Optimization of fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway for selectively enhanced production of C12/14 and C16/18 fatty alcohols in engineered Escherichia coli
© Zheng et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 15 December 2011
Accepted: 20 May 2012
Published: 20 May 2012
With the increasing stress from oil price and environmental pollution, aroused attention has been paid to the microbial production of chemicals from renewable sources. The C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols are important feedstocks for the production of surfactants and detergents, which are widely used in the most respected consumer detergents, cleaning products and personal care products worldwide. Though bioproduction of fatty alcohols has been carried out in engineered E. coli, several key problems have not been solved in earlier studies, such as the quite low production of C16/18 alcohol, the lack of optimization of the fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway, and the uncharacterized performance of the engineered strains in scaled-up system.
We improved the fatty alcohol production by systematically optimizing the fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway, mainly targeting three key steps from fatty acyl-acyl carrier proteins (ACPs) to fatty alcohols, which are sequentially catalyzed by thioesterase, acyl-coenzyme A (CoA) synthase and fatty acyl-CoA reductase. By coexpression of thioesterase gene BTE, acyl-CoA synthase gene fadD and fatty acyl-CoA reductase gene acr1, 210.1 mg/L C12/14 alcohol was obtained. A further optimization of expression level of BTE, fadD and acr1 increased the C12/14 alcohol production to 449.2 mg/L, accounting for 75.0% of the total fatty alcohol production (598.6 mg/L). In addition, by coexpression of thioesterase gene ‘tesA, acyl-CoA synthase gene fadD and fatty acyl-CoA reductase gene FAR, 101.5 mg/L C16/18 alcohol was obtained, with C16/18 alcohol accounting for 89.2% of the total fatty alcohol production.
To our knowledge, this is the first report on selective production of C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols by microbial fermentation. This work achieved high-specificity production of both C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols. The encouraging 598.6 mg/L of fatty alcohols represents the highest titer reported so far. In addition, the 101.5 mg/L 89.2% C16/18 alcohol suggests an important breakthrough in C16/18 alcohol production. A more detailed optimization of the expression level of fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway may contribute to a further improvement of fatty alcohol production.
KeywordsFatty alcohol Escherichia coli Pathway optimization Selective production Fermentation
Fatty alcohols, usually with hydrocarbon chains ranging from C8 to C18, are composed of a nonpolar, lipophilic carbon chain and a polar, hydrophilic hydroxyl group. The C8/10 alcohol (a blend of C8 and C10 alcohols) only has limited applications in the production of plasticizers, while the C12-C18 alcohols find applications in a multitude of uses. The C12/14 alcohol (a blend of C12 and C14 alcohols) can be used as lubricant additives, and the C16/18 alcohol (a blend of C16 and C18 alcohols) can be employed as defoamers, solubility retarders, and consistency giving factors. More importantly, the C12-C18 alcohols can be used to produce detergents and surfactants by replacing their hydroxy group with other larger hydrophilic groups [1, 2]. Now the fatty alcohol market is dominated by natural alcohol and synthetic alcohol products. The natural alcohols are prepared from natural oil such as coconut oil and palm oil using transesterification and hydrogenation processes. The synthetic alcohols are produced from petrochemical feedstocks mainly using Ziegler-Process and Oxo-Process. However, these processes either need harsh production environments, or bring harmful materials to the environment. Besides, they are both now facing the huge challenge from the increasingly higher price of the raw materials. Therefore, increasing attentions have been paid to the microbial production of fatty alcohols from renewable resources [3, 4].
The thioesterase, acyl-CoA synthase and fatty acyl-CoA reductase play the key role in the fatty alcohol biosynthesis . Either thioesterases, acyl-CoA synthases or fatty acyl-CoA reductases from different organisms have differences in substrate specificity . For examples, the thioesterase BTE from Umbellularia californica prefers the medium-chain acyl-ACPs [9–11], and the thioesterase ‘TesA (a ‘leaderless’ version of TesA) from E. coli possesses a much broader substrate preference [3, 5, 12]. As for the fatty acyl-CoA synthase, the FadD from E. coli can efficiently activate the fatty acids ranging from C10 to C18, but FAA2 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae prefers the medium-chain fatty acids [13, 14]. Many fatty acyl-CoA reductases, such as Acr1, FAR and CER4, are capable of converting fatty acyl-CoAs to fatty aldehydes (Acr1) or fatty alcohols (FAR and CER4) [6, 15–18]. To investigate the substrate specificities of FAR and CER4, Doan et al. determined the composition of the fatty alcohols obtained by expressing a single FAR or CER4 in E. coli . It was not a compellent strategy for evaluating the substrate specificity of fatty acyl-CoA reductase, since the FFAs with different chain lengths are not equally accumulated in the host. Though the substrate specificity of Acr1 was characterized in vitro by Reiser and Somervill , it is also needed to further characterize its substrate specificity in vivo to better simulate the cytocatalytic production of fatty alcohols.
Based on the achieved knowledge of the fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway, microbial production of fatty alcohols was carried out in engineered E. coli . Steen et al. enhanced the production of the medium chain fatty alcohols in an engineered E. coli by overexpression of the fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway and deletion of the endogenous fadE gene (encoding acyl-CoA dehydrogenase) of E. coli. In addition, they made attempts to tailor the composition of fatty alcohols by employing thioesterases preferring different chain-length fatty acyl-ACPs. The C12 alcohol was mainly produced by expressing UcFatB, while expression of ChFatB3 or ‘tesA mainly contributed to production of C14 alcohol. However, only a small proportion of C16/18 alcohol was observed in their engineered strains .
Though fatty alcohols have been produced by engineered E. coli, however, several problems have not been solved in previous studies. First, no improvement has been achieved in the production of C16/18 alcohol; Second, detailed optimization of the fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway has not been carried out; Third, the performance of the engineered E. coli on the production of fatty alcohols has not been investigated in scaleable fermentation processes.
In order to optimize the fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway for selectively enhanced production of C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols, we investigated the effect of acyl-CoA synthases and fatty acyl-CoA reductases on the production of fatty alcohols, determined the C12/14 and C16/18 alcohol production across different thioesterases, acyl-CoA synthases and fatty acyl-CoA reductases, optimized the expression level of associated enzymes, and evaluated the biocatalytic properties of the engineered strains in fed-batch fermentation.
Fatty alcohol distribution in engineered strains employing fatty acyl-CoA reductases FAR, Acr1 or CER4
To employ the proper fatty acyl-CoA reductases for selective production of C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols, we determined the fatty alcohol distribution of the engineered strains Zh05, Zh07 and Zh08 by adding an equivalent blend of lauric acid (C12:0), myristic acid (C14:0), palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0) and oleic acid (C18:1) (200 mg/L each) into their cultures. Zh05, Zh07, and Zh08 overexpressed FAR gene from S. chinensis acr1 gene from A. baylyi and CER4 gene from A. thaliana, respectively. To promote the conversion of FFAs to fatty acyl-CoAs, an endogenous acyl-CoA synthase gene (fadD) was also coexpressed in all three engineered strains. Given FadD has close substrate specificities towards C10 to C18 FFAs , the substrate preferences of CER4 and FAR can be roughly speculated according to the chain length distributions of the synthesized fatty alcohols. Though the substrate specificity of Acr1 can not be concluded from the distribution of fatty alcohols, the combined effect of Acr1 and endogenous alcohol dehydrogenase/aldehyde reductase on the fatty alcohol production can be clearly determined with the expression of Acr1 in E. coli. In addition, the endogenous FFAs of the host were determined in the same conditions where FFAs are supplied in the culture. The host E. coli BL21(DE3) only produced 15.7 mg/L FFAs (C12, 1.1 mg/L; C14, 2.0 mg/L; C16, 7.2 mg/L; C18, 5.4 mg/L), and the engineered strains Zh05, Zh07 and Zh08 produced nearly the same endogenous FFAs. Therefore, the endogenous FFAs of the hosts can be almost neglected when compared with fatty acids exogenously supplemented.
Comparison of the efficiencies of three different acyl-CoA synthases on fatty alcohol production
As above mentioned, the desired fatty acyl-CoA reductases have been obtained. And the substrate specificities of thioesterases BTE and ‘TesA have been well characterized. BTE produces a predominant C12/14 FFAs, and ‘TesA mainly produces C14-C18 FFAs. To better activate the specific FFAs to corresponding fatty acyl-CoAs, it is necessary to overexpress a proper acyl-CoA synthase. Therefore, we compared the efficiencies of three different acyl-CoA synthases (FadD, Yngl and FAA2) on the production of C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols from glucose.
To further confirm that acyl-CoA synthases contributed to the difference in the production of C12/14 alcohol, we determined the FFAs unutilized by these engineered strains. In contrast to 52.7 mg/L and 41.3 mg/L C12/14 acid unutilized by Zh112 and Zh122, respectively, only 2.1 mg/L C12/14 acid was not utilized by Zh072 (Figure 3B). It demonstrated that FadD could activate C12/14 acid to C12/14 acyl-CoA much more efficiently than Yngl and FAA2, and the higher reaction rate of FadD contributed to Zh072 achieving a higher C12/14 alcohol titer than Zh112 and Zh122.
We then compared their efficiencies on the production of C16/18 alcohol. When coexpressed with ‘TesA and FAR, the strain with FadD overproduction (Zh054) produced 2.45 mg/L C16/18 alcohol in shake flask, 4.95-fold and 4.44-fold higher than that of the strains employing Yngl (Zh094) and FAA2 (Zh104), respectively (Figure 3C). This result illuminated that, compared with Yngl and FAA2, FadD could direct more C16/18 acid to corresponding acyl-CoA, which was further reduced to C16/18 alcohol by FAR. This conclusion could be further confirmed by the analysis of the FFAs unutilized. Only 8.3 mg/L C16/18 acid was unutilized by Zh054, in contrast to 29.5 mg/L and 33.1 mg/L C16/18 acid unutilized by Zh094 and Zh104, respectively (Figure 3D).
We also analyzed the composition of fatty alcohols synthesized by Zh054. Zh054 produced C16/18 alcohol as its predominant fatty alcohol constituent (89.2%), with C12 alcohol (5.4%) and C14 alcohol (5.4%) being the other fatty alcohols observed (Figure 4).
Optimization of the expression level of C12/14 alcohol biosynthesis pathway
Thus far, we have obtained two engineered strains Zh072 and Zh054, which were well performed in high-specificity production of C12/14 alcohols and C16/18 alcohols, respectively. However, it is possible to further enhance the production of fatty alcohols in E. coli by optimizing the expression level of fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway. Given C12/14 alcohol and C16/18 alcohol biosynthesis pathways are quite similar to each other, we only did the optimization of the expression level of C12/14 alcohol biosynthesis pathway.
The genes above mentioned are all under the control of the strong T7 promoter. Given Lennen et al. achieved a high production of fatty acids by using a medium-strength ara BAD promoter (PBAD) , we thus partly replace the T7 promoter with PBAD. But unfortunately, none of the engineered strains improved the production of C12/14 alcohol, when either BTE or acr1 gene was under the control of PBAD (Figure 5).
It was worth noting that, at the end of the fermentation, 621.1 mg/L C16/18 FFA and 133.4 mg/L C12/14 FFA were unutilized by Zh054 and Zh072, respectively. Contrastively, only 316.0 mg/L and 39.4 mg/L corresponding FFAs were unutilized by Zh054 and Zh072 at the 8-h time point, when both Zh054 and Zh072 produced fatty alcohols at a maximum productivity. It demonstrated that the produced FFAs were no longer converted to fatty alcohols in the later stage of the fermentation. The fatty alcohol production ceased ahead of the production of FFAs.
Expression of alcohol-forming fatty acyl-CoA reductases in E. coli can result in the biosynthesis of fatty alcohols from endogenous E. coli fatty acids, but the levels were quite low . To improve the production of fatty alcohols, Steen et al. carried out a further genetic modification of E. coli, and achieved an increased titer (~60 mg/L) of the medium chain fatty alcohols (C12 or C14 alcohols) . In their strategy, they employed thioesterases with different substrate specificities to tailor the composition of the FFAs, and used the aldehyde-forming fatty acyl-CoA reductase Acr1 for the conversion of fatty acyl-CoAs to fatty aldehydes. The synthesized fatty aldehydes can be further converted to fatty alcohols by an unknown alcohol dehydrogenase/aldehyde reductase of E. coli .
However, Steen et al. just obtained a small quantity of C16/18 alcohol, though they used the thioesterase ‘TesA, which was capable of yielding a large proportion of C16/18 FFA . As aforementioned, expression of Acr1 in E. coli can only obtain a predominant C12/14 alcohol, even if the longer FFAs are supplied. Therefore, their poor C16/18 alcohol production is probably attributed to the Acr1 they employed. However, Reiser and Somerville spectroscopically assayed the substrate specificity of an unpurified Acr1 protein by measuring the acyl-CoA-dependent oxidation of NADPH, and found Acr1 had the biggest substrate preference towards C16/18 acyl-CoAs . It suggests that the endogenous alcohol dehydrogenase/aldehyde reductase of E. coli may have substrate preference for fatty aldehydes with shorter chain lengths, and thus block the conversion of C16/18 aldehydes to corresponding alcohols. This bioconversion process will be much clearer if the purified Acr1 protein can be characterized by determining its synthesized products.
We are cognizant of the fact that it is impossible to obtain all our desired fatty alcohols just by tailoring the composition of FFAs. We thus replaced Acr1 with FAR as the fatty acyl-CoA reductase for the production of long chain fatty alcohols, given FAR preferred the longer acyl groups. To data, no research was performed to optimize the long chain fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway. Therefore, we combined the expression of thioesterase and acyl-CoA synthase with FAR to enhance the long chain fatty alcohol production from glucose. Our achieved titer of 101.5 mg/L represents the highest C16/18 alcohol production ever reported [4, 19].
In addition, Steen et al. found the importance of acyl-CoA synthase in improving the fatty alcohol production . It is of significance to explore and find a proper acyl-CoA synthase that capable of enhancing the production of C12/14 or C16/18 alcohol. We found FadD possessed broad substrate specificity and high catalytic activity, based on the investigation of three different acyl-CoA synthases from E. coli (FadD), B. subtilis (Yngl) and S. cerevisiae (FAA2), respectively. FadD can convert most of the C12-C18 FFAs into their activated forms – fatty acyl-CoAs, and it was suitable for the production of both C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols.
The level of free CoA may also play an important role in the conversion of FFAs to fatty acyl-CoAs, since free CoA directly participates the reaction as a substrate. Once the fatty acyl-CoAs accumulate, that will lead to a reduction of free CoA. The decreased level of free CoA may further block the activation of FFAs. In contrast, increased level of free CoA will benefit the conversion of FFAs to fatty acyl-CoAs.
With a series of combination across different thioesterases, acyl-CoA synthases and fatty acyl-CoA reductases, we constructed two engineered strains (Zh072 and Zh054) that were capable of high-specificity production of C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols, respectively. Lennen et al. achieved a high level of fatty acid production by using a medium-strength PBAD . Therefore, it is possible to enhance the fatty alcohol production by optimization of the expression level of fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway. No enhanced fatty alcohol production was obtained when either BTE or acr1 was under the control of PBAD. However, an obviously improved fatty alcohol production was achieved by optimization of the plasmid copy number. This result provides a useful clue for enhancing the fatty alcohol production. Of course, a more detailed optimization of the expression level is still needed to further improve the production of fatty alcohols.
Given no process data is available on the fatty alcohol production by engineered E. coli, we evaluated the performances of three well-performed strains in the fed-batch fermentation. The maximum fatty alcohol productivity was observed in the early stage of the post-induction. Over this phase, fatty alcohol production ceased. Given FFAs can be also converted to fatty aldehydes [6, 21–23], maybe the released FFAs were predominately transformed to fatty aldehydes instead of fatty alcohols in the latter stage. To make the fermentation processes be clearer, it is needed to perform some further investigations focusing on the production of fatty aldehydes.
The lower titer in our shake-flask study was probably attributed to the low buffering capacity of our culture medium, whose pH decreased rapidly with the growth of cells. The resultant lower biomass caused the decreased fatty alcohol production. The fatty alcohol production dramatically increased in the fed-batch fermentation with pH adaption.
In addition, given that fatty acyl-CoA reductases need the participation of coenzyme NADPH , the production of fatty alcohols may be enhanced by expressing the NADPH regeneration system such as phosphite dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in E. coli.
Given the importance of the C12-C18 fatty alcohols as surfactants and the issues associated with petroleum and natural oil feedstocks, increasing attention is being paid to seeking after the low-cost renewable routes from sugars. In addition, it will have a better downstream application to obtain the fatty alcohol products with narrow-range distribution of carbon chain lengths. Therefore, the ultimate objective of this study was to realize the high-level and selective production of C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols in engineered E. coli by optimization of the fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway. To our knowledge, this is the first report on selective production of C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols in engineered microbes. High-specificity production of both C12/14 and C16/18 alcohols has been obtained. The C12/14 alcohol and C16/18 alcohol occupied 75.0% and 89.2% of total fatty alcohols produced by Zh172 and Zh054, respectively. Without detailed optimization of the production conditions, an encouraging 598.6 mg/L of fatty alcohols was finally achieved, representing the highest fatty alcohol production achieved so far. In addition, the 101.5 mg/L 89.2% C16/18 alcohol suggests an important breakthrough in C16/18 alcohol production. A more detailed optimization of the expression level of fatty alcohol biosynthesis pathway may contribute to a further improvement of fatty alcohol production. Our study provides the groundwork for microbial production of a surfactant range of fatty alcohols from the rich lignocellulose sources.
Bacterial strains, media, and growth conditions
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study
Plasmid or strain
Reference or source
pBR322 ori lacI T7lac Kanr
P15A ori lacI T7lac Cmr
ColA ori lacI T7lac Kanr
pBR322 ori ara BAD Ampr
pACYCDuet-1 harboring FAR from Jojoba and fadD from E. coli
pACYCDuet-1 harboring acr1 from A. baylyi and fadD from E. coli
pACYCDuet-1 harboring CER4 from A. thaliana and fadD from E. coli
pACYCDuet-1 harboring FAR from Jojoba and yngl from B. subtilis
pACYCDuet-1 harboring FAR from Jojoba and FAA2 from S. cerevisiae
pACYCDuet-1 harboring acr1 from A. baylyi and yngl from B. subtilis
pACYCDuet-1 harboring acr1 from A. baylyi and FAA2 from S. cerevisiae
pCOLADuet-1 harboring acr1 from A. baylyi and fadD from E. coli
pCOLADuet-1 harboring acr1 from A. baylyi, fadD from E. coli and BTE from U. californica
pBAD/Myc-HisA harboring acr1 from A. baylyi and fadD from E. coli
pET-30a(+) harboring BTE from U. californica
pCOLADuet-1 harboring ‘tesA from E. coli
pCOLADuet-1 harboring BTE from U. californica
pACYCDuet-1 harboring BTE from U. californica
pBAD/Myc-HisA harboring BTE from U. californica
F-,φ80dlacZ ΔM15, Δ(lacZYA-argF)U169, deoR,recA1, endA1, hsdR17(rk-,mk+), phoA, supE44, λ-,thi-1, gyrA96, relA1
F-ompT gal dcm lon hsdSB(r B - m B - ) λ(DE3)
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh05
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh07
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh08
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh07 and pYN2
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh11 and pYN2
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh12 and pYN2
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh05 and pLL4
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh09 and pLL4
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh10 and pLL4
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh07 and pYN12
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh17 and pXW2
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh18
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh07 and pYN22
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh17 and pYN22
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh27 and pXW2
E. coli BL21 (DE3) bearing pZh27 and pYN12
The arachidyl alcohol and arachidic acid were ordered from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium) and Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA), respectively. All restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligatase were purchased from Fermentas (Vilnius, Lithuania). The Pyrobest DNA polymerase was supplied by Takara Biotechnology (Dalian, China). The pACYCDuet-1, pCOLADuet-1 and pET-30a(+) expression vectors were purchased from Novagen (Darmstadt, Germany). Oligonucleotides were ordered from BGI (Beijing, China).
Primers used in this study
Sequence (5'→ 3')
The amplified FAR gene was firstly gel purified, then digested with NcoI and BamHI, and finally ligated into pACYCDuet-1 that had been digested with the same restriction enzymes, yielding pZh01. In the same means, the BglII-XhoI digested fadD, NdeI-EcoRV digested FAA2 and EcoRV-XhoI digested yngl were ligated into pZh01 to yield pZh05, pZh09 and pZh10, respectively. For the construction of pZh07 and pZh08, the FAR located at pZh05 was replaced with acr1 and CER4, respectively. To yield pZh11 and pZh12, the acr1 gene was removed from the plasmid pZh07 by restriction enzyme digestion with NcoI/EcoRI, gel purified, and ligated into pZh09 and pZh10 whose FAR gene had been removed by restriction enzyme digestion. To create pZh17 and pZh27, acr1 fadD, cut from pZh07 with NcoI/XhoI, was cloned into corresponding sites of pCOLADuet-1 and pBAD/Myc-HisA, respectively. Three sets of primers, BTE-NdeF/BTE-NotR, BTE-NdeF/BTE-XhoR and BTE-NcoF/BTE-XhoR, were used to amplify the thioesterase gene BTE. The amplified BTEs were inserted into the NdeI/NotI site of pET-30a(+), NdeI/XhoI site of pCOLADuet-1 and pACYCDuet-1, and NcoI/XhoI site of pBAD/Myc-HisA, respectively. The resulted recombinant plasmids were designated as pYN2 , pYN12, pXW2 and pYN22, respectively. A primer set of T7min-BamF/BTE-NotR was used to amplify the BTE with a T7 promoter (T7BTE) using pYN2 as the template, the PCR product was digested with BamHI/NotI, and then inserted into pZh17 to yield pZh18. As for the thioesterases gene ‘tesA, the NcoI/EcoRI digested ‘tesA were ligated into corresponding sites of pCOLADuet-1, creating pLL4. Plasmids used in this work are listed in Table 1.
Detection of metabolites
The harvested cultures were first heated with boiled water for 20 minutes to partly lyse the cells. Then the pH values of the cultures were adjusted to 2.0 using hydrochloric acid. Next chloroform–methanol (v/v, 2:1) was added into the cultures. The resultant blends were vortexed for a few minutes and then left overnight to extract the fatty alcohols and fatty acids. The arachidyl alcohol and arachic acid were added into the cultures and used as the internal standards for the analysis of fatty alcohols and fatty acids, respectively. The desired products of the shake-flask culture were quantified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using an Agilent 7890A system equipped with a HP-INNOWax (30 m × 0.25 mm; 0.25 μm film thickness). Helium was used as the carrier gas. The injection port was held at 250°C, and the following oven temperature program was carried out: 100°C for 2 min, increase of 10°C/min to 240°C for 15 min. The desired products of the fermentor culture were quantified by a gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a flame ionization detector. The separation of FFAs was performed using a CP-FFAP CB capillary column (25 m × 0.25 mm; 0.2 μm film thickness) purchased from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA). The oven temperature was initially held at 100°C for 1 min, then raised with a gradient of 10°C/min until reaching 250°C, and finally held for 10 min. Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas. The injector and detector were held at 270°C and 300°C, respectively.
Acyl carrier protein
Free fatty acid
Polymerase chain reaction
Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry.
This work was financially supported by Guangdong Province-Chinese Academy of Sciences Joint Project (2009B091300146), National Natural Science Foundation of China (21106170), and Main Direction Program of Knowledge Innovation of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-EW-G-13). We also thank Dr. Wenna Guan and Cong Wang for assistance with the GC- MS analysis.
- Hreczuch W, Szymanowski J: Synthesis of surfactants with narrow-range distribution of the polyoxyethylene chain. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1996, 73: 73-78. 10.1007/BF02523451View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hatcher D: Fatty alcohol sulfates. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1957, 34: 175-178. 10.1007/BF02670946View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Steen EJ, Kang Y, Bokinsky G, Hu Z, Schirmer A, McClure A, del Cardayre SB, Keasling JD: Microbial production of fatty-acid-derived fuels and chemicals from plant biomass. Nature 2010, 463: 559-562. 10.1038/nature08721View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tan X, Yao L, Gao Q, Wang W, Qi F, Lu X: Photosynthesis driven conversion of carbon dioxide to fatty alcohols and hydrocarbons in cyanobacteria. Metab Eng 2011, 13: 169-176. 10.1016/j.ymben.2011.01.001View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lu X, Vora H, Khosla C: Overproduction of free fatty acids inE. coli: Implications for biodiesel production. Metab Eng 2008, 10: 333-339. 10.1016/j.ymben.2008.08.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Reiser S, Somerville C: Isolation of mutants ofAcinetobacter calcoaceticusdeficient in wax ester synthesis and complementation of one mutation with a gene encoding a fatty acyl coenzyme A reductase. J Bacteriol 1997, 179: 2969-2975.Google Scholar
- Vioque J, Kolattukudy PE: Resolution and purification of an aldehyde-generating and an alcohol-generating fatty acyl-CoA reductase from pea leaves (Pisum sativumL.). Arch Biochem Biophys 1997, 340: 64-72. 10.1006/abbi.1997.9932View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Liu X, Sheng J, Curtiss R: Fatty acid production in genetically modified cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2011, 108: 6899-6904. 10.1073/pnas.1103014108View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voelker TA, Davies HM: Alteration of the specificity and regulation of fatty acid synthesis ofEscherichia coliby expression of a plant medium-chain acyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase. J Bacteriol 1994, 176: 7320-7327.Google Scholar
- Yuan L, Voelker TA, Hawkins DJ: Modification of the substrate specificity of an acyl-acyl carrier protein thioesterase by protein engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1995, 92: 10639-10643. 10.1073/pnas.92.23.10639View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Voelker TA, Worrell AC, Anderson L, Bleibaum J, Fan C, Hawkins DJ, Radke SE, Davies HM: Fatty acid biosynthesis redirected to medium chains in transgenic oilseed plants. Science 1992, 257: 72-74. 10.1126/science.1621095View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bonner WM, Bloch K: Purification and properties of fatty acyl thioesterase I fromEscherichia coli. J Biol Chem 1972, 247: 3128-3133.Google Scholar
- Morgan-Kiss RM, Cronan JE: TheEscherichia coli fadK(ydiD) gene encodes an anerobically regulated short chain acyl-CoA synthetase. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 37324-37333. 10.1074/jbc.M405233200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hettema Ewald H, van Roermund Carlo WT, Ben Distel, van den Berg Marlene, Cristina Vilela, Claudina Rodrigues-Pousada, Wanders RJA, Tabak HF: The ABC transporter proteins Pati and Pat2 are required for import of long-chain fatty acids into peroxisomes ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 1996, 15: 3813-3822.Google Scholar
- Rowland O, Zheng H, Hepworth SR, Lam P, Jetter R, Kunst L: CER4encodes an alcohol-forming fatty acyl-coenzyme A reductase involved in cuticular wax production in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2006, 142: 866-877. 10.1104/pp.106.086785View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kalscheuer R, Stöveken T, Luftmann H, Malkus U, Reichelt R, Steinbüchel A: Neutral lipid biosynthesis in engineeredEscherichia coli: jojoba oil-like wax esters and fatty acid butyl esters. Appl Environ Microbiol 2006, 72: 1373-1379. 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1373-1379.2006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Metz JG, Pollard MR, Anderson L, Hayes TR, Lassner MW: Purification of a jojoba embryo fatty acyl-coenzyme A reductase and expression of its cDNA in high erucic acid rapeseed. Plant Physiol 2000, 122: 635-644. 10.1104/pp.122.3.635View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Santala S, Efimova E, Kivinen V, Larjo A, Aho T, Karp M, Santala V: Improved triacylglycerol production inAcinetobacter baylyiADP1 by metabolic engineering. Microb Cell Fact 2011, 10: 36. 10.1186/1475-2859-10-36View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Doan TTP, Carlsson AS, Hamberg M, Bülow L, Stymne S, Olsson P: Functional expression of fiveArabidopsisfatty acyl-CoA reductase genes inEscherichia coli. J Plant Physiol 2009, 166: 787-796. 10.1016/j.jplph.2008.10.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lennen RM, Braden DJ, West RM, Dumesic JA, Pfleger BF: A process for microbial hydrocarbon synthesis: Overproduction of fatty acids inEscherichia coliand catalytic conversion to alkanes. Biotechnol Bioeng 2010, 106: 193-202. 10.1002/bit.22660View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ishige T, Tani A, Takabe K, Kawasaki K, Sakai Y, Kato N: Wax ester production from n-alkanes byAcinetobacter sp.strain M-1: ultrastructure of cellular inclusions and role of acyl coenzyme A reductase. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002, 68: 1192-1195. 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1192-1195.2002View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Dellomonaco C, Fava F, Gonzalez R: The path to next generation biofuels: successes and challenges in the era of synthetic biology. Microb Cell Fact 2010, 9: 3. 10.1186/1475-2859-9-3View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Santala S, Efimova E, Karp M, Santala V: Real-Time monitoring of intracellular wax ester metabolism. Microb Cell Fact 2011, 10: 75. 10.1186/1475-2859-10-75View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hyeseon Cho, John E, Cronan J: Escherichia colithioesterase I, molecular cloning and sequencing of the structural gene and identification as a periplasmic enzyme. J Biol Chem 1993, 268: 9238-9245.Google Scholar
- Cho H, Cronan JE: Defective export of a periplasmic enzyme disrupts regulation of fatty acid synthesis. J Biol Chem 1995, 270: 4216-4219. 10.1074/jbc.270.9.4216View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang X, Li L, Zheng Y, Zou H, Cao Y, Liu H, Liu W, Xian M: Biosynthesis of long chain hydroxyfatty acids from glucose by engineeredEscherichia coli. Bioresour Technol 2012. 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.119Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.