A comparative summary of expression systems for the recombinant production of galactose oxidase
© Spadiut et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 2 July 2010
Accepted: 13 September 2010
Published: 13 September 2010
The microbes Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris are convenient prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts, respectively, for the recombinant production of proteins at laboratory scales. A comparative study was performed to evaluate a range of constructs and process parameters for the heterologous intra- and extracellular expression of genes encoding the industrially relevant enzyme galactose 6-oxidase (EC 18.104.22.168) from the fungus Fusarium graminearum. In particular, the wild-type galox gene from F. graminearum, an optimized variant for E. coli and a codon-optimized gene for P. pastoris were expressed without the native pro-sequence, but with a His-tag either at the N- or the C-terminus of the enzyme.
The intracellular expression of a codon-optimized gene with an N-terminal His10-tag in E. coli, using the pET16b+ vector and BL21DE3 cells, resulted in a volumetric productivity of 180 U·L-1·h-1. The intracellular expression of the wild-type gene from F. graminearum, using the pPIC3.5 vector and the P. pastoris strain GS115, was poor, resulting in a volumetric productivity of 120 U·L-1·h-1. Furthermore, this system did not tolerate an N-terminal His10-tag, thus rendering isolation of the enzyme from the complicated mixture difficult. The highest volumetric productivity (610 U·L-1·h-1) was achieved when the wild-type gene from F. graminearum was expressed extracellularly in the P. pastoris strain SMD1168H using the pPICZα-system. A C-terminal His6-tag did not significantly affect the production of the enzyme, thus enabling simple purification by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography. Notably, codon-optimisation of the galox gene for expression in P. pastoris did not result in a higher product yield (g protein·L-1 culture). Effective activation of the enzyme to generate the active-site radical copper complex could be equally well achieved by addition of CuSO4 directly in the culture medium or post-harvest.
The results indicate that intracellular production in E. coli and extracellular production in P. pastoris comprise a complementary pair of systems for the production of GalOx. The prokaryotic host is favored for high-throughput screening, for example in the development of improved enzymes, while the yeast system is ideal for production scale-up for enzyme applications.
Galactose 6-oxidase (GalOx; D-galactose:oxygen 6-oxidoreductase; EC 22.214.171.124) is a monomeric, free radical copper oxidase that oxidizes a range of primary alcohols to aldehydes, especially the C6 hydroxyl group of galactose . GalOx is naturally secreted by a number of filamentous fungi, most prominently Fusarium spp. [2, 3], with the GalOx from F. graminearum being perhaps the most well-studied representative [4–7]. Due to a particularly high selectivity for galactose and galactose-containing oligo- and polysaccharides, GalOx has been harnessed for a diversity of biotechnological applications. GalOx has been successfully applied in biosensors to measure the lactose concentration in dairy products [8, 9] and the presence of glycoproteins in biomaterials . It has also been used in chemical synthesis and various diagnostic applications in medicine [11, 12]. Oxidation of galactosylated polysaccharides, in particular galactomannans and xyloglucans from plant seeds, has been employed for multivalent functionalization of these biopolymers [13–15]. The resulting aldehyde derivatives can be used directly e.g. as strength additives in the paper industry [14, 16], oxidized to carboxylic acids  or further derivatized to install chemical functional groups .
For fundamental studies and applications, the GalOx from F. graminearum has been recombinantly produced in a range of microbial hosts, including Escherichia coli [17, 18], Pichia pastoris [5, 14, 19] and Aspergillus nidulans . The factors dictating the choice of expression host are manifold, including growth rate, complexity of growth medium and handling, ease of transformation, potential for post-translational protein modification, ease of harvest, extent of endogenous contaminants, overall productivity, etc. In this context, Escherichia coli and Pichia pastoris have become the pre-eminent pro- and eukaryotic microbial hosts, respectively, for routine laboratory use. Despite individual reports of the successful use of E. coli and P. pastoris for GalOx production, a direct, practical comparison has not been performed thus far. In the present study, we have therefore explored a variety of codon-optimized and affinity-tagged variants of the galox gene from F. graminearum for the recombinant production of the enzyme in these hosts. This study highlights the advantages and limitations of particular gene construct-host systems, with respect to their suitability for high-throughput screening and up-scaling for enzyme applications.
Materials and methods
Genes and vectors
The nucleotide and amino acid sequences of all constructs used in the present study, omitting both the pro-peptide sequence and the native signal peptide, are available in Additional File 1 (Figures S1-S12).
All cloning steps were performed using standard molecular biology techniques. A list of the oligonucleotide primers used is given in Table S1 (Additional File 1). Correct insertion of the GalOx-encoding genes and the absence of mutations were checked by DNA sequencing using the primers T7fwd and T7rev for the E. coli constructs or 5'AOX1 and 3'AOX1 for the P. pastoris constructs, respectively (Table S1, Additional File 1). Nucleotides, buffers and enzymes were purchased from Fermentas (Stockholm, Sweden).
Expression in E. coli
The wild-type galox gene from Fusarium graminearum (wtgalox) and a variant optimized for the expression in E. coli (M1galox) were generously provided by Prof. Nicholas Turner (University of Manchester, UK). The M1 variant differs from the wild-type in 5 amino acid substitutions (S10P, M70V, G195E, V494A, N535D), which have shown beneficial effects on the expression level and the stability of GalOx in E. coli [17, 18]. The two genes, coding only for the mature GalOx protein, were cloned into a pET16b+ vector (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) with an N-terminal His10-tag and an IPTG-inducible T7 promoter for the intracellular expression in E. coli .
Expression in P. pastoris
To test the intracellular expression in P. pastoris, both galox genes were cloned into the pPIC3.5 vector (Invitrogen, CA, USA) using the restriction sites Avr II and Not I. For extracellular expression the genes were cloned into the pPICZα-C vector (Invitrogen), providing the α-factor signal sequence for secretion, using the restriction sites Not I and Xba I. For all these constructs, integration of the galox gene occurred at the AOX1 locus in the genome of P. pastoris. To check the effect of a His-tag on the expression level and the activity of GalOx, different constructs were prepared either with or without an N-terminal His10-tag following the α-factor secretion signal peptide. A galox gene codon-optimized for the expression in the yeast P. pastoris (Additional File 1, Figure S13), was synthesized (GenScript, NJ, USA) and cloned into the pPICZα-C vector with or without a C-terminal His6-tag using the restriction sites Not I and Xba I. The optimization parameters were determined according to the OptimumGene™ algorithm (GenScript, NJ, USA) taking into account the e.g. codon usage bias, GC content, mRNA secondary structures and RNA instability motifs.
Media and strains
Expression hosts, galox genes and vectors used in this study
galox Gene construct
E. coli FNI
E. coli BL21DE3a
E. coli ENI
P. pastoris FxI
P. pastoris GS115b
P. pastoris ExI
P. pastoris FNI
P. pastoris ENI
P. pastoris FxE
P. pastoris SMD1168Hc
P. pastoris ExE
P. pastoris FNE
P. pastoris ENE
P. pastoris PxE
P. pastoris PCE
For propagation of the different constructs, E. coli cells were cultivated in LB-medium (yeast extract 5 g·L-1; tryptone 10 g·L-1; NaCl 10 g·L-1; pH 7.5) or Low Salt LB-medium (yeast extract 5 g·L-1; tryptone 10 g·L-1; NaCl 5 g·L-1; pH 7.5) under appropriate selective conditions (ampicillin or zeocin was added to a final concentration of 0.1 g·L-1 or 0.025 g·L-1, respectively) according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen). Expression studies in E. coli were performed in TBamp-medium (yeast extract 24 g·L-1; peptone from casein 12 g·L-1; glycerol 4 mL·L-1; KH2PO4-buffer 1 M, pH 7.5; ampicillin 0.1 g·L-1).
P. pastoris clones were propagated in YPD medium (yeast extract 10 g·L-1; peptone 20 g·L-1; dextrose 10 g·L-1) under appropriate selective conditions. After transformation of the P. pastoris strain GS115 with linearized pPIC3.5/galox constructs, cells were spread on RDBamp (Regeneration Dextrose Base) plates and incubated at 30°C for 48 h. SMD1168H cells were transformed with linearized pPICZα-C/galox constructs and grown on YPDSzeocin plates at 30°C for 48 h. Expression experiments were performed using Buffered Glycerol-Complex Medium (BMGY) and Buffered Methanol-Complex Medium (BMMY). All media were prepared according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen).
Screening for His+Mut+ or His+MutS variants in GS115
Correctly sequenced pPIC3.5/galox constructs were linearized with Sac I and transformed into the P. pastoris strain GS115, resulting in His+Mut+ transformants. To guarantee the correct insertion in the genomic DNA, 10 colonies of each transformation were tested for phenotype and growth on Minimal Methanol (MM) and Minimal Dextrose (MD) plates according to the manufacturer's protocol (Invitrogen).
Colony screening for highly-expressing P. pastoris transformants
To test the expression level in P. pastoris and to find a highly-expressing clone, 5 colonies of each transformation were picked and small-scale expression trials were performed. Typically (in ca. 10 independent transformations), best levels of activity were observed in two of five clones, and very high producing outliers were not observed. Transformants were precultured in 25 mL BMGY at 30°C and 220 rpm overnight. The following day, an appropriate amount of preculture was sampled, cells were spun down and diluted in 10 mL BMMY to a final OD600 of 1.0. Cultures were grown in 50 mL Falcon tubes at 25°C and 220 rpm for 120 h and methanol (MeOH) was reconstituted to a final concentration of 0.5% every day. Samples were taken periodically and analyzed for protein content and enzymatic activity and aliquots were loaded onto SDS-PAGE gels.
Shake-flask cultivation of GalOx in E.coli BL21DE3
Cultures (1 liter) of E. coli BL21DE3 transformants were grown in TBamp medium in baffled flasks at 37°C and 220 rpm. Protein expression was induced at an OD600 of ~0.5 by adding IPTG to a final concentration of 0.5 mM. After incubation at 25°C for further 20 h, approximately 15 g of wet biomass per liter were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 15 min and 4°C, and resuspended in Buffer A (NaH2PO4 50 mM; NaCl 500 mM; imidazole 20 mM; pH 7.5) containing the protease inhibitor PMSF (0.1% w/v). After disruption in a French Press (1200 psi) the crude cell extract was separated from cell debris by centrifugation (70,400×g, 4°C) and used for protein purification by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) with a 10 mL Ni-charged Sepharose 6 Fast Flow Resin (GE Healthcare; Uppsala, Sweden). Before the sample was loaded, the column was equilibrated with 10 column volumes (CV) of buffer A. After the protein sample was applied to the column, it was washed with 3 CV of the same buffer, before proteins were eluted with a linear gradient (0-1 M imidazole) of 5 CV Buffer B (NaH2PO4 50 mM; NaCl 500 mM; imidazole 1 M; pH 7.5). Active fractions were combined and imidazole was removed by ultrafiltration using an Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filter Device (Millipore; Billerica, MA, USA) with a 10-kDa cut-off membrane. The concentrated enzymes were washed 3 times with 10 mL of NaH2PO4-buffer (100 mM, pH 7.5) and finally diluted in the same buffer to a total protein concentration of 2-3 mg·mL-1.
Intracellular and extracellular large scale expression of GalOx in P. pastoris
Highly-expressing P. pastoris transformants were precultured in 250 mL BMGY in 2 L baffled flasks at 30°C overnight. The next day, OD600 was measured, an appropriate amount of culture was sampled, cells were spun down and diluted in 1 liter BMMY to an initial OD600 of 1.0. Cultures were grown in special 2.5 L baffled flasks (Tunair; Sigma-Aldrich; Stockholm, Sweden) at 25°C and 220 rpm up to 216 h. To optimize the expression of active GalOx, different constructs with either a N-terminal, a C-terminal or no His-tag and different temperatures (25°C and 30°C) during cultivation were tested. In addition, the expression of correctly folded enzyme was tested in the presence of copper (II) ions (as CuSO4), which is required for the activation of GalOx [5, 19, 21], at a concentration of 0.5 or 1.0 mM in the medium.
To obtain the intracellularly expressed GalOx, P. pastoris cells were were harvested by centrifugation (4,000×g, 4°C, 15 min) and resuspended in sodium phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.5) containing the complete-mini EDTA-free protease inhibitor (1 tablet per 10 mL buffer; Roche; Basel, CH). P. pastoris cells were disrupted in a French Press (1200 psi) and cell debris was separated by subsequent centrifugation (70,400×g, 4°C, 30 min).
Analysis of expression- and growth-parameters
Samples were taken in appropriate time intervals during cultivations and analyzed for optical density at 600 nm (OD600), dry cell weight (DCW) and concentration of expressed protein and enzymatic activity. To determine the DCW, 1 mL samples were taken, biomass was harvested in a previously dried and pre-weighed tube by centrifugation (4000 rpm, 5 min), supernatants were discarded, cells were washed twice with ultrapure H2O and then dried at 65°C to a constant weight. To evaluate the process conditions, the volumetric productivity (enzyme activity units per liter culture per hour of cultivation, U· L-1·h-1) and the product yield (expressed as the mass of protein produced per mass of DCW, g·g-1) were determined.
Enzyme activity assay
GalOx activity was measured with the standard chromogenic ABTS [2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid)] assay . A sample of diluted enzyme (10 μL) was added to 990 μL of assay buffer containing horseradish peroxidase (142 U), ABTS (14.7 mg), NaH2PO4-buffer (100 mM, pH 7.5) and D-galactose (300 mM). The absorbance change at 420 nm (ε420 = 42.3 mM-1 cm-1) was recorded at 30°C for 180 s. One Unit of GalOx activity was defined as the amount of enzyme necessary for the oxidation of 2 μmol of ABTS per min, corresponding to the consumption of 1 μmol of O2 per min. Protein concentrations were determined at 595 nm by the Bradford assay  using the BioRad Protein Assay Kit with BSA as standard.
Posttranslational processing of GalOx
The native GalOx enzyme is expressed as a precursor peptide with an additional 17-amino acid pro-sequence, lacking the thioether bond between Tyr272 and Cys228. In this study, GalOx was heterologously expressed in different hosts without the pro-sequence at the N-terminus. To find the optimal conditions for post-translational activation, different amounts of CuSO4 were added either to the concentrated enzyme preparations or directly into the cultivation media. After incubation, excess copper was removed by gel filtration using PD10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare), and enzymes were tested for catalytic activity and protein content and analyzed on SDS-PAGE gels.
To test if the stored enzyme preparations could be further activated by the additional incubation with an oxidizing agent [5, 14, 17, 23, 24], various experiments with K3Fe(CN)6 and CuSO4 were performed. Aliquots of GalOx were incubated with either 5 mM, 50 mM and 100 mM K3Fe(CN)6 or with additional 0.5 mM CuSO4 on ice for either 10 min, 1 hour or overnight. After removal of the excessive oxidizing agent by gel filtration using PD10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare), catalytic activity with D-galactose (300 mM) and the protein content were measured.
To check the purity of the enzyme preparations and the correct formation of the radical Tyr-Cys cofactor , SDS-PAGE analysis was done. The heterologously expressed GalOx in this study can run as 2 distinct bands on an SDS-PAGE gel: at 65.5 kDa (mature GalOx containing the thioether bond) and at 68.6 kDa (mature GalOx lacking the thioether bond). SDS-PAGE was performed using precast 10% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) and 1x MOPS-buffer (MOPS 10.46 g·L-1; EDTA 0.3 g·L-1; TrisBase 6.06 g·L-1; SDS 1.0 g·L-1; pH 7.7). Gels were run in the Novex MiniCell (Invitrogen) at 150 V for about 2 h. The protein mass standard used was the SeeBlue Plus 2 prestained standard (Invitrogen). Gels were stained with Coomassie blue.
To perform Western blotting analysis, an SDS-PAGE gel was run with 10 μL-aliquots of a GalOx expressed with a C-terminal His6-tag (2 mg·mL-1; pure and 1:10 dilution). Proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Scheichler & Schuell Protran BA83 0.2 μM) using Towbin buffer  and a Trans-Blot apparatus (Biorad; Sundbyberg, Sweden). The transfer was carried out at 40 V overnight under gentle stirring at 4°C. The membrane was blocked in 1xTris-buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST; 100 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, 0,1% Tween 20) supplemented with 5% BSA at room temperature for 2 hours and then incubated with a 1:5000 dilution (v/v) of an anti His6 antibody conjugated to horse radish peroxidase (Pierce, Biocompare; CA, USA) at room temperature with gentle rocking for another 2 hours. The membrane was extensively washed in TBST and then revealed using the ECL kit (Amersham; Uppsala, Sweden). The images were acquired with a GelDoc camera (Biorad) using the chemiluminescence filter.
Storage stability of GalOx preparations from P. pastoris
To find the best conditions to store the large amounts of GalOx produced in P. pastoris for an extended period of time, different conditions were tested. Enzyme solution was aliquoted in 500 L portions and either stored at 4°C, snap-frozen in liquid N2 and stored at -80°C or lyophilized and stored at -20°C. After different time intervals samples were thawed on ice and catalytic activity and protein content were measured. Storage at 4°C was tested for 4 weeks, and samples were analyzed every day. Lyophilized samples were resuspended in the same amount of buffer (500 μL) and the activity at a substrate concentration of 300 mM D-galactose were determined and the protein content were compared to the values before lyophilisation.
Results and Discussion
In this study, different strategies for the recombinant production of GalOx were compared to systematically explore the advantages and potential drawbacks of each system. An overview of the strain names, the GalOx gene constructs, expression vectors, and host organisms is given in Table 1.
F. graminearum GalOx is naturally produced as a pre-pro-enzyme containing a 17 amino acid N-terminal sequence that is cleaved to yield the "immature" form of the enzyme. A previous study suggested that the pro-sequence was required as an intramolecular chaperone for copper binding and cofactor formation . In contrast, however, fully active GalOx has been successfully produced in a number of cases by aerobic addition of copper (II) to versions of GalOx lacking this pro-sequence [5, 19, 21]. Additionally, Pichia pastoris is not able to efficiently process the native signal sequence . Thus, all gene constructs in this study were designed to omit both the pro-peptide sequence and the native signal peptide (see Additional File 1, Figure S1-S12).
Intracellular expression of GalOx in E. coli
To quantify the expression of active GalOx from F. graminearum in the prokaryotic host E. coli, 2 genes, the wild-type galox gene (wtgalox) and the optimized variant M1 (M1galox), were cloned into a pET16b+ vector and transformed into the E. coli strain BL21DE3 to give E. coli FNI and E. coli ENI, respectively (Table 1). The optimized gene M1 differs in 5 amino acid substitutions (see Additional File 1), which have been reported to result in a higher expression yield and increased stability of the fungal enzyme in E. coli [17, 18]. In these studies, a higher expression of GalOx in E. coli was desired for high-throughput screening in the context of directed evolution studies for altering the substrate specificity of this enzyme [17, 18]. However, a detailed analysis and explicit comparison of the expression levels of these 2 genes in E. coli has not been performed previously.
Both the wild-type and M1-variant genes used in this study encoded the mature GalOx protein, in which the native signal sequence and the pro-sequence were replaced with an N-terminal His10-tag. Following successful expression of both constructs in E. coli and cell disruption in a French Press, GalOx was purified from the crude extracts using IMAC. The resulting purification factor was 93.8 for the wild-type enzyme and 109.0 for the optimized variant M1. The expression level of the optimized gene was 10-fold higher than that of wtgalox (4.1 mg·mL-1and 0.4 mg·mL-1were obtained, respectively). Likewise, the specific activity of the purified M1 product was higher by a factor of 2.4 (24 U·mg-1 versus 10 U·mg-1 for wtgalox), prior to further activation with copper (II) ions.
Clearly, GalOx proteins lacking the pro-sequence can be successfully processed post-purification by the addition of 0.5 mM CuSO4 under aerobic conditions to yield the catalytically active, mature species. Using this strategy, after 20 h of expression at 25°C, 3600 U·L-1 active GalOxM1 could be obtained, resulting in a volumetric productivity of 180 U·L-1·h-1 for this expression system under these conditions. This expression level of the fungal enzyme GalOx in the prokaryotic host E. coli thus forms a platform for directed evolution studies of this enzyme [17, 18], where a rapid, easily implemented expression system is advantageous.
Intracellular expression of GalOx in P. pastoris
The methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris has become one of the leading eukaryotic expression systems for general laboratory use due to its ease of cultivation and the availability of a range of commercially available expression vectors [27, 28]. Indeed, strain and vector systems have been developed, which allow both intra- and extracellular protein production under the control of various promoters, the most common being the methanol-induced alcohol oxidase 1 (AOX1) promoter .
Volumetric activity of GalOx expressed intracellularly in P. pastori s
120 h c
P. pastoris FxI
P. pastoris ExI
P. pastoris FNI
P. pastoris ENI
The expression of the wtgalox gene from the fungus F. graminearum in the yeast P. pastoris was slightly better than the M1galox gene, which had been optimized for the expression in E. coli (Table 2). The incubation with 0.5 mM CuSO4 efficiently activated the GalOx enzyme in the crude extracts and resulted in an increase of activity up to 15-fold, with lower degrees of activation observed in variants bearing a N-terminal His10-tag. The wtgalox gene yielded the highest amount of expressed, active GalOx enzyme and a volumetric productivity of 120 U·L-1·h-1. Notably, the presence of an N-terminal His10-tag on both the wild-type and M1 variants severely suppressed the yield of enzyme obtained in cultivations (Table 2).
As shown in Figure 3B, bands at 65 kDa, corresponding to the mature GalOx enzyme containing the Tyr-Cys cofactor, but also bands at 68 kDa, possibly corresponding to the pre-mature GalOx lacking the radical cofactor in the active site [5, 24], could be detected. However, incubation with up to 2.0 mM CuSO4 did not result in an increased amount of active GalOx, but rather in a decrease in protein content after the incubation because of protein denaturation. As a consequence of the intracellular production, many other proteins were detected in the crude extracts (Figure 3B), which could also influence the copper-activation of GalOx and further complicate subsequent purification in the absence of an affinity tag. Generally speaking, the lower volumetric productivity of the intracellular P. pastoris system indicates that this system is not competitive with intracellular expression in E. coli.
Extracellular expression of GalOx in P. pastoris
One of the key advantages of P. pastoris for recombinant protein production lies in the ability of this yeast to secrete proteins to the culture medium under the agency of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae α-factor secretion signal peptide [27, 30]. P. pastoris in general secretes low levels of endogenous proteins, and the SMD1168H strain in particular has low detrimental protease activity, thus facilitating the recovery and downstream processing of reasonably pure crude extracts. For comparison with the E. coli and P. pastoris intracellular production systems, the expression of the wild-type, M1 (E. coli optimized) and P. pastoris codon-optimized variant of galox was examined in combination with various His affinity tag strategies (Table 1).
Effect of N-terminal His10-tag on expression of wtgalox and M1galox
The wtgalox gene and the optimized variant M1galox were cloned into the pPICZα-C vector with or without an N-terminal His10-tag and transformed into the P. pastoris strain SMD1168H to give P. pastoris strains FNE, ENE, FxE and ExE (Table 1). After colony screening, clones with the highest expression level of GalOx were cultivated in shake-flask cultivations (1 L) at 25°C for 120 h and analyzed periodically. After determining the optimal amount of CuSO4 for activation (data not shown, similar to Figure 2), enzymatic activity was measured in the crude extracts before and after incubation with 0.5 mM CuSO4 and stirring overnight.
Catalytic activity and protein content of GalOx expressed extracellularly in P. pastoris
vol. activity [U·mL-1]
spec. activity [U·mg-1]
P. pastoris FxE
P. pastoris ExE
P. pastoris FNE
P. pastoris ENE
Summary of productivity of galactose oxidase in different hosts
180 ± 7 (n = 2)b
180 ± 7
0.15 ± 0.1
P. pastoris FxIc
10 (n = 1)
P. pastoris FxEc
260 ± 14 (n = 3)
610 ± 30
0.12 ± 0.09
P. pastoris PCE
250 ± 12 (n = 3)
580 ± 25
0.19 ± 0.1
Effect of cultivation temperature on enzyme yield
Direct activation of GalOx in the cultivation medium
To streamline the extracellular production of GalOx by P. pastoris, the direct activation of GalOx by supplementing copper (II) in the culture medium was tested. Transformants were cultivated in BMMY supplemented with CuSO4 to final concentrations of 0.5 and 1.0 mM (2 mM Cu++ is known to result in growth toxicity to P. pastoris ). P. pastoris resulted in a final OD600 between 65-70 and a final dry cell weight between 45-50 mg·mL-1 after 216 hours regardless of the presence of copper in the medium. The protein content in the medium was also comparable between the different cultivations; without copper in the medium a protein concentration of 0.57 mg·mL-1 was obtained, and in the presence of 0.5 and 1.0 mM copper 0.54 mg·mL-1 and 0.50 mg·mL-1 could be measured, respectively.
Codon-optimization of GalOx for P. pastoris and effect of C-terminal His6-tag addition
To test the possibility of further improving the extracellular expression of GalOx in P. pastoris, a codon-optimized variant for P. pastoris was obtained by gene synthesis. The sequence identity between the wtgalox gene from F. graminearum and the codon-optimized gene for P. pastoris was 75% (Figure S13; Additional File 1). Due to the observation that the N-terminal His10-tag negatively affected the production of GalOx in P. pastoris (both intra- and extracellular), the codon-optimized galox gene was cloned into the pPICZα-C system with and without a C-terminal His6-tag. Both constructs were transformed into the P. pastoris strain SMD1168H to give P. pastoris PCE and P. pastoris PxE, respectively (Table 1). After screening for highly-producing clones, shake-flask cultivations of P. pastoris FxE, P. pastoris PxE, and P. pastoris PCE were performed in parallel at 25°C for 120 h.
A subsequent IMAC purification of the His6-tagged GalOx enzyme was performed, resulting in a concentrated enzyme preparation, which could be analyzed for the correct formation of the Tyr-Cys radical by visible spectroscopy (350-800 nm). A characteristic peak at 445 nm confirmed the formation of the radical cofactor [5, 17]. The purified enzyme was also analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western Blot (Figure 7B &7C), which indicated the presence of the correctly formed radical Tyr-Cys cofactor, the His6-tag at the C-terminus of the enzyme and a minimal amount of proteolytic degradation products. The high volumetric productivity of 580 U·L-1·h-1 and possibility for simple purification by IMAC indicate that the extracellular expression of GalOx with a C-terminal His6-tag by P. pastoris is perhaps the best strategy for the large-scale production of this enzyme among the systems tested.
Potential for further activation of GalOx by an inorganic oxidant
Solutions of produced GalOx are often a mixture of the fully active (Cu2+/Tyr-Cys · ) and the inactive (Cu2+/Tyr-Cys) form [5, 23]. Previous studies have indicated that treatment of GalOx enzyme preparations with the oxidizing agents, such as peroxidases or K3Fe(CN)6, results in the conversion of the inactive form into the fully active, radical species [5, 14, 17, 23, 24]. To test if the enzymes prepared in the present study could be further activated in the presence of an additional oxidizing agent, incubation of preparations with various concentrations of K3Fe(CN)6 and CuSO4 were performed. However, none of the experiments led to an additional increase in catalytic activity. Thus, the incubation of GalOx lacking the pro-peptide with 0.5 mM CuSO4 at 4°C under aerobic conditions overnight led to an efficient and apparently complete activation of the enzyme in all cases.
Storage stability of extracellularly produced GalOx preparations from P. pastoris
To facilitate the direct use of GalOx preparations in applications where the presence of stabilizing additives (e.g., glycerol) may complicate the downstream isolation of carbohydrate products, simple storage conditions were explored. When stored at 4°C, the enzyme did not lose any activity for the tested period of 4 weeks. Snap-frozen (N2( l )), lyophilized samples exhibited a 50% decrease in catalytic activity. When GalOx was otherwise snap-frozen in liquid N2, stored in aliquots at -80°C and thawed on ice before measurements, no loss in catalytic activity or protein content was observed.
In this study, codon-optimized and affinity tag variants of the galox gene from F. graminearum were examined for optimal heterologous intra- and extracellular production in E. coli and P. pastoris, two of the most easily accessible microbial expression hosts for general laboratory use. E. coli, in particular, is well-known as a fast-growing host, which can be readily transformed using a range of plasmid vectors. E. coli is thus the system of choice where both high transformation efficiency and high throughput are desired, such as in protein engineering studies via directed evolution [17, 18]. Indeed, the codon-optimized M1 variant of GalOx, bearing an N-terminal His10 tag, is efficiently produced intracellularly in E. coli (Table 4), with both a good volumetric productivity (180 U·L-1·h-1) and high specific activity (180 U·mg-1, after IMAC purification and subsequent activation with Cu++).
The yeast P. pastoris, in contrast, has become one of the key eukaryotic expression hosts [27, 28]. P. pastoris is transformed via chromosomal integration, with the drawback of a lower transformation efficiency than bacterial plasmid transformation, but with the advantage that stable genetic constructs are generated. The ability of P. pastoris to secrete proteins to the medium under the agency of the α-factor secretion signal peptide confers a significant advantage to this host, by greatly simplifying downstream protein isolation. Notably, the intracellular production of GalOx in P. pastoris, was plagued by a lower volumetric productivity (120 U·L-1·h-1) than in E. coli (Table 4), a greater amount of contaminating proteins, and the lack of a facile purification due to an intolerance for N-terminal oligo-histidine tagged constructs. In contrast, the extracellular production of the F. graminearum GalOx in this host was facile (volumetric productivity of 600 U·L-1·h-1, independent of yeast/fungal codon optimization, Table 4). A minimum amount of endogenous protein contaminants was observed, while the addition of a C-terminal His6-tag to GalOx provided a convenient strategy for removing colored medium components via IMAC. The observation that the enzyme could be directly activated to essentially similar levels by copper (II) ions added directly in the culture medium compared with post-harvest addition allows additional streamlining of GalOx production.
Thus, the intracellular E. coli and extracellular P. pastoris systems comprise a complementary pair for the production of GalOx, from high-throughput screening to production scale-up for applications.
List of abbreviations used
dry cell weight
immobilized metal affinity chromatography
The Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation is thanked for funding via the Wallenberg Wood Science Center (http://wwsc.se/). H.B. is a Special Research Fellow (Rådsforskare) of the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet). We thank Prof. Nicholas Turner and Dr. Julie Rannes for the optimized galox gene M1.
- Avigad G, Amaral D, Asensio C, Horecker BL: The D-galactose oxidase of Polyporus circinatus. J Biol Chem. 1962, 237: 2736-2743.Google Scholar
- Whittaker JW: The radical chemistry of galactose oxidase. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2005, 433: 227-239. 10.1016/j.abb.2004.08.034.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whittaker JW: Free radical catalysis by galactose oxidase. Chem Rev. 2003, 103: 2347-2363. 10.1021/cr020425z.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rogers MS, Tyler EM, Akyumani N, Kurtis CR, Spooner RK, Deacon SE, Tamber S, Firbank SJ, Mahmoud K, Knowles PF, et al.: The stacking tryptophan of galactose oxidase: a second-coordination sphere residue that has profound effects on tyrosyl radical behavior and enzyme catalysis. Biochemistry. 2007, 46: 4606-4618. 10.1021/bi062139d.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rogers MS, Hurtado-Guerrero R, Firbank SJ, Halcrow MA, Dooley DM, Phillips SE, Knowles PF, McPherson MJ: Cross-link formation of the cysteine 228-tyrosine 272 catalytic cofactor of galactose oxidase does not require dioxygen. Biochemistry. 2008, 47: 10428-10439. 10.1021/bi8010835.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rogers MS, Baron AJ, McPherson MJ, Knowles PF, Dooley DM: Galactose oxidase pro-sequence cleavage and cofactor assembly are self-processing reactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2000, 122: 990-991. 10.1021/ja993385y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ito N, Phillips SE, Stevens C, Ogel ZB, McPherson MJ, Keen JN, Yadav KD, Knowles PF: Novel thioether bond revealed by a 1.7 A crystal structure of galactose oxidase. Nature. 1991, 350: 87-90. 10.1038/350087a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Szabo EE, Adanyi N, Varadi M: Application of biosensor for monitoring galactose content. Biosens Bioelectron. 1996, 11: 1051-1058. 10.1016/0956-5663(96)87664-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Adanyi N, Szabo EE, Varadi M: Multi-enzyme biosensors with amperometric detection for determination of lactose in milk and dairy products. European Food Research and Technology. 1999, 209: 220-226. 10.1007/s002170050484.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kinoshita M, Inagake K, Kawabata A, Kuroda R, Oda Y, Kakehi K: Fluorometric determination of mucin-type glycoproteins by the galactose oxidase-peroxidase method. Anal Biochem. 2000, 284: 87-92. 10.1006/abio.2000.4689.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carter JH, Deddens JA, Pullman JL, Colligan BM, Whiteley LO, Carter HW: Validation of the galactose oxidase-Schiff's reagent sequence for early detection and prognosis in human colorectal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 1997, 3: 1479-1489.Google Scholar
- Said IT, Shamsuddin AM, Sherief MA, Taleb SG, Aref WF, Kumar D: Comparison of different techniques for detection of Gal-GalNAc, an early marker of colonic neoplasia. Histol Histopathol. 1999, 14: 351-357.Google Scholar
- Yalpani M, Hall LD: Some Chemical and Analytical Aspects of Polysaccharide Modifications .2. A High-Yielding, Specific Method for the Chemical Derivatization of Galactose-Containing Polysaccharides - Oxidation with Galactose-Oxidase Followed by Reductive Amination. Journal of Polymer Science Part a-Polymer Chemistry. 1982, 20: 3399-3420.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hartmans S, de Vries HT, Beijer P, Brady RL, Hofbauer M, Haandrikman AJ: Production of oxidized guar galactomannan and its applications in the paper industry. Hemicelluloses: Science and Technology. 2004, 864: 360-371. full_text. full_text.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Parikka K, Leppanen AS, Pitkanen L, Reunanen M, Willfor S, Tenkanen M: Oxidation of Polysaccharides by Galactose Oxidase. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010, 58: 262-271. 10.1021/jf902930t.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frollini E, Reed WF, Milas M, Rinaudo M: Polyelectrolytes from Polysaccharides - Selective Oxidation of Guar Gum - a Revisited Reaction. Carbohydrate Polymers. 1995, 27: 129-135. 10.1016/0144-8617(95)00021-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sun L, Petrounia IP, Yagasaki M, Bandara G, Arnold FH: Expression and stabilization of galactose oxidase in Escherichia coli by directed evolution. Protein Eng. 2001, 14: 699-704. 10.1093/protein/14.9.699.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Escalettes F, Turner NJ: Directed evolution of galactose oxidase: generation of enantioselective secondary alcohol oxidases. Chembiochem. 2008, 9: 857-860. 10.1002/cbic.200700689.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Deacon SE, Mahmoud K, Spooner RK, Firbank SJ, Knowles PF, Phillips SE, McPherson MJ: Enhanced fructose oxidase activity in a galactose oxidase variant. Chembiochem. 2004, 5: 972-979. 10.1002/cbic.200300810.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Baron AJ, Stevens C, Wilmot C, Seneviratne KD, Blakeley V, Dooley DM, Phillips SE, Knowles PF, McPherson MJ: Structure and mechanism of galactose oxidase. The free radical site. J Biol Chem. 1994, 269: 25095-25105.Google Scholar
- Whittaker MM, Whittaker JW: Cu(I)-dependent biogenesis of the galactose oxidase redox cofactor. J Biol Chem. 2003, 278: 22090-22101. 10.1074/jbc.M300112200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 72: 248-254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whittaker MM, Whittaker JW: The Active-Site of Galactose-Oxidase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1988, 263: 6074-6080.Google Scholar
- Firbank SJ, Rogers M, Hurtado-Guerrero R, Dooley DM, Halcrow MA, Phillips SE, Knowles PF, McPherson MJ: Cofactor processing in galactose oxidase. Biochem Soc Trans. 2003, 31: 506-509. 10.1042/BST0310506.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J: Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979, 76: 4350-4354. 10.1073/pnas.76.9.4350.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Whittaker MM, Whittaker JW: Expression of recombinant galactose oxidase by Pichia pastoris. Protein Expr Purif. 2000, 20: 105-111. 10.1006/prep.2000.1287.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cregg JM, Vedvick TS, Raschke WC: Recent advances in the expression of foreign genes in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnology (N Y). 1993, 11: 905-910. 10.1038/nbt0893-905.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Macauley-Patrick S, Fazenda ML, McNeil B, Harvey LM: Heterologous protein production using the Pichia pastoris expression system. Yeast. 2005, 22: 249-270. 10.1002/yea.1208.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tschopp JF, Brust PF, Cregg JM, Stillman CA, Gingeras TR: Expression of the lacZ gene from two methanol-regulated promoters in Pichia pastoris. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987, 15: 3859-3876. 10.1093/nar/15.9.3859.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Scorer CA, Buckholz RG, Clare JJ, Romanos MA: The intracellular production and secretion of HIV-1 envelope protein in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. Gene. 1993, 136: 111-119. 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90454-B.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sreekrishna K, Potenz RH, Cruze JA, McCombie WR, Parker KA, Nelles L, Mazzaferro PK, Holden KA, Harrison RG, Wood PJ, et al.: High level expression of heterologous proteins in methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. J Basic Microbiol. 1988, 28: 265-278. 10.1002/jobm.3620280410.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Westerholm-Parvinen A, Selinheimo E, Boer H, Kalkkinen N, Mattinen M, Saloheimo M: Expression of the Trichoderma reesei tyrosinase 2 in Pichia pastoris: isotopic labeling and physicochemical characterization. Protein Expr Purif. 2007, 55: 147-158. 10.1016/j.pep.2007.04.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jeong H, Barbe V, Lee CH, Vallenet D, Yu DS, Choi SH, Couloux A, Lee SW, Yoon SH, Cattolico L, et al.: Genome sequences of Escherichia coli B strains REL606 and BL21(DE3). J Mol Biol. 2009, 394: 644-652. 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.052.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- De Schutter K, Lin YC, Tiels P, Van Hecke A, Glinka S, Weber-Lehmann J, Rouze P, de Peer YV, Callewaert N: Genome sequence of the recombinant protein production host Pichia pastoris. Nature Biotechnology. 2009, 27: 561-U104. 10.1038/nbt.1544.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Daly R, Hearn MTW: Expression of heterologous proteins in Pichia pastoris: a useful experimental tool in protein engineering and production. Journal of Molecular Recognition. 2005, 18: 119-138. 10.1002/jmr.687.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.