular medium, which results in a significant loss of precursors that compromises the process yield. In the present study, we aimed for dynamic expression of the fatty acyl-CoA synthetase gene FAA1 to regulate FFA and acyl-CoA pools in order to improve fatty alcohol production yields.


We analyzed the metabolite dynamics of a faa1Δ faa4Δ strain constitutively expressing a carboxylic acid reductase from Mycobacterium marinum (MmCAR) and an endogenous alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh5) for in vivo production of fatty alcohols from FFAs. We observed production of fatty acids and fatty alcohols with different rates leading to high levels of FFAs not being converted to the final product. To address the issue, we expressed the MmCAR + Adh5 pathway together with a fatty acyl-CoA reductase from Marinobacter aquaeolei to enable fatty alcohol production simultaneously from FFA and acyl-CoA, respectively. Then, we expressed FAA1 under the control of different promoters in order to balance FFA and acyl-CoA interconversion rates and to achieve optimal levels for conversion to fatty alcohols. Expressing FAA1 under control of the HXT1 promoter led to an increased accumulation of fatty alcohols per OD600 up to 41% while FFA levels were decreased by 63% compared with the control strain.


Fine-tuning and dynamic regulation of key metabolic steps can be used to improve cell factories when the rates of downstream reactions are limiting. This avoids loss of precursors to the extracellular medium or to competing reactions, hereby potentially improving the process yield. The study also provides knowledge of a key point of fatty acid regulation and homeostasis, which can be used for future design of cells factories for fatty acid-derived chemicals.


Fatty alcohols Fatty acid activation FAA1 Dynamic control Yeast Metabolic engineering


Society’s need for sustainable production of liquid fuels and oleochemicals is indisputable. The use of plants for the extraction of lipid molecules for conversion to biofuels and oleochemicals is often not sustainable in a long term due to requirements for large areas of fertile land together with extensive extraction and chemical conversion processes. Therefore, there is a need for alternative production routes for petrol and plant lipid-derived chemicals that can simultaneously offer a sustainable life cycle and assure a stable supply. The development of microbial cell factories proposes a substitute production path by redirecting cell metabolism towards a product of interest [1, 2]. Many studies have already shown how Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be successfully engineered for production of different fatty acid-derived chemicals such as fatty alcohols, alkanes, alkenes, fatty acyl ethyl esters and triacylglycerols [36].

For an efficient production of a desired chemical through fermentation, there is usually a need to engineer the production organism for reduced formation of byproducts. Byproduct formation diverts nutrients towards unwanted molecules, reducing the yield of the desired product and compromising the process efficiency [79]. In metabolic engineering, byproduct formation easily arises when fluxes are not properly balanced and pathway precursors or intermediates accumulate in the cell, becoming abundant substrates for side reactions and processes. For this reason, balancing fluxes through enzyme modulation and controlling metabolite pool levels usually play an important role with regard to the final product yield.

Fatty alcohols in S. cerevisiae can be produced either from acyl-CoA or free fatty acids (FFAs) in two steps. In either case, the precursor is first converted to a fatty aldehyde through an acyl-CoA reductase [10] for acyl-CoA reduction, or a carboxylic acid reductase [11] for FFA reduction. The formed fatty aldehydes are then reduced to a primary alcohol by endogenous alcohol dehydrogenases [12]. An alternative route for fatty alcohol production from acyl-CoA is a four-electron reduction catalyzed by a bifunctional fatty acyl-CoA reductase [13], in which an aldehyde is also formed as an intermediary metabolite but the enzyme is capable of catalyzing both reaction steps.

The most successful strategies for production of fatty alcohols so far rely on using the FFA pathway, in which the main factor of success is the possibility to accumulate FFAs in the cytosol at levels several orders of magnitude higher compared with acyl-CoA [1416]. Here, one of the major strategies used for accumulation of FFAs is the simultaneous deletion of the fatty acyl-CoA synthetase genes FAA1 and FAA4, encoding the main responsible enzymes for the activation of FFAs to fatty acyl-CoA [17, 18]. Simultaneous deletion of these two genes together with POX1 (encoding fatty acyl-CoA oxidase, the first enzyme of the fatty acid beta-oxidation pathway), allows production of up to 490 mg/L of FFA, whereas the wild-type reference strain only produces around 3 mg/L FFAs [5, 19]. Although there remains some discussion as to the origin of these fatty acids, evidence shows that these are produced mainly from hydrolysis of acyl chains from storage and membrane lipids, and not directly from acyl-CoA due to thioesterase activity or spontaneous hydrolysis [18].

Increased FFA production in faa1Δ faa4Δ deletion strains results in high levels of these FFA accumulating in the extracellular medium. Further increasing production levels in these same strains results in an increase of extracellular FFA while intracellular levels are not significantly changed, which strongly suggests a limit to intracellular FFA accumulation in the cell [5, 19]. It is unclear if this release of FFA to the medium is carried out by uncharacterized transporters or if it is a process of transmembrane diffusion due to very high concentration of FFAs in the cytosol. In either case, released FFA are inaccessible to the cell due to lack of re-import and fatty acid activation mechanisms, for which FAA1 and FAA4 are responsible [18, 20, 21].

Although an efficient accumulation of FFAs is most beneficial for the production of chemicals derived thereof, enzymes identified so far for production of fatty acid-derived chemicals such as fatty alcohols are often not efficient enough to keep up with the flux of FFA formation. This creates a situation where FFAs are produced faster than they can be converted to the final product [5].

In order to qualify as an industrially feasible process, production of fatty acid-derived chemicals requires achieving the maximum production yield possible. Thus far, these unbalanced fluxes create an intra- and extracellular over-accumulation of a large amounts of FFAs, which are ultimately not converted to the product of interest. This constitutes a serious loss of carbon and reducing cofactors that might hinder the production yields for fatty alcohols and other fatty acid-derived chemicals.

We therefore studied how fine-tuning of a single step in this pathway would allow control of the involved metabolite levels and how this could be a possible approach to reduce the described problem. A successful application of this strategy would allow for an improvement in final product yields and production titers since it provides an optimization of resource usage during cultivation of engineered cell factories.


Plasmid construction

The FAA1 gene was amplified by PCR from Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-11C and cloned into p413TEF using restriction enzymes BamHI and XhoI, resulting in plasmid pTEF-FAA1. For construction of plasmids pHXT1-FAA1 and pHXT7-FAA1, the HXT7 and the HXT1 promoters were amplified from S. cerevisiae CEN.PK113-11C and fused to the backbone p413 by PCR. The p413 backbone plasmid was amplified from p413TEF. The FAA1 gene and HXT1/HXT7 promoters were amplified by PCR to generate the complementary overhangs for insertion into the plasmid by Gibson assembly (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts, United States). Strains and plasmids generated and used in this study are presented in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. A list of primers used for plasmid construction is shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Table 1

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used in this study





MATa MAL2‐8c SUC2 his3Δ1 ura3‐52 hfd1Δ pox1Δ faa1Δ faa4Δ

Zhou et al. [5, 6]



This study



This study


YJZ08 pAOH9 p413

This study



This study



This study



This study



This study

Table 2

Plasmids used in this study





pYX212 empty plasmid: 2 μm, ampR, URA3, TPIp, pYX212t

R&D systems



Zhou et al. [5, 6]



Zhou et al. [5, 6]


p413TEF empty plasmid: CEN.ARS, ampR, HIS3, TEF1p, CYC1t

ATCC® 87362



This study



This study



This study



This study

Growth medium

Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with uracil and histidine auxotrophies were grown on YPD plates containing 20 g/L glucose, 10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone from casein and 20 g/L agar. Plasmid carrying strains were grown on selective growth medium containing 6.9 g/L yeast nitrogen base w/o amino acids (Formedium, Hunstanton, UK), 0.77 g/L complete supplement mixture w/o histidine and uracil (Formedium), 20 g/L glucose and 20 g/L agar. Shake flask cultivations were performed in minimal medium containing 20 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 14.4 g/L KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4·7H2O. After sterilization, 2 mL/L trace element solution and 1 mL/L of vitamin solution were added. The composition of the trace element and vitamin solution has been reported earlier [32].

Shake flask cultivations

All experiments were performed with strains cultivated as biological triplicates. This means that three independent transformants were used to start pre-cultures. For these, 3 mL of minimal medium in a 15 mL tube, or in 5 mL in a 50 mL tube, were inoculated for the first experiment, and cultivated at 200 rpm and 30 °C for 18 h. Subsequently, the pre-culture was used to inoculate 20 mL of minimal medium in a 100 mL shake flask, or 100 mL of minimal medium in a 500 mL shake flask for the first experiment, at an OD600 of 0.1. Shake flasks were incubated at 200 rpm and 30 °C for 72 h.

A spectrophotometer (Genesis20, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to measure cell growth at designated time points and at the end of the shake flask cultivations. Optical density (OD600) was measured by absorbance at 600 nm of a diluted culture sample.

Growth rates on glucose were calculated using OD600 data points between 6 and 12 h, from which the slope of the plotted log (OD600) values over time interval was calculated.

Quantification of extracellular metabolites

For quantification of glucose and ethanol, 1 mL samples were taken throughout the culture. The biomass was removed by filtration using a 0.45 µm nylon filter (VWR International AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Sample analysis was performed by HPLC using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 (Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) together with an Aminex HPX-87H column (300 × 7.8 mm, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and a refractive index detector (512 µRIU). The column temperature was kept constant at 45 °C and 15 µL were injected into the mobile phase consisting of 5 mM H2SO4. The flow rate was set to 0.6 mL/min.

Quantification of lipids

Samples for lipid analysis were taken as 5 mL of culture at the end of the shake flask cultivations, after 72 h. Subsequently, the samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm and the supernatant was discarded. The pellets were kept at −20 °C for 5 min and then freeze-dried using a Christ alpha 2–4 LSC (Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen, Osterode, Germany). The samples were analyzed as described previously [33] using 10 mg of dry cell biomass.

Quantification of FFAs and fatty-alcohols

FFAs were simultaneously extracted and methylated by dichloromethane containing methyl iodide as methyl donor [34]. Briefly, 200 μL aliquots of whole cell culture (cells + supernatant) were taken into glass vials, then 10 μL 40% tetrabutylammonium hydroxide (base catalyst) was added immediately followed by addition of 200 μL dichloromethane containing 200 mM methyl iodide as methyl donor and 100 mg/L pentadecanoic acid as an internal standard. The mixtures were shaken for 30 min at 1400 rpm. By using a vortex mixer, and then centrifuged at 5000g to promote phase separation. A 160 μL dichloromethane layer was transferred into a GC vial with glass insert, and evaporated 4 h to dryness. The extracted methyl esters were resuspended in 160 μL hexane and then analyzed by gas chromatography (Focus GC, ThermoFisher Scientific) equipped with a Zebron ZB-5MS GUARDIAN capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Phenomenex) and a Flame Ionization Detector (FID, ThermoFisher Scientific). The GC program was as follows: initial temperature of 50 °C, hold for 2 min; ramp to 140 °C at a rate of 30 °C per minute, then raised to 280 °C at a rate of 10 °C per min and hold for 3 min. The temperature of inlet was kept at 280 °C. The injection volume was 1 μL. The flow rate of the carrier gas (helium) was set to 1.0 mL/min. Final quantification was performed using the Xcalibur software.

For fatty alcohol quantification, cell pellets were collected from 5 mL cell culture and then freeze-dried for 48 h. Metabolites were extracted by 2:1 chloroform:methanol solution [33], which contained pentadecanol as internal standard. The extracted fraction was dried by rotary evaporation and dissolved in ethyl acetate. Quantification of fatty alcohols was performed on the same GC–FID system as used for fatty acid analysis. The GC program for fatty alcohol quantification was as follow: initial temperature of 45 °C hold for 2 min; then ramp to 220 °C at a rate of 20 °C per min and hold for 2 min; ramp to 300 °C at a rate of 20 °C per min and hold for 5 min. The temperature of the inlet was kept at 250 °C. The injection volume was 1 μL. The flow rate of the carrier gas (helium) was set to 1.0 mL/min. Final quantification was performed with Xcalibur software.


FFA accumulation during fatty alcohol production in a faa1Δ faa4Δ strain

Before designing and engineering a flux control strategy, the dynamics of metabolite levels throughout the batch culture of the initial fatty alcohol-producing strain was studied. The initial strain YJZ08 (CEN.PK 113-11C hfd1Δ faa1Δ faa4Δ pox1Δ) carried deletions in the genes FAA1 and FAA4 and as such was unable to reconvert FFAs to acyl-CoAs. Other genes relevant for the process were also deleted such as POX1, encoding the first enzyme of the beta-oxidation pathway responsible for the degradation of acyl-CoAs, and HFD1, a fatty aldehyde dehydrogenase responsible for conversion of fatty aldehydes into fatty acids. Deletion of HFD1 has been reported as important for ensuring flux from fatty aldehydes to fatty alcohols in S. cerevisiae, since the encoded enzyme efficiently converts produced aldehydes back to their FFA form [12]. YJZ08 was transformed with the 2 µm plasmid pAOH3 for constitutive strong expression of MmCAR [11] encoding a carboxylic acid reductase from Mycobacterium marinum, which converts long chain FFAs into the respective aldehydes, and ADH5, encoding a native alcohol dehydrogenase from S. cerevisiae, which efficiently reduces long chain aldehydes to the respective alcohols [5] (Fig. 1a). The resulting strain YZFOH1 was cultivated for 72 h in minimal media with 2% glucose and analyzed by quantification of optical density (OD) and relevant internal and external metabolites, i.e. glucose, ethanol, total FFAs and fatty alcohols. Samples were taken every 3–6 h (Fig. 1b). Due to the ability of fatty acids to form emulsions in the culture media and adsorb to cell membranes, which challenges an accurate distinction between intra- and extracellular FFA, FFA were extracted and quantified from a total volume of culture sample resulting in quantification of total FFA levels.
Fig. 1

Metabolite profiling of YZFOH1 for production of fatty alcohols from FFAs. a Schematic representation of the strain YZFOH1. POX1, HFD1, FAA1 and FAA4 have been deleted in this strain and MmCAR and ADH5 are overexpressed from a 2 µm plasmid (pAOH3). b Total FFAs, fatty alcohols (FOH), glucose and ethanol (EtOH) levels in the culture are represented for YZFOH1. Samples were taken every 3–6 h for 72 h from 3 parallel replicate cultures. c FFA and fatty alcohol titers divided by the culture OD600 at each time point

Measured metabolite profiles showed glucose being entirely consumed at 18 h, while ethanol was gradually formed up to 6 g/L. When glucose was depleted, ethanol started being consumed until its depletion after 60 h. Fatty alcohols and FFAs were constantly produced throughout the culture from either glucose or ethanol as carbon sources. When normalized by the OD values, FFAs showed a constant increase throughout the culture while fatty alcohols reached and oscillated in a plateau from the 21 h time point onwards (Fig. 1c).

The final titers show that from the total formed fatty acids, only 20% were actually converted to fatty alcohols. Furthermore, we observed turbidity in the culture supernatant (not shown) from accumulation of extracellular FFA in form of micelles. This is consistent to what was observed in other studies where similar strains were analyzed [5, 19].

Designing a dynamic substrate pathway for fatty alcohol production

In order to increase the yield of fatty alcohol production, our primary goal was to fine-tune the FFA to acyl-CoA conversion rates. This would allow FFA levels in the cell to be high enough for optimal conversion to fatty alcohols without reaching the excessive level that causes release of these precursors to the extracellular medium.

Furthermore, strategies explored so far focus on production of fatty alcohols either from acyl-CoA or from FFAs. Here, we explored the possibility of having a combined expression of both pathways that could benefit from high and balanced levels of both fatty acid pools. Production of fatty alcohols from FFAs through MmCAR + Adh5 has a higher potential to achieve high conversion rates compared to conversion from acyl-CoA, since FFAs can accumulate to much higher levels compared to -CoA metabolites [5, 1416]. On the other hand, the use of acyl-CoA prevents loss and diffusion of fatty acids to the extracellular medium and other subcellular compartments. Acyl-CoA also has the benefit of being the direct product of the fatty acid biosynthesis pathway, while FFAs are a product of lipid recycling with many intermediary steps and higher energy requirements.

We first used the previously described strain YZFOH1 already overexpressing MmCAR and ADH5 and additionally introduced a fatty acyl-CoA reductase gene (FaCoAR) from Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8 [13] expressed from a 2µ plasmid (pAOH9), resulting in strain YZFOH2. This strain would then be able to convert both acyl-CoA directly to fatty alcohols through FaCoAR, convert FFA to fatty aldehydes through MmCAR, and use both Adh5 and FaCoAR to convert fatty aldehydes to fatty alcohols.

While faa1Δ faa4Δ strains lack the ability to recycle FFAs back to acyl-CoA, wild type strains expressing both FAA1 and FAA4 have a too high acyl-CoA synthetase activity. Therefore, we needed strains that would have different expression patterns of fatty acyl-CoA synthetase so that FFA and acyl-CoA levels could be simultaneously balanced.

Faergeman et al. [20] showed that Faa1 can fully compensate for the loss of Faa4 activity, which means that expression of FAA1 is sufficient to restore the acyl-CoA activation and import activity lost by the deletion of the two genes.

In our strategy, we wanted to induce FAA1 expression at specific time points using different native promoters. This would allow us to study the effects of the regulation of FFA and acyl-CoA pools on the conversion of the two precursors to the final product. For that purpose, FAA1 was cloned on a CEN.ARS plasmid under the control of a copper-induced promoter (CUP1 promoter) so that expression could be enabled by the addition of Cu2+ to the culture medium at specific time points [22, 23]. In parallel, FAA1 was also put under control of a promoter induced by high glucose and repressed by low glucose concentrations (HXT1 promoter) and a promoter repressed by high glucose and induced by low glucose conditions (HXT7 promoter), respectively [24, 25]. As controls, an empty plasmid not expressing FAA1 (p413) and a plasmid with strong constitutive expression using the TEF1 promoter (pTEF1-FAA1) (Fig. 2) were used.
Fig. 2

Design of strain producing fatty alcohols from both fatty acyl-CoA and FFAs using dynamically controlled FAA1 expression. a Schematic representation of strain YZFOH2 (YJZ08 pAOH9) expressing FAA1 under different promoters. POX1, HFD1, FAA1 and FAA4 have been deleted in this strain and MmCAR, ADH5 and FaCoAR are overexpressed. b Schematic representation of the plasmids constructed for expression of FAA1. FAA1 is expressed from a CEN.ARS plasmid under the control of promoters CUP1p, TEF1p, HXT1p or HXT7p, represented as pX-FAA1 for pCUP1-FAA1, pTEF1-FAA1, pHXT1-FAA1 or pHXT7-FAA1, respectively. c Schematic representation of the plasmid expressing the enzymes for production of fatty alcohols. npgA, MmCAR, ADH5 and FaCoAR are expressed under strong constitutive promoters from a 2μ plasmid

Dynamic control of FAA1 expression using the copper-inducible promoter CUP1p

YZFOH2 strains expressing FAA1 under control of the TEF1 promoter (TEF1p-FAA1), CUP1 promoter (CUP1p-FAA1), or containing an empty plasmid (p413) were cultured for 72 h in minimal media with 2% glucose. Fatty alcohols, FFAs and OD were analyzed at 24, 48 and 72 h (Fig. 3a, b respectively).
Fig. 3

FFA and fatty alcohol production profiles using CUP1p-FAA1. Fatty alcohols (a) and FFA (b) produced by YZFOH2 expressing FAA1 under control of the CUP1 promoter, induced by adding Cu2+ at 24 h (CUP1-i24 h) or 48 h (CUP1-i48 h) and without addition of Cu2+. For comparison, the same strain without expression of FAA1 (p413) or with FAA1 being expressed under control of the TEF1 promoter were used. c Final fatty alcohol specific titers at 72 h normalized to the OD600 values. Also shown is the distribution of fatty alcohols in terms of chain length and saturation levels. Experiments were performed with biological triplicates. *p value <0.05, “NS” (not significant): p value >0.05 (student’s t test)

Strong constitutive expression of FAA1 under control of the TEF1 promoter yielded the lowest amount of FFA and fatty alcohols levels compared with the p413 control. After 72 h of culture, lack of expression of FAA1 led to production of tenfold more FFAs and around threefold more fatty alcohols compared to constitutive expression of this gene. Also, there was a significant increase in production of both FFAs and fatty alcohol after 24 h in the p413 control strain. The TEF1p-FAA1 strain on the other hand presented a much less steep increase and from the 48 h time point the FFA levels decreased even though fatty alcohol levels did not increase.

Through the use of a copper-inducible promoter CUP1p, we induced FAA1 expression at specific time points by adding 200 µM Cu2+ either at 24 or 48 h and compared it with a non-induced culture (no addition of Cu2+).

All CUP1p-FAA1 strains produced considerably lower levels of free fatty acids independent of induction time and did not show a decrease of FFA levels after the 48 h time point as it was observed in the TEF1p-FAA1 strain. The non-induced strain produced only 22.6% FFAs compared to the p413 control strain (empty plasmid). When induced at 24 and at 48 h, FFA production levels are 27.7 and 31.1%, respectively, compared with the p413 control strain.

Inducing expression of FAA1 at 48 h resulted in the highest fatty alcohol titer of 52 mg/L, which is approximately the same titer achieved by the non-induced strain, and higher than the control strain of 47.4 mg/L. Inducing expression of FAA1 at 48 h resulted in the highest specific fatty alcohol titers of 8.2 mg/L·OD, and while this is slightly higher than the control strain of 7.6 mg/L·OD, the difference between the two is not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, no turbidity resulting from FFA micelles was observed in the culture supernatant for TEF1p-FAA1 or any CUP1p-FAA1 strains, while presence of this was evident for the p413 control strain, indicating a very significant reduction in excreted FFAs.

These results suggest that presence of low Faa1 levels might be beneficial through most of the culture for balancing the fatty acid pools. However, it is clear that a strong induction of expression early in the process causes a too high flux towards conversion of FFA to acyl-CoA, therefore compromising pathway balance.

Dynamic regulation of FFA and acyl-CoA pools using glucose-regulated promoters

As an alternative strategy to copper-induced promoters, we sought to control FAA1 expression with glucose-responsive promoters, which allows syncing expression levels with growth phases and carbon source usage. For this purpose, we chose the hexose transporter gene promoters HXT1p and HXT7p. The promoter HXT1p is induced at high glucose concentration and repressed at low glucose concentration [24]. This means that in the HTX1p-FAA1 system Faa1 is produced during the initial high glucose phase of the batch culture (approximately the first 18 h, Fig. 1b), followed by a tight repression during the ethanol phase, which leads to very low levels of Faa1 present in the cytosol through most of the culture. On the other hand, HXT7p is induced under low glucose conditions, while being repressed at high glucose levels [25]. This way, FAA1 is only expressed in the end of the glucose phase when glucose levels are very low so that FFAs are converted to acyl-CoA mostly during the ethanol phase.

OD, fatty alcohol and FFA levels were analyzed at 24, 48 and 72 h for these strains (Fig. 4a, b respectively). Final FFA levels at 72 h showed a decrease by 63 and 87% for HXT1p-FAA1 and HXT7p-FAA1 strains, respectively. HXT7p-FAA1 showed a small decrease in FFA levels after 48 h, which is similar to TEF1p-FAA1, while in the HXT1p-FAA1 system, FFAs showed a linear increase throughout the culture. Fatty alcohol final titers in the HXT7p-FAA1 strain were only 61% of the p413 control strain while the HXT1p-FAA1 strain achieved a fatty alcohol titer of 43.6 mg/L, the same level as the p413 control strain. Furthermore, the specific fatty alcohol titer (production level per OD) of HXT1p-FAA1 was improved by 41% compared with the control strain (Fig. 4c), which suggests a higher cellular metabolic flux toward fatty alcohol biosynthesis.
Fig. 4

FFA and fatty alcohol production profiles using FAA1 expressed under control of promoters HXT1p or HXT7p. Fatty alcohol (a) and FFA titers (b) produced by YZFOH2 expressing FAA1 under control of the HXT1 or HXT7 promoters. For comparison, the same strain without expression of FAA1 (p413) or with FAA1 being expressed under control of the TEF1 promoter were used. c Final fatty alcohol titers at 72 h normalized to the total OD600 values. Also shown is the distribution of fatty alcohols in terms of chain length and saturation levels. **p value <0.005 (student’s t test)

Analysis of chain length and saturation level of formed fatty alcohols shows that increased expression levels of FAA1 decreased the percentage of C16:0 fatty alcohols produced and increased the percentage of unsaturated fatty alcohols C16:1 and C18:1. In addition, there was a 4.5-fold increase in decanol production exclusively in the HXT1-FAA1 strain (Table 3).
Table 3

Fatty alcohol distribution in strains expressing FAA1 under control of different promoters

% Total fatty alcohols










0.65 ± 0.11

8.25 ± 0.24

7.67 ± 0.47

54.62 ± 6.48

11.52 ± 1.43

14.74 ± 1.91

2.55 ± 0.33


3.50 ± 0.52

8.81 ± 1.20

10.81 ± 0.89

45.81 ± 1.73

11.37 ± 0.66

15.29 ± 1.70

4.40 ± 0.11


0.38 ± 0.04

3.62 ± 0.52

11.25 ± 0.76

38.08 ± 4.21

17.64 ± 2.05

22.98 ± 2.98

6.06 ± 0.77


0.64 ± 0.10

7.48 ± 1.23

14.05 ± 0.14

29.49 ± 3.35

21.48 ± 1.59

17.33 ± 2.24

9.54 ± 0.94

aExperiment is a result of biological triplicates, standard deviation is presented for each value

Since we observed a substantial decrease in measured FFAs while fatty alcohol levels were kept stable, we investigated the possibility of fatty acids being accumulated in other forms such as storage lipids or phospholipids. For that, we analyzed the total intracellular lipid content on these strains. Between the control strain p413 and TEF1p-FAA1, the lipid profile was radically changed. It is clear that expression of FAA1 led to a higher accumulation of storage and membrane lipids, since TEF1p-FAA1 showed a 45% increase in sterol esters, an 86% increase in triacylglycerols and at least a threefold increase in every form of phospholipid measured. The HXT7p-FAA1 system showed a lipid profile very close to TEF1p-FAA1, while the profile of HXT1p-FAA1 was very close to the control strain p413, with the exception of sterol esters, which in HXT1p-FAA1 was increased by 37% (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Growth kinetics for the strains p413, TEF1p-FAA, HXT1p-FAA1 and CUP1p-FAA1 (not induced by CuSO4) were also studied by measuring OD600 values at several timepoints over 72 h. Growth rates on glucose ranged from 0.16 h−1 for HXT1p-FAA1 to 0.19 h−1 for TEF1p-FAA1 but with no statistically significant difference (p value >0.05 for t test analysis) between p413 control and any other strain. Final OD600 values at 72 h for HXT1p-FAA1 were of 4.9, which is lower than the values reached by the other strains (6.3 for p413 strain, 5.7 for TEF1p-FAA1, 7.3 for CUP1p-FAA1) (Additional file 1: Figure S3).


Metabolic balancing is essential for production of target molecules with high yield. In this study, metabolic profiling of a fatty alcohol producing strain YZFOH1 (Fig. 1) suggested a limitation in fatty alcohol production and accumulation of fatty acids during the course of the batch culture. The limitation in conversion of FFAs to fatty alcohols results in secretion of FFA to the culture medium, causing loss of precursors needed for fatty alcohol biosynthesis and consequential loss of yield.

We thus engineered fatty alcohol-producing strains using dynamically controlled expression of the fatty acyl-CoA synthetase gene FAA1 in order to balance the levels of FFAs and acyl-CoA in the cell. This allowed us not only to optimize the intracellular fatty acid levels for conversion to the desired product, but also to explore a potential additive or synergistic effect of using both acyl-CoA and FFA-consuming pathways for fatty alcohol production.

Controlling expression of FAA1 using the CUP1 promoter with different induction times resulted in FFA production levels approximately between 20 and 30% of the levels measured for the control strain. On the cases of late induction at 48 h and using only basal expression levels the final fatty alcohol titers were increased by approximately 10% (Fig. 3). On the other hand, early expression of FAA1 was detrimental to the final fatty alcohol titers and yield. A similar effect could be observed by expressing FAA1 under control of a HXT1 promoter, where FFA levels were drastically reduced while fatty alcohol levels per biomass were improved. The CUP1 promoter has been previously characterized and in a single-copy plasmid it is known to have basal expression levels up to 7% (based on enzyme activity level) compared to induction with 100 µM Cu2+ [22, 23]. Furthermore, the minimal culture medium used in this study contains approximately 6 µM Cu2+, therefore contributing to a moderate expression level of FAA1 on the non-induced culture. These results suggest that constitutive basal expression levels of the CUP1 promoter in our culture conditions produced enough enzyme to regulate the acyl-CoA/FFA levels in a favourable way. The later (48 h) induced expression or not-induced expression of FAA1 resulted in much higher fatty alcohol production compared to the earlier induction (24 h) (Fig. 3c), which suggested that sustained high expression of FAA1 created a too high flux of FFA conversion to acyl-CoA, reducing FFA supply for fatty alcohol biosynthesis. This was corroborated when FAA1 was expressed under control of the HXT7 promoter. Although main expression of HXT7 promoter occurs only at the end of the glucose phase, basal expression levels are quite high when compared with HXT1p [24, 25], which creates a phenotype much closer to TEF1p-FAA1.

Overall interpretation of the results indicates that TEF1p-FAA1, HXT7p-FAA1 and early induced CUP1p-FAA1 express high levels of FAA1. High levels of FAA1 expression created a high flux of FFA towards acyl-CoA formation, which lowered FFA availability for fatty alcohol production through MmCAR. Although this could promote higher flux through FaCoAR due to a higher substrate supply, it is generally accepted that acyl-CoA cannot be accumulated in high concentrations due to limited -CoA availability in the cell. Additionally, an increase of acyl-CoA levels in yeast has been previously shown to be related with feedback inhibition of fatty acid biosynthesis at the level of the acyl-CoA carboxylase Acc1 [26], and therefore having a negative effect on fatty acid and fatty acid-derived chemicals production. Furthermore, in contrast to FFAs, acyl-CoA is consumed in many competing reactions, which can be demonstrated by the increased levels of certain storage and phospholipids in those strains with higher FAA1 expression.

The HXT1 promoter, on the other hand, allows for expression of FAA1 in high glucose conditions, which is the case during the very early stage of the batch culture, not longer than 15 h of culture. From that point on, HXT1p presumably keeps the expression level of FAA1 low, which apparently represents a favourable flux balance to maintain the acyl-CoA/FFA pools for efficient conversion of these metabolites into fatty alcohols.

When the distribution of produced fatty alcohols was analyzed in the resulting strains, it was possible to observe a shift in saturation levels and chain length related to the promoter strength expressing FAA1. By respective order, HXT1p-FAA1, HXT7p-FAA1 and TEF1p-FAA1 strains showed a higher ratio of C16:1/C16:0 and C18:1/C18:0 as well as a higher percentage of C14 fatty alcohols compared with the control strain p413 (Table 3). This is probably a result of Faa1 specificity, since most enzymes have higher affinity towards specific fatty acid chain lengths and saturation levels. Affinity of Faa1 towards different fatty acids would change the balance of corresponding acyl-CoA/FFA for those fatty acids in question and therefore influence the final product distribution. This is a valuable tool if production of a specific fatty alcohol is desired.

Furthermore, variations on FAA1 expression levels seem to have a minimal impact on growth kinetics. A small decrease in OD600 at 72 h was observed for HXT1-FAA1, but not for CUP1-FAA1. Since HXT1-FAA1 shows a higher level of accumulated FFA at 72 h compared to CUP1-FAA1 and nearly identical fatty alcohol titers, the growth defect might suggest a certain toxicity from high FFA levels during stationary phase when FAA1 is present at a minimal level.

Together, our set of experiments indicates a need for tight regulation of FAA1 expression in order to achieve an optimal balance of acyl-CoA and FFAs for fatty acid production from a combined use of our two pathways. We see a favourable effect in using very low levels of FAA1 expression, which can be hard to achieve using native promoters whose activity may be influenced by many factors. Here, the use of technologies that allow for a more predictable and fine-tuned expression such as synthetic promoters [27, 28], CRISPRi [29, 30] and acyl-CoA biosensors [31] for dynamic gene expression could be beneficial for future optimisation on similar systems.

Nevertheless, our final strain represents an improvement over the original one due to the capacity of being able to produce fatty alcohols in similar or slightly improved final titers but with better product-to-biomass yield and without high production of FFA by-products. Further improvement of these strains for increased performance is now possible since precursor accumulation is not an issue that compromises yield.


In this work, we exemplified how one can address the arising problem of unbalanced fluxes in a synthetic pathway. We addressed a situation where kinetics of downstream steps is a limiting factor on the product formation, which leads to accumulation and loss of precursors to the extracellular medium, compromising final yields where these are a fundamental aspect of the process. In many cases accumulated precursors might end up as by-products that comprise the entire production process or represent a major carbon loss. In this aspect, pathway fine-tuning is a fundamental asset for applicability of existing pathway prototypes in microbial cell factories that must find its place in the design process.

On the other hand, the work also provides general knowledge for the development of cell factories for fatty acid-derived products. Fatty acid recycling and regulation of FFA/acyl-CoA interconversion is a central aspect, which is not completely understood and our analysis provide new insight into how fluxes are controlled in this pathway.


Author’s contributions

PGT designed the study, performed experiments, evaluated results and wrote the manuscript. RF performed experiments and assisted in designing the study, evaluating results and writing the manuscript. YJZ, VS and JN took part in designing the study, evaluating the results and writing the manuscript. This manuscript has been approved by all the authors listed. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


We would like to acknowledge Jiufu Qin for valuable input and ideas on experimental design and the Chalmers Mass Spectrometry Infrastructure (CMSI) for assisting with the analytic procedures.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All generated data is available in the manuscript or additional files. If required, data and material are available upon request to the authors.


The authors would like to acknowledge the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Vetenskapsrådet for funding support.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biology and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Chalmers University of Technology
Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark


  1. Nielsen J, Keasling JD. Engineering cellular metabolism. Cell. 2016;164:1185–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Krivoruchko A, Zhang Y, Siewers V, Chen Y, Nielsen J. Microbial acetyl-CoA metabolism and metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 2015;28:28–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Runguphan W, Keasling JD. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of fatty acid-derived biofuels and chemicals. Metab Eng. 2014;21:103–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhou YJ, Buijs NA, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Fatty acid-derived biofuels and chemicals production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2014;2:32.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhou YJ, Buijs NA, Zhu Z, Qin J, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Production of fatty acid-derived oleochemicals and biofuels by synthetic yeast cell factories. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11709.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhou YJ, Buijs NA, Zhu Z, Gómez DO, Boonsombuti A, Siewers V, et al. Harnessing yeast peroxisomes for biosynthesis of fatty-acid-derived biofuels and chemicals with relieved side-pathway competition. Soc: J Am Chem; 2016.Google Scholar
  7. Nakayama S, Morita T, Negishi H, Ikegami T, Sakaki K, Kitamoto D. Candida krusei produces ethanol without production of succinic acid; a potential advantage for ethanol recovery by pervaporation membrane separation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:706–14.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Balzer GJ, Thakker C, Bennett GN, San K-Y. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli to minimize byproduct formate and improving succinate productivity through increasing NADH availability by heterologous expression of NAD(+)-dependent formate dehydrogenase. Metab Eng. 2013;20:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim TY, Park JM, Kim HU, Cho KM, Lee SY. Design of homo-organic acid producing strains using multi-objective optimization. Metab Eng. 2015;28:63–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Reiser S, Somerville C. Isolation of mutants of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus deficient in wax ester synthesis and complementation of one mutation with a gene encoding a fatty acyl coenzyme A reductase. J Bacteriol. 1997;179:2969–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Akhtar MK, Turner NJ, Jones PR. Carboxylic acid reductase is a versatile enzyme for the conversion of fatty acids into fuels and chemical commodities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:87–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Buijs NA, Zhou YJ, Siewers V, Nielsen J. Long-chain alkane production by the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:1275–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Willis RM, Wahlen BD, Seefeldt LC, Barney BM. Characterization of a fatty acyl-CoA reductase from Marinobacter aquaeolei VT8: a bacterial enzyme catalyzing the reduction of fatty acyl-CoA to fatty alcohol. Biochemistry. 2011;50:10550–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng X, Lian J, Zhao H. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to improve 1-hexadecanol production. Metab Eng. 2015;27:10–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Tang X, Chen WN. Enhanced production of fatty alcohols by engineering the TAGs synthesis pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2015;112:386–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Schjerling CK, Hummel R, Hansen JK, Borsting C, Mikkelsen JM, Kristiansen K, et al. Disruption of the gene encoding the acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACB1) perturbs acyl-CoA metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:22514–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Black PN, DiRusso CC. Yeast acyl-CoA synthetases at the crossroads of fatty acid metabolism and regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1771:286–98.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Scharnewski M, Pongdontri P, Mora G, Hoppert M, Fulda M. Mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae deficient in acyl-CoA synthetases secrete fatty acids due to interrupted fatty acid recycling. FEBS J. 2008;275:2765–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Leber C, Polson B, Fernandez-Moya R, Da Silva NA. Overproduction and secretion of free fatty acids through disrupted neutral lipid recycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2015;28:54–62.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Faergeman NJ, Black PN, Zhao XD, Knudsen J, DiRusso CC. The Acyl-CoA synthetases encoded within FAA1 and FAA4 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function as components of the fatty acid transport system linking import, activation, and intracellular utilization. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:37051–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Knoll LJ, Johnson DR, Gordon JI. Complementation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains containing fatty acid activation gene (FAA) deletions with a mammalian acyl-CoA synthetase. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:10861–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Gorman JA, Clark PE, Lee MC, Debouck C, Rosenberg M. Regulation of the yeast metallothionein gene. Gene. 1986;48:13–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Butt TR, Sternberg EJ, Gorman JA, Clark P, Hamer D, Rosenberg M, et al. Copper metallothionein of yeast, structure of the gene, and regulation of expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1984;81:3332–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Özcan S, Johnston M. Function and regulation of yeast hexose transporters. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:554–69.Google Scholar
  25. Ye L, Berden JA, van Dam K, Kruckeberg AL. Expression and activity of the Hxt7 high-affinity hexose transporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 2001;18:1257–67.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Faergeman NJ, Knudsen J. Role of long-chain fatty acyl-CoA esters in the regulation of metabolism and in cell signalling. Biochem J. 1997;323(Pt 1):1–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Rajkumar AS, Liu G, Bergenholm D, Arsovska D, Kristensen M, Nielsen J, et al. Engineering of synthetic, stress-responsive yeast promoters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:e136.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Redden H, Alper HS. The development and characterization of synthetic minimal yeast promoters. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7810.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith JD, Suresh S, Schlecht U, Wu M, Wagih O, Peltz G, et al. Quantitative CRISPR interference screens in yeast identify chemical-genetic interactions and new rules for guide RNA design. Genome Biol. 2016;17:45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Larson MH, Gilbert LA, Wang X, Lim WA, Weissman JS, Qi LS. CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:2180–96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang F, Carothers JM, Keasling JD. Design of a dynamic sensor-regulator system for production of chemicals and fuels derived from fatty acids. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:354–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, Van Dijken JP. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast. 1992;8:501–17.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Khoomrung S, Chumnanpuen P, Jansa-Ard S, Ståhlman M, Nookaew I, Borén J, et al. Rapid quantification of yeast lipid using microwave-assisted total lipid extraction and HPLC-CAD. Anal Chem. 2013;85:4912–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Haushalter RW, Kim W, Chavkin TA, The L, Garber ME, Nhan M, et al. Production of anteiso-branched fatty acids in Escherichia coli; next generation biofuels with improved cold-flow properties. Metab Eng. 2014;26:111–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar


© The Author(s) 2017