Open Access

Regioselective biooxidation of (+)-valencene by recombinant E. coli expressing CYP109B1 from Bacillus subtilis in a two-liquid-phase system

  • Marco Girhard1, 2,
  • Kazuhiro Machida2,
  • Masashi Itoh2,
  • Rolf D Schmid1,
  • Akira Arisawa2 and
  • Vlada B Urlacher1Email author
Microbial Cell Factories20098:36

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-8-36

Received: 12 February 2009

Accepted: 10 July 2009

Published: 10 July 2009



(+)-Nootkatone (4) is a high added-value compound found in grapefruit juice. Allylic oxidation of the sesquiterpene (+)-valencene (1) provides an attractive route to this sought-after flavoring. So far, chemical methods to produce (+)-nootkatone (4) from (+)-valencene (1) involve unsafe toxic compounds, whereas several biotechnological approaches applied yield large amounts of undesirable byproducts. In the present work 125 cytochrome P450 enzymes from bacteria were tested for regioselective oxidation of (+)-valencene (1) at allylic C2-position to produce (+)-nootkatone (4) via cis- (2) or trans-nootkatol (3). The P450 activity was supported by the co-expression of putidaredoxin reductase (PdR) and putidaredoxin (Pdx) from Pseudomonas putida in Escherichia coli.


Addressing the whole-cell system, the cytochrome CYP109B1 from Bacillus subtilis was found to catalyze the oxidation of (+)-valencene (1) yielding nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4). However, when the in vivo biooxidation of (+)-valencene (1) with CYP109B1 was carried out in an aqueous milieu, a number of undesired multi-oxygenated products has also been observed accounting for approximately 35% of the total product. The formation of these byproducts was significantly reduced when aqueous-organic two-liquid-phase systems with four water immiscible organic solvents – isooctane, n-octane, dodecane or hexadecane – were set up, resulting in accumulation of nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) of up to 97% of the total product. The best productivity of 120 mg l-1 of desired products was achieved within 8 h in the system comprising 10% dodecane.


This study demonstrates that the identification of new P450s capable of producing valuable compounds can basically be achieved by screening of recombinant P450 libraries. The biphasic reaction system described in this work presents an attractive way for the production of (+)-nootkatone (4), as it is safe and can easily be controlled and scaled up.


The sesquiterpenes are a large class of terpenoid compounds and common constituents of plant essential oils. The parent sesquiterpenes are often readily available and their oxygenation gives derivatives which are sought-after fragrances and flavorings, pharmaceuticals or building blocks for chemical synthesis [1]. For example, (+)-valencene (1) is found in citrus oils and can be cheaply obtained from oranges. Recently the valencene synthase gene from orange has been cloned and functionally expressed in E. coli [2, 3]. The selective oxidation of (+)-valencene (1) at allylic C2-position yields cis- (2) and trans-nootkatol (3), which can be further oxidized to (+)-nootkatone (4), a high added-value commercial flavoring (Figure 1). Traditionally nootkatone is extracted from grapefruits, and its price and availability is dependent on the annual harvest, which is restricted to a narrow producing area and very sensitive to weather conditions. Thus, various approaches for chemical or biotechnological production of (+)-nootkatone have been investigated in the past years (very recently reviewed by Fraatz et al. [4]).
Figure 1

Schematic experimental setup for the conversion of (+)-valencene (1) by CYP109B1 in a biphasic system. (+)-Valencene (1) is converted to cis-nootkatol (2), trans-nootkatol (3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) by recombinant E. coli expressing CYP109B1, putidaredoxin reductase (PdR) and putidaredoxin (Pdx). The organic phase acts as substrate reservoir and allows the accumulation of the mono-oxygenated conversion products, which prevents them from overoxidation.

Chemical synthesis of (+)-nootkatone (4) from (+)-valencene (1) has been studied with tert-butyl chromate [5], via copper(I)-mediated oxidation by alkyl hydroperoxides [6] and with surface-functionalized silica supported by metal catalysts such as Co2+ and Mn2+ [7]. However, these synthetic methods are neither safe nor environment-friendly, because they involve toxic heavy metals or peroxides.

Biotechnological processes to achieve this oxidation have also been designed. Recent attempts include the manufacturing of (+)-nootkatone (4) with green algae like Chlorella or Euglena [8], fungi such as Aspergillus niger, Fusarium culmorum [9], Mucor sp. [10, 11] or the ascomycete Chaetomium globosum [12]. Cell free enzymatic reactions for the conversion of (+)-valencene (1) exploiting enzymes from Cichorium intybus L. roots [13], lignin peroxidase [14] and fungal laccase [15] have also been reported.

Several cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (P450s or CYPs) have been reported to catalyze terpene oxidation [1621]. Cytochrome P450s belong to a superfamily of heme b-containing proteins that accept a vast number of organic compounds and catalyze an enormous variety of oxidative reactions. These reactions include hydroxylation, epoxidation, heteroatom oxidation, C-C bond cleavage via successive hydroxylations and many other complex reactions [22, 23].

Interestingly, (+)-nootkatone (4) has been shown to inhibit activity of some human P450s, including CYP2A6 and CYP2C19 [24]. However, given the large superfamily of these enzymes (> 8100 sequences, http://​drnelson.​utmem.​edu/​p450stats.​Feb2008.​htm) and their diverse substrate range, it is unlikely that (+)-nootkatone (4) will inhibit all P450s. Indeed, a recent report describes the hydroxylation of (+)-valencene (1) by mutants of the cytochromes P450cam from Pseudomonas putida and P450BM3 from Bacillus megaterium [25]. In both cases, however, certain improvements are required. While the reported P450cam-mutants demonstrated quite low activity, the P450BM3-mutants, although being active, had low chemo- and regioselectivity and produced up to six byproducts besides nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4). Another report described a membrane-bound plant P450 monooxygenase from Hyoscyamus muticus, which was able to oxidize (+)-valencene (1) to nootkatol [16]. Generally, all current biotechnological systems for production of (+)-nootkatone (4) have in common an unsatisfactory accumulation of the C2-oxidized compounds because of low enzyme activity and/or the drawback of the formation of large amounts of byproducts.

In the search for new P450 monooxygenases with activity and high regioselectivity towards (+)-valencene (1), we screened 125 P450 enzymes from a novel recombinant P450 library, based on about 250 bacterial cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, co-expressed with putidaredoxin reductase (PdR) and putidaredoxin (Pdx) in Escherichia coli. The library contains, for example, the complete P450 complement of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), Bacillus subtilis 168, Nocardia farcinica IFM 10152 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum USDA110. Generally, about 70% of the P450 candidates originate from actinomycetes. Construction and application of this P450 library has recently been reported with respect to steroid oxidation [26].

The actual screening identified CYP109B1 from Bacillus subtilis, which catalyzed the regioselective oxidation of (+)-valencene (1) to nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4). When the whole-cell biooxidation of (+)-valencene (1) with E. coli expressing CYP109B1 and electron transfer partners was carried out in an aqueous milieu, a number of undesired multi-oxygenated oxidation products was observed. In order to reduce byproduct-formation biphasic systems with water immiscible organic solvents were applied and the best system was scaled-up.

Results and discussion

Screening of the recombinant P450 library

In our approach to find new P450s capable to oxidize (+)-valencene (1) regioselectively at allylic C2-position, 125 bacterial P450s from an E. coli-based recombinant P450 library were screened. Generally, P450 monooxygenases require electron transfer partners for activity. Since natural electron transfer partners for most of these 125 P450s are unknown, PdR and Pdx from P. putida were co-expressed in the E. coli cells. In the screening two enzymes were found to be able to oxidize (+)-valencene (1), namely CYP109B1 from B. subtilis 168 and CYP105 from Nonomuraea recticatena NBRC 14525 (also referred to as P450MoxA [27]). The conversion of (+)-valencene (1) by CYP109B1 from B. subtilis resulted in six oxidation products, with the desired mono-oxygenated compounds nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) accounting for approximately 65% of the total product, whereas oxidation of (+)-valencene (1) by P450MoxA yielded 15 different mono- and multi-oxygenated oxidation products (which mostly could not be identified), with the desired products accounting for less than 10% of the total product (Figure 2). The E. coli BL21(DE3) cells expressing only PdR and Pdx did not convert (+)-valencene. Because of its high regioselectivity, CYP109B1 was chosen as biocatalyst for further studies.
Figure 2

GC diagrams of extracts of (+)-valencene (1) conversions. Conversion of 2 mM (+)-valencene (1) was carried out with recombinant E. coli expressing PdR, Pdx and either P450MoxA or CYP109B1 in 2 ml aqueous CV2 buffer with 2% DMSO for 8 h at 30°C and extracted with ethyl acetate. Numbered peaks represent cis-nootkatol (2), trans-nootkatol (3), (+)-nootkatone (4) and overoxidation products (5, 6 and 7). * Conversion products of (+)-valencene (1) that could not be identified. ** Non-specific peaks that were also present in the negative control.

Biooxidation of (+)-valencene by CYP109B1 in an aqueous system

Whole-cell biotransformation with E. coli BL21(DE3) cells expressing PdR-, Pdx- and CYP109B1 was first carried out in aqueous milieu (CV2 buffer, see Material and Methods). The average expression level of CYP109B1 verified through CO-difference spectra was 160 mg l-1, which corresponds to 7.6 mg g-1 cell wet weight (cww). Since in all experiments 70 g cww l-1 were used, the final P450 concentration was approximately 530 μg ml-1. Expression of PdR and Pdx was verified by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamid gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) [see Additional file 1].

When (+)-valencene (1) was added directly to the cell suspension, the oxidation of the substrate by CYP109B1 proceeded with 270 nM min-1 and after 8 h 6% conversion was achieved. Because of the low conversion, 2% dimethyl sulfoxid (DMSO) was added to the reaction. DMSO increases the solubility of (+)-valencene (1), which is poorly soluble in the aqueous reaction medium. In consequence the volumetric productivity could be increased up to 990 nM min-1 and after 8 h 25% of the substrate was converted.

Electron transfer to CYP109B1 in E. coli cells can occur either via co-expressed heterologuos PdR and Pdx and/or via endogenous flavo- or ferredoxins and reductases from the host strain. To investigate, if co-expressed PdR and Pdx in fact support the activity of CYP109B1, E. coli BL21(DE3) was transformed with the pET28a-CYP109B1-plasmid comprising exclusively the CYP109B1-gene without PdR and Pdx (see Material and Methods section). In this case the biooxidation of (+)-valencene (1) preceded with only 40 nM min-1, regardless of the addition of DMSO, which demonstrates that co-expression of PdR and Pdx is necessary for activity of CYP109B1 in vivo.

For further evaluation of the electron transport to CYP109B1 via PdR and Pdx, a reconstituted in vitro system with recombinantly expressed and purified CYP109B1, PdR and Pdx [see Additional file 1] was set up as described in the material and methods section. In this system, the NADH oxidation rate was 64 nmol nmol-1 P450 min-1 and approximately 10% conversion of 200 μM (+)-valencene (1) was observed, however, only if all three proteins were added to the reaction mixture. Mixtures without PdR and/or Pdx did not show any activity towards (+)-valencene (1) (data not shown). Detailed biochemical characterization of CYP109B1 is a topic of our current investigations.

Gas chromatography (GC) analysis of reaction mixtures after the in vivo (+)-valencene (1) biotransformation revealed several new peaks besides the substrate peak (Figure 2). According to their mass fragmentation spectra (MS) and by comparison with authentic reference compounds three peaks were identified as cis-nootkatol (2) (retention time [RT] = 9.9 min), trans-nootkatol (3) (RT = 10.1 min) and nootkatone (4) (RT = 11.3 min) accounting for 6.2, 55.1 and 4.0% of the total product, respectively. Three other products were observed at RTs of 12.1, 12.3 and 13.3 min accounting for 2.3, 27.2 and 5.2% of the total product. A time course of the reaction demonstrated that these byproducts appeared shortly after the two nootkatol-isomers (2 and 3) and nootkatone (4) were formed, which indicates that these compounds could represent products of overoxidation (data not shown). Furthermore, the fragmentation spectra and molecular weights of these compounds indicated the incorporation of two oxygen atoms into (+)-valencene (1) [see Additional file 2]. In a control experiment with nootkatone (4) as substrate instead of (+)-valencene (1), only the product with a RT of 13.3 min was identified by GC/MS analysis (data not shown). Obviously, this product is the oxidized nootkatone. Accordingly, when a mixture of nootkatol isomers (2 and 3) was added as substrate, the products with RT of 12.1 and 12.3 min and small amounts of (+)-nootkatone (4) were observed. Thus these products were assumed to be products of further oxidation of the two nootkatol isomers (2 and 3), which is in agreement with their MS data. In order to investigate if the primary oxidation products could be protected from overoxidation, we applied an aqueous-organic two-liquid-phase approach as shown in figure 1.

Remarkably, in the control experiment with nootkatone (4) instead of (+)-valencene (1), CYP109B1 oxidized approximately 60% of (+)-nootkatone (4) (final concentration 2 mM) within 2 h of conversion, whereas (+)-valencene (1) (final concentration 2 mM) was oxidized by only approximately 5% within this time. This means that nootkatone is actually a better substrate for CYP109B1 than valencene. Interestingly, this phenomena has also been reported for the P450BM3 wild type enzyme and mutants, which accept nootkatone as substrate much better than valencene [25].

Biocompatibility of organic solvents

Aqueous-organic two-liquid-phase systems (further referred to as biphasic systems) represent a powerful biotechnological tool for biotransformations of toxic organic compounds [2830]. This approach allows 1) the use of high overall concentrations of hydrophobic toxic substrates by regulating substrate and product concentrations in the aqueous biocatalyst phase, and 2) simple in situ product recovery into organic phase. Four water-immiscible organic solvents (n-octane, isooctane, dodecane and hexadecane) were chosen to set up biphasic systems and compared to the aqueous system. Control experiments showed that none of the organic solvents was oxidized by the host strain.

It is known that some organic solvents used as a second phase can damage the microbial cells [31]. Viability assays conducted after 8 h of (+)-valencene (1) conversion with E. coli expressing PdR, Pdx and CYP109B1 in systems with 20% (v/v) solvent showed that isooctane and octane had a strong effect on cell viability, with only 20% of cells surviving, whereas the more hydrophobic solvents dodecane and hexadecane were totally biocompatible with E. coli, as they did not harm the cell viability considerably. The addition of 2% DMSO had no considerable effect on cell viability in aqueous systems and in systems with dodecane or hexadecane, but led to further diminution of cell viability with octane and isooctane (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Cell viability of E. coli. Cell viability of recombinant E. coli expressing PdR, Pdx and CYP109B1 was measured after 8 h exposure to biphasic systems consisting of CV2 buffer with or without 2% DMSO and 20% (v/v) organic solvents and compared to pure CV2 buffer (aqueous). Values represent mean ± standard deviation.

Biooxidation of (+)-valencene (1) in biphasic systems

First, biphasic systems without addition of DMSO were set up. In these systems, however, the volumetric productivities were low (≤ 100 nM min-1) and after 8 h only 2% or less (+)-valencene (1) conversion was achieved in all systems tested. Presumably, the substrate holding capacity of the organic solvents was too high, preventing its oxidation in the aqueous phase. High distribution coefficients (log D) measured for (+)-valencene (1) in all four organic solvents confirm this observation (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution coefficients for (+)-valencene (1), trans-nootkatol (3) and (+)-nootkatone (4)


DMSO [%]a

Distribution coefficient (log D)b






(+)-valencene (1)


2.79 ± 0.03

2.61 ± 0.04

2.74 ± 0.05

2.62 ± 0.10

trans-nootkatol (3)


2.43 ± 0.03

2.31 ± 0.04

2.12 ± 0.02

2.11 ± 0.04

(+)-nootkatone (4)


2.63 ± 0.04

2.55 ± 0.03

2,68 ± 0.08

2.37 ± 0.12

(+)-valencene (1)


0.87 ± 0.05

0.18 ± 0,03

0.32 ± 0.08

0.62 ± 0.02

trans-nootkatol (3)


1.55 ± 0.05

1.57 ± 0.05

1.39 ± 0.06

1.23 ± 0.04

(+)-nootkatone (4)


1.77 ± 0.04

1.98 ± 0.05

1.83 ± 0.07

1.29 ± 0.06

aFinal concentration in the mixture.

bValues represent mean ± standard deviation.

After addition of 2% DMSO the conversion of (+)-valencene (1) rose significantly in all biphasic systems employed, but was still lower in comparison to the aqueous system where 25% conversion was reached (Table 2). Generally, the addition of an organic phase led to a strong reduction of the generated multi-oxygenated byproducts causing a shift of the product distribution towards the mono-oxygenated compounds nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) (Table 2). Moreover, the amount of byproducts decreased with increasing amounts of organic solvents from 10 to 20%. This tendency was similar for all four solvents tested. Basically, addition of 10% organic solvent reduced the amount of byproducts to less than 12% of the total product; 20% organic phase resulted in less than 7% byproducts. The best result in terms of reduction of byproducts was achieved with 20% hexadecane, were nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) accounted for 97% of the total product (Figure 4).
Table 2

Product distribution and conversion of (+)-valencene (1) by CYP109B1 in biphasic systemsa

Biphasic system

cis-nootkatol (2)b

trans-nootkatol (3)b

(+)-nootkatone (4)b

RT 12.1 minb

RT 12.3 minb

RT 13.3 minb

Conversion [%]c

Volumetric productivity [nM min-1]








24.7 ± 3.8

990 ± 158

10% dodecane







19.5 ± 2.9

859 ± 121

20% dodecane







17.2 ± 1.8

719 ± 75

10% n-octane







16.4 ± 2.7

770 ± 116

20% n-octane







14.4 ± 2.4

502 ± 101

10% isooctane







9.6 ± 1.6

399 ± 68

20% isooctane







7.8 ± 1.8

313 ± 84

10% hexadecane







15.1 ± 3.5

631 ± 150

20% hexadecane







9.3 ± 1.2

387 ± 53

aConversion of 2 mM (+)-valencene (1) was carried out with recombinant E. coli expressing PdR, Pdx and CYP109B1 in 2 ml CV2 buffer with 2% DMSO for 8 h at 30°C and extracted with ethyl acetate. All values are shown as mean (± standard deviation), n ≥ 3.

bValues are given in % of the total product.

cPercental amount of (+)-valencene (1) that was converted to products.

RT: Retention time during GC (for unidentified products).

---: Compound was not observed in the reaction. The detection limit was 4 μM.
Figure 4

Product distributions of (+)-valencene (1) conversions in biphasic systems. Conversion of 2 mM (+)-valencene (1) was carried out with recombinant E. coli expressing PdR, Pdx and CYP109B1 in biphasic systems consisting of 2 ml CV2 buffer, 2% DMSO and organic solvents (v/v) as indicated for 8 h at 30°C and extracted with ethyl acetate. Values represent mean ± standard deviation, n ≥ 3. "Products" sum up the percental amounts of the total product of the two nootkatol isomers (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4), "byproducts" combine the percental amounts of the total product of the compounds with RT 12.1, 12.3 and 13.3 min, respectively.

Generally, the volumetric productivities of the biphasic systems were lower than those of the aqueous system (990 nM min-1). For example, addition of 10% of isooctane resulted in a 60% loss in original volumetric productivity (400 nM min-1), 20% of isooctane – in an almost 70% loss (Table 2). This high reduction is obviously due to the toxicity of isooctane to E. coli, as described in the previous section. For n-octane – which is toxic for E. coli as well – volumetric productivities of 770 and 502 nM min-1 were obtained at 10% or 20% n-octane, respectively. Dodecane had the slightest effect on volumetric productivity; about 87% could be retained in the system with 10% dodecane after 8 h conversion (860 nM min-1). Interestingly, the retained volumetric productivities with hexadecane were significantly lower then those observed in the presence of n-octane, especially at 20% (Table 2), although the viability assay demonstrated that hexadecane is benign for E. coli.

When we determined the log D of (+)-valencene (1), trans-nootkatol (3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) for the biphasic systems with 20% organic solvent in the presence of 2% DMSO (Table 1), in the biphasic system with hexadecane a log D of 0.62 for (+)-valencene (1) was obtained, which is two-fold higher than with dodecane (0.32) and 3.5-times higher than with n-octane (0.18). The high log D for hexadecane implies a larger substrate holding capacity of this solvent, which might explain the significantly reduced volumetric productivity of the whole-cell process for this solvent compared to dodecane. The highest log D for (+)-valencene under these conditions was determined in isooctane (0.87), presumably also contributing to the low volumetric productivities in addition to the toxicity of this solvent.

Taking into account both, the reduction of byproduct formation and volumetric productivities, the best performance was observed in the biphasic system comprising 10% dodecane and 2% DMSO.

Reaction scale-up

Conversion of (+)-valencene (1) was carried out in 20 ml volume for the biphasic system comprising 10% dodecane and 2% DMSO. The influence of cell density and substrate concentration on the yield of nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) was investigated.

At a constant cww of 70 g l-1 (corresponding to 18.4 g l-1 cell dry weight (cdw)) higher substrate concentrations resulted, as expected, in higher overall amounts of desired products, however the substrate conversion values decreased (Table 3). For example, from 409 mg l-1 (+)-valencene (1) 61.6 mg l-1 nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) were produced, and from 818 mg l-1 (+)-valencene (1) – 96.0 mg l-1 (Table 3). Product distribution did not change, independently on substrate concentration.
Table 3

Yields of nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) in biphasic systems with 10% dodecanea

Cww [g l-1]

cvalencene [mg l-1]

Conversion [%]b

Yield [mg g-1 cdw]

Yield [mg l-1]































aConversion of (+)-valencene (1) was carried out with recombinant E. coli expressing PdR, Pdx and CYP109B1 in 20 ml CV2 buffer with 2% DMSO for 8 h at 30°C and extracted with ethyl acetate. Cell wet weight (cww) was as indicated; 70 g cww correspond to 18.4 g cell dry weight (cdw). Values are shown as mean of two experiments.

bPercental amount of (+)-valencene (1) that was converted to nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4)

At a constant substrate concentration of 409 mg l-1 and two-fold increased cell density (140 g l-1) the yield of desired products could be increased from 61.6 mg to 89.1 mg l-1. A four-fold higher cell density resulted in 94.2 mg l-1 (Table 3). Thus, higher cell densities at a constant substrate concentration lead to higher substrate conversion and higher overall amounts of nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4), but lower product yields per g of cells.

Under optimized reaction conditions 120 mg l-1 of desired products were produced. In comparison, the concentration of desired products in the aqueous system under the same conditions reached 83 mg l-1.


It was demonstrated that the identification of new P450s capable of producing valuable compounds can basically be achieved by the screening of recombinant P450 libraries. The P450-library used in this study is easy to handle and allows high throughput screening of various substrates.

For the biooxidation of (+)-valencene (1) with E. coli expressing recombinant CYP109B1 from Bacillus subtilis, Pdx and PdR the use of organic solvents improved the accumulation of nootkatol (2 and 3) and (+)-nootkatone (4). Although the addition of organic solvents reduced the volumetric productivity of the whole-cell process, the production of nootkatol is promising. Considering the accumulation of nootkatol (2 and 3) it should be noted that a bottleneck reaction seems to be the oxidation of nootkatol (2 and 3) to (+)-nootkatone (4). Here both, process and enzyme engineering could help to overcome this limitation. For example, CYP109B1 could be optimized for higher affinity and activity towards (+)-valencene (1) and nootkatol (2 and 3) with the goal to achieve an increased productivities of the whole-cell process and higher amounts of (+)-nootkatone (4). Alternatively, a specific dehydrogenase could be expressed in the same E. coli host to oxidize nootkatol (2 and 3) to (+)-nootkatone (4) and thereby regenerate NADH, which in addition would reduce metabolic stress for the host strain.


Enzymes and materials

Restriction endonucleases, T4 DNA ligase, Pfu DNA polymerase and isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) were obtained from Fermentas (St. Leon-Rot, Germany). (+)-Valencene and (+)-nootkatone were from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase from Leuconostoc mesenteroides (EC and other chemicals, solvents and buffer components were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Schnelldorf, Germany).

Molecular biological techniques

General molecular biology manipulations and microbiological experiments were carried out by standard methods [32]. Construction of pT7-camAB – a plasmid based on pET11a (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) and harboring the camA (PdR) and camB (Pdx) genes from Pseudomonas putida ATCC 17453 – has been described previously [33]. pT7NS-camAB was prepared by insertion of an Nde I-Spe I linker into pT7-camAB and plasmids for the expression of bacterial P450s were created by amplification of annotated P450-encoding genes from genomic DNA of various bacteria as described in [33]. The plasmid for co-expression of PdR, Pdx and CYP109B1 – pCYP109B1-camAB – was constructed by amplification of the CYP109B1-encoding yjiB-gene [GenBank:CAB13078] from genomic DNA of the Bacillus subtilis strain 168 [34] and by following ligation of the PCR fragment into pT7NS-camAB utilizing the restriction sites for Nde I and Spe I of the Nde I-Spe I linker. pCYP109B1-camAB comprises the genes under control of the IPTG-inducible T7 phage-promoter in an artificial operon in the following order: yjib (CYP109B1), camA (PdR), camB (Pdx).

pET28a-CYP109B1 – a vector for the expression of CYP109B1 alone, without PdR and Pdx – was constructed as follows: The yjiB-gene was amplified from pCYP109B1-camAB with the primers 5'-AATAgctagc ATGAATGTGTTAAACCGCCG-3' and 5'-TCGctcgag TTACATTTTCACACGGAAGC-3'. The PCR was performed with Pfu DNA polymerase under the following conditions: 95°C for 4 min, 25 cycles of (95°C for 1 min, 56°C for 30 s, 72°C for 3 min), 72°C for 5 min. The PCR-product was purified, digested with endonucleases Nhe I and Xho I and inserted into the previously linearized expression vector pET28a(+) (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany). The resulting DNA-construct encoded for N-terminally His6-tagged CYP109B1 under control of the IPTG-inducible T7 phage-promoter.

pET28a-camA – a vector for the expression of PdR – was constructed by PCR-amplification of the camA-gene from pT7NS-camAB with the primers 5'-GGAATTCCATATGAACGCAAACGAC-3' and 5'-GATCGAATTCTCAGGCACTACTCAG-3'. The PCR was done as described for pET28a-CYP109B1, the PCR-product was purified and digested with endonucleases Nde I and Eco RI and inserted into previously linearized expression vector pET28a(+). The resulting plasmid encoded for N-terminally His6-tagged PdR under control of the IPTG-inducible T7 phage-promoter.

The basic steps for the design of pET28a-camB – which incorporates the camB-gene under control of the IPTG-inducible T7 phage-promoter for expression of N-terminal His-tagged Pdx – were identical to those for construction of pET28a-camA, except for primers. The primers 5'-GGGAATTCCATATGTCTAAAGTAGTGTAT-3' and 5'-CCGGAATTCTTACCATTGCCTATCGGG-3' were used for PCR in this case.

Protein expression and purification

Recombinant CYP109B1 was expressed under the following conditions: E. coli BL21(DE3) cells were transformed with pET28a-CYP109B1 and transformants were selected on LB-agar plates with kanamycin (30 μg ml-1). 400 ml LB supplemented with 30 μg ml-1 of kanamycin were than inoculated with 2 ml overnight culture – grown from a single colony – and grown at 37°C and 180 rpm, until the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) reached approximately 1.0. 100 μM IPTG, 80 μg ml-1 5-aminolevulinic acid and 0.1 μM FeSO4 were added and the culture was grown for another 19 h at 30°C and 140 rpm. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 20 min, the supernatant was discarded and the cell pellet was resuspended in 10 ml purification buffer (50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 100 μM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride). Cells were lysed by sonification on ice (3× 1,5 min, 1 min intermission), cell debris was removed by centrifugation (35,000 × g, 30 min, 4°C), the soluble protein fraction was recovered and filtered through a 0,2 μm filter.

Recombinant expression of PdR and Pdx was achieved by transformation of E. coli BL21(DE3) with either pET28a-camA or pET28a-camB. Transformants were selected on LB-agar plates with kanamycin (30 μg ml-1). 400 ml LB with kanamycin were inoculated with 2 ml from an overnight culture – grown from a single colony – and grown at 37°C and 180 rpm, until the OD600 reached approximately 0.7. 100 μM IPTG were added and the culture was grown for 17 h at 25°C and 160 rpm. The soluble protein fraction was recovered as described for CYP109B1.

Purification of CYP109B1, PdR and Pdx was done by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) with a Talon® resin (7 ml bed volume). Protein lysates were applied to the column, which was pre-equilibrated with 5 column volumes of purification buffer. Non-specifically bound proteins were washed from the column with 4 column volumes of purification buffer with 5 mM imidazol, before the bound protein was eluted with purification buffer containing 100 mM imidazol. 5% Glycerol was added to the eluate and it was dialyzed two times against 2 l of 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 7.5, containing 5% glycerol, 100 μM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride and frozen at -20°C until use.

Determination of protein concentration

The P450 expression levels were estimated using the CO-difference spectral assay as described previously [35, 36] using ε450–490 = 91 mM-1 cm-1.

The concentration of PdR was determined as the average of the concentration calculated from each of the three wavelength 378, 454 and 480 nm using extinction coefficients 9.7, 10.0 and 8.5 mM-1 cm-1 [37].

The concentration of Pdx was determined as the average concentration calculated from the two wavelength 415 and 455 nm using extinction coefficients 11.1 and 10.4 mM-1 cm-1 [37].

In vitro activity reconstitution of CYP109B1

A reconstituted in vitro system for conversion of (+)-valencene (1) by CYP109B1 was set up as described in [25] except for addition of catalase. The components were mixed in a 1,5 ml reaction tube, incubated at 30°C for 2 min and 200 μM NADH were added. Absorption at 340 nm was followed spectro-photometrical and NADH-consumption was calculated using ε = 6.22 mM-1 cm-1. For product identification the setup was slightly modified as follows: 1 μM PdR, 10 μM Pdx, 1 μM CYP109B1, 5 units of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 4 mM glucose-6-phosphat and 1 mM MgCl2. After incubation, the internal standard (-)-carvone (50 μM) was added, samples were extracted with 400 μl ethyl acetate and the extracts were analyzed by GC/MS.

Construction of whole-cell biocatalysts

E. coli BL21(DE3) was used as a host for the gene expression. The BL21(DE3) cells were correspondingly transformed with plasmids harboring P450-genes and grown in 50 ml of M9 expression-medium, which is based on M9 medium [32], supplemented with 1% casamino acids, 20 μg ml-1 thymine, 0.1 μM FeSO4, 80 μg ml-1 5-aminolevulinic acid and 50 μg ml-1 carbenicillin. For protein expression the Overnight Express™ Autoinduction System 1 (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) was added according to the supplier's manual. The cultivation was carried out for 24 h at 25°C. Cells were collected by centrifugation (2400 × g) and resuspended in 10 ml of aqueous CV2 buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, 2% glycerol, 0.1 mM IPTG, 50 μg ml-1 carbenicillin), whereupon the cww was adjusted to 70 g l-1. The substrate was added to a final concentration of 2 mM for the biooxidation assay either directly or from a stock solution dissolved in DMSO to yield a final DMSO concentration in the reaction mixture of 2%. Samples were then split in 2 ml aliquots. For the biphasic systems 10 or 20% (v/v) of an organic solvent (isooctane, n-octane, dodecane or hexadecane) was added to the CV2 buffer. The biotransformation was carried out at 30°C under shaking at 200 rpm for 8 h. After incubation the internal standard (-)-carvone (50 μM) was added and samples were extracted with 1 ml of ethyl acetate for GC or GC/MS analysis. A negative control was performed with E. coli BL21(DE3) transformed with pT7NS-camAB.

For biooxidation reactions on a larger scale, 20 ml of CV2 buffer were set up with 70, 140 or 280 gcww l-1 in round bottom flasks (70 g cww correspond to 18.4 g cdw). (+)-Valencene (1) was added from concentrated stock solutions in DMSO to achieve final concentrations of 2, 3 or 4 mM (+)-valencene (1) and 2% DMSO in the reaction mixture. The reaction was carried out at 30°C for 8 h under stirring with a magnetic stirrer. After incubation the internal standard (-)-carvone (50 μM) was added and samples were extracted with 10 ml ethyl acetate for GC analysis.

Viability assays

E. coli viability during the biotransformation was monitored by taking cell aliquots from the reaction mixtures at certain time points. 40 μl of the aqueous phase were diluted in serial dilutions, plated on Luria broth agar plates containing ampicillin (100 μg ml-1) and after incubation at 30°C for 24 h the grown colonies were counted.

Product analysis

The concentrations of (+)-valencene (1) and its conversion to products was determined by GC analysis using a GC2014 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an Equity-5 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Supelco, Pennsylvania, USA). The injector and detector temperatures were set at 250 and 270°C, respectively. 1 μl of a sample was injected at a split ratio of 4, with helium as carrier gas. The column temperature was maintained at 120°C for 4 min, ramped to 250°C at a rate of 10°C min-1 and held at 250°C for 5 min. For quantitative GC analysis the FID response was calibrated for (+)-valencene (1) and (+)-nootkatone (4). Mixtures of CV2 buffer containing (+)-valencene (1) or (+)-nootkatone (4) in final concentrations of 50 to 2500 μM and (-)-carvone from a 5 mM stock solution in ethanol (final concentration 50 μM) as an internal standard were extracted with 1 ml of ethyl acetate and analyzed as described. The ratio of the area of the substrate to that of the internal standard was plotted against the substrate concentration to give a straight-line calibration plot.

Mass spectra were acquired on a GC/MS-QP2010 (Shimadzu) equipped with a FS-Supreme-5 column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, Chromatographie Service GmbH, Langerwehe, Germany). The same setup as for the GC-analysis was used. The products were identified by their characteristic mass fragmentation patterns by comparison with mass spectra of authentic reference compounds and by comparison with mass spectra reported elsewhere [16].

Determination of distribution coefficients

The distribution coefficients (log D) for (+)-valencene (1), trans-nootkatol (3) and (+)-nootkatone (4) were determined by dissolving increasing amounts of the respective compound (final concentration 500 to 5000 μM) in a 50% (v/v) mixture of aqueous CV2 buffer and an organic solvent (isooctane, n-octane, dodecane or hexadecane) in a total volume of 10 ml. After equilibration for 4 h at 25°C under vigorous shaking, phases were separated by centrifugation. 500 μl of each the organic and the aqueous phase were recovered separately and the internal standard (-)-carvone (final concentration 50 μM) was added. The aqueous phase was extracted with 1 ml of ethyl acetate and 500 μl of ethyl acetate were added to the organic phase. Both phases were analyzed quantitatively by GC. Subsequently the log D values were calculated.

Synthesis of cis- (2) and trans-nootkatol (3)

390 mg (+)-nootkatone (4) was dissolved in 2 ml dry diethyl ether and added dropwise under stirring at 0°C on ice to a suspension of 130 mg LiAlH4 in 8 ml dry diethyl ether. After complete conversion, the solution was cooled down to -30°C and 20 ml saturated sodium potassium tartrate solution were added. The solution was allowed to warm to ambient temperature and was stirred for 16 h. The aqueous phase was extracted with diethyl ether (4 × 20 ml). The extracts were combined and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. Solvents were removed at 40°C. The raw product was applied to a silica gel column (ethyl acetate:petroleum ether 1:10). Fractions were analyzed by GC/MS and NMR. Nootkatol was isolated as a mixture of cis- (2) and trans-nootkatol (3) with a ratio of cis:trans of approximately 1:9. Solvents were removed from the nootkatol fraction at 40°C until no change in mass occurred. Nootkatol (2 and 3) (350 mg, 89%) was retained as colorless oil.

1H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, for numbering see figure 1): δ = 0.89 (3 H, d, J 6.9, 4-Me), 0.95 (1 H, br s, 2-OH), 1.00 (3 H, s, 5-Me), 1.21 (1 H, dddd, J 13.9, 12.4, 12.4, 4.3, 8-Hax), 1.37 (1 H, ddd, J 12.7, 12.7, 10.0, 3-Hax), 1.52 (1 H, dqd, J 13.0, 6.8, 2.1, 4-H), 1.71 (3 H, dd, J 1.3, 1.1, 13-Me), 1.77 (1 H, dddd, J 12.3, 2.3, 1.6, 1.3, 8-Heq), 1.78 – 1.84 (1 H, m, 3-Heq), 1.86 (1 H, ddd, J 12.8, 2.7, 2.7, 6-Heq), 2.12 (1 H, ddd, J 14.1, 4.2, 2.6, 9-Heq), 2.21 – 2.28 (1 H, m, 9-Hax), 2.29 – 2.37 (1 H, m, 7-H), 4.23 – 4.27 (1 H, m, 2-Hax), 4.67 – 4.70 (2 H, m, 2× 14-Hax), 5.32 (1 H, ddd, J 2.6, 1.8, 1.8, 1-Hax) ppm.

13C-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.4 (4-Me), 18.2 (5-Me), 20.8 (13-Me), 32.4 (C-8), 32.9 (C-6), 37.3 (C-10), 38.2 (C-5), 39.3 (C-4), 40.8 (C-7), 44.6 (C-9), 68.0 (C-2), 108.6 (C-14), 124.3 (C-1), 146.1 (C-10), 150.2 (C-13) ppm.



We wish to thank Prof. Shinobu Oda (Kanazawa Institute of Technology) for helpful comments and Sebastian Kriening (Universitaet Stuttgart) for synthesis of nootkatol. MG, VBU and RDS acknowledge the support of this work by Arbeitsgemeinschaft industrieller Forschungsvereinigungen "Otto von Guericke" e.V. (AiF), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB706) and Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg.

Authors’ Affiliations

Institute of Technical Biochemistry, Universitaet Stuttgart
Bioresource Laboratories, Mercian Corporation


  1. Fraga BM: Natural sesquiterpenoids. Nat Prod Rep. 2004, 21: 669-693.View Article
  2. Chappell J: Valencene synthase – a biochemical magician and harbinger of transgenic aromas. Trends Plant Sci. 2004, 9: 266-269.View Article
  3. Sharon-Asa L, Shalit M, Frydman A, Bar E, Holland D, Or E, Lavi U, Lewinsohn E, Eyal Y: Citrus fruit flavor and aroma biosynthesis: isolation, functional characterization, and developmental regulation of Cstps1, a key gene in the production of the sesquiterpene aroma compound valencene. Plant Journal. 2003, 36: 664-674.View Article
  4. Fraatz MA, Berger RG, Zorn H: Nootkatone – a biotechnological challenge. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2009, 83: 35-41.View Article
  5. Arantes SF, Farooq A, Hanson JR: The preparation and microbiological hydroxylation of the sesquiterpenoid nootkatone. J Chem Res-S. 1999, 248-248A.
  6. Salvador JA, Melo ML, Neves AS: Copper-catalysed allylic oxidation of Delta(5)-steroids by t-butyl hydroperoxide. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38: 119-122.View Article
  7. Salvador JAR, Clark JH: The allylic oxidation of unsaturated steroids by tert-butyl hydroperoxide using surface functionalised silica supported metal catalysts. Green Chem. 2002, 4: 352-356.View Article
  8. Hashimoto T, Asakawa Y, Noma Y, Murakaki C, Tanaka M, Kanisawa T, Emura M: Nootkatone manufacture with Chlorella from valencene or hydroxyvalencene. Japanese patent. 2003, No. 2003070492
  9. Furusawa M, Hashimoto T, Noma Y, Asakawa Y: Biotransformation of citrus aromatics nootkatone and valencene by microorganisms. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2005, 53: 1423-1429.View Article
  10. Furusawa M, Hashimoto T, Noma Y, Asakawa Y: Highly efficient production of nootkatone, the grapefruit aroma from valencene, by biotransformation. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 2005, 53: 1513-1514.View Article
  11. Hashimoto T, Asakawa Y, Noma Y, Murakaki C, Furusawa M, Kanisawa T, Emura M, Mitsuhashi K: Manufacture of nootkatone with Mucor sp. Japanese patent. 2003, No. 2003250591
  12. Kaspera R, Krings U, Nanzad T, Berger RG: Bioconversion of (+)-valencene in submerged cultures of the ascomycete Chaetomium globosum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005, 67: 477-483.View Article
  13. de Kraker JW, Schurink M, Franssen MCR, Konig WA, de Groot A, Bouwmeester HJ: Hydroxylation of sesquiterpenes by enzymes from chicory (Cichorium intybus L.) roots. Tetrahedron. 2003, 59: 409-418.View Article
  14. Willershausen H, Graf H: Mikrobieller Abbau von Lignin. CLB Chemie in Labor und Biotechnik. 1996, 47: 24-28.
  15. Huang R, Christenson P, Labuda IM: Production of natural flavours by laccase catalysts. European patent. 2001, No. 1083233
  16. Takahashi S, Yeo YS, Zhao Y, O'Maille PE, Greenhagen BT, Noel JP, Coates RM, Chappell J: Functional characterization of premnaspirodiene oxygenase, a cytochrome P450 catalyzing regio- and stereo-specific hydroxylations of diverse sesquiterpene substrates. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 31744-31754.View Article
  17. Bernhardt R: Cytochromes P450 as versatile biocatalysts. J Biotechnol. 2006, 124: 128-145.View Article
  18. Peterson JA, Lu JY, Geisselsoder J, Grahamlorence S, Carmona C, Witney F, Lorence MC: Cytochrome-P-450terp – Isolation and Purification of the Protein and Cloning and Sequencing of Its Operon. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1992, 267: 14193-14203.
  19. Bell SG, Sowden RJ, Wong LL: Engineering the haem monooxygenase cytochrome P450cam for monoterpene oxidation. Chemical Communications. 2001, 635-636.
  20. Celik A, Flitsch SL, Turner NJ: Efficient terpene hydroxylation catalysts based upon P450 enzymes derived from actinomycetes. Org Biomol Chem. 2005, 3: 2930-2934.View Article
  21. Dietrich M, Eiben S, Asta C, Do TA, Pleiss J, Urlacher VB: Cloning, expression and characterisation of CYP102A7, a self-sufficient P450 monooxygenase from Bacillus licheniformis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008, 79: 931-940.View Article
  22. Cryle MJ, Stok JE, De Voss JJ: Reactions catalyzed by bacterial cytochromes P450. Aust J Chem. 2003, 56: 749-762.View Article
  23. Isin EM, Guengerich FP: Complex reactions catalyzed by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007, 1770: 314-329.View Article
  24. Tassaneeyakul W, Guo LQ, Fukuda K, Ohta T, Yamazoe Y: Inhibition selectivity of grapefruit juice components on human cytochromes P450. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000, 378: 356-363.View Article
  25. Sowden RJ, Yasmin S, Rees NH, Bell SG, Wong LL: Biotransformation of the sesquiterpene (+)-valencene by cytochrome P450cam and P450BM-3. Org Biomol Chem. 2005, 3: 57-64.View Article
  26. Agematu H, Matsumoto N, Fujii Y, Kabumoto H, Doi S, Machida K, Ishikawa J, Arisawa A: Hydroxylation of testosterone by bacterial cytochromes P450 using the Escherichia coli expression system. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006, 70: 307-311.View Article
  27. Yasutake Y, Imoto N, Fujii Y, Fujii T, Arisawa A, Tamura T: Crystal structure of cytochrome P450 MoxA from Nonomuraea recticatena (CYP105). Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007, 361: 876-882.View Article
  28. Buhler B, Schmid A: Process implementation aspects for biocatalytic hydrocarbon oxyfunctionalization. J Biotechnol. 2004, 113: 183-210.View Article
  29. Witholt B, de Smet MJ, Kingma J, van Beilen JB, Kok M, Lageveen RG, Eggink G: Bioconversions of aliphatic compounds by Pseudomonas oleovorans in multiphase bioreactors: background and economic potential. Trends Biotechnol. 1990, 8: 46-52.View Article
  30. Wubbolts MG, Favre-Bulle O, Witholt B: Biosynthesis of synthons in two-liquid-phase media. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1996, 52: 301-308.View Article
  31. Leon R, Fernandes P, Pinheiro HM, Cabral JM: Whole-cell biocatalysis in organic media. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1998, 23: 483-500.View Article
  32. Sambrook J, Russell D: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2001, New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Third
  33. Arisawa A, Agematu H: A Modular Approach to Biotransformation Using Microbial Cytochrome P450 Monooxygenases. Modern Biooxidation. Edited by: Schmid RD, Urlacher VB. 2007, 177-192. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, FirstView Article
  34. Kunst F, Ogasawara N, Moszer I, Albertini AM, Alloni G, Azevedo V, Bertero MG, Bessieres P, Bolotin A, Borchert S, et al: The complete genome sequence of the gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature. 1997, 390: 249-256.View Article
  35. Omura T, Sato R: The Carbon Monoxide-Binding Pigment of Liver Microsomes. II. Solubilization, Purification, and Properties. J Biol Chem. 1964, 239: 2379-2385.
  36. Omura T, Sato R: The Carbon Monoxide-Binding Pigment of Liver Microsomes. I. Evidence for Its Hemoprotein Nature. J Biol Chem. 1964, 239: 2370-2378.
  37. Purdy MM, Koo LS, Ortiz de Montellano PR, Klinman JP: Steady-state kinetic investigation of cytochrome P450cam: interaction with redox partners and reaction with molecular oxygen. Biochemistry. 2004, 43: 271-281.View Article


© Girhard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.