Open Access

Expression in Escherichia coli, purification, refolding and antifungal activity of an osmotin from Solanum nigrum

  • Magnóliade A Campos1, 2, 3, 4Email author,
  • Marilia S Silva3, 4,
  • Cláudio P Magalhães1, 4,
  • Simone G Ribeiro1, 4,
  • Rafael PD Sarto1, 2, 4,
  • Eduardo A Vieira3, 4 and
  • Maria F Grossi de Sá1, 4
Microbial Cell Factories20087:7

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-7-7

Received: 21 November 2007

Accepted: 11 March 2008

Published: 11 March 2008



Heterologous protein expression in microorganisms may contribute to identify and demonstrate antifungal activity of novel proteins. The Solanum nigrum osmotin-like protein (SnOLP) gene encodes a member of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, from the PR-5 sub-group, the last comprising several proteins with different functions, including antifungal activity. Based on deduced amino acid sequence of SnOLP, computer modeling produced a tertiary structure which is indicative of antifungal activity.


To validate the potential antifungal activity of SnOLP, a hexahistidine-tagged mature SnOLP form was overexpressed in Escherichia coli M15 strain carried out by a pQE30 vector construction. The urea solubilized His6-tagged mature SnOLP protein was affinity-purified by immobilized-metal (Ni2+) affinity column chromatography. As SnOLP requires the correct formation of eight disulfide bonds, not correctly formed in bacterial cells, we adapted an in vitro method to refold the E. coli expressed SnOLP by using reduced:oxidized gluthatione redox buffer. This method generated biologically active conformations of the recombinant mature SnOLP, which exerted antifungal action towards plant pathogenic fungi (Fusarium solani f. sp.glycines, Colletotrichum spp., Macrophomina phaseolina) and oomycete (Phytophthora nicotiana var. parasitica) under in vitro conditions.


Since SnOLP displays activity against economically important plant pathogenic fungi and oomycete, it represents a novel PR-5 protein with promising utility for biotechnological applications.


Plants have evolved a complex array of chemical and enzymatic defenses, both constitutive and inducible, which are not involved in pathogen detection but whose effectiveness influences pathogenesis and disease resistance [1]. Plants protect themselves from pathogen invasion through the local expression of a variety of cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptides and a set of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins [2, 3]. Interestingly, most of the components belonging to these two classes of defense proteins are antifungal proteins, even though they are highly divergent in primary structure, in length and exhibit different direct antimicrobial activity.

The family of PR-5 proteins (also known as permatins, thaumatins or osmotins) is part of a larger group of proteins so-called PR-proteins, the last being classified into 17 families (PR-1 to PR-17) [35]. Neutral, basic and acid isoforms of PR-5 proteins have been found in plants, all of them consisting of cysteine-rich proteins involved in plant defense responses to several pathogens and abiotic stresses. Many PR-5 genes are activated by different signals such as abscisic acid, ethylene, auxin, salinity, lack of water, cold, UV light, wounding, virus and fungal/oomycete infection, that result in PR-5 protein accumulation in plant cells [68].

Different activities have been ascribed to the members of this family [913], especially antifungal/antioomycetal in vitro and in planta activity for most of them [14, 15]. It is not known how PR-5 proteins exert the antifungal activity demonstrated through in vitro inhibition of hyphal growth and spore germination, spore lysis and reduction in viability of germinated spores. It has been proposed that they may act by permeabilization of fungal membranes or interaction with fungal membrane receptors [13, 1519]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that a number of PR-5 proteins bind β-1,3-glucan and have detectable in vitro β-1,3-glucanase activity [20, 21]. Moreover, a tobacco osmotin induces apoptosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [22]. Nevertheless, the molecular mechanisms of membrane permeabilization, interaction with fungal receptor or apoptosis remain not completely understood.

Intensive efforts have been undertaken to find PR-5 genes encoding for novel putative antifungal proteins, which could be used in agricultural and/or pharmaceutical biotechnological approaches to control fungal diseases. In this context and based on previously published evidences, wild Solanum plant species represent a valuable source of natural plant resistance against many fungi and oomycetes, in which PR-5 proteins might be involved [2326]. However, in order to evaluate the potential of these proteins as source of plant resistance, their ability to display antifungal activity needs to be proven experimentally. In order to test and characterize the in vitro activity of a particular protein, the first step is to purify the functional protein in large scale [27, 28].

Supporting these claims, the majority of PR-5 proteins have been purified from plant native conditions. The demonstration of the antifungal activity of a PR-5 protein predicted from gene sequence requires its in vivo (cell system or in planta) expression by and purification from a heterologous systems [13, 2931]. In a previous work, we have described the isolation and cloning of a gene (SnOLP) coding for a neutral osmotin-like protein from Solanum nigrum var. americanum [32]. Based on deduced amino acid sequence of the SnOLP protein, a computer modeling produced a structure that is indicative of antifungal activity. Herein, it is described the validation of SnOLP activity against plant pathogenic fungi and oomycete. This validation was performed by expression of the SnOLP gene in Escherichia coli, followed by purification of mature SnOLP and subsequent in vitro refolding, what generated biologically active conformations of the protein.


Expression and purification of His6-tagged mature SnOLP

The hexahistidine (His6)-tagged mature form of a neutral osmotin-like protein from Solanun nigrum L. var. americanum (SnOLP) was overexpressed in E. coli heterologous system by using pQE30 expression vector and purified by using immobilized-metal (Ni2+) affinity chromatography (IMAC). Since bacterial expression systems do not perform certain post-translational processing, deletion mutations were generated by PCR amplification from the previously cloned SnOLP gene [32] to produce a mature SnOLP form lacking its signal peptide and its carboxy-terminal peptide. This PCR product was cloned into the pQE30 vector, which contains an inbuilt His6-tag sequence, what resulted into a His6-tagged mature SnOLP coding sequence (pQE30-SnOLP construct, Fig. 1). The expected His6-tagged mature SnOLP protein is 225 amino acids in length with a theoretical M r of 24,363 KDa, calculated from deduced amino acid sequence (ExPASY Protein Parameters Tools Analysis).
Figure 1

Schematic description of the construct designed to express His 6 -tagged mature SnOLP in E. coli. The regions of the preproprotein SnOLP are shown. The positions of the primers used to generate fragments coding for mature SnOLP form are shown. The orientations of the primers PPM1 and PPM2, including the respective restriction cloning sites, are indicated by arrows. The His6-tag encoded by the pQE30 vector is indicated. SP, Signal Peptide; CT, Carboxy-Terminal propeptide; M, Methionine; *, Stop codon.

In order to obtain information on the solubility of bacterially produced His6-tagged mature SnOLP, this protein was expressed in IPTG-induced M15 E. coli cells carrying the pQE30-SnOLP construct. Total cell protein fraction was obtained from non-induced and induced bacterial cells lysed under native conditions. Then soluble and insoluble protein fractions from induced protein fractions were separated by centrifugation. Equal amounts of total, soluble and insoluble protein fractions were analyzed on 12% SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2A). A protein presenting a mass around the predicted M r of the His6-tagged mature SnOLP was present in high amounts within the induced total protein fraction as compared to the non-induced total protein fraction (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 and 3). The majority of the probable His6-tagged mature SnOLP is present within the insoluble protein fraction, as compared to the soluble protein fraction (Fig. 2A, lanes 4 and 5), and represents around a third of the total protein fraction contents. As confirmed by Western blotting, low quantity of the His6-tagged mature SnOLP is present within the soluble fraction whereas high quantity is detected within the insoluble fraction (Fig. 2B, lanes 6 and 7). Curiously, an extra band, higher than the putative His6-tagged mature SnOLP, is present within the insoluble fraction though absent in the soluble fraction (Fig. 2B, lanes 6 and 7). This extra band may be due to dimeric forms of the His6-tagged mature SnOLP.
Figure 2

Expression of His 6 -tagged mature SnOLP in E. coli , solubilization and purification. A. SDS-PAGE analysis of the expression of His6-tagged mature SnOLP in E. coli cultures incubated at 37°C for 3 h and induced by 0.4 mM IPTG (when indicated). 1. Molecular mass marker (LMW, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech); 2. Total protein fraction from non-induced E. coli culture; 3. Total protein fraction from IPTG-induced E. coli culture; 4. Soluble protein fraction from IPTG-induced E. coli culture; 5. Insoluble protein fraction from IPTG-induced E. coli culture. B. Western blot analysis of expressed His6-tagged mature SnOLP probed with His6-monoclonal antibody. 6. Soluble protein fraction from IPTG-induced E. coli culture; 7. Insoluble protein fraction from IPTG-induced E. coli culture. C. SDS-PAGE analysis of insoluble His6-tagged mature SnOLP which was urea solubilized and subsequently purified by immobilized-metal (Ni2+) affinity chromatography (IMAC). 8 and 9. Eluates from IMAC. In A. and C. the gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. His6-tagged mature SnOLP protein is indicated by arrow heads.

Supported by these findings, an expression in a larger scale, in order to purify His6-tagged mature SnOLP, was performed by E. coli culture incubated at 37°C for 2 h after expression induction by IPTG 0.4 mM. This larger scale expression protocol produced high quantities of insoluble His6-tagged mature SnOLP, which was subsequently urea-solubilized and purified by IMAC under denaturing conditions. SDS-PAGE analysis of IMAC eluates revealed that purification of the bacterially expressed and solubilized His6-tagged mature SnOLP provided virtually 100% pure protein, as evident by the single band detected in two representative IMAC eluates (Fig. 2C, lanes 8 and 9). These procedures led to elevated yields of high quality pure and soluble, though denatured, His6-tagged mature SnOLP (~1 mg/mL) from 500 mL of induced E. coli culture. In order to promote the recovery of steric structures and biological activity of the pure soluble denatured His6-tagged mature SnOLP, the fusion protein was slowly renatured in buffer containing a redox state maintained by reduced-glutathione:oxidized-glutathione pair, followed by dialysis against water. No significant precipitation was observed during or after refolding.

In vitro antifungal activity studies using His6-tagged mature SnOLP

The activity of the refolded His6-tagged mature SnOLP was determined by in vitro inhibition of mycelial growth of one plant oomycete (Phytophthora nicotiana var. parasitica) and four plant fungi (Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines, Macrophomina phaseolina, Colletotrichum gloesporioides,Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides). The tested concentrations of refolded His6-tagged mature SnOLP were 0,1 μg/μL, 0,2 μg/μL and 0,3 μg/μL, corresponding to total doses of 1, 2 and 3 μg of SnOLP, respectively (Fig. 3). A dose of 10 μg BSA (negative control) at the concentration of 1 μg/μL had no effect on mycelial growth of any fungi (Fig. 3B and data not shown) or oomycete (Fig. 3A), as expected. On the other hand, a dose of 2000 U of the pharmaceutical fungicide Nistatin (positive control), at the concentration of 200 U/μL, inhibited the mycelial growth of all four fungi (Fig. 3B and data not shown) tested but not of the oomycete (Fig. 3A), also as expected. The highest concentration tested to achieve the maximum inhibitory activity of SnOLP against the four fungi and the oomycete was 0,3 μg/μL (Fig. 3). The sensitivity of almost all pathogens to SnOLP increased at growing concentrations of the protein (Fig. 3C, D, E, G), except for Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides, which was equally sensitive to SnOLP at both 0,2 and 0,3 μg/μL concentrations (Fig. 3F). Macrophomina phaseolina was the only pathogen tested which was not sensitive to SnOLP at the concentration 0,1 μg/μL (Fig. 3B, D). In summary, these results prove that SnOLP directly inhibits growth of the pathogens tested, in a dose and concentration dependent manner.
Figure 3

Bioassays of the mycelial growth inhibition activity of purified and renatured His 6 -tagged mature SnOLP. A-B. Representative bioassay Petri dishes. Filter paper discs containing 10 μL of test proteins were placed on plates 3 days after inoculation with fungal mycelia (plugs). Petri dishes were incubated at 29°C during the entire bioassay. Inhibitory effects of purified and renatured His6-tagged mature SnOLP upon the fungi are observed as areas lacking mycelial growth. A. Phytophthora nicotiana var. parasitica; 1 day after adding protein (a.a.p.); B. Macrophomina phaseolina, 5 days a.a.p. 1–3. Corresponds to the doses of 1 μg, 2 μg and 3 μg of purified and renatured His6-tagged mature SnOLP, or to the concentrations of 0,1 μg/μL, 0,2 μg/μL and 0,3 μg/μL, respectively; 4. Corresponds to the dose of 10 μg of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA), or to the concentration of 1 μg/μL; 5. Corresponds to the dose of 2000 U Nistatin, or to the concentration of 200 U/μL. C-F. Average area (mm2) of mycelial growth inhibition caused by renatured His6-tagged mature SnOLP, as measured (software UTHSCSA Image Tool, Version 3.00 [57]) in three replicates, similar to the bioassay Petri dishes shown in A and B, for each fungus/oomycete and for each dose/concentration of SnOLP separately. Standard deviation bars are shown for each average column. The averages were statistically compared by using ANOVA and Tukey Test at the probability level of 1% (software Genes [58]). Different letters above the average columns (i.e. a, b and c), indicate that the average values were considered to be statistically different among each other, whereas statistically identical average values are indicated by the same letter. C. Phytophthora nicotiana var. parasitica; 1 day after adding protein (a.a.p.); D. Macrophomina phaseolina, 5 days a.a.p. ; E. Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, 12 days a.a.p.; F. Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides, 5 days a.a.p.; G. Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines, 5 days a.a.p.


In this work, we report the successful expression, purification, refolding and antimicrobial activity of the neutral His6-tagged mature SnOLP, a Solanum nigrum var. americanum osmotin belonging to the antimicrobial PR-5 protein family. The results demonstrated that SnOLP is effective against several agronomically important plant pathogens. SnOLP, as well as other neutral and basic members of the PR-5 protein family, require the formation of eight disulfide bonds for its biological activity and are synthesized in plants as an inactive precursor (i.e. preproprotein). In general, the preproprotein precursor contains an N-terminal signal peptide, which mediates the transport of the protein through the secretory pathway [33, 34], and an additional carboxy-terminal extension, which may be removed during or after transport to the plant vacuole [29, 34, 35]. Although bacterial expression systems neither perform certain post-translational modifications (such as removal of signal peptides) nor form all disulfide bonds of eukaryotic proteins correctly, it is still a faster and cheaper system for heterologous expression than other eukaryotic cell systems, such a yeast, insect or mammalian cells. Therefore, we chose to adapt an E. coli expressing system coupled with in vitro post-expression refolding to successfully produce high amounts of active forms of SnOLP.

In order to express mature SnOLP in E. coli, the signal peptide and the carboxy-terminal extension from the prepro SnOLP ORF [32] was deleted by PCR-engineering, and the resulting PCR-fragment was cloned into the bacterial expression vector pQE30, which encodes a His6-fusion tag. The resulting pQE30-SnOLP construct was introduced into E. coli for the expression of His6-tagged mature SnOLP. The conditions herein established to overexpress His6-tagged mature SnOLP in E. coli (induction with 0.4 mM IPTG and incubation at 37°C for 3 h) led to formation of protein inclusion bodies, abundantly present within the insoluble protein fraction. This appears to be frequently observed when proteins are overexpressed and exceed around 30% of the total host cell protein contents. Inclusion bodies, amyloids and protein precipitation are common manifestations of protein aggregation, in which misfolded protein molecules may be present [36]. However, the probable misfolding of the insoluble His6-tagged mature SnOLP overexpressed in E. coli was successfully repaired by denaturing and subsequent refolding procedures. These corrective procedures resulted in biologically active conformations of the recovered mature SnOLP that, according to results herein shown, exerted antimicrobial action towards plant pathogenic fungi and oomycete. Despite the amount of correctly refolded mature SnOLP was not quantified, the use of reduced:oxidized gluthatione redox buffer, which can produce a mixture of correctly refolded and misfolded protein, folding intermediates and kinetic traps [37], yielded biologically functional SnOLP.

A small number of PR5-like proteins have also been successfully expressed in E. coli in a biologically active form [31, 13]. Hu and Reddy [31] demonstrated that an Arabidopsis thaumatin-like protein (ATLP3) could be expressed in E. coli in form of inclusion bodies, purified and that the refolded mature form displayed activity against some pathogenic fungi. Newton and Duman [13] found that an osmotin-like cryoprotective protein from Solanum dulcamara, when expressed in E. coli and directed to periplasmic localization, resulted in high concentrations of the soluble protein with cryoprotective activity, whereas when it was expressed in the bacterial cytoplasm, high amounts of insoluble and aggregated proteins were produced.

Here, we demonstrated that the SnOLP protein, in a refolded fusion-mature form, displays activity against a spectrum of four fungi and one oomycete, which were chosen due to their economical importance as plant pathogens. Sudden death syndrome of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), caused by several species of Fusarium belonging to the taxonomic section Martiella, among them F. solani f. sp. glycines, is a disease of increasing economic importance in soybean producing countries, such as Brazil [3840]. Moreover, Macrophomina phaseolina, which causes the charcoal rot disease in soybean root and stem, has been considered one of the most prevalent soybean pathogens in Brazil [41, 42]. Furthermore, Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides is cited as the etiological agent of ramulose, one of the most impacting fungal diseases occurring on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. var. latifolium Hutch) in Brazil, which provokes super budding of the plant flushing tissues [43]. Phytophthora nicotiana var. parasitica causes root rot and gummosis in citrus (Citrus spp.) worldwide, especially in rootstock plants, leading to serious damage and losses in citrus seedbeds, nurseries, as well as young and mature groves [4446]. Finally, Colletotrichum gloesporioides causes anthracnoses, a relevant disease occurring on a wide range of plants, including Stylosanthes guianensis, an important tropical forage plant [47, 48]. Therefore, the discovery of a protein, such as SnOLP, that affects the growth of these pathogens could be of uppermost relevance for the transgenic control of these diseases in economically important crops.

As shown in Figure 3, the sensitivity of the pathogens to SnOLP appears to be species specific, since different levels of sensitivity were observed among unrelated pathogen species. Nevertheless, all the tested pathogens were sensitive to 2 and 3 μg of refolded His6-tagged mature SnOLP. Abad et al. [15] demonstrated that 30, 60 e 100 μg of a native tobacco osmotin had no effect against Macrophomina phaseolina. Likewise, in the presence of 100 μg of the referred tobacco protein, the mycelial growth of Colletotrichum gloesporioides was slightly inhibited. The mycelial growth of Fusarium spp. was considered only weakly inhibited, and also the inhibition of Phytophthora spp. was visible as a discrete zone beyond the protein disc [15]. Our results demonstrate that SnOLP exerts in vitro inhibitory effect upon mycelial growth of the tested pathogens, though some of these pathogens are not sensitive to the before mentioned tobacco osmotin [15].

Another osmotin isolated from Solanum nigrum, denoted as SniOLP and which is 99% identical to SnOLP, when expressed in E. coli and subsequently refolded, exerted antifungal activity against Rhizoctonia batiticola and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum [49]. Therefore, it is very likely that SnOLP also presents activity against these fungi. Some osmotins present endo-β-1,3-glucanase activity, which is speculated to be involved in the antifungal mechanism of action of osmotins [50, 51]. Similarly to SniOLP, which does not present endo-β-1,3-glucanase activity, SnOLP most like does not have glucanase activity as well.

Our results are relevant from a biological point of view, since the SnOLP gene was isolated from a solanaceous weed, Solanum nigrum var. americanum, common in the Americas. It was reported that a quite similar species, an European S. nigrum variety, is a nonhost plant possessing resistance to Phytophthora infestans, a destructive oomycete causing late blight disease in potato [24]. In addition, it was demonstrated that the penetration of S. nigrum leaf epidermis by P. infestans was accompanied by rapid Hypersensitive Response of plant cells, within 22 h after inoculation, what resulted in abortion of the infection [52, 53]. Evidences pointed out that the constitutive expression of PR genes, including PR-5, may contribute to non-specific host resistance to P. infestans [26] and that PR-5 proteins are induced in potato in response to infection by this pathogen [7, 54]. However, no indication for a participation of PR-5 proteins in nonhost resistance response was given so far. Here we provided one more evidence for the specific antioomycetal effect of PR-5 proteins targeted to Phytophthora spp. Despite of the lack of ultimate evidence, we hypothesize that the SnOLP gene might also be involved in basal defense responses to oomycetes and/or fungi in Solanum nigrum. Further analysis will contribute to elucidate a possible biological function or involvement of the SnOLP gene in defense responses of S. nigrum to pathogens.


We report here the successful overexpression in E. coli, purification, refolding and antifungal activity of the SnOLP osmotin from S. nigrum. The herein demonstrated inhibition of in vitro mycelial growth of economically important pathogens of soybean, cotton and citrus by SnOLP reveals promising features for biotechnological applications, being this is a subject of our current researches.


Construction of expression vector, cloning and transformation of E. coli

The isolation of SnOLP gene and used primers were described previously by Campos et al. [32]. The complete open reading frame (ORF) sequence coding for the wild type preproprotein SnOLP (GenBank accession no AF450276) was amplified by PCR from black nightshade(Solanum nigrum var. americanum) genomic DNA [32]. This ORF was used as template to prepare the prepro-truncated form (Figure 1). The prepro-truncated form, coding for mature SnOLP protein, was obtained by usage of the primers PPM1 (CGCGGATCCG CTGCGACTATCGAGGTACGC), containing a suitable Bam H I cloning site (underlined within the primer sequence), and PPM2 (CCCAAGCTT ACCCTTAGGACAAAAGACAACCC), containing a Hind III site (underlined within the primer sequence), and high fidelity Pfu DNA polymerase (Invitrogen).

The PCR amplified fragments were eluted from agarose gel, cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) and subcloned into the Bam H I and Hind III sites of the expression vector pQE30 (QiaExpressionist-QiaGen), which contains a N-terminal His6-tag extension, resulting in the pQE30-SnOLP construct. The recombinant clones were selected by using 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D galatopyranoside (X-Gal)/Isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) blue/white colony screening system and digested with appropriated restriction enzymes. Thereafter, the presence of correct deletion mutations and the correct frame were verified by sequencing entirely both strands of the coding region of His6-tagged mature SnOLP, by using an automated ABI sequencer with BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit (Perkim-Elmer). Sequences were analyzed by using the UWGCG software Package (Version 9.1 Genetics Computer Group, Wisconsin, Madison, Wisc.). The pQE30-SnOLP expression construct containing inserts coding for His6-tagged mature SnOLP was introduced into E. coli M15 strain (QiaGen) competent cells using standard transformation techniques.

Overexpression of His6-tagged mature SnOLP in E. coli

Preliminary experiments with the pQE30-SnOLP expression construct were performed to determine the solubility of the SnOLP, according to the instructions of manufactures (QiaEXpressionist-QiaGen), and to establish the expression levels of the mature protein. Cells of E. coli M15 strain carrying out the construct were cultured overnight at 37°C in 5 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium containing 100 μg/mL ampicillin and 25 μg/mL kanamycin (i.e. LB selective medium) under vigorous agitation (200 rpm). This pre-inoculum suspension was then used to inoculate 500 mL fresh LB selection medium, which was agitated until an O.D. 600 of 0.6 was reached. Thereafter, an aliquot of non induced control cells was colleted and reserved, and the expression of His6-tagged mature SnOLP protein was induced in the left cells by addition of IPTG to a final concentration of 0.4 mM. The cells were cultivated at 37°C for 3 h in the induction medium (i.e. LB selective medium plus IPTG) and afterwards collected by centrifugation at 4.000 g at 4°C for 20 min.

Purification of the His6-tagged mature SnOLP protein

As an attempt to determine the solubility of the protein, an aliquot of soluble fraction was recovered after centrifugation of cellular lysate, obtained from an aliquot of induced pelleted cells by using lysis buffer (50 mM potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.8, 400 mM NaCl, 100 mM KCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, 10 mM Imidazole), under native conditions.

For a larger scale experiment, the pelleted cells were resuspended in denaturing lysis buffer (0.1 M Tris.HCl, 6 M Urea, pH 8.0) and the cellular suspension was maintained under gentle shaking for 1 hour at room temperature. Cellular debris were removed by centrifugation at 10.000 g for 25 min at 4°C in order to obtain the solubilized fraction from the supernatant. Final purification of His6-tagged mature SnOLP was performed by high-performance immobilized-metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) on 10 mL batches of 50% Nickel-nitrilotriacetic-acid (Ni-NTA) resins (QiaEXpressionist-QiaGen), under constant shaking for 1 hour. In order to eliminate proteins nonspecifically bound to the column, the resin was submitted to the washing solution (0.1 M Tris.HCl, 6 M Urea, 20 mM Imidazol, pH 8.0) and afterwards the recombinant protein was eluted in two steps by using 10 mL of 0.1 M Tris.HCl, 6 M Urea, 200 mM Imidazol, pH 8.0. The eluted fractions were collected and reserved until use.

Protein gel and Western blotting analysis

Protein expression and purification were monitored by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) [55]. Typically, an aliquot of 50 μl of soluble and insoluble fractions were mixed with loading buffer (1:1) consisting of 250 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 150 mM dithiothreitol, 35% (w/v) glycerol, 7% SDS and 0.2% (w/v) bromophenol blue, and boiled for 5 min. Protein samples were electrophoresed on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and visualized by Comassie Blue staining (10% (v/v) methanol, 10% (v/v) acetic acid and 0.0125% (w/v) Comassie G-250). The distaining solution was 10% (v/v) methanol and 10% (v/v) acetic acid in water.

For Western blotting, following SDS-PAGE, the protein samples were transferred onto nitrocellulose Hybond membranes (Amersham Pharmacia) using a semi-dry blotting cell (BioRad). The membranes were blocked and incubated with His6 monoclonal antibody (Clontech), according to the instructions of manufacturer (1:5000 dilutions) for 60 min. After washing the membranes, the blot was incubated with anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Sigma) (1:5000 dilution) for 60 min. Immunoreactive bands were detected colorimetrically by immersing the blot into alkaline phosphatase substrate solution (0.3 mg/ml nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) and 0.15 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-inodolyl phosphate (BCIP) in 0.1 M Tris pH 9.5, 0.1 M NaCl, 50 mM MgCl2).

Refolding of recombinant SnOLP

Renaturation of solubilized mature His6-SnOLP was performed by dropwise mixing purified SnOLP protein under denaturing conditions into refolding buffer (20 mM Tris.HCl pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM reduced glutathione, 1 mM oxidized glutathione, and 20% (w/v) glycerol), at 4°C, under stirring, in a protein:buffer ratio of 1:10. After repeated dialysis processes, at 4°C, performed with deionized water to slowly remove denaturants, the recombinant protein was concentrated by lyophilization. Lyophilized recombinant SnOLP was resuspended in water for use in in vitro bioassays. Protein concentration was determined spectrophotometrically by the method of the Bradford [56], using Bio Rad Protein Assay with Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) as the standard.

Fungal growth inhibition bioassays

The purified and refolded recombinant SnOLP protein was assayed for its ability to inhibit the in vitro mycelial growth of plant pathogenic oomycete and fungi, essentially as described by Abad et al. [15]. The pathogens used for the tests were Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goidanich and Fusarium solani (Mart.) f. sp.glycines isolates from Glycine max (soybean), Colletotrichum gloesporioides (Penz.) Penz & Sacc. isolate from Stylosanthes guianensis,Colletotrichum gossypii South. var.cephalosporioides Costa isolate from Gossypium hirsutum (cotton), and Phytophthora nicotiana (Breda de Haan) var.parasitica (Dast.) Waterh isolate from Citrus sp. All fungi were cultivated in PDA (potato dextrose agar, Sigma) and the oomycete P. nicotiana var. parasitica was grown in CA (carrot agar) from mycelial disc placed at the center of agar plates, for up to three days. Then, sterile paper discs were positioned adjacent to the growing colony margin and saturated with 10 μL of either BSA 10 μg (Sigma) as a negative control, or Nistatin (Micostatin 2000 U; generic pharmaceutical) as a positive control, or of recombinant refolded SnOLP protein to different doses (1, 2 or 3 μg). The plates were further incubated and daily monitored for up to twelve days. Experiments were conducted with three replicates, digitally photographed and the area of mycelial growth inhibition was measured (Free software: UTHSCSA Image Tool, Version 3.00) [57] for each pathogen and for each concentration of SnOLP separately. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the average areas of mycelial growth inhibition by using ANOVA and Tukey Test at the probability level of 1% (Software: Genes) [58].



The authors thank Dr. Marcos Antonio Machado (Centro APTA de Citrus, IAC, Cordeirópolis-SP, Brazil) for providing the Phytophthora nicotiana var. parasitica isolate, Dr. Leila Costamilan (Embrapa Trigo, Passo Fundo-RS, Brazil) for providing the Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines isolate, Dr. Nelson Dias Suassuna (Embrapa Algodão, Campina Grande-PB, Brazil) for providing the Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides isolate and Dr. Maria José D'Ávila Chachar (Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina-DF, Brazil) for providing the Colletotrichum gloesporioides and Macrophomina phaseolina isolates. We are also grateful for the technical support received from Cleiton Carlos M. da Cruz (Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília-DF, Brazil). The authors render special thanks to Dr. Marcel Prins and Dr. Rob Goldbach (Wageningen University and Research Centrum-WUR, Wageningen, The Netherlands), who provided infra-structure at the Laboratory of Virology (WUR) for the expression and purification of the recombinant SnOLP protein. The present work was financially supported by CNPq, FAP-DF and Embrapa.

Authors’ Affiliations

EMBRAPA Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia
Departamento de Biologia Celular, Universidade de Brasília
EMBRAPA Cerrados
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Lavras


  1. Hammond-Kosack K, Jones JDG: Response to plant pathogens. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Edited by: Buchanan B, Gruissem R, Jones R. 2000, Rockville, MD, USA: American Society of Plant Physiologists, 1102-1156. []1Google Scholar
  2. Broekaert WF, Cammue BPA, De Bolle MFC, Thevissen K, De Samblanx GW, Osborn RW: Antimicrobial peptides from plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 1997, 16: 297-323. 10.1080/713608148.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. van Loon LC, van Strien EA: The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 proteins. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 1999, 55: 85-97. 10.1006/pmpp.1999.0213.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen H: The molecular characterization of two barley proteins establishes the novel PR-17 family of pathogenesis-related proteins. Mol Plant Pathol. 2002, 3: 135-144. 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00105.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. van Loon LC, Rep M, Pieterse CMJ: Significance of Inducible Defense-related Proteins in Infected Plants. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2006, 44: 135-162. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Nelson DE, Raghothama KG, Singh NK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA: Analysis of structure and transcriptional activation of an osmotin gene. Plant Mol Biol. 1992, 19: 577-588. 10.1007/BF00026784.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhu B, Chen THH, Li PH: Activation of two osmotin-like protein genes by abiotic stimuli and fungal pathogen in transgenic potato plants. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108: 929-937. 10.1104/pp.108.3.929.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sato F, Kitajima S, Koyama T, Yamada Y: Ethylene-induced gene expression of osmotin-like protein, a neutral isoform of tobacco PR-5, is mediated by the AGCCGCC cis-sequence. Plant Cell Physiol. 1996, 37: 249-255.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Neale AD, Walleithner JÁ, Lund M, Bonnet HT, Kelly A, Meeks-Wagner DR, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES: Chitinase, β-1,3-glucanase, osmotin, and extensin are expressed in tobacco explants during flower formation. Plant Cell. 1990, 2: 673-684. 10.1105/tpc.2.7.673.Google Scholar
  10. Salzman RA, Tikhonova I, Bordlon BP, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA: Coordinate accumulation of antifungal proteins and hexoses constitutes a developmentally controlled defense response during fruit ripening in grape. Plant Physiol. 1998, 117: 465-472. 10.1104/pp.117.2.465.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Singh NK, Braker CA, Hasegawa PM, Handa AK, Hermodson MA, Pfankoch E, Regnier FE, Bressan RA: Characterization of osmotin. Plant Physiol. 1987, 85: 529-536.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. LaRosa PC, Singh NK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA: Stable NaCl tolerance of tobacco cells is associated with enhanced accumulation of osmotin. Plant Physiol. 1989, 91: 855-861.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Newton SS, Duman JG: An osmotin-like cryoprotective protein from bittersweet nightshade Solanum dulcamara. Plant Mol Biol. 2000, 44: 581-589. 10.1023/A:1026599028063.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberts WK, Selitrennikoff CP: Zeamatin, an antifungal protein from maize with membrane-permeabilizing activity. J Gen Microbiol. 1990, 136: 1771-1778.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Abad LR, D'Urzo MP, Liu D, Narasimhan ML, Reuveni M, Zhu JK, Niu X, Singh NK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA: Antifungal activity of tabacco osmotin has specificity and involves plasma membrane permeabilization. Plant Sci. 1996, 118: 11-23. 10.1016/0168-9452(96)04420-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Anzlovar S, Serra MD, Demastia M, Menestrina G: Membrane permeabilizing of pathogenesis-related protein linusitin from flax seed. Mol Plant-Microbe Inter. 1998, 7: 610-617. 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.7.610.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Yun DJ, Zhao Y, Pardo JM, Narasimhan ML, Damsz B, Lee M, Abad LR, D'Urzo MP, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA: Stress proteins on the yeast cell surface determine resistance to osmotin, a plant antifungal protein. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 1997, 94: 7082-7087. 10.1073/pnas.94.13.7082.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E: Responses to abiotic Stress. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants. Edited by: Buchanan B, Gruissem R, Jones R. 2000, Rockville, MD, USA: American Society of Plant Physiologists, 1158-1203. []1Google Scholar
  19. Ibeas JI, Lee H, Damsz B, Prasad DT, Pardo JM, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Narasimhan ML: Fungal cell wall phosphomannans facilitate the toxic activity of a plant PR-5 protein. Plant J. 2000, 23: 375-383. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00792.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Grenier J, Potvin C, Trudel J, Asselin A: Some thaumatin-like proteins hydrolyse polymeric beta-1,3-glucanase. Plant J. 1999, 19: 473-480. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00551.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Menu-Bouaouiche L, Vriet C, Peunmans WJ, Barre A, van Damme EJ, Rouge P: A molecular basis for the endo-beta 1,3-glucanase activity of the thaumatin-like proteins from edible fruits. Biochemie. 2003, 85: 123-131. 10.1016/S0300-9084(03)00058-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Narasimhan ML, Damsz B, Coca MA, Ibeas JI, Yun DJ, Pardo JM, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA: A plant defense response effector induces microbial apoptosis. Mol Cell. 2001, 8: 921-930. 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00365-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross H: Potato breeding – Problems and perspectives: Advances in Plant Breeding. J Plant Breed. 1986, 1-130. Suppl 13
  24. Colon LT, Eijlander R, Bulding DJ, van Ijzedoon MT, Pieterse MMJ, Hoogendoorn J: Resistance to potato late blight(Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary) in Solanum nigrum, S. villosum and their sexual hybrids with S. tuberosum and S. demissum. Euphytica. 1993, 66: 55-64. 10.1007/BF00023508.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Edmonds JM, Chweya JA: Promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. 15: Black nightshades. Solanum nigrum L. and related species. 1997, Gatersleben, Germany: Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research,/Rome, Italy: International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, []Google Scholar
  26. Vleeshouwers VGAA, van Dooijeweert W, Govers F, Kamoun S, Colon LT: Does basal PR gene expression in Solanum species contribute to non-specific resistance to Phytophthora infestans?. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2000, 57: 35-42. 10.1006/pmpp.2000.0278.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Colao MC, Lupino S, Garzillo AM, Buonocore V, Ruzzi M: Heterologous expression of lcc1 gene from Trametes trogii in Pichia pastoris and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Microb Cell Fact. 2006, 5: 31-42. 10.1186/1475-2859-5-31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Ergin A, Büssow K, Sieper J, Thiel A, Duchmann R, Adam T: Homologous high-throughput expression and purification of highly conserved E coli proteins. Microb Cell Fact. 2007, 6: 18-30. 10.1186/1475-2859-6-18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Sato F, Koiwa H, Sakai Y, Kato N, Yamada Y: Synthesis and secretion of tobacco neutral PR-5 protein by transgenic tobacco and yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995, 211: 909-913. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1898.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Faus I, Patiño C, del Río JL, del Moral C, Barroso HS, Rubio V: Expression of a synthetic gene encoding the sweet-tasting protein thaumatin in Escherichia coli. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996, 229: 121-127. 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1767.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Hu X, Reddy ASN: Cloning and expression of a PR5-like protein from Arabidopsis: inhibition of fungal growth by bacterially expressed protein. Plant Mol Biol. 1997, 34: 949-959. 10.1023/A:1005893119263.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Campos MA, Ribeiro SG, Rigden DJ, Monte DC, Grossi de Sá MF: Putative pathogenesis-related genes within Solanum nigrum var. americanum genome: isolation of two genes coding for PR5-like proteins, phylogenetic and sequence analysis. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol. 2002, 61: 205-216. 10.1006/pmpp.2002.0430.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Bol JF, Linthorst HJM, Cornelissen BJC: Plant pathogenesis-related proteins induced by virus infection. Ann Rev Phytopathol. 1990, 28: 113-138. 10.1146/ ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Melchers LS, Sel-Buurlage MB, Vloemans SA, Woloshuk CP, van Roekel JSC, Pen J, van der Elzen PJM, Cornelisen BJC: Extracellular targeting of the vacuolar tobacco proteins AP24, chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase in transgenic plants. Plant Mol Biol. 1993, 21: 583-593. 10.1007/BF00014542.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Liu D, Rhodes D, D'Urzo MP, Xu Y, Narasimhan ML, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Abad L: In vivo and in vitro activity of truncated osmotin that is secreted into the extracellular matrix. Plant Sci. 1996, 121: 123-131. 10.1016/S0168-9452(96)04514-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Pain RH: Frontiers in Molecular Biology: Mechanisms of Protein Folding. 1994, New York, USA: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Bulaj G: Formation of disulfide bonds in proteins and peptides. Biotecnol Adv. 2005, 23: 87-92. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2004.09.002.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Huang YH, Hartman GL: Reaction of selected soybean genotypes to isolates of Fusarium solani f. sp. glycines and their culture filtrates. Plant Dis. 1998, 82: 999-1002. 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.9.999.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Wrather JA, Anderson TR, Arsyad DM, Tan Y, Popler LD, Porta-Puglia A, Ram HH, Yorinori JT: Soybean disease loss estimates for the top ten soybean-producing contries in 1998. Can J Plant Pathol. 2001, 23: 115-121.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Auki T, O'Donnell K, Scandiani MM: Sudden death syndrome of soybean in South America is caused by four species of Fusarium : Fusarium brasiliense sp. nov., F. cuneirostrum sp. nov., F. tucumaniae, and F. virguliforme. Mycoscience. 2005, 46: 162-183. 10.1007/s10267-005-0235-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Almeida AMR, Abdelnoor RV, Arias CAA, Carvalho VP, Jacoud Filho DS, Marin SRR, Benato LC, Pinto MC, Carvalho CGP: Genotypic diversity among Brazilian isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina revealed by RAPD. Fitopatol Bras. 2003, 28: 279-285.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Mengistu A, Paris RL: Comparison of disease assessments of soybean genotypes in the presence of charcoal rot [abstract]. Phytopathol. 2003, 93: 561-Google Scholar
  43. Mathieson JT, Mangano V: Ramulose, a new cotton disease in Paraguay caused by Colletotrichum gossypii var. cephalosporioides. Summa Phytopathol. 1985, 11: 115-118.Google Scholar
  44. Davis RM: Phytophthora-induced diseases. Compendium of Citrus diseases. Edited by: Whiteside JO, Garnsey SM, Timmer LW. 1988, St. Paul. Minnesota, USA: APS Press, 22-24. 1Google Scholar
  45. Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK: Phytophthora diseases worldwide. 1996, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: APS Press, []Google Scholar
  46. Muniz MFS, Queiroz FM, Menezes M: Characterization of Phytophthora isolates pathogenic to Citrus sinensis in the State of Alagoas, Brazil. Fitopatol Bras. 2004, 29: 201-204. 10.1590/S0100-41582004000200014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Manners JM, He C: Recent advances in studies of anthracnose of Stylosanthes. IV. Molecular approaches to studies of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, causing anthracnose of Stylosanthes in Australia. Trop Grassl. 1997, 31: 435-444.Google Scholar
  48. Chakraborty S, Fernandes CD, Charchar MJd'Á, Thomas MR: Pathogenic variation in Colletotrichum gloesporioides infecting Stylosanthes spp. in a center of diversity in Brazil. Amer Phytopathol Soc. 2002, 92: 553-562. 10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.5.553.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Jami SK, Anuradha TS, Guruprasad L, Kirti PB: Molecular, biochemical and structural characterization of osmotin-like protein from black nightshade (Solanum nigrum). J Plant Physiol. 2007, 164: 238-252. 10.1016/j.jplph.2006.01.006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Grenier J, Potvin C, Trudel j, Asselin A: Some thaumatin-like proteins hydrolyze polymeric β-1,3-glucans. Plant J. 1999, 19: 473-480. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00551.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Laurence MB, Vriet C, Peumans WJ, Barre A, van Damme EJM, Rouge P: A molecular basis of the endo-β-1,3-glucanase activity of the thaumatin-like proteins from edible fruits. Biochemie. 2003, 85: 123-131. 10.1016/S0300-9084(03)00058-0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  52. Kamoun S, Huitema E, Vleeshouwers VGAA: Resistance to oomycetes: a general role for the hypersensitive response?. Trends Plant Sci. 1999, 4: 196-200. 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01404-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Vleeshouwers VGAA, van Dooijeweert W, Govers F, Kamoun S, Colon LT: The hypersensitive response is associated with host and nonhost resistance to Phytophthora infestans?. Planta. 2000, 210: 853-864. 10.1007/s004250050690.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Takemoto D, Katsumi F, Doke N, Kawakita K: Identification of chitinase and osmotin-like protein as actin-binding proteins in suspension-cultures potato cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997, 38: 441-448.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Laemlli UK: Clevage of Structural Proteins during the assembly of head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976, 7: 248-254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  57. University of Texas Health Science Center in San Antonio (UTHSCSA) Image Tool, Version 3.00. []
  58. Cruz CD: Programa Genes (versão Windows): aplicativo computacional em genética e estatística. 2001, Viçosa: Editora UFVGoogle Scholar


© de A Campos et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.