Open Access

Lactate production yield from engineered yeasts is dependent from the host background, the lactate dehydrogenase source and the lactate export

  • Paola Branduardi1,
  • Michael Sauer2, 3,
  • Luca De Gioia1,
  • Giuseppe Zampella1,
  • Minoska Valli2, 3,
  • Diethard Mattanovich2, 3 and
  • Danilo Porro1Email author
Microbial Cell Factories20065:4

DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-5-4

Received: 28 November 2005

Accepted: 30 January 2006

Published: 30 January 2006

Abstract

Background

Metabolic pathway manipulation for improving the properties and the productivity of microorganisms is becoming a well established concept. For the production of important metabolites, but also for a better understanding of the fundamentals of cell biology, detailed studies are required. In this work we analysed the lactate production from metabolic engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells expressing a heterologous lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) gene. The LDH gene expression in a budding yeast cell introduces a novel and alternative pathway for the NAD+ regeneration, allowing a direct reduction of the intracellular pyruvate to lactate, leading to a simultaneous accumulation of lactate and ethanol.

Results

Four different S. cerevisiae strains were transformed with six different wild type and one mutagenised LDH genes, in combination or not with the over-expression of a lactate transporter. The resulting yield values (grams of lactate produced per grams of glucose consumed) varied from as low as 0,0008 to as high as 0.52 g g-1. In this respect, and to the best of our knowledge, higher redirections of the glycolysis flux have never been obtained before without any disruption and/or limitation of the competing biochemical pathways.

Conclusion

In the present work it is shown that the redirection of the pathway towards the lactate production can be strongly modulated by the genetic background of the host cell, by the source of the heterologous Ldh enzyme, by improving its biochemical properties as well as by modulating the export of lactate in the culture media.

Background

Metabolic engineering can be defined as the directed improvement of product formation or cellular properties through the modification of specific biochemical reactions or introduction of new ones with the use of recombinant DNA technology. Aimed to produce single compounds, metabolic engineering necessarily includes the modification of the cellular pathway(s) as well as the redirection of the energy toward the production itself (see for a review [1]). The existing metabolic engineering applications are the result of more than two decades of global experience developing processes for the production of fine chemicals, vitamins, nutraceuticals and animal nutritional supplements such as amino acids (as examples, see [25]). Given their relatively low complexity, the first biotechnological applications have been developed in microorganisms.

Different research teams have been involved in the production of lactate from metabolic engineered yeasts such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae [613], Kluyveromyces lactis [14, 15], Torulaspora delbrueckii [16] and Zygosaccharomyces bailii [17]. L-Lactic acid, first discovered by the Swedish chemist Scheele (1780), has been traditionally used as a food preservative and food flavoring compound [18]. Recently, it has received attention since it can be used to produce a biodegradable polymer with plastic properties. The market for this organic acid is rapidly growing, exceeding several hundred million dollars annually [10]. This carboxylic acid is currently mainly produced using lactic-acid bacteria, such as various Lactobacillus species,(via an, anaerobic fermentation that operates optimally at pH values where the salt of the organic acid rather than the free acid is formed, although free lactic acid is preferred for most industrial processes [18]. The use of microorganisms like yeasts that are more tolerant to low pH values than the current production organisms, could strongly decrease the amount of neutralizing agents required and lower the cost of down-stream processing. Pyruvate is the end product of glycolysis; it can be further metabolized either by the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (Pdh, EC 1.2.4.1) to acetyl-coenzyme A or by pyruvate decarboxylase (Pdc, EC4.1.1.1) to acetaldehyde and subsequently to ethanol. In previous works it has been shown that the expression of a heterologous lactate dehydrogenase (Ldh, EC 1.1.1.27) gene in the above mentioned yeast hosts introduces a new and alternative pathway for the NAD+ regeneration, allowing a direct reduction of the intracellular pyruvate to lactate leading to a simultaneous formation of ethanol and lactic acid [7]. Only following a partial or a full replacement of the ethanol production by the lactate production, obtained in recombinant yeast cells lacking the Pdc and/or Pdh activities, it has been possible to obtain lactate production with high yield (max reported yield: 0.85, i.e., gram of lactate produced per gram of glucose consumed) values [15]. Theoretically, 2 moles of lactate and 2 moles of ATP are formed per mole of glucose consumed. In the present work we show that in S. cerevisiae cells, the yield value can be strongly modulated by the genetic background of the host, by the source of the heterologous Ldh enzymes, by improving their biochemical properties as well as by modulating the export of lactate in the culture media. Following all these approaches we have been able to improve the yield from values as low as 0,0008 to values as high as 0.52 without any modulation of the Pdc and/or Pdh activities.

Results and discussion

Expression of different LDH(s) in different yeast hosts

Lactic acid has been already produced by metabolically engineered yeast hosts (see Introduction). To better understanding the modulation of lactate production from the background of wild type S. cerevisiae cells, we firstly tested lactate production from different S. cerevisiae yeast strains transformed with the same integrative plasmid, pB1. As a model LDH gene we chose the mammalian Ldh-A lactate dehydrogenase. The transcription of the heterologous gene is under the control of the strong constitutive S. cerevisiae TPI (Triose Phosphate Isomerase) promoter. The resulting expression vector has been used to transform five different S. cerevisiae host strains. Transformed strains have been grown in batch shake-flask culture on 2% wv-1 glucose-YNB based media. Further, to better understand the modulation of the production from different Ldh(s), we also tested the lactate production from the same S. cerevisiae yeast strain (GRF18U) transformed with the same integrative expression vector, but bearing different Ldh(s).

Table 2 compares the lactate and the ethanol productions obtained. Independently from the yeast strain used and of the heterologous enzyme, the highest accumulation of lactate and ethanol were observed at the beginning of the stationary phase (reached, in these growth conditions, after about 30 hours from the inoculum), in coincidence with the exhaustion of glucose (data not shown; see for example also figure 1A and 1B). Findings reported indicate that the lactate production is strongly dependent from the background of the hosts. Furthermore, a higher lactate production comes along with a lower ethanol accumulation (data not shown). Productions ranging from 20 to 801 mg l-1 have been obtained from different yeast hosts expressing one copy of the same bovine Ldh and yielding similar specific activities (ranging from 0,4 to 0,6 U mg-1). If two or three gene copies are expressed, the product levels (up to 1110 mg l-1) and activity (up to 0,8 U/mg) increase, even if the improvement not proportional to the gene copy number. Data reported in the Table 2 further indicate that different Ldh(s) lead to different lactate productions (from 20 to 6150 mg l-1). On one side it is interesting to underline that, despite the high Km value for pyruvate, high productions (4160 mg l-1) have been observed transforming the GRF18U yeast host with the Lactobacillus casei Ldh gene. On the other side, lactate concentrations of the same order (6150 mg l-1) have been obtained using the fructose1-6BP independent L. plantarum Ldh, which has a much lower Km value (Table 2).
Table 1

Plasmids (all integrative) utilized in this study*

Vector

Promoter

Heterologous protein

Selection marker

Reference

pB1

Sc TPI

Bt LDH

URA 3

this study

pB2

Sc TPI

Bt LDH

HIS 3

this study

pB3

Sc TPI

Bt LDH

LEU 2

this study

pBME2

Sc TPI

Bm LDH

URA 3

this study

pBST2

Sc TPI

Bs LDH

URA 3

this study

pLC5

Sc TPI

Lc LDH

URA 3

Brambilla et al., 1999

pLC7

Sc TPI

Lc LDH

HIS 3

Brambilla et al., 1999

p022TLP

Sc TPI

Lp LDH

HIS 3

this study

p012TLP

Sc TPI

Lp LDH

URA 3

this study

p022TLPD94G

Sc TPI

Lp LDHD94G

HIS 3

this study

p012TLPD94G

Sc TPI

Lp LDHD94G

URA 3

this study

p012Jen1

Sc TPI

Sc Jen1

URA 3

this study

p022Jen1

Sc TPI

Sc Jen1

HIS 3

this study

*a complete description of plasmids construction is given in Materials and Methods

Abbreviations: Sc: S. cerevisiae; Bt: Bos taurus; Bm: Bacillus megaterium Bs: Bacillus stearothermophylus; Lc: Lactobacillus casei; Lp: Lactobacillus plantarum

Table 2

Lactate and ethanol productions from different S. cerevisiae hosts transformed with different Ldh(s).

 

plasmid

LDH

Lactate

EtOH

Yield

LDH activity

LDH Km

Strains

 

(source)

mg l-1

mg l-1

g g-1

U mg-1

mM

W303-1A

pB1

B. taurus

20

6430

0,0010

0,4

1,00 [19]

CEN.PK

pB1

B. taurus

140

6340

0,0070

0,5

1,00

GRF18U

pB1

B. taurus

801

5750

0,0401

0,6

1,00

MB11

pLC5

L. casei

200

6110

0,0100

Nd

10,00 [19]

GRF18U

pB1; pB2

B. taurus

950

5730

0,0475

0,7

1,00

GRF18U

pB1; pB2; pB3

B. taurus

1100

5648

0,0550

0,8

1,00

GRF18U

pBST2

B. stearotherm.

128

6310

0,0064

0,6

0,03 [19]

GRF18U

pBME2

B. megaterium

1371

5672

0,0686

0,7

Nd

GRF18U

pLC5

L. casei

4160

4270

0,2080

5,5

10,00

GRF18U

p022TLP

L. plantarum

6150

3730

0,3075

3,2

1,50 (this study)

All the indicated recombinant yeast strains, together with the respective control here not reported, have been grown in shake-flasks on 2% (w/v) glucose-YNB based media till stationary phase, reached after about 30 hours after the inoculum. Cultures were independently repeated, after the screening of independent transformants, (at least) three times, rising to comparable results. In the table one fermentation per each set of experiment is reported, being the independent kinetics reproducible among themselves.

Lactate and ethanol production (mg l-1, columns 4 and 5, respectively) correspond to the highest measured production levels.

The Yield value (column 6) represents the grams of lactate produced per gram of glucose consumed (max theoretical yield = 1).

Ldh activity (column 7) has been determined at the highest lactate production level.

Km values against NADH are comprised between 0.001 and 0.0045 mM [19].

Km apparent value of mitocondrial pyruvate transporter is 0,3 mM [44]

Nd: not determined.

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2859-5-4/MediaObjects/12934_2005_Article_68_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Wild type Vs mutated Ldh. Recombinant S. cerevisiae GRF18U cells expressing the wild type (closed symbols) or mutated (open symbols) L. plantarum LDH genes were shake-flask grown in glucose 2% wv-1 minimal selective medium till stationary phase. Samples were collected at indicated times for optical density (OD 660 nm, circles; panel A), lactate (g l-1, squares; panel A), ethanol (g l-1, circles; panel B) and residual glucose (g l-1, squares; panel B) determinations.

In general, and as expected, it can be concluded that the higher the specific activity is, the more efficient is the conversion of pyruvate to lactate.

Similar results have been obtained transforming the host cells with identical centromeric plasmids bearing different Ldh(s) under the control of the same Sc TPI promoter (data not shown).

Improving lactate production and yield by protein engineering

The Ldh enzyme is composed of four identical subunits [19]. All the bacterial Ldh enzymes listed in Table 2, with the exception of the L. plantarum Ldh, require fructose 1-6BP as a cofactor. It has been proposed that the rate limiting step of the enzymatic reaction corresponds to the conformational rearrangement of the so-called catalytic loop [20]. In particular, the movement of the catalytic loop is necessary to allow pyruvate binding and L-lactate release.

Looking at a computational development of a better Ldh enzyme, we initially took into consideration the spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias) Ldh protein. This enzyme was selected because the spatial structure of the enzyme, which is required for the docking simulations, is available in literature [21]. Because of the high sequence similarity with Ldh proteins from other sources, simulations data can be extended to the other enzymes of this family. The comparison between the X-ray structures of the apo and holo form of Ldh from S. acanthias reveals that the aminoacid Asn108 could play a relevant role in the dynamic behaviour of the catalytic loop. The effect of Asn108 replacement on the potential energy profile related to the conformational rearrangement of the catalytic loop has been evaluated in silico, according to the procedure outlined in Methods. In particular, the computational investigation of five Ldh mutants in which Asn108 has been replaced by Asp, Ala, Gly, Lys or His suggests that the Asn108/Gly replacement should lower the energy barrier of the rate determining step, possibly leading to a catalytically more efficient Ldh. In light of these computational results, we produced a mutated L. planctarum Ldh where the aminoacid Asp94, (corresponding to Asn108 of the S. acanthias enzyme), is replaced by Gly.

Initially we cloned the new LDH gene into an integrative expression vector under the control of the constitutive Sc TPI promoter (Table 1). The GRF18U S. cerevisiae strain has been transformed. Lactate production from the new Ldh and the wild-type L. plantarum Ldh (i.e., the control) enzymes were compared, Figure 1A, B. The yeast clones obtained after transformation with the new LDH gene yielded a much higher lactate accumulation (11300 against 6150 mg l-1) and productivity (240 mg l-1 h-1 against 90 mg l-1 h-1 as determined during the exponential growth phase).

Additionally, comparable results have been obtained transforming the host cells with two identical centromeric plasmids bearing the wild-type (i.e., control) or the mutated LDH gene under the control of the same Sc TPI promoter (data not shown).

In principle, the improved production level and productivity rate could be at least associated with a better transcription rate of the mutated LDH gene, and/or to a lower turnover rate of the transcript, and/or to a better translation rate of the transcript and/or to a lower turnover rate of the protein. Since Ldh antibodies are not commercially available, to address these general considerations, we developed (see MM section) a polyclonal antibody against the L. plantarum Ldh protein. The amounts of the wild type and mutated proteins were evaluated along the growth curves of the recombinant hosts. We also determined the Ldh specific activities. On one side, Figure 2 clearly indicates that the amounts of the wild-type and mutated Ldh protein synthesized by the transformed GRF18U strain are similar. On the other side, the specific activity and the deduced Km value (calculated on crude cell extracts), of the mutated enzyme are different from those determined for the wild-type one, being 9,9 U mg-1 and 1,01 mM against 3,2 U mg-1 and 1,504 mM, respectively. The higher activity and the lower Km justify the higher lactate accumulation and the consequently much higher yield on glucose: 0,525 against 0,3075 grams of lactate produced per gram of glucose consumed, respectively. Surprisingly, the mutated Ldh did also lead to a similar ethanol production (Fig. 1A) and to a slightly better biomass production (Fig. 1A); these findings can be associated with a higher specific glucose consumption rate (Fig. 1B).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2859-5-4/MediaObjects/12934_2005_Article_68_Fig2_HTML.jpg
Figure 2

Comparison of wild type and mutated L. plantarum Ldh protein levels: Western Blot determination. S. cerevisiae GRF18U cells transformed with the plasmid carrying the wild type or the mutated L. plantarum LDH genes were shake-flask grown in glucose 2% wv-1 minimal selective medium. From samples collected at indicated times total protein were TCA extracted and Ldh(s) levels were visualised by Western Blot analyses. Protein extracts corresponding to 107 cells were loaded in each lane, together with a negative control (-).

Overexpression of JEN1 in yeast hosts producing different amounts of lactate

Wild type S. cerevisiae cells do not produce lactic acid; however, lactate can be used as carbon and energy source [22]. Lactic acid can freely diffuse through the membranes only in its undissociated form. Since yeast cells can grow on lactate even at pH values much higher than the pKA value of the organic acid (i.e., 3,78), a specific transporter should be involved in the uptake of lactate. In S. cerevisiae, synthesis of a lactate permease takes place after transcription of the JEN 1 gene. Transcription of JEN 1 is induced by lactate and it is repressed by glucose [2325]. Jen1 is the only S. cerevisiae member of the sialate-proton symporters subfamily belonging to the major facilitator superfamily [26].

It has been already shown that the over-expression of JEN 1 in both S. cerevisiae and Pichia pastoris resulted in an increased activity of the lactate (inward) transport, while the deletion of JEN 1 impaired the growth on both lactate and pyruvate [27]. A copy of JEN 1 under the control of the constitutive GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) promoter has been introduced in S. cerevisiae cells using a centromeric plasmid; independently of the mechanisms of repression and degradation previously reported for the JEN 1 gene and Jen1 protein, the cloning under a strong promoter allowed the constitutive expression of the JEN 1 gene even in the presence of glucose [27].

Theoretically, higher lactate productions could be obtained by facilitating the lactate export. In fact, since the cytoplasmic pH value in yeast cells is much higher than the lactic acid pKa value, almost all of the lactic acid produced is in the dissociated form and has to be actively transported outside the cells. A limitation of lactic acid transport will inevitably lead to an increase in the cytoplasmic lactate concentration, inhibiting the "in vivo" Ldh activity and leading to the reduction or arrest of the lactate production. Indeed, Figure 3 proves that "in vitro" a lactate concentration as low as 10 g l-1 reduces the overall Ldh activity by about 40%. It can be speculated that the Jen1 permease could transport lactate/H+ across the two sides of the plasma membranes depending on their concentrations.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2859-5-4/MediaObjects/12934_2005_Article_68_Fig3_HTML.jpg
Figure 3

"In vitro" inhibition of the Ldh activity by the substrate (lactate). Total cell proteins were extracted from GRF18U hosts cells expressing the bovine LDH gene. The same amount of protein extract was used to determine the Ldh activity in presence of different amounts of lactate (abscissa) and referred as percentage (ordinate) of the Ldh activity determined in absence of lactate (control).

Based on these considerations and looking to increase lactate export and production, we co-expressed the JEN 1 and LDH genes in S. cerevisiae host cells growing on 2% glucose-YNB. The first findings obtained for the GRF18U yeast strain transformed with the bovine, the L. casei or the L. plantarum LDH genes showed that the co-expression of JEN 1 was associated with an increase of both lactate production and yield. An example of such an improvement is shown in Figure 4. Results reported in the figure seem to indicate that the extracellular accumulation of the produced lactate could be modulated by the over-expression of the Jen1 permease. To test this hypothesis, we checked the lactate production from yeast host transformed with a LDH gene and deleted of the endogenous JEN 1 gene. When we compared the lactate production from wild type and jen1 strains transformed with a LDH gene, no differences were observed (data not shown). Since lactate can not diffuse through the membranes, this simple observation indicates that at least another lactate transporter must be operative.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2859-5-4/MediaObjects/12934_2005_Article_68_Fig4_HTML.jpg
Figure 4

Effect of JEN 1 expression on lactate production in recombinant GRF18U host cells. S. cerevisiae GRF18U cells transformed with the L. plantarum LDH (control; closed symbols) or co-transformed with the L. plantarum LDH and the endogenous JEN 1 genes (open symbols) were shake-flask grown in glucose 2% wv-1 minimal selective medium till stationary phase. Samples were collected at indicated times (h) for optical density (OD 660 nm, circles) and lactate (g l-1, squares) determinations.

To further investigate the effect of the co-over-expression of LDH and of the JEN 1 genes, we grew different recombinant yeast strains on glucose 5%-YNB. Essentially, an increase of the carbon source availability (from 2 to 5% wv-1) simply leads to an increased lactate production. Figure 5 reports the improvements associated to the over-expression of JEN 1 against the total lactic acid production from different yeast strains transformed with the L. casei or the L. plantarum LDH genes. The improvement value, for any test, is the ratio between the amount of lactate produced by the yeast strain co-over-expressing JEN 1 and LDH and the same strain expressing only the LDH gene (i.e., control). A value of 1 means that an identical lactate production was observed, a value of 1.5 means a 50% higher production, a value of 2 means a double production, and so on. From the analysis of the data it can be easily evinced that co-over-expression of JEN 1 has a clear effect when the production of lactate is very low. However, the effect of Jen1 permease becomes undetectable when the lactate production approaches about 8–10 g l-1, suggesting a possible saturation of the Jen1 transport mechanism.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2859-5-4/MediaObjects/12934_2005_Article_68_Fig5_HTML.jpg
Figure 5

JEN 1 effect decreases for high lactate productions. Different yeast strains (see also Table 2) transformed with the L. casei or L. plantarum LDH genes (i.e., controls) or co-transformed with the same LDH and the S. cerevisiae JEN 1 genes (see also Table 1) were shake-flask grown in glucose 2% or 5% wv-1 minimal selective medium till stationary phase. In abscissa are reported the highest lactate production determined, while in the ordinate are reported the improvements observed. The improvement value represents the ratio between the highest lactate production observed in the strain co-expressing the LDH gene and the Jen1 permease and the same strain expressing only the LDH gene.

In this respect, we did not try to further over-express the JEN 1 gene because it has been shown that its over-expression using a multicopy plasmid did lead to an impaired growth [28].

It has been recently suggested that the export of lactate from recombinant yeast is an ATP-dependent process [10]. This extra energy required for the export of lactate could justify the lower biomass yield we generally observed for host cells producing a higher amount of lactate; Figure 4 for example compares the biomass values reached by two strains producing different amounts of lactate, being 2,4 (OD660) for the strain transformed with the L. plantarum LDH or 2,1 (OD660) for the same strain transformed with the same LDH gene and the S. cerevisiae JEN 1.

In this respect, it is important to underline that an opposite behaviour can be obtained following the expression of the mutated L. plantarum LDH gene. In fact, in this case we observed a better lactic acid production/productivity and a better biomass production, being 2,4 (OD660) for the strain transformed with the L. plantarum LDH or 2,6 (OD660) the same host strain, but transformed with the mutated LDH gene. However, it should be also noted that a similar ethanol production and a higher glucose consumption rate have been obtained too. More investigations are required to better understand the biological background of this behaviour.

Conclusion

Evolution has produced a huge variety of micro-organisms living in radically different environments. In particular, some of these micro-organisms have evolved metabolic pathways leading to the synthesis of potentially useful compounds that are difficult to produce from the chemical industry or that are environmentally harmful to manufacture. Generally speaking, the fundamental basis of evolution is the need to survive and reproduce, not to produce potentially important and commercially valuable products. Indeed, interesting metabolites are very often produced from wild type micro-organisms in such low concentrations that biotechnological exploitation is impractical. The ability to select mutants or to develop organisms by means of rDNA technologies to enable fast and environmentally friendly productions of these products has the obvious potential to revolutionize the biotechnological industry. The basic idea of metabolic engineering is to increase the flux through the selected metabolic pathway by (i) deleting (where possible) the competing branch pathways leading to the accumulation of by-products and/or by (ii) over-expressing the proteins catalysing rate-limiting steps and thereby removing bottlenecks. However, metabolic control analysis (MCA) theory teaches that, under stationary conditions, these bottlenecks do not exist. Generally speaking, all of the enzymes along a pathway are more or less equally rate-limiting [29].

As already underlined, not only for the production of important metabolites, but also for a better understanding of the fundamentals of cell biology, detailed studies are required. In this respect, we tried to modulate the lactate production and yield by improving the efficiency of the last (i.e., lactate transport) and the penultimate (i.e., Ldh activity) steps of the pathway leading to the accumulation of lactate from pyruvate. In fact, MCA also anticipates that a bottleneck situation sometimes could hold true for enzymes at the beginning and/or at the end of a pathway, i.e., the steps controlling the starting of the pathway and the removal of the final product [29].

A yield as high as 0,52 g g-1 can be reached forcing the metabolic flux towards the accumulation of the final product without any disruption and/or limitation of the other pathways competing for the same substrate. Figure 6, summarizes the production and yield values that can be achieved from the same S. cerevisiae strain (GRF18U) bearing different LDH growing under the same physiological conditions on 2% wv-1 glucose-YNB.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2859-5-4/MediaObjects/12934_2005_Article_68_Fig6_HTML.jpg
Figure 6

Lactate production and yield obtained from recombinant GRF18U host cells. Different recombinant S. cerevisiae GRF18U cells were shake-flask grown in glucose 2% wv-1 minimal selective medium till stationary phase. Samples were collected at indicated times (h) for lactate (g l-1) and yield (gram of lactate produced per gram of glucose consumed; values are here below reported) determinations. ( https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F1475-2859-5-4/MediaObjects/12934_2005_Article_68_IEq1_HTML.gif ) B. taurus LDH yield 4% ± 0.2% (☍) L. casei LDH yield 21% ± 0.4% (■) L. plantarum LDH yield 31% ± 0.5% (□) L. plantarum LDH + ScJEN 1 yield 39% ± 0.5% () Mutated L. plantarum LDH. yield 52% ± 0.7%

Concluding, in this manuscript we proved that a high redirection of the glycolytic flux can be also obtained by modulating the last and the second last steps of the pathway leading to the extracellular accumulation of lactate from glucose. In this respect, and to the best of our knowledge, higher redirections of the glycolityc flux have never been obtained before without any disruption and/or limitation of the competing pathways.

Methods

Yeast strains, media and transformation

The S. cerevisiae strains used in this study were GRF18U [30] (MATα; ura3; leu2-3,112; his3-11,15; cir+), CENPK 113-11C (MATa ura3-52; his3-11,15;cir+) (see, as an example [31]), W303-1A (MATa; ade2-1; ura3-1; leu2-3, 112; his3-11, 15; trp1-1; can1-100) [32] and MB11 (MATa; ade2-101; ura3-52; lys2-801; his3-Δ200; trp1-Δ1; can1) [33].

Yeast cultures were shake-flask grown in minimal synthetic medium (0.67% wv-1 YNB Biolife without amino acids) with 2% wv-1 of glucose as carbon source. When required, supplements such as leucine, uracil and histidine were added to a final concentration of 50 mg l-1. The cultures were repeated independently (at least) three times, samples were taken at different times for the determination of growth parameters, metabolite production, nutrient consumption, enzymatic activities and protein level.

Transformation of S. cerevisiae strains was performed according to the LiAc/PEG/ss-DNA protocol [34]. The yeasts were transformed with one or more of the constructs described below, together with the respective empty plasmid(s). For each set of transformation, independent clones (at least 4) were initially tested and lactate levels determined, showing no significative differences among the independent clones.

Genes amplification, mutagenesis and expression plasmid construction

For the expression of the different heterologous LDH activities and for the over-expression of the S. cerevisiae lactate transporter Jen1, yeast expression plasmids of the series named "pYX" (R&D Systems Wiesbaden, Germany) have been used. In these plasmids, the cassette for heterologous protein expression is based on the constitutive S. cerevisiae TPI promoter and the respective polyA, interspaced by the multi-cloning site (MCS), exploited for the sub-cloning of the genes of interest. The selection is based on different S. cerevisiae auxotrophic markers (in the present study always indicated in parenthesis, see also Table 1). In particular, the series of plasmids here utilised are all integrative, and the efficiency of integration was optimised by linearizing the plasmids before the yeast transformation, exploiting a unique site present in the sequence of the auxotrophic marker.

The full length Bos taurus (bovine) LDH-A coding sequence was PCR amplified from the plasmid pLDH12 [35] and inserted in the pALTER-1 (Promega) vector as already described [36]. From the resulting plasmid pVC1 the bovine LDH was sub-cloned into the commercially available yeast integrative vector pYX012 (URA3 marker) generating the expression plasmid pB1. Alternatively, the bovine LDH gene was sub-cloned into the integrative plasmid pYX022 (HIS3 marker) and pYX042 (LEU2 marker), generating the plasmids pB2 and pB3, respectively. For the described expression plasmids, the enzyme coding sequences were all EcoR I/Sal I excised, and sub-cloned in the receiving expression vectors equally opened.

The Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus stearothermophylus LDH genes (sequences available at the accession n. M22305 and M19396 GenBAnk, respectively) were PCR amplified from genomic DNA of the respective strains obtained by using the Invisorb Spin Bacteria DNA Mini Kit (Invitek), following manufacturer's instructions. The following primers were designed and used: LDHBM fw: 5' ACA AAT GAA AAC ACA ATT TAC ACC AAA AAC 3' LDHBM rev: 5' ATG TTA CAC AAA AGC TCT GTC GC 3'; LDHBSt fw: 5' AAT GAA AAA CAA CGG TGG AGC CCG 3' LDHBSt rev: 5' tgc ctc atc gcg taa aag cac gg 3'. The respective unique fragments obtained were sub-cloned in the vector pSTblue-1 utilising the Perfectly Blunt® Cloning Kit (Novagene) and checked by sequencing analysis. From the obtained plasmids pSTBMLDH and pSTBSTLDH, the coding sequences were EcoR I excided and subsequently sub-cloned into the S. cerevisiae integrative expression vector pYX012 (URA3 marker), EcoR I opened and de-phosphorylated. The resulting expression plasmids were named: pBME2 and pBST2, respectively.

The Lactobacillus casei LDH gene was PCR amplified and subsequently sub-cloned into the yeast integrative vector pYX012 (URA3 marker) generating the expression plasmid pLC5, or in pYX022 (HIS 3 marker) generating the expression plasmid pLC7, as previously described [30].

The Lactobacillus plantarum LDH gene (sequence available at the accession n. X70926, GenBAnk) was PCR amplified from genomic DNA obtained from the strain ATCC 8014 by using the Invisorb Spin Bacteria DNA Mini Kit (Invitek), following manufacturer's instructions. The following primers were designed and used: LDH fw: 5' TGA CTT ATT ATG TCA AGC AT 3', where a mismatch was introduced in order to substitute the bacterial start codon TTG with ATG, correctly recognised by S. cerevisiae, and LDH rev: 5' ATC GTA TGA AAT GAT TAT TTA TT 3'. The unique fragment obtained was sub-cloned in the vector pSTblue-1 utilising the Perfectly Blunt® Cloning Kit (Novagene) and sequenced. In the amplified sequence four bp resulted substituted in respect to the original sequence, but only two of them generated two conservative aa substitutions (H54D and C302S, respectively). From the obtained and sequenced plasmid pSTplLDH, the coding sequence of plLDH was EcoR I excised and subsequently sub-cloned into the S. cerevisiae integrative expression vector pYX022 (HIS3 marker), pYX012 (URA3 marker) EcoR I opened and de-phosphorylated. The resulting expression plasmids were named p022TLP and p012TLP, respectively.

The plLDH was then also mutagenised according to the suggestions derived from modelling studies (see below). In particular, the aa 94 Asp (D) was changed into Gly (G) by a double bp substitution changing the triplet GAC into GGT. The mutagenesis was made by the Altered Sites II in vitro Mutagenesis Systems (Promega) using plasmid pSTplLDH as template DNA and complementary primer pairs that encode the desired amino acid replacement, following manufacturer's instructions. The sequence change was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis and finally sub-cloned into plasmids of the already described series "pYX". In particular, the modified sequence was inserted in the plasmid pYX022 (HIS3 marker) or in the plasmid pYX012 (URA3 marker), resulting in the yeast expression plasmids p022TLPD94G and p012TLPD94G, respectively.

The DNA sequence of JEN 1 (available at the accession n. U24155, GenBank) was PCR amplified with the following primers: Tony s: 5' ACT GCT ACT GAA AAT ATG TCG TCG T 3' and Tony as: 5' AGT GAT TAA ACG GTC TCA ATA TGC TC 3' starting from S. cerevisiae genomic DNA extracted as described (slightly modified from [37]). The unique fragment obtained was sub-cloned in the vector pSTblue-1 and sequenced. From the obtained plasmid, the coding sequence of ScJEN 1 was EcoR I excided and subsequently sub-cloned into the S. cerevisiae integrative expression vectors pYX012 (URA3 marker) and pYX022 (HIS3 marker) EcoR I opened and de-phosphorylated, generating the plasmids p012Jen1 and p022Jen1, respectively.

DNA manipulations, transformation and cultivation of Escherichia coli (DH5αF' (φ 80d lacZ ΔM15, Δ (lacZYA-argF), U169, deo, rec1, end1, sup44, λ, THI-1, gyrA96, relA1 and Novablue Competent Cells (Novagene) were performed following standard protocols [38]. All the restriction and modification enzymes used were from New England Biolabs (Hitchin, Herts, UK) or from Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany).

Measurement of cell concentration, metabolites and enzymatic activities

Independent recombinant yeast transformants were shake-flasks cultured in minimal medium. During the cultures, followed up to stationary phase, samples were collected at regular time intervals. Cell concentration was determined by measuring the optical density at 660 nm or the cell number by a Coulter Counter determination [39].

Glucose, ethanol, L(+)-lactate were determined by using diagnostic kits (Boehringer Mannheim cat n° 148261, 716251 and 176290, respectively) according to manufacturer's instructions. The lactate yields were calculated by linear regressions obtained by plotting the grams of glucose consumed in the course of fermentation processes versus the grams of lactate produced.

For all LDH activities, samples were prepared as follows: about 108 cells were harvested, washed in ice-cold water and re-suspended in 50 mM phosphate buffer pH 7.5, Glycerol 20%, PMSF 1 mM and protease inhibitors (Complete EDTA-free Protease inhibitor cocktail tablets, Roche). Cells were broken with 5 cycles of vigorous vortexing in presence of glass beads (diam. 400–600 μm, Sigma) at 4°C. After centrifugation, protein extracts concentration was determined (Bradford, Biorad).

For bovine LDH activity, about 0.2 mg of extract were tested using the Sigma kit DG1340-UV, according to manufacturer's instructions.

For all bacterial LDH activities determination, except the L. plantarum one, cellular extract (0.05 ml of properly diluted samples) were incubated with 0.01 ml of 12.8 mM NADH, 0.1 ml of 2 mM fructose1,6-diphosphate, 0.74 ml of 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 5.6) and 0.1 ml sodium pyruvate 100 mM. The L. plantarum LDH activity was almost identically determined, omitting the not necessary cofactor fructose1,6-diphosphate, as previously described [40]. LDH activity was assayed as micromoles of NADH oxidized per min, per mg of total protein extract, at 340 nm, 25°C.

Simulations

The computational investigation has been carried out using the X-ray structure of Ldh from Squalus acanthias, chosen because both of the holo and apo structures are available (pdb codes: 3LDH, 6LDH, respectively. Web site: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb). However, results are expected to be valid also for Ldh from L. planctarum, due to the high sequence similarity between the two proteins (not shown).

Molecular Mechanics (MM) optimizations were performed using the GROMACS simulation software package [41], implemented on a parallel architecture. MM runs consisted in 1000 steepest descent cycles followed by 10000 conjugate gradient steps.

Initially, cofactor (NADH) and substrate (pyruvate) have been removed from the X-ray structure, in order to simplify the computational investigation of the conformational properties of the protein. Since the movement of the catalytic loop takes place on a relatively low time scale (kcat = 250 s-1), average value among several species [20] standard Molecular Dynamics simulations could not be used to investigate the conformational rearrangement. Instead, the conformational properties of the catalytic loop have been investigated by iterative modification of selected torsional angles, followed by Molecular Mechanics optimization. In particular, analysis of the X-ray structures of the apo and holo form of Ldh suggests that the conformational rearrangement of the catalytic loop mainly implies modification of two protein torsion angles (phi96 and phi97, N-Calfa), which have been systematically rotated in steps of 10 degrees. The resulting structures were optimised by MM in order to obtain stationary points on the Potential Energy Surface (PES), thus allowing to sample the PES of the protein structure along the reaction coordinate corresponding to the relevant movement of the catalytic loop.

Antibody development against L. plantarum LDH and protein level analysis

Different commercially available antibodies against LDH were tested, but none of them is specific for bacterial LDHs and none of them resulted sufficiently specific for pl LDH detection in our host system. By utilizing the tool Syfpeithi http://www.bmi-heidelberg.com/ we individuated the peptide DCKDADLVVITAGAPQKPGE (from aa 71 to aa 90 of the aminoacidic sequence of the protein) as the preferred immunogen to develop polyclonal antibody. The above mentioned peptide and the corresponding antibody (as immune serum) were synthesized and developed, respectively, by Primm Italia http://www.primmbiotech.com.

LDH expression levels were analyzed by Western Blot. From each point of the above described kinetics of growth, a culture volume corresponding to 108 cells was harvested by centrifugation, and crude extracts were prepared by following the trichloroacetic acid protocol [42] and resuspending the final protein extract in 150 μl of Laemmli buffer [43]. Protein extracts corresponding to 107 cells were loaded on a 12% polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE); after separation, proteins were blotted to nitrocellulose membranes and immunodecorated. LDH levels were detected using the developed primary rabbit polyclonal antibody, (dilution 1:250) and a secondary anti-rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase-conjugated (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, UK; dilution 1:5000) antibody. The immunoreactive protein bands were developed using the Super Signal West Pico Western blotting system (Pierce), according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by Tate & Lyle North America, Decatur, Illinois and F.A.R. 2005 to DP. The work related to the mutated LDH was partially supported by the Project BIOCDM (Biotech Clusters Development and Management) Interreg IIIC – REGINS, 2005 to DP. The authors are indebted to Marina Vai, Vittorio Carrera and Luca Brambilla for helping with some of the presented cloning work and experiments and to Carla Smeraldi for language corrections throughout the manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano – Bicocca, P.zza
(2)
Institute of Applied Microbiology, BOKU – University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences
(3)
School of Bioengineering, Fh-campus wien – University of Applied Sciences

References

  1. Stephanopoulos G: Metabolic fluxes and metabolic engineering. Metab Eng. 1999, 1 (1): 1-11. 10.1006/mben.1998.0101.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Kramer M, Bongaerts J, Bovenberg R, Kremer S, Muller U, Orf S, Wubbolts M, Raeven L: Metabolic engineering for microbial production of shikimic acid. Metab Eng. 2003, 5 (4): 277-83. 10.1016/j.ymben.2003.09.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Thykaer J, Nielsen J: Metabolic engineering of beta-lactam production. Metab Eng. 2003, 5 (1): 56-69. 10.1016/S1096-7176(03)00003-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Thelen JJ, Ohlrogge JB: Metabolic engineering of fatty acid biosynthesis in plants. Metab Eng. 2002, 4 (1): 12-21. 10.1006/mben.2001.0204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Bongaerts J, Kramer M, Muller U, Raeven L, Wubbolts M: Metabolic engineering for microbial production of aromatic amino acids and derived compounds. Metab Eng. 2001, 3 (4): 289-300. 10.1006/mben.2001.0196.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Dequin S, Barre P: Mixed lactic acid-alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the Lactobacillus casei L(+)-LDH. Biotechnology (NY). 1994, 12 (2): 173-7. 10.1038/nbt0294-173.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Porro D, Brambilla L, Ranzi BM, Martegani E, Alberghina L: Development of metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells for the production of lactic acid. Biotechnol Prog. 1995, 11 (3): 294-8. 10.1021/bp00033a009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Ansanay V, Dequin S, Camarasa C, Schaeffer V, Grivet JP, Blondin B, Salmon JM, Barre P: Malolactic fermentation by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae as compared with engineered Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast. 1996, 12 (3): 215-25. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19960315)12:3<215::AID-YEA903>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Skory CD: Lactic acid production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a Rhizopus oryzae lactate dehydrogenase gene. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003, 30 (1): 22-7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. van Maris AJ, Winkler AA, Porro D, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT: Homofermentative lactate production cannot sustain anaerobic growth of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae: possible consequence of energy-dependent lactate export. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70 (5): 2898-905. 10.1128/AEM.70.5.2898-2905.2004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Colombie S, Sablayrolles JM: Nicotinic acid controls lactate production by K1-LDH: a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain expressing a bacterial LDH gene. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004, 31 (5): 209-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishida N, Saitoh S, Tokuhiro K, Nagamori E, Matsuyama T, Kitamoto K, Takahashi H: Efficient production of L-Lactic acid by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a genome-integrated L-lactate dehydrogenase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71 (4): 1964-70. 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1964-1970.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Saitoh S, Ishida N, Onishi T, Tokuhiro K, Nagamori E, Kitamoto K, Takahashi H: Genetically engineered wine yeast produces a high concentration of L-lactic acid of extremely high optical purity. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005, 71 (5): 2789-92. 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2789-2792.2005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Porro D, Bianchi MM, Brambilla L, Menghini R, Bolzani D, Carrera V, Lievense J, Liu CL, Ranzi BM, Frontali L, Alberghina L: Replacement of a metabolic pathway for large-scale production of lactic acid from engineered yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999, 65 (9): 4211-5.Google Scholar
  15. Bianchi MM, Brambilla L, Protani F, Liu CL, Lievense J, Porro D: Efficient homolactic fermentation by Kluyveromyces lactis strains defective in pyruvate utilization and transformed with the heterologous LDH gene. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67 (12): 5621-5. 10.1128/AEM.67.12.5621-5625.2001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Porro D, Bianchi MM, Ranzi BM, Frontali L, Vai M, Winkler AA, Alberghina L: Yeast strains for the production of lactic acid. 1999, PCT WO 99/14335Google Scholar
  17. Branduardi P, Valli M, Brambilla L, Sauer M, Alberghina L, Porro D: The yeast Zygosaccharomyces bailii: a new host for heterologous protein production, secretion and for metabolic engineering applications. FEMS Yeast Res. 2004, 4 (4–5): 493-504. 10.1016/S1567-1356(03)00200-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Benninga H: A history of lactic acid making. 1990, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. Garvie EI: Bacterial Lactate Dehydrogenases. Microbiol Rev. 1980, 44 (1): 106-139.Google Scholar
  20. Clarke AR, Wigley DB, Chia WN, Barstow D, Atkinson T, Holbrook JJ: Site-directed mutagenesis reveals role of mobile arginine residue in lactate dehydrogenase catalysis. Nature. 1986, 324: 699-702. 10.1038/324699a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Abad-Zapatero C, Griffith JP, Sussman JL, Rossmann MG: Refined crystal structure of dogfish M4 apo-lactate dehydrogenase. J Mol Biol. 1987, 198 (3): 445-67. 10.1016/0022-2836(87)90293-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Casal M, Paiva S, Andrade RP, Gancedo C, Leao C: The lactate-proton symport of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is encoded by JEN1. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181 (8): 2620-3.Google Scholar
  23. Andrade RP, Casal M: Expression of the lactate permease gene JEN1 from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Fungal Genet Biol. 2001, 32 (2): 105-11. 10.1006/fgbi.2001.1254.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Lodi T, Fontanesi F, Guiard B: Co-ordinate regulation of lactate metabolism genes in yeast: the role of the lactate permease gene JEN1. Mol Genet Genomics. 2002, 266 (5): 838-47. 10.1007/s00438-001-0604-y.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Andrade RP, Kotter P, Entian KD, Casal M: Multiple transcripts regulate glucose-triggered mRNA decay of the lactate transporter JEN1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005, 332 (1): 254-62. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.04.119.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Makuc J, Paiva S, Schauen M, Kramer R, Andre B, Casal M, Leao C, Boles E: The putative monocarboxylate permeases of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae do not transport monocarboxylic acids across the plasma membrane. Yeast. 2001, 18 (12): 1131-43. 10.1002/yea.763.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Soares-Silva I, Schuller D, Andrade RP, Baltazar F, Cassio F, Casal M: Functional expression of the lactate permease Jen1p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Pichia pastoris. Biochem J. 2003, 376: 781-787. 10.1042/BJ20031180.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. de Kerchove d'Exaerde A, Supply P, Goffeau A: Subcellular traffic of the plasma membrane H(+)-ATPase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1996, 12 (10): 907-916. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(199608)12:10<907::AID-YEA10>3.0.CO;2-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Brown AJP: Control of metabolic flux in yeasts and fungi. 1997, TIBTECH Elsevier Science Ltd, 15: 445-447.Google Scholar
  30. Brambilla L, Bolzani D, Compagno C, Carrera V, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, Ranzi BM, Alberghina L, Porro D: NADH reoxidation does not control glycolytic flux during exposure of respiring Saccharomyces cerevisiae cultures to glucose excess. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999, 171: 133-140.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L, Duboc P, Francois JM, Gancedo C, Giuseppin MLF, Heijnen JJ, Hoare M, Lange HC, Madden EA, Niederberger P, Nielsen J, Parrou JL, Petit T, Porro D, Reuss M, Van Riel N, Rizzi M, Steensma HY, Verrips CT, Vindelov J, Pronk JT: An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2000, 26 (9–10): 706-714. 10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00162-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Thomas BJ, Rothstein R: Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell. 1989, 56 (4): 619-630. 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90584-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis ES, Becker A, Heitman J, Hall MN, Brennan MB: A yeast cyclophilin gene essential for lactate metabolism at high temperature. PNAS. 1992, 89 (23): 11165-73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Gietz RD, Woods RA: Transformation of yeast by the Liac/ss carrier DNA/PEG method. Methods in Enzymology. 2002, 350: 87-96.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ishiguro N, Osame S, Kagiya R, Ichijo S, Shinagawa M: Primary structure of bovine lactate dehydrogenase-A isozyme and its synthesis in Escherichia coli. Gene. 1990, 91 (2): 281-5. 10.1016/0378-1119(90)90101-V.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Porro D, Brambilla L, Ranzi BM, Martegani E, Alberghina L: Development of metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells for the production of lactic acid. Biotechnol Prog. 1995, 11 (3): 294-8. 10.1021/bp00033a009.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoffman , Winston : Rapid Genomic Prep. Protocol. 1987, [http://www.fhcrc.org/labs/gottschling/yeast/qgprep.html]Google Scholar
  38. Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Edited by: second. 1989, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NYGoogle Scholar
  39. Vanoni M, Vai M, Popolo L, Alberghina L: Structural heterogeneity in populations of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1983, 156: 1282-1291.Google Scholar
  40. Bernard N, Ferain T, Garmyn D, Hols P, Delcour J: Cloning of the D-lactate dehydrogenase gene from Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus by complementation in Escherichia coli. FEBS Lett. 1991, 290 (1–2): 61-4. 10.1016/0014-5793(91)81226-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. van der Spoel D, van Buuren AR, Apol E, Meulenhoff PJ, Tieleman DP, Sijbers ALTM, Hess B, Feenstra KA, Lindhal E, van Drunen R, Berendsen HJC: Gromacs User Manual version 3.1.1,. 2002, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands, [http://www.gromacs.org]Google Scholar
  42. Surana U, Amon A, Dowzer C, McGrew J, Byers B, Nasmyth K: Destruction of the CDC28/CLB mitotic kinase is not required for the metaphase to anaphase transition in budding yeast. EMBO J. 1993, 12: 1969-1978.Google Scholar
  43. Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970, 227: 680-685. 10.1038/227680a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. van Urk H, Schipper D, Breedveld GJ, Mak PR, Scheers WA, van Dijken JP: Localization and kinetics of pyruvate-metabolizing enzymes in relation to aerobic alcoholic fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 8066 and Candida utilis CBS 621. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1989, 992: 78-86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Branduardi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement